assessing ad message effectiveness

65
Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Upload: gifte-77

Post on 26-Dec-2015

38 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness powerpoint presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Assessing Ad Message

Effectiveness

Page 2: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

“Watchability” by Millward Brown

• Function of ‘involvement’ and ‘enjoyment’• Use

– Humor– Music– Limited voice-overs– Pace– Celebrities– Cute things

• More likely to be recalled and drive sales

2

Page 3: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

3

Overview of Advertising Research

• More than 80% of advertisers and agencies pretest television commercials before airing them on a national basis.

It’s not easy or inexpensivebut the value outweighs the drawbacks.

Page 4: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

4

What Does Advertising Research Involve?

• To test effectiveness of messages• Pretesting ads during developmental stages• Posttesting to determine if messages achieve

their established objectives

Media Effectiveness (covered later)

Message Research

Page 5: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

5

Four Stages At Which Ad Message Research Might Be Conducted

1. Copy development stage (testing ideas)

2. “Rough” stage (testing rough concepts and layouts)

3. Final production stage (testing complete ads)

4. After the ad has been run in the media (post testing)

Page 6: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

6

Industry Standards for Message Research

Principle 1: provide measurements that are relevant to the advertising objectives

What question would you use to test recall?

Principle 2: requires agreement about how the results will be used in advance of each specific test

e.g. specify what the results of the focus group will be used for.

Principle 3: provides multiple measurements because single measurements are generally inadequate

Think of two ways to test brand preferences

PACT Principles

Page 7: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

7

Industry Standards for Message Research

Principle 4: based on a model of human response to communications

Reception of a stimulus > Comprehension of the stimulus > The response of the stimulus

Check whether consumers understood the ad before forming conclusions based on sales

Principle 5: allows for consideration of whether the advertising stimulus should be exposed more than once

external generalizability

PACT Principles

Page 8: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

8

Industry Standards for Message Research

Principle 6: recognizes that a more finished piece of copy can be evaluated more soundly

Alternative executions be tested in the same degree of finish

Principle 7: system provides controls to avoid the bias normally found in the exposure context

Increase internal validity of results

PACT Principles

Page 9: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

9

Industry Standards for Message Research

Principle 8: takes into account basic considerations of sample definition

Requires that the sample be representative of the target audience

Principle 9: can demonstrate reliability and validity

A reliable test is one that yields consistent results

A valid test is one that is predictive of the marketplace performance

PACT Principles

Page 10: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

10

What Can Be Learned from Message Research?

• Message research is needed to diagnose an advertisement’s prospective equity-enhancing and sales-expanding potential.

• The ARF assessed which of 35 measures best predicts the sales effectiveness of television commercials. The only definitive conclusion of their study is that no one measure is universally appropriate or best.

Page 11: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

11

Message Research Methods

Qualitative Message Research

Quantitative Message Research

Page 12: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Qualitative Message Research

• Focus Groups

• In-depth Interviews

• Observation

• Ethnography

• Projective Techniques– ZMET

• Neurological Networks

12

Page 13: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

13

Illustrative Message Research Methods

Page 14: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

14

Advertising Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

MessageResearchMethods

Page 15: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

15

Message Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

• Starch readership service (magazines)

• Bruzzone tests (TV)• Burke day-after recall

(TV)

Page 16: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

16

Starch Readership Service

•Examines reader awareness of ads in consumer magazines and business publications

•Measures the primary objective of a magazine ad—to be seen and read

•Over 75,000 ads in more than 140 publications surveying more than 100,000 people annually. Sample sizes – 100 to 150 nos. per issue

•Interviews in the early life of the publication

•Respondents asked if they read an ad and what they remember from the ad

•Readers are classified

Page 17: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

17

Starch Readership Service

Classifications

Noted—percentage who remember having previously seen the ad in the issue being studied

Associated—percentage who noted the ad and saw or read some part of it that clearly indicated the name of the brand or advertiser

Page 18: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

18

Starch Readership Service

Classifications

Read Some—percentage who read any part of the ad’s copy

Read Most—percentage who read half or more of the written material in the ad

Page 19: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

19

Starch Readership Service

Indices are developed for the four classifications.

