asae membership marketing symposium 1 asae membership marketing symposium march 19, 2001 kevin...
TRANSCRIPT
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
1
ASAE Membership Marketing SymposiumMarch 19, 2001
Kevin Whorton Director of Strategic Marketing
ChainDrugStore.net
National Association of Chain Drug Stores
Membership Perspectives on Industry Consolidation
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
2
Why Are We Here?
I. Consolidation Happens
II. Learn from Others
III. Observations from Survey Results
IV. Your Experiences
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
3
Before We Start A few key points to make ..
Contrary to the old saying, perception isn't reality--however it's more important than reality
In trade associations we often deal with small numbers and very one-on-one
We need "Spin" for outbound communications, to influence public opinion and generate sales
We need "Facts" to run our internal businesses, manage the expectations of our leadership
Lots of details in this presentation to get to a big picture that's hard to see without the data
Ignorance isn't bliss. This data is flawed, but it's the best we have to work with
We'll present some top-line results, then cross tabs to explain some fundamental principles
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
4
I: Consolidation Happens
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
5
Current Consolidation Waves
Consolidation is an ongoing phenomena in most industries Driven by many factors over which we have no control
Investors reward growth—internal or external! Real efficiencies are possible—eliminate redundancy Larger size = greater market influence/control Eliminate competition: if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em
Real effects on associations as a result Decreases in total membership and dues Fewer small-company or independent operator
members; more of a ‘big-company’ feel Often, more pressure to perform if dues, fees
have to rise to offset consolidation
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
6
Trade Association Structure
‘Typical’ trade association relies on a variety of revenue sources:
Direct DuesAssociate DuesExhibit FeesConference RegistrationsProducts/Services (research, publications)
Members are often ‘2D’ in what they expectGovernment relations—legislative and regulatoryForums and opportunities to work togetherPerhaps public awareness/broad industry
relationsSo the expense side reflects these priorities
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
7
My Association: Dealing with Challenges Big changes in the industry ….
Several acquisitions per year claiming members among drug chains and supermarkets
Character changes rapidly: from many 200 store chains to a few large: Wal-Mart, Safeway, CVS
Sharp change in development strategies: Recruiting supermarket based operators—50 top chains
belong Recruiting regional chains—many small,
previously not pursued Recruiting international chains And consciously not adding dot-coms, non-Rx retailers
Changes in services … Same government relations, similar revenue structure E-commerce initiative: ChainDrugStore.net
Net effect—sharp increase in total chains and stores represented (170 domestic and 32,000 stores)
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
8
A Need for Empirical Trend Data
Survey conducted among associations Quantitative survey conducted via emailA total of 70 trade associations participated
Included 48 CEOs and 22 individuals attending the Symposium
Looking for several key variables: actual cross section within many industries
Difficult to establish “best practices” because optimal strategy varies with each association’s:
Dependence on duesPrevailing market shareGeneral business model
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
9
II: Learn From Others
Survey results and comments
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
10
Association CEOs Comment
“A significant part of the focus on member services has moved toward servicing the significant players in the market to ensure that they remain satisfied with the association's products, services, and response to their issues.”
“(We’re) seeing increases in total associate/supplier members while regular membership is remaining even—increases (are being) offset by members lost to consolidation and going out of business, in addition to those choosing not to renew.”
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
11
39%
20%
23%
31%
17%
12%
11%
29%
9%
8%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Over 70%
50-70%
33-49%
20-33%
under 20% Top 10Companies inthe Industry
Your TotalMembership
Proportion of Total Industry Volume Covered: 10 Largest Companies, And Your Total Membership
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
12
And the Point Is?
