arboricultural assessment & report south eastern outfall land, rosebud · 2018. 1. 15. ·...

August 2016

Prepared for: Melbourne Water

Arboricultural Assessment & ReportSouth Eastern Outfall Land, Rosebud

Treemap Arboriculture PO Box 465, Heidelberg VIC 3084

ABN 20 325 463 261 www.treemap.com.au

Treemap Arboriculture PO Box 465, Heidelberg VIC 3084

ABN 20 325 463 261 www.treemap.com.au

Wednesday, 10 August 2016

Arboricultural Assessment & Report South Eastern Outfall Land, Rosebud

Table of Contents: 1 Name and address of consultant ......................................................................................................... 1 2 Instructions .......................................................................................................................................... 1 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 4 Key Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 2 5 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................. 2 6 Method ................................................................................................................................................. 3 7 Observations ........................................................................................................................................ 5 8 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................... 7 9 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................... 9 10 References .................................................................................................................................... 11 11 Definitions ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Appendix 1 – Tree assessment detail table for individual trees Appendix 2 – Descriptors Appendix 3a-3h –Tree Plans with Tree Protection Zones and Tree numbers Appendix 4 – Scope of survey plan

Arboricultural report for South Eastern Outfall Land, Rosebud

©TREEMAP 2016 August Page 1 of 11

1 Name and address of consultant

Dean Simonsen Treemap Arboriculture PO Box 465, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084

2 Instructions

2.1 The instructions provided to Treemap Arboriculture on 12/07/16 by Melbourne Water were to provide an Arboricultural assessment and report that examines trees located within a variety of land parcels associated with the South Eastern Outfall pipeline, Rosebud.

2.2 The instructions were to provide details on each tree using standard arboricultural assessment fields. The detail collected would typically provide information that allows a range of tree management decisions and activities to be implemented.

3 Introduction

3.1 The managers of the subject site are undertaking investigations and a review of the trees on the land. As part of the review process, the managers are examining the vegetation located on or near the site. This report examines the arboricultural matters associated with this vegetation.

3.2 Most arboricultural tree assessments utilise the fields and assessment guidelines provided within AS4970-2009 (Australian Standard – Protection of trees on development sites). The tree assessment and following report would be defined as a ‘Preliminary assessment and arboricultural report’. The standard indicates that the information in this type of report can ‘be used by planners, architects and designers to finalise the design layout to facilitate the retention of suitable trees’.

3.3 The site and land parcels under review are located to the south of Rosebud town centre. The land was originally purchased in the late 1960’s for the creation of the South Eastern Outfall pipeline which conveys treated effluent from Bangholme to Gunnamatta where it is discharged. The pipe was assembled under the natural surface in 1974 via the open cut method (open cut excavated by machine).

3.4 The site under review was comprised of a number of separate property parcels as follows:

15 Herman Street, Rosebud 41 Herman Street, Rosebud 1-11 Leura Crescent, Rosebud 53 Herman Street, Rosebud 55-57 Herman Street, Rosebud 59 Herman Street, Rosebud 318 Bayview Road, Rosebud 341 Bayview Road, Rosebud 343 Bayview Road, Rosebud 345 Bayview Road, Rosebud 14 Cook Avenue, Rosebud 181-183 Jetty Road, Rosebud 226 Jetty Road, Rosebud 228 Jetty Road, Rosebud



4 Key Objectives

4.1 To undertake a general assessment of trees located on or near the subject site.

4.2 To provide an assessment of the subject trees with respect to their overall condition, structure, safety, value and suitability for preservation.

4.3 To provide recommendations on the suitability of the trees for removal or retention, and provide general guidelines for tree protection.

5 Executive summary

5.1 Four hundred and sixty nine (469) individual trees were examined as part of the site review. The individual tree assessments included 450 trees on the subject site, 12 street trees and 7 neighbouring trees.

5.2 The subject site contained predominantly native trees. The individual tree assessment identified 336 indigenous trees or large shrubs.

5.3 Almost 75% of the assessed trees and shrubs were locally indigenous species and a further 14% were Victorian native or Australian native species. The 15 most frequently recorded species (of the 40 species identified) accounted for nearly 92% of all individual trees examined in the survey.

Species No. of trees % *Leptospermum laevigatum 179 38.17% Eucalyptus viminalis 83 17.70% *Pinus radiata 48 10.23% Eucalyptus ovata 26 5.54% *Melaleuca armillaris 18 3.84% *Acacia longifolia 14 2.99% Banksia integrifolia 14 2.99% *Pittosporum undulatum 9 1.92% *Acacia longifolia var. sophorae

7 1.49%

Eucalyptus radiata 6 1.28% Allocasuarina littoralis 6 1.28% Acacia mearnsii 6 1.28% Eucalyptus sp. 5 1.07% Eucalyptus pryoriana 5 1.07% *Chamaecytisus palmensis 4 0.85% 430 91.70%

*denotes woody weed species

5.4 The assessed trees were assigned a retention value rating. This rating combines tree condition factors with functional and aesthetic characteristics in the context of a semi-urbanised landscape. The retention or preservation of trees may not depend solely on arboricultural considerations; therefore, the ratings may act as a guide to assist in decisions relating to tree management and tree retention.

Retention value No. of trees High 0 Moderate 33 Low 301 None 135



All of the trees that were assigned a ‘Moderate’ retention value rating were indigenous specimens of Eucalyptus viminalis, E. pryoriana and E. ovata, or specimens of Banksia integrifolia (Coast Banksia). The trees in the ‘Moderate’ category were typically larger trees ranging between 15-20m in height. The ‘Low’ retention value category includes 173 Leptospermum laevigatum (Coast Tea-tree), which could legitimately be placed in the ‘None’ category because of their environmental weed status.

5.5 The future management of the trees across the site can be assisted by interrogating the tree assessment detail provided in this report. ‘Moderate’ retention value trees would be considered the most significant arboricultural elements in the study area. Trees that have been assigned a ‘Low’ retention value were typically in poor condition, or small in size. Trees assigned a retention value of ‘None’ would generally be removed because they were in very poor condition, or they are generally considered to be environmental woody weeds.

6 Method

6.1 Site and tree inspections were conducted on Monday 2nd and Tuesday 3rd August, 2016.

6.2 The tree assessment consisted of a visual inspection of each tree that was located within the study area (as indicated on the feature survey plan and specified by the client).

6.3 The tree assessment consisted of a visual inspection, which was undertaken with regard to modern arboricultural principles and practices. The assessment did not involve a detailed examination of below ground or internal tree parts. The assessment was undertaken from the ground of the subject site to determine tree condition and species type. Measurements were taken to establish trunk and crown dimensions. No tree samples or site soil samples were taken unless specified. Trunk diameters for trees on adjoining properties may be estimated due to site access limitations.

6.4 Specific tree details were recorded for each tree during the assessment. The following fields were populated for each of the individually assessed trees.

Tree assessment fields Field Description No. Unique number Species Botanic name of tree Common Name Common name as occurs in current Australian horticultural literature DBH (cm) Diameter measured at Breast Height (1.4m above ground) TPZ (m) Tree Protection Zone calculated using DBH (AS4970) SRZ (m) Structural Root Zone calculated using modified DBH (AS4970) HxW Height and width of tree canopy in metres Age Broad age class of tree Health Broad class of the health and vigour of the tree Structure Broad class of the structure and stability of the tree ULE Useful Life Expectancy – estimate of useful life remaining Form Symmetry of tree canopy Comment Additional comment that may provide specific detail on the condition of the tree or

management requirements Tree Type Origin and type of tree species Retention Value Qualitative rating that combines tree condition factors with functional and aesthetic

characteristics in the context of an urban landscape. The retention or preservation of trees may not depend solely on arboricultural considerations; therefore, the ratings may act as a guide to assist in decisions relating to tree management and retention.

