april 2016 trip to washington dc€¦ · maintaining military superiority: development of the...

April 2016Trip to Washington DC

ACC Web Site: arnoldcommunitycouncil.com

2016 Arnold Community Council (ACC) Background Paper for

The Congressional Range and Test Center Caucus (CRTCC)

Executive Summary

The ACC is pleased to have the opportunity to support the CRTCC with information that will strengthen the Nation’s defense. The ACC is most thankful for the CRTCC’s continuing support of all the Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) which contribute so critically to the development, improvement and sustainment of U.S. military weapon systems, commercial aerospace programs and American technological superiority.

The ACC asks the CRTCC to continue to expand its membership to gain additional support for MRTFB missions in anticipation of the next round of Base Realignments and Closures. The ACC requests specific support for three initiatives that will improve the Nation’s aerospace technical superiority, extend the life and efficiency of the MRTFBs and reduce the overhead associated with operating MRTFBs. We ask the CRTCC and other Congressional Representatives to: 1) Support DoD Test Management Resource Center (TRMC) initiatives to expand the Revitalizing Laboratory Facilities program (RLF) to include MRTFBs and increase the threshold for its use; 2) Support the current funding levels and budgets for the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) programs, facility construction/modernization and education/training identified in this year’s NDAA and the Five Year Defense Plan; and, 3) Support Air Force initiatives to consolidate and reduce overhead associated with operating MRTFB hypersonic and related facilities.

The ACC continues its tradition of not asking for any additional funding, budget accelerations or legislative ear marks, but is providing information which the Congress can use to better support its constituents. More specifics may be found in the following white paper, attachments and links.


White PaperOn

ACC’s Request for Congressional Support of DoD Initiatives

Supporting DoD Efforts to Expand the Revitalizing Laboratory Facilities (RLF) ProgramCurrently, RLF allows the Services to spend up to $5M on construction to extend the life of laboratory facilities or improve such facilities using appropriated funds in accordance with NDAA 2009 Section 219 provisions. These provisions were established to allow needed refurbishment of Service laboratory facilities that could not be accomplished using the Military Construction Program. DoD’s Test Resource Management Center (TRMC) is seeking to expand the program to include MRTFBs and raise the construction limit to $10M. Implementation of such an initiative would increase MRTFB Commanders’ flexibility to quickly repair/replace deteriorating capability needed for critical weapon system testing without requiring any additional funding.

Continuing Support for Current RDT&E and Hypersonic Program Funding Levels. Congress, in its National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, noted that the state of the Nation’s hypersonic ground test and evaluation facilities and workforce had not received adequate attention over the years. They faced both threats of divesture as well as gradual decay. The 2013 NDAA required the Executive branch to undertake a study identifying how to rectify the U.S. technical shortfall in hypersonic development facilities, related workforce and weapon system programs. Eighteen months later the study called for significant investment in each area and the President’s USAF budgets reflected substantial increases in improvement and modernization monies for MRTFBs. This investment reflects a clearer understanding of reducing the cost of fielding breakthrough technologies. The cost of correcting an error found in operational field testing of a new weapon system is an order of magnitude higher than correcting that same error found during initial operational testing; which is an order of magnitude higher than correcting that same error found during prototype testing; which is an order of magnitude higher than correcting that same error found during ground testing; which is an order of magnitude higher than and correcting that same error found during design reviews. That is a cumulative 1000-fold cost savings through the earliest error correction. Currently the hypersonic laboratory and ground test infrastructure is incapable of providing comprehensive design experiments, prototype simulations or model measurements to find the nuances of hypersonic research and development to advance the state of the art and decrease the risks and costs associated with hypersonic system fielding. The proposed budgets in the FYDP invest in hypersonic work force development, facilities and instrumentation needed to more fully understand the unknown aspects of hypersonic physics and aerothermal-chemistry which have not previously been encountered in advancing aerospace vehicles to hypersonic speeds.

