ast reporting: how to get the biggest bang for your buck...aug 31, 2017 · provide advice on...
TRANSCRIPT
AST Reporting: How to get the
biggest bang for your buck: Clinically-orientated reporting, and
antimicrobial stewardship
Piotr Chlebicki
Senior Consultant
Department of Infectious Diseases
Singapore General Hospital
August 31, 2017
Microbiology Lab
Two main functions
1. Clinical – to help to diagnose and manage
infections in the individual patient
2. Epidemiological
Surveillance
Infection control
Outbreak management
Local antibiograms and guidelines
1. Clinical role
(not only diagnostic)
Advice how to collect the best specimen
(accept and reject specimens)
Advice how to transport
Advice which test to order
Advice on turnaround time
Helps to interpret it
Early notification for important results
Determine susceptibility
Provide advice on antibiotic choice
2. Epidemiological role of
microbiology lab
Surveillance
Infection control
Outbreak management
Local antibiograms and guidelines
Education
Organism specific HAI
surveillance
Identify ‘alert’ microorganisms
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
(MRSA)
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE)
MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa
MDR Acinetobacter baumannii
MDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis
ESBL enterobacteria
Clostridium difficile
Another role is Antimicrobial
Stewardship
“prescribing antimicrobials only when they are
likely to be beneficial to the patient,
selecting agents that will target the likely
pathogens,
and using these agents at the correct dose
and for the proper duration”.
CDC Campaign
Why to do ASP?
Improve patients outcomes
Improve patients safety
Reduce resistance
Reduce cost
Or “optimize clinical outcomes while
minimizing unintended consequences”
How do clinicians prescribe antibiotics?
A. Based on culture results
B. Empirically = 7 steps
1. Define the problem/disease/syndrome
2. Severe?
3. At risk of MDRO?
4. Immunocompromized?
5. List possible organisms and consider local
resistance patterns
6. Pick the best antibiotic
7. Decide duration
How does microbiology lab can
influence ASP?
ASP = Appropriate Specimen Program
Rapid diagnostic tests
Selective reporting of susceptibility
Communication of critical results
Local epidemiology
Automatic alerts for targeted pathogens
Case 1
52 year old man, PMH of DM, complains of fever and
cough for 3 days. No recent hospitalization
120/70 HR 100, RR 25, 38.6 C
Crepitations over right lung base
Severity impacts diagnostic testing
Mild infection = testing optional
More severe infection = more testing
Outpatient CAP Hospitalized
CAP
Severe CAP
Testing optional Blood culture
Sputum Gram
stain and culture
Blood culture
Sputum Gram
stain and culture
Urinary antigen
(Legionella and
Streptococcus)
Molecular
testing
Interpreting sputum cultures (or any culture from non sterile site)
1. Does this patient really have infection for
which test was sent? (is it pneumonia?)
2. Was provided specimen of good quality?
3. Can isolated organism really cause this
infection?
1. Does this patient really have infection for
which test was sent? (is it pneumonia?)
52 year old man, PMH of DM, complains of fever and
cough for 3 days. No recent hospitalization
120/70 HR 100, RR 25, 38.6 C
?
Pneumonia most common and
most misdiagnosed
AJRCCM 2006
Methods
Randomized, controlled, open intervention
trial involving 302 patients with all severities
of CAP admitted to the emergency
department
procalcitonin group
“usual practice” (control group)
Patients with cystic fibrosis, PTB, HAP or
severely immunocompromised patients were
excluded
Antibiotic use was reduced but outcomes unchanged
Laboratory that offers biomarkers can have large impact
on antibiotic use
2. Was provided specimen of good quality?
Please reject
Specimen source: Respiratory
Specimen site: Sputum
Growth of
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Candida species
K. pn P. aer
Amox R
Aug S
Cefuroxime I
Ciprofloxacin S R
Ceftriaxone S R
Ceftazidime S S
Tri/Sulpha S
Pip/Tazo S S
Imipenem S S
Meropenem S S
Specimen source: Respiratory
Specimen site: Sputum
Epithelial cells: 2+
White cells: 1+
Mixed growth of Gram-negative bacilli
including
Klebsiella pneumoniae Scanty
growth
Comment:
Note presence of epithelial cells which
may indicate sample contamination
with upper airway flora.
