arthritis and musculoskeletal alliance (arma) annual...
TRANSCRIPT
Arthritis and Musculoskeletal
Alliance (ARMA)
Annual Lecture
London, 29 January 2018
Dame Carol Black
Expert Adviser on Health and Work
Public Health England and NHSE
Principal, Newnham College Cambridge
Musculoskeletal conditions,
disability and employment
Where are we ?
• … on a journey, accelerating.
• We need to capitalise on interest
currently shown by stakeholders and
government, and work with them all.
• Perhaps we’re at a “tipping point”
• Much of this is in our own hands,
to influence and change
Work
“ Work is central to human existence and the
motive force for all economies.
For individuals it provides structure and
meaning, and it is good for people’s
health and wellbeing, as well as their
financial health and prosperity.
Moreover, work benefits families and is
socially inclusive.”
CB Working for a healthier tomorrow 2008
• ... is (generally) therapeutic and can lead to better health outcomes
• can help to promote recovery and rehabilitation
• minimises the unwanted and harmful effects of long-term sickness absence
• reduces the risk of chronic disability and long-term incapacity
• reduces poverty and social exclusion
• ... improves quality of life and well-being.
You do not have to be 100% fit to be in work!
For those with chronic conditions or disability,
Good Work ...
Chronic conditions – and
reduced ability to work
• Once a worker – especially a worker with a long-term or chronic health condition – loses their place in the labour market, it is very difficult for them to return.
• The gap in employment rate, between 47% for people with a disability and 80% for the rest of the population, is wider in UK than in most other European countries (2015).
• This is an avoidable waste of human capital and productive capacity which affects competitiveness, social and community cohesion, and family stability.
• The UK needs a workforce which is Fit for Work – ill-health in the working-age population is economically inefficient and socially corrosive.
MSKs in England
• Lower back & neck pain: leading disability cause1990 to 2016,
2,221 years lived with disability (YLD) per 100,000 people.
• Estimated MSK levels showed, of people aged 45+, 18% with
knee OA and 11% hip OA; back pain in 17% of all ages.
• Risk factors heightening susceptibility to MSK : age, overweight,
low physical activity, poor health habits such as smoking.
• Age and reduced physical activity often coincide. Aged19 to 24
years, 77% of people are physically active compared to
25 % of individuals aged over 85 years.
PHE 2017
Work and MSKs
• After coughs and colds, MSKs were
in 2016 the major cause of UK
days lost from work, 23% of the total.
• MSKs are very important to the labour
market and productivity.
Preventing people from working
or from working well
Common MSK Common Mental Chronic medical Major functional
problems Health problems conditions (multiple?) incapacity
Back pain, Stress, anxiety Diabetes, lung, Major trauma,
neck pain, depression heart (obesity- addictions,
soft-tissue related), cancer, neurological
rheumatism inflammatory disabilities.
arthritis
Social determinants of health
Poor workplaces, poor work, poor managers
Health conditions and deprivation
People living in the
least deprived areas
tend to have fewer,
or no, health
conditions –
- whereas those
living in the most
deprived areas
often have several
health conditions.
From Marmot, Fair
Society, Healthy
Lives, 2010
Absence : Historical Perspective
“Absenteeism is a much more complex problem, mainly because,
although disease initiates absence, the time taken to return
to work is influenced by a multitude of social factors little to
do with medicine, and the pathological diagnosis of the
disease is often in doubt.”
“Absence from work is an inaccurate measure of morbidity – 90%
of minor illness does not lead to incapacity. Absence often
depends, not on a particular disease process, but …
dissatisfaction with working conditions encouraging escape
to outside interests, including ill-health and absence. ”
Clinical Aspects of Absenteeism, R.S.H 10, 1957, p.681
Paper by Sir Walter Chiesman, Treasury Medical Adviser,
Predictors of back pain
may not be ‘medical’
After adjustment for age, sex, skill level, back pain severity and other potential confounders, the most consistent predictors of back pain were:
• decision control at work (lowest Odds Ratio 0.68;
99% confidence interval (CI): 0.49 - 0.95),
• empowering leadership at work (lowest OR 0.59; 99% CI: 0.38-0.91)
• fair leadership at work (lowest OR 0.54; 99% CI: 0.34-0.87)
Christensen JO, Knardahl S. 2012
Do not forget leadership and other psycho-social factors
The MSK challenge
in 167 workplaces, 2016-17
Britain’s Healthiest Workplace
• devised by Vitality Health, the health insurer
• produced in association with RAND Europe, the FT, the
University of Cambridge, and Mercer HR consultants.
• The free survey seeks to create awareness among
employers and employees of the importance of
workplace health and wellbeing, ….
• … and to build an evidence base for :
- employers to make improvements, and
- employees to engage with their modifiable risks.