Two types of indices:

1. Ad’s scores against average of all ads in the magazine issue

2. ADNORM index: compares an advertisement’s scores against other ads in the same product category as well as the same size (e.g., full page) and color classifications (e.g., four-color ads)

Average Adnorm index is 100. A score of 130 indicates the ad did 30% better than the comparable ads.

Page 20: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

20

Measures of Recognition &

Recall

• 39% of people noted the ad,

• 37% associated it,

• 27% read some of it, and

• 10% read most of the body copy contained in the ad.

Page 21: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

21

Measures of Recognition &

Recall

• 58% of people noted the ad,

• 54% associated it,

• 39% read some of it, and

• 39% read most of the body copy contained in the ad.

Page 22: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

22

Starch Readership Service

• Kia Sorento ad Adnorm index scores

• 72 (noted) • 74 (associated) • 73 (read some) • 59 (read most) • The ad performed

28% worse than the average noted score for similar ads.

• Jose Cuervo Especial Tequila ad

• 107 (noted) • 108 (associated) • 105 (read some) • 229 (read most) • The ad performed

slightly above average noted score for similar ads.

Page 23: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Problems with the Starch scores

• Respondents may report ads that actually never ran or may have run in another magazine / issue

• Respondents may report that they have not seen an ad when in fact they have.– Implicit memory– Effect on attitudes in spite of lack of conscious

recollection

23

Page 24: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

24

Bruzzone Tests

Bruzzone test provides advertisers with a test of consumer recognition of television commercials. Anything identifying the brand is removed, to test whether viewers remember the name of the advertiser.

Page 25: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Bruzzone Tests

• Emails 15 commercials (six frames from the commercial) to a sample

• Each respondent is asked if they remember seeing the commercial on TV

• If yes – more questions; If no or not sure – skip to next.• Brand name references removed from the frames• Also asked how the commercial made them feel (check from a

battery of adjectives); how interested they were in it, whether they liked it, etc.

• Finally asked if they remember the brand name• http://www.bruzzone-research.com/ONLINE_DEMOq.htm#Q26

25

Page 26: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

26

Measures of Recognition & Recall

Advertising Response Model (ARM) links responses to the 27 descriptive adjectives to consumers’ attitudes toward both the ad and the advertised brand and to purchase interest.

Budweiser “Thanking the Troops”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LawSGhTM0es

Bruzzone test

Page 27: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

27

ARM for the “Thanking the Troops” Commercial

Page 28: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Taco Bell Carne Asada Superbowl commercial http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7oN7X9z6Cc4

4

28

Page 29: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

29

Advertising Response Model (ARM) for the “Carne Asada Taquitos” Commercial

Page 30: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

30

Measures of Recognition & Recall

Provides valid prediction of actual marketplace performance along with being relatively inexpensive

Doesn’t provide a before-the-fact indication

Tests offer important info for evaluating a commercial’s effectiveness and whether it should continue to run

Tests are performed online

Bruzzone test

Page 31: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Burke Day-after Recall

• Used to assess the effectiveness of test commercials

• Tested the day following the day the commercial is first aired

• Telephone interviews

• Product / Brand cue given

• Asked if they saw the commercial and then asked to recall all they can about it.

31

Page 32: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

32

Measures of Recognition & Recall

(1) Claimed-recall scores—indicate the percentage of respondents who recall seeing the ad

(2) Related-recall scores—indicate the percentage of respondents who accurately describe specific advertising elements

Burke Day-After Recall Testing

Page 33: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

33

Measures of Recognition & Recall

Many marketers reject recall as a valid measure

1) Recall simply measures whether an ad is received but not whether the message is accepted

2) Recall is biased in favor of younger consumers

Page 34: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

34

Measures of Recognition & Recall

3) Recall scores generated by ads are not predictive of sales performance

4) Day-after recall testing is biased against certain types of advertising content

