aqueous two phase extraction

27
resented by: gendra P PBT204 Tech Pharmaceutical Biotechnology INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY

Upload: nagendra-p

Post on 12-Apr-2017

79 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Presented by:Nagendra P16PBT204M.Tech Pharmaceutical Biotechnology

INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY

Page 2: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Monoclonal Antibodies

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are established medicines that are being safely produced by big pharma companies in quantities up to several tons per year.

Despite their effectiveness and safety as therapeutic agents, mAbs are amongst the most expensive drugs on the market

Given their low potency and increasing market potential, large amounts of pure mAbs are thus required.

This increasing product demand has been challenging biotechnologists to increase production capacity, improve purification technologies and reduce manufacturing costs.

Page 3: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Up to now, protein A affinity chromatography has been considered the most effective technology in the downstream processing of mAbs.

It accounts for more than 50% of the entire downstream processing costs.

In fact, the current DSP technologies are unable to cope not only with the high titers, but also with the large cell densities, which are challenging traditional solid–liquid technologies, resulting in poor yields.

Page 4: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

What is Aqueous Two Phase Extraction? To extract biologically active polymers such as proteins, enzymes and nucleic acids

it is necessary to have a two-phase system, which will not denature the biopolymers.

The separation of two or more components from a liquid mixture into two immiscible liquid phases, based on their unequal solubility is known as aqueous two phase extraction.

Aqueous two phase partitioning of biomolecules is a well established process which was first introduced by Albertson.

It is a type of liquid – liquid extraction method which makes use of two aqueous phases.

In aqueous bi-phase extraction, the basic principle involves the differential partitioning of desired proteins in to two immiscible phases extracted from an aqueous feed containing a complex mixture of proteins. Both the phases contain distinct polymers or polymer and salt and are relatively rich in water (80-85% content) and do not denature proteins and other biopolymers.

Page 5: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

It has many advantages like simple and benign technique (presence of more than 80% water in both phases), rapid separation with little denaturation (volatile organic components are not used), rapid mass transfer (low interfacial tension), selective separation (affinity partition) and easy scale up.

Therefore, ATPS has been applied in several fields of biotechnology such as recovery of proteins, enzymes, biopharmaceuticals and extractive fermentation.

Two types of aqueous two-phase systems are commonly used:

1. Polymer-polymer two-phase system (e.g Polyethylene glycol/Dextran)

2. Polymer-salt two-phase system (e.g Polyethylene glycol/phosphate)

A polymer-polymer two phase system can for instance be obtained by mixing dextran and PEG at a certain composition. By adding specific amounts of these polymers to an aqueous feed phase (which contains the solute), two aqueous phases, one rich in PEG and the other rich in dextran is obtained.

Page 6: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction
Page 7: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Phase Diagram

The miscibility range and the formation of aqueous two-phase systems between two phase forming polymer-polymer or polymer-solute combinations depends on their concentration ratios and it is discussed with the help of phase diagrams.

A mixture represented by point B with a composition of 85% water+5% PEG+10% dextran, is below the binodal curve and is not stable as a homogeneous phase.

It will separate into two phases, one phase with 90% water+10% PEG (represented by point C in the phase diagram) and a second phase with 80% water+ 19% dextran + 1% PEG (represented by point D in the phase diagram).

Page 8: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction
Page 9: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Present discussion

Aqueous two-phase systems (ATPS) allow for the simultaneous purification, concentration, and clarification of bioproducts by direct extraction of the target product from the cell culture media in a system composed by an aqueous solution of two polymers or a polymer and a salt.

This paper demonstrated the use of an affinity dual ligand, the LYTAG-Z, which is composed of a choline binding polypeptide tag (C-LytA) fused to the synthetic antibody binding Z-domain, for mAbs purification from complex media using PEG and EOPO containing ATPSs.

Page 10: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

C-LytA C-LytA is the C-terminal region of the LytA amidase enzyme

isolated from Streptococcus pneumonia.

LytA amidase enables the attachment of this enzyme to the phosphocholine residues present on the teichoic acids of the cell wall surface.

Structurally, C-LytA is built up from six conserved b-hairpins that form four choline-binding sites.

This module’s affinity for choline and choline structural analogs (e.g. ternary amines) has been used for the purification of C-LytA tagged proteins by adsorption to amine-based chromatographic resins (e.g. DEAE cellulose) followed by elution with choline.

Page 11: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Z domainZ-domain is a synthetic IgG-binding peptide based on the B-domain of staphylococcal protein A.

