Attribution of Haze Phase Attribution of Haze Phase 2 and Technical Support 2 and Technical Support

SystemSystemProject UpdateProject Update

Dust Emissions Joint Forums – Dust Emissions Joint Forums – Tempe, AZTempe, AZ

November 16, 2005November 16, 2005

OverviewOverview

AoH Phase 2/TSS work plan AoH Phase 2/TSS work plan http://wrapair.org/forums/aoh/meetings/050817c/AoH_PhaseII_Work_plan_drahttp://wrapair.org/forums/aoh/meetings/050817c/AoH_PhaseII_Work_plan_draft_081705.pdfft_081705.pdf

Review of data summary products and Review of data summary products and suggested modifications for Phase 2suggested modifications for Phase 2

IWG input from August meetingIWG input from August meeting AoH workgroup discussion from AoH workgroup discussion from

September 14-15September 14-15 TSS scoping studyTSS scoping study Weight of evidence approachWeight of evidence approach Critical milestonesCritical milestones Example graphicsExample graphics

Goals of the AoH Phase 2 Goals of the AoH Phase 2 AnalysisAnalysis

Refine Phase 1 techniques for use in Phase 2.Refine Phase 1 techniques for use in Phase 2. Reduce uncertainty and address the remaining Reduce uncertainty and address the remaining

uncertainty in modeled data and attribution uncertainty in modeled data and attribution results.results.

Analyze the differences between modeled Analyze the differences between modeled results for 2002 and the projected 2018 base results for 2002 and the projected 2018 base case and various other control strategy case and various other control strategy scenarios.scenarios.

Develop additional analytical approaches (e.g., Develop additional analytical approaches (e.g., receptor modeling, trends analysis, receptor modeling, trends analysis, determination of the representativeness of determination of the representativeness of baseline data set).baseline data set).

Goals of the AoH Phase 2 TSS Goals of the AoH Phase 2 TSS ProjectProject

Provide a single web-based location for access Provide a single web-based location for access and display of technical data, display of and display of technical data, display of analytical results, and the reference location for analytical results, and the reference location for related documentation to support the regional related documentation to support the regional haze implementation plans.haze implementation plans.

Provide specific analysis tools to synthesize Provide specific analysis tools to synthesize technical and contextual data and GIS layers, technical and contextual data and GIS layers, conduct analyses, and store results for conduct analyses, and store results for subregional/local/Class I area-specific regional subregional/local/Class I area-specific regional haze planning.haze planning.

Provide the analysis and display tools for Phase 2 Provide the analysis and display tools for Phase 2 analyses, and the technical support analyses, and the technical support documentation for WRAP region SIPs and TIPs documentation for WRAP region SIPs and TIPs for regional haze.for regional haze.

Team Members and Team Members and ResponsibilitiesResponsibilities

Team Member Primary Contacts Responsibilities ARS Joe Adlhoch Analysis lead, responsible for compilation and

interpretation of attribution and related results and communication with AoH and Implementation work groups

CIRA Shawn McClure Rodger Ames

Design/development lead and hosting; acquire appropriate data sets; use other team members for development support as appropriate (funded under separate contract)

ENVIRON Gerry Mansell Ralph Morris

Emissions inventory development and modeling results (predominantly funded under separate contract) Transfer of emissions, modeling, and attribution data to CIRA; development support for GIS applications as required

Image Matters Jeff Ehman John Davidson

Architectural/technical design; metadata template and catalog development; data discovery, viewing, and access capability - design and implementation; interoperability standards and specifications; GIS application support as required; documentation

AoH Work Group Provide oversight and review of web site development and products

Work Plan Tasks – Analysis Work Plan Tasks – Analysis ProjectProject

Task 1: Solicit and define user requirements Task 1: Solicit and define user requirements from the appropriate WRAP work groups.from the appropriate WRAP work groups.

Task 2: Prepare suite of data products based Task 2: Prepare suite of data products based on final 2002 emissions, modeling, and on final 2002 emissions, modeling, and attribution results.attribution results.

Task 3: Define the weight of evidence (WOE) Task 3: Define the weight of evidence (WOE) approach to be applied to AoH Phase 2 data.approach to be applied to AoH Phase 2 data.

Task 4: Interpret 2018 results and implications Task 4: Interpret 2018 results and implications for showing progress under the Regional Haze for showing progress under the Regional Haze Rule.Rule.

Task 5: Prepare draft and final AoH Phase 2 Task 5: Prepare draft and final AoH Phase 2 analysis report.analysis report.

