author title an interpretative study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the...

125
ED 041 865 AUTHOR TITLE INSTITUTION SPONS AGENCY BUREAU NO PUB DATE CONTRACT NOTE EDRS PRICE DESCRIPTORS IDENTIFIERS DOCUMENT RESUME 24 SP 004 15_2 Edling, Jack V.; Buck, J. E. An Interpretative Study of Individualized Instructional Programs. Phase I: Analysis and Interpretation. Final Report, Phase I. Oregon State System of Higher Education, Monmouth. Teaching Research Div. Office of Education (DHEW) , Washington, D.C. BR-8-0710 31 May 69 OEC-0-9-470710-0776(010) 125p. EDRS Price MF-$0.50 HC-$6.35 Classroom Techniques, *Experimental Programs, *Individualized Instruction, *Individualized Programs, Interviews, *Program Administration, Program Development, *Questionnaires, Surveys National Education Association ABSTRACT This is a report on Phase I of a two-phase project identifying the requirements of administrators, teachers, and school board members for implementing an individualized instruction program, identifying such programs in the United States, and selecting 48 for site visits. A preliminary questionnaire was administered to 21 Oregon public school superintendents and the data, with data from interviews with 38 members of the target audience, were used to construct a second questionnaire covering seven major areas - 'effects on students, operation of individualized programs, teachers, costs, facilities and equipment, materials, and implementation. This questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California, and the Northwest, with a further classification of school districts as small rural, large consolidated rural, suburban, and central city. On-going programs were identified through chief state school officers, directors of regional educational laboratories, colleges and universities, the U.S. Office of Education, and the National Education Association, to obtain a comprehensive view, compile a selected list of programs in each state, and select the most diversified for site visits. Appendixes provide examples and more detailed information on questionnaires, interviews, programs identified, program identifiers, and site visits. (MBM)

Upload: others

Post on 23-Jun-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

ED 041 865

AUTHORTITLE

INSTITUTION

SPONS AGENCYBUREAU NOPUB DATECONTRACTNOTE

EDRS PRICEDESCRIPTORS

IDENTIFIERS

DOCUMENT RESUME

24 SP 004 15_2

Edling, Jack V.; Buck, J. E.An Interpretative Study of IndividualizedInstructional Programs. Phase I: Analysis andInterpretation. Final Report, Phase I.Oregon State System of Higher Education, Monmouth.Teaching Research Div.Office of Education (DHEW) , Washington, D.C.BR-8-071031 May 69OEC-0-9-470710-0776(010)125p.

EDRS Price MF-$0.50 HC-$6.35Classroom Techniques, *Experimental Programs,*Individualized Instruction, *IndividualizedPrograms, Interviews, *Program Administration,Program Development, *Questionnaires, SurveysNational Education Association

ABSTRACTThis is a report on Phase I of a two-phase project

identifying the requirements of administrators, teachers, and schoolboard members for implementing an individualized instruction program,identifying such programs in the United States, and selecting 48 forsite visits. A preliminary questionnaire was administered to 21Oregon public school superintendents and the data, with data frominterviews with 38 members of the target audience, were used toconstruct a second questionnaire covering seven major areas - 'effectson students, operation of individualized programs, teachers, costs,facilities and equipment, materials, and implementation. Thisquestionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audiencein upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,and the Northwest, with a further classification of school districtsas small rural, large consolidated rural, suburban, and central city.On-going programs were identified through chief state schoolofficers, directors of regional educational laboratories, collegesand universities, the U.S. Office of Education, and the NationalEducation Association, to obtain a comprehensive view, compile aselected list of programs in each state, and select the mostdiversified for site visits. Appendixes provide examples and moredetailed information on questionnaires, interviews, programsidentified, program identifiers, and site visits. (MBM)

Page 2: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

An Interpretive Studyof

Individualized Instructional ProgramsPhase I -

Anai-isis and Interpretalaon

Jack V. EdlingJames E. Buck

U,S, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION& WELFARE

OFFICE OF EDUCATIONTHIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN RFPRODUCFPEXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON f,JRORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT, POINTS OFVIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECES-SARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU-CATION POSITION OR POLICY.

Final Report - PhaseCost Reimbursement contract No OEC-0-9-470710-0776(010)

U. S. Department t,f Health, Education and WelfareOffice of Education

May 31, 1969

Teaching Research DivisionOregon State System of Higher Education

Monmouth, Oregon 97361

Page 3: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Table of Contents

Page

AcknowledgeMents 1

Preface

Chapters

I. Information Needs of Target Audiences 2

II. Identification and Analysis of Individualized

Instructional Programs 6

III. Data Collection Tour-Site Visitations 8

IV. Implications of Learner Differences 10

Appendices

A-1 Superintendents' Questionnairc and Analysis 15

A-2 IntervLewees and Interview Summaries 20

la

A-3 Questionnaire 35

A-4 Questionnaire Administration Centers andParticipating School Districts 39

A-5 Part A - Mean Scores Target Audiences 42

Part B - Target Audiences - Five Most ImportantQuestions 46

Part C - Target Audiences - Rankings of Each'Section 50 .

Part D - Target Audiences - Rankings by School Types 52

Part E - Target Audiences - Rankings by Each TargetAudience 54

B-1 Part A - Letter Requesting Name ofKnowledgeablePersons 57

Part B - List of Persons Contacted

B -2 Part A - Letter Requesting Location of Programs

Part B - List of Persons Contacted

B-3 Part A - Letter to Program Directors

Pairt B - Form to Gather Descriptive Data

58

68

69

74

76

Page 4: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Table of Contents

B-4 Part A - Districts, Schools, and Programs Ieentified'

Part B Selected Sites "Close to Home"

C-1 Site Visitation Request

C-2 List of Schools Visited

D Bibliography on Individual Differences andIndividualized Instruction

rm.

79

104

113

114

117.

Page 5: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This project was conceived by Dr. Wilbur Schramm, Chairman, Advisory

Board, the ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Media and Technology at the

Institute for Communication Research, Stanford University. Dr. Schramm

identified the need for more information on techniques to individualize

instruction, and convinced the principal investigator that it was worth

two years of his life to obtain the needed data and prepare case studies

and related materials.

Mr. James E. Buck, project coordinator, handled all administrative

arrangements. Beginning in the Fall of 1968 he identified school board

members, school administrators and teachers in Oregon who would help identify

the information needs of target audiences. He assisted in the preparation

of data gathering instruments, conducted a national survey to obtain needed

data, contacted all fifty chief state school officers, directors of regional

laboratories, numerous colleges, institutes and foundations, scheduled fifty

site visits and conducted a review of the literature on the need for indivi-

dualized instruction.

Special appreciation is due those who contributed so freely of their time

in supplying needed information. Of particular note are the National Advisory

Committee, representatives of the target audiences who completed questionnaires,

and individuals who supplied detailed information about on-going programs of

individualized instruction.

Dr. William Paisley, Director, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Media

and Technology hosted the meeting of the National Advisory Committee and

provided invaluable guidance and advice in planning the dissemination phases

of the project.

-1

Jack V. Edling

Page 6: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Preface

There is no question of the reality of individuallearner differences

and there is considerable opinion that it is important to provide for these

differences in instructional situations. However, how to provide individualized

instruction within the structure of the typical elementary or secondary school

to actually enhance learning is a significant unresolved problem. The current

intensity of interest in the individualization of instruction requires that

a rather major, effort be made to collate as many of the ideas attd programs

as possible to identify the present status of knowledge, procedures, techniques,

and materials relevant to the problem of individualization. Equally as important

an effort must be made to discover the information needs for implementation of

individualized instruction by school board members, administrators, and teachers.

The major activities of Phase I have been three-fold: (1) the identification

of the information requirements for implementation of an individualized

instruction program by administrators, teachers, and school board members; (2)

the identification of many programs of individualized instruction throughout

the United States; and (3) the selection and visitation of forty-eight of

these programs for the purpose of collecting information desired by the target

audiences.

This report is intended merely to describe activities in Phase J of the

project. It deals with procedures and findings related to information require-

ments and places where desired data were obtained. Phase II will report on

the details of individualized instructional programs. Appendices have been

prepared which will provide examples and more detailed information on question-

naires, interviews, programs identified, program identifiers, and site

visitations.

-la-

Page 7: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Chapter I

Information Needs of Target AuJiences

The ultimate goal of the total project is to provide teachers, school

board members, and school administrators with information that each would

need to (a) evaluate the relevancy of individualized instruction (I.I.) for

their particular situation, (b) plan an appropriate version of LI, if it

were considered relevant, and (c) implement a program that should logically

enhance the educational program of the school in terms of learner satisfaction

and achievement. The first step in ach/eving the final goal was &:o discover

what information the target audiences (school administrators, school board

members, and teachers) considered important for evaluating the relevancy of

an I.I. program and implementing an appropriate version of an 1.I. program.

The plan to discover the information needs of target audiences was initiated

by interviewing three members of the education faculty of Oregon College of

Education. With these interviews as a background several members of the

instructional unit research staff of Teaching Research prepared a question-

naire for distribution to the Oregon Public School Superintendents' meeting

on Friday, September 20, 1969. The week following, September 23-27, the

project director, Jack V. Edling, and the project coordinator, James E.

Buck, held interviews throughout the Willamette Valley area of Oregon with

thirty-eight (3S) individuals representing all segments of the target audience.

The interviews and the analyses of the sueprintendent's questionnaire

provided the necessary information for the design of a revised questionnaire

for national administration to determine whether the information needs of

target audiences % the nation were consistent The questionnaire contained

questions related to seven major areas: (1) effects on students; (2) operation

of individualized programs; (3) teachers; (4) costs; (5) facilities and

equipment; (6) materials; and (7) implementation.

-2-

Page 8: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

The revised questionnaire was sent to the U.S. Office of Education for

approval. Immediately upon receiving approval it was administered to indivi-

duals representing all segments of the target audiences in five different

geographical parts of the country. In each of these five areas, the target

audience of four classifications of types of school districts of varying

sizes and locations completed the questionnaire. The four districts were

classified as (1) swell rural school; (2) large consolidated school, rural

setting; (3) suburban; and (4) central-city. The five geographical areas

were: (1) upper New York State; (2) the State of Maryland; (3) mid-Texas;

(4) southern California; and (5) the Northwest. In each area, the question-

naire was administered by college gradua:v students, except in the Northwest

where Teaching Research handled the administration.

The directions for scoring instructed each member of the target audience

in this manner.

The sequence of numbers (0,1,2) in front of each question Is forthe purpose of rating the relative importance you feel an answer to thequestion would have for your purposes. If you believe an answer to thevestion would be very important to you and your school district insetting up or improving individualized instruction programs, circle the"2". If you feel it would be somewhat helpful, circle the "I", If youfeel it would be of no value, circle the "0".

In total four hundred and forty-nine (449) individuals completed the

questionnaire. In order to interpret the mean scores reported in Appendix

A-5, Part I, it is necessary to understand the meaning of the rcplrted

mean scores which are as follows:

A mean score of: Means that from a total of 449:

1.75-2.00

1.50-1.74

1.25-1.49

Fewer than 112 rated the item as only"somewhat helpful"

112-224 rated the item as only "somewhathelpful"

225-337* rated the item as only "somewhathelpful"

*Some individuals rated an item as oas indicated.

-3-

"no value" but the mean ratings are

Page 9: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

1.00 - 1.24 338 - 449* rated the item as only "somewhathelpful"

below 1.00 The majority consider the item either of"no value" or only "somewhat helpful"

Since scores above 1.00 indicate that information on that item is

considered as "somewhat helpful" it is reasonable to conclude that the areas

and specific concerns of the members of the target audience in Oregon are

also areas and concerns of the target audience on a nationwide basis. In

only one instance, Central City school board members, did a specific group

feel that the information asked for by one question, number 23, was going to

be less than "somewhat helpful" to them to implement a program of individualized

instruction.

The seven major areas of the questionnaire, in the eyes of the target

audience, were not of equal concern. The questions relating to "Effect on

Students" and "Teacher" were the areas of greatest interest. The

questions relating to "Implementation" and "Costs" of the program were of

less interest. However, as Part E of Appendix A-5 illustrates, the target

audiences in each of the four types of school districts (central city, sub-

urban, etc) do not, except in the case of "Implementation," rank the areas

in any consistent pattern.

The areas of moat concern, from the results shown in Part A, Appendix

A-5, have been verified by sampling opinions in the five (5) sections of the

country listed previously. In the opinion of the advisory committee these

five (5) sections would represent a fairly accurate estimate of opinion of

information needs on a nationwide basis.

The following appendices contain data on the topics indicated:

*Some individuals rated an item as of "no value" but the mean ratingsare as indicated.

-4-

Page 10: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Appendices

A-1 Superintendents' Questionnaire and Analysis

A-2 Interviewees and Interview Summaries

A-3 Questionnaire

A-4 Questionnaire Administration Centers andParticipating School Districts

A-5 Part A - Mean Scores Target Audiences

Part B - Target Audiences - Five Most Important Questions

Part C - Target Audiences - Rankings of Each Section

Part D - Target Audiences - Rankings by School Types

Part E - Target Audiences - Rankings by Each TargetAudience

-5

Page 11: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Chaprr II

Identification and Analysis of Individualized Instructional. Programs

To meet the information needs of the target audiences, it was necessary

to identify throughout the United States many on-going I.I. programs. It was

also necessary to have a brief analysis of each program in order to eelect

from among the many schools nominated, those schools which would provide

inforwaVon on a wide range of techniques, materials, organization and

procedures.

Identification of I.I. programs was initiated by contacting tEe fifty

(50) chief state school officers, the twenty (20)directors of regional

educational laboratories, twenty-eight (28) colleges and universities in

areas not adjacent to regional laboratories, nine (9) institutes and founda-

tions interested in improving instruction, the U.S. Office of Education, and

the National Educational Association. The officers and organizntions were

asked to recommend someone on their staff who could identify in their respective

areas of operation, programs of I.I. These nominees were then contacted for

the names, addresses, and person responsible, for each on-goin:4 1.1. program

with which they were familiar.

Districts, schools, and/or departments or grade levels within scoolswii:h

identified programs of I.I. were then contacted for a brief description of

their program. Descriptions received from each program were analyzed to

accomplish three purposes. First, to obtain a comprehensive view of what:

was happening with reference to 1.1. on a nationwide basis. Second, to compile

a selected list of programs in each state that appeared to offer an opportunity

for future "close to home" visitation sites for school personnel interested

in implementing an 1.1. program. Third, to select the most diversified pro-

grams for site visitations.

Page 12: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

The task of identifying on-going individualized instructional programs

was both difficult and rewarding. It was believed that many fine programs

would not be identified because: (1) programs were known only to local

people; (2) many state departments, regional educational laboratories, edu-

cation associations, and foundations were not organized to have the necessary

information; (3) the local and national elections and busy fall schedule

would cut deeply into the time of those who had the needed information; and

(4) some people asked would not feel the project to be of sufficient importance

to warrant the time and effort required to cooperate. However, even with

anticipated defeciencies it is believed that program identifiers performed

a most creditable function. Programs which actually provided individualized

instruction to learners were identified in the vast majority of states.

Information received from each program was contributd without cost to the

project. All of the over 800 men and women who contributed to program identifi-

cation and to program information are due special appreciation hum all those

who will benefit from the new knowledge

The following appendices contain data on the topics indicated:

Appendices

B-1 Part A - Letter Requesting Name of KnowledgeablePersons

Part B - List of Persons Contacted

B-2 Part A - Letter Requesting Location of Programs

Part B - List of Persons Contacted

B-3 Part A - Letter to Program Directors

Part B - Form to Gather Descriptive Data

B-4 Part A - Districts, Schools, and erograms Identified

Part B - Selected Sites "Close to Home"

Page 13: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Chapter III

Data Collection Tour - Site Visitations

More than 500 programs of I.I. were identified in the United States by

various cooperating agencies, organizations, and departments. Detailed

descriptive information was collected on a majority of these programs.

The process of selecting schools for site visitations was a two phase

operation. First, an attempt was made to select several functioning pro-

grams of individualized instruction within each state. This was possible in

the majority of states. It is recognized that it is possible that there

were many programs of equal or superior quality that were not identified.

However, because of the system employed it is believed that at least re-

presentative programs have been identified. This first step in the site-

visitation selecton will also serve as a "close to home" visitation guide

for school board members, teachers, and administrators. Second, an attempt

was made to select from the initially screened list, programs throughout

the country that would: (1) meet the information needs as identified by

the target audiences; (2) represent the widest spectrum of individualized

instructional procedures at, all levels,K through grade 12; (3) represent the

four types of school districts (central city, suburban, large consolidated,

and small rural); and (4) represent the major geographical and population

areas of our country.

The result of the site visitations has been the collection of large

amounts of information on each school visited. The collected information

includes: (1) recorded and transcribed interviews with those responsible

for the program; (2) over 1,500 35 mm slides illustrating materials, procedures,

techniques, and facilities; (3) sample materials and schedules; and (4)

statements of objectives, philosophy, etc. A wide variety of effective

Page 14: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

techniques has been observed. The strength and weaknesses of various ar-

rangements and the condition under which each most effectively can be em-

ployed has been studied and analyzed.

Information gathered from site visitations, upon recommendation of a

National Advisory Committee, will be disseminated to local districts through

a plan that has been devised and is described in the proposal for Phase II.

This plan has potentialities to meet the ultimate objective of enhancing the

educational program in terms of learner satisfaction and achievement, as

well as teacher and parent satisfaction. By training specialists in

state departments and teacher education institutions and providing them the

materials necessary to hold seminars for school administrators and their

staffs, all schools may be provided the new knowledge necessary to devise

an I.I. program appropriate for their particular situation.

The following appendices contain data on the topics indicated:

Appendices

C-1 Site Visitation Request

C-2 List of Schools Visited

Page 15: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Chapter IV

Implications of Learner Differences

Section III of the Phase I proposal for the project began with the

following statement,

"There is no question of the reality of individual learnerdifferences, and there is considerable opinion that it is importantto provide for these differences in instructional situations."

It is a curious fact, that in all communication to date on the project,

no one asked the question, "Why individualize?" This group includes: (1)

twenty-three (23) Oregon Public School Superintendents; (2) thirty-eight (38)

target audience interviewees; (3) four hundred and forty-nine (449) members of

the target audience; eight hundred (800) plus program identifiers and program

information people; (4) the seven (7) members of our National Advisory

Committee; and (5) the great number of people the project director talked

with on his 16,473 mile data collection tour across the continental United

States.

It appears from this sample of education minded Americans that it is

not a question of "Why individualize?" but rather, "How can we individualsqty ?"

The reality of individual difference among students has, it appearl, bec(Are

an educational fact. Teachers, school administrators, school board memtvY.F;,

parents, and community members believe that student; i differ in wlys that ar

important for instructional purposes. A major problem nosy facing the class-

room teacher and all those who support her is one of implementiag prowlms

that will enhance educational opportunities in terms of learner satisfaction

and achievement. However, the implementation of 1.1. programs is a major

goal of the project and will be dealt with more specifically in Phase II.

Individual differences among learners have long been a complicating

factor in the teaching of a group, and have caused the group7oriented teacher

-10.

Page 16: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

problems. Differences among learners in intelligence, school achievement,

special aptitudes and talents, personality, interests and values, and

cognitive style1 have been recognized by teachers for many years as valid.

However, except in a minority of classrooms, recognition of these differences

does not express itself in the instructioual program.

The six classes of differences listed above (with the possible exception

of cognitive style) are acknowledged in educational psychology in 'chat there

are standardized techniques utilized in their measurement. Detailed informa-

tion on each is available, with minor changes in order and emphasis, from a

variety of basic educational psychology textbooks.

Additions and modifications to the classes of differences enumerated

above have been made by various experts in differing contexts. In examining

the "process of learning," Jensen (1967) classifies differences in the

following manner: (1) intrinsic and extrinsic individual differences; (2)

penotypes and genotypes; (3) primary mental, abilities; and (4) transfer

and individual differences.2

Abrams (1966) states that intellectual,

educational, neurological, psysiological, psychological, and sociological

differences in various patterns of inteelationships influence the "thinking

process."3 Hefferon (1967) reports thLt in order for every learner to

achieve his individual potential, educational leaders must identify and meet

his diverse needs in: (1) the maturity of the learner; (2) his physical and

social environment; (3) his family background; (4) his physical condition;

mool1 A.11.0.4.81.IMMO

(1) Tyler, Leona E., The fathakan of Human Differences,. Appleton-CenturyCrofts, New York, 1956. pp. 5.

(2) Jensen, Arthur R., "Varieties of Individual Differences in Learning,"Learning. and Individual Differences, ed. Robert M. Gagne', CharlesE. Merril Books, Inc., Columbus, Ohio, 1967. pp., 121-134.

(3) Abrams, Jules C., Factors Affecting Thinking and Comprehension, ERIC.Report No.Re 000 424,Philadelphia, Pa; Temple University.

Page 17: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

and (5) his individual differences in ability, interest, aptitude, and

4aspiration. Grambs and Waetjen (1966) make a good case for their position

that "it makes a significant difference whether the person we are teaching

is a boy pupil or a girl pupil and that instructional provisions should be

made accordingly.5

This supplemental listing to the "standard six" differences

in learners could be expanded; however, the teacher, the educational psy-

chologist, and the general public are all aware that children are different

and it is possible to educate each one differently.

Individualized instruction has been taking place in some American

classrooms since the days of the one room school. At the present time

there appears to be a need and a desire to proceed from what has become

"traditional group based instruction to an individualized form of instruc-

tion, which actually was the earliest form of instruction. Shane (1966)

states the following factors as having helped force I.I. to the forefront

in this decade: "(1) vigorous debates over the quality of mass public in-

struction; (2) the rapid growth of pupil population at all levels, and the

long sustained teacher shortage; (3) the increasing use and impact of education

media; (4) federal funds for improvement of schools; (5) educational proposals

to more personalized instruction which have gathered much public attention;

(6) greater recognition and acceptance of the view that. the United States can

no longer afford the uneducated man.6

(4) Hefferman, Helen, "The Diverse Needs of the Learners to be Served," inA Basic Reference Shelf on Individualized Instruction, Wade, Serena, ASeries One Paper from ERIC at Stanford, Stanford, California, Dec., 1968,pp. 5.

Grambs, Jean D., and Waetjen, Walter B., "Being Equally Different: A NewRight for Boys and Girls," The National Elementary pLincipal. Vol. XLVI,No. 2, November, 1966., pp. 59-60.

(6) Shane, Harold G., "The School and Individual Differences," Chapter 3 inIndividualized Instruction, The Sixty-first yearbook of the NationalSociety for the Study of Education, University of Chicago Press, Chicago,

Illinois, 1962., pp. 44-45.

