asw process world languages, arts education, health and physical education, ap & ib
TRANSCRIPT
Analysis of Student WorkASW 101
Cheryl Maney and Mark PropstArts Education Department
Kim CookeHealthful Living Department
Mara CobeWorld Languages
Parker MorseAP and IB
A Little History and a Look into the Future
Pilot
Required by state
Alternatives
CMS Analysis of Student Work Feedback Form
• MSL = Measures of Student Learning
• Small Pilot = 100 people across state
Analysis of Student Work
Contribute
to Academic
Success
ASW demonstrates a teacher’s contribution towards academic growth in the content area.
Teachers submit student work which is rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.
Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership.
Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students.
Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.
Standard IV: Teachers facilitate learning for their students.
Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice.
Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.
NC Professional Teaching Standards
Overview of Standard 6
Contribute to
Academic Success
End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests
6 NC Final Exams
6 Career Technical Education Assessment
6 Analysis of Student Work
K-3 Checkpoints6
6
5 Rating Categories
1 65432Demonstrate Leadership
Establish Environment
KnowContent
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Contribute
to Academic
Success
3 Rating Categories
Not Demonstrated
Developing
Proficient
Accomplished
Distinguished
Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System
ASW Process: Step 1: Teaching Context
Sept. to Oct 15 and Feb
AFs and APIs!
Course and
Teacher Coding!
Class Selection
The online platform will select the 5 classes in which the teacher must collect artifacts.
Note: Teachers who are on a semester or 4x4 schedule will have classes selected for 1st semester. Classes for 2nd semester will be selected prior to 2nd semester.
Looking at the NC Essential Standards, teachers will use the Strands guidance charts to select 5 clarifying objectives one for each class selected by the platform.
NC Essential Standards: Clarifying Objective Selection
Arts EducationChoose one objective for each of the strands in your
Arts Education discipline plus 1-2 additional objectives
World LanguagesObjectives encompass each of the 3 strands of World Languages and all of the Essential Standards that are
part of your language program.
AP/IB
• AP Teachers will use the AP objectives posted on AP Central.
• IB Teachers will use the IB objectives posted on the IB Online Curriculum Centre.
Considerations for Teachers in Objective Selection
• Realize that not all objectives link easily to the ASW process
• Careful alignment between Objective chosen, instruction, assessment, and artifacts.
• Focus on performance based assessment
Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart
Principal’s Input
Note: Teachers who are on a semester schedule will select for their first semester classes. After their second semester classes are selected by the platform, they will select their remaining objectives.
AFs and APIs!
Objective Selection
Timelapse Artifacts
• 5 timelapse artifacts are required• One timelapse artifact for each objective
selected• Each Timelapse Artifact has:
– 2 whole class work samples with context OR – 6 individual student work samples, two from each
of the 3 students, with context
Compile Timelapse Artifacts2 distinct points in time
Time Teachers must choose two points in time to gather and harvest evidence of student growth on the clarifying objective chosen.
Collect and keep 2 work samples:• for each class member• for the objective • at 2 separate points in
time
Compile Timelapse ArtifactsIndividual Student Work Samples
2 work samples that represent the entire class
• for the objective • at 2 separate points in
time
Compile Timelapse ArtifactsWhole Class Work Samples
Compile Timelapse Artifacts: Methods to Harvesting Student Work
Pre TestSljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf
sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf
Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd.
Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk
Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe
ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf
sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf
Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdf sdf;df msdf;sdf sdfmsdf lmf, sdfmsd.
Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk
Ljdflkjf ljkdlkjsdf tjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkw klwe
ljsdfljsdf sdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdf sdfljsdfljdf sdflkjsdf sdflnksdflnsdf sdfllsdf sdflnsdf
sdfklsdflkjf fsl flk sdflkjsdf sdf
REC
TA 1
Only for:Individual Student Work Samples
Online platform will select3 students
The TA will be compiled using the Individual Student Work Samples from these selected students.
