art advances-into the next decade james hakim mb mmed msc frcp professor of medicine, university of...
TRANSCRIPT
ART Advances-into the Next Decade
James Hakim MB MMed MSc FRCPProfessor of Medicine, University of Zimbabwe
AIDS 2010
Vienna-Austria18-23 July 2010
Antiretroviral Therapy Into the Next Decade
Historical perspectives
Current Status of ART
ART Into the Next Decade
Key ART Initiatives
UNGASS
WHO
UNAIDS
GFATM
PEPFAR
CHAI
UNITAID
National & Regional Initiatives
NGO & Other Initiatives
Status of ART Roll-Out 2009
• 5.2m PLH on ART– Most - MLIC
• Infection outstrips Treatment by 5:2
• 5m more need treatment
• 2010 WHO Guidelines takes this to 10 Mill
Achievements of ART
• Improved survival • Decreased
opportunistic infections
• Improved quality of life
Restores Hope & Dignity
Kim J, Farmer P. NEJM 2006
Mortality RLS vs RRS
• ART-LINC vs ART-CC comparisonsLow-INC High-
INC
Female 51% 25%
CD4 (base)
108 235
CD4 gain (6mths)
106 103
VL (6mths)<500c/ml
76% 77%
Mortality Adjusted HR1-6 mths - 4.3 (95%CI 1.6-11.8)7-12 mths-1.5 (95% CI 0.7-3.0)
Braitstein P. Lancet 2006;367;817
Mortality in RRS
• Resource rich settings– Increasing
importance of non-AIDS illnesses beyond second year
ART-CC CID 2010;50:1387
Mortality in RLS
• High early mortality after initiation of ART– Causes
• Tuberculosis• Acute sepsis• Cryptococcal disease• Malignancy (KS)• P jiroveci• Others
Lawn S. AIDS 2008;22:1897 Lawn S. AIDS 2009;23:335
Impact of time spent on various CD4 strata on mortality
Other Achievements of ART
• Impact:– Tuberculosis– Maternal and child mortality
» Hogan M, et al. Lancet 2010;375:1609
– Improves school attendance & workforce» Zivin J, et al. J Publ Econ 2009;93:1008» Thirumurthy H, et al. J Hum Res 2008;43:511
– HIV transmission» Donnell D, et al. Lancet 2010;375:2092
Impact on Tuberculosis
• Ecological analysis• Fall in TB
prevalence in HIV patients
• 1,250 pts in S. Africa
• RCT– Early vs Delayed
ART– 816 participants– TB cases:
• 18 vs 36 p=0.0125
2005 2008 P-value
All 3.2% 1.6% P=0.02
HIV+ve 9.2% 3.6% p=0.003
Rxd TB 4% 2.3% p=0.06
Middelkoop K, et al. IAS C Town 2009; Am J Resp Crit Care 2010; Jun 25
Severe P, et al. NEJM 2010;363:257
Early ART Delayed ART p-value
18 36 P=0.0125
ART in the Developing World
• Implementation has been greatly helped by WHO guidelines– 2002– 2003– 2006– 2010
2010 WHO ART Guidelines for Adults & Adolescents Guidelines
Early Initiation of ART CD4 threshold 350c/mm3
• CIPRA-HT-001– Severe P, et al. NEJM
2010;363:257
– 816 participants– Deaths:
• 6 vs 23 p=0.0011
• Cohort Analysis– Even higher
thresholds– 350-500– >500
– Kitahata MM, et al. NEJM 2009;360:1815
Guidelines-CD4 ThresholdsGuidelines CD4-Asymptomatic Pts
DHHS (2010) <350 (consider 500)
IAS (2010) <500
EACS (2008) <350 (consider >350)
BHIVA (2008 <350 (consider >350)
WHO EURO (2007/8) 200-350
WHO (2006) <200 (consider 200-350)
WHO (2010) <350
Treat Earlier-2010 WHO Guidelines
To start earlier is the right thing to do
“Harmonize treatment guidelines”
CD4<350 c/mm3
Seek and Treat (earlier diagnosis)
IAS July 2009 18
SurvivalSurvival
0.90
0.87
0.08
0.92
0.90
0.18
0.95
0.94
0.55
0 1 2 3 4 5
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Pro
port
ion
aliv
e
Years from enrolment
Entebbe Cohort(Uganda):pre-ART 1996-2000, median CD4 75 at enrolment:57.7/100 PY
164 eventsLCM: 2.2/100 PYCDM: 2.9/100 PY
218 events
Survival at 5 yrs: LCM-90%, CDM-87%
Trained Lay Workers-monitoring ART
• Home-based vs Facility based care– End point-Virologic
Failure (RNA >500c/ml)
• 859 participants – (HBC-729 vs FBC-483)
• Rate Ratio:– 1.04 (95%CI 0.78-1.4)
HBC is as effective as FBC
Jaffar S, et al. Lancet 2009;374:2080
CIPRA South Africa
• Nurse monitored vs Doctor monitored– Randomized non-
inferiority trial
• Follow up-120 wks
Doctor monitored n=408
Nurse monitored n=404
Total Failure
179(44%) 192(48%)
Deaths 10 11
Virol Fail 44 39
Toxicity 68 66
LTFU 70 63
Nurse vs Doctor monitoring is non-inferiorHR 1.09 (95% CI 0.89-1.33)
Sanne I, et al. Lancet 2010;376:33
Antiretroviral Drugs
