PowerPoint Presentation

1Fabiola Gianotti (CERN), representing theATLAS CollaborationUsing the full datasets recorded in 2011 at s= 7 TeV and 2012 at s=8 TeV: up to 10.7 fb-1

Status of Standard Model Higgs searches in ATLAS

Fabiola Gianotti (CERN), representing the ATLAS CollaborationATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201212

Blick am AbendTuesday, 19 June 2012 This is how the Higgsboson could look ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/20123We present updated results on SM Higgs searches based on the data recorded in 2011 at s=7 TeV (~4.9 fb-1) and 2012 at s=8 TeV (~5.9 fb-1)Results are preliminary: 2012 data recorded until 2 weeks ago harsher conditions in 2012 due to ~ x2 larger event pile-up new, improved analyses deployed for the first timeH and H 4l: high-sensitivity at low-mH; high mass-resolution; pile-up robustanalyses improved to increase sensitivity new results from 2011 data all the data recorded so far in 2012 have been analyzedresults are presented here for the first timeOther low-mass channels: H WW(*) ll, H , W/ZH W/Z bb: ETmiss in final state less robust to pile-up worse mass resolution, no signal peak in some casescomplex mixture of backgrounds understanding of the detector performance and backgrounds in 2012 well advanced, but results not yet mature enough to be presented today 2011 results used here for these channels for the overall combinationATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/2012

Data-taking efficiency = (recorded lumi)/(delivered lumi): ~ 94.6% Fraction of non-operational detector channels:(depends on the sub-detector)few permil (most cases) to 4%Good-quality data fraction, used for analysis :(will increase further with data reprocessing) ~ 93.6%2012 data-taking so far

4Peak luminosity in 2012:~ 6.8 x1033 cm-2 s-1ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/20124

2012 data-taking so far

5Peak luminosity in 2012:~ 6.8 x1033 cm-2 s-1~ 90%of the delivered luminosity used for these results(slightly larger fraction than in 2011): in spite of the very fresh data in spite of the harsher conditionsATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201256

Luminosity delivered to ATLAS since the beginning 2012:6.6 fb-1 at 8 TeV20115.6 fb-1 at 7 TeV20100.05 fb-1 at 7 TeVATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/20127

BIG THANKSTo the whole LHC exploitation team, including the operation, technical and infrastructure groups, for the OUTSTANDING performance of themachine, and to all the people who have contributed to the conception, design, construction and operation of this superb instrumentATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/2012

The BIG challenge in 2012: PILE-UP

Z 8

Experiments design value (expected to bereached at L=1034 !) Z event from 2012 data with 25 reconstructed verticesATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201289Huge efforts over last months to prepare for 2012 conditions and mitigate impact of pile-up on trigger, reconstruction of physics objects (in particular ETmiss, soft jets, ..), computing resources (CPU, event size)Pile-up robust, fast trigger and offline algorithms developed Reconstruction and identification of physics objects (e, , , , jet, ETmiss) optimised to be ~independent of pile-up similar (better in some cases!) performance as with 2011 dataPrecise modeling of in-time and out-of-time pile-up in simulationFlexible computing model to accommodate x2 higher trigger rates and event size as well as physics and analysis demands

Number of reconstructed primary verticesNote: number of reconstructed primary vertices is ~ 60% number of interactions per crossings Understanding of ETmiss (most sensitive to pile-up) iscrucial for H WW(*) ll , W/ZHW/Zbb, HETmiss resolution vs pile-up inZ events before andafter pile-up suppressionusing tracking informationATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/2012910Trigger in 2012

L1: up to ~ 65 kHzL2: up to ~ 5 kHzEF: ~ 400HzManaged to keep inclusive un-prescaled lepton thresholds within ~ 5 GeV over last two years in spite factor ~ 70 peak lumi increaseItem pT threshold (GeV) Rate (Hz) 5x1033

Incl. e 24 70Incl. 24 45 ee 12 8 13 5 29,20 12 35,25 10 ETmiss 80 17 5j 55 8 Lowest un-prescaled thresholds (examples)

Optimization of selections (e.g. object isolation) to maintain low un-prescaled thresholds (e.g. for inclusive leptons) in spite of projected x2 higher L and pile-up than in 2011Pile-up robust algorithms developed (~flat performance vs pile-up, minimize CPU usage, ...)

