appendix p cost associated with screened engineering

APPENDIX P COST ASSOCIATED WITH SCREENED ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES

1 - 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 - 25 16 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

COST ASSOCIATED WITH SCREENED ENGINEERING ALTERNATIVES

1 .O INTRODUCTlON

This appendix describes the methodology for determining estimated costs associated with the screened engineering alternatives (EA). Costs will be calculated for each of the screened EAs in the Decentralized, Regionalized, and Centralized configuration. The cost consists of summarizing waste processing, transportation, repository backfill, and emplacement handling for the selected EAs. The collection of the analyzed costs includes comparative analysis of the incremental change of the screened EAs relative to the repositoly baseline cost. The impact of cost for each EA will be an important tool for planning the implementation of an EA since it will typicauy determine the level of funding that must be appropriated. Costs are analyzed by developing process flow diagrams that segment the EA into conceptual elements. The costs for the EAs are developed on the basis of waste quantities and rate to meet schedule constraints.

Cost are based on an approach that utilized an approach consistent with current US. Department of Energy (DOE) methodologies and assumptions. The results of the analysis are presented according to backup calculations and summarized according to each EA.

2.0 METHODOLOGY USED TO EVALUATE COSTS

2.1 Process Costina MethodoIOU

The waste processing costs were estimated using information contained in "Interim Report: Waste Management Facilities Cost Information for Transuranic Waste" (WMFCITRUW) (Feizollahi and Shropshire, 1994). The cost estimating method used by Feizollahi and Shropshire involves segmenting waste management facilities into discrete modules which are used to estimate the costs for building and operating facilities to perform various waste management functions. Cost estimates for different types of integrated transuranic (TRU) waste facilities are created by linking modules for different functions together in such a way that they closely approximate an actual waste management facility. This methodology provides the flexibility to estimate the costs many different sized facilities with many different functions without having to perform a rigorous conceptual design and cost estimate for each facility configuration.

Figure P-1 shows the information flow diagram used to develop waste processing cost estimates. Information from process flow diagrams and mass flow rates are required as input to the cost modules. A combination of data sources were used to develop this information, including existing waste inventories and waste generation projections (Appendix 0). processing schedules (Appendix Q), a listing of EAs that require waste processing (Section 2), and the system configuration for the waste processing facilities (i.e., centralized, regionalized, or decentralized) (Section 2).

Process flow diagrams were developed for each alternative in each configuration (see Figures P-2 to P-12). These flow schemes were based on the DOE 'Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Feasibility of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Engineered Alternatives:

AU0895/WPEACBSR3744-P 763435.01 11/16/95 845m

Engineering Alternatives Cost BeneM Study

- In

t ) 4 . t

r 1

763435.01.W~W.OWZc A169 P-2 DOEWIPP 9521% 10113195

Engineering Alternatives Cost Benefit Study

250,000 1

200.000 -.

2 150*m t? !-

0

100,000

50,000

n " . . 0 1,000 2,000 3.000 4,000 5.000 6,000 7,000 8.000. 9,000 -

INPUT CAPACITY (kg/hr)

LEGEND tinear (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K) - + 1.0 PRE-OPERATION

- tinear (3.0 oa M (m yr)) y = 0.878~ + 2969.1 R 2 = 1

2.0 CONSTRUCTION y = 2 .6672~ + 12644

Linear (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) $K)

tinear (3.0 08 M (10 yr))

- -

R 2 - 1 . . . tinear (2.0 CONSTRUCTION)

Linear (4.0 D a D)

- A 3.0 O& M (10 yr)

y = 7 . 3 1 5 1 ~ + 23831 R 2 - 1

)( 3.0 O& M (20 yr) y = 1 4 . 6 3 ~ + 47661 R 2 = 1

- - timar (I .a PRE-OPERATION)

x 4.0 D & D y = 2 .2816~ + 2395.4 R 2 = 1

0 TOTAL PLCC (1 0 yr) $K y = 13 142x + 41839 R2 = 1

f TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K y = 20 457x + 65670 R 2 = 1

Figure P-2 CH-RH Certification and Shipping Cost Curves

P-3 DOEWlPP95-2135 10115195 763415 01 W W OOIZS A32

i

l W 0

Front - 1Wh End z s t o r e d .

Sites Treating and Storing Waste Decentralized - 10 sites ‘ + Regionalized = 5 sites

WasleChar. Camty

W o ohored) Trampot - Transpor( (1oO/oOl r4Kied. - la

Of stored la WasleChar.

I DEFINITIONS Z=2S%larlANLandlNEL Z= @/olaaIlahersks

Alterrmiim ID# 1 sludges: Basalha (Cement) solid Ruganka: Supermmpan Sold Organka: Supermmpact

Figure P-3 Decentralized and Regionalized Alternative ID #s 1 and 77(a-d) Contact Handled

Process Flow Diagram B

Sites Treating and Storlng Waste ! Decentralized = Id sites 8 Regionalized - 5 sites 0

1Wh proPCled.

a yl

llX%

Transport to Other -.Ies for Treatment, Certiflcatlon,

and Storage ~

WasleChar. CNUq (or --L Trampan Front

End - (1G%ofprolecled, - 34% 01 stored) Transport

1Wh Prdeded

r' 1w46

stored

2 = Wo lor all @her sites

Soiid Organb Sold lmrganb

AM6fnaIl.e ID# 6 BaSekm (Cemenl) Sludges:

solid Imrganb: Shred and Compact SdldOrganlcs: Shred and hpsd

Figure P-4 Decentralized and Regionalized Alternative ID# 6 Contact Handled

Process Flo*** Diagram C ) I

Sites Treating and Storing Waste

$ Decentralized - 10 sites

g Regionalized = 5 sites 0 i,

1Wh ProlEcted

1Wh stwed

?i Rellleval

(W/oolslored la Waste Char.

