assessment: course four column · el camino: course slos (bus) - real estate fall 2016 assessment:...

El Camino: Course SLOs (BUS) - Real Estate

FALL 2016Assessment: Course Four Column

ECC: RE 11:Real Estate Principles

Course SLOs Assessment MethodDescription Results Actions

SLO #1 Build Vocabulary - Studentswill define, describe and differentiatebetween various real estate standardterminology showing comprehensionand knowledge of real estatevocabulary used in the workplace toassist and prepare each student fromthe diverse student body to gainconfidence in their ability toeffectively communicate andcollaborate in a real estate sales,property management, appraisal,loan or investment to work withboth licensees and a diverse public ina typical real estate transaction.

Inactive Date:

Course SLO Assessment Cycle: 2015-16 (Spring 2016)

Course SLO Status: Active

Input Date: 12/05/2013

Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The difference in score is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show an increase inscore of 5%.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:2014 Spring RE11 RE Principles AM #3766 (No Names).xlsx2014 Spring RE11 RE Principles SAT #3764 (No Names).xlsx

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14(Spring 2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetA pre- and post-test was given to the 9am TTh RE11 (#3766)Principles students. 31 students took the pre-test, 14completed the post-test. Of the 14 students, the averageincrease was 56.2% on the 150 question exam that includeda predominance of real estate terminology. A pre- and post-test was given to the 8-week Sat RE11 (#3764) Principlesstudents. 18 students took the pre-test, 11 completed thepost-test. Of the 11 students, the average increase was43.2% on the 150 question exam that included apredominance of real estate terminology. A total of 49students took the pre-test. A total of 25 students took boththe pre- and post-test, with an average increase of 50.5% onthe predominantly real estate standard terminology 150questions. (05/19/2014)

Action: Based on the results, nochanges in the SLO statement orassessment needed. (12/07/2013)

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14 (Fall2013)Standard Met? : Standard Met

Additional Information:

Exam/Test/Quiz - A pre-test will beadministered prior to any coursematerials. A post-test will beadministered at the end of thecourse, in the form of the final exam.The same questions are containedon both tests, however they are notin the same order. The questions onthe pre-test are jumbled on the finalexam.

01/22/2018 of 62Generated by TracDat® a product of Nuventive

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=Gb6ypq5tiwdv

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=BJmZTAapF6P5


% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: Dr. Donna Grogan, Professor ofReal Estate, El Camino CollegeFaculty Contributing to Assessment: NoneRelated Documents:2013 Fall RE11 RE Principles AM #3770.xlsx2013 Fall RE11 RE Principles PM #3775.xlsx

Action Category: SLO AssessmentProcessAction: No Program/Collegechanges needed to improvestudent learning. (12/07/2013)Action Category:Program/College SupportAction: No curriculum changes areneeded. (12/07/2013)Action Category: CurriculumChangesAction: Due to high results, noimprovements needed.(12/07/2013)Action Category: TeachingStrategies

A pre- and post-test was given to the 9am TTh RE11 (#3770)Principles students. 36 students took the pre-test, 15completed the post-test. Of the 15 students, the averageincrease was 41.3% on the 150 question exam that includeda predominance of real estate terminology.A pre- and post-test was given to the 6pm M RE11 (#3775)Principles students. 23 students took the pre-test, 11completed the post-test. Of the 11 students, the averageincrease was 29.0% on the 150 question exam that includeda predominance of real estate terminology.A total of 59 students took the pre-test. A total of 26students took both the pre- and post-test, with an averageincrease of 34.5% on the predominantly real estatestandard terminology 150 questions. (12/07/2013)

Action: Change SLO statement forSp 2015 (01/19/2015)

Follow-Up: The SLO statementcurrently states:

(Fall 2014) RE 11 Real EstatePrinciples: SLO #1 BuildVocabulary: Students willdifferentiate between various realestate standard terminologyshowing comprehension andknowledge of real estatevocabulary used in the statelicense required Real EstatePrinciples course and in theworkplace to assist and prepareeach student from the diverse

Action Category: SLO/PLOAssessment Process

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard Met(1) Prior to October 1, 2014 the following resultswere scored by students on the R.E. 11 PrinciplesVocabulary test:

# Vocabulary test score 1 1002 993 984 945 946 937 938 939 9310 9111 91

Exam/Test/Quiz - 1) VocabularyTest: Using the instructor homepage(http://www.elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan/reprinciples/reprinciples.html),students click on the course name:RE11 RE Principles, then click on“Vocabulary Instruction” and willread the instructions to determinewhich of four exams he or she is tocomplete, based upon alphabeticname order. Each student uses a #2pencil to mark their answers on ascoring sheet (#882E) Scantron tomatch 100 vocabulary words with100 definitions.On the Syllabus, “Midterm:Vocabulary” test is found under“Course Activities” and describes the


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=NzebCsoyZ9N7

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=OcDPcP67lg9I


Standard and Target for Success: (1)Based on Percentages, it is

expected that 85% of students willscore 75% or above on this SLO.(2) Based on the actual testscore on the 150 questions on thepretest, and comparing the actualscore received on the final exam, thedifference between the two testswill reflect a one-third or higherscore.

student body to gain confidencein their ability to effectivelycommunicate and collaborate in atypical sales, appraisal orinvestment real estatetransaction and as needed to passthe final exam and in preparationfor the state license examinationto obtain a real estate license.

The SLO statement should bechanged prior to the beginning ofthe Spring 2015 semester to thefollowing:

(Spring 2015) RE 11 Real EstatePrinciples: SLO #1 BuildVocabulary: SLO #1 BuildVocabulary: Each student willshow comprehension andknowledge of real estate typicalindustry acronyms andvocabulary to prepare eachstudent in a typical sales,appraisal, property management,real property loan or investmentreal estate transaction, and asneeded to pass the final exam,and in preparation for the stateexamination to obtain a realestate certification or license. (02/03/2015)

12 9113 9114 9115 9016 8717 8518 8219 7820 7621 7622 7123 6124 5025 32(1) The target was that 85% of students will score75% or above on this SLO. Of the 25 students whocompleted the test, 85% would include 21.25 students thatwould be expected to score 75% or above on thevocabulary test. The average for all 25 students was 84%.60% of the total students received a score 90% or above.(2) By the end of the semester each student whocompleted the course completed the final exam. The targetwas that of the 150 questions given in both the pre-test andthe final exam, that the average for those who completedthe final exam would reflect a one-third or more increase intest score. 1/3 of 150 questions is 50 or greater.Pretest Final Difference49 105 5643 78 3533 112 7935 87 5243 91 4837 77 4032 91 5926 149 12345 103 5839 112 7328 86 5837 70 3334 133 99

Additional Information: (1) Thevocabulary test documents arefound on the instructor homepagefor RE11 Principles: (http://www.elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan/reprinciples/reprinciples.html(2) The pre-test and finalexam are both on the textbookpublisher, Rockwell Publishing, website. No documents are attached asthe publisher maintains the web site.

Vocabulary Test, with the due dateshown on the last page of thesyllabus.

2) Pre-Test/Final: Eachstudent uses an online textbook thatcontains test materials, including apre-test. The questions on the pre-test are the same questions as arefound on the final exam, exceptjumbled in a different order. Eachstudent must complete the pre-testin order to access Chapter 1 of thecourse materials.



% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: D. GroganFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE 11 SLO1 ATTACHMENT.docx

26 41 1552 108 5653 123 70

59.625

1 322 233 254 295 346 227 338 419 4010 5411 3412 3513 3214 2715 3516 3917 2318 3319 28

32.579

A total of 19 students completed both tests andexceeded the average of 50 by scoring 59.63—almost 10points higher than projected. Another 19 studentsenrolled in the course and completed the pre-test but didnot finish the course or take the final exam, asshown in the second chart. The average score for these 19students was 32.58 scored on the pre-test. (10/08/2014)

Action: Change SLO statement forSemester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=PziUGeRIWdqR


Sp 2015 (01/20/2015)Action Category: SLO/PLOAssessment Process

2014)Standard Met? : Standard Met(1) Prior to October 1, 2014 the following resultswere scored by students on the R.E. 11 PrinciplesVocabulary test:

# Vocabulary test score 1 1002 993 984 945 946 937 938 939 9310 9111 9112 9113 9114 9115 9016 8717 8518 8219 7820 7621 7622 7123 6124 5025 32(1) The target was that 85% of students will score75% or above on this SLO. Of the 25 students whocompleted the test, 85% would include 21.25 students thatwould be expected to score 75% or above on thevocabulary test. The average for all 25 students was 84%.60% of the total students received a score 90% or above.(2) By the end of the semester each student whocompleted the course completed the final exam. The target



was that of the 150 questions given in both the pre-test andthe final exam, that the average for those who completedthe final exam would reflect a one-third or more increase intest score. 1/3 of 150 questions is 50 or greater.Pretest Final Difference49 105 5643 78 3533 112 7935 87 5243 91 4837 77 4032 91 5926 149 12345 103 5839 112 7328 86 5837 70 3334 133 9926 41 1552 108 5653 123 70

59.625

1 322 233 254 295 346 227 338 419 4010 5411 3412 3513 3214 2715 3516 3917 23



% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: D. GroganFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

18 3319 28

32.579

A total of 19 students completed both tests andexceeded the average of 50 by scoring 59.63—almost 10points higher than projected. Another 19 studentsenrolled in the course and completed the pre-test but didnot finish the course or take the final exam, asshown in the second chart. The average score for these 19students was 32.58 scored on the pre-test.

(09/30/2014)

Standard and Target for Success:This course is usually a student’s firstin real estate and advanceknowledge of the vocabulary,practices and concepts is verylimited. A 50% improvement overallis expected. The PreTest offeredduring the Fall 14 semester by thispublisher is very comprehensive,thus yielding very low scores atbeginning of semester. After asemester of study and lecturematerial, students make a dramaticimprovement which is evidenced inthe results below for those students

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DelucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Action: Reduce needed internetaccess time (11/12/2014)Action Category: TeachingStrategies

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe above data shows the percentage change in a studentsability to recognize the varied material described in this SLO#1. The average improvement is 138% from beginning toend of semester. This tool available when using theRockwell system. When different text book is selected, thelikely measurement tool will be those offered in theEtudes.org course management system. (02/06/2015)

This SLO #1 describes the overallcourse topics. Students completed aPre-Test at the beginning of thesemester through the RockwellPublishing online text platform, andthen a similar test as a final exam atthe end of the semester. Theimprovement in scoresdemonstrates the student success.



completing both tests.Additional Information:

Standard and Target for Success: Anaverage of 70% or better is expected

Related Documents:DeLuca SLO1 RE11 Spring 2016.docx

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DelucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Action: Label vocabulary questionsthroughout semester quizzes forcompilation at end (06/01/2017)

Follow-Up: Labeling questionswithin individual chapter quizzestakes a significant effort toprocess. The plan is to implementwithin Etudes by Spring 2017 orsooner, however in the event ofnew online platform such asCompass, the implementationmay take longer. In the interim,the method used in this report isadequate for this SLO item.(06/01/2017)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16(Spring 2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe data shows that questions items are answered correctlyby over 80% of students.Individual student scores average over 80% (05/18/2016)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscomplete an end of semester quiz(Ch. 15) devoted to variousvocabulary and definitions from theentire semester.

SLO #2 Industry Forms andDocuments - Students show theability to prepare and completestandard real estate industry formsand documents as found in diversereal estate sales, rental, finance,appraisal or investment businesstransactions.

Inactive Date:

Course SLO Assessment Cycle: 2016-17 (Fall 2016)



Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The difference in score is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show an increase inscore of 5% on the second in-classquiz near the end of the semesterover the quiz scores tallied from thefirst in-class quiz taken at thebeginning of the semester.

Related Documents:

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14 (Fall2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of the two quizzes administered by the facultysupport the program-level goal for the 6:30pm Mondaynight RE11 Principles, with an overall increase of 12.5% onthe in-class quiz. This exceeds the 5% target.