If I'm VP Sales for a prospective associate member and … If I visit each of the top 10 companies' headquarters,
I reach 51% of the industry According to this, if I [use a list, visit the conference, sponsor
an event, advertise] I reach 61% of the industry
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Assn pct of industry
Top 10 companies
Difference
Assn pct of industry 61 54 70 58 62 60
Top 10 companies 51 42 54 51 57 36
Difference 10 12 17 7 6 24
Overall Small Medium LargeLow
GrowHigh Grow
Median pct share (computed from ranges)
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
13
Relating Size, Growth to Your Value Proposition Growth
High growth associations seem to operate in fragmented industries: top 10 only makes up 36% of total business
High growth associations offer huge premiums to primary members who want to interact with peers, and to associates who want more market exposure: 24% more of the business
Low growth associations (lower than 15% 5-year budget growth) operate in concentrated industries: 57% top 10
These associations represent 62% of the market Size
Large associations are in industries where top 10 is 1/2 the business and only offer an additional 7 share points
Medium sized are in far better shape, operating in concentrated industries but offer an additional 17 share points
Small associations are in less concentrated industries, but offer a decent premium: an additional 12 share points
However, working with them only gets me 54% of the market—I have to work with others as well
This may be why the association is small/lacks resources
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
14
Key Questions Regarding Market Penetration
How do we clearly demonstrate the value proposition of the association: to associates, exhibitors, advertisers to reach a
higher proportion of members and price accordinglyand more importantly, to primary members to
consider joining this communityand perhaps the public to convince them that you’re
an articulate voice of the industry you serve How closely do we track our industry?
Do we know who our prospects are … with regard to increasing industry penetration
Are we taking steps to improve our shareDo we feature this kind of information in our
communications vehicles (when it befits us!)
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
15
43%
69%
34%
16%
23%
16%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Increased
Roughly the same
Decreased The Industry'sOverallConcentration
YourMembership'sMarket Share
Recent Trends in Concentration: In the Industry, and the Market Share of Members
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
16
And the Point Is … More associations see eroding market share, while
industry concentration continues to increaseThe harm is indirect in the short term; half of
associations increased share past five years, half faced declines or stable share
However, most report that their industries were becoming increasingly consolidated
The impact of the association has to suffer over time--many comments in our survey underscores changes in character, influence and leverage, not financial impacts
Keeping consolidation and association market share on the Board's radar screen is critical
Ensure that you're being graded on a curve Ensure that they understand the motivation for dues
increases, increased membership marketing efforts from the association's perspective, not merely from
their own company's perspective!
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
17
18%
24%
21%
37%
57%
60%
0% 20% 40% 60%
Other methods
Web site/outbound e-mailmarketing
Exhibits at otherassociations' trade shows
Personal sales visits
Response to incominginquiries
Proactive direct marketing(mail/telemarketing
campaigns)
Pct of chains
How Trade Associations Recruit New Members
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
18
And the Point Is …
Comparing associations by their reliance on dues tells us: High dues-reliant associations* are more likely to use
personal sales—consistent with high concentration, and high dues revenue per “sale”
Low-reliance associations typically use more tactics— especially 'passive' ones: web site, inquiry responses
High usage of direct marketing among all associations
*Over 35% of total budget comes from general/primary membership dues
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Low High
Low 19% 73% 35% 73% 35% 19%
High 52% 58% 13% 52% 19% 10%
Personal sales
Proactive DMExhibits-
trade showsInquiry
responseWeb
site/emailOther
methods
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
19
Key Questions Regarding Member Recruitment
Review your tactics How often do new members have to come to you, versus
you finding them How effective are these methods are are they collectively
enough All prospects were not created equal, how does your level
of effort relate to the value of the prospect you pursue What is the real value of the company--in terms of
increased exhibit, ad, and other revenue--not just in terms of their direct participation
Who is inquiring—and who else should you be contacting within a prospect company?
In terms of level, ability to to make a commitment, attend events personally, drive participation by employees
How well do the mailing/calling lists, circulations, and attendee profiles fit your needs vis a vis your direct marketing, advertising, and exhibit efforts?