INEUANL-W, 33% of stored)

Frml End ----* LANL.SRS, --+ (10%01po~ed, - Malnteenarce -

Hanlad)

Transport to Other Sites for Treatment, Certification,

P and Storage m

- -

Altemallve I l l 10

Sludges: Phsma

SdM Imrganks: Pksma

Transpol(

-.-I

SdkJ Organlcs: Plasma B 2 II II

1Wh Prc+3cled

Phsma

lWY0 3m.d

1

q-pi Staed

Figure P-5 Decentralized and Regionalized Alternative ID# 10 Contact Handled

Process Flow Diagram D

Sltes Treating and Storing Waste Decentralized = 10 sites Reglonaiized - 5 sites

ProNed

1W/O StWed

Sludges Emplamment Retteval

at WlPP - CeMyto WlPP store

Mahlenance Enhanced Front (W/bOISlaedla Waste Char.

End - WAC Cement --+ IANL,SRS, --+ (100hd Wed, -

INEUANL-W, 3osb dxslorsd) Hanlatd) -

Transport to Other Sites for Treatment, Certiflcation,

and Storage

L 1 .

Solid Organlcs Sola lnaganks 1W/O -

Trampat Pr+ted -+ to

WlW 1W stud

4 Shred and

Alernatlve ID# W(a-I) SludgeS: Enhanced Cement Sdd Imwnlcs: solkl Orgadcs:

Shred and Add Clay Shred and Add Clay

IWh ProWed

Figure P-6 Decentralized and Regionalized Alternative ID# 94(a-f) Contact Handled

Process Flr iagram E P

1Wh StorBa

E s All Sites 8 8

c

Front

- Maintenance Cement

Front (1 0% projected (10% proiected End b sludges, 25% b sludges, 25%

stored sludges for stored sludges for LANL, INEL) LANL. INEL)

? m

Retrieval (30% of stored for

LANL, SRS, INEUANL-W,

Hanford)

Transport to WlPP Treatrnent/Certilication

Waste Char. Certity to Facility (1 0% of projected, Transport

30% 01 stored)

WlPP

isport to WlPP , ..-&I Handling Building w v v i r r

I I

Flgure P-7 Centralized Base Case and Alternative ID #s 33,35(a&b), 83, and 11 1 Contact Handled

Process Flow Diagram F

All Sltes

? (D

I WlPP

2 = 25%1a LANLand INEL Z- 0% for alolher s i b

solki Organks Solki lnaganks

ARmalbe ID# 1

%Id Inaganks: Supenampad SolidOrganks: Supenampla

BaseNne (Cement) SllKJUdges:

!

Figure P-8 Centralized Alternative ID#s 1 and 77(a-d) Contact Handled

Process Flolaf Diagram G 1

All Sltes

? 2 0

Tiamport lo WlPP Cemenl Malnteram (lab plc+?€iKl Certltylo Wasla Handllng Building

__c (Allwasteexcepl Wges b Slw, 25% . WlPP Fran End (IWZ)%Saed b

WAC ElU$ES)

DEFINlTlON Z=29/ola LANLandlNEL

Figure P-9 Centralized Alternative ID# 6 Contact Handled

Process Flow Diagram H

Solid Imrganlcs: Shred and Compact Shred and Compact SoMOrganics:

All Shes

1 00% Prolected

100% Stored

+

+

TreatmenYCertlfication Retrieval (30% of stored lor

INEUANL-W, Hanlord)

Certlly to Facillty Waste Char. b LANL.SRS, c (10% of projected, b Transport

Front End 30% of stored)

WlPP

- Front Malntenance

Transport to WlPP certify to Waste Handling Building

Plasma b WlPP c WAC

Alternatlve ID# 10

Sludges: Plasma Solld Inorganlcs: Plasma Solid Organlcs: Plasma

Figure P-10 Centralized Alternative ID# 10 Contact Handled

Process Flr .Piagram I

All Sites

8 Front 8 t 00% Stored End

I

RelrlwaI TreatmenllCertlllcation (30% 01 stored lor Waste Char. Certlly to ' Facility . (lO%oof rojecled, Transport LANL,SRS.

INEUANL-W. 30% ofstored) Hanlord)

c

? a N

Sludges Enhanced . Malntanance Front End Cement

I

Transport to WlPP celltty to Waste Handling Bullding 4

Figure P-11 Centralized Alternatlve ID# 94(a-f)

Process Flow Diagram J

AIternaWe ID# Sys-1) Enhanced Cement Shred and Add Clay

Sludges: Solld Inorganlcs: Solld Organlcs: Shred and Add Clay

Sites Treating and Storing Waste

Decentralized = 10 sltes

Reglonallzed = 5 sites

Prgeded

1 W h Staed

Front End

4

-

R#tlevaI Maintenance Cement (3% d stwed (or WasleChar. (tM%PrOjSaed (IWo prdSaed cenny10

WlPP IANL,SAS. + (lWoolpmWed, --+ sludgeS,25% --b sludgeS,25% d INEUANL-W. %%O! SMed) stored slulgss lor SlMed SIWgBS lor WAC

tianford) LANL, INEL) UNL, INEL)

a ‘3 ? 4

W

Transport to Other Sites for Treatment, Certlflcatlon,

and Storage

Plajeded Waste Char. Cenilq

(10%01 prolead, stued mh 01 stored) Transpat

4 Transport

Figure P-12 Decentralized Base Case Remote Handled

Process Flr- iagram K P

Emplacemenl al WlPP __*

I I slued

1 - 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

16 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46

-25

Final Report of the Engineered Alternatives Task Force” (DOE, 1991), the Draft Environmental Management Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EM-PEE) report (DOE, 1995b), and the WMFCITRUW report (Feizollahi and Shropshire, 1994). Information from these sources were used to connect each of the modules and to construct a visual description of mass and volume flow through each treatment process.