Understate the memorability of commercials that employ emotional or feeling-oriented themes and are biased in favor of rational or thought-oriented commercials

Page 35: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

35

Message Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

• Psychogalvanometer• Pupilometer

Page 36: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

36

Measures of Recognition & Recall

• Ads that are better liked are more likely to be remembered and to persuade

• Efforts are now made to measure consumer’s affective and emotional reactions to ads

Measures of Physiological Arousal

Page 37: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

37

Measures of Recognition & Recall

• Galvanometer—measures minute levels of perspiration in response to emotional arousal

• Pupillometric tests—measure pupil dilation

• Advertising researchers use changes in physiological functions to indicate the actual, unbiased amount of arousal resulting from ads.

• Neuroscience – brain imaging tests

Measures of Physiological Arousal

Page 38: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

38

Message Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

• Ipsos-ASI Next*TV method

• Rsc’s ARS Persuasion method

Page 39: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

39

Measures of Persuasion

Used when an advertiser’s objective is to influence

consumers’ attitudes toward and preference for the advertised

brand.

Page 40: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

40

Measures of Persuasion

• Measures recall and persuasion of TV commercials

• Performs ad research in more than 50 countries

• Tests television commercials in consumers’ homes

• Tells consumers to evaluate a TV program, but actually evaluating the commercials within the program

• Mails 30 minute TV programs (like a sitcom) to a national sample with embedded commercial breaks

Ipsos-ASI Next*TV Method

Page 41: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

41

Measures of Persuasion

• One day after viewing—personal contact with sampled consumers and measure their reactions to the TV program and the advertisements

• Measures message recall and persuasion

Ipsos-ASI Next*TV Method

Page 42: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

42

Measures of Persuasion

• Persuasion measured by:

Consumers’ attitudes toward advertised brands

Shift in brand preferences

Brand-related purchase intent and frequency

Ipsos-ASI Next*TV Method

Page 43: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

43

Measures of Persuasion

1) Tests in a natural environment

2) Assesses the ability of TV commercials to break through the clutter

3) Determines how well tested commercials are remembered after this delay period

4) Allows the use of a representative national sampling

Ipsos-ASI Next*TV Method

Page 44: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Research Systems Company - rsc

• Very active in message testing – tests TV commercials in various stages of completion – rough cut to finished form

• ARS schedules test sessions in eight metropolitan areas• 800 – 1000 consumers from each metro randomly

invited to preview TV material with embedded ads (including test ads)

• Before and after research design – basket of competing products

• Tested over 40,000 commercials so far

44

Page 45: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

45

Measures of Persuasion

1) Respondents indicate what brands they prefer to receive among a “basket” of options—the pre measure.

2) After exposure to a television program respondents again indicate what brands they would prefer to receive if their name were selected in a drawing—the post measure.

The ARS Persuasion Method--rsc

ARS Persuasion Score = Post % for target brand –

Pre % for target brand

Page 46: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

46

Measures of Persuasion

The ARS Persuasion score simply represents the post-measure percentage of respondents preferring the target brand minus the pre-measure percentage who prefer that brand

A positive score indicates a shifted preference toward the target brand

A higher-scoring commercial generates greater sales volume and larger market share gains

The ARS Persuasion Method--rsc

Page 47: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

47

Measures of Persuasion

ARS Persuasion scores are valid predictors of in-market performance

The higher the score, the greater the likelihood that a tested commercial will produce positive sales gains when the focal brand is advertised under real-world, in-market conditions

The ARS Persuasion Method--rsc

Page 48: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

48

Predictive Validity of ARS Persuasion Scores

Tested 332 commercials in seven countries ; involving 148 brands representing 76 product categories; market shares before and after advertising commenced were compared.