(Task 11: Travel to provide progress reports (Task 11: Travel to provide progress reports and solicit project feedback at WRAP meetings.)and solicit project feedback at WRAP meetings.)

Work Plan Tasks – TSS ProjectWork Plan Tasks – TSS Project

Task 6: Perform TSS requirements analysis and Task 6: Perform TSS requirements analysis and scoping study.scoping study.

Task 7a: Acquire and prepare the relevant Task 7a: Acquire and prepare the relevant databases. databases.

Task 7b: Summarize and evaluate WRAP Dust Task 7b: Summarize and evaluate WRAP Dust inventory.inventory.

Task 8: Develop data review interfaces based on Task 8: Develop data review interfaces based on user requirements. user requirements.

Task 9: Develop data exchange protocols and Task 9: Develop data exchange protocols and guidelines. guidelines.

Task 10: Develop method to capture on-line user Task 10: Develop method to capture on-line user feedback.feedback.

Task 11: Travel to provide progress reports and Task 11: Travel to provide progress reports and solicit project feedback at WRAP meetings.solicit project feedback at WRAP meetings.

Project Timing by TaskProject Timing by Task

AoH Phase 2 Analysis TSS Development Travel

Task(s) Task(s) Task Month

1 2 3 4 5 6 7a,b 8 9 10 11 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 July 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006

TSS Data Summary TSS Data Summary ProductsProducts

Emissions, monitoring, modeling, and attribution Emissions, monitoring, modeling, and attribution results will be housed in on-line databasesresults will be housed in on-line databases

User requests will combine data with contextual User requests will combine data with contextual information and/or GIS layers (if appropriate)information and/or GIS layers (if appropriate)

ARS and AoH work group will develop a Weight of ARS and AoH work group will develop a Weight of Evidence (WOE) approach for integrating resultsEvidence (WOE) approach for integrating results

Scoping study (Task 6) will determine the level of Scoping study (Task 6) will determine the level of sophistication achievable for data products during sophistication achievable for data products during projectproject

All data used for 2007 SIPS/TIPS will be All data used for 2007 SIPS/TIPS will be version controlled to keep it separate from version controlled to keep it separate from new data and information added to the TSS new data and information added to the TSS over timeover time

IWG SIP IWG SIP OutlineOutline

SIP Cover #1 SIP Submittal Letter (required) SIP Submittal letter enclosure (Authorizing statutes) (optional) SIP Completeness Checklist (required) Executive Summary (Optional) SIP Cover #2 1. Regional Haze Background

1.1. What is Visibility Impairment (optional) 1.2. State description (Class I Areas list/maps) (optional) 1.3. Visibility History (optional) 1.4. Existing Visibility Protection in State (optional)

1.4.1. Monitoring Strategy 1.5. Federal Land Manager Consultation (required)

[Note: Refer to Appendices for contact letter & notice of SIP Hearing] 1.6. Collaboration with Tribes (strongly suggested/required if tribal source impacts CIA )

2. Regulatory Overview 2.1. Monitoring Strategy 2.2. Establishing Reasonable Progress Goals

2.2.1. Baseline Conditions 2.2.2. Natural Conditions 2.2.3. Glide path 2.2.4. Consideration/Consultation of RPG factors

2.2.4.1. Costs of compliance 2.2.4.2. Time necessary for compliance 2.2.4.3. Energy and non-air quality environmental impacts of compliance 2.2.4.4. Remaining useful life of any potentially affected sources

2.2.5. Consultation on RPG’s 2.2.6. Emissions reductions measures needed

2.3. Apportionment of Contribution by Pollutant and Predominant Sources 2.3.1. Contribution from Outside the State 2.3.2. Contribution from natural sources

2.4. Projected Emissions by Pollutant 2.5. Long Term Strategies

2.5.1. Enforcement (description of existing control strategies, authority) 2.6. Demonstration of Reasonable Progress

2.6.1. Weight of Evidence 2.6.2. Consultation

2.7. Periodic Review [NOTE: 5 year average of annual values]

3. National, regional and state-wide strategies 3.1.1. 2018 Baseline/Alternative Control Strategies 3.1.2. Mobile Sources 3.1.3. Enhanced Smoke Management Plans

4. Class I Area Analyses (to be used with Table __) 4.1. CIA #1

4.1.1. Analysis of chapter 2 requirements 4.2. CIA #2, etc

5. Class I Areas (and Tribal Class I Areas) Impacted by (my) State [NOTE: Same analysis as Chapter 3, but by percentage of apportionment]

Revised SIP outline Revised SIP outline developed at August developed at August 29-30 meeting29-30 meeting

Items in Items in redred are are directly supportable directly supportable by TSS and are by TSS and are required products of required products of TSSTSS

Each of these items Each of these items exists from Phase 1 or exists from Phase 1 or is planned for the TSSis planned for the TSS

IWG Flow Chart #1IWG Flow Chart #12018 Baseline/Alternative Control Scenario Flowchart

Done

Uniform Rate of Progress Met?