Results from 2012 operation show trigger is coping very well (in terms of rates, efficiencies, robustness, ..) with harsh conditions while meeting physics requirementsNote: ~ 500 items in trigger menu !ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201210

x-componentresolutionRed: 2011 Blue: 2012Efficiency of inclusive electron trigger (ET thresholds as low as 24) as a function of pile-up

Offline ET miss (GeV)11Many improvements in ET miss trigger:e.g. pile-up suppression, L2 fast front-end board sums instead of L1 only samethreshold as in 2011, sharper turn-on curveFrom Z ee eventsATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/2012

12It would have been impossible to release physics results so quickly withoutthe outstanding performance of the Grid (including the CERN Tier-0)Includes MC production,user and group analysisat CERN, 10 Tier1-s, ~ 70 Tier-2 federations > 80 sites100 kNumber of concurrent ATLAS jobs Jan-July 2012> 1500 distinct ATLAS users do analysis on the GRIDAvailable resources fully used/stressed (beyond pledges in some cases) Massive production of 8 TeV Monte Carlo samples Very effective and flexible Computing Model and Operation team accommodate high trigger rates and pile-up, intense MC simulation, analysis demands from worldwide users (through e.g. dynamic data placement) ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201213Most recent electroweak and top cross-section measurementsInner error: statisticalOuter error: total

Important on their own and as foundation for Higgs searchesMost of these processes are reducible or irreducible backgrounds to HiggsReconstruction and measurement of challenging processes (e.g. fully hadronic tt, single top, ..) are good training for some complex Higgs final statesATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201214SM Higgs production cross-section and decay modesNote: huge efforts and progress from theory community to compute NLO/NNLO cross-sections for Higgs production and for (often complex !) backgrounds

Most sensitive channels 120 400 GeV|| (-jj) > 2.6 After all selections, expect (10.7 fb-1, mH~ 126 GeV) ~ 170 signal events (total signal efficiency ~ 40%) ~ 6340 background events in mass window S/B ~ 3% inclusive (~ 20% 2jet category)

ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/20121819m2= 2 E1 E2 (1-cos)Electron scale transported to photons usingMC (small systematics from material effects) Mass resolution of inclusive sample: 1.6 GeVFraction of events in 2: ~90%Present understanding of calorimeter E response (from Z, J/ ee, W e data and MC):E-scale at mZ known to ~ 0.3%Linearity better than 1% (few-100 GeV)Uniformity (constant term of resolution): ~ 1% (2.5% for 1.37 17.5-50 GeV (vs mH)Main backgrounds: -- ZZ(*) : irreducible -- low-mass region mH < 2mZ : Zbb, Z+jets, tt with two leptons from b-jets or q-jets lSuppressed with isolation and impact parameter cuts on two softest leptons H ZZ(*) 4l (4e, 4, 2e2) 110 < mH < 600 GeVCrucial experimental aspects: High lepton acceptance, reconstruction & identification efficiency down to lowest pT Good lepton energy/momentum resolution Good control of reducible backgrounds (Zbb, Z+jets, tt) in low-mass region: cannot rely on MC alone (theoretical uncertainties, b/q-jet l modeling, ..) need to validate MC with data in background-enriched control regions27 x BR ~ 2.5 fb mH ~ 126 GeVMain improvements in new analysis:kinematic cuts (e.g. on m12) optimized/relaxed to increase signal sensitivity at low massincreased e reconstruction and identification efficiency at low pT , increased pile-up robustness, with negligible increase in the reducible backgrounds

Gain 20% (4) to 30% (4e) in sensitivity compared to previous analysisATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201227Results are from Z ee data and MCtag-and-probeHigh efficiency for low-pT electrons (affected by material) crucial for H 4e, 22e

28Re-optimized e identification usingpile-up robust variables (e.g. TransitionRadiation, calorimeter strips) achieved ~ 95% identification efficiency, ~ flat vs pile-up; higher rejections of fakes

Improved track reconstruction and fitting to recover e undergoing hard Brem achieved ~ 98% reconstruction efficiency, flatter vs and ETATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/2012Results are from Z ee data and MCtag-and-probeHigh efficiency for low-pT electrons (affected by material) crucial for H 4e, 22e

29Re-optimized e identification usingpile-up robust variables (e.g. TransitionRadiation, calorimeter strips) achieved ~ 95% identification efficiency, ~ flat vs pile-up; higher rejections of fakes

Improved track reconstruction and fitting to recover e undergoing hard Brem achieved ~ 98% reconstruction efficiency, flatter vs and ETTotal gain in reconstruction and identification efficiency for electrons from H 4e: ~ 8% average up to 15% at pT ~ 7 GeVTotal acceptance x efficiency for H 4e: ~23% (+60% gain)ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/2012

2012 Z dataReconstruction efficiency ~ 97%, ~ flat down to pT ~ 6 GeV and over ||~2.7Total acceptance x efficiency for H 4: ~ 40% (+45% gain)Muons reconstructed down to pT = 6 GeV over || 160 GeV (dominated by ZZ background):147 11 events expected191 observed~ 1.3 times more ZZ events in data than SM prediction in agreement with measured ZZ cross-section in 4l final states at s = 8 TeV

Measured (ZZ) = 9.3 1.2 pbSM (NLO) (ZZ) = 7.4 0.4 pb31ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201231H 4l mass spectrum after all selections: 2011+2012 data32

Enhanced by relaxing cuts on m12, m34 and pT(4)Peak at m(4l) ~ 90 GeV fromsingle-resonant Z 4l production

Observed: 57 eventsExpected: 65 5ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201232H 4l mass spectrum after all selections: 2011+2012 data33

ATLAS: Status of SM Higgs searches, 4/7/201233

The low-mass regionm4l