Specific members of the Arnold Community Council are using their influence, talent and resources to directly support the advancement of hypersonic sciences. The University of Tennessee Space Institute (UTSI) is poised to jump start the white and blue collar education and training necessary to ensure holistic hypersonic system development (See Attachment 1). Synergistic with this education initiative is the opportunity to improve the productivity of test and evaluation through the establishment of a Center for Test Sciences also formulated by UTSI (See Attachment 2). AEDC is assisting in this effort through the Digital Thread initiative which allows the integration and advancement of digital test (see http://www.nist.gov/el/msid/upload/1Kraft_DigitalThread.pdf). Finally, UTSI proposes to work with the University of Dayton on a Reusable Hypersonic Vehicle Structures Project – the ACC supports this particular project using unallocated funds within current budgets.

Support for USAF Ground Test Facility Productivity Improvement. The Air Force is reorganizing ground test facility management to improve hypersonic ground test facility synergies. This small reorganization will make Air Force test complex administration similar to that used in the Army and Navy. Each Air Force test complex will have an approximately level distribution of responsibilities at a wing level. Such an organization will enhance equitable financial and agency support across and among complexes.


Maintaining Military Superiority: Development of the Hypersonic Testing Workforce

Hypersonic capabilities that operate at speeds greater than Mach 5 (five times the

speed of sound, Mach 1 ~760 mph at sea level) are prioritized in national policy.

Congress, in its National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, noted that the state of the Nation’s hypersonic ground test and evaluation facilities and workforce have not received adequate attention over the years facing both threats of divesture as well as gradual decay

Congress must recognize the vital need to develop the current workforce supporting the Test & Evaluation of Hypersonic Systems and Technology and encourage the DoD to prioritize workforce development.

Successful current pilot programs supported by the DoD T&E Enterprise which emphasize students must be expanded to include the current T&E workforce – craft, engineering staff, and subject matter experts

A national effort to develop the current workforce across the entire DoD Hypersonics T&E Enterprise will require a geographically diverse effort with significant presence in the major T&E sites

Reflecting the cooperative nature of system RDT&E, partnerships with industry to promote development of the entire national hypersonic workforce must be strongly encouraged

AEDC’s Tennessee and Maryland sites are strongly supported in both research and workforce development by The University of Tennessee Space Institute (UTSI) and the University of Maryland

Arnold Community Council 2016 Critical Issue

NDAA 2013 “hypersonic workforce

needs attention”

AF FY15 S&T Priorities “Hypersonics is a Game

Changer” OMB-OSTP FY16

R&D Priority

The Historic Trend of Boom-Bust Cycles in Hypersonics has Inhibited Sustainment of the Hypersonic Workforce

Historically, workforce development has been supported through R&D efforts that train students who might join the T&E workforce. Resources for development of the current workforce have been sparse.

Hypersonics R&D is a Modernization Priority

ACC Web Site: www.arnoldcommunitycouncil.com

Student development is vital to a healthy future workforce, but they may pursue other career options


Attachment 1

The Ce

nter fo

r Test Scien

ces

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Center Overview

February 201

6

J. Schm

isseu

rUniversity

of Ten

nessee

Space Institu

[email protected]

u

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Att

achm

ent 2

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Hig

h-S

peed

Cap

abilit

ies

= M

ilita

ry O

ppor

tuni

ty

Strategic Priorities R

equire

Efficient Area Co

verage

“Pivot to

the Pa

cific”

High‐Speed Ca

pabilities Are

Potential G

ame‐Ch

angers in

respon

se to

an An

ti‐Ac

cess/Area Den

ial threat

15 m

in at

500 nm

/hr

15 m

in at

Mach 6

~50X

area

23 m

in at

Mach 6

15 m

in at

Mach 9

~120

X area

•Survivable

•Respo

nsive

•Ope

ratio

nally Efficient –

greatly

increased area

coverage per asset

For T

ime Critical Targets: AMach 6

System

Covers a

n Area

Equ

ivalen

t to 50

Co

nven

tional Systems

•Significant re

duction in infrastructure,

supp

ort, risk

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Curren

t Status –

Hyperson

icsD

eman

ds

Accelerated Tech Transition

Dual‐Fue

l Veh

icle Con

cept,

Courtesy Boe

ing

Hype

rson

ic Systems:

•Highly Integrated

•Highly Uncertain

•De

mand

Foun

datio

nal

Know

ledge

Challenges

•Extrem

e environm

ent req

uires scien

ce and

techno

logy inno

vatio

n and breakthrou

ghs

•De

signs and

con

cepts are still evolving –narrow

gap from

disc

overy to im

plem

entatio

n

•Historic boo

m‐bust cycle has had

broad

impact

•Und

ereq

uipp

ed workforce

•Disjointed

techno

logy fu

nding path

•De

signing

the system

s of the

future… with

the tool se

ts of the

past!

Opp

ortunity

•Hy

person

icsis p

rioritize

d in m

ultip

le national

policy do

cumen

ts

•Increasin

g natio

nal recognitio

n of th

e ne

ed to

address the

challenges abo

ve

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Four Dom

ains W

here Inno

vatio

n is Re

quire

dAc

celerated Techno

logy Transition

Workforce Develop

men

t

Restricted Ac

cess (D

riven

) Research

Metho

dology Develop

men

t

Targeted

research sp

ecifically cho

sen to add

ress

critical challenges identified by program

s

3‐5 Generation

Advancem

ent, 30

+ Tech Transition

s beyond

HTV

‐2

Education of th

e currenth

ypersonics

workforce

as well as p

otentia

l future workforce

•Gradu

ate de

grees

•Specialty

certificates

•Short C

ourses

•Online Seminars

~50%

of the

ME/AE

stud

ents

at UTSI are AED

C Em

ployees

Ex: AF

OSR

‐fun

ded STAR

team

develop

ed STABL cod

e to

improve aerothermod

ynam

ic heatin

g analysis utilized in

DARPA HT

V‐2 program

New

tools a

nd m

etho

ds critical to

the

advancem

ent o

f hypersonic capabilities

Ex: CT

S mem

bers are amon

g the

leading National Experts in

Low

Disturbance

“Quiet” Tunn

els

Research driv

en by ne

eds from sp

ecific

programs w

ith sp

ecific access

requ

irements.

•ITAR

and

classified

•Re

search can

be un

classified/ITAR

, bu

t dire

cted

by spon

sors to

add

ress

challenges from

restricted

programs

This Capability is Und

er Develop

ment

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

CTS Mem

ber Institutions

•Expe

rtise

•Re

levance

•Proxim

ity

Phase 1 –Expe

rtise

in

Laminar‐Turbu

lent

Transition

Expe

rimen

ts,

Quiet Tun

nels

Simulations

Phase 2 –Expe

rtise

in

Shock Interactions,

Expe

rimen

tal M

etho

ds

Governm

ent &

Indu

stry Partners

Air F

orce Research Labo

ratory

Arno

ld Engineerin

g De

velopm

ent C

omplex

NAS

A –Marshall, Langley, Ames

Army Av

iatio

n and MissleR&

D Ce

nter

Oak Ridge National Laboratories

Sand

ia National Laboratories ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Indu