For the 9am course, the results were a -4.7% on the samequestions. This indicates that the RE11 Principles studentsin the morning class did not comprehend broker trust fundaccounting forms (64.7% first quiz, 52.9% second quiz) andpre-printed/computer-generated real estate forms (64.7%first quiz, 47.1% second quiz). These topics are covered inRE13 Practice in depth, as required by law prior to takingthe state licensing exam. The morning class had a total of50.6% on the five questions regarding real estate forms onthe first quiz and a 45.9% on the second quiz. About half ofall students in both classes did understand the questions on

Additional Information: Each quizcontains 5 real estate formsquestions.

Exam/Test/Quiz - Written scantrontest administered by instructor withtwo in-class quizzes (one within thefirst month of the semester, and asecond one within the last month ofthe semester).


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=BtQavjGbMfA7


SLO - Forms Questions.doc% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: Dr. Donna Grogan, Professor ofReal Estate, El Camino CollegeFaculty Contributing to Assessment: NoneRelated Documents:2013 Fall RE11 #3770 SLO #2.xlsx2013 Fall RE11 #3775 SLO #2.xlsx

real estate forms. (12/08/2013)

Standard and Target for Success:Students are expected to achieve a70% score on this type of test forspecific topics recently introduced inlive lecture.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DeLucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE11 SLO 2 Fall 16.doc

Action: Improve lecture supportmaterials beyond new textbookadopted Fall 15. (05/15/2017)

Follow-Up: Additional materialwas added to lecture slides andmade available online for reviewduring Fall 2016 to augment newtextbook previously introduced inFall 15. More will follow.(01/20/2017)

Action Category: TeachingStrategies

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17 (Fall2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe data sheets pasted below analyze student individualscores on the test as well as sample questions withfrequency of correct answers. There is separate data foreach of two sections of this course, one live lecture, theother online. The resulting average scores and frequency ofcorrect response to individual questions is an acceptable70% or above (see related document). (01/06/2017)

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DelucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE 11 SLO2 ATTACHMENT.docx

Action: Implemented in classlecture/quiz reviews (08/29/2014)

Follow-Up: Implementation of a“class participation” style chapterreview near the end of the lectureyielded very desirable results onweekly quizzes as demonstratedin the data for this SLO #2. Suchreviews will be done in futuresemesters when/if teaching thiscourse. (02/27/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe data below shows the student average score was 94%with one student scoring very low. This student did notcomplete the course. Also shown are sample questions andhigh percentage (84%) answered correctly. (02/06/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscompleted a test about various realestate procedures, contract forms,clauses, and disclosures.

Action: Change the current SLO toa new SLO statement(01/20/2015)


Project - Real Estate PrinciplesProject: Each student will complete“Real Estate Project #1”as found on


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=yL6jPrPT34I4

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=fSJ7LbWOTbeg

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=8jLrh5t3u2Cs

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=uuWis25ZweYT

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=ksxKfhoe9IMQ


Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentage it is expectedthat 85% of students will score 50%or above on this SLO.

Related Documents:RE 11 SLO 2 Forms.doc


Follow-Up: The current SLOstates:

RE 11 Real Estate Principles: SLO#2 Industry Forms Documents:Students show the ability toprepare and complete standardreal estate industry forms anddocuments as found in diversereal estate sales, rental, finance,appraisal or investment businesstransactions.

It should be changed to read:

RE 11 Real Estate Principles: SLO#2 Industry Forms Documents:Students show the ability tocomprehend clauses and datafound in a real estate documentsor contracts as found to prepareand complete standard realestate industry forms usingdocuments as found in a typicalreal estate sale, loan, propertymanagement, appraisal andinvestment business transaction. (01/20/2015)

Action Category: SLO/PLOAssessment ProcessFall 2014 Principles Project #1 SLO

Question # Total Attempted Total IncorrectTotal Correct

1 21 11 1013 21 7 1414 21 8 1315 21 4 1716 21 9 1224 21 7 1426 21 5 1644 21 12945 21 9 1246 21 15 647 21 8 13 #95#136Total 21 students 41.1%58.9%

The results are that about 60% of the students correctlyanswered the Project question about standard real estateforms. The questions asked about the following forms:Disclosure forms, property profile, deeds, listing agreementcontract, Residential Purchase Agreement (RPA) form. (10/17/2014)


the Professor’s home page,(http://www.elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan/reprinciples/reprinciples.html ), to answer questions aboutcommon industry forms that wouldbe used for a transaction to sell aLawndale condominium or Lomitasingle family residence. Thequestions pertaining to this SLO aretallied to determine the number ofcorrect responses.

SLO #3 Methods of Holding Title -Students will identify, distinguish anddifferentiate the differences betweenthe various methods of holding titleto real property, showing the abilityto analyze, concisely write and/orverbally communicate and apply theappropriate vesting available in atypical real estate business

Standard and Target for Success:The difference in score is thestandard of success. The expected

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14 (Fall2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetFor Fall 2013, the 9am Principles class had derived adifference in score from the first test (43.5%) to the secondtest (72.9%) with an average increase of 29.4%. Thisexceeds the 5% target.



https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=OmNKKRvjb3Ba


transaction.

Inactive Date:




Comments::

results are to show an increase inscore of 5% on the second in-classquiz near the end of the semesterover the quiz scores tallied from thefirst in-class quiz taken at thebeginning of the semester.

Related Documents:SLO - Title Questions.doc

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: Dr. Donna Grogan, Professor ofReal Estate, El Camino CollegeFaculty Contributing to Assessment: NoneRelated Documents:2013 Fall RE11 #3770 SLO #3.xlsx2013 Fall RE11 #3775 SLO #3.xlsx

For Fall 2013, the 6:30pm Principles class had derived adifference in score from the first test (56.3%) to the secondtest (76.3%) with an average increase of 20%. This exceedsthe 5% target. (12/08/2013)

Additional Information: Each quizcontains 5 real estate methods ofholding title questions.

Standard and Target for Success:Students are expected to achieve a70% or higher score


Action: Implemented in classlecture/quiz reviews (08/29/2014)

Follow-Up: Implementation of a“class participation” style chapterreview near the end of the lectureyielded very desirable results onweekly quizzes as demonstratedin the data for this SLO #3. Suchreviews will be done in futuresemesters when/if teaching thiscourse. (02/27/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe data below shows the average score by studentscompleting the test was 94%, well in excess of the target.The second chart shows student success on individual testquestions, all above 70% minimum. (02/06/2015)Additional Information:

Exam/Test/Quiz - Students competea test on the subject matter for thisSLO #3, Title and related topics.

Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages, it is expectedthat students will show an increaseof knowledge about vesting andholding title by at least a 20% higher

Action: Change the current SLOstatement by Spring 2015.(05/15/2015)

Follow-Up: The results from theexact same test given to two (2)RE11 Principles classes on Vestingand Holding Title wereadministered in Fall 2010 andgiven to the college SLO anddivision SLO committee. Theresults were one class improvedby 4.5% and the other classimproved by 17.14% for Fall 2010.


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results were as follows:Student 9-Sep 4-Nov Difference1 4 5 12 5 5 03 2 5 34 3 5 25 5 5 06 2 3 17 3 4 18 1 5 49 2 5 310 4 5 1

Exam/Test/Quiz - Each student willbe given a real estate quiz aboutvesting and holding title twice: (1)once the 2nd week of the semester;and, (2) once the towards the end ofthe semester after the chaptermaterials on vesting and holding titlehave been covered in class. The twoscores will be compared todetermine the difference.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=PXpkCG5YdAQu

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=tOfWMWj8hh9e

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=9rvQXULH7uiI

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=lB2v2KAVRmdH


score from the administering of thefirst quiz to the second quiz for thisSLO.

Related Documents:RE 11 SLO 3 Title.doc

The current test resulted in anincrease of 31% in averagestudent scores, thus no furtherimprovement or changes arerecommended for this particularsubject matter. From earliertesting of these concepts andemphasis in class instruction inthese areas, there is an over 20%increase in the results from Fall2010 to Fall 2014.

The current SLO states:

RE 11 Real Estate Principles: SLO#3 Methods of Holding Title:Students will identify, distinguishand differentiate the differencesbetween the various methods ofholding title to real property,showing the ability to analyze,concisely write and/or verballycommunicate and apply theappropriate vesting available in atypical real estate businesstransaction.A new SLO statement for Spring2015 should state:

RE 11 Real Estate Principles: SLO#3 Vesting and Holding Title:Students will analyze how title isheld to real property and howreal estate is acquired, used,regulated, taxes and transferred. (06/02/2015)

11 3 4 112 3 2 -113 4 5 114 2 4 215 3 4 116 2 5 317 1 5 418 2 5 319 4 4 020 4 5 1AVG 2.95 4.50 31.00%

On September 9, 2014 a five (5) question the above testwas given to 34 students during class. The same test wasadministered Nov 4, 2014 to the remaining 20 studentspresent on this date. The chart shows the number correctfor each assessment in the first two columns with the date,and indicates the difference in score in the last column. Ofthe 20 students who took both tests, the results indicate a31% increase in average score on this title test.

When compared to the results of the exact same test at anearlier date, the results for two of the exact same courseswere as follows:

RE 11 – Real Estate Principles Semester: Fall 2010 Class: M PM Section # 3775 Campus:

ECC

Question # # Total % Question ## Total % Difference

Number Right Wrong Number Correct NumberRight Wrong Number Correct In score

(%)Q #1 Title26 5 32 81.25% Q #1 Title

18 1 19 94.74% +13.49%Q #2 Title21 11 32 65.62% Q #2 Title

18 1 19 94.74% +29.12%Q #5 Title20 12 32 62.5% Q #5 Title



https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=S3nJNENWLNTu



16 3 19 84.21% +21.71%Q #6 Title24 8 32 75.0% Q #6 Title

18 1 19 94.74% +19.74%Q #10 Title 28 4 32 87.5%

Q #10 Title 17 2 1989.47% +1.97%

Totals 119 40 160 74.43% Totals87 8 95 91.57% +17.14%

RE 11 – Real Estate PrinciplesSemester: Fall 2010 Class: TTh AM

Section # 3770 Campus: ECCTitle questions 1, 2, 5, 6, & 10Date: 9/7/10Date: 12/09/10Question # # Total % Question #

# Total % DifferenceNumber Right Wrong Number Correct Number

Right Wrong Number Correct In score(%)Q #1 Title18 6 24 75% Q #1 Title

10 5 15 66.67% -8.33%Q #2 Title19 5 24 79.17% Q #2 Title

12 3 15 80% +0.83%Q #5 Title12 12 24 50% Q #5 Title

10 5 15 66.67% +16.67%Q #6 Title12 12 24 50% Q #6 Title

7 8 15 46.67% -3.33%Q #10 Title 20 4 24 83.33%

Q #10 Title 15 0 15100% +16.67%

Totals 81 39 120 67.5% Totals54 21 75 72% +4.5%

(09/09/2014)

Action: Provide Updated Chartscomparing Title Vesting options(02/23/2018)

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17(Spring 2017)Standard Met? : Standard Met

Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscomplete several quizzes and examsduring the semester. Quiz 2 is



Standard and Target for Success:Students are expected to achieve ascore of 70% or higher.

Related Documents:RE 11 SLO 3 Spr17.doc

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DeLucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE 11 SLO 3 Spr17.doc


See Related Documents (09/11/2017)


specifically about the subject ofSLO3, Holding Title to Real Propertyand related issues.

SLO #4 Mathematical Computations -Students will demonstrate the abilityto calculate typical real estatemathematic computational problemsas found in diverse real estatebusiness areas of sales, leases,prorations, finance, appraisal,property management, investmentsand capitalization, land or structurearea and taxation.

Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The difference in score is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show an increase inscore of 5% on the second in-classquiz near the end of the semesterover the quiz scores tallied from thefirst in-class quiz taken at thebeginning of the semester.