The modules are described below:

Front End: Front-end support facilities consist of all administrative and laboratory buildings required for the waste management support functions. Front-end support functions include security, personnel decontamination (radioactive and hazardous), maintenance of noncontaminated areas and equipment, health physics, radiation badges, facility access control. sanitary facilities, work control and personnel support, internal and external communications, spill or emergency response provisions (hazardous and radioactive), analytical laboratory, environmental field sampling, environmental regulatory reporting, and records management.

Retrieval: This module consists of all-weather excavation, inspection, and repackaging of berried waste. The module includes three principal unit operations: earthen-cover extraction and decontamination, waste-container retrieval and inspection, and packaging and staging for shipment.

Waste Characterization: This module is a self-contained facility in which waste characterization is performed. Activities include extracting physical samples of waste; conducting chemical, physical, and radiological analysis of waste samples; and repackaging drums and boxes to remove and stabilize noncompliant waste.

Maintenance: A maintenance facility is used in conjunction with treatment facilities. It consists of a failed-equipment receiving and repair building housing machinery and tools.

Treatment: The treatment module varies based on the alternative being considered. Treatment options include grouting, supercompacthg, shredding and compacting, plasma melting, enhanced-cement processing, and shredding and adding clay.

Storage: This module consists of a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-compliant storage building sized to accommodate an accumulation of up to 20 years’ volume of waste input from treatment modules. Storage area features include spill collection, sloping floors, sumps, and concrete berms. Monitoring is included for both gamma and alpha radiation control.

Certification: Certification consists of storage of incoming material, assay and certification, and truck loading. The facility is equipped with a bridge crane and a forklift. It is assumed that certification operations will take place indoors.

AUOB-95NVPEACBSR3744-P P-14 763435.01 11/16/95 045am

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

I

Transportation: Transportation consists of truck shipments. Equipment includes a tractor and trailer transporting three Transuranic Package Transporter4 (TRUPACT-11s) for contact-handled (CH) waste or one remote-handled (RH) cask (RH-72B) (a cylinder consisting of a separate inner canister within an outer cask protected by impact limiters at each end) for RH waste.

The process flow diagrams are developed from multiple data sources, and TRU waste processing knowledge from various sources: therefore, the uncertainty of the process flow diagrams cannot be quantified, but should be in the Same order of magnitude as the documents used as guidelines for this study. The process flow diagrams developed for this study were designed mostly in accordance with the EM-PEIS and the WMFCITRUW report; however, not every module recommended in the WMFCITRUW report was included in this study. The reasons for deviating from the recommended WMFCITRUW guidance indude (1) minimizing the costs of duplicate equipment contained in more than one module, and (2) more accurately representing the functions in existing and planned TRU waste facilities.

Mass and volume throughput are calculated using data from the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Transuranic Waste Baseline Inventory Report (BIR) (DOE, 1995d). These rates are calculated using a 20-year processing period and a 4,032-hour working year. The mass or volume input to each of the individual modules is shown in Appendix 0 and is used as the basis for the module throughput which is the primary data used to estimate the cost of the module.

"The TRU waste disposal inventory in the BIR is derived from existing information on waste, which has been provided by DOE TRU waste generatorktorage sites and is predominately based

study. Calculated processing rates using a 20-year period and 4,032-hour working year may also introduce a level of uncertainty in estimating the costs. Many of the calculated processing rates were below or beyond the range of processing rates listed in the WMFCITRUW report and may cause the calculated costs to be skewed.

on process knowledge" (DOE, 19954). Any uncertainty within the BIR is carried into this EA -..

Numerical data values for cost versus flow rate information were obtained from the authors of the WMFCITRUW and used to construct approximate relations or curve fits for cost versus mass or volume throughput for a specific processing module, as shown in Figures P-13 through P-23. Cost data are available in the WMFCITRUW report according to specific project activities including pre-operations (pre-ops), planning life-cycle cost (PLCC), construction, operations and maintenance (O&M), and decontamination and decommissioning (D&D). Appendix P provides additional information on the method for establishing the modules. The PLCC is the summation of pre-ops, construction, O&M and D&D cost.

The WMFCITRUW was developed specifically to calculate facility costs in the EM-PEIS. Neither the WMFCITRUW nor the EM-PEE provide a quantitative uncertainty of the costing data. From the costing categories listed in Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers (Peters et al., 1991), the WMFCITRUW study cost estimates fall into the Study Estimate cost category where the probable accuracy of the estimate is plus or minus 30 percent. To ensure that the waste processing cost estimates presented in this study account for those facilities that currently exist, a list of existing facilities was assembled from information gathered from several sources, including personal communications (Bjotvedt, 1995; George, 1995) and preliminary information being developed by the DOE National TRU Program Office. Data from these sources were consolidated into a single list used to describe existing TRU waste processing

AUO8-95NVPIEACBS:R3744-P 763435.01 11/16/95 845arn


450,000

400,000

350,000

300,000 -

' 250,000

c

u

z 8 200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0 1 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210


LEGEND

1 .O PRE-OPERATIONS y = 39.957~ + 1603.4 R2= 1

2.0 CONSTRUCTION y = 410.93~ + 2820.7

-Linear (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) 5K)

-Linear (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) 5K)

R2= 1 -Linear (4.0 D&D)