-12-

Page 18: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

If it is accepted that "(1) all pupils are not equal in their ability

to do school work, (2) learning rates vary among students, (3) an appropriate

sequence in a subject field for one student is not necessarily the best

sequence for another student",7and (4) the aspiration and values of learners

differ then, what are the implications for education? John Garner (1964)

expresses the idea that the goal for educators should be a lifetime of

learning, "The ultimate goal of the educational system is to shift to the

individual the burden of pursuing his own education.-"8

The implications

for method are equally extensive in that they force an almost complete re-

orientation of teachers. It is the purpose of Phase II of the project to

explore the many ways that individualization has actually influenced the

goals of education, and the methods to attain those goals in schools of

various sizes and locations at both the elementary and secondary levels.

For additional information on individual differences and individualized

instruction, the reader is referred to the bibliography in Appendix D.

11111111141,(7) Bahner, John M., "Modern Goals of Secondary Education," Education,

January, 1966, pp. 271.

(8) Gardner, John, Self-Renewal: The Individual and the Innovative Society.,New York: Harper and Row, 1964. pp. 241.

-13-

Page 19: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDICES A-1 and A-2

This appendix includes a copy of the questionnaire administered to

twenty-one (21) Oregon public school superintendents.

The analysis indicates their ranking of an item as a result of

mean score response.

The superintendents' questionnaire data together with interview data

obtained from the individuals listed in Appendix A-2 were used to construct

the questionnaire administered to a nationwide sample. Appendix A-2 also

summarizes the key concepts expressed by the person interviewed.

-14-

Page 20: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-1

INDIVIDUALIZED INSTRUCTION SURVEY GOALS QUESTIONNAIRE

The purpose of this questionnaire is to find out what you feel thegoals of Teaching Research's nationwide survey of individualized instructionin grades K-12 should be. We at Teaching Research feel the only way theresults of this survey can be meaningful to administrators, teachers, andschool board members is to find out what questions these groups want answered.These questions, after national verification, will become the goals of thesurvey.

We are collecting data for determining the survey goals in two ways:(1) This questionnaire for the Oregon School Superintendents meetingFriday September 20, and (2) Interviews with administrators, teachers, andschool board members from September 20 - September 27, 1968.

It is our hope that by using both of these data collection techniqueswe will have an accurate picture of what the teachers, administrators, andschool board members interviewed would find most helpful in (1) making adecision whether to implement a program of individualized instruction or(2) improving current programs. We also realize that without your responsethis survey could possibly produce a large volume of data that would bemeaningless to the public schools.

QUESTIONNAIRE

The sequence of numbers (0, 1, 2) in front of each question is for thepurpose of rating the relative importance you feel the question should meritin determining the goals of the data collection tour. If you believe ananswer to the question would be very important to you and your school dis-tirct in setting up or improving individualized instruction programs, circlethe "2". If you feel it would be somewhat helpful, circle the "1". If youfeel it would be of no value, circle the "0".

We have provided space for the additional questions you feel should beasked during the questionnaire.

O 1 2 1. What are the advantages of individualized instruction for thestudents?

O 1 2 2. What can individualized instruction provide for the student thata self-contained classroom, as normally organized, cannot?

0 1 2 3. What is the student-teacher ratio in a program of individualizedinstruction?

0 1 2 4. How are students organized in an individualized instructionprogram?

0 1 2 5. What tests other than achievement and I.Q. are being used inindividualized instruction for placement and/or evaluation.

-15-

Page 21: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

0 1 2 6. What are the purposes of testing in individualized instruction?

Additional Questions:

0 1 2 7. Will any additional training be needed for our present staffto begin an individualized program?

0 1 2 8. Where is additional training available?

0 1 2 9. Are resource people available to bring into our district forinservice training in individualized instruction?

0 1 2 10. What kind of teacher organizational pattern is found inbuildings with an individualized instruction program?

0 1 2 11. At what grade levels do you find individualized instruction?

0 1 2 12. Is individualized instruction usually found in separateclassrooms or is it standard throughout a building?

0 1 2 13. In what parts of the curriculum is individualized instructionusually carried out?

0 1 2 14. What curriculum programs are available commercially that couldbe used directly in an individualized instruction program?

0 1 2 15. What curriculum programs are available commercially that couldbe modified for use in an individualized instruction program?

0 1 2 16. What materials are currently being used?

0 1 2 17. What kind of follow-through is being made to access thisyears program in relationship to what will happen next year?

0 1 2 18. Can an individualized instruction program be modified at anytime?

Additional Questions:

0 1 2 19. What are the building requirements?

-16-

Page 22: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

0 1 2 20.

0 1 2 21.

012 22.

U 1 2 23.

0 1 2 24.

0 1 2 25.

0 1 2 26.

0 1 2 27.

0 1 2 28.

0 1 2 29.

0 1 2 30.

0 1 2 31.

How have standard classrooms been modified to fulfill theneeds of an individual instruction program?

What would be the cost of training our staff in an inserviceprogram within our own district?

What would be the cost of training our staff on a collegecampus?

What is the cost per student in an individualized instructionprogram?

Where are the successful programs of individualized instructionin our area?

What are the problems encountered by classes, grade levels,and schools now using a program of individualized instruction?

How are school districts implementing programs of individu-alized instruction?

Whc are the nationally known "experts" in individualizedinstruction?

Who are the people in our area who can help us get a programstart'd?

Where can T find a good bibliography on individualizedinstruction?

How do you know individualized instruction will work?

What research has been done?

Additional Questions:

Comments:

Form A

-17-

Completed by:

Page 23: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Rank order of responses from 21 0.egonPublic School Superintendents

Mean Response question & Number on Supt. Survey.(2.00 Y perfect)

1.857

1.857

1. What are the advantages of individualized instruction for thestudents?

25. What are the problems encountered by classes, grade levels,and schools now using a program of individualized instruction?

1.800 26. How are school districts implementing programs of individ-ualized instruction?

1.762 4. How are students organized in an individualized instructionprogram?

1.762 24. Where are the successful programs of individualizedinstruction in our area?

1.750 30. How do you know individualized instruction will work?

1.750 31. What research has been done?

1,714 2. What can individualized instruction provide for the studentthat a self-contained classroom, as normally organized, cannot?

7,, Will any additional training be needed for our presentstaff to begin an individualized program?

1.700 28. Who are the people in our area who can help us get a programstarted?

1.714

1.667

1.619

1.619

1.600

1.600

23. What is the cost per student in an individualized instructionprogram?

8. Where is additional training available?

9. Are resource people available to bring into our district forinservice training in individualized instruction?

16. What materials are currently being used?

21. What would be the cost of training our staff in an inserviceprogram within our own district?

1.571 3. What is the student-teacher ratio in a program ofindividualized instruction?

Page 24: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Mean Response

1.550 29.

1.524 17.

1.450 10.

1.450 19.

1;450 20.

1.429 5.

1.429 15.

1.400 6.

1.400 27.

1.381 14.

1.333 13.

1.300 22.

1.200 11.

1.200 12.

1.200 18.

guestio,1 & Number, on Supt. Survey

Where can I find a good bibliography on individualizedinstruction?

What kind of follow-through is being made to access thisyears program in relationship to what will happen next year?

What kind of teacher organizational pattern is found inbuildings with an individualized instruction program?

What are the building requirements?

How have standard classrooms been modified to fulfill theneeds of an individual instruction program?

What tests other than achievement and I.Q. are being used inindividualized instruction for placement and/or evaluation?

What curriculum programs are available commercially thatcould be modified for use in an individualized instructionprogram?

What are the purposes of testing in individualized instruction?

Who are the nationally known "experts" in individualized

instruction?

What curriculum programs are available commercially thatcould be used directly in an individualized instructionprogram?

In what parts of the curriculum is individualized instructionusually carried out?

What would be the cost of training our staff on a collegecampus?

At what grade levels do you find individualized instruction?

Is individualized instruction usually found in separateclassrooms or is it standard throughout a building?

Can an individualized instruction program be modified atany time?

-19;-

Page 25: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-2

'INTERVIEWS FOR RELEVANT INFORMATION QUESTIONNAIRE

Interview Number One - Charles Actor, Darrell Potter, Elementary Principals,Lake Oswego Public Schools, Lake Oswego, Oregon

Interview Number Two - Bill Wallace and Dennis Chamberlin, Junior HighPrincipals, Milwaukie School District, Milwaukie, Oregon

Interview Number Three - Mrs. Mary Rieke, School Board Member, PortlandPublic Schools, Portland, Oregon

Interview Number Four - Warren Oliver, Don Marmeduke, John Pederson, SchoolBoard Members, Lake Oswego Public Schools, Lake Oswego, Oregon

Interview Number Five - Don Robertson, Chairman, History Department, MikeReilly, History Department Teacher, ,Scolastica Murty, HumantiesDepartment Chairman, Frank Werneken, English Teacher, Chuck Gildeker,Math Department Chairman; Lake Oswego High School, Lake Oswego, Oregon

Interview Number Six - Wendell Austin, Elementary Principal, SpringfieldPublic Schools, Springfield, Oregon

Interview Number Seven - Don Ebbert, Mrs. Mildred Holly, School BoardMembers, Springfield, Oregon, Mrs. Gail Nicholson, Mrs. Lora Webb,Richard Miller, School Board Members, Eugene Public Schools, Eugene, Oregon

Interview Number Eight - Ken Brinkerhoff, Principal, Monmouth ElementarySchool, Mrs. Evelyn Barker, District Curriculum Coordinator, Rose Marie.Jesperson, Barbara Burelbach, Bonnie Davis, Shirley Flug, Bertha Owen,Teachers, Grades 1-3, Monmouth Elementary School, Monmouth, Oregon

Interview Number Nine - Robert Humphreys, President, Oregon School BoardMembers Association, Dr. G. C. McNeilly, School Board Members,Silverton Public Schools, Silverton, Oregon

Interview Number Ten - Glen Hawkins, Assistant Superintendent, Tom Putnam,Principal, Danebo, Elementary, Phil Berg, Principal., Malabon Elementaiy,Don Keiper, Principal, Irving Elementary, Lee Wilson, Principal, FairfieldElementary, Hal Jole, Principal, Clear Lake Elementary, Lefty Woodruff,Principal, Shasta Junior High, Don Brand, Principal, Willamette HighSchool, Members of Bethel Administrative Council, Bethel School District,Eugene, Oregon

Interview Number Eleven - Don Essig, Resource Teacher, Francis Willard,Elementary, Eugene, Oregon

Page 26: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

College De artment Interviews - Mr.of Student Teaching and Intern Program, Dr. Robertof Elementary Education, Mr. Dale Harp, Principal,School

Henry Tetz, DirectorAlbritton, DirectorCampus Elementary

Page 27: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 1

Darrell PotterChuck Actor

Elementary PrincipalsLake Oswego School DistrictLake Oswego, Oregon

Friday, September 20, 1968

(1) What size of classroom Lan a teacher really accomplish this in?Are numbers of extreme importance?

(2) Training teachers have - are they ready?

(3) Inservice programs.

(4) How can we get the individualized instruction information to theteachers?

(5) Instructional materials available.

(6) Teacher time.

(7) Aid help for teacher.

(8) Materials what is found for each subject in each classroom or are theycentralized?

(9) Facilities - any type school, modern, normal, antiquated.

(10) Definition of individual instruction - can a small group be calledindividual instruction?

(11) Organization so students are not lost in the shuffle.

(12) How can the unorganized teacher handle it?

Page 28: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 2

Bill WallaceDennis Chamberlin

Junior High PrincipalsMilwaukie School DistrictMilwaukie, Oregon

(1) Discussion started on what Ickes Junior High now has to meetindividual learner differences.

(2) What age levels and subject matter areas has I.I. been most effective?

(3) What other areas (besides achievement) is gained or lost by 1.I.?

(4) Does I.I. turn problem students on or off?

(5) Description of techniques used to obtain I.I.

(6) What materials are available?

(7) What process does a "traditionally" trained teacher need to go throughto become an effective 1.I. teacher?

(8) What testing has been effective in evaluating 1.I.?

(9) Is there any evidence of a relationship between I.I. and motivation?

(10) Does I.I. promote socialization?

(11) Be sure to tell us only about "real" programs - not paper ones.

Page 29: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 3

Mary Rieke

School Board MemberPortland Public SchoolsPortland, Oregon

Monday, September 23, 1968

(1) What other area other than basic skills are we able to individualizethe instruction?

(2) Norm Hamilton is aware of individualized instruction in the PortlandPublic Schools.

(3) Total look: placement, counsel, instruction.

(4) Models are helpful after "homework".

(5) Process of getting to the individualized instruction pr)gram.

-24-

Page 30: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

interview 4

Warren OliverDon MarmedukeJohn Pederson

School Board MembersLake Oswego SchoolsLake Oswego, Oregon

Monday, September 23, 1968

(1) Type of children it will work with.

(2) What kind of teachers do you need to make it work?

(3) What kind of equipment?

(4) How many dollars?

(5) What kind of facilities?

(6) These members wait for a plan to come from the administration.(want details of plan)

(7) U.S.O.E. to influence administration and then administration bring

essentials to the board.

(8) Case study in enough detail and in an objective manner:(a) What is required to make it a success?

(b) What are other districts of our similar suburban situationsdoing?

(9) Boards to read about 25 pages.

(10) Avery - Superintendent of Wenecto School District outside of

Chicago equipment and individual instruction.

(11) Number one question:What are you attempting to accomplish and why can't you accomplish

this the way you are doing it now?

-25-

Page 31: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 5

Scolastica MurtyFrank WernekenChuck GildekerDon RobertsonMike Reilley

High School TeachersLake Oswego [Ugh SchoolLake Oswego, Oregon

September 23, 1968

(1) What is available?

(2) Are they contained objectives?

(3) Measuring instruction to determine what student needs.

(4) Required learning.Student wants to learn.

(5) Programmed learning - humanistic.

(6) Evidence as to "good" of programs.

(7) Cost?

(8) Instructional materials available.

(9) Can it be accomplished by grouping?

(10) What advantages to students?

(11) Do all students find advantages?

Page 32: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 6

Wendell Austin

Thurston Elementary School PrincipalSpringfield Public SchoolsSpringfield, Oregon

Wednesday, September 25, 1968

(1) Process of moving staff from here to there.

(2) Implement from:

(a) administrative level or(b) teacher staff

(3) What types of materials best facilitate traditional teachers to makethe change over?

(4) Familiar with elementary programs in individual similar situations.

(5) Basic Text with individualized instruction from other sources.

(6) Inservice:How to accomplish.Materials.Do facilities really make a difference?(a) level (b) attitude (c) communityWith, why or why not?

(7) Evaluation - if and how well:(a) attitude feeling es-pre-de-corp(b) student achievement

(8) Report - pupil progress card - included.

Page 33: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 7

Lora WebbGail NicholsonRichard Miller

Mildred HollyDon Ebbert

School Board MembersEugene School District - Springfield School DistrictEugene, Oregon Springfield, Oregon

Wednesday, September 25, 1968

(1) How general in curriculum?

(2) How much success?

(3) Programs allowing for academic growth staying within the peer group.

(4) Process of getting staff with you.Process of getting community with you.

(5) Training of staff.

(6) Student-.teacher ratio.

(7) Other than certified staff.

(8) Why do it?

(9) Problem of implementation,

(10) Curriculum fitting into state requirement.

(11) Eugene - brief description and show me.

(12) Tomorrow Schools Tod - Paperback.

(13) Description from a problem solving basis.

(14) Definition of individualized instruction. What does each district

think it is?

(15) All schools, all sizes, all areas of the country.

Page 34: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 8

Ken Brinkerhoff, PrincipalEvelyn Barker, Diet CurriculumTeachers 1-3

Rose Marie JespersonBarbara BurelbachBonnie DavisShirley FlugBertha Owen

Central School Districtindependence, Oregon

Wednesday, September 25, 1968

(1) Types of organization, record keeping, and materials.

(2) Test devise - pupils feel about themselves.

(3) Child's own pace within a basic set of materials (pre-set goals)?

(4) Row much of the day in individualized instruction?

(5) What happens to the child who is not self-directed?

(6) How much grouping used in individualized instruction?

(7) Student organization

(8) Programs in a normal setting.

(9) Sources to go for help:(a) people(b) library

(10) Mechanics so we can adapt.

(11) 1-3 Learn to read4- Read to learn

(12) Easier to individualize basic skills.

-29-

Page 35: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 9

Robert HumphreysDr. McNeilly

School Board MembersSilverton SchoolsSilverton, Oregon

Thursday, September 26, 1968

(1) Does it help as far as the youngsters are concerned?

(2) What does iL cost?

(3) Teacher training requirements to make it work.

(4) What students benefit from individualized instruction?

(5) What students do not benefit from individualized instructon?

(6) What levels is individualized instruction being done?

(7) Do all students have a required course or anything?

(8) Certain level of proficiency in an area?

(9) Haven't you always teed to do this?

(10) What evidence do you have that you are able to do something forchildren which you could not do before?

(11) Are children from different grades grouped in individualized instruction?

(12) Model School: University of Hawaii

(13) Tools to sell to tax payer would help school boards.In schools we must:

(a) Find out exactly what is going on; subject matter, areas, levels,materials, mechanics, how they are doing it, purposes, evidence,complete status report of what is there now.

(b) How did it come about?(1) process(2) each levels perception of who started it

(c) Problems encountered.

Page 36: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 10

Tom Putnam, PrincipalPhil Berg, PrincipalDon Keiper, PrincipalLee Wilson, PrincipalHal Joie, PrincipalLefty Woodruff, PrincipalDon Brand, PrincipalGlen Hawkins, Assistant Superintendent

Bethel Administrative CouncilEugene, Oregon

Friday, September 27, 1968

(1) What is individualized instruction?

(2) Places individualized instruction has proven more effective.

(3) Research.

(4) Group paced better than individualized instruction.

(5) Can you have groups with individualized instruction?

(6) Subject areas and effect of individualized instruction.

(7) Characteristics of children working, but in individualized instruction.

(8) Mechanics of individualized instruction program.

(9) Socially how does an individualized instruction program effect?

(10) Can individualized instruction gain a commitment from the unmotivated

child?

(11) What are the common elements of individualized instruction? (item

analysis)

(12) Individualized instruction and motivation - what evidence to support

it?

(13) Goals of a system using individualized instruction.

(14) Teacher who can and cannot use individualized instruction.

(15) Does individualized instruction foster:

(a) creativity or

(b) expanding knowledge

(16) Is competency at a level one of the goals?

-31-

Page 37: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

(17) Now to retrain staff at:(a) inservice(b) college campus

(18) Climate created process of getting from here to there.

(19) Gains and losses of an individualized instruction program.

(20) Paper programs or real?

(21) Motivation from what level - administrations;, school board orteachers?

Page 38: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Interview 11

Don Essig

Resource TeacherFrancis Willard ElementaryEugene, Oregon

Friday, September 27, 1968

(1) Individual plan for sequence for the student:(a) supplies(b) cost(c) student-teacher ratio

(2) How is it being done within the normal constraints of the budget?

(3) Process from here to there.

(4) Characteristic of child that benefits.

(5) Commercial materials available.

(6) Implementation.

(7) Summer workshops on individualized instruction. Emphasis on adaptationof others to your situation.

(8) How does individualized instruction fit:(a) discipline problems(b) emotionally disturbed

Page 39: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDICES A-3 and A-4

Appendix A-3 contains a copy of the questionnaire which was approved

by the U.S.O.E. for use in obtaining data on the information relating to

individualized instruction desired by the various target audiences.

Appendix A-4 contains a listing of the geographical areas, types of

school districts and the specific school districts in which the question-

naires were administered.

Page 40: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-3

WHAT WOULD YOU MOST LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT INDIVIDUALIZED INSTRUCTION?

(Your position) Check one:School Board MemberSchool AdministratorTeacher

Definition:

The term individualized instruction is used to connote any procedure(s)employed to enable each learner to be confronted with unique learning ex-periences. It may be contrasted with instruction that is aimed at providinga common learning experience for a group or class. Uniqueness may be definedin terms of goals, instructional methods, pacing, method or time of evalua-tion, or any combination of these or other elements. The term does not ruleout group activities, and does nbt connote isolation from teacher or class-mates.

Instructions:

The sequence of numbers (0, 1, 2) in front of each question is for thepurpose of rating the relative importance you feel an answer to the questionwould have for your purpose. If you believe an answer to the questionwould be very important to you and your school district, in setting up orimproving individualized instruction programs, circle the "2". If you feelit would be somewhat helpful, circle the "1". If you feel it would be ofno value, circle the "0".

Questions relating to: Effects on Students

Is there evidence which indicates that individualized instructionprovides advantages to some learners in some subjects?

What are the characteristics of students who benefit most fromindividualized instruction (and those for whom it is inappropriate)?

0 1 2 1.

0 1 2 2.

0 1 2 3.

0 1 2 4.

What does individualized instruction provide students that groupinstruction does not or'cannot?

What other objectives (besides achievement) are gained or lost byindividualizing, e.g., creativity, socialization, etc.?

Questions relating to: The Operation of Individualized Vrograms

What different techniques have been used to achieve individualizedinstruction, i.e., what are the mechanics of different programs?

What problems were encountered by districts, buildings or classroomsin implementing and maintaining an individualized program?

Where are there successful individualized programs that can be seenfirst-hand?

0 1 2 5.

0 1 2 6.

0 1 2 7.

-35-

sissisElea

Page 41: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

r"..........1.1111.1111.1111111.091111=11111W7

0 1 2 8.

0 1 2 9.

What are the limits of individualization, i.e., are there subjectsor grade levels that are inappropriate for individualization?

How is individual testing, record keeping, and reporting toparents accomplished?

Questions relating to: Teachers

10. What are the characteristics of teachers who work well in anindividualized program?

11. What new skills must a group oriented teacher learn before becomingeffective in an individualized program?

12. How and where can teachers learn the skills to operate anindividualized program?

Questions relating to: Costs

0 1 2 13. What is the student-teacher ratio in a typical individualizedprogram?

o 1 2 14. What is the cost per pupil in a typical individualized program?

0 1 2

0 1 2

0 1 2

0 1 2 15. What additional costs are involved in initiating an individuali2edprogram, e.g., staff training, extra materials, facilitiesmodifications, etc?

Questions relating to: Facilities and Equipment

0 1 2 16. Can individualized program be carried out successfully inconventional classrooms?

0 1 2 17. What are the ideal facilities to support individualized instruction?

0 1 2 18. What additional equipment is required to support individualizedinstruction?

Questions relating to: Materials

0 1 2 19. What additional materials, if any are needed to support a programof individualized instruction?

0 1 2 20. Where are such materials available, and how much do they cost?

0 1 2 21. What is required to adapt existing materials for an individualizedprogram?

Questions relating to: Implementation

0 1 2 22. Where are we trying to go, and is individualization the way toget there?

0 1 2 23. Why have other districts or buildings decided to adopt anindividualized program?

-36-

Page 42: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

0 1 2 24. What were the processes a district, building, or group wentthrough to adopt an individualized program?