2018 Baseline Scenario

Analyze 2018 Alternate Control

Scenarios

Uniform Rate of Progress met?

Justify why Uniform Rate of Progress not

met

NO

NO YES

YES

NO

2018 Control Strategy Evaluation Process

Consult with other States and FLMs on selected

reasonable progress goals.

State evaluates and selects alternative control measures

based on the four factors.

WRAP evaluation of 2018 baseline and alternative

control measures.

Establish reasonable progress goals based on all

control measures to be implemented.

Do reasonable progress goals achieve the Uniform

Rate of Progress?

Explain why it is not reasonable to achieve the Uniform Rate of Progress

by 2018.

NOYES

IWG Flow Chart #2

Highlights of AoH 9/14-15 Highlights of AoH 9/14-15 Meeting (1):Meeting (1):

TSS Scoping Study ScheduleTSS Scoping Study Schedule Scoping study (task 6) must be Scoping study (task 6) must be

completed before most of the completed before most of the remaining TSS tasks (7-10) can be remaining TSS tasks (7-10) can be startedstarted

Expected completion: November 2005Expected completion: November 2005 AoH work group will receive a detailed AoH work group will receive a detailed

update at November meetingupdate at November meeting

Highlights of AoH 9/14-15 Highlights of AoH 9/14-15 Meeting (2):Meeting (2):

AoH Feedback on TSSAoH Feedback on TSS TSS should include emissions data from TSS should include emissions data from

EDMS and SMOKEEDMS and SMOKE Attribution map products should show Attribution map products should show

“footprint” of a state’s impact “footprint” of a state’s impact (essentially an isopleth map of (essentially an isopleth map of particulate mass/extinction/dv impact for particulate mass/extinction/dv impact for each state)each state)

Discussion of necessity to link TSS Discussion of necessity to link TSS products to the Implementation Work products to the Implementation Work Group SIP outline/templateGroup SIP outline/template

Request for some sort of TSS/WOE Request for some sort of TSS/WOE tutorialtutorial

Highlights of AoH 9/14-15 Highlights of AoH 9/14-15 Meeting (3):Meeting (3):

Upcoming AoH Calls/MeetingsUpcoming AoH Calls/Meetings Meeting: November 16-17 (Tempe, Meeting: November 16-17 (Tempe,

AZ)AZ) Present Scoping Study update (should be Present Scoping Study update (should be

near completion)near completion) Present strawman WOE approachPresent strawman WOE approach

Meeting: November 16-17 (Tempe, Meeting: November 16-17 (Tempe, AZ)AZ)

Call: December 13 @ 2:30 MDT)Call: December 13 @ 2:30 MDT) Meeting: January 24-26 (San Diego, Meeting: January 24-26 (San Diego,

CA)CA) Present beta version of TSSPresent beta version of TSS

TSS Scoping Study OutlineTSS Scoping Study Outline Identify, understand, and refine the user/system Identify, understand, and refine the user/system

requirementsrequirements Match products types with user needs (e.g., SIP outline)Match products types with user needs (e.g., SIP outline) Identify a set of case studies that illustrate the system’s Identify a set of case studies that illustrate the system’s

useuse Explore the architectural optionsExplore the architectural options

Select and evaluate a candidate architecture Select and evaluate a candidate architecture (feasibility, available expertise)(feasibility, available expertise)

Revisit system requirements – changes needed?Revisit system requirements – changes needed? Finalize selection: create set of documents and Finalize selection: create set of documents and

diagrams that describe system architecture, team diagrams that describe system architecture, team member rolesmember roles

Generate a detailed project planGenerate a detailed project plan What is feasible with available time/funds?What is feasible with available time/funds? What cannot be done at this time?What cannot be done at this time? Minimum requirement: Minimum requirement: MUSTMUST support SIP support SIP

preparationpreparation

TSS Scoping Study TSS Scoping Study ScheduleSchedule

Scoping study (task 6) must be Scoping study (task 6) must be completed before most of the completed before most of the remaining TSS tasks (7-10) can be remaining TSS tasks (7-10) can be startedstarted

