april4, 2014 mr. mark dimondstein president ... · as information, enclosed is a copy of first post...
TRANSCRIPT
April4, 2014
Mr. Mark Dimondstein President American Postal Workers
Union, AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128
Dear Mark:
Certified Mail Tracking Number: 70131090000244358694
As information, enclosed is a copy of First Post Implementation Review (PIR) for the Terre Haute, Indiana, Processing and Distribution Facility (P&DF), (SCF 478), into the Indianapolis IN, Processing and Distribution Center (P&DC) Area Mail Processing (AMP).
In accordance with the Non-disclosure Agreement February 11, 2013 the Postal Service is providing both redacted and un-redacted copies of the PIR.
If there are any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7 412.
Sincerely,
Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)
Enclosures
(CA2014-293)
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Facility Name & Type: Terre Haute P&DF
Street Address: 150 W Margaret Drive City: Terre Haute
State: IN 50 Facility ZIP Code: 47802
District: Greater Indiana Area: Great Lakes
Finance Number: 17-8695 Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 475, 478
Miles to Gaining Facility: 72 Miles EXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager: Senior Plant Manager: Jeff Mitchell
District Manager: Larry Diegel
Facility Name & Type: Indianapolis P&DC Street Address: 125 W South St
City: Indianapolis State: IN
50 Facility ZIP Code: 46206 District: Greater Indiana
Area: Great Lakes Finance Number: 17-4038
Current 3D ZIP Code(s): 460- 462 EXFC office: Yes
Plant Manager: Jeff Mitchell Senior Plant Manager: Jeff Mitchell
District Manager: Larry Diegel
Approval Date: February 20, 2012 Implementation Date: Jul-01-2013
PIR Type: 1st PIR
Redacted
Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013: Dec-31-2013 Processing Days per Year: 310
Bargaining Unit Hours per Year: 1,745 EAS Hours per Year: 1,819
Date of DAR Factors/Cost of Borrowing!
New Facility Start-up Costs Update June 16, 2011
Date & Time this workbook was last saved: l 03-19-2014 09:13
Area Vice President: Vice President, Network Operations:
Area AMP Coordinator: NAI Contact:
Jacqueline Krage Stako David E. Williams Stefanie Cherry Jugh Bedi I Todd Katkow
PIR Data Entry Page
Approval Signatures
2
Executive Summary Last Saved: March 19, 2014 Date Range of Data:
Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:
City:
State:
Current SCF ZIP Code(s):
Type of Distribution Consolidated:
Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:
City:
Savings/Costs
Staffing
Service
Function 1 Workhour Savings
Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint!Trans)
PCES/EAS Workhour Savings
Transportation Savings
Maintenance Savings
Space Savings
Total Annual Savings
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Savings
Craft Position Loss
PCES/EAS Position Loss
FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 0/N)
FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 2 Day)
FCM Service Performance (EXFC & PFCM 3 Day)
Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Residential at PFC level
Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction Small Business at PFC level
1st PIR vs Pre AMP 1st PIR vs Approved
Losing Current Qtr Gaining Current Qtr
98.16% 96.77%
91.70% 93.71%
89.17% 91.18%
PIR Type: 1st PIR Jul-01-2013 Dec-31-2013
from Workhour Costs- Combined
from Other Curr vs Prop
from Other Curr vs Prop
from Transportation HCR and Transportation PVS
from Maintenance
from Space Evaluation and Other Costs
from Space Evaluation and Other Costs
from Stafffng-Craft
from Stafffng-PCESIEAS
from SeNice Performance & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
from Service Performance & CSM
PIR Executive Summary
Calculation Beferences Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: Pre AMP Proposed 1st PIR
Function 1 Workhour Costs $55,073,389 $51,736,079 $51 ,455, 106 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs
$1,935,055 $1,804,604 $2,014,646 (less Maintenance & Transportation)
PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $7,841,264 $7,565,683 $7,149,892 Transportation Costs $61,425,574 $60,753,008 $63,203,871
Maintenance Costs $18,608,955 $17,975,166 $18,487,806 Space Savings $0 $0 $0
Total Annual Cost $144,884,239 $139,834,540 $142,311,321
Total One-Time Costs $54,536
Total First Year Costs $144,884,239 $140,112,129 $142,365,857
Staffing