In this paper, C-LytA was fused to the Z domain and used as a dual affinity ligand for mAbs purification from complex media through aqueous two-phase extraction.

Once the two-phase system is generated, it is expected to obtain LYTAG-Z-antibody complexes in the PEG rich-phase, while cells and other impurities partition to the opposite phase.

Page 12: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Experiments 1. CHEMICALSMonobasic and dibasic potassium phosphatesodium chloridePEG 3350dextran 500,000polyacrylic acid sodium salt (NaPAA) 8000Ethylene oxide/propylene oxide co-polymers (EOPO) 2. BIOLOGICSHuman immunoglobulin was obtained from Octapharma (Lachen, Switzerland) as a commercially available solution for therapeutic administration (Gammanorm), in which the active substance has a concentration of 165 mg/mL, and at least 95% corresponds to immunoglobulin G (IgG).

Page 13: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

CHO cell supernatant was produced and delivered by IcoSagen (Tartumaa, Estonia). This supernatant contains a humanized monoclonal antibody, from IgG1 sub-class.

Hybridoma cells were grown in a mixture of two different media, composed of 25% (v/v) of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) high glucose (Gibco) and 75% (v/v) of CD Hybridoma medium (Gibco). The IgG produced is a mouse anti-human CD34+ antibody.

3. LYTAG-ZThe LYTAG-Z fusion protein (245 aa, 28.39 kDa, theoretical pI 4.88) was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified using CascadeTM/LYTAG technologies.

4. ATPS formulationFour different types of ATPS were formulated: 1. PEG/phosphate,2. PEG/dextran, 3. EOPO/dextran and 4. EOPO/NaPAA.

Page 14: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Each ATPS system was thoroughly studied using a factorial design and the best formulation found for each ATPS was:

1. 12.5% (w/w) PEG and 12.5% (w/w) potassium phosphate; 2. 7% (w/w) PEG and 6% (w/w) dextran; 3. 10% (w/w) EOPO and 10% (w/w) dextran; 4. 10% (w/w) EOPO and 10% (w/w) NaPAA.

The corresponding biological sample (pure human serum antibodies, clarified CHO cell culture supernatant or unclarified Hybridoma cell culture media) was loaded at 20% (w/w).

The LYTAG-Z ligand (600 mg/L) was also loaded at 20% (w/w) of the system, to assure a molar ratio of antibody to LYTAG-Z of 1:10. The system was completed to 2 g with milli-Q water.

Page 15: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

The ATPS were afterward mixed by vortex and phases coalescence was achieved letting the systems settle for 30 min.

Control systems were prepared without LYTAG-Z and used to assess the effectiveness of the dual ligand.

Blank systems were prepared without biological sample and LYTAG-Z and used to evaluate and discount the interference of the phase forming components in the analytical methods.

Page 16: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

5. Cell counting The total number of cells present in the top and bottom phases was counted using a hemocytometer by trypan blue dye exclusion method.

6. Protein G affinity chromatographyIgG concentration was determined by affinity chromatography. POROS protein G affinity column was used.The column was equilibrated with an adsorption buffer composed by 50 mM NaH2PO4, 150 mM NaCl at pH 7.4. Samples were diluted ten times in the adsorption buffer. Elution was achieved with 12 mM HCl with 150 mM NaCl at pH 2–3. A calibration curve from 0.2 to 20 mg/L was made using Gammanorm IgG. Absorbance was monitored at 215 nm.

Page 17: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

7. Total protein concentrationTotal protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method . Briefly, 50 lL of sample, previously 4 times diluted, were mixed with 250 µL of Bradford reagent in a 96-well microplate. The microplate was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Absorbance was measured at 595 nm. A calibration curve from 5 to 400 mg/L was made using BSA. Samples containing biological product were read against blanks prepared with the same ATPS composition.

Page 18: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

8. Extraction performance parameters To evaluate the performance of the ligand in the different systems, the partition coefficient, the recovery yield and the purity of IgG were calculated.

Kp = IgG concentration in the top phase IgG concentration in the bottom phase.

Recovery yield (%)=the mass of IgG in the top (or bottom) phase the total mass of IgG added to the system

Purity(%) = IgG concentration in the top (or bottom) phaseto total protein concentrations in the top (or bottom) phase

Page 19: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Results and discussionSelection of the ATPS based on its structural analogy to cholineCholine is an amino alcohol that seems to play an essential role in the protection of the hydrophobic zones present in the choline binding sites of C-LytA.