Klebsiella is an uncommon cause of
community-acquired pneumonia.
Courtesy Dr Tan Thean Yen
Pretreatment Gram stain and culture of
expectorated sputum should be performed
only if a good-quality specimen can be
obtained and quality performance measures
for collection, transport, and processing of
samples can be met. (Moderate recommendation; level II evidence.)
Specimen source: Swab
Specimen site: Foot left, ulcer
Growth of
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Escherichia coli
Enterococcus faecium
K. pn E. coli E.
faecium
Amox R R S
Aug R R
Cefuroxime R R
Ciprofloxacin R R
Ceftriaxone R R
Tri/Sulpha S R
Pip/Tazo S S
Imipenem S S
Vancomycin R
Specimen source: Swab
Specimen site: Foot left, ulcer
Mixed growth of Gram-negative bacilli
and skin commensals
Comment:
Dependant sites are often colonised
with enteric bacteria. Gram-negative
bacilli usually represent superficial
colonisation or post-antibiotic flora,
rather than true infection.
REJECT
CDI Clinical Spectrum
Associated signs and symptoms: nausea, dehydration, low-grade fever, cramping and leukocytosis
Diarrhea
Colitis
Pseudomembranous
Colitis
Death
Toxic
Megacolon
Symptomless carriage
Severe case
Moderate
case
Asymptomatic
case
How does microbiology lab can
influence ASP?
ASP = Appropriate Specimen Program
Rapid diagnostic tests
Selective reporting of susceptibility
Communication of critical results
Local epidemiology
Automatic alerts for targeted pathogens
Rapid diagnostic testing
Urinary streptococcal antigen
Gram stain
Rapid diagnostic testing for CAP
Urinary streptococcal antigen
Legionella urinary antigen
Respiratory virus multiplex PCR
Rapid Diagnosis
24 hour microbiology laboratories
“direct” susceptibility testing
rapid identification technologies Vitek automated systems MALDI-TOF fluorescent hybridisation PCR identification
Genexpert TB
Why not Genexpert MDRO??
Carba NP
How does microbiology lab can
influence ASP?
ASP = Appropriate Specimen Program
Rapid diagnostic tests
Selective reporting of susceptibility
Communication of critical results
Local epidemiology
Automatic alerts for targeted pathogens
Susceptibility pattern of urinary E. coli
Antibiotic Susceptibility
Ampicillin R
Co-amoxiclav S
Cephalexin S
Cefuroxime S
Cefotaxime S
Ceftazidime S
Cefepime S
Cefoxitin S
Pip-tazobactam S
Meropenem S
Ciprofloxacin S
Nitrofurantoin S
Co-trimoxazole S
Amikacin S
Gentamicin S
Selective antimicrobial
susceptibility reporting
Susceptibilities are reported for only the most
appropriate and least expensive drugs to which the organism is susceptible.
The use of a cascading microbiology report encourages clinicians to select more narrow-spectrum and cost-effective antimicrobial agents.
Suppressing ciprofloxacin results
October 25, 2013 • SGH inpatients whose urine, wounds and respiratory specimens
grew Gram-negatives, and where is at least one more
susceptible antibiotic
• Still reported for all sterile sites
• Still released for outpatients, if it is the only susceptible oral
drug.
• Clinicians can call up the lab to ask for cipro results
Ciprofloxacin utilization (DDD per 100 inpatient days)
Ciprofloxacin use in SGH is empiric not culture based
Ertapenem in SGH is culture
directed
Attempt to spare meropenem
How does microbiology lab can
influence ASP?