Related Documents:SLO - Math Questions.doc

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: Dr. Donna Grogan, Professor ofReal Estate, El Camino CollegeFaculty Contributing to Assessment: NoneRelated Documents:2013 Fall RE11 #3770 SLO #4.xlsx2013 Fall RE11 #3775 SLO #4.xlsx

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14 (Fall2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetFor Fall 2013, the 9am Principles class had derived adifference in score from the first test (40.0%) to the secondtest (45.9%) with an average increase of 5.9%. The exceedthe target of 5%.

For Fall 2013, the 6:30pm Principles class had derived adifference in score from the first test (53.8%) to the secondtest (43.8%) with an average decrease of 10%. A guestspeaker demonstrated the real estate financial calculatorwhen the night students took the first math test in week 3,because the math chapter for this course is Chapter 5,during week 6 of the semester. It appears that studentsretained math knowledge at the time of the demonstrationand completion of the math chapter, but did not retain thesame level of math skills when given identical mathquestions in week 11. The students had just over 50% inweek 3, and about 45% on week 11. (12/08/2013)

Additional Information: Each quizcontains 5 real estate mathquestions.


Action: Spreading math lecture &in class exercises over several


Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscomplete a test on various realestate math concepts, formulas and


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=u6ZChuFLUCCD

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=u6ZChuFLUCCD

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=SCmfimCBlmlh

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=GfqIrv7qqSNV

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=1ih4narsPZvS


Standard and Target for Success:Students are expected to achieve a70% or higher score by the end ofthe semester on math questions.


weeks of semester (09/26/2014)Action Category: TeachingStrategies

The data below demonstrates student success with variousmath computations and concepts. The average score is88%, well above the target. The second data shows thepercentage of students answering individual questionscorrect, 88%. Only one question was answered correctly byless than 70% of students. (02/06/2015)Additional Information:

calculations.

Standard and Target for Success: (1)Based on Percentages, it is

expected that students will have an

Action: Create a one-day realestate math course annuallythrough ECC Community Service(05/01/2016)

Follow-Up: Using existing mathtext and materials, a full one-dayseminar on real estate basic mathskills and use of a real estatefinancial calculator is developedto cover each aspect of thebusiness with topics on a salestransaction, real estate loanfinancing, property management,escrow prorations, investmentsand appraisal calculations.(03/15/2016)

Action Category: CurriculumChanges

Action: Provide real estate mathtutors from either paid studenthelp, college approved mathtutors, or prior real estate studenttutors. (12/01/2015)

Follow-Up: Like the other collegedepartments, paid tutoringstudent help is established to

Action Category:Program/College Support

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard Met(1) (a) Of the 21 students who completed the R.E.Principles Project #1 ten (10) math questions, the averagefor students was that they scored an average of 43.29%correct.

Fall 2014 Principles - Real Estate Project #1 - SLO GridQuestion # Total Attempted Total Incorrect

Total Correct % Correct% IncorrectProj #1 SLO #

2 21 2 19 90.48% 9.52%4

3 21 9 12 57.14% 42.86%4

4 21 5 16 76.19% 23.81%4

37 21 18 3 14.29% 85.71%4

38 21 14 7 33.33% 66.67%4

39 21 17 4 19.05% 80.95%4

40 21 17 4 19.05% 80.95%4

41 21 14 7 33.33% 66.67%4

42 21 17 4 19.05% 80.95%

Multiple Assessments - (1) Usingthe instructor homepage ( http://www.elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan/reprinciples/reprinciples.html ), each student willcomplete(a) Real Estate PrinciplesProject #1 questions due the 8thweek of the fall 2014 semester.Question numbers: #2,3,4,37,38,39,40,41,42,48 & 49 (11questions); and,(b) Real Estate PrinciplesProject #2 questions due the 12thweek of the fall semester.Question numbers: #31 through 38,questions #40 & 41, questions # 45through 60(25 questions).

(2) The instructor administered a 5question math quiz on Sept 9, 2014and the same test on October 4,2014 to determine if studentsincreased their ability to correctlyanswer mathematical computations.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=5KVjgFh3cwyd


average score 25% or above correcton this SLO for the student projectsfor this course.(2) It is expected that studentswill increase the correct answers onthe math test by at least 10% fromthe beginning of the semester to theend of the semester.

Related Documents:RE 11 SLO 4 Math.doc

assist real estate students toattain better mathematical skillsfor basic real estate mathcalculations. (09/30/2015)Action: Review math chapterdeeper (12/01/2015)

Follow-Up: All faculty teachingthis course meet to combineideas on better strategies toimprove math exit skills whenstudents enter the courseunderprepared for basic realestate mathematicscomputational abilities.(09/30/2015)


Action: Change the SLO statement(01/20/2015)

Follow-Up: The current SLOstatement states:RE 11 Real Estate Principles: SLO#4 Mathematical Computations:Students will demonstrate theability to calculate typical realestate mathematic computationalproblems as found in diverse realestate business areas of sales,leases, proration’s, finance,appraisal, property management,investments and capitalization,land or structure area andtaxation.The SLO statement should bechanged by the beginning ofSpring 2015 to state:RE 11 Real Estate Principles: SLO


448 21 10 11 52.38% 47.62%

449 21 8 13 61.90% 38.10%

3

Average 43.29% 56.62%(2) (b) Results: Of the 15 students who completed theR.E. Principles Project #2 thirty (30) math questions, theaverage for students scored an average of 60% correct and40% incorrect.

Fall 2014 Principles Project #2 SLO Question # Total Attempted Total

Incorrect Total Correct1 9 15 0 152 13 15 0 153 17 15 0 154 21 15 0 155 25 15 0 156 31 15 3 127 32 15 4 118 33 15 6 99 34 15 7 810 35 15 5 1011 36 15 4 1112 37 15 3 1213 38 15 12 314 40 15 12 315 41 15 10 516 45 15 6 917 46 15 9 618 47 15 2 1319 48 15 8 720 49 15 7 821 50 15 6 922 51 15 9 623 52 15 5 1024 53 15 10 525 54 15 13 2



https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=u6eGrxcqvZ8x


#4 Mathematical Computations:Students will demonstrate theability to calculate common realestate mathematicalcomputations found in standardindustry real estate sales,property management, finance,escrow, property management,investments and appraisalproperty transactions. (01/20/2015)

26 55 15 10 526 56 15 2 1327 57 15 5 1028 58 15 5 1029 59 15 12 330 60 15 12 3

Average (40%) 6.03 (60%)8.97

The pattern of the data that was observed is thatcertain questions (#37, 39, 40 & 42) indicated that theaverage for this class of students had over 80% incorrectresponses indicating that either the materials needed toanswer these questions correctly need to be betterexplained in class so that a higher number of students areable to correctly answer the question or the questions needto be eliminated from the project. A review of questions #37, 39, 40 and 42 should also bereviewed to determine how students may betterunderstand the materials.

(3) On September 9, 2014 a five (5) question mathcalculation test was given to 34 students during class. Thesame test was administered Nov 4, 2014 to the remaining20 students present on this date. The chart below showsthe number correct in the first two columns with the date,and indicates the difference in score in the last column. Ofthe 20 students who took both tests, the results indicate a15% increase in average score on this math test.

9-Sep 4-Nov Difference1 2 1 -12 1 4 33 3 3 04 1 2 15 0 3 36 1 2 1



7 3 4 18 3 3 09 1 5 410 3 3 011 1 4 312 3 5 213 3 2 -114 3 0 -315 2 0 -216 3 3 017 0 2 218 2 2 019 1 4 320 3 2 -1Average

1.95 2.70 15.00%

The important findings of the data support the originalpremises that students are under-prepared for math whenthey enter the course. No pre-requisite or math placementtesting is performed before a student may enroll in thisintroductory course. On the test given at the beginning ofthe course, during the 2nd week of class, two studentsscored no correct answer and another six students scoredonly 1 correct answer out of five. Thus 8 of the 21 students,representing 38% of students who took the first test, didnot command the basic math skills required for the coursematerials.

Towards the end of the semester 5 of 21 students scored azero and 3 got only got only one correct out of the fivequestions. The most important findings are that 5 studentsscored worse on the second test than on the first test.

This is after one entire week was devoted to the mathchapter, and after a guest speaker demonstrated using thereal estate financial calculator to determine real estatemath questions. After years of trying to get a new course“real estate mathematics” into the curriculum, there has




been no success in aiding students obtain higher skills inreal estate math. No math tutors are available for the realestate department students. Thus, when students enter realestate finance, mortgage loan brokering, investments andappraisal, and if they do not possess basic math skills tosucceed, it is not likely he or she can succeed in the area ofmathematics. (09/09/2014)


ECC: RE 12A:Legal Aspects of Real Estate


SLO #1 Build Vocabulary - Studentswill define, describe and differentiatebetween various real estate standardterminology showing comprehensionand knowledge of real estatevocabulary used in the workplace toassist and prepare each student fromthe diverse student body to gainconfidence in their ability toeffectively communicate andcollaborate in a real estate sales,property management, appraisal,loan or investment to work withboth licensees and a diverse public ina typical real estate transaction.

Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that 70% of the class willscore 70% or above on this SLO. % of Success for this SLO:

Faculty Assessment Leader: M. BotelloFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Action: Review edition ofTextbook to assure it is the latestedition and current. (01/26/2016)

Follow-Up: Reviewed latesttextbooks and adopted newedition of textbook. (01/26/2016)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe class exceeded the target of seventy percent. Thestudents were able to define real estate vocabulary.(01/26/2016)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Take homeexamination that requiresapplication of the vocabulary to caseexamples.

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that average score forthe class will be a score of 70%

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: M. BotelloFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Action: Continue to review thetextbook to assure it incorporatesthe current RE terminology in use.(10/31/2016)Action Category: CurriculumChanges

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16(Spring 2016)Standard Met? : Standard Met91% or 23 of the 24 students correctly defined, describedand differentiated when the legal remedy of rescission asopposed to the other legal remedies: declaratory relief,injunction or reformation is the appropriate legal remedy.23 of 24 students correctly identified the parties whocollaborate in a typical real estate transaction: agent andprincipal, grantor and grantee, optionor and optionee andlessor and lessee and which creates a fiduciary relationship.(09/20/2016)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Final examination


Inactive Date:




Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that 70% of the studentswill score 70% or above on this SLO. % of Success for this SLO:

Faculty Assessment Leader: M. BotelloFaculty Contributing to Assessment:




Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe class exceeded the goal of 70%. The students were ableanalyze the CAR residential purchase agreement.(01/26/2016)


Homework Problems - Students didhomework assignments thatanalyzed the CAR ResidentialPurchase Agreement.

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that average score for

Action: Continue to reviewtextbooks to assure incorporationof the latest RE standard forms.





Comments:: the class will be a score of 70%.


(10/31/2016)Action Category: CurriculumChanges

87% or 21 of 24 students correctly showed the ability toprepare and complete the requirements for a standard realestate industry form real estate purchase contract bycorrectly distinguishing among its standard clauses: date forclosing, time of possession, method of financing, andproperty description. (09/20/2016)


Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that students will scorean average of 70% or above on thisSLO.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. PhamFaculty Contributing to Assessment: M. Botello

Action: Real Estate Faculty need tore-evaluate teaching strategies toimprove comprehension of thematerial. (08/01/2017)Action Category: TeachingStrategiesAction: Real Estate Faculty shouldevaluate changes in the industryand make sure assessments reflectthe current industry needs andrequirements. (08/01/2017)Action Category: CurriculumChanges

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17 (Fall2016)Standard Met? : Standard Not MetA total of 18 students from the Fall 2016 sections of RE12Aparticipated in and completed the assessment with anaverage of 65.4%. This data suggests that students werenot competently able to absorb the material, analyze thetransactions and properly prepare the forms. (10/27/2016)


Exam/Test/Quiz - A multiple choiceexam that required studentsdemonstrate an understanding ofthe standard real estate industryforms found in real estate sales,rental, finance, appraisal orinvestment business transactions.

SLO #3 Methods of Holding Title -Students will identify, distinguish anddifferentiate the differences betweenthe various methods of holding titleto real property, showing the abilityto analyze, concisely write and/orverbally communicate and apply theappropriate vesting available in atypical real estate businesstransaction.

Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that 70% of the class willscore above 70%.





Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe class average exceeded the 70% goal on the homeworkassignments. The students were able to distinguishcommunity property from joint tenancy title. (01/26/2016)Additional Information:

Homework Problems - Case studymultiple choice questions.

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that average score forthe class will be a score of 70%.

Action: Continue to review thetextbook to assure it incorporatesthe current forms of jointownership. (10/31/2016)Action Category: CurriculumChanges

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16(Spring 2016)Standard Met? : Standard Met91% or 22 of 24 students correctly distinguished anddifferentiated the differences between the various methodsthe different forms of co-ownership: Partnership,community property, Tenancy in Common and Joint






Tenancy; and 100% or 24 of 24 students correctly appliedthe appropriate vesting available and possible to a brotherand sister. (09/20/2016)

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that 75% of students willachieve at 70% or higher.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: N. McGrueFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Action: Real Estate and law facultyshould confer to ensure theachievement levels are set at alevel that is achievable yet alsochallenging to students.(03/01/2018)Action Category: SLO/PLOAssessment ProcessAction: Real Estate and law facultyshould confer to ensure thatinstruction methods are in linewith the latest and best processesin each industry. (03/01/2018)Action Category: CurriculumChanges

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17(Spring 2017)Standard Met? : Standard MetA total of 20/24 students from the Spring 2017 sections ofRE12A participated in and completed the assessment with a70% or higher. This reflects an 83% achievement level. Thisdata suggests that students have a working understandingof various title vesting options and know how to apply thatknowledge to practical situations. Student success is basedon the fact that faculty is teaching to the course outline andthe proper course objectives are being stressed. This was avery high achievement level. Faculty should look intoadjusting the achievement metrics in order to ensure theproficiency level is of a high enough caliber. (08/31/2017)


Exam/Test/Quiz - An examinationwhich assesses students’understanding of the various ways ofholding title, while requiring them toevaluate a scenario and provideinstruction as to an appropriate formof title.

SLO #4 Ethics and Agency - Studentswill differentiate between variousparts of the real estate code of ethicsand the standards of professionalappraisal practices to explain howagency relationships are created andthe duties and liabilities of agents andprincipals.

Inactive Date:

Course SLO Assessment Cycle:Course SLO Status: Active


Comments::

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that average score forthe class will be a score of 70%.


Action: Continue to presentstudents with actual legal caseswhere ethical issues arise.(12/16/2016)Action Category: TeachingStrategies

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16(Spring 2016)Standard Met? : Standard Met91% or 22 of 24 students distinguished factual legal liabilityof a real estate agent, as a fiduciary, involved in a salestransaction for fraud as opposed to puffing, deceit ormisrepresentation. (09/20/2016)



Action: Real Estate and law facultyshould confer to ensure theachievement level are set at alevel that is achievable yet alsochallenging to students.(03/01/2018)

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17(Spring 2017)Standard Met? : Standard Not MetA total of 20/24 students from the Spring 2017 sections ofRE12A participated in and completed the assessment with a70% or higher. This reflects an 83% achievement level. This

Exam/Test/Quiz - An examinationwhich assesses students’understanding of the agencyrelationships along with legal,administrative, and ethicalrequirements that go along with



Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that 75% of students willachieve at 70% or higher.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: N. McGrueFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Action Category: SLO/PLOAssessment ProcessAction: Real Estate and law facultyshould confer to ensure thatinstruction methods are in linewith the latest and best processesin each industry. (03/01/2018)Action Category: CurriculumChanges

data suggests that students have a working understandingof agency relationships and the various legal, ethical andother implications. Student success is based on the factthat faculty is teaching to the course outline and the propercourse objectives are being stressed. This was a very highachievement level. Faculty should look into adjusting theachievement metrics in order to ensure the proficiency levelis of a high enough caliber. (08/31/2017)


such relationships.


ECC: RE 13:Real Estate Practice


SLO #1 Build Vocabulary - Studentswill define, describe and differentiatebetween various real estate standardterminology showing comprehensionand knowledge of real estatevocabulary used in the workplace toassist and prepare each student fromthe diverse student body to gainconfidence in their ability toeffectively communicate andcollaborate in a real estate sales,property management, appraisal,loan or investment to work with bothlicensees and a diverse public in atypical real estate transaction.

Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The difference in score is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show an increase inscore of 5%.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: Derf FredericksFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of the two tests administered by the instructorsupport the program level goals for the 6:30 Monday nightRE13 Practice class with an overall increase of 25.4% on testscores. This exceeds the 5% goal. (12/16/2015)

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:2014 Spring RE13 RE Practice #3780 (No Names).xlsx

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14(Spring 2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetA pre- and post-test was given to the RE13 (#3780) Practicestudents. 33 students took the pre-test, 23 completed thepost-test. Of the 23 students, the average increase was38.7% on the 100 question exam that included apredominance of real estate terminology. (05/20/2014)


Exam/Test/Quiz - A pre-test will beadministered prior to any coursematerials. A post-test will beadministered at the end of thecourse, in the form of the final exam.The same questions are containedon both tests, however they are notin the same order. The questions onthe pre-test are jumbled on the finalexam.

Standard and Target for Success:Students are expected to improvetheir score from Pre Test to Final


Action: Change Text (01/17/2015)

Follow-Up: Text change has beenimplemented and movementaway from Rockwell Publishingonline text for this course.The new text provides guidancefor the recently updated industrystandard forms and an emphasison their use in practice asopposed to concepts emphasizedin the prior online text.Additionally more time can be


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetAverage 79.56% improvement from start of semester toend of semester. Final exam scores are 81% average, wellabove the expected of 70% (02/06/2015)

Exam/Test/Quiz - This SLO 1describes topics, vocabulary andconcepts covered throughout thecourse. In Fall 2014, studentscompleted a Pre-Test at thebeginning of the semester via theonline text & course from RockwellPublishing. They subsequentlycompleted a similar test as part oftheir final exam. The two results arecompared.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=YeF9DHBblL4Z

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=bfz5xIwYHD8K


Exam by at least 25%. That was farexceeded.

devoted to actual agent practicesin the field. (03/12/2015)Additional Information:

Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages: It is expectedthat all students will score 75% orabove as an average percentage onall quizzes given on the topic.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: D. FredericksFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Action: Update current studymaterial to conform to changes inthe industry. (07/01/2017)Action Category: TeachingStrategies

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16(Spring 2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe average quiz score for all students was 88%. Theresults of the 15 quizzes administered by the instructorexceeds the program level goals of 75% for the 6:30Tuesday night Practice class. (05/10/2016)


Exam/Test/Quiz - A scantron quiz isadministered by the instructor afterreviewing the topics. Vocabulary andreal estate terminology is an integralpart of course work in all 15 chaptersof our textbook. 15 quizzes make upthis assessment.


Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The percentage of students whoresponded as feeling they've gained20% or more knowledge about howto complete forms is the standard ofsuccess. The expected results are toshow a score of 50% or more.

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2012-13(Spring 2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of questions 2, 3, & 4 of the Monkey Surveyadministered online during the Spring 2013 semester forReal Estate Principles students indicates that when studentsbegan that term just under 90% knew five or less typicalreal estate FORMS used in a real estate transaction, withover 70% knowing less than 3 industry FORMS. By the endof that semester just under 75% knew 6 or more industryFORMS. The Principles course is an introductory classwhere it would not be expected that students would have ahigh degree of FORMS usage since emphasis is onvocabulary, government licensing and regulations andindustry topics, such as finance, appraisal and propertymanagement. The results indicate that the learnersobtained a great deal of knowledge about real estateFORMS by the end of the semester.Almost 85% of respondents indicated they felt they hadgained 20% or more knowledge about how to completestandard industry real estate FORMS as a result ofcompleting the El Camino real estate course.


Survey/Focus Group - An onlineSurvey Monkey survey containingquestions regarding industry formsknowledge will be distributed duringthe final week of the class.



% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE13 #2 FORMS Sp 2013 SLO Assessment Report.doc

(05/01/2013)

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that students will answer70% of questions correctly.



% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DelucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:DeLuca Spr15 RE13 SLO2.docx

Action: Assignment Project(01/01/2016)

Follow-Up: Learning aboutindustry forms and their properusage is a primary result of thiscourse. The test examples shownhere can be refined and theassignment example can beexpanded and offered as anongoing project during thesemester. It is unknown when Iwill teach this course again, sodate of implementation “ActionDate” is unknown. (09/18/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15(Spring 2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetResults Below are partial examples of test questions andstudent scoring statistics for each of the above tests. Thevast majority of questions are successfully answered.(06/29/2015)

Action: Refine SLO measurementsvia online course management i.e.Etudes.0rg (08/31/2015)

Follow-Up: Presentlyexperimenting with online quizzes


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetBelow are individual test results and question analysis froma test administered online via Etudes.org. Average resultsare above satisfactory. A few questions indicateimprovement needed or refine question. (02/06/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscompleted an online test in theEtudes course management system.This test was comprised of questionsto measure the students’understanding of common formsused in real estate transactions


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=HyGYJY8jDcuy

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=mJgMQgqp5XXd



during Spring Semester with goalto implement further in Fall 2015,if assigned to teach this course.(03/12/2015)Action: Obtain permission todisplay CA Assoc Realtors forms(01/17/2015)

Follow-Up: Permission to displayon password protected website(Etudes.org) obtained for SpringSemester. This permission is forme as individual instructor notcollege wide and must requestrenewal for each semester.01/17/2015 (03/12/2015)


Action: Change text book(01/17/2015)

Follow-Up: Implemented forSpring 2015 Semester 1/17/2015(03/12/2015)


Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages: It is expectedthat students will score 75% orabove as an average percentage.


Action: Update current forms asneeded to conform to industrychanges. (02/01/2017)Action Category: TeachingStrategies

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17 (Fall2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe average project score for all students was 82%. Theresults of the project exceeds the program level goals of75% for the 6:30 Monday night Practice class. (12/20/2016)


Project - A project spanning 10weeks includes templates ofapproximately 30 real estate forms(over 70 pages) are completed bythe student based on a given realestate transaction.

SLO #3 Methods of Holding Title -Students will identify, distinguish anddifferentiate the differences between


Survey/Focus Group - An onlineSurvey Monkey survey containingquestions regarding holding title and


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=M9lNrLp8iZvB


the various methods of holding titleto real property, showing the abilityto analyze, concisely write and/orverbally communicate and apply theappropriate vesting available in atypical real estate businesstransaction.

Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The percentage of students whoresponded as feeling they've gained20% or more knowledge about howto hold title and vesting is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show a score of 50% ormore.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE13 #4 TITLE & VESTING Sp 2013 SLO AssessmentReport.doc

The results of question 7 was that just under 75% ofrespondents felt they had increased their knowledge abouttaking and holding TITLE to real property and how VESTINGis held, with almost 75% of respondents indicating that theirknowledge had increased by greater than 20% as a result ofthe Fall 2013 real estate El Camino course. (05/01/2013)


vesting knowledge will bedistributed during the final week ofthe class.

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that students will answer70% of questions correctly.