stry/G

ov’t

Consortiu

m

One

Center –

Multip

le M

issions

Efficient Operatio

nsvia a

single orga

nizatio

nal

structure

Metho

dology Develop

men

tWorkforce Develop

men

tAccel. Tech Transition

Restricted Access Effo

rts

Advancem

ents in one

mission benefit others

New

Capability

Traine

d Cu

rrent W

orkforce

“Real‐T

ime” Te

ch Insertion

Redu

ced Tech Risk

Exam

ple from

Prio

r Work

Improved

Stability An

alysis

Existing Workforce Trained

&

Grad Stud

ents Hire

d

HTV

-2

X-5

1

Utilize

d as “prob

lem so

lver” by

Demo Programs

STAB

L‐3D

Evolved and Ap

plied as ITAR

‐restricted tool fo

r T&E Enterprise

CTS Po

rtfolio

Com

prise

d of M

ultip

le Fun

ded Efforts –

mappe

d against m

ission areas

Advancem

ent o

f Quiet Tun

nels

Restricted Access

Programs

Developm

ent o

f National T&E

Workforce Initiative

Arno

ld Diagnostics

Summit

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Developm

ent O

pportunitie

s for th

e Cu

rrent &

FutureT&

E Workforce

Craft Force

Engine

ering Staff

Subject M

atter E

xperts

Future Employees

Specialized

Training in New

Metho

ds and

Techn

iques

Gradu

ate Education in Disc

iplines Critical to

Hy

person

ic Systems

Short C

ourses

Certificate Program

s

Internships

and On‐Site

Experie

nce

Opp

ortunitie

s to Learn from

Recognized International Experts

–Enabled by On‐Site and

Web

‐Based

Interactions

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Steerin

g Co

mmittee

/ Spon

sors:

“Vote with

Their Wallets”

Technical Challenges & Prio

rities

•Specific Efforts w

ithin

Thrusts P

erform

ed by sub‐

grou

ps of C

TS M

embers

•Ap

proved/prio

ritize

d by

Steerin

g Co

mmittee

Advanced

Simulations

Laminar‐Turbu

lent

Transition

Turbine

Engine

s?Shock

Interactions

Organiza

tional Structure

–Indu

stry/G

overnm

ent

Consortiu

m

Diagno

stics &

Instrumen

tatio

n

Phase I

Phase II

Future Phases

CTS Mem

bers Propo

se

Research‐Driv

en Solutions

Major Research Thrusts

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Engagemen

tInitial Stages o

f Partnership/

Advocacy Develop

ment

Indu

stry

•Raythe

on and

Boe

ing are

supp

ortive

•Lockhe

ed and

Northrop

Grumman

wou

ld like to

kno

w

more

Governm

ent

•TR

MC initially engaged

•DA

RPA, ASD

RE and

AFRL –

discussin

g dates for brie

fings

•NAS

A, Navy, Arm

y ‐T

BDRaythe

on has se

nt letters o

f advocacy to th

e VP

‐Research at UT, Purdu

e, ND, and

Arizon

a

Ray

theo

n en

dors

es th

e ef

forts

of D

r. Sc

hmis

seur

to d

evel

op

and

lead

the

mul

ti-un

iver

sity

, Cen

ter f

or T

est S

cien

ces,

…

and

will

giv

e se

rious

con

side

ratio

ns to

bei

ng a

n in

dust

rial

mem

ber i

n th

e fu

ture

col

labo

rativ

e ce

nter

.

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Exa

mpl

e C

TS In

itiat

ive:

Adv

ance

d D

iagn

ostic

s &

In

stru

men

tatio

nD

evel

opm

ent

Arno

ld Diagnostics S

ummit

Summer Program

•2 Weeks of C

ollabo

ratio

n at UTSI

durin

g Summer

•“W

orksho

p” enviro

nmen

t includ

ing academ

ic, governm

ent,

and contractor re

searchers

•Cu

lminates with

Dem

o of

Potential Solutions in

AED

C facilities

Accelerated Techno

logy Transition

, an

d Workforce Develop

ment for

the T&

E Enterprise

•“G

rand

Challenge” m

easuremen

t each year

•3‐5 participating institu

tions/year g

eared up

for challenge

•AF

OSR/SBIR/STTR

/HSST/AE

DC sp

onsored

•An

nual program

review

= dem

o of possib

le

Grand

Challenge solutio

ns•AE

DC Ju

nior Force m

embe

r paired with

each

participating institu

tion

•Facilitate tech transition –tech and

hum

an

Concep

t of O

peratio

nsAn

nual Program

Review

Potential Participants: CT

S Mem

bers and

Other Institu

tions

Lead

Institu

tion

Gov’t team

s cou

ld participate, to

o

Leverage Sum

mer Faculty Fellows P

rogram

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Exam

ples of C

TS M

embe

rs Prio

r Con

tributions

•Critical expertise in hypersonic laminar

turbulen

t transition

provide

d to HTV

‐2 and

X‐51

program

s

•Tech Transition

of research tools to

application at AED

C Tunn

el 9

•Partne

rship with

AFRL on

Flight Test o

f Laminar Flow Con

trol Devices

•Cu

rren

t ope

rators of all hype

rson

ic quiet

tunn

els in th

e US

•Creatio

n and Initiation of AFRL‐Au

stralian

DSTO

HIFiREProgram

•CT

S mem

bers’ stude

nts are actively sought

•AF

RL, N

ASA, Sandia, and

Indu

stry

This

is n

ot th

e sa

me

Tunn

el 9

from

10

yea

rs a

go -Dan

Mar

ren

Dire

ctor

, AE

DC

T9

HTV

-2X-

51

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

Center fo

r Test Sciences

Tran

sforming Hy

person

ic RDT

&E

Mach

Scale (in

ches)

4812

UT TA

Lon

M6 36

dia

(201

8)

M5 36

dia

Quiet

(202

0)AE

DC VKF

A40x40

Mach 1.5‐5

UT TA

Lon

M4

24x24

AEDC

Tun

nel 9

60 inch dia.

Mach 7,8,10

,14

AEDC

VKF

B

50 in

dia

Mach 6,8

USA

FA M

6 Ludw

iegTube

20 in

dia.

Purdue

M6

Ludw

ieg

Tube

9 in. dia

Texas A

&M

M6 Quiet

Tunn

el 7.5

in. dia.

Florida State

Mach 5 12

x12

U. Texas

Mach 5 6x7

CTS Mem

ber &

Notable Facilitie

s

Basic

Research

Test & Evaluation

TALon& ND

Tunn

els B

ridge

the Gap

TALonbridges gap from

basic

science to T&E

•Inten

ded to driv

e inno

vatio

n / tech

transfer

UT, Notre Dam

e, and

Pu

rdue

are collabo

ratin

g on

Quiet Tun

nel

Developm

ent (also with

Texas A&

M and

NAS

A Langley)

HSWT 8x8

M 2.0 (2

016)

M 1.8

M 3.0

(201

6)M 2.3

UTSI Current Facilitie

s

(2016)

ND M6 Quiet

Ludw

iegTube

24 in

dia. (20

18)

ND High

Enthalpy

Tun

nels

Texas A

&M

ACE M 5‐8

Key

Quiet Facilitie

sHigh

Enthalpy

Friend

s of C

TS

ACC W

eb S

ite:

ar

nol

dco

mm

unityc

ounci

l.co

m

AEDC’s economic impact $609 million in 2015

AEDC Arnold Engineering Development ComplexArnold Air Force Base, Tenn. 37389An Air Force Test Center Test Facility

Test Before Flight www.arnold.af.mil

Arnold Engineering Development Complex’s (AEDC) economic impact – which includes AEDC and its remote operating locations the Hypervelocity Tunnel 9 at White Oak in Silver Spring, Md., and the National Full-Scale Aerodynamics Complex at Moffett Field, Calif. – was $609.3 million in Fiscal Year 2015.

Each location impacted the local areas through payroll, secondary jobs, created through local spending, and other expenditures for supplies, utilities, fuel and services and the spin-off impact of those purchases.

AEDC employed a combination of active-duty military personnel from the Air Force and Navy; Department of Defense civilians; and contractor personnel, which totaled 2,266 personnel in fiscal 2015. Of the 2,266 personnel, 53 were active-duty military; one Air Force Reserve and National Guard; 324 appropriated fund civilian employees (includes general schedule, federal wage board and other military branches); 53 government non-appropriated fund employees; 36 other civilians (credit

union, Base Exchange and commissary tenants); and 1,799 contractor and sub-contractor employees.

