assignment 2 2015 rev 1.pdf

3
UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING MEC4103F Product Design ASSIGNMENT 2 2015 Title: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL AND COST MODELLING, DETAIL DESIGN, LIFE CYCLE COSTS (LCC) Type: Individual submission Emphasis: Project planning and management Technical and cost modelling and performance analysis Final product requirement specification (FPRS) Detail design Product economics Design File: Project planning in Planning section Modelling and performance and cost analysis in Design, Modelling & LCC section FPRS in Requirements and Concepts section Submission: Latest by 10h00, 2015/04/10 Where: E-copy: Resources\Group folders\Group #\Assignment 2 Design File: To be announced 1. Each team member is to make a copy of the group’s marked Assignment 1 submission and place this copy in his/her Design Folder. 2. In consultation with your team, generate a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Gantt chart for your project, doing your planning as if you were in industry and not limited by the constraints of the course. The chief designer is to produce a high level overview WBS and Gantt chart on which the main activities are summarized. Clearly show the contributions by the sub-assembly designers on your WBS and Gantt chart. Failure of doing so will result in you failing ECSA ELO8, group work, and you will be awarded a DPR for the course. (In the event of a team member failing to supply their contribution to you, document this fact and have it co-signed by other team members. The offending team member will be awarded a DPR due to failing ECSA ELO8.) 3. Make a copy of your preferred concept sketch of Assignment 1 and present it as the first page of your modelling work, discussed in the steps below 4. The chief designer: a. With the aim of setting up your Final Product Requirement Specification (FPRS), conceive the necessary mathematical models and conduct high level performance and cost calculations for your device. The performance calculations include estimating power required, loads acting on assemblies, stability, etc. As details of the sub-assembly costs are unknown at this stage, the team has to make rough estimates of assembly and manufacturing costs (only work in USD). A good approach is to follow the target-cost approach as explained on pp. 114-116 of U&E. You may use any package such as Excel, Matlab or MathCAD. Briefly summarize your assumptions, methodology and equations used. Make sure all your symbols are defined and that your work can easily be deciphered. b. Following the five step process of U&E on page 105, perform the necessary calculations to refine the TPRS towards the FPRS. Output from this step should inform the design requirements for the various sub-assemblies. Present the FPRS in the format given in Exhibit 6-12.

Upload: jedmas

Post on 30-Sep-2015

4 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN

    DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

    MEC4103F Product Design ASSIGNMENT 2 2015

    Title: PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, TECHNICAL AND COST MODELLING,

    DETAIL DESIGN, LIFE CYCLE COSTS (LCC)

    Type: Individual submission

    Emphasis: Project planning and management

    Technical and cost modelling and performance analysis

    Final product requirement specification (FPRS)

    Detail design

    Product economics

    Design File: Project planning in Planning section

    Modelling and performance and cost analysis in Design, Modelling & LCC section

    FPRS in Requirements and Concepts section

    Submission: Latest by 10h00, 2015/04/10

    Where: E-copy: Resources\Group folders\Group #\Assignment 2

    Design File: To be announced

    1. Each team member is to make a copy of the groups marked Assignment 1 submission and place

    this copy in his/her Design Folder.

    2. In consultation with your team, generate a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Gantt chart for

    your project, doing your planning as if you were in industry and not limited by the constraints of

    the course. The chief designer is to produce a high level overview WBS and Gantt chart on which

    the main activities are summarized. Clearly show the contributions by the sub-assembly designers

    on your WBS and Gantt chart. Failure of doing so will result in you failing ECSA ELO8,

    group work, and you will be awarded a DPR for the course. (In the event of a team member

    failing to supply their contribution to you, document this fact and have it co-signed by other team

    members. The offending team member will be awarded a DPR due to failing ECSA ELO8.)