Expected completion: November 2005Expected completion: November 2005 AoH work group will receive a detailed AoH work group will receive a detailed

update at November meetingupdate at November meeting

Weight of Evidence Weight of Evidence ApproachApproach

Recipe for assessment of reasonable progress:Recipe for assessment of reasonable progress: Comparison between 2000-04 baseline and 2018 base caseComparison between 2000-04 baseline and 2018 base case Review alternate methods of calculating 2000-04 baseline (exclude Review alternate methods of calculating 2000-04 baseline (exclude

fire, etc.?)fire, etc.?) Review of alternate 2018 control scenariosReview of alternate 2018 control scenarios Justification of why a site does or does not show reasonable Justification of why a site does or does not show reasonable

progressprogress Checklist containing each products type:Checklist containing each products type:

Succinct description of what information product displaysSuccinct description of what information product displays Relative uncertainty of each productRelative uncertainty of each product Relative importance or weight of each productRelative importance or weight of each product

Assessment of how well various analyses “agree”:Assessment of how well various analyses “agree”: Do all attribution methods tend toward similar results?Do all attribution methods tend toward similar results? Do EIs combined with back trajectory analyses support attribution Do EIs combined with back trajectory analyses support attribution

results?results? Do changes in EIs support reasonable rate of progress Do changes in EIs support reasonable rate of progress

demonstration?demonstration?

Prepare tutorial for users – several case studies which Prepare tutorial for users – several case studies which require somewhat different approachesrequire somewhat different approaches

Highlights of 9/14-15 AoH Highlights of 9/14-15 AoH Meeting:Meeting:

Emissions Data and Emissions Data and ModelingModeling Final 2002 emissions inventories Final 2002 emissions inventories

availableavailable When will these be put into EDMS?When will these be put into EDMS? Do we need to wait for EI data to be put into Do we need to wait for EI data to be put into

EDMS?EDMS? Attribution modeling to be done with Attribution modeling to be done with

CAMx/PSAT:CAMx/PSAT: Planning to run for SO4, NO3, NH4Planning to run for SO4, NO3, NH4 May test for SOA, EC, OC, Soil, CMMay test for SOA, EC, OC, Soil, CM

2002 modeling done by Oct 10 (?), 2002 modeling done by Oct 10 (?), attribution results available by Oct 31 attribution results available by Oct 31 (?)(?)

Highlights of AoH Meeting Highlights of AoH Meeting 9/14-15:9/14-15:

Causes of Haze Project Causes of Haze Project UpdateUpdate Some new trends products on COHA Some new trends products on COHA

web site web site ((http://coha.dri.edu/web/general/tools_trendanaly.htmlhttp://coha.dri.edu/web/general/tools_trendanaly.html))

PMF analysis (source apportionment) PMF analysis (source apportionment) will be completed ~1 month after will be completed ~1 month after release of 2004 IMPROVE aerosol datarelease of 2004 IMPROVE aerosol data

Will run PMF for groups of sites Will run PMF for groups of sites (possibly based on earlier attribution (possibly based on earlier attribution results or carbon mass)results or carbon mass)

Discussion about DRI running Discussion about DRI running evaluations of EDAS met fields evaluations of EDAS met fields (details need to be resolved)(details need to be resolved)

Weight of Evidence Weight of Evidence ApproachApproach

(from Ralph Morris – (from Ralph Morris – WRAP RMC)WRAP RMC)

Glide paths and modeled RPG test (EPA)Glide paths and modeled RPG test (EPA) Eliminate days dominated by “natural” Eliminate days dominated by “natural”

events in modeled RPG test (e.g., fires, dust)events in modeled RPG test (e.g., fires, dust) 2018 projections for species dominated by 2018 projections for species dominated by

anthropogenic emissions (e.g., SO4, NO3)anthropogenic emissions (e.g., SO4, NO3) 2018 projections for modeled worst visibility 2018 projections for modeled worst visibility

days, worst sulfate days, etc.days, worst sulfate days, etc. Other???Other???