In 2016-17, 32,000 employees in 167 organisations took part.
Open to small, medium and large employers
The BHW survey process
- online organisational health assessment completed by a
representative of the organisation
- voluntary online health assessment completed by
employees, who each receive a personal report
- leading to a comprehensive report on the health of the
organisation and its employees, benchmarked
against others, with suggestions for interventions.
Ordinary people at work, not “patients”.
Serial data over 4 years shows continuous
improvement in many organisations.
BHW Results : Insights re MSKs
• 81% of employees cited having pain related to an MSK issue
(top prevalence in older females), 6% took leave
• Males take more leave related to MSK than females,
though highest incidence is for females aged 45 to 55.
• Prevalence: lower back 44%, neck 32%, shoulder 32%.
• Little variation of overall MSK incidence with income, but
lower-back, knee, hip more prevalent at lower incomes.
• Higher incidence among older managers and lower-paid
professionals, and in clerical and service jobs.
BHW: Typical survey analysis
Overall MSK at particular sites
Green = Good (compared with column average), Yellow = Middling, Red = Bad
Courtesy Shaun Subel, Vitality Health.
BHW : Multiple MSK conditions
Employees with more than one MSK issue more likely to:
• have significantly higher work impairment
• make poorer lifestyle choices, less active, smoke
• be overweight or obese, or have clinical measures (e.g.
blood pressure) out of range
• not get adequate sleep
• suffer from chronic lifestyle conditions
• take time off work for health issues
• have depression or work stress
• be less engaged with their job (“Presenteeism”).
MSKs and poor Mental Health
‘Body and Soul’ report (2010) explored connection between physical and mental health conditions, and impact on productivity and work participation.
Findings included :
• Rate of mental health conditions higher among those with a chronic physical health condition.
MSKs : about 25% of people with arthritis report a co-morbid mental health condition.
The Work Foundation
2010
Mental Health and MSKs are often inter-woven
Obesity and consequent disease
in the UK
Predicted rates per 100,000 2006 2030 2050
Arthritis 603 649 695
Breast cancer 792 827 823
Colorectal cancer 275 349 375
Diabetes 2869 4908 7072
Coronary heart disease 1944 2471 3139
Hypertension 5510 6851 7877
Stroke 792 887 1050
Likely that by 2025 40% of adults will be obese,
and the number living and working with chronic
conditions will rise steadily, affecting morale,
competitiveness, and profitability.
Obesity is now a rheumatological problem.
Occupational activities and knee OA
Keith T Palmer, British Medical Bulletin 2012; 1-24 using
systematic searches Embase and Medline 1996-2011.
• Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis is rising.
• Obese workers have additional OA risk, weight loss needed.
• Physical work activities (kneeling, squatting, lifting, climbing)
can cause and/or aggravate knee OA.
• Workplace interventions/policies to prevent knee OA have
seldom been evaluated.
• Trends towards extended working life make research crucial.
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Work
• 50% of UK adults with RA are of working age.
• 75% are diagnosed when of working age
• Work disability occurs rapidly among people with RA
• 33% of people with RA will have stopped working within 2 years, and 40 to 45% by five years.
• Bigger impact on people doing manual work
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
RA (mean)
General Pop. (mean)
-12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 +5 +6 +7 +8 +9 +10 +11 +12
Months after RA diagnosis
Da
ys
of
sic
k-l
eave
an
d d
isa
bil
ity
pe
ns
ion
pe
r m
on
th
Impact on Work : Rheumatoid Arthritis
Patients diagnosed 1999-2007; n=3029. General population comparators matched 5:1
on age (±1 year), sex, education level and country. RA, rheumatoid arthritis.
Neovius M, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1010-15.
Days on sick-leave and
disability pension before
and after diagnosis
• Late diagnosis ?
• Treatment inc.
pain control ?
• Employer
response ?
• Patients’
response to
disease ?
Work disability and benefit claims
in early RA
D.F. McWilliams et al, Rheumatology, 2014;53:473-481
• Study aimed to identify predictive factors for work disability
and state benefit claims in cohort with early RA
(Early RA Network, ERAN: 22 centres in UK and Ireland)
• 1,235 participants reported yearly, work status/benefit claims.
• At baseline, 47% employed and 17% on benefits due to RA.
• Within 3 years, 6% lost their job, 33% were claiming benefits.
• Work disability was predicted by pain and low vitality
• New benefits claims were predicted by baseline disability,
extra-articular disease, and disease activity.
What is needed ?
An ideal system would …. :
• quickly identify people unable to work
• offer advice early, and enable problem-solving.
…. and ensure that :
• those with conditions compatible with current
work receive interventions to support
retention in or return to that work
• those needing a job-change are helped
into new work
• as few as possible enter the benefits system.