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
20
11%
13%
16%
22%
31%
36%
73%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Other concern
None of these concern us
Lower profile/prestige of the association over time
Losing market share directly from consolidation
Losing market share due to lower willingness/abilityto pay by members that stay in business
Less interest/support from exhibitors/sponsors
Losing more operating revenue in the form ofgeneral member dues
Specificconcerns
Significant Concerns as a Result of Consolidation
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
21
And the Point Is …
Concerns reflect current priorities Associations that rely heavily on dues are most
concerned with lost revenue Associations that reply less on dues are
concerned with exhibitor support Affordability (willingness/ability to pay) matters to all Loss of market share (the underlying problem) is
less of a concern
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Low rely
High rely
Low rely 31% 62% 38% 15% 50% 12%
High rely 24% 82% 45% 12% 24% 9%
Losing mkt share directly
Losing dues revenue
Losing share-lower ability
to pay
Lower industry profile
Less exhibitor support
Other concern
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
22
Financial, Membership Characteristics of Associations
Profile of responding associations:Average size association Mean Median
Total general members 1,967 540Total associate members 309 108Budget size $4.91M $2.20M
Mean percent of total income: Today 5 yrs ago
General/primary member dues 42.0% 45.4%Associate/affiliate member dues 8.2% 8.7%Exhibit/sponsorship income 20.3% 19.9%All other sources of income 29.5% 26.0%
Average changes over five years: Mean Median
Total general members 9.6% 0.0%Total associate members 22.0% 2.8%Total budget 53.1% 18.8%
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
23
What is the Estimated Cost of Consolidation?
Survey question: how many members companies have you lost over the past five years due to mergers and consolidation? (outside of 'normal' attrition) We multiplied average dues times lost members to measure the total
financial cost (in terms of money you don't have today from cumulative membership losses)
We look at this in terms of total revenue, as a percent of the association's total budget, and as a percent of total revenue from general/primary member dues
Results: Members lost to mergers and consolidation 73 companiesEstimated Dues Income Lost $206,190 As a percent of budget 5.4% As percent of membership revenue 10.8%
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
24
And the Point Is …
Looking at lost revenue by association size and reliance on dues: Large associations are affected least as a percent of their
budget (only 2.8%) Medium to smaller are losing over 6% of total budget—and as
much as 15% of their membership revenue Obviously, associations that rely more heavily on dues are
losing a far higher proportion of their revenue
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Pct budget
Pct dues
Pct budget 5.4 6.7 6.8 2.8 3 7.8
Pct dues 10.8 10 15.3 5.7 10.7 11.3
Overall Small Medium Large Low rely High rely
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
25
13%12%
9%16%
22%29%29%
34%31%
50%53%53%
0% 20% 40% 60%
No response needed on our part
Recognizing sub-units of companies as members
Other changes
Adding new governance structures to be more responsive
Changed structure/dues of associate/affiliate members
Increased overall dues for current general members
Changed the dues structure to capture more revenue
Reduced expenses and/or staff to offset revenue loss
Moving aggressively into new markets or membershipsegments
Increased efforts to reduce member loss
Created new services to diversify the membership base
Increased efforts recruiting additional general members
Actions taken
Ways Associations Have Responded to Industry Consolidation
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
26
And the Point Is …
Actions taken tend to reflect an association’s ability to mount efforts Small cut expenses, increase dues but don't change structure Medium add services, change their primary dues structure Large go into new markets In general, action (retention, recruitment) prevails over structural
changes (governance, charging subunits of merged companies) Changes occur primarily to general dues, not associate dues In 'other' some actually cut their dues to ensure affordability
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Small
Medium
Large
Small 33% 13% 47% 47% 40% 47% 27% 20% 13% 27%
Medium 24% 48% 56% 48% 64% 36% 28% 20% 12% 24%
Large 18% 27% 55% 59% 50% 27% 45% 14% 14% 23%
Incr dues
Chg dues struct
Incr recruit
Incr retenti
on
New service
s
Reduced
expen
New Market
s
Add gov
structu
Recognizing subuni
Chg assoc dues
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
27
Trade Association Respondent Profile
Sl i ce 1
0%
Sl i ce 2
0%
Sl i ce 3
0%
Flat rate33%
Sliding scale67%
Dues Structure
Strong competition
16%
One key competitor
20%
No direct competition
64%
Competitive Position in the Industry
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
28
And the Point Is …
Loss of market share has a stronger effect on degree of Board concern than competitive position, industry concentration, budget growth, other variablesWe often worry about and focus on something after it's
occurred and shows up in our numbersAssociations with a constant market share are split
between considerable, some, or little/no concern
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Considerable concernSome concernLittle/no concern
Considerable concern 25% 73% 40%
Some concern 46% 27% 40%
Little/no concern 29% 0% 20%
Increased Decreased Constant
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
29
“The most negative aspect is its impact on volunteers. With consolidation there are only a limited number of chairs available in a company. Good, talented people are let go, many with non-compete agreements—and the industry plus association are the losers.”