ASP = Appropriate Specimen Program
Rapid diagnostic tests
Selective reporting of susceptibility
Communication of critical results
Local epidemiology
Automatic alerts for targeted pathogens
Crucial communications
Communication of critical results
3 hospitals, 110 beds
Before and after design
189 patients (pre), 190 patients (post)
Intervention
Before
Cultures reported in the
system
Antibiotics changed by
physicians if and when
they notice the result
After
Automated alert sent to
ASP pharmacists
Pharmacist reviews
medical records
Pharmacist calls
physician, discusses case
and adjusts therapy
Results
Decreased time to appropriate therapy
(8 vs 14 hours)
Reduction in length of stay 2.2 days
Additionally, for patients who were not on
appropriate antimicrobial therapy at the time
of initial culture positivity benefit was even
stronger.
Not only reduction in LOS but also infection-
related mortality
How does microbiology lab can
influence ASP?
ASP = Appropriate Specimen Program
Rapid diagnostic tests
Selective reporting of susceptibility
Communication of critical results
Local epidemiology
Automatic alerts for targeted pathogens
Local data 1. MRSA MIC
2012 in SGH
Of the 112 tested isolates, 58 had MIC of 1.5
or greater (51.8%)
Our lab in 2010
Summary and recommendation:
“… trough serum vancomycin concentrations of 15–20 mg/L are
recommended”.
Local data 2. Mupirocin and MRSA
Number of
Isolates
ST239 (%) ST22 (%) ST45 (%) Others (%) orfX (%) MupA (%)
A 157 8 (5.1%) 87 (55.4%) 13 (8.3%) 49 (31.2%) 2 (1.3%) 75 (47.8%)
B 31 1 (3.2%) 14 (45.2%) 3 (9.7%) 13 (41.9%) 0 (0%) 8 (25.8%)
C 10 1 (10.0%) 5 (50.0%) 1 (10.0%) 3 (30.0%) 0 (0%) 1 (10.0%)
D 44 2 (4.5%) 22 (50.0%) 11 (25.0%) 9 (20.5%) 0 (0%) 8 (18.2%)
E 76 3 (3.9%) 36 (47.4%) 9 (11.8%) 28 (36.8%) 2 (2.6%) 24 (31.6%)
SGH 159 22 (13.8%) 98 (61.6%) 5 (3.1%) 34 (21.4%) 15 (9.4%) 45 (28.3%)
F 188 18 (9.6%) 81 (43.1%) 23 (12.2%) 66 (35.1%) 11 (5.9%) 41 (25.8%)
Reducing use helps
Brazilian hospital
Mupirocin for every patient colonized or
infected with MRSA (including wounds)
They implemented a policy to restrict
mupirocin use to patients colonized but not
infected with MRSA
Resistance in clinical MRSA isolates fell from
65% to 15% over a period of five years
Vivoni et al, ICHE 2005;26:662-667
Results so far
Resistance rates fell below 20%
We are analyzing results
Antibiograms
How many isolates? Duplicates? Outpatient?
When last updated?
Impact on prescribing:
developing clinical pathways for empiric
antimicrobial treatment
monitoring resistance trends
updating the drug formulary
developing antimicrobial restriction policies
Antibiogram
Local data 3
Neutropenia protocol in Hematology.
Cefepime was the drug of choice for empiric
therapy
Is it really the drug of choice?
Antibiogram
But is piptazo effective against
ESBL?
But is piptazo effective against ESBL? CGH data, ESBL E coli, 2012
Local data 3
Febrile neutropenia protocol was changed
from cefepime alone to piperacillin-
tazobactam or cefepime plus amikacin
How does microbiology lab can
influence ASP?
ASP = Appropriate Specimen Program
Rapid diagnostic tests
Selective reporting of susceptibility
Communication of critical results
Local epidemiology
Automatic alerts for targeted pathogens
MRSA and VRE alert
Summary
The impact of microbiology lab on prescribers
is profound
It not only influence the choice of antibiotics
for individual patients but also hospital
policies and guidelines