Recommendation General recommendation for tree X Coordinate Map Grid of Australia 1994 - Grid Coordinates (MGA94, Zone 55) Y Coordinate Map Grid of Australia 1994 - Grid Coordinates (MGA94, Zone 55)

*Descriptors at Appendix 2



6.5 Design of field survey form

A field data collection form was designed using ESRI Arcpad software. The field survey form contained the fields indicated at section 6.4.

6.6 Field survey approach

The field survey was conducted with a qualified arborist (AQF – Level 5) who undertook the mapping and collection of tree details.

GPS mapping for any additional trees This included a combination of GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) real time differentially corrected point positions referenced with orthorectified aerial imagery on a mobile GIS (Geographic Information System) platform called Arcpad.

Tree point accuracies range from 0.3m to 1.0m. The coordinate positions of each tree are submitted as eastings and northings in Map Grid of Australia 1994 - Grid Coordinates (MGA94, Zone 55).

Tree inspections conducted using Visual Tree Assessment (VTA). Visual tree assessment (VTA) was put forward by Mattheck & Breloer (1996). The principle of this assessment approach is that a visual tree inspection from the ground is sufficiently detailed in its approach to identify the majority of tree defects or symptoms of defects. The assessment approach recommends more detailed examinations if the visual inspection reveals defects that cannot be determined fully from the visual inspection.

Mattheck & Breloer (1996) indicate that the method provides failure criteria with biomechanics as the cornerstone. Practitioners would need to refer to the work of Mattheck & Breloer (1996) to understand the intricacies of the method. If a defect is confirmed, it may be measured, or further diagnostic work undertaken, for example testing the strength of the defective tree part, root plate investigation, or pathogen identification.

VTA and the general concept of visually assessing trees has broad acceptance in the industry of Arboriculture.

Tree stability and structure inspection process Inspecting a tree to determine its stability involves observations of multiple tree components. Kim Coder (1990) developed an inspection process that illustrates and indicates the major components of a tree that may require evaluation when assessing tree stability and structure. The method places more importance on certain sections of the tree, relative to other sections. This approach assists with focusing attention and ranking observed defects. It can also be used as a means of structuring the tree inspection process.

It is noted that this assessment procedure places emphasis on the bottom one metre of the tree trunk and the metre or so of soil and roots immediately around the base of the trunk.

The following section indicates the zoned approach adopted by the system.

o ZONE 1: STEM / ROOT BASE (4 feet up and out) -- Bottom four feet of main stem and zone of rapid taper (ZRT) in roots stretching out four feet. No Compromise -- No Doubt.

o ZONE 2: MAIN STEM (up to live crown and base of scaffold branches). o ZONE 3: PRIMARY ROOT SUPPORT (out to 1/2 the drip line). o ZONE 4: PRIMARY BRANCH SUPPORT (major branch base area plus the basal 1/3

of their length). Faults in zones two, three, and four are correctable with large inputs of time, money, materials and technical maintenance. Corrective measures may represent a notification of problems.



o ZONE 5: REMAINDER OF WOODY ROOTS (out to 1.5 times the dripline). o ZONE 6: REMAINDER OF CROWN Zones five and six are not of primary structural

concern but any faults still represent significant risks.

Tree Risk Assessment: Systematic Evaluation Process, Dr. Kim D. Coder, University of Georgia 1990

6.7 A feature survey plan was provided by the client (Plan of Feature and Level Survey prepared by Taylors, Ref No. 20303_3_S1_D001 and dated Jan-Feb 2015). The assessed trees have been numbered on these plans (Appendix 3a - 3h). The detail provided at Appendix 3a - 3h has also been provided to the client in Autocad format with Tree Protection Zones and Structural Root Zones for planning and design assistance.

7 Observations

7.1 The site under review presented as a variety of separate land parcels, and in combination they measure approximately 5.6 hectares. The site is bordered by a variety of roads and residential allotments. The following property addresses in the study area contained trees that were assessed individually:

15 Herman Street, Rosebud 41 Herman Street, Rosebud 1-11 Leura Crescent, Rosebud 53 Herman Street, Rosebud 55-57 Herman Street, Rosebud 59 Herman Street, Rosebud 318 Bayview Road, Rosebud 341 Bayview Road, Rosebud

343 Bayview Road, Rosebud 345 Bayview Road, Rosebud 14 Cook Avenue, Rosebud 181-183 Jetty Road, Rosebud 226 Jetty Road, Rosebud 228 Jetty Road, Rosebud

7.2 Four hundred and sixty nine (469) individual trees were examined as part of the site review.

The individual tree assessments included 450 trees on the subject site, 12 street trees and 7 neighbouring trees. The detail collected for each individual tree assessment is provided in table format at Appendix 1. Tree numbers within the assessment table correspond to those numbers provided on the modified feature plan (Appendix 3a-3h).

7.3 The subject site contained mostly native trees. The individual tree assessment identified 336 indigenous tree or large shrubs.



7.4 The following 15 most frequently recorded species (of 40 species identified) accounted for nearly 92% of all individual trees examined in the survey.

15 most frequently recorded species Species No. of trees % *Leptospermum laevigatum 179 38.17% Eucalyptus viminalis 83 17.70% *Pinus radiata 48 10.23% Eucalyptus ovata 26 5.54% *Melaleuca armillaris 18 3.84% *Acacia longifolia 14 2.99% Banksia integrifolia 14 2.99% *Pittosporum undulatum 9 1.92% *Acacia longifolia var. sophorae

7 1.49%

Eucalyptus radiata 6 1.28% Allocasuarina littoralis 6 1.28% Acacia mearnsii 6 1.28% Eucalyptus sp. 5 1.07% Eucalyptus pryoriana 5 1.07% *Chamaecytisus palmensis 4 0.85% 430 91.70%

*denotes woody weed species

7.5 The tree survey and assessment for the site has examined the larger and more significant trees and shrubs. However, the tree survey was guided and influenced by the detail provided in the feature survey provide. A large number of shrub-sized plants have not been included in this assessment because they were not collected in the feature survey. The site was heavily populated with Leptospermum laevigatum (Coast Tea-tree) and 179 individual specimens were recorded in the survey. However, the parcel of land at 14 Cook Avenue was dense with this species along with the eastern section of 181-183 Jetty Road, Rosebud. There may be as many as 300 individual specimens of this species across these 2 properties. There were also numerous shrub-sized species of Acacia longifolia var. sophorae (Coast Wattle), Acacia longifolia (Sallow Wattle), Callistemon spp. (Bottlebrush) and Pittosporum undulatum (Sweet Pittosporum) and other weed species scattered across the properties and these shrubs or weeds were not individually assessed as part of this study.

7.6 The following list summarises the type and origin of trees recorded during the assessment.

Tree type/origin No. of trees %Indigenous 351 74.84% Exotic conifer 49 10.45% Victorian native 40 8.53% Australian native 23 4.90% Exotic evergreen 4 0.85% Exotic deciduous 2 0.43%



7.7 An analysis was undertaken of the individual tree assessment fields collected as part of the survey (as tabled at Appendix 1). The following results provide a summary and overview of the survey findings with regard to specific fields.

Age No. of trees Semi-mature 163 Maturing 306

Health No. of trees Fair 161 Fair to Poor 236 Poor 42 Very Poor 15 Dead 15

Structure No. of trees Fair 64 Fair to Poor 133 Poor 249 Very poor 12 Failed 11

ULE No. of trees 50+ years 0 30 to 50 years 36 15 to 30 years 138 5 to 15 years 197 1 to 5 years 66 0 years 32

7.8 The assessed trees were assigned a retention value rating. This rating combines tree

condition factors with functional and aesthetic characteristics in the context of a semi-urbanised landscape. The retention or preservation of trees may not depend solely on arboricultural considerations; therefore, the ratings may act as a guide to assist in decisions relating to tree management and tree retention.

