authority analysis appendixlibraryarchives.metro.net/dpgtl/studies/1998_regional...rtaa does not...

174
r m" d;) ) LOS ANGELES COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY REGIONAL TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS STUDY RESULTS APPENDIX Presented by Boez·AIIen & Hamilton Inc. November 17, 1998

Upload: others

Post on 01-Mar-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

~

~~

~

r ~'0

m" ~~~

d;)

~

)

• ~ LO

S A

NG

EL

ES

CO

UN

TY

ME

TR

OP

OL

ITA

N T

RA

NS

PO

RT

AT

ION

AU

TH

OR

ITY

RE

GIO

NA

L T

RA

NS

IT A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

AN

AL

YS

IS

ST

UD

Y R

ES

UL

TS

AP

PE

ND

IX

Pre

sent

ed b

y B

oe

z·A

IIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

In

c.

Nov

embe

r 17

, 19

98

Page 2: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

••

en w 0 -c z w a. a.

.<t en 1-..J :::J en w a: > c :::J l­en <t <t 1-a:

Page 3: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

HE 4491 .L675 R738a

---30135

DEC 0 3 2003

••

Page 4: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• D

escr

iptio

n

TH

E S

TU

DY

RE

SU

LT

S A

PP

EN

DIX

PR

OV

IDE

S D

ET

AIL

ED

DA

TA

TO

SU

PP

OR

T T

HE

R

EC

OM

ME

ND

AT

ION

S I

N T

HE

NO

VE

MB

ER

9,

1998

ST

UD

Y R

ES

UL

TS

RE

PO

RT

• T

he i

nfor

mat

ion

incl

uded

in t

his

repo

rt r

epre

sent

s a

wor

k in

pro

cess

• T

he a

ltern

ativ

es d

escr

ibed

her

ein

repr

esen

t a

sket

ch p

lan

of c

orrid

or o

ptio

ns a

nd s

houl

d be

use

d in

sup

port

of

a m

ore

deta

iled

alte

rnat

ive

eval

uatio

n to

be

done

on

each

cor

ridor

in

the

futu

re

• T

he r

esul

ts c

onta

ined

in t

his

repo

rt r

epre

sent

the

bes

t av

aila

ble

info

rma

tion

giv

en t

he t

ime

cons

trai

nts

unde

r w

hich

thi

s st

udy

was

com

plet

ed.

The

leve

l of

det

ail f

or e

ach

alte

rnat

ive

varie

s.

Whe

re a

vaila

ble,

prio

r w

ork

was

use

d, b

ut a

larg

e am

ount

of

new

ana

lysi

s w

as

done

as

part

of t

his

stud

y.

All

resu

lts s

houl

d co

ntin

ue to

be

eval

uate

d an

d re

fined

as

the

stud

y pr

oces

s is

adv

ance

d

TH

E C

OR

RID

OR

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S P

RE

SE

NT

ED

RE

PR

ES

EN

T A

N I

NIT

IAL

BE

ST

R

EP

RE

SE

NT

AT

ION

OF

AL

IGN

ME

NT

S T

HA

T C

AN

SE

RV

E T

HE

TR

AN

SIT

DE

MA

ND

CO

RR

IDO

RS

. A

S S

TU

DIE

S A

DV

AN

CE

, A

DD

ITIO

NA

L A

LIG

NM

EN

TS

AN

D M

OD

AL

OP

TIO

NS

SH

OU

LD

BE

C

ON

SID

ER

ED

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

-1

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 5: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Su

mm

ary

TH

E S

TU

DY

RE

SU

LT

S A

PP

EN

DIX

IN

CL

UD

ES

FO

UR

SE

CT

ION

S

• A

pp

end

ix 1

sum

mar

izes

the

cha

nges

to

the

reve

nue

and

cost

com

mitm

ents

sin

ce t

he

com

plet

ion

of M

ilest

one

1.

Thi

s se

ctio

n in

clud

es t

he 1

989

Ret

rofit

Sou

ndw

all

Lis

t whi

ch

was

use

d as

a b

asis

for

det

erm

inin

g th

e S

ound

wal

l fu

ndin

g re

com

men

datio

n in

the

Stu

dy

Res

ults

Rep

ort;

this

sec

tion

also

incl

udes

the

pos

t 19

89 S

ound

wal

l Li

st w

hich

the

RT

AA

do

es n

ot fu

nd

• A

pp

end

ix 2

sum

mar

izes

the

Per

form

ance

Mea

sure

s us

ed f

or e

valu

atio

n of

eac

h al

tern

ativ

e, i

nclu

ding

the

int

ent

of e

ach

perf

orm

ance

mea

sure

, th

e ba

sis

used

in i

ts

dete

rmin

atio

n, a

nd t

he p

rese

ntat

ion

of th

e re

sults

• A

pp

end

ix 3

det

ails

the

cos

ting

met

hodo

logy

use

d an

d is

pre

sent

ed in

tw

o s

ub-s

ectio

ns:

Ap

pen

dix

3.1

des

crib

es t

he m

etho

d us

ed t

o de

term

ine

the

thre

e co

st c

ateg

orie

s:

MT

A c

osts

, th

e lo

wer

bou

nd e

stim

ate,

and

the

bes

t es

timat

e

Ap

pen

dix

3.2

des

crib

es t

he r

esul

ts f

or e

ach

alte

rnat

ive

in t

he t

hree

cos

t ca

tego

ries

and

sum

ma

rize

s po

ssib

le s

teps

the

MT

A c

an t

ake

to r

educ

e co

sts

from

th

eir

aver

age

into

the

ran

ge o

f th

e be

st e

stim

ate

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

-2

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 6: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Su

mm

ary

TH

E F

OU

RT

H S

EC

TIO

N O

F T

HIS

AP

PE

ND

IX C

ON

TA

INS

TH

E R

AP

ID B

US

AN

D C

OR

RID

OR

A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

AN

AL

YS

ES

• T

he in

form

atio

n in

Ap

pen

dix

4 in

clud

es t

he s

yste

m d

efin

ition

and

ope

ratin

g ch

arac

teris

tics,

per

form

ance

mea

sure

s, o

pera

ting

and

capi

tal

cost

s, r

ider

ship

and

ca

paci

ties,

alig

nmen

t de

finiti

on a

nd i

mpl

emen

tatio

n sc

hedu

le

• T

he in

form

atio

n is

pre

sent

ed in

fou

r su

b-se

ctio

ns.

A d

etai

led

desc

riptio

n of

the

da

ta

cont

ent

of e

ach

sub-

sect

ion

is p

rovi

ded

at t

he b

egin

ning

of

App

endi

x 4

App

endi

x 4.

1:

Rap

id B

us

App

endi

x 4.

2:

Eas

tsid

e C

orrid

or A

ltern

ativ

es

App

endi

x 4.

3:

Wes

tsid

e C

orrid

or A

ltern

ativ

es

App

endi

x 4.

4:

San

Fer

nand

o C

orrid

or A

ltern

ativ

es

Re

gio

na

l T

ran

sit

Alte

rna

tive

s A

na

lysi

s A

-3

Bo

oz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

In

c.

Page 7: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

,.... ><Cl -z C-ZC wz Q.:::J a.u. <C

Page 8: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

~ z <( ..J co 1-u. w ..J

> ..J ..J • <( z 0 i= z w 1-z

••

Page 9: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

RE

VE

NU

E U

PD

AT

E

($ m

illio

ns)

FY

99-F

Y04

F

Y05

-FY

10

FY

99-F

Y10

ES

TIM

AT

ED

RE

VE

NU

ES

, M

ILE

ST

ON

E 1

$1

8,45

4.3

$19,

199.

0 $3

7,65

3.3

Ad

just

me

nts

: -

Une

xpen

ded

Pas

aden

a B

lue

Line

fun

ds

$22.

6 $2

2.6

-A

dditi

onal

New

Sta

rts

fund

ing

$8.3

$8

.3

-R

evis

ed S

TIP

fun

d es

timat

e $1

52.1

$1

50.0

$3

02.1

-A

udit

adju

stm

ent t

o fin

anci

al m

odel

$7

.5

$7.5

UP

DA

TE

D R

EV

EN

UE

ES

TIM

AT

E

$18,

644.

8 $1

9,34

9.0

$37,

993.

8

• ·1

-1F

Page 10: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• T

HR

OU

GH

OU

T T

HE

RT

AA

PR

OC

ES

S,

RE

VE

NU

E P

RO

JEC

TIO

NS

HA

VE

BE

EN

RE

VIS

ED

AN

D

UP

DA

TE

D A

S A

DD

ITIO

NA

L I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N B

EC

AM

E A

VA

ILA

BL

E

• T

he M

ilest

one

1 "b

est

est

imat

e" o

f $1

8,45

4.3

mill

ion

is b

ased

on

assu

mpt

ions

of

cont

inui

ng e

cono

mic

gro

wth

, as

rei

tera

ted

on p

age

six

of th

e st

udy

resu

lts d

ocum

ent

• F

our

adju

stm

ents

hav

e be

en m

ade

to t

he M

ilest

one

1 re

venu

e es

timat

es:

Less

has

bee

n ex

pend

ed o

n th

e P

asad

ena

Blu

e Li

ne t

han

orig

inal

ly e

stim

ated

, th

ereb

y in

crea

sing

ava

ilabl

e re

venu

e by

$22

.6 m

illio

n.

How

ever

, al

l of

thes

e fu

nds

are

com

mitt

ed b

y th

e S

chiff

Bill

to

the

JPA

T

he r

ecen

t F

eder

al a

ppro

pria

tion

prov

ides

$8.

3 m

illio

n m

ore

in N

ew

Sta

rts

fund

s th

an p

revi

ousl

y an

ticip

ated

. O

f thi

s am

ount

, $8

mill

ion

are

com

mitt

ed t

o R

ed Lin~

plan

ning

for

Eas

t S

ide

and

Mid

-Citi

es;

$0.3

mill

ion

is a

vaila

ble

for

an E

ast

Sid

e T

rans

it C

ente

r C

altr

ans

rece

ntly

rev

ised

the

ST

IP f

und

estim

ate,

inc

reas

ing

the

amou

nt a

vaila

ble

to L

os A

ngel

es C

ount

y by

$15

2.1

mill

ion

The

rec

ent

audi

t of

the

MT

A's

fin

anci

al m

odel

ide

ntifi

ed $

7.5

mill

ion

that

had

bee

n co

mm

itted

tw

ice,

mak

ing

that

muc

h m

ore

avai

labl

e fo

r pr

ogra

mm

ing

• A

s a

resu

lt of

the

se a

djus

tmen

ts,

reve

nue

proj

ectio

ns f

or t

he F

Y99

-FY

04 p

lann

ing

horiz

on

tota

l $1

8,64

4.8

mill

ion

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

A 1-

1 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

In

c.

Page 11: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

CO

MM

ITM

EN

TS

UP

DA

TE

($

mill

ion

s)

FY

99

-FY

04

F

Y05

-FY

10

FY

99

-FY

10

ES

TIM

AT

ED

CO

MM

ITM

EN

TS

, M

ILE

ST

ON

E 1

$1

7,13

5.1

$16,

738.

4 $3

3,87

3.5

Ad

just

men

ts:

-C

omm

itmen

ts o

vers

tate

d in

Mile

ston

e 1

($2.

1)

($1

,256

.7)

($1

,258

.8)

-P

asad

ena

Blu

e Li

ne r

ail

cars

45

.0

45.0

-

Pas

aden

a B

lue

Line

ope

ratin

g co

sts

64.2

21

7.8

282.

0 -

Acc

eler

ated

Bus

Pro

cure

men

t 26

5.0

265.

0 -

Rev

ised

ST

IP f

undi

ng e

stim

ate

(24

. 0)

(24.

0)

-M

odel

adj

ustm

ents

(R

ed L

ine/

Blu

e Li

ne)

(22.

5)

(22.

5)

-A

SI

expa

nsio

n 75

.0

90.0

16

5.0

-A

dditi

onal

New

Sta

rts

fund

ing

8.3

8.3

-T

SM

bac

kfill

9.

0 9.

0 A

udit

adju

stm

ent t

o fin

anci

al m

odel

7.

4 7.

4

UP

DA

TE

D C

OM

MIT

ME

NT

ES

TIM

AT

E

$17,

560.

4 $1

5,78

9.5

$33,

349.

9

• ·1

-2

F

Page 12: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OS

TS

HA

VE

AL

SO

BE

EN

UP

DA

TE

D T

O I

NC

OR

PO

RA

TE

MO

RE

CU

RR

EN

T I

NF

OR

MA

TIO

N

• C

omm

itmen

ts w

ere

over

stat

ed in

the

Mile

ston

e 1

repo

rt,

prim

arily

for

the

FY

05-F

Y1

0 pe

riod.

T

he M

ilest

one

1 re

port

not

ed t

his

disc

repa

ncy

and

attr

ibut

ed it

to

the

diff

icul

ty o

f fo

llow

ing

prov

isio

ns in

the

MT

A's

fina

ncia

l m

odel

for

fin

anci

ng d

ebt

• T

he c

ost

of 1

8 ad

ditio

nal

rail

cars

nee

ded

for

the

Pas

aden

a B

lue

Line

is e

stim

ated

to

be

$45

mill

ion

• O

pera

ting

cost

s fo

r th

e P

asad

ena

Blu

e Li

ne a

re a

dded

and

ass

ume

that

ser

vice

wou

ld

begi

n in

Jul

y 20

02

• T

he A

ccel

erat

ed B

us P

rocu

rem

ent w

as a

dopt

ed b

y th

e B

oard

and

fun

ded

at $

265

mill

ion

• F

unds

pre

viou

sly

iden

tifie

d as

com

mitt

ed in

ant

icip

atio

n of

the

Cal

tran

s S

TIP

fun

ds

revi

sion

are

now

trea

ted

as u

ncom

mitt

ed,

redu

cing

com

mitm

ents

by

$2

4 m

illio

n

• A

n ad

just

men

t to

the

finan

cial

mod

el w

as n

eces

sary

to r

educ

e an

ove

rsta

ted

com

mitm

ent

to t

he R

ed L

ine

by $

22.5

mill

ion

• R

ecen

t an

d pr

ojec

ted

rider

ship

gro

wth

on

AD

A-m

anda

ted

para

tran

sit

serv

ices

pro

vide

d by

A

SI

indi

cate

a p

oten

tial

shor

tfall

of a

ppro

xim

atel

y $1

5 m

illio

n pe

r ye

ar,

begi

nnin

g in

FYO

O

• R

ecen

tly a

ppro

pria

ted

New

Sta

rts

fund

s ha

ve b

een

com

mitt

ed t

o bu

s fa

cilit

ies

and

Red

Li

ne p

lann

ing

($8.

3 m

illio

n)

• T

he n

eed

to p

rovi

de t

he m

atch

for

bac

k-ye

ar p

roje

cts

(mat

ched

by

the

Sta

te b

efor

e S

B45

w

as e

nact

ed)

was

rec

ogni

zed,

res

ultin

g in

add

ition

al c

omm

itmen

ts o

f $9

mill

ion

• T

he a

udit

of th

e M

TA

fin

anci

al m

odel

ide

ntifi

ed a

dditi

onal

com

mitt

ed r

even

ue (

$7.4

mill

ion)

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

1-2

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 13: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

LOS ANGELES COUNTY 1989 SOUNDWALL RETROFIT LIST

1. = 1;--From..:.P....;;ost=lp.:;;!.l:.::.~=-o--1 •• :ZS't' met.t·1: ~ 3..9 ~ lf.bJlnr ?m. a.z w ~A. vi a. 1E ~ Av $5 $ -4,0&)

316 ~t.A-210 3-4.7 I :38.3 Dl8lla, ~A~EOG ~ 1 WB $ 3,212

ZZ2 11ocil,..,...1 .LA-¢10 3.4 3..1 Szrtalob1i:a,~~st:S $ 8)0

2S3 Uef.in -:.01·lu..oso 15.1 I 15.9 Nar~ Hts. il:lid CzotnR®& E~ :W!El $ 7,700 ~ iTiec' ru -02 ILA-4C5 18.0 1~.2 ICt t.z.r.:!ale. Yt:tat -"'ifrl:er.xd A't .m..~ I s 3.Z81 ~ ~03 l..k06a 13.8 14.8 I Near lr'xU:ly, O.S W7':1 ~ WT~ cayn Rd :W&S $ 4.1~

301 r)Um~ ~ 19.0 19.S ~,O..SW~RrJ~Rd:S $ 1,160

Zl2 ~-05 1...A-OOS 37.4 37.7 Perl:r.ma Citf, Osb:lme b o.3 H ~ I$ 5o(O

·~ ner11r--o7·~1o1 -··1 ···r.:r- --7-:7 ,t~Gr ii::::!ytoocd. ca-en;s-~ st ~&Sa $ eea ~ TJerlV-01 U<:al. 3.3 5.3 ~oaw WO:::.:SA~1E~Av:Wa $ 8,1~

306 r~N-02 t..A-QS1 ,"",5 16.1 IEa!b'er.l..uawa;Q ~ AY:N &.S8 $ 9,CSO

'317 ~:ro I..A-134 0.0

' 2.1 L:::s ~ pjs 1 01.+lotr'IIO:Id Wtrt '$8 I s 5,041

~ rle'f IV-·04 I..A-710 13..6 I 13.9 Neet~Alla::le~ aNd :Sa s 552

~ TierNA05 LA-101 25.8 27.1 jt::s ~. 0.3 S V«tin ~Ave :Sa s 1.9861 310 r*N-oo I..A-210 I M-8 I ~-! ~Cue( kd(J;f~Av :'Mi s 229 :111 tr'..ec N •. fil l.A-060 1.0 I Z.4 i!.os~ f:QjAv!J2N:-.td St.-:N H3 s s.~l

312" ft..rw~oa l..A-OOS I 16..1 18.8 I Los A.~ Esl21J.\o~ Av :'H t EB s 1,a10

3t3fTiet rv·~~- LA.oos 32.7 I 33..9 !L:::s A.~ Qj N ~Wy!J:Z N Surtand 51 =a I s Z.iS7 31-tP"'.er IV- -ttl LA-101 21.2 I Z3...3 l!.!:sM;eles. ~-~k:t:NB I s "'~ 318 tr~2ll.A-101 I 13.8 I 14..9 !U:s~ 0.3 S ~C'Iyri1'{o:xlmanAve ~~3 Is 3,-420

317 (T!Qr!V ·13~~0 9.6 I 10.1 it..os~0.2EWCls.~:Yle Is l..SOO j31a..j11e£ 'N ·;-f4jtA-405 I 22.2 . Z3A ln;le'r::a1 CertlJ:y ~ ~:."<8 ! t 2,1~

• 319 fTJeCJ'"(.· 15 LA-~10 I S.i3 ) 6.5 ICollo:l\ .~ ~ st:ms ' $ 3.004

I :z:J~'l"'iec' IV··«l l.A--101 I 1~4 l 1S.9 jl.::s ~ Haz!le'm ~ N!.."ts 61 :SB s 2.~

.:32'1 I'Tlei'N.~ 17 ,lA-060 l 1.9 I 3.1 jii='Les~ !nr:!.r.a ~ Av :fB $ 1,935

~IT• IV -ts t.M:::Sl 21.! 229 I L'ldus:ry, 0,5 w l.elnx/6:1« Ca:lyal :N&S Is 3.;!49

lz:l~. 19/l..A-OCS 21.3 I 28.4 ~ 'Nci!m J.'IPI().2N~Av:SS $ 2.3'4 · ~ lr« IV _.20 ILA-71o I 22..3 zs.2 1~ ezrtr~ ~ 7S!Ipn!Jxl :H & sa $ 2.296 szslner rv ~21 LA-13-4 6..2 5.7 Glen:aloe. Concm1 ~kl PCC -:Na i $ 1,-435

~~~r.t-22 I..A-405 25...5 I 29.2 Lcs~0.1 H~1 S~BMl :m5a I $ 3.~

3Z1 lrJCili' lV ~ 23 L...A.-003 25.0 I :25.3 ~ &!r,.clalllald Ba'~W Gcat1 Spr.Q :NB I s 1.517 ~ T«.N. 2.4 lA-605 20..3 20.6 ~ ~ J!oa:I1C.'0.3 HfiOI::IIlO jt8 ; . 1..32:2

:!29 r•N·25 l.A-101 I 11.5 12..0 Los~~~$ s ~.700

3:'llllil!r sv-::-21!" J,.MnO I ~ ~ ~~ Gi'lrdAIIIOA E Gandh -:N8 s 1,702

~,.~n.r r-~. a t..A--'05 :29.0 28.6 jU:lr ~ lbJie 1~.Pabs &111 :m.s3 ' . s 2.347

i 3:::2: -net N • ~ ~ '15.5 15.9 icmra. ~.1 s 'ftjm .:H&SS s 1,!28

333 Tlec:.N-29 I..A-101 14.9 1S.S ~ ~anH0al!iki:SS s 2.600 ~ TliiiN"l..- 30 I u.-.1 01 13.2 1"'-9 cm'lo. Q.1 E Wti...Y:!.t« o::J!lna :Sa $ 4,210

336ITaw.iV-31 L..A.-1~ I 3.5 I 3..8 !Los~ !.oshxz* ~La:w Or:'HB $ 3,122

~IT.tr.N- :32 l.A-710' i 22..5 2.2.7 ~ 'ih:J*Qbt~HWZ~iq!al ~ Is 1.)m I

~33:7{11er r-1- 33 1..),..«:5 I 14.5 16.4 Neorl~, 11.2.N ~ ~ s R.c:le His fld :Sa IS 2.~1

I

•• Preliminary estimates as of October 13, 1998

Regional Transit Alternatives Analysis A1-3 Booz·AIIen & Hamilton Inc.

Page 14: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

LOS ANGELES COUNTY POST 1989 SOUNDWALL RETROFIT LIST

ProjQCt Oe&cripdon en-ext I ~112 -roc.~ X$1000 Ulcx:i:l

• ~ l.A-002 l"-2 15.1 Lcs Alqlla. Gi«m\11 ~ $ 'Yi'8 ' 1,425

~1-;-.. : t.A-002 I 15.1 17.0 Lcs~ Rana~Rco:1 $IS $ 1,800

~1 ~ l 17.0 18.8 l.CII ,vq-. Verdago ~ 13-< ~IS $ 1,700 ~ · :.. 1.)...002 17.5 17.3 iLcs ArQei!Js. Ycrtmrd.U.t N Ram T~ Dm :W&S s t3SO I .. ~ l.A.005 3.0 4.9 NcM.t sr.oe.~msa s 1,813

3-44 lu...oos 4.9 6.9 NonrUc. ~ 6)5 ~ s 1,SSO ~ ~ I 6.9 9.! c:o.nsy, Rcu!: ~~ ~ :N&SB $ S2S

~I I~ 1<4.0 17.2 Lcs~O.tS~~:.~ s 7SQ

. ~71. .. i~ , . 1S..5 ··zr.o ~ AnJales, ~ 108i at la ~ AAY::S&SS . s 1.12.5

1~1 !I..A-005 22.S 23.7 ,Lcs ~ Fi'&:ncrtlriw:'S d~m.d ~8 ~ 1.~

3-Cg lA005 I 27.1 33.2 !SU/tW.. t.cs An;jG!:! Rl'reoSci Sunl;nj el';'j :.~ $ 1,-47~

:so~ IL:A-005 I 36.2 :39.4- ~~ 0.1 STf.n;a ~118 ~&Sa I $ 1~

. :.:111 ILA-OOS I ~-"' ~1.5 Lc~~~11~~:S&SS I s l,ll75

~~ il..-'r¢10 2.2 3..7 ISantalolcni:2.. l..i'Jr;::h SNdl E d27ih Sblt -:N&a Is 1,.500

l53 !~o I 4.0 5.4 1~ Mo:lb.. e: a Ceni-.ela.A~ -'OS:wa $ 2.500 ~f :~a I .5.5 s.~ ~~~R.cm~he:W&a I s 1,COO

!$Sf IJ.A.010 5.4 s.a IL::s ~ ~ AYtiYI:Ia Ava :A'S I s ~

~~~ 11...)...010 72 I 9.3 ~~W~:'HU3 $ 1.~1 :57 i~10 I 10.1 13..~ l~A.-qdee,~E!Mm•o sCI!Ai'e:'H~ $ 2.1U I 35& ILM10 I 1~ I 13.5 IU!:s~~A~AWJS $ 2..:00 I 3SS L-\-<J10 I I:J..:l I ·ts." L::s ~ Nan:a.'ldeAM d JJ;;mr ~~as s 1,!7S I ~I ll.Ml10 1-".2 ! 18.4 jt.::s~ SVI~ ~'!11!8 I s a50

351 l.t.A-01o I 21.5 I 2-4.0 .Ahr.:txa. w a 1tam 71~ -:tl!S I s 1,5031

J6:2j V..010 2<!.a· I 2tU ~~~Nl:w~~k/e~&EB $ 1,z75

~~ ~~10 28.2 29.6 E Mc::IIB, Rio Ha.'¢Naltrf :ta.8 s 1.250 i • :l&4 ll.),..01Q ' 25.7 31.1 IS Ua2. E dVIMj ~ 605 :f/&8 I s 1,S25 I :!:65 l..M:l10 I 31.1 ~..5 !~Fm:.~~J.~-:ti&S I s ~ :ll'5l5 !l..M:l10 ~.a I ~0 Yfll!it C...""''N. S~ Aw.UJ± Rln AW! -:H&S I s 1,-400

3671 ~l.A.-010 ~.0 I 3e.! IWe6tCo*-a. Lnfien A~ A~ :Wt.a $ 1.275

3S8 ILA-a10 36..5 I u.! IW~ ~ ).ru:saA't'eOJul :fi&S I s 1.075 35a t.A-C10 ~.5 I .\2...4 jWct~Gr.rod~~~:W&S I s 1,95

~70 ILJ\.01o I 4-4..2 :.5.7 IF-cnma. Otx!ey A~ Hie -:H&S $ J,llS

371 l.M10 . -'5.7 ~.3 Fcmc:oa. GmT AWIWs :m!9 ~ 3.,J75

m ~~ 1.:3 2.9 I.I~~~A.,.'!/i!El , • $ 100

3T.S ~ . 1.2 5..1 l:lilmQnd E'¥, H d 8a:l& ~ c:t SlDC ~~&.sa $ 1..600

37<4 ~ 6.0 I v. Fan:n;. 0.: STimi!IA~a ~ ~ $ 8:25

S71ij I~ 2..2 :3..3 Las~~71Q.:W9 s 52S

378 t...Mel 8.8 11.7 t.cs~ Sln GIOOd ~ SilS:W&S I s 1,350

lTT UrOO:l 13.1 1-4.3 ,l.c:s ~ OCISI ROad ~Ave :HB s 7SJ

;ml f...lr.OeO 19..5 2:3.5 Ditlnn:l Su, Ft:lertr1 R~ST:Wta s 325

31S lt..J..aSC 25.5 28.0 Pcm:na. Oilam:l Ber ~ Rax:h ~N&a I s 1,100

*I . I..A-071 M I 1.~ Pan:as,ll.2 s Sa1~c..kl8 ctV*t ~:N&S8 s 1.125 . ~11- ·~ .. - · . J · J..A..09Q t1 I 2.0 t.cs~.B~Ue~fillrd:WS ' 1,725

312 ~~ l 2..0 I ;U .. ~ar.~~~$&e s 1.%75. : .. ·- ·--~· .·. ·.· . ..

;a ~~ I 11.8 t-4.5 ~l.osAngolel ~ BMi~ I s 575

~ /LA-101 r 2.1 I "'-6 Loa klQIIeS. s d ~ ShC.fl dVet:rrt:1ti.Ava :H&.$ $ 7!iO

~ l.A-101 I 12.6 I 12.8 Los ~ill.~ AM:IJrll Czrtytn tl\ld :llB $ -400 -· Preliminary estimates as of October 13, 1998

Regional Transit Alternatives Analysis A 1-4 Booz·AIIen & Hamilton Inc.

Page 15: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

LOS ANGELES COUNTY POST 1989 SOUNDWALL RETROFIT LIST

3M . ilJ\.101

~ . ~101

~ .'~101 - L.A.-110

::lli10 l.A-110

:91 lA-110

~i ILJlr.11a ~ l..A-118 ~ Lo\-134 395 LA-134

~ tA-l~

~~ l.A-170

~ l.A-1'70

300 l.h170

.cOO 1~170

-'011 l..A-210

.o102l t..A-2'10

-'03! !L'--210

-'04! t..A-210

-405j L-\-210 ~ lA-210

-4071 lA-210

o~~C&! j~o ,41:21 ~(t

4101 L..A-210

41'i' I..A-210

412 ILM05 4131 l.MOS

<41•'1 ll.A-005 -415 I..A-4C5 o416j jt..A-a)S

'17 I.A-o405 ~181 I..M105

4191 lt.Me5 .t.:2Q t..A-405

41 ' ~

"ZZ ~

"~ l.Jl...405 ~ ILA-71o 440 LJ..1Q1

-'4:2 t.A-1,0 ~ I..Jr.t-4

I -41oSI {!..A-1~

4CT !LA-l1c

18..7 19.7 ILc:s .An;e~es. M c:t Hrtcr'.'l:::::tA~ ~ :msa $

20.2 21.0 Lc:s ~ Whlll Cllt~~ .m.ss $

31.~ I 32.2 Ca.1abaas. Lost fJ.ill Ro;d.U3 N L:ztl-ils Rcod :Na s 0.7 6.6 ilcs ~. N d.Cti'W~ 1 N 7.itt'li~:NS s

I 2-4.0 27.-4 Lcs ~ S o1 ,...~., H J,:led Jite :Sa s 27.7 W.1 l..:s )q:!Jd. O.A I.G ~ *" 52!J.rrr:ro ~~:sa $

..(,S !.3 t..:s~ Ed. Tampa kWH ri~Jwe -:ti&S s 9.2 124 l.:ls Arr;t!8s. E r:l.~ A~ F4lmll'do Roed :til.S s 0.9 I 2.~ &.nt::ri, N d.~~ r:l. CaJi:m!a Shcl:S s I

8..2 6.8 I~ w oteooc:::m ~ ct C¢lJ:rbca ~&.8 $

7.1 11.:! (Gb:Zle. ~~a~ snet-:«&a $

1 · 1.1..1 17.3 ~~ ~ ~ t:tVr::r, S!l'd~t.E I $

I I I

I I I

I I

! I I

I

I I

I

I

I

15.5 18..3 LOIS A~ Burt::z:* ~~:W&.Ea $

16.5 1e!..9 l..cs~ l.JuR,j~ ~f!Mi :W&S s 1!.7 19.7 Lcs ~ s-i:::::t ~ !ild ~ Is a.s I <1.8 Los~-E!d~ ~ O(~eraet:W;..~ s 6.0 I 11.5 Los~ Ps:Q:xl ~ ot SrlrQrtj)Jfl :W&S s 1~9 17.1 lcr~ 3osix'~ ~-:te:We i $

li.~ 21..5 lu~ ~~Pa:$:tl¢E!3 I s 18.9 21.5 LaC;r.oza. Reina ~0 ~ P'acs -:fi&S s no :s.e ~ w ali:l:::::IWMs::a :W&a i s 29.5 I ~..4 ~~~-:til£3 s ~.2 I -41..9 ~~A~ C;t'f::c ~ ~ ! s .1.1.9 I 4.:2...1 IG'eD:ra. sq Cab\ ~kR :na I s 42..1 4.7.' G'e.a!l::s. Sand::a kltiJ:J = ~ ~he ~&8 s -44.S 45..2 ~rrmas.1.2 WJ..J sri.~ ~:tiS I s 0.0 I 1..0 . I~ SEd!. s.n GUn!!~ St::M :sa s 6...4 10.S lt.cn; &sad!, ~ 8aa::h ~ Sre«::N&SB Is 11.~ 14.-4 !sw. Ft~ ~~«6-.!tf~ msa 1 s 13.8 15.2 tram:e. Non:a.'Xil ~ d ~:S&Sa s 19.! 21.0 jr.maa, s o{Ra.1s 1C:Rmcns :sa $

Z3...5 :B.S !~ F'mmc:tA~ dBal:al Crueit ~ $

:<S.i 215.1 ~ lto.,a, 210'S 0(~ l)lw: N&SS $

::6.1 I 215~ C<.*w elf, SB.=cn A~ '!:lb~ • er.i: :S3 . - s Zl.O ~1.1 c::M"Cit'. ilndod: ~Ia ~ .

. Is ~6 39.0 L..cs~~~SM1:Sa $

~ 39.5 Los).ngeles. ~ ~ 101, H Momson St;.i&SS s o!S.2 ,1.7 Los~ s riDe-ta::tft ~ ~:lt&SE $

,7.0 I 1$.0 8ei. H a 1.c:s ~ RnlS « cm snct :m.sa $

23..20 2.4~ ~Ave.~Ced:l-

:2!J.SO ~!SeMen~ SL.znd D!nt. Sl.7t) Av.-P A¥ • .F,WB

10.90 11.:30 'W"PS.a M;o.-011 ~ t) E3QII Vtsia Odloe fiB

zz.so . n20 1Nodl Nr:rc Bl'toi ic llx:cb ~

Tcl:d c.=; (lndud!ng ~ Suppc:rl Cast)

Preliminary estimates as of October 13, 1998

Regional Transit Alternatives Analysis A1-5

1,225

1,!00

~

1,375

1,:l00

1,125

2,550

2.-475 750 ¢23

2.700

2.~

1,:150

700

1.180 5.950 2,Tl5

1,:i00

3.~

1,m 3.075

.1..925

2.800

4-63 I 2.47S

CS8

325 1,400

2.125

1,550

~

1,.5.25

575

800

3,i'SO

"-25 1.075

1,s25

sso

t1~ ...

Booz·AIIen & Hamilton Inc.

Page 16: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

z 0 -I-C. -a: 0 tJ) w c

NW ><a: -:::;) Ccn Z<( Ww 8::25 <(W

0 z <( :25 a: 0 L1. a: w a.

Page 17: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

~ z <( -I al

1-u. w -I

> -I • -I <( z 0 i= z w 1-z

Page 18: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PE

RF

OR

MA

NC

E E

VA

LU

AT

ION

MA

IN T

AS

KS

Def

ine

-,.-

Pe

rfo

rma

nce

In

dica

tors

De

fine

D

ete

rmin

e

Eva

luat

ion

1-

.. In

dic

ato

rs &

..

Pre

sen

t

Go

als

..

Ap

ply

to

,.. F

ind

ing

s P

roje

cts

v A~

... D

efin

e ...

Co

llect

"'

Ou

tpu

ts

.. D

ata

.H.

Fin

aliz

e

De

velo

p

De

velo

p

... A

ltern

ativ

es

Alte

rna

tive

s -.

,..

Alte

rna

tive

s D

etai

l S

cre

en

ing

P

roce

ss

--------

-----

.gio

na

l T

rans

it A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

·-1F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

.n

Inc.

Page 19: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

---------------------

----

·-

• •

• P

erfo

rman

ce E

valu

atio

n F

ram

ewor

k

PE

RF

OR

MA

NC

E E

VA

LU

AT

ION

FO

R T

HE

MT

A A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

HA

S N

OW

BE

EN

CO

MP

LE

TE

D

• T

he P

roje

ct te

ams

utili

zed

the

11S

hort

list ..

of

optio

ns d

evel

oped

fo

r M

ilest

one

2

• P

roje

ct t

eam

s fle

shed

out

eac

h al

tern

ativ

e in

te

rms

of

indi

vidu

al d

ata

fiel

ds n

eces

sary

to

calc

ulat

e th

e pe

rfor

man

ce m

easu

res,

bot

h qu

antit

ativ

ely

and

qu

alit

ativ

ely

• T

he

MT

A r

egio

nal t

rave

l de

man

d m

odel

con

stitu

ted

one

of t

he k

ey

inpu

ts f

or

trip

ge

nera

tion,

veh

icle

del

ay a

nd o

the

r m

obili

ty a

nd e

nvir

onm

enta

l is

sues

• In

put f

rom

co

mm

un

ity f

ocus

gro

ups,

go

vern

me

nt

ad-h

oc,

pe

er

revi

ew p

anel

s w

as

inco

rpor

ated

th

rou

gh

ou

t the

pro

cess

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s .

A2-

1 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 20: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Per

form

ance

Eva

luat

ion

Fra

mew

ork

TH

E E

XIS

TIN

G F

RA

ME

WO

RK

IN

CO

RP

OR

AT

ES

EIG

HT

GO

AL

S

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s

En

viro

nm

en

t

Co

mm

un

ity

Imp

act

s

Saf

ety

Eco

no

mic

Mo

bili

ty I

Acc

ess

ibili

ty

Tra

nsi

t D

ep

en

de

nce

Re

liab

ility

Co

st

Eff

ect

ive

ne

ss

A2-

2

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 21: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

OU

TR

EA

CH

IN

PU

T T

O E

VA

LU

AT

ION

GO

AL

S

rfo

rman

ce A

rea

bili

ty/ A

cce

ssib

ility

ln

sit

De

pe

nd

en

cy

liabi

lity

st E

ffe

ctiv

en

ess

mm

un

ity

Imp

act

s

Jnom

ic

ety

vi ro

n m

en

tal

Pe

Mo

Tra

Re

Co

Co

Eco

Sa

f

En

v

.eg

ion

al

Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s

Ave

rag

e R

anki

ng

1.

98

2.88

2.

92

3.74

4.

02

4.10

4.

59

4.61

·2-3

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .n

Inc.

Page 22: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• P

erfo

rman

ce E

valu

atio

n F

ram

ewor

k

EA

CH

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

IS

PR

ES

EN

TE

D B

AS

ED

ON

A T

WO

-TIE

R E

VA

LU

AT

ION

SY

ST

EM

, R

EF

LE

CT

ING

EX

TE

RN

AL

FE

ED

BA

CK

RE

CE

IVE

D (

E.G

., A

D-H

OC

, P

EE

R R

EV

IEW

) V

IS-A

-VIS

TH

E

RE

LA

TIV

E I

MP

OR

TA

NC

E O

F E

AC

H M

EA

SU

RE

ME

NT

AR

EA

TIE

R 2

...

Key

Eva

luat

ion

Are

as:

• E

cono

mic

me

asu

res

• S

afet

y •

Env

iron

men

tal

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-3

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 23: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• P

erfo

rman

ce E

valu

atio

n F

ram

ewor

k ..

. Mob

ility

MO

BIL

ITY

EV

AL

UA

TIO

N I

NC

LU

DE

S F

OU

R S

EP

AR

AT

E S

ER

IES

OF

PE

RF

OR

MA

NC

E M

EA

SU

RE

S

• M

arke

t S

ize

corr

espo

nds

to t

he t

otal

num

ber

of a

dditi

onal

tra

nsit

trip

s ge

nera

ted

as a

resu

lt of

eac

h al

tern

ativ

e, c

ompa

red

to t

he b

ase

case

fo

r 20

10.

Tot

al t

rans

it tr

ips

in t

he

C

ount

y ar

e lis

ted,

as

wel

l as

the

alte

rnat

ive

tran

sit t

rip p

erce

ntag

e of

thos

e to

tal t

rips

• M

ob

ilit

y In

dex

cor

resp

onds

to

the

aver

age

pers

on t

hrou

ghpu

t fo

r th

e c

ount

y.

The

mob

ility

in

dex

is p

rese

nted

com

pare

d to

the

bas

e ca

se a

nd a

s pe

rcen

tage

incr

ease

ove

r th

e b

ase

case

• V

ehic

le D

elay

rep

rese

nts

the

tota

l nu

mbe

r o

f ho

urs

lost

due

to

cong

estio

n fo

r al

l Lo

s A

ngel

es C

ount

y tr

ip m

aker

s

• Jo

b A

cces

sib

ilit

y is

the

per

cent

of t

otal

em

ploy

men

t th

at

can

be r

each

ed w

ithin

one

ho

ur

of tr

ansi

t tra

vel t

ime

(incl

udin

g w

aitin

g, w

alki

ng,

and

the

trav

el t

ime

on

the

bus

or

rail

syst

em)

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-4

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

am

ilto

n I

nc.

Page 24: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

....

....

....

.

TR

AN

SIT

DE

PE

ND

EN

CE

IN

DE

X M

AP

E

ast

sid

e C

orr

ido

r -

Hea

vy R

ail

Op

tio

ns

Me

tro

rail

-E

xist

ing

or

Un

de

r C

on

stru

ctio

n

0 R

ed L

ine

Eas

tsid

e E

xte

nsi

on

-S

uspe

nded

Pro

ject

6 M

od

ifie

d A

lign

me

nt

to

Cha

vez

I So

to

A2-

5F

Le

ge

nd

-V

ery

Hig

h

1111

Hig

h

1~1

Mo

de

rate

D

D

Page 25: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

..

• •

• P

erfo

rman

ce E

valu

atio

n F

ram

ewor

k ..

. Tra

nsit

De

pe

nd

en

cy

TH

E D

EG

RE

E O

F T

RA

NS

IT D

EP

EN

DE

NC

E F

OR

MS

A C

RIT

ICA

L C

OM

PO

NE

NT

OF

TH

E

EV

AL

UA

TIO

N F

RA

ME

WO

RK

• T

ran

sit

Dep

end

ence

In

dex

-T

his

Ind

ex c

orre

spon

ds t

o a

geog

raph

ic s

uper

posi

tion

of

thre

e cr

itica

l dr

iver

s to

tra

nsit

depe

nden

cy: p

opul

atio

n de

nsity

, in

com

e le

vel,

and

low

aut

o ow

ners

hip.

T

he o

vera

ll In

dex

is d

evel

oped

by

com

pari

ng t

he a

lignm

ents

of

each

al

tern

ativ

e w

ith t

rans

it de

pend

ence

.. z

ones

.. an

d ov

eral

l O

rigi

n-D

estin

atio

n pa

tter

ns f

or th

e C

omm

unity

Sta

tistic

al A

rea.

T

he e

nd r

esul

t is

a T

rans

it D

epen

denc

e In

dex

whi

ch v

arie

s fr

om 11

IOW

11 to

.. ve

ry h

igh

.. fo

r ea

ch a

ltern

ativ

e

• Jo

b A

cces

sib

ilit

y -

The

per

cent

of

tota

l em

ploy

men

t tha

t ca

n be

rea

ched

with

in o

ne h

our

of tr

ansi

t tra

vel t

ime

for

the

tran

sit

depe

nden

t pu

blic

(in

clud

ing

wai

ting,

wal

king

, an

d th

e tr

avel

tim

e on

the

bus

or

rail

syst

em)

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-5

. B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

-···

--

Page 26: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Per

form

ance

Eva

luat

ion

Fra

mew

ork

... C

ost

Eff

ectiv

enes

s

CO

ST

EF

FE

CT

IVE

NE

SS

AIM

S T

O A

NS

WE

R T

WO

QU

ES

TIO

NS

: H

OW

MU

CH

AN

D H

OW

EF

FIC

IEN

TL

Y A

RE

TH

E D

OL

LA

RS

SP

EN

T

• P

roje

ct C

ost

s in

clud

e ca

pita

l an

d op

erat

ing

cost

s.

Cap

ital

cost

s ty

pica

lly la

st o

nly

for

the

cons

truc

tion

perio

d, w

hile

ope

ratin

g an

d m

aint

enan

ce c

osts

las

t for

the

ent

ire li

fe o

f th

e

proj

ect

• C

ost

Eff

icie

ncy

is l

iste

d in

ter

ms

of c

ost

per

trip

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-6

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 27: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Per

form

ance

Eva

luat

ion

Fra

mew

ork

... R

elia

bilit

y

TH

E R

EL

IAB

ILIT

Y M

EA

SU

RE

RE

FE

RS

TO

EX

PE

CT

ED

SE

RV

ICE

RE

LIA

BIL

ITY

FR

OM

A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

, B

UT

IT

IS B

AS

ED

ON

PA

ST

MT

A E

XP

ER

IEN

CE

RE

LIA

BIL

ITY

A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

E

Mo

del

No

tes

e V

ery

I ~

Rel

iabl

e I (

t M

oder

atel

y R

elia

ble

Rel

iabl

e

HR

to

Fir

st/

Lore

na

E-1

Sus

pend

ed

• H

R to

Cha

vez/

Sot

o (W

itho

ut

Littl

e T

okyo

Sta

tion)

E

-2 H

RT

• LR

fro

m U

nion

Sta

tion

to W

hitt

ier/

Atla

ntic

Blv

d.

E-5

LR

T

a R

apid

Bus

(A

tlant

ic B

lvd.

I S

anta

Mon

ica

) E

-4 B

usW

ay

()

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-7

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 28: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

CO

MM

UN

ITY

IM

PA

CT

RA

TIN

GS

0 A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

S

HR

to

Pic

o I S

an V

ince

nt

HR

to

Wil

shir

e I

Fai

rfax

B

lue

Lin

e E

xpos

itio

n R

apid

Bus

(A

tlan

ac

Bus

Tra

nslt

way

alo

ng

(Sus

pend

ed)

Bra

nch

Blv

d./S

anta

Mon

iC.)

E

xpos

itio

n B

lvd.

GE

NE

RA

L C

OM

MU

NIT

Y

IMP

AC

TS

-5

0 +5

-5

0

+5

-5

0 +5

-5

0

+5

·5

0 +5

Impa

cts

on P

rope

rty

Val

ues

Impa

cts

on B

usi

nes

ses

Impa

cts

on S

ecur

ity

Impa

cts

on A

esth

etic

s

Noi

se I

mpa

cts

Impa

cts

on T

raff

ic L

anes

, Com

mu

nit

y R

esp

onse

I II

6

CO

MM

UN

ITY

IMP

AC

TS O

N

RE

LOC

ATI

ON

S

Rel

oc1.

tions

Faci

lity

Rel

ocat

ions

• R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

-.....

... ... .

_.

.. .....

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

' ----

--

HT

to P

ico

I San

Vin

cent

(S

uspe

nded

)

11./

I

11./

11./

II

v>

-~

-, ,\

t IW

G'"t

'Bil'f

:;.

N.o

•tv.

N

tfw

t .....

.. Nea

•tl ..

.. N

tf.c

t .....

.. ./

./

./

./·

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

---

----

L .

. ..

--------,_

--

---

----

ALT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

HR

to

Wil

shir

e I

Fai

rfax

B

lue

Lin

e E

xpos

itio

n B

ranc

h

./

./

./

./

./

./

I

.A2

-8F

1'

........

... ._

. .....

..

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

------

--------

---

Rap

id B

us

(Atl

anti

c B

lvd.

/San

ta M

onic

a)

~ . --

Ho

Ert

.ct

.......

./

./

./

./

./

./

./

, __

....

Bus

Tra

nslt

way

alo

ng

Exp

osit

ion

Blv

d.

~ Boo

z·A

IIen

& .lt

on

Inc.

Page 29: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

•• P

erfo

rman

ce E

valu

atio

n F

ram

ewor

k ..

