average properties of southern california earthquake ground motions envelopes …
DESCRIPTION
Average properties of Southern California earthquake ground motions envelopes …. G. Cua, T. Heaton Caltech. Main Points. saturation of rock vs soil sites attenuation characteristics of P vs S-waves importance of station corrections. Motivation: Seismic Early Warning. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Average properties of Southern California
earthquake ground motions envelopes…
G. Cua, T. Heaton
Caltech
Main Points
saturation of rock vs soil sites attenuation characteristics of P vs S-
waves importance of station corrections
Motivation: Seismic Early Warning
Q1: Given available data, what ismost probable magnitude andlocation estimate?
Q2: Given a magnitude and location estimate, what are the expected ground motions?
Full acceleration time history
envelope definition– max.absolute value over 1 second window
Ground motion envelope: our definition
P,S-wave envelopes – rise time, duration, constant amplitude, 2 decay parameters
Noise - constant
model for observed envelope
Modeling ground motion envelopes
2 2 2OBS P S NOISEE E E E
70 events 2 < M <=7.3 0 < R < 200 km
9 channels Z, EW, NS acc, vel, disp
binary classfication rock - NEHRP BC, above soil - NEHRP C, below
log10(distance in km)
M
ag
nit
ud
e
Database
Functional form for M, R-dependence of ground motion amplitudes
C(M) term “turns on”amplitude saturation forM > 5
Magnitude
C(M
)
* Modified from Campbell (1981)
10 1 10 1
ground motion amplitudes
1,...[9 channels 2 (rock and soil) 2 (P-, S-wave)]
or for 5;
for 5
epicentral distance for 5
log ( ) ( ( )) log ( ( ))
b l
W
i i i i i i
A
i
M m m M
M M
R M
A a M b R C M d R C M e
21
1 2
2i
closest distance to fault (when available) for 5
9
( ) (arctan( 5) 1.4) ( exp( ( 5))) *
constant + station corrections
statistical error, ~ (0, )
i
M
R R
C M M c c M
e
N
Main Points
saturation of rock vs soil sites attenuation characteristics of P vs S-
waves importance of station corrections
ROCKS-wave
SOILS-wave
Scaling for small magnitudes-
10 1 10 1log ( ) ( ( )) log ( ( ))i i i i i iA a M b R C M d R C M e
0.81.4
1~ 10 MU
R
Saturation of rms horizontal acceleration S-wave (rock vs soil)
Saturation is most pronounced in acceleration in close to large events Also present to some degree in velocity and displacement Rock and soil approach similar amplitude levels in close to large events Displacements are high-passed filtered
Acceleration Velocity
(filtered)Displacement
Main Points
saturation of rock vs soil sites
attenuation characteristics of P vs S-waves
importance of station corrections
S-wave acceleration (ROCK)
P-wave acceleration (ROCK)
scaling for small magnitudes, 0.7
1.2
0.81.4
1~ 10
1~ 10
MP
MS
UR
UR
horizontal P-wave amplitudes saturate more than horizontal S-wave difference between P- and S-waves is more pronounced in horizontal than vertical uniquely decomposing P and S wave at close distances is problematic, particularly on horizontal
Vertical P and S waveHorizontal P and S wave
Something curious …
Average Rock and Soil envelopes as functions of M, R ACCELERATION
Main Points
saturation of rock vs soil sites attenuation characteristics of P vs S-
waves
importance of station corrections
rock only= 0.308
rock w/ station corr= 0.243
~21% reduction in
How much do station corrections improve standard deviation?
rock + soil= 0.315
22 ( )
#obs predA A
dof
Acceleration Amplification Relative to Average Rock Station
Velocity Amplification Relative to Average Rock Station
Conclusions Saturation of rock and soil sites
Soil sites saturate ground motions more than rock Stronger saturation at higher frequencies Difference between rock and soil sites decreases
with increasing ground motion amplitude
P-waves appear to have higher degree of saturation than S-waves ?
Station-specific data contributes to ~20% variance reduction
Rock versus Soil
CDMG map of Preliminary Surface Geologic Material (Wald) and SCEC Phase III Report Velocity Calculator
NEHRP Class
Maximum Shear Wave Velocity in Upper 30 m (m/s)
A (Hard Rock)
1400
B (Soft Rock) 724
BC 686
C 464
CD (Alluvium)
372
D 301
DE 298
E (Mud) 163
30 CISN ROCK Stations
120 CISN SOIL Stations
Our Binary Classification
Average Rock and Soil envelopes as functions of M, R VELOCITY
Average Rock and Soil envelopes as functions of M, R (filtered) DISPLACEMENT
ROCK SOILa 0.7789 0.8354b -2.56E-03 -2.32E-03c1 1.4775 1.768c2 1.1054 1.03d -1.352 -1.563e -0.645 -0.338
magnitude-dependence
saturation
anaelastic attenuation
geometric attenuationconstant
S-wave S-wave
10 1 10 1log ( ) ( ( )) log ( ( ))i i i i i iA a M b R C M d R C M e
P-wave S-wavea 0.718 0.779b -3.27E-03 -2.56E-03c1 1.6 1.478c2 1.045 1.105d -1.195 -1.105e -1.064 -0.645
S-wave acceleration (ROCK)
P-wave acceleration (ROCK)
Station Corrections
Average residual at a given station relative to expected ground motion amplitude given by attenuation relationship
Defined for stations with 2 or more available records
Consistent with generally known station behavior
PAS, PFO are typically used as hard rock reference sites SVD anomalous due to proximity to San Andreas
Some “average” rock stations are: DGR, JCS, HEC, MWC, AGA, EDW