Action: Reconsider whether theSLO 3 is needed or should berewritten (03/01/2016)

Follow-Up: No action will betaken until a review of SLOs forthis course, the Action Date is anestimate only.While the subject of “HoldingTitle” is important in real estate,all course texts and materials forthis course strongly advise thatthe practicing agent not discussthe manner of holding title withclients, but refer them to anattorney for such advice.(This subject matter is covered


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15(Spring 2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetBelow are student scores and specific question resultanalysis from a test administered online via Etudes.org.Average results are far above satisfactory. All questionswere answered correctly 70% or more frequently.(06/29/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - The assessment isbased upon relevant test questionsregarding the subject of ‘Title’


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=olypq4ypCOe2

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=olypq4ypCOe2

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=BygW4GNCdZRG


more in RE11, Real EstatePrinciples) (09/18/2015)


Action: Reconsider whether theSLO 3 is needed or should berewritten (03/01/2016)

Follow-Up: No action will betaken until a review of SLOs forthis course, the Action Date is anestimate only.While the subject of “HoldingTitle” is important in real estate,all course texts and materials forthis course strongly advise thatthe practicing agent not discussthe manner of holding title withclients, but refer them to anattorney for such advice.(This subject matter is coveredmore in RE11, Real EstatePrinciples) (03/12/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetBelow are specific test question result and analysis from atest administered online via Etudes.org. Average results areabove satisfactory. With the exception of one question, allwere answered correctly by over 92% of studentscompleting. One question indicates improvement neededor refine question. Individual scores follow with 87%average. (02/06/2015)

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that all students willscore 75% or above as an average



Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17(Spring 2017)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe average quiz score combined with Project II scores was84%. The results of the 15 quizzes and Project IIadministered by the instructor exceeds the program levelgoals of 75% for the 6:30 Tuesday night Real Estate 13Practice class. (09/15/2017)

Multiple Assessments - A scantronquiz is administered by theinstructor after reviewing the topics.Methods of holding title and realestate terminology is an integral partof course work in all 15 chapters ofour textbook. In addition, Project IIincludes paperwork and formsgenerated by agents that detailvarious ways to hold title in a typicalreal estate transaction. 15 quizzesand Project II make up thisassessment.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=hzwbjDfyQlm5


percentage on all quizzes given onthe topic and for Project II.Additional Information:


Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The percentage of students whoresponded as feeling they've gained20% or more knowledge about howto do real estate math is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show a score of 50% ormore.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE13 #1 MATH Sp 2013 SLO Assessment Report.doc

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2012-13(Spring 2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of question 5 was that over 56.3% ofrespondents felt they were greater than 30% better able tocalculate real estate MATH as a result of the Fall 2013 realestate El Camino course, and another 31.3% increased 20-30%. Thus, just under 90% of student felt they were muchbetter able to calculate real estate math as a result of thisreal estate course in Spring 2013 Semester.For question 6, 56.3% of the students indicated they gained30% or greater and another 31.3% of students indicatedthey gained a 20% to 30% increase in their real estateMATH skills. Thus, while the majority of respondents, justunder 90%, indicated they believe they gained real estateMATH skills as result of the El Camino real estate coursetaken Spring Semester 2013. (05/01/2013)


Survey/Focus Group - An onlineSurvey Monkey survey containingquestions regarding real estate mathknowledge will be distributed duringthe final week of the class.

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that students will answer70% of questions correctly. % of Success for this SLO:

Faculty Assessment Leader: Derf FredericksFaculty Contributing to Assessment:


Action: Spreading math lecture &in class exercises over severalweeks of semester (11/06/2014)



Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscomplete test questions requiringrecognition and/or calculation ofcommon real estate mathprocedures.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=mBWV4AIs6TTT



Follow-Up: Students havedifferent levels of basic mathskills. Delivering math conceptsin segments over several weeks ofthe semester rather thanprimarily during one or twoweeks results in highcomprehension and higher scoreson tests as evidenced the datashown in above Results sectionfor this SLO #4 Math.(03/12/2015)


The following charts show the average student score andtest question analysis. The students average score was 90%and all questions were answered correctly 77% or more.(02/06/2015)

Standard and Target for Success:70% average scores

Related Documents:DeLuca Spr15 RE13 SLO4.docx % of Success for this SLO:

Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DelucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:DeLuca Spr15 RE13 SLO4.docx

Action: Reconsider wording of SLOregarding math for this course(03/01/2016)

Follow-Up: Action Date isestimated as the next time I “maybe” assigned to teach this courseis unknown.Math concepts are included inseveral chapters, however manytexts for this course do not have aspecific chapter on mathcalculations and formulae. Thisdisrupts the syllabus if adding anew chapter just for math.Separating the math in a fewchapters and implementingexercises for practice may behelpful.The SLO 4 statement is the sameas one for another course, REPrinciples. Revising thestatement for this course, REPractice may be in order the next


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15(Spring 2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetSee following data with score results and question analysisfrom 2 chapters which contain concepts involving math.The average test scores are well in excess of minimumexpectations and test questions are answered accuratelyover 76% except for 2 questions indicating confusion aboutsome definitions. (06/29/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Tests and quizzesdelivered via the Etudes onlineplatform. See section below withdetail under “Assessment Data &Analysis.”


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=jqFU6F9cfmnw

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=csZwWweHPN3F

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=csZwWweHPN3F


time the SLO statements arereviewed. (09/18/2015)Action: Implement more mathcalculation exercises (03/01/2016)

Follow-Up: Action Date isestimated as the next time I “maybe” assigned to teach this courseis unknown.Math concepts are included inseveral chapters, however manytexts for this course do not have aspecific chapter on mathcalculations and formulae. Thisdisrupts the syllabus if adding anew chapter just for math.Separating the math in a fewchapters and implementingexercises for practice may behelpful.The SLO 4 statement is the sameas one for another course, REPrinciples. Revising thestatement for this course, REPractice may be in order the nexttime the SLO statements arereviewed. (09/18/2015)



Standard and Target for Success:Students are expected to answer70% of questions correctly

% of Success for this SLO:



Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscomplete questions from varioustests related to the subject matter ofthis SLO



Inactive Date:

Course SLO Assessment Cycle: 2015-16 (Fall 2015), 2017-18 (Fall 2017)



Comments::

Faculty Assessment Leader: Derf FredericksFaculty Contributing to Assessment:


Action: Clarify some Agencyrelated subjects and quizquestions (10/31/2015)

Follow-Up: Modify lesson for thissubject and measure during 3rdweek of first or second half, 8week course in Fall 2015depending when and if I amassigned to teach this course.(03/12/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe following compilations of data indicate student scoresfor particular questions as well as student individual testscores for the subject matter. This data is from Etudesquizzes and Rockwell online SLO measure for ethics relatedpractices.Below is the results from Rockwell online text course whichmeasures the following specific questions regarding Ethics.Results at far right are 81-100% (02/06/2015)

Standard and Target for Success:Questions will be answered correctlyby 70% or more students


Action: Implementation ofmaterial from Cont. Ed. Courseson these SLO topics (03/01/2016)

Follow-Up: The SLO #5 Statementis generally accurate with theexception of the phrase“standards of professionalappraisal practices.” This may bea typographical error, but theword “appraisal” should bedeleted as this is not an appraisalcourse. Action due date is merelyan estimate.Real Estate licensees must renewtheir license every 4 years. To doso the licensee must provideproof that they have completed aminimum required 15 CE hourson the subjects of Ethics, Agency,


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15(Spring 2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetThese questions reflect topics included in the SLOstatement #5 and have been compiled for this report fromseveral chapter quizzes administered via the Etudes onlineplatform. The results indicate that nearly all of thequestions are answered correctly by an average of 85% ofstudents. Only two questions have poor results indicating aneed for teaching clarification of these items and/orimprovement of the question/answer wording.(08/07/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Quiz questionsabout the SLO topics from variouschapter quizzes


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=DH3IWrIRWORK

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=3WbPEqcHoZ8X


Trust Fund Handling, FairHousing, and Risk Management.Depending on the text bookselected for RE 13, material fromthese CE courses could beconsidered to supplement thiscourse in order to emphasizethese topics. Action Due Date isan estimate. (09/18/2015)

Action: Correction to SLO #5Statement (03/01/2016)

Follow-Up: The SLO #5 Statementis generally accurate with theexception of the phrase“standards of professionalappraisal practices.” This may bea typographical error, but theword “appraisal” should bedeleted as this is not an appraisalcourse. Action due date is merelyan estimate.Real Estate licensees must renewtheir license every 4 years. To doso the licensee must provideproof that they have completed aminimum required 15 CE hourson the subjects of Ethics, Agency,Trust Fund Handling, FairHousing, and Risk Management.Depending on the text bookselected for RE 13, material fromthese CE courses could beconsidered to supplement thiscourse in order to emphasizethese topics. Action Due Date isan estimate. (09/18/2015)




Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that all students willscore 75% or above as an averagepercentage on all quizzes given onthe topics.



Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe average quiz score for all students was 82%. The resultsof the two quizzes administered by the instructor exceedthe program level goals of 75% for the 6:30 Monday nightRE13 Practice class. (12/16/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - A scantron quiz isadministered by the instructor afterreviewing the topics. Ethics andAgency is covered over a two weekperiod during the semester by classlectures and student study of thetextbook.


ECC: RE 19:Real Property Management



Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The standard will be the students'test scores. The target of a minimumof 25% will be scored by studentswho are administered the in-classtest regarding standard real estatevocabulary.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: Dr. Donna Grogan, Professor ofReal Estate, El Camino CollegeFaculty Contributing to Assessment: NoneRelated Documents:2013 Fall RE19 #3785 SLO #1.xlsx

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14 (Fall2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetA midterm exam was administered where over 50% of theexam consists of questions regarding real estate vocabulary.The results of the exam indicate that 71.9% of studentscorrectly answered the questions regarding real estatevocabulary. This surpasses the 25% target. (12/08/2013)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Written scantrontest administered by instructor inclass approximately halfway throughthe class.

Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages it is expectedthat 85% of students will score 50%or above on this SLO.

Related Documents:RE 19 SLO 1 ATTACHMENT.docx

Action: Change SLO statement(01/20/2015)

Follow-Up: (Fall 2014) RE 19 RealProperty Management: SLO #1Build VocabularyStudents will define, describe anddifferentiate between various realestate standard terminologyshowing comprehension andknowledge of real estatevocabulary used in the workplaceto assist and prepare eachstudent from the diverse studentbody to gain confidence in theirability to effectively communicateand collaborate in a real estateproperty management career thatwould include real estate sales,1031 exchanges and investmentterminology to work with bothlicensees and a diverse



1 422 293 234 305 156 367 318 379 3910 1511 3712 2913 2514 1515 416 3317 1618 29


Exam/Test/Quiz - Acronym Test:Each student will be given a pagecontaining 50 Property ManagementAcronyms commonly referred to inthe real estate industry with a blankline for him or her to fill in what theletters, numbers or symbols meanwith words or math formula.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=WpoSrEHWqruN

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=7e24tisFcJgL



public in a typical real estatetransaction and as needed to passthe final exam in preparation forthe state license examination toobtain a real estate license.

The SLO statement should bechanged by the beginning ofSpring 2015 to state:

(Spring 2015) RE 19 Real PropertyManagement: SLO #1 BuildVocabulary Each student willshow comprehension andknowledge of real estate typicalindustry acronyms andvocabulary to prepare eachstudent in a real estate propertymanagement career that wouldinclude real estate sales, 1031exchanges and investment realestate transaction and as neededto pass the final exam and inpreparation for the state licenseexamination to obtain a realestate license. (01/20/2015)

19 2620 2021 2222 1823 2624 20Total 617

÷24 = 25.71 Average (09/09/2014)

Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that 70% of students willreceive a passing grade (C or above)in the class, based on the followingrubric:

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: J. BlissFaculty Contributing to Assessment:

Action: Continue to keep lecturematerial up to date and currentfor industry standards, andconsider making the coursematerial more rigorous. Assurethat all items covered in the classmeet changing market demands,etc. (09/29/2017)Action Category: TeachingStrategies

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17 (Fall2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThere were a total of 36 students who completed the class.Four out of 36 (11%) did not receive a passing grade in theclass. Based on the results, the assessment was met.

It is noted that perhaps the assessment methodology/standards, and/ or class material needs to be readdressed inthe future making it more rigorous. (04/03/2017)

Multiple Assessments - Theassessment method includes thefinal grade received in the class. Allclass assignments, exams, etc.require the student to define,describe and differentiate betweenvarious real estate standardterminology.



A - 79-100 pointsB - 69- 78 pointsC – 59-77 pointsD – 44-58 pointsF – 0-48 pointsAdditional Information:


Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The standard will be the students'test scores. The target of a minimumof 50% will be scored by studentswho are administered the in-classtest regarding standard real estateforms.