“We've had to cater more to the larger companies. They are on the leading edge of operations, and we can benefit from their influence and learning.”
“We now focus more on government/legislative efforts to protect the small businesses that make up the majority of our membership.”
Survey Comments from your Colleagues …
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
30
“The association is the result of a merger of two competing associations. After previous unsuccessful attempts to merge, the single biggest driver at this point was consolidation within the membership base of both previous associations.”
“We are a global organization. Consolidations have resulted in an increase in internationalization of the organization.”
“Larger companies have less need for association services.”
“Forced us seek out merger opportunities with other associations to help us serve different but related market segments.”
More Comments from your Colleagues …
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
31
“We've changed from being strictly a "trade association" to one that more closely represents the entire industry/channel. We've also eliminated a lot of peripheral service areas and concentrated on our core competency development.”
“It's had no real impact or required action on our part—what's occurred has been offset by the new niches that we have embraced.”
“There is the potential threat to our government relations efforts as companies develop more resources in-house to address that area. The Association was primarily founded upon a government relations need.”
And Yet Another Page of Comments …
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
32
“Improved and more efficient member communications. Raise profile and thus value of association in the industry.”
“Perception that association is a "mouthpiece" for largest member, who is the most dominant player in our industry.”
“Some positive results since larger companies are more professionally managed.”
“The biggest change has been in the volunteer base and support—not always does the most active member remain after a merger (either due to retirement, sometimes from assignments).”
Ran out of Sub-Heads …
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
33
“Lower attendance at meetings as conglomerates send fewer representatives, and there is less purchasing of product due to fewer attendees.”
“More industry share is in fewer member hands—smaller committees, less demand for social activities, meetings are shorter and at more convenient locations, on-line and e-services are expanding.”
“We're looking at businesses supplied by our membership—not an option 5 years ago.”
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
34
III: Observations from the Survey Results
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
35
I: Consolidation is a Concern
Many associations indicate real effects from consolidation
Often not a high profile concern—a strategic issue, just not high priority for many organizations
Those least concerned are often financially secure, and have a more diversified revenue base
Many of the associations most concerned are smaller associations, or companies with the greatest direct dependence on dues
Many associations are concerned now Often laying the goundwork to exploit future
opportunities later for diversification, new servicesEven governance, association mergers are an option to
maintain size, prestige, and adequate member value
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
36
II: Consolidation Costs Association Far More Than Direct Dues Income
Associations may understate the actual costs of consolidation, beyond the short-term pain
The real monetary effect is greater than foregone dues
Associations deciding to tighten belts may also be cutting member acquisition budgets when they are most needed
Members often experience member loss both among direct members and associate members
Communications strategies need to change to convey ongoing size/strength of the associations
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
37
III: Often, Limits to Aggressive Response
Proposals may be submitted to act to offset loss but less likely to be approved
Higher dues, fewer services not consideredMore revenue growth and more belt-tightening are not
seen as enticing by leadersDifficult to be decisive and to penetrate new markets
Organizational philosophy may rightly be to support the existing member—not the organization itself
Hence, rate decreases during times of lost membership With consolidation, member market concentration
may increase so fewer members = same industry sizeAssociations may get higher dues from larger
companies, but they lose community, volunteers and advocates
ASAE Membership Marketing Symposium
38
IV: What are Your Experiences?