. Com

mun

ity I

mpa

cts

CO

MM

UN

ITY

IMP

AC

TS

AR

E C

RIT

ICA

L IN

CO

NS

IDE

RIN

G A

NY

MA

JOR

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

AN

D

INC

OR

PO

RA

TE

TE

N I

ND

IVID

UA

L E

LE

ME

NT

S

CO

MM

UN

ITY

IMP

AC

T

EX

AM

PL

E

Impa

ct o

n P

rope

rty

Val

ues

Pos

itive

im

pact

on

prop

erty

val

ues

due

to n

ew h

eavy

rai

l lin

e Im

pact

on

Bus

ines

ses

Pos

itive

im

pact

due

to n

eigh

borh

ood

attr

activ

enes

s Im

pact

s on

Sec

urity

R

educ

ed c

omm

unity

sec

urity

due

to

vag

ran

ts d

raw

n by

sta

tion

Impa

cts

on A

esth

etic

s R

educ

e ae

sthe

tics

due

to e

leva

ted

light

rai

l lin

e an

d as

soci

ated

ca

tena

ry

Noi

se I

mpa

cts

¢ N

eglig

ible

sur

face

im

pact

with

sub

terr

anea

n m

etro

Impa

cts

on T

raff

ic L

anes

N

egat

ive

due

to t

rans

form

ing

a la

ne t

o a

dedi

cate

d bu

s tr

ansi

tway

C

omm

unity

Res

pons

e N

egat

ive

if de

spite

env

ironm

enta

l m

itiga

tion,

sig

nific

ant c

ompo

nent

s of

the

com

mun

ity a

re a

gain

st th

e pr

ojec

t H

ouse

hold

Rel

ocat

ions

S

igni

fican

t im

pact

with

lig

ht r

ail

syst

em c

onst

ruct

ion

Com

mun

ity F

acili

ty R

eloc

atio

ns

Neg

ligib

le w

ith s

ubte

rran

ean

met

ro

His

toric

Site

Rel

ocat

ions

P

roba

bly

sign

ifica

nt e

ven

if on

ly o

ne o

r tw

o fa

cilit

ies

need

rel

ocat

ion

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-8

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

! I

Page 30: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• P

erfo

rman

ce E

valu

atio

n F

ram

ewor

k ..

. Com

bine

d T

ier

1 M

easu

res

CO

MB

INE

D T

IER

ON

E M

EA

SU

RE

S C

AN

BE

CO

MP

AR

ED

WIT

HIN

SE

PA

RA

TE

CO

RR

IDO

RS

OR

A

CR

OS

S C

OR

RID

OR

S A

S N

EE

DE

D

MO

BIL

ITY

T

RA

NS

IT D

EP

EN

DE

NC

E

CO

ST

EF

FE

CT

IVE

NE

SS

R

ELI

AB

IUT

Y

Mar

t;et

M

ob

ility

Inde

x P

roJe

ct U

nit

Cos

ta

Co

at E

ffic

ien

cy

AL T

ER

NA

TIY

E

Ann

ual.

Tra

nsit

Tra

nsi

t W

ork

Job

Acc

oss

lblll

ty

Add

ition

al D

aily

LA

Cou

nty

Tra

velT

ime

Job

Acc

essi

bilit

y D

epen

den

ce

O&

MC

osl

s A

nnua

lized

L

ifo C

ycle

Tr

ans«

Trip

s D

aily

Tra

nsit

Perc

ent

Afte

mat

iva

Bas

e Pe

rcen

t D

estin

atio

n In

dex

Cap

ital·e

ost

s I

Mia

L

llocy

clo

Co

al/

S

ub

sid

y/

Cos

Wae

r B

enef

it

Failu

re R

ale

per

ol T

otal

S

peci

fic

2010

C

hang

e D

ecre

ase

Inde

x M

ie

(MTA

) T

rip

M

od

o

Gen

erat

ed

Trip

s (B

AH

) T

rip

H

our

WE

ST

SID

E

---

HR

to P

ico

I S

an

" "

() •

N/A

• ()

()

()

()

0 ()

" •

• •

Vinc

ent

HR

lo W

ilsh

ire

/

" "

()

" N

/A

" "

()

()

• ()

0

~

" •

" •

Fai~ax

:----

Blu

e U

ne

Exp

osi

tion

" •

()

()

N/A

()

()

" ()

()

" "

" ()

~

" B

ran

ch

Exp

osi

tion

Bu

swa

y

• •

• ()

N

/A

() •

• ()

()

• •

• •

• "

~

()

" •

Lo

w

Mod

erat

e H

igh

Ver

y H

igh

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-9

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

am

ilto

n I

nc.

Page 31: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• P

erfo

rman

ce E

valu

atio

n F

ram

ewor

k ..

. Tie

r 2

Mea

sure

s

AD

DIT

ION

AL

ME

AS

UR

ES

CO

NS

IDE

RE

D IN

TH

E P

RO

JEC

T W

ILL

IN

CL

UD

E E

CO

NO

MIC

IM

PA

CT

S,

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

EM

ISS

ION

S,

AN

D S

AF

ET

Y

Job

s S

uppo

rted

-

jobs

sup

port

ed b

y ca

pita

l ex

pend

iture

s -

job

s su

ppor

ted

by

oper

atin

g ex

pend

iture

s

Gro

ss A

rea

Pro

duct

Aut

o E

mis

sion

s 1 P

ass

en

ge

r A

ccid

ents

/Boa

rdin

g -

incl

udes

Rea

ctiv

e O

rga

nic

G

ases

, hy

droc

arbo

ns a

nd

nitr

ous

oxid

es

Ped

estr

ian

Acc

iden

ts/1

00,

000

Bus

Em

issi

ons

I tra

in m

iles

(tra

ins)

P

edes

tria

n A

ccid

ents

/1 0

0,00

0 V

MT

(bu

Veh

icle

Acc

iden

ts/1

00,

000

trai

n m

iles

(tra

ins)

V

ehic

le A

ccid

ents

/1 0

0,00

0 V

MT

(b

us)

BO

TH

TIE

R 1

AN

D T

IER

2 M

EA

SU

RE

S A

RE

IN

CL

UD

ED

IN T

HE

FIN

AL

PR

OJE

CT

EV

AL

UA

TIO

N

MA

TR

IX

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-10

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

In

c.

Page 32: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

••

Res

ults

...

PE

RF

OR

MA

NC

E E

VA

LU

AT

ION

RE

SU

LT

S A

RE

PR

ES

EN

TE

D F

OR

EA

CH

CO

RR

IDO

R

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

• T

op D

own

Sum

mar

ies

prov

ide

"Har

vey

Bal

l" re

sults

for

eac

h al

tern

ativ

e, b

y st

udy

corr

idor

(i.e.

, R

apid

Bus

, E

asts

ide,

Wes

tsid

e, S

an F

erna

ndo

Val

ley)

• W

hile

the

def

initi

ons

of th

e ha

rvey

bal

ls v

ary

by

perf

orm

ance

mea

sure

(e.

g.,

hig

he

r:deg

ree

of s

afet

y ve

rsus

low

er d

egre

e of

saf

ety,

hig

her

mob

ility

impa

ct v

ersu

s lo

wer

mob

ility

im

pact

), e

ach

alte

rnat

ive

can

cons

iste

ntly

be

com

pare

d ba

sed

on a

"m

ost f

avor

able

",

"lea

st fa

vora

ble"

bas

is.

DE

TA

ILE

D H

AR

VE

Y B

AL

L A

ND

NU

ME

RIC

RE

SU

LT

S P

ER

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

AR

E P

RO

VID

ED

IN

AP

PE

ND

IX 4

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

2-11

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

In

c.

Page 33: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

> " 0

" ..J 0 c 0 J:

~~­)(W -~

~" wz c..­c..l-<(~ -l-en w

l­en 0 0

Page 34: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

••

en ..J -~ w

~c • M(!l ><z i5i= Z<( w:: 0.­a.J-<ffi

l­en 0 (.)

Page 35: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

••

~ z <2: ..J OJ

ti: w ..J

>­..J ..J <2: z 0 i= z w 1-z

Page 36: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

UN

IT C

OS

TS

FO

R T

HE

IN

ITIA

L R

ED

LIN

E S

EG

ME

NT

WE

RE

GENE~ALL Y

HIG

HE

R

TH

AN

TH

E N

AT

ION

AL

AV

ER

AG

E*

Sel

ect

Red

Lin

e U

nit

Co

sts

Rel

ativ

e to

Nat

ion

al A

vera

ge

for

Hea

vy R

ail

Pro

ject

s

Tra

ck F

eet

106%

Tra

ck F

eet

146%

Sta

tions

S

ub

wa

y S

tatio

n 16

5%

Veh

icle

s R

even

ue V

ehic

les

Rev

. V

eh

icle

14

1%

Sof

t-C

osts

E

nqin

eeri

nq &

Des

iqn

Lin

ea

r F

eet

792%

Lin

ea

r F

eet

42

9%

Lin

ea

r F

eet

556%

Lin

ea

r F

eet

66

8%

Lin

ea

r F

ee

t 50

4%

* N

atio

nal a

vera

ge v

alu

es

infla

ted

to L

A p

rice

leve

ls,

Sou

rce:

Boo

z-A

llen

& H

amilt

on I

nc .

• ..

1-1

F

Page 37: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• A

ppro

ach

to C

apita

l Cos

t D

evel

opm

ent

CA

PIT

AL

CO

ST

S W

ER

E D

EV

EL

OP

ED

FO

R E

AC

H A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

E B

AS

ED

ON

TH

E A

LIG

NM

EN

T

DE

FIN

ITIO

NS

PR

OD

UC

ED

BY

TH

E A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

AN

AL

YS

IS T

EA

M

• T

hree

set

s of

inde

pend

ent

capi

tal

cost

est

ima

tes

wer

e de

velo

ped

for

each

alte

rnat

ive:

1.

M

TA E

sti

ma

tes-

Cap

ital c

ost

estim

ates

bas

ed o

n M

T A

's c

urre

nt c

ost

expe

rien

ce

2.

Inde

pend

ent E

sti

ma

tes-

Inde

pend

ent c

apita

l co

st e

stim

ates

bas

ed o

n th

e av

erag

e ca

pita

l co

st e

xper

ienc

e of

oth

er U

S t

rans

it op

erat

ors.

3.

B

est E

stim

ate

Cap

ital C

osts

-T

he

se

cos

t es

timat

es r

epre

sent

the

low

est

belie

ved

to b

e at

tain

able

by

MT

A a

nd i

nclu

de a

ltern

ate

cont

ract

ing

and

man

agem

ent

appr

oach

es (

e.g.

D

esig

n-B

uild

)

• T

his

cost

ing

appr

oach

was

des

igne

d to

add

ress

con

cern

s th

at

MT

A c

apita

l cos

ts a

re f

requ

ently

hi

gher

than

ind

ustr

y av

erag

es

The

MT

A E

stim

ates

pro

vide

an

up

pe

r bo

und

to t

he c

ost

of e

ach

alte

rnat

ive

The

Ind

epen

dent

Est

imat

es p

rovi

de l

ower

bou

nd c

ost

rang

es b

ased

on

the

actu

al

cost

and

con

stru

ctio

n ex

peri

ence

of

oth

er

oper

ator

s -t

he

se

low

er b

ound

es

timat

es m

ay n

ot b

e at

tain

able

by

MT

A g

iven

loc

al c

ost

leve

ls,

labo

r ag

reem

ents

, et

c.

The

Bes

t E

stim

ate

Cap

ital

Cos

ts u

tiliz

e:

a)

MT

A u

nit

cost

s w

hen

the

MT

A c

osts

are

at t

he l

ower

bou

nd,

are

not

sign

ifica

ntly

diff

eren

t fr

om t

he in

depe

nden

t co

sts

or

are

belie

ved

to b

e m

ore

real

istic

for

loca

l co

nditi

ons

b) I

ndep

ende

nt c

osts

whe

re a

ttai

nabl

e by

MT

A a

nd s

igni

fican

tly lo

wer

than

MT

A c

osts

c)

A c

ombi

natio

n of

the

MT

A a

nd I

ndep

ende

nt b

ased

(pr

imar

ily f

or s

oft-

cost

s) b

ased

on

the

leve

l of

cos

t sa

ving

s be

lieve

d to

be

atta

inab

le b

y M

TA

(e.

g.,

thro

ugh

alte

rnat

e co

ntra

ctin

g an

d m

anag

emen

t tec

hniq

ues)

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.1

-1

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

am

ilto

n I

nc.

Page 38: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

apita

l Cos

t D

ata

Sou

rces

TH

E C

AP

ITA

L U

NIT

CO

ST

S U

SE

D T

O E

ST

IMA

TE

TH

E T

OT

AL

CO

ST

OF

EA

CH

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

W

ER

E D

ER

IVE

D F

RO

M M

TA

RE

CO

RD

S A

ND

FR

OM

NA

TIO

NA

L C

AP

ITA

L C

OS

TIN

G E

XP

ER

IEN

CE

• M

TA

est

ima

tes

of

capi

tal

cost

s fo

r ea

ch a

ltern

ativ

e u

tiliz

ed M

TA

's "

Pla

nn

ing

Le

vel"

co

st

estim

ates

: T

he

se c

osts

are

reg

ular

ly a

dju

ste

d t

o r

efle

ct M

TA

's a

ctu

al

cost

exp

eri

en

ce

Leve

l o

f de

tail

coin

cid

es

with

th

e a

sse

t typ

es

de

finiti

on

s d

efin

ed

fo

r th

is s

tud

y

Co

stin

g s

truc

tur(

3 in

clu

de

s M

TA

's o

verh

ea

d (

soft

) co

sts

incl

ud

ing

sta

rt-u

p c

osts

,

insu

ranc

e, d

esi

gn

and

pro

ject

ma

na

ge

me

nt

cost

s an

d co

ntin

ge

nci

es

• T

he

In

de

pe

nd

en

t u

nit

capi

tal

cost

est

ima

tes

we

re d

eri

ved

fro

m B

oo

z•A

IIe

n's

nat

iona

l ca

pita

l co

st

da

tab

ase

: D

ata

ba

se c

ap

ture

s u

nit

capi

tal

cost

s fr

om a

ll lig

ht

rail,

he

avy

rai

l an

d B

usw

ay/

HO

V

pro

ject

s co

mp

lete

d in

th

e U

S o

ver

the

pa

st 2

0-y

ea

r pe

riod

Le

vel

of

de

tail

coin

cid

es

with

th

e a

sse

t ty

pe

s d

efin

itio

ns

de

fine

d f

or

this

stu

dy

(see

ab

ove

) D

ata

ba

se id

en

tifie

s o

ver

40

0 c

apita

l co

st li

ne i

tem

s

Pro

vid

es

de

taile

d d

esc

rip

tion

s o

f p

roje

ct a

lign

me

nts

, d

esi

gn

ph

iloso

ph

y an

d o

the

r

cha

ract

eri

stic

s Id

entif

ies

yea

r o

f p

roje

ct c

on

stru

ctio

n

Incl

udes

rig

ht-o

f-w

ay,

en

viro

nm

en

tal

miti

gatio

n, d

em

olit

ion

s, u

tility

rel

ocat

ion

Incl

udes

all

soft

-co

sts

(en

gin

ee

rin

g &

de

sig

n,

con

stru

ctio

n m

an

ag

em

en

t, p

roje

ct

ma

na

ge

me

nt,

ins

uran

ce,

test

ing

and

sta

rt-u

p, e

tc.)

• A

ll N

atio

na

l D

ata

ba

se c

ost

s h

ave

bee

n co

nve

rte

d t

o a

co

mm

on

$1

99

8 b

ase

line

usi

ng F

TA

's

Tra

nsi

t C

apita

l C

ost

Pri

ce I

nd

ex

de

velo

pe

d b

y B

oo

z•A

IIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

Inc

.

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.1-

2 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

In

c.

Page 39: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

apita

l U

nit C

osts

SA

MP

LE

UN

IT C

OS

TS

FO

R S

YS

TE

MS

, S

TA

TIO

NS

AN

D V

EH

ICL

ES

AS

US

ED

FO

R T

HE

MT

A A

ND

IN

DE

PE

ND

EN

T C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

S

DR

AF

T U

NIT

CA

PIT

AL

CO

ST

S-Gu

i"'0'"

'~

Rou

te F

eet

NA

N

ot A

vaila

ble

Rou

te F

eet

NA

$2

,460

Rou

te F

eet

$6,5

00

$650

0 R

oute

Fee

t $6

,125

$3

,750

Rou

te F

eet

$3,5

00

$3,5

00

Rou

te F

eet

$1

-Cu

t &

Co

ver

Rou

te F

eet

$12,

000

$8,5

00

Rou

te F

ee

t

-Tu

nn

el

Rou

te F

eet

$10,

000

Not

Ava

ilabl

e R

oute

Fee

t $1

0,30

0

Rou

te F

eet

$6,5

00

$3,5

00

Rou

te F

eet

$5,5

00

$4,5

00

NA

$2

50,0

00

Eac

h N

A

$180

,000

Rou

te F

eet

$4

20

-$5

75

$

42

0-$

48

0

Tra

ck F

eet

$675

$

14

0-$

26

0

Fac

ilitie

s IB

uild

inQ

I

$2,0

00,0

00

$25,

000,

000

Rev

. V

ehic

le

$7,7

00,0

00

$650

,000

Lum

p S

um

to

to

Tra

ck F

eet

$440

$1

60

$50,

000,

000

$35,

000,

000

Rev

. V

ehic

le

$157

,000

$4

2,00

0

* N

atio

nal a

vera

ges

base

d on

exp

erie

nce

of

othe

r U

S t

rans

it op

erat

ors

t D

raft

cost

est

imat

es -

estim

ates

cur

rent

ly u

nd

er

revi

ew

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.1-

3 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 40: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• P

eer

Rev

iew

of C

apita

l U

nit

Cos

ts

UN

IT C

OS

TS

FO

R S

YS

TE

MS

, S

TA

TIO

NS

AN

D V

EH

ICL

ES

AS

US

ED

FO

R T

HE

MT

A A

ND

IN

DE

PE

ND

EN

T C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

S

DR

AF

T U

NIT

CA

PIT

AL

CO

ST

S-

Ro

ute

Fe

et

$2

58

$

29

6

Ro

ute

Fe

et

$6

60

$

37

0

Ro

ute

Fe

et

$1

,50

0

$2

30

R

ou

te F

ee

t $

18

0

$8

3

Sta

tion

$

75

0,0

00

$

24

0,0

00

S

tatio

n

$1

,00

0,0

00

$

13

0,0

00

Sta

tion

s IA

t-G

rad

e

I S

tatio

n

$3

6,0

00

,00

0

$3

,50

0,0

00

S

tatio

n

$1

8,0

00

,00

0

$1

.13

5.0

00

Sta

tion

$

65

,00

0,0

00

N

A

Sta

tion

Sta

tion

$

30

,00

0,0

00

$

7,5

00

,00

0

Sta

tion

Sta

tion

$

35

,00

0,0

00

$

28

,70

0,0

00

S

tatio

n

$2

4,0

00

,00

0

$2

1,0

00

,00

0

Sta

tion

$

20

,00

0,0

00

N

A

Sta

tion

$

18

,50

0,0

00

N

A

Sp

ace

$3

,161

$

3,0

00

S

o a

ce

$5

.50

0

$2

.43

7

Ea

ch

$5

,00

0,0

00

N

ot

Ava

ilab

le

s S

tatio

n

$1

,50

0,0

00

S

tatio

n

$3

oo

,oo

o

I $

35

,15

7

icle

s I R

eve

nu

e V

eh

icle

s (''

LA"

Ve

hic

le)

I Rev

. V

eh

icle

N

A

$3

,20

0,0

00

R

ev.

Ve

hic

le

NA

l

$2

Rev

. V

eh

icle

N

A

$2

,40

0,0

00

R

ev.

Ve

hic

le

NA

En

viro

nm

en

tal

!Ha

zard

ou

s W

ast

e H

an

dlin

g

I Ro

ute

Fe

et

$5

00

-$1

I 00

0

$2

00

R

ou

te F

ee

t $

10

0

I $

10

0

* N

atio

na

l ave

rag

es

ba

sed

on

exp

eri

en

ce o

f o

the

r U

S t

ran

sit

op

era

tors

t D

raft

co

st e

stim

ate

s -

est

ima

tes

curr

en

tly u

nd

er

revi

ew

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.1

-4

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 41: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

apita

l U

nit C

osts

SO

FT

-CO

ST

AS

A P

ER

CE

NT

OF

HA

RD

-CO

ST

S A

ND

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

FA

CT

OR

S

DR

AF

T U

NIT

CA

PIT

AL

CO

ST

S-

So

ft C

ost

an

d C

on

tin

aen

of

8.0%

6.

5%

Tot

al

2.5

%

2.5%

-

"Art

for

Tra

nsit"

-S

tatio

n A

rtw

ork

Har

d 0.

5%

NA

Pro

fess

iona

l Ser

vice

s C

osts

t 30

%-4

5%

22%

to

25%

Con

tinge

ncie

s G

uide

way

s &

Str

uctu

res

Per

cent

1

0%

-12

%

10

%-1

2%

Haz

ardo

us W

aste

Han

dlin

g o

f 1

0%

-12

%

10

%-1

2%

Sta

tions

T

otal

1

2%

-17

%

12

%-1

7%

Cos

t 8

%-1

0%

8

%-1

0%

ns,

Insu

ranc

e I

by

10%

10

%

Ca

teg

ory

+

10%

10

%

Pro

fess

iona

l Ser

vice

s I

10%

10

%

* N

atio

nal a

vera

ges

base

d on

exp

erie

nce

of o

ther

US

tra

nsit

oper

ator

s

t T

otal

har

d co

sts

incl

ude

cost

s fo

r al

l gu

idew

ay,

trac

kwor

k, s

tatio

ns,

syst

ems,

veh

icle

s, f

acili

ties

and

othe

r "h

ard

"

asse

ts

+R

an

ge

s re

flect

the

deg

ree

of c

ompl

etio

n/de

sign

(i.e

., co

ntin

genc

y fa

ctor

dec

lines

as

a pr

ojec

t be

com

es m

ore

defin

ed).

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.1-

5 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 42: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

App

roac

h to

Dev

elop

men

t o

f Ope

ratin

g &

Ma

inte

na

nce

Cos

ts

OP

ER

AT

ING

AN

D M

AIN

TE

NA

NC

E (

O&

M)

CO

ST

S F

OR

EA

CH

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

HA

VE

BE

EN

D

EV

EL

OP

ED

US

ING

MT

A'S

EX

IST

ING

O&

M C

OS

T M

OD

EL

• O

&M

Mod

el d

evel

oped

usi

ng M

TA

's d

etai

led

budg

et (

appr

ox.

700

line

item

s)

• M

TA

's O

&M

mod

el p

rovi

ded

the

flexi

bilit

y re

quire

d to

ana

lyze

the

co

st im

pact

s of

in

depe

nden

t cha

nges

in s

ervi

ce l

evel

s fo

r th

e R

ed L

ine,

Blu

e Li

ne,

Gre

en L

ine

and

bus

syst

em.

• B

udge

t le

vel d

etai

l per

mitt

ed a

naly

sis

of O

&M

cos

t im

pact

s re

sulti

ng f

rom

new

tech

nolo

gies

(e.

g.,

new

fare

box

syst

ems)

• M

odel

was

rec

alib

rate

d to

the

FY

1998

bud

get

• A

naly

sis

of th

e O

&M

cos

ts f

or e

ach

alte

rnat

ive

used

inp

ut d

ata

deri

ved

from

th

e

alte

rnat

ive'

s op

erat

ing

plan

and

tra

vel

dem

and

anal

ysis

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.1

-6

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 43: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

en 1-_. ::J en w a: l­en 0

N(.) •

M(!l ><Z --Cl-z<C wa: a.w a. a. <CO

c z <C _. <C 1--a. <C (.)

Page 44: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• A

ltern

ativ

e C

apita

l and

Ope

ratin

g C

osts

CA

PIT

AL

AN

D O

PE

RA

TIN

G C

OS

TS

,---

----

----

T--.

,

-. .. ..

. · ·

.. -·

' '

·j-

' · "

" ,,

' ·-'

,,, '"·

· ' ·-

''''I "w

' ·~;

~'t*h

<i:i!;

J\t.;I

\"L+'

K+~

t~f'

~eit

'1\ri5

ffii\W

~JI~l~~

~;!:

\'i;

t:tct:'r'iMIIe

Ea

stsi

de

E1

S

usp

ende

d R

ed

Uni

on S

tatio

n e

ast

I

3.6

2 I $

92

2.6

l$7

39

.9l$

79

4.9

l$2

54

.9l$

20

4.4

l$2

19

.6l

$10.

5 Li

ne

to F

irsV

Lore

na

Red

Lin

e 2

Sta

tion

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

I

1.92

I$

48

1.1

I$3

85

.0I$

41

4.8

I$2

50

.6I$

20

0.5

I$2

16

.0I

$3

.4

Ext

ensi

on

Ch

ave

z I

Sot

o E

2

Bu

swa

y-A

t-G

rade

U

nion

Sta

tion

to

I 5.

9 I

$8

8.2

I $6

8.2

I $

70

.4 I

$1

4.9

I $

11.6

I $

11.9

I

$15.

5 (w

ith b

ranc

hing

W

hitt

ier

& A

tlant

ic

E4

*

rout

es)

Ligh

t R

ail -

At-

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

I

5.9

I $4

30

.9 I

$35

1.31

$3

71

.0 I

$7

3.0

I $

59.5

I $

62.9

I

$9

.9

Gra

de

W

hitt

ier

& A

tlant

ic

E5

*

Ligh

t R

ail

-A

t-U

nion

Sta

tion

sout

h 1

0.4

1

$6

3.4

1 $

41

.8 1

$53

.1

1 $15

1.0

I $9

9.5

I $12

6.41

$

0.2

G

rad

e

to L

ittle

To

kyo

E

6

Su

spe

nd

ed

Red

W

ilshi

re &

Wes

tern

1

2.6

1 $6

07

.4l$

47

1.6

l$4

89

.3l$

23

7.3

l$1

84

.2l$

19

1.1

l $

4.4

Li

ne

to P

ico

& S

an

Wes

tsid

e W

1

Vic

ente

S

ub

wa

y R

ed L

ine

Be

low

gra

de t

v 3

.17

$8

59.7

$

68

4.0

$7

33

.6 $

27

1.2

$2

15

.8 $

231.

41

$6

.5

Wils

hire

W

4

W2

* B

usw

ay

Exp

ositi

on .

18

.5

$2

64

.3

$316

.1

$231

.1

$14.

3 $1

7.1

$12.

5 I

$1

4.7

W

3*

!Lig

ht R

ail

!Exp

ositi

on

1 18

* C

ost

estim

ates

for

thes

e op

tions

do

not

incl

ude

exte

nsiv

e an

alys

is o

f co

ndem

natio

n a

nd

/or

miti

gatio

n re

quire

men

ts.

Act

ual

deve

lopm

ent

cost

s m

ay b

e hi

gher

.

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.2-

1 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

Inc

.

Page 45: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• A

ltern

ativ

e C

apita

l an

d O

pera

ting

Cos

ts

CA

PIT

AL

AN

D O

PE

RA

TIN

G C

OS

TS""

" C

on

tin

ued

V3

*

V2

l~vdPmwirte B

us

B5

Red

Lin

e E

xte

nsi

on 'N

ort

h H

olly

wo

od

to

1-40

5 1-

405

Bu

swa

y

Ligh

t R

ail

Exp

an

de

d R

apid

B

us N

etw

ork

(I

nclu

des

Rap

id

Bus

Ba

se R

ou

tes

plus

ad

diti

on

al

rout

es. C

ost

s ar

e in

ad

ditio

n to

th

ose

in

clu

de

d in

th

e h

igh

Wa

rne

r C

en

ter

to

No

rth

Ho

llyw

oo

d

Red

Lin

e S

tatio

n W

arn

er

Ce

nte

r to

N

ort

h H

olly

wo

od

R

ed L

ine

Sta

tion

14

I $17

3.0

l$1

40

.81$

143.

81 $

12.4

I $

10.1

I $

10.3

I $

14.0

13.8

I $

1,12

61$8

78.4

1$93

4.51

$81

.6 I

$3

4.6

I $

67.7

I $

22.6

338

.5 I

$22

1.41

$19

9.21

$20

6. 9

1 $0

.7 I

$0

.6

I $0

.6 I

$60.

0

* C

ost

est

ima

tes

for

the

se o

ptio

ns

do

no

t in

clu

de

ext

en

sive

an

aly

sis

of c

on

de

mn

atio

n a

nd

/or

miti

ga

tion

req

uire

men

ts.

Act

ual

de

velo

pm

en

t co

sts

ma

y be

hig

he

r.

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.2

-2

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 46: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Rev

iew

of C

apita

l Cos

ts

DE

TA

ILE

D C

AP

ITA

L C

OS

TS

HA

VE

BE

EN

DE

VE

LO

PE

D F

OR

EA

CH

OF

TH

E P

RO

JEC

T

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S

• •

Fo

r m

ost

cap

ital

item

s, M

T A

co

sts

we

re n

ot s

ign

ifica

ntly

diff

eren

t fro

m t

he

nat

iona

l a

vera

ge

(whe

n ad

just

ed t

o L

A p

rice

leve

ls)

• S

igni

fican

t ex

cept

ions

to

thi

s o

bse

rva

tion

in

clu

de.

the

fol

low

ing

ass

et t

ypes

:

Sta

tions

Veh

icle

s C

om

mu

nic

atio

ns

Sig

na

ge

and

Gra

ph

ics

Pro

ject

So

ft-C

ost

s

• E

ach

of t

he

se it

em

s of

fers

th

e p

oten

tial f

or

pro

ject

co

st s

avi

ng

s -

in t

he

ca

se o

f st

atio

ns,

veh

icle

s an

d so

ft-c

osts

, th

ese

sa

vin

gs

ma

y be

sig

nific

ant:

Sta

tions

/o t

o 4

0°/o

1 O

o/o t

o 15

°/o

Veh

icle

s 1 0

°/o t

o 2

5°/o

1 0

°/o t

o 15

°/o

Sof

t-C

osts

20

°/o

to 3

0°/o

30

°/o

to 4

5°/o

• T

he

tota

l co

st s

avin

gs a

ttai

nabl

e fr

om t

he

se a

reas

is c

aptu

red

by t

he

"B

est

Est

ima

tes"

Cos

ts

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.2-

3 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 47: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• A

chie

ving

Pot

entia

l Cos

t Sa

vin

gs-

Sta

tions

and

Veh

icle

s

BO

OZ

·AL

LE

N A

ND

PE

ER

-GR

OU

P A

NA

LY

SIS

ID

EN

TIF

IED

BO

TH

ST

AT

ION

AN

D V

EH

ICL

E C

OS

TS

AS

HIG

HE

R T

HA

N A

VE

RA

GE

Veh

icle

s •

Veh

icle

cos

ts m

ight

be

redu

ced

thro

ugh

the

use

of p

erfo

rman

ce s

peci

ficat

ion

whi

ch

faci

litat

es t

he u

se o

f "o

ff th

e sh

elf"

tec

hnol

ogy

• P

eer

revi

ew t

eam

mem

bers

iden

tifie

d M

T A

as

havi

ng s

peci

ficat

ion

requ

irem

ents

whi

ch a

re

cons

ider

ably

mor

e st

renu

ous

than

the

ind

ustr

y av

erag

e

• G

iven

the

se r

equi

rem

ents

, M

T A

has

pai

d pe

r ve

hicl

e co

sts

whi

ch a

re 1

0°/o

to

25°/

o hi

gher

th

an t

he i

ndus

try

aver

age

for

sim

ilar

vehi

cles

Sta

tions

Sim

ilarly

, th

e pe

er r

evie

w g

roup

sug

gest

ed t

he s

tatio

n co

sts

mig

ht b

e re

duce

d by

:

Cre

atin

g a

stan

dard

ized

sta

tion

desi

gn

Util

izin

g le

ss a

men

ities

tha

n tr

aditi

onal

MT

A s

tatio

n fa

cilit

ies

Bui

ldin

g sm

alle

r st

atio

ns

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.2-

4 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

Inc

.

Page 48: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

. • •

Ach

ievi

ng P

oten

tial C

ost S

avin

gs-

Sof

t-C

osts

A V

AR

IET

Y O

F O

PT

ION

S E

XIS

T T

O R

ED

UC

E P

RO

JEC

T S

OF

T C

OS

TS

• "L

earn

ing

by D

oing

" -c

ap

ita

l de

velo

pmen

t co

sts

tend

to

decl

ine

as a

genc

ies

expa

nd

thei

r ra

il ne

twor

ks

Dec

reas

ed c

osts

ref

lect

red

uced

des

ign

need

s an

d in

crea

sed

agen

cy c

onst

ruct

ion

expe

rienc

e D

evel

opm

ent

cost

s fo

r th

e R

ed L

ine

exte

nsio

n to

Nor

th H

olly

woo

d ar

e le

ss th

an

that

for

the

initi

al R

ed L

ine

segm

ent

Infla

tion

adju

sted

cap

ital c

osts

for

Was

hing

ton

Met

ro (

WM

AT

A}

decr

ease

d by

be

twee

n 25

°/o

and

33°/

o ov

er th

e pe

riod

197 4

and

198

8 du

ring

whi

ch W

MA

T A

co

nstr

ucte

d 1 0

rai

l se

gmen

ts

• D

esi

gn

-Bu

ild

Use

of t

urnk

ey c

ontr

actin

g by

US

ope

rato

rs is

yie

ldin

g co

st s

avin

gs to

spo

nsor

ing

agen

cies

T

he h

ighe

st c

ost

sav

ings

orig

inat

e fr

om r

educ

tions

in t

he

tim

e re

quire

d to

com

plet

e pr

ojec

t de

velo

pmen

t T

he c

apita

l cos

ting

team

will

pro

vide

ord

er o

f m

agni

tude

est

imat

es o

f the

pot

entia

l co

st s

avin

gs

SA

VIN

GS

ID

EN

TIF

IED

TH

RO

UG

H T

HIS

PR

OC

ES

S W

ER

E A

PP

LIE

D T

O "

BE

ST

ES

TIM

AT

E"

CO

ST

S

nr:r

:' ··

:·''

·. :•

nsi

t A

ltcr

n;J

1 i• <

:s !

' n:'l

ly·

i:;

!\n

nr

r . ..

_).

f llo

o:-·

· ··l

ien

.'~ H

:!l'

~ilton ln

r..

Page 49: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

. • •

Lear

ning

by

Doi

ng ..

.

PR

OJE

CT

UN

IT C

OS

TS

TE

ND

TO

DE

CL

INE

WH

EN

NE

W S

EG

ME

NT

S A

RE

AD

DE

D T

O A

N

EX

IST

ING

RA

IL N

ET

WO

RK

{I.E

., R

EL

AT

IVE

TO

TH

E I

NIT

IAL

NE

TW

OR

K IN

VE

ST

ME

NT

)

• A

var

iety

of

fact

ors

cont

ribut

e to

thi

s co

st d

ecre

ase

incl

udin

g:

Red

uced

des

ign

cost

s (c

ompo

nent

s on

ly n

eed

to b

e de

sign

ed o

nce)

In

crea

sed

agen

cy p

rocu

rem

ent,

proj

ect

and

cons

truc

tion

man

agem

ent

expe

rien

ce

Sup

plie

r ag

reem

ents

(re

fined

thr

ough

suc

cess

ive

proc

urem

ents

) O

ne t

ime

cost

s (c

ontr

ol c

ente

r, a

dmin

, re

venu

e co

untin

g)

• M

T A

may

ach

ieve

sim

ilar

redu

ctio

ns in

cos

t sa

ving

s by

lear

ning

fro

m p

ast

proj

ects

Per

form

mos

t co

nstr

uctio

n m

anag

emen

t in

-hou

se u

sing

MT

A s

taff

Li

mit

cont

ract

ing

of c

onst

ruct

ion

ma

na

ge

me

nt

dutie

s to

spe

cial

ized

are

as s

uch

as

geot

echn

ical

and

adv

ance

d sy

stem

s B

id m

ore

engi

neer

ing

and

desi

gn w

ork

on a

com

petit

ive

basi

s to

gre

ater

num

ber

of s

mal

l, sp

ecia

lty c

ontr

acto

rs

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.2-

6 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

In

c.

Page 50: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

' • •

• D

esi

gn

-Bu

ild (

Tur

nkey

)

US

E O

F D

ES

IGN

-BU

ILD

CO

NT

RA

CT

ING

CA

N R

ED

UC

E P

RO

JEC

T C

AP

ITA

L C

OS

TS

BY

5°/o

TO

10

°/ot

(H

IGH

ER

FO

R D

BO

M-

DE

SIG

N/B

UIL

D/O

PE

RA

TE

/MA

INT

AIN

)

• U

nder

a D

esi

gn

-Bu

ild c

ontr

act,

a s

ingl

e co

ntra

ctor

com

plet

es t

he f

inal

des

ign,

co

nstr

uctio

n, s

yste

ms

proc

urem

ent

and

star

t-up

/tes

ting

of th

e fu

ll pr

ojec

t

• 0

/B r

educ

es c

osts

thr

ough

the

fol

low

ing

mec

hani

sms:

S

ched

ule

com

pres

sion

and

red

uced

pri

ce e

scal

atio

n re

duce

d fu

ndin

g co

nstr

aint

s el

imin

atio

n o

f ta

sk s

eque

ncin

g bu

ffer

s ov

erla

ppin

g o

f se

quen

tial t

ask

s (w

here

pos

sibl

e)

Red

uced

con

stru

ctio

n m

an

ag

em

en

t an

d ad

min

istr

ativ

e co

sts

shor

ter

proj

ect

dura

tion

few

er c

ontr

act

inte

rfac

es t

o c

oord

inat

e In

crea

sed

effic

ienc

ies

of

a si

ngle

con

trac

tor

cons

olid

ated

PM

fun

ctio

ns

pool

ing

of r

isks

(pe

rfor

man

ce b

onds

, in

sura

nce)

m

ore

effe

ctiv

e ut

iliza

tion

of

labo

r (r

educ

ed d

ownt

ime

and

de

lay

clai

ms)

R

educ

ed i

ncen

tive

for

desi

gn a

nd d

elay

cla

ims

lead

s to

red

uced

con

tinge

ncy

requ

irem

ents

1 B

ase

d o

n B

AH

rese

arch

for

FTA

an

d 'P

asad

ena

Tu

rnke

y Im

plem

enta

tion

An

aly

sis"

repo

rt p

rep

are

d fo

r M

TA

by

BA

H J

anua

ry,

1996

.

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.2-

7 ·

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 51: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• D

esi

gn

-Bu

ild C

ost

Sav

ings

ES

TIM

AT

ED

CO

ST

SA

VIN

GS

FR

OM

A D

ES

IGN

-BU

ILD

PR

OC

UR

EM

EN

T B

Y F

UN

CT

ION

(A

S A

P

ER

CE

NT

OF

TO

TA

L P

RO

JEC

T C

AP

ITA

L C

OS

TS

)

(PE

RC

EN

T O

F T

OT

AL

CA

PIT

AL

CO

ST

S)

• • • • • •

Red

uced

Esc

alat

ion

Red

uced

Con

stru

ctio

n M

an

ag

em

en

t C

osts

R

educ

ed M

T A

Pro

ject

Adm

inis

trat

ion

Eco

nom

ies

of

Sca

le

Red

uced

Con

tinge

ncy

Add

ed C

onsu

ltant

and

Leg

al S

up

po

rt

CA

PIT

AL

CO

ST

SA

VIN

GS

• O

&M

Co

st S

avin

gs

O&

M A

ND

CA

PIT

AL

CO

ST

SA

VIN

GS

De

sig

n-B

uild

D

BO

M

2.75

2.

75

1.63

·4

.88

0.75

1.

3 '0

.75

1.38

0.

75

0.75

(1

.00)

(1

.00)

6.25

°/o

9.50

°/o

0.00

11

.88

6.25

o/o

21.3

8o/o

TH

ES

E E

ST

IMA

TE

S O

F D

/B C

OS

T S

AV

ING

S M

AY

BE

CO

NS

ER

VA

TIV

E-

MA

RY

LA

ND

MT

A IS

E

XP

EC

TIN

G H

IGH

ER

OV

ER

AL

L S

AV

ING

S F

OR

IT

S D

ES

IGN

-BU

ILD

LR

T E

XT

EN

SIO

N P

RO

JEC

TS

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.2-

8 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 52: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• R

evie

w o

f O&

M C

osts

TH

E O

&M

CO

ST

MO

DE

L'S

INP

UT

, O

UT

PU

T A

ND

PA

RA

ME

TE

R S

ET

TIN

GS

HA

VE

BE

EN

R

EV

IEW

ED

FO

R R

EA

SO

NA

BIL

ITY

AN

D A

CC

UR

AC

Y

• O

&M

cos

ting

team

has

ver

ified

the

rec

alib

rate

d of

the

MT

A O

&M

mod

el

• T

he O

&M

cos

ting

team

has

ass

esse

d th

e r

easo

nabi

lity

of th

e m

od

el's

inte

rnal

cos

t pa

ram

eter

s (e

.g.,

for

fuel

, w

ages

, st

affin

g ra

tes,

etc

.) a

gain

st in

9ust

ry s

tand

ards

Mod

el e

stim

ates

are

con

side

red

reas

onab

le g

iven

the

mod

es,

netw

ork

stru

ctur

e an

d se

rvic

e le

vels

pro

pose

d C

onfid

ence

in t

he m

od

el's

pre

dict

ive

accu

racy

• T

he O

&M

cos

ting

team

has

ver

ified

the

mod

el p

aram

eter

set

tings

for

each

alte

rnat

ive

to e

nsur

e th

ey

accu

rate

ly r

efle

ct th

e al

tern

ativ

e's

serv

ice

ch

ara

cte

risti

cs-

incl

udin

g nu

mbe

r of

veh

icle

s,

reve

nue

mile

s,. s

ervi

ce h

ours

, un

it co

sts

and

othe

r in

put v

alue

s

• T

he O

&M

tea

m h

as a

sses

sed

the

reas

onab

ility

of

mod

el o

utpu

t fo

r ea

ch a

ltern

ativ

e

Mod

el o

utpu

t is

con

side

red

reas

onab

le

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

3.2-

9 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

Inc

.

Page 53: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

en w > -1-<( z a:

~w )(1--...J C<( z U. · wo a. a.z <(Q -1-

<( ::l ...J <( > w

Page 54: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

,... ·en ~::::l ~m cc z_ • we.

'• \

C.<( c.. a: <(

~•

Page 55: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

' • •

• In

trod

uctio

n

TH

IS S

EC

TIO

N S

UM

MA

RIZ

ES

TH

E C

OM

PO

NE

NT

S O

F T

HE

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S A

NA

LY

SIS

--T

HE

P

RE

SE

NT

AT

ION

IN E

AC

H A

PP

EN

DIX

SU

B-S

EC

TIO

N G

EN

ER

AL

LY

FO

LL

OW

S T

HIS

FO

RM

AT

• T

he s

ectio

n st

arts

with

a d

escr

iptio

n of

the

mod

al t

ypes

and

alig

nmen

ts e

xam

ined

in e

ach

corr

idor

• N

ext

is a

sum

mar

y ev

alua

tion

of th

e co

rrid

or a

ltern

ativ

es'

perf

orm

ance

, im

plem

enta

tion

dura

tion

and

cost

usi

ng M

T A

his

toric

al c

ost

data

, as

wel

l as

a s

umm

ary

of e

ach

alte

rnat

ive'

s ph

ysic

al d

escr

iptio

n an

d op

erat

ing

char

acte

rist

ics

• E

ach

corr

idor

sec

tion

then

loo

ks a

t ea

ch a

ltern

ativ

e in

divi

dual

ly a

nd i

nclu

des

an a

lignm

ent

map

, th

e al

tern

ativ

e's

phys

ical

and

ope

ratin

g ch

arac

teris

tics,

str

engt

hs a

nd w

eakn

esse

s,

and

a de

taile

d co

st b

reak

dow

n

• T

he c

urre

nt s

tatu

s of

eac

h al

tern

ativ

e in

the

cor

ridor

is s

umm

ariz

ed n

ext,

follo

wed

by

a de

taile

d im

plem

enta

tion

sche

dule

for

eac

h al

tern

ativ

e

• T

ier

1 an

d T

ier

2 P

erfo

rman

ce G

oals

are

sum

mar

ized

for

eac

h al

tern

ativ

e, f

ollo

wed

by

deta

iled

Per

form

ance

Mea

sure

s th

at s

uppo

rt e

ach

Per

form

ance

Goa

l

• T

he s

ub-s

ectio

n en

ds w

ith d

etai

led

back

up s

uppo

rt f

or t

he a

naly

sis

of c

omm

unity

impa

cts

and

tran

sit

depe

nden

ce

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4-1

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 56: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• R

apid

Bu

s

TH

E C

OU

NT

YW

IDE

RA

PID

BU

S S

YS

TE

M I

NC

LU

DE

S A

NU

MB

ER

OF

FE

AT

UR

ES

WH

ICH

CA

N B

E

US

ED

TO

DIF

FE

RE

NT

IAT

E A

ND

SP

EE

D U

P B

US

SE

RV

ICE

• T

he R

apid

Bus

net

wor

k is

int

ende

d to

pro

vide

hig

h qu

ality

, hi

gh s

peed

ser

vice

thr

ough

a

com

bina

tion

of li

mite

d st

op s

ervi

ce a

nd s

igna

l pr

iorit

y

• R

apid

Bus

inc

lude

s: v

ehic

les

with

a d

iffer

ent

look

from

oth

er b

uses

in t

he f

leet

(e.

g.,

gold

st

anda

rd);

veh

icle

s w

ith a

dditi

onal

tec

hnol

ogy

com

pone

nts

(e.g

., si

gnal

pre

empt

ion)

; di

amon

d la

ne o

pera

tion

durin

g pe

ak h

ours

; jo

int

use

tran

sit

cent

ers

at k

ey lo

catio

ns

• R

apid

Bus

veh

icle

s co

uld

func

tion

diff

eren

tly th

an t

he s

tand

ard

fleet

and

cou

ld i

nclu

de lo

w

floor

and

art

icul

ated

bus

es

• C

riter

ia f

or s

elec

tion

of p

riorit

y ra

pid

bus

rout

es s

houl

d in

clud

e:

Tra

nsit

depe

nden

t co

rrid

ors

Maj

or h

igh

spee

d tr

ansi

t co

nnec

tions

P

riorit

y co

mm

unity

ser

vice

due

to s

uspe

nded

or

defe

rred

rai

l pr

ojec

ts

• Im

plem

enta

tion

is p

ossi

ble

in t

he v

ery

near

term

: In

itiat

e th

ree

dem

onst

ratio

n lin

es o

ver

the

next

12

mon

ths

and

mon

itor

thei

r pe

rfor

man

ce t

hrou

gh F

Y20

01

Exp

and

reas

onab

le c

ount

ywid

e ne

twor

k in

acc

orda

nce

with

a lo

ng r

ange

pla

n C

ould

ser

ve to

foc

us r

ider

ship

on

pote

ntia

l fu

ture

fix

ed g

uide

way

cor

ridor

s

TH

E I

ND

IVID

UA

L C

OM

PO

NE

NT

S O

F T

HE

RA

PID

BU

S P

RO

GR

AM

CO

UL

D B

E I

MP

LE

ME

NT

ED

IN

F

UL

L O

R P

AR

T

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.1-

1 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 57: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

l.

\

..Jc <tw i=c zz W<t f-a. 0>< a.w

(J)~ :::la: mo 5!;: O.f­<tw a:z

LL C\1

I

·-

Page 58: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• R

apid

Bu

s

A C

OU

NT

YW

IDE

RA

PID

BU

S A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

E IS

BI;

ING

CO

NS

IDE

RE

D T

O E

NH

AN

CE

RE

GIO

NA

L

BU

S S

ER

VIC

E.

TH

E F

EA

TU

RE

S O

F T

HIS

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

IN

CL

UD

E L

IMIT

ED

ST

OP

, S

IGN

AL

P

RIO

RIT

IZA

TIO

N A

ND

PE

AK

HO

UR

DE

DIC

AT

ED

LA

NE

S W

HE

RE

AV

AIL

AB

LE

• A

pot

entia

l ra

pid

bus

netw

ork

coul

d in

clud

e th

e fo

llow

ing

rout

es ..

.

·, t,

.. · .... )

;Vt

,t··.