Related Documents:SLO - Forms Questions.doc


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14 (Fall2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of the quiz on standard real estate formsadministered by the faculty during the last month of thesemester indicate that 60% of the students correctlyanswered the questions regarding standard real estateforms. (12/08/2013)

Additional Information: The quizcontains 5 real estate formsquestions.

Exam/Test/Quiz - Written scantrontest administered by instructor inclass within the last month of thesemester.


Follow-Up: The current SLOstatement states:

RE 19 Real PropertyManagement:SLO #2 Industry FormsDocuments: Students show theability to prepare and completepre-qualification forms and loancomparison forms used in themortgage loan brokering field asfound in typical real estate loan


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard Met22 students completed the “forms” project that contained atotal of 34 points.1 242 223 254 275 276 217 278 229 2010 3111 25

Exam/Test/Quiz - Each student willuse the directions for the “FormsProject” that is found on theProfessor’s homepage(http://www.elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan/repropertymanagement/repropertymanagement.html ) tocomplete industry standard typicalrental agreement forms for both amove-in and for a move-out of atenant in a residential rental unit,where the student is acting as alicensed real estate salespersonagent who works under a licensedreal estate broker as the hiredproperty manager of the property


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=yL6jPrPT34I4

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=qSccupIa6GcU


Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages it is expectedthat the students will score 60% orabove on this SLO.


business transaction.

The SLO statement should bechanged by the beginning ofspring 2015 to state:

(Spring 2015) SLO #2 Forms:Students show the ability toprepare and complete standardreal estate industry propertymanagement forms usingdocuments as found in typicalreal estate rental businesstransaction, including the move informs such as rental agreement,walk thru form, house rules,disclosure agreement, and themove out forms such as walk thruform and security deposit refundform. (06/02/2015)

12 2813 2314 2015 2216 2617 2618 2219 2620 2321 1722 17Total 521 ÷ 22 = 23.68 Average = 69.7%

It was expected that that the students would score 60% orabove, with the actual results indicate that the classaveraged a score of 70% on this SLO. (11/04/2014)


owner.


A - 79-100 pointsB - 69- 78 pointsC – 59-77 points

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: J. BlissFaculty Contributing to Assessment:


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17 (Fall2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThere were a total of 36 students who completed the class.Four out of 36 (11%) did not receive a passing grade in theclass. Based on the results, the assessment was met.

It is noted that perhaps the assessment methodology/standards, and/ or class material needs to be readdressed inthe future making it more rigorous. (04/03/2017)

Multiple Assessments - Theassessment method includes thefinal grade received in the class. Allclass assignments, exams, etc.require the student to show theability to prepare and completestandard real estate industryproperty management forms usingdocuments as found in typical realestate rental business transaction



D – 44-58 pointsF – 0-48 pointsAdditional Information:


Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The standard will be the students'test scores. The target of a minimumof 25% will be scored by studentswho are administered the in-classtest regarding standard real estatemath.

Related Documents:SLO - Math Questions.doc


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2013-14 (Fall2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of the quiz on standard real estate mathquestions administered by the faculty during the last monthof the semester indicate that 54.5% of the studentscorrectly answered the questions regarding standard realestate math. This exceeds the target of 25%. (12/08/2013)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Written scantrontest administered by instructor inclass within the last month of thesemester.

Standard and Target for Success: (1)


Follow-Up: The current SLOstatement states: SLO #3 MathematicalComputations: Students willdemonstrate the ability tocalculate typical real estatemathematic computationalproblems as found in diverse realestate business areas of sales,leases, proration’s, finance,appraisal, property management,investments and capitalization,land or structure area andtaxation.The SLO statement should bechanged by the beginning ofSpring 2015 to state: SLO #3 Mathematical


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard Met(1) On September 9, 2014 a five (5) question mathcalculation test was given to 33 students during class. Thesame test was administered Nov 4, 2014 to the remaining33 students present on this date. The chart below showsthe number correct in the first two columns with the date,and indicates the difference in score in the last column. Ofthe 33 students who took both tests, the results indicatedthat students increased their score by over 9% increase onaverage score on this math test.

Total 5 Points TestStudent 9-Sep 4-Nov Difference1 1 3 22 4 3 -13 2 1 -14 1 1 05 2 4 26 2 2 07 0 2 2

Exam/Test/Quiz - (1) Theinstructor administered a math quizon Sept 9, 2014 and the same teston November 4, 2014 to determineif students increased their ability tocorrectly answer mathematicalcomputations.(2) Each student was given atypical property management trustfund data to enter onto a CaliforniaBureau of Real Estate Trust Fundsform, showing receipt of ownerfunds to open the account, payingthe owner’s bills, collecting thetenant’s rents, distributing theproperty management fees, tenantsecurity deposit refund and ownerwithdrawals. The accounting incomeand expense statement is to have adaily balance.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=gsV8R7rbw7u7

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=5D6JwguCEt6F


It is expected that students willincrease the correct answers on themath test by at least 5% from thebeginning of the semester to the endof the semester.(2) It is expected that of thosestudents who complete theassignment the average score will be25% or more correct.


Computations: Students willdemonstrate the ability tocalculate common real estatemathematical computationsfound in standard industry realestate sales, propertymanagement, finance, escrow,property management,investments and appraisalproperty transactions. (06/02/2015)

8 0 0 09 3 3 010 1 1 011 4 4 012 5 4 -113 2 4 214 2 4 215 1 3 216 4 4 017 2 4 218 4 4 019 1 2 120 2 2 021 3 1 -222 4 1 -323 0 4 424 2 4 225 5 5 026 2 3 127 1 4 328 3 3 029 1 0 -130 3 4 131 2 1 -132 3 3 033 5 4 -1

AVG 2.33 2.79 9.09%

(2) Trust fund accountingTotal 16 Points Math Test1 82 8



https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=o2RGQvgECSBV



3 124 115 136 87 128 89 1510 011 1312 1513 014 315 216 017 218 719 1120 721 022 0Total 155

÷ 22 = 7.05

(1) The analysis is that the goal was for students toincrease the correct answers on the math test by at least5%, when students showed an increase of almost doublethat figure, scoring over 9% increase on the math testquestion scores from the beginning of the semester to theend of the semester.(2) The analysis of the basic trust fund accountingwas that the average score would be 25% or more correct. (09/09/2014)

SLO #4 Ethics and Agency - Studentswill differentiate between variousparts of the real estate code of ethics

Action: Change the SLO statement(01/20/2015)Action Category: SLO/PLO


Essay/Written Assignment - Theassessment instrument used is foundon the instructor homepage



and the standards of professionalappraisal practices to explain howagency relationships are created andthe duties and liabilities of agents andprincipals.

Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages, it is expectedthat 85% of students will score 75%or above on this SLO.




SLO #4 Ethics and Agency:Students will differentiatebetween various parts of the realestate code of ethics and thestandards of professionalappraisal practices to explain howagency relationships are createdand the duties and liabilities ofagents and principals.The SLO statement should bechanged by the beginning ofspring 2015 to state:

SLO #4 Ethics and Agency:Students will differentiatebetween the 17 Articles of theNational Association of Realtors®(NAR) code of ethics to compareand contrast each with the 14Institute of Real EstateManagement (IREM) code ofethics Articles to create a chartthat identifies the similarity anddifferences between the twocodes.**Note: Agency relationship iswritten code law and distinctlydifferent than a code of ethicsagreed upon by members of anassociation. (06/02/2015)

Assessment ProcessThe results of the assessment is listed below. Twentystudents in this class completed the

1 1002 903 1004 905 506 907 908 1009 10010 9011 8012 10013 10014 10015 10016 9017 8018 8019 9020 90Total 1810

÷ 20 = 90.5The goal was that 85% of students will score 75% or aboveon this SLO. The results were that of the 20 students whocompleted the Ethics assignment, the average of the 20 was90.5, which exceeded the goal. (11/18/2014)


(elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan), onthe left side bar for the “RE 19Property Management” course, thesecond item (just under “CourseMaterial, Syllabus,” etc.) titled“Ethics SLO” of which the followingis a copy:


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=IYHcNmWMVJmH

ECC: RE 26:Escrows



Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The percentage of students whoresponded as feeling they've gained20% or more knowledge about realestate vocabulary to complete formsis the standard of success. Theexpected results are to show a scoreof 50% or more.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE26 #3 EXAM Sp 2013 SLO Assessment Report.doc

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2012-13(Spring 2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of question 8 was that just under 80% ofrespondents felt that their ability had increased by 20% ormore, and almost 70% of respondents felt they weregreater than 30% better able to PASS the STATEEXAMination as a result of the Fall 2012 real estate ElCamino course. (05/01/2013)


Survey/Focus Group - An onlineSurvey Monkey survey containingquestions regarding real estatevocabulary knowledge will bedistributed during the final week ofthe class.

Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages, it is expectedthat the average score for studentswill be 50% or above on the writtenclosed book written assignmentacronym test administered duringclass.

Related Documents:RE26 Escrow Vocab List SLO 1.docx



(Fall 2014) RE 26 Escrows: SLO #1Build Vocabulary: Students willdefine, describe and differentiatebetween various real estatestandard terminology showingcomprehension and knowledge ofreal estate vocabulary used in anescrow on real property and inthe workplace to assist andprepare each student from thediverse student body to gainconfidence in their ability toeffectively communicate andcollaborate in an escrow on a realestate sale or exchange to work


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetOf the fourteen students in class on the night theassessment was administered, the goal was for the averagestudent score to be 50% or higher. The actual average was61.6, almost 62% correct. The result of the assessment isthat students exceeded the expected goal.

1 222 143 264 195 246 167 168 269 1810 1111 2212 1413 19


Exam/Test/Quiz - Each student willbe administered an in-class writtenassignment test with 30 commonindustry escrow acronyms, followedby a blank line where the student isto write the whole word meaning forthe initials or numeric value.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=oh5UDpCgOGHp

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=29KEec3IzOzC



with both licensees and a diversepublic in a typical real estatetransaction and as needed to passthe final exam in preparation forthe state license examination toobtain a real estate license.

The SLO statement is to bechanged to:

(Spring 2015) RE 26 Escrows: SLO#1 Build Vocabulary: Each studentwill show comprehension andknowledge of real estate typicalindustry acronyms andvocabulary to prepare eachstudent in a typical escrow realestate transaction and as neededto pass the final exam and inpreparation for the state licenseexamination to obtain a realestate license. (06/03/2015)

14 12Total 259

÷ 14 = Average 18.5 (11/20/2014)

Standard and Target for Success:Students complete a series of weeklychapter quizzes and cumulativeexam preparation quizzes. Virtuallyall chapter quizzes include someelements named in the SLO #1statement. Average class grade of70% or higher is the target.

Related Documents:RE26 FA15 SLO 1.doc


Action: Updated text and morepractice materials (08/20/2017)

Follow-Up: While this courseprovides a fundamentalunderstanding of escrowprocedures, new employees to anescrow company usually learnthe job as low level clericalassistant. An updated text bookwith current examples of “on thejob tasks” is anticipated. Trainingmaterials availability directly fromthe escrow industry are minimal.I made great improvement this


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17 (Fall2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe following spreadsheet indicates the frequency ofquestions answered correctly by those taking the tests.These are questions from various chapters that reflect SLO1. There is an average 89% correct answers, demonstratingthe students comfort with the vocabulary and concepts.Most students have taken other real estate courses prior tothis section (see related document). (01/06/2017)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscomplete weekly and bi semesterquizzes and cumulative quizzes tomeasure progress of coursematerial.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=CTpWAKw8L8cl

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=vWJYmXBngSOE


semester over Fall 2015 withpractical application in class andactual examples. Escrow andtitle industry guest speakersdemonstrations were added. 1student actually obtainedemployment in an escrow officeduring the semester.(01/20/2017)

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DelucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE26 FA15 SLO 1.doc

Action: Refine SLO statements tobe more specific to the Escrowsubject (01/01/2017)Action Category: SLO/PLOAssessment ProcessAction: Consider a text book fromthe Escrow Industry (11/01/2015)

Follow-Up: Discussed with otherinstructors has occurred andsearch for alternative text bookhas been initiated. (12/28/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetThese statistics show a very high average score. Thequestions on these cumulative quizzes given prior tomidterm and final exams show student success at retaininginformation through the semester. (12/28/2015)


Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The percentage of students whoresponded as feeling they've gained20% or more knowledge about howto complete forms is the standard ofsuccess. The expected results are toshow a score of 50% or more.