Review of AoH Project Review of AoH Project ScheduleSchedule

Phase 2

Report

DraftDraft TSS Home Page TSS Home Page

Emissions DataEmissions Data

Use EDMS as data Use EDMS as data sourcesource

Summary of emissions Summary of emissions data will be available data will be available by source type, point, by source type, point, county, and grid cellcounty, and grid cell

Provide summaries of Provide summaries of projected changes in projected changes in emissions from 2002 to emissions from 2002 to 20182018

Include GIS Include GIS informationinformation

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX)

4,479 thousand tons/yr

Point

Area

On-Road Mobile

Off-Road Mobile

Rx Fires

Ag Fires

Off-Shore

Windblown Dust

Road Dust

Wildland Fire

Biogenics

Animals/Soils NH3

Sulfer Dioxide (SO2)

1,326 thousand tons/yr

Volatile Organic Carbon (VOC) 17,288 thousand tons/yr

Ammonia (NH3)

1,938 thousand tons/yr

Fine Particulates (PM2.5)

2,345 thousand tons/yrCoarse Particulates (PMC)

3,524 thousand tons/yr

Area SourcesArea Sources Area sources except dust sourcesArea sources except dust sources Off shore Marines shipping in the Pacific OceanOff shore Marines shipping in the Pacific Ocean Off shore area sources in the Gulf of MexicoOff shore area sources in the Gulf of Mexico

Point SourcesPoint Sources Point sources emissions for all RPOs, Can & MexPoint sources emissions for all RPOs, Can & Mex Off shore point sources in the Gulf of MexicoOff shore point sources in the Gulf of Mexico

Mobile SourcesMobile Sources On road mobile sources for WRAP RPO On road mobile sources for WRAP RPO On-road mobile sources for CENRAP statesOn-road mobile sources for CENRAP states On-road mobile sources for MW, VISTAS, & MAINE-VUOn-road mobile sources for MW, VISTAS, & MAINE-VU On-road mobile sources for Can/MexOn-road mobile sources for Can/Mex

Off Road Mobile SourcesOff Road Mobile Sources Off road mobile with annual IDA filesOff road mobile with annual IDA files Off road mobile with monthly or seasonal IDA filesOff road mobile with monthly or seasonal IDA files

Source Categories Provided by the RMCSource Categories Provided by the RMC

Fire SourcesFire Sources WRAP wild, prescribed and agricultural firesWRAP wild, prescribed and agricultural fires Area fires from CENRAPArea fires from CENRAP Point sources fires from non WRAP states (CENRAP and VISTAS)Point sources fires from non WRAP states (CENRAP and VISTAS) Canadian Wild fires/Blue Sky algorithmCanadian Wild fires/Blue Sky algorithm

Biogenic SourcesBiogenic Sources Biogenic emissions from BEIS3 for the entire domainBiogenic emissions from BEIS3 for the entire domain

Ammonia SourcesAmmonia Sources Ammonia from agricultural sources for CENRAP/MW statesAmmonia from agricultural sources for CENRAP/MW states Ammonia emissions ag sources for WRAP GIS Ammonia emissions ag sources for WRAP GIS modelmodel

Dust SourcesDust Sources Fugitive dust (Ag & construction) for entire domainFugitive dust (Ag & construction) for entire domain Road dust for the entire domainRoad dust for the entire domain Wind blown dust for entire domainWind blown dust for entire domain

Oil and Gas SourcesOil and Gas Sources Oil and gas for WRAP states (except CA)Oil and gas for WRAP states (except CA)

Source Categories Provided by the RMC (cont.)Source Categories Provided by the RMC (cont.)

PM 10(Tons/year)

>10,000

8,000 - 10,000

7,000 - 8,000

6,000 - 7,000

5,000 - 6,000

4,000 - 5,000

3,500 - 4,000

3,000 - 3,500

2,500 - 3,000

2,000 - 2,500

1,500 - 2,000

1,000 - 1,500

500 - 1,000

All Base02a Dust Sources Combined

PM C(Tons/year)

>10,000

8,000 - 10,000

7,000 - 8 ,000

6,000 - 7 ,000

5,000 - 6 ,000

4,000 - 5 ,000

3,500 - 4 ,000

3,000 - 3 ,500

2,500 - 3 ,000

2,000 - 2 ,500

1,500 - 2 ,000

1,000 - 1 ,500

500 - 1 ,000

PointSources

PM 10(Tons/year)

>10,000

8,000 - 10,000

7,000 - 8,000

6,000 - 7,000

5,000 - 6,000

4,000 - 5,000

3,500 - 4,000

3,000 - 3,500

2,500 - 3,000

2,000 - 2,500

1,500 - 2,000

1,000 - 1,500

500 - 1,000

FugitiveDust

Sources

PM 10(Tons/year)