Additionally, using the Tennessee Valley Authority economic impact model methodology, AEDC estimated that more than 1,608 secondary jobs were created in the local area, for a total of 3,874 jobs directly related to AEDC. Examples of secondary jobs include those created by home construction and at local supermarkets, car dealerships and department stores.

During fiscal 2015, the payroll cost for AEDC government and contractor personnel was $244.2 million. AEDC’s direct expenditures – which include utility costs, service contracts with outside vendors and military health insurance paid to local doctors and hospitals – was $170 million. Furthermore, the indirect spin-off impact of these direct expenditures is approximately $195 million.

The overall economic impact figure does not include more than $100 million paid to the approximately 4,608 retired military personnel living in the local area.

In total, this retired pay group generates more than $154 million, including the spin-off effect.

The economic impact data and secondary employment estimates represent AEDC’s economic impact during fiscal 2015, which runs from Oct. 1, 2014 to Sept. 30, 2015.

AEDC operates the world’s largest complex of ground test facilities with a replacement value of more than $11.6 billion.

Direct Employment at AEDC Military 54 DoD Civilian 324 Non-appropriated Fund 53 ATA 1,799 Other 36

Base Exchange, Commissary, Ascend Federal Credit Union, tenant organizations, other contractors

Total 2,266

Secondary Jobs Created 1,608 Total Employment Impact 3,874

Fiscal Year 2015Work Force Impact Data

TVA Model Estimates for AEDCAs of Sept. 30, 2015

AEDC Public Affairs • 100 Kindel Drive Suite A‒242 • Arnold AFB, TN(931) 454-4204 • DSN 340-4204

For information on AEDC visit our website at www.arnold.af.mil

Release # 2016-063

Total Employment2,266

Total Economic Impact$609.3. M

As of September 30, 2015

Some outside contractors are not in included on this map.

WHERE THE AEDC WORK FORCE LIVES...

TUNNEL 9, White Oak, Maryland - 38

NFAC - 4

Other Out-of-State - 37


Bryant Diane Executive Director, Tullahoma Area Chamber of Commerce

ACC Member [email protected] (931) 247-5717

Bymaster Mark Aeropropulsion Product Manager, ATA


Cordell Gary Coffee County Mayor ACC Member [email protected] (931) 580-4321Craig Ben Realtor/Owner, Craig & Wheeler

RealtyACC Past President

[email protected] (931) 639-0694

Gamble Rick Space & Missile Product Manager, ATA


Gattis Kathy Public Affairs Manager, ATA ACC Facilitator [email protected] (615) 714-6932Haars Jeff Deputy General Manager, ATA ACC Member [email protected] (850) 496-4180

Herron Jim Business Development ACC President [email protected] (931) 808-2053

Hicks Jim Recording Secretary,AEMTC; AFL-CIO


Hudson Terri Executive Director,Manchester Area Chamber of Commerce


Jalbert Paul Flight Systems Test Section Manager, ATA


Layton Tim Propulsion Test Branch Manager, ATA


Lee Beverly Colonel, USAFR (Ret) ACC Member [email protected] (949) 701-2932McAmis Dr. Rob Integrated Test &

Evaluation Director, ATAACC Member [email protected] (931) 247-0019

Morse Claude Chairman of the Honor Flight of Middle Tenn

ACC Secretary [email protected] (931) 247-5151

Niederhauser Mike Businessman ACC Chairman, Legislative Affairs


Schlagheck Ron Retired NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center


Sebourn Lynn Chairman, Tullahoma Area Economic Development Corp


Skelton Brian General Manager, Tullahoma Utilities Board

ACC Vice Presi-dent


Stewart Jack NAMI Greene County, President ACC Member [email protected] (423) 329-4355

Teal Stan 2016 President, Manchester Area Chamber of Commerce


Wiedemer Mike Major General, USAF (Ret) Acting ACC President


Wood Walt USAF Chief of Staff Civic Leader ACC Past President


Last Name

ACC Legislative Trip Attendees 2016

First Name Job Title ACC Title Email Cell Phone


april 2016 trip to washington dc€¦ · maintaining military superiority: development of the...

Documents