assessment of kinematic integer precise point positioning ... · assessment of kinematic integer...

12
04/24/12 2012 European Geophysical Union – Vienna, Austria – April 2012 F. Fund 1 , F. Perosanz 1 , F. Mercier 1 , S. Loyer 2 Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2

Upload: others

Post on 13-Mar-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

04/24/12

2012 European Geophysical Union – Vienna, Austria – April 2012

F. Fund1, F. Perosanz1, F. Mercier1, S. Loyer2

Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances

1 2

Page 2: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/122

� Single epoch/Single receiver PPP more and more popu lar for:� Geosciences (seismology, oceanography, altimeter Cal/Val, loading effects…)� The monitoring of the troposphere/ionosphere� Time Transfer applications� Precise mobile tracking� Applications on “isolated” areas

� This study focuses on:� 1) Impacts of ambiguity fixing� 2) Correlations between parameters� 3) Effects of satellite geometry

� Quantify the PPP accuracy from the user’s point of view

� Understanding single epoch processing could improve static one

� Method:� Single epoch processing of static sites� Check repeatability

MOTIVATIONS

Time

Typical SingleEpoch PPP error

+/- 5cm

Page 3: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/123

AMBIGUITY FIXING FOR PPP AT CNES-CLS IGS AC

GRG products from a global network

Hardware WL Sat. Biases

Sat. Orbits

“Integer” Sat. Clocks

IGS

Loyer et al. (2012) in J. of Geod; [email protected]

(see http://igsac-cnes.cls.fr/)

WSBs

- Integer NL- Positions- Tropospheric delays- Rec. clock biases

- Integer (N1-N2)- WL Rec. Biases

WL combinations

GRG Orbits GRG Sat. Clocks

Iono-Free combinations

Single Receiver RINEX

Users: methodology for « Integer » PPP (IPPP)

Page 4: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/124

PROCESSING STRATEGY

# Stations ~120

# Days 15

Session batch 24h; IndependentStation Solutions

Estimates Every 30s

Weighting Code: 0.3m Phase: 3mm

Constraints None

Orbits/Sat. Clocks GRG

Cutoff 10°

Troposphere 2h piecewise model

GPT+GMF

No Gradient

Models IERS2010

Ambi. Fixing ~95 +/- 3%

Page 5: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/125

IMPACTS OF FIXING AMBIGUITIES

Float

N FixedE Fixed

U Fixed

East

North

Up

Page 6: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/126

IMPACTS OF FIXING AMBIGUITIES

� Float ambiguities:� Solution discontinuities may appear at batch

boundaries

� Wrong estimates can induce slopes in time

series

� Fixed ambiguities:� Fixing ambiguity provides continuous

solutions� Slopes are removed

� REMAINING UNEXPLAINED SIGNAL!

Up

EastNorth

Page 7: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/127

GLOBAL PERFORMANCE OF IPPP

North ~1.5 +/- 1cm RMS

East ~1.0 +/- 1cm RMS

Up ~3.5 +/- 1cm RMS

North

East

Up

Page 8: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/128

CORRELATION TIME VARIATIONS

� How the correlations between parameters change over time?

� We computed the correlation matrix derived from a 2 4h Kalman Filter using an SP3 orbit file

� Positions, Rec. clocks and ZWDs estimated every 30s . Constraint of 5mm/h^0.5 applied on ZWD estimates

� Strong correlation between Up and ZWD estimates.� But, no significant variations despite evolutions o f sat. geometry.

~-90 +/- 5%

Corr. Coef. Up vs ZWD (%)Lon: 0°; Lat:45°N

Page 9: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/129

CORRELATION SPATIAL VARIATIONS

E N U Clk

ZWD

Clk

U

N� More than 40% correlation between North and Up/Clock/ZWD at latitudes >55°

� More than 90% correlation between Up, Clock, and ZWD estimates!

� East not significantly correlated

~-1/3 ~-1/4

~+0.8

Page 10: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/1210

HOW ERRORS PROPAGATES AT CLOSE STATIONS?

� Horizontal errors are dominated by satellite geomet ry� DPPP vs Single/Double differences present similar

performances for horizontal components� Up/Clocks errors suffer from:

� Differences in tropospheric estimates� The correlation between Up/Clocks and ZWDs

� Idea: comparing their PPP series; USN: USNO-USN3; ~ 600m

dN/E/UdZWD

dClock

ZWD x -3! dEastdNorth dUp+/- 2cm

Page 11: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/1211

DAY TO DAY DPPP ERRORS

� High frequency site dependant errors (multipath…)� Differential tropospheric estimates induce long per iod

signatures on the Up component (sideral repeatabili ty?)

4min/day

Period < 1h Period > 1hUSN; Up component +/- 5cm

Page 12: Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning ... · Assessment of Kinematic Integer Precise Point Positioning Performances 1 2. ... 3 Assessment of Kinematic Integer

Assessment of Kinematic Integer PPP Performances – 04/24/1212

CONCLUSIONS ON SINGLE EPOCH PPP PERFORMANCES

� Fixing ambiguities to integer values:� reduces spurious slopes� guarantees continuity of time series

� Current RMS of single epoch IPPP using GRG products is:� ~1.0/1.5cm for North and East components� ~3.5cm for the Up component

� Horizontal component errors mainly dominated by sat ellite geometry� Up/Clock components limited by:

� Correlations between Up, Receiver Clock, and ZWD es timates: >90% and ratio from ~1/3 to ~1

� Errors on tropospheric estimate errors propagates i nto the Up component� And induce long period signatures (>1h)

� Additional consistent constraints with the expected signal are needed to improve the Up component.