3.0 0 & M 10 years y = 260.51~ + 13871 R2= 1

-Linear (3.0 O& M

-tinear (2.0 Const)

20 years)

3.0 0 & M 20 years y = 521.02~ + 27742 R2= 1 10 years)

-Linear (3.0 O& M

4.0 D & D y = 1035.7~ - 3E-10 R2= 1

-Linear (1 .O Pre-Ops)

. TOTAL PLCC (1 0 yr) v=1747.1~+18295

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) y = 2007.6~ + 32166 R2= 1

Figure P-13 CH-RH Retrieval

P-16


450,000

400,000

350,000

300,000

250,000 e i-

0 g 200,000

150,000

100,000

50,000

0 80 100 120 140 160 180 200


LEGEND

+ 1 .O PRE-OPERATIONS -Linear (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) y = 81.515~ + 4188.3 $K)

-Linear (TOTAL PLCC (1 0 yr)

-Linear (3.0 O& M 2.0 CONSTRUCTION $K) y = 200.17~ + 47294

R 2 = 1 10 years)

3.0 O& M 10 years y = 691x + 20625 R 2 = 1

-Linear (2.0 Const)

-Linear (1 .O Pre-Ops) . . .

-Linear (4.0 D&D) Y 3.0 O& M ,. 20 years

y = 1382x + 41 250 R2= 1

4.0 D&D y = 12.555~ + 10374 R 2 = 1

0 TOTAL PLCC (1 0 yr) $K y = 1676.3~ + 1031 06 R 2 = 1

$K .+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) ..,

y = 985.25~ + 82481 R 2 = 1 .-/’

-Linear (3.0 O& M 20 years)

Figure P-14 Waste Characterization

P-17 76335 01 00 00 OOlew A157 OOEWPP 95-2135 10113195


6oo'ooo 3 500,000

400,000

2 3 + 300,000 v) 0 0

200,000

100.000

0 " , - I I I " I x y = = y * = 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000


n 3.0 O& M 10 years y = 31.836~ + 49523 R2=1

x 3.0 O& M 20 years y = 63.673~ + 99046 R2 = 1

x 4.0 D&D y = 1.5643~ + 2136.6 R 2 = 1

0 TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) $K y = 40.578~ + 65777 R2 = 1

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K y = 72.415x+ 115300 R2 = 1

LEGEND -

-Linear (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr)

-Linear (3.0 O& M

-Linear (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr)

-Linear (3.0 O& M

-Linear (4.0 D&D)

$K)

20 years)

$K)

10 years)

Figure P-15

P-I a

CH-RH Front End Support (TADMIN)

DoE/WlPP 95.2135 1W13/95

I -

.-


30,000 ,

763435 01 OO.OO.DDlcwA159

0 1 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000


LEGEND

+ 1 .O PRE-OPERATIONS -Linear (2.0 Const) y = 3.6004~ + 5679.6 R 2 = 1


2.0 CONSTRUCTION y = 3.5771~ + 8437.9 R z = l

Figure P-16 CH-RH (TADMIN)

P-19 DOEIWIPP 952135 10113195


250,000 , 200,000

2 150,000

+ v)

t?

8 100,000

50,000

0 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000


LEGEND -

+ 1 .O PRE-OPERATIONS y = 0.878~ + 2969.1

-Linear (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K)

R2=1 -Linear (3.0 O& M rn 2.0Const

y = 2.6672~ + 12644 R2=1

20 yeais)

$K) -Linear (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr)

3.0 O& M 1 o years 10 years) y = 7.3151~ + 23831 R2=1

-Linear (3.0 O& M

-Linear (2.0 Const)

x 3.00& M -Linear (4.0 D&D) 20 years y = 14.63~ + 47661 R 2 = 1


w: 4.0D&D y = 2.2816~ + 2395.4 R 2 = 1

0 TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) $K y=13.142~+41839 R 2 = 1

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K y = 20.457~ + 65670 R 2 = 1

Figure P-17 (ir. CH-RH Certify and Ship

P-20 i t 76343mi .W.WWW A 160 --./ OOEIWIPP95-ZI35 TO/! 3/95


300,000

250,000

200,000

5' 52 + 150,000

0 3

100,000

50,000

0 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 I (


LEGEND

I00

+ 1 .O PRE-OPERATIONS -Linear (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) v = 1 .181~ + 2724.3 $K) R2- 1 -Linear (3.0 O& M

2.0 CONSTRUCTION -Linear (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) y = 3.458~ + 7922

3.0 O& M -Linear (3.0 O& M 10 years 10 years) y = 9.871 7x + 22786 R2= 1 -Linear (2.0 Const)

x 3.00& M -Linear (1 .O Pre-Ops) 20 years y - 19.743~ + 45572 R2= 1

20 years)

$K)

-Linear (4.0 D&D)

x 4.0 D&D y = 0.6254x + 1592 R2- 1 . TOTAL PLCC (1 0 yr)

$K y = 15.136~ + 35024 F?= 1

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K

R2= 1 y = 25.008x + 5781 1

Figure P-18 CH-RH Maintenance

76343501 OOOOOOlowAlSl P-21 DOEWIPP 95-2135 10113195


*-

160,000

140,000

120.000

5' loo,ooo ?z I- 80,000 v) ' 60.000

40,000

20,000

0 0 20,000 40,000 60,OW R0,OOO 100,000

INPUT CAPACITY (m3)