Student Selection
TA 1
Only for: Individual Student Work SamplesStudent Selection
If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled to create another sampling.
Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher
Student Selection
• This step is not necessary for the classes where teachers have chosen to gather whole class work samples.
• Even if the composition of a class changes, the teacher will still submit the whole class sample.
Context for 1st work sample in each Timelapse Artifact
How does this artifact show where the studentis in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?
Upload Evidence
How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?
This artifact was created using an 8th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the student did not show proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways.1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist. 2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper chest.3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow.4. The elbows are bending during the compression.
Context for 2nd work sample in each Timelapse Artifact
How does this artifact show where the studentis in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?
Upload Evidence
How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective?
This artifact was created using an 8th grade Health Education Class containing 32 students three class days after instruction began. In this video, the student shows proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways. 1. The student has the proper body position, on his knees next to the victim. 2. The force of the compression is generated from the hips and applied in a vertical direction. 3. The hands are positioned with an interlocking grip.4. The heel of the bottom hand has been placed on the sternum.
Context for Growth in each Timelapse Artifact
Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2.
Upload Evidence
Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2.
CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival
Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples with Context
1
2
1
2
1
2
1 Timelapse
Artifact
Upload Evidence
All 5 Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platformas the teacher’sEvidence Collectionfor the school year.
TA 3Student
TA 4Student
TA 5Whole Class
TA 1 Student
TA 2 Whole Class
Upload Evidence
The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area experts.
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
Blind Review
ED M
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise.
Blind Review
If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year.
Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
M
Blind Review
M
Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2
If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year.
M
Reviewer #3
Blind Review
E
• D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth
Evidence Collection Rating Form:
TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5
Receive Rating
D M M M E
Synthesis table to determine Standard 6 rating
Receive Rating
Does Not Meet Meets ExceedsD D D D D M M M M M E E E E ED D D D E M M M M E M E E E ED D D D M D M M M M M M E E ED D D E E M M M E E D E E E ED D D M E D D M M M D M E E ED D D M M D M M M E D D E E E D D M M E D D M E E D M M E E
An educator receives an Effectiveness Status when he or she has 3 years of their own content data for Standard 6
Effectiveness Status
3 Years of Combined Data for Standard 6
6 6 6Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Standard Standard Standard
6 6 6Year 1
2014-2015Does Not Meet
Expected Growth
Year 22015-2016
Meets Expected Growth
Year 32016-2017
Meets Expected Growth
Standard Standard Standard
Mr. NC’s 3 years of growth data:
2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1) 2015-16 Meets (Year 2)+ 2016-17 Meets (Year 3)
Mr. NC’s Standard 6 rating for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth
Effectiveness Status Only for 2014 – 2017: Best 2 out of 3 years of data
Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017
2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished
Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership
Standard 2 Establish Environment
Standard 3Know Content
Standard 4Facilitate Learning
Standard 5 Reflect on Practice
Standard 6Three year growth
data
X
X
XX
XBest 2 out of 3 years of growth data for 2014 – 2017
Meets Expected Growth
Principal Role
In Need of Improvement
Effective Highly Effective
Any rating lower than proficient
Proficient or Higher
on Standards1-5
Accomplishedor Higher
on Standards1-5
1Demonstrate Leadership
2Establish Environment
345
Know Content
Facilitate Learning
Reflect on Practice
Standards
Does Not Meet
Expected Growth
Meets or Exceeds Expected Growth
Exceeds Expected Growth
Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017
6Contribute to Academic Success (3 yrs. of data)
Effectiveness Status for 2016 - 2017
2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished
Standard 1 Demonstrate leadership
Standard 2 Establish Environment
Standard 3Know Content
Standard 4Facilitate Learning
Standard 5 Reflect on Practice
Standard 6Three year growth
data
X
X
XX
XBest 2 out of 3 years of growth data for 2014 – 2017
Meets Expected Growth
Effective
Principal Role