assessment developed by contra costa selpa 2003-2004
TRANSCRIPT
ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT
Developed byContra Costa
SELPA
2003-2004
Assessment 2-07-02 2
Facilitated by
Contra Costa SELPA Staff
Assessment 2-07-02 3
Purpose
The purpose of this training is to inform those that conduct
special education assessments of the requirements under
federal and state law.
Assessment 2-07-02 4
Agenda
IDEA ’97 & The Process of Assessment
Initial Evaluation Written Reports Special Factors Statewide Testing Program Independent Evaluations Re-Evaluation
Assessment 2-07-02 5
IDEA ’97 on Assessments
Modifies the procedures for re-evaluation to include the review of existing data
Includes students with disabilities in assessment programs with accommodations
Emphasizes access to and progress in the general curriculum
Includes parents in decision-making
Assessment 2-07-02 6
The Process of Assessment
Documentation Prior To Referral Written Referral Assessment Plan Assessment Including Observation Written Report Eligibility Criteria IEP Team Decision Making
Assessment 2-07-02 7
Initial Evaluations
“A variety of assessment tools and strategies are used to gather relevant functional and developmental information about the child, including information provided by the parent, and information related to enabling the child to be involved in and progress in the general curriculum”
35 CFR Part 300
Assessment 2-07-02 8
Questions to be Answeredthrough an Evaluation
Does the student have a disability? What are the student’s present levels
and unique educational needs? Does the student need special education
and related services to address educational needs?
Are accommodations or modifications required to participate in general curriculum?
Assessment 2-07-02 9
13 Eligibility Categories
Mental Retardation Specific Learning
Disability Language/Speech
Disorder Other Health
Impaired Orthopedically
Impaired Deaf/Blind
Deaf Hearing Impaired Visually Impaired Traumatic Brain
Injury Autism Emotional
Disturbance Multiple Disabilities
Assessment 2-07-02 10
Assessment Plan
Developed by Team with Parent Input Addresses All Areas of Suspected Disability Acknowledges Assessment & Information
Submitted Given to Parent within 15 Days of Request Parent has 15 days to sign: Follow up Date Stamp: 50 Day Timeline begins when
plan is received back from parent
Assessment 2-07-02 11
Requirements for Assessments
Written Consent of parent or guardian Multidisciplinary team involvement Vision & hearing screening Competent, trained assessors,
knowledgeable in area of disability, cultural background and primary language
Tests administered in primary language, using appropriate modes of communication
Conducted in all areas of suspected disability
Assessment 2-07-02 12
Participation of regular teacher in SLD assessments, and observation of student in general education classroom by IEP member
Consideration of independent educational evaluations
Use of non-discriminatory assessment materials and procedures
Tests reflect what they purport to measure No single instrument or procedure used
Requirements for Assessments (cont.)
Assessment 2-07-02 13
Assessment of African-American Students
Validity requirements Use Alternative Assessments No “IQ” tests, mental ages, standard
scores that correlate with IQ No “waivers” from parents Have parents of bi-racial students
select designated race (no changes later)
Assessment 2-07-02 14
Requirements forWritten Reports
Information pertaining to all areas identified on the assessment plan
Description of relevant behavior noted during observation in appropriate setting
If standardized tests were used:a. A statement regarding the validity of the test results
b. The results of the standardized tests
Assessment 2-07-02 15
Relationship of behavior to student’s academic and social functioning as well as area of need
Educationally relevant health, developmental and medical findings
Determination concerning the effects of environmental, cultural or economic disadvantage, when appropriate
Statement as to whether student’s needs can be met in a regular classroom
Requirements for Written Reports (cont.)
Assessment 2-07-02 16
Consideration of independent assessments
Need for specialized services, materials and equipment for low incidence student
Basis for making eligibility determination, for consideration by IEP team
Information required for certification for SLD eligibility
Whether the assessment was valid
Requirements for Written Reports (cont.)
