argonne town hall energy

7
Argonne Town Hall Energy May 31, 2007

Upload: veta

Post on 04-Jan-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Argonne Town Hall Energy. May 31, 2007. There have been two previous Town Hall meetings. Berkeley Nanoscience Oak Ridge Nuclear Energy fission. Berkeley next steps. Focused on materials This subject is on web-site Carrier transport simulation for solar cell - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Argonne Town Hall Energy

Argonne Town HallEnergy

May 31, 2007

Page 2: Argonne Town Hall Energy

There have been two previous Town Hall meetings

• Berkeley– Nanoscience

• Oak Ridge– Nuclear Energy

• fission

Page 3: Argonne Town Hall Energy

Berkeley next steps

• Focused on materials– This subject is on web-site

• Carrier transport simulation for solar cell• Numerical design of catalysts• Numerical design of hydrogen storage• Biofuel• Nuclear Energy

– Fission• NIF

• Hydrocarbon fuels efficiency (combustion)– Efficiency at low emmisions

• Liquid fuels

Page 4: Argonne Town Hall Energy

Berkeley focused on the science

• We need to also articulate to the payoffs.– Conservation of existing technologies

• increases in efficiency - hydrocarbon fuels• Much lower emissions – hydrocarbons fuels• Solid state lighting – a factor of 2

– New systems and materials• Cheap and efficient solar cell (organic system, nano)

• hydrogen storage with the right binding energy

• Catalysis – Hydrogen, coal

Page 5: Argonne Town Hall Energy

Oak Ridge next steps• Focused entirely on nuclear energy

– Fuel performance– Reactor design– Separations– Integration

• Discussion centered around what challenges and issues are in the way of having exa-scale applications ready by 2015 (stretch goal)

• Not only technically complex, but complex in that new and innovative ways for engaging industry and regulatory agencies must be devised

• In some areas legacy codes simply do not exist (simulation has never been applied in these areas, e.g., waste forms) – will this make it “easier”?

• Requirements definition still evolving – Driven by two basic needs: design/analysis, safety/licensing– Depends upon user turn-around time required– The case for exascale is easy to make

• Not yet posted on web– 4 presentations yet to be translated into prose

Page 6: Argonne Town Hall Energy

ITER• Goal is to develop a world-leading integrated modeling capability of major

benefit to harvesting science from ITER ($10B international project to be built in France in 10-12 years)

– Key for US strategy beyond ITER to DEMO phase of fusion development• V & V a key component of this proposed “FSP” – Fusion Simulation Project

– Associated workshop report available soon (July ’07 time-frame)– Some of key codes (e.g., multi-scale kinetic transport dynamics) presently

demonstrate very good scaling on leadership class platforms (CRAY XT-3 Jaguar @ ORNL, BGL @ IBM Watson, Earth Simulator in Japan, etc.) – excellent potential for petascale & eventually exascale

– Other key codes (e.g., MHD dynamics) need to significantly improve scalability on leadership class platforms – where the “science scales with the number of processors used

– System integration will demand modern frameworks where modules with improved predictive physics capability can be readily incorporated

– Connections to international facilities over the next decade important from a validation perspective

Page 7: Argonne Town Hall Energy

Some additional comments

• Need exa-flop computing at all scales – 1,000’s of cpu’s to millions of cpu’s– Time to solution from minutes to weeks– Number of users is measured in multiple thousands

not 10’s or 100’s

• Theory and algorithm development will match or exceed the factor of 1,000,000 achieved by the transition from teraflops to exa-flops

• Need a systems, economic overview