·;.( 1·

~a·t

>Sl:

~f.~

lif£ ""

'· ' ,,.,

" iJt"

'''~i

· . '' ')

l:~'PJ

,!?iC(

~~;

. {{

' .·;.~~~~

~Jj:i:. ~~~~

~l l~~~~~~

~t;'i, ~~w

~~-t~~

~~ ~tt&;:

r;r.t:

<"><);

I ' "'

'·')-~{~

"-~t~~i~

~ :::::

rra

nsir

'r: 7Average

~·il ... ; :

·;·;._ Ra

~id '8

1.1~ •

• i<·:~:'

-~~~k{

~~,?~~

~ZS,

. . .. ,. Limi

ts

• ··:.

?<t::~·

l;'' '"~*

'i'i'~ j§

J,~.~,~

~~~~""

:r1;;ts

peec

i;·

1

Bus

es·

:.· en

tenb

· '''t:ength

V~

1.

Ga

rve

y A

ve.

El M

onte

Bus

way

-LA

CB

D

13

16

15.9

15

.6

2.

Cha

vez

I V

enic

e M

onte

rey

Pa

rk-

San

ta M

onic

a 30

48

1

24.4

16

.2

3.

Atla

ntic

Blv

d.

Pas

aden

a -

Art

esia

Blu

e Li

ne S

tatio

n 16

19

26

.7

15.9

4.

Col

orad

o B

lvd.

P

asa

de

na

-H

olly

woo

d 15

26

18

.2

16.5

5.

Whi

ttie

r I

Wils

hire

C

ity o

f Com

mer

ce -

San

ta M

onic

a 43

47

1

23.7

16

.6

6.

Flo

renc

e B

lvd

. Lo

s A

ngel

es I

nter

natio

nal A

irpor

t -W

hitt

ier

16

31

1 27

.9

31.6

7.

Long

Bea

ch B

lvd.

LA

CB

D -

Long

Bea

ch

20

38

22.4

17

8.

San

Fer

nand

o R

d.

LAC

BD

-S

ylm

ar

Tra

nsit

Cen

ter

15

30

25

.1

19.8

9.

Van

Nuy

s B

lvd.

S

ylm

ar T

rans

it C

en

ter-

Wes

twoo

d/U

CLA

14

19

1

23.0

17

.9

10.

Ros

coe

Blv

d.

Red

Lin

e N

orth

Hol

lyw

ood

Sta

tion

-W

arne

r C

ente

r 12

15

22

.7

25.3

11.

Ven

tura

Blv

d.

Red

Lin

e U

nive

rsal

City

Sta

tion

-W

arne

r C

ente

r 14

19

1

18.2

21

.8

Bra

nch

Line

to

Cal

Sta

te N

orth

ridge

Via

Res

eda

Blv

d.

12.

San

ta M

onic

a B

lvd.

LA

CB

D -

San

ta M

onic

a 27

31

1

20.0

15

.6

13.

Wes

tern

Ave

. H

olly

wo

od

-G

reen

Lin

e Im

peria

l/Wilm

ingt

on S

tatio

n 14

20

18

.2

16.1

14.

Ver

mon

t Ave

. H

olly

wo

od

-G

reen

Lin

e V

erm

ont

Ave

. Sta

tion

19

17

12.7

14

.4

15.

Cre

nsh

aw

Blv

d.

Hol

lyw

ood

-S

outh

Bay

Gal

leria

Tra

nsit

Ce

nte

r 10

3

3

21.5

17

.0

16.

Haw

thor

ne B

lvd

. LA

CB

D -

Sou

th B

ay G

alle

ria T

rans

it C

en

ter

14

26

17.9

14

.9

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.1-

2 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

In

c.

Page 59: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• R

apid

Bus

PR

EL

IMIN

AR

Y E

VA

LU

AT

ION

OF

TH

E C

OU

NT

YW

IDE

RA

PID

BU

S A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

HA

S Y

IEL

DE

D

TH

E F

OLL

OW

ING

IN

FO

RM

AT

ION

• T

he im

plem

enta

tion

of t

his

prog

ram

is a

ssum

ed t

o fo

llow

a th

ree

phas

ed a

ppro

ach;

Pha

se 1

is

ant

icip

ated

to

oper

ate

mid

way

thro

ugh

FY

2000

thro

ugh

FY

2001

, P

hase

2 o

pera

tes

mid

way

thro

ugh

FY

2003

and

Pha

se 3

ope

rate

s m

idw

ay th

roug

h F

Y20

05

• U

nder

this

impl

emen

tatio

n sc

hem

e an

d in

flatin

g th

e ca

pita

l an

d op

erat

ing

cost

s w

hich

are

in

1998

dol

lars

res

ults

in a

dditi

onal

com

mitm

ents

thr

ough

the

201

0 pl

anni

ng h

oriz

on:

$147

.8 m

illio

n in

cap

ital

and

$119

.3 m

illio

n in

ope

ratin

g co

sts

thro

ugh

FY

2004

$1

18.9

mill

ion

in c

apita

l an

d $4

78.8

mill

ion

in o

pera

ting

cost

s fr

om F

Y05

to F

Y1

0

TO

TA

L A

VA

ILA

BL

E

LES

S R

AP

ID B

US

CO

ST

S

NE

T R

EM

AIN

ING

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s

$ 5

93

.9

$ 26

7.1

$ 3

26

.8

A4.

1-3

$1

83

0.8

$

59

7.7

$1

233.

1

$2

42

4.7

$

86

4.8

$

15

59

.9

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 60: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

1st T

ier P

1rto

rmsn

c1 M

easu

r"

SY

ST

EM

WID

E A

L T

EA

NA

TIV

E

AL

TE

RN

A T

lVE

-----

Mod

el

No

t ..

MO

BIL

ITY

Rou

te M

II••

I-• ..,-.....,--Oo...,.,-.-!~~-:-,---+---T===j----j "

;:'~

~~=-••

T

nrnM

T,;

p.

O*C

r ...

.

"""""'"

"

Job

A

cc .. e

lbU

ity

~~~~

------

---l~~~~

-~:_

1 ___

37.·~

-~-~~~-

1 __ ... 0

7.,.

, 43

.59

43.3

2 0

.&2%

34

,395

I

11.0

0

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

M

odel

N

ote

a

---

1--

·---

·1··· ·

----

··-··-

--··

--·-

-·· -

-•···-

Ro

ute

Mil•

•• A

cHtio

NII

OM

y Tn

rnM

Trip

l; G

enel

tlle

d

Ma

rtia

l

lACoun~

D.t

yTrl

lmit

Tr

ipo

P.n

:.e

nlo

l To

lol

MO

BIL

ITY

M

ob

lllt

yln

dll

Alle

mot

rv. 1 9

••2

01

0

Spo

cif>

c P

ere.

n

""""""

Ann

uli,

Tr.

n.tl

T

r..,

.&llrn

l

Deer•

•••

Job

Acceeelb~Uty

TR

AN

SIT

DE

PE

ND

EN

CE

T,.

n•U

O

eptn

den

ce

""'"

.ln

dll

co

rnpo

eauo

n .l

ob

AC

CM

itb

llty

ln

dec

CO

ST

EF

FE

CT

IVE

NE

SS

R

EU

AB

IUT

Y

Pro

ject

Uni

t C

otil

l I

Co

tt E

mel

ency

......

..,,.,

I UfeCyc~

c.pw

eo.t

aiiM

•I

O&

MC

osla

iMI .

. lu

rKJC

~eCo

tt S

ub

eld

yiT

rtp

C

oti

/Ua.

.-p.

tTA

I f8

AHt

ITrt

p_

·

Be

n.f

tl H

ow

Fa

lkn

A-l

e p

er M

od

.

~~-~~~~

~-=~~-~~

--~~~-~~

~~~----

--· [~!~

-~-F--=

1= '231

·~-=

~--~~

~=1

;.~~~~

-~~:~

_1=----

=-~~--

me

diu

n.

IO%

klw

TR

AN

SIT

DE

PE

ND

EN

CE

Tr•

n-'1

D

ep

en

de

nce

In

dex

wo ..

o .

. ~~n~~aon

Jo

b A

cc .. elb

lllty

~-·

-----

1-----

-·-·

-··-

-·---

-·-

-·-

---

--

CO

ST

EF

FE

CT

IVE

NE

SS

P

rof.

c:IU

nttC

oat.

c.pilal~~tW•I

0&M=

,_. ..

CoatEmc~

..........

U

feey

de C~t (

Subl

lkty

' I T

ltp

ITit

p

Ufe

Cyc

le

Co

et/U

e.,

Be

ne

ntJ

to..

RE

UA

BIU

TY

Fa

llur•

fb

le p

er M

od

t

·~~-

:--~~~

=J-··

··~r

~.

1 __

._--_-J

•-]-.]-.

--I~

~·---~

~-.-.J

~~~~~~

~=-4f-=

:C~ __ [

.i~~

=c=-•=

l---.

--l-

-.

I e

I e

I ~-=

~-~-=

2n

d T

ier

Per

form

ance

Mea

sure

s

EC

ON

OM

IC

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

AF

ET

Y

Mo

de

l Jo

bs

Gro

ss A

rea

Gro

ss A

rea

Air

Qu

alit

y In

de

x .

Sa

fety

Ind

ex

ALT

ER

NA

TIV

E

No

tes

Job

Sup

port

ed,

Sup

port

ed,

Pro

duct

, P

rodu

ct,

Add

ition

al

No

n T

rans

it P

erce

nt o

l P

ass.

Acc

iden

ts

Pas

s. A

ccid

ents

T

raff

ic A

ccid

en

ls

Ope

ralin

g C

apila

l O

pera

ling

Cap

ilal

Tra

nsit

Veh

icul

ar

NT

VE

p

er

100,

000

pe

r 1

00

,00

0

pe

r 10

0,00

0 S

afet

y In

dex

($98

Mill

ions

) ($

98M

illio

ns)

Em

issi

ons

Em

issi

ons

(kgs

) B

oard

ings

H

ub/T

rain

Mile

s H

ub/T

rain

Mile

s '

Rap

id B

us

B-3

Rap

idbu

s 56

5 5

10

18

.96

25.2

7

7,64

1 24

2,93

2 3

.15%

0.

40

0.06

2.

69

Com

posi

te

EC

ON

OM

IC

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

AF

ET

Y

Mo

de

l Jo

bs

Gro

ss A

rea

Gro

ss A

rea

Air

Qu

alit

y In

de

x S

afe

ty In

de

x A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

N

ote

s Jo

b S

uppo

rted

, S

uppo

rted

, P

rodu

ct,

Pro

duct

, A

ddili

onal

N

on T

rans

il P

ass.

Acc

iden

ts

Pas

s. A

ccid

en

ls

Tra

ffic

Acci~enls

Ope

ratin

g T

ran

sil

Veh

icul

ar

Per

cent

of

pe

r 1

00

,00

0

pe

r 10

0,00

0 p

er

100,

000

Sa

fely

Inde

x C

apita

l O

pera

ting

Cap

ital

Em

issi

ons

Em

issi

ons

(kgs

) N

TV

E

Boa

rdin

gs

Hub

/Tra

in M

iles

Hu

bfr

rain

Mile

s

Rap

id B

us

B-3

Rap

idbu

s ......

• 0

• 0

--~-

()

• 'I

'I

'I

'I

------

----

------

--·

• ..

1-4

F

Page 61: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• R

esul

ts ..

. Sys

tem

wid

e O

ptio

ns

RA

PID

BU

S R

ES

ULT

S F

OR

TH

E S

YS

TE

M-W

IDE

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S I

NC

LU

DE

...

TIE

R 1

ME

AS

UR

ES

Alte

rna

tive

M

odel

Not

e M

ob

ility

T

ran

sit

Re

liab

ility

C

om

mu

nit

y C

ost

Dep

ende

ncy

Imp

act

s E

ffe

ctiv

en

ess

Rap

id B

us

B-3

e

~

ct

ct

a _f

3~pi

g ?

us

TIE

R 2

ME

AS

UR

ES

Alte

rna

tive

M

odel

Not

e E

con

om

ic

Sa

fety

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l

Rap

id B

us

B-3

ct

a

a R

apid

Bus

-----

---

KEY

I -----

I M~ Fa

vora

ble

or H

igh

I 0

I Leas

t F

avor

able

or

Low

I

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.1

-4

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 62: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

CO

ST

ES

TIM

AT

E C

OV

ER

SH

EE

T

PR

OJE

CT

: S

YS

TE

MW

IDE

RA

PID

BU

S

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

2 1

6 L

INE

S

DA

TE

11

/5/9

8 O

F

2 R

EV

. 2

XL

S

$:

19

98

Do

llars

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

MT

AU

NIT

B

AH

UN

IT

MT

A

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

O

TY

P

RIC

E

PR

ICE

U

NIT

C

OS

T

BO

UN

D

CO

ST

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) 0

$0

$0

$0

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

0 $1

,500

,000

N

A

LS

$0

$

0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$0

$

0

$0

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

RA

PID

BU

S S

TA

TIO

N S

TO

PS

38

7 $

50

,00

0

$5

0,0

00

E

A

$1

9,3

50

,00

0

$1

9,3

50

,00

0

$1

9,3

50

,00

0

(tot

al c

ost

pe

r di

rect

iona

l pa

ir in

clud

ing

shel

ters

, pe

de

stri

an

cro

ssw

alk

s, l

ands

capi

ng, l

ight

ing,

sig

nage

, in

form

atio

n k

iosk

s, b

us

pads

)

TR

AN

SIT

CE

NT

ER

S

6 $4

,000

,000

$

4,0

00

,00

0

EA

$

24

,00

0,0

00

$

24

,00

0,0

00

$

24

,00

0,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$4

3,3

50

,00

0

$4

3,3

50

,00

0

$4

3,3

50

,00

0

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL &

YA

RD

CO

ST

S

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

!AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

20

0

$5

4, 1

51

. $

54

,151

V

EH

$

10

,83

0,2

40

$1

0,8

30

,24

0

$1

0,8

30

,24

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$1

0,8

30

,24

0

$1

0,8

30

,24

0

$1

0,8

30

,24

0

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LE

!in

clu

din

g d

iagn

ostic

s, c

ount

ers,

on

bo

ard

G

20

0

$3

82

,50

0

$3

65

,791

E

A

$7

6,5

00

,00

0

$7

3,1

58

,20

0

$7

3,1

58

,20

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICL

E C

OS

T)

$7

6,5

00

,00

0

$7

3,1

58

,20

0

$7

3,1

58

,20

0

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

PR

IOR

ITY

SIG

NA

LIZ

AT

ION

(B

Y I

NT

ER

SE

CT

ION

) 12

55

$25,

000

$2

5,0

00

E

A

$3

1,3

75

,00

0

$3

1,3

75

,00

0

$3

1,3

75

,00

0

UN

IFIE

D F

AR

E S

YS

TE

M (

INC

L R

AIL

CO

ST

S,

EX

CL

BU

S V

EH

.)

$22,

315

,96

0

$2

2,3

15

,96

0

LS

$0

$

0

$0

U

NIF

IED

FA

RE

SY

ST

EM

• B

US

FA

RE

BO

XE

S

20

0

$5

,500

$

5,5

00

V

EH

$

1,1

00

,00

0

$1

,10

0,0

00

$1

,10

0,0

00

U

NIF

IED

FA

RE

SY

ST

EM

·C

AR

D/T

RA

NS

FE

R P

RO

CE

SS

OR

S

20

0

$3

,60

0

$3

,60

0

VE

H

$7

20

,00

0

$7

20

,00

0

$7

20

,00

0

UN

IFIE

D F

AR

E S

YS

TE

M •

PA

RT

S A

ND

SE

RV

ICE

S

1 $

27

3,0

00

$

27

3,0

00

LS

$

27

3,0

00

$

27

3,0

00

$

27

3,0

00

G

PS

IAV

L ·O

N-B

OA

RD

VE

HIC

LE

EQ

UIP

. 0

$2

5,0

00

$

25

,00

0

VE

H

$0

$

0

$0

G

PS

IAV

L ·T

RA

NS

MIS

SIO

N T

OW

ER

S

$3

94

,00

0

$3

94

,00

0

EA

$

0

$0

$

0

GP

SIA

VL

·CE

NT

RA

LC

ON

TR

OL

$

1,8

00

,00

0

$1,8

00

,00

0

EA

$

0

$0

$

0

BU

S D

IAG

NO

ST

ICS

PA

CK

AG

E (

ne

w v

eh

icle

s on

ly)

0 $

5,0

00

$

5,0

00

V

EH

$

0

$0

$

0

ON

-BO

AR

D P

AS

SE

NG

ER

CO

UN

TE

RS

W/

AV

L 0

$2

,50

0

$2,5

00

V

EH

$0

$

0

$0

O

N-B

OA

RD

PA

SS

EN

GE

R C

OU

NT

ER

S W

/0 A

VL

$

7,5

00

$

7,5

00

V

EH

$

0

$0

$

0

PA

SS

EN

GE

R C

OU

NT

ER

SY

ST

EM

SO

FT

WA

RE

$

30

,00

0

$3

0,0

00

R

F

$0

$

0

$0

O

N-B

OA

RD

CA

ME

RA

S

0 $

3,5

00

$

3,5

00

V

EH

$

0

$0

$

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$3

3,4

68

,00

0

$3

3,4

68

,00

0

$3

3,4

68

,00

0

(TO

TA

L• e

sti

MA

TE

oco

st;;

:;;-i9

9F

DO

LL

AR

S· A

,, ,

_ •

.••

, •.

"" .

.. •

·"

•.

• '

'""'·

· :.

><'··.

"'·~~·· <

·'·'"·

• · '"

''''"'

· ::~:

;::::---

:-s1

64~:

wp::

If60

,8o6

,44-

oT -

$1

60

,80

6,4

40

1

No

te:

Exc

lud

es

inve

stm

en

t in

Hig

h T

ech

eq

uip

me

nt

for

exi

stin

g (

2073

veh

icle

) bu

s fle

et;

incl

udes

co

sts

for

E3

Rap

id B

us s

yste

m .

• ·-5F

Page 63: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

P

RO

JEC

T:

SY

ST

EM

WID

E R

AP

ID B

US

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 1

6 L

INE

S

DA

TE

1

1/5

/98

O

F

2 0

RE

V.:

2

0 $

: .

19

88

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$0

$

0

$0

1 B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DL

ING

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

$0

$

0

$0

2)

ST

AT

ION

S

$4

3,3

50

,00

0

$4

3,3

50

,00

0

$4

3,3

50

,00

0

3) M

AIN

YA

RD

AN

D S

HO

P

$1

0,8

30

,24

0

$1

0,8

30

,24

0

$1

0,8

30

,24

0

4) S

YS

TE

MW

IDE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

$

33

,46

8,0

00

$

33

,46

8,0

00

$

33

,46

8,0

00

5)

VE

HIC

LE

S

$7

6,5

00

,00

0

$7

3,1

58

,20

0

$7

3,1

58

,20

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee

pa

ge

2 f

or

de

tails

) $

16

4,1

48

,24

0

$1

60

,80

6,4

40

$

16

0,8

06

,44

0

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.9

%

$4

,76

0,2

99

$

4,6

63

,38

7

$4

,66

3,3

87

7)

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

0.0

%

$0

$0

$

0

8) M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

0.0

%

$0

$0

$

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $

4,7

60

,29

9

$4

,66

3,3

87

$

4,6

63

,38

7

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C)

0.0

%

$0

$0

$

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C

) $

0

$0

$

0

1 0)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D)

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

$0

$0

$

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $

0

$0

$

0

11

) P

RO

F.

SE

RV

ICE

S (

E)

$3

2,3

42

,98

9

$1

5,6

39

,23

7

$2

2,6

16

,34

9

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $

32

,34

2,9

89

$

15

,63

9,2

37

$

22

,61

6,3

49

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

1

2%

$

0

$0

$

0

ITE

M 1

8

12

%

$0

$0

$

0

B)

ITE

M 2

1

0%

$

4,3

35

,00

0

$4

,33

5,0

00

$

4,3

35

,00

0

C)

ITE

M 3

, 4,

& 5

1

0%

$

12

,07

9,8

24

$

11

,74

5,6

44

$

11

,74

5,6

44

D

) IT

EM

6,

7, &

8

10

%

$4

76

,03

0

$4

66

,33

9

$4

66

,33

9

E)

ITE

M 1

0 1

0%

$

0

$0

$

0

F)

ITE

M 1

1 1

0%

$

3,2

34

,29

9

$1

,56

3,9

24

$

2,2

61

,63

5

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $

20

,12

5,1

53

$

18

,11

0,9

06

$

18

,80

8,6

18

[GRA

ND TOTAU

';,~~1998bOLLARS~:;;i~~T~· •..

' • ·

· .,;;

::::~;

. cc•i

,~-f'<

·.

.·-<' <

· +: "

;:, 'l

~J.(

li;·

';<"

""''

''""

·J•;;

: .. ,

:

,,, •:

'tif'.

"/•; '

'"'i0

-"1V

' $

22

1,3

76

,68

0 I r

lt!>$19

9;21

9,97

0:I~!

c$206,894,793

:1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.1-

5 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

-·-

-·-

-·-

-

Page 64: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

CO

ST

ES

TIM

AT

E C

OV

ER

SH

EE

T

PR

OJE

CT

: R

AP

ID B

US

DE

MO

NS

TR

AT

ION

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 2

3 L

INE

S

DA

TE

11

/5/9

8 O

F

2 R

EV

. 2

XLS

$:

1

99

8 D

olla

rs

t:S

TIM

AT

ED

M

TA

UN

IT

BA

H U

NIT

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

T

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

QT

Y

PR

ICE

P

RIC

E

UN

IT

CO

ST

B

OU

ND

C

OS

T

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) 0

$0

$0

$0

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

0 $1

.500

,000

N

A

LS

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$0

$0

$0

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

RA

PID

BU

S S

TA

TIO

N S

TO

PS

65

$5

0,00

0 $5

0,00

0 E

A

$3,2

50,0

00

$3,2

50,0

00

$3,2

50,0

00

(tot

al c

ost

pe

r di

rect

iona

l pai

r in

clud

ing

shel

ters

, ped

estr

ian

cros

swal

ks, l

ands

capi

ng,

light

ing

, sig

nage

, inf

orm

atio

n ki

osks

, b

us

pads

)

TR

AN

SIT

CE

NT

ER

S

1 $4

,000

,000

$4

,000

,000

E

A

$4,0

00,0

00

$4

,00

0,0

00

$4

,000

.00

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$7,2

50,0

00

$7,2

50,0

00

$7,2

50,0

00

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL &

YA

RD

CO

ST

S

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

!AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

40

$54,

151

$54

,151

V

EH

$2

,166

,048

$2

,166

,048

$2

,166

,048

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

T. F

AC

IL.)

$2

,166

,048

$2

,16

6,0

48

$2

,16

6,0

48

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LE !

incl

udin

g di

agno

stic

s, c

ount

ers

, c

40

$382

,500

$3

65,7

91

EA

$1

5,30

0,00

0 $1

4,63

1 ,6

40

$14,

631

,640

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICL

E C

OS

T)

$15,

300,

000

$14,

631,

640

$14

,631

,640

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

PR

IOR

ITY

SIG

NA

LIZ

AT

ION

(B

Y IN

TE

RS

EC

TIO

N)

200

$25,

000

$25

,000

E

A

$5,0

00,0

00

$5

,000

,00

0

$5,0

00,0

00

UN

IFIE

D F

AR

E S

YS

TE

M (

INC

L R

AIL

CO

ST

S,

EX

CL

BU

S V

EH

.)

$22

,315

,960

$2

2.3

i 5,9

60

LS

$0

$0

$0

UN

IFIE

D F

AR

E S

YS

TE

M •

BU

S F

AR

E B

OX

ES

40

$5

,500

$5

,500

V

EH

$2

20,0

00

$220

,00

0

$220

,000

U

NIF

IED

FA

RE

SY

ST

EM

-C

AR

D/T

RA

NS

FE

R P

RO

CE

40

$3

,600

$3

,600

V

EH

$1

44,0

00

$1

44

,00

0

$144

,000

U

NIF

IED

FA

RE

SY

ST

EM

-P

AR

TS

AN

D S

ER

VIC

ES

1

$54,

600

$54

,600

LS

$5

4,60

0 $5

4,60

0 $5

4,60

0 G

PS

/AV

L-

ON

-BO

AR

D V

EH

ICLE

EQ

UIP

. 0

$25,

000

$25,

000

VE

H

$0

$0

$0

GP

S/A

VL

-T

RA

NS

MIS

SIO

N T

OW

ER

S

$394

,00

0

$394

,000

E

A

$0

$0

$0

GP

S/A

VL

-C

EN

TR

AL

CO

NT

RO

L

$1,8

00,0

00

$1

.800

,000

E

A

$0

$0

$0

BU

S D

IAG

NO

ST

ICS

PA

CK

AG

E (

new

veh

icle

s on

ly)

0 $5

,000

$5

,000

V

EH

$0

$0

$0

O

N-B

OA

RD

PA

SS

EN

GE

R C

OU

NT

ER

S W

/ AV

L 0

$2,5

00

$2,5

00

VE

H

$0

$0

$0

O

N-B

OA

RD

PA

SS

EN

GE

R C

OU

NT

ER

S W

/0 A

VL

$7,5

00

$7,5

00

VE

H

$0

$0

$0

PA

SS

EN

GE

R C

OU

NT

ER

SY

ST

EM

SO

FT

WA

RE

$3

0,00

0 $3

0,00

0 R

F

$0

$0

$0

O

N-B

OA

RD

CA

ME

RA

S

0 $3

,500

$3

,500

V

EH

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$5,4

18,6

00

$5,4

18,6

00

$5,4

18,6

00

(TO

TA

L· E

ST

IMA

TE

D COST

·~~199

8 D

OL

LA

RS

<.

~,:;

.,;.

·.

,: "·

:~

V

i''!<

""'

.;·· ·~

·'

"'

' ·

·~

,, ,J

'~

$30,

134,

648

I '$

29

;46

6;2

88

Tc$

29

;46

6,2

88

(

No

te:

Exc

lude

s in

vest

men

t in

Hig

h T

ech

equ

ipm

ent f

or e

xist

ing

(207

3 ve

hicl

e) t

ius

fleet

; inc

lude

s co

sts

for

E3

Rap

id B

us s

yste

m .

• ·1

-6

F

Page 65: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

P

RO

JEC

T:

RA

PID

BU

S D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

1 3

LIN

ES

D

AT

E

11/5

/98

OF

2

0 R

EV

.: 2

0 $:

19

88 D

olla

rs

MT

A

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

ED

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

BO

UN

D

FIN

AL

IT

EM

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

CO

ST

C

OS

T

CO

ST

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$0

$0

$0

1 B)

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G A

LLO

WA

NC

E

$0

$0

$0

2) S

TA

TIO

NS

$7

,250

,000

$7

,250

,000

$7

,250

,000

3)

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$2

,166

,048

$2

,166

,048

$2

,166

,048

4)

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$5,4

18,6

00

$5,4

18,6

00

$5,4

18,6

00

5) V

EH

ICLE

S

$15,

300,

000

$14,

631,

640

$14,

631,

640

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee p

ag

e 2

fo

r d

eta

ils)

$30,

134,

648

$29,

466,

288

$29,

466,

288

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.9%

$8

73,9

05

$854

,522

$8

54,5

22

7) O

WN

ER

S I

NS

UR

AN

CE

0.

0%

$0

$0

$0

8) M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

0.0%

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $8

73,9

05

$854

,522

$8

54,5

22

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT ~C)

0.

0%

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C

) $0

$0

$0

10)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y ~D)

ALL

OW

AN

CE

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $0

$0

$0

11)

PR

OF

. S

ER

VIC

ES

~E)

$5

,497

,993

$2

,658

,025

$3

,843

,847

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $5

,497

,993

$2

,658

,025

$3

,843

,847

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

12

%

$0

$0

$0

ITE

M 1

B

12%

$0

$0

$0

B

) IT

EM

2

10%

$7

25,0

00

$725

,000

$7

25,0

00

C)

ITE

M 3

, 4,

& 5

10

%

$2,2

88,4

65

$2,2

21,6

29

$2,2

21,6

29

D)

ITE

M 6

, 7,

&8

10

%

$87,

390

$85,

452

$85,

452

E)

ITE

M 1

0 10

%

$0

$0

$0

F)

ITE

M 1

1 10

%

$549

,799

$2

65,8

03

. $38

4,38

5

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $3

,650

,655

$3

,297

,884

$3

,416

,466

GR

AN

D:T

OT

AL.!

_:~··~t1998

;D()LLARS

<;,<J:

;c'""*

'''oi~

~'x'0Y

ic?}'{

,\'~}0

i~t t

,,,

y\i>

;~+~

i~:~

7z~~

;~,t

,;(.

~c,;

.0;~

<ro'

~%sJ

;%;;

~r'i

tvo:

~· -

''5b·

:S~·

> .;;

· $40

,157

,201

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.1-

6 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 66: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

~ •

• •

Rap

id B

us

TH

E C

OU

NT

YW

IDE

RA

PID

BU

S E

XP

AN

SIO

N H

AS

TH

E F

OL

LO

WIN

G S

TR

EN

GT

HS

AN

D

WE

AK

NE

SS

ES

;:,.;~ ·:

:3~,-~

~;;;~~

±\iz~~~JB§~gJIJI

§~~S:

:: .. · ~:~~

~ §L:~L

~·.;C

·~'c ....

. 1.

Offe

rs r

egio

nal

mob

ility

sol

utio

n 2.

Tw

o th

irds

of th

e ra

pid

bus

corr

idor

s se

rve

tran

sit

depe

ndan

t po

pula

tions

and

des

tinat

ions

3.

C

an b

e qu

ickl

y im

plem

ente

d 4.

R

elat

ivel

y lo

w c

ost

5.

Ser

ves

high

dem

and

corr

idor

s 6.

Tra

nsit

cent

ers

impr

ove

mod

al c

onne

ctiv

ity a

nd

puts

rig

ht-o

f-w

ay p

urch

ased

in s

uspe

nded

rai

l co

rrid

ors

to p

rodu

ctiv

e us

e 7.

S

erve

s to

foc

us t

rans

it de

man

ds to

sup

port

fu

ture

fix

ed g

uide

way

sys

tem

s 8.

A

pplic

able

to

all

coun

ty o

pera

tors

9.

R

eadi

ly r

ecog

niza

ble

as a

diff

eren

t ser

vice

of

ferin

g

·····(1.~:~1 fz~

~<"':J

.:';!•

.:xG.:

0;;,~3

;WEAKN

·EssEc

> ~-~

;v<.

, :0:

;>;.,n

"'~>~-

;, .t>

k:/~.t

-:r~1-

,J-~i-

_..~·-

.!.t•

"l<--~ ·

-. .,.

..;; . ..-

..:..:

:kJ:;\

~"'"'~

-::t:}

>.N~-.

4~

1. P

rovi

ding

ded

icat

ed P

eak

Hou

r La

nes

redu

ces

the

num

ber

of tr

avel

lan

es a

nd l

eads

to

incr

ease

d co

nges

tion

2.

Not

hav

ing

dedi

cate

d ri

ght-

of-w

ay s

low

s op

erat

ions

rel

ativ

e to

an

excl

usiv

e fa

cilit

y 3.

Bu

s se

rvic

e m

ay n

ot p

rovi

de a

s si

gnifi

cant

ec

onom

ic r

edev

elop

men

t op

port

uniti

es a

s ra

il lin

es

4.

Som

e el

emen

ts o

f the

com

mun

ity in

dica

te

stro

ng s

uppo

rt f

or r

ail

proj

ects

TH

E D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TIO

N P

RO

GR

AM

WIL

L B

E D

ES

IGN

ED

TO

MA

XIM

IZE

SY

ST

EM

PE

RF

OR

MA

NC

E

AN

D D

EM

ON

ST

RA

TE

DIF

FE

RE

NT

AP

PR

OA

CH

ES

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

A4.

1-7

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 67: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

RA

PID

BU

S I

MP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

SC

HE

DU

LE

MO

NT

H

Pe

rce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

P

RO

JEC

T P

HA

SE

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

6

0

66

72

I P

hase

I

I

Sel

ect

Dem

onst

ratio

n R

oute

s 0%

1

En

gin

ee

rin

g-,

Con

stru

ctio

n 10

%

11

~evenuofServ1ce

16

-tv

a u

a e

rogr

am

U"/

o lt

l i

Pha

se II

I

:se

ec

ou e

s u

·.

6 P

rocu

re B

uses

0

%

24

Eng

inee

ring

20%

12

C

on

stru

ctio

n

0%

12

Sta

of

Rev

enue

:ser

v1ce

Pha

se I

ll S

ee

ct R

ou

es

0%

t;

-P

rocu

re B

uses

U

"/o

~4

tng

me

en

ng

-2

0%

12

-c

ons

rue

1on

0%

12

:s

ta

o av

enue

::;e

rv1c

e

The

use

of

buse

s ac

quir

ed a

s pa

rt o

f the

acc

eler

ated

pro

cure

men

t pr

ogra

m a

llow

s th

e fir

st p

hase

to b

e im

plem

ente

d w

ithin

12

mon

ths

• ·-8F

~

Page 68: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• R

apid

Bus

TH

E I

MP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

OF

TH

E C

OU

NT

YW

IDE

RA

PID

BU

S S

YS

TE

M C

AN

FO

LL

OW

A P

HA

SE

D

PR

OC

ES

S T

HR

OU

GH

FY

200

5

• D

eter

min

e P

rior

ity C

orrid

ors

for

dem

onst

ratio

n pr

ojec

ts (

e.g

., S

uspe

nded

I D

efer

red

Pro

ject

Cor

ridor

s, T

rans

it D

epen

dent

)

• C

oord

inat

e P

riorit

y S

igna

l P

rogr

am w

ith C

ity o

f Lo

s A

ngel

es D

epar

tmen

t of T

rans

port

atio

n

• D

esig

n C

orri

dor

Fac

ilitie

s

• P

rocu

re B

uses

• C

onst

ruct

Fac

ilitie

s

• Im

plem

ent S

ervi

ce

• M

on

itor

Pro

gram

Per

form

ance

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.1-

8 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 69: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

••

a: 0

Ng ~a: ><a: -0 co Zw ~c a.-<(~ en

<( w

Page 70: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• E

asts

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es

FO

UR

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S W

ER

E T

AK

EN

TH

RO

UG

H T

HO

RO

UG

H A

NA

LY

SIS

FO

R T

HE

EA

ST

SID

E

CO

RR

IDO

R

• R

ed L

ine

Sub

way

Ext

ensi

on t

o F

irst

/Lor

ena

(Sus

pend

ed P

roje

ct)

• R

ed L

ine

Sub

way

Ext

ensi

on t

o C

ha

vez/

So

to

• Li

ght

Rai

l E

xten

sion

to

Whi

ttie

r I

Atla

ntic

• B

us T

rans

itway

to W

hitt

ier

I A

tlant

ic

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

1 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

In

c.

Page 71: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F E

AS

TS

IDE

CO

RR

IDO

R A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

Sub

way

I

4 I

Non

e I

3.2

I 7.

4 I

~5.9

I

4.25

I

5.0

I lU

ll

I H

eavy

Rai

l to

Cha

vez

I U

nion

Sta

tion

to

I H

eavy

o

to-

Rev

ised

Alig

nmen

t C

ha

vez/

So

to

Rai

l I

Sub

way

I

2 I

Non

e I

1.9

I 3.

6 I

31.3

I

4.25

I

5.0

Littl

e T

okyo

Sta

tion

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

A

t-G

rade

W

hitt

ier I

Atla

ntic

Li

ght

Rai

l w

ith o

ne

I 7

I N

one

I 5

.9

I 26

.5

I 13

.4

I 5.

0 I

12.0

ae

rial

sect

ion

Gat

eway

Pla

za to

I

Bus

I At

-Gra

de I

7 I

Non

e I

5.9

I

26.

5 I

13.4

I

5.0

I 12

.0

Wh

ittie

r I A

tlant

ic

• ·-2F

Page 72: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• S

UM

MA

RY

RE

SU

LT

S F

OR

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S

He

avy

Rai

l S

ubw

ay:

1 U

nion

Sta

tion

to F

irst I

92

2.6

I 10

.5

I 10

,400

I

7 I ~

I e

I e

I ~

I ~

Lore

na (

Sus

pend

ed

Pro

ject

)

He

avy

Rai

l S

ubw

ay:

I 48

1.1

I 3.

4 I

6,10

0 I

32

I

()

I e

I e

I e

I 0

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

C

ha

vez

I S

oto

Ligh

t R

ail A

t-G

rade

:

I 43

0.9

I 15

.5

I 11

,500

I

62

I ~

I ~

I ~

I ()

I ~

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

A

tlant

ic I

Wh

ittie

r

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y A

t-

I 88

.2

I 9.

9 I

11,4

00

I 62

I ~

I 'I

I

'I

I ()

I

'I

Gra

de:

Ga

tew

ay

Pla

za to

A

tlant

ic I

Wh

itte

r

KEY

e

Mo

st F

avor

able

EfJ

Le

ast

Fav

orab

le o

r o

r Hig

h L

ow

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

2 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

Inc

.

Page 73: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

1-0 w ..., 0 a: 0. c w c z w 0. en ::J en I

a: 0 c -a: a: 0 0 w c -~ en <t w

,;{i?~ "-/

:

' / ... j'

i ·~.

.'

... Ill "C c: ~ ... 0 tn c:

:;::: Ill ")( w c:

0 I :;:::

u "iij :I ... ... o-._Ill -c: 1110 :EO

-u Ill ·o ...

Cl.. "C Ill "C c:

Ill Ill "C a. ·c;; Ill - :I 111cn ca, We 1110 C:·-·-Ill ..Jc: -clll ~~~-a:~

· ......... !~

\. ''··-··.:;,:

LL ('t)

I

C\J •

••

Page 74: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Eas

tsid

e C

orri

dor

Alte

rnat

ives

De

scri

ptio

ns-

Sus

pend

ed P

roje

ct

TH

E S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

TO

TH

E E

AS

TS

IDE

PR

OV

IDE

S A

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

SU

BW

AY

A

LIG

NM

EN

T I

NT

O T

HE

HE

AR

T O

F E

AS

T L

OS

AN

GE

LE

S

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s of

the

alig

nmen

t in

clud

e ..

.

Alig

nmen

t U

r:nits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

Fir

st/L

oren

a Li

ttle

To

kyo

/ Art

s D

istr

ict

Fir

st/B

oyle

C

have

z/S

oto

Fir

st/L

oren

a N

o. V

ehic

les:

N

one,

ext

ensi

on o

f R

ed L

ine

and

utili

zes

exis

ting

fleet

Pla

nn

ed

Pea

k-O

ne

-Wa

y P

eak

Off

-Pe

ak

Ho

ur

Ca

pa

city

C

on

sist

R

ou

te

Sp

ee

d

Tim

e

He

ad

wa

y H

ea

dw

ay

(Pa

sse

ng

ers

pe

r V

eh

icle

s L

en

gth

M

iles

(MP

H)

(Min

) (M

in)

(Min

) H

ou

r)

Not

Req

uire

d 4

3.2

25

.9

7.4

4.25

5

31,3

50

Str

en

gth

s W

ea

kne

sse

s

1.

Ser

ves

dem

and

trav

el c

orri

dor

1.

Hig

h C

ost

2.

S

tron

g C

omm

unity

Sup

port

3

. M

inim

al C

om

mu

nity

Im

pact

s 4.

D

esig

n is

nea

rly

com

plet

e 5.

U

tiliz

es e

xist

ing

Red

Lin

e V

ehic

les

6.

Util

izes

Exi

stin

g M

aint

enan

ce F

acili

ty

7.

Exp

ands

the

Red

Lin

e ne

twor

k an

d Im

prov

es r

egio

nal

conn

ectiv

ity

8.

Por

tion

of

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay_P

urch

ased

-------

Ma

xim

um

B

uild

-Ou

t !

Pe

ak-

Ho

ur

Ca

pa

city

(P

ass

en

ge

rs P

er

Ho

ur)

53

,294

-·----

·-----

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

3 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 75: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: E

AS

TS

IDE

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

U

NIO

N S

TA

TIO

N T

O 1

ST

/LO

RE

NA

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

T

WIN

TU

NN

EL

S

EIS

MIC

SE

CT

ION

AD

DE

R

SU

BT

OT

AL

(GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

T)

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

ALL

OW

AN

CE

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

S

UB

WA

Y S

TA

TIO

NS

S

UB

WA

Y S

TA

TIO

NS

W/ C

RO

SS

OV

ER

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

MA

INL

FA

CIL

& Y

AR

D C

OS

TS

M

AIN

TE

NA

NC

E F

AC

ILIT

IES

(A

LLO

WA

NC

E)

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

!. F

AC

IL.)

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LE

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICLE

CO

ST

)

SY

ST

EM

WIP

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

TR

AC

KW

OR

K (

INC

L. S

PE

CIA

L T

RA

CK

WO

RK

) T

RA

IN C

ON

TR

OL

ST

A.

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L G

DW

Y

TR

AC

TIO

N P

OW

ER

ST

A.

(XF

MR

) C

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

FA

RE

CO

LLE

CT

ION

S

IGN

AG

E &

GR

AP

HIC

S

SU

BT

OT

AL

(SY

ST

EM

CO

ST

)

ES

T.

DA

TE

R

EV

. $

:

QT

Y

19

12

4

29

5

19

12

4

38

00

2 2

1912

4 4 19

124 3

1912

4 4 4

HT

L

11/5

/98

0 19

88 D

olla

rs

MIA

UN

IT

BA

H U

NIT

P

RIC

E

PR

ICE

$H

,oo

o

$10,

296

$5,0

00

$5,0

00

$650

N

A

$40,

000,

000

$36,

663,

148

$70,

000,

000

$66,

663,

148

$575

$6

74

$1,1

00,0

00

NA

$1

,100

$8

80

$1,7

50,0

00

$4,2

35,3

77

$1,0

00

$208

$7

50,0

00

$1,0

72,4

20

$750

,000

$3

02,1

55

SH

T.

2 O

F

2 X

LS

ES

TIM

AT

ED

M

IA

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

U

NIT

C

OS

T

BO

UN

D

CO

ST

RF

$2

10,3

64,0

00

$196

,909

,257

$2

10,3

64,0

00

RF

$1

,475

,000

$1

,475

,000

$1

,475

,000

$211

,839

,000

$1

98,3

84,2

57

:: $2

11,8

39,0

00

RF

$2

,470

,000

$2

,470

,000

$2

,470

,000

$2,4

70,0

00

$2,4

70,0

00

$2,4

70,0

00

EA

$8

0,00

0,00

0 $7

3,32

6,29

7 $7

3,32

6,29

7 E

A

$140

,000

,000

$1

33,3

26,2

97

$133

,326

,297

$220

,000

,000

$2

06,6

52,5

93

$206

,652

,593

LS

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

EA

$

0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

RF

$1

0,99

6,30

0 $1

2,89

0,89

1 $1

0,99

6,30

0 E

A

$4,4

00,0

00

NA

$4

,400

,000

R

F

$21

,036

,400

$1

6,83

5,34

7 $2

1,03

6,40

0 E

A

$5,2

50,0

00

$12,

706,

132

$5,2

50,0

00

RF

$1

9,12

4,00

0 $3

,969

,375

$3

,969

,375

LS

$3

,000

,000

$4

,289

,681

$3

,000

,000

LS

$3

,000

,000

$1

,208

,620

$1

,208

,620

$66,

806,

700

$51,

900,

046

$49,

860,

695

ITQT

AU\,ESJIMATEP

~cos

;r:??,

;ri199

8:rDotcARs~J1M~H-~

"~~~~){§!?f$~

~~~

$SI>

1~1.1

5r7o

o_;l~t$4s9:~os:-&as1~lo;s22;288

rl

•. 2-

4F

Cos

t de

velo

pmen

t wor

kshe

et H

R.x

ls E

1 L

oren

a-S

u.S

ofi

·Co

sts

Page 76: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

PR

OJE

CT

: E

AS

TS

IDE

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

E

ST.

H

TL

SH

T.

UN

ION

ST

AT

ION

TO

1S

T/L

OR

EN

A

DA

TE

11/5

/98

OF

2 R

EV

.: 0

$:

1988

Do

llars

M

TA

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

ED

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

BO

UN

D

FIN

AL

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A}

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$211

,839

,000

$1

98,3

84,2

57

$211

,839

,000

1B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DLI

NG

ALL

OW

AN

CE

$2

,470

,000

$2

,470

,000

$2

,470

,000

2)

ST

AT

ION

S

$220

,000

,000

$2

06,6

52,5

93

$206

,652

,593

3}

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$0

$0

$0

4}

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$66,

806,

700

$51,

900,

046

$49,

860,

695

5)V

EH

ICLE

S

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A)

(see

pag

e 2

for

deta

ils)

$501

,115

,700

$4

59,4

06,8

96

$470

,822

,288

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5%

$1

2,52

7,89

3 $1

1,48

5,17

2 $1

1,77

0,55

7 7}

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0%

$4

0,08

9,25

6 $3

6,75

2,55

2 $3

7,66

5,78

3 8}

MA

ST

ER

AG

RE

EM

EN

TS

2.

5%

$12,

527,

893

$11,

485,

172

$11,

770,

557

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B)

$65,

145,

041

$59,

722,

897

$61,

206,

897

0

9) A

RT

FOR

TR

AN

SIT

(C

) 0.

5%

$2,5

05,5

79

$2,2

97,0

34

$2,3

54,1

11

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C)

$2,5

05,5

79

$2,2

97,0

34

$2,3

54,1

11

10)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D)

INC

L. C

OS

T T

O D

ATE

($1

7,72

8,00

0)

$36,

609,

000

$36,

609,

000

$36,

609,

000

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D)

$36,

609,

000

$36,

609,

000

$36,

609,

000

11)

PR

OF.

SE

RV

ICE

S (

E)

INC

L. C

OS

T T

O D

ATE

($9

0,00

0,00

0)

$242

,150

,128

$1

22,8

03,4

91

$159

,877

,843

S

UB

TO

TA

L (E

) $2

42,1

50,1

28

$122

,803

,491

$1

59,8

77,8

43

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F)

A

) IT

EM

1A

10

%

$21,

183,

900

$19,

838,

426

$21,

183,

900

ITE

M 1

B

10%

$2

47,0

00

$247

,000

$2

47,0

00

B)

ITE

M2

8%

$1

7,60

0,00

0 $1

6,53

2,20

7 $1

6,53

2,20

7 C

) IT

EM

3, 4

, &

5

8%

$5,3

44,5

36

$4,1

52,0

04

$3,9

88,8

56

D)

ITE

M 6

, 7,

& 8

10

%

$6,5

14,5

04

$5,9

72,2

90

$6,1

20,6

90

E)

ITE

M 1

0B

0%

IN

CL.

IN

ITE

M

INC

L. I

N IT

EM

IN

CL.

IN

ITE

M

F)

ITE

M 1

1 10

%

$24,

215,

013

$12,

280,

349

$15,

987,

784

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F)

$75,

104,

953

$59,

022,

276

$64,

060,

437

[~~NP1-'fQt~~

1P~I

!:'POJ;iltAB.S

tlittJ~p(jiW~~.I~

':!•

·~;~

';,y

~,5,P!~~

"9~~~-

B*i,

rt~:

;$92

2;6.3

Q;40

0iiS

$Jc3

~:!1

s1f611

4~1tM$

7,94;~~9i5Z

7?:1

Cos

t de

velo

pmen

t wor

kshe

et H

R.x

ls E

1 L

ore

na

-S

um l

nd

Sof

t·C

osls

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

4 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

Inc

.

Page 77: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-M

OD

IFIE

D A

LIG

NM

EN

T T

O C

HA

VE

Z IS

OT

O

' l

I :&.

~-\ _l.~

, l!;·

·--~

!q_Y

' '

\~ -=~

~~~~ffj)J

~~.~ -~-~

.,;;;---

, ... ~

· ol

.•

't-

;-\

1 '<

'::{li~.,

.:__

. ·_

'~"'-

: i

' -~

; )

. ''-~

•_, ..