0 1 2 25. How long does it take to transfer over to an individualizedprogram?

0 1 2 26. How was the community convinced that individualization was asupportable program?

0 1 2 27. What are the roles of teachers, administrators, and school boardmembers in implementing and maintaining an individualized program?

0 1 2 28. What activities and procedures should be available in implementingan individualized program?

0 1 2 29. Who can we get to help us with our own individualized program?

0 1 2 30. What;has been the long term public reaction to individualizedinstructional programs?

If you have questions that have not been asked which you feel are important,would you please list them here.

-37-

Page 43: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

. . . . one final question

What is your reaction to the following:(Please select and respond to your own category)

A. School Board Members have told us that the best way for them to get

answers to their questions would be to have "case studies"prepared telling the whole story in school districts which are

comparable to their own. Such case studies should be prepared in

both summary and detailed form. These people have also indicated

that they would have a need for materials like films and pamphlets

to describe individualized instruction to their constituents.

Do you agree with this, or do you have a different idea? Would

you please answer on the back of this sheet.

B. School Administrators have told us that the best way for them to get

answers to their questions would be to have relatively short

conferences (regional) with speakers, films in a group showing,

with opportunities for questions, discussion, etc. There is so

much to read that this kind of material just stacks up and doesn't

get read. Do you agree with this or do you have a different idea?

Would you please answer on the back of this sheet?

C. Teachers have told us that the best way for them to get answers to their

questicins is in an extended (maybe 6 week) summer session. The kind

of information teachers need one can't get in a short, quick

orientation. They need to become thoroughly familiar with new

materials, methods, etc. Then they need time to adapt them to their

own situation. Films could be used to familiarize teachers with

new concepts, but they need to actually use the materials, role

play, and work with the new procedures until they feel comfortable

and confident in their use. Do you agree with this or do you have a

different idea? Would you please answer on the back of this sheet.

Page 44: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-4

RELEVANT INFORMATION SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Administration Centers and Participating School Districts

HREEEinELIEFK. State

Central City - Syracuse Public Schools

Suburban - Liverpool Public Schools

Large Consolidated - Cortland Public Schools

Small Rural - Morovia Public Schools

Maryland

Dr. Don ElySyracuse UniversitySyracuse, New York

Dr. Desmond P. WedburgUniversity of MarylandCollege 'ark, Maryland

Central City - Baltimore Public Schools

Suburban - Montgomery County Public Schools) Rockvilles, Maryland

Large Consolidated - Prince George County Public SchoolsLaurel, Maryland

Small Rural - Salisbury Public Schools

Mid - Texas Mr. Kevin MoorseUniversity of TexasAustin, Texas

Central City - San Antonio Independent School District

Suburban - Northeast San Antonio Independent School, District

Large consolidated - Pharr -San Juan -Alamo Independent School DistrictPharr, Texas

S all Rural - Marble Falls Public Schools

-39-

Page 45: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Southern California Dr. James FinnUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles, California

Central City - Oxnard City Elementary and High School Districts

Suburban - Inglewood Unified School District

Large consolidated - La Puente Unified High School District

Northwestern James E. BuckTeaching ResearchMonmouth, Oregon

Large consolidated - Pullman, Washington

Small Rural - Florence, Oregon

All Interview participants - cross section of the four site distributions.

-40-

Page 46: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-5

Part A - Is a listing of the mean response to each item on the question-

naire by each target audience (school board members, administrators,

and teachers) and by school district type (central city, suburban,

large consolidated school - rural setting and, small rural school).

The significance of the score is explained in Chapter I.

Part B Is a listing of the five (5) items considered of most concern by

each target audience.

Part C - Is a ranking by each target audience of the relative importance

of the seven (7) questionnaire sections.

Part D - Is an analysis of the rankings by each target audience of the

relative importance of the seven (7) questionnaire sections by

type of school district.

Part E - Is an analysis of the rankings by type of school district of the

relative importance of the seven (7) questionnaire sections by

each target audience.

-41-

Page 47: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

1

APPENDIX A,5 PART A

INFORMATION SURVEYQuestionnaire AnalysisSchool Board Members

Mean Scores (perfect score = 2.00)

CentralCity. Suburban

LargeConsolidated

SmallRural Summary

N= 8 N = 9 N = 13 N = 7 N = 37

1. 1.3750 1.8889 1.5385 1.8571 1.6486

2. 2.0000 1.5556 1.3846 1.7143 1.6216

3. 1.7500 1.8889 1.7692 1.7143 1.7838

4. 1.2500 1.3333 1.6154 1.8571 '1.5135

5. 1.3750 1.8889 1.6154 1.7143 1.6486

6, 1.2500 1.6667 1.6154 1.7143 1.5676

7. 1.5000 1.5556 1.8462 2.0000 1.7297

8. 1.5000 1.2222 1.7692 1.4286 1.5135

9. 1.6250 1.5556 1.4615 1.4286 1.5135

10. 1.6250 4---L-4444-__ 1.6154 1.5714 1.5676

11. 1.3750 1.6667 1.8462 1.2857 1.5946

12. 1.,5000 1.6667 1.8462 1.4286 1.6486

13. 1.6250 1.6667 1.5385 1.4286 1.5676

14. 1.6250 1.3333 1.3846 1.7143 1.4865

15. 1.6250 1.8889 1.6154 1.7143 1.7027

16. 1.6250 1.5556 1.6154 1.5714 1.5946

17. 1.1250 1.3333 1.6154 1.7143 1.4595

18. 1.5000 1.7778 1.6923 1.8571 1.7027

19. 1.6250 1.6667 1.3846 1.1429 1.4595

20. 1.3750 1.3333 1.3846 1.2857 1.3514

21. 1.3750 1.6667 1.4615 1.4286 1.4865

22. 1.6250 1.7778 1.8462 1.7143 1.7568

23. .8750 1.3333 1.1538 1.1429 1.1351

24. 1.2500 1.5556 1.3846 1.1429 1.3514

25. 1.2500 1.4444 1.1538 1.4286 1.2973

26. 1.7500 1.1111 1.3846 1.2857 1.3784

27. 1.2500 1.7778 1.6154 1.7143 1.5946

28. 1.0000 1.6667 1.5385 1.5714 1.4595

29. 1.5000 1.5556 1.3846 1.8571 1.5405

30. 1.7500 1.4444 1.2308 1.7143, 1.4865

-42-

Page 48: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

INFORMATION SURVEYQuestionnair, Analysis

Administrators

Mean Scores (perfect score as 2..00)

Central Large SmallCitx. Suburban Consolidated Rural Summar

N - 33 N gim 29 N is 28 N mi 18 N mg 1U8

1. 1.8485 1.6552 1.7857 1.6111 1.74072. 1.8182 1.8276 1.8214 1.7778 1.81483. 1.5152 1.5517 1.8214 1.6111 1.62044. 1.6667 1.5172 1.7500 1.5000 1.6204

5. 1.7576 1.9310 1.7857 1.7778 1.81486. 1.6364 1.8276 1.6429 1.5556 1.67597. 1.6364 1.6207 1.6786 1.7222 1.65748. 1.6364 1.5517 1.6429 1.6667 1.62049. 1.4848 1.4828 1.7143 1.5000 1.5463

10. 1.5758 1.7931 1.7857 1.6667 1.7037'11. 1.6667 1.9655 1.8214 1.7222 1.796312. 1.6364 1.8966 1.6429 1.6111 1.7037

13. 1.3333 1.3793 1.5000 1.5000 1.416714. 1.4242 1.3448 1.2500 1.5000 1.370415. 1.5758 1.5862 1.4643 1.6111 1.5556

16. 1.4545 1.6552 1.4643 1.5000 1.518517. 1.5152 1.7241 1.4643 1.3889 1.537018. 1.6061 1.6897 1.5000 1.6667 1.6111

19. 1.6667 1.7586 1.6786 1.7778 1.713020. 1.5758 1.4828 1.3929 1.6667 1.518521. 1.4848 1,7241 1.4643 1.7778 1.5926

22. 1.8485 1.7586 1.5000 1.6111 1.694423. 1.0909 1.1724 1.3214 1.2222 1.194424. 1.4848 1.418 1.6071 1.5000 1.518525. 1.2121 1.2069 1.1786 1.3889 1.231526. 1.4848 1.4138 1.3214 1.3889 1.407427. 1.6970 1.5172 1.6786 1.7222 1.648128. 1.5455 1.5517 1.7143 1.7222 1.620429. 1.5455 1.6552 1.6429 1.5556 1.601930. 1.4242 1.2414 1.2500 1.6111 1.3611

-43-

Page 49: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

INFORMATION SURVEYQuestionnaire Analysis

Teachers

Mean Scores (perfect score 2.00)

Central Large SmallCity Suburban Consolidated Rural Summary

N = 53 N -68 N in 66 N m 107 N in 294

1. 1.7736 1.64712. 1.6604 1.67653. 1.6415 1.69124. 1.6792 1.6765

5. 1.7358 1.82356. 1.6415 1.79417. 1.6415 1.66188. 1.3208 1.42659. 1.6415 1.4412

10. 1.5660 1.617611. 1.6415 1.794112. 1.6226 1.7500

13. 1.4151 1.558814. 1.3774 1.338215. 1.5283 1.4853

16. 1.4906 1.514717. 1.6226 1.617618. 1.7170 1.7059

19. 1.6981 1.735320. 1.5472 1.573521. 1.6226 1.7353

22. 1.6415 1.823523. 1.1698 1.294124. 1.4151 1.455925. 1.1887 1.397126. 1.3585 1.441227. 1.6226 1.750028. 1.6604 1.691229. 1.6415 1.750030. 1.3585 1.3382

1.7424 1.6262 1.68371.6667 1.6075 1.64631.7424 1.5794 1.65311.5758 1.5981 1.6259

1.6364 1.7570 1.74151.6516 1.5888 1.65991.6061 1.6355 1.63611.4545 1.4953 1.43881.5606 1.5327 1.5374

1.5303 1.4579 1.53061.7121 1.7290 1.72451.7121 1.5981 1.6633

1.5758 1.5047 1.51701.3485 1.4299 1e38101.4091 1.4579 1.4660

1.6061 1.6262 1.57141.5303 1.5607 1.57821.6970 1.6542 1.6871

1.7121 1.7477 1.72791.5303 1.4673 1.52041.6515 1.6262 1.6565

1.7424 1.6168 1.69731.1970 1.2430 1.23131.3485 1.4299 1.41501.2879 1.3645 1.32311.5303 1.5421 1.48301.6970 1.5981 1.6599

1.7273 1.6355 1.6735

1.6212 1.5047 1.61221.2727 1.3738 1.3401

-44-

Page 50: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

INFORMATION SURVEYQuestionnaire AnalyiisSite Distribution Summary

Mean Scores (perfect score = 2.00)

CentralCity Suburban

LargeConsolidated

SmallRural

N = 94 N = 106 N = 107 N = 132

1. 1.7660 1.6698 1.7290 1.63642. 1.7447 1.7075 1.6729 1.63643. 1.6064 1.6698 1.7664 1.59094. 1.6383 1.6038 1.6262 1.5985

5. 1.7128 1.8585 1.6729 1.75766. 1.6064 1.7925 1.6449 1.59097. 1.6277 1.6415 1.6542 1.66678. 1.4468 1.4434 1.5421 1.5152

9. 1.5851 1.4623 1.5888 1.5227

10. 1.5745 1.6509 1.6075 1.4924

11. 1.6277 1.8302 1.7570 1.7045

12. 1.6170 1.7830 1.7103 1.5909

13. 1.4043 1.5189 1.5514 1.5000

14. 1.4149 1.3396 1.3271 1.4545

15. 1.5532 1.5472 1.4486 1.4924

16. 1.4894 1.5566 1:5701 1.6061

17. 1.5426 1.6226 1.5234 1.5455

1L. 1.6596 1.7075 1.6449 1.6667

19. 1.6809 1.7358 1.6636 1.7197

20. 1.5426 1.5283 1.4766 1.4848

21. 1.5532 1.7264 1.5794 1.6364

22. 1.7128 1.8019 1.6916 1.6212

23. 1.1170 1.2642 1.2243 1.2348

24. 14255 1.4717 1.4206 1.4242

25. 1.2021 1.3491 1.2430 1.3712

26. 1.4362 1.4057 1.4579 1.5076

27. 1,6170 1.6887 1.6822 1.6212

28. 1.5638 1.6509 1.7009 1.6439

29. 1.5957 1.7075 1.5981 1.5303

30. 1.4149 1.3208 1.2617 1.4242

Page 51: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-5 PART B

QUESTIONNAIRE ANALYSIS

Five Most Important Questions by Target Audience

RankMean QuestionnaireScore Number & Question

School Board Members

1. 1.78 3.

2. 1.75 22.

3. 1.70 15.

3. 1.70 18.

5. 1.64 1.

5. 1.64 5.

5. 1.64 12.

Administrators

1. 1.74 2.

1. 1.81 5.

3. 1.79 11.

4. 1.74 1.

5. 1.71 19

What does individualized instruction providestudents that group instruction does notor cannot?

Where are we trying to go, and is individual-,ization the way to get there?

What additional costs are involved in initiat-ing an individualized program, e.g., stafftraining, extra materials, facilitiesmodifications, etc?

What additional eqmipment is required tosupport individualized instruction?

Is there evidence which indicates that in-dividualized instruction provides advantagesto some learners in some subjects?

What different techniques have been used toachieve individualized instruction, i.e., whatare the meramnics of different programs?

How and where can teachers learn the skillsto operate an individulized program?

What are the characteristics of students whobenefit most from individualized instruction(and those for whom it is inappropriate)?

What different techniques nave beenachieve individualized instruction,what are the mechanics of different

used toi.e.,programs?

What new skills must a group oriented teacherlearn before becoming effective in an indi-vidualized program?

Is there evidence which indicates that in-dividualized instruction provides advantagesto some learners in some subjects?

What additional materials, if any are needed

to support a program of individualized

instruction?

-46-

Page 52: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Questionnaire Analysis Cont.

Mean QuestionnaireRank Score Number & Question

Teachers

1. 1.74 5.

2. 1.72 11.

2. 1.72 19.

4. 1.69 22.

5. 1.68 1.

5. 1.68 18.

Central City_

1.76 1.

2. 1.74 2.

3. 1.71 5.

3. 1.71 22.

5. 1.68 19.

What different techniques have been used toachieve individualized instruction, i.e.,what are the mechanics of different programs?

What new skills must a group oriented teacher.learn before beconing effective in an in-dividualized program?

What additional materials, if any are neededto support a program Of individualizedinstruction?

Where are we trying to go, and is indivi-dualization the way to get there?

Is there evidence whir' indicates that in-dividualized instruction provides advantagesto some learners is some subjects?

What additional equipment is required tosupport individualized instruction?

Is there evidence which indicates that in-dividualized instruction provides advantagesto some learners is some subjects?

What are the characteristics of students whobenefit most from individualized instruction(and those for whom it is inappropriate)?

What different techniques have been used toachieve individualized instruction, i.e.,what are the mechanics of different programs?

Where are we trying to go, and is indivi-dualization the way to get there?

What additional materials, if any are neededto support a program of individualizedinstruction?

Page 53: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Questionnaire Analysis Cont.

Mean QuestionnaireRank Score Number & Question

Suburban

1. 1.83 11. What new skills must a group oriented teacherlearn before becoming effective in an in-dividualized program?

2. 1.80 22. Where are we trying to go, and is indivi-dualization the way to get there?

3. 1.79 6. What problems were encountered by districts,buildings or classrooms in implementing andmaintaining an individualized program?

4. 1.78 12. How and where can teachers learn the skillsto operate an individualized program?

5. 1.73 19. What additional materials, if any are neededto support a program of individualizedinstruction?

Lar&eConsolidated

1. 1.76 3. What does individualized instruction providestudents that group instruction does notor cannot?

2. 1.75 11. What new skills must a group oriented teacherlearn before becoming effective in an indi-vidualized program?

3. 1.72 1. Is there evidence whidh indicates that in-dividualized instruction provides advantagesto some learners in some subjects?

4. 1.71 12 How and where can teachers learn the skillsto operate an individualized program?

5. 1.69 22. Where are we trying to go, and is indivi-dualization the way to get there?

Page 54: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Questionnaire Analysis Cont.

RankMean QuestionnaireScore Number & Question

Small Rural

1. 1.75 5.

2. ll 19.

3. 1.70 11.

4. 1.66 7.

4. 1.66 18.

What different techniques have been used toachieve individualized instruction, i.e.,what are the mechanics of different programs?

What additional materials, if any are neededto support a program of individualizedinstruction?

What new skills must a group oriented teacherlearn before becoming effective in an in-dividualized program?

Where are there successful individualizedprograms that can be seen first-hand?

What additional equipment is required tosupport individualized instruction?

Five Questions Summary

These five questions occured in five (5) of the seven (7) areas as listedin Part B. This leads us to assume these five (5) questions are considered bythe target audience to be most significant.

1. Is there evidence which indicates that individualized instruction providesadvantages to some learners in some subjects?

5. What different techniques have been used to achieve individualized instructioni.e., what are the mechanics of different programs?

11. What new skills must a group oriented teacher learn before becoming effectivein an individualized program?

19. What additional materials, if any are needed to support a program ofindividualized instruction?

22. Where are we trying to go, and is individualization the way to get there?

Page 55: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-5 PART C

Part C - Ratings for Questionnaire Areas by Target Audience - Group Summary

School Board Members

Ranking

1. Effect on Students2. Teachers3. Cost3. Facilities and Equipment5. Operation of Individualized Program6. Implementation7. Materials

Administrators

1. Teachers2. Effect on Students3. Operation of Individualized Program4. Materials5. Facilities and Equipment6. Implementation7. Costs

Teachers

1. Effect on Students2. Teachers3. Materials4. Facilities and Equipment5. Operation of Individualized Program6. Implementation7. Costs

-50-

Page 56: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Central City Suburban

1. Effect on Students Y. Teachers2. Teachers 2. Effect on Students3. Operation of Individualized Program 2. Materials3. Materials 4. Operation of Individualized Program5. Facilities and Equipment 5. Facilities and Equipment6. Implementation 6. Implementation7. Cost 7. Cost

Large Consolidated Small Rural

1. Effect on Students 1. Materials1. Teachers 2. Effect on Students3. Operation of Individualized Program 2. Operation of Individualized Program4. Facilities and Equipment 4. Facilities and Equipment5. Materials 5. Teachers6. Implementation 6. Cost7. Cost 7. Implementation

Page 57: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-5 PART D

Ratings for Questionnaire Areas

School Board Members

CentralCity

Suburban LargeConsolidated

SmallRural

Effect on Students 2 1 4 1

Operation ofIndividualizedProgram 4 4 2 3

Teacher 3 3 1 6

Cost 1 2 5 4

Facilities andEquipment 6 7 3 2

Materials 4 5 7

Implementation 7 6 6 5

Administrators

CentralCity

Suburban LargeConsolidated

SmallRural

Effect on Students 1 5 1 4

Operation ofIndividualizedProgram 2 2 3 3

Teacher 2 1 2 2

Cost 7 7 7 5

Facilities andEquipment 5 2 5 7

Materials 4 4 4 1

Implementation 6 6 6 6

-52-

Page 58: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

CentralCity

Teachers

Suburban

Effect on Students 1 3

Operation ofIndividualizedProgram 5 4

Teacher 3 1

Cost 7 7

Facilities andEquipment 3 5

Materials 2

Implementation 6 6

LargeConsolidated

SmallRural

1 3

5 3

2 3

7 7

4 1

3 1

6 6

Page 59: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX A-5 PART E

Ratings for Questionnaire

SchoolBoard

Central City

TeachersAdministrators

Effect on Students 2 5 1

Operation ofIndividualizedProgram 4 2 5

Teacher 3 1 3

Costs 1 7

Facilities andEquipment 6 2 3

Materials 4 4 2

Implementation 7 6 6

SchoolBoard

Suburban

TeachersAdministrators

Effect on Students 1 3

Operation ofIndividualizedProgram 4 2

leacher 3 1

Costs 2 7 7

Facilities andEquipment 2 5

Materials 5 4 2

Implementation 6 6 6

Page 60: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Effect on Students

Operation ofIndividualized

SchoolBoard

4

Large Consolidated

TeachersAdministrators

1

Program 2 5

Teacher 1 2 2

Costs 5 7 7

Facilities andEquipment 3 5 4

Materials 7 4 3

Implementation 6 6 6

Small Rural

SchoolBoard

Administrators Teachers

Effect on Students 1 4 3

Operation ofIndividualizedProgram 3 3

Teacher 6 2 3

Costs 4 5 7

Facilities andEquipment 2 7

Materials 7 1 1

Implementation 5 6

Page 61: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-1

Part A - Is a copy of the letter requesting the name of the person in

each agency contacted most knowledgeable, of programs on

individualized instruction.

Part B - Is a list of all persons to whom the letter was sent.

Not The list of addresses was obtained from, and the letter 14: elf was

sent by Dr. Allen Lee from the Teaching Research Staff. Dr. Lee

has had many years of experience and is well known to the Chief

State School Officers. His contribution is gratefully acknowledged.

Page 62: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-1 PART A

Hon. Ernest StoneSuperinteadent of EducationState Department of EducationMontgomery, Alabama 36104

Dear Superintendent Stone:

The: U. S. Office of Education is undertaking a major effortto disseminate what is currently going on in individualized instruc-

tion. The Teaching Research Division of the Oregon State Systemof Higher Education has been selected to conduct this survey. We

feel that it is of such importance that our Director, Dr. Jack V.Edling5 will be making a data collection visit to thirty selectedschools late this fall.

We are asking the assistance of you or one of your staffmembers in the identification of schools in your locale with indi-vidualized instruction programs in grades K-12. Mr. Jim Buck ofour staff will be in communication with you or your staff selection

in the near future.

Would you please fill out the enclosed card and return it tothe Teaching Research Division? Thank you.

Sincerely,

Allen LeeResearch Professor

AL:bl

lj Enclosure

Page 63: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX PART B

Chief State School Officers

Hon. Ernest. Stone

Superintendent of EducationState Department of EducationMontgomery, Alabama 36104

Hon. Clifford R. HartmanCommissioner of EducationState Department of EducationJuneau, Alaska 99801

Hon. Sarah FolsomSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of Public InstructionPhoenix, Arizona 85007

Hon. A. W. Ford

Commissioner of EducationState Department of EducationLittle Rock, Arkansas 72201 .