LEGEND

+ 1 .O PRE-OPERATIONS y = -7.905E-174x+ 2.058E-1 14x - 1 .997E-062x + 1.095E-01x + 7.279€+02 R2 = 9.995E-01

rn 2.0 CONSTRUCTION y = 0.4628~ + 2222.5 R 2 = 1

3.0 O& M 10 years y = 0.4715~ + 2753 R2= 1

x 3.00& M 20 years v = -1 .437E-154x - 3.631 E-0s3x + 3.743E-IO'x + 1.756E+OOx + 1.186E+04

R2 = 9.985E-01 x 4.0 D&D

y = -7.186E-184x + 1.871E-103x - 1.816E-052x + 8.778E-01x + 5.929E+03 R2 = 9.985E-01

6 TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) $K y = 4.01 2E-1 13x- 8.584E-062x + 1.631 E+OOx + 1.358E+04 R2 = 9.998E-01

$K y = 7.626E-1 13x- 1 , 632E-05~~ + 2.247E+OOx + 2.126E+04 R2 = 9.996E-01

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr)

-Poly. (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) -Linear (4.0 D&D) $KI

I

-Poly. (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) -Poly. (3.0 O& M 10 years) $to

-Poly. (3.0 O& M 20 years)

-Linear (2.0 Const)

-Poly. (1 .O Pre-Ops)

Figure P-19 CH-RH Storage

753435.01.00.00 OOlcw A152 P-22 DOEIWIPP 95-2135 10113195

,-


900,000

800,000

700,000

600,000

'f, 500,000 + E 400,000

300,000

200,000

E

_-c-

100,000

0 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000


LEGEND

+ 1 .O PRE-OPEqPTIONS y = -5.890E-09 x + 2.963E-053x - 5.700E-022x + 5.747E+OIx + 1.195E+04 R2 = 9.997E-01

rn 2.0 CONSTRUfTlON v = -8.831 E-09 x + 4.443E-053x - 8.547E-0Z2x + 9.580E+OIx + 4.519E+04 k2= 9.998E-01

R O O R M -. . - .. . . . 10 years y = -5.133E-084~ + 2.583E-043~ - 4.968E-01 2x + 4.985E+02x + 9.730E+04 R2= 9.996E-01

x 3.00& M 20 years y = -1 .027E-074~ + 5.166E-043x9.937E-01 2x + 9.970E+02x + 1.946E+05 R2 = 9.996E-01

y = 1.6149~ + 3941 .I R 2 = 1

TOTAL PLCC (1 0 yr) $K y = -6.605E-084x + 3.323E-043x - 6.393E-01 zx + 6.534E+OZx + 1.584E+05 R2= 9.997E-01

r: 4.0 D&D

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K y = -1.174E-074x + 5.906E-043x - 1 .136E+002x + 1.152E+03x + 2.557E+05 R2 = 9.997E-01

-Poly. (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr)


-Poly. (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) SKI

-Poly. (2.0 Const)

-Poly. (2.0 Const)

-Poly. (1.0 Pre-Ops)

$K)


-Linear (4.0 D&D)

Figure P-20 (7, q, :I ' cement t ' ,

763435.01 00.00.001cw A163 P-23 DOElWlPP 95-2135 1Ol13195


n

1,200,000

1,000,000

800,000

2 3 t- 600,000 v) 0 0

400,000

200,000 -

0 0 500 1,000 1,500

INPUT CAPACITY (kg/hr) 00

LEGEND

+ 1 .O PRE-OPEYTIONS y = -7.612E-09 x + 3.830E-053x - 7.367E-0Z2x + 7.427E+OIx + 1.489E+04 R2= 9.996E-01

m 2.0 CONSTRYTION y - 1.226E-05 x - 5.104E-022x + 9.489E+Olx + 6.073€+04 R2- 9.991E-01 3.0 O& M I o years y = -6.625E-084x + 3.333E-043~ - 6.41 2E-01 2x + 6.434E+02x + 1.214€+05 R2= 9.996E-01

x 3.0 O& M 20 years y = -1 .325E-074x + 6.667E-043x - 1 .282E+002x + 1.287E+03x + 2.428€+05 R2 = 9.996E-01

x 4.0 D&D y = 1.941 2x + 4832.6 R 2 = 1

o TOTAL PLCC (10 yr.) $K y = -8.57E-084x + 4.31 E-043x - 8.29E-01 2x + 8.47E+02x + 1.97E+05 R2= l.OOE+OO

$K y = -1 .519E-074x + 7.643E-043x - 1 .470E+002x + 1.490E+03x + 3.184E+05 R2= 9.997E-01

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr.)

-Poly. (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr.) -Poly. (2.0 Const) $K)

-Poly. (3.0 O& M 20 vears)

-Poly. (1 .O Pre-Ops)

-POI;. (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr.)


-Linear (4.0 D&D) $K)

Fiaure P-21

DDElwlPP 95-2135 10/13/95


400, ooo

350,000

300,000

250,000 2 e + 200,000 v) 0 " 150,000

100,000

50,000 I 0

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000


LEGEND

+ 1 .O PRE-OPERATIONS -Linear (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr)

-Linear (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) y = 5.0482~ + 6231.2 $K) R 2 - I 2.0 CONSTRUCTION $K) y = 29.447~ + 43598 0 2 - 4 20 years)