Retention value No. of trees High 0 Moderate 33 Low 301 None 135

All of the trees that were assigned a ‘Moderate’ retention value rating were indigenous specimens of Eucalyptus viminalis, E. pryoriana and E. ovata, or specimens of Banksia integrifolia (Coast Banksia). The trees in the ‘Moderate’ category were typically larger trees ranging between 15-20m in height. The ‘Low’ retention value category includes 173 Leptospermum laevigatum (Coast Tea-tree), which could legitimately be placed in the ‘None’ category because of their environmental weed status.

7.9 The site is influenced by a variety of planning overlays that apply to trees. A Mornington Peninsula Shire Vegetation Protection Overlay (VPO) and Schedule 1 to the Overlay (VPO1) influence all of the properties. This is based on a planning property report for the site being

Indicates an established landscape cohort

Indicates that the overall health of the assessed trees was below average

Indicates that the overall structure of the assessed trees was biased towards poor structure. This result is influenced by the high proportion of Leptospermum laevigatum that were assigned a poor structure rating.

Indicates a poor range and diversity of life expectancies, with a low proportion of trees expected to survive beyond 30 years



obtained from www.dtpli.vic.gov.au/planning on 10/08/16. The schedule to the Vegetation Protection Overlay states:

A permit is required to remove, destroy or lop any vegetation, except for:

The removal of vegetation carried out in conjunction with a development approved under a planning permit and in accordance with an endorsed plan.

The removal of vegetation necessary for the construction of a dwelling, dwelling extension or outbuilding where no planning permit is required and provided that:

o A building permit has been granted for the proposed development. o Vegetation is only removed from the building footprint or within 2 metres of the

proposed building.

o No tree with a trunk circumference greater than 0.35 metres is removed within 6 metres of a road frontage.

The removal of vegetation to enable the formation of a single crossing and access driveway with a maximum width of 3.7 metres.

The removal of vegetation which presents an immediate risk of personal injury or damage to property including the culling of single trees located within 3 metres of a dwelling or outbuilding, or which overhangs a boundary line.

The removal of any dead timber or branch which has occurred through natural circumstances, fire or the spread of noxious weeds.

The removal of any tree or branch of a tree which impairs the access of motor vehicles along any existing or approved access track, provided that such access track has a width no greater than 3.7 metres.

The maintenance of landscaping, including pruning, which does not effect the stability, general form and viability of the vegetation.

The removal of vegetation that has been established for less than 10 years and which is not required as landscaping under a planning approval.

An application for permit must be accompanied by a vegetation management plan clearly indicating:

All existing vegetation on the site, the extent and purpose of proposed vegetation removal and the species, density and location of trees and other vegetation to be planted.

The location of any watercourse on the property, and, if relevant, the location of areas where the ground slope exceeds 20 percent.

Where it is proposed to relocate a building, the application must specify the intended access route and provide an assessment of the vegetation impact, both on the site and on road reserves, including any proposed replanting.

7.10 A Mornington Peninsula Shire Environmental Significance Overlay (ESO) and Schedule 17 to

the Overlay (ESO17) predominantly apply to the following 2 parcels of land:

41 Herman Street, Rosebud 1-11 Leura Crescent, Rosebud

Schedule 17 to the Environmental Significance Overlay (ESO17) does not contain any specific permit requirements relating to vegetation, but the Environmental Significance Overlay states:



A permit is required to:

Remove, destroy or lop any vegetation, including dead vegetation. This does not apply:

o If a schedule to this overlay specifically states that a permit is not required. o If the table to Clause 42.01-3 specifically states that a permit is not required. o To the removal, destruction or lopping of native vegetation in accordance with a

native vegetation precinct plan specified in the schedule to Clause 52.16.

The decision guidelines under Schedule 17 to the Environmental Significance Overlay (ESO17) also state:

Whether substantial change or detriment will be caused to soil stability, vegetation, water quality or habitat values of the streamline.

7.11 Trees that are native to Victoria will be influenced specifically by Clause 52.17 (Native vegetation) of the planning scheme where each property parcel is larger than 0.4ha. This clause has particular obligations and requirements relating to indigenous trees.

7.12 Native vegetation is defined as ‘Plants that are indigenous to Victoria, including trees, shrubs, herbs, and grasses’ under the Definitions of the State Planning provisions – Clause 72.

7.13 The various planning controls relating to vegetation indicate that all of the vegetation on the land would require a permit for removal. This is a specific requirement under VPO1. Furthermore, the requirements of Clause 52.17 (Native vegetation) could also have application requirements regarding native indigenous trees on parcels of land greater than 0.4ha, which is the case for a proportion of the land parcels.

7.14 There is a variety of planning application requirements in relation to the trees because of the various planning controls that relate to vegetation. One factor that is considered under the VPO1 is the value and quality of the vegetation. The general condition of the vegetation on the site is relatively poor, from an arboricultural perspective. Large numbers of indigenous trees on the site were dead, dying or defective and a large proportion of indigenous trees on the site have been assigned ‘Low’ retention values. Only 33 trees or 7% of the assessed trees were assigned a retention value of better than ‘Low’, using arboricultural criteria. Furthermore, a large proportion of the assessed trees are considered environmental weeds.

7.15 The previous statement requires some clarification in relation to the planning controls that apply to the property. The broader population of trees is in poor arboricultural condition, and the vast majority of trees could not be sustained or maintained within a developed landscape. However, the majority of assessed trees are also native indigenous trees and they will need to be examined and assessed for other values such as their environmental or ecological value.

7.16 The assessment of trees for their environmental or ecological value may result in obligations that are required to offset the loss of trees for development purposes. These offsets and obligations may eventuate regardless of the individual condition or weed status of trees. These obligations would need to be assessed and reviewed by a suitably qualified ecologist to appreciate the level of these requirements.



7.17 As discussed earlier, a large proportion of the assessed trees and shrubs are generally considered to be environmental weeds. The following species are listed as weeds in the 2012 Mornington Peninsula Shire Council Brochure ‘Noxious & Environmental Weeds & Plant Pathogens of the Mornington Peninsula.

Species No of trees Acacia floribunda 1 Acacia longifolia 14 Acacia longifolia var. sophorae 7 Acacia saligna 4 Chamaecytisus palmensis 4 Hakea salicifolia 4 Melaleuca armillaris 18 Pinus radiata 48 Pittosporum undulatum 9 109

It would be unusual for the local authority to refuse an application to remove environmental weeds, but there is no exemption provided for weeds under Schedule 1 to the VPO.

7.18 In addition to the weeds listed above, the Weed Management Strategy for the Mornington

Peninsula Shire Council (prepared by the Keith Turnbull Research Institute, Ballarto Road, Frankston on behalf of Agriculture Victoria Services Pty Ltd, February 2003) also lists Leptospermum laevigatum as an environmental weed (179 recorded trees in survey and a further 300 trees of this species not recorded across site). In combination, the number of recorded environmental weeds across the site equates to nearly two thirds of all assessed trees.

7.19 There are also exemptions that apply under Clause 52.48 of the Victoria Planning Provisions (Bushfire Protection: Exemptions) in relation to vegetation controls. Trees that are situated within 10m of an existing dwelling and within 4m of the property boundary may be exempt from any permit requirements. This exemption would apply to a large proportion of the vegetation on the site because many of the assessed trees were located near land parcel boundaries.

7.20 A further factor to be considered, in terms of site design and planning, is the potential impact of any design towards trees on adjoining land. An obvious constraint will be any trees located on adjoining land that are close to the property boundary of the subject site. The Tree Protection Zone clearance requirements for neighbouring trees will range from 2m to 15m depending on the trunk diameter measurements for individual trees. The street trees along roads bordering the various land parcels will also need consideration in this regard. The tree survey in this report does not provide a comprehensive survey or assessment of street trees or neighbouring trees near the site.