• NRTIs– Zidovudine– Lamuvudine– Stavudine– Didanosine– abacavir– Tenofovir– Emtricitabine
• NNRTIs– Nevirapine– Efavirenz– Etraverine
• Integrase Inhibitors– Raltegravir
• Protease inhibitors– Lopinavir– Atazanvir – Tipranavir– Darunavir– Indinavir– Ritonavir– Nelfinavir– Saquinavir– Amprenavir– Fosamprenavir
• Fusion Inhibitors– Enfuvertide
• CCR5 antagonists– Maraviroc
First-Line ART
• Harmonized to include TB and pregnant women
• ART to all TB and HBV patients• Preferred-NNRTI based regimen• Preferred use of TDF or AZT• d4T withdrawal and elimination
WHO 2010 Guidelines
Second-Line ART
• Boosted PI-based regimens– Poor evidence of efficacy of NRTI
backbone in public health approach– High resistance mutations when failure is
clinically or immunologically diagnosed» Hosseinipour M, et al. AIDS 2009;23:1127
– ? Immediate use of new classes/drugs immediately (RAL, ETV, Darunavir)
Second-Line ART
• Need for studies to provide evidence for public health approach to second line regimens– EDCTP trial-EARNEST (enrolling)– ACTG trial– Other
• The place of PI/r monotherapy
Third-Line ART
• Real need to treat those failing second-line ART
• Can this be addressed with public health approach principles?
– ? Need for resistance testing– WHO 2010 recommends drugs eg DRV,
ETV, RLV– Does this obviate resistance testing?
Monitoring
• Issues – Efficacy tests (CD4, RNA VL)
• Cost• Lab capacity• Impact on pace of roll-out• Need for evidence-based monitoring
– Evidence for RNA VL monitoring is good-but availability to date is limited
• Need for roll-out of low-cost point-of-care tests– CD4, RNA VL, resistance testing
Monitoring
• Toxicity tests– CBC
• Chronic illness, AZT, malignancies, malnutrition, etc
– Renal function test (which? creatinine, urine)• TDF
• Other– Tropism tests, HLAB5701 (ABC)
Into the Next Decade• Pipeline for new
antiretroviral drugs• The pace of
development has slowed in this area
Into the Next Decade
• Current drugs are efficacious with good safety and tolerance– But there is still need for drugs that are:
• More efficacious• Better tolerated (Better adherence)• More safe (Less monitoring)• More forgiving (Less resistance)• Compatible with TB, pregnancy, hepatitis,
malaria, etc...
Treatment 2.0
Into the Next Decade
Address long- term non-AIDScomplications
Cardiovascular
Neuro-congnitive
Hepatic
Renal
SMART. NEJM 2006;355:2283DAD NEJM 2007;356:1723
Bone
Into the Next Decade
• Non-AIDS outcomes– unmitigated HIV replication or ART
• cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, bone, neuro-cognitive effects, cancer
• Aging/senescence
Limited data from RLSMore research required
Into the Next DecadeLaboratory Monitoring
• Accelerate roll-out of Point-of-care technology– CD4 counts– RNA Viral Load– Resistance– Other
HIV Eradication
• A preventive HIV vaccine is an important intermediate step
• The eradication and cure of HIV remains the only victory that we can celebrate
• The science and strategy required to achieve this is of the highest priority
• Granich R. Lancet 2009;373:48• Hütter G. NEJM 2009;360:692• Carter C. Nature Med 2010;16:446
Conclusions-Current
• The last decade has seen a momentous expansion of ART in LMIC
• We continue to see the benefits of ART in improved survival, reduction in disease progression & improved quality of life
• ART impacts non-AIDS conditions in both negative and positive ways. This must continue to be a focus of research
ConclusionsInto the Next Decade
• The quest for more efficacious, better tolerated, safer and more forgiving antiretroviral drugs must continue
• Better delivery modes of ART are needed to improve access to all
• Preventive value of ART has come of age-pMTCT and beyond...
• HIV cure remains the ultimate prize in the response to AIDS
Acknowledgements
• UCSF– Diana Havlir
• ARASA– Michaela Clayton
• Univ of Zimbabwe– Anthony Chisada– Nehemiah Nhando– Wadzanai Samaneka
– Mike Chirenje
• YRG-Care– Kumar Kumarasamy
• University of Denver– Thomas Campbell
• WHO– Marco Vitoria
• Slides & Comments– Many