Necessary players
All Health Professionals
Employers
(Workplaces, Line
managers, Human
Resources)
Employees
OH professionals Trade Unions
NGOs
Arms-length bodies
e.g. NICE
Cross-government action after the command paper.
CCGs, STPs
Patients
Local Authorities
Research
institutions
Immediate essential players
• good clinical care, Vocational
Rehabilitation, well-informed work-
conscious healthcare professionals
• employers’ : flexibility and adaptation
in the workplace
• fully-informed patients, in control,
motivated to co-create health
• engaged Clinical Commissioners
and Local Authorities
Principles for health professionals
Understand :
• Work is a determinant of health
• Work may aid recovery
• Vocational rehabilitation
Consider :
• Capacity not incapacity
• Function not disease
• Early intervention
• Psycho-social problems
• Work environment.
• Adaptation and flexibility at work
WORK should be a CLINICAL OUTCOME
‘Fit Note’ - Back pain
New Fit Note, April 2010 • Is this the real problem ?
• Is it poor work or workplace ?
• A poorly-aware line manager ?
• The wrong job ?
• Social determinants of health ?
• The patient’s expectation ?
• Is there a Mental Health problem ?
BACK PAIN
‘Fit Note’ - Rheumatoid Arthritis
New Fit Note, April 2010 Is this because of :
• the disease not being controlled ?
• the messages given to patients by
their doctors and nurses ?
• an idea that work is bad for you ?
• culture/expectation not to work ?
• lack of flexibility in employment ?
You must always ask : ‘What is the problem ?’
R A
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Work in UK
Hospitals and GPs
56% of hospitals were aware of Gov’t’s Access to Work
scheme, but :
- 33% of these did not give information to RA patients
- only12% of GPs gave information about continuing in employment to those newly diagnosed
- only 20% of those with RA considered they received sufficient information from their Rheumatology clinic about employment issues.
National Audit Office. Services for People
with Rheumatoid Arthritis, July 2009
Training of Health Professionals
• Much needs to be done, in all professions.
• Recent example of progress :
GMC revising its document Outcomes for …Graduates.
• Suggested new wording :
“Recognise that work is a clinical outcome, and undertake
a Fitness for Work conversation with patients of working
age including social, personal and biological factors,
incorporating their findings into their management plan.”
• Work in progress.
Prevention and Treatment of MSKs :
PHE Toolkit on ROI
Aim : to develop easy-to-use, interactive tool for stakeholders,
NHS Clinical Commissioning Groups, Local
Authorities and Sustainability & Transformation
Partnerships (STPs), to assess return on investment
(ROI) for programmes to prevent/treat MSK conditions.
Two key objectives (2017) :
literature review to identify which interventions are cost
effective in reducing complications associated with
OA of hip or knee, neck pain or back pain;
develop an ROI tool that predicts the resource and
financial consequences of implementing these cost-
effective interventions nationally and locally.
Interventions of value
Greatest impact on work-days saved : STarT Back,
Yoga for Healthy Lower Backs, and vocational advice.
Summary of Recommendations
• Usefulness of the tool needs evaluation in everyday practice,
and users should be invited to give feedback.
Information should be shared to add to the evidence base,
and evidence on outcomes should be collected beyond
12 months, to extend the time horizon of the tool.
• For self-management programmes, interventions in their own
right, evidence is lacking on effectiveness for MSKs.
• More research into prevention of neck pain, for which there is
poor prevalence data and poor evidence on interventions.
Job Design
Line Management
Vocational Rehabilitation
Employers
Workplaces that promote
health, support employees
who are not wholly fit, and encourage
early intervention to restore health and
wellbeing, are crucial.
Over 90% of all
UK private-sector
businesses are SMEs.
Make it easy : Toolkit for MSKs
• The toolkit is freely available and relevant to all employers,
whatever their size or sector.
• It gives prime emphasis to, but goes beyond, MSK health ..
• .. as part of a wider initiative designed to help employers take
positive action to build a culture that champions good
mental and physical health, and improve understanding
of how to help those who need more support.
• Produced by Business in the
Community (BITC) and
PHE, supported by ARMA
• Designed with and for business
Make it worth it - ROI
How effective are
interventions, commonly
used to manage MSDs,
in reducing sickness
absence or health-
related job loss?