8 Discussion

Tree assessments involving this quantity of trees typically reveals a range of trees with differing attributes for health, structure and overall value. Some trees may be considered insignificant for their size, age, species type or condition, but they might still be considered suitable for retention because they are located conveniently on the site, or because they have been planted as a group for a specific purpose. The individual value and attributes of the individual tree may be less than the overall value provided by the collective more broadly.

Conversely, some individual trees may be exceptional for various reasons but there may be no scope for their retention because of their location, and other site constraints that might affect the land. One of the main objectives of the tree assessment is to determine those trees that would be preferable, in terms of preservation, and to identify poor or less valuable trees that may easily be replaced, or replaced with more desirable species.

The arborist must also exercise judgement and expertise with respect to the types of trees that are deemed suitable for preservation, and they should also consider the stage of the tree in its overall lifecycle.

The vegetation planning controls that influence any parcel of land are a major factor for allowing property owners to determine the constraints or opportunities presented by existing vegetation. When a property is influenced by specific vegetation controls with clear criteria and decision guidelines, it is easy to identity what trees might be considered by council with respect to enforcing tree preservation or permitting tree removal. The broad nature of the specific vegetation control that applies to this site implies that council wants to examine any or all proposed vegetation removal, and it is difficult to predict their position.

The variety and broad nature of vegetation controls that apply to the various parcels of land will probably result in the local authority having a significant role in the final development outcomes for the site. However, it is also true that the parcels of land are generally bordered by residential style properties and residential zoning would seem likely. There is a degree of inevitability that the land will eventually be developed for residential style purposes, and this would ultimately result in the fragmentation and or removal of native vegetation across the site.

This being said, the retention of trees that are desirable species, and in good condition, can provide benefits towards a completed residential style development.

The interpretation of the planning controls that apply to the site are further complicated by the exemptions that apply under Clause 52.48 of the Victoria Planning Provisions (Bushfire Protection: Exemptions) and the high number of weeds that are present across the individual properties. Furthermore, the influence of Clause 52.17 (Native vegetation) only applies to native indigenous trees on parcels of land greater than 0.4ha. Considering the complex interactions of these various planning controls and exemptions, it would be far simpler to utilise the arboricultural assessment retention values as a means of determining what trees should be considered for retention.

The simplest way to interrogate and action the detail collected as part of this assessment is to filter the tree records on the basis of their assigned tree retention values. The most significant trees on the site, from an arboricultural perspective, are the relatively small number of trees that received a ‘Moderate’ retention value (33 trees across the various land parcels).

The next group of trees that might be considered for retention is the 233 trees that were assigned a ‘Low’ retention value and a recommendation of ‘Could be retained’. This group contained trees that were either; in poorer condition, were less desirable species, or they were trees that were small and easily replaceable. If the species Leptospermum laevigatum were removed from this category (because of its environmental weed status), the total number of trees



in the ‘Low’ retention value ‘Could be retained’ category would be reduced to 87 trees. Some of the smaller trees in this category may grow to become more significant trees, and their retention value may subsequently be upgraded. The trees that have longer term value would generally be assigned a longer Useful Life Expectancy in the survey detail and it would also be generally preferable to retain indigenous species amongst this category (Appendix 1).

‘Low’ retention value trees that were in poor condition were assigned a shorter life expectancy and some 26 trees have been recommended for removal within this category. Poor structure was the primary reason for recommending removal for the majority of the trees in this category.

There were 131 trees that were assigned a retention value of ‘None’. This group included dead trees, trees in very poor condition and tree species that are generally recognised as woody weeds or environmental weeds. Under normal best practice management, trees that are assigned a retention value of ‘None’ would be removed and replaced regardless of any proposed site changes. The species Leptospermum laevigatum could technically be included in this category, which would add a further 179 surveyed trees.

8.1 Tree protection zones

Where works are proposed in the vicinity of trees, the level of encroachment and the impact to specific trees can be estimated by comparing standard or modified tree protection clearances with those clearances provided to trees in the design. The overall impact towards any given tree will be based on the severity of encroachment into the respective tree protection zones. The degree of root activity in the tree protection zone can vary significantly (because of existing structures or obstructions), which can result in more or less severe impacts to trees. It is often difficult to accurately determine the level of root activity in these zones and root investigations are generally impractical. The alternative to undertaking root investigations is to assign appropriate tree protection zones.

This report adopts AS4970-2009, Australian Standard – Protection of trees on development sites as the preferred tree protection method. The method provides a tree protection zone and a tree protection fencing distance (radial measurement from trunk centre) by using the width of the trunk at 1.4m above ground multiplied by 12. The prescribed TPZ distances are provided for each tree in Appendix 1 and they have been provided in GIS and Autocad format as part of the report submission.

There is scope under the standard to reduce the tree protection zone area by 10% without any further investigations. The rationale for any reduced tree protection distance (as may be necessary for some trees) is detailed in AS4970-2009 (Australian Standard – Protection of trees on development sites). Under encroachment Type A, it is acceptable to reduce the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) area by 10%. This translates to a reduction in radial clearance distance of approximately 33% on one side of the tree only. This can be applied if there is contiguous space around the tree for root development to occur. The following diagram (from AS4970-2009) is provided to illustrate the approach.



9 Recommendations

9.1 The tree assessment and report provides a condition snapshot and landscape composition of the trees located on the review site. The survey detail collected provides an opportunity for the site managers to address the management of individual trees, and it may lend support to decisions regarding the future composition of the landscape. The detail provided at Appendix 1 can be interrogated to implement a management program, or to assist with planning and design issues.

9.2 The broad nature of vegetation controls that apply to the site are complicated by exemptions that apply under Clause 52.48 of the Victoria Planning Provisions (Bushfire Protection: Exemptions), plus there is a large number of environmental weeds present across the individual properties. Furthermore, the influence of Clause 52.17 (Native vegetation) only applies to native indigenous trees on parcels of land greater than 0.4ha, and it is difficult to determine how the individual land parcels might be considered in this respect. Considering the complex interactions of these various planning controls, interpretations and exemptions, it would appear simpler and more informative to revert to the arboricultural assessment retention values as a means of determining what trees could or should be considered for retention from an arboricultural perspective.

9.3 The following 33 trees were assigned a ‘Moderate’ retention value and they should be considered for retention:

Tree 45, 54, 58, 62, 77, 110, 116, 124, 136, 143, 144, 152, 158, 161, 166, 167, 173, 215, 222, 234, 245, 312, 313, 319, 326, 389, 390, 392, 393, 394, 407, 413, 464

The plans at Appendix 3a - 3d show all of the assessed trees and their Tree Protection Zones. The plans at Appendix 3e – 3h highlight the Tree Protection Zone for ‘Moderate’ retention value trees and trees in the ‘Low’ retention value ‘Could be retained’ category.

9.4 The following 87 trees were assigned a ‘Low’ retention value and they received a recommendation of ‘Could be retained’. This group contained trees that were either; in poor condition, undesirable species, or trees that were small and easily replaceable. Trees in this category do not generally deserve design modifications or adjustments to assist with their retention because this effort would generally be considered disproportionate to their value. However, if there is scope to easily retain trees from this category in the design, this should be considered. A large proportion of trees in this group are indigenous trees that might be

Type A Type B



considered to have broader values beyond those considered under arboricultural assessment criteria.

Tree 1, 12, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 37, 38, 43, 44, 51, 55, 56, 57, 59, 60, 64, 74, 75, 76, 80, 82, 88, 90, 91, 118, 119, 120, 125, 126, 135, 145, 157, 159, 160, 168, 169, 171, 172, 187, 189, 192, 195, 211, 213, 216, 218, 219, 220, 221, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 235, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 281, 282, 299, 300, 309, 311, 325, 328, 331, 351, 359, 415, 439, 440

9.5 The following 35 ‘Low’ retention value trees were in poor condition and they are recommended

for removal. Poor structure was the primary reason for recommending removal for the majority of the trees in this category.