. ,

~--~~""'!

····~.

. ~!. ..... -+

­-

1-r-

t;<;

i ,

~_;::=~=

~r~=

:( . --

\ !

----~--

......

......

... t·

····

Met

rora

il -

Exi

stin

g o

r U

nd

er

Co

nst

ruct

ion

_;

'·'\.:.. ~

--

,\~0\

;/;:;.

'/~'*=

" ""'

~<t

! .,

1 /)

li

j/ ;g

O::" .

.....

... ·

~· "' ~

­--~

.$'!

J

·i

i '

f ; __

____

____

...

E.

~dj

! 0

'1

£.;

::..:.

---r-.

,~

; "i

i.'

), ::/~ .. t~,

:_~J==:

~~~~~

~s~~sr

/ ):

/···

i of~

-w

: }

' ~

/ .

. 1&

..]

-•t"

4-'''

"' ...

..... ·

·· a:

fil -~-

::::!!

<(

~

,&t"

"~=-

~~~=:==·~,,·,r~~~;~~

:z:

; EY

EilS

OII

!

::::!1

=~~:·;

_~·-·#

··

.... __ j

~~t-~

.t ,/

\ \~<l"

-~·c=•·•;

Ji

-.......

/ /

.'···· ·-t

~~

: ---

--~-i

l~o

"#:~

-..£

5'1'8·

~~;~~~

~ -.

-~ow

1!,9'f

;'

. ..n

-f--·

' i

~--··

/

-&.-

. I

""'-~

I ...

,.,

!

. .....-.

...........

. \,

-/'

' //

RJ.O

OII'I

/ ·j'

~

'

·./::~-

~~'11iiw~

w~JY~~~P

,,,

o•

·, s

l /.

"-"---..

... ,_

~~

) \

f 'r 1

v10.k.·~

~·~ -_

/ ~--

"7:~

~:>:

:. ,,

... '~~

---. ....

. ~

',A·-

.

····--

-~~;

;;';~~-

Mo

dif

ied

Alig

nm

ent

to

Ch

avez

I S

oto

33

TH

, Jl

TH

I t f"l

i n -r

l T 1

.\-: ],..,

1~~---·· :_LE~L? _

____

_ .l.

. !

.

~01\

( ''-

' •··

1..

DISl

'~IC

t,

•. ....

-...>;:-;

.._ "' <!:'•

0

,'

• ·-SF

Page 78: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• E

asts

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es D

escr

iptio

ns -

Mod

ified

Alig

nmen

t to

Cha

vez

I Sot

o

TH

E C

HA

VE

Z/S

OT

O H

EA

VY

RA

IL S

UB

WA

Y A

LIG

NM

EN

T T

O T

HE

EA

ST

SID

E M

OD

IFIE

S T

HE

S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

BY

EL

IMIN

AT

ING

TW

O S

TA

TIO

NS

AN

D R

ED

UC

ING

TH

E L

EN

GT

H O

F

TU

NN

EL

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s of

the

alig

nm

en

t in

clud

e ..

.

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

Ch

ave

z/S

oto

F

irst

/Boy

le

Cha

vez/

Sot

o N

o. V

ehic

les:

N

one,

ext

ensi

on o

f R

ed L

ine

and

utili

zes

exis

ting

Fle

et

Pla

nn

ed

Pe

ak-

Ma

xim

um

B

uild

-Ou

t I

On

e-W

ay

Pe

ak

Off

-Pe

ak

Ho

ur

Ca

pa

city

P

ea

k-H

ou

r C

ap

aci

ty .

C

on

sist

R

ou

te

Sp

ee

d

Tim

e

He

ad

wa

y H

ea

dw

ay

(Pa

sse

ng

ers

pe

r (P

ass

en

ge

rs P

er

Ve

hic

les

Le

ng

th

Mile

s (M

PH

) (M

in)

"(Min

) (M

in)

Ho

ur)

H

ou

r)

Not

Req

uire

d 4

1.9

31.3

3.

6 4.

25

5 18

,418

31

,310

Str

en

gth

s W

ea

kne

sse

s

1.

Ser

ves

dem

and

trav

el c

orri

dor

1.

Hig

h C

ost

2.

S

tron

g C

omm

unity

Sup

port

2.

Li

mite

d C

orri

dor

Pen

etra

tion

3.

Min

imal

Com

mun

ity I

mpa

cts

3.

No

Littl

e T

oky

o C

onne

ctio

n 4.

U

tiliz

es e

xist

ing

Red

Lin

e V

ehic

les

4.

Req

uire

s M

odifi

catio

n to

EIR

5.

U

tiliz

es E

xist

ing

Mai

nten

ance

Fac

ility

5.

R

equi

res

Red

esig

n 6.

E

xpan

ds t

he R

ed L

ine

netw

ork

and

Impr

oves

reg

iona

l co

nnec

tivity

7

. P

ortio

n of

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay P

urch

ased

8.

Lo

wer

Cos

t th

an S

uspe

nded

Pro

ject

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

5 B

ooz·

Alle

n &

Ha

milt

on

In

c.

Page 79: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: E

AS

TS

IDE

LR

T

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

2 U

NIO

N S

TA

TIO

N T

O W

HIT

TIE

R/A

TL

AN

TIC

D

AT

E

11/5

/98

OF

2

RE

V.

0 X

LS

$:

19

88 D

olla

rs

ES

TIM

AT

ED

M

TA

UN

IT

BA

H U

NIT

M

TA

L

OW

ER

'P

RO

JEC

T

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

QT

Y

PR

ICE

P

RIC

E

UN

IT

CO

ST

B

OU

ND

C

OS

T

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

B

RID

GE

OV

ER

101

FR

EE

WA

Y {

SE

GM

EN

TA

L)

800

$10,

500

$3,7

50

RF

$8

,400

,000

$3

,000

,045

$8

,400

,000

A

T-G

RA

DE

-GU

IDE

WA

Y

3025

0 $2

,500

$2

,457

R

F

$75,

625,

000

$74,

334,

268

$75,

625,

000

{incl

udin

g st

reet

res

tora

tion

@ $

250

RF

and

side

wal

k re

cons

truc

tion

@ $

400

RF

)

SU

BT

OT

AL

{G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) $8

4,02

5,00

0 $7

7,33

4,31

1 $8

4,02

5,00

0

I:JA

ZA

BQ

Q!J

S W

AS

IE I:JA~OLI~G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

1 $1

,500

,000

LS

$1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

HA

Z M

AT

) $1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

SIA

IIQ

N C

QS

I P

AS

SE

NG

ER

LO

AD

ING

/UN

LOA

DIN

G F

AC

ILIT

IES

7

$500

,000

$6

56,2

60

EA

$3

,500

,000

$4

,593

,819

$3

,500

,000

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$3,5

00,0

00

$4,5

93,8

19

$3,5

00,0

00

MA

INI,

FA

CIL

& Y

AB

D C

QS

IS

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

{ALL

OW

AN

CE

) 1

$35,

000,

000

LS

$35,

000,

000

$27,

048,

316

$35,

000,

000

SU

BT

OT

AL

{M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$35,

000,

000

$27,

048,

316

$35,

000,

000

VE

HIC

LE

CQ

SI

RE

VE

NU

E V

EH

ICLE

34

$2

,500

,000

$2

,008

,268

$8

5,00

0,00

0 $6

8,28

1,11

5 $6

8,28

1,11

5 S

UB

TO

TA

L {

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

) $8

5,00

0,00

0 $6

8,28

1,11

5 $6

8,28

1,11

5

SY

SIE

M W

IDE

EQ!JI~ME~I Q

QS

I T

RA

CK

WO

RK

{IN

CL.

SP

EC

IAL

TR

AC

KW

OR

K)

3105

0 $4

21

$522

R

F

$13,

072,

050

$16,

207,

294

$13,

072,

050

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L S

TA

. 6

$160

,000

In

clud

ed b

elow

E

A

$960

,000

In

clud

ed b

elow

$9

60,0

00

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L G

DW

Y

3105

0 $5

00

$485

R

F

$15,

525,

000

$15,

055,

647

$15,

525,

000

TR

AC

TIO

N P

OW

ER

ST

A.

{XF

MR

) 6

$1,1

00,0

00

$1,9

27,8

75

EA

$6

,600

,000

$1

1,56

7,24

8 $6

,600

,000

C

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

3105

0 $0

$9

0 R

F

$0

$2,8

07,4

14

$0

FA

RE

CO

LLE

CT

ION

6

$250

,000

$1

51,4

77

EA

$1

,500

,000

$9

08,8

60

$1,5

00,0

00

SIG

NA

GE

& G

RA

PH

ICS

6

$0

$41,

016

EA

$0

$2

46,0

97

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

{S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$37,

657,

050

$46,

792,

559

$37,

657,

050

I~OT

AL{J:S

TIMA

tEDJ~o

.sTl

.'f~

9s{[

)ot.

:!YA

R$~~

-tt~

P~~~~;~~~:&~~f!!fu~~•t«%f

!fJI.,_.

,'W~$~

1ii~a2

;oso

~L'l

i$22

5;~®

:-:J2o

?IM$2

29i9!

'i.3i16.~

;1

Cos

t dev

elop

men

t wor

kshe

et L

RT.

xls

eS

-S

um

• •. 2-

6F

Page 80: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

PR

OJE

CT

: E

AS

TS

IDE

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

· E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. U

NIO

N S

TA

TIO

N T

O C

HA

VE

ZIS

OT

O

DA

TE

11

/5/9

8 O

F

2 R

EV

.: 0

$:

1988

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$112

,751

,000

$1

05,6

33,8

61

$112

,751

,000

1 B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DLI

NG

ALL

OW

AN

CE

$2

,470

,000

$2

,470

,000

$2

,470

,000

2

)ST

AT

ION

S

$110

,000

,000

$1

03,3

26,2

97

$103

,326

,297

3)

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$0

$0

$0

4)

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$35,

760,

300

$27,

294,

227

$26,

848,

285

5)V

EH

ICL

ES

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee p

ag

e 2

fo

r d

eta

ils)

$260

,981

,300

$2

38,7

24,3

85

$245

,395

,582

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5%

$6

,524

,533

$5

,968

,110

$6

,134

,890

7

)0W

NE

RS

INS

UR

AN

CE

8.

0%

$20,

878,

504

$19,

097,

951

$19,

631,

647

8) M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

2.5%

$6

,524

,533

$5

,968

,110

$6

;134

,890

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $3

3,92

7,56

9 $3

1,03

4,17

0 $3

1,90

1,42

6

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (C

) 0.

5%

$1,3

04,9

07

$1,1

93,6

22

$1,2

26,9

78

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C)

$1,3

04,9

07

$1,1

93,6

22

$1,2

26,9

78

10)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D)

INC

L. C

OS

T T

O D

AT

E (

$17,

728,

000}

$1

9,40

2,77

0 $1

9,40

2,77

0 $1

9,40

2,77

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D)

$19,

402,

770

$19,

402,

770

$19,

402,

770

11}

PR

OF

. S

ER

VIC

ES

(E

) IN

CL.

CO

ST

TO

DA

TE

( a

ppro

x $3

2,50

0,00

0}

$126

,246

,618

$6

3,89

6,61

6.02

$8

3,41

9,49

1.57

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E)

$126

,246

,618

$6

3,89

6,61

6 $8

3,41

9,49

2

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

10

%

$11,

275,

100

$10,

563,

386

$11,

275,

1 00

IT

EM

1B

10

%

$247

,000

$2

47,0

00

$247

,000

B

) IT

EM

2

8%

$8,8

00,0

00

$8,2

66,1

04

$8,2

66,1

04

C)

ITE

M 3

, 4,

& 5

8%

$2

,860

,824

$2

,183

,538

$2

,147

,863

D

) IT

EM

6,

7, &

8

10%

$3

,392

,756

.90

$3,1

03,4

17.0

0 $3

,190

,142

.57

E)

ITE

M 1

0 B

0%

IN

CL.

IN

IT

EM

IN

CL.

IN

IT

EM

IN

CL.

IN

IT

EM

F)

IT

EM

11

10%

$1

2,62

4,66

1.8

2 $6

,389

,661

.60

$8,3

41,9

49.1

6

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F)

$39,

200,

343

$30,

753,

107

$33,

468,

158

IGR,

A~Q¥:t

PJ:~

ilt#~

li99~~DQ.~a:..\RS~~~~~~~-~~4';$L~¥t~PMrwll'ltf.M~s

~~o

.!la;5

9~viM

s.3"a~

I9Q~;~~9

.~I~i

$4~.4

l~JtJ:1o

.s[l

Cos

t dev

elop

men

t wor

kshe

et H

R.x

ls E

2 C

ha

vez-

Sum

ln

cl s

un

k·C

ost

s

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

6 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Hq

milt

on

Inc

.

Page 81: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-L

IGH

T R

AIL

' ,i '.!

~

. I

''-';"-:

;;/"

<'.A

».-.V

W

·~~

. :

·w~>

~v

j i)>

"· '\

-~

. ·

<

~

v_'<

! .

¥ '"4.

.

. ?

"' ..

&

. .:

/j!

'Vi-. \,;

. '

Gi:)i

\~'

~,'_~""'

"\ f

~ ;fl

'·~, 'o··

, .: ·,.:::~

}. ' ,_

1 ,

. •

t1t

z 1

""'·

. . ·

·£

--~~~-

:-··

...... :

j ···4

' ~!·

.. ,,

,. ';;,

~~~

_.·

• I

I W

i .-s-

<1;(

0'

1 .... (~

'!:<r __

....

/ff•

·-r'

-,1

-./ _

___ -~P

~t~-,~~~~

~~~7~::;.·

/ .·

c¢~

' W

'

fe,

(fi

u:

-~ ....

_..

, .. -· .

a:

! ~

: :

>-I

~.;,

· ~:..

iE' 1

__ i .

., ~ ~~~

) . }4

:\~ t

! ">

;' .

a:'-

--_____ + I

s:~ -r-

----~

·

e>'-.

-~" ; 8

' ·'

. . f

' '

i

~ .

',; .

. ""~,-~ -,,.

,, .

.

$'

~-··

~-

... .

.. S;:

~·-~ ·

, "<l~

>cQ

·,!]

!:,

'-·~!

-~

·

---~.-· ......

.............

r ........

--~-·-·

-··r

·-·+

·"'1-~

<1\t~

J _____

_ j___

' M

etr

ora

il -

Exi

stin

g o

r U

nd

er

Co

nst

ruct

ion

e -

-..

. A

t-G

rade

Lig

ht

Rai

l

0 L

ittle

To

kyo

Ext

en

sio

n

6 A

tlan

tic E

xte

nsi

on

ji,~

··

: .. ::c-

-.. F~t

~~.

_ .. -··

' _

.. L

...

~s...::

_-f

----

'----~

~q"

i ,,;

··'

;m-H

j

JlT

H

.,

r ~ ··

···t~·

l·······

···········

' (

·-...L

,

~vol!t

,_ PA

CI>

I:

\~ONl5

i ....

...

. [)

ISt~

IC:t

·-..

..2

-7F

' IL

.;

I .. /

·

_,.;·

·· I

~'

1 <t

"'~u

::~·

:::~p

:~;s""

':'~F~

'':'·~

;~ z

; EY

EI!S

OII

'

~~

:5;-

----

--·

' . ..:

:-.

t:~

. :s;

~}r}-

~F~

I /

~-i

D'/ /

j

. fj~t

=~\)1

··~

.

; • i

....... -.

. "

· .. "'(

Q;

z;

.. ,::j VLO

.ACO

STA

--.

. J ..

.. --

...

'{-...

. "'

'

····-·~ ... ,

'~~

........

.... {·

......

..

.... -·--

t)LYlf

f>IC?

....

. "•

·.

/ ~

~

• ..•.

(:li,t

' •

Page 82: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• E

asts

ide

Co

rrid

or

Alte

rnat

ives

Des

crip

tions

-Li

ght

Rai

l Alig

nm

en

t

TH

E L

IGH

T R

AIL

AL

IGN

ME

NT

IS A

N E

XT

EN

SIO

N O

F T

HE

PA

SA

DE

NA

BL

UE

LIN

E A

ND

P

RO

VID

ES

AN

AT

-GR

AD

E A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

E T

O S

ER

VE

TH

E T

RA

VE

L M

AR

KE

T N

EE

DS

OF

TH

E

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s of

the

alig

nmen

t in

clud

e ..

.

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

No.

Veh

icle

s: .

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

Atla

ntic

Blv

d.

Littl

e T

okyo

, F

irst/B

oyle

, F

irst/S

oto,

Fir

st/I

ndia

na

Whi

ttier

/Row

an,

Whi

ttie

r/A

rizo

na,

Whi

ttie

r/A

tlant

ic

34

Pla

nn

ed

Pe

ak-

On

e-W

ay

Pe

ak

Off

-Pe

ak

Ho

ur

Ca

pa

city

C

on

sist

R

ou

te

Sp

ee

d

Tim

e

He

ad

wa

y H

ea

dw

ay

{Pa

sse

ng

ers

pe

r V

eh

icle

s L

en

gth

M

iles

{MP

H)

{Min

) {M

in)

{Min

) H

ou

r)

34

2 5.

9 13

.4

26.5

5.

0 12

.0

5,45

3

Ma

xim

um

B

uild

-Ou

t P

ea

k-H

ou

r C

ap

aci

ty

{Pa

sse

ng

ers

Per

H

ou

r)

10,2

24

Str

en

gth

s W

ea

kne

sse

s

1.

Mee

ts T

rave

l M

arke

t D

eman

ds

1.

Ded

icat

ed R

ight

-of-

Way

Req

uire

s R

educ

tion

in t

he n

umbe

r o

f Tra

vel L

anes

2.

Lo

wer

Cos

ts

2.

Sta

tion

Con

stru

ctio

n R

equi

res

Sig

nific

ant

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay P

urch

ase

and

3.

Dee

pest

Pen

etra

tion

Thr

ough

Eas

tsid

e C

onde

mna

tion

of R

esid

entia

l/Bus

ines

s P

rope

rty

4.

Exp

ands

Pas

aden

a B

lue

Line

Net

wor

k 3.

M

ixed

Flo

w A

ltern

ativ

e S

igni

fican

tly R

educ

es S

yste

m S

peed

and

Sig

nific

antly

5.

C

an P

rovi

de C

onne

ctio

n to

Litt

le T

okyo

if

Impa

cts

Str

eet C

onge

stio

n C

have

z/S

oto

Sub

way

Alte

rnat

ive

is P

refe

rred

4

. R

equi

res

Mod

ifica

tion

or

Ne

w E

IR

5.

Sys

tem

Des

ign

Mus

t B

e D

one

6.

Req

uire

s T

ran

sfe

r to

Tra

vel W

est

7.

Req

uire

s N

ew

Mai

nten

ance

Fac

ility

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

7 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

In

c.

Page 83: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: E

AS

TS

IDE

LR

T

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

2

UN

ION

ST

AT

ION

TO

WH

ITII

ER

IAT

LA

NT

IC

DA

TE

1

1/5

/98

O

F

2 R

EV

. 0

XL

S

$:

1988

Do

llars

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

MT

AU

NIT

B

AH

UN

IT

MT

A

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

QTY

P

RIC

E

PR

ICE

U

NIT

C

OS

T

BO

UN

D

CO

ST

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

B

RID

GE

OV

ER

101

FR

EE

WA

Y (

SE

GM

EN

TA

L)

80

0

$1

0,5

00

$

3,7

50

R

F

$8

,40

0,0

00

$

3,0

00

,04

5

$8

,40

0,0

00

AT

-GR

AD

E-G

UID

EW

AY

3

02

50

$

2,5

00

$2

,457

R

F

$7

5,6

25

,00

0

$7

4,3

34

,26

6

$7

5,6

25

,00

0

(inc

ludi

ng s

tre

et r

esto

ratio

n @

$25

0 R

F a

nd s

ide

wa

lk r

econ

stru

ctio

n @

$40

0 R

F)

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) $

84

,02

5,0

00

$

77

, 33

4,31

1 $

84

,02

5,0

00

tfA

ZA

BD

QU

S W

AS

IE tf

AM

DL

IMG

A

LL

OW

AN

CE

1

$1,5

00

,00

0

LS

$

1,5

00

,00

0

$1

,50

0,0

00

$1

,50

0.0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$1

,50

0,0

00

$

1,5

00

,00

0

$1

,50

0,0

00

ST

AII

QM

CQ

SI

PA

SS

EN

GE

R L

OA

DIN

G/U

NL

OA

DIN

G F

AC

ILIT

IES

7

$5

00

,00

0

$656

,260

E

A

$3

,50

0,0

00

$

4,5

93

,81

9

$3

,50

0,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$3

,50

0,0

00

$

4,5

93

,81

9

$3

,50

0,0

00

MA

IN!.

FA

CIL

& Y

AR

D C

QS

IS

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

(AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

1 $

35

,00

0,0

00

L

S

$3

5,0

00

,00

0

$2

7,0

48

,31

6

$3

5,0

00

,00

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$3

5,0

00

,00

0

$2

7,0

48

,31

6

$3

5,0

00

,00

0

VE

HIC

LE

CQ

SI

RE

VE

NU

E V

EH

ICL

E

34

$

2,5

00

,00

0

$2

,00

8,2

68

$

85

,00

0,0

00

$

68

,28

1,1

15

$6

8,28

1 '1

15

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICL

E C

OS

T)

$8

5,0

00

,00

0

$6

8,2

81

,11

5

$6

8,2

81

,11

5

SY

SIE

M W

IDE

EQUI~MEHI C

QS

I T

RA

CK

WO

RK

(IN

CL.

SP

EC

IAL

TR

AC

KW

OR

K)

3105

0 $4

21

$5

22

R

F

$1

3,0

72

,05

0

$1

6,2

07

,29

4

$1

3,0

72

,05

0

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L S

TA

. 6

$1

60

,00

0

Incl

uded

bel

ow

EA

$

96

0,0

00

In

clud

ed b

elo

w

$9

60

,00

0

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L G

D'N

Y

31

05

0

$5

00

$

48

5

RF

$

15

,52

5,0

00

$

15

,05

5,6

47

$

15

,52

5,0

00

TR

AC

TIO

N P

OW

ER

ST

A.

(XF

MR

) 6

$1

,10

0,0

00

$1

,927

,875

E

A

$6

,60

0,0

00

$1

1,5

67

,24

8

$6

,60

0,0

00

CO

MM

UN

ICA

TIO

NS

3

10

50

$

0

$9

0

RF

$

0

$2

,80

7,4

14

$

0

FA

RE

CO

LL

EC

TIO

N

6 $

25

0,0

00

$1

51,4

77

EA

$

1,5

00

,00

0

$9

08

,86

0

$1,5

00,0

00

SIG

NA

GE

& G

RA

PH

ICS

6

$0

$4

1,01

6 E

A

$0

$

24

6,0

97

$

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$3

7,6

57

,05

0

$4

6,7

92

,55

9

$3

7,6

57

,05

0

IT.· O

T.A'.'

>!E. s

t. 1"."

''' :r.eo

;cos]i

''"99

8*DOLLARS

;~t1hl

i!J8Nf

fi'il4

\'''~~

~~~h1

!${¥t~

£,~'1

p~*'

~"'!

ll~w

J."'

t<,\

1ii\

ilil

c1~

'$'"'

6'68

2'060J

jiiS ..

22

... 5.

i.SSCl120

''IIi$.2

29.'963

••ss

~l , ;

, -_

,...,

."_

,: Tl~ __

_ ,

"'· ,

. -

-"'-

_'="':U

6 --·

:· -~

----

---·---

· ..

··.

_:f'

~--.;;

<,j,i._

."~i

'=·"-s

y'"M'_

-m·_>i

-~-

_ .

--~~

_U~':!

S,3-

.-,_

.. _. _.

_ ._,_

---Hfi

.~"g

"~?'

W~t,

, -·

___

___ ,,;

.:<.,,

__ .~

,f>~"f,(~,.Yif<,,,~

,..,-.t:

¥.:~·o:A

'fiRIJ~

li;~\-~

--'-

---·-

---'--

. __

!W

, _

~-_

_ ,

..•

6 .. --.

-!~· ..

,!:f

fi ·· .

. ;

_ ...

' ,

,-,,

.,,.

,•,

Co

st d

eve

lop

me

nt

wor

kshe

et L

RT

.xls

E5

-S

um

• ..

2-B

F

Page 84: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• C

OS

T E

ST

IM,T

E C

OV

ER

SH

EE

T

• P

RO

JEC

T:

EA

ST

SID

E L

RT

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 1

UN

ION

ST

AT

ION

TO

WH

ITII

ER

IAT

LA

NT

IC

DA

TE

11

/5/9

8 O

F

2 R

EV

.: 0

$:

1988

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$84,

025,

000

$77,

334,

311

$84

,025

,000

1 B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DLI

NG

ALL

OW

AN

CE

$1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

2)

ST

AT

ION

S

$3,5

00,0

00

$4,5

93,8

19

$3,5

00,0

00

3) M

AIN

YA

RD

AN

D S

HO

P

$35,

000,

000

$27,

048,

316

$35,

000,

000

4) S

YS

TE

MW

IDE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

$3

7,65

7,05

0 $4

6,79

2,55

9 $3

7,65

7,05

0 5)

VE

HIC

LES

$8

5,00

0,00

0 $6

8,28

1,11

5 $6

8,28

1 '1

15

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee p

ag

e 2

fo

r d

eta

ils)

$246

,682

,~50

$2

25,5

50,1

20

$229

,963

,165

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5

%

$6,1

67,0

51

$5,6

38,7

53

$5,7

49,0

79

7)0

WN

ER

SIN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0%

$1

9,73

4,56

4 $1

8,04

4,01

0 $1

8,39

7,05

3 8)

MA

ST

ER

AG

RE

EM

EN

TS

2

.5%

$6

,167

,051

$5

,638

,753

$5

,749

,079

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $3

2,06

8,66

7 $2

9,32

1,51

6 $2

9,89

5,21

1

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C)

0.5%

$1

,233

,410

$1

,127

,751

$1

,149

,816

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C)

$1,2

33,4

10

$1,1

27,7

51

$1,1

49,8

16

10)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D)

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D)

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

11)

PR

OF

. S

ER

VIC

ES

(E

) $1

10,1

95,8

11

$61,

624,

777

$74,

482,

294

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E)

$110

,195

,811

$6

1,62

4,77

7 $7

4,48

2,29

4

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

10

%

$8,4

02,5

00

$7,7

33,4

31

$8,4

02,5

00

ITE

M 1

B

10%

$1

50,0

00

$150

,000

$1

50,0

00

B)

ITE

M2

8%

$2

80,0

00

$367

,505

$2

80,0

00

C)

ITE

M3

,4,&

5

8%

$12,

612,

564

$11,

369,

759

$11

,275

,053

D

) IT

EM

6, 7

, &

8

10%

$3

,206

,867

$2

,932

,151

.56

$2,9

89,5

21

E)

ITE

M 1

0 0%

$0

$

0

$0

F)

ITE

M 1

1 10

%

$11,

019,

581

$6,1

62,4

78

$7,4

48,2

29

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F)

$35,

671,

512

$28,

715,

325

$30,

545,

304

IGAANo

-;ro

TA~¥

-!i,1

!19~

t:oo

!.;L

rAR~~~r£~~~~w,;M,w~~~~~m•~ml@:l~tt~~!f~1.twP

;Pii1

;lls.P

}I•

s.3fi

1J33

9:.~~

J.,, •

• 3l.!'

:Q3s

;z!l.o

:l

Co

st d

eve

lop

me

nt w

ork

she

et l

rt.x

ls e

1 eS

sum

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

8 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 85: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

> < ~ (/) z < a: 1-(/) ::l m

I a: 0 c -a: a: 0 0 w c -(/) t; < w

i 3foN'O'n lioil ·· ·-·)'+---~··· ; . .. !,cfii:r.,;ct

-';~---j ·· · -~

---· --!

i z _:'-.. ..

... :.#~ ....... J . _____ ----- ~ ---/ / ffi I

b( ........... ~ !

' i \

... ·····--·············· ~ l

j

;

i /

,_ Gl 'C c:

:::> ,_ 0 Dl c:

; Ill

·;c c: Wo I·--::U as:l ,_,_ o-,_Ill -c: CliO :!EO

> aJ

! ~ - -·- ...

"iii c: aJ ,_ .... Ill :l fD

u. 0)

I

C\1 •

Page 86: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• -

• E

asts

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es D

escr

iptio

ns -

Bu

s T

ran

sitw

ay

TH

E B

US

TR

AN

SIT

WA

Y F

OL

LO

WS

TH

E S

AM

E A

LIG

NM

EN

T A

S T

HE

LIG

HT

RA

IL A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

E

AN

D P

RO

VID

ES

BU

S S

ER

VIC

E T

O S

ER

VE

TH

E T

RA

VE

L M

AR

KE

T N

EE

DS

OF

TH

E E

AS

TS

IDE

C

OR

RID

OR

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s of

the

alig

nm

en

t in

clud

e ..

.

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

No.

Veh

icle

s:

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

Atla

ntic

Blv

d.

Littl

e T

okyo

, F

irst

/Boy

le·,

Firs

t/Sot

o, F

irst

/Ind

iana

W

hitt

ier/

Row

an,

Wh

ittie

r/ A

rizon

a, W

hitt

ier/

Atla

ntic

34

Pla

nn

ed

Pea

k-O

ne

-Wa

y P

eak

Off

-Pe

ak

Ho

ur

Ca

pa

city

C

on

sist

R

ou

te

Sp

ee

d

Tim

e

He

ad

wa

y H

ea

dw

ay

(Pa

sse

ng

ers

pe

r V

eh

icle

s L

en

gth

M

iles

(MP

H)

(Min

) (M

in)

(Min

) H

ou

r)

34

2 5.

9 13

.4

26.5

5.

0 12

.0

1,99

6 ·---

--

Str

en

gth

s W

ea

kne

sse

s

Ma

xim

um

B

uild

-Ou

t P

ea

k-H

ou

r C

ap

aci

ty

(Pa

sse

ng

ers

Pe

r H

ou

r)

6,73

2

1.

Mee

ts T

rave

l Mar

ket

Dem

ands

1.

D

edic

ated

Lan

e R

equi

res

Red

uctio

n in

the

num

ber

of T

rave

l 2.

Lo

wes

t Cos

t La

nes

3.

Dee

pest

Pen

etra

tion

Thr

ough

Eas

tsid

e 2.

R

equi

res

Tra

nsfe

r to

Tra

vel W

est

4.

Less

Com

mun

ity D

isru

ptio

n th

an L

ight

Rai

l Alte

rnat

ive

3.

Ded

icat

ed L

ane

Lim

its P

arki

ng

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

9 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 87: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

CO

ST

ES

TIM

AT

E

PR

OJE

CT

: E

AS

TS

IDE

BU

S T

RA

NS

ITW

AY

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 2

DA

TE

11

/6/9

8 O

F

2 U

NIO

N S

TA

TIO

N T

O

RE

V.

0 X

LS

W

HIT

IIE

R/A

TL

AN

TIC

VIA

AL

AM

ED

A

$:

1998

Do

llars

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

MT

AU

NIT

B

AH

UN

IT

MT

A

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

Q

TY

P

RIC

E

PR

ICE

U

NIT

C

OS

T

BO

UN

D

CO

ST

G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

S

AT

GR

AD

E B

US

WA

Y

2937

0 $3

20

$466

R

F $9

,398

,400

$1

3,68

5,28

8 $9

,398

,400

A

T G

RA

DE

BU

SW

AY

@ S

TA

TIO

N

2880

$5

35

lncl

in a

bove

R

F

$1,5

40,8

00

lncl

in a

bove

$1

,540

,800

S

TR

EE

T I

MP

RO

VE

ME

NT

S @

XIN

GS

30

$1

52,0

00

$139

,891

E

A

$4,5

60,0

00

$4,1

96,7

18

$4,5

60,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) 32

280

$15,

499,

200

$17,

882,

006

$15,

499,

200

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

ALL

OW

AN

CE

1

$1,5

00,0

00

NA

LS

$1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

HA

Z M

AT

) $1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

$1

,500

,000

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

A

T G

RA

DE

ST

AT

ION

(1

20

FT

. S

IDE

PLA

TF

OR

M)

7 $5

05,0

00

$526

,318

E

A

$3,5

35,0

00

$3,6

84,2

24

$3,5

35,0

00

(incl

udin

g fin

ishe

s, l

ands

capi

ng,

cano

pies

, lig

htin

g &

sig

nage

)

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$3,5

35,0

00

$3,6

84,2

24

$3,5

35,0

00

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL &

YA

RD

CO

ST

S

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

(ALL

OW

AN

CE

} 1

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

VE

HIC

LE C

OS

T

RE

VE

NU

E V

EH

ICLE

34

$3

50,0

00

$333

,291

$1

1,90

0,00

0 $1

1,33

1,89

4 $1

1,33

1,89

4 S

UB

TO

TA

L (

VE

HIC

LE C

OS

T)

$11,

900,

000

$11,

331,

894

$11,

331

,894

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

PR

IOR

ITY

SIG

NA

LIZ

AT

ION

1

$2,5

80,0

00

$750

,000

LS

$2

,580

,000

$7

50,0

00

$750

,000

T

ICK

ET

VE

ND

ING

MA

CH

INE

S

52

$75,

000

NA

E

A

$3,9

00,0

00

$908

,859

$9

08,8

59

CO

MM

UN

ICA

TIO

NS

32

250

$50

$24

RF

$1,6

12,5

00

$774

,418

$7

74,4

18

GU

IDE

WA

Y L

IGH

TIN

G I

NC

L. E

LEC

TR

IFIC

AT

ION

32

250

$60

$60

RF

$1

,935

,000

$1

,935

,000

$1

,935

,000

S

EC

UR

ITY

32

250

$30

$30

RF

$967

,500

$9

67,5

00

$967

,500

S

IGN

AG

EIG

RA

PH

ICS

(O

TH

ER

TH

AN

ST

AT

ION

S)

3225

0 $2

0 $1

7 R

F $6

45,0

00

$538

,040

$5

38,0

40

$11,

640,

000

$5,8

73,8

17

$5,8

73,8

17

Page 88: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• -

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

PR

OJE

CT

: E

AS

TS

IDE

BU

S T

RA

NS

ITW

AY

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 1

0 D

AT

E

11

/6/9

8

OF

2

UN

ION

ST

AT

ION

TO

R

EV

.:

0 W

HIT

TIE

R/A

TL

AN

TIC

VIA

AL

AM

ED

A

$:

19

88

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A

) G

UID

EW

AY

S A

ND

ST

RU

CT

UR

ES

$

15

,49

9,2

00

$

17

,88

2,0

06

$

15

,49

9,2

00

1B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DL

ING

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

$1

,50

0,0

00

$

1,5

00

,00

0

$1

,50

0,0

00

2)

ST

AT

ION

S

$3

,53

5,0

00

$

3,6

84

,22

4

$3

,53

5,0

00

3)

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$

5,0

00

,00

0

$5

,00

0,0

00

$

5,0

00

,00

0

4) S

YS

TE

MW

IDE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

$

11

,64

0,0

00

$

5,8

73

,81

7

$5

,87

3,8

17

5)

VE

HIC

LE

S

$11

,90

0,0

00

$

11

,33

1 ,8

94

$1

1,33

1,8

94

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee

pa

ge

2 f

or

de

tails

) $

49

,07

4,2

00

$

45

,27

1,9

41

$

42

,73

9,9

11

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5

%

$1

,22

6,8

55

$

1,1

31

,79

9

$1

,06

8,4

98

7)

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0

%

$3

,92

5,9

36

$

3,6

21

,75

5

$3

,41

9,1

93

8)

MA

ST

ER

AG

RE

EM

EN

TS

5

.0%

$

2,4

53

,71

0

$2

,26

3,5

97

$

2,1

36

,99

6

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $

7,6

06

,50

1

$7

,01

7,1

51

$

6,6

24

,68

6

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C)

. 0

.5%

$

24

5,3

71

$

22

6,3

60

$

21

3,7

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C

) $

24

5,3

71

$

22

6,3

60

$

21

3,7

00

10)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D)

$0

$

0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $

0

$0

$

0

11)

PR

OF

. S

ER

VIC

ES

(E

) $

22

,77

0,4

29

$

8,8

97

,05

5

$1

3,8

81

,92

3

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $

22

,77

0,4

29

$

8,8

97

,05

5

$1

3,8

81

,92

3

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

1

2%

$

1,8

59

,90

4

$2

,14

5,8

41

$

1,8

59

,90

4

ITE

M 1

B

12

%

$1

80

,00

0

$1

80

,00

0

$1

80

,00

0

B)

ITE

M 2

1

7%

$

60

0,9

50

$

62

6,3

18

$

60

0,9

50

C

) IT

EM

3,

4, &

5

10

%

$2

,85

4,0

00

$

2,2

20

,57

1

$2

,22

0,5

71

D)

ITE

M 6

, 7

, &

8

10

%

$7

60

,65

0

$7

01

,71

5

$6

62

,46

9

E)

ITE

M 1

0

10

%

$0

$

0

$0

F

) IT

EM

11

10

%

$2

,27

7,0

43

$

88

9,7

05

$

1,3

88

,19

2

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $

8,5

32,

54

7

$6

,76

4,1

50

$

6,9

12

,08

6

GR

AN

D ;T

OT

AL

:'t';.,7

:19

98

•· DO

LL

:AR

S if.

::i.@

:::cJ!•

tiii<{

;l;o'.:

, t~. ·;

;:y;y;

-:;y;!

rc,;<

l?p.i;,

; ;,{3'~(6?0:S;;rR¥~

'>:0:'f

1!il:/

~l;>,;

;?f:;}

,~~~;~G';~:.~(;~~S$88,229,048

·J;~,

ifW't$68

;1:76,

656

,J ~>

t": $

70

,37

2,3

06

!

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

10

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 89: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• -

• E

ast

sid

e C

orr

ido

r A

ltern

ativ

es

-P

roje

ct T

ime

line

EA

CH

OF

TH

E A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

SE

LE

CT

ED

FO

R F

INA

L E

VA

LU

AT

ION

IN

TH

E E

AS

TS

IDE

C

OR

RID

OR

AR

E A

T D

IFF

ER

EN

T S

TA

GE

S IN

TH

E P

LA

NN

ING

AN

D D

ES

IGN

PR

OC

ES

S

• T

he s

uspe

nded

pro

ject

to F

irst

and

Lore

na is

for

all

inte

nts

and

purp

oses

rea

dy to

go,

but

ad

equa

te f

undi

ng i

s no

t av

aila

ble

to b

uild

thi

s se

gmen

t o

f sub

way

The

oth

er p

roje

cts

in t

his

corr

idor

are

at

diff

eren

t st

ages

in t

he

pla

nnin

g pr

oces

s an

d m

ust

a nu

mbe

r of

ste

ps p

rior

to im

plem

enta

tion

"~-'"-""•·''

-""---'~>-

.<'""-'·''<' ~ :

·< •.

• : ...

...

·' ,

,•

• .,

'"

·-·

:. ·

>

....

....

'

.o'o

.W.:

••••

:A

V..

<.o

•• :~· ..... ,

''"" ,.,

.,_,

,:-~

:.<<

.•. •~.•

.,.

• •

• ~:~,

• ",

>

• <

-: ~~~

Hea

vy R

ail S

ubw

ay:

I Com

plet

e I

Com

plet

e

I C

ompl

ete

I C

ompl

ete

I Com

plet

e I C

ompl

ete I C

ompl

ete I C

ompl

ete I

95%

U

nion

Sta

tion

to

Firs

t I L

oren

a 3

mo

. I

4m

o.

(Sus

pend

ed P

roje

ct)

Hea

vy R

ail S

ubw

ay:

I Com

plet

e I

Com

plet

e

I Com

plet

e

I C

ompl

ete

I 65

%

I 0%

I 0%

I

0%

I 50

%

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

C

have

z I

Sot

o 3

mo

. 6

mo

. 4

mo

. I

6m

o.

I 9

mo

. I

4m

o.

Ligh

t Rai

l At-

Gra

de:

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I

0%

I 0%

U

nion

Sta

tion

to

Atla

ntic

I W

hitti

er

3m

o.

Sm

o.

10 m

o.

3m

o.

'9m

o.

6m

o.

4m

o.

I 6

mo

. I

12 m

o.

I 4

mo.

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I 0%

I

0%

At-

Gra

de:

Gat

eway

Pla

za to

3

mo

. S

mo

. 10

mo

. 3

mo

. 9

mo

. 6

mo

. 4

mo

. 6

mo

. 12

mo

. I

4 m

o.

Atla

ntic

I W

hitte

r

I I I I

NO

PR

OJE

CT

IN T

HE

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

IS

RE

AD

Y T

O G

O A

ND

AD

DIT

ION

AL

PL

AN

NIN

G O

R

FU

ND

ING

IS

NE

ED

ED

IN T

HE

FY

04 P

ER

IOD

PR

IOR

TO

IM

PL

EM

EN

TA

TIO

N

?m

o.

32

mo

.

62

mo

.

62

mo

.

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

11

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 90: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

EF

RA

ME

FO

R S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

TO

FIR

ST

I L

OR

EN

A

MO

NT

HS

P

erc

en

t M

on

ths

to

PR

OJE

CT

PH

AS

E

Co

mp

lete

C

om

ple

te

6 12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

91

.~!!!!

!!.lf:

I.I!:O

:!!~.~

.').'~

)~i.~ .

......

......

......

.•.. J.

9.9.~(

~ .......

.......

........

........

.. ....

. .....

.....

.....

..... .

.... ..

... ....

. . ....

.....

. .... .

.... .

.... .

.... ..

... ...

.. ....

. . ....

..... .

....

..... ..

... .....

. .....

...... .....

. ......

.....

...... .

.....

. !?E!!

!!.~!:

?. ....

..•...

......

......

......

......

......

.. ~.9.

9.!:'~

........

........

........

........

.....

..... .

.... ...

.. ....

. ....

. ....

. .....

.....

..... .

.... ..

... ....

. .....

.....

. .... ..

... ....

. .....

.....

..... .

..... ..

.... ...

.. ....

.. ....

.. .....

. .....

...... .

.....

. F-!~!

!!.~!:

?. ....

......

......

......

......

......

..... :

.. ~.9.

9.!:'~

........

........

........

........

....

. ...

.. ...

.. . ...

. .....

. ....

.....

..... .

.... ..

... ....

. .....

.....

..... .

.... ..

... ....

. . ....

.....

..... ·

···· ...

... ....

.. .....

......

......

...... .

.... ..

.... ...

... . ~!

.~.I!.

'!!!~!

!!Y.5!

:1.9.i

.r:'.~.~

.~.r:'.

9 ......

......

......

)9.9.~(~ ...

........

........

.......

......

.....

.....

.....

.....

.....

..... .

.... ..

... ....

. .....

.....

..... .

....

.....

..... .

.... ...

.. ...

.. ...

.. ...

.. ...

.. ...

... ··

···· .

....

......

.....

. ......

.....

······ ·

·····