-Linear (3.0 O& M I , - 3

-Linear (3.0 O& M

-Linear (2.0 Const) 3.0 O& M 10 years) 10 years Y = 38.531~ + 45748 +=I

-Linear (1.0 Pre-Ops) x 3.00& M

20 years -Linear (4.0 D&D) v = 77.062~ + 91496 R 2 = 1

x 4.0 D&0 y = 2.0512~ + 3408.2 R 2 = 1

TOTAL PLCC (1 0 yr) $K y = 75.077~ + 98986 R2=1

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K y=113.61~+144734 R2=1

Fiuure P-22

OOElwlPP 95.2135 10113/05


/--

CH VITRIFICATION (PLASMA) 600,000 ,

500,000

400,000

2 52. + 300,000 v) 0 0

200,000

100,000

0

-_--- _--- _____------

0 100 200 300


LEGEND ___

+ 1.0 PRE-OPERATIONS y = -0.Ol2Z2x + 28.113~ + 19882

/4 R2 = 0.9987

2.0 CONSTRI$XON y = 4.233E-08 x . 5.855E-054x + 3.1 1ZE-OZ3x. 8.093E+003x + 1.155E+03x + 1.157Et05 R2= 9.991 E-01

3.0 O& M 10 years 10 years y = 167.24~ + 82022 R2= 1

x 3.0 O& M 20 years 20 years y = 334.48~ + 164045 R2= 1

y = 3,943E.0g5x - 5.454E-064~ + 2L199E-03~~ - 7.538E-01% + 1.075Et02x + 9.789Et03 P?= 9.991 E-01

TOTAL PLCC (10 yr) $K y = -9.666E.064x + 1.119E-0Z3x - 4.763E+002x + 1.168Et03x + 2.329Et05 R2= 9.993E-01

x 4.0 D&D

+ TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K y = 2.073E.033x - 1 965E+002x + 1.030€+03x + 3.232E+05 R2 = 9.988E-01

Figure P-23 CH Vitrification (Plasma)

J

400 500

- Poly. (TOTAL PLCC (20 yr) $K)

$ K ) -Poly. (TOTAL PLCC (10 yr)

-Linear (3.0 O& M 20 years)

-Poly. (2.0 Const)

--Unear (3.0 O& M 10 years)

--Poly. (4.0 D&D)

-Poly. (1.0 Pre-Ops)

76343501 M M W O W A1 66 P-26

1 - 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

3 5 '6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

facilities for this study, as shown in Table P-1. All of the information sources have not been subject to extensive review, thus uncertainly of the data arises from the uncertainties associated with the sources themselves, and any changes that have occurred between the current time and the time these sources were compiled.

The existing facility list was used to adjust process cost estimates. O&M and D&D costs were added and applied to facilities that had current existing TRU waste processing facilities for a specific module, while the PLCC was applied to facilities that did not have existing processing capabilities for a specific module.

Combining all of the information gathered, computer cost-model programs have been developed using Visual Basic computer programming language and cost equations were applied based on a calculated mass or volume throughput for a specific module. These programs were implemented using a computer spreadsheet with mass and volume throughput data. The computer cost model programs calculate the cost for each processing module for each alternative in each configuration. Summary results for process costs are presented in Section 4.1 of this appendix.

2.2

This section will supply information on the sources and assumptions used to complete transpartation cost estimations for the various EAs.

The guidance chosen for development of transportation cost estimates is based on a report titled "Waste Management Facilities Cost Information for Transportation of Radioactive and Hazardous Materials," co-authored by Fred Feizollahi and David Shropshire of the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory (INEL) (Feizollahi and Shropshire, 1994). This report is also used as guidance for development of transportation cost estimation in the Draft EM-PEIS. The report also covers the procedure for estimating the costs of various types of wastes, including an entire section on RH and CH-TRU waste transportation.

It is important to note that the report does not make an attempt to limit the volume 'or radionuclides of the waste being transported; all shipments are mass-limited. The report includes only guidance for estimating the cost of transportation of waste; loading and unloading operations are included in the facility operating and maintenance costs.

It is assumed that all CH-TRU waste will be shipped by truck in TRUPACT-II containers, which have weight, volume, and radionuclide restrictions that limit the amount of waste transported in one shipment. Given waste volume and mass data for each of the sites, both mass-limited and vdume-limited cases were developed. It was found that the treatment of the weight results in the majority of the shipments will carry waste of sufficiently high density to be mass-limited. The mass limitation of the TRUPACT-II shipments requires that the transportation of the waste be load

TRU Waste Transportation Cost Estimation Methodoloqy

P-27 763435.01 11/1W95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

managed. The load management of the waste requires that payload scenarios be taken into account for the shipment of TRUPACT-11s. RH-TRU waste, however, did have limitations on the radionuclide content and the volumes had to be further reduced to meet container and shipping specifications. The number of shipments was ultimately derived by making assumptions not included in the report. It was assumed that a 60/40 split between 55-gallon drums and standard waste boxes would be made (for volume limited shipments). The mass limited shipments required that the waste be packaged into 55-gallon drums to maintain loading efficiency (see Tables P-53 through P-74). Fourteen 55-gallon drums or two standard waste boxes can fit into a TRUPACT-II container. A truck shipment has the capacity for three TRUPACT-II containers. The mass limited shipments varied the number of drums that were shipped from 42 drums to 7 drums per TRUPACT-11. Additionally, the number of TRUPACT-II per shipment varied from 3 to 1.

The planned route and total mileage traveled for each of the shipments is determined by the HIGHWAY 3.3 Routing Model that was prepared by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory for use by DOE. The model is an extensive computerized atlas that determines the optimum route for a given origin and destination. The DOE sites that produce and treat TRU waste are all included, as is the WIPP repository. The program allows the user to place constraints on route choices, and several were invoked in order to choose the most preferred route for TRU waste transportation. Route constraints include the barred use of roads that prohibit truck use, the preferred use of routes already designated for hazardous waste transportation, and the use of roads in New Mexico designated as preferred shipment routes to the WIPP. The model is described in Section 3.5.2 of this report, Methodology Used to Evaluate Factor 5 (Risk of Transportation).

There are three types of costs associated with transportation. Carrier costs and hardware costs are functions of a moving vehicle and are combined to make up the "costs per loaded mile" (CPLM). Carrier costs include tractor, fuel, labor, insurance, security escort, taxes, tools, permit fees, and related costs incurred during waste transportation. Hardware costs are associated with maintenance of the specialized trailers and railroad cars used to transport waste. Fixed costs are independent of the distance traveled and are considered separately. Fixed costs include demurrage costs of the canier and the hardware used in the shipment. The total cost for a single shipment can be determined by adding the fixed costs to the product of the CPLM and the number of miles traveled. It should be noted that the CPLM unit rate is based on one-way mileage from origin to destination, but that the total cost for one shipment includes the return trip (see Section 3.5.2.5).

Finally, the process of estimating the costs is a straightforward analysis. The costs are derived from the number of shipments based on a volumetric and mass calculation, taking into consideration the volume and mass of drums or standard waste boxes. The number of shipments are applied to the CPLM and the round-trip mileage, and the fixed costs are added to determine the total transportation costs for each individual site. Transportation cost estimations were performed for the decentralized and regionalized cases and each EA therein. An estimation was also made for the centralized baseline. Since the centralized transportation configuration requires that all waste be treated at the WIPP, all the centralized €As are similar from a transportation point of view. Results are discussed in Section 4.2.

There are relatively few sources of uncertainty in the development of the transportation cost estimations. Included in these are the uncertainty of the waste volumes and masses requiring

-.

-

-

AU08-9YWPEACBSR3744-P

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

-25 ’6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

- transportation and the uncertainty in the numbers provided in the report used as guidance for estimate development. The level of uncertainty is discussed in Section 4.2.

2.3 Backfill Emplacement Cost Estimation Methodolow

Backfill emplacement costs were developed by analyzing a logical approach to emplacing material into a panel. The approach had to be generic in nature to accommodate the fact that an exact method of emplacement has not been developed. The approach for estimating the costs of emplacement are generated by applying mine development data sources to an activity that is not characteristic the mining industry. The backfilling of waste emplaced in a mine has not been an activity that is common practice for the DOE or mining industry.

The cost estimation of a backfill operation was developed based on the rate at which backfill would be emplaced. The assumptions for this estimation are listed in Section 3.0. Once the capacity of the equipment requirement was determined a cost model was developed to determine the cost requirements for backfill.

The primary source of costing information is the SME Mining Engineering Handbook (Hartman, 1992), which provided a logical approach to the activities that would be performed. Assumptions had to be made in order to provide some logical data points for performing a backfill activity. An estimation of this type would be categorized as a Study Estimate where the uncertainty of the estimate is plus or minus 30 percent.

Data for the estimate was dependent on the mass and volume of backfill material. The backfill was to be emplaced daily as a batch and would not interrupt the waste ernplacement activities. The rate for backfill was assumed to be 960 hours per year for 35 years.

Calculation of the cost estimation was developed utilizing a spreadsheet format that applied the cost equations to the rate at which the backfill would be emplaced. The spreadsheet calculated the cost for each EA that had a bacMill associated with it.

Costs included in the estimate are based on capital equipment design and development and on operation and maintenance. The capital is based on actual equipment costs and the tons per day of emplacement capacity (Hartman, 1992). The operating costs are calculated as the total number of m s for backfill operations multiplied by the number of hours to perform the backfill times a labor rate. Maintenance costs are assumed to be 30 percent of total capital equipment costs. Design and development of the backfill emplacement activities is calculated as 30 percent of the total capital equipment expenditures. A contingency factor of 25 percent was applied to the overall cost. The manpower for the backfill emplacement was analyzed similarly to an unmechanized shrinkage mine. This facilitated the complexity of departmental requirements for safety of operations.

P-29 763435.01 11/16/95 8:-

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

2.4 WlPP Waste Operations Emolacement Cost Estimation Methodoloqy

The m t estimation for the impacts associated with the WlPP operations only analyzed the incremental costs to the actual activities associated with waste handling and emplacement. These impacts provide a measure of the planning necessary to implementing an EA.

For each of the EAs and configuration (i.e., decentralized, regionalized, or centralized) the throughput of the waste was determined in order to handle and emplace the waste at WIPP. The throughput rate was based on the number of transported waste shipments that were to be handled at WIPP. The waste work-off and repository configuration is analyzed and accounted for to determine additional equipment requirements or modifications. The next parameter is to determine the manpower necessary to handle the waste. Guidance was provided (Palanca, 1995) .in order to determine the size of a crew and the waste handling capacity.

The number of waste shipments to the WlPP was determined based on the methodology for transportation (see Section 2.2) The throughput rate was calculated by applying the number of shipments to the operational period of the WIPP. The waste transported to the WlPP site had to meet the time constraint of a 35 year operational l ie for the treatment and emplacement. The alternatives that required waste treatment would not have waste available for approximately 10 years, which only allows 25 years for transportation and emplacement. Additionally, the manpower requirements for the waste handling operation were given as three possible crews based on the throughput rate. The capital equipment requirement was estimated and totaled for the applicable EA.

Calculation of the WlPP handling cost estimation was developed utilizing a spreadsheet format that applied the capital requirements and the throughput rate of the waste to the manpower requirement. The cost was calculated for each EA and configuration. A comparative analysis was performed to the baseline decentralized EA.

3.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND DATA FOR FACTOR 7

Two major sources of data were used for the analysis of cost and schedule:

The initial retrievable and projected waste volumes were obtained from the WlPP BIR (DOE, 1995d)

Guidance for process flow diagrams and costing and cost curves were obtained from the draft EM-PEIS (DOE, 1995b).

