australian resources online nrm interoperability in action workshop 23-24 may 2006

Australian Resources Online

NRM Interoperability in Action Workshop

23-24 May 2006

NRM Interoperability in Action 2

Welcome and Introduction (Peter Wilson)

• Welcome

• Workshop Objectives

• Introductions


AgendaTime Activity

08:30 – 9:00 Registration, Tea/Coffee

09:00 – 09:10 Welcome & Introduction

09:10 - 10:20 Background, Context and Guiding Principles

10:20 – 10:50 Morning Tea

10:50– 11:50 Group Work: Users, Use-Cases and Scope

11:50 – 12:30 Plenary - Report Back

12:30 – 13:30 Lunch

13:30 – 15:45 Group Work - Develop Abstract Information Model

15:45– 16:00 Afternoon Tea

16:00 – 17:15 Plenary – Reporting back and Consolidation

Evening: dinner organised by NLWRA - Thai


Workshop Approach

• Active participation and contributions from participants

• Intensive group work with regular reporting back• Main workshop components

– Introduction: presentation of context and baseline– Define stakeholders, use-cases and scope– Define abstract information model for NRML– Modelling of information model in UML (using “Hollow

World” jumpstart)


Workshop Outcomes

1. An agreed set of use cases for NRML users

2. An agreed scope for NRML

3. Develop “final” application schemas (abstract models) for water quality (based on current AWDIP work) and vegetation extent information

4. Consideration of an “overarching” NRML component to glue the theme based bits together

5. Recommendation of a technical implementation of the above abstract models

6. Harmonisation with Feature Model, O&M, Coverage Model.

7. Initial thoughts about schemas for project/activity and weeds/ferals possibly based on a standard grid reporting framework


Guiding Principles1. Theme based application schemas are based on data/information

required for NM&EF reporting in the first instance

2. Schemas should align where possible to existing standards

3. Schemas should allow future extension to cater for additional NRM data and information needs

4. Striking a balance between schemas that are rich enough to support the (high-priority) use-cases, and are lean (and standardised) enough to allow broad take-up and implementation

5. Schemas should be implementable in the short term to allow demonstration of the capability of distributed information management and reporting

6. NRML is focussed on a specific domain & specific usage scope (e.g. reporting) and is not intended to be the overarching schema for “all things NRM”.


Context and Baseline (Simon Cox)


Questions & Discussion


Morning Tea


Groupwork:Users, Use-cases and Scope

• Group Allocations– Members– Scribe/Spokesperson

• Instructions– User Groups– Use-Case template and Example


Group Allocations

Group A Group B Group C(Water) (Vegetation) (Other)

Evert B Matt B David J

Jonathan D Leo B Milos S

David L Geoff D Chris A

Jake Mc M Belinda A Andrew B

Simon C/Jake McM Simon C Maurits vdV


User GroupsCode Name Role in System Sample Users/ Job

Positions

GU General User Query and display natural resource information (water & vegetation extent)

Novice/Competent/Expert.

[Workshop outcome]

C Custodian Make NR information available in NRML compliant web service

[Workshop outcome]

CA Custodian Administrator

Moderates publication of services from a custodian perspective.

[Workshop outcome]

SA System administrator for NRML central facilities

Manages, moderates and administers NRML Registry (publishing, quality assurance, notification of users, compiling usage and user feedback, management of user profiles)

[Workshop outcome]

Use-Case ExampleUser Name Roger

User Group User

Role Regional GIS Officer in State Government Department

Skill level (Novice, Competent, Expert)

Competent

Narrative Roger has been asked by his local CMA contact (CMA officer) for a map showing salinity and water quality issues in a particular sub-catchment. Using his desktop GIS, he queries the registry to see if one already exists. This is not the case, so he searches for and finds a number of salinity and water quality datasets in that area. He examines the titles, modification dates and data descriptions to choose the most appropriate for his purpose and adds them as layers to his map. When the map is ready, he prints it off and takes it to the CMA staff.

Key Tasks Indicator ReportingMetadata examinationDataset selection (binding)Create Map (data rendering)

Information (Product) Requirements

Water Quality & Salinity, catchment levelParameters: Electrical ConductivityCurrent and historicMetadata

Tool(s) used Desktop GIS

Importance (High, Medium, Low)

Medium

Additional Comments


In your groups:

• User Groups:– Confirm profiles, and enter sample users/job

positions

• Use-Cases:– Develop at least one for each user group

(more for general-users)– Identify key tasks and information product

requirements– Indicate importance


Reporting Back

• Spokesperson reporting back– User group profiles, sample users– Use cases

• Present• Prioritise


LUNCH


Plenary: Methodology and Examples (Simon Cox)


Groupwork:Develop Abstract Information

Model• Group Allocations

– Members– Scribe/Spokesperson

• Instructions


Group Allocations

Group A Group B Group C(Water) (Vegetation) (Other)

Evert B Matt B David J

Jonathan D Leo B Milos S

David L Geoff D Chris A

Jake Mc M Belinda A Andrew B

Simon C/Jake McM Simon C Maurits vdV


In your groups:

• Using O&M Vocabulary, develop “abstract information model:– “lists of stuff”:

• Features of Interest• Observed Properties• Observation Procedures

– Boxes and Arrows?– Use flip charts…


Afternoon Tea


Reporting Back

• Spokesperson reporting back– Verification against guiding principles, use-

cases and scope– Consolidation and Harmonisation of

Information Models– Implications for Systems Architecture


Discussion and Close

australian resources online nrm interoperability in action workshop 23-24 may 2006

Documents

information needsstriking

set of use cases

feature model

coverage model

nmef reporting

highpriority usecases

abstract models harmonisation

additional nrm data