Tree 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 20, 21, 25, 26, 36, 40, 41, 42, 50, 78, 84, 129, 131, 164, 165, 193, 212, 233, 237, 248, 249, 251, 256, 327, 329, 404, 416, 448

9.6 The following 295 trees were assigned a retention value of ‘None’ or ‘Low (none)’ in the specific case of the species Leptospermum laevigatum. This group included dead trees, trees in very poor condition and tree species that are recognised as woody or environmental weeds. Under normal best practice management, trees that are assigned a retention value of ‘None’ would be removed and replaced regardless of any proposed site changes.

Tree 4, 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 33, 34, 35, 39, 46, 47, 48, 49, 52, 53, 61, 63, 65, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 79, 81, 83, 85, 86, 87, 89, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 111, 112, 113, 114, 117, 121, 122, 123, 127, 128, 130, 132, 133, 134, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154, 155, 156, 162, 163, 170, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 188, 190, 191, 194, 197, 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 214, 217, 236, 246, 247, 250, 252, 253, 254, 255, 257, 258, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 310, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 330, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 349, 350, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 361, 363, 364, 365, 366, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 387, 388, 391, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 401, 402, 403, 405, 406, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 414, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463 & 465

9.7 The following 12 street trees and 7 neighbouring trees would need to be considered in the

design response. A large number of other street trees and neighbouring trees would also need to be considered in any proposed design, but they have not been assessed in this report.

6, 66, 115, 174, 196, 346, 347, 348, 360, 362, 367, 368, 369, 386, 400, 466, 467, 468 & 469

9.8 The following 45 trees are influenced by Mornington Peninsula Shire Environmental

Significance Overlay (ESO) and Schedule 17 to the Overlay (ESO17). The dominant species in this group was Eucalyptus ovata (Swamp Gum). The majority of trees in this group were in the ‘Low’ retention value ‘Could be retained’ category. There may be exemptions that apply to



a proportion of these trees under Clause 52.48 of the Victoria Planning Provisions (Bushfire Protection: Exemptions).

Tree 62, 75, 76, 77, 78, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241, 242, 243, 244, 245 & 246

Dean Simonsen (BAppSc Melb.) Consultant Arborist

10 References

Australian Standard – AS 4373, 2007, Pruning of Amenity Trees, Standards Australia. Australian Standard AS 4970, 2009. Protection of trees on development sites. Standards Australia

Mattheck, C. & Breloer, H. (1996) The body language of trees – A handbook for failure analysis, Third Impression. HSMO The Stationery Office, London.

11 Definitions

The TPZ and SRZ are defined in AS4970-2009, Australian Standard – Protection of trees on development sites as: Tree protection zone (TPZ) A specified area above and below ground and at a given distance from the trunk set aside for the protection of a tree’s roots and crown to provide for the viability and stability of a tree to be retained where it is potentially subject to damage by development. Structural root zone (SRZ) The area around the base of a tree required for the tree’s stability in the ground. The woody root growth and soil cohesion in this area are necessary to hold the tree upright. The SRZ is nominally circular with the trunk at its centre and is expressed by its radius in metres. This zone considers a tree’s structural stability only, not the root zone required for a tree’s vigour and long-term viability, which will usually be a much larger area.

Tree Assessment Detail - August 2016 South Eastern Outfall land, Rosebud Appendix 1No. Species Common Name DBH (cm) TPZ -

AS4970 (m)

SRZ - AS4970

(m)

HxW (m) Age Health Structure Form ULE Comment Tree type Retention value Recommend X MGA94 Zone 55

Y MGA94 Zone 55

1 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 41 4.92 2.37 7x8 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Acute branch attachments, Multiple attachments at same point

Indigenous Low Could be retained 317965.459 5751050.961

2 Bursaria spinosa Sweet Bursaria 22 2.64 1.82 9x6 Semi-mature Poor Fair Symmetric 5 to 15 years Dieback Indigenous Low Remove 318073.215 5751057.8603 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 51 6.12 2.60 11x12 Maturing Poor Poor Symmetric 1 to 5 years In severe decline, Bifurcation with

included bark, DiebackIndigenous Low Remove 318114.832 5751056.170

4 Bursaria spinosa Sweet Bursaria 22 2.64 1.82 4x7 Maturing Very Poor Very poor Manipulated 0 years In severe decline, Powerline pruned

Indigenous None Remove 318119.384 5751059.730

5 Acacia longifolia var. sophorae Coast Wattle 30 3.60 2.08 5x7 Maturing Fair Failed Asymmetric 0 years Major limbfall evidence, Active split, Woody weed


6 Acacia pravissima Ovens Wattle 15 2.00 1.55 5x6 Semi-mature Fair Fair Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Victorian native Low Street tree 318142.852 5751060.9897 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 54 6.48 2.66 8x14 Maturing Fair Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Suppressed, On lean Indigenous Low Remove 318159.409 5751056.2308 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 61 7.32 2.80 15x12 Maturing Fair Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Bifurcation with included bark Indigenous Low Remove 318160.564 5751056.6609 Eucalyptus radiata Narrow-leaved Pepperm 24 2.88 1.89 5x5 Semi-mature Fair Poor Major asymmetry 1 to 5 years Bifurcation with included bark Indigenous Low Remove 318162.023 5751055.88010 Eucalyptus radiata Narrow-leaved Pepperm 26,26 (36.8) 4.42 2.26 8x8 Semi-mature Fair Poor Manipulated 1 to 5 years Powerline pruned, Bifurcation with

included barkIndigenous Low Remove 318163.227 5751056.260

11 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 53,50,50 (88.4) 10.61 3.27 15x18 Maturing Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 1 to 5 years In decline, Dieback, Limbfall evidence

Indigenous Low Remove 318163.821 5751054.401

12 Bursaria spinosa Sweet Bursaria 13 2.00 1.50 7x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 318171.539 5751055.79013 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 22 2.64 1.82 6x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 318183.718 5751057.54014 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20,20,20,20,20 (44.7) 5.36 2.46 7x7 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Multiple bifurcations with included

barkIndigenous Low (none) Could be retained 318184.081 5751059.080

15 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 4x7 Maturing Poor Very poor Major asymmetry 0 years Collapsing Indigenous None Remove 318189.391 5751060.08916 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 35 4.20 2.22 4x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Very poor Manipulated 0 years Previously lopped Indigenous None Remove 318211.581 5751057.43017 Malus sp. Apple 20 2.40 1.75 4x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Very poor Manipulated 0 years Previously lopped Exotic deciduous None Remove 318212.199 5751039.90418 Acacia longifolia var. sophorae Coast Wattle 15 2.00 1.55 5x6 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 0 years Woody weed Indigenous None Remove 318212.166 5751014.68919 Pinus radiata Monterey Pine 40 4.80 2.34 11x9 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Woody weed Exotic conifer None Remove 318212.389 5751007.37020 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 22,19,19 (34.7) 4.16 2.21 11x9 Semi-mature Fair Poor Manipulated 1 to 5 years Bifurcation with included bark,

Previously loppedIndigenous Low Remove 318211.655 5750999.332

21 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 20 2.40 1.75 5x5 Semi-mature Fair Poor Stump re-sprout 1 to 5 years Multi-stemmed Indigenous Low Remove 318108.920 5750996.91222 Eucalyptus obliqua Messmate Stringybark 70,53,36 (94.9) 11.39 3.37 17x18 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Planted, P014120 Victorian native Low Could be retained 318068.367 5750987.59423 Corymbia maculata Spotted Gum 30 3.60 2.08 11x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Basal wound Victorian native Low Could be retained 318068.235 5750984.57524 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 55 6.60 2.68 17x10 Maturing Poor Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Planted, P014122 Indigenous Low Could be retained 318068.235 5750981.61525 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 92 11.04 3.33 17x16 Maturing Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Dieback, Planted, P014122 Indigenous Low Remove 318067.880 5750978.42626 Eucalyptus occidentalis Swamp Yate 81 9.72 3.15 17x16 Maturing Fair Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Limbfall evidence, Previously

loppedAustralian native Low Remove 318047.051 5750985.045

27 Eucalyptus bancroftii Bancroft's Red Gum 21 2.52 1.79 8x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Suppressed Australian native Low Could be retained 318046.590 5750988.37428 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 55 6.60 2.68 17x15 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 318034.377 5750980.49629 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 82 9.84 3.17 17x20 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Limbfall evidence, Contorted form Indigenous Low Could be retained 318031.764 5750982.825