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2012-13(Spring 2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of questions 2, 3, & 4 of the Monkey Surveyadministered online during the Spring 2013 semester forReal Estate Principles students indicates that when studentsbegan that term just under 90% knew five or less typicalreal estate FORMS used in a real estate transaction, withover 70% knowing less than 3 industry FORMS. By the endof that semester just under 75% knew 6 or more industryFORMS. The Principles course is an introductory classwhere it would not be expected that students would have ahigh degree of FORMS usage since emphasis is onvocabulary, government licensing and regulations andindustry topics, such as finance, appraisal and propertymanagement. The results indicate that the learners


Survey/Focus Group - An onlineSurvey Monkey survey containingquestions regarding industry formsknowledge will be distributed duringthe final week of the class.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=CTpWAKw8L8cl


% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE26 #2 FORMS Sp 2013 SLO Assessment Report.doc

obtained a great deal of knowledge about real estateFORMS by the end of the semester.Almost 85% of respondents indicated they felt they hadgained 20% or more knowledge about how to completestandard industry real estate FORMS as a result ofcompleting the El Camino real estate course. (05/01/2013)


Follow-Up: The current StudentLearning Outcome states:

SLO #2 Industry FormsDocuments: Students show theability to prepare and completestandard real estate industryescrow forms using documents asfound in typical real estatebusiness transactions, includingcompleting the escrow projectwhere each student creates thelayout for an escrow companyhomepage after critiquing three(3) escrow company homepagesand indicating both the good andthe bad elements for eachcompany, and reviewing onesection selected by each studentand approved by the Professorfrom the text to give an oralpresentation to the class on theselected topic within the chapterthat contains research for the


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results were as follows for the 100 point project where1 point equals 1% and where bonus points of up to 5 areawarded when student gives full citation of 3 or moreescrow company homepages, showing site, listing bothgood and bad items on the site and listing improvementsthat should be made to the site, not to exceed 105 totalpoints possible:

RE26 Escrow Project SLO #2 Forms1 502 803 754 755 806 797 758 1059 9010 9011 10012 9513 8514 6516 10517 90

Exam/Test/Quiz - Each student usesthe directions for the “Real EstateProject” as found on the CourseSyllabus from the Professor’s homepage(http://www.elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan/reescrow/reescrow.html ),where item #6 describes the StudentProject: to complete typical industryescrow forms on various types ofreal property transfers using anescrow company, such as AlcoholicBeverage Control license transferform, mobile home ownershiptransfer form, franchise tax boardownership transfer form, etc.); and,each student is do an oralpresentation to demonstrate to theProfessor and classmates on how theform is used, how it is completed,what government agencies the formmust be reported to, and duties ofthe escrow company to theprinciples for obtaining andcompleting the forms.As part of the same project, studentswill show three (3) escrow companyhome pages and critique the layout


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=G4nuMo2REps4


Standard and Target for Success:Based on percentages, it is expectedthat students will score 75% orabove on this SLO.


most up to date form for thatchapter (i.e. Alcoholic BeverageControl license transfer form,mobile home ownership transferform, franchise tax boardownership transfer form, etc.) asfound in a typical escrow on thespecialized type of real propertytransaction for which the escrowwas opened and for which theescrow firm is trying to closeescrow.By Spring 2015 the StudentLearning Outcome should bechanged to state:

Industry Forms Documents:Students show the ability toprepare and complete standardreal estate industry escrow formsusing documents as found intypical real estate businesstransactions, by selecting onesection of the textbook withapproved by the Professor to giveboth an oral presentation to theclass on the selected topic withinthe chapter that containsresearch for the most up-to-dateform for that chapter (i.e.Alcoholic Beverage Controllicense transfer form, mobilehome ownership transfer form,franchise tax board ownershiptransfer form, etc.) as found in atypical escrow on the specializedtype of real property transactionfor which the escrow was openedand for which the escrow firm istrying to close escrow and also

20 8521 9022 9023 60Total 1664Average 83.2

It was expected that students would score 75% orabove on this SLO, when they actually scored just over 83%,which exceeded expectations. (12/11/2014)


homepage.



giving a written report showingthe form and explaining how theform is completed. (06/03/2015)


Related Documents:RE26 FA15 SLO 2.doc

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DelucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE26 FA15 SLO 2.doc

Action: Implement newerexamples than offered in textbook (12/01/2015)

Follow-Up: Consultations withcurrent escrow practitioners hasbeen initiated to obtain newerforms examples. (12/28/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe above data shows a high average score and samplequestions on the subject matter of this SLO #2. The Samplequestions are for reference and showing success rate perquestion. (12/28/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Students answermultiple choice quiz questions aboutthe types of forms andconsiderations involved incompleting escrow documents.

Standard and Target for Success:Average class grade of 70% or higheris the target.


Action: More implementation offorms completion practice in class(08/20/2017)

Follow-Up: Students wereprovided with actual sampledocuments and file organizers topractice compiling an escrowtransaction file. Escrow and titleindustry guest speakerdemonstrations were added. 1student actually obtainedemployment in an escrow officeduring the semester. More handson exercises will be included inthe future as materials can beobtained in print. Most escrowcompanies complete documentsvia computer software, which isnot possible in this course.(01/20/2017)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17 (Fall2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe following spreadsheet indicates the frequency ofquestions answered correctly by those taking the tests.These are questions from various chapters that reflect SLO2. There is an average 84% correct answers, demonstratingthe students comfort with the transaction documentsrequired for various escrows (see related document)(01/06/2017)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscomplete weekly and bi semesterquizzes and cumulative quizzes tomeasure progress of coursematerial.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=kog966z8rQtb

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=kog966z8rQtb

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=ozYvpIYZ5f5m


SLO #3 Methods of Holding Title -Students will identify, distinguish anddifferentiate the differences betweenthe various methods of holding titleto real property, showing the abilityto analyze, concisely write and/orverbally communicate and apply theappropriate vesting available in atypical real estate businesstransaction.

Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The percentage of students whoresponded as feeling they've gained20% or more knowledge about howto hold title and vesting is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show a score of 50% ormore.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE26 #4 TITLE & VESTING Sp 2013 SLO AssessmentReport.doc

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2012-13(Spring 2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of question 7 was that just under 85% ofrespondents felt they had increased their knowledge abouttaking and holding TITLE to real property and how VESTINGis held, with almost 80% of respondents indicating that theirknowledge had increased as a result of the Fall 2013 realestate El Camino course. (05/01/2013)


Survey/Focus Group - An onlineSurvey Monkey survey containingquestions regarding holding title andvesting knowledge will bedistributed during the final week ofthe class.

Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages, it is expectedthat the students will have anaverage score of 50% or above.




Follow-Up: The current SLOstates:

RE 11 Real Estate Principles: SLO#3 Methods of Holding Title:Students will identify, distinguishand differentiate the differencesbetween the various methods ofholding title to real property,showing the ability to analyze,concisely write and/or verballycommunicate and apply theappropriate vesting available in atypical real estate businesstransaction.

A new SLO statement for Spring2015 should state:

RE 11 Real Estate Principles: SLO


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of the assessment were as follows:Question number Number correct Percentage correct1 15 71%2 16 76%3 19 91%4 12 57%5 17 81%Total Average 16 for 21 tests 75%The goal for this SLO assessment was that the studentswould have an average score of 50% or above. The actualresults were that students had a score greater than 50% onevery question, with an overall average of 75% on the totalassessment. (12/23/2014)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Each student willtake a test during class on questionsabout vesting and holding title toreal property and place his or heranswer on a Scantron grading sheetfor scoring.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=2Etu7yaQaVP8

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=2Etu7yaQaVP8

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=ZkUuZVEV13eA


#3 Vesting and Holding Title:Students will analyze how title isheld to real property and howreal estate is acquired, used,regulated, taxed and transferred. (06/03/2015)


Related Documents:RE26 FA15 SLO 3.docx

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: V. DelucaFaculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE26 FA15 SLO 3.docx

Action: Implement industrypractitioners as guest speakers(11/01/2015)

Follow-Up: A guest speaker fromthe Title Insurance industry hasspoken to the class during the Fall2015 semester. (12/28/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetStudent scores are well in excess of target. Questions arerelated to SLO 3 and answered correctly at a high rate.(12/28/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Students answermultiple choice quiz questions aboutthe title considerations involved incompleting escrow documents.


Inactive Date:




Comments::

Standard and Target for Success:The percentage of students whoresponded as feeling they've gained20% or more knowledge about howto do real estate math is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show a score of 50% ormore.

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader:Faculty Contributing to Assessment:Related Documents:RE26 #1 MATH Sp 2013 SLO Assessment Report.doc

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2012-13(Spring 2013)Standard Met? : Standard MetThe results of question 5 was that over 52.6% ofrespondents felt they were greater than 30% better able tocalculate real estate MATH as a result of the Spring 2013real estate El Camino course, and another 26.3% increased20-30%. Thus, about 80% of student felt they were muchbetter able to calculate real estate math as a result of thisreal estate course in Spring 2013 Semester. For question 6, 47.4% of students indicating they gained30% or greater, and another 31.6% of students indicatedthey gained a 20% to 30% increase in their real estateMATH skills. Thus, just under 80% of respondents indicatedthey believe they gained real estate MATH skills as result ofthe El Camino real estate course taken Spring Semester2013. (05/01/2013)




https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=TGxnBvtrJfmA

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=TGxnBvtrJfmA

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=oQiAIgV8Vvkc


Standard and Target for Success: (1)It is expected that students

will increase the correct answers onthe math test by at least 5% fromthe beginning of the semester to theend of the semester.(2) It is expected that studentswill increase the correct answers onthe HUD-1 Settlement Statement byat least 10% or more from the firstattempt on the condo to the secondattempt on the single family home.


Action: Change the mathquestions (01/20/2015)

Follow-Up: 2. Change themath questions:The math questions used in thetest administered wereinvestment, sales, loan andtaxation questions. The escrowstudents should all have knownhow to calculate question #5about taxation, but the other 4questions were beyond the scopeof this course and the futuremath assessment should be moredirected towards specific escrowmath problems. (06/03/2015)



Follow-Up: The current SLOstatement states: SLO #4 MathematicalComputations: Students willdemonstrate the ability tocalculate typical real estatemathematic computationalproblems as found in diverse realestate business areas of sales,leases, proration’s, finance,appraisal, property management,investments and capitalization,land or structure area andtaxation.The SLO statement should bechanged by the beginning of


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard Met(1) On September 11, 2014 a five (5) question mathcalculation test was given to each student during class. Thesame test was administered Nov 13, 2014 to the remaining23 students present on this date. The chart below showsthe number correct in the two columns with the date, andindicates the difference in score in the last column. Of the23 students who took both tests, the results indicated thatstudents increased their score by over .68 increase onaverage score on this math test.

Student 11-Sep 13-Nov Difference1 0 *2 0 *3 0 *4 1 *5 3 5 26 1 5 47 4 5 18 2 1 -19 1 0 -110 3 1 -211 1 1 012 1 0 -113 1 0 -114 3 4 -115 0 0 016 4 3 -117 2 2 018 0 0 019 0 3 320 1 2 121 1 0 -122 3 4 123 3 5 2Total 34 41AVG 1.48 2.16 0.68

* Did not complete class-did


Multiple Assessments - (1) Theinstructor administered a math quizon Sept 11, 2014 and the same teston November 13, 2014 to determineif students increased their ability tocorrectly answer mathematicalcomputations.(2) Each student was tocomplete a HUD-1 settlementstatement where he or shecalculated the closing costs for asingle family home buyer and theclosing costs for a seller who sells hiscondominium to purchase the home,using the proceeds from the sale ofthe condo to close escrow on thehome purchase.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=jKUfjmu4LZYX


Spring 2015 to state: SLO #4 MathematicalComputations: Students willdemonstrate the ability tocalculate common real estatemathematical computationsfound in standard industry realestate sales, propertymanagement, finance, escrow,property management,investments and appraisalproperty transactions. (06/03/2015)

not take 2nd test.