~~~~t~

~~~-·

=~=~

i~ -~ .••••••••

•••••••••••••.••.••••.•.••

••.•• : :: ·~ ~ ~

••••· •·••• ••••. ~ ~···

••.•• -~ ~· : •••••• ::

· =~ ~·· C

onstr

uctio

n an

d Te

stin

g 0%

3

6-4

2

Tota

l Tim

e to

Com

plet

ion

45

-52

• ·2

-12

F

Page 91: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• -

• E

asts

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es T

imel

ines

-S

usp

en

de

d P

roje

ct

TH

E S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

TO

TH

E E

AS

TS

IDE

CO

UL

D C

ON

TIN

UE

WIT

H O

NL

Y F

INA

L D

ES

IGN

E

LE

ME

NT

S A

ND

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N R

EM

AIN

ING

• A

ll en

viro

nmen

tal d

ocum

ents

for

th

e fu

ll S

uspe

nded

Pro

ject

are

com

plet

e

• F

ive

perc

ent

of th

e de

sign

and

eng

inee

ring

wor

k re

mai

ns

' '

• C

ompl

etio

n of

con

stru

ctio

n to

Firs

t an

d Lo

rena

and

the

rev

enue

tes

ting

peri

od is

est

imat

ed

to r

equi

re a

n ad

ditio

nal 3

to

3 Y2

yea

rs

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

12

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 92: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

E F

RA

ME

FO

R M

OD

IFIE

D A

LIG

NM

EN

T T

O C

HA

VE

Z IS

OT

O

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

P

RO

JEC

T P

HA

SE

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

90

Alt

em

ati

ws

Ana

lys

is

100%

I-

-I-

----

--

--

-D

raft

EIS

65

%

3 D

EIS

Re\

'iew

0%

6

Fin

al E

IS

0%

4 P

relim

inar

y E

ngin

eerin

g 65

%

12

Pro

cure

men

t S

tra

teg

y I

RO

D

0%

6 --

---

~------~--

-~-----

Fin

al D

esig

n I

Eng

inee

ring

50%

9

-----

------1-----~--1------

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay A

cqu

isiti

on

90

%

6 --------

-----~---

-C

ontr

acto

r B

id

0%

4 C

onst

ruct

ion

and

Tes

ting

0%

36

--

Tot

al T

ime

to C

ompl

etio

n 68

_lL~-

~

~

• ·-

13

F

Page 93: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• -

• E

ast

sid

e C

orr

ido

r A

ltern

ativ

es

Tim

elin

es

-M

od

ifie

d A

lign

me

nt t

o C

ha

vez

I S

oto

TH

E M

OD

IFIE

D A

LIG

NM

EN

T T

O C

HA

VE

Z I

SO

TO

RE

QU

IRE

S R

EV

ISIO

NS

TO

DE

SIG

N F

OR

TH

E

NE

W T

UN

NE

L A

LIG

NM

EN

T.

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N T

IME

CA

N D

EC

RE

AS

E B

UT

AD

DIT

ION

AL

E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L T

IME

TO

PR

EP

AR

E E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L D

OC

UM

EN

TS

IS R

EQ

UIR

ED

• T

he M

odifi

ed A

lignm

ent

to C

have

z I

Sot

o re

quire

s a

rese

lect

ion

of th

e Lo

cally

Pre

ferr

ed

Alte

rnat

ive.

T

his

proc

ess,

whi

ch t

akes

pla

ce n

orm

ally

dur

ing

the

dev

elop

men

t of

the

Dra

ft

EIS

, is

exp

ecte

d to

take

9 m

onth

s

• N

ew tu

nnel

des

igns

mus

t be

com

plet

ed f

or

the

shor

tene

d tu

nnel

bet

wee

n U

nion

Sta

tion

and

the

stat

ion

at F

irst

and

Boy

le.

Alth

ough

sta

tion

desi

gns

for

the

Firs

t I B

oyle

and

C

have

z I

Sot

o st

atio

ns a

re n

early

com

plet

e, t

hey

may

req

uire

min

or r

evis

ions

. T

he

se

desi

gn r

evis

ions

and

com

plet

ion

of th

e F

inal

Env

iron

men

tal

Impa

ct S

tate

men

t ca

n o

ccu

r as

the

Loc

ally

Pre

ferr

ed A

ltern

ativ

e is

bei

ng r

evis

ed

• R

ight

-of-

way

acq

uisi

tion

for

the

Mod

ified

Alig

nmen

t is

nea

rly

com

plet

e an

d re

quire

s ju

st a

n

addi

tiona

l 6

mon

ths

• C

onst

ruct

ion

for

this

sho

rten

ed s

ubw

ay a

ltern

ativ

e ca

n be

com

plet

e in

tw

o ye

ars.

Tes

ting

and

final

pre

para

tions

are

est

imat

ed t

o re

quire

up

to a

n ad

ditio

nal y

ear

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2

-13

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 94: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

E F

RA

ME

FO

R L

IGH

T R

AIL

EX

TE

NS

ION

TO

WH

ITT

IER

I A

TL

AN

TIC

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

P

RO

JEC

T P

HA

SE

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

90

IIII

I.

Alte

mat

ii.€S

An

aly

sis

0%

21

Dra

ft E

IS

0%

9 D

EIS

Rel

.iew

0%

6

Fin

al E

IS

0%

4 P

relim

inar

y E

ngin

eerin

g 0%

12

~

-------

·f--

1-P

rocu

rem

ent

Str

ate

gy

I R

OD

0%

6

--------c-------

,1_1_

1 __ --

--

1--

Fin

al D

esig

n /-

Eng

inee

ring

0%

12

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay A

cqu

isiti

on

0%

12

C

ontr

acto

r B

id

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d T

estin

g 0%

3

6-4

2

• •

Tot

al l

ime

to

Com

plet

ion

94

-10

0

• -2

-14

F

Page 95: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• -

• E

ast

sid

e C

orr

ido

r A

ltern

ativ

es

Tim

elin

es

-L

igh

t R

ail

Ext

en

sio

n t

o W

hitt

ier I

Atla

ntic

AN

EX

TE

NS

ION

OF

LIG

HT

RA

IL T

O T

HE

EA

ST

SID

E R

EQ

UIR

ES

AN

EN

TIR

EL

Y N

EW

PR

OJE

CT

D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

PR

OC

ES

S

• C

hoos

ing

a lig

ht r

ail

optio

n on

the

Eas

tsid

e w

ill r

equi

re a

new

alte

rnat

ives

ana

lysi

s pr

oces

s w

hich

can

las

t ap

prox

imat

ely

21 m

onth

s

• D

evel

opm

ent

of

a ne

w D

raft

EIS

and

ado

ptio

n of

a L

ocal

ly P

refe

rred

Alte

rnat

ive

will

req

uire

ap

prox

imat

ely

15 m

onth

s

• C

ompl

etio

n of

the

Fin

al E

nviro

nmen

tal

Impa

ct S

tate

men

t re

quire

s fo

ur a

dditi

onal

mon

ths

• C

onst

ruct

ion

and

test

ing

of a

n E

asts

ide

light

rai

l al

tern

ativ

e w

ill r

equi

re a

ppro

xim

atel

y th

ree

to f

our

year

s.

Add

ition

al t

ime

to m

itiga

te im

pact

s to

str

eet t

raff

ic a

nd c

omm

erci

al

busi

ness

es o

ccur

s w

ithin

thi

s tim

e fr

ame

• T

he c

onst

ruct

ion

proc

ess

is c

ompl

icat

ed b

y th

e ne

ed t

o bu

ild a

brid

ge o

ver

the

exis

ting

US

-

101

free

way

. T

he n

eed

to m

aint

ain

traf

fic fl

ow r

equi

res

· an

elon

gate

d co

nstr

uctio

n sc

hedu

le

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2

-14

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 96: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

E F

RA

ME

FO

R B

US

TR

AN

SIT

WA

Y T

O W

HIT

TIE

R I

AT

LA

NT

IC

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

P

RO

JE

CT

PH

AS

E

Co

mp

lete

C

om

ple

te

6 12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

9(

Alte

rnat

ives

An

aly

sis

0%

21

. -~-

-----1-

------

Dra

ft E

IS

0%

9 D

EIS

Re\

1ew

0%

6

Fin

al E

IS I

Pre

lim.

Eng

inee

rir

0%

4 P

relim

inar

y E

ngin

eerin

g 0%

12

_

.,

Pro

cure

men

t S

tra

teg

y I

RO

D

0%

6 -F

inal

Des

ign

I E

ngin

eerin

g 0%

12

----

1--~-----

~-~---~--

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay A

cqu

isiti

on

0%

12

C

ontr

acto

r B

id

0%

4 C

onst

ruct

ion

0%

24

Tot

al T

ime

to C

ompl

etio

n 86

• -2

-15

F

Page 97: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• -

• E

asts

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es T

ime

line

s -

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y to

Whi

ttie

r I

Atla

ntic

TH

E D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

OF

A B

US

WA

Y T

O T

HE

EA

ST

SID

E R

EQ

UIR

ES

AN

EN

TIR

EL

Y N

EW

P

RO

JEC

T D

EV

EL

OP

ME

NT

PR

OC

ES

S

• C

hoos

ing

a bu

s tr

ansi

tway

opt

ion

on t

he E

asts

ide

will

req

uire

a n

ew a

ltern

ativ

es a

naly

sis

proc

ess

whi

ch c

an l

ast

appr

oxim

atel

y 21

mon

ths

• D

evel

opm

ent

of a

new

Dra

ft E

IS a

nd a

dopt

ion

of a

Loc

ally

Pre

ferr

ed A

ltern

ativ

e w

ill req

~ire

appr

oxim

atel

y 15

mon

ths

• C

ompl

etio

n of

the

Fin

al E

nviro

nmen

tal

Impa

ct S

tate

men

t re

quire

s fo

ur

addi

tiona

l m

onth

s

• C

onst

ruct

ion

of a

n E

asts

ide

bus

tran

sitw

ay a

ltern

ativ

e w

ill r

equi

re a

ppro

xim

atel

y tw

o ye

ars.

Add

ition

al t

ime

to m

itiga

te im

pact

s to

str

eet t

raff

ic a

nd c

omm

erci

al b

usin

esse

s m

ay b

e ne

cess

ary

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

15

Boo

z·A

llen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 98: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• -

• R

esul

ts ..

. Eas

tsid

e C

orri

dor

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

RE

SU

LT

S I

NC

LU

DE

...

TIE

R 1

ME

AS

UR

ES

Alt

ern

ativ

e M

od

el N

ote

M

ob

ility

T

ran

sit

Rel

iab

ility

C

om

mu

nit

y C

ost

Dep

end

ency

Im

pac

ts

Eff

ecti

ven

ess

Hea

vy R

ail t

o F

irst

/Lor

ena

E-1

~

e e

~

~

Sus

pend

ed

Hea

vy R

ail t

o C

have

z/S

oto

E-2

HA

T

()

e e

. e

0 (w

ithou

t Li

ttle

To

kyo

Sta

tion)

Ligh

t R

ail f

rom

Uni

on S

tatio

n E

-5 L

RT

~

~

~.

()

~

to W

hitt

ier

I Atla

ntic

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y fr

om U

nion

E

-4

~

~

~

()

~

Sta

tion

to W

hitt

ier

I A

tlant

ic

Tra

nsitw

ay

--

---

TIE

R 2

ME

AS

UR

ES

Alt

ern

ativ

e M

od

el N

ote

E

con

om

ic

Saf

ety

En

viro

nm

enta

l

He

avy

Rai

l to

Fir

st/L

oren

a E

-1

e e

e S

uspe

nded

He

avy

Rai

l to

Ch

ave

ziS

oto

(w

ithou

t Li

ttle

E-2

HA

T

()

e e

To

kyo

Sta

tion)

Ligh

t R

ail f

rom

Uni

on S

tatio

n to

Whi

ttie

r I

E-5

LR

T

()

()

e A

tlant

ic

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay fr

om U

nion

Sta

tion

to

E-4

~

~

~

Whi

ttie

r I

Atla

ntic

T

ran

sitw

ay

KE

Y

e M

ost

Fav

orab

le o

r H

iah

0 Le

ast

Fav

orab

le o

r Lo

w

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.2-

16

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 99: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

ls.o

nn

.. c<

Mc•

sur.

o T

he -id

e C

orri

dor

• M

OB

ILIT

Y

TRA

NS

IT D

EP

EN

DE

NC

E

CO

ST

EFF

EC

TIV

EN

ES

S

----

---jR

EU

AB

IUlY

Rou

te

........

Mo

bili

ty I,_

.•

A-.1

. Tre

ntl

T

ran•

lt

Pro

iect

Un

iiC

ost

l C

ott

Erf

tdw

tcJ

ALT

ER

NA

TIV

E

I Mod

ol N

ote

I

Mlle

o 1...

......,"''

'1-.._

... rraw~n-

..... -

.....

.lo

bA

cceu

lbfiU

y ....

......

,1 ,..

_ .. .. .

.-.

Bn

e20

10

A

cceu

ibll

lt

<_.,..

., .....

C

ap

lta

lto

st.

/Mie

O

&M

Co

sts/

M._

U

t.q

cho

Coe

t,

IW.k

fr I

Tdp

I fW

idi"

,_M

od

tt

T,.

,...

T,.

_

T-.

.11

T..

.,

·-"""

"' o.c

:r ...

. .....

.....

.....

c-.l

ed

-

-T

rip

----

HA

tofl

rlf

ll-

r·-3.

12

1,71

5 H

J.tt

l o.tn

43

.31

43.3

2

0.1

2'!1.

3.<

0ll

11.2

1 3.

3 ~VwyHigh,

:ZU

I $:

ZS4

,N1

,17

1

s:z.to

o.m

.o

$32 .

...

I $5

.101

I

v..,.

_ .. ._

40"JioHigt\.1~

low

HRto~Soto

E:Z

HR

T

1.112

,..

882.

253

0.04

'!1.

43.0

43

.32

0.23

"'

'·"'

tl.:z

t 3.

$ 7

0"A

V..

,Hig

h, I

:ZU

5

I $2

50,5

72,1

11

I $

1,7

70

,W.»

I

164.

241

I .... ,

I

v.., .

...... ,

_ ("

Mt''I

\A:

l..lt

tl.

To

kyo

Stll

tiDn)

~Higl\.10"4

low

~===-

.. ----~~ 1

- ... 1,

71Z

.., __ ··-

43.4

0 43

.32

0

.11'

4 4,

173

11.4

0 l.O

S

==-~

' 22

.10

I 1

7J,

Oll

.8H

I

$t,

l1t .

... t

o I

$15,

551

I ... ..

, I

low

~.15'!1.V..,

,_

~-=:s..doft•JE-4r~J

... I

·2.2

02

I 17

1,1

U I 4

.21'!

1. ~-

-~-~ l _

_ 4l.l2

-~~L~~---_1~~ I

l-,t

5,.

Vw

y

21.1

0

I $1

4,52

$,4

24

I

$1,(

)17,

711.

11

I ...

I ...

I lo

w

,_

MO

BIU

TY

T

RA

NS

IT DEPENOENC~

CO

ST

EF

FE

CT

IVE

NE

SS

R

EL

IAB

IUlY

R

out•

.....

. M

ob

illt

)'ln

de

a

Ann

ual.

Tr.

nll

T

r.n1

lt

Pro

}ee

tu..

itC

01

t.

C0

1I1

Em

d_

,-A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

M

odel

Not

e M

il .. ~tw,

.._ ...

Tr•

..... n

-Jo

b

-w

....

Jo

iiA

ec .. a'

tMII

ty

..........

-,..

_.,

.. _...

Acc.l

lib

lllt

O

.lll

nll

lio

n

......

Clr

plt .

. C

.Ita

l M

-O

&M

Co

lta

iM ..

Trw

.IT

,._

T

....

a

T..

.,

·-kM

20

10

""""'

o.u

....

.....

. ... ~

.... U~C:O.tl

Sub~

Jcfr

iTri

p ..

..w

lltr

pW

Mo

de

.,.,_.

, .. T

rip

HII

IID

Fn

iiL

-E

·1 s

-p..

cte

d

3.12

~

rot

()

rot

... rot

()

cs

-~

• ~

0 0

~

~

• H

R ..

Ch

wu

/So

te

E·2

HJl

T

1.12

()

()

~ •

.,. ~ ~ ~ •

• ~

0 ~

0 0

• ~U..T~Sia&or,)

llll

tom

uro

loft

Stl

ltio

ft ..

E·S

UtT

WIIIWI"""*S~

. ...

~

rot

() •

... •

() ~ ~

• c•

~

~

~

~

rot

Bu

l ,,.

,.,.

_,.

-(I

Jnlo

lt S

t.tl

oll ..

E

""'T

f-"-1

...

~

Wll

tiw

Atl

-* !~hod

.)

~

0 0

... 0

~ ~ ~

• ~

• ()

...

... ~

A4.

2-17

Page 100: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

T.c

rfo

nll

all

ce M

easu

res

Th

e E

a.d

e C

orri

dor

• E

CO

NO

MIC

E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

T

SA

FE

TY

Mod

el

Job

Jo

bs

Gro

ss A

rea

G

ross

Are

a

Air

Qu

alit

y In

de

x S

afe

ty I

nd

ex

ALT

ER

NA

TIV

E

Not

es

Sup

port

ed,

Sup

port

ed,

Pro

duct

, P

rodu

ct,

Add

ition

al

Non

Tra

nsit

Pas

s. A

ccid

ents

P

ass.

Acc

iden

ts

Tra

ffic

Acc

iden

ts

Ope

ratin

g C

apita

l T

ran

sit

Veh

icul

ar

Per

cent

of

pe

r 10

0,00

0 p

er

100,

000

pe

r 10

0,00

0 S

afe

ty I

ndex

O

pera

ting

Cap

ital

($98

Mill

ions

) ($

98M

illio

ns)

Em

issi

ons

Em

issi

ons

(kgs

) N

TV

E

Boa

rdin

gs

Hub

/Tra

in M

iles

Hu

bff

rain

Mile

s

HR

to

Fir

st I

Lore

na

E-1

Sus

pend

ed

311

2218

9 10

.43

1099

.74

N

/A

242,

992

N/A

0.

08

0.0

0 1.

33

Com

posi

te

(sta

tiona

ry

sour

ce)

HR

to

Cha

vez/

Sol

o E

-2 H

RT

0.

08

0.0

0 1.

33

Com

posi

te

(With

out L

ittle

Tok

yo S

tatio

n)

101

11,5

70

3.3

8 57

3.47

N

/A

243,

024

N/A

(s

tatio

nary

so

urce

)

LR t

o Li

ttle

Tok

yo

E-5

LR

T

293

10,3

63

9.83

51

3.63

N

/A

243,

026

N/A

0.

15

0.83

4

.17

Com

posi

te

(sta

tiona

ry

sour

ce)

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay -

(Uni

on S

tatio

n to

E

-4 T

rans

itway

0.

40

0.06

2.

69

Com

Pc>

site

W

hitt

ier

Atla

ntic

Blv

d.)

186

2,06

1 6.

26

102

.15

5,72

5 24

3,03

1 2

.36%

EC

ON

OM

IC

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

AF

ET

Y

Mod

el

Job

Jobs

G

ross

Are

a

Gro

ss A

rea

A

ir Q

ua

lity

Ind

ex

Sa

fety

In

de

x A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

N

ote

s S

uppo

rted

, S

uppo

rted

, P

rodu

ct,

Pro

duct

, A

dditi

onal

N

on T

rans

it P

ass.

Acc

iden

ts

Pas

s. A

ccid

ents

T

raff

ic A

ccid

ents

P

erce

nt o

f O

pera

ting

Cap

ital

Ope

ratin

g C

apita

l T

ran

sit

Veh

icul

ar

NT

VE

p

er

100,

000

pe

r 10

0,00

0 p

er

100,

000

Sa

fety

Ind

ex

Em

issi

ons

Em

issi

ons

(kgs

) B

oard

ings

H

ub/T

rain

Mile

s H

ub

ffra

in M

iles

-------.

HR

to

Fir

st I

Lore

na

E-1

Sus

pend

ed

" •

" •

ct

• •

• •

• H

R t

o C

have

z/ S

oto

E-2

HR

T

0 ct

0

ct

• ct

• •

• •

(With

out

Littl

e T

okyo

Sta

tion)

---

--

-------------

·--

-LR

to

Litu

e T

okyo

E

-5 L

RT

ct

ct

ct

ct

ct

• ct

ct

ct

()

Bus

Tra

nsit

wa

y-

(Uni

on S

tatio

n to

E

-4 T

rans

itway

ct

0

ct

0 "

ct

" "

• "

a W

hitt

ier A

tlan

tic B

lvd.

)

A4.

2-18

R

egio

nal T

ran

sit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s B

ooz-

AIIe

n H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 101: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

N.o

d In

tegr

ity M

atrix

C

ty

lm,.

cts

The

.id

e C

orri

dor

• 0

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S

HR

to F

irst

I Lo

rena

H

R t

o C

have

z I S

olo

LR

fro

m U

nion

Sta

. To

Bu

s T

rans

lway

(U

nion

(Sus

pend

ed)

(With

ou

t Ltl.

To

kyo

Sta

.)

Wh

ittie

r/A

tlan

tic B

lvd.

S

tatio

n T

o W

hitt

ier/

Atla

ntic

GE

NE

RA

L C

OM

MU

NIT

Y

Blv

d.)

IMP

AC

TS

.$

0

+5

.$

0 +

5 .$

0

+5

.$

0 +

5

~i~I*'f~~

<t~;k:fl~

:t<'%5

.. :~~_.,

.,,,

-.. ,_

.....

.. -.. ._.

.....

.. -.. ,_

- -

.. ,_ -

lmp•

cts

on r

rop

trly

V•l

uu

./

./

./

./

ln_~

_pac

ls o

n B

usin

esst

s ./

./

./

./

h~!p_acls

on S

ecu

rity

./

./

./

./

1m po

ets

on A

uth

tlic

s

./

./

./

./

Noi

se I

mpa

cts

./

./

./

./

Impa

cts

on T

uff

ic L

anes

./

./

./

./

C:~~munity R

esp

onse

./

./

./

./

•Wb

ur.

Ap

pli

ull

lr

• •

~

()

Pos

iive

Pos

itive

S

light

Miti

gabl

e N

eutr

al

6 A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

HR

to F

irst

I Lo

rena

H

R to

Cha

vez

I So

lo

LR fr

om

Uni

on S

ta. T

o B

us T

rans

lway

(U

nion

CO

MM

UN

ITY

IMP

AC

TS

ON

(S

uspe

nded

) (W

ithou

t Ltl.

To

kyo

Sta

.)

Wh

ittie

r/A

tlan

tic B

lvd.

S

tatio

n T

o W

hitt

ier/

Atla

ntic

B

lvd

.)

RE

LOC

AT

ION

S

~~~t

41t~r~

~~rt

vi~~

~·r.

· :~k~l~

-.....

·-.....

·-.....

-.....

I H

ouse

hol

d R

eloc

atio

ns

./

./

IJ

./

Com

mu

nit

y F

acil

ity

Rel

ocat

ion

s ./

./

./

./

His

tori

c S

ile

Rel

ocat

ions

./

./

IJ

./

~

()

~

• Le

ss P

ositi

ve

Neu

tral

S

ligt

Miti

gabl

e P

ositi

ve

A4.

2-19

Page 102: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

' • •

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

Me

tro

rail

-E

xist

ing

or

Un

de

r C

on

stru

ctio

n

••••

• • •

• • •

• • •

R

ed L

ine

Ea

stsi

de

E

xte

nsi

on

-S

usp

en

de

d P

roje

ct

A4.

2-20

Le

ge

nd

-V

ery

Hig

h

1•1

Hig

h

1~-

1 M

od

era

te

D

D

Page 103: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• • -

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-M

OD

IFIE

D A

LIG

NM

EN

T T

O C

HA

VE

Z/S

OT

O

Me

tro

rail

-E

xist

ing

or

Un

de

r C

on

stru

ctio

n

--

--

Mo

difi

ed

Alig

nm

en

t to

C

have

z I

So

to

A4.

2-21

Lege

nd

-V

ery

Hig

h

1.-1

Hig

h

Mod

erat

e

Page 104: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

EA

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-LI

GH

T R

AIL

ALI

GN

ME

NT

At-

Gra

de L

igh

t R

ail

Lit

tle

To

kyo

Ext

en

sio

n

Atl

an

tic

Ext

en

sio

n

A4.

2-22

Le

ge

nd

-V

ery

Hig

h

llfil

Hig

h

Mo

de

rate

Lo

w

Page 105: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

> ~ s: !::: en z ~ a: .... en ::::> co a: • 0 c -a: a: 0 0 UJ c -en .... en ~ UJ

••

t!"..c Q) .2'1 > J:

,t.: . .

·~·. <>-Nv·~-"""·.,.-.o~O---·· -~~·· < -~~ 0 -~'---·,.._

('t) C\1

I

C\1 ..¢ <X:

Page 106: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

••

a: 0 c

M-·0:: ~a: ~0 co Zw we 0..­c..cn <(l-en

w 3:

Page 107: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• W

ests

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es

FO

UR

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S IN

TH

E W

ES

TS

IDE

CO

RR

IDO

R A

DV

AN

CE

D T

O E

VA

LU

AT

ION

• R

ed L

ine

Ext

ensi

on t

o P

ice/

San

Vic

ente

(S

uspe

nded

Pro

ject

)

• R

ed L

ine

sub

wa

y ex

tens

ion

to F

airf

ax v

ia W

ilshi

re B

oule

vard

• ·

Ligh

t R

ail t

o d

ownt

own

Sa

nta

Mo

nic

a v

ia E

xpos

ition

rig

ht-o

f-w

ay

• B

us T

rans

itway

to d

ownt

own

Sa

nta

Mo

nic

a v

ia E

xpos

ition

rig

ht-o

f-w

ay

TH

E P

HY

SIC

AL

AN

D O

PE

RA

TIN

G C

HA

RA

CT

ER

IST

ICS

OF

EA

CH

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

AR

E D

EF

INE

D

FO

R F

UR

TH

ER

AN

AL

YS

IS

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-1

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 108: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F W

ES

TS

IDE

CO

RR

IDO

R A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

eavy

Rai

l to

Pic

a I

San

W

ilsh

ire

I W

est

ern

to

H

Vic

en

te-

Sus

pend

ed

Pic

a S

an V

icen

te v

ia I

~a~y

I S

ub

wa

y I

2 I

1 I

2.2

I 3.

9 I

33.8

I

4.25

I

5.0

Pro

ject

, su

bw

ay

Wilt

on

and

Arl

ingt

on

al

He

avy

Rai

l to

Wils

hir

e I

Wils

hir

e B

oule

vard

I H

ea

vy I S

ubw

ay

Fa

irfa

x su

bw

ay

or

aeria

l to

R

. 1 or

I

3 I

Non

e I

3.0

I 4.

4 I

41.3

I

4.25

I

5.0

Fa

irfa

x al

A

eria

l --

Ligh

t R

ail A

t-G

rad

e E

xpo

?'hi

Fio

wer

LA

CB

D t

o

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay:

Exp

ositi

on v

ia

16

71h

I F

low

er to

41 h

I exi

stin~

Lon.

g B

each

I Lig

ht R

ail I A

t-Gra

de I

(2

I 7

I 18

I

51

I 21

.2

I 5.

0 I

12.0

C

olor

ado

Blu

e L1

ne a

lignm

ent,

ex

istin

g)

Exp

ositi

on to

41 h

I C

olo

rad

o

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y A

t-U

riion

Sta

tion

To

41 h

Gra

de

Co

lora

do

Exp

o R

ight

-of-

Way

: I

Bus

I A

t-Gra

de

I 24

I

6 I

18.5

I

51

I 21

.8

I 5.

0 I

12.0

G

ate

wa

y P

laza

to 4

1 h I

Co

lora

do

.eg

ion

al

Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s •. 3-2

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .lt

on

Inc.

Page 109: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• W

ES

TS

IDE

CO

RR

IDO

R A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

He

avy

Rai

l S

ubw

ay:

1 W

ilshi

re I

Wes

tern

to

60

7.4

I 4

.4

I 16

,300

I

35

I ~

I ~

I e

I e

I ~

Pic

a I

San

Vic

ente

(S

uspe

nded

Pro

ject

)

He

avy

Rai

l Sub

way

:

1 W

ilshi

re I

Wes

tern

to

85

9.7

I 6.

5 I

21,6

00

I 50

I ~

I ~

I e

· I

e I ~

Wils

hire

I F

airf

ax

Ligh

t R

ail A

t-G

rade

I 93

0.8

I 21

.2

I 3

6,6

00

I 62

I ~

I ~

I ~

I ()

I

()

Exp

o R

ight

-of-

Way

: 71

h I

Flo

wer

to 4

1 h I

Col

orad

o

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay A

t-

I 26

4.3

I 14

.7

I 33

,400

I

62

I ~

I ()

I ~

I ()

I

e G

rade

E

xpo

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay:

Gat

eway

Pla

za to

41 h

I C

olor

ado

KE

Y e

Mo

st F

avor

able

L

ea

st F

avor

able

or

or

Hig

h L

ow

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-2

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 110: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

2:'

~

2:'

if

!!!

-~

. \._

/ \ ·~ -~

,~1\

. ,)

{IS·

·, _

___ ,

o.

2:''

.'(

'j

··· .. ,

.

·,l, '·

¥·,

'1

':.,.~

.... -

~~~ · .. /t"

)<//

'· ::--

/

.r·_,

<(r /)

::['

" \.,

\ \ \

~-_ .. ·

\

· .. , ·-..

....

;·N

.;c,.

.,.,

'

. <·· /

-+A·---t----~N.-

--~· -t:

: __ -~

--./ .

....

biii

......... ·.~

.f :·;

.•..;,

.,...-.

-····

'-·+

¥~¥·

-···

/ ·~

~::_

w'

,;:--.:

· ·. \

7;;!

-----~

-/5

1 'fV

1

. g'

, " ~: ~~

--·· ... t

"i =~L~

><

.: ...

\ '\

....

~ _ _,

___ .

1 .

E .

t' R

'I

; i

I ~--·-----

XIS

mg

aJ

__

._S.L

AU~f

l !

' ,;

..

....

. \-

--'-

----

-'

I ...

I·---·

·· ·.

0 R

ed L

ine

Mid

-Citi

es

_.•

i , •

'• ,i

,1

. ,

-'

Ext

en

sio

n-

Su

spe

nd

ed

Pro

ject

\~W:

· U··

······ ;;--

! '· +

· ;;:

<·;>>d>t+

~WJd'{.;;,

\ '~ • .,

t-0'

... o.

.. ~ .I ,~,

·-----••

:.-'<,

r _ _

..,J-j-

-i,·

l-+-ir

.· H

-r·

• R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

.4.3

-3F

'.

l: r 1

:.

_ __

_

....

. =·.

:

1--

· I

t •.

:

LORf

i'ICC

l,

TT

! . B

ooz·

AIIe

n .ilto

n In

c.

Page 111: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Wes

tsid

e C

orri

dor

Alte

rnat

ives

Des

crip

tions

-S

uspe

nded

Pro

ject

TH

E S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

TO

TH

E W

ES

TS

IDE

EX

TE

ND

S E

XIS

TIN

G R

ED

LIN

E S

UB

WA

Y

SE

RV

ICE

FU

RT

HE

R I

NT

O T

HE

WIL

SH

IRE

DIS

TR

ICT

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s of

the

alig

nmen

t in

clud

e ..

.

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

Wils

hire

/Wes

tern

to

Pic

a/S

an V

icen

te

Oly

mp

ic/ A

rling

ton

Pic

a/S

an V

icen

te

No.

Veh

icle

s:

Non

e, e

xten

sion

of

Red

Lin

e an

d ut

ilize

s ex

istin

g F

leet

• T

his

is t

he l

ocal

ly p

refe

rred

alte

rnat

ive

and

as s

uch

has

a nu

mbe

r of

ben

efits

whi

ch c

ome

at a

hig

h co

st

Pla

nn

ed

M

axi

mu

m

Bu

ild-

On

e-W

ay

Pe

ak

Off

-Pe

ak

Pe

ak-

Ho

ur

Ou

t P

ea

k-H

ou

r C

on

sis

t R

ou

te

Sp

ee

d

Tim

e

He

ad

wa

y H

ea

dw

ay

Ca

pa

city

C

ap

aci

ty

Ve

hic

les

Le

ng

th

Mile

s {M

PH

) {M

in)

{Min

) {M

in)

· {P

ass

en

ge

rs

{Pa

sse

ng

ers

Pe

r p

er

Ho

ur)

H

ou

r)

No

t R

eqfd

4

-2

.2

33

.8

3.9

4

.25

5

8,62

1 1

8,3

20

Str

en

gth

s W

ea

kne

sse

s

1.

Ser

ves

Tra

vel

Dem

and

Co

rrid

or

1. H

igh

Co

st

2.

Min

imal

Co

mm

un

ity I

mpa

cts

3.

Str

ong

Co

mm

un

ity S

up

po

rt

4.

Ap

pro

ved

EIR

5.

D

esig

n is

ne

arl

y C

ompl

ete

6.

Ext

ends

Exi

stin

g R

ed L

ine

Se

rvic

e 7.

U

tiliz

es E

xist

ing

Mai

nten

ance

Fac

ility

U

tiliz

es E

xist

ing

Red

Lin

e F

leet

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-3

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 112: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: W

ES

TS

IDE

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 2

WIL

SH

IRE

/WE

ST

ER

N T

O

DA

TE

1

1/5

/98

O

F

2 V

EN

ICE

/SA

N V

ICE

NT

E

RE

V.

0 X

LS

SU

BW

AY

$:

19

88 D

olla

rs

ES

TIM

AT

ED

M

TA

UN

IT

BA

H U

NIT

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

T

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

QT

Y

PR

ICE

P

RIC

E

UN

IT

CO

ST

B

OU

ND

C

OS

T

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

T

WIN

TU

NN

EL

10

190

$1

0,0

00

$1

0,29

6 R

F $

10

1,9

00

,00

0

$104

,920

,798

$1

01 ,9

00

,00

0

CU

T &

CO

VE

R G

UID

EW

AY

24

07

$1

2,0

00

$1

2,25

5 R

F

$28,

884,

000

$29,

497,

228

$2

8,8

84

,00

0

OP

EN

TR

EN

CH

GU

IDE

WA

Y

950

$6

,50

0

$3,5

25

RF

$6

,175

,000

$3

,348

,933

$

6,1

75

,00

0

$0

$0

$0

$

0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

T)

1354

7 $

13

6,9

59

,00

0

$1

37

,76

6,9

58

$

13

6,9

59

,00

0

I:IA

ZA

BD

OU

S W

AS

il;

I:IA

ND

LIN

G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E (

incl

. La

Bre

a T

ar

Pits

) 13

547

$5

00

N

A

RF

$

6,7

73

,50

0

$6,7

73,5

00

$6

,77

3,5

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$6,7

73,5

00

$6,7

73,5

00

$6

,77

3,5

00

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

S

UB

WA

Y S

TA

TIO

N

1 $

65

,00

0,0

00

$5

3,03

7,72

4 E

A

$6

5,0

00

,00

0

$53,

037,

724

$5

3,0

37

,72

4

OP

EN

TR

EN

CH

ST

AT

ION

1

$3

5,0

00

,00

0

$23,

916,

624

EA

$

35

,00

0,0

00

$2

3,91

6,62

4 $

23

,91

6,6

24

B

US

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

1 $3

,000

,000

$3

,000

,000

E

A

$3,0

00,0

00

$3,0

00,0

00

$3

,00

0,0

00

P

AR

KIN

G S

TR

UC

TU

RE

1

$5

,00

0,0

00

$5

,000

,000

E

A

$5,0

00.0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5

,00

0,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$1

08

,00

0,0

00

$

84

,95

4,3

48

$

84

,95

4,3

48

MA

INI.

EA

CIL

& Y

AB

D C

OS

IS

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

(AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$0

$0

$0

VE

HIC

LE

CO

SI

RE

VE

NU

E V

EH

ICL

E

$0

$0

$

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICL

E C

OS

T)

$0

$0

$0

SY

SIE

M W

IDE

EQ

UIE

!ME

NI C

OS

I T

RA

CK

WO

RK

(IN

CL.

SP

EC

IAL

TR

AC

KW

OR

K)

1354

7 $

57

5

$674

R

F

$7,7

89,5

25

$9,1

31,6

09

$7

,78

9,5

25

T

RA

IN C

ON

TR

OL

ST

A.

2 $

1,1

00

,00

0

NA

E

A

$2,2

00,0

00

NA

$

2,2

00

,00

0

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L G

DW

Y

1354

7 $

1,1

00

$8

80

RF

$

14

,90

1,7

00

$1

1,92

5,77

1 $

14

,90

1,7

00

TR

AC

TIO

N P

OW

ER

ST

A.

(XF

MR

) 2

$1

,75

0,0

00

$4

,500

,365

E

A

$3,5

00,0

00

$9,0

00,7

31

$3

,50

0,0

00

C

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

1354

7 $1

,000

$2

08

RF

$1

3,54

7,00

0 $2

,811

,813

$

2,8

11

,81

3

FA

RE

CO

LL

EC

TIO

N

2 $

75

0,0

00

$1

,072

,420

LS

$1

,500

,000

$2

,144

,841

$

1,5

00

,000

S

IGN

AG

E &

GR

AP

HIC

S

2 $

75

0,0

00

$3

02,1

55

LS

$1,5

00,0

00

$604

,310

. $

60

4,3

10

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$4

4,9

38

,22

5

$35,

619,

075

$3

3,3

07

,34

8

lT(l

T,6.

L~ESTIMATED;COST<

k~~19

!J8i

[DOLLARS;f

'~~~

l\'i

'~%®

fi;!

i:'~

~S~.\

~~~%1~

;~\~

~~~.

t'.J

'{~-

~t14

¥ir~

!'l#

~~~$

296

;670

,725

tlil!~

$265

i!l;t3

;118

:11,l

,ft~$2

6,1f9~

"4~196

~1

Co

st D

eve

lop

me

nt W

ork

she

et H

R.X

Is W

1 B

1 •

Sum

.Re

gio

na

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s •. 3-4

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .lt

on

Inc.

Page 113: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

PR

OJE

CT

: W

ES

TS

IDE

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 1

WIL

SH

IRE

/WE

ST

ER

N T

O

DA

TE

11

/5/9

8 O

F

2 V

EN

ICE

/SA

N V

ICE

NT

E

RE

V.:

0 S

UB

WA

Y

$:

1988

Do

llars

M

TA

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

ED

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

BO

UN

D

FIN

AL

IT

EM

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

CO

ST

C

OS

T

CO

ST

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$136

,959

,000

$1

37,7

66,9

58.

$136

,959

,000

1 B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DLI

NG

ALL

OW

AN

CE

$6

,773

,500

$6

,773

,500

$6

,773

,500

2)

ST

AT

ION

S

$108

,000

,000

$8

4,95

4,34

8 $8

4,95

4,34

8 3)

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$0

$0

$0

4)

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$44,

938,

225

$35,

619,

075

$33,

307,

348

5)V

EH

ICL

ES

$0

$0

$

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A)

(see

pa

ge

2 f

or

de

tails

) $2

96,6

70,7

25

$265

,113

,881

$2

61,9

94,1

96

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5%

$7

,416

,768

$6

,627

,847

$6

,549

,855

7

)0W

NE

RS

INS

UR

AN

CE

8.

0%

$23,

733,

658

$21,

209,

110

$20,

959,

536

8) M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

2.5%

$7

,416

,768

$6

,627

,847

$6

,549

,855

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $3

8,56

7,19

4 $3

4,46

4,80

5 $3

4,05

9,24

5

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (C

) 0.

5%

$1,4

83,3

54

$1,3

25,5

69

$1,3

09,9

71

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C

) $1

,483

,354

$1

,325

,569

$1

,309

,971

10)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (D

) A

LLO

WA

NC

E E

QU

IVA

LEN

T T

O A

DO

PT

ED

ALI

GN

ME

NT

$4

4,00

0,00

0 $4

4,00

0,00

0 $4

4,00

0,00

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $4

4,00

0,00

0 $4

4,00

0,00

0 $4

4,00

0,00

0

11)

PR

OF

. S

ER

VIC

ES

(E

) IN

CL.

CO

ST

TO

DA

TE

$1

62,1

29,0

50

$75,

900,

945

$95,

581

0 755

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E)

$162

,129

,050

$7

5,90

0,94

5 $9

5,58

1,75

5

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F)

A)

ITE

M 1

A

12%

$1

6,43

5,08

0 $1

6,53

2,03

5 $1

6,43

5,08

0 IT

EM

1B

12

%

$812

,820

$8

12,8

20

$812

,820

B

) IT

EM

2

17%

$1

8,36

0,00

0 $1

4,44

2,23

9 $1

4,44

2,23

9 C

) IT

EM

3,

4, &

5

10%

$4

,493

,823

$3

,561

,908

$3

,330

,735

D

) IT

EM

6,7

,&8

10

%

$3,8

56,7

19

$3,4

46,4

80

$3,4

05,9

25

E)

ITE

M 1

0 10

%

$4,4

00,0

00

$4,4

00,0

00

$4,4

00,0

00

F)

ITE

M 1

1 10

%

$16,

212,

905

$7,5

90,0

94

$9,5

58,1

76

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F)

$64,

571,

347

$50,

785,

576

$52,

384,

974

IGRAND

~!O'

tA~

.9.98iPOL~RS~0

'~%!

4l!)

t~~i

)t;~

«~??

t£~1

i:Si

~~tf

~~~'

lfii

\~J~

};:N

if~.

?{~l

fii:

%1;~

)'#;¥

~l'/

JEJ~

·~~~ii$607:;42~;67,0

il~$:47

,1;59

0;7;

76~l-

~9;3

30,'

1~?t

l

Cos

t D

evel

opm

ent W

ork

she

et

HR

.xls

W1

61 -

Su

m

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-4

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 114: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-W

ILS

HIR

E A

LIG

NM

EN

T

;;,.

1~

i. ~U.,~_,. •.

A •

.••

i\

' !

..;;~

.;...

j ..

.. ~

\

",s. ~

~'0

._,.rr

··t \

.,,..._ __

/ ····'

,\ ·'

'\, l

·, '

' •,

.,.. '

1\

;',

~

·, . ·-

-· ~r··~C

~;>

/---

')_/

>:

.":-;'

·, .t

l .. ··

·, ',

\_

'· j

l .

-.:...

;,e~

~7~~

:·:~

?

" ·~·

' .. .,~,

;~

·)<'.-

':i_

' •'

I , .

. -"

'>,

¥

/ \

\ '~

\ ~

).. <

/

;-,

..,.~,~·

·-· .

,'

' -'

, \

"~ .

(

' . "

\ /'

. ~

'(

' /

\.

-(

/'

\A

/ ~

... /0

'

'.

,.>"

>

~·;

.-'"'·

. \.

···---~~·-.r

.:r.:=_:

__ ~:-~:~,

~~;~~~E

Q:~~r:

~-~-~~~2

.) =~-

C~~L--

-~--~~{

~~·;··· ...

... ·.

. ;

I .

'·l '

l j(

O>#"

. \.-

· ~:::

:'· t·--

T t

·.,

l ···

····~-

-~·

l,~(

:_.,,<

··'\('<>

~~))0\:

{ _(

Exi

stin

g R

ail

•······

····•

6 W

ilsh

ire

Alig

nm

ent

. "'

,. ..

,. ...

. li

lt/'

3· ~r--

-J·":;-=-t

f ,f-~

"--(-;i.A

'r­~1~

t . _:

.:Ill /l

~i-~

.eg

ion

al

Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s •. 3-5

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .lt

on

Inc.

Page 115: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

-•

Wes

tsid

e C

orri

dor

Alte

rnat

ives

Des

crip

tions

-W

ilshi

re A

lign

me

nt

TH

E W

ILS

HIR

E H

EA

VY

RA

IL S

UB

WA

Y A

LIG

NM

EN

T E

XT

EN

DS

RE

D L

INE

SE

RV

ICE

DO

WN

W

ILS

HIR

E B

OU

LE

VA

RD

TO

FA

IRF

AX

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s o

f the

alig

nmen

t in

clud

e ..

.

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

Wils

hire

/Wes

tern

to

Wils

hire

/Fai

rfax

W

ilshi

re/C

rens

haw

W

ilshi

re/L

a B

rea

Wils

hire

/Fai

rfax

N

o. V

ehic

les:

N

one,

ext

ensi

on o

f R

ed L

ine

and

utili

zes

exis

ting

Fle

et

Pla

nned

Pea

k-O

ne

-Wa

y P

eak

Off

-Pe

ak

Ho

ur

Cap

acity

C

onsi

st

Rou

te

Spe

ed

Tim

e (

Min

) H

ea

dw

ay

He

ad

wa

y (P

asse

nger

s pe

r V

ehic

les

Leng

th

Mile

s (M

PH

) (M

in)

(Min

) H

our)

Not

Req

fd_

4 3.

03

41.3

4.

4 4.

25

5 11

,874

Str

en

gth

s W

ea

kne

sse

s

1.

Ser

ves

Tra

vel

Dem

and

Cor

rido

r 1.

H

igh

Cos

t

Max

imum

B

uild

-O

ut P

ea

k-H

ou

r C

ap

aci

ty

(Pas

seng

ers

Pe

r H

our)

L-

25,2

32

2.

Min

imal

Com

mun

ity I

mpa

cts

2.

Legi

slat

ive

Res

tric

tion

will

hav

e to

be

Ove

rtu

rne

d

3.

Ext

ends

Exi

stin

g R

ed L

ine

Ser

vice

3.

R

equi

res

Des

ign

4.

Util

izes

Exi

stin

g M

aint

enan

ce F

acili

ty

5.

Util

izes

Exi

stin

g R

ed L

ine

Fle

et

6.

Pro

vide

s D

eepe

st P

enet

ratio

n in

to W

ests

ide

of a

ll S

ub

wa

y A

ltern

ativ

es

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-5

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

am

ilto

n I

nc.

Page 116: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: W

ES

TS

IDE

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 2

WIL

SH

IRE

/WE

ST

ER

N T

O

DA

TE

11

/5/9

8 O

F

2 W

ILS

HIR

E/F

AIR

FA

X

RE

V.

0 X

LS

S

UB

WA

Y A

LIG

NM

EN

T

$:

1988

Do

llars

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

MT

AU

NIT

B

AH

UN

IT

MT

A

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

Q

TY

P

RIC

E

PR

ICE

U

NIT

C

OS

T

BO

UN

D

CO

ST

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

T

WIN

BO

RE

TU

NN

EL

16

750

$11

,000

$1

0,29

6 R

F

$184

,250

,000

$1

72,4

65,4

92

$184

,250

,000

$0

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) 16

750

$184

,250

,000

$1

72,4

65,4

92

$184

,250

,000

I:IA

ZA

BD

QU

S W

AS

IE I

:IM

IDL

ING

A

LL

OW

AN

CE

(in

cl. L

a B

rea

Ta

r P

its)

1675

0 $1

,000

N

A

RF

$1

6,75

0,00

0 $1

6,75

0,00

0 $1

6,75

0,00

0 S

UB

TO

TA

L (

HA

Z M

AT

) $1

6,75

0,00

0 $1

6,75

0,00

0 $1

6,75

0,00

0

SIA

IIQ

N C

QS

I W

ILS

HIR

E/C

RE

NS

HA

W S

TA

TIO

N

1 $4

0,00

0,00

0 $3

9,26

3,22

4 E

A

$40,

000,

000

$39,

263,

224

$39,

263,

224

WIL

SH

IRE

/LA

BR

EA

ST

AT

ION

1

$40,

000,

000

$39,

263,

224

EA

$4

0,00

0,00

0 $3

9,26

3,22

4 $3

9,26

3,22

4 W

ILS

HIR

E/F

AIR

FA

X S

TA

TIO

N &

XO

VE

R

1 $7

0,00

0,00

0 $6

9,26

3,22

4 E

A

$70,

000,

000

$69,

263,

224

$69,

263,

224

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$150

,000

,000

$1

47,7

89,6

73

$147

,789

,673

MA

INL

FA

CIL

& Y

AB

D C

QS

IS

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S (

AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(MA

INT

. F

AC

IL.)

$0

$0

$0

VE

I:IIC

LE C

QS

I R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LE

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

) $0

$0

$0

SY

SIE

M W

IDE

EQ

UIE

!ME

NI C

QS

I T

RA

CK

WO

RK

(IN

CL.

SP

EC

IAL

TR

AC

KW

OR

K)

1675

0 $5

75

$674

R

F

$9,6

31,2

50

$11,

290,

651

$9,6

31,2

50

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L S

T A

. 3

$1,1

00,0

00

NA

E

A

$3,3

00,0

00

NA

$3

,300

,000

T

RA

IN C

ON

TR

OL

GD

WY

16

750

$1,1

00

$880

R

F

$18,

425,

000

$14,

745,

454

$18,

425,

000

TR

AC

TIO

N P

OW

ER

ST

A. (

XF

MR

) 3

$1,7

50,0

00

$3,7

09,6

10

EA

$5

,250

,000

$1

1 '1

28,8

29

$5,2

50,0

00

CO

MM

UN

ICA

TIO

NS

16

750

$1,0

00

$208

R

F

$16,

750,

000

$3,4

76,6

27

$3,4

76,6

27

FA

RE

CO

LL

EC

TIO

N

3 $7

50,0

00

$1,0

72,4

20

LS

$2,2

50,0

00

$3,2

17,2

61

$2,2

50,0

00

SIG

NA

GE

& G

RA

PH

ICS

3

$750

,000

$3

02,1

55

LS

$2,2

50,0

00

$906

,465

$9

06,4

65

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$57,

856,

250

$44,

765,

287

$43,

239,

342

l.ro;r;~l

i!,E$1

1M~I

EQico.s:

r~A1

.ssa~PO

I!CA

Rs:,

•+~,

;;;,

;y,;

l11,

~~&:

~fii

~f:!

llKt

~~il

£i~~

<~~t

!it'

t~li

~*~~

t'f~

~~Mt

~liw

~w40

s;as

s;2!iO

il~1!3s

1't77

j):'J

$2~I~

$3!!2/0~

;o~.~~

l

No

te:

Ve

hic

le c

osts

are

zer

o as

ve

hic

les

have

alr

eady

bee

n pu

rcha

sed

for

this

lin

e.

MP

A e

stim

ates

4 v

ehic

le f

leet

req

uire

d to

ope

rate

thi

s se

gmen

t.

Co

st D

evel

opm

ent W

orks

heet

HR

.XIs

Wils

hir

e S

ub

wa

y· S

um

e R

egio

nal T

rans

it A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

.4.3

-6

F

Boo

z·A

IIen .ilto

n In

c.

Page 117: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

-C

OS

T E

S,.

AT

E C

OV

ER

SH

EE

T

• P

RO

JEC

T:

WE

ST

SID

E H

EA

VY

RA

IL

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

WIL

SH

IRE

/WE

ST

ER

N T

O

DA

TE

11

/5/9

8 O

F

2 W

ILS

HIR

E/F

AIR

FA

X

RE

V.:

0 S

UB

WA

Y A

LIG

NM

EN

T

$:

19

88

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$184

,250

,000

$1

72,4

65,4

92

$184

,250

,000

1 B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DLI

NG

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

$16,

750,

000

$16,

750,

000

$16,

750,

000

2)S

TA

TIO

NS

$1

50,0

00,0

00

$147

,789

,673

$1

47,7

89,6

73

3) M

AIN

YA

RD

AN

D S

HO

P

$0

$

0

$0

4)

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$57,

856,

250

$44,

765,

287

$43,

239,

342

5)V

EH

ICL

ES

$

0

$0

$

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee p

ag

e 2

fo

r d

eta

ils)

$408

,856

,25q

$3

81,7

70,4

52

$392

,029

,015

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5

%

$10,

221,

406

$9,5

44,2

61

$9,8

00,7

25

7) O

WN

ER

S I

NS

UR

AN

CE

8.

0%

$32,

708,

500

$30,

541,

636

$31,

362,

321

8) M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

2.5%

$1

0,22

1,40

6 $9

,544

,261

$9

,800

,725

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $5

3,15

1,31

3 $4

9,63

0,15

9 $5

0,96

3,77

2

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C)

0.5%

$2

,044

,281

$1

,908

,852

. $

1,96

0,14

5

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C)

$2,0

44,2

81

$1,9

08,8

52

$1,9

60,1

45

10)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D)

AL

LO

WA

NC

E E

QU

IVA

LEN

T T

O A

DO

PT

ED

ALI

GN

ME

NT

$6

6,00

0,00

0 $6

6,00

0,00

0 $6

6,00

0,00

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D)

$66,

000,

000

$66,

000,

000

$66,

000,

000

11)

PR

OF

. SE

RV

ICE

S (

E)

INC

L. C

OS

T T

O D

AT

E

(MT

A-

45%

, B

AH

-22

%)

$238

,523

,330

$1

09,8

79,9

43

$143

,066

,821

.09

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $2

38,5

23,3

30

$109

,879

,943

$1

43,0

66,8

21

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

12

%

$22,

110,

000

$20,

695,

859

$22,

110,

000

ITE

M 1

B

12%

$2

,010

,000

$2

,010

,000

$2

,010

,000

B

) IT

EM

2

17%

$2

5,50

0,00

0 $2

5,12

4,24

4 $2

5,12

4,24

4 C

) IT

EM

3,

4, &

5

10%

$5

,785

,625

$4

,476

,529

$4

,323

,934

D

) IT

EM

6,

7, &

8

10%

$5

,315

,131

$4

,963

,016

$5

,096

,377

E

) IT

EM

10

10%

$6

,600

,000

$6

,600

,000

$6

,600

,000

F)

IT

EM

11

10%

$2

3,85

2,33

3 $1

0,98

7,99

4 $1

4,30

6,68

2

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $9

1,17

3,08

9 $7

4,85

7,64

2 $7

9,57

1,23

8

IGRA

ND&toJ

>AI1

tt$t1

saa

·DoC,~Rs:~

wfj*

~~~'

~)(+

~~r~

;J.;

~~,*

:r~l

1~Wr

'&:m

<it~

l~il

~9~f

.~'l

i0B!

i-n~

~~,~

~l!¥

.fit

1·re

(ll!

f.if~?$a

.S.9

i14s

:2~3

tlt~

$6sl

':o4

r~P:

4s*l~

$7.33

;sso

.ss1H

Cos

t Dev

elop

men

t Wor

kshe

et H

R.x

ls W

ilshi

re S

ub

wa

y· S

um

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-6

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

am

ilto

n I

nc.