Craft Position Total On-Rolls 1,037 979 921 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 72 72.59018643 56
1st PIR vs Proposed 1st PIR vs Pre-AMP {At;!t;!roved) AMP Approved AMP
Function 1 Workhour Savings $3,618,283 $280,974 $3,337,310 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings ($79,591) ($210,042) $130,451 (less MaintfTrans)
PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $691,373 $415,792 $275,581 Transportation Savings ($1 ,778,297) ($2,450,863) $672,567
Maintenance Savings $121,149 ($512,640) $633,790 Space Savings $0 $0 $0
Total Annual Savings $2,572,918 ($2,476,781) $5,049,698
Total One-Time Costs ($54,536) $223,053 ($277,589)
Total First Year $2,518,382 $4,772,109
Staffing Craft Position Loss 116 58 58
PCES/EAS Position Loss 16 17 ( 1)
PIR Executive Summary
Summary Narrative Last Saved: March 19, 2014
Losing Facility Name and Type: Terre Haute P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 475, 478
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest
Gaining Facility Name and Type: Indianapolis P&DC Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 460- 462
Background; The Greater Indiana District, with assistance from the Great Lakes Area, has completed the first (six-month) Post Implementation Review (PIR) of the Terre Haute, IN Processing and Distribution Facility (P&DF) Area Mail Processing (AMP). The first PIR projects a full year savings and determines whether the Postal Service increased efficiency by consolidating originating and destinating mail processing operations from SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to the Indianapolis P&DC. The data for the first PIR period is July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.
Prior to the AMP, Terre Haute, IN P&DF processed originating and destinating volumes for service areas 4 75 and 4 78. Terre Haute P&DF's originating Priority mail volume was processed at the Indianapolis P&DC on Saturdays.
Terre Haute, IN P&DF completed transfer of originating and destinating letter, flat, Priority and Express mail volumes from SCF 478 to the Indianapolis P&DC, located approximately 72 miles away, in April of 2013. In June of 2013, Terre Haute, IN P&DF transferred originating and destinating letter, flat, Priority and Express mail volumes from SCF 475 to the Evansville, IN P&DF, which is approximately 109 miles away.
Terre Haute, IN P&DF is a postal owned facility that currently houses a retail unit and BMEU in addition to being utilized as a transfer and distribution hub.
Financial savings for the consolidation of the originating and destinating SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC are:
Financial Summary;
Calculation References Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data:
Function 1 Workhour Costs
Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs (less Maintenance & Transportation)
PCES/EAS Workhour Costs
Transportation Costs
Maintenance Costs
Space Savings
Total Annual Cost
Total One-Time Costs
Total First Year Costs
PreAMP
$55,073,389
$1,935,055 $7,841,264
$61,425,574 $18,608,955
$0 $144,884,239
$144,884,239
Proposed
$51,736,079
$1,804,604 $7,565,683
$60,753,008 $17,975,166
$140,112,129
Total Annual Savings: 1•• PIR vs. Pre-AMP $2,572,918
tst PIR vs. Approved ($2,476,781) $223,053 Total One-Time Cost: $54,536
Total First Year Savings: $2,518,382 ($2,253, 727)
1st PIR
$51,455,106
$2,014,646 $7,149,892
$63,203,871 $18,487,806
$54,536
$142,365,857
1st PIR vs. Adjusted $5,897,018 $54,536 $5,842,482
The total projected first year savings of $2,518,382 is below the expected savings of $4,772,109. This loss is attributed primarily to a $3,324,100 increase in PVS and HCR transportation costs outside the scope of the
PIR Summary Narrative
AMP. Adjusting for these non-AMP related costs, the 1st PIR to Pre-AMP first year savings would be $5,842,482.
Customer Service Considerations: Terre Haute P&DF service performance fell in the two and three day service category. In an effort to improve performance, the district completed internal audits on the Terre Haute P&DF mail flow, adjusted transportation dispatch times and changed the containerization of mail destined for the Terre Haute P&DF hub. As a result, services score are starting to return to pre-AMP levels.
Service performance at the Indianapolis P&DC remained constant throughout the AMP process.
Transportation Considerations: The SCF 478 Terre Haute, IN to Indianapolis, IN package projected a transportation savings of$672,567. The first PIR shows a cost of $1,778,297 compared to pre-AMP levels.