    3. Make a copy of your preferred concept sketch of Assignment 1 and present it as the first page of

    your modelling work, discussed in the steps below

    4. The chief designer:

    a. With the aim of setting up your Final Product Requirement Specification (FPRS),

    conceive the necessary mathematical models and conduct high level performance and

    cost calculations for your device. The performance calculations include estimating power

    required, loads acting on assemblies, stability, etc. As details of the sub-assembly costs

    are unknown at this stage, the team has to make rough estimates of assembly and

    manufacturing costs (only work in USD). A good approach is to follow the target-cost

    approach as explained on pp. 114-116 of U&E. You may use any package such as Excel,

    Matlab or MathCAD. Briefly summarize your assumptions, methodology and equations

    used. Make sure all your symbols are defined and that your work can easily be

    deciphered.

    b. Following the five step process of U&E on page 105, perform the necessary calculations

    to refine the TPRS towards the FPRS. Output from this step should inform the design

    requirements for the various sub-assemblies. Present the FPRS in the format given in

    Exhibit 6-12.

  • 5. For each cluster, embody your design concepts by performing detail design and essential

    modelling. Detail design implies deciding on assembly lay-out details, e.g., selecting bearings and

    their mounting schemes, keys, gears, sprockets, pulleys, belts, etc. Factors to consider are form fit

    and function, material selection, cost reduction using Design for Manufacturing and Assembly

    (DFMA) techniques, environmentally responsible design employing Design for the Environment

    (DFE) practices, etc. Select Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) devices from catalogues

    (the Thomas Register of American Manufacturers is a good source for this,

    www.thomasnet.com). Your output for this step must be mainly in the form of sketches with

    clarifying annotations.

    6. Produce a neat sketch of your assembly showing the details discussed above. No dimensioning is

    yet required.

    7. Essential modelling implies those algorithms and calculations deemed necessary to ensure

    functional performance. These could include motion analysis, stress and deflection analysis,

    bearing life calculations, etc. You may use any package such as Excel, Matlab or MathCAD.

    Briefly summarize your assumptions, methodologies and equations used and present your final

    results. Make sure all your symbols are defined and that your work can easily be deciphered. To

    save time, you dont have to analyze each and every component in your assembly. Analyzing

    two or at most three components is acceptable. It is acceptable to guess the sizes of the remaining

    components based on your gut-feel. This is often done in industry during the initial stages of

    product design.

    8. Estimate the manufacturing costs for your cluster and summarize these in a Bill of Materials

    (BOM) (see Exhibit 13-6 in the text). All costing is to be done in USD. A target costing-approach

    for your cluster may be wise (see pp. 114-116 of the text). Appendices A, B, C and D of chapter

    13 of the text contain useful guidelines for custom component estimations. If you cant easily find

    the costs of OEM items, make intelligent guesses for these. Do not solicit prices from vendors as

    it is too time consuming and you will be wasting their time for not actually making a purchase.

    Provide your cost estimates to your chief designer, who is to consolidate the trailer manufacturing

    costs in a high level BOM.

    9. For the purposes of detail design, hand sketches are strongly recommended at this stage. You may

    move on to CAD once your ideas are maturing. No working drawings are required yet.

    10. Conduct an economic analysis by following the four steps on page 356 of U&E. Specific tasks to

    be performed are explained below.

    11. Referring to your planning as done in step 3 and your BOM of step 8, set up a base-case financial

    model for your product or cluster by estimating the timing and magnitude of future cash flows

    followed by calculating the net present value (NPV) of the project and each cluster. Estimate the

    project and cluster costs for development, ramp-up, marketing and support. Also estimate your

    volumes of sale, the unit price of your product or cluster and a period over which your product

    will be on the market. On a spreadsheet, merge your project financials and schedule and calculate

    your NPV in a format similar to Exhibit 17-6.

    AdministratorHighlight

    AdministratorHighlight

    AdministratorHighlight

    AdministratorHighlight

  • Deliverables (page numbers indicated are maximum values):

    1. Title page and anti-plagiarism declaration (first page of your submission)

    2. Group work declaration (chief designer only)

    3. WBS and Gantt diagram (4 pages each) 20 marks

    4. FPRS (2 pages) 10 marks*

    5. Copy of selected concept sketch (1 page) 5 marks

    6. Detailed assembly sketch (1 page) 15 marks

    7. Model description and detail design (6 pages) 60 marks

    8. BOM (3 pages) 20 marks

    9. Base case financial model (4 pages) 35 marks

    TOTAL: Chief designer: 165 marks

    Cluster designers: 155 marks

    General:

    1. Untidy work will be rejected and a zero score given.

    2. Work not adhering to submission requirements: Mark multiplied by 0.9.

    3. * Indicates marks for chief designers only.