Hon. Max RaffertySuperintendent of Public InstructionAnd Director of EducationState Department of EducationSacramento, California 95814

Hon. F. A. CastlesSuperintendent of SchoolsDivision of SchoolsBalboa Heights, Canal Zone

Ron. Byron W. HAnsford

Commissioner of 'EducationState Department of EducationDenver, Colorado 80203

Hon. William J. SandersCommissioner of EducationState Department of EducationP. O. Box 2219Hartford, Connecticut 06115

Hon. Floyd T. ChristianSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of EducationTallahassee, Florida 32304

Hon. Jack P. NixSuperintendent of SchoolsState Department of EducationAtlanta, Georgia 30334

Hon. L. P. nartinDirector of LducatiznDepartment of EducationGovernment of GuamAgana, Guam 96910

Hon. Ralph H. KiyosakiSuperintendent of EducationState Department of EducationHonolulu, Hawaii 96804

Hon. D. F. Engelking

Superintendent of Public Instruction andExecutive Secretary, State Board ofEducationState Department of EducationBoise, Idaho 83702

Hon. Ray PageSuperintendent of Public InstructionOffice of the Supt., of .Public Instruction302 State Office BuildingSpringfield, Illinois 62706

Hon. Richard D. WellsSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of Public InstructionIndianapolis, Indiana 46204

Hon. Paul F. JohnstonSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of PublicvInstructionDes Moines, Iowa 50319:

Hon. Murle M. Hayden

Superintendent of Public InstructionState Department of Public InstructionTopeka, Kansas 66612

Hon. Wendell ButlerSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of EducationFrankfort,. Kentucky, 40601

-58-

Hon. William J. DoddSuperintendent of Public EducationState Department of EducationBaton Rouge, Louisiana 70804

Page 64: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Hon. William T. Logan, Jr.Commissioner of EducationState Department of EducationAugusta, Maine 04330

Hon. James A. SensebaughSuperintendent of SchoolsState Department of EducationBaltimore, Maryland 21201

Hon. Owen B. KiernanCommissioner Of EducationBoston, Massachusetts 02111

Hon. Ira PolleySuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of EducationLansing, Michigan 48902

Hon. Duane J. MattheisCommissioner of EducationState Department of EducationSt. Paul, Minnesota 55101

Hon. Garvin JohnstonSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of EducationJackson, Mississippi 39205

Hon. Hubert WheelerCommissioner of EducationState Department. of EducationJefferson City, Missouri 65101

Hon. Harriet MillerSuperintendent of Public InstructionExecutive Officer, Vocational EducationState Department of Public InstructionHelena, Montana 59601

Hon. Floyd A. MillerCommissioner of EducationState Department of EducationLincoln, Nebraska 68509

Hon. Burnell LarsonSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Exec. Officer for Voc. Educationand Vocational RehabilitationState Department of EducationCarson City, Nevada 89701

-59-

Hon. Paul E. FarnumCommissioner of EducationState Department of EducationConcord, New Hampshire 03301

Hon. Carl L. MarburgerCommissioner of EducationState Department of EducationTrenton, New Jersey 09625

Hon. Leonard J. De LayoSuperintendent of Public InstructionExec. Oificer, State Board of Voc.EducationState Department of EducationSanta Fe, New Mexico 87501

Hon. James E. Allen, Jr.Commissioner of EducationState Department of EducationAlbany, New York 12224

Hon. Charles F. CarrollSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Board of Education.

Department of Public InstructionRaleigh, North Carolina 27602

Hon. M. F. PetersonSuperintendent of Public InstructionBismarck, North Dakota 58501

Hon. Martin W. EssexSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of EducationState Office BuildingColumbus, Ohio 43215

Hon. E. H. McDonald

Deputy Superintendent of Public InstructionState Department of Education.Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105

Hon. Dale ParnellSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department EducationSalem, Oregon 97310

Hon. David H. KurtzmanSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of Public InstructionHare,sburg, Pennsylvania 17126

Page 65: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

upwwwwwww,

Hon. William P. Robinson, Jr.Commissioner of EducationState Department of EducationProvidence, Rhode Island 02908

Hon. Cyril B. BusbeeSuperintendent of EducationState Department of EducationColumbia, South Carolina 29201

Hon. Gordon A. DiedtrichActing Superintendent of Public InstructionState Department of Public InstructionPierre, South Dakota 57501

Hon. J. H. WarfCommissioner of EducationState Department of EducationNashville, Tennessee 37219

Hon. J. W. EdgarCommissioner of EducationTexas Education AgencyAustin, Texas 78711

Hon. T, H. Bell

Superintendent of Public InstructionOffice of the Supt. of Public InstructionSalt Lake City, Utah 84111

Hon. Daniel G. O'ConnorCommissioner of EducationState Department of EducationMontpelier, Vermont 05602

Hon. Woodrow W. WilkersonSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Board of EducationRichmond, Virginia 23216

Hon. Louis BrunoSuperintendent of Public InstructionOffice of State Superintendent ofPublic Instruction and StateBoard of Education

Olympia, Washington 98501

Hon. Rex M. SmithSuperintendent of SchoolsState Department of EducationCharleston, West Virginia 25305

-60-

Hon. William C. Kahl,Superintendent of Public InstructionState Department of Public Instruction148 N. State CapitolMadison, Wisconsin 53702

Hon. Harry RobertsSuperintendent of Public InstructionState Department of EducationCheyenne, Wyoming 82001

Page 66: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Education Laboratories

Dr. Benjamin Carmichael, DirectorAppalachia Educational LaboratoryP. O. Box 1348Charleston, West Virginia 25325

Dr. C. Taylor Whittier, Exec. Direp.torCentral Atlantic Regional EducationalLaboratory1200 - 17th Street, N. W.Washington, D. C. 20036

Dr. Wade M. Robinson, DirectorCentral Midwestern RegionalEducational Laboratory

10646 St. Charles Rock Road

St. Ann, Missouri 63074

Dr. David M. Jackson, DirectorCooperative Educational ResearchLaboratory, Inc.540 West Frontage RoadNorthfield, Illinois 60093

Dr. Robert A. Dentl,w, DirectorCenter for Urban Education105 Madison AvenueNew York, New York 10016

Dr. Arthur Singer, PresidentEducational Development Center, Thee55 Chapel StreetNewton, Massachusetts 02160

Dr. Sidney Archer, DirectorEastern Regional Institute for Education635 James StreetSyracuse, New York 13203

Dr. John K. Hemphill, DirectorFar West Laboratory for EducationalResearch and Development

1 Garden Circle, Hotel ClaremontBerkeley, California 94705

Dr. Robert S. Gilchrist, DirectorMid-Continent Regional EducationalLaboratory104 East Independence AvenueKansas City, Missouri 64106

-61-

Dr. Stuart C. Rankin, Exec. DirectorMichigan-Ohio Regional Educational

Laboratory3750 Woodward AvenueDetroit, Michigan 48201

Dr. Lawrence D. Fish, Exec. DirectorNorthwest Regional Educational Laboratory400 Lindsay Building710 S. W. Second AvenuePortland, Oregon 97204

Dr. James W. Becker, Exec. DirectorResearch For Better Schools, Inc.121 South Broad StreetPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania 19107

Dr. Everett H. Hopkins, PresidentRegional Educational Laboratory forthe Carolinas and Virginia

411 West Chapel Hill StreetDurham, North Carolina 27701

Dr. James Thrasher, DirectorRocky Mountain Educational Laboratory1620 Reservoir RoadGreeley, Colorado 80631

Dr. J. D. Williams, Exec. DirectorSouth Central Regional EducationalLaboratory, Corp.408 National Old Line BuildingLittle Rock, Arkansas 72201

Dr. Robert Hopper, DirectorSoutheastern Educational Laboratory3450 International Boulevard, Suite 211Hapeville, Georgia 30054

Dr. James L.

SouthwesternLab., Inc.117 RichmondAlbuquerque,

Olivero, DirectorCooperation Educational

Drive, N. E.New Mexico 87106

Dr. Edwin Hindsman, Executive DirectorSouthwest Educational DevelopmentCorporationCommodore Perry Hotel, Suite 550Austin, Texas 78701

Page 67: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Dr. Richard Schutz, DirectorSouthwest Regional Laboratory for

Educational Research and Development11300 La Cienega BoulevardInglewood, California 90304

Dr. David N. EvansExecutive DirectorUpper Midwest Regional Educational

Laboratory1640 East 78th StreetMinneapolis, Minnesota 55423

Page 68: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Colleges and Universities

Dr. Truman M. Pierce, DeanCollege of EducationAuburn UniversityAuburn, Alabama 36830

Dr, F. Robert Paulsen, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of ArizonaTucson, Arizona 85721

Dr. Joe T. ClarkDean of Instruction

Henderson State Teachers CollegeArkadelphia, Arkansas

Dr. Theodore L. Reller, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of CaliforniaBeykeley CampusBerkeley, California 94720

Dr. John Good/adSchool of EducationUniversity of California at L. A.Los Angeles, California 90007

Dr. Stephen A. Romie, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of ColoradoBoulder, Colorado 80302

Dr. Donald G. Decker, DeanColorado State CollegeGreeley, Colorado

Dr. Kimball Wiles, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of FloridaGainesville, Florida 32601

Dr. Joseph Williams, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of GeorgiaAthens, Georgia 30602

Dr. David L. Clark, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of IndianaBloomington, Indiana 47405

-63-

Dr. Howard R. Jones, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of IowaIowa City, Iowa 52240

Dr. James McComas, DeanSchool of EducationKansas State UniversityManhattan, Kansas 66502

Dr. Lyman V. Ginger, DeanSchool of Education

University of KentuckyLexington, Kentucky 40506

Dr. Vernon E. Anderson, DeanCollege of EducationUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland 20742

Dr. Theodore R. Sizer, DeanSchool of EducationHarvard UniversityCambridge, Massachusetts 02133

Dr. Glaydon D. Robbins, DeanSchool of EducationMoorhead State CollegeMoorhead, Minnesota 56560

Dr. Earl N. Ringo, DeanSchool of EducationMontana State UniversityBozeman, Montana 59715

Dr. Paul GeerDean of InstructionKearney State CollegeKearney, Nebraska 68847

Pr. Wesley Meierhenry, Asst. DeanTeachers CollegeUniversity of NebraskaLincoln, Nebraska 68508

Dr. Leroy Pinnell, DeanEducation and PsychologyEastern New Mexico UniversityPortales, New Mexico 88130

Page 69: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Dr. David R. Krathvr)hl, Dean

College of EducationUniversity of SyracuseSyracuse, New York 13201

Dr. Paul H. Masoner, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213

Dr. Robert B. Howsam, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of HoustonHouston, Texas 77004

Dr. Glen OvardDirector of ResearchBrigham Young UniversityProvo, Utah 84601

Dr. Stephen P. Hencley, DenSchool of EducationUniversity of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah

D. Ralph Cherry, DeaoSchool of EducationUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesville, Virginia 22903

Dr. Fred Giles, DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of WashitmtonSeattle, Washington 98105

Dr. Donald J. McCarty, Dean

School of EducationUniversity of WisconsinMadison CampusMadison, Wisconsin 53706

Page 70: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Foundations and Educational Organizations

John A. Griffin, Exec. DirectorSouthern Education Foundation, Inc.811 Cypress Street N. E.

Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Foundation for Character Educationc/o Herbert M. Agoos,209 South StreetBoston, Massachusetts 02111

Emory W. Morris, PresidentKellogg Foundation400 North AvenueBattli: Creek, Michigan 49016

Lloyd N. Morrisett, Vice PresidentCarnegie Corporation of New York589 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10017

Morris Green, PresidentFelt Foundation, Inc.362 Fifth AvenueNer.i York, New York 10001

Ford Foundationc/o Marvin J. Feldmen477 Madison AvenueNew York, New YOrk 10022

Arthur S. Holden, Jr., President

Jennings Foundation1100 National City Bank BuildingCleveland, Ohio 44114

Dr. John BahnerI.D.E.A.55.35 Far Hills Avenue

Dayton, Ohio 45429 .

Mr. Beverly V. Thompson, Jr.The Texas.Educational Association2012 Continental National Bank BuildingFort Worth, Texas 76102

Page 71: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Office of Education and N.E.A.

Dr. Nolan Estes, Associate Commissioner

Bureau of Elementary ard Secondary Education

Office of EducationDepartment of Health, Education and Welfare

400 Maryland AvenueWashington, D. C.

Dr. Norman J. BoyanActing Associate CommissionerBureau of ResearchOffice of EducationDepartment of Health, Education and Welfare

400 Maryland AvenueWashington, D. C.

Mr. David S. BushnellDivision of Comprehensive and Vocational

Education ResearchBureau of ResearchOffice of EducationDepartment of Health, Education and Welfare

400 Maryland AvenueWashington, D. C.

Mr. Glenn C. BoerrigterOrganization and Studies Branch

Bureau of ResearchOffice of EducationDepartment of Health, Education and Welfare

400 Maryland AvenueWashington, D. C.

Virginia H. Stephenson, Chief

Education Research ServiceResearch DivisionNational Educational Association

1201 Sixteenth Street N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20036

Dr. Ole Sand, DirectorCenter for the Study of Instruction

National Education Association

1201 Sixteenth Street N. W.

Washington, D. C. 20036

Page 72: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Part A - Is a copy

responsi

addres

Part B - Is a

APPENDIX B-2

of the letter requesting names, addresses and person

ble for each on-going I.I. program with which the

see was familiar.

list of all persons to whom the letter was sent.

-67-

Page 73: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-2 PART A

Dr. Wayne TeagueCoordinator Field ServicesAuburn UniversityAuburn, Alabama

Dear Dr. Teague:

Hon. Garvin Johnston has recommended you to the TeachingResearch Division, Oregon State System of Higher Education, to assistin a survey we are conducting in the area of individualized instruction.We appreciate your willingness to contribute your knowledge of theindividualized instruction programs in Grades K-12 in your locale.

We define individualized instruction as a program of instructionwhere each student can proceed at his own individually determined pacethrough a program planned to meet previously determined goals. Theseprograms can range from the very complex modular-flexible programmingset up by computers to the much easier to organize individualized read-ing programs found in some elementary schools.

This survey was contracted to Teaching Research by the U.S. Officeof Education to find out just what is going on in individualizedinstruction. We are interested in locating as wide a variety of indi-vidualized instruction as possible.

You can be most helpful to this survey by sending us the schoolname and location of the individualized instruction programs, as wellas the teacher or administrator responsible for the program. We willcontact these people for further information about their program,

If you could denote the time you spent identifying the programsit would be very much appreciated. Without your cooperation thisproject would be impossible. We hope at some future date we will beable to return your favor.

JEB:kpEnclosure

Sincerely,

James E. BuckProject Coordinator

-68-

Page 74: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-2 PART B

RESOURCE PEOPLE FOR IDENTIFICATION OFINDIVIDUALIZED INSTRUCTION PROGRAMS

Dr. Wayne TeagueCoordinator of Field ServicesAuburn UniversityAuburn, Alabama

Dr. William R. MarshDirector, Instructional ServicesState Dept. of EducationJuneau, Alaska

Dr. Curtis GarnerChairman, Director of Education.Henderson State Teachers CollegeArkadelphia, Arkansas

Dr. Flwd DelonAssociate Executive DirectorSouth Central Regional

Educational Laboratory Corp.Little Rock, Arkansas

Dr. Warren KallenbackProjector DirectorFar West Laboratory forEd. Research and DevelopmentBerkeley, California

Dr. Robert BakerSouthweOt Regional Lab. forEd. Research and DevelopmentInglewood, California

Dr. Robert E. KeuscherCoordinator, League ofCooperating SchoolsI/D/E/A/, Inc.1100 Glendon Ave. Suite 950Los Angeles, California 90024

Dr. Thomas J. QuirkAmerican Inst. for ResearchPalo Alto, California

Keith Martin, ConsultantState Dept. of EducationSacramento, California

-69-

Dr. Myrle HemenwayAsst. Professor of EducationUniversity of ColoradoBoulder, Colorado

Dr. Russell B. Vlaanderen, DirectorResearch and DevelopmentState Dept. of EducationDenver, Colorado

Dr. Bruce BroderiusAssociate DeanSchool of EducationColorado State CollegeGreeley, Colorado

Dr. Dean TalaganAssist. for CommunicationsRocky Mountain Ed. Lab.Greeley, Colorado

Frederick D. Boyer, DirectorESEA Title I and IIIState Dept. of Public InstructionDover, Delaware

William M. Alexander, DirectorInstitute for Curr. ImprovementUniversity of FloridaGainesville, Florida

Tom CultonCurriculum ConsultantState Dept. of EducationTallahassee, Florida

Dr. Claude Ivie, DirectorDivision of CurriculumState Department of Education

Atlanta, Georgia

Dr. John CrittendenField RepresentativeSoutheastern Ed. LaboratoryHapeville, Georgia

Page 75: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

George Kageluio, DirectorSecondary EducationState Dept. of EducationHonolulu, Hawaii

Reid BishopDeputy State Supt.State Dept. of EducationBoise, Idaho

Dr. LeRoy JensenAsst. Supt. - InstructionState Dept. of Public InstructionSpringfield, Illinois

Patrick T. WalshProgram AssociateCoop. Ed. Research LaboratoryNorthfield, Illinois

Dr. Donald Manlove, DirectorDivision of Inst. and CurriculumSchool of EducationUniversity. of IndianaBloomington, Indiana

Harold.NeglexDirector of CurriculumState Dept. of Public InstructionIndianapolis, Indiana

Dr. A. J. Moore, HeadCurriculum and Inst. AreaCollege of EducationKansas State Universi.Manhattan, Kansas

Cleo C. RiceDirector of CurriculumState Dept. of Public Instruction

Topeka, Kansas

Wilber SmithInstructional ServicesState Department of Education

Frankfort, Kentucky

Robert A. Watson, DirectorCurriculum InnovationState Dept. of EducationBoston, Massachusetts

-70-

Mrs. Mildred SowersAsst. Director forCurriculum DevelopmentState Dept. of EducationBaltimore, Maryland

L. Morris McClureAssoc. DeanUniversity of MarylandCollege Park, Maryland

Dr. Delino Della-DoraDivisional Director,Placement and DevelopmentMich. - Ohio Reg. Ed. LaboratoryDetroit, Michigan

Dr. Leon WaskinDeputy Assoc. Supt.State Dept. of Public Instruction

Lansing, Michigan

Robert WiningerProgram Coor.dinatorUpper Midwest Reg. Ed. Lab.

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Miss Ruth hansonStudent Teaching Supervisor

Moorhead State CollegeMoorhead, Minnesota

Mr. Donald ClausonDirector of CurriculumState Department of Education

St. Paul, Minnesota

Raymond RobertsDirector of CurriculumState Dept. of EducationJefferson City, Missouri

Joseph BarrettProject CoordinatorCentral Midwestern Reg. Ed. Lab.

St. Ann, Missouri

Kermit ColeElementary SupervisorState Department of Public Instruction

Helena, Montana 59601

Page 76: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Dr. Leonard Skov, ChairmanDivision of Education and PsychologyKearney State CollegeKearney, Nebraska

W. C. MeierhenryProfessor of EducationUniversity of NebraskaLincoln, Nebraska

Royal HenlineState Dept. of EducationLincoln, Nebraska

Robert BestAssoc. Supt. InstructionState Dept. of EducationCarson City, Nevada

Roy H. WagnerAssist. in Sec. EducationState Dept. of EducationTrenton, New Jersey

Dr. A. A. ValenciaResearch AssociateAlbuquerque, New Mexico

Ralph Drake, DirectorElementary Education.State Dept. of EducationSanta Fe, New Mexico

Stanley R. LisserProgram CoordinatorCenter for Urban EducationNew York, New York

Mrs. Barbara FinbergExecutive AssociateCarnegie Corporation of New YorkNew York, New York

Kenneth N. Fiahell, Assoc. Dir.Center for Instruction CommunicationUniversity of SyracuseSyracuse, New York

Dr. Robert F. BickelDirector IPOI ProgramEastern Regional Institute for EducationSyracuse, New York

-71-

Bernard HaakeAsst. Comm.State Dept. of EducationAlbany, New York

Roger A. Schurrer, Asst. Dir.Division of General EducationState Dept. of EducationRaleigh, North Carolina

Dr. Ann GroomsDivision of Innovative ProgramsI/D/E/A/Dayton, Ohio

Miss Virginia M. Lloyd, ChiefElementary Education SectionState Dept. of EducationColumbus, Ohio

J. D. Giddens, DirectorDivision of InstructionState Dept. of EductionOklahoma City, Oklahoma

Dr. Bill WardDirector of DevelopmentNorthwest Reg. Ed. Lab.Portland, Oregon

A. E. HaddockDirector Elementary Education &Title I ESEAState Department of EducationSalem, Oregon 97310

Kennard L. BowmanCurriculum DevelopmentState Dept. of Public InstructionHArrisburg, Pennsylvania

Dr. William Moore, ChairmanDepartment of EducationBucknell UniversityLewisburg, Pennsylvania

Dr. Robert G. ScanlonDirector - Instructional SystemsPosition

Research for Better Schools, Inc.Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Page 77: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Joel TaylorChief Elementary Supervisor PositionState Department of EducationColumbia, South Carolina 29201

L. F. BalsigerAsst. Supt. Ed. ServicesState Dept. of Public InstructionPierre, South Dakota

Tom Kelley, DirectorProgram DevelopmentNashville, Tennessee

Robert S. RandallAssoc. DirectorPlanning and Evaluation Div.Southwest Ed. Development Corp.Austin, Texas

Dr. Loye Hollis, D4,t. ChairmanCurriculum and IhstructionUniversity of HoustonHouston, Texas

Dr. Glen Ovard, CoordinatorEd. Experimental ProgramsBrigham Young UniversityProvo, Utah

Edwin A. ReadAsst. DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City, Utah

Mary MacDougallAssociate Professor.School of EducationDiv. Educational ResearchUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesville, Virginia

W. Harold FordFairfax County Public SchoolsFairfax, Virginia

Charles E. CDirector o: xchState Departnw6c of EducationRichmond, Virginia 23216

Dr. Holder Boroughs, Jr.Asst.,DeanSchool of EducationUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, Washington

Doris M. CookProgram Consultant,Center for Research and Program Dev.State Dept. of Public InstructionMadison, Wisconsin

James WalterResearch and Development Centerfor Cognitive LearningUniversity of WisconsinMadison, Wisconsin

James HeadleeChief of Instructional ServicesState Department of EducationCheyenne, Wyoming 82001

Fred Husmann, Program Assoc.Center for the Study of InstructionWashington, D. C.

Sidney High, Acting Branch ChiefDiv. of Comp. and Vocational ResearchU.S.O.E.Washington, D. C.

Loyd JohnsonU.S.O.E.Washington, D. C.

Frank SchmidtleinProgram AssociateU.S.O.E.Washington, D. C.

Page 78: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-3

Part A - Is a copy of the letter sent to request descriptive information

on specific programs.

Part B - Is a copy of the form used to obtain the specific descriptive

information desired.

Page 79: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-3 'PART A

Dr. Melvin Barnes, Supt.Portland Public Schools631 N.E. Clackamas StreetPortland, Oregon 97208

Dear Dr. Barnes:

Your school system has been recommended to the Teaching

Research Division by Dr. Bill Ward of the N.W. Regional Laboratory

as having several on-going programs of individualized instruction.

The Teaching Research Division is under contract to the U. S.

Office of Education to find out what is going on in individualized

instruction.

We are very interested in identifying the schools within

your district with on-going programs of individualized instruction.

If you would send us a list of these schools we will contact them

for a thumbnail sketch of what they are doing.

Thank you for your time and effort.

JEB:kp

Enclosures

Sincerely,

James E..Bucl.c.

Project Coordinator

Page 80: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Mr. Arthur WongHokulani1903 Palolo Ave.Honolulu, Hawaii 96816

Dear Mr. Wong:

Mr. George Kagehiro of the Hawaii Department of Educationhas recommended to us your inclusion in our nationwide indivi-dualized instruction study. The Teaching Research Division ofthe Oregon State System of Higher Education is under contract to

the U. S. Office of Education to complete an interpretive studyof on-going individualized instruction programs.

We would appreciate it very much if you would complete theenclosed questionnaire. and return it to us with any additionalcomments or materials that you may wich to include.

Thank you very much.

JEB:blEnclosure

Sincerely,

James E. BuckProject Coordinator

-75-

Page 81: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-3 'PART B

NAME

ECHOOL

INDIVIDUALIZED INSTRUCTION SURVEYQUESTIONNAIRE

1) At what grade levels and in ghat subject matter areas is yourindividualized instruction yirogram?

Who selects the goals that the student is working toward?

The studentThe teacher

A test ....140.-srerr.,...,10/am.A computer

The student and teacher

3) Who plans the 2.togysim to reach the selected goals?

The studentThe teacherA computer

Programs are previously plannedThe student and teacherOther

4) Who keeps track of the students time and progress?

TIME The student PROGRESS The stndentThe teacher The teacherA computer A computerOther Other

5) Who makes the evaluation of the student's progress on the plannedprogram toward the selected goals?

The studentThe teacher

Other

Student and teacherA prepared test

6) What type of organizational pattern does your individualized instructionprogram fit into if it does at all?

ungraded independent study tutorialteam teaching continuous growth othermodular scheduling self-instruction

-76-

a.m......1.1(...1

Page 82: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

7) Have you any research about student growth in your individualized

instruction program?

Yes No

8) Often a questionnaire doesn't ask for some of the information you would

like to communicate. Please use the rest of this to fill us in on the

material you feel we need to know about your program of individualized

instruction.

-77-

Page 83: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-4

Part A - Is a list of all programs identified as implementing some form

of individualized instruction.

Part B - Is a selected list of schools considered worthy of visitation

because they are "close to home", and would not entail a large

expenditure by local school districts to get some information

on an I.I. program..

Note: Three (3) state departments neither, responded nor were named by

others as having I.I. programs (Louisiana, Wyoming and Vermont).

One (1) state responded by stating it had no knowledge of any

I.I. programs (Montana).

-78-

Page 84: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-4 PART A

District, Schools, and Programs Identified

ALABAMA

Anniston City Board of EducationAnniston, Alabama 36201K-4James E. Owen, Asst. Superintendent

Theodore High SchoolTheodore, Alabama 36582Ernest A. Smith, Principal

Charles Henderson High SchoolTroy, AlabamaO.W. Dotson

ALASKA

Glenallen SchoolGlenallen, Alaska 99588Mr. L.S. WrightSuperintendent of Schools

Hoonah City School DistrictP.O. Box 8Hoonah, Alaska 99829Mr. Donald L. MacKinnonSuperintendent of Schools

Bristol Bay Borough SchoolsP.O. Box 527Naknek, Alaska 99633Mr. Daniel G. TurnerSuperintendent of Schools

ARIZONA

G.S. Skiff School Elementary1430 South 18 StreetPhoenix, ArizonaJack Null

Erickson ElementaryTucson, Arizona2-6 Reading6th Math1-6 S.S., ScienceMary Belle McCorkle

Harelson School Elementary826 West Chapala DriveTucson, Arizona 85704Don Scott, Principal

Lulu ElementaryTucson, ArizonaAll AreasMr. Nelson, Principal

Sahuaro High SchoolTucson, Arizona

ARKANSAS

Henderson Junior High School401 John Barrow RoadLittle Rock, ArkansasEugene Keeton, Principal

CALIFORNIA

Brookhurst Junior High SchoolAnaheim, California

Bolder Creek ElementaryBolder Creek, CaliforniaI.P.I. Program

Borrego Springs Elementary and High School

Borrego Springs, California 92004Jack J. Jones, Superintendent

Boulder Creek Elementary SchoolLomond and Laurel StreetsP.O. Box 806Boulder Creek, California 95006

Capitola ElementaryCapitola, CaliforniaMr. Hartley Greene, Principal

Reed Union School District50 EL Camino DriveCorte Madera, California 94925John C. Fitch

-79-

Page 85: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Cupertino School District10300 Vista DriveCupertino, CaliforniaDr. William Fisher, Supt.

Monte Vista High School3131 Stone Valley RoadDanville, California 94526Raymond J. Roberts, Principal

Arthur D. Nieblas ElementaryFountain Valley, CaliforniaMike Brick, Asst. Superintendent

Fremont Unified School DistrictFremont, California1,2,3,4,5,6,9,10,11Eng., S.S., ScienceDr. William J. Bolt, Superintendent

John F. Kennedy High School39999 Blacow RoadFremont, CaliforniaEllis H. Mertins, Principal

Garden Grove School District6202 Cerulean StreetGarden Grove, California 92641Mr. Hilton D. Bell, Supt.

Dr. Erwood G. Edgar ElementarySchoolGarden Grove, CaliforniaK-5 Reading, Math, S.S., L.A.J. Prescott Jones, Principal

Fountain Valley School DistrictHuntington Beach, CaliforniaTotal DistrictMike Brick, Assistant Superintendent

Oak Street Elementary School633 South Oak StreetInglewood, California 90301Mrs. Frances Worthington, Principal

Wolf Grade ElementaryKentfield, California 91904Gene L. Hendsch, Principal

Stephen Foster Elementary School5223 East Bigelow StreetLakewood, California 90712Mr. Gerard Cook, Principal

-80-

Loma Vista Elementary SchoolMountain View, BoulevardVandenberg A.F.B.Lompoc, California 93437

Mr. Maynard Strong, Principal

Marion Anderson School1623 East 118 StreetLos Angeles, California 90059Thurman C. Johnson

Old Mill Elementary SchoolMill Valley, California 94941David W. Erskine, Principal

Strawberry Point Elementary SchoolMill Valley, California 94941Don Klein and Judy Stratten, Teachers

Foothill SchoolP.O. Box 1231Monterey, CaliforniaMr. Thomas Bridges

Banyan School1120 Knollwood DriveNewbury Park, California 91320

Arthur N. Thayer

Laguna Salada Union School DistrictP.O. Box 1005Pacifica, California 94044James Brien

David Avenue School104 David AvenuePacific Grove, CaliforniaMrs. Hazel Allemand, Principal

Brentwood School Elementary2086 ClarkPalo Alto, California 94303

Walter Hays School Elementary1525 Middlefield RoadPalo Alto, CaliforniaDwain McLeary, Principal

Poway High SchoolPoway, CaliforniaAllDan M. Thompson, Principal

Page 86: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Capuchino High School1501 Magnolia DriveSan Bruno, California 94066Mr. Don O. Dake

Chesterton Elementary School7335 Wheatley StreetSan Diego, California 92111Mr. Lawrence S. Gritz, Principal

Aragon High School900 Alameda de Las PulgasSan Mateo, California 94402Mr. Lawrence Hyink

Capuchino High SchoolSan Mateo Union High School District9, Reading, Listening and Study SkillsDon Drake, Instructor

Hillsdale High School31st and Del Monte AvenueSan Mateo, California 94403Mr. Howard Van Dyk

San Mateo High SchoolGrades 11 and 12, Office ProceduresJames J. Nameth, Instructor

Dixie School District35 Trellis DriveSan Rafael, California 94902Dr. Penrod Moss, Asst. Superintendent

Green Acres ElementarySanta Cruz, CaliforniaRobert Crooks, Principal

Laurel ElementarySanta Cruz, CaliforniaEdith King, Principal

Santa Cruz Gardens Elementary SchoolSanta Cruz, CaliforniaDwane Beaubian, Principal

Grace S. Thille Elementary SchoolSanta Paula, California 93060Joe Bravo, Jr Principal

Sherman Oaks Elementary School14726 Dickens StreetSherman Oaks, California 91403Miss Lillian Raphael, Principal

-81-

Park View Elementary School1500 Alexander StreetSimi, California 93065Mr. William Johnson, Principal

Soquel Elementary SchoolSoquel, CaliforniaCurt Bowman, Principal

COLORADO

Foster Elementary School5300 Saulsbury Ct.Arvada, Colorado 80002H. Gene Cosby, Principal

Lawrence Elementary School5611 Zephyr StreetArvada, Colorado 80002Miss Eloise Spencer, Principal

Oberon Junior nigh SchoolJefferson County School District R-17300 Quail StreetArvada, Colorado 80002Mr. Edward Tanguay, Principal

Peck Elementary School6495 Carr StreetArvada, Colorado 80002Louis Kuykendall, Principal

Vanderhoof Elementary School59th & Route WayArvada, Colorado 80002George Jurata, Jr., Principal

Montview Elementary SchoolMontview Blvd. and Moline StreetAurora, Colorado 80010Arly Burch, Principal

Boulder Valley Public SchoolsBoulder, Colorado 80302Dr. Paul E. Smith, Supt.

Broomfield High School1100 Daphne StreetBroomfield, Colorado 80020Mr. Herbert Wenger, Principal

Columbine Elementary School3130 Repplier DriveBoulder, Colorado 80302Duane B. Squires, Principal

Page 87: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Fairview High School6096 Baseline RoadBoulder, Colorado 80302Mr. Lyle T. Dorland, Principal

Grant Elementary School4602 Westwood BoulevardColorado Springs, Colorado 80907Philip J. Van Pelt, Principal

Jackson Elementary School4340 North Edwinstowe AvenueColorado Springs, Colorado 80907Frederick Dickinson, Principal

Manangs Elementary SchoolDrawer RCortez, Colorado 81321Violet Ranis, Principal

Devinny Elementary School1850 South Wright StreetDenver, Colorado 80228William Driscoll, Principal

Eastridge Elementary School2375 South Oswego Ct.Denver, ColoradoWilliam Driscoll, Principal

Green Mountain Elementary School12250 W. Kentucky DriveDenver, Colorado 80228William Boland, Principal

Holly Ridge Elementary School3301 South Monaco ParkwayDenver, Colorado 80222Mrs. Louise Corwin, Principal

John Dewey Junior High School7480 No. BroadwayDenver, Colorado 80221Rociogioso, Principal

Monterey Elementary School2200 McElwain BoulevardDenver, Colorado 80229Joseph Halley, Principal

Western Hills Elementary School7700 Delta StreetDenver, Colorado 80221Dennis McDaniel, Principal

-82-

Charles Hay Elementary School3185 South Lafayette StreetEnglewood, Colorado 80110Paul Lindsay, Principal

Scenic View Elementary School2200 South Raritan StreetEnglewood, Colorado 80110Gene Snyder, Principal

Washington ElementaryEnglewood, ColoradoK-3 Reading, Math, and P.E.Paul F. Lindsay, Principal

Village Heights Elementary School3651 South Colorado BoulevardEnglewood, Colorado 80110Mrs. Pauline Andrews, Principal

Georgetown Elementary SchoolGeorgetown, Colorado 80444Joe Vanchena, Principal

Johnson Elementary School701 Johnson DriveGolden, Colorado 80401Robert Ferris, Principal

Greeley Public Schools1416 - 9 AvenueGreeley, Colorado 80631Le Triplett, Director

Franklin Elementary School3429 Tenth StreetGreeley, Colorado 80631Thomas H. Elliott, Principal

Sherwood Elementary School29th Avenue & 13th StreetGreeley, Colorado 80631Wilma Scott, Principal

Haxtun High SchoolHaxtun, ColoradoCareer Selection EducationAl Renzelman, Principal

Jefferson School District R-11580 Yarrow StreetLakewood, Colorado 80215Jay Caton, Coordinator of Secondary Schools

Page 88: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Larkspur Elementary SchoolLarkspur, Colorado 80118Thomas Moore, Principal

South Elementary School6390 Windermere StreetLittleton, Colorado 80120Mrs. Dolly M. Ryan, Principal

Meeker Elementary SchoolP.O. Box 988Meeker, Colorado 81641Herbert H. Oba, Principal

Meeker High SchoolMeeker School District RE-1Box 159Meeker, Colorado 81641Mr. Laverne E. Etter, Principal

Mangely Elementary SchoolP.O. Box 128Rangely, Colorado 81648James C. Hixson, Principal

Prospect Valley Elementary School3395 Parfet StreetWheat Ridge, Colorado 80033Mike Cussen, Principal

CONNECTICUT

Bethel Elementary SchoolBethel, ConnecticutMiss Veronica Baske, Directorof Elementary Education

Branford High SchoolBrandford ConnecticutEdward J. O'Donnell,Acting Superintendent

Farmington Elementary SchoolFarmington, ConnecticutJohn P. McDonough, Superintendent

Glastonbury Elementary SchoolGlastonbury, ConnecticutDr. Hugh M. Watson, Superintendent

North Haven High SchoolNorth Haven, Connecticut 06473Dr. Charles F. Ritch, Jr., Superintendent

-83-

DELAWARE

Dover Special School District945 Forrest StreetDover, Delaware 19901Dustin W. Wilson, Jr. Supt.

West Dover Elementary School901 Forrest StreetDover, Delaware 19901Mr. Henry J. Papierrik

Friends School101 School LaneWilmington, Delaware 19803Mr. Charles W. Hutton

Marbrook Elementary School2101 Centerville RoadWilmington, Delaware 19808Mr Paul Julian

FLORIDA

BeaTlake Elementary SchoolApopka, FloridaFloyd C. Richards, Principal

Cocoa Beach High1500 Minuteman CausewayCocoa Beach, Floricla 32931James E. Lee, Jr.

National Teacher Corps Training ProgramSchool of EducationUniversity of MiamiCoral Gables, Florida 33124Robert E. Hendricks, Director.

Coral Gables High SchoolDade County Public SchoolsMiami, Florida

Nova SchoolsFort Lauderdale, Florida 33313Dr. Warren Smith

William Kallin Elementary Nova High3600 SW 70 AvenueFort Lauderdale, Florida 33314Dave Fitzpatrick

Pinecrest ElementaryImmokalee, Florida 33939Terrence K. Weed, Principal

Page 89: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Learning to Learn School, Inc.1936 San Marco BoulevardJacksonville, Florida 32207Herbert Sprigle, Director

Lincoln Avenue ElementaryNorth Lincoln and 9th StreetsLakeland, Florida 33801Charles Coleman

Longwood ElementaryLongwood, Florida 32750Louis Kosky

Margate Junior High500 NW 65 AvenueMargate, Florida 33063Mrs. Elda Carney

Melbourne High SchoolMelbourne, Florida

Treasure Island Elementary7540 East Treasure DriveMiami Beach, Florida 3314Mrs. Harriet Bannon

Miami Springs High School751 Dove AvenueMiami Springs, Florida 33166

Highland Oaks20500 NE 24th AvenueNorth Miami Beach, Florida 33160

North Miami Senior High800 NE 137 StreetNorth Miami, Florida 33161Dale Boggy

Markham Elementary School1501 NW 15 AvenuePompano Beach, Florida 33063B.F. Stephenson, Principal

Glenn Oak Elementary SchoolSt. Petersburg, FloridaMr. William G. Thompson, Principal

GEORGIA

Atlanta Public SchoolsAtlanta, Georgia 30325Dr. John Letson, Superintendent

DeKalb School SystemDecatur, GeorgiaMr. Sam Moss, Deputy Superintendent

-84-

HAWAII

Waimalu Elementary98-375 Moanalua RoadAica, Hawaii 96818

Campbell High SchoolEwa Beach, Hawaii 96706Mr. George Yamamoto, Principal

Ewa Beach ElementaryEwa Beach, Hawaii 96706Mr. George Fujimoto, Principal

Iroquois Point ElementaryEwa Beach, Hawaii 96706Mr. Yoshinobu Oshiro, Principal

Pohakea ElementaryEwa Beach, Hawaii 96706Edward Kawamoto

Waiakea Elementary180 Puainako StreetHilo, Hawaii ;5720Mr. Harry Char, Principal

Aliamanu Elementary3265 Salt Lake BoulevardHonolulu, Hawaii 96818Mrs. Marjorie Lau, Principal

Hokulani School1903 Palolo AvenueHonolulu, Hawaii 97816Mr. Arthur Wong, Principal

Kahala School4559 Kilauea AvenueHonolulu, Hawaii 96821Mrs. Estelle Murphy, Principal

Radford High School4361 Salt Lake BoulevardHonolulu, Hawaii 96818Mr. Andy Nii, Principal

Kailua High451 Ulumanu DriveKailus, Hawaii 96734Milton S. DeMello, Principal

Kapaa High SchoolKapaa, Kauai, Hawaii9-12 Eng., S.S., Independent StudyWil Welch, Principal

Page 90: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Kapaa High and IntermediateKapaa, Hawaii 96746Charles Lennox

Kaumakani SchoolKaumakani, Hawaii 96747Mrs. Martha Morita, Principal

Lanikai Elementary SchoolHawaii State Departmentof EducationWindward District140 Alala RoadLanikai, Oahu, HawaiiMrs. Louis Pohl

Kauai High and IntermediateLihue, Kauai, Hawaii 96766

Isami Miueshi, Principal

Kauai High SchoolLihue, Hawaii9-12 L.A.Emide Kuraoda, Principal

Waihee School'P.O. Box 122Wailuku, Maui, Hawaii 96793Mr. Stanley Izumigawa

Ahrens ElementaryWaipahu, Hawaii 96797Mr. Isami Kurasake, Principal

IDAHO

Elk River Public SchoolsBlackfoot, IdahoK-12 (150 Children)Completely Individualized

Moreland ElementaryRoute 2, Wilson BuildingBlackfoot, Idaho 83221R. Laverne Marcum, Supt.

Grand View High School9-12 All Areas

Grandview ElementaryGrandview, Idaho 83624Al Glanders, Principal

Hagerman Elementary SchoolHagerman, Idaho 83332George Carnie, Supt.

-85-

Hagerman High SchoolHagerman, Idaho9-12 All Areas

ILLINOIS

Arlington Heights Elementary SchoolArlington Heights, IllinoisGene B. Goodman, Principal

Juliette Low ElementaryArlington Heights, Illinois

Barrington Middle SchoolBarrington, Illinois 60010

W. Pargeles, Principal

Institute for Research on ExceptionalChildren403 East Healey StreetChampaign, Illinois 61820

Mr. W.P. Hurder, Director

CAM Academy3932 West Madison StreetChicago, IllinoisMiss Mary Nelson, Principal

Lakeview High SchoolDecatur Public Schools District #61

1001 Brush CollegeDecatur, IllinoisMr. William Fromm,

Road

Principal

Salt Creek SchoolCommunity Consolidated #59School District65 Kennedy BoulevardElk Grove Village, Illinois 60007

Mr. Robert Michalsen, Principal

Evanston Township High SchoolIllinois School District 2021600 Dodge AvenueEvanston, IllinoisDr. James Elliott, Hall Principal

Foster SchoolCommunity Consolidated SchoolDistrict 651314 Ridge AvenueSkokie, Evanston, Illinois 6020L

Mr. Joe Hill, Principal

Ladd ElementaryEvanston, Illinois

Page 91: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Highland Community SdhoolsUnit No. 51800 LindenthalHighland, IllinoisPaul J. Diefenbach, Teacher

Ridgewood High SchoolCook County School District #2347500 West Montrose

. Norridge, Illinois 60634Mr. Scott G. Richardson, Principal

Skokie Junior High SchoolWinnetka, Illinois

INDIANA ,

Arlington Heights Elementary"800 Gourley RoadBloomington, Indiana 47401Mr. Gene Goodman, Principal

Binford Junior High SchoolBloomington, Indiana

Bloomington High SchoolBloomington, Indiana

Broadview Elementary School705 Coolidge DriveBloomington, Indiana 47401Mr. Harold Stewart, Principal

Childs Elementary SchoolSouth High StreetBloomington, Indiana 47401

Mr. John Fleener, Principal

Denfore Junior High SchoolBloomington, Indiana

Fairview Elementary School627 West Eighth StreetBloomington, Indiana 47401.

Mr. John Goen, Principal

University Elementary SchoolTenth and By-PassBloomington, Indiana 47401Mr. Art Brill, Principal

University High SchoolBloomington, IndianaArthur H. Aestreich, Professor ofEducation and Director

-86-

Columbia Senior High SchoolColumbia, Indiana

Elkhart Elementary SchoolElkhart, Indiana

Elkhart Senior High SchoolElkhart, Indiana

Hawthorne School Elementary501 W. Lusher AvenueElkhart, Indiana 46514

Mr. Donm Davis, Principal

Lincoln SchOol608 Oakland AvenueElkhart, Indiana 46514Mr. Don Massey, Principal

Mary F. Beck Elementary School818 MacDonald StreetElkheart, Indiana 46514Charles Walker, Principal

Roosevelt Elementary School215 East Indiana AvenueElkheart, Indiana 46514Clarence N. Leichty, Principal

Ben Davis Junior High SchoolMetropolitan School District ofWayne Township1155 South High School RoadIndianapolis, Indiana 46241Howard Wood, Principal

East Noble High SchoolEast Noble School Corp.South Garden StreetKendallville, IndianaMr. R.W. Tritch, Principal

Kokomo Senior High SchoolKokomo. Indiana

Burris. High SchoolMuncie, Indiana

Munster Junior HighMunster, Indiana

Munster High School808 ColumbiaMunster, IndianaJohn Edington, Biology Teacher

Page 92: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Chrysler Memorial High SchoolNew Castle, Indiana

IOWA

Cedar Falls Community Schools903 WashingtonCedar Falls, Iowa 50613John R. Baker, Director of Curriculum

North High SchoolDes Moines Independent CommunitySchool District2617-6 AvenueDes Moines, Iowa 50313Frank L. Hildreth, Vice Principal

Eagle Grove Community SchoolsEagle Grove, Iowa 50533Mr. John Gannen, Superintendent

Mason City Community Schools120 East StateMason City, Iowa 50401Dr. Roderick Bickert, Superintendent

Hoover Elementary School1123 Eighth Street NWJason City, Iowa 50401Mr. Dale Jensen, Principal

Lincoln Elementary School122 Second Street NEMason City, Iowa 50401Miss Esther Ahrens, Principal

Mason City Senior High School1700 Fourth Street SEMason City, Iowa 50401Mr. John B. Patzwald, Principal

Urbandale Community Schools7101 Airline AvenueUrbandale, Iowa 50322Mr. Lyle Kehm, Superintendent

Urbandale High School.Urbandale, IowaModular SchedulingDale Whatt, Principal

KANSAS

yandotte Unified #2043rd and CedarBonner Springs, Kansas 66012Kenneth Tewell

-87-

Clay Unified #3795th and LincolnClay Center, Kansas 67432

Dean Oberhelman

Ford Unified #4431000 SecondDodge City, KansasFrank B. Toalson

Dodge City Senior High SchoolDodge City, KansasHarold R. Nosey, Asst. Superintendent

Roosevelt High SchoolKansas State TEachers CollegeEmporia, Kansas 68801Fred A. Markowitz

Montgomery Unified #446Box 844Independence, Kansas 67301Lonnie N. Wood

Allen Unified #257402 East JacksonIola, Kansas 66749

Consolidated School District #110Johnson County, KansasDr. Eugene A. Diggs

Bishop Meige High School5041 ReinhardtKansas City, Kansas

Manhattan Junior High SchoolManhattan, Kansas 66502Jack L. Larson, Principal

McPherson Unified #418301 West KansasMcPherson, Kansas 67460

Park Elementary SchoolMcpherson, KansasMrs. Lucille McKenna, Principal

Barber Unified #254Box 288Medicine Lodge, Kansas 67104M.L. Williams

Medicine Lodge High SchoolMedicine Lodge, Kansas9-12 Any and All Subjects through In-dependent StudyHarold Hanck, Principal

Page 93: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Kiowa Unified #424Mullinville, Kansas 67109R.W. Galhon

Buckner Elementary School3530 East 27 StreetNorth Wichita, Kansas 67720Donald A. Janssen, Principal

Johnson Unified #233105 South Kansas AvenueOlathe, Kansas 66061

Richview Elementary SchoolOlathe, Kansas'Marie Beck, Principal

Valley View School District8101A West 95 StreetOverland Park, KansasDr. Challendar

Parsons District SchoolsParsons, KansasMrs. Margaret NewbanksDirector of Instruction

Johnson #4447200 BelinderPrairie Village, Kansas 66208Harold C. Dent

Salina Untried District #305Box 808Salina, Kansas 67401Dr. Lloyd Schurr

Sacred Heart Elementary SchoolSalina, Kansas 67401Sr. M. Anthony

Topeka Public SchoolsTopeka, KansasUngraded Primary, 4-9 and 10-12 RemedialReading7-9 and 10-12 Independent StudyWilliam L. Howard, AssociateSuperintendent

Topeka Shawnee Unified #501415 Wrqt 8thTopeka, Kansa 66603Dr. William Howard

Kelly Elementary SchoolWichita, KansasBoyd Weiss, Principal

Sedwick Unified #259428 South BroadwayWichita, Kansas 67202'

Dr. Lawrence H. Shepoiser

KENTUCKY

W.R. McNeill City College SchoolOld Russellville RoadBowling Green, Kentucky

Breathitt County SchoolsJackson, KentuckyMrs. Marie Turner, Supt.

LBJ ElementaryJackson, KentuckyMiss Francis Johnson, Principal

Owensboro City Schools620 Walnut StreetOwensboro, Kentucky 42301Kenneth A. Estes, Supt.

MAINE

Rockland District High SchoolRockland, MaineFred Perkins, Principal

MARYLAND

Baltimore Public SchoolsBaltimore, Maryland 21202Dr. Thomas Sheldon, Superintendent

Northwestern High SchoolPark Heights Avenue and Fallstaff RoadBaltimore, Maryland 21215Miss Betty Williams, Vice Principal

Villa Cresta Elementary SchoolBoard of Education of Baltimore CountyRader AvenueParkville, Baltimore, Maryland 21234

Lucien F. Peters, Jr., Principal

Brun'swick Elementary SchoolBrunswick, Maryland 21716Alonzo D. Peters, Principal

Northfield Elementary School741 Northfield RoadEllicott City, Maryland 21043

Governor Thomas Johnson Junior-Senior High SchoolNorth Market StreetFrederick, Maryland 21701

-88- Karl S. Manwiller, Principal

Page 94: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Pasadena Elementary SchoolAnne Arundel CountyPasadena, Maryland 21122Curtis H. Wolfe, Principal

Lake Normandy Elementary SchoolFalls RoadRockville, Maryland 20854

Montgomery County Public Schools850 North Washington. StreetRockville, MarylandDr. Homer 0. Elseroad, Supt.

John F. Kennedy Senior High SchoolSilver Springs, MarylandModular SchedulingCharles M. Procter, Director ofResearch

Prince George's County Public SchoolsUpper Marlboro, Maryland 20870Mr. William S. Schmidt, Supt.

Bushey Drive Elementary School12210 Bushey DriveWheaton, Maryland 20902

MASSACHUSETTS

Town HallAmherst, Mass. 02002Ronald Fitzgerald, Supt.

Stow StreetConcord, Mass. 01742Sayre Uhler, Supt.

Bridge School55 Middleby RoadLexington, Mass. 02173Lester E. Goodridge, Jr., Principal

Lincoln RoadLincoln, Mass. 01773Robert Filbin, Supt.

Weston Junior High SchoolWeston, Mass.

Hamilton Elementary SchoolNewton, Mass.

Woodland Elementary SchoolWeston, Mass.

-89-

Hoarse Mann ElementaryNewton, Massachusetts1-6 Subject Matter Areas

Meadowbrook Junior HighNewton, Massachusetts7-9 Eng., S.S., Art, Music, IndustrialArts, Home Ec., Typing(Continuous Progress)Maurice H. Blum, Principal

265 Water StreetNewton, Mass. 02158James Lauritz, Supt.

Quincy Public SchoolsQuincy, Mass.Elementary School-70Project PLANProject ABLELawrence P. Creedon, AssistantSuperintendent

MICHIGAN

Bloomfield Hills Public SchoolsBloomfield, Michigan 48013Mr. Eugene L. Johnson, Superintendent

East Hills Junior HighBloomfield Hills, Michigan

Lahser Senior HighBloomfield Hills, Michigan

Way ElementaryBloomfield Hills, Michigan

Franklin High SchoolLivonia Public Schools31000 Joy RoadLivonia, Michigan 48153Mr. David D. Amerman, Principal

Martha Campbell Elementary SchoolDistrict #4, Lamphere Public Schools31201 DorchesterMadison Heights, Michigan 48071Mr. Douglas J. Nelson, PrincipalAn IDEA Demonstration School

John D. Pierce School ElementaryNorthern Michigan UniversityMarquette, Michigan 49855Thomas I. Culhane, Principal

Page 95: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Monroe Public SchoolsMonroe, MichiganElementary Learning LaboratoryTerry Semones, Director ofReading Services

Marine City High SchoolEast China Public Schools2380 S. Riverside AvenueSt. Clair, MichiganMr. Edward J. Trudell, Principal

Troy High SchoolTroy School District3179 Livernois RoadTroy, Michigan 48084Mr. Joseph Bechard, Principal

MINNESOTA

Central Junior High SchoolAlexandria, MinnesotaReading/Study Skills/InstructionalMaterials CenterJohn C. Peterson, Principal

Six-year High SchoolBalaton, Minnesota 56115Claus Miedema, Principal

Washington Senior High SchoolBrainerd, MinnesotaMr. Donald Adamson, Principal

Hubert Olson Junior High SchoolBloomington, Minn.Virginia Buegel, Principal

Junior High SchoolChisholm, MinnesotaMr. Kenneth Peatross, Principal

Senior High SchoolChisholm, MinnesotaMr. Edward Keckeisen, Principal

Central Junior High SchoolCrookston, MinnesotaLeslie J. Knox, Principal

Senior High SchoolCrookston, MinnesotaMr. Ray A. Flom, Principal

Danube High SchoolDanube, Minnesota 56230

G. Edward Schramm, Principal

Chester Park ElementaryWashington Junior High SchoolCentral High SchoolDuluth Public SchoolsDuluth, MinnesotaDr. L.V.Rasmussen, Superintendent

Grand Meadow High SchoolGrand Meadow, Minnesota 55936Richard Wickman, Principal

Hopkins Senior High.Hopkins, Minnesota10-12 Most AreasRay C. Weidner, Project Director

Janesville High SchoolJanesville, Minn.John J. Graft, Principal

Junior-Senior High SchoolLe Sueur, MinnesotaMr. Kenneth Von Wald, Principal

Hcsterman Junior High SchoolMinneapolis, Minn.L. Mollinger, Principal

South Senior High SchoolMontgomery, MinnesotaMr. Dean R. Shawbold, Principal

Springlakepark Elementary SchoolMinneapolis, Minn.. 55432Don Watson, Principal

Susan B. Anthony Junior HighMinneapolis, MinnesotaMr. William C. Cooksey, Principal

Montevideo Junior HighMontevideo, MinnesotaOrlan Cox, Principal

Six-year High SchoolMontgomery, MinnesotaMr. Mark Linneman, Principal

-90-

Page 96: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Cooper. High SchoolNew Hope, Minnesota10-12 Modular ScheduleLyndon Ulvich, Principal

Brooklyn Junior High SchoolOsseo, Minn.Robert Gary Jacobson, Principal

Osseo Senior High SchoolOsseo, MinnesotaMyron Johnson, Principal

Princeton Elementary SchoolDistrict No. 477Princeton, Minnesota 55371Raymond H. Peterson Elem. Dir.

Lafayette High SchoolRedlakefalls, Minn.J.H. Haller, Principal

Slayton Junior High SchoolSlayton, MinnesotaC.W. Mather, Principal

Spring Lake Park Senior HighSpring Lake Park, Minn.Mr. Leland S. Renz, Principal

North Junior High SchoolSt. Cloud,Minn.7-9 Modular Program30% Independent Study TimeJerry F. Larson, Principal

South Junior High SchoolSt. Cloud, Minn.J.G. Carlson, Principal

Senior High SchoolStillwater, Minn.E.O. Monette, Principal

Harding Senior High SchoolSt. Paul, Minn. 55103R. Engebretson, Principal

Highland Park Junior High SchoolSt. Paul, Minn.Harold T. Lehto, Principal

Franklin Junior High SchoolTheif River Fails, Minn.Mr. Neil Taverna, Principal

Lincoln High SchoolThief River Falls, MinnesotaModular Program12th Grade S.S. and Eng.R. Edlund, Principal

Wadena Senior High SchoolWadena, Minnesota 56482

Donald Johansen, Principal

-91-

White Bear Senior HighWhite Bear Lake, Minn.10-12 AU AreasRoy Wahlberg, Principal

MISSISSIPPI

McComb Public SchoolsMcComb, Miss.J.D. Prince, Superintendent

Natchex Special Municipal SeparateSchool DistrictP.O. Box 630Natchex, Miss.Mrs. Willie Turner

Tupelo High SchoolTupelo, Miss. 38801B.L. Rivers, Principal

MISSOURI

Parkway West Senior High SchoolBaldwin, No. 63011Melba James, Principal

Cape Girardeau Public SchoolsCape Girardeau, MissouriCharles E. House, Supt.

McCluer High SchoolFlorissant, Missouri

Joplin Public SchoolsJoplin, MissouriMr. Cecil Floyd, Asst. Superintendent

Kansas City Public Schools1211 McGee StreetKansas City, MissouriDr. Donald Hair, Asst. Superintendent

James Elementary School5810 Scarritt StreetKansas City, MissouriMrs. Ethel Johnson

Page 97: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Loretto in Kansas City12411 Wornall RoadKansas City, Missouri 64145James Stafford, Jr., Directorof Community Relations

Kirksville R-III Public SchoolsKirksville, MissouriDr. 0. Wayne Phillips, Supt.

Kirksville SchoolKirksville, MissouriK-12 L.A., S.S.John Goeke, Title III Director

Lee's Summit R-VIII Public SchoolsLee's Summit, MissouriDr. William J. Underwood, Asst. Supt.

Lindbergh High SchoolLindbergh, Missouri

Sikeston R-VI Public SchoolsSikeston, MissouriMr. Lynn Twitty, Supt.

Springfield Public SchoolsSpringfield, MissouriDr. Willard J. Graff, Supt.

St. Joseph Public SchoolsSt. Joseph, MissouriMr. G.M. Coleman, Asst. Supt.

Benton High SchoolSt. Josephs, Mo.Lawrence E. Hanker, Principal

Ferguson-Florissant R-2 School DistrictSt. Louis County, MissouriMcCluer nigh SchoolFerguson Junior High SchoolFlorissant Junior High SchoolCross Keys Junior High SchoolForeign Language InstructionFlorence Phelps, Director

Horton Watkins High School1201 S. Warson RoadSt. Louis, MissouriRichard F. Stauffer, Principal

Lindbergh R-VIII Public Schools4900 South Lindbergh BoulevardSt. Louis, MissouriMr. Noah E. Gray, Superintendent

Lindbergh Senior High SchoolSt. Louis, Missouri 63216Morgan L. Rushing, Principal

The University School SystemUniversity City, MissouriMcKnight ElementaryUniversity City High School

McKnight Elementary8346 Delcrest DriveUniversity City, Missouri 63124Mrs. Marion Green

Pershing Elementary6761 BartmerUniversity City, Missouri 63130James L. Lanman, Principal

NEBRASKA

Bellevue Public SchoolsBellevue, NebraskaRichard Triplett

Bellevue Elementary School1100 West Million StreetBellevue, NebraskaRichard Triplet, Principal

Broken Bow Public SchoolsBroken Bow, NebraskaMr. George Mills

Hasting Public SchoolsHastings, NebraskaFlexible Modular SchedulingGrades 3,6, 10-12Ross L. Speece, Superintendent

Alcott Elementary School419 N. Hastings AvenueHastings, Nebraska 68901Jack Horsham, Principal

Hastings Junior High School419 N. Hastings AvenueHastings, Nebraska 68901Dr. Thomas N. Keating, Principal

Hawthorne Elementary School419 N. Hastings AvenueHastings, Nebraska 68901Edward O'Donnell, Principal

Page 98: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Lincoln Elementary School419 N. Hastings AvenueHastings, Nebraska 68901Mrs. Lucille Cotner, Principal

Longfellow Elementary School419 N. Hastings AvenueHastings, Nebraska 68901Kenneth Wiederspan, Principal

Morton Elementary School419 N. Hastings AvenueHastings, Nebraska 68901Mrs. Cecilia Gass, Principal

Kearney Public SchoolsKearney NebraskaMr. John Johnston

Kearney Junior High School300 West 24 StreetKearney, Nebraska 68847Allen, Bellinger, PrincipalWill Henderson, TeacherRichard Sweet, Teacher

Kearney Senior High School38th and 6th AvenueKearney, Nebraska 68847Harold McClure, Principal

Northeast Elementary School910 East 34th StreetKearney, Nebraska 68847Rodney Bartels, Principal

Park Elementary School3000 - 7 AvenueKearney, Nebraska 68847Don Clark, Principal

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Omaha100 North 62 StreetOmaha, Nebraska 68132Msgr. Roman Ulirich, Supt, of Schools

Omaha Public Schools39th and DavenportOmaha, NebraskaDr. Craig Fullerton, Superintendent

District #66 78th & CassOmaha, NebraskaDr. Vaughn Phelps

-93-

Archbishop Ryan Memorial High School5616 "L" StreetOmaha, Nebraska 68117Sister Pacis, Principal

Harry A. Burke High School12200 Burke BoulevardOmaha, NebraskaDr. Robert S. Brown, Principal

South High School4519 South 24th StreetOmaha, NebraskaDr. Leonard Hanson, Principal

Westside High School87th & Pacific StreetOmaha, NebraskaDr. Kenneth Hansen, Principal

NEVADA

Roy Martin Junior High SchoolLas Vegas, Nevada7-9 Major AreasResource Study CenterBruce Miller, Principal

Ruby S. Thomas ElementaryLas Vegas, NevadaAll AreasMulti-Media Library

Virgin ValleyMesquite, Nevada7-12 Entire CurriculumDiane W. Allan, Principal

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Somersworth School DistrictSupervisory Union 56Somersworth, New Hampshire 03878Anthony Bahros

Somersworth High SchoolSomersworth, New HampshireTotal ProgramRobert L. Brunelle, Superintendent

NEW JERSEY

South Brunswick Township10 Allston RoadKendall Park, New Jersey 08824James A. Kimple, Supt.

Page 99: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Long Branch Public Schools6 West End Court, West EndLong Branch, New Jersey 07742William Meskill, Supt.

Montclair Public Schools22 Valley RoadMontclair, New Jersey 07042Robert W. Blanchard, Supt.

Stoneybrook Elementary260 Grove StreetPlainfield 07060Roland J. BlackDirector of Elementary Education

Washington School ElementaryTrenton, New Jersey 08611Dr. John Almond, PrincipalIPI Demonstration School

Willingboro Public SchoolWillingboro, New Jersey1-3 I.P.I. 9-12 Eng., S.S. MathDr. Gabriel H. Reuben, Supt.

NEW MEXICO

Collet Park Elementary724 S. MapleAlbuquerque, New Mexico

Del Norte High School724 S. MapleAlbuquerque, New Mexico

Mark Twain Elementary SchoolAlbuquerque, New Mexico 87110Hal L. Dopkins, Principal

Navajo Elementary724 S. MapleAlbuquerque, New Mexico

Clovis Muncipal High SchoolProgrammed EnglishVernon Mills, Superintendent

Corona Public SchoolsCorona, New Mexico1-12 Reading, L.A., and Math

Los Alamos Public SchoolsLos Alamos, New Mexico

-94-

Western States Small Schools ProjectsProgrammed MathematicsDes Moines High School - ProgrammedEnglishQuemado High SchoolCloudcroft High SchoolDora High School

NEW YORK

Ithaca City School District400 Lake StreetIthaca, New York 14850Leonard Co Buyse, Asst. Supt.

Mamaroneck Public SchoolsMamaroneck, New York 10543Organic Curriculum.DevelopmentFrank Casseta, Developer

Union Free School District No. 252369 Merrick AvenueMerrick, Long IslandNew York 11566Roland Chatterton, Ad. of Schools

Mineola Public SchoolsMineola, New York 11501Dr. Ben Wallace, Supt.

Cross Street Elementary SchoolMinneola, New YorkPatrick Corsentino, Principal

Minneola Junior High SchoolMinneola, New YorkRobert Ricken, Principal

Willis Avenue SchoolMineola, New York 11501Wiley C. Bowyer, Principal

Fox Lane Middle SchoolBedford Community Schools CentralDistrict #2369 Lexington AvenueMount Kisco, New YorkMr. Peter Telfer, Associate Principal

Harlem Preparatory School2366 - 5 StreetNew York, New York 10036Mr. EdwargiCarpenter, Director

Page 100: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

The Dalton School108 East 89th StreetNew York, New York 10028Mr. Donald Barr, Headmaster

Miskayuna Public Schools1626 Balltown MadSchenectady, New York 12309James Purcell, Superintendent

Porter Elementary SchoolSyracuse, New YorkMr. Lowell Smith, Principal

Heins Elementary SchoolWilliam Smith, New YorkThomas H. Puler, Principal

845 Fox Meadow RoadYorktown Heights, New York 10598Richard L. WingCoordinator of Curr. Research

NORTH CAROLINA

Bdrkeley Manor ElementaryCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaHerman S. Parker

Brewster Jr. H.S.Marine Corps BaseCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaDuane L. Linker

Lejeune High SchoolCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaE. Conrad Sloan

Midway Park ElementaryCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaHerschel Green

Stone Street ElementaryCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaMrs. Lois James

Tarawa Terrace I ElementaryCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaGeorge Ezzard

Tarawa Terrace II ElementaryCamp Lejeune, North CarolinaJohn L. Frist, Principal

-95-

Child Development Research InstituteUniversity of North CarolinaChapel Hill, North CarolinaMr. Halbert Robinson, Director

Albemarle Road Jr. High School6900 Democracy DriveCharlotte, North CarolinaJoseph R. Brooks, Principal

Durham Public SchoolsDurham, North CarolinaDr. Spalding, Project Director

Delalio ElementaryMarine Corps Air FacilityJacksonville, North CarolinaWilbur H. Tuck

Lexington Middle SchoolLexington, North CarolinaReed Prillamaresea, Title III Director

Barbee Elementary1116 N. Blount StreetRaleigh, North CarolinaDaisy R. Radford

Lawsonville Avenue School ElementaryReidsville, North CarolinaJames H. Hardy

Lawrence Elementary School2900 Indiana AvenueWinston-Salem, North CarolinaLee H. Potter, Principal

Parkland Senior High SchoolWinston-Salem, North CarolinaFlexible Scheduling and Team TeachingMarvin Ward, Principal

NORTH DAKOTA

Ashley High School '

Ashley, North Dakota 58413Floyd Schock

Central High SchoolGrand Forks Public School District No.1Grand Forks, North Dakota 58201Mrs. Margaret'Abbot

Page 101: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Red River High School'Grand Forks, North Dakota10-12 "Non-timed Flexible Scheduling"Chris S. Ballas, Principal

Lakota High SchoolLakota, North Dakota 58344

Donald Busche, Principal

Maddock High SchoolMaddock, North Dakota 58348John Huidsten, Principal

Campus Laboratory SchoolMinot State CollegeMinot, North DakotaK-4 Communication ProgramJoseph Wax, Principal

Starkweather High SchoolStarkweather, North Dakota 58377

Donald Kuhla, Principal

Velva High SchoolVelva, North Dakota 58201Benjamin Grossman, Principal

L.E. Berger Middle SchoolWest Fargo, North Dakota 58078

James A. Claypool, Principal

West Fargo High SchoolWest Fargo, North DakotaAll Areas

OHIO

Cincinnati City Elementary2015 Freeman AvenueCincinnati, Ohio 45214Thomas E. Bennington, Principal

Berea City Jr. High17001 Holland RoadCleveland, Ohio 44142Richard Vale, Principal

Ford Junior High SchoolBerea School SystemCleveland, Ohio7-9 Major Subject Matter Areas, PlusArt, Industrial Arts, and Home Ec.Learning Centers and LibrariesNeil Fort, Principal

Orange Local32000 Chagrin BoulevardPepper Pike Village

Cleveland, Ohio 44124Dr. Peter J. Romanoli Asst. Supt. -96-

Mentor High School4677 Center StreetMentor, Ohio 44060Jarvis Hcogleta, Principal

Mareland SchoolShaker Heights, OhioAll Elementary Levels

Shaker Heights City Elementary15600 Parkland DriveShaker Heights, Ohio 44120Mrs. Selma Leavitt

Sidney High SchoolSidney, Ohio12th Most Areas10-12 Biology and ReadingClayton C..Pepple, Principal

Loel Elementary SchoolSydney, OhioLois L. Edler, Principal

Athens City High SchoolThe Plains, OhioR. Stacey, Principal

Washington Local High5601 Clegg. DriveToledo, Ohio 43613J.A. Aufderheide, Project Direct

Whitmer High SchoolToledo, OhioSubject Matter AreasOpen LaboratoriesJalan Aufderheide, Principal

Willoughby-Eastlake City Jr., High38106 Euclid AvenueWilloughby, Ohio 44094Dr. Ellsworth Statler, Asst. Supt.

OKLAHOMA

Glenwood Elementary School'Midwest City, Oklahoma 73110Mr. Jack Huffman, Principal

Hawthorne Elementary School2300 NW 15 StreetOklahoma City, OklahomaMrs. Caroline Murnane, Principal

Parmlee Elementary School6700 South JudsonOklahoma City, OklahomaMrs. Leslie L. Kelly, Principal

Page 102: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Putnam Heights School Elementary1601 NW 36 StreetOkalhoma City, OklahomaMrs. Erma Baskett, Principal

OREGON

Highland Park SchoolBeaverton, OregonJack Nelson, Principal

Hoover ElementaryCorvallis, OregonL.A. & IPI MathAl Haydon, Principal

Madrona Elementary School520 Detrick DriveGrants Pass, Oregon

Manzanita Elementary School310 San Francisco StreetGrants Pass, Oregon

River Grove ElementaryLake Oswego1 and 5 All AreasDarrell Potter, Principal

Pendleton, OregonJohn Murry Junior Nigh School

Lincoln Elementary SchoolNW Carden AvenuePendleton, Oregon

Sherwood Heights ElementarySW MarshallPendleton, Oregon

Washington ElementarySW Byers AvenuePendleton, Oregon

Phoenix Elementary & High SchoolPhoenix, Oregon

Portland Public Schools9-12 Eng. and S.S.RooseveltJeffersonJacksonMadisonFranklinLincolnGrantMr. Alvin Hulse

-97-

1-8 Language ArtsSittonLaneWhitmanWoodlawnFosterBoiseJames JohnVestalCharles Boer

.KindergartenLanguage Development (CHILD)Perceptual-Motor Development (IMPS)(CHILD)LaneLentVestalChief JosephKingWoodlawnHumboltSunnysideGeorge

(IMPS)

BarlowFosterMarysvilleKellyScottSacajaweaMrs. Sarah Irvin,

PENNSYLVANIA

Abington High SchoolSchool District of Albington Township1841 Susquehanna StreetAbington, Pennsylvania 19001Dr. Allan A. Glatthorn, Principal

Altuna Area School DistrictAltuna, Penn.Thomas R. Helsep, Superintendent

McAnnulty Elementary School5151 McAnnulty RoadBaldwin-Whitehall Township, Penn.

Oakleaf Elementary SchoolBaldwin-Whitehall Township, Penn,

Downey Elementary SchoolHarrisburg, Penn.

Page 103: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

The Philadelphia School DistrictPhiladelphia, Penn.Hancock Demonstlation SchoolConwell Middle Magnet SchoolsDaniel R. Fascione, Asst. Director

IPI Demonstration SchoolsMcAnnulty Elementary SchoolPittsburgh, Penn.Downey ElementaryHarrisburg, Penn.Richland ElementaryQuakertown, Penn.

Richland Elementary SchoolQuakertown, Pennsylvania

RHODE ISLAND

Hampden Meadows SchoolNew Meadow RoadBarrington, Rhode Island 02806Mr. John I. Tappen, Principal

Middletown High. SchoolMiddletown, RhOde Island7 and 8, 9-12 Continuous Progress

GRASP, Pawtuckett School Dept.Park PlacePawtuckett, Rhode Island 02860Beatrice B. Donovan

Edmund W. FlynnProvidence, Rhode Island1-5 Math, Science, Music, ArtDavid Minicucci, SEC

Rhodes School110 Sherwood AvenueWarwick, Rhode Island 02888Mrs. Helen Harson, Principal

SOUTH CAROLINA

Meadowfield ElementaryRichland County School District:Columbia, South Carolina

SOUTH DAKOTA

Douglas School SystemEllsworth Ari Force BaseSouth DakotaM.D. McKenney, Principal

Huron High SchoolHuron, South DakotaModular Scheduling"Computer Costs Fifty Cents/Pupil"James Solon, Principal

Mt. Marty High SchoolYankton, South DakotaGrade 9 Algebra 1Grade 11 Algebra 2Sister Martin Mergen, Instructor

TENNESSEE

Tusculum ElementaryGreenville, Tenn.Dr. Robert De Lozier

Oakridge High SchoolProvidence RoadOak Ridge, Tenn. 37831Thomas R. Dunigan, Principal

TEXAS

James Bowie ElementaryBox 981Abilene, Texas 79604Daniel Russ

Alief Independent School DistrictP.O. Box 68Alief, Texas 77411Jerry L. McElyea, Superintendent

Brentwood School Elementary6700 Arroyo SadoAustin, TexasMr. K. R. Isbell

Metz Elementary School2102 Willow StreetAustin, Texas A702R.D. Evans

Project for Individualized InstructionJ. Robert Purvis, Director6700 Arroyo Seca - Room 304Austin, Texas 78757

Matzke ElementaryRoute 1 Box 145Cypress, Texas 77422Mrs. Kay Killough

-98-

Page 104: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Deer Park Independent School District203 ivy StreetDeer Park, Texas 77536Dr. Sebron B. Williams

Braeburn Elementary7707 RampartHouston, TexasMiss Dorothy Swope,

School

Principal

Burbank Elementary School216 Tidwell RoadHouston, Texas 77022Mrs. Charles Powell, Principal

Burrus Elementary School7707 RampartHouston, TexasMiss Dorothy Swope, Principal

Chatham Elementary School8110 Bertwood at Weaver RoadHouston, TexasWayman C. Anderson

Crawford Elementary School1510 JensenHouston, TexasEdward L. Klein, Principal

Dogan Elementary School4202 Liberty RoadHouston, TexasMrs. Irena D. Barnes, Principal

Durham Elementary School4803 BrinkmanHouston, TexasMiss Maude Fite, Principal

Garden Oaks Elementary School901 SuebarnettHouston, TexasMrs. Sue Bernard, Principal

Garden Villas Elementary School7185 Santa Fe StreetHouston, Texas 77017Mrs. Letham Reynolds, Principal

Gulf Crest Elementary School7414 FariwayHouston, Texas 77017Mrs. Eileen C. Wuycheck, Principal

-99-

Herod Elementary SchoolMrs. Mary Chatham, Principal5627 Jason .

Houston, Texas 77035

Highland Heighto Elementary865 QuinnHous ton, Texas

Mrs. Johnnie M. Brooks, Principal

Harris Elementary School811 BroadwayHouston, TexasGeorge J. Smith, Principal

Kashmere Gardens Elementary4901 Lockwood DriveHouston, Texas 77026Mrs. Annie B. Johnson

Clear Creek Independent School DistrictP.O. Box 799League City, TexasDr. A. N. Pupa

Lantrip Elementary School100 Telephone RoadHouston, Texas 77023Mr. Curtis A. Roberts

Memorial Elementary School6401 ArnotHouston, Texas 77007Mrs. Doris M. Mills, Principal

Neff Elementary School8200 Carvel StreetHouston, Texas 77036Mrs. Edith Moore, Principal

North Shore Sr. High School13501 Hollypark DriveHouston, Texas 77015Mrs. Wilma Ruth Cooper

Parker. Elementary School10626 Atwell DriveHouston, Texas 77035Mrs. Rosalind Hill

Red Elementary School4520 TonowandaHouston, Texas 77035Mrs. Louise Roberts

Page 105: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

River Oaks Elementary School2008 KirbyHouston, TexasMr. Theild Shastid, Principal

Stevens Elementary School1910 La MonteHouston, Texas 77018Miss Margaret McConnell, Principal

Walnut Bend Elementary School10620 Briar ForestHouston, Thxas 77042Mrs. Imogene Miller, Principal

Windsor VillaL,L Elementary School14040 PoloHouston, Texas 77045Miss Bernice Newton, Principal

La Porte lodependent School DistrictEast Avenue JLa Porte, TexasMr. Marvin Madison, Asst. Superintendent

Pasadena Independent School DistrictP.O. Box 1799Pasadena, TexasElmer G. Bundy

Park View Intermediate SchoolPasadena, TExas 77501John W Clinton, Principal

Pasadena High SchoolPasadena, TexasLonnie Keller, Principal

Bowie Elementary100 North MagdalenSan Angelo, Texas 76901

Michael Lehr

John Glenn Elementary100 North MagdalenSan Angelo, Texas 76901

Adine C. Wright, Director ofDissemination

Edgewood Independent School Dist.San Antonio, Texas 78207

Mr. Bennie Steinhauser

Central Elementary SchoolBox 479Smithville, Texas 78957

Mr. Leslie Hurta, Principal

Sam Houston Jr. HighBox 479Smithville, Texas 78957

Jimmy N. Stacy

UTAH

Cedar City High School600 South 703 WestCedar City, Utah 84720Mr. Clair Morris, Principal

Cedar North Elementary School550 West 200 NorthCedar.City, Utah 84720

Claudia J. Forsyth, Principal

East Midvale Elementary School6990 South Third EastSalt Lake City, Utah 84117

Mr. William Doxey, Principal

Parkside Elementary School544 Vine StreetMurray, Utah 84107Mr. Estel F. Campbell, Principal

Weber High School1100 Washington Blvd.Weber, UtahNephi Manning, Principal

Bell Junior HighOgden, UtahMr. Croft

Bonneville High SchoolOgden, UtahJay Taggart, Principal

Mar Lon Hills Elementary School4400 Madison AvenueOgden, UtahMr. Gene. Tones, Principal

Pioneer Elementary School250 North 1600 WestOgden, Utah

South San Antonio Independent School Dist. , Mr. Glen McEntire, Principal

Kendred ElementarySan Antonio, Texas Riverdale Elementary School1 and 2 All Subject Matter Areas 1150 West 4400 South(85%-90% Mexican Americans - Eng. is the Ogden, Utah

Major Problem) Mr. Robert Reed, Principal

-100-

Page 106: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Edgemont Elementary School550 East 3600 NorthProvo, Utah 84601Mr. Glen R. Brown, Principal

Dixon Junior High School750 West 2nd NorthProvo, Utah 84601John L. Matthews, Principal

Franklin Elementary School683 West 3rd SouthProvo, Utah 84601Mr. Darrell L. Hadley

Grandview Elementary School1591 North Jordan AvenueProvo, Utah 84601Mr. Dan R. Bird, Principal

Roy High SchoolRoy UtahDr. Spencer Wyatt

Lowell Elementary School134 "D" StreetSalt Lake City, Utah 84103Mr. Ray B. Stensrud, Principal

Meadow Moor Elementary School5315 South 1700 EastSalt Lake Utah 84117Mr. William Doxey, Principal

Parkview Elementary School1250 West Mead AvenueSalt Lake City, Utah 84104

Mr. Delbert M. Lamb, Principal

Rosalyn Heights Elementary School2291 South 20th EastSalt Lake City, Utah 84109Mrs. Naomi C. Evans, Principal

Bell View Elementary School800 East 9800 SouthSandy, Utah 84070Mr. Raymond W. Whittenberg, Principal

East Elementary School150 South Seventh EastTooele, Utah 84074Mr. F. Del Wasden

VIRGINIA

Alexandria Public Schools418 South Washington StreetAlexandria, Virginia 22313Dr. John Albohm, Supt.

Fort Hunt High SchoolAlexandria, VirginiaAnn M. Jaekle, Eng. Dept. Ch.

John Adams Middle SchoolAlexandria, VirginiaAlbert E. Edgemon, Principal

Lyles-Crouch Elementary SchoolAlexandria, Virginia

Arlington County Public Schools4751 Twenty-fifth Street, NorthArlington, Virginia 22207

Dr. Ray E. ReidDivision Superintendent

-101-

Brookfield Elementary SchoolChantilly, Virginia 22021

Bruce Odell, Principal

Fairfax County Public Schools10700 Page AvenueFairfax, Virginia 22030

Dr. EarlC. Funderburk, Supt.

Churchill Road Elementary SchoolMcClean, Virginia 22101

May M. Redman, Principal

Madison High SchoolYrenna, Virginia

WASHINGTON

Ardmore Elementary SchoolBellevue, Washington

Bellewood ElementaryBellevue, Washington

Myak Junior HighBellevue, Washington

Interlake HighBellevue, Washington.

Page 107: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

LaCamas ElementaryCamas, Washington

Vale School ElementaryCashmere, Washington

Campus ElementaryEastern Washington State CollegeK-6 All AreasR. Dean Gaudette, Principal

Morgan Junior HighE11r4nsburg, Washington

Glendale Junior HighHighiine, Washington

Lake Washington SpecialEducation Center11133 NE 65 StreetKirkland, Washington 98033Gordon R. Hauck, Principal

Sunnyside ElementaryPullman, Washington

Ingraham High SchoolSeattle, WashingtonDon C. Maxey, Principal

J.J. Miner Elementary SchoolSeattle, WashingtonRichard Aenis, Administrative Asst.

Nathan Hale High SchoolSeattle, Washington.Claude Turner, Principal

Thompson Junior High SchoolSeattle, WashingtonDon C. Kessler, Principal

Selah HighSelah, Washington

Kellogg Junior High

Shoreline, Washington

Shoreline HighShoreline, Washington

-102-

Joel E. Ferris High SchoolEast 30 20. - 37 Avenue

Spokane, WashingtonArthur Blauert, Principal

Havermale Junior HighSpokane, Washington

Indian Trail ElementarySpokane, Washington

Daffodil Valley ElementarySumner, Washington

Shadow Lake ElementaryTahoma (Maple Valley, Wash.

Jason Lee High SchoolVancouver, Washington

WEST VIRGINIA

George Washington High SchoolCharleston, West Virginia 25314

Mrs, Edith F. Martin, Director ofDissemination

WISCONSIN

Cashton ElementaryCashton, Wisconsin

Delavan-Darien High SchoolDelavan, WisconsinIntroductory Geometry, Typing 1 and 2Frederic C. Vorlop, Principal

Eau Claire Joint District #5122 Mappa StreetEau Claire, WisconsinClifford Stanford

Southeast High SchoolGreen Bay Joint District #11520 South Point RoadGreen. Bay, Wisconsin 54301Mr. Jerome McCormick, Principal

Green Bay High School (Southwest)Green Bay, Wisconsin

Page 108: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Janesville Joint District #1315 South Jackson StreetJanesville, WisconsinLouis Lpofboro

Adams School1138 St. Mary's AvenueJanesville, Wisconsin.Mr. Robert Cook, Principal

Wilson School465 Rockport RoadJanesville, WisconsinMr. Norman Graper, Principal

Franklin School305 W. LakesideMadison, WisconsinMr. Donald Stoddard, Principal

Ray W. Hugel ElementaryMadison, WisconsinK-6 L.A.Jerry Johnson, Principal

Wisconsin Heights High School.Wisconsin Heights School DistrictR.F.D. #1Mazomanie, Wisconsin 53560Mr. Dennis E. Renz, Principal

Piattenville Joint District #440 East Madison StreetPlatteville, WisconsinRonald 0. Sime

O.E. Gray ElementaryPlatteville, Wisconsin 53818

Westview Elementary SchoolPlatteville, WisconSin 53818

Racine Unified School District #12230 Northwestern AvenueRacine, WisconsinDavid L. Sweeney

Franklin School1012 Center StreetRacine, WisconsinMr. John Blickle, Principal

Stephen Bull School Elementary815 Dekoven AvenueRacine, WisconsinMr. Jerome Sullivan, Principal

Winslow School1325 Park AvenueRacine, WisconsinMiss Dawn Kloften, Principal

Page 109: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX B-4 PART B

SELECTED SITES "CLOSE TO HOME"

ALABAMA

Anniston City Board of EducationAnniston, AlabamaJame E. Owen, Assistant Supt.

ALASKA

Glenn Allen Area SchoolsGlenn Allen, Alaska8-12 Systems. Study ElectronicsWelding, Speech, Plastics,and Math.

Hoonah City School DistrictHoonah City, AlaskaK-6Donald MacKinnon, Superintendent

ARIZONA

G. S. Skiff SchoolPhoenix, ArizonaMajority of Areas

District 6 ElementaryPhoenix, Arizona

Erickson ElementaryTucson, Arizona2-6 Reading6th Math1-6 S.S., ScienceMary Belle McCorkle

Harelson SchoolTucson, ArizonaModeled after Lulu ElementaryDon Scott, Principal

Lulu ElementaryTucson, ArizonaAll AreasMr. Nelson, Principal

ARKANSAS

Henderson Jr. High School401 John Barrow RoadLittle Rock, ArkansasEugene Keeton, Principal

CALIFORNIA

Bolder Creek LlementaryBolder Creek, CaliforniaI.P.I. Program

Fremont Unified School DistrictFremont, California1,2,3,4,5,6,9,10,11Eng., S.S., Math, ScienceDr. William. J. Bolt, Superintendent

Dr. Eriood G. EdgarElementary SchoolGarden Grove, CaliforniaK-5 Reading, Math, S.S., L.A.J. Prescott Jones, Principal

Fountain Valley School DistrictHuntington Beach, CaliforniaTotal DistrictMike Brick, Assistant Superintendent

Loma Vista ElementaryLompoc, CaliforniaK-6 TeamingMaynard H. Strong, Principal

Walter Hays ElementaryPalo Alto, California5-6 Computerized Drill andPractice-Math

Chesterton ElementarySan Diego UnifiedSan Diego, California3-6 All AreasL. Gritz, Principal

-104-

Page 110: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Aragon High SSan Mateo, C9, 10, 11, 1Richard Rup

Brittan AcSan Carlos

choolalifornia2 Auto Mechanicsel, Instructor

as ElementaryCalifornia

Granada Community School (Elem.)Corte Madera, California

HillsdalSan Mat

TempleTemple

UCLALos

e High Schoolo, California

City Public SchoolsCity, California

Lab School (Elem.)Angeles, California

COLORADO

BolBoA

der Valley Public Schoolslder, ColoradoComputer Approach to

Experiences

Andrew Jackson ElementaryColorado Springs, ColoradoTeam Teaching and A Resource Cetter

Frederick Dickinson, Principal

Eastridge Cherry Creek SchoolDenver, Colorado1-6 Math, Spelling and ReadingDave Mathias, Principal

Washington ElementaryEnglewood, ColoradoK-3 Reading, Math, and P.E.Paul F. Lindsay, Principal

Appleton ElementaryGrand Junction, Colorado1-6 Reading and MathFrank Folk, Principal

-105-

Franklin ElementaryGreeley, Colorado

Haxtun High SchoolHaxtun, ColoradoCareer Selection EducationAl Renzelman, Principal

CONNECTICUT

Farmington ElementaryFarmington, ConnecticutJohn P. McDonough, Superintendent

North Haven High SchoolNorth Haven, ConnecticutDr. Charles F. Ritch.Jr., Supt.

West Hartford Public SchoolsWest Hartford, Connecticut

DELAWARE

West Dover ElementaryDover, Delaware

FLORIDA

Nova School SystemFort Lauderdale, Florida

Margate Junior High SchoolMargate, Florida7-8 Migrant Students, All Subject Areas

Melbourne High SchoolMelbourne, Florida

Highland Oaks ElementaryMiami Beach, FloridaMulti-age Grouping

Miami Springs High SchoolMiami, Florida

Page 111: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

GEORGIA

DeKelab School SystemDecatur, GeorgiaMr. Sam Moss, Deputy Superintendent

HAWAII

Kahala ElementaryHonolulu, Hawaii

Kailua high SchoolKailua, liawaii

Kapaa High SchoolKapaa, Kauai, Hawaii9-12 Eng., S.S., Independent StudyWil Welch, Principal

Kauai High SchoolLihue, Hawaii9-12 L.A.Emide Kuraoda, Principal

IDAHO

Elk River Public SchoolsBlackfoot, IdahoK-12 (150 children)Completely Individualized

Grand View High School9-12 All areas

Hagerman High SchoolHagerman, Idaho9-12 All Areas

ILLINOIS

Juliette Low ElementaryArlington Heights, Illinois

CAM AcademyChicago, IllinoisDrop-Outs School3932 MadisonChicago, Illinois

Lakeview High SchoolDecatur, Illinois9-12 Independent Study in All SubjectAreas

Gary Lonnon - Project Director

-106-

Ladd ElementaryEvanston, Illinois

Skokie Junior High SchoolWinnetka, Illinois

INDIANA

Ben Davis Junior High SchoolIndianapolis, Indiana'Flexible, Modular ScheduleLearning Contracts

East Noble High SchoolKendallville, IndianaFlexible SchedulingPace Maker Award

IOWA

Community Middle SchoolEagle Grove, Iowa6-9 Math, Science, and HumanitiesMrs. Glorida Shaull, Information Coordinator

Mason City High SchoolMason City, IowaPerformance CurriculumI.I. Program Self PacedJohn P. Patzwald, Principal

Urbandale High SchoolUrbandale, Iowamodular SchedulingDale Whatt, Principal

KANSAS

Medicine Lodge High SchoolMedicine Lodge, Kansas9-12 Any and All Subjects ThroughIndependent Study

Harold Hanck, Principal

Topeka Public SchoolsTopeka, KansasUngraded Primary, 4-9 and 10-12Remedial Reading7-9 and 10-12 Independent StudyWilliam L. Howard, AssociateSuperintendent

Page 112: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

KENTUCKY

L. B. J. Elementary

Jackson, KentuckyMiss Francis Johnson, ?rincipal

LOUISIANA

No Identification

MAINE

Rockland District High SchoolRockland, MaineFred Perkins, Principal

MARYLAND

Montgomery County iublic SchoolsRockville, harylandSamuel Goodman, Director of Research.

John F. Kennedy Senior High Sci.loolSilver Springs, MarylandModular SchedulingCharles M. Procter, Director of Rem,

MASSACHUSETTS

Hoarse Mann ElementaryNewton, Massachusetts1-6 Subject Matter Areas

Meadowbrook Junior HighNewton, Massachusetts7-9 Eng., S.S., Art, Music,Arts, Home ft., Typing(Continuous Progress)Maurice H. Blum, Principal

MICHIGAN

East Hill Junior High SchoolBloomfields, MichiganContinuous Growth

Franklin High SchoolLivonia, MichiganModular Scheduling"The Franklin Clan"'David D. Amerman, Principal

Marine City High SchoolMarine City, MichiganGrade 9 Physical ScienceGrade 10 Biology and Algebra10-12 World History, 11-12 English

Monroe Public SchoolsMonroe, MichiganElementary Learning LaboratoryTerry Semones, Director of ReadingServices

MINNESOTA

Central Junior High SchoolAlexandria, MinnesotaReading/Study Skills/InstructionalMaterials Center

John C. Peterson, Principal

Duluth, Minnesota Public SchoolsOn-going Programs in:

Industrial Chester Park ElementaryWashington Junior High SchoolCentral High SchoolOther Schools Also.

