autonomy

14
Autonomy

Upload: ayasha

Post on 24-Feb-2016

83 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Autonomy. Autonomy. Ancient G reek: autonomy = „one who gives oneself their own law“ au·ton·o·my: I ndependence  or freedom, as of the  will  or  one's actions: the autonomy  of the individual . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Autonomy

Autonomy

Page 2: Autonomy

Autonomy

• Ancient Greek: – autonomy = „one who gives oneself their own law“

• au·ton·o·my: – Independence or freedom, as of the will or one's

actions: the autonomy of the individual.– The condition of being autonomous; self-

government, or the right of self-government; independence

Page 3: Autonomy

Types of autonomy

• Autonomy of environment

• Social autonomy

• Operational autonomy / autonomy of control– Goal autonomy

Page 4: Autonomy

Why is autonomy desirable?

• ≈Same reasons as for AGI• Reduces or eliminates human control and

intervention– Less operational cost– Highly autonomous systems more reusable

• Building learning, flexible, self-adaptive systems that can operate without complete pre-specification of tasks

• Central feature of human intelligence

Page 5: Autonomy

Autonomy

• Task fully specified?• Task only focused towards external

environment?• Task involves learning?

• Autonomy is closely related to intelligence– Learning to perform partially specified or

unspecified tasks requires intelligence

Page 6: Autonomy

Autonomy• Most current “autonomous” systems are built to operate in conditions more or less fully described a priori, which

is insufficient for achieving highly autonomous systems that adapt efficiently to unforeseen situations.

• Fully specified operation– Operating contexts must comply with specification– Systems not meant to change

• E. Nivel & K. R. Thórisson: Self-Programming: Operationalizing Autonomy– Behaviorally autonomous systems– Change as desirable and controllable phenomenon

• Structural autonomy

– Automatic adaptation• Adaptation is used here in a strong sense as the ability of a machine not only to maintain but also to improve its utility function and so, in

partially specified conditions with limited resources (including time) and knowledge.

– IKON FLUX

• In our view, autonomous systems automatically perform tasks in some environment, with unforeseen variations occurring in both, through some type of automatic learning and adaptation that improves the system's performance with respect to its high-level goals

Page 7: Autonomy

Autonomy

• Weak autonomy– Systems that require some degree of human control to

perform target tasks• Medium autonomy– Systems that perform fully specified target tasks

without human intervention• Strong autonomy– Systems generating own goals that learn to adapt to

unforeseen varations and perform new tasks without human control

Page 8: Autonomy

Autonomy

• Autonomy = (system S, task T, context C)– From Sanz 2000

• System S is autonomous if it can fulfill task T in context C

A refrigerator (SYSTEM = ”refrigerator of Alex”) is autonomous because it can fulfill its task (TASK = ”keep the interior temperature at 5° C”) in a specific context (CONTEXT = ”Interior of a house in Philadelphia”)

Page 9: Autonomy

Automatic vs Autonomous

Page 10: Autonomy

AFLUS autonomy framework

• http://www.nist.gov/el/isd/ks/upload/ALFUS-BG.pdf

Page 11: Autonomy

Autonomy Comparsion Framework for AGI systems (Thórisson & Helgason)

Page 12: Autonomy

Autonomy dimensions• Learning

– Enables system to handle novel situations and task varations• Meta-learning

– System improves own operation, increasing its capacity to solve complex tasks

• Realtime– Failure to keep up with the environment reduces autonomy and overall

operation• May introduce artificial pauses etc.

• Resource management– Autonomous operation involving multiple simultaneous cognitive

processes, complex environments, limited resources and time constraints requires sophisticated management of resources

Page 13: Autonomy

Evaluation of selected AGI systems

Page 14: Autonomy

Qualitative comparison