approach to the mediastinum in trauma: density vs. width tammy washut ms4
TRANSCRIPT
Approach to the Approach to the Mediastinum in Mediastinum in
Trauma:Trauma:
Density vs. WidthDensity vs. Width
Tammy Washut MS4Tammy Washut MS4
Traumatic Injuries to Worry Traumatic Injuries to Worry AboutAbout
Mediastinal hematomaMediastinal hematoma
– Aorta/great vessel injuryAorta/great vessel injury
– Spinal hematomaSpinal hematoma
MechanismMechanism
Rapid deceleration Rapid deceleration injuryinjury
Blunt chest Blunt chest trauma- MVA, fallstrauma- MVA, falls
Sudden decelerationas sternum hits steeringwheel.
The sudden stop causes the blood filled descendingaorta to “snap”. The aortic arch isfixed in position by branches from the arch.
As the aortic tube “snaps”, the intima is torn just distal to left sub-clavian artery.
External signsExternal signs ““Seat belt sign”Seat belt sign” Chest ecchymosisChest ecchymosis Sternal/Rib fracturesSternal/Rib fractures
Chest X-rayChest X-ray
Classically taught to look for widened Classically taught to look for widened mediastinummediastinum
Wide mediastinum = 8 cmWide mediastinum = 8 cm
What is the problem with this???What is the problem with this???
• Wide mediastinum has a broader differential than paratracheal density
Causes of Wide Causes of Wide MediastinumMediastinum
MagnificationMagnification RotationRotation Mediastinal hematomaMediastinal hematoma Spinal hematomaSpinal hematoma LymphadenopathyLymphadenopathy Long intravascular volumeLong intravascular volume Obese patientsObese patients
MagnificationMagnification
MagnificationMagnification• Film placed directly behind the patient
• Initially used to determine the 8 cm criteria for wide mediastinum
MagnificationMagnification• Film placed under the backboard
• 17% enlargement
MagnificationMagnification• Film placed in trauma bed
• 25% enlargement
RotationRotation
Rotated Right Rotated Left
7 cm 4 cm
Intravascular VolumeIntravascular Volume
4 cm7 cm
Pre-Dialysis Post-Dialysis
LymphadenopathyLymphadenopathy
Right Paratracheal Right Paratracheal DensityDensity
Composed of Composed of azygous vein and azygous vein and SVCSVC
Density normally less Density normally less than aortic archthan aortic arch
Increased = Increased = hematomahematoma
Why?Why?– Not affected by Not affected by
technical factorstechnical factors– SimpleSimple
Right Paratracheal Right Paratracheal DensityDensity
Normal Increased Density
Mediastinal HematomaMediastinal Hematoma Other Signs:Other Signs:
– PT stripePT stripe– Apical capApical cap– Aortic ArchAortic Arch– NG deviationNG deviation– Tracheal Tracheal
deviationdeviation
Mediastinal HematomaMediastinal Hematoma Other SignsOther Signs::
– PT stripePT stripe– Apical capApical cap– Aortic ArchAortic Arch– NG deviationNG deviation– Tracheal Tracheal
deviationdeviation
Mediastinal HematomaMediastinal Hematoma Other SignsOther Signs::
– PT stripePT stripe– Apical capApical cap– Aortic ArchAortic Arch– NG deviationNG deviation– Tracheal Tracheal
deviationdeviation
Mediastinal HematomaMediastinal Hematoma Other SignsOther Signs::
– PT stripePT stripe– Apical capApical cap– Aortic ArchAortic Arch– NG deviationNG deviation– Tracheal Tracheal
deviationdeviation
Mediastinal HematomaMediastinal Hematoma Other Signs:Other Signs:
– PT stripePT stripe– Apical capApical cap– Aortic ArchAortic Arch– NG deviationNG deviation– Tracheal Tracheal
deviationdeviation
Hypothesis:Hypothesis:
Right paratracheal density is Right paratracheal density is discriminatory sign in trauma discriminatory sign in trauma
patients with widened patients with widened mediastinummediastinum
OHSU DATA
MethodsMethods
122 Trauma patients (2001-2003)122 Trauma patients (2001-2003)– Screening Trauma chest radiographScreening Trauma chest radiograph– Mediastinal width > 8.0 cmMediastinal width > 8.0 cm– CT Chest w/contrast within 24 hoursCT Chest w/contrast within 24 hours
Four readers of different levels of Four readers of different levels of training training
R paratracheal region evaluatedR paratracheal region evaluated
MethodsMethods
Patients categorized by ISSPatients categorized by ISS– AIS by body regionAIS by body region– Chest: 1-6Chest: 1-6– Low risk: 0-2 (80 patients)Low risk: 0-2 (80 patients)– High risk: >2 (42 patients)High risk: >2 (42 patients)