Page 118: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

-..J z 0 E en 0 c. >< w I

a: 0 c -a: a: 0 0 w c -en .... en w 3: -......... ·

i

I i ,' ( .

.... .-,;--.-'

-~.C--

! . ! ' T ...... )~

.... i'····-..

' ! ········\':.·'.--,l.

J... ·· .

·, '.,... ~

. ..... ,: ... -. . ___ ......... ~·-· ......

'.

.c u c !!! IXl c 0

:;:::: ·u; 0 c. )( w Cl)

c .::J

Cl)

::l

05

.. ·~

Page 119: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

-•

• W

ests

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es D

escr

iptio

ns -

Exp

ositi

on L

ight

Rai

l

TH

E E

XP

OS

ITIO

N L

IGH

T R

AIL

AL

IGN

ME

NT

BR

AN

CH

ES

OF

F T

HE

LO

NG

BE

AC

H B

LU

E L

INE

S

ER

VIC

E A

ND

UT

ILIZ

ES

EX

IST

ING

RIG

HT

-OF

-WA

Y A

LO

NG

EX

PO

SIT

ION

BO

UL

EV

AR

D

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s of

the

alig

nmen

t in

clud

e ...

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: 7t

h/F

low

er (

L.A

.) t

o 4t

h/C

olor

ado

(San

ta M

onic

a)

Sta

tion

Loca

tions

: 2

Exi

stin

g on

Lon

g B

each

Blu

e L

ine

Alig

nmen

t

14

New

Sta

tions

alo

ng E

xpos

ition

(Lo

catio

ns T

o B

e D

eter

min

ed)

No.

Veh

icle

s:

39

Pla

nned

Pe

ak-

Ma

xim

um

B

uild

-Ou

t O

ne

-Wa

y P

ea

k O

ff-P

ea

k H

ou

r C

ap

aci

ty

Pe

ak-

Ho

ur

Ca

pa

city

C

onsi

st

Rou

te

Spe

ed

Tim

e (

Min

) H

ea

dw

ay

He

ad

wa

y (P

ass

en

ge

rs p

er

(Pas

seng

ers

Pe

r V

ehic

les

Leng

th

Mile

s (M

PH

) (M

in)

(Min

) H

our)

H

our)

39

2 18

21

.2

51

5 12

16

,635

31

,190

Str

en

gth

s W

eakn

esse

s 1.

U

tiliz

es E

xist

ing

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay

1.

So

me

Co

mm

un

ity O

ppos

ition

2.

S

erve

s T

ran

sit

Dep

ende

nt C

orr

ido

r 2.

D

oes

No

t Se

rve

Tra

vel

Dem

and

Co

rrid

or

of S

usp

en

de

d

3.

Pro

vide

s R

ail A

cce

ss t

o C

onve

ntio

n C

ente

r, S

tapl

es C

ente

r,

Pro

ject

U

SC

, C

olis

eum

and

Spo

rts

Are

na

3.

R

equi

res

Env

iron

men

tal

Pro

cess

4.

Ext

ends

Exi

stin

g B

lue

Line

Ser

vice

4.

R

equi

res

Des

ign

5.

Exp

ands

Reg

iona

l Con

nect

ivity

5.

A

t-G

rad

e A

lignm

ent

Pos

es S

om

e S

afe

ty C

onsi

dera

tions

6.

A N

um

be

r of

Bra

nch

Alte

rnat

ives

can

Fur

ther

exp

and

Reg

iona

l Con

nect

ivity

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-7

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 120: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: W

ES

TS

IDE

CO

RR

IDO

R

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

2 E

XP

OS

ITIO

N L

INE

D

AT

E

11/5

/98

OF

2

US

C T

O S

AN

TA

MO

NIC

A

RE

V.

0 X

LS

LR

T

$:

1988

Do

llars

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

MT

AU

NIT

B

AH

UN

IT

MT

A

LOW

ER

P

RO

JEC

T

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

QT

Y

PR

ICE

P

RIC

E

UN

IT

CO

ST

B

OU

ND

C

OS

T

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

A

T G

RA

DE

{IN

ST

RE

ET

CO

NS

T.)

7755

$1

,800

$2

,457

R

F

$13

,959

,000

$1

9,05

6,60

3 $1

3,95

9,0

00

AE

RIA

L G

UID

EW

AY

17

60

$4,5

00

$5,2

84

RF

$7

,920

,000

$9

,300

,139

$7

,920

,000

A

ER

IAL

GU

IDE

WA

Y {

OV

ER

110

FR

WY

) 72

0 $5

,40

0

incl

uded

abo

ve

RF

$3

,888

,000

in

clud

ed a

bove

$3

,888

,000

S

PE

CIA

L B

EN

T S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

3 $3

50,0

00

$350

,000

E

A

$1,0

50,0

00

$1,0

50,0

00

$1,0

50,0

00

SP

EC

IAL

TR

AF

FIC

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

1

$800

,000

$8

00,0

00

LS

$800

,000

$8

00,0

00

$800

,000

S

UB

TO

TA

L {

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

T)

$27,

617,

000

$30,

206,

742

$27,

617,

000

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

ALL

OW

AN

CE

R

F

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$0

$0

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

A

T G

RA

DE

ST

AT

ION

{2

CA

R P

LAT

FO

RM

) 3

$1,2

00,0

00

$756

, 261

E

A

$3,6

00,0

00

$2,2

68,7

84

$2,2

68,7

84

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$3,6

00,0

00

$2,2

68,7

84

$2,2

68,7

84

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL &

YA

RD

CO

ST

S

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S ~ALLOWANCE)

$0

$0

$0

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL.)

$0

$0

$

0

VE

HIC

LE C

OS

T

RE

VE

NU

E V

EH

ICLE

~al

l ve

hicl

e co

sts

cove

red

in U

SC

to S

anta

Mon

ica

shee

t)

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICLE

CO

ST

) $0

$0

$0

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

TR

AC

KW

OR

K {

INC

L. S

PE

CIA

L T

RA

CK

WO

RK

) 10

235

$421

$2

88

RF

$4

,308

,935

$2

,943

,540

$4

,308

,935

T

RA

IN C

ON

TR

OL

ST

A.

3 $1

60,0

00

Incl

uded

bel

ow

EA

$4

80,0

00

Incl

uded

bel

ow

$480

,000

T

RA

IN C

ON

TR

OL

GD

WY

10

235

$500

$4

85

RF

$5

,117

,500

$4

,962

,787

$5

,117

,500

T

RA

CT

ION

PO

WE

R S

TA

. {X

FM

R)

3 $1

'100

,000

$3

09,9

56

EA

$3

,300

,000

$9

29,8

69

$3,3

00,0

00

TR

AC

TIO

N P

OW

ER

GD

WY

. {C

AT

EN

AR

Y)

1023

5 $2

70

$282

R

F

$2,7

63,4

50

$2,8

83,0

38

$2,7

63,4

50

CO

MM

UN

ICA

TIO

NS

10

235

$200

$9

8 R

F

$2,0

47,0

00

$1,0

05,0

00

$1,0

05,0

00

FA

RE

CO

LLE

CT

ION

3

$250

,000

$1

29,8

37

EA

$7

50,0

00

$389

,511

$7

50,0

00

SIG

NA

GE

& G

RA

PH

ICS

3

$100

,000

$3

5,15

7 E

A

$300

,000

$1

05,4

70

$105

,470

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$19,

066,

885

$13,

219,

217

$17,

830,

355

ee

gio

na

l T

ran

sit

Alt

ern

ati

ves

An

aly

sis

•. 3-S

F

Bo

oz·

AII

en

& .lto

n In

c.

Page 121: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

-•

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

P

RO

JEC

T:

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. E

XP

OS

ITIO

N L

INE

D

AT

E

11/5

/98

OF

2

US

C T

O S

AN

TA

MO

NIC

A

RE

V.:

0

LR

T

$:

1988

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$27,

617,

000

$30,

206

,742

$2

7,61

7,00

0 1 B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DLI

NG

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

$0

$

0

$0

2)

ST

AT

ION

S

$3,6

00,0

00

$2,2

68,7

84

$2,2

68,7

84

3) M

AIN

YA

RD

AN

D S

HO

P

$0

$

0

$0

4)

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$19,

066,

885

$13,

219,

217

$17,

830,

355

5) V

EH

ICLE

S

$0

$

0

$0

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

A)

(se

e p

ag

e 2

fo

r d

eta

ils)

$50,

283,

885

$45,

694,

742

$47,

716,

139

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5

%

$1,2

57,0

97

$1,1

42,3

69

$1

,19

2,9

03

7)

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0%

$4

,022

,711

$

3,6

55,5

79

$3,8

17,2

91

8} M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

2.5

%

$1,2

57,0

97

$1,1

42,3

69

$1

,19

2,9

03

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $6

,536

,905

$5

,940

,317

$

6,2

03

,09

8

9} A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT {

C}

0.5%

$2

51,4

19

$228

,474

$2

38,5

81

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C

) $2

51,4

19

$228

,474

$2

38,5

81

10}

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y {

D}

PE

R B

UD

GE

T O

F 8

1/25

/92

$12,

292,

553

$12,

292,

553

$12,

292,

553

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $1

2,29

2,55

3 $1

2,29

2,55

3 $1

2,29

2,55

3

11}

PR

OF

. SE

RV

ICE

S (

E}

$20,

809,

429

$15,

147,

945

$18,

606,

104

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $2

0,80

9,42

9 $1

5,14

7,94

5 $1

8,60

6,1

04

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

1

1%

$3

,037

,870

$3

,322

,742

$

3,0

37

,87

0

ITE

M 1

B

11

%

$0

$

0

$0

B

) IT

EM

2

11%

$3

96,0

00

$249

,566

$

24

9,5

66

C

) IT

EM

3,

4, &

5

11

%

$2,0

97,3

57

$1,4

54,1

14

$1

,96

1,3

39

D

) IT

EM

6,

7, &

8

11

%

$719

,060

$6

53,4

34.8

2 $6

82,3

41

E)

ITE

M 1

0 25

%

$3,0

73,1

38

$3,0

73,1

38

$3

,07

3,1

38

F)

IT

EM

11

10%

$2

,080

,943

$1

,514

,795

$

1,8

60

,61

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $1

1,40

4,36

8 $1

0,26

7,78

9 $1

0,86

4,86

5

[GRANDftOtA

Llfmc

ludi

nQ'tUSC

iJCi!Sa

iita

!Monica$eQment

l&T1998

tDOIIIfAF:lS

?$rl'&~ti®ff:1t!M0it$$4Jff1rMokK@I't\W:JiN~~1ri€'1[¥WJ\'fli!$1$93Q

!840

;96Q

~II,

'*$739

t1iZO}'Z90

1Ilfi

11S842l87

6;'l~i

:rHI

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-8

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 122: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: W

ES

TS

IDE

CO

RR

IDO

R

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

2 E

XP

OS

ITIO

N L

INE

D

AT

E

11

/5/9

8

OF

2

US

C T

O S

AN

TA

MO

NIC

A

RE

V.

0 X

LS

L

RT

$:

1

98

8 D

olla

rs

ES

TIM

AT

ED

M

TA

UN

IT

BA

H U

NIT

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

T

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

QT

Y

PR

ICE

P

RIC

E

UN

IT

CO

ST

B

OU

ND

C

OS

T

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

A

T G

RA

DE

(IN

ST

RE

ET

CO

NS

T.)

65

00

$1

,80

0

$2

,45

7

RF

$1

1,70

0,00

0 $1

5,97

2,65

2 $

11

,70

0,0

00

A

T G

RA

DE

(IN

RA

ILR

OA

D R

OW

) 43

350

$1

,20

0

$7

57

R

F

$52,

020,

000

$32,

828,

779

$5

2,0

20

,00

0

AE

RIA

L G

UID

EW

AY

(F

L YO

VE

R)

1260

0 $

4,5

00

$

3,7

50

R

F

$56,

700,

000

$4

7,2

50

,70

6

$5

6,7

00

,00

0

SU

BW

AY

GU

IDE

WA

Y (

UN

DE

RC

RO

SS

ING

) 15

00

$11,

400

$12

,867

R

F

$1

7,1

00

,00

0

$1

9,2

99

,81

7

$1

7,1

00

,00

0

BR

IDG

E W

IDE

NIN

G

450

$2

,00

0

$2

,00

0

RF

$9

00,0

00

$900

,000

$9

00,0

00

RE

MO

VE

EX

IST

ING

TR

AC

KS

57

350

$65

$18

TF

$3

,727

,750

$1

,048

,199

$3

,727

,750

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

T)

12

17

50

$1

42,1

47,7

50

$117

,300

,154

$1

42,1

47,7

50

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

1 $1

,738

,438

N

A

RF

$1

,738

,438

$1

,738

,438

$1

,738

,438

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

HA

Z M

AT

) $1

,738

,438

$1

,738

,438

$1

,738

,438

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

A

T G

RA

DE

ST

AT

ION

(2

CA

R P

LA

TF

OR

M)

9 $1

,500

,000

$7

56,2

61

EA

$

13

,50

0,0

00

$

6,8

06

,35

2

$6

,80

6,3

52

A

ER

IAL

ST

AT

ION

(2

CA

R P

LAT

FO

RM

) 5

$4,3

33,3

33

$2

,66

7,2

16

E

A

$2

1,6

66

,66

7

$13,

336,

080

$1

3,3

36

,08

0

PA

RK

& R

IDE

{S

UR

FA

CE

LO

T}

25

00

$2

,000

$

2,4

37

S

Eac

es

$5,0

00,0

00

$6

,09

3,3

04

$

6,0

93

,30

4

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$4

0,1

66

,66

7

$2

6,2

35

,73

5

$26,

235,

735

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL &

YA

RD

CO

ST

S

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

(AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

1 $3

5,00

0,00

0 $

31

,02

6,0

10

$

35

,00

0,0

00

$

31

,02

6,0

10

$

35

,00

0,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$3

5,0

00

,00

0

$31

,026

,010

.

$3

5,0

00

,00

0

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LES

39

$2

,500

,000

$

2,0

02

,33

0

$9

7,5

00

,00

0

$78,

322,

456

$78,

322,

456

$97,

500,

000

$78,

322,

456

$7

8,3

22

,45

6

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

TR

AC

KW

OR

K

(IN

CL.

SP

EC

IAL

TR

AC

KW

OR

K)

6440

0 $4

21

$288

R

F

$27,

112,

400

$18,

521,

152

$2

7,1

12

,40

0

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L S

TA

. 11

$1

60,0

00

Incl

uded

be

low

E

A

$1,7

60,0

00

Incl

uded

be

low

$

1,7

60

,00

0

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L G

DW

Y

6440

0 $5

00

$485

R

F

$32,

200,

000

$31,

226,

528

$32,

200,

000

TR

AC

TIO

N P

OW

ER

ST

A.

(XF

MR

) 11

$1

,100

,000

$

53

1,8

97

E

A

$12,

100,

000

$5

,85

0,8

62

$

12

,100

,000

T

RA

CT

ION

PO

WE

R G

DW

Y.

(CA

TE

NA

RY

) 6

44

00

$2

70

$282

R

F

$17,

388,

000

$18,

140,

466

$1

7,3

88

,00

0

CO

MM

UN

ICA

TIO

NS

64

400

$200

$8

9 R

F

$12,

880,

000

$5,7

63,1

95

$5,7

63,1

95

FA

RE

CO

LLE

CT

ION

11

$2

50,0

00

$165

,247

E

A

$2,7

50,0

00

$1,8

17,7

19

$2,7

50,0

00

SIG

NA

GE

& G

RA

PH

ICS

11

$1

00,0

00

$44,

745

EA

$1

,100

,000

$4

92,1

95

$492

,195

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$107

,290

,400

$8

1,81

2,11

7 $9

9,56

5,79

0

TO

T A

LhE

ST

IMA

1;J;

:OiC05

:1;'W:

;;199

8if:DOLL'ARS

j@'f;i

t1ii?i

'1@JP~

lHif

iitx4:

i/{;\M

ii!lik

1i'i%i

~tJf0:

tc&%Bi

::e:)i

i<[tf;

:jt:;{

1JfWk:

;;!if>

kihbti

il\itt

10;l@i

:;rbt:

\1¥;~%

l;it}if

ii$il

.~3}84

3}25

[email protected]

ik$3~6

!434

~~1.

1lkl$;

tliii$383

i0~ ..

0;'1

69'!

.e

gio

na

l T

ran

sit

Alt

ern

ati

ves

An

aly

sis

•. 3-

9F

B

oo

z·A

IIe

n &

.ilto

n I

nc.

Page 123: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

P

RO

JEC

T:

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 1

EX

PO

SIT

ION

LIN

E

DA

TE

1

1/5

/98

O

F

2 U

SC

TO

SA

NT

A M

ON

ICA

R

EV

.: 0

LR

T

$:

1988

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$142

,147

,750

$1

17,3

00,1

54

$1

42

,14

7,7

50

1

8)

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G A

LL

OW

AN

CE

$1

,738

,438

$1

,738

,438

$

1,7

38

,43

8

2) S

TA

TIO

NS

$4

0,16

6,66

7 $2

6,23

5,73

5 $

26

,23

5,7

35

3)

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$3

5,00

0,00

0 $3

1,02

6,01

0 $

35

,00

0,0

00

4)

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$107

,290

,400

$8

1,81

2,11

7 $

99

,56

5,7

90

5}

VE

HIC

LES

$9

7,50

0,00

0 $7

8,32

2,45

6 $

78

,32

2,4

56

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee

pa

ge

2 f

or

de

tails

) $4

23,8

43,2

55

$336

,434

,91

0 $

38

3,0

10

,16

9

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5

%

$10,

596,

081

$8,4

10,8

73

$9

,57

5,2

54

7)

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0%

$3

3,90

7,46

0 $2

6,91

4,79

3 $

30

,64

0,8

14

8}

MA

ST

ER

AG

RE

EM

EN

TS

2.

5%

$10,

596,

081

$8,4

10,8

73

$9

,57

5,2

54

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

B)

$55,

099,

623

$43,

736,

538

$49,

791

,322

9} A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C}

0.5

%

$2,1

19,2

16

$1

,68

2,1

75

$1

,915

,051

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C)

$2,1

19,2

16

$1,6

82,1

75

$1,9

15,0

51

10}

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D}

PE

R U

PD

AT

E O

F 1

1/23

/93

$82,

588,

736

$82,

588,

736

$8

2,5

88

,73

6

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $8

2,58

8,73

6 $8

2,58

8,73

6 $8

2,58

8,73

6

11}

PR

OF

. SE

RV

ICE

S (

E)

$172

,923

,592

$1

09,6

59,8

62

$144

,845

,478

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $1

72,9

23,5

92

$109

,659

,862

$

14

4,8

45

,47

8

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

11

%

$15,

636,

253

$12,

903,

017

$1

5,6

36

,25

3

ITE

M 1

8

11%

$1

91,2

28

$191

,228

$

19

1,2

28

B

) IT

EM

2

11%

$4

,418

,333

$2

,885

,931

$2

,885

,931

C

) IT

EM

3,

4, &

5

11%

$

26

,376

,944

$2

1,02

7,66

4 $

23

,41

7,7

07

D

) IT

EM

6,

7, &

8

11%

$6

,060

,959

$4

,811

,019

.21

$5

,47

7,0

45

E

) IT

EM

10

28

%

$22,

711,

903

$22,

711,

903

$22,

711,

903

F)

ITE

M 1

1 10

%

$17,

292,

359

$1 0

,965

,986

$

14

,48

4,5

48

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $9

2,68

7,97

8 $7

5,49

6,74

8 $

84

,80

4,6

14

li&1\&$~4~

}§~!1

:~~?

9tl'rr

,lit$t4G19&~'fa't11

I\!

Re

gio

na

l T

ran

sit

Alt

ern

ati

ves

An

aly

sis

A4

.3-

9 B

oo

z·A

IIe

n &

Ha

milt

on

Inc

.

Page 124: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

~ c;; z < a: 1-(/) :::) al z 0 E (/) 0 D. >< w I

a: 0 c a: a: 0 0 w c -(/)

t; w 3:

c3 c c

LL 0 ..--

('t) •

Page 125: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

Wes

tsid

e C

orri

dor

Alte

rnat

ives

Des

crip

tions

-E

xpos

ition

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y

TH

E E

XP

OS

ITIO

N B

US

TR

AN

SIT

WA

Y P

RO

VID

ES

A B

US

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

TO

AL

ON

G T

HE

E

XIS

TIN

G E

XP

OS

ITIO

N R

IGH

T-O

F-W

AY

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s of

the

alig

nmen

t in

clud

e ...

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

No.

Veh

icle

s:

Con

sist

R

oute

V

ehic

les

Leng

th

Mile

s

29

N/A

18

.5

Str

en

gth

s 1.

U

tiliz

es E

xist

ing

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay

Uni

on S

tatio

n (L

.A.)

to

4th

/Col

orad

o (S

anta

Mon

ica)

24

New

Sta

tions

(Lo

catio

ns T

o B

e D

eter

min

ed)

29

Pla

nned

Pea

k-O

ne-W

ay

Pea

k O

ff-P

eak

Hou

r C

apac

ity

Spe

ed

Tim

e (M

in)

Hea

dway

H

eadw

ay

(Pas

seng

ers

(MP

H)

(Min

) (M

in)

per

Hou

r)

21.8

51

5

12

6,09

0

We

akn

ess

es

1.

Som

e C

omm

unity

Opp

ositi

on

Max

imum

B

uild

-O

ut

Pea

k-H

our

Cap

acity

(P

asse

nger

s P

er

Hou

r)

20,5

38

2.

Ser

ves

Tra

nsit

Dep

ende

nt C

orri

dor

2.

Doe

s N

ot S

erve

Tra

vel

Dem

and

Cor

rido

r of

Sus

pend

ed

3.

Pro

vide

s T

rans

itway

Acc

ess

to C

onve

ntio

n C

ente

r, S

tapl

es

Pro

ject

C

ente

r, U

SC

, C

olis

eum

and

Spo

rts

Are

na

3.

Req

uire

s E

nviro

nmen

tal

Pro

cess

4.

Lo

w C

ost

4.

Re

qu

ire

s D

esig

n

5.

Exp

ands

Reg

iona

l Con

nect

ivity

5

. A

t-G

rade

Alig

nmen

t P

oses

Som

e S

afet

y C

onsi

dera

tions

6

. A

Num

ber

of B

ranc

h A

ltern

ativ

es c

an F

urth

er e

xpan

d R

egio

nal C

onne

ctiv

ity

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s

6.

Low

erC

apac

ffie

s

A4

.3-

10

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

----

--

----~

Page 126: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: E

XP

OS

ITIO

N B

US

TR

AN

SIT

WA

Y

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

2 D

AT

E

11/6

/98

OF

2

SA

NT

A M

ON

ICA

TO

R

EV

. 2

XL

S

GA

TE

WA

Y

$:

1998

Do

llars

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

MT

A U

NIT

B

AH

UN

IT

MT

A

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

Q

TY

P

RIC

E

PR

ICE

U

NIT

C

OS

T

BO

UN

D

CO

ST

G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

S

AT

GR

AD

E B

US

WA

Y

6336

0 $3

20

$1,6

76

RF

$2

0,27

5,20

0 $1

06,

195,

985

$20,

275,

200

AT

GR

AD

E B

US

WA

Y@

ST

AT

ION

78

00

$535

ln

cl in

abo

ve

RF

$4

,173

,000

ln

cl in

ab

ove

$4

,173

,000

S

TR

EE

T I

MP

RO

VE

ME

NT

S @

XIN

GS

11

0 $1

52,0

00

$139

,891

E

A

$16,

720,

000

. $15

,387

,966

$1

6,72

0,00

0 T

RA

CK

RE

MO

VA

L 63

360

$65

$18

RF

$4

,118

,400

$1

,114

,819

$4

,118

,400

A

ER

IAL

OV

ER

PA

SS

54

00

$5,0

00

$2,7

08

RF

$2

7,00

0,00

0 $1

4,62

0,82

4 $2

7,00

0,00

0 B

EL

OW

GR

AD

E U

ND

ER

PA

S

1 $5

,000

,000

$5

,000

,000

E

A

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

RA

ILR

OA

D B

RID

GE

RE

PLA

CE

ME

NT

3

$2,0

00,0

00

$2,0

00,0

00

EA

$6

,000

,000

$6

,000

,000

$6

,000

,000

M

IXE

D F

LO

W D

ED

ICA

TE

D B

US

WA

Y

2020

$1

50

$2,8

45

RF

$3

03,0

00

$5,7

46,9

82

$303

,000

D

OW

NT

OW

N C

ON

NE

CT

OR

(G

RA

ND

/OLI

VE

) 26

900

$150

ln

cl in

abo

ve

RF

$4

,035

,000

ln

cl in

abo

ve

$4,0

35,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) 16

8954

$8

7,62

4,60

0 $1

54,0

66,5

77

$87,

624,

600

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

1 $1

,500

,000

N

A

LS

$1,5

00,0

00

$1,5

00,0

00

$1,5

00,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$1,5

00,0

00

$1,5

00,0

00

$1,5

00,0

00

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

AE

RIA

L S

TA

TIO

N (

80F

T. S

IDE

PL

AT

FO

RM

} 1

$1,5

05,0

00

$1,6

81,6

66

EA

$1

,505

,000

$1

,681

,666

$1

,681

,666

(in

clud

ing

2 el

evat

ors,

fin

ishe

s, c

anop

ies,

lig

htin

g &

sig

nage

} A

T G

RA

DE

ST

AT

ION

(12

0FT

. S

IDE

PLA

TF

OR

M}

21

$505

,000

$5

26,3

18

EA

$1

0,60

5,00

0 $1

1,05

2,67

2 $1

1,05

2,67

2 (in

clud

ing

finis

hes,

lan

dsca

ping

, ca

nopi

es,

light

ing

& s

igna

ge}

CU

RB

SID

E S

TA

TIO

N (

INC

L. C

AN

OP

Y,

BE

NC

HE

S}

2 $2

7,50

0 $2

5,00

0 E

A

$55,

000

$50,

000

$55,

000

PA

RK

ING

FA

CIL

ITIE

S (

MIN

IMA

L A

ME

NIT

IES

) 18

00

$1,8

00

$2,3

46 S~aces

$3,2

40,0

00

$4,2

23,4

21

$3,2

40,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

) $1

5,40

5,00

0 $1

7,00

7,75

8 $1

6,02

9,33

7

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL &

YA

RD

CO

ST

S

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

(AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

1 $5

,000

,000

$5

,000

,000

$5

,000

,000

$5

,000

,000

$5

,000

,000

S

UB

TO

TA

L (M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

$5,0

00,0

00

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LE

29

$350

,000

$3

33,2

91

$10,

150,

000

$9,6

65,4

39

$9,6

65,4

39

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICL

E C

OS

T)

$10,

150,

000

$9,6

65,4

39

$9,6

65,4

39

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

PR

IOR

ITY

SIG

NA

LIZ

AT

ION

1

$5,5

96,5

00

$2,7

50,0

00

LS

$5,5

96,5

00

$2,7

50,0

00

$2,7

50,0

00

TIC

KE

T V

EN

DIN

G M

AC

HIN

ES

46

$7

5,00

0 N

A

EA

$3

,450

,000

$2

,856

,414

$2

,856

,414

C

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

6336

0 $5

0 $3

8 R

F

$3,1

68,0

00

$2,4

33,8

85

$2,4

33,8

85

GU

IDE

WA

Y L

IGH

TIN

G I

NC

L. E

LEC

TR

IFIC

AT

ION

63

360

$60

$60

RF

$3

,801

,600

$3

,801

,600

$3

,801

,600

S

EC

UR

ITY

63

360

$30

$30

RF

$1

,900

,800

$1

,900

,800

$1

,900

,800

S

IGN

AG

EIG

RA

PH

ICS

(O

TH

ER

TH

AN

ST

AT

ION

S)

9768

0 $2

0 $3

9 R

F

$1,9

53,6

00

$3,8

09,6

49

$1,9

53,6

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$19,

870,

500

$17,

552,

349

$15,

696,

299

.gio

na

l T

rans

it A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

-11

F

Bo.

oz·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 127: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OST

E

STIM

AT

E

CO

VE

RSH

EE

T

PR

OJE

CT

: E

XP

OS

ITIO

N B

US

TR

AN

SIT

WA

Y

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

1 0

DA

TE

1

1/6

/98

O

F

2 S

AN

TA

MO

NIC

A T

O

RE

V.:

2

GA

TE

WA

Y

$:

19

88

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$8

7,6

24

,60

0

$1

54

,06

6,5

77

$

87

,62

4,6

00

1

8)

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G A

LL

OW

AN

CE

$

1,5

00

,00

0

$1

,50

0,0

00

$

1,5

00

,00

0

2) S

TA

TIO

NS

$

15

,40

5,0

00

$

17

,00

7,7

58

$

16

,02

9,3

37

3)

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$

5,0

00

,00

0

$5

,00

0,0

00

$

5,0

00

,00

0

4} S

YS

TE

MW

IDE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

$

19

,87

0,5

00

$

17

,55

2,3

49

$

15

,69

6,2

99

5}

VE

HIC

LE

S

$1

0,1

50

,00

0

$9

,66

5,4

39

$

9,6

65

,43

9

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee

pa

ge

2 f

or

de

tails

) $

13

9,5

50

,10

0

$2

04

,79

2,1

23

$

13

5,5

15

,67

6

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5

%

$3

,48

8,7

53

$

5,1

19

,80

3

$3

,38

7,8

92

7)

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0

%

$1

1,1

64

,00

8

$1

6,3

83

,37

0

$1

0,8

41

,25

4

8} M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

5. 0

%

$6

,97

7,5

05

$

10

,23

9,6

06

$

6,7

75

,78

4

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $

21

,63

0,2

66

$

31

,74

2,7

79

$

21

,00

4,9

30

9} A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C}

0.5

%

$697

,751

$1

,023

,961

$

67

7,5

78

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C

) $6

97,7

51

$1,0

23,9

61

$6

77

,57

8

10}

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D}

AL

LO

WA

NC

E F

OR

4 P

AR

K-N

-RID

ES

$

4,9

00

,00

0

$4

,90

0,0

00

$

4,9

00

,00

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $

4,9

00

,00

0

$4

,90

0,0

00

$

4,9

00

,00

0

11}

PR

OF

. S

ER

VIC

ES

(E

} $

70

,92

7,4

10

$

41

,07

6,8

59

$4

5,38

7,49

1

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $

70

,92

7,4

10

$

41

,07

6,8

59

$4

5,38

7,49

1

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

-

12

%

$1

0,5

14

,95

2

$1

8,4

87

,98

9

$1

0,5

14

,95

2

ITE

M 1

8

12

%

$1

80

,00

0

$1

80

,00

0

$1

80

,00

0

B)

ITE

M 2

1

7%

$

2,6

18

,85

0

$2

,89

1,3

19

$

2,7

24

,98

7

C)

ITE

M 3

, 4,

& 5

10

%

$3

,50

2,0

50

$

3,2

21

,77

9

$3

,03

6,1

74

D

) IT

EM

6,

7, &

8

10

%

$2

,16

3,0

27

$

3,1

74

,27

8

$2

,10

0,4

93

E

) IT

EM

10

10%

$

49

0,0

00

$

49

0,0

00

$

49

0,0

00

F)

IT

EM

11

10%

$7

,092

,741

$

4,1

07

,68

6

$4

,53

8,7

49

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $2

6,56

1 ,6

20

$3

2,55

3,05

1 $

23

,58

5,3

55

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-11

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 128: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• W

ests

ide

Cor

rido

r Alte

rnat

ives

-P

roje

ct T

imel

ines

AL

L A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

WIT

HIN

TH

E W

ES

TS

IDE

CO

RR

IDO

R R

EQ

UIR

E A

DD

ITIO

NA

L P

LA

NN

ING

• N

o pr

ojec

t in

the

We

stsi

de

cor

rido

r is

rea

dy t

o m

ove

into

con

stru

ctio

n a

t thi

s tim

e

• T

he s

uspe

nded

pro

ject

mus

t st

ill g

o th

roug

h a

supp

lem

enta

l E

IS p

roce

ss,

as w

ell

as d

esig

n pr

ior

to m

ovin

g to

con

stru

ctio

n

Hea

vy R

ail S

ubw

ay:

0%

40%

40

%

0%

65%

I 0%

I 0%

I I

5%

Wils

hire

I W

este

rn t

o 3

mo

. 3

mo

. 6

mo

. 3

mo

. 3

mo

. 6

mo

. 4

mo

. 6

mo

. 12

mo.

I 4

mo

. I

Wils

hire

I F

airf

ax

Ligh

t R

ail A

t-G

rade

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

I

0%

I 0%

I

I 0%

E

xpo

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay:

3m

o.

5m

o.

10 m

o.

3m

o.

9m

o.

6m

o.

4m

o.

6m

o.

12 m

o.

I 4

mo

. I

7th

I F

low

er to

4th

I C

olor

ado

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay A

t-0%

0%

0%

0%

I

I 0%

G

rade

5

mo

. 10

mo

. 3

mo

. 4

mo

. 6

mo

. 12

mo.

I

4m

o.

I E

xpo

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay:

Gat

eway

Pla

za to

4th

I C

olor

ado

NO

PR

OJE

CT

IN T

HE

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

IS

RE

AD

Y T

O M

OV

E I

NT

O C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

AN

D

AD

DIT

ION

AL

PL

AN

NIN

G M

US

T B

E D

ON

E D

UR

ING

TH

E F

Y04

PE

RIO

D

50 m

o.

62

mo

.

62

mo

.

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-12

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 129: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

E F

RA

ME

FO

R S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

TO

PIC

O I

SA

N V

ICE

NT

E

MO

NT

HS

Pe

rce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

I I

PR

OJE

CT

PH

AS

E

Co

mp

lete

C

om

ple

te

6 12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

90

:~:~:.W~)~~~:~

:::::=::::::::

::::::::::::::

:::::~~~%:::::

::::::::::::::

::L:::::::

······ ···

·· :::::

::::: :::::

::::: :::::

::::: :::::

::::: :::::

::::: :

:::: :::::

::::: :::::

::::: :::::·

::::: ::

::: ::::::

:::::: ::::

: ::::::

:::::: ::::

:: :::::

:::::: ::::::

:::::: ::

:::!

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d T

estin

g 0%

36

• 4

8

Tot

al T

ime

to C

ompl

etio

n 79

• 9

1

.gio

na

l T

rans

it A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

·-1

3F

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

.o

n In

c.

Page 130: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• W

ests

ide

Cor

ridor

Alte

rnat

ives

Tim

elin

es-

Sus

pend

ed P

roje

ct

TH

E I

MP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

OF

TH

E S

US

PE

ND

ED

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

PR

OJE

CT

TO

PIC

O I

SA

N V

ICE

NT

E

RE

SU

ME

S A

PA

RT

IAL

LY

CO

MP

LE

TE

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

CL

EA

RA

NC

E P

RO

CE

SS

• T

he c

ompl

etio

n of

the

last

po

rtio

n o

f the

Dra

ft E

nvir

onm

enta

l Im

pact

Sta

tem

ent w

ill t

ake

ap

prox

imat

ely

thre

e m

onth

s

• C

ompl

etio

n o

f the

Fin

al E

nvir

onm

enta

l Im

pact

Sta

tem

ent w

ill r

equi

re a

n ad

ditio

nal

four

m

onth

s

• R

ight

-of-

way

acq

uisi

tion

begi

ns o

nce

all

engi

neer

ing

wo

rk is

com

plet

e a

nd f

alls

with

in a

tw

o-ye

ar ti

me

fram

e

• O

nce

enou

gh r

eal

esta

te is

acq

uire

d to

beg

in s

tatio

n co

nstr

uctio

n, c

onst

ruct

ion

of t

he

proj

ect w

ill l

ikel

y re

quire

an

addi

tiona

l thr

ee t

o fo

ur y

ears

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

~nalysis

A4

.3-

13

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 131: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

E F

RA

ME

FO

R W

ILS

HIR

E S

UB

WA

Y

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

PR

OJE

CT

PH

AS

E

Co

mp

lete

C

om

ple

te

6 12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

9(

II II~

.~l.t

.~!.

~~\i::'~~.~~~~~!~ ••

••••••

•••.••

•••.•.•

•• .!R~(~ ••

••••••

••.•••

.....• ~

.?.ooo

oooooo

000

000 00

000 0

00000

...... .

.......

... ··

········

·· . ....

. ....

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

.....

ᤤ~~f

vlewoo

oooooo

oooooo

oooooo

oooooo

oooooooo

o•~~oo

oooooo

oooooo

oooooo

o~oooo

oooooo

oooo•

oooo•

ooooo

oooo•

oooooo

ooo

ooo

.......

......

.......

...

. .....

.......

........

......

.......

.......

.......

... ····

······

·······

·······

········

····

:~~~'~1i.~i:

~~i~i.iil.1~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i

f::~~:~~~~~~~~

~:~~~~~~~:~:~~~~

~ :::~: :~~~:: ~~~

~~: ~~~~~ :~~~~· :::::

: 000000 00000

~ . • 000

0 ........

... ...

......

...

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

......

...

.... ...

.......

. .....

.......

. ...

......

.......

......

......

.......

.......

......

......

......

........

.......

.......

....

:• ~

0000

0000

0000

00

..... ·

······

······

······

····

········

······

······

··· ..

.......

.......

.......

.......

......

, ...... -

-.Ill:.

::::::::

::::::::::::

: .f.

!!)i!!

.!?.~~

.iJJD.

!..sr!

ll!~~~

~r!~~o

ooooo

oooooo

oooo!?

~(~ooo

oooooo

oooooo

oooooo

~.?.oo

oooooo

o 000

00 000

00 000

00 000

00 000

00 000

000 00

0000 o

ooo·

000000

0

.f.!~9

.~\:~!

:~!'!Y

.!.!~9

!!!~.i

.t!!?D

ooooo

oOOooO

OOOOOO

O~RJ~o

oooooo

ooooo

oooooo

o?.L

oooo

oo ooo

o· 000

00 ooo

o· 000

00 000

00 000

000 00

0000 0

0000

000000

...

.....

....

.....

......

Con

tract

or B

id 0%

4

·coiisiiiiCiion·a:r;Ci·fesHn9oooooooooooooooooooo/~00000000000000004a·:oos400000

00000

00000

000000

00000

oooo

. 000

000 00

0000 0

0000

000000

...

......

.....

......

...

_..

.. e

W'

•.

Tota

l Tim

e to

Com

plet

ion

104

-11

0

.eg

ion

al

Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s •

. 3 -

14

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

&.i

lto

n In

c .

Page 132: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

,.-----------------------------------------------------

-----

• •

• W

ests

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es T

imel

ines

-W

ilshi

re A

lign

me

nt

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

OF

TH

E W

ILS

HIR

E S

UB

WA

Y A

LIG

NM

EN

T T

O F

AIR

FA

X A

VE

NU

E R

EQ

UIR

ES

R

EV

ISIO

NS

TO

AL

RE

AD

Y C

OM

PL

ET

E E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L I

MP

AC

T S

TA

TE

ME

NT

S

• E

nviro

nmen

tal

clea

ranc

es f

or t

he W

ilshi

re S

ub

wa

y A

lignm

ent

wer

e co

mpl

eted

in 1

987.

A

lthou

gh e

nviro

nmen

tal

docu

men

ts a

re c

ompl

ete,

new

con

ditio

ns r

equi

re t

hat t

hese

do

cum

ents

be

revi

sed.

A

par

tial

alte

rnat

ives

ana

lysi

s sh

ould

be

done

in o

rder

for

this

op

tion

to a

dvan

ce.

Suc

h a

proc

ess

may

req

uire

app

roxi

mat

ely

15 m

onth

s

• C

ompl

etio

n of

the

Env

ironm

enta

l Im

pact

Sta

tem

ent

requ

ires

appr

oxim

atel

y an

add

ition

al

yea

r

• A

lthou

gh n

early

20

perc

ent

of th

e re

quire

d ri

ght-

of-w

ay is

alr

eady

ow

ned

by th

e M

TA

, th

e re

mai

ning

rig

ht-o

f-w

ay w

ill r

equi

re a

n ad

ditio

nal t

wo

year

s to

pur

chas

e

• S

ince

a s

igni

fican

t po

rtio

n of

the

rig

ht-

of-

wa

y is

alre

ady

owne

d by

the

MT

A,

cons

truc

tion

can

occu

r co

ncur

rent

with

the

fin

al p

urch

ases

of

right

-of-

way

• C

onst

ruct

ion

of th

e fu

ll ex

tens

ion

to F

airf

ax A

venu

e w

ill t

ake

appr

oxim

atel

y th

ree

to f

our

year

s.

Tes

ting

will

req

uire

an

addi

tiona

l on

e-ha

lf to

one

yea

r be

fore

rev

enue

ser

vice

can

be

gin

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

A4

.3-

14

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 133: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

--~-· -------

---

--

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

EF

RA

ME

FO

R E

XP

OS

ITIO

N L

IGH

T R

AIL

ST

AT

E F

UN

DIN

G P

RO

CE

SS

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

P

RO

JEC

T P

HA

SE

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

90

I I

I I

I I

Alte

mat

i...e

s A

naly

sis

0%

21

Dra

n El

:>

0%

9

Ul:.

l::i K

eV!e

W

N/A

at~

Fina

l EIS

U

'ro

4 Pr

e11m

1nar

y t:.

ngm

eenn

g 0%

12

Vro

cure

men

t S

trate

gy

U'ro

b

I

Fmal

oes

1gn

1 t:.

ngm

eenn

g 0%

1

2

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay A

CqU

ISitiO

n 9

0%

1

2

Con

tract

or B

l<l

-o%

4

I co

nstr

uctio

n an

d T

estin

g 0%

3

6-

4tl

Tota

l lim

e to

Com

plet

ion

92

-98

FE

DE

RA

L F

UN

DIN

G P

RO

CE

SS

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

P

RO

JEC

T P

HA

SE

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

90

I I

I I

I A

ltem

ati..

.es

Ana

lysi

s 0%

21

D

ran

t:.l:>

0%

9

DE

IS R

eVIe

W

0%

b

Fmal

tl:>

0%

4

I V

reflm

mar

y-E

ngm

eenn

g 0%

12

Pro

cure

men

t st

rate

gy 1

KU

U

U"/o

b

F m

al u

es1g

n 1

t:.ng

mee

nng

0%

12

~lght-of-Way A

cqw

sitlo

n 9

!)%

1

2

cont

ract

or 1:

11<1

0%

4

\:"on

slru

ct1o

n an

d Te

stm

g 0%

3

6 -

4tl

IC

tii w

. . -

Tota

l lim

e to

Com

plet

ion

98

-10

4

.eg

ion

al

Tran

sit A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

•. 3-1

5F

B

ooz-

AIIe

n &

.to

n In

c.

Page 134: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• W

ests

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es T

imel

ines

-E

xpos

ition

Lig

ht R

ail ·

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

OF

TH

E L

IGH

T R

AIL

ON

TH

E E

XP

OS

ITIO

N R

IGH

T-O

F-W

AY

RE

QU

IRE

S A

N

EN

TIR

EL

Y N

EW

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

AL

CL

EA

RA

NC

E P

RO

CE

SS

. T

HE

TIM

E F

RA

ME

FO

R

CO

MP

LE

TIO

N D

EP

EN

DS

ON

TH

E S

OU

RC

E O

F F

UN

DS

• F

undi

ng t

he E

xpos

ition

Lig

ht R

ail

proj

ect

entir

ely

with

loc

al a

nd s

tate

fun

ds r

equi

res

that

th

e pr

ojec

t sa

tisfy

the

requ

irem

ents

of t

he C

alifo

rnia

Env

ironm

enta

l Q

ualit

y A

ct.

The

sta

te

envi

ronm

enta

l cle

aran

ce p

roce

ss is

thr

ee t

o ni

ne m

onth

s sh

orte

r th

an t

he f

eder

al

• F

undi

ng t

he E

xpos

ition

Lig

ht R

ail

proj

ect

with

par

tial f

eder

al f

undi

ng r

equi

res

the

satis

fact

ion

of th

e fe

dera

l en

viro

nmen

tal

revi

ew p

roce

ss.

Thi

s le

ngth

ens

the

proj

ect t

ime

fram

e by

9 m

onth

s.

The

com

plet

ion

of e

nviro

nmen

tal

clea

ranc

e is

est

imat

ed a

t 40

mon

ths

• C

onst

ruct

ion

of th

e pr

ojec

t an

d co

mpl

etio

n of

test

ing

are

estim

ated

to

requ

ire a

n ad

ditio

nal

thre

e to

fou

r ye

ars

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-15

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 135: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

EF

RA

ME

FO

R E

XP

OS

ITIO

N B

US

WA

Y

ST

AT

E F

UN

DIN

G P

RO

CE

SS

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

P

RO

JEC

T P

HA

SE

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

48

.54

60

66

72

78

84

90

I I

I I

I ~

Alte

mat

iws

Ana

lysi

s 0%

21

ur

an t

:l:>

U'l'o

lj

DE

IS R

elol

eW

N/A

1m

1-1na

1 t:l

:>

0"/o

4

l"'re

umm

ary

t:ng1

neen

ng

0%

12

Pro

cure

men

t :>

trate

gy

0%

6

~lllll

ll 1-1

na1

ues1

gn 1

t:n

gmee

nng

U%

12

R

lgnt

-oi-W

ay A

CQUI

SIIIO

n 95

%

12

~.;ontractor 1

:110

0%

4

l'Ons

truc

tlon

0%

24

Tota

l lim

e to

Com

plet

ion

80

·----~·

·-~.