(2) The results of the two HUD forms were comparedto determine if students increased learning from the firstattempt, where they merely calculated prorations on asimple worksheet, to the second attempt where they usedthe industry standard HUD-1 actual settlement statementthat indicates the buyer and the seller closing costs on thetransaction.

RE26 Escrow Project SLO #1 Math RE26Escrow Project SLO #2 MathOct 16 HUD-1 1st Nov 13 HUD-1 2nd1 25 1 402 31 2 503 25 3 254 25 4 505 25 5 506 35 6 507 25 7 258 35 8 509 37 9 5010 37 10 5011 32 11 5012 42 12 2513 36 13 5014 31 14 5016 39 15 5017 36 16 5018 25 17 5019 25 18 25




20 23 Total 79021 38 Average 43.8922 3523 30 Total 692Average 31.45

(1) The results on the in-class math test was thatstudents improved by .06 from the first attempt to thesecond attempt. Only one math question was appropriatefor escrow, while the other four questions were geared atinvestments and finance. Thus, the results show that thestudents did not know how to calculate the non-escrowmath problems.(2) The results show that between the first attemptwork sheet to the second attempt industry HUD-1settlement form the students showed an increase of over12%, which exceeded the goal of an increase of over 10%.

(09/11/2014)




Action: Revise SLO 4 statement tobe more specific to escrowcalculations (08/01/2016)Action Category: SLO/PLOAssessment ProcessAction: Develop more practicalproblems than those offered intext book (12/01/2015)

Follow-Up: More practicalquestions were taught andincluded in Final Exam in Fall2015. (12/28/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetMost questions are answered correctly by a large majorityof students. The latter few from the final exam were lesssuccessful. This suggests the subject of escrow prorationneeds improvement. (12/28/2015)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Students answermultiple choice quiz questions aboutthe method for typical calculationsinvolved in completing escrowdocuments.

SLO #5 Ethics and Agency - Students Action: Change the SLO statementSemester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (FallEssay/Written Assignment - The


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=4gwXdPMlpsvT

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=4gwXdPMlpsvT


will differentiate between variousparts of the real estate code of ethicsand the standards of professionalappraisal practices to explain howagency relationships are created andthe duties and liabilities of agents andprincipals.

Inactive Date:




Comments::


(01/20/2015)


SLO #4 Ethics and Agency:Students will differentiatebetween various parts of the realestate code of ethics and thestandards of professionalappraisal practices to explain howagency relationships are createdand the duties and liabilities ofagents and principals.The SLO statement should bechanged by the beginning ofspring 2015 to state:

SLO #4 Ethics and Agency:Students will differentiatebetween the 17 Articles of theNational Association of Realtors®(NAR) code of ethics to compareand contrast each with the 12Articles of California EscrowAssociation code of ethics\] tocreate a chart that identifies thesimilarity and differencesbetween the two codes.**Note: Agency relationship iswritten code law and distinctlydifferent than a code of ethicsagreed upon by members of anassociation. (06/03/2015)


2014)Standard Met? : Standard Met

1 902 903 804 755 906 1007 758 909 9010 7511 8012 100Average 1035

÷ 12 = 86.25%

The goal was that 85% of students will score 75% or aboveon this SLO. The results were that of the 12 students whocompleted the Ethics assignment, the average of the 20 wasjust over 86%, which exceeded the goal. (11/13/2014)

assessment instrument used is foundon the instructor homepage(elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan), onthe left side bar for the “RE26Escrow” course, the second item(just under “Course Material,Syllabus,” etc.) titled “Ethics SLO” ofwhich the following is a copy:

1. Go to both:(1) Escrow officer ethics – Code ofEthics – EscrowTalk (www.escrowtalk.net/SNEA/Code%20of%20Ethics.pdf ) and study the 14Articles; and(2) The National Association ofRealtors Code of Ethics (full text)

(http://www.realtor.org/code-of-ethics) and studythe 17 Articles.

Use the current year Codeof Ethics.Make a chart that lists both set ofArticles and align, side-by-side, theArticle Number for each and matchthose that are the same or verysimilar. Write a header for eachArticle to indicate what it is about.

Example:NAR Escrow1.Interest of Client: Treat all partieshonestly2.Avoid exaggeration,misrepresentation, concealment

II. Protect public againstfraud, misrepresentation & unethicalpractices



Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages, it is expectedthat 85% of students will score 75%or above on this SLO.Additional Information:

3.Cooperate with other licensees IX. Escrow Officer should

not seek unfair advantage overfellow Escrow Officers

1. The duty of the escrowagent is ethical considerations thatstate that an escrow agent acting inthe capacity of an innocentstakeholder is relieved of liability forNOT taking sides and must carefullyavoid taking sides. For each of theitems below, indicate true or false ifthe escrow officer is taking sides;write a brief explanation for each.

a. True/False. Paying escrowmoney only under writteninstructionsb. True/False. Telling theseller about an “NSF” check from thebuyerc. True/False. Depositing theearnest money into a trust fundaccountd. True/False. Preparing andobtaining signatures for propertydocuments

Action: Revise SLO statement tobetter conform to this subject -Escrow (08/01/2016)Action Category: SLO/PLO

Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2015-16 (Fall2015)Standard Met? : Standard MetOf the group of pertinent questions compiled to assess this

Exam/Test/Quiz - Studentscompleted an exam prep testcovering the whole course. Selectedquestions relate to this SLO



Standard and Target for Success: Itis expected that questions areanswered correctly by 70% ofstudents.



Assessment ProcessAction: Identify SLO relatedquestions in advance for latercompilation (12/01/2015)

Follow-Up: Teaching Strategy toidentify questions for SLOmeasurement has beenimplemented and used herein.(12/28/2015)


SLO, all are answered correctly 85-100% of the time.(01/01/2016)


statement in thearea of agency and ethics.


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=q4NZrYi5RihQ

https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=q4NZrYi5RihQ

ECC: RE 31:Mortgage Loan Brokering and Lending


SLO #1 Industry Forms andDocuments - Students show theability to prepare and completestandard real estate industry formsand documents - as found in diversereal estate sales, rental, finance,appraisal or investment businesstransactions.

Inactive Date:




Comments::Standard and Target for Success:Based on Percentages, it is expectedthat the average score for studentswill be 25% or above on the writtenclosed book written assignmentacronym test administered duringclass.





(Fall 2014) SLO #1 BuildVocabulary: Students will define,describe and differentiatebetween various real estatestandard terminology showingcomprehension and knowledge ofreal estate vocabulary used in anescrow on real property and inthe workplace to assist andprepare each student from thediverse student body to gainconfidence in their ability toeffectively communicate andcollaborate in an escrow on a realestate sale or exchange to workwith both licensees and a diversepublic in a typical real estatetransaction and as needed to passthe final exam in preparation forthe state license examination toobtain a real estate license.

The SLO statement is to bechanged to:

(Spring 2015) SLO #1 BuildVocabulary: Each student willshow comprehension andknowledge of real estate typicalindustry acronyms and


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard MetOf the fourteen students in class on the night theassessment was administered, the goal was for the averagestudent score to be 25% or higher. The actual average was34.14, just under 49% correct. The result of the assessmentis that students exceeded the expected goal.

1 202 433 224 345 456 417 438 419 2610 2911 4812 3313 2814 25Total 478

÷ 14 = Average 34.14 (12/29/2014)


Exam/Test/Quiz - Each student willbe administered an in-class writtenassignment test with 70 commonindustry mortgage loan acronyms,followed by a blank line where thestudent is to write the whole wordmeaning for the initials or numericvalue:


https://elcamino.tracdat.com:443/tracdat/viewDocument?y=7vayHUp9d7j1


vocabulary to prepare eachstudent in a typical escrow realestate transaction and as neededto pass the final exam and inpreparation for the state licenseexamination to obtain a realestate license.

(06/04/2015)


A - 79-100 pointsB - 69- 78 pointsC – 59-77 pointsD – 44-58 pointsF – 0-48 points

% of Success for this SLO:Faculty Assessment Leader: R. RooksFaculty Contributing to Assessment:


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2016-17 (Fall2016)Standard Met? : Standard MetThere were a total of 36 students who completed the class.All 36 students received a passing grade of 70% or above inthe class. Two out of 36 students received a grade of C,with the remaining 34 students receiving either an A or B inthe class. Based on the results, the assessment was met.It is noted that perhaps the assessment methodology/standards, and/ or class material needs to be readdressed inthe future making it more rigorous. The overall classperformance was exceptionally good. (04/03/2017)


Multiple Assessments - Theassessment method includes thefinal grade received in the class. Allclass assignments, exams, etc.require the student to define,describe and differentiate betweenvarious real estate standardterminology.


Standard and Target for Success:The percentage of students whoresponded as feeling they've gained20% or more knowledge about how




Inactive Date:




Comments::

to do real estate math is thestandard of success. The expectedresults are to show a score of 50% ormore.Additional Information:



RE 19 Real PropertyManagement:SLO #2 Industry FormsDocuments: Students show theability to prepare and completestandard real estate industryforms documents, as found indiverse real estate sales, rental,finance, appraisal or investmentbusiness transaction.The SLO statement should bechanged by the beginning ofspring 2015 to state:

(Spring 2015) SLO #2 Forms:Students show the ability toprepare and complete pre-qualification forms and loancomparison forms used in themortgage loan brokering field asfound in typical real estate loanbusiness transaction. (06/05/2015)


Semester and Year Assessment Conducted: 2014-15 (Fall2014)Standard Met? : Standard Met21 students completed the “forms” project I and project IIthat contained a total of 34 points for project I and pointsfor project II. The chart below shows the results of Project Iand Project II.

It was expected that the students would increase his or herscore from Project I to Project II by 5% or more on this SLOwhere the actual results were that the class averageresulted in an increase of 8.24% .

RE 31 MLB FormsProj #11 352 443 384 355 406 387 258 359 2510 4811 3812 2513 4714 4215 3516 40

Project - Each student will use thedirections for the “Project – Part I(#4, 5, 6) & Part II (#7, 8, 9)” that isfound on the Professor’s homepage(http://www.elcamino.edu/faculty/dgrogan/mortgageloanbrokering/mlbindex.html ) tocomplete industry standard typicalmortgage loan forms.

A. Part I of the project iswhere each student uses a FNMA1003 Loan Application (LA) tocomplete five pre-qualificationforms, showing the qualifying ratiosand the monthly loan payment:1. for a first trust deedConventional with 15% cash downwhere the owner carries back a 5%second trust deed so the first trustdeed is 80%, or2. obtains a 5% piggy-backloan so the first trust deed is 80%, or3. takes a 85% first trust deedwith private mortgage insurance(PMI) , or4. procures a new 85% firsttrust deed FHA loan with MutualMortgage Insurance (MMI), or5. secures a new 85% VAloansand complete a loan comparisonform chart that the Mortgage LoanOriginator (MLO) would present to aprospective borrower to discuss



Standard and Target for Success:Based on percentages, it is expectedthat the students will increase his orher score from project I to project IIby 5% or more on this SLO.


17 3518 2519 4020 2521 40 Total 755 Average 35.95%RE 31 MLB FormsProj #21 402 543 504 405 596 537 318 489 3110 5711 4012 013 5514 5215 4616 5517 5318 3119 5320 4021 40 Total 928 Average 44.19%

44.19 –35.95 = 8.24%

(12/08/2014)


which loan the borrower prefersdesires.B. Part II of the Project hasthe student complete the Cash-to-Close form for each of the abovelisted five individual loan options.




Inactive Date:

Course SLO Assessment Cycle:Course SLO Status: Active


Comments::