ResultsResults 19 mediastinal hematomas (15.6%)19 mediastinal hematomas (15.6%)
– 13 high-risk13 high-risk– 6 low-risk6 low-risk
5 aortic injuries (4.1%)5 aortic injuries (4.1%) 4 deceased (3.3%)4 deceased (3.3%)
ResultsResults
Mechanism of Injury
44%
25%16%
7%8%
MVCFallMCAAuto vs. PedsOther
ResultsResults
Hematomas
57%
11%
32%
MVCFallMCA
ResultsResults
1.8 1.7
3.1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
All Patients No Hematoma Hematoma
Average Injury Score
ResultsResults
9.8
9.6
9.9
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.9
cm
All Patients Hematoma No Hematoma
Average Mediastinal Width
ResultsResults
0
20
40
60
80
100
%
Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
Right Paratracheal Density Low-Risk Patients
ResultsResults
0
20
40
60
80
100
%
R PT Density vs. Other Signs
R PT Stripe
Apical Cap
Azygous
Arch
AP Window
Trach Dev
L Bronchus
L PV Stripe
R PT Density
Sensitivity
LimitationsLimitations Single institutionSingle institution Presented to readers in artificial Presented to readers in artificial
settingsetting Relatively few hematomasRelatively few hematomas AIS/ISS scoring not useful as triage AIS/ISS scoring not useful as triage
tooltool
StrengthsStrengths
Trauma patients with widened Trauma patients with widened mediastinummediastinum
Confirmed by CT w/in 24 hoursConfirmed by CT w/in 24 hours Blinded analysisBlinded analysis Clinical information available on all Clinical information available on all
patientspatients
ConclusionsConclusions
Screening chest radiograph valuable Screening chest radiograph valuable in low/moderate risk trauma patientsin low/moderate risk trauma patients
Right paratracheal density valuableRight paratracheal density valuable Avoid CT in low-risk patientsAvoid CT in low-risk patients 7.3% normal mediastinum7.3% normal mediastinum High risk patients should have CTHigh risk patients should have CT
RecommendationsRecommendations
Low risk patients with or without a Low risk patients with or without a wide mediastinum but no wide mediastinum but no paratracheal density do not need to paratracheal density do not need to have CT of the chesthave CT of the chest
High risk patients with mechanism of High risk patients with mechanism of injury (i.e. seatbelt sign) should go to injury (i.e. seatbelt sign) should go to CT regardlessCT regardless
Paratracheal density, not width, Paratracheal density, not width, should direct further managementshould direct further management
ExamplesExamples
Possible Hematoma?Possible Hematoma?
• Yes- aortic rupture
• Paratracheal density on right and loss of aortic arch definition
Possible Hematoma?Possible Hematoma?
• Yes, but in this case it is lymphadenopathy in a high risk trauma patient
• This patient should get a chest CT
Possible Hematoma?Possible Hematoma?
• No- mediastinum is wide, but no paratracheal density
• Patient is rotated to right
ExamplesExamples
ExamplesExamples
ExamplesExamples
ReferencesReferences1.1. Melton SM et al., Melton SM et al., J TraumaJ Trauma 2004; 56:243-250 2004; 56:243-250
2.2. Mirvis SE et al., Mirvis SE et al., RadiologyRadiology 1987; 13:487-493 1987; 13:487-493
3.3. Baker SP et al., Baker SP et al., J TraumaJ Trauma 1974; 14:187-196 1974; 14:187-196
4.4. Woodring JH et al., Woodring JH et al., RadiologyRadiology 1984; 151:15-21 1984; 151:15-21
5.5. Parmley LF et al., Parmley LF et al., CirculationCirculation 1953; 17:1086-1101 1953; 17:1086-1101
6.6. Woodring JH et al., Woodring JH et al., J Emerg MedJ Emerg Med 1990; 8:467-476 1990; 8:467-476
7.7. Woodring D et al., Woodring D et al., Ann Thor SurgAnn Thor Surg 1984; 37:171-178 1984; 37:171-178
8.8. Blackmore CC et al., Blackmore CC et al., Emerg RadiologyEmerg Radiology 2000; 7:142-148 2000; 7:142-148
9.9. Patel NH et al., Patel NH et al., RadiologyRadiology 1998; 209:335-348 1998; 209:335-348
10.10. Milne EN et al., Milne EN et al., Radiology Radiology 1984; 153:25-311984; 153:25-31
11.11. Demetriades D et al., Demetriades D et al., Arch SurgArch Surg 1998; 133:1084-1088 1998; 133:1084-1088
12.12. O’Connor CE et al., O’Connor CE et al., Emerg Med JEmerg Med J 2004; 21:414-419 2004; 21:414-419
• Special thanks to Dr. Marc Gosselin and Dr Peter Verhey for references,
images and study data and slides.