FE

DE

RA

L F

UN

DIN

G P

RO

CE

SS

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

P

RO

JEC

T P

HA

SE

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

3

6

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

90

I I

I I

I I

Alte

mat

iws

Ana

lysi

s 0%

21

ur

an 1

:1::>

0%

9 D

t:IS

Kel

oleW

0%

6

I 1-1

na1

1:1::>

U'

l'o

4 P

relim

mar

y E

ngm

eenn

g 0%

12

P

rocu

rem

ent

::.tra

tegy

1 t

(UU

U

%

0

r-1na

1 ue

s1gn

1 r

:ngm

eenn

g 0%

12

K

lgnt

-oi-W

ay A

CQ

UIS

itiOn

95%

1<

!

l'Ont

ract

Or

t:lla

0%

4

cons

truc

tion

ana

1 esu

ng

0%

24

Tota

l lim

e to

Com

plet

ion

86

lJ_

LW

ll

-

.eg

ion

al T

rans

it A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

•. 3

-16

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .o

n In

c.

Page 136: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• • •

• W

ests

ide

Cor

rido

r A

ltern

ativ

es T

imel

ines

-E

xpos

ition

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

OF

TH

E E

XP

OS

ITIO

N B

US

WA

Y M

AY

RE

QU

IRE

BE

TW

EE

N F

IVE

AN

D S

IX

YE

AR

S

• T

he E

xpos

ition

Bus

way

cou

ld b

e fu

nded

ent

irely

with

loc

al a

nd s

tate

fun

ds.

Thi

s fu

ndin

g ar

rang

emen

t re

quire

s th

at th

e pr

ojec

t sa

tisfy

the

requ

irem

ents

of t

he C

alifo

rnia

E

nviro

nmen

tal Q

ualit

y A

ct o

nly.

T

he p

roje

ct w

ould

not

be

requ

ired

to h

ave

fede

ral

envi

ronm

enta

l doc

umen

ts.

The

sta

te e

nviro

nmen

tal c

lear

ance

pro

cess

can

tak

e 12

to 1

8 m

onth

s

• F

undi

ng t

he E

xpos

ition

Bus

way

pro

ject

with

par

tial f

eder

al f

undi

ng r

equi

res

the

satis

fact

ion

of t

he f

eder

al e

nviro

nmen

tal

revi

ew p

roce

ss.

Thi

s le

ngth

ens

the

proj

ect t

ime

fram

e by

9

mon

ths.

T

he c

ompl

etio

n of

env

ironm

enta

l cl

eara

nce

is e

stim

ated

at

40 m

onth

s

• B

usw

ay c

onst

ruct

ion

can

be

com

plet

ed w

ithin

app

roxi

mat

ely

2 ye

ars

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-16

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

In

c.

Page 137: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

•• R

esul

ts ..

. Wes

tsid

e C

orri

dor

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

RE

SU

LT

S I

NC

LU

DE

...

TIE

R 1

ME

AS

UR

ES

Alt

ern

ati

ve

Mo

de

l N

ote

M

ob

ility

T

ran

sit

Re

liab

ility

C

om

mu

nit

y C

ost

De

pe

nd

en

cy

Imp

act

s E

ffe

ctiv

en

ess

Hea

vy R

ail t

o P

ica/

San

W

-1

~

~

e e

~

Vic

ente

S

uspe

nded

Hea

vy R

ail t

o W

ilshi

re/F

airf

ax

W-4

HR

T

: ~

~

e e

. ~

Blu

e Li

ne t

o E

xpos

ition

Bra

nch

W-3

LR

T

~

~

~

()

()

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay a

long

W

-2 B

usw

ay ~

()

~

()·

e E

xpos

ition

Bra

nch

TIE

R 2

ME

AS

UR

ES

Alt

ern

ati

ve

Mo

de

l N

ote

E

con

om

ic

Sa

fety

E

nvi

ron

me

nta

l

Hea

vy R

ail t

o P

ica/

San

Vic

ente

W

-1

~

e e

Sus

pend

ed

Hea

vy R

ail t

o W

ilshi

re/F

airf

ax

W-4

HR

T

~

e e

! I

Blu

e Li

ne t

o E

xpos

ition

Bra

nch

W-3

LR

T

e ()

e

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay a

long

Exp

ositi

on B

ranc

h W

-2 B

usw

ay

~

~

~

-~

KEY

I e

I ~Most

Favo

rabl

e or

Hig

h --I

0 I L

east

Fav

orab

le o

r Lo

w

I

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3

-17

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 138: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

.Perf

orm

an

ce M

easu

res

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

M

od

el N

ote

HRtoPico/San~

IW.I

.._

....

.I

HR

to 'M

sl*

al

F ai

rfla

I

W-4

HR

T I

SU

I li

ne

Exp

olll

on &

.nch

I

W-3

UIT

I

E.x

posl

.lonB

usw

•y

I w

-2,._

,.,1

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

M

od

el N

ote

HR

toP

ico

/Sa

n'V

Ino

en

l W

.l..

_..

...

HR

to..

.w.t

hi'F

Hfu

w

.tH

RT

8lu

l lin

e b

po

dlo

n a

r.n

ch

W

->U

IT

Exp

osl

ion

Bu

lwliy

W

-2B

usw

ay

Rou

te

Mile

s .... 3.1

7

10

11.5

Rou

te

Mile

s .... 3.1

7

I I I I

--- ,. 11

.5

MO

BIU

lY

Ma

rke

t

Add

«lon

al D

•lty

ILA

eo.

ny I Pe

rce,

.. of

I Alfm

lltw

.l s .

.. 20

10

Tr.

nsl

Tt1

M

08

ly T

r11n

M

Tota

l S

ptd

flc

Gen

erat

ed

Trip

s

1,02

5 I

OIIJ.

o ..

I . _

.,..

I 4

3.30

I

43.

32

-------------

-2,

142

.......

0.2

4'1o

43.3

0 43

.32

----f-----

3,JO

S ... ,.

. O

.Jll

'lo

43.

34

4

3.3

2

8,06

3 I

..,,..

, I

._.,..

I

43.

33

I 4

3.3

2

MO

BIL

ilY

I

.......

CN

ng

o

0.1

6 ..

---

0.1

....

0.0

5 ..

I .....

.

_, ..

JIII

KIO

tii1J

if'IC

M.I

Adc

ition

a!D

aty

LA C

ouN

y .,

.rt:

erio

f A

lem

atN

e .....

.. T

r.n

&IT

,_,.

D

af1

Tra

MII

B

aM20

10

GeN

... t

ed

T ....

T

... l

-""""

""

I I

a a

() •

NIA

~

a a

()

a N

IA

a ~ -.-

()-

() ---

()

NIA

f--

• •

• ()

N

IA

()

Th

e .id

e C

orri

dor

An

nu

al T

rans

l T

raw

l11m

e .....

... 0,

1158

---- . .....

---

-

15,1

45

22.3

34

Ann

ual.

Tra

nt;

l T

raw

lllm

e

o.a

....

I I

____

_i!__

_

~ • •

-A

cce

salb

itlty

16.

34

16.3

8

----

16.3

3

15.

54

-A

cce .

. lb

llll

y

()

()

() •

I I

TR

AN

SIT

DE

PE

ND

EN

CE

Tra

n ..

..........

.. -· t.JS

..• 1.0

1.5

......

"-'""

"'

l•• ..

v•""'""

· 1

2S'tt

Hig

h,60

-Ao

Ver

y lo

w

""'"

""'·'

..,I

lo

w

lO'rt

Var

y H

igh,

J

, ......

---

I"""

'"""

"""

I 70

'1f.

low

, tD

"rt

Ver

y lo

w

Job

Acu

sslb

6U

ty

......

22.0

0

22.1

7

22.

12

22. ..

TR

AN

SIT

DE

PE

ND

EN

CE

Tra

nUI -

w ...

Job

Acc

ea

alb

lllty

......

Ded

lnat

lon

-· ()

()

()

• ()

~

_ _SL

()

()

()

A4.

3-18

I I I I

• C

OS

T E

FF

EC

TIV

EN

ES

S

RE

UA

BIU

TY

P

rote

ct U

nit

Co

sta

C

Oif

Eff

ic:'-

nq'

Re

WN

!tly

,.,

Moe

N

..........

.... U

loq

do

Coo

t~ S

ubol

dyi T

..

T ..

cap~~a1 1;:

-',. 1

O&

M=

JM

Me

$237

,265

,625

I

$1.7

11,7

50

I $1

1,02

1 I

$2,0

70

I V

.,-,

low

kllo

w

$271

,196

,738

I

$2,0

50,4

73

I $2

4,27

11

I S2

,11S

I I

Va

rykl

wto

low

$54,

861,

111

I st

,tn,m

I

sn

.~t

I $0

,020

I

... S

1S,0

89,t

88

I

S297

.2SI

7 I

S2.T

30

I ....

I lo

w

CO

ST

EF

FE

CT

IVE

NE

SS

REUA~IUTY

Pro

fed

Un

llCo

sts

Co

ltE

md

ency

..........

. C

apit

al C

ost

tJM

I!.t

O

&M

eo

.ta

/Mile

U

loq

do

c..

t S

ub

U!f

r/T

rtp

R

ella

biU

iyp

erM

od

e

(MTA

J

"""

T ..

0 ~

()

()

• 0

~

()

()

• ~

()

()

~

~

• •

• •

~

Page 139: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

EC

ON

OM

IC

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

AF

ET

Y

Job

s G

ross

Are

a G

ross

Are

a A

ir Q

ua

lity

Ind

ex

Sa

fety

In

de

x A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

M

od

el N

ote

s Jo

b S

uppo

rted

, S

uppo

rted

, P

rodu

ct,

Pro

duct

, A

dditi

onal

N

on T

rans

it P

ass.

Acc

iden

ts

Pas

s. A

ccid

ents

T

raff

ic A

ccid

ents

O

pera

ting

Ope

ratin

g C

apita

l T

rans

it V

ehic

ular

P

erce

nt o

f p

er

100,

000

pe

r 10

0,00

0 p

er

100,

000

Saf

ety

Inde

x C

apita

l ($

98M

illio

ns)

($98

Mill

ions

) E

mis

sion

s E

mis

sion

s (k

gs)

NT

VE

B

oard

ings

H

ubfT

raln

Mile

s H

ubfT

rain

Mile

s

HR

to

Pic

o I

San

Vin

cent

W

-1 S

uspe

nded

13

0 14

,608

4

.37

724.

02

NIA

24

3,02

1 N

IA

0.0

8

0.00

1.

33

Com

posi

te

(sta

tiona

ry

sour

ce)

HR

to

Wils

her I

Fai

rfax

W

-4H

RT

1

92

20

,676

6.

45

1024

.76

NIA

24

3,02

3 N

IA

0.08

0

.00

1.

33

Com

posi

te

(sta

tiona

ry

sour

ce)

Blu

e Li

ne E

xpos

ition

Bra

nch

W-3

LR

T

627

23,7

49

21.0

5 11

77.1

0 N

IA

243,

021

NIA

0.

15

0.83

4.

17

Com

posi

te

(sta

tiona

ry

sour

ce)

Exp

ositi

on B

usw

ay

W-2

Bu

swa

y 1

63

7,

559

5.46

37

4.65

5,

638

243,

005

2.32

%

0.4

0 0

.06

2.6

9 C

ompo

site

EC

ON

OM

IC

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

AF

ET

Y

I Jo

bs

Gro

ss A

rea

Gro

ss A

rea

Air

Qu

alit

y In

de

x S

afe

ty I

nd

ex

I A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

M

od

el N

ote

s Jo

b S

uppo

rted

, A

dditi

onal

N

on T

rans

it P

ass.

Acc

iden

ts

Pas

s. A

ccid

ents

T

raff

ic A

ccid

ents

!

Sup

port

ed,

Pro

duct

, P

rodu

ct,

Per

cent

of

Ope

ratin

g C

apita

l O

pera

ting

Cap

ital

Tra

nsit

Ve

hic

ula

r N

TV

E

pe

r 10

0,00

0 p

er

10

0,0

00

p

er

10

0,0

00

S

afet

y In

dex

! E

mis

sion

s E

mis

sion

s (k

gs)

Boa

rdin

gs

Hub

fTra

in M

iles

Hub

fTra

in M

iles

HR

to

Pic

o I

San

Vin

cent

W

-1 S

uspe

nded

~

~

~

~

• ()

• •

• •

HR

to

Wils

her I

Fai

rfax

W

-4H

RT

()

()

• •

()

__.

• •

• •

Blu

e Li

ne E

xpos

ition

Bra

nch

W-3

LR

T

•-~-

•--•

- -•

• _

i)_

L•

()

()

()

()

Exp

ositi

on B

usw

ay

W-2

Bu

swa

y C

l ~

___i

l ~

~-_

i)

~

'it

• 'it

a

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.3-

19

Boo

z-A

IIen

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

--·-

·---

--

--·-

----

----· ----

·--

----

Page 140: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

a... .

. __

. ;;,... ..

Th

.tsd

ie C

orri

dor

• v

ALT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

HR

to P

k:o

I S

an

VIn

cen

t H

R t

o W

ilsh

ire/

F81

rfu

Blu

e U

ne

EJ:

poal

llon

E

J:po

aiU

on B

us

Tra

na

ltw

ay

(Su

op

on

de

d)

Bra

nch

I G

EN

ER

AL

CO

MM

UN

ITY

IM

PA

CT

S

.. •

.... •

. ... •

.. .. •

.. 'ii

.. ·"

'"'I;

1.

."-?

;;,t

~*~'

.

-hP~

--

h-

- -h

....

- -h

....

-m

pu

ts o

n P

ropu

1y V

•lu

n

./

./

./

./

mpa

cts

on B

usln

euea

./

./

./

./

mpa

cts

on S

ecur

ity

./

./

./

./

mpa

cts

on A

esth

etic

s ./

./

./

./

ol•

•lm

pad

s ./

./

./

./

mpa

cta

on T

raff

ic L

inn

./

./

./

./

omm

unll

y R

espo

nse

• ./

./

./

./

•wa.

-..y,

lk••

•·

• •

()

~

Pos

itive

P

osi

tive

N

eutr

al

Less

Pos

itive

6 A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

S

HT

to

Plc

o I

San

Vin

cen

t H

R to

Wils

hir

e/ F

airf

ax

Blu

e L

ine

Exp

osi

tion

E

a:po

sttlo

n B

usw

ay

(Su

spe

nd

ed

) B

ranc

h

CO

MM

UN

ITY

IMP

AC

TS O

N

RE

LOC

AT

ION

S

·-.....

.. . .... ·-

..... ·-

-o

u1

tho

ld R

elo

uti

on

s ./

./

./

./

omm

unlt

y h

clll

ty R

elou

tlon

s ./

./

./

./

lsto

rlc

Sit

e R

tloc

atlo

ns

./

./

I ./

./

-

----

·-

L_

--· --

• •

• •

Pos

itive

P

ositi

ve

Pos

itive

P

ositi

ve

A4.

3-20

Page 141: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

' • •

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-S

US

PE

ND

ED

PR

OJE

CT

Le

ge

nd

-V

ery

Hig

h

liiJ

Hig

h

l;,,;w

,t;l

Mo

de

rate

D

Lo

w

D

Oth

er

e -

--e

0

Red

Lin

e M

id-C

itie

s E

xte

nsi

on

-S

usp

en

de

d P

roje

ct

A4.

3-21

Page 142: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-W

ILS

HIR

E A

LIG

NM

EN

T

Le

ge

nd

-V

ery

Hig

h

liti

l H

igh

rwk:::

l M

od

era

te

Exi

stin

g R

ail

• • •

• • •

• • •

·•

6 W

ilsh

ire

Alig

nm

en

t

A4.

3-22

Page 143: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-E

XP

OS

ITIO

N L

IGH

T R

AIL

Le

ge

nd

-V

ery

Hig

h

151

Hig

h

Mo

de

rate

• •

Blu

e L

ine

Exp

osi

tio

n B

ran

ch

A4.

3-23

Page 144: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

WE

ST

SID

E C

OR

RID

OR

-E

XP

O B

US

TR

AN

SIT

WA

Y

Le

ge

nd

-V

ery

Hig

h

lliJ

Hig

h

Ural

M

od

era

te

D

D

Exc

lusi

ve B

us

Gu

ide

wa

y

A4.

3-24

Page 145: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

en w > -~ z a: w ..... ...J <(

~a: ~0 ~c c­za: wa:

0 R:o <l:o

c z <( z a: w LL

z <( en

Page 146: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

San

Fer

nand

o V

alle

y A

ltern

ativ

es

TH

RE

E A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

IN T

HE

SA

N F

ER

NA

ND

O C

OR

RID

OR

AD

VA

NC

ED

TO

FIN

AL

E

VA

LU

AT

ION

• H

ea

vy r

ail

exte

nsio

n to

the

1-4

05 (

Def

erre

d P

roje

ct)

• Li

ght

Rai

i/DM

U a

ltern

ativ

e fr

om t

he

Nor

th H

olly

woo

d S

tatio

n to

Wa

rne

r C

en

ter

• B

us T

ran

sitw

ay

from

Red

Lin

e N

orth

Hol

lyw

ood

Sta

tion

to W

arn

er

Ce

nte

r

TH

E P

HY

SIC

AL

AN

D O

PE

RA

TIN

G C

HA

RA

CT

ER

IST

ICS

OF

EA

CH

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

AR

E D

EF

INE

D

FO

R F

UR

TH

ER

AN

AL

YS

IS

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

1 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 147: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

SU

MM

AR

Y O

F S

AN

FE

RN

AN

DO

VA

LL

EY

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S

Hea

vy R

ail t

o 1-

405,

N

orth

Hol

lyw

ood

to 1

-H

eavy

S

ubw

ay I

1 su

bway

I ae

rial

405

via

Bur

bank

I 4

I 4

I 5.

6 I

9.5

I 35

.4

I 8.

5 I

10.0

co

mbi

natio

n C

hand

ler

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay

Rai

l A

eria

l

Ligh

t R

ail

(or

DM

U)

to

Nor

th H

olly

woo

d to

A

t-G

rade

ar

ner

Cen

ter

Wa

rne

r C

ente

r vi

a Li

ght

Rai

l w

ith

12

I 10

I

13.8

I

24.8

I

33.1

I

5.0

I 12

.0

Bur

bank

I C

hand

ler

Ele

vate

d 1

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay

Fly

over

s

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay

!Nor

th H

olly

woo

d to

A

t-G

rade

in

Wa

rne

r C

ente

r vi

a B

us

Exc

lusi

ve I

13

I 6

I 13

.8

I 24

.8

I 33

.1

I 5.

0 I

12.0

B

urba

nk I

Cha

ndle

r R

igh

t-of

R

ight

-of-

Way

W

ay

• eg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s ·.

4-2

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .lt

on

Inc .

Page 148: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• S

UM

MA

RY

RE

SU

LT

S F

OR

SA

N F

ER

NA

ND

O C

OR

RID

OR

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S

... >\:-}

T:·[ ·

~t~ :-

--

----------

.

' Op

er(

ltin

g.

Est

ima

ted

·.····T

ime

Be

fore

·: 1

.:>.

"' <I

..

, co

sts

·R

ide

rsh

ip

· constr~~ii9~

He

avy

Rai

l: 92

0.0

N

orth

Hol

lyw

ood

Sta

tion

to 1

-405

Ligh

t R

ail A

t-G

rade

11.12

6.1

I B

urba

nk I

Ch

an

dle

r R

ight

-of-

Way

: N

orth

Hol

lyw

ood

Sta

tion

to W

arn

er

Ce

nte

r

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y A

t-

I 17

3.0

I G

rade

B

urba

nk I

Ch

an

dle

r R

ight

-of-

Way

: N

orth

H

olly

woo

d S

tatio

n to

W

arne

r C

en

ter

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s

' ($

M)

. (m

on

ths)

·

12

.7

I 15

,900

I

38

22.6

I

23,4

00

I 38

14.

0 I

16,1

00

I 3

8

KE

Y e

Mo

st F

avor

able

o

r H

igh

A4.

4-2

I I I

a I ~

() I

~

() I

~

Le

ast

Fav

orab

le o

r L

ow

• . I

J'ii

<:>

;:-

;;;;,<

::,,:I

I

' . ~

..

I • I

a I

()

I a

I ()

I

()

I a

I ()

I •

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 149: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

SA

N F

ER

NA

ND

O V

AL

LE

Y-

DE

FE

RR

ED

PR

OJE

CT

~-

--

·--

--:: ...

. ----------

--··--·

·-·

·--

-!

'• .

. ~§/

oc.

,,:>r

~·~l

iml'

\

>

z

,,~'f'JIL~

L.•s;

t:•l

~

~ '1 \';':;{-:

,~-\<~::,

. \\

.. ,,_\,.,,

_ ,,~,;/:

;.. ~

~ :c

... _,~

..;:.,,

~LU

rN•\

ER

~

w

"'l~

"~""~'"/

/. J

-N

~

""~'" ............

... / ........ ,..

//. w

t~O

J:l o

4orr

~

r~;_}·

­

<F

~~~~

-%

~

:1'/////

////////

/////~

~ -

' ~,

z~ ~

~//"/""///

/////////<

..::·

p,r.

R)I-IEI~

IA ~

~/. '· ~

'-~

.... ////

,1.;

,../

. '

Z

' ~<

lJ'~

N

v

0 l

-~

~ ~A

~:;.;'

//////

// ~

( -

1"/,-/.~

M !

0 >

'

////

////

~~

....

:t'~

......

z.

=

', 83

, ~ ... / .....

..........................

.. ,."" R

o

o

~ ...... ~ ... ~

~~ .,....

.... ~.,

., _ .

<(

a::·

1 o

W//

//.1

// ... /"

"h'//~coc

~ ~

tt

=>

~9,,~/.

, ,

~.

' ~' ~

~ +

~

W

W/////.1

////////

/,~.:

::>

~ ...

. ~ ~ i

~~ ""

0~,.

-..:

.

Lr 1

UN

!• CN

~,-G

I'

... S!'

.. ,,

.. g

ST

I!A

TI!

E_I!

\l_

-~'

: W

////

////

////

////

/1'/

////

/.

~ :

' '

; ~,-0~

~:%

: ·-A

A ;c

,__

~~

,.,_~------

a::·

l ~

; W

////

////

.1//

////

//.

~

i ~

I I ~ ~

""·

1 '

=>

s.o.n

::ov

~

I W//

//////

///~

I ~

. · --

--···--

-----o

'

"~n \\ ..

. ~:

W

l

, ~

~ ~

• .

. 'I

'l j

~ . -·

<

W//

///1

'"//

////

. ~

-.....~ .. ~

z l

~/~h

'fb"'

! •

cat ·-

-~~ _

_ ._

; ~ry_

_. ...... __

,_,_ ~

~ i

~~ W//

//////

///(h/

//~~

; '

~ l

. ~.,..

~~~ "

~ .... \

~

. :rl

J ~

: i

{SH

ER

UA

N

V¥~-j¥

¥~¥ rK~

~/11'//g

////////

. ~--

---

' ""~~~

'.

·.

~;~

~ .

~ .... --~~----

-------·

;: ,

-•

---

--.

[ E

:r...

V/.~w///

//Q~::o .. M

::;

, ~~

"·'.,

..

-...._~..-

, •

0l

---~

~-

~-~-

.... ~

, l

~

h ,

w~//

////

. ~

~~

~ ,

~ ,

, l

• ,

, !

;:;.;

~ ,

V//

///.

j o,.;;)

"~

'" .

:xJ

. =·

. .

. I

i ,

. -

-f-

s, 'a

.

---r----

1-----W

//////

/~~~

.,~ t

----

---c::

¥--

1 ffi:

<t

. L

-v

vq

• ---

~ .._

~ >j~~A

-~~ --

-l '

i ~~ A~~

~ ~'~

-:

~~ :'!

-i ~~

-. ---

Z

~ ~ ~

) ~ZW

/1////

//////

///;/~

~ '·~....

.>·..:.,

.... ,'

'si(

)l

·-.,

...

.,.

· ,

.,.J

1

. j

:' .

. >-

_l,\

:z::

,---

--·-

····

· 0

Q

VC

TO

RY

,

., ,.

"

' •

I r

--·--

·----

---·-

---

· 1.

··-

1'!·--z·~

, '

\;!,<

.

1 ,.

-

---,

" • -

---~----·{ -

--

--" ----

----

,__

,,

' Q

) 1

_.

<C

~(,)

' ·-~

~ :.!

:,......

l "~

. ~

\ >

'

~ 0

[J

, '

.,,----

,.. ..

-~ ~

'·' ~,

..

. '

I "

-I

'· .. ~ -

I '

0:,

'

, ..

....

...

¥· ---

' "

<>'

~~

~ ~

"-',

., )

' ~

~

........

. ~

-...

..-::-

--'

....

,,

·-'1

~ U

J a:

: '

.......

,...~

) ....

. • '

\ )" ~

{)I.

',

, a:

: •z

: ___

____

____

--·

-..

. ··-

-g

0•

'>;)

j I'

I I

1-

:::>

• '

••

"...

. ,'

'l>>.

•. , •

• 8

' ~

• ~

, '\'*

:::; , I

\ g;

'

5 '

' ',

,£'i-~/ ',

/ -~·

'\ _

,..

· '

w

1:;

~ 'i,

>-

w' .

....

. l

'-··

8-•

, ---

-"'"''

.-1

·'

· ·'•

:.!'>'

,.,....

--·

-··-~

-~ 'i ¢

-~ /

~

cC.,~

,:g

, ...

., ·-

_ .-.

... ~

· •

...... --

~---~ z

f ~

,, _,

tro

LE

• -~

r~ ~C

I .~

~ ·

. ""

:

~ ~

~ ~

"""""""'

"'"F"""~

"'''tL'

. •

~' "',

_i=

:_ ••

1·•·-L

-----

--~-~

~--..

-~

·.-~(<'·~

·'t--/1

\

. ~

~ oo

....:

z -~~

~ , 8-

{;;

_,. irl

I 0

' ~

~~'---

~-"'

) .

, ""

,. ·tT

,

.... .

, ·,

::::;

' '

">

01

" z'

N•

.. l ... ------·

-,

, ·-

···

....

'-

<1'

' '~

• ·,

' '

-~.h.

.. .

r k~

..,.,.,~~~

, --

ffi --

. ~

t .

: .... ~

'\"'i\

\~ ... --

· ... <

.. .(·

-..

... -·

...:

• ..,

.

~!li

Fu.

I : ~

:;~

t-:

' I!

I\IE

I!SI

DE

: L

_

----·' -.,

., · .

... :.~

:.>··:-

--· .

.. ,..

.,~

~ ~

Ill~~

·-..

....

,_..]

i'i%

!i:,.

C.,l

"'.;'i

l<t-

.-.

·, !

' l ~

1:.\

.. do

"--"

.:~'

""

~"""

" .

, ~~

~"'~-·e

-~"~·''~~-

. ---,

~-'

j;~

-.

__ ·.

;' .,

.. -

J: :·:

:·,~ --~·

··:· .-:

·: •

_ :, ~-

-·--

';'!

(Al

l '·-\

;.,~,:

. .-/<

:}.~.,,-

~. -e

Red

Li~

e San

Fer

nan

do

Val

ley

1 ~·

... :)

.· ( -

.------

· _ ___;

·--'

~ -.

~, ~--

..:,v:

::.,~.

. . ...

.... ~

.--i

'c}: "·

E

xten

sio

n -

Def

erre

d P

lan

; ·-

· J

' .:·

~.,

o\,.

' ~:~.

. ~~-

-~./ ·

·.~._ .. ,

.:::.:.~ .

.. ~·

':~· .··

...... ··

-···~-

~-····

\ \

_., --.· ....

-. ·~:·

~··

• eg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s ·.

4-3

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .lt

on

Inc.

Page 150: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• S

an F

ern

an

do

Va

lley

Alte

rna

tive

s D

esc

rip

tion

s -

De

ferr

ed

Pro

ject

TH

E D

EF

ER

RE

D P

RO

JEC

T IN

TH

E S

AN

FE

RN

AN

DO

VA

LL

EY

EX

TE

ND

S T

HE

RE

D L

INE

NO

RT

H

HO

LL

YW

OO

D S

EG

ME

NT

CU

RR

EN

TL

Y U

ND

ER

CO

NS

TR

UC

TIO

N

• T

he c

hara

cter

istic

s of

the

alig

nmen

t in

clud

e ...

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: N

orth

Hol

lyw

ood

Sta

tion

to 1

-405

Sta

tion

Loca

tions

: V

an N

uys

Bou

leva

rd

Val

ley

Col

lege

La

urel

Can

yon

Sep

ulve

da B

oule

vard

N

o. V

ehic

les:

N

one,

ext

ensi

on o

f R

ed L

ine

and

utili

zes

exi

stin

g F

leet

Max

imum

B

uild

-Out

P

lann

ed P

ea

k-P

ea

k-H

ou

r P

eak

Off

-Pea

k H

ou

r C

ap

aci

ty

Ca

pa

city

C

on

sist

R

oute

S

peed

O

ne-W

ay

Hea

dway

H

eadw

ay

(Pas

seng

ers

pe

r (P

asse

nger

s V

ehic

les

Leng

th

Mile

s (M

PH

) T

ime

(Min

) (M

in)

(Min

) H

our)

P

er H

our)

No

t R

eq

'd

6 5.

6 35

.4

9.5

8.5

10

32,9

17

46,6

33

Str

en

gth

s W

ea

kne

sse

s 1.

S

erve

s T

rave

l D

eman

d C

orr

ido

r 1.

H

igh

Co

st

2.

Min

imal

Co

mm

un

ity I

mpa

cts

2.

Doe

s N

ot S

erve

Wa

rne

r C

en

ter

3.

Ext

ends

Exi

stin

g R

ed L

ine

Ser

vice

3.

S

ome

Com

mun

ity O

ppos

ition

4.

U

tiliz

es E

xist

ing

Mai

nten

ance

Fac

ility

5.

U

tiliz

es E

xist

ing

Red

Lin

e F

leet

I

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4

-3

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 151: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: V

AL

LE

Y H

EA

VY

RA

IL

ES

T.

HT

L S

HT

. 2

NO

HO

LL

YW

OO

D T

O 1

-405

D

AT

E

11/5

/98

OF

---2

ST

A 4

20+

00 T

O 7

36+

00

RE

V.

0 X

LS

$:

1988

Do

llars

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

MT

AU

NIT

B

AH

UN

IT

MT

A

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

Q

TY

P

RIC

E

PR

ICE

U

NIT

C

OS

T

BO

UN

D

CO

ST

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

A

ER

IAL

6750

$6

,500

$6

,125

R

F $4

3,87

5,00

0 $4

1,34

1,93

0 $4

3,87

5,00

0 A

T-G

RA

DE

11

00

$2,2

50

$1,0

05

RF

$2,4

75,0

00

$1,1

05,2

12

$2,4

75,0

00

OP

EN

GU

IDE

WA

Y

1660

$6

,500

$3

,525

R

F $9

,906

,949

$5

,851

,819

$9

,906

,949

R

ET

AI N

ED

FIL

L 15

00

$4,5

00

$1,7

63

RF

$6,7

50,0

00

$2,6

43,8

94

$6,7

50,0

00

BO

RE

D T

UN

NE

L

2939

$1

0,00

0 $1

0,29

6 R

F $2

9,39

0,00

0 $3

0,26

1,25

9 $2

9,39

0,00

0 C

UT

& C

OV

ER

GU

IDE

WA

Y

1769

0 $1

2,00

0 $8

,615

R

F $2

12,2

80,0

00

$152

,407

,212

$2

12,2

80,0

00

OT

HE

R I

MP

RO

VE

ME

NT

S

1 $1

0,00

0,00

0 $1

0,00

0,00

0 LS

. $1

0,0

00,0

00

$10,

000,

000

$10,

000,

000

BR

IDG

EW

OR

K

100

$101

,000

$1

01,0

00

RF

$10,

100,

000

$10,

100,

000

$10,

100,

000

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) 31

740

$324

,776

,949

$2

53,7

11,3

25

$324

,776

,949

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

3173

9 $2

7 N

A

RF

$861

,973

$8

61,9

73

$861

,973

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$861

,973

$8

61,9

73

$861

,973

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

A

ER

IAL

(6 C

AR

PLA

TF

OR

M)

3 $1

5,0

00,0

00

$9,0

86,2

50

EA

$4

5,00

0,00

0 $2

7,25

8,75

1 $2

7,25

8,75

1 O

PE

N S

TA

TIO

N (

6 C

AR

PLA

TF

OR

M W

/ XO

VE

F 1

$36,

000,

000

$40,

888,

127

EA

$3

6,00

0,00

0 $4

0,88

8,12

7 $4

0,88

8,12

7

2000

$2

,375

$5

,447

E

A

$4,7

50,0

00

$10,

893,

141

$10,

893,

141

$85,

750,

000

$79,

040,

019

$79,

040,

019

0 $2

,045

, 000

LS

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

$0

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LE

0 E

A

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICLE

CO

ST

) $0

$0

$0

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

TR

AC

KW

OR

K (

INC

L. S

PE

CIA

L T

RA

CK

WO

RK

) 31

739

$575

$5

95

RF

$18,

249,

925

$18,

895

,149

$1

8,24

9,92

5 T

RA

IN C

ON

TR

OL

ST

A.

3 $1

,100

,000

N

A

EA

$3

,300

,000

N

A

$3,3

00,0

00

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L G

DW

Y

3173

9 $1

,100

$8

80

RF

$34,

912,

900

$27,

940,

655

$34,

912

,900

T

RA

CT

ION

PO

WE

R S

TA

. (X

FM

R)

3 $1

,750

,000

$3

,435

,027

E

A

$5,2

50,0

00

$10,

305

,082

$5

,250

,000

T

RA

CT

ION

PO

WE

R G

DW

Y (

TH

IRD

RA

IL)

3173

9 $1

10

$340

E

A

$3,4

91,2

90

$10,

782

,553

$3

,491

,290

C

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

3173

9 $1

,000

$2

08

RF

$31,

739,

000

$6,5

87,7

42

$6,5

87,7

42

FA

RE

CO

LLE

CT

ION

3

$750

,000

$1

,429

,894

LS

$2

,250

,000

$4

,289

,681

$2

,250

,000

S

IGN

AG

E &

GR

AP

HIC

S

3 $7

50,0

00

$402

,873

LS

$2

,250

,000

$1

,208

,620

$1

,208

,620

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$101

,443

,115

$8

0,00

9,48

2 $7

5,25

0,47

7

!TO

TA

L' E

ST

IMA

TE

D C

OS

T. •

'199

8 :.D

OL

LA

RS

: .. ,.

"~ ,

,, . '<

O>•';~

;R'' l/t

i~~?

t/4Y

i)d

'"'' >

7' '

." "'

' -"'+

:., ' $

5121

832,

037:

·1 $4

1316

22!7

99.1

$479

1929

,418

·I

• eg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s .4

.4-4

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .ilto

n In

c .

Page 152: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

P

RO

JEC

T:

VA

LL

EY

HE

AV

Y R

AIL

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. N

O H

OL

LY

WO

OD

TO

1-4

05

DA

TE

11

/5/9

8 O

F

2 S

TA

420

+00

TO

736

+00

R

EV

.: 0

$:

1988

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$324

,776

,949

$2

53,7

11,3

25

$324

,776

,949

1B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DLI

NG

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

$861

,973

$8

61,9

73

$861

,973

2)

ST

AT

ION

S

$85,

750,

000

$79,

040,

019

$79,

040,

019

3) M

AIN

YA

RD

AN

D S

HO

P

$0

$

0

$0

4) S

YS

TE

MW

IDE

EQ

UIP

ME

NT

$1

01,4

43,1

15

$80,

009,

482

$75,

250,

477

5) V

EH

ICLE

S

$0

$0

$0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee

pa

ge

2 f

or

de

tails

) $5

12,8

32,0

37

$413

,622

,799

$4

79,9

29,4

18

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5

%

$12,

820,

801

$10,

340,

570

$11

,998

,235

7)

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0%

$4

1 ,0

26,5

63

$33,

089,

824

$38,

394,

353

8) M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

2.5%

$1

2,82

0,80

1 $1

0,34

0,57

0 $1

1,99

8,23

5 S

UB

TO

TA

L (

B)

$66,

668,

165

$53,

770,

964

$62,

390,

824

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C)

0.5%

$2

,564

,160

$2

,068

,114

$2

,399

,647

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

C)

$2,5

64,1

60

$2,0

68,1

14

$2,3

99,6

47

10

A)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

MT

A)

$79,

500,

000

$79,

500,

000

$79,

500,

000

10 B

) R

IGH

T O

F W

AY

(P

RO

PO

SE

D T

AK

ES

) $9

,711

,568

$9

,711

,568

$9

,711

,568

S

UB

TO

TA

L (

D)

$89,

211,

568

$89,

211

,568

$8

9,21

1 ,5

68

11)

PR

OF

. SE

RV

ICE

S (

E)

INC

L. C

OS

T T

O D

AT

E

$165

,962

,524

$1

05,4

48,7

34

$119

,493

,01

7

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $1

65,9

62,5

24

$1 0

5,44

8,73

4 $1

19,4

93,0

17

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

12

%

$38,

973,

234

$30,

445,

359

$103

,437

IT

EM

16

10

%

$8

6,1

97

$8

6,19

7 $7

,904

,002

B

) IT

EM

2

12%

$1

0,29

0,00

0 $9

,484

,802

$

0

C)

ITE

M 3

, 4,

& 5

10

%

$10,

144,

312

$8,0

00,9

48

$55,

517,

989

D)

ITE

M 6

, 7,

& 8

10

%

$6,6

66,8

16

$5,3

77,0

96

$0

E)

ITE

M 1

0 B

IN

CL.

IN

IT

EM

IN

CL.

IN

IT

EM

IN

CL.

IN

IT

EM

F)

IT

EM

11

10%

$1

6,59

6,25

2 $1

0,54

4,87

3 $1

1,94

9,30

2 S

UB

TO

TA

L (

F)

$82,

756,

812

$63,

939,

277

$75,

474,

730

IGRANi:ftotAL->

~·~199

8'DOI

:I:A

RS v

<,,

\/••

:/.>

"i<

F•.

,c·

''>'!

. ,,·

,.,, .

.., '

';·,i

>>

jij;'

:;{\·o

)',:.;

,<t}.

'W_t,

}:J:.•;

c.:;

; • •

. '<

:i

:t;!•

'.\W

)x'(

;:;

i'.:.~

··$9

19,9

95,2

66.:1

\Y%.~$728,061;455*~$828,899,204

•1

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

A4.

4-4

· B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 153: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

-...J

> w ...J ...J <( > 0 c z <( z a: w u. z <( en

;j ; ~ ·,~ :g

.. tno

;

en c ;; U)

')( w .:.= .5 0 ... -C1)

:E

lS!IOHP~3MiiH

c 0 ;; (,) :I ... - c U) 0 c 0

;;

0 c. 0 ...

C1) :::;) "'C :E c :::;) c -'iii 'iii ... a: 0 -... .r:. -C1) en :E ::::i

'

0 c: c

• ~ c:

..!!! ~ N 0 0 co

LL 1.0

I "¢

Page 154: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• S

an F

erna

ndo

Va

lley

Alte

rnat

ives

De

crip

tio

ns-

Ligh

t R

ail

TH

IS A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

E P

RO

VID

ES

AN

AT

-GR

AD

E L

IGH

T R

AIL

AL

IGN

ME

NT

TO

WA

RN

ER

CE

NT

ER

U

TIL

IZIN

G T

HE

BU

RB

AN

K/C

HA

ND

LE

R R

IGH

T-O

F-W

AY

• T

he

cha

ract

eris

tics

of th

e al

ignm

ent

incl

ude

...

Alig

nm

en

t Li

mits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

Nor

th H

olly

woo

d R

ed L

ine

Sta

tion

to W

arne

r C

en

ter

12 N

ew S

tatio

ns (

Loca

tions

To

Be

Det

erm

ined

) N

o. V

ehic

les:

33

One

-Way

C

onsi

st

Rou

te

Spe

ed

Tim

e (M

in)

Veh

icle

s I

Leng

th

Mile

s (M

PH

)

33

I

2 13

.8

33.1

25

Str

en

gth

s 1.

U

tiliz

es E

xist

ing

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay

2.

Ser

ves

War

ner

Cen

ter

3.

Low

er C

ost t

han

Sub

way

4.

M

inim

izes

Com

mun

ity I

mpa

cts

5.

Cou

ld b

e Im

plem

ente

d us

ing

DM

U T

echn

olog

y 6.

A

Num

ber

of B

ranc

h A

ltern

ativ

es c

an F

urth

er e

xpan

d R

egio

nal C

onne

ctiv

ity

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s

Pla

nned

Pea

k-M

axim

um

Bui

ld-O

ut

Pea

k O

ff-P

eak

Ho

ur

Cap

acity

P

ea

k-H

ou

r Cap

acity

H

eadw

ay

Hea

dway

(P

asse

nger

s pe

r (P

asse

nger

s P

er

(Min

) (M

in)

Hou

r)

Hou

r)

5 12

12

,753

23

,913

We

akn

ess

es

1.

Rob

bin'

s B

ill p

rohi

bits

at-

grad

e al

tern

ativ

e o

ver

a se

ctio

n of

pr

opos

ed a

lignm

ent

2.

Seg

men

t O

pera

tes

Inde

pend

ently

and

Doe

s N

ot E

xpan

d an

y C

urre

nt S

yste

m

3.

Req

uire

s E

nviro

nmen

tal P

roce

ss

4.

Req

uire

s D

esig

n 5.

A

t-G

rade

Alig

nmen

t P

oses

Som

e S

afet

y C

onsi

dera

tions

6

. R

equi

res

tran

sfer

to d

ownt

own

L.A

.

A4.

4-5

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 155: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

--

--

PR

OJE

CT

: V

AL

LE

Y L

RT

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 2

NO

HO

LL

YW

OO

D T

O W

AR

NE

R C

D

AT

E

11

/5/9

8

OF

2

ST

A 4

+5

4 T

O 7

36

+0

0

RE

V.

0 X

LS

$:

1

98

8 D

olla

rs

ES

TIM

AT

ED

M

TA

UN

IT

BA

H U

NIT

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

T

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

QT

Y

PR

ICE

P

RIC

E

UN

IT

CO

ST

B

OU

ND

C

OS

T

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

A

T G

RA

DE

4

41

75

$1

,800

$

1,5

57

R

F

$7

9,5

15

,00

0

$6

8,7

90

,46

8

$7

9,5

15

,00

0

RE

TA

INE

D G

UID

EW

AY

1

52

25

$3

,500

$7

11

RF

$

53

,28

7,5

00

$

10

,82

2,3

40

$

53

,28

7,5

00

A

ER

IAL

GU

IDE

WA

Y

13

19

6

$4

,50

0

$3

,75

0

RF

$

59

,38

2,0

00

$

49

,48

5,7

40

$

59

,38

2,0

00

B

RID

GE

S L

A R

iver

, A

rro

yo S

eco

(A

ctua

ls)

10

0

$1

00

,00

0

$1

00

,00

0

EA

$

10

,00

0,0

00

$

10

,00

0,0

00

$

10

,00

0,0

00

O

TH

ER

GU

IDE

WA

Y I

MP

RO

VE

ME

NT

S

1 $

16

,550

,00

0

$1

6,5

50

,00

0

EA

$

16

,55

0,0

00

$

16

,55

0,0

00

$

16

,55

0,0

00

G

RA

DE

CR

OS

SIN

GS

15

$

25

0,0

00

$

18

2,8

15

LS

$3

,75

0,0

00

$2

,74

2,2

28

$

2,7

42

,228

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) 7

27

12

$

22

2,4

84

,50

0

$1

58

,39

0,7

76

$

22

1,4

76

,72

8

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

1 $

1,7

23

,94

7

NA

R

F

$1

,72

3,9

47

$

1,7

23

,94

7

$1

,72

3,9

47

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$1

,72

3,9

47

$

1,7

23

,94

7

$1

,72

3,9

47

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

A

T G

RA

DE

ST

AT

ION

(2

CA

R P

LA

TF

OR

M)

5 $

1,5

00

,00

0

$7

56

,261

E

A

$7

,50

0,0

00

$3

,781

,30

7

$3

,78

1,3

07

A

ER

IAL

ST

AT

ION

(2

CA

R P

LA

TF

OR

M)

5 $

3,3

33

,33

3

$1

,77

8,1

44

E

A

$1

6,6

66

,66

7

$8

,89

0,7

20

$

8,8

90

,72

0

AE

RIA

L S

TA

TIO

N (

2 C

AR

PL

AT

FO

RM

W/X

O'v

1

$3

,33

3,3

33

$

1,7

78

,14

4

EA

$

3,3

33

,33

3

$1

,77

8,1

44

$

1,7

78

,14

4

OP

EN

ST

AT

ION

(2

CA

R P

LA

T.

W/

CR

OS

SO

V

1 $

16

,66

6,6

67

$

16

,66

6,6

67

E

A

$1

6,6

66

,66

7

$1

6,6

66

,66

7

$1

6,6

66

,66

7

PA

SS

EN

GE

R T

RA

NS

FE

R P

OR

TA

L A

T N

O. H

< 1

$5,0

00

,00

0

$5,0

00

,00

0

EA

$

5,0

00

,00

0

$5

,00

0,0

00

$

5,0

00

,00

0

PA

RK

& R

IDE

(S

UR

FA

CE

LO

T)

47

00

$

2,7

50

$

2,4

37

seace~

$1

2,9

25

,00

0

$11,

455,

411

$1

2,9

25

,00

0

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$6

2,0

91

,66

7

$4

7,5

72

,24

8

$4

9,0

41

,83

7

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL &

YA

RD

CO

ST

S

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

(AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

1 $2

5,0

00

,00

0

$2

6,2

52

,77

7

$25

,00

0,0

00

$

26

,25

2,7

77

$

25

,00

0,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$2

5,0

00

,00

0

$2

6,2

52

,77

7

$2

5,0

00

,00

0

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LE

3

3

$2

,40

0,0

00

$

1,9

59

,37

9

$7

9,2

00

,00

0

$6

4,6

59

,49

2

$6

4,6

59

,49

2

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICL

E C

OS

T)

$7

9,2

00

,00

0

$6

4,6

59

,49

2

$6

4,6

59

,49

2

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

TR

AC

KW

OR

K (

INC

L. S

PE

CIA

L T

RA

CK

WO

Rt

73

14

6

$421

$

28

8

RF

$

30

,79

4,4

66

$

21

,03

6,4

62

$

30

,79

4,4

66

T

RA

IN C

ON

TR

OL

ST

A.

12

$1

60

,00

0

NA

E

A

$1

,92

0,0

00

N

A

$1,9

20

,00

0

TR

AIN

CO

NT

RO

L G

DW

Y

73

14

6

$5

00

$

48

5

RF

$

36

,57

3,0

00

$

35

,46

7,3

23

$

36

,57

3,0

00

T

RA

CT

ION

PO

WE

R S

TA

. (X

FM

R)

12

$1

,10

0,0

00

$2

,27

0,7

94

E

A

$1

3,2

00

,00

0

$2

7,2

49

,53

0

$1

3,2

00

,00

0

TR

AC

TIO

N P

OW

ER

GD

WY

. (C

AT

EN

AR

Y)

73

14

6

$2

70

N

A

RF

$

19

,74

9,4

20

n

clu

de

d in

Tra

c $

19

,74

9,4

20

C

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

73

14

6

$2

00

$

83

R

F

$1

4,6

29

,20

0

$6

,09

7,5

40

$

6,0

97

,54

0

FA

RE

CO

LL

EC

TIO

N

12

$

25

0,0

00

$8

6,5

58

LS

$

3,0

00

,00

0

$1

,03

8,6

97

$

3,0

00

,00

0

SIG

NA

GE

& G

RA

PH

ICS

1

2

$1

00

,00

0

$3

5.1

57

LS

$1

,20

0,0

00

$4

21,8

81

$4

21

, 881

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$1

21

,06

6,0

86

$

91

,31

1,4

32

$

11

1,7

56

,30

7

!TO

TA

L: E

ST

fMA

fED

CO

ST

• 1

99

8 · D

OL

LA

RS

"··

,.