• Research, Southampton
University, D.Coggon
Vocational impact of MSDs
Source Index Finding
LFS % of all sick leave, past 7d, all MSDs 31%
SWI Lost days, 2008/9, work-related back pain 3.51 M
ThorGP Days certified sick leave, past yr, all MSDs 2.26 M
DWP On IB >5 yrs, all MSDs 0.24 M
Cabinet Office % of lost days, past yr, all MSDs 12%
LGE % of lost days, past yr, all MSDs 21-23%
CBI/AXA % employers citing back pain as important 45-67%
CIPD % employers citing back pain as important 36-55%
EEF % of employers citing MSDs as important 22%
Reports from employers and other organisations :
Some findings by type of intervention
RR (IQR),
return to work
Mean days/month
sick leave
avoided
Workplace intervention 1.26 (1.00 – 1.63) 1.11 (0.38 – 2.66)
Extra services 1.25 (1.00 – 1.60) 1.67 (0.31 – 2.85)
Exercise therapy 1.20 (1.00 – 1.60) 1.01 (0.24 – 1.37)
CBT 1.10 (1.00 – 1.40) 1.25 (0.35 – 2.44)
Relaxation therapy 1.15 (1.00 – 1.30) 1.18 (0.33 – 2.41)
All 1.21 (1.00 – 1.60) 1.11 (0.32 – 3.20)
No obvious ‘best buy’ : more research needed
Conclusions from this review
• Literature relatively large, but with notable gaps
• Studies mostly small, with methodological weaknesses
• Most interventions beneficial
• Modest effects & likely publication bias
• Median benefit: ~10% better chance of RTW or 0.5
day/month avoided sickness leave
• No interventions clearly superior, some less expensive
• Few economic evaluations; little evidence of net cost
benefit
MRC Unit, Southampton
We need more research and evidence.
• The report Self-management of chronic musculo-skeletal
disorders and employment captured the barriers to work.
• Employers should consider workplace adjustments and
career development for people with MSKs.
• Government should :
- promote “Access to Work”, and give extra assistance
to employees in SMEs
- ensure that work is viewed by healthcare professionals
as a clinical outcome
- invest in more ‘Specialist Nurse’ roles.
• A central finding was confirmation that work itself should be
considered as a form of self-management.
• Individuals reviewed for the report found that partaking in
work was an important way in which they managed
several (often psychological) aspects of living with
their painful condition.
The Patients: their voice
Fit for Work UK and the Work Foundation
Work Matters : UK survey on RA
Barriers against working
2017
% of all 1,222 respondents, all with RA: ‘Not serious’, ‘Don’t know’ not given here
• Majority female – over 3 to 1
• Mean symptom duration 12.7 yrs, 10.5 since diagnosis
• Drugs: 63% on anti-pain, 81% DMARDS.
*
*
*
NRAS & CfMR 2017
Government
2006
2008
Green Paper
October 2016
– for
consultation.
Joint Work and
Health Unit
received 6,000
responses.
Government
response,
November
2017
Numerous
reports prior
to 2016
Green Paper Nov 2016
In summary, the Government wants to :
• ensure that people with disabilities and/or long-term
conditions have full access to labour market, plus support
• help employers take action to manage ageing workforce
with increased chronic conditions, to keep people in work
• ensure personalised access to the right employment and
health services, at the right time
• integrate more effectively health, social care and welfare
• put mental and physical health on an equal footing
• invest in innovation
• change cultures and mind-sets across all of society.
Gov’t Response
to Consultation on Green Paper
Improving lives: the future of work, health and disability
Some relevant themes in the strategy (which commits to
1 m more disabled people in work within ten years)
• Raising the profile of work as a health outcome with all
healthcare professionals to recognise that good work
improves good health and embed this practice better.
• Reforming the Fit Note so it is seen as an enabler for
conversations about health and work, focusing on
what people can do, not what they cannot do.
Gov’t Response (cont’d)
to Consultation on Green Paper
Improving lives: the future of work, health and disability
Further relevant themes in the strategy :
• Developing the role of Occupational Health to ensure
effective OH services within and beyond the NHS,
providing access for everyone including small
businesses and the self-employed.
• Improving provision and testing new models for MSK
services, the Government having recognised a
particular focus on mental health and MSK conditions,
the most common conditions affecting ability to work.
Gov’t Response: Research Investment
• Continuing to invest in research to build understanding of
existing provision across health and employment support.
• Also collaborating with MSK research centres to support
thinking on potential research and intervention studies.
• Building on commitment in the Green Paper to identify routine
data collection about MSK incidence, prevalence, clinical
activity and outcomes.
• A Data Advisory Group led by Arthritis Research UK has been
examining the issue.
• NHS England are currently facilitating transfer of the
knowledge hub to ARMA in 2018/19.
Collaboration and progress
• ARMA : Tony Wolff
• Fit for Work Coalition
• Public Health England
• Business in the Community
• MRC & Arthritis Research UK
• Southampton University
• Arthritis Action
• Joint Work and Health Unit
(DWP/DH)
• Council for Health and Work
• NHSE
• British Society of Rheumatology
- and more….
Final thought ....
“If you keep on doing the same things,
and expect things to change,
that’s insanity.”
Albert Einstein