PVS transportation schedules in Indianapolis P&DC increased from 79 to 141; however, none of these new schedules was a result of the consolidation of the Terre Haute volume. The PVS cost of $343,590 is not within the scope of this AMP.
Terre Haute, IN saved $556,600 with the elimination of HCRs 602L9 and 624L4. Mileage reductions to HCRs 478L9 and 478MO contributed another $507,511 in savings. The net HCR savings for Terre Haute, IN P&DF was $1,214,381 compared to pre-AMP levels.
Indianapolis, IN P&DC's HCR costs increased by $2,649,087 compared to pre-AMP levels. The majority of this cost is attributable to increases in long-hauls not within the scope of the AMP. Due to changes resulting from the national optimization initiative, HCRs 240AE, 300UE and 500AE had mileage increases that added $1,164,731 in cost. HCR 46053, an STC contract administered by Greater Indiana District, added an additional $1,815,779 due to the addition of five trips.
The net cost for the SCF 478 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC is $1,778,297. However, adjusting for all non-AMP related cost increases, the package shows a transportation savings of $1,545,804.
It should be noted that Terre Haute, IN P&DF's HCRs were cited in both packages. As each AMP stands alone, the savings are correct; however, the system savings is inflated.
Staffing Impacts: The approved AMP identified a net craft decrease of 58 employees and one additional EAS position with the consolidation of SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DF volume into the Indianapolis P&DC.
Complement data for the first PIR shows a reduction of 116 craft employees and 16 EAS employees.
It should be noted that the Terre Haute, IN P&DF is still utilized as a transportation and distribution hub. As a result, the Terre Haute Post Office still has employees that perform hub functions. Six mailhandlers and two clerk expeditors share the duties associated with the hub activity. On average, these employees use a total of 45 workhours per week for this workload.
PIR Summary Narrative
The Terre Haute, IN P&DF staffing matrix is the same matrix for both the originating and destinating consolidations: SCF 478 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC and SCF 475 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Evansville, IN P&DF. The impact to the employees can only be counted once.
The staffing impacts and management-to-craft ratios for SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC are summarized below:
1 Craft/Management= All
1 Craft= F1 + F4 at Losing; F1 only at Gaining
Maintenance Impacts; The AMP projected a net annual savings of $633,790 in maintenance costs. The first PIR shows a savings of $121,419 compared to pre-AMP levels.
The Indianapolis P&DC added six DBCS machines and one APBS machine to their fleet during the PIR data period that was not included in the proposed AMP maintenance costs. These additional machines were due to other concurrent initiatives, such as the transfer of South Bend P&DC's originating Priority volume to the Indianapolis Mail Processing Annex (MPA). The result was a $769,221 increase in LDC 36 and 37, Mail Processing Equipment and Building Equipment, cost than was originally proposed
PIR Summary Narrative
Space Impacts and One Time Costs: The AMP projected a one-time cost of $277,589 for the consolidation of SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IN P&DC into the Indianapolis P&DC. The first PIR shows a one-time cost of $54,536.
All of the one-time costs were for the installation of an additional APBS machine. This cost includes the transport, installation and equipment/material cost surrounding this addition to the Indianapolis machine set.
An additional $87,773 is allocated for the relocation and installation of an additional AFSM. These funds have not been used as of the first PIR but will be used prior to the final PIR.
Similarly, the one-time facility cost of $139,816 for the upgrades to the low cost tray sorter transport system has not been used as of the first PIR. This project is scheduled for completion prior to the final PIR.
Other Concurrent Initiatives: Prior to and during the six months of the SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IL P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC first PIR. the losing and gaining sites engaged in other concurrent initiatives including:
• APBS machine (2) installation at the Indianapolis Mail Processing Annex (MPA), April 2013 • South Bend P&DC Originating Priority volume transferred to Indianapolis MPA, May 2013 • Fort Wayne P&DC Originating Priority volume transferred to Indianapolis MPA, May 2013 • SCF 4 75 Terre Haute, IN P&DF to Evansville, IN P&DF originating/ destinating AMP, june 2013 • A $3,324,100, non-AMP related, increase to PVS/HCR transportation costs
Conclusion: The first PIR for the consolidation of originating and destinating mail from SCF 4 78 Terre Haute, IL P&DF to Indianapolis P&DC shows reduction of85 F1/F4 FTE (full time equivalents) and 35 FTE in F38 employees. It is to be noted that the consolidation of Terre Haute into Indianapolis and Evansville, IN impacts the same pool of Terre Haute employees. The 45 clerks and 22 mailhandlers cited in this package are the same employees in the concurrent Evansville package.
