1.) lacking ang guidelines or specific provisions ang Bill. i based this sa senate bill sa Alaska because their medicinal marijuana bill has more specify on it - ang possession limit sa patients, cultivation rules, patient registration, caregiver registration

#3 argument is the bill is lacking on the provision on whether or not mu accept ba ang Authority ug registry cards from other countries

#1 – The bill is lacking in guidelines or specific provisions.

>we compare with the senate bill of Alaska, it has more specifications on it such as the possession limit of patients, cultivation rules of patients, patient registration and caregiver registration,

>as compared to our bill, it says na bahala na ang Authority mag provide sa specifics

#2 – The bill is does not state on whether or not the Authority or MCCC’s will accept registry cards from other countries

Why is this relevant?

>for TOURISTS who are qualified patients abroad and are only visiting here for awhile, if they run out of marijuana and they need it immediately, can they use their ID’s to be able to buy marijuana from us? If we allow it, their ID’s might be subject to fraud. If we don’t allow it, idunno, they might die or whatever.

#3 – Is the government prepared for this? (needs elaboration)

aside from authorizing MCCC’s to prescribe marijuana, are they planning on establishing gov't buildings THROUGHOUT the country just for this endeavor? And if mag tukod silag clinic everywhere, can the government even afford that? provided that daghan pag remote areas na dapat nila i-cover