30 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 70,53 (87.8) 10.54 3.26 18x20 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Dieback, Major limbfall evidence Indigenous Low Could be retained 318023.031 5750978.086

31 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 57 6.84 2.72 18x15 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 318022.924 5750980.47632 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 60 7.20 2.78 13x13 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years On lean Indigenous Low Could be retained 318019.675 5750985.96533 Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum 20 2.40 1.75 7x7 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Woody weed Victorian native None Remove 318017.564 5750979.73634 Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum 36 4.32 2.24 8x8 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Woody weed Victorian native None Remove 318002.491 5750976.93635 Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum 25 3.00 1.92 8x7 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Symmetric 15 to 30 years Woody weed Victorian native None Remove 318000.141 5750978.97636 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 25 3.00 1.92 7x8 Semi-mature Very Poor Poor Major asymmetry 1 to 5 years Indigenous Low Remove 317988.860 5750984.98537 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 32 3.84 2.13 8x9 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years On acute lean Indigenous Low Could be retained 317985.867 5750985.60538 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 56 6.72 2.70 10x10 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317985.109 5750984.68539 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 25,20 (32) 3.84 2.13 8x9 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Very poor Stump re-sprout 0 years Dieback Indigenous None Remove 317986.618 5750980.56640 Fraxinus 'Raywood' Claret Ash 25 3.00 1.92 7x7 Semi-mature Poor Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Dieback Exotic deciduous Low Remove 317982.701 5750983.62541 Syzygium smithii Lilly Pilly 20,44,14 (50.3) 6.04 2.58 6x4 Semi-mature Fair Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Multi-stemmed from base Victorian native Low Remove 317977.176 5750980.69642 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 53,45 (69.5) 8.34 2.96 17x14 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Bifurcation of main stem with

included bark, DiebackIndigenous Low Remove 317967.034 5750979.796

43 Corymbia ficifolia Red-flowering Gum 30 3.60 2.08 9x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Multiple attachments at same point

Australian native Low Could be retained 317960.412 5750980.556

44 Cupressus macrocarpa Monterey Cypress 110 13.20 3.59 20x15 Maturing Fair Fair Symmetric 15 to 30 years Exotic conifer Low Could be retained 317955.143 5750985.02545 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 38 4.56 2.29 20x11 Semi-mature Fair Fair Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317951.606 5750984.93546 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30,24 (38.4) 4.61 2.30 8x9 Maturing Fair Very poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Half of tree has failed Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317946.584 5750989.22447 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 22 2.64 1.82 6x4 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317952.274 5750994.20348 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 15 2.00 1.55 2x6 Maturing Fair Poor Major asymmetry 1 to 5 years Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317952.950 5750994.92349 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 5x6 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317950.509 5750996.93250 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 74,55,35,30 (103.1) 12.37 3.49 14x18 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Branch decay cankers, In severe

decline, Major limbfall evidenceIndigenous Low Remove 317951.663 5750997.832

51 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 63,44 (76.8) 9.22 3.08 19x20 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Major limbfall evidence, Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317944.201 5750982.645

52 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 5x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317941.735 5750983.97553 Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum 19 2.28 1.71 8x6 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Symmetric 15 to 30 years Woody weed Victorian native None Remove 317938.495 5750980.87654 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 72 8.64 3.00 21x20 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Limbfall evidence Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317937.951 5750981.32555 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 34 4.08 2.19 8x10 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Suppressed, On acute lean Indigenous Low Could be retained 317935.518 5750982.37556 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 46,22 (51) 6.12 2.60 9x13 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Suppressed, On acute lean Indigenous Low Could be retained 317933.556 5750981.49557 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 39 4.68 2.32 14x12 Semi-mature Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years In decline Indigenous Low Could be retained 317929.301 5750979.21658 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 44 5.28 2.44 14x14 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317924.930 5750980.93659 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 40 4.80 2.34 13x12 Semi-mature Poor Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317923.966 5750977.68660 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 20 2.40 1.75 5x8 Semi-mature Fair Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317921.863 5750981.11661 Acacia floribunda Gossamer Wattle 20 2.40 1.75 4x5 Maturing Dead Poor Major asymmetry 0 years Woody weed Victorian native None Remove 317921.632 5750982.40562 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 49 5.88 2.55 14x14 Semi-mature Fair Fair Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317915.736 5750981.60563 Melaleuca armillaris Bracelet Honey-myrtle 50,40,30 (70.7) 8.48 2.98 9x12 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Woody weed Victorian native None Remove 317911.976 5751042.84364 Acacia melanoxylon Blackwood 23 2.76 1.86 8x7 Semi-mature Fair Fair Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317914.269 5751054.601


AS4970 (m)

SRZ - AS4970

(m)


Y MGA94 Zone 55

65 Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum 25 3.00 1.92 6x6 Semi-mature Fair Fair Symmetric 15 to 30 years Woody weed Victorian native None Remove 317923.141 5751056.45066 Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum 25 3.00 1.92 6x6 Semi-mature Fair Fair Symmetric 15 to 30 years Woody weed Victorian native None Street tree 317924.271 5751059.44067 Acacia longifolia var. sophorae Coast Wattle 30 3.60 2.08 7x7 Maturing Fair Fair Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Woody weed Indigenous None Remove 317931.329 5751054.30168 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 5x6 Maturing Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317901.380 5751053.59169 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 5x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317894.462 5751052.20170 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 6x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317893.266 5751052.89171 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20,20,15 (32) 3.84 2.13 6x5 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317894.520 5751055.50072 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 7x5 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317896.053 5751055.51073 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 8x5 Maturing Fair Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317878.424 5751053.33174 Casuarina cunninghamiana River She-oak 25 3.00 1.92 10x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Australian native Low Could be retained 317878.416 5751054.44175 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 27,27 (38.2) 4.58 2.30 9x9 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317864.422 5751035.90476 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 32,23 (39.4) 4.73 2.33 9x11 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317858.560 5751045.71277 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 68 8.16 2.93 17x17 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317854.643 5751052.92178 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 55 6.60 2.68 9x9 Maturing Very Poor Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years In severe decline Indigenous Low Remove 317860.695 5751055.17079 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 60 7.20 2.78 6x7 Maturing Poor Poor Symmetric 1 to 5 years Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317868.273 5751057.89080 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 68 8.16 2.93 14x13 Maturing Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317847.931 5751043.94381 Acacia longifolia var. sophorae Coast Wattle 30 3.60 2.08 8x7 Maturing Fair Very poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Woody weed Indigenous None Remove 317835.620 5751043.70382 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 70 8.40 2.97 12x13 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317824.463 5751048.96283 Acacia longifolia var. sophorae Coast Wattle 25 3.00 1.92 8x7 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Woody weed Indigenous None Remove 317819.450 5751049.88284 Exocarpos cupressiformis Cherry Ballart 45 5.40 2.46 8x8 Maturing Very Poor Fair to Poor Symmetric 1 to 5 years In severe decline Indigenous Low Remove 317820.398 5751055.79085 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 7x6 Maturing Poor Poor Symmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317811.006 5751058.03086 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 7x6 Maturing Poor Poor Symmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317807.559 5751055.75087 Pinus radiata Monterey Pine 52 6.24 2.62 16x11 Semi-mature Fair Fair Symmetric 30 to 50 years Woody weed Exotic conifer None Remove 317800.138 5751055.10088 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 35,26 (43.6) 5.23 2.43 7x9 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317783.819 5751049.09289 Pittosporum undulatum Sweet Pittosporum 15 2.00 1.55 7x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair Symmetric 15 to 30 years Woody weed Victorian native None Remove 317781.164 5751055.25090 Allocasuarina littoralis Black She-oak 25 3.00 1.92 7x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Victorian native Low Could be retained 317765.555 5751047.02291 Allocasuarina littoralis Black She-oak 25 3.00 1.92 8x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Victorian native Low Could be retained 317766.478 5751048.56292 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 7x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317767.583 5751054.28193 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 7x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317764.351 5751054.23194 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 7x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317754.481 5751054.88195 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 8x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317745.039 5751056.78096 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 8x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317744.091 5751056.42097 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 8x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317743.571 5751056.42098 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 8x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317742.862 5751055.29099 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 4x7 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317739.696 5751055.040100 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 35 4.20 2.22 7x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317739.440 5751056.780101 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 6x7 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317736.249 5751054.591102 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x6 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317736.760 5751055.180103 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 6x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317734.352 5751055.830104 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 6x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317732.843 5751055.320105 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 6x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317732.464 5751055.220106 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 6x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317732.398 5751054.601107 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 35 4.20 2.22 8x7 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317730.155 5751055.610108 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317725.059 5751054.221109 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x5 Semi-mature Poor Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317722.990 5751055.410110 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 67 8.04 2.91 18x20 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Previously lopped Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317720.161 5751053.461111 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x4 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317718.067 5751052.021112 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 7x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317715.140 5751052.301113 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 7x5 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317715.164 5751054.301114 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 45 5.40 2.46 7x8 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317713.705 5751051.811115 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 5x4 Semi-mature Poor Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Indigenous None Neighbour's tree 317711.256 5751052.141116 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 30 3.60 2.08 8x8 Semi-mature Fair Fair Asymmetric 30 to 50 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317713.523 5751043.573117 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 74 8.88 3.04 14x11 Maturing Fair Very poor Asymmetric 0 years Powerline pruned, Fungal bracket

on lower trunkIndigenous None Remove 317709.574 5751040.803

118 Eucalyptus pryoriana Gippsland Manna Gum 37,27 (45.8) 5.50 2.48 12x9 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Powerline pruned Indigenous Low Could be retained 317708.493 5751038.194119 Allocasuarina littoralis Black She-oak 22,20 (29.7) 3.56 2.07 7x6 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Victorian native Low Could be retained 317709.062 5751025.446120 Allocasuarina littoralis Black She-oak 24 2.88 1.89 7x6 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Victorian native Low Could be retained 317708.510 5751026.166121 Acacia longifolia Sallow Wattle 25,23 (34) 4.08 2.19 9x9 Maturing Fair Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Bifurcation with included bark,

Woody weedIndigenous None Remove 317698.260 5750983.065

122 Acacia longifolia Sallow Wattle 30 3.60 2.08 8x9 Maturing Fair Very poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Major limbfall evidence, Bifurcation with included bark, Woody weed


123 Acacia longifolia Sallow Wattle 20 2.40 1.75 5x8 Semi-mature Fair Poor Major asymmetry 1 to 5 years On acute lean, Woody weed Indigenous None Remove 317699.225 5750978.596124 Eucalyptus pryoriana Gippsland Manna Gum 110 13.20 3.59 17x23 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Major limbfall evidence and

associated woundIndigenous Moderate Could be retained 317708.782 5750979.046

125 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 35 4.20 2.22 5x12 Semi-mature Fair Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years On acute lean Indigenous Low Could be retained 317695.968 5750976.456126 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 43 5.16 2.42 10x11 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317696.776 5750974.617127 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 5x7 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317723.089 5750984.495128 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 35 4.20 2.22 7x7 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317726.074 5750984.095129 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 42,39 (57.3) 6.88 2.73 12x12 Semi-mature Fair Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years In decline, Lost main leader Indigenous Low Remove 317726.370 5750981.205130 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 35 4.20 2.22 5x8 Maturing Fair Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317730.526 5750975.217131 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 56,50,46 (88) 10.56 3.26 15x17 Maturing Poor Poor Major asymmetry 1 to 5 years Mistletoe, In decline, Fungal

brackets mid trunkIndigenous Low Remove 317735.086 5750977.936

132 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25,20 (32) 3.84 2.13 8x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317733.223 5750985.095133 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 8x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317733.849 5750987.454134 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 6x7 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317741.122 5750982.075135 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 40,35,30 (61) 7.32 2.80 14x17 Maturing Fair Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Bifurcation with included bark Indigenous Low Could be retained 317730.576 5750995.423136 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 81 9.72 3.15 17x16 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Hollows, Major limbfall evidence Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317743.060 5750975.687

137 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 4x9 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years On acute lean Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317749.294 5750985.825138 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 8x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317750.382 5750978.296


AS4970 (m)

SRZ - AS4970

(m)


Y MGA94 Zone 55

139 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 6x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317752.032 5750975.867140 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 8x7 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317755.330 5750983.895141 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 9x6 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317757.589 5750975.847142 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 7x7 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317760.467 5750975.597143 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 52 6.24 2.62 17x12 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Major limbfall evidence and

associated woundIndigenous Moderate Could be retained 317762.322 5750979.756

144 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 52 6.24 2.62 17x14 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair Symmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317757.268 5750985.985145 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 64,28 (69.9) 8.39 2.96 17x15 Maturing Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Limbfall evidence, In decline Indigenous Low Could be retained 317759.667 5750988.554146 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 35 4.20 2.22 8x7 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317762.454 5750988.654147 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 8x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317762.652 5750985.185148 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 45 5.40 2.46 9x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317768.012 5750983.075149 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 8x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317769.348 5750986.144150 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 45 5.40 2.46 9x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317771.698 5750984.855151 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 8x7 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317771.475 5750989.944152 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 42 5.04 2.39 11x9 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Mistletoe Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317768.507 5750975.707153 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 6x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317772.333 5750974.737154 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 47 5.64 2.51 16x13 Maturing Very Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 0 years Near dead Indigenous None Remove 317777.322 5750979.256155 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 29 3.48 2.05 12x9 Semi-mature Very Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 0 years Near dead Indigenous None Remove 317778.451 5750978.646156 Acacia longifolia Sallow Wattle 20,15 (25) 3.00 1.92 8x9 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Woody weed Indigenous None Remove 317791.092 5750978.436157 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 20 2.40 1.75 8x9 Semi-mature Fair Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317795.273 5750981.905158 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 67,55 (86.7) 10.40 3.24 16x17 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Limbfall evidence Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317798.348 5750976.656159 Banksia integrifolia Coast Banksia 14 2.00 1.51 6x2 Semi-mature Fair Fair Symmetric 30 to 50 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317798.151 5750981.865160 Banksia integrifolia Coast Banksia 14 2.00 1.51 7x2 Semi-mature Fair Fair Symmetric 30 to 50 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317799.849 5750984.445161 Banksia integrifolia Coast Banksia 25 3.00 1.92 9x4 Semi-mature Fair Fair Symmetric 30 to 50 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317794.902 5750988.424162 Acacia longifolia Sallow Wattle 25 3.00 1.92 6x6 Maturing Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Woody weed Indigenous None Remove 317798.472 5750991.463163 Acacia longifolia Sallow Wattle 20 2.40 1.75 8x6 Maturing Poor Poor Major asymmetry 1 to 5 years Woody weed Indigenous None Remove 317799.693 5750990.934164 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 100,87 (132.5) 15.00 3.88 20x21 Maturing Fair Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Fungal bracket upper trunk,

Multiple major limb failuresIndigenous Low Remove 317785.699 5750988.274

165 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 83 9.96 3.19 15x20 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Basal wound, Fungal bracket on lower trunk, Major limbfall evidence and associated wound