The first PIR projects a first year savings of$2,518,382 compared to the expected $4,772,109 savings. The full savings potential was not realized due to non-AMP related increases in PVS and HCR transportation costs totaling $3,324,100. Adjusting for this cost, the annual savings for this PIR would be $5,842,482 which exceeds that proposed in the AMP.
PIR Summary Narrative
Losing site
Gaining Site
AMP completed on PIRType PIR Dates PIR Due
F1workhour costs Other workhour costs Management costs Transportation costs Maintenance costs Facility costs Total
One-time costs
First year costs
Savings/Costs
Terre Haute P&DF Indianapolis P&DC
61112013 1st PIR
7/1/2013 2/28/2014
Pre-AMP $55,073,389 $1,935,055 $7,841,264
$61,425,574 $18,608,955
$0 $144,884,239
$0
12/31/2013
AMP Study $51,736,079 $1,804,604 $7,565,683
$60,753,008 $17,975,166
$0 $139,834,540
$277,589
PIR Adjustments $51,455,106 $2,014,646 $7,149,892
$63,203,871 ($3,324, 1 00) $18,487,806
$0 $142,311,321 ($3,324, 1 00)
$54,536
$144,884,239 $140,112,129 $142,365,857 ($3,324, 100)
($4,772, 1 09) ($2,518,382)
Losing Site Service
PIR Briefing Sheet
Deviations
$0 {#~~~"~ ~0 :;:" ~""~\!-~ 'cj7m;. !$'1iiB't'98J,ll!J
·~ik .~ ~":I'Sli,E,
$0 'Jff'V£U!f;71!
Note: Bars are scores prior to the consolidation. Lines are scores during the PIR timeframe.
3/19/2014
Rationale
Non AMP related (HCR to
. • • •• ;·Maae.!'il'i et:; . ·vP!%
Gaining Site Service
-Q) Q) ..c en en c:
It= Q) 'i: m 0::: a:
Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: March 19, 2014
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF District: Greater Indiana
Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC District: Greater Indiana
PIRType: Implementation Date:
1st PIR 07/01/13
(15) Notes: ____________________ _
Satisfaction Measurement (CSM) became Customer Experience Measurement Data reflects most recently completed quarter available in GEM.
PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement
Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities r------·-~---~----l
Combined Facilities Last Saved: March 19, 2014
PIR Type•: ~~~:oo;;;;;;;:.,.;;;;n;:;;,iiadj, Fln;t F'IR
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jul-01*2013 to Oec..J1-2013
P!R Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities
P!R Workhour Costs~ Combined Facilities
P!R Workhour Costs • Combined F aci!ities
(27)NOTES: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __
-i#'ti~'
P!R Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities
Workhour Costs ~ Losing Facility Last Saved: Marcll19, 2014
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF PIRType~: .~.~'~"pu;-,.,.,,., "''"'~"~'
Type of Distribution Consolidated:___ Orig & Oest ___ _ Date Range of Data: ~ to Oec-31·2013
f-···· ANNUAIJZEO--!