Assessment 2-07-02 17
SLD Eligibility Summary
Alternative Means Discrepancy: Ability/Achievement Psychological Processing Disorder Other Possible Causes of Discrepancy Classroom Behavior Attach Documentation if No Discrepancy Certification of Conclusions
Assessment 2-07-02 18
Requires Considerationof Special Factors:
Behavior impeding learning Communication needs for limited English
proficient students Need for assistive technology Communication needs for visually impaired Communication needs for hearing impaired
Assessment 2-07-02 19
Functional Assessment
of Behavior Required if student’s behavior impacts
his learning or the learning of others Not the same requirements as
California’s “Hughes Bill” Requires observation and hypothesis Replacement behavior must serve same
function as target behavior Replacement behavior must be taught
Assessment 2-07-02 20
Assessment of Bilingual Students
Administered by qualified personnel who are competent in student’s primary language or mode of communication, and have knowledge and understanding of cultural and ethnic background of the pupil
If it is clearly not feasible to do so, an interpreter must be used and assessment report must document suspected invalidity
Assessment 2-07-02 21
The normal process of second-language acquisition, as well as manifestations of dialect and socio-linguistic variance shall not be diagnosed as a handicapping condition
Parent notifications, parent rights, IEP and reports should be provided in the parent’s primary language. If written translation is not available, provide alternate means
Assessment of Bilingual Students (cont.)
Assessment 2-07-02 22
Assistive Technology Needs
AT must be considered for every student at every IEP meeting
An “Assessment” can consist of the IEP team looking at: Student Strengths Environmental Requirements Tasks (adaptations & modifications) Tools necessary to accomplish tasks
Assessment 2-07-02 23
Is the use of assistive technology required for the student to perform the required tasks in the least restrictive environment, or perform successfully with less personal assistance?
Examine options from low-tech to high-tech
Try out possible device options Consider AAC/AT teams and other options
Assistive Technology Needs(cont.)
Assessment 2-07-02 24
Communication Needs for Visually and Hearing Impaired Students
For Visually Impaired Students, consider the use of large print, Braille, directions read aloud, etc.
For Hearing Impaired Students, consider the use of amplification, closed captioning device, interpreters, etc.
Assessment 2-07-02 25
Inclusion in Statewide Testing
“Children with disabilities are included in general State and district-wide assessment programs, with appropriate accommodations, where necessary”
State requires that the IEP team determine if a student will take the CAT 6 or alternative assessments program.
Assessment 2-07-02 26
Accommodations
Category1: Available to any student who regularly uses accommodations in the classroom Flexible setting On-task reminders Magnification
Category 2: Available only to special ed. students with accommodations written on their IEP. These accommodations cannot fundamentally alter what is tested.
Assessment 2-07-02 27
Accommodations Cont.
Category 3: These accommodations DO fundamentally alter what is tested on the CAT 6.
Ex. Use of calculator
Students who receive Category 3 accommodations will be reported as
Non-Proficient and their scores will not be included in the school’s API
Assessment 2-07-02 28
Alternate Assessment
IEP teams may no longer exempt a student from STAR testing
The IEP team may determine whether the student should take the CAT 6 with Level 1,2 or 3 accommodations or take the California Alternative Performance Assessment
Parents may exempt their children from the STAR Program testing, but this is NOT an IEP issue. Direct parent inquiries regarding exemption to the school principal.
Assessment 2-07-02 29
Independent Educational Evaluations
District Board Policy in Place Parent has right to IEE IF they
disagree with an assessment obtained by LEA
District must have an assessment that is one year old or less for the parent to disagree with. IF the assessment is old or does not exist, the district should conduct a new one
Assessment 2-07-02 30
If parent provides an independent educational evaluation, district must convene an IEP according to usual timelines to consider the results of this evaluation
Independent educational evaluation must meet the same standards as a district provided evaluation, and must be performed by a qualified educational provider
Independent Educational Evaluations (cont.)
Assessment 2-07-02 31
Re-evaluation Requirements
Use existing assessment data Use current classroom-based
assessments and observations Use teacher and related services
providers observations Use information
from parents
Assessment 2-07-02 32
Questions for Re-evaluations
Continues to have a disability? Present levels of performance
and needs? Continues to need special education and
related services? Need modifications to the program to
enable the child to meet annual goals and participate in the general curriculum?
Assessment 2-07-02 33
If there IS Sufficient Information:
Parents are notified of the decision and the reasons for it
Parents are informed that they have the right to request an assessment, if they desire
An assessment report documents the evaluation information
Assessment 2-07-02 34
If there IS NOT Sufficient Information:
An assessment plan is developed and sent for parent approval, along with a copy of parent rights
An assessment is conducted and a report documents the evaluation information
THANK YOU THANK YOU FOR ATTENDINGFOR ATTENDING