166 Banksia integrifolia Coast Banksia 45 5.40 2.46 12x7 Maturing Fair Fair Minor asymmetry 30 to 50 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317776.736 5750993.063167 Banksia integrifolia Coast Banksia 42 5.04 2.39 12x7 Maturing Fair Fair Minor asymmetry 30 to 50 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317765.876 5751014.519168 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 50 6.00 2.57 15x14 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317813.315 5750989.734169 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 65,55 (85.1) 10.21 3.22 11x16 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Laying on ground, Collapsed Indigenous Low Could be retained 317813.941 5750989.114170 Banksia marginata Silver Banksia 15 2.00 1.55 2x1 Semi-mature Dead Failed Symmetric 0 years Stump Indigenous None Remove 317808.746 5750982.785171 Eucalyptus radiata Narrow-leaved Pepperm 47 5.64 2.51 16x14 Maturing Poor Fair Symmetric 5 to 15 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317812.531 5750980.666172 Eucalyptus radiata Narrow-leaved Pepperm 34 4.08 2.19 12x8 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317809.192 5750977.276173 Banksia integrifolia Coast Banksia 52 6.24 2.62 12x9 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317811.253 5750975.777174 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25,25 (35.4) 4.25 2.23 7x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Street tree 317816.654 5750974.827175 Acacia saligna Golden Wreath Wattle 19 2.28 1.71 8x6 Semi-mature Fair Fair Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Woody weed Australian native None Remove 317816.968 5750978.286176 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 8x4 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317817.322 5750978.166177 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 8x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317818.122 5750978.236178 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 8x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317818.798 5750978.406179 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x5 Maturing Very Poor Poor Major asymmetry 0 years Indigenous None Remove 317814.634 5750981.645180 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x5 Maturing Very Poor Poor Asymmetric 0 years Indigenous None Remove 317815.269 5750983.765181 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25,20 (32) 3.84 2.13 9x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317822.179 5750984.655182 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30,30,30,20 (55.7) 6.68 2.69 11x9 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317824.768 5750980.806183 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 9x9 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317823.861 5750977.826184 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 8x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317829.839 5750975.237185 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317828.899 5750975.677186 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 15 2.00 1.55 6x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317828.553 5750975.257187 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 50 6.00 2.57 15x11 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Lost main leader Indigenous Low Could be retained 317829.641 5750983.875188 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 37 4.44 2.27 4x4 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Failed Stump re-sprout 5 to 15 years Lost main leader Indigenous None Remove 317838.506 5750983.445189 Banksia marginata Silver Banksia 22 2.64 1.82 7x6 Maturing Fair Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Basal decay Indigenous Low Could be retained 317838.728 5750982.005190 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30,20,20,20,20 (50) 6.00 2.57 9x10 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317839.734 5750989.794191 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20,20 (28.3) 3.40 2.03 9x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317834.473 5750990.564192 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 75 9.00 3.05 12x14 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317841.293 5750987.384193 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 57 6.84 2.72 10x12 Maturing Very Poor Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years In severe decline, Fungal bracket

on upper branchIndigenous Low Remove 317843.701 5750988.684

194 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 6x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317846.875 5750990.524195 Eucalyptus radiata Narrow-leaved Pepperm 21,12 (24.2) 2.90 1.90 6x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317845.177 5750978.916196 Eucalyptus radiata Narrow-leaved Pepperm 45 5.40 2.46 14x9 Maturing Poor Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Dieback, In severe decline Indigenous Low Neighbour's tree 317850.545 5750974.937197 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 7x4 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317849.407 5750982.755198 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 8x4 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317849.860 5750982.545199 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 8x4 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317850.594 5750982.235200 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 8x4 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317849.976 5750984.295201 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 25 3.00 1.92 8x4 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317852.037 5750986.244202 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 8x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317854.684 5750980.386203 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 6x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317854.239 5750981.136204 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 7x8 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317854.734 5750981.905205 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 7x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317854.552 5750985.965206 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 45 5.40 2.46 7x7 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317854.593 5750986.994207 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317859.698 5750981.695208 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 6x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317860.720 5750981.705209 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 40 4.80 2.34 7x6 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317860.753 5750983.795210 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 20 2.40 1.75 5x3 Maturing Poor Poor Asymmetric 1 to 5 years Indigenous Low (none) Remove 317866.715 5750975.637211 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 50 6.00 2.57 9x9 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317869.155 5750977.236212 Exocarpos cupressiformis Cherry Ballart 20,20,15 (32) 3.84 2.13 5x8 Maturing Fair Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years Collapsing Indigenous Low Remove 317867.853 5750979.346213 Acacia mearnsii Late Black Wattle 38 4.56 2.29 13x10 Maturing Fair Fair Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317869.823 5750984.115


AS4970 (m)

SRZ - AS4970

(m)


Y MGA94 Zone 55

214 Leptospermum laevigatum Coast Tea-tree 30 3.60 2.08 7x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low (none) Could be retained 317868.397 5750984.975215 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 37 4.44 2.27 10x9 Semi-mature Fair Fair Minor asymmetry 30 to 50 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317864.612 5750993.583216 Acacia mearnsii Late Black Wattle 37 4.44 2.27 14x10 Maturing Fair Fair Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317881.104 5750984.105217 Acacia mearnsii Late Black Wattle 40 4.80 2.34 4x8 Maturing Dead Failed Major asymmetry 0 years Collapsed Indigenous None Remove 317885.309 5750984.195218 Melaleuca ericifolia Swamp Paperbark 20 2.40 1.75 7x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317888.467 5750988.634219 Melaleuca ericifolia Swamp Paperbark 20 2.40 1.75 6x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317887.008 5750992.343220 Banksia integrifolia Coast Banksia 18 2.16 1.68 7x5 Semi-mature Fair Fair to Poor Asymmetric 30 to 50 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317882.695 5750986.794221 Melaleuca ericifolia Swamp Paperbark 20 2.40 1.75 6x5 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Indigenous Low Could be retained 317886.183 5751000.262222 Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum 98 11.76 3.42 18x19 Maturing Fair Fair to Poor Minor asymmetry 30 to 50 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317877.673 5750996.362223 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 33 3.96 2.16 12x8 Semi-mature Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317876.750 5751003.601224 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 42 5.04 2.39 15x10 Semi-mature Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317879.413 5751007.850225 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 44 5.28 2.44 12x14 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years On acute lean, Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317874.012 5751004.961226 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 37 4.44 2.27 11x12 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 5 to 15 years On acute lean, Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317868.479 5751011.579227 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 51 6.12 2.60 14x12 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Symmetric 15 to 30 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317870.648 5751013.219228 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 29 3.48 2.05 12x12 Semi-mature Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Major asymmetry 15 to 30 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317871.184 5751014.559229 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 46 5.52 2.49 12x11 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317868.949 5751018.068230 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 20 2.40 1.75 4x7 Semi-mature Poor Poor Major asymmetry 1 to 5 years On acute lean, Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317868.908 5751018.688231 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 47 5.64 2.51 12x11 Maturing Fair to Poor Poor Asymmetric 5 to 15 years Major limbfall evidence, Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317863.515 5751019.938

232 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 59,27 (64.9) 7.79 2.87 13x14 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair to Poor Asymmetric 15 to 30 years Dieback Indigenous Low Could be retained 317860.044 5751014.999233 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 71,63,59 (111.8) 13.42 3.61 15x16 Maturing Poor Poor Minor asymmetry 5 to 15 years Dieback, Multi-stemmed from

base, Fungal bracket on lower trunk


234 Eucalyptus ovata Swamp Gum 45 5.40 2.46 15x12 Maturing Fair to Poor Fair Minor asymmetry 15 to 30 years Indigenous Moderate Could be retained 317868.875 5751028.106235 Acacia mear

arboricultural assessment & report south eastern outfall land, rosebud · 2018. 1. 15. ·...

Documents