apt workshop on digital student benchmarking tool and tracker

24
Benchmarking the Digital Student experience: an update from Jisc Helen Beetham Sarah Knight Tabetha Newman

Upload: helen-beetham

Post on 13-Apr-2017

405 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Benchmarking the Digital Student experience: an update from Jisc

Helen Beetham Sarah KnightTabetha Newman

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

Background

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 23

http://digitalstudent.jiscinvolve.org

» ‘Digital Student’ project› Four studies: HE, FE, Adult and Skills, and Online learners

(also a review of practice in schools)› Involved: Lit reviews, reviews of institutional data,

student interviews/focus groups, consultation events (1000+), exemplars

Stop press! #OLsuccess is next› Identified: 7 Challenge areas, 12 Themes› Produced: a range of resources

What do we mean by ‘digital students’??

» Learning in digital organisations› Student identity mediated via digital systems: registration,

records, library, timetable, VLE, assessment... › Learning journey - first contact

to alumnus - mediated online› Online sources of learning and

know-how - integrated/competing› Digital technologies, media, skills

central to most subjects studied› Organisational ‘performance’

digitally monitored and measured

What do we mean by ‘digital students’??

» Learning with their own digital devices,services, practices and expectations (e.g.)› always connected› information <-> communication› continuous recording and sharing› seamless inter-connectivity› ‘content is free’› rapid feedback› ease of adoption› ...

What do we mean by ‘digital students’??

› less secure› more entrepreneurial› fragmented› uncertainly located› reputation-based› monitored, quantified› distributed human/machine

» Preparing for digital work/places

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

Outcomes and deliverables

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 23

Digital students are different

Jisc Digital Student http://digitalstudent.jiscinvolve.org.uk

unconnected and

vulnerable

Access-led

Access conceived of broadly

9

mainstream pragmatist

Tutor-ledPedagogy –ledInstitution-led

Staff offer range of activities and

tools

intensive and specialist enthusiast

Learner-led

Social digital practices are

valued

Learners who are:

Experience the digital environment as:

Learn best when:

Digital students are different

Outcomes: 7 challenge areas

» Joined-up approach» Prepare and progress students» Develop staff skills» Relevant digital curriculum» Digital environment and BYO» Inclusion» Student empowerment and

partnership

Deliverables

» 60+ institutional exemplars (HE and FE)» ‘Digital Students are Different’ posters» ‘Enhancing the Digital Experience for Students’ cards» ‘The Student Digital Experience in 2020’» ‘Enhancing the student digital experience: a strategic

approach’ guide: jisc.ac.uk/guides/enhancing-the-student-digital-experience

» Benchmarking tool developed in collaboration w. NUS» Digital Student Experience Tracker (pilot)

Digital students are different posters

12

Discussion cards for staff/students

13

Benchmarking tool

14

» How might you use this at your institution?

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

At your tables

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

»How might the Benchmarking tool be useful at your institution?»What issues would you want to focus on?

12

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

Development of the Tracker»Consultations 2014-2015: demand for

a better understanding of learners' digital experiences and expectations

»No standard reliable instrument»Tracker questions based on research by

the Jisc Digital student project, inc. studies of learners in HE, FE and skills

»Consultation workshop with staff and students refined the proposed question set to 12 key questions

»Cognitive interviewing with FE and HE students, and early beta testing further refined the questions for piloting

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 8

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

The Tracker questions1.Access to digital devices, personal and institutional2.Access to digital services3.Digital activities in courses of study4.Guidance and support5.Overall digital experience6.STOP7.START8.KEEP9. (11) Value of VLE/LMS

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 8

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

Aims of the Tracker»gather evidence from learners about

their digital experience, and track changes over time

»make better informed decisions about the digital environment

» target resources for improving digital provision

»plan other research, data gathering and student engagement around digital issues

»demonstrate quality enhancement and student engagement to external bodies and to students themselves

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 8

Reasons for engaging with the Tracker

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

Aims of the Tracker

Early findings:» Big appetite for sector benchmarking» Infrastructure, curriculum and

strategy development - plus ‘understand’ student experience

»Desire for a student-facing ‘digital capabilities’ tool to use alongside the Tracker

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 8

Reasons for engaging with the Tracker

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

Piloting the Tracker» Survey implemented in BOS,

a system developed for UK HE/FEand already used by many

»50+ education providers applied:24 chosen based on a spread ofinstitutional sizes, types andlocations

» Pilot sites required to involvestakeholders, consider how theywould engage learners, and explorehoped-for benefits

»Teams at each pilot site responsible for: customising the survey, releasing it to learners, maximising completion rates and analysing their own data

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 9

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

Support for the pilot

» Six separate guides produced to support the pilot process and to ensure parity of data collected

» Sites had only the guides and collective email/blog postings to reproduce service delivery

» Project negotiated for sector benchmarking data to be made available within BOS

» Pilot sites took different approachesto engaging stakeholders and eliciting learner responses

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 10

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

Where we are today»10,753 unique data sets» Initial data report released,

press released» Each site achieved a good

response rate: analysing,understanding andresponding to their data

» Feedback about the pilotprocess (18 out of 24 sites)

»The experience of sixcontrasting sites is beingexplored in more detail,including feedback from learners and other stakeholders

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016 11

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

More information

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

» Full report is available from:http://bit.ly/student-tracker-report

» Further information about the pilot and the process:http://bit.ly/jiscdigidataservice

12

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

At your tables

22/06/2016

Student digital experience tracker pilot results 2016

»How might the Tracker be useful at your institution?»What would you most want to find out from your

learners?

12