Page 49: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

49

Message Research Methods

Physiological Arousal

Persuasion

Recognition & Recall

Sales Response

• AC Nielsen’s SCANTRACK

• IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 50: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

50

Measures of Sales Response

Single-Source Systems

Gather purchase data from panels ofhouseholds using: (1) electronic television meters (2) optical laser scanning of universal

product codes (UPC) at retail checkout (3) split-cable technology

Page 51: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

51

Measures of Sales Response

SCANTRACK collects purchase data by having panel households use handheld scanners

Panelists record purchases of every bar-coded product purchased regardless of the store where purchased

Nielsen’s SCANTRACK

Page 52: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

52

Measures of Sales Response

Use handheld scanners to enter:

Any coupons used

Record all store deals

Record in-store features that influenced their purchasing decisions

Transfer data to Nielsen by calling a toll free number and holding the scanner to the phone

Nielsen’s SCANTRACK

Page 53: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

53

Measures of Sales Response

IRI knows what items each household purchases by linking up optically scanned purchases with ID numbers

Members provide IRI with detailed demographic information

Five markets in the US – communities that depend on cable TV to get good reception – Pittsfield (MA), Eau Claire (WI), Cedar Rapids (IA), Midland (TX), Grand Junction (CO)

In each market 3000 households are recruited; approx 1000 are hooked to people meters

IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 54: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

54

Measures of Sales Response

Single source data consists of:

(1) household demographic info

(2) household purchase behavior

(3) household exposure to new television commercials that are tested under real world test conditions

IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 55: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

55

Measures of Sales Response

Splits cable signal before it reaches panel households

Uses optically scanned purchase data to know exactly which commercial each household had the opportunity to see and how much of a brand is purchased

IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 56: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

56

Measures of Sales Response

Two types of tests are offered: (1) weight tests and (2) copy tests

1) Weight tests—panel households are divided into test and control groups and frequency is varied

2) Copy tests—holds the amount of weight constant but varies commercial content

IRI’s BehaviorScan

Page 57: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

Conclusions from TV ads research

• What does it take for TV ads to enhance sales and market share performance– Ad copy must be distinctive– Ad weight without persuasiveness is

insufficient– Even good advertising wears out over time– Advertising works quickly if at all it works

57

Page 58: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

58

Conclusion 1: All Commercials Are Not Created Equal: Ad Copy Must

Be Distinctive • Commercials having strong selling propositions

are distinctive and tend to achieve higher ARS Persuasion scores (e.g. Mentadent toothbrush with a strong USP (flexible handle for gentle brushing) scored 11.2 on ARS persuasion)

• Commercials for new brands tend to be most persuasive, but commercials for established brands can be made persuasive via brand differentiation.

Page 59: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

59

Illustration of a Commercial with a Strong Selling Proposition

Page 60: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

60

Conclusion 2—More is Not Necessarily Better: Weight Is Not

Enough • Ad weight means the number of gross

rating points (GRP) that support an advertising campaign.

• An ineffective ad (not distinctive or persuasive) has no likelihood of increasing sales even if the ad weight is doubled or tripled.

Page 61: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

61

Relations among Advertising Weight, Persuasion Scores, and Sales

Page 62: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

The Relationship Between Media Weight and Creative Content

• 47 commercials for established brands were tested and classified as: – Rational information (informative; argument based)

– Heuristic appeals (using celebrities, nice things like babies, puppies, etc.)

– Affectively based cues (ads depicting warmth, love, affection, companionship, friendship)

• Finding:– Increased advertising weight led to significant sales increases in

sales only for commercials using affective cues

62

Page 63: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

63

Conclusion 3—All Good Things Must End: Advertising Eventually

Wears Out • Advertising ultimately wears out and must

be refreshed to maintain or increase brand sales.

• Familiar brands have been shown to wear out more slowly than unfamiliar brands.

Page 64: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

64

The Role of Sales-Effective Advertising for an Undisclosed Campbell Soup Brand

Page 65: Assessing Ad Message Effectiveness

65

Conclusion 4—Don’t Be Stubborn: Advertising Works Quickly or Not at

All• Some advertisers tend to “hang in there”

and wait for an ad to increase sales.

• Most of the sales impact occurs in the first three months of a new ad.

• “Sunk costs” are an issue to consider, but if an ad is not working at first, it probably never will.