P!R Workhour Costs- Losing
PIR Workhour Costs- Losing
PIR Workhour Costs -losing
PIR Wori<hour Costs- Losing
Workhour Costs- Gaining Facility Last Saved: March 19,2014
Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC PIR Type•: ~:o"5:'o':..!,I,:_;RP"IR""c"o"l""mo">""i>'"'•7nn_._,.,,,.-=-.ccd7to-c, F"'i.s~t· PIR
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jui..01~2013 to Dec..J1-2013
PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining
P!R Workhour Costs - Gaining
P!R Workhour Costs~ Gaining
PlR Workhour Costs~ Gaining
16
1stPIR
$0
PIR Workhour Costs· Gaining
(27)NOTES: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __
PlR Workhour Costs ·Gaining
* 0 0
[ - -~·-·~·-·~ Other Workhour Move Analysis I losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Indianapolis P&DC Date Range of Data: 12/31/13
P!R Other Workhour Costs
PI R Other Workhour Costs
Pl R Other Workhour Costs
PIR Other Workhour Costs
[ Distribution to Other PIR Worksheet Tabs -~
Pl R Other Workhour Costs
PIR Other Workhour Costs
Staffing -Craft Last Saved: March 19, 2014
PIR Type: 1st PIR Data Extraction Date: 01/10/14
Craft Positions
Finance#: 17-4038
Craft Positions
~-----------~------------~ I (23) I (24) I
! 1st PIR vs Pre AMP ! 1st PIR vs Proposed ! Total Craft Position Loss: L ____ !..:_~ ____ j _____ _:~-----J
(Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)
PIR Staffing -Craft
Staffing - PCES/EAS
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Data Extraction Date: 1/10/2014
PCES/EAS Positions
Last Saved: March 19, 2014
PIR Type: 1st PIR
Finance # 17-8695 -------
PIR Staffing - P ES/EAS
Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC Finance # .c1C!7:::-4~0:.:!3::::8 ____ _ Data Extraction Date: 1/10/2014
PCES/EAS Positions
,,_.,_.,_., .. ,_.,_.,_.,_.,-r,--~--~--~--~--~--~--1--'_., .. ,_.,_., .. ,_.~
j Total PCES/EAS1 (37
) 1
(38
) 1
j Position Lossj 16 j 17 j ~~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~--~~~--~--~--~--~--~--~--j--,_.,_.,_.,_.,_.,._~
(Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)
PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS
Transportation - PVS Last Saved: March 19, 2014
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Finance Number: ....:1~7...:-8:.:6:.:9::::5 _____ _
(11) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-PVS Savings: $343,590 (This number added to the Executive Summary
1~t PIR PIR Type: ------------~---------
Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013
Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC Finance Number: 17-4038
~~~---------
--to -- Dec-31-2013
(12) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-PVS Savings: $343,590 (This number added to the Executive Summary)
(13) Notes: -----------:----:-:--:::-:-:-:-:------;:=-:-:::::==-::=-:-::::::;::;:;::::-:;::::::-;::;::::~~;;;-;;;:;;;-;;::;;:;=u;-:rh:;;;;;~~;;;;;;;ici;;the;~;-;;f---While the number of PVS schedules increased from 79 to 141, none of these increases were a result of the Terre Haute 0/D AMP into Indianapolis. These changes were outside the scope of
the AMP.
PIR Transportation- PVS
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest
Data of HCR Data File:
Transportation - HCR Last Saved: March 19, 2014
PIR Type: 1st PIR
CT for Outbound Dock:
PIR Transportation HCR- Losing
Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed
Notes:
PIR Transportation HCR- Losing
Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest
Date of HCR Data File:
(1)
Route#
Transportation - HCR Last Saved: March 19, 2014
CET for Inbound Dock:
CET for Cancellations:
(6) (7)
Proposed 11 st PIR Annual Annual Cost Cost
PIR Type: 1st PIR
CETforOGP:
CT for Outbound Dock:
(9)
------(10)
1st PIR Annual Cost/Mile
PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining
Notes:
Summary HCR Losing & Gaining (12) (13) I (14)
Change Analysis 1st PIR vs Pre AMP I 1st PIR vs Proposed
Losing
Gaining
(13) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)
$1,434,706
(14) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: (from losing and gaining facilities)
HCR PVS
1st PIR vs Pre AMP
$1,434,706 $343,590
(15) Total 1st PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HeR): $1,778,297 (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)
(16) Total 1st PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HeR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)
1st PIR vs Proposed
$2,107,273
1st PIR vs Proposed
$2,107,273 $343,590
$2,450,863
PIR Transportation HCR- Gaining
MPE Inventory Last Saved: March 19, 2014
Data Extraction Date: 01/15/13 PIR Type: 1st PIR Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 --to-- Dec-31-2013
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC
(5) (6)
1st PIR
(10) Notes:
The APBS relocation cost includes a $836.36 transport cost (APBS to new facility), a $95,635 workhour cost for installation and a $12,600 eqiupment cost (anhors and lift kits). The AFSM machine relocation cost of $87,773 has not been used as of the 1st PIR, but the intent is for this relo to occur before the final PIR.
