application experience with line current differential relays on three terminal lines

47
Application Experience with Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Series Compensated Lines Tom Roseberg Aaron Martin Ilija Jankovic Roger Hedding BPA BPA ABB Inc. ABB Inc.

Upload: vankurd

Post on 20-Feb-2016

21 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Application Experience with Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Series Compensated Lines

Tom Roseberg Aaron Martin Ilija Jankovic Roger Hedding BPA BPA ABB Inc. ABB Inc.

Page 2: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Outline of Presentation• Series compensated line challenges• Distance relay Protection• Line current differential protection• Bonneville Power Administration line protection replacement• BPA Testing• BPA Results• Conclusions

Page 3: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Series compensated line challenges• Capacitive nature of the fault• Metal Oxide Varistor operation• Spark Gap operation• Voltage inversion• Current Reversal

Page 4: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Series Capacitor installation

𝑃=¿¿¿Sin Θ

Page 5: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Apparent impedance of line

Page 6: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Distance Relay challenges• Three terminal lines

• Under-reach effect for internal faults due to current infeed at the T point• Over-reach effect for external fault due to outfeed at one terminal

• Series compensated lines• MOV Operation• Voltage inversion• Current reversal• Subharmonic oscillations

Page 7: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

MOV operating characteristics

Page 8: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Series compensated line impedance diagram

Page 9: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Voltage Inversion

Page 10: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Current inversion

Page 11: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Subharmonic Oscillations

Page 12: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Line current differential scheme

Page 13: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Line current differential advantages• Not subject to

• Voltage Inversions• Power Swings• CCVT transients• Overreaching

• Simple Kirchoff’s law : If Ilocal – Iremote > 0, then internal fault• However, it is communication dependent !

Page 14: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Current differential operating characteristic

Page 15: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Line charging current

Page 16: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Multi terminal line

Page 17: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

BPA Service Territory

Page 18: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

BPA 500kV operation• Use series compensated lines with MOV to limit voltage across

capacitor to 2.0 – 2.5 per unit.• Bypass breaker closes when accumulated energy or MOV current

exceeds preset threshold• Bypass breaker remains closed during single pole trip and reclose

operation ( 1.4 – 1.7 seconds)• Series capacitors on unfaulted phases remain in service leading to

short term load current unbalance which relays must allow.

Page 19: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

BPA reliability criteria at 500kV• Two redundant sets of relays• Two redundant communications systems• 1 cycle operation for close in, high magnitude faults

• Additional cycle for communication aided tripping

Page 20: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Relays being replaced• 2 redundant sets of static travelling wave relays• Each operating in parallel with static distance relay• Logic for single pole operation done with e/m auxiliary relays with

static timers• Schemes

• Single pole communication independent Zone 1• Communication independent mode wave detectors• Permissive zone 2• Permissive travelling wave detectors

Page 21: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Schemes• Single pole communication independent:

• Zone 1 distance• wave detectors

• Permissive Communications aided:• zone 2• travelling wave detectors

• Back up time delayed protection• Distance• Directional overcurrent

• Travelling wave units no longer available• Replacement all in one microprocessor unit• BPA replacing analog microwave with digital communications channel• Line current differential now viable

Page 22: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

BPA Protection Challenge• New relays had to combine fully functional single pole line distance

relay for series compensated line with a fully functional single pole line current differential relay.

• Since not practical to upgrade communications equipment with relay replacement, new relays at some locations had to operate with older communications equipment till upgraded.

• When the digital communications is available, the relays are connected for relay to relay communications and line current differential function is turned on.

Page 23: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Operation of new BPA protection system• Primary single pole trip

• Line current differential relay• Communications independent Zone 1• Permissive Zone 2

• Back up three pole tripping• Time delayed ground and phase distance element• Directional ground overcurrent

Page 24: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Back up three pole tripping uses• Multi phase faults• Evolving faults• Failure to reclose• Reclose into fault• For a fault that occurs after successful reclose but before reset time• External events such as breaker failure• Reclosing is blocked for all back up trips

Page 25: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Testing• Fault data from EMTP studies used to test settings, programming, and

performance of the protection system• EMTP fault files are created to explore relay operations for difficult

system conditions• Heavily loaded systems with maximum series compensation• Longer lines• Terminals that have weak sources• Three terminal lines• Lines that share the same corridor with heavy mutual coupling

• All fault types studied

Page 26: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Modeled protected lineGrizzly 525kV

To Bake Oven

10.3%

Captain Jack 525kV

Summer Lake

10.3% 20.7% 19% 15.5%

Malin 525kV

34.5%

Ponderosa #1230kV

20.7%

30.4% 18.6% 15.2% 35.8%

19%

Ponderosa #2 230kV

15.5%

7 miles

To OLinda

To RoundMoutain

Klamath

To Buckley

To Round Butte

Sand Springs Series Caps

Fort Rock Series Caps

Sycan Series Caps

-30.8% -20.5% -30.8%

-58.9% -39%

-30% -20% -30%

Page 27: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Faults chosen• Faults were simulated on the line side of the series capacitors at both ends of the

line. For these cases the series capacitors will bypass during the fault operation. • Faults were simulated on the line near each terminal, but far enough out on the line

such that the series capacitors are fully in service. • High resistive line to ground faults similar to one that occurred on the BPA in 2006

was also included for testing. • The faults were rotated between phases to provide a more thorough test of the

internal logic in the relays. • The faults were run with an average line load of 1000 megawatts and also with an

emergency line load of 2100 to 2300 megawatts. • The ground faults were run with varying values of ground resistance up to 100 ohms.

Page 28: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly 525kV

To Bake Oven

10.3%

Captain Jack 525kV

Summer Lake

10.3% 20.7% 19% 15.5%

Malin 525kV

34.5%

Ponderosa #1230kV

20.7%

30.4% 18.6% 15.2% 35.8%

19%

Ponderosa #2 230kV

15.5%

7 miles

To OLinda

To RoundMoutain

Klamath

To Buckley

To Round Butte

Sand Springs Series Caps

Fort Rock Series Caps

Sycan Series Caps

-30.8% -20.5% -30.8%

-58.9% -39%

-30% -20% -30%

Fault I1 A – Ground 9.4 miles from Grizzly

I1X

Page 29: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Test I1• Single line to ground fault near one terminal• 1000 MW load• 1 set of series capacitors in service• Under heavy load line is nearly 100% compensated, this limits the ability to set zone 1.• For most faults zone 1 will not operate• Distance relay will operate by permissive tripping logic• Line differential will operate normally• During reclose dead time line will have to loaded phases on one open phase creating

3IO on this line and adjacent lines• A four reactor scheme is used at terminal 1 to extinguish the secondary arc

Page 30: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly

Differential trip time = 20ms

Permissive trip time = 37 ms

Breaker trip output = 20ms

Summer Lake

Differential trip time = 17 ms

Permissive trip time = 37 ms

Breaker trip output = 17ms

Ponderosa

Differential trip time = 17.5 ms

Permissive trip time = 37 ms

Breaker trip output = 17.5 ms

I1 results

Page 31: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly Trip Test I1

Page 32: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly Trip and Reclose Test I1

Page 33: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

April 22, 2023

I 16 BC-G Fault near Summer Lake

| Slide 33

Grizzly 525kV

To Bake Oven

10.3%

Captain Jack 525kV

Summer Lake

10.3% 20.7% 19% 15.5%

Malin 525kV

34.5%

Ponderosa #1230kV

20.7%

30.4% 18.6% 15.2% 35.8%

19%

Ponderosa #2 230kV

15.5%

7 miles

To OLinda

To RoundMoutain

Klamath

To Buckley

To Round Butte

Sand Springs Series Caps

Fort Rock Series Caps

Sycan Series Caps

-30.8% -20.5% -30.8%

-58.9% -39%

-30% -20% -30%

I16 X

Page 34: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

B phase to C phase to ground fault Zone 1 will not operate for most faults Distance will operate by permissive trip logic Line differential will operate normally Since this is multi phase fault all terminals will

trip 3 pole and block reclosing Back up three pole trip will be sent to all

terminals

Test I16

Page 35: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly

Differential trip time = 23ms

Permissive trip time = 50ms

Breaker trip output = 23ms

Summer Lake

Differential trip time = 19ms

Permissive trip time = 48ms

Breaker trip output = 19ms

Ponderosa

Differential trip time = 19ms

Permissive trip time = 39ms

Breaker trip output = 19ms

Test I16 Results

Page 36: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly Trip Test I16

Page 37: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

April 22, 2023 | Slide 37

I28 North of Sand Spring B phase to ground , 100 Ohm fault resistance

Grizzly 525kV

To Bake Oven

10.3%

Captain Jack 525kV

Summer Lake

10.3% 20.7% 19% 15.5%

Malin 525kV

34.5%

Ponderosa #1230kV

20.7%

30.4% 18.6% 15.2% 35.8%

19%

Ponderosa #2 230kV

15.5%

7 miles

To OLinda

To RoundMoutain

Klamath

To Buckley

To Round Butte

Sand Springs Series Caps

Fort Rock Series Caps

Sycan Series Caps

-30.8% -20.5% -30.8%

-58.9% -39%

-30% -20% -30%

I28 X

Page 38: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Phase B to ground fault with 100 Ohm ground resistance Heavily loaded line – 2300MW All series compensation in service Zone 2 settings limited by load and sub harmonic

oscillations As fault resistance increases Zone 2 elements have

difficulty detecting the fault. If more than one Zone 2 elements fail to detect the fault,

then the distance elements will not trip Time delayed directional ground overcurrent element

provides back up to distance elements

Test I 28

Page 39: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly

Differential trip time = 26ms

Permissive bit transmit = 37ms (no permissive trip)

Breaker trip output = 26ms

Summer Lake

Differential trip time = 26ms

Permissive trip time = NA (no permissive trip)

Breaker trip output = 26ms

Ponderosa

Differential trip time = 26ms

Permissive trip time = NA

(no permissive trip)

Breaker trip output = 26ms

Test I28 results

Page 40: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly trip Test I28

Page 41: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

April 22, 2023

External Fault E13 on Ponderosa 500kV TX1 A -G

| Slide 41

Grizzly 525kV

To Bake Oven

10.3%

Captain Jack 525kV

Summer Lake

10.3% 20.7% 19% 15.5%

Malin 525kV

34.5%

Ponderosa #1230kV

20.7%

30.4% 18.6% 15.2% 35.8%

19%

Ponderosa #2 230kV

15.5%

7 miles

To OLinda

To RoundMoutain

Klamath

To Buckley

To Round Butte

Sand Springs Series Caps

Fort Rock Series Caps

Sycan Series Caps

-30.8% -20.5% -30.8%

-58.9% -39%

-30% -20% -30%

E13

Page 42: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Phase A to ground fault at Ponderosa on the bus side of the line breaker

Zone 2 at both terminals will operate and transmit the permissive signal to Ponderosa.

At Ponderosa, zone 3 will pick up and block permissive tripping at all terminals.

Test check coordination between remote zone 2 and local zone 3 relays.

Differential will not operate because this is an external fault

External fault E13 on Ponderosa 500kV

Page 43: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Grizzly

Differential trip time = did not op

Permissive bit transmit = 42ms

Breaker trip output = did not op

Summer Lake

Differential trip time = did not op

Zone 3 pick up time = 14ms

Breaker trip output = did not op

Ponderosa

Differential trip time = did not op

Permissive bit transmit = 17ms

Breaker trip output = did not op

External fault E13 results

Page 44: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

Ponderosa Test E13

Page 45: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

©April 22, 2023

Distance elements are used along with line current differential elements for this protection

The line current differential complements the distance function

Line current differential has no setting or operational issues when a series compensated line is either adjacent to or in the zone of protection

Line current differential has the same operating quantities at each terminal, so the tripping time is the same for each terminal.

Conclusions

| Slide 45

Page 46: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

April 22, 2023

EMTP results have shown the line current differential relays are stable at the more sensitive settings and give proper single pole operation for ground faults with higher values of fault resistance.

Ground faults that used to be cleared by time delayed back up three pole tripping are now properly cleared single pole with reclosing.

The addition of the line current differential element significantly improved the overall performance of the new protective relay system.

Conclusions

| Slide 46

Page 47: Application Experience With Line Current Differential Relays on Three Terminal Lines

April 22, 2023 | Slide 47

Questions ?