>10,000

8,000 - 10,000

7,000 - 8 ,000

6,000 - 7 ,000

5,000 - 6 ,000

4,000 - 5 ,000

3,500 - 4 ,000

3,000 - 3 ,500

2,500 - 3 ,000

2,000 - 2 ,500

1,500 - 2 ,000

1,000 - 1 ,500

500 - 1 ,000

RoadDust

SourcesPM 10

(Tons/year)

>10,000

8,000 - 10,000

7,000 - 8 ,000

6,000 - 7 ,000

5,000 - 6 ,000

4,000 - 5 ,000

3,500 - 4 ,000

3,000 - 3 ,500

2,500 - 3 ,000

2,000 - 2 ,500

1,500 - 2 ,000

1,000 - 1 ,500

500 - 1 ,000

W indblownDust

Sources

Dust by Category

Monitoring/Modeling DataMonitoring/Modeling Data

Display visibility Display visibility based on monitoring based on monitoring or modeling results or modeling results

Include RHR and other Include RHR and other monitoring data setsmonitoring data sets

Tie in 2000-2004 Tie in 2000-2004 baseline and glide baseline and glide path results path results

Include GIS Include GIS informationinformation

Uniform Rate of Reasonable Progress Glide PathGreat Smoky Mountains NP (TN) - 20% Worst Days

28.9427.77

24.86

21.94

19.02

16.11

13.19

11.44

25.2323.76

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034 2039 2044 2049 2054 2059 2064

Year

Ha

zin

ess

In

de

x (D

eci

vie

ws)

Glide Path Natural Condition (Worst Days) Observation Method 1B Prediction

Attribution DataAttribution Data

Attribution results will Attribution results will include: PSAT, TRA, PMFinclude: PSAT, TRA, PMF

Integrate results with EIsIntegrate results with EIs Provide more results with Provide more results with

map products than in map products than in Phase 1Phase 1

Review attribution Review attribution groupingsgroupings

TSSA SulfateC ontribution by

"O ther"

10%

40%

70%

TSSA Sulfate C ontributionA ttributed to the "O ther"(non-Point, non-M obile)Source C ategory 1

2

34

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

1617

18

1920

Supporting DataSupporting Data

Assess what Assess what supporting data is supporting data is needed for SIP/TIP needed for SIP/TIP preparation and WOEpreparation and WOE

Regional assessments Regional assessments included in Phase 1?included in Phase 1?

Back trajectory Back trajectory summaries?summaries?

Integrate with GIS Integrate with GIS data?data?

Links to data web sitesLinks to data web sites

Display States, Class I Areas

Home extent set to 36km grid

Zoom rectangle tool

Class I Areas labeled when zoomed beyond 1:5,000,000

Counties appear when zoomed beyond 1:5,000,000

Zoom further in

Roads appear when zoomed beyond 1:2,000,000

Turn on gridded emissions layer for VOC

Zoom to Bay Area to test identify tool

Identify by grid cell to get gridded emissions values (all pollutants shown)

Turn on gridded emissions layer for NOX

Zoom in and identify by grid cell to get gridded emissions values (all pollutants shown)

Turn on county-based SMOKE emissions layer for SO2

Zoom in and identify by county to get county emissions values (all pollutants shown)

View zoomed area with grid cells displayed; could be used for selecting a grid cell but actually querying county-based emissions

New Data Summary New Data Summary ProductsProducts

Presentation of control strategies – may be descriptive Presentation of control strategies – may be descriptive text with bar charts showing anticipated reductionstext with bar charts showing anticipated reductions

Projected 2018 emissions, visibility, modeling, and Projected 2018 emissions, visibility, modeling, and attribution results – will be able display just like 2002 attribution results – will be able display just like 2002 results; will also include display of 2002-2018 changesresults; will also include display of 2002-2018 changes

Historical trend and future glide slope analyses – may Historical trend and future glide slope analyses – may include multiple data sets (RHR, “raw”) and extinction include multiple data sets (RHR, “raw”) and extinction equations (current and proposed) – both VIEWS and equations (current and proposed) – both VIEWS and COHA projects working on versions of these productsCOHA projects working on versions of these products

Weight of evidence approachWeight of evidence approach Ability for users to add data/GIS layers/analyses to Ability for users to add data/GIS layers/analyses to

TSSTSS

Thanks -Thanks - Questions/comments?Questions/comments?