(7) Proposed Relocation
Costs
(8) 1st PIR
Carried to Space Evaluation and
(9)
PIR MPE Inventory
Maintenance Last Saved March 19, 2014
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF
$
$
$
$
$
Parts and Supplies
Grand Total
(13)
(2)
I (3)
Proposed 1st PIR Costs Costs
(5) I
0 $ 32,370
72,010 $ 27,535
328,485 $ 36,494
---0 $ 6,637
0 $ 0
400,495 $ 103,036
168,178
0
271,214
(11) 1st PIR vs Pre AMP- Maintenance Savings:
(12) 1st PIR vs Proposed- Maintenance Savings:
PIR Type*: _:.1..:..st:..:.P_:.IR'--------Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 : Dec-31-2013
Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC
Grand Total
$512,640
I (7) (8) (9) Variance 1st
Proposed 1st PIR PIR to Pre Costs Costs AMP
8,028,873 $ 8,427,539 550,031 $
2,095,239 $ 2,465,794 452,296
2,924,146 $ 3,241,073 316,927
902,156 $ 1,020,746 118,589
257,195 $ 75,763
14,207,610 15,230,914 1,278,525
2,985,678
0
18,216,592 1,175,292 $
(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)
(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)
*Data in P!R columns is annualized for First P!R
(10)
Variance 1st PIR to Pre Proposed
398,666
370,555
316,927
118,589
1,023,305
879,651
PIR Maintenance
(1)
Distribution Changes Last Saved: March 19, 2014
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF PIR Type: 1st PIR
Type of Distribution Consolidated: Orig & Dest Date Range of Data: Jul-01-2013 --to-- Dec-31-2013
Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP.
DMM L001 DMM L011
Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.
(2) March 21, 2013
X DMM L002 X DMM L201
DMM L003 DMM L601
DMM L004 DMM L602
X DMM L005 DMM L603
DMM L006 DMM L604
DMM L007 DMM L605
DMM LOOS DMM L606
DMM L009 DMM L607
DMM L010 DMM L801
(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts
FAST Appointment Summary Report
Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?
<3l Yes
NASS Facility Name
Total No-Show Late Arrival Oren Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count %
Nov '13 Losing Facility 478 Terre Haute, IN P&DF N/A
Dec '13 Losing Facility 478 Terre Haute, IN P&DF N/A
Nov '13 Gaining Facility 460 Indianapolis, IN P&DC 337 110 32.64% 60 17.80% 0 0.00%
Dec '13 Gaining Facility 460 Indianapolis, IN P&DC 294 86 29.25% 62 21.09% 0 0.00% ~ . - '
Count
227
208
Closed %
67.36%
70.75%
(5lNotes: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------==============
PIR Distribution Changes
Unschd Count
3
6
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF
5-Digit ZIP Code: 4 7802 Data Extraction Date: -:0.:,.1/7:1'=5/'::1-:4------
1. Collection Points Number picked up before 1 p.m.
Number picked up between 1-5 p.m.
Number picked up after 5 p.m.
Total Number of Collection Points
Customer Service Issues Last Saved: March 19,2014
2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"? c-o-]
3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP? c-o-]
4. Delivery Performance Report
% Carriers returning after 1700
5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Times) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours
7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes
8. Notes:
Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC
9. What postmark is printed on collection mail? [------- - ----- - l PIR Customer Service Issues
Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved: March 19, 2014
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF Date: ________ _
1 . Affected Facility
2. One-Time Costs
Enter any one-time costs: _..:,S1.:.:3;;;;9:,:.8.:.:1,:;:6 __ $0 ($'139,816) (These numbers shown below under One-Time Costs section.)
3. Savings Information
Space Savings($): __ ...;s;,;;o __ _ $0 $0 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)
4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain.
5. Notes:
The one-time facility cost of $139,816 has not yet been utilized. Prior to the final PIR, the site will use these funds for LCTS enhancements.
Employee Relocation Costs
Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs (from MPE Inventory)
Facility Costs (from above)
Total One-Time Costs
Losing Facility: Terre Haute P&DF
Pre-AMP: FY 2012
$137,773 ($83,237)
$139,816 ($139,816)
$277,589 $54,536 ($223,053) P!R costs carrled f01ward to Executive Summary)
Gaining Facility: Indianapolis P&DC
Range of Report PIR: FY 2013
(6) (9)
Product
PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs