australian showcase:theme 1:australia and waterined_v3
DESCRIPTION
Presentation of Vice President Dr. Willem F. Vlotman at 21stTRANSCRIPT
1/11/2011
21 October 2011, Tehran, Iran
Australian Showcase:Theme 1:
Australia and WaterWillem F. Vlotman
Outline Presentation
Background on climate, irrigation and drainageg , g gBackground on water management in AustraliaDrivers of the Water Act 2007 and why we are modernising our water management systemsGovernment investments; Mary Harwood
1/11/2011
Climatic Regions
Distribution of surface water run‐off
1/11/2011
Background of water management in Australia
1890’s – 1980’s Development era – ‘drought, royal commission, new d ’dams’
1915 NSW, VIC and SA, River Murray Waters Agreement.1987 Murray-Darling Basin Agreement.1994 COAG Agreement on Water Reform – environmental
flows, unbundling water and land ‘titles’, corporatisation and cost recovery
1995 MDB ‘Cap’ on more extractions2004 COAG National Water Initiative reaffirms commitments to
reform agenda, eflows and markets’ role in reallocating g gwater
2007 Commonwealth Water Act.2019 Murray-Darling Basin Plan in effect in all States
These formal processes have been underpinned by considerable effort by many people at local, regional, state and national levels
Main Objectives of the Water Act 2007
An Act to make provisions for the management of the water resources of the Murray Darling Basin and to make
The Murray-Darling Basin AgreementManagement of Basin water resources (MDBA)
Basin PlanWater Resource plans for particular water resource plan areasCritical human water needs
resources of the Murray-Darling Basin, and to make provisions for other matters of national interest in relation to water and water information, and for related purposes.
Audits by National Water Commission (NWC)Basin water charge and water market rules (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, ACCC)Murray-Darling Basin Water rights Information ServiceCommonwealth Environmental Water HolderWater Information (Bureau of Meteorology, BOM)Enforcement
1/11/2011
MDB Basin PlanVariability of available water; total inflows in Murray‐Darling
basin
14,000
Development of diversions for consumptive use in the Murray‐Darling Basin
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
GL/
y
Period of above average inflows
0
2,000
1927 1936 1945 1954 1963 1972 1981 1990 1999 2008
MDB NSW VIC SA QLD ACT
1/11/2011
Murray-Darling Basin water resources
Interceptions Interceptions
Environment60%
Flow to sea40%
p
Diversions42%
Consumptive
Environment58%
42%Consumptive
Environment58%
Environment
Flow to the sea
p
Diversions
Environment
Flow to the sea
33 - 30%Consumptive
Environment67 - 70%
33 - 30%Consumptive
Environment67 - 70%
WITHOUTDEVELOPMENT
WITHOUTDEVELOPMENT CURRENTCURRENT FUTUREFUTURE
Balancing consumptive and environmental requirements
How much water is needed for a healthy river?yHow do we maintain productivity without compromising the environment?What is the most effective and efficient way to source water for the environment?
Reconciling environmental, social/cultural and
Ecological health: balancing extractive and environmental use of water resourcesResilient communities: with viable irrigation industriesSustainable food production: maintaining ( & increasing) production with less water
g ,economic considerations: triple bottom line
1/11/2011
The SRWUIP was established by the Australian government in 2008 with a total
Sustainable Rural Water Use and Infrastructure Program (SRWUIP)
The SRWUIP was established by the Australian government in 2008 with a total funding of $A5.8 billion.
Much of the funding is focused in the Murray Darling Basin
$3.2 billion is committed to State Priority Projects under the Inter‐Governmental Agreement on Murray Darling Basin Reform.
Investment Objectives for State Priority Projects:
Invest in infrastructure to improve the efficiency and productivityof rural water use and management;
Help secure a long‐term sustainable future for irrigated agriculture and communities;
Deliver substantial and lasting returns of water to the environment; and
Deliver value for money projects.
1/11/2011
SRWUIP ‐ Program Structure
SRWUIP “head program”
State priority projects (up to $3.2b) Other commitments
State led projects Commonwealth led projects
Major components include:
Victoria $1,103m NSW Private Irrigation Infrastructure
On-Farm Irrigation Efficiency $300m
South Australia $420mQueensland $160m
New South Wales$708m
Australian Capital Territory $85m
Infrastructure Operators Program $650m
South Australia Private Irrigation Infrastructure Program $110m
Efficiency $300m
Strengthening Basin Communities $200m
National Water Market System $56mCompliance and Enforcement $60m
SRWUIP - Who is delivering the projects?SRWUIP delivery partners include:
State government departments –
e g water primary industrye.g. water, primary industry, environment
Irrigation infrastructure operators
Irrigation industry associations
Industry commodity bodies
e.g. rice‐growers, tomato growers
Individual irrigators
Catchment management (resourcemanagement) authorities Natural
Local government
Water utilities
CSIRO (sustainable yields studies)
1/11/2011
SRWUIP - What sorts of projects are being funded?Planning and investigationslocal governmentirrigation districts/corporationshot spots assessments (identifying areas of water loss and leakage)rural water re‐use resource assessment
upgrading irrigation systems off farmfixing/replacing leaky old systemslining channels, replacing channels with pipesreconfiguring and rationalising channel systems and farm off‐takesdecommissioning channels and providing alternate stock and domestic supplyImproving water delivery standards
installing compliant water metersInfrastructure and other works on farm to improve water use efficiencyworks and measures to improve ecological health and restore natural flows water saving municipal projects – e.g. storm water harvesting
SRWUIP – current issues
Spotlight on SRWUIP’s role in contributing water savings to ‘bridge the gap’ to the sustainable diversion limits under the Murray Darling Basin Plan
• Focus on water savings for the environment vs. broader benefits, including industry and environmental outcomes
• What benchmarks are appropriate? …$/ML, multiple of water market price.
• Building and using local knowledge and capacity in rolling out projects
Timelines for infrastructure roll‐out – managing expectations, while i fit f l t d i bl j tsecuring fit‐for‐purpose, properly costed, viable projects
Integration of infrastructure investment (SRWUIP) with the water purchase program in the MDB
Supporting delivery system/footprint rationalisation for irrigation districts
1/11/2011
Closing remarks
On water management and reform in Australia:Long history of steps towards better water managementIn a dry, highly variable climate and water resourcesCurrent focus is on increasing water use efficiency andCurrent focus is on increasing water use efficiency and rebalancing water use (environment and extraction) in the Murray Darling for long term sustainabilityHow to ensure best results are achieved from investment in water saving technologiesThe Basin Planning process for the Murray Darling – bringing together many aspects of water reformWater MarketsManagementGovernment investment in infrastructure and water buyback to assist transition to lower water extraction levels