Quincy Public SchoolsQuincy, MassachusettsES-70Project PLANProject ABLELawrence P: Creedon, AssistantSuperintendent

-107-

Page 113: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Hopkins Senior HighHopkins, Minnesota10-12 Most AreasRay C. Weidner, Project Director

Cooper High SchoolNew Hope, Minnesota13-12 Modular ScheduleLyndon Ulvich, Principal

North Junior High SchoolSt. Cloud, Minnesota7-9 Modular Program30% Independent Study TimeJerry F. Larson, Principal

Lincoln High SchoolThief River Falls, MinnesotaModular Program12th Grade S.S. and EnglishR. Edlund, Principal

White Bear Senior HighWhite Bear Lake, Minnesota10-12 All AreasRay Wahlberg, Principal

MISSISSIPPI

McComb Public SchoolMcComb, MississippiJ. D. Prince, Superintendent

MISSOURI

Loretto in Kansas CityKansas City, Missouri

Kirksville SchoolKirksville, MissouriK-12 L.A., S.S.John Goeke, Title III Director

Ferguson-Florissant R-2 SchoolDistrictSt. Louis County, MissouriMcCluer High SchoolFerguson Junior High SchoolFlorissant Junior High SchoolCross Keys Junior High SchoolForeign Language InstructionFlorence Phelps, Director

-108-

Horton Watkins High SchoolSt. Louis, MissouriModular SchedulingGordon R. Garrett, Director of Research

The University School SystemUniversity City, MissouriMcKnight ElementaryUniversity City High School

MONTANA

No Identification

NEBRASKA

Heating Public SchoolsHastings, NebraskaFlexible Modular SchedulingGrades 3, 6, 10-12Ross L. Speece, Superintendent

Park ElementaryKearney, Nebraska5-6 All Subject Matter AreasDonald Clark, Principal

Archbishop Ryan Memorial High SchoolOmaha, NebraskaEntire School 9-12Sister M. Pacis, OSF

Harry A. Burke High SchoolOmaha, Nebraska

NEVADA

Roy Martin Junior High SchoolLas Vegas, Nevada7-9 Major AreasResource Study CenterBruce Miller, Principal

Ruby S. Thomas ElementaryLas Vegas, NevadaAll AreasMulti-Media Library

Virgin ValleyMesquite, Nevada7-12 Entire CurriculumBlane W. Allan, Principal

Page 114: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Somersworth High SchoolSomersworth, New Hampshire

NEW JERSEY

Washington ElementaryTrenton, New JerseyI.P.I. Demonstration School

Willingboro Public SchoolWillingboro, New Jersey1-3 I.P.I., 9-12 English, S.S., Math

NEW MEXICO

Western States Small Schools ProjectsProgrammed MathematicsDes Moines High School 7Programmed English

Quemado High SchoolCloudcroft High SchoolDora High School

Clovis Muncipal High SchoolProgrammed EnglishVernon Mills, Superintendent

Corona Public SchoolsCorona, New Mexico1-12 Reading, L.A., and Math

NEW YORK

Ithica School DistrictK-12 Audio-Tutorial Programof Cornell UniversityDr. Leonard C. Buyse, AssistantSuperintendent

Merrick Elementary SchoolMerrick, Long Island, New York

Miskayuna Public SchoolsSchenectady, New YorkJoseph Oakey, bpecial ProjectsDirector

-109-

Harlem Preparatory SchoolNew York, New YorkEdward F. Carpenter, Headmaster

NORTH CAROLINA

Durham Public SchoolsDurham, North Carolina

!)r. Spalding, rroject Director

Lejeune High SchoolNorth CarolinaNon- Graded High School

Parkland Senior High SchoolWinston-Salem, North CarolinaFlexible Scheduling and Team TeachingMarvin Ward, Principal

NORTH DAKOTA

Red River High SchoolGrand Forks, North Dakota10-12 "Non-timed Flexible Scheduling"Chris S. Belles, Principal

Campus Laboratory SchoolMinot State CollegeMinot, North DakotaK-4 Communication ProgramJoseph Wax, Principal

L. E. Berger Middle SchoolWest Fargo, North Dakota

West Fargo High School.West Fargo, North DakotaAll Areas

OHIO

Ford Junior High SchoolBerea School SystemCleveland, Ohio7-9 Major Subject Matter Areas, PlusArt, Industrial Arts, and Home Ec.

Learning Centers and LibrariesNiel Fort, Principal

Page 115: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Mareland SchoolShaker Heights, OhioAll Elementary Levels

Sidney High SchoolSidney , nh4n12th Most Areas10-12 Biology and ReadingClayton C. Pepple, Principal

Witmer High SchoolToledo, OhioSubject Matter AreasOpen LaboratoriesJalan Audferheide, Principal

OKLAHOMA

Putnam Heights Elementary1601 N.W. 36th StreetOklahoma City, OklahomaMrs. Erma Baskett, Principal

OREGON

Portland Public Schools9-12 Eng. and S.S.RooseveltJeffersonJacksonMadisonFranklinLincolnGrantMr. Alvin Hulse

1-8 Language ArtsSittonLaneWhitmanWoodlawnFosterBoiseJames JohnVestalCharles Boer

-110-

KindergartenLanguage Development (CHILD)Perceptual-Motor Development (IMPS)(MILD)LaneLentVestalChief JosephKingWoodlawnHumboldtSunnysideGeorge

(IMPS)

BarlowFosterMarysvilleKellyScottSacajaweaMrs. Sarah Irvin

Hoover ElementaryCorvallis, OregonL.A. and I.P.I. MathAl Haydon, Principal

River Grove ElementaryLake Oswego1 and 5 All AreasDarrell Potter, Principal

Pendleton Public SchoolsOn-going Programs in:John Murray Junior HighSerwood Heights ElementaryWashington Elementary

Highland Park Junior HighBeaverton7-9 Industrial ArtsJack Nelson, Principal

Page 116: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

PENNSYLVANIA

Abington High School North CampusAbington, PennsylvaniaGrades 9 and 10(Modular Scheduling)

The Philadelphia School DistrictPhiladelphia, PennsylvaniaHancock Demonstration SchoolConwell Middle Magnet SchoolsDaniel R. Fascione, AssistantDirector

I.P.I. Demonstration SchoolsMcAnnulty Elementary SchoolPittsburgh, PennsylvaniaDowney ElementaryHarrisburg, PennsylvaniaRichland ElementaryQuakertown, Pennsylvania

RHODE ISLAND

Middletown High SchoolMiddletown, Rhode Island7 and 8, 9-12 Continuous Progress

Edmund W. FlynnProvidence, Rhode Island1-5 Math, Science, Music, ArtDavid Minicucci, SEC

SOUTH CAROLINA

Meadowfield ElementaryRichland County School DistrictColumbia, South Carolina

SOUTH DAKOTA

Huron High School

Huron, South DakotaModular Scheduling"Computer Costs Seventy-FiveCents/Pupil

James Solon, Principal

Mt. Marty High SchoolYankton, South DakotaGrade 9 Algebra 1Grade 11 Algebra 2Sister Martin Mergen, Instructor

TENNESSEE

Tusculum ElementaryGreenville, TennesseeDr. Robert DeLozier

Oakridge High SchoolProvidence RoadOakridge, Tennessee 37831Thomas R. Dunnigan, Principal

TEXAS

Project for Individualized InstructionJ. Robert Purvis, Director6700 Arroyo Seca - Room 304Austin, Texas 78757

Austin Independent School DistrictBrentwood ElementaryMetz Elementary

Matzke ElementaryCypress, TexasK-5 All SubjectsKay Killough, Principal

Stevens ElementaryHouston, Independent School DistrictK-6 Basic Skills to Independent StudyMargaret McConnell, Principal

John h. Glenn Junior High SchoolSan Angelo, TexasModular SchedulingAdine C. Wright, Director ofDissemination

Kindred ElementarySan Antonio, Texas1 and 2 All Subject Matter Areas(85%-9U% Mexican Americans - Englishis the Major Problem)

Page 117: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

UTAH

Parkside ElementaryMurray Utah

Roy High SchoolRoy, UtAL

Meadow Moor ElementaryGranite DistrictSalt Lake City, Utah

Parkview ElementarySalt Lake City, Utah

East UementaryTooele, Utah

VERMONT

No Identification

VIRGINIA

Alexandria Public Schools418 W. Washington StreetAlexandria, Virginia 22313

Dr. John Albohm, Superintendent

Fort Hunt HighAlexandria, VirginiaAnn M. Jackie, English Dept.Chairman

John Adams Middle SchoolAlexandria, VirginiaAlbert E. Edgeman, Principal

WASHINGTON

Campus ElementaryEastern Washington State CollegeK-6 All AreasR. Dean Gaudette, Principal

SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLSOn Going Programs In:Roxhill ElementaryM.Arona ElementaryMinor ElementaryLaurelhurst ,Elementary

Joel E. Ferris High SchoolSpokane, Washington9-12 All SubjectsArthur Sievert, Principal

WEST VIRGINIA

George Washington High SchoolCharleston, West Virginia 25314

Mrs. Edith Martin,Director of Dissemination

-112-

WISCONSIN

Caahton ElementaryCashton, Wisconsin

Delavan-Darien High SchoolDelavan, WisconsinIntroductory Geometry, Typing 1 and 2Frederic G. Vorlop, Principal

Green Nay High School (Southwest)Green Bay, Wisconsin

Janesville ElementaryJanesville, Wisconsin

Ray W. Hugel ElementaryMadison, WisconsinK-6 L.A.Jerry Johnson, Principal

WYOMING

No Identification

Page 118: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX C-1

Mr. Milton S. DeMelloKailua High School451 Ulumanu DriveKailua, Hawaii 96734

Dear Mr. DeMello:

Thank you for completing our individualized instruction programquestionnaire. We would like to include a site visitation to yourschool as part of our nationwide study about on-going individualizedinstruction programs.

Dr. Jack V. Edling will ,be in Hawaii from May 8 - May 15, 1969He would like to visit with you and your school's indl/idualizedinstruction program on Monday, May 12, 1969. During this visithe will be interested in getting from you and your staff the, followinginformation: (a) what are the goals of your program; (b) how are youaccomplishing meeting these goals; (c) how was your program originatedand implemented;. (d) what evaluation, formal or informal, do you haveto support your program's success; (e) what problems have you had; and(f) what are your plans for the future. Please do not consider thisa formal list, but just as a gdide that you might find helpful beforeDr. Edling visits your school.

The information gathered by Dr. Edling will be used to facilitateinterested schools in implementing their program of individualized in-struction. The visit to your school is part of a U.S. Office of Ed-ucation sponsored project to find out what is going on in individualizedinstruction and locate the information necessary to implement such aprogram.

We are looking forward to Dr. Edling's visit with 'you on May 12,1969. Please complete the enclosed card and return it to me at yourearliest convenience.

Sincerely,

James E. BuckIndividualized InstructionProject Coordinator

Page 119: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX C-2

Data Collection Tour Site Visitations

1- John Murray Junior High School 13- Juliette Low Elementary SchoolPendelton, Oregon

Arlington Heights, Illinois

2- Hagerman High School (Grandview H.S.) 14- Skokie Junior High SchoolHagerman, Idaho Winnetka, Illinois

3- Parkside Elementary School 15- Ladd Elementary SchoolMurray, Utah

Evanston, Illinois

East Elementary School 16- Janesville Elementary SchoolTooele, UtahJanesville, Wisconsin

5- Parkview Elementary School 17- Cashton Elementary SchoolSalt Lake City, Utah

Cashton, Wisconsin

6- Meadow Moor Elementary SchoolGranite DistrictSalt Lake City, Utah

18- Green Bay High School (Southwest)Green Bay, Wisconsin

.

19- Urbandale High School7- Roy High School

Urbandale, IowaRoy, Utah

20- Burke High School8- Huron High School

Omaha, NebraskaHuron, South Dakota

21- Haxtun High School9- L.E. Berger Middle School Haxtun, Colorado

West Fargo, North Dakota

22- Franklin Elementary School10- Chester Park Elementary School Greeley, ColoradoDuluth, Minnesota

23- G.S. Skiff School - Elementary11- Washington Junior High School Phoenix, ArizonaDuluth, Minnesota

12- Central High SchoolDuluth, Minnesota

-114-

24- Brittan Acres Elementary

San Carlos, California

Page 120: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

25- Granada Community School (Elem.) 37- DeKalb Public Schools (Elem.)Corte Madera, California Decatur, Georgia

26- Hillsdale High School 38- Durham Elementary SchoolDurham, North CarolinaSan Mateo, California

27- UCLA Lab School (Elem,)Los Angeles, California

28- Temple City Public Schools

39- Montgomery Public SchoolsRockville, Maryland

40- West Dover ElementaryTemple City, California Dover, Delaware

29- Pacoima Elementary School 41- Merrick Elementary SchoolPacoima, California Merrick, Long Island, New York

30- District 6 Elementary School 42- West Hartford Public SchoolsPhoenix, Arizona

31- John H. Glenn Jr. High School

Hartford, Connecticut

43- Niskayuna High SchoolSan Angelo, Texas Schenectady, New York

32- Matzke Elementary School 44- Milton Community SchoolCypress, Texas Milton, Pennsylvania

33- McComb Public Schools 45- Harrisburg Elementary SchoolMcComb, Mississippi Harrisburg, Pennsylvania

34- Miami Springs Sr. High School 46- Kahala ElementaryMiami Springs, Florida Honolulu, Hawaii

35- Nova Public Schools 47- Kailua High SchoolFort Lauderdale, Florida Kailua, Hawaii

36- Melbourne High School 48- Kauai High 4 IntermediateMelbourne,,, Florida Lihue, Kauai, Hawaii

Page 121: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX D

Bibliography on Individual Differences and Individualized Instruction.

Note: Many references are not listed herein because they are listed in

the bibliographies cited.

Page 122: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

APPENDIX D

Alexander, William M. & Hines, Vynce A., Independent Rudy. in SecondarySchools ERIC, Ed 010 043 Report number CRP-2969. Gainesville, Fla:University of Fla., 1966, p. 169

Audiovisual Instruction, 1968, 13, (3) March

Aubrey, Roger F., "What is the Role of the Elementary School Teacher",Elementary School Journal, 277-283 March 1968

Bahner, John M., "Modern Goals for Secondary Education, Education, 268-275,January 1966

Bushnell, Don D.,. The Computer as an Instructional Tool: A summary,SP-1554, Santa Monica, Calif.: System Development Corporation, 1964

Carmichael, Bennie, Turney and David, "Research and Individualization",Educational Leadership, 96-101, November 1959

Concannon, Sister J., An Experimental Study. of t1 Influence of Individualvs. Group Instruction on Spatial Abilities in Preschool Children,ERIC, ED 010 126 Report Number CRP-2885. Chestnut Hill, Mass.:Boston Coll, School of Education, September 1966, p. 166

Coulson, John E.,(Ed) Programmed Learning and simetissg! Instruction,New York: Wiley, 1962

Deep, Donald, The Effect of an Individually. Prescribed Instruction Programin Arithmetic on Pupils at Different Ability Levels, ERIC, ED 010 210Report Number BR-5-0253-Thesis -2. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University ofPittsburgh, 1966, p. 104

Edling, Jack V. & others, Four Case Studies of Programmed Instruction,New York: Fund for the Advancement of Education, June 1964, p. 119

Esbensen, Thorwald, Working with Individualized Instruction-The Duluth_Experience, Palo Alto: Fearon Publishers, 1968

Finn, James D., Instructional technology, Bulletin of the NationalAssociation of Secondary School Principals, 1963, 47, May, 99-119

Flanagan, John C.,' "Functional Education for the Seventies", Phi Delta Kappan,27-32, September 1967

Fact Sheets on Education Improvement Protects Pre-School Through CommunityCollege, (editor Brenda Cox) Ford Foundation, 1968

Gardner, John, Excellence, Can We Be Equal and Excellent, Too? New York:

Harper. & Bros., 1961, 28

Gardner, John, Self-Renewal: The Individual and the Innovative Society,

New York: Harper and Row, 1964

-117-

Page 123: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Gentile, J. Ronald, The First Generation of Computer-Assisted InstructionalSystems: An Evaluative Review, University Park, Pa.: Computer-AssistedInstruction,Lab., Penn State University, 1965

Glaser, Robert & others,Studies of the Use of Programmed Instruction inthe Classroom, ERIC, ED 010 208 Report Number Br-5-0253-TR-1. Pittsburgh,Pa.: Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh,May 1966, p. 194

Glaser, Robert, Adapting. the Elementary School Curriculum to IndividualPerformance, Pittsburgh, Pa: Reprint number 26, Learning Research andDevelopment Center, University of Pittsburgh, 1968, p. 22

Glaser, Robert, The Program for Individually Prescribed Instruction, ERIC,ED 010519 Report Number BR-5-0253-WP-2. Pittsburgh, Pa: Learning Researchand Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, 1966, p. 8

Glaser, Robert, Ramage, William W. & Lipson, Joseph I. (with Appendix byA. Edward Blackhurst). The Interface Between Student and SubjectMatter, Pittsburgh, Pa.: Learning Research and Development Center,University of Pittsburgh, 1964

Glaser, Robert, The New Pedagogy, ERIC, Ed 210 205 Report Number BR-5-0253-1.Pittsburgh, Pa.:' Learning Research & Development Center, University ofPittsburgh, November 1965, p. 29

Glaser, Roberl-., Training Research andlEducation, New York: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.,1962

1

Grambs, Jean D. and Westjen, Walter B , "Being Equally Different-A NewRight for Boys and Girls", The National Elementary Principal, XLVI

No. 2: 59-67, November 1966

Gropper, G. L. & Kress, G. C., "Indiv dualizin,.. Instruction Through PacingProcedures", Audiovisual Conununi ations Review, 1965, 13 (2) 165-182

hint, Brue, "Surprising Things Happen When They Study on Their Own",Grade Teacher, 114+, November 196

Jacquette, Charles, An Individualized English Program for High School Freshmenand Sophomores, ERIC, ED 011 789, Denver, Colorado: State Department ofEducation, 1964, p. 11

Jensen, Arthur R., "Varieties of Individual Difference in Learning", Learningand Individual Differences, (edited by Robert M. Gagne), Columbus, Ohio:Chareles E. Merril Books, Inc., 1967

Lindvall, C. M., & Bolvin, John, The Project for Individually PrescribedInstruction: The Oakleaf Project, ERIC, ED 010 522 Report No. BR-5-9253-WP-8.Pittsburgh, Pa.: Learning Research & Development Center, PittsburghUniversity, February 1966, p. 19

Page 124: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

MacDonald, James B. and others, An Experimental Study of the Group Versus the9ne-to-One Instructional Relationship in First Grade Basal Readingyrograms, ERIC, Ed 010 330 Report Number CRP-2674. Madison, Wisconsin:University of Wisconsin School of Education, 1966, p.55

Morningstar, Ned, The Aspen Continuous.Prngress Plan, ERIC, Ed 011 788,Denver: Colorado State Department of Education, 1965, p.33

National Society for the Study oftwenty-fourth Yearbook, Part1967

National Society for the Study of(edited by Nelson B. Henry),of Chico Press, 1962

Education, (edited by Careton Washburne),II, Chicago: University of Chicago Press,

Education, Individualizing Instruction,sixty-first Yearbook, Chicago: University

National Society for the Study of Education, Programed Instruction, (editedby Phil C. Lange), sixty-sixth Yearbook, Part Its Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press, 1967

National Society for the Study of Education, Educational Evaluation: NewRoles, New Means, (edited by Ralph W. Tyler), sixty-eighth Yearbook,Part II, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969

Oba, Betty, The Individualization of the Teaching of Spelling in theElementary School, ERIC, Ed 011 790, Denver: Colorado State Departmentof Education, 1964, p. 17

Ovird, Glen FContinuous Progress Ideas-Report of Schools Visited, Provo,Utah: Brigham Young University, 1966

Ovard, Glen F., Individualizing Instruction in the Rocky Mountain Region,Denver, Colorado: Rocky Mountain Education Laboratory, 1967

Parker, Don H., Schooling for Individual Excellence. New York: ThomasNelson & Sons, 1963

Petrequin, Gaynor, Individualized Learning through Modular-FlexiblePpagrammina, San Francisco: McGraw-Hill, 1968

Prevention of Failure, Washington, D.C.: Department of Elementary-Kindergarten-Nursery Education, National Education Association, 1965

Read, Edwin A., Ruel, Allred A., Baird, Louise O., Continuous Progress inSpelling-An Individualized Spelling Program, Provo, Utah: BrighamYoune University. 1968

Sands, Theodore, & Hicklin, Charles R. The Development and Testing ofInstructional Materials for Gifted Primary Pupils - Final Report,ERIC, Ed 010 766, Illinois State University, Normal, 1965, p. 69

Spenser, Doris U., Individualized Reading...Versus A Basal Reading:Programin Rural Communities, ERIC, Ed 012 686 Report Number CRP-3179, JohnsonState College, Johnson, Vermont, 1966

-119-

Page 125: AUTHOR TITLE An Interpretative Study of …questionnaire was administered to all segments of the target audience in upper New York State, Maryland, mid-Texas, southern California,

Spitzer, Liliank, A Selected Bibliography on Individualized Instruction,Los Angeles: I /i) /E /A /, 1968

Starkweather, John A. COMPUTEST: A computer language for individualtesting, instruction, and interviewing, Psychological Reports, 1965,17, 227-237

Stolurow, Lawrence M., Computer -Based Instruction, Technical Report #9.Urbana, Illinois Training Research Lab.: University of Illinois, 1965

Suppes, Patrick, Accelerated program in elementary-schoolthe second year, Psychology in the Schools, 1966, 3,

Suppes, Patrick, Computer-based mathematics instruction:of the project, Bulletin of the International StudyMathematics Learning, 1965, 3, 7-22

mathematics -

294-307

The first yearGroup for

Tyler, Leona E., The Psychology of Human Differences, New York:Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1956

Valdman, Albert, Th= Implementation and Evaluation of a Multiple-CreditSelf-Instructional Elementary. French Course, Final Report. ERIC,Ed 010 466 Report No. NDEA-VI-88-3, Bloomington, Indiana: IndianaUniverSity, 1965, p. 298

Wade, Serena E., A Basic Reference Shelf on Individualized Instruction,Stanford, Cal: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Media & Technology,1968

Walker, A. Reed, "Education and Individuality", National Association ofSchool Principals' Bulletin, 61-68, December 1965

Washburne, Careton W. and Marland, Sidney P. Jr., Winnetka, Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963

Western States Small Schools Project, Individualizing Instruction in SmallSchools, ERIC, Ed 011 474, December 1966, p. 36

Wolfson, Bernice T., "Individualizing Instruction", Washington, D.C.:National Education Association, 32+, November 1966

Yeager, John L., Measures of Learning Rates for Elementary. School Studentsin Mathematics and Reading Under a Program of Individually PrescribedInstruction, ERIC, Ed 010 209 Report Number BR-5-0253-Thesis-1.Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: University of Pittsburgh, p. 92