association for organics recycling: scotland spring seminar, 2010 glasgow caledonian university –...

25
Association for Organics Association for Organics Recycling: Scotland Spring Recycling: Scotland Spring Seminar, 2010 Seminar, 2010 Glasgow Caledonian University – Wednesday 28 th April, 2010 RECYCLING KINSWAY COURT FOOD RECYCLING KINSWAY COURT FOOD RESIDUES RESIDUES NATURE’S WAY NATURE’S WAY Douglas Boyle, CRNS & Frank MacMaster, DRCET

Upload: vaughn-beezley

Post on 13-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Association for Organics Recycling: Scotland Association for Organics Recycling: Scotland Spring Seminar, 2010Spring Seminar, 2010

Glasgow Caledonian University – Wednesday 28th April, 2010

RECYCLING KINSWAY COURT FOOD RECYCLING KINSWAY COURT FOOD RESIDUES RESIDUES

NATURE’S WAYNATURE’S WAY

Douglas Boyle, CRNS & Frank MacMaster, DRCET

Acknowledgements to Project Partners:Acknowledgements to Project Partners:

Scottish Government

SEPA

Awards for All

Glasgow City Council

Glasgow Housing Association & Clydeside Tenant Partnership

Dumbarton Road Corridor Environment Trust Dumbarton Road Corridor Environment Trust

CRNSCRNS

Remade, and from henceforth:

DRCET Climate Challenge Fund Award and

CRNS Compost Doctors - Scotland

Extract Consume Dump

From Linear to Cyclical Thinking & Solutions

ZERO WASTEZERO WASTE

• Resource Recovery and Reuse

• Tightening Legislation

• Rising Costs, Cost Benefits

• C-footprints

• Hygiene

• Storage, Scavengers & Vermin

• Beneficial Products and SAGE (Sow & Grow Everywhere)

• Community Responsibility & Behavioural Change

Why Treat Food Residues On-site?Why Treat Food Residues On-site?

KINGSWAY COURT,

GLASGOW

6 Blocks contain 684 flats

Transient population thus 600 assumed to be occupied

On-Site Food Residue Collection has c200 participants

Participants average 3kg Food Residues per week (0.16t/a), TOTAL 31.2t/a composted on-site

Remaining 400 residents use waste chutes – ultimately landfill, TOTAL62.4t/a to landfill

Methods of Roll out• Engagement, door-knocking, awareness (SWAG survey)

• Caddies & Liners

• Bins in Chute Rooms to Door-Door Collection

• Twice weekly collection; Continuous Engagement

• Licence Facility and Install IVCs

• Open Days, Primary School days, Newsletters, Raised beds

• SWAG Mid-project survey and Love Food Hate Waste Leafleting

COMMUNICATION

KINGSWAY COURT IVC FACILITY

CLEAN END

DIRTY END

Barrier

KINGSWAY COURT IVC FACILITYAfter 12 hours

KINGSWAY COURT IVC FACILITYAfter 48 hours

KINGSWAY COURT IVC PRODUCT

Screened Maturing Product - <25mm

KINGSWAY COURT IVC PRODUCT

Screened Product - <12mm

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52

Week

Nu

mb

ers

or

Mas

s (k

g)

MEMBERS MASS PARTIC.

Max. 345 members

Max. 202 participants/week

Max. 562kg/wk

KINGSWAY COURTFood Residue Collection Statistics

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52

Week

Val

ue

(lts

or

kg)

Mass Vol

Average Bulk Density 0.47t/m3

KINGSWAY COURTFood Residue Collection Bulk Density

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52

WEEK

%

Memb % Est. Participants % Memb

Participants % Est. No Interest

64%

44%

28%

18%

KINGSWAY COURTFood Residue Collection Participation

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

3.00

3.50

4.00

4.50

Week

Mas

s kg

kg/m kg/p

NEW YEAR

2008 2009

KINGSWAY COURTFood Residue Arisings

BEHAVIOUR CHANGE

Participation currently static but can be increased

Quantities (kg/wk/participant) beginning to fall back

SWAG survey shows:

• 86% see no need for improvements to 86% see no need for improvements to collection servicecollection service

• 30% have started to change purchasing 30% have started to change purchasing habitshabits (buying less,using only what’s needed, reduced portions (Somerset)

Thus per flat per annum:

Participants in On-Site Composting generate 5kgCO5kgCO2eq2eq/flat/flat

Non-Participants generate 57kg/CO57kg/CO2eq2eq flat flat

The total annual emissions for Participants = 0.936tCO0.936tCO2eq2eq

The total annual emissions for non-participants = 22.78tCO22.78tCO2eq2eq

On-site composting generates 30kgCO2eq/t composted

Landfill generates 365kgCO2eq/t disposed(DEFRA/DECC Guidelines for GHG Reporting, 2009)

From FLAT to COURT

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Mas

s t/

a

Traditional Today Tomorrow

System

Landfill Compost GHG

Potential GHG Reductions at KINGSWAY

At the average rate of waste arisings:

If all went to landfill as hitherto, then 93.6t/a would generate 34.16t CO34.16t CO2eq2eq

If all were to be collected separately and composted on-site only 2.8tCO2.8tCO2eq2eq would be generated

The CO2eq emission saving is 31.6t31.6t

A reduction of 92% 92%

Replicated across Glasgow, or Scotland, the potential is exceptionally exciting!

From KINGSWAY COURT to SCOTLAND

• Create a community garden on the Kingsway Court High Rise Estate,

• Environmental education/awareness-raising with local primary schools,

• Redevelop the Glasgow Greenies youth environmental awareness and action programme,

• Promote recycling more broadly (dry recyclables),

• Promote lower household energy use and reduced carbon footprints,

• Encourage behavioural change,

• Develop volunteer involvement in and local resident management of these programmes.•Anniesland College and Outreach Training

CCF PROJECTS LINKED to FOOD RESIDUES

Problems:Problems:

• transient & problematic population; unemployment up

• only 65% of members (c30% occupants) participating weekly

• fire regulations necessary because of arson and vandalism

• in recent survey 58% still didn’t know what happens to collection

• initial operational teething resulted in odour – largely resolved but inside maturation still not ideal

• Waste Management Licence costs work inflate costs, but may soon be resolved

Conclusions:Conclusions:• 96% of participants rate system Good to Very Good

• 48% of participants much more aware of food wastage

•99% used caddies and liners and found them handy and hygienic

• average 2.65kg (5.9lt) per flat per week (WRAP 0.5kg)

•The current collection system costs >£300/t, but costs would be incurred by segregated collection for any other disposal

• considerable GHG reductions achievable (will be better w/o tspt)

• >30% participants recorded behavioural changes, 2 want to be Food Waste Champions

• could achieve ZERO WASTEZERO WASTE for food and facilitate other recycling

• the project model is valid for roll-out to other localities

Recommendations:Recommendations:

•continual engagement and awareness raising required

• new survey required in May

•engage more volunteers and part-timers from Kingsway unemployed

• set up SLA with GCC for ALL ALL deliverables

•System can be perfected and rolled out elsewhere (already 2 other Housing Associations interested)

• implement symbiotic CCF projects to maximise benefits – Behavioural Change and GHG reductions

KINGSWAY COURT

““ZERO FOOD WASTE – Nature’s Way”ZERO FOOD WASTE – Nature’s Way”

EDUCATING, ENABLING AND EDUCATING, ENABLING AND EMPOWERING THE EMPOWERING THE

COMMUNITY THROUGH COMMUNITY THROUGH COMPOSTING –COMPOSTING –

NATURE’S RECYCLINGNATURE’S RECYCLING

KINGSWAY COURTBEHAVIOUR CHANGE