are all atypical antipsychotics equal for the treatment of

1
Introduction Are All Atypical Antipsychotics Equal for the Treatment of Cognition and Affect in Schizophrenia? By Joseph Zohar, MD One of the major developments in psychiatry in the last decade is the development and widespread use of the new antipsychotics. The field has moved from the typical dopamine D2-blocking neuroleptics into the new era of antipsychotics with the addition of the serotonin 5-HT 2A properties to the classical D 2 antagonism. These "atypical" antipsychotic drugs (APDs) provide us with new tools with which to treat our patients. However, do we really know how to make the most of these new medications? Are we equipped with the knowledge to do the best matching between the different APDs and the patients that we will see in an hour's time? One potential way to get the maximum therapeutic effect of a specific medication is to improve the match- ing between the compound and the patient that we are seeing, ie, to try and get the best medication for the patient. For example, the medication one would choose for a patient with cognitive decline and a tendency to be overweight, would likely be different from an anti- psychotic one would select for a patient with the same diagnosis, but who is slim and has paranoid delusions. It is also intuitively clear to us that we should treat first-epi- sode patients differently from those with a 20-year history of social decline. Similarly, a patient with pronounced affective component would receive a different treatment regimen from a patient who is affectively "flat." Although we have been hearing and reading a lot about all the different APDs, it would be quite accurate to postulate that a concise updated summary of the differ- ent APDs, examining them around four different critical axes, might be welcomed by our readers. The topics covered in this supplement are: the differ- ential receptor's profile of APDs and their clinical impli- cations, the issue of cognitive impairment in schizophre- nia and APDs, monitoring guidelines to assess metabolic abnormalities that may occur with APDs, and an update on treatment after first-episode psychosis. In the first article, Darius K. Shayegan, BS, and Stephen M. Stahl, MD, PhD, address many intriguing questions such as why does one patient respond to one agent and not to another? How is it that some patients experience side effects with one agent, yet others do not? All these questions focus on the fundamental dilemma of how to select the medication which is best fitting in terms of receptor profile on one hand and the patient's clinical needs on the other. They also emphasize the issue and importance of appropriate dosing. Next, Herbert Y. Meltzer, MD, focuses on the cogni- tive impairment and negative symptoms in schizophre- nia. In his scholarly review, Dr. Meltzer describes, among other issues, the developments in mapping the different roles of 5-HT receptors (eg, 5-HT 2A versus 5-HT 6 and 5-HTj) in cognition and the potential implications for the APDs in treating cognitive deficits early on. The third article deals with the primary hippocratic principle of prinvum rum nocere ("first, do no harm") by providing the reader with practical and useful guidelines to monitor weight, glucose, and lipid imbalance. In his article, Jonathan M. Meyer, MD, gives us a balanced perspective and practical tools to prevent severe somatic side effects while using APDs. Finally, Lili C. Kopala, MD, FRCPC, describes the role of APDs in early intervention and long-term main- tenance after first-episode psychosis as a potential way to improve long-term outcome. The contributors should be congratulated for their efforts to bring us a scholarly comprehensive overview about different aspects of using APDs. One of the goals of CNS Spectrums is to bridge the gap between the experts and the clinician, and I hope that this supplement will indeed succeed in this mission. 1339 Dr. Zohar is professor of psychiatry in the Division of Psychiatry at Chaim Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, Israel. He is also the inter- national editor of CNS Spectrums. Volume 9 - Number 10 (Suppl 11) CNS Spectrums - October 2004 https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900025074 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 65.21.228.167, on 27 Feb 2022 at 02:13:53, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at

Upload: others

Post on 27-Feb-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Are All Atypical Antipsychotics Equal for the Treatment of

Introduction

Are All Atypical AntipsychoticsEqual for the Treatment of Cognition

and Affect in Schizophrenia?By Joseph Zohar, MD

One of the major developments in psychiatry in thelast decade is the development and widespread use ofthe new antipsychotics. The field has moved from thetypical dopamine D2-blocking neuroleptics into the newera of antipsychotics with the addition of the serotonin5-HT2A properties to the classical D2 antagonism. These"atypical" antipsychotic drugs (APDs) provide us withnew tools with which to treat our patients. However,do we really know how to make the most of these newmedications? Are we equipped with the knowledge to dothe best matching between the different APDs and thepatients that we will see in an hour's time?

One potential way to get the maximum therapeuticeffect of a specific medication is to improve the match-ing between the compound and the patient that we areseeing, ie, to try and get the best medication for thepatient. For example, the medication one would choosefor a patient with cognitive decline and a tendency tobe overweight, would likely be different from an anti-psychotic one would select for a patient with the samediagnosis, but who is slim and has paranoid delusions. Itis also intuitively clear to us that we should treat first-epi-sode patients differently from those with a 20-year historyof social decline. Similarly, a patient with pronouncedaffective component would receive a different treatmentregimen from a patient who is affectively "flat."

Although we have been hearing and reading a lotabout all the different APDs, it would be quite accurateto postulate that a concise updated summary of the differ-ent APDs, examining them around four different criticalaxes, might be welcomed by our readers.

The topics covered in this supplement are: the differ-ential receptor's profile of APDs and their clinical impli-cations, the issue of cognitive impairment in schizophre-nia and APDs, monitoring guidelines to assess metabolicabnormalities that may occur with APDs, and an updateon treatment after first-episode psychosis.

In the first article, Darius K. Shayegan, BS, andStephen M. Stahl, MD, PhD, address many intriguingquestions such as why does one patient respond to oneagent and not to another? How is it that some patientsexperience side effects with one agent, yet others do not?All these questions focus on the fundamental dilemmaof how to select the medication which is best fitting interms of receptor profile on one hand and the patient'sclinical needs on the other. They also emphasize the issueand importance of appropriate dosing.

Next, Herbert Y. Meltzer, MD, focuses on the cogni-tive impairment and negative symptoms in schizophre-nia. In his scholarly review, Dr. Meltzer describes, amongother issues, the developments in mapping the differentroles of 5-HT receptors (eg, 5-HT2A versus 5-HT6 and5-HTj) in cognition and the potential implications forthe APDs in treating cognitive deficits early on.

The third article deals with the primary hippocraticprinciple of prinvum rum nocere ("first, do no harm") byproviding the reader with practical and useful guidelinesto monitor weight, glucose, and lipid imbalance. In hisarticle, Jonathan M. Meyer, MD, gives us a balancedperspective and practical tools to prevent severe somaticside effects while using APDs.

Finally, Lili C. Kopala, MD, FRCPC, describes therole of APDs in early intervention and long-term main-tenance after first-episode psychosis as a potential way toimprove long-term outcome.

The contributors should be congratulated for theirefforts to bring us a scholarly comprehensive overviewabout different aspects of using APDs. One of the goals ofCNS Spectrums is to bridge the gap between the expertsand the clinician, and I hope that this supplement willindeed succeed in this mission. 1339

Dr. Zohar is professor of psychiatry in the Division of Psychiatry at Chaim Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, Israel. He is also the inter-national editor of CNS Spectrums.

Volume 9 - Number 10 (Suppl 11) CNS Spectrums - October 2004

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900025074Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 65.21.228.167, on 27 Feb 2022 at 02:13:53, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at