•.::c.,

'"'·'

":' ·'

1'···;

-,.f

,(;A

'~;.

>~<<

:<·:

::J'

· '

'"···

., N

•>'>

<\i;S

i'< $

511 ~5

66,2

00:1

$3

89

,91

0,6

73

·I $4

73

,65

8;3

12

·1

.eg

ion

al Tr

~nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s ·.

4-6

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .to

n In

c.

Page 156: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

J

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

P

RO

JEC

T:

VA

LL

EY

LR

T

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

NO

HO

LL

YW

OO

D T

O W

AR

NE

R C

TR

D

AT

E

11/5

/98

OF

2

ST

A 4

+5

4 T

O 7

36

+0

0

RE

V.:

0

$:

1988

Do

llars

M

TA

L

OW

ER

P

RO

JEC

TE

D

ES

TIM

AT

ED

B

OU

ND

F

INA

L

ITE

M D

ES

CR

IPT

ION

C

OS

T

CO

ST

C

OS

T

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$2

22

,48

4,5

00

$

15

8,3

90

,77

6

$221

,47

6,72

8 1B

) H

AZ

AR

DO

US

WA

ST

E H

AN

DLI

NG

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

$1,7

23,9

47

$1

,72

3,9

47

$1

,723

,947

2)

ST

AT

ION

S

$62,

091,

667

$4

7,5

72

,24

8

$49,

041

,837

3)

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$

25

,00

0,0

00

$

26

,25

2,7

77

. $

25

,00

0,0

00

4)

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$121

,06

6,08

6 $9

1,31

1,43

2 $1

11 ,7

56,3

07

5) V

EH

ICL

ES

$7

9,20

0,00

0 $6

4,65

9,49

2 $

64

,65

9,4

92

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee

pa

ge

2 f

or

de

tails

) $

51

1,5

66

,20

0

$3

89

,91

0,6

73

$

47

3,6

58

,31

2

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5

%

$12,

789,

155

$9

,74

7,7

67

$

11

,84

1,4

58

7)

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0%

$4

0,92

5,29

6 $3

1,1

92,8

54

$3

7,8

92

,66

5

8) M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

2.5

%

$1

2,7

89

,15

5

$9

,74

7,7

67

$1

1,8

41 ,4

58

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $6

6,50

3,60

6 $

50

,68

8,3

87

$6

1,57

5,58

1

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C)

0.5

%

$2,5

57,8

31

$1,9

49,5

53

$

2,3

68

,29

2

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C

) $2

,557

,831

$

1,9

49

,55

3

$2

,36

8,2

92

10 A

) R

IGH

T O

F W

AY

(M

TA

PR

OP

ER

TIE

S)

$1

59

,00

0,0

00

$

15

9,0

00

,00

0

$1

59

,00

0,0

00

10

) R

IGH

T O

F W

AY

(P

RO

PO

SE

D T

AK

ES

) $

57

,46

4,8

99

$

57

,46

4,8

99

$5

7,4

64

,89

9

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $

21

6,4

64

,89

9

$2

16

,46

4,8

99

$

21

6,4

64

,89

9

11)

PR

OF

. S

ER

VIC

ES

(E

) $2

41 ,

327,

646

$1

55

,60

0,2

15

$2

11 '1

38

,78

3

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E)

$2

41

,32

7,6

46

$

15

5,6

00

,21

5

$2

11

,13

8,7

83

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

1

2%

$

26

,69

8,1

40

$1

9,00

6,89

3 $

26

,57

7,2

07

IT

EM

1B

1

0%

$

17

2,3

95

$

17

2,3

95

$

17

2,3

95

B

) IT

EM

2

12

%

$7,4

51,0

00

$5

,70

8,6

70

$

5,8

85

,02

0

C)

ITE

M 3

, 4,

& 5

10

%

$22,

526

,609

$1

8,22

2,37

0 $2

0,14

1 ,5

80

D)

ITE

M 6

, 7,

& 8

10

%

$6,6

50,3

61

$5,0

68,8

39

$6

,15

7,5

58

E

) IT

EM

10

0%

IN

CLU

DE

D IN

IT

EM

$0

$0

$0

F)

IT

EM

11

10

%

$2

4,1

32

,76

5

$15,

560,

021

$21

'11

3,8

78

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $8

7,63

1,26

8 $6

3,73

9,18

8 $

80

,047

,639

IGRAND

:TOTAL~:

.;;;1998 D

OL

LA

RS

/ '·

···

•.:c

:f:.>

• ···

• . .,,

.. • .

•. <

/ · .

· ..

... ~ •• -

c.,,;

.: -"~

~;·.:• .

:x.;•

o: .,

·, ·;:

;: J

•,

· t:

···<

'' ·.•

$1

;12

6,0

51

;45

0·!-

?$8

78

,35

2,9

15

I ~f

:$93

4;51

5,14

11

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

6 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 157: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

SA

N F

ER

NA

ND

O V

AL

LE

Y-

BU

S T

RA

NS

ITW

AY

lj -~'

f" -.."f

l< ..

l rO

OT

!! IL

L

,_;)<'·'

~

,,

-~@

>

'~-.·'

A

~-'~;•

-;;;'9

-: .•

, -~

1 ~.

,(..

p.,h

<

,<';

/:/~

" "'

-<r;~

) _.._o

i;:' ~

·.: :-;

;;.\\iti

' .

' . ~o'f

~~~~t

·/····-----...

~-/ :-·

·

-----·

--~--

9---'"·

------~--~

~It

1' •

:! !

' -

' ...

......

. "'

.

. .,

:, =--

---1· c

:,;9'':''

''. ~/

~---:--

---....

.....

. ~, .....

........

. J ... -

---;

.. __

___

__

W//

/q//

//.<

l

t ~

• p,o

.RYH

et'IIJ

>.

l 0

. z

· ·

:::1•

: w

: W

////.<

--.. ~,

••

•• ·-

__

>-__

,.<

('

: i

' Hli

t//

///k,

0w///

.<

: .

~ ~

'• z

t ;

a:::t

l -c:

c-W

////

/;';.

: R

os

.~ <

( f

....

·----~· ·:

--·-

--a·

·· +---

---j-~-

---;

· ·---

---·

~---

· w'/':'

''''//''''/~

,~1: 1

j , ·

-----

~ '

z.

. F-

l .

' J:::

' ///

/////.

< "

a:

--·u

:•_ .. ;..

. ol

·

ST

ile,

Til

Ell N

x:

l .

rw///

//.<

., ::>

a.

• C

l) ;

' '

a:'

-..

.. -

=>

' <

W

////

////

//1

1

-•

oo

. w

: l,

i:)

o ~

1 ~W/

.1'///

/;.:

z 1 ..

.....

:

0 l

l ~

' .,

I

W//

////

///.

<

w

·.• r

-· ··_· __ ... __

.. _ .. _._ .... ,_ •. _ .. _.-____ .-_

-.r=-:· __ ._-

-·.

.~_.· ..... _,__.. -

--. -...

-_._· ... ..

. . ...

. ....

~TI:OY . .

_ ..•• · .

I.

.•..

.. W

/.<w_ ..

, __ ""'"

::

:"

. ..

1!1:\

; :J

:..

J I

·, !

s:r

~ l

,, l

···-

-W

////

//.<

'

'ii'

! t-l

.

II i

I 1

I r.lw

.... ,...._,,.. ..........

.............. ,... .......

. .~.: -....

t ::>

; •

• '

' ~""

"" •

'· ~--

W//

////

////

////

////

////

.4

Me

tro

link

-E

xist

ing

Me

tro

rail

-U

nd

er

Co

nst

ruct

ion

0 E

xclu

sive

Bu

swa

y

.gio

na

l T

rans

it A

ltern

ativ

es A

naly

sis

--......

, .....

-·-..

........

, .. ..;.

;:.,.-:

:··

·.4

-7

F

~A'v•

··~.._

''-w·~J

J\' :,

~ #.:

-sf!·.

~~

----

't%'

':><

~ l

·. J

_,~

,~~:~\.

------

¥-~k~

\)

... ~A-

A+~---f-o

•:••••

. z~

~ ................. ""

'"'"'4"

/;.: -"~

~""'

~ I

~,~ "%.

.......

, l

W//q

;.:

~ z

· ,

"·"'"-

?.'\

·"

\ ;

' >'////

///)(/////~

'~4'0-~ '

-,,_

. ,$;

t

W///

/.<

'i;'~

" \

iS':

' z

. ~~

vv--~¥

~~1-'W////

///,j~ht

'~<!f'~

''";t'

0 '~

/'.,._if,

~

"~"~/~

t<l.·

1'~

'\/

--i'-:&··~

I W

kq//

.<

~~-

_.·

••

.'

W//

///.

0 ~~ ~;

.: ~

' '

·• •. ··

.--

~ W/

////

//Q~

. ·.

, .> \

,· ,

~:;--

I I ,

--~

/ ::'!

'\.'',>

;

f '

--· '· _

.,.,.-"'

\' ~'

-,,

'-.

c~~~~

,-,~~6~

~-:~.---... ·--

.;.:.:.

........ -

~---.,

... ..

\~llli

A'IIIC*~¥\

,~nv>C

D"""'"

'''P""'*

"'"'

·r ···-_

:>).::,JJ

.)/-

-.... ·/:.~~

:,,, ..

-,I

~)},

,· t*0~8

-' .

01

.

-~,

)

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .o

n In

c.

Page 158: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

San

Fer

nand

o V

alle

y A

ltern

ativ

es D

esc

rip

tio

ns-

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y

TH

IS T

RA

NS

ITW

AY

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

PR

OV

IDE

S A

N A

T-G

RA

DE

BU

S O

PT

ION

TO

WA

RN

ER

C

EN

TE

R U

TIL

IZIN

G T

HE

BU

RB

AN

K/C

HA

ND

LE

R R

IGH

T-O

F-W

AY

• T

he

cha

ract

eris

tics

of t

he a

lignm

ent

incl

ude

...

Alig

nmen

t Li

mits

: S

tatio

n Lo

catio

ns:

Nor

th H

olly

woo

d R

ed L

ine

Sta

tion

to

War

ner

Ce

nte

r 13

New

Sta

tions

(Lo

catio

ns T

o B

e D

eter

min

ed)

No.

Veh

icle

s:

22

Pla

nned

Pea

k-P

eak

Off

-Pe

ak

Ho

ur

Ca

pa

city

C

on

sist

R

oute

S

peed

O

ne

-Wa

y H

eadw

ay

He

ad

wa

y (P

asse

nger

s p

er

Veh

icle

s Le

ngth

M

iles

(MP

H)

Tim

e (

Min

) (M

in)

(Min

) H

our)

22

N

/A

13.8

33

.1

25

5 12

4,

669

Str

en

gth

s W

eakn

esse

s

Ma

xim

um

B

uild

-O

ut

Pe

ak-

Ho

ur

Ca

pa

city

(P

asse

nger

s P

er

Hou

r)

15,7

46

1.

Util

izes

Exi

stin

g R

ight

-of-

Way

1.

R

obbi

n's

Bill

pro

hibi

ts a

t-gr

ade

alte

rnat

ive

ove

r a

sect

ion

of p

rop

ose

d a

lign

me

nt

2.

Ser

ves

Wa

rne

r C

en

ter

2.

Req

uire

s E

nvir

onm

enta

l P

roce

ss

3.

Lo

we

st C

ost

Opt

ion

3.

Req

uire

s D

esig

n 4.

M

inim

izes

Com

mun

ity I

mpa

cts

4.

At-

Gra

de A

lignm

ent

Pos

es S

ome

Saf

ety

Co

nsi

de

ratio

ns

5.

Low

er C

apac

ities

6.

R

eq

uir

es

Tra

nsfe

rs

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

7 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 159: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

: V

AL

LE

Y B

US

TR

AN

SIT

WA

Y

ES

T.

HT

L

SH

T.

2 D

AT

E

11

/6f9

8

OF

2

NO

RT

H H

OL

LY

WO

OD

TO

R

EV

. 0

XL

S

WA

RN

ER

CE

NT

ER

$:

1

99

8 D

olla

rs

MT

AU

NIT

B

AH

UN

IT

MT

A

LO

WE

R

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

QT

Y

PR

ICE

P

RIC

E

UN

IT

CO

ST

B

OU

ND

GU

IDE

WA

Y C

OS

TS

A

T G

RA

DE

BU

SW

AY

7

28

64

$

32

0

$4

66

R

F

$2

3,3

16

,48

0

$3

3,9

75

,15

8

AT

GR

AD

E B

US

WA

Y @

ST

AT

ION

7

20

0

$535

ln

cl in

ab

ove

R

F

$3

,85

2,0

00

ln

cl in

abo

ve

ST

RE

ET

IM

PR

OV

EM

EN

TS

@ X

ING

S

42

$

15

2,0

00

$1

39,8

91

EA

$

q,3

84

,00

0

$5

,87

5,4

05

T

RA

CK

RE

MO

VA

L

70

00

0

$65

$1

8

RF

$

4,5

50

,00

0

$1

,23

1,6

50

S

PE

CIA

L B

RID

GE

WO

RK

@ T

UJU

NG

A W

AS

H

1 $

5,0

00

,00

0

$5

,00

0,0

00

LS

$

5,0

00

,00

0

$5

,00

0,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(G

UID

EW

AY

CO

ST

) 1

50

10

7

$4~,

1 0

2,4

80

$

46

,08

2,2

14

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G

AL

LO

WA

NC

E

1 $

1,5

00

,00

0

NA

LS

$

1,5

00

,00

0

$1

,50

0,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(H

AZ

MA

T)

$1

,50

0,0

00

$

1,5

00

,00

0

ST

AT

ION

CO

ST

A

T G

RA

DE

ST

AT

ION

(1

20

FT

. S

IDE

PL

AT

FO

RM

) 1

3

$5

05

,00

0

$5

26

,31

8

EA

$

6,5

65

,00

0

$6

,84

2,1

30

(i

nclu

ding

fin

ishe

s, l

an

dsc

ap

ing

, ca

nopi

es,

light

ing

& s

ign

ag

e)

PA

RK

ING

FA

CIL

ITIE

S {

MIN

IMA

L A

ME

NIT

IES

} 4

96

5

$1

,80

0

$2

,34

6

sea

ces

$8

,93

7,0

00

$

11

,64

9,6

03

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

TA

TIO

N C

OS

T)

$1

5,5

02

,00

0

$1

8,4

91

,73

3

MA

INT

. F

AC

IL &

YA

RD

CO

ST

S

MA

INT

EN

AN

CE

FA

CIL

ITIE

S

{AL

LO

WA

NC

E)

1 $

5,0

00

,00

0

$5

,00

0,0

00

$

5,0

00

,00

0

$5

,00

0,0

00

SU

BT

OT

AL

(M

AIN

T.

FA

CIL

.)

$5

,00

0,0

00

$

5,0

00

,00

0

VE

HIC

LE

CO

ST

R

EV

EN

UE

VE

HIC

LE

2

2

$3

50

,00

0

$333

,291

$

7,7

00

,00

0

$7

,33

2,4

02

SU

BT

OT

AL

(V

EH

ICL

E C

OS

T)

$7

,70

0,0

00

$

7,3

32

,40

2

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T C

OS

T

PR

IOR

ITY

SIG

NA

LIZ

AT

ION

1

$4

,33

6,8

00

$

1,0

50

,00

0

LS

$4

,33

6,8

00

$

1,0

50

,00

0

TIC

KE

T V

EN

DIN

G M

AC

HIN

ES

24

$

75

,00

0

NA

E

A

$1

,80

0,0

00

$1

,687

,881

C

OM

MU

NIC

AT

ION

S

72

86

0

$5

0

$2

0

RF

$

3,6

43

,00

0

$1

,43

8,2

05

G

UID

EW

AY

LIG

HT

ING

IN

CL.

EL

EC

TR

IFIC

AT

ION

7

28

60

$

60

$

60

R

F

$4

,37

1,6

00

$

4,3

71

,60

0

SE

CU

RIT

Y

72

86

0

$3

0

$3

0

RF

$

2,1

85

,80

0

$2

,18

5,8

00

S

IGN

AG

EIG

RA

PH

ICS

{O

TH

ER

TH

AN

ST

AT

ION

S)

72

86

0

$2

0

$2

3

RF

$

1,4

57

,20

0

$1

,65

2,7

97

SU

BT

OT

AL

(S

YS

TE

M C

OS

T)

$1

7,7

94

,40

0

$1

2,3

86

,28

3

ITb

tAI}

<-e

s"F

IMA

TE

D,c

osT

t;;'t

19

98

• DOLLARS

'f\<'~"'>r>w, ,

,,,z

,'''

l;;r

,-s~

&'1$

;~i:

f~i!

J!>r

i~~~

'0~"

'~1~

E>',

v''~

'*AA

''*'l1iihlii~~;j~~~~i':$9o;sgs~88o l

~q,:

F$90

, 792

,631

1

.eg

ion

al

Tra

nsi

t A

ltern

ativ

es

An

aly

sis

·.4

-8

F

Bo

oz·

AII

en

& .lt

on

Inc.

Page 160: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

~ 1

• •

• C

OS

T E

ST

IMA

TE

CO

VE

RS

HE

ET

P

RO

JEC

T:

VA

LL

EY

BU

S T

RA

NS

ITW

AY

E

ST

. H

TL

S

HT

. 1

0 D

AT

E

11

/6f9

8

OF

2

NO

RT

H H

OL

LY

WO

OD

TO

R

EV

.: 0

WA

RN

ER

CE

NT

ER

$:

19

88 D

olla

rs

MT

A

LO

WE

R

PR

OJE

CT

ED

E

ST

IMA

TE

D

BO

UN

D

FIN

AL

IT

EM

DE

SC

RIP

TIO

N

CO

ST

C

OS

T

CO

ST

1A)

GU

IDE

WA

YS

AN

D S

TR

UC

TU

RE

S

$43,

1 02

,480

$4

6,08

2,21

4 $4

3,10

2,48

0 1

8)

HA

ZA

RD

OU

S W

AS

TE

HA

ND

LIN

G A

LLO

WA

NC

E

$1,5

00,0

00

$1,5

00,0

00

$1,5

00,0

00

2) S

TA

TIO

NS

$1

5,50

2,00

0 $1

8,49

1,73

3 $1

5,50

2,00

0 3)

MA

IN Y

AR

D A

ND

SH

OP

$5

,000

,000

$5

,000

,000

$5

,000

,000

4)

SY

ST

EM

WID

E E

QU

IPM

EN

T

$17.

794,

400

$12,

386,

283

$12,

190,

686

5) V

EH

ICLE

S

$7,7

00,0

00

$7,3

32,4

02

$7,3

32,4

02

SU

BT

OT

AL

(A

) (s

ee

pa

ge

2 f

or

de

tails

) $9

0,59

8,88

0 $9

0,79

2,63

1 $8

4,62

7,56

8

6) P

RE

RE

VE

NU

E O

PE

RA

TIO

N

2.5%

$2

,264

,972

$2

,269

,816

$2

,115

,689

7)

OW

NE

RS

IN

SU

RA

NC

E

8.0

%

$7,2

47,9

10

$7,2

63,4

10

$6,7

70,2

05

8) M

AS

TE

R A

GR

EE

ME

NT

S

2.5

%

$2,2

64,9

72

$2,2

69,8

16

$2,1

15,6

89

SU

BT

OT

AL

(B

) $1

1,77

7,85

4 $1

1,80

3,04

2 $1

1,00

1,58

4

9) A

RT

FO

R T

RA

NS

IT (

C)

0.5

%

$452

,994

.40

$453

,963

.16

$423

,138

SU

BT

OT

AL

(C

) $4

52,9

94

$453

,963

$4

23,1

38

10)

RIG

HT

OF

WA

Y (

D)

AL

LO

WA

NC

E F

OR

4 P

AR

K-N

-RID

ES

$4

,680

,000

$4

,680

,000

$4

,680

,000

SU

BT

OT

AL

(D

) $4

,680

,000

$4

,680

,000

$4

,680

,000

11)

PR

OF

. S

ER

VIC

ES

(E

) $4

8,00

8.57

7 $1

8, 2

51 ,3

23

$28,

205,

041

SU

BT

OT

AL

(E

) $4

8,00

8,57

7 $1

8,25

1,32

3 $2

8,20

5,04

1

12)

CO

NT

ING

EN

CY

(F

) A

) IT

EM

1A

12

%

$5,1

72,2

98

$5,5

29,8

66

$5,1

72,2

98

ITE

M 1

8

12%

$1

80,0

00

$180

,000

$1

80,0

00

B)

ITE

M 2

17

%

$2,6

35,3

40

$3,1

43,5

95

$2,6

35,3

40

C)

ITE

M 3

, 4

, & 5

10

%

$3,0

49,4

40

$2,4

71,8

68

$2,4

52,3

09

D)

ITE

M 6

, 7,

& 8

10

%

$1,1

77,7

85

$1,1

80,3

04

$1,1

00,1

58

E)

ITE

M 1

0 10

%

$468

,000

$4

68,0

00

$468

,000

F

) IT

EM

11

10%

$4

,800

,858

$1

,825

,132

$

2,8

20,5

04

SU

BT

OT

AL

(F

) $1

7,48

3,72

1 $1

4,79

8,76

5 $1

4,82

8,60

9

IGR

AN

D.T

OT

AL:

.:-,1

99

8 D

OL

LA

RS

•'J~

'':n

;.:;;

;.;t

<Y1f

.:·•

<··"

·,>'

·: •

t<

''••

._:·s:

:·<:>

'/Y

Mf;i

'··'

·'\'

i":~

.;;;

:·J;

·.-:

f..,

;z·;

;::s

w "'"

'"'"'>V

f.'•',;•

; •·.

$173

,002

,027

•1··,:

:$1

40

,7'ff

f:/2

6,1

JXii$

143,

765-

;-94

(fl

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

8 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 161: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• S

an F

erna

ndo

Val

ley

Alt

ern

ati

ves-

Pro

ject

Tim

elin

es

IN T

HE

SA

N F

ER

NA

ND

O C

OR

RID

OR

TH

E L

OC

AL

LY

PR

EF

ER

RE

D A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

E S

TIL

L M

US

T

BE

SE

LE

CT

ED

• T

he t

hree

pro

ject

s id

entif

ied

for

final

eva

luat

ion

in t

he R

TA

A a

re a

t a

poin

t in

the

pro

cess

w

here

the

Loc

ally

Pre

ferr

ed A

ltern

ativ

e (L

PA

) is

to

be s

elec

ted

• O

nce

the

LPA

has

bee

n de

term

ined

, th

e se

lect

ed p

roje

ct c

an b

egin

th

e p

roce

ss t

o co

nstr

uctio

n

De

taile

d

Pre

pa

re

Alt

ern

ati

ve

Eva

lua

te

Dra

ft

Bo

ard

I F

ina

l ·I D

evelo~ I

De

sig

n I·

. Bid I

To

tal

. Pu

rpo

se

Alt

ern

ati

ves

De

fin

itio

n

Alt

ern

ati

ves

EIS

R

evi

ew

E

IS

RO

D.,,

, '.

(1

2 ·

. (4

. · M

on

ths

to

Alt

ern

ati

ve

(3 m

o.)

(5

mo

.)

(10

mo

.)

(3 m

o.)

(9

mo

.)

(6m

o.)

H

eavy

Rai

l:

Com

plet

e C

ompl

ete

Com

plet

e C

ompl

ete

35%

0%

I

0%

I I

0%

Nor

th H

olly

woo

d S

tatio

n 6

mo

. 6

mo

. 4

mo

. 6

mo

. 12

mo.

I

4m

o.

I 3

8m

o.

to 1

-405

Li

ght

Rai

l At-

Gra

de

Com

plet

e C

ompl

ete

Com

plet

e 0%

B

urba

nk I

Cha

ndle

r 12

mo.

1

4m

o.

1 3

8m

o.

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay:

Nor

th H

olly

woo

d S

tatio

n to

War

ner

Cen

ter

Bus

Tra

nsitw

ay A

t-C

ompl

ete

Com

plet

e C

ompl

ete

0%

Gra

de B

urba

nk I

12 m

o.

I 4

mo

. I

38

mo

. C

hand

ler

Rig

ht-o

f-W

ay:

Nor

th H

olly

woo

d S

tatio

n to

War

ner

Cen

ter

NO

PR

OJE

CT

IN T

HE

SA

N F

ER

NA

ND

O V

AL

LE

Y C

OR

RID

OR

IS R

EA

DY

TO

MO

VE

IN

TO

C

ON

ST

RU

CT

ION

. T

HE

LO

CA

LL

Y P

RE

FE

RR

ED

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

MU

ST

BE

DE

TE

RM

INE

D A

ND

TH

E

PL

AN

NIN

G P

RO

CE

SS

CO

MP

LE

TE

D P

RIO

R T

O I

MP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

9 B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

Ham

ilton

Inc

.

Page 162: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

PR

OJE

CT

PH

AS

E

Alte

ma

tiws

Ana

lysi

s D

raft

EIS

D

EIS

Re~ew

Fin

al E

IS

Pre

limin

ary

Eng

inee

ring

-Pro

cure

men

t S

trat

egy

I R

OD

F

inal

Des

ign

I E

ngin

eerin

g R

ight

-of-

Way

Acq

uisi

tion

Con

trac

tor

Bid

C

onst

ruct

ion

and

Tes

ting

Tot

al l

ime

to

Com

plet

ion

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

EF

RA

ME

FO

R D

EF

ER

RE

D P

RO

JE

CT

-­N

OR

TH

HO

LL

YW

OO

D T

O 1

-405

MO

NT

HS

P

erce

nt

Mo

nth

s to

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

100%

65

%

6 0%

6

1-f-

1-f-

---

-1

--

--

-· -

--

--

--

-0%

4

f-1

-1

-1

---

--

--

0%

12

1-f-

-6--

-·-

--· -

-· -

-· -

· --

--

--

0%

0%

12

~lllll

J 90

%

12

0%

4 0%

3

6-4

2

74

-80

---

--L

--

-

.eg

ion

al

Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s ·.

4-1

0F

78

84

90

-f-

--

--

1-f-

·--

1-

-

Boo

z·A

IIen

& .lt

on

Inc.

Page 163: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

• S

an F

erna

ndo

Val

ley

Alte

rnat

ives

Tim

elin

es-

Def

erre

d P

roje

ct

TH

E I

MP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

OF

TH

E D

EF

ER

RE

D H

EA

VY

RA

IL P

RO

JEC

T T

O 1

-405

RE

SU

ME

S T

HE

E

NV

IRO

NM

EN

TA

L C

LE

AR

AN

CE

PR

OC

ES

S

• T

he p

lann

ing

proc

ess

for

a S

an F

erna

ndo

Eas

t-W

est

rail

line

was

def

erre

d be

fore

the

Loca

lly P

refe

rred

Alte

rnat

ive

was

sel

ecte

d.

An

addi

tiona

l tw

elve

mon

ths

is r

equi

red

to

.com

plet

e th

e D

raft

Env

ironm

enta

l Im

pact

Sta

tem

ent

and

sele

ct th

e Lo

cally

Pre

ferr

ed

Alte

rnat

ive

• C

ompl

etio

n of

the

Fin

al E

nviro

nmen

tal

Impa

ct S

tate

men

t re

quire

s fo

ur a

dditi

onal

mon

ths

• R

ight

-of-

way

acq

uisi

tion

begi

ns o

nce

all

engi

neer

ing

wor

k is

com

plet

e an

d fa

lls w

ithin

a

one-

year

tim

e fr

ame.

M

ost

of th

e rig

ht-o

f-w

ay a

long

the

Bur

bank

I C

hand

ler

righ

t-of

-way

is

alre

ady

owne

d by

the

MT

A

• C

ompl

etio

n of

con

stru

ctio

n an

d te

stin

g w

ill r

equi

re a

ppro

xim

atel

y 3

to 3

1f2

year

s

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

1 0

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

am

ilto

n I

nc.

Page 164: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

E F

RA

ME

FO

R S

AN

FE

RN

AN

DO

VA

LL

EY

LIG

HT

RA

IL

MO

NT

HS

P

erc

en

t M

on

ths

to

PR

OJE

CT

PH

AS

E

Co

mp

lete

C

om

ple

te

6 12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

.7

8 84

90

Con

stru

ctio

n an

d T

estin

g 0%

3

6-4

8

Tot

al T

ime

to C

ompl

etio

n 7

4-8

6

• eg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s ·.

4-1

1F

B

ooz·

AIIe

n &

.to

n In

c .

Page 165: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

9

• •

• S

an F

erna

ndo

Val

ley

Alte

rnat

ives

Tim

elin

es-

Ligh

t R

ail

TH

E I

MP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

OF

LIG

HT

RA

IL O

N T

HE

BU

RB

AN

K I

CH

AN

DL

ER

RIG

HT

-OF

-WA

Y C

AN

U

SE

WO

RK

CO

MP

LE

TE

D F

RO

M T

HE

DE

FE

RR

ED

PL

AN

NIN

G P

RO

CE

SS

• M

ost

of t

he e

nvir

onm

enta

l cle

ara

nce

wor

k fo

r th

e ri

ght-

of-w

ay b

etw

een

the

Nor

th

Hol

lyw

ood

stat

ion

and

the

1-40

5 fr

eew

ay is

com

plet

e.

A n

ew e

nvir

onm

enta

l pr

oces

s m

ust

be

initi

ated

for

the

por

tion

of th

e ro

ute

wes

t of

the

1-40

5 fr

eew

ay

• A

n ad

ditio

nal y

ea

r is

req

uire

d to

com

plet

e th

e D

raft

EIS

and

sel

ect t

he L

ocal

ly P

refe

rred

A

ltern

ativ

e

• C

ompl

etio

n of

the

Fin

al E

nvir

onm

enta

l Im

pact

Sta

tem

ent w

ill r

equi

re a

n ad

ditio

nal

four

m

onth

s

• R

ight

-of-

way

acq

uisi

tion

begi

ns o

nce

all

engi

neer

ing

wor

k is

com

plet

e an

d fa

lls w

ithin

a

one-

year

tim

e fr

ame.

M

ost o

f the

rig

ht-o

f-w

ay a

long

the

Bu

rba

nk

I C

hand

ler

righ

t-of

-way

is

alre

ady

owne

d b

y th

e M

T A

• C

ompl

etio

n o

f con

stru

ctio

n an

d te

stin

g w

ill r

equi

re a

ppro

xim

atel

y 3

to 4

yea

rs

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

11

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 166: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

IMP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

TIM

E F

RA

ME

FO

R S

AN

FE

RN

AN

DO

VA

LL

EY

BU

SW

AY

MO

NT

HS

P

erc

en

t M

on

ths

to I

I P

RO

JEC

T P

HA

SE

C

om

ple

te

Co

mp

lete

6

12

18

24

30

36

42

48

54

60

66

72

78

84

90

.~l.t.

~.'rl.~

ti::

'!:!

!.~~

~~!!

! ....

......

......

......

.. 1QQ

~(? ..

......

......

..••..

~....

......

...

.. ...

.. ...

.. ...

... ..

.... .

....

. .....

......

......

.....

........

.......

........

. .....

.......

.......

.... ...

... ...

... ....

.. .....

. ......

. .....

...... .

..... . ...

. . .....

. ..... . ...

.. D

raft

EIS

35

%

6 ····

······

······

······

· .....

.......

.......

......

....

.......

.......

........

. ....

.......

......

.......

......

....

........

.......

.... ..

........

.......

......

......

....

........

......

..... .

........

.......

.......

......

······

······

······

·····

......

......

......

.....

······

...

.......

.......

.......

......

..

Con

stru

ctio

n 0%

24

-36

jill

........

.........

.........

·····:

Tot

al T

ime

to C

ompl

etio

n 6

2-7

4

• gi

onal

Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s ·4

-12

F

Boo

z·A

IIen

& r

eo

n In

c .

~

Page 167: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

' ~ ., •

• •

San

Fer

nand

o V

alle

y A

ltern

ativ

es T

ime

line

s-

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y

TH

E I

MP

LE

ME

NT

AT

ION

OF

A B

US

WA

Y O

N T

HE

BU

RB

AN

K I

CH

AN

DL

ER

RIG

HT

-OF

-WA

Y T

O

WA

RN

ER

CE

NT

ER

CA

N U

TIL

IZE

WO

RK

CO

MP

LE

TE

D IN

TH

E D

EF

ER

RE

D P

LA

NN

ING

PR

OC

ES

S

• M

ost

of t

he e

nviro

nmen

tal

clea

ranc

e w

ork

for

the

right

-of

-way

eas

t o

f the

1-4

05 f

reew

ay is

co

mpl

ete.

A

new

env

ironm

enta

l pr

oces

s m

ust

be i

nitia

ted

for

the

port

ion

of th

e ro

ute

wes

t of

the

1-40

5 fr

eew

ay.

An

addi

tiona

l ye

ar

is r

equi

red

to c

ompl

ete

the

Dra

ft E

IS a

nd s

elec

t th

e Lo

cally

Pre

ferr

ed A

ltern

ativ

e

• C

ompl

etio

n o

f the

Fin

al E

nviro

nmen

tal

Impa

ct S

tate

men

t re

quire

s an

add

ition

al f

our

mon

ths

• R

ight

-of-

way

acq

uisi

tion

begi

ns o

nce

all

engi

neer

ing

wo

rk is

com

plet

e an

d fa

lls w

ithin

a

one-

year

tim

e fr

ame.

M

ost

of t

he r

ight

-of-

way

alo

ng t

he B

urba

nk I

Cha

ndle

r ri

ght-

of-w

ay is

al

read

y ow

ned

by t

he M

T A

• C

ompl

etio

n of

con

stru

ctio

n w

ill r

equi

re 2

-3

year

s

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsit

Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

12

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 168: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

) • •

• •

Res

ults

... S

an F

erna

ndo

Val

ley

Cor

rido

r

SA

N F

ER

NA

ND

O V

AL

LE

Y C

OR

RID

OR

RE

SU

LT

S I

NC

LU

DE

...

TIE

R 1

ME

AS

UR

ES

Alt

ern

ativ

e M

od

el N

ote

M

ob

ility

T

ran

sit

Rel

iab

ility

C

om

mu

nit

y C

ost

!

Dep

end

ency

Im

pac

ts

Eff

ecti

ven

ess

He

avy

Rai

l to

1-40

5 (S

ub

wa

y I

V-1

HR

T

~

~

e ~

()

Aer

ial

com

bina

tion)

Ligh

t R

ail

(or

DM

U)

to W

arn

er

V-2

LR

T

()

~

~

()

()

Ce

nte

r

Bus

Tra

nsi

twa

y (N

orth

V

-3

()

~

~

()

e , H

olly

YJo

od t

o W

arn

er

Cen

ter)

tr

an

sitw

ay

TIE

R 2

ME

AS

UR

ES

Alt

ern

ativ

e M

od

el N

ote

E

con

om

ic

Saf

ety

En

viro

nm

enta

l

He

avy

Rai

l to

1-40

5 (S

ub

wa

y I

Aer

ial

V-1

HR

T

e e

e co

mb

ina

tion

)

Ligh

t R

ail

(or

DM

U)

to W

arn

er

Ce

nte

r V

-2 L

RT

e

()

e B

us T

ran

sitw

ay

(Nor

th H

olly

wo

od

to

V-3

~

~

~

, Warn~r C

ente

r)

Tra

nsi

twa

y

KEY

e M

ost

Fav

orab

le o

r H

iah

0 Le

ast

Fav

orab

le o

r L

ow

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

13

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 169: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• • 1

s.P

cif

orm

an

cc M

eas1

1rcs

T

he S

an F

ern

.do

Val

ley

Co

rrid

or

• M

OB

ILIT

Y

TR

AN

SIT

DE

PE

ND

EN

CE

C

OS

T E

FF

EC

TIV

EN

ES

S

REL

IAB

ILIT

Y

Ma

rke

t M

ob

ility

Ind

ex

Pro

ject

Un

tt C

ost

a

Co

st E

ffkl

en

cy

Ro

ute

A

nnua

l.

Tra

nsn

A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

E

Mo

de

l No

tes

Add

ition

al D

ally

LA

Co

tnly

T

ran

stt

Ind

ex

Jo

b A

cc ..

. alb

lllty

A

nnua

lize

d M

iles

Tra

nsit

Trip

s D

ally

P

erce

nt o

f A

ne

ma

live

B

ase

Per

cent

T

r.va

iTim

e Jo

b A

cc .. al

biU

ty

De

pe

nd

en

ce

Co

mp

osi

tio

n

lnd

ox

Ca

pita

JCo

sts/

O

&M

Co

sts

I M

ile

Lh

cyc .

. S

ub

sid

y I

Re

liab

ility

pe

r M

od

e

Tra

nsit

Tal

a!

Spe

cllic

2

01

0

Cha

nge

Ind

ex

Mile

(U

TA

) (B

AH

) T

rip

G

ener

ated

Tr

ips

De

cre

ase

C

oo

t/T

rip

HR

tol-

40

5

V-1

HR

T

6.0

t 7,

389

889,

293

0.83

"1.

43.3

9 43

.32

O.t6

"/o

t0,0

43

16

.32

t 22

.03

St 5

3,07

8,20

3 $

2,t

t3,t

44

.76

$

7,9

3t

$t,

50

3

Ver

y lo

w to

krN

(S

ubw

ay I

Aer

ial C

ombi

natio

n 1

00

"/.L

ow

LA

(o

r OM

U)

lo W

am

er

Ce

nle

V

-2 L

RT

t3

.8

(534

) 8

8t,

37

0

-0.0

6%

43.3

2 43

.32

0.0

0%

8,

330

t6.t

5

t 21

.78

$81,

601,

449

St ,6

37,6

81.1

6 N

IA

NIA

L

ow

1

00

%L

ow

Bu

s T

ran

sitw

ay

V..'J

Tra

nsitw

ay

14

3,96

9 8

85

,87

3

0.45

°/o

43.3

4 4

3.3

2

o.os•;

. 7,

732

16.2

3 1

21

.92

$1

3,47

8,57

1 $3

50,0

00.0

0 $3

,250

$1

,019

Lo

w

{N.

Ho

ftyw

oo

d/W

am

er

100%

Lo

w

--

·----

-------

MO

BIL

ITY

T

RA

NS

IT D

EP

EN

DE

NC

E

CO

ST

EF

FE

CT

IVE

NE

SS

J

REL

IAB

ILIT

Y

Ma

rke

t M

ob

ility

In

de

x P

ro e

el U

nit C

ost

a C

ost

Eff

kle

ncy

Ro

ute

L

AC

otn

ly

An

nu

.l.

Tra

nd

A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

M

od

el N

ole

s A

dditi

onal

Dal

ly

Tra

nsft

W

ork

Jo

b A

cce

ssib

ility

A

nnua

lized

M

iles

Dal

ly

Per

cent

ol

Ane

mal

tve

Bas

e P

erce

nt

Jo

b A

cce

ssib

ility

D

ep

en

de

nce

C

apita

l Co

sts

/ O

&M

Cos

ts I

Mile

S

ub

sid

y I

Tra

nsit

Trip

s T

rans

it T

otal

S

pe

cllic

20

10

Cha

nge

Tra

vel T

ime

In

de

x O

ealln

aUon

In

de

x M

ile

(MTA

) (B

AH

) ll

ecy

cle

Tri

p

Re

liab

ility

po

r M

od

o

Gen

era l

ad

Trip

s D

ecr

ea

se

Co

at/

Tri

p

HR

tol-

40

5

V-1

HR

T

6.01

• •

• •

NIA

• ~

()

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

• (S

ub

wa

t I A

eria

l Com

bina

tion

~

LR {

or O

MU

) to

Wa

me

r Ceo

te

V-2

LR

T

13.8

~

()

0 ()

N

IA ~ ~

0 ~

~

0 ()

~

NIA

N

IA

'-t

Bu

s T

ran

sitw

ay

V-3

Tra

nsi

fwa

y 14

~

• ~

()

NIA

()

()

~

~

~

~

• •

• ~

'-t

(N.

Hol

ywoo

d I W

amer

A4.

4-14

Page 170: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

)

•• •

• T

HE

SA

N F

ER

NA

ND

O V

AL

LE

Y C

OR

RID

OR

EC

ON

OM

IC

EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

AF

ET

Y

Mod

el

. G

ross

Are

a G

ross

Are

a A

ir Q

ua

lity

Ind

ex

Sa

fety

In

de

x A

LTE

RN

AT

IVE

Jo

b

Jobs

P

rodu

ct,

Pro

duct

, A

dditi

onal

IW

II

11<1

11;:>

11

""""·

"""

''""'

" N

otes

S

uppo

rted

, S

uppo

rted

, V

ehic

ular

P

erce

nt o

f A

ccid

ents

pe

r A

ccid

ents

pe

r A

ccid

ents

pe

r O

pera

ting

Cap

ital

Ope

ratin

g C

apita

l T

rans

it E

mis

sion

s N

TV

E

100,

000

100,

000

100,

000

Saf

ety

Inde

x ($

98M

illio

ns)

($98

Mill

ions

) E

mis

sion

s '"

o.

. rr •

. .r

r ..

HA

to

I· 4

05

V-1

HA

T

0.0

8 0

.00

1.

33

Com

posi

te

Sub

way

I A

eria

l C

ombi

natio

n)

376

2212

6 12

.61

1096

.64

N/A

24

3,00

4 N

IA

(sta

tiona

ry

sour

ce)

LA (

or D

MU

) to

Wa

rne

r V

-2 L

AT

0.

15

0.8

3 4.

17

Com

posi

te

Cen

ter

669

2708

3 22

.44

1342

.31

NIA

24

3,0

26

N/A

(s

tatio

nary

so

urce

) B

us T

rans

itway

V

-3 B

usw

ay

0.40

0

.06

2.

69

Com

posi

te

(N.

Hol

lyw

ood

I W

arn

er

145

4538

4

.87

224

.93

5,62

2 24

2,98

0 2.

31

%

EC

ON

OM

IC

·EN

VIR

ON

ME

NT

S

AF

ET

Y

Mod

el

Job

Jo

bs

Gro

ss A

rea

Gro

ss A

rea

Air

Qu

alit

y In

de

x S

afe

ty I

nd

ex

ALT

ER

NA

TIV

E

No

tes

Add

ition

al

"U

I '""

""

... ,.,..

... ,.,. .

'"'"

" S

uppo

rted

, S

uppo

rted

, P

rodu

ct,

Pro

duct

, V

ehic

ular

P

erce

nt o

f A

ccid

ents

pe

r A

ccid

ents

pe

r A

ccid

ents

pe

r O

pera

ting

Cap

ital

Ope

ratin

g C

apita

l T

rans

it E

mis

sion

s N

TV

E

100,

000

100,

000

100,

000

Sa

fety

Inde

x ,

Em

issi

ons

/L

o.

. rr •

. ,r

r,

.

HA

to 1

-40

5

V-1

HA

T

a •-_ a

_ -•

• _

i) _ ~

• •

• •

(Sub

way

I A

eria

l Com

bina

tion)

LA (

or D

MU

) to

Wa

rne

r V

-2L

AT

• •

• •

• ()

()

()

()

()

Cen

ter .. ,

•aooo~o

~

~

~

~

~

()

~

~

a a

~

V-3

Bus

way

Reg

iona

l Tra

nsi

t Alte

rnat

ives

Ana

lysi

s A

4.4-

15

Boo

z·A

IIen

& H

amilt

on I

nc.

Page 171: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

~

~

NA

,oo

d In

tegr

ity M

atrix

cZ

'ity Im

pact

s Th

e S

an F

ern

&o

Val

ley

Co

rrid

or

• "

AL

TE

RN

AT

IVE

S

HR

to

1·40

5 (s

ubw

ay I

LR (

or D

MU

) to

War

ner

Bu

s T

rans

ltw

ay (N

. H

olly

'd.

GE

NE

RA

L C

OM

MU

NIT

Y

aeri

al C

omb.

) C

ente

r W

arne

r C

ente

r)

IMP

AC

TS

-5

0

+5

-5

0 +

5-5

o

+S

~,.f:

;:.

?.>

':,;

·'<.·.

:.

· (.··· .

.. ·>:···•h¥

":-0

Wi't~

Neg

ativ

e N

o E

tf.e

t P

ostl

lve

Neg

ativ

e N

oE

HK

t P

otft

lve

Neg

ativ

e N

o E

tf.e

t P

otl

ttv.

Impa

cts

on P

rope

rty

Val

ues

./

./

./

I Im

pact

s on

Bus

ines

ses

./

./

./

Impa

cts

on S

ecur

ity

./

./

./

Impa

cts

on A

esth

etic

s ./

./

./

Noi

se I

mpa

cts

./

./

./

Impa

cts

on

Tra

ffic

Lan

es

./

./

./

Com

mun

ity

Res

pons

e •

./

./

./

• W

lrt'r

t A

ppli

cab

lt

" ~

()

Less

Pos

itive

S

light

Miti

gabl

e N

eutr

al

@

II A

LT

ER

NA

TIV

ES

I H

R t

o 1·

405

(sub

way

I LR

(or

DM

U)

to W

arne

r B

us

Tra

nsit

way

(N. H

olly

'dJ

CO

MM

UN

ITY

IM

PA

CT

S O

N

aeri

al C

omb.

) C

ente

r W

arne

r C

ente

r)

RE

LO

CA

TIO

NS

1 ·•··

, ·• x·

•f',i

~J~i

;>>f

~";"

:, <>

'-~,»,

~< -,' rtl'~

/(."

''"·'''

"•

,, ~

.....

Moj

o<

.. ... M

•Jot

"""

" M

a)O

f

Hou

seho

ld R

eloc

atio

ns

./

./

./

Com

mun

ity

Fac

ilit

y R

eloc

atio

ns

./

./

./

His

tori

c S

ite

Rel

ocat

ions

./

.....

... ./

./

---

-

A4.

4-16

Page 172: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

1-(.) w ..., 0 a: a. c w a: a: w LL w

I'--..--c I

~ '<:t <t: • > w

...J

...J <( > 0 c z <(

c: >-0 ~ :;::: iiic: (.)

::s >Ill

z

... - o-

a:

(/) "CCI.. c: c:"C

w

0 CIICI) tn (..) c: ...

LL

c: ...... :;::: ... CI)CII Cl) U..(i)

z

(/) "C ")( c: c:c

<(

w => Ill, I (/)c:

en

~

·~ CliO c: c:·-·- (/) 0 0 ...Jc: ... ... "C~ --Cl) Cl) Cll><

:2 :2 a:w

' I I • •

Page 173: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

,. ••

• S

AN

FE

RN

AN

DO

VA

LL

EY

-LI

GH

T R

AIL

---

/ ~

--, ...

---

, 1

1 1

1 1 ~

Me

tro

link

-E

xist

ing

Me

tro

rail

-U

nd

er

Co

nst

ruct

ion

Lig

ht

Ra

il/

DM

U O

pti

on

A4.

4-18

• L

eg

en

d

..

Ve

ryH

igh

IJII

Hig

h

,.,,,

Cl

Cl

Mo

de

rate

Lo

w

Oth

er.

Page 174: AUTHORITY ANALYSIS APPENDIXlibraryarchives.metro.net/DPGTL/studies/1998_Regional...RTAA does not fund • Appendix 2 summarizes the Performance Measures used for evaluation of each

• •

)>

·~ ....... <0

• •

00111111 0 r- s: :I: < - 0 0 CQ

(!) :T :E c. :T ~ (!)

(!) :I: ""'l

""'l s:u

CQ -(!) :T

r-(!)

CQ (!) :J c.

CJ) )> z , m :r:J z )> z c 0 < )> r­r­m -<