Choline also induces dimerization of the monomer low-active form into a homodimer fully active form, resulting also in a significant increase in the stability of the protein.

Choline binding occurs through hydrophobic and cation–Π interactions.

It has been suggested that PEG interacts with the choline-binding site through hydrophobic and CH-Π interactions that mimic the cation-Π.

Page 20: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Affinity extraction studiesThe partitioning of pure human serum antibodies was studied within eight different ATPS:

1. PEG/ phosphate, 2. PEG/dextran, 3. Three different EOPO/dextran and 4. Three EOPO/NaPAA systems.

To assess the effect of LYTAG-Z on IgG partition behavior, the partition coefficient (Kp) was determined.

As seen in Fig. 1A, the presence of the ligand affected the partition of the antibody towards the top phase.

Page 21: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Fig. 1. Effect of LYTAG-Z on the partitioning (log Kp) of (A) pure human serum antibodies and (B) antibodies from CHO cell clarified supernatant in different ATPS: ( ) in the absence and ( ) in the presence of 20% LYTAG-Z. The following systems composition as used: 12.5% PEG and 12.5% phosphate; 7% PEG and 6% dextran; 10% EOPO and 10% dextran; 10% EOPO and 10% NaPAA. All systems contained 20% of sample loading.

Page 22: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Despite the substantial increase in the Kp values noticed in the presence of the ligand, the log Kp of IgG remained negative, which meant that although the concentration of IgG in the top phase had considerably increased, the concentration of IgG in the bottom phase was still very high (although smaller) than in the top phase.

The electrostatic interaction between the positively charged IgG and the negatively charged phosphate ions enhance the partition of IgG to the bottom phosphate-rich phase, even in the presence of LYTAG-Z.

Regarding the EOPO/NaPAA systems, as NaPAA is a negatively charged polymer, electrostatic interactions between NaPAA and the positively charged IgG will also favor the partition of the antibody molecules to the NaPAA-rich (bottom) phase.

(Fig. 1B)For the remaining systems an increase in the log Kp is observed but once again the effect of the ligand it is not enough to pull all the antibody molecules to the top phase and the log Kp remains negative.

Page 23: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Clarification of animal cell culturesThe possibility to treat unclarified antibody crude stocks and to integrate in one single operation clarification and partial purification without requiring a cell removal step upstream is one of the major advantages of ATPS.

Fig. 2 shows microscopy images of the top, interface and bottom phase from the system, confirming that Hybridoma cells partition preferentially towards the interface or to the bottom phase. Less than 5% of the cells were found in the top phase, which allowed a clarification higher than 95%.

Page 24: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Based on these partitioning studies, PEG/dextran ATPS showed to be a promising system for mAbs recovery from a complex non-clarified cell culture, taking advantage of the dual ligand.It is important to note that the cell culture has an initial IgG purity of around 25%, which means that with this single ATPS step we achieved not only the clarification and capture of the antibody but also an almost 2-fold increase in the purity.

Page 25: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

ConclusionThe dual ligand LYTAG-Z has shown to enhance the partition of antibodies towards the choline structural analogue rich-phase (PEG and EOPO).In the absence of LYTAG-Z, antibodies shown to preferentially partition to the bottom phases, presenting a negative log Kp, andIn the presence of the ligand this value increased for all the tested systems.The successfully partition of mAbs to the PEG rich-phase was accomplished using 7% PEG 3350 and 6% Dextran that allows an increase in the partition coefficient of one order of magnitude.An IgG recovery yield of 89% was obtained with a 42% of purity, from a cell containing medium.The possibility of recovering the ligand for further processes is also a great advantage of this approach.

Page 26: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

Referenceshttp://www.topbritishinnovations.org/pastinnovations/monoclonalantibodieshttp://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=4IWThttp://www.rcsb.org/pdb/explore/explore.do?structureId=1BDChttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24138575https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixer-settlerCampos-Pinto, I., Espitia-Saloma, E., Rosa, S. A., Rito-Palomares, M., Aguilar, O., Arévalo-Rodríguez, M., ... & Azevedo, A. M. (2017). Integration of cell harvest with affinity-enhanced purification of monoclonal antibodies using aqueous two-phase systems with a dual tag ligand. Separation and Purification Technology, 173, 129-134.Azevedo, A. M., Rosa, P. A., Ferreira, I. F., & Aires-Barros, M. R. (2009). Chromatography-free recovery of biopharmaceuticals through aqueous two-phase processing. Trends in biotechnology, 27(4), 240-247.

Page 27: Aqueous Two Phase Extraction

THANK YOU