The major assumptions follow:

Cited references are the most current information source of the reference subject and the information gathered from these references are correct.

Mass and volume changes occur during certain processing activities. A summary of the mass and volume changes is presented in Table P-1.

,---...

1 2

- 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

!6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

-29

- 25

The volume of waste categorized as "unknown" was processed the same as solid organics and inorganics. However, the mass of unknown waste was assumed to be zero because no information was available regarding the density of the unknown waste, and the volume of this waste was small compared to the total volume of waste destined for WIPP.

Thirty percent of the stored waste at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Savannah River Site (SRS), INEUArgonne National Laboratory-West (ANL-W), and Hanford requires retrieval.

Twenty-five percent of stored sludges at LANL and INEL require re-grouting.

Waste is treated and or stored according to the site configurations denoted in Table P-2.

Waste is processed 4,032 hours per year over a 20-year waste treatment facility operating life.

All waste within a major waste form category (i.e., sludges, solid organic, solid inorganic) can be treated using a specified technology.

The supercompaction module does not include shredding.

Costs for supercompaction processing were analyzed as a modified cost module for the WMFCITRUW supercompaction module.

Costs for a vitrification unit were considered adequate for the costs for a plasma melter.

Costs for enhanced cement processing are identical to costs for grouting except for material costs.

Costs for shredding and adding day are identical to costs for grouting except for material costs.

Costs for shredding and compacting were analyzed as a modified cost module for supercompaction.

Transportation of waste to WlPP is either mass or volume limited. The limiting factor determines the number of shipments.

Costs for a throughput of 0.05 kg/hr or less to any processing module are considered zero.

Costs are in 1994 dollars and do not take into account escalation or the time value of dollars.

The operations at WlPP are 35 years. Waste treatment alternatives require 10 years for start-up to turnkey operations.

/----..... / ., ~ , * <

A!J08-95/WPiEACBS:R3744-P \ P-31 \- _/

763435.01 1111 6/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

The waste emplacement operations at WlPP consists of two eight hour shift operation five days a week.

EAs 94(a-9 decentralized and regionalized requires 28.6 years of waste emplacement which exceeds the time constraint of 35 years by 3.6 years.

Both waste handling and backfill is completed in the 35 year operational period.

Waste emplacement is dependent upon the number of TRUPACT-11s per day.

Backfill costs are based on a batch per day (tons) of material that would be emplaced each day.

Backfill of the rwms does not impact operations.

4.0 RESULTS OF ANALYSIS FOR FACTOR 7

4.1 Process Costinq Results

As described in Section 2.1, process costs are calculated using computer program cost models developed for this study. Costs are calculated for each EA in each configuration for CH waste and for decentralized baseline for RH waste. Cost values are based on 1994 cost data and do

the planning life cycle cost (Feizollahi and Shropshire, 1994). Summaries of these costs are presented in Tables P-3 and P-4. These tables present the summary of process costs for the baseline and each of the dierent EAs in each of the configurations for CH waste and for the decentralized baseline for RH waste.

Processing schemes for EAs 33,35(a&b), 83, and 11 1 are identical to the processing schemes for the baseline for each of the configurations, therefore their processing costs are assumed to be identical to the processing costs for the baseline. The processing scheme for EA 77 (a-d) is the same as the processing scheme for Alternative 1 for each of the configurations; therefore, its processing costs are identical to the process costs for EA 1. EA 33,35 (a and b), 77 (a through d), 83, and 11 1 will be omitted from further discussion in this section because they are not unique with respect to processing cost.

The range of processing costs for CH waste varies between $3.2 billion for the centralized baseline and $6.3 billion for decentralized EAs %(a-9. The process costs for the decentralized EAs are the highest for a specific EA; the process costs for the centralized configuration are the lowest. This was expected because process costs for treatment (maintenance and specific alternative treatments) are applied to a larger number of sites in the decentralized (10 sites) and regionalized (5 sites) configuration as compared to the centralized (1 site) configuration.

The processing costs for the baseline case were least expensive when compared to the EAs; processing costs for EA 94 (a-9 were most expensive. This results from a combination of effects. One explanation for this is that the treatment module throughput values for the baselines are lowest; treatment module throughput values for €A 94 (a-f) are highest. The baseline consists

not take into consideration time value of money or escalation for expenditures occurring during -

-

ALIOE95MPIEACBSR3744-P

1 2

- 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 !6

27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48

-19

of treating to the WIPP-Waste Acceptance Criteria (WAC) standards. Treatment to WIPP-WAC entailed shredding and grouting a portion of the existing sludges and all of the projected sludges, along with repackaging waste as necessary to meet transportation and WlPP requirements. In EA 94(a-9 all of the waste was treated in some way by either repackaging, enhanced-cement processing, or shredding and adding clay. Thus, the 'treatmenr processing throughput for EA 94 (a-9 is higher than the baseline.

The second explanation is that for the shred-and-add-clay and, enhanced-cement cost modules, it was assumed that there were currently no facilities that had these processing capabilities. The result was that the PLCC was applied to all appropriate sites (decentralized, regionalized and centralized configurations) making EA 94 (a-9 more costly than other EAs (e.g EA 1, etc.) where some facilities currently do have a specific processing capability.

Another observation from the information presented in Table P-3 is that after taking the level of uncertainty of the cost estimations plus or minus 30 percent (Section 2.1), that the centralized EA processing costs are approximately the same as compared to the decentralized baseline. The decentralized baseline represents the current strategy for managing CH waste. Thus, a greater benefit may be obtained by implementing a Centralized case for the same cost as the current strategy.

The RH process costs for the baseline decentralized configuration is $1.01 billion.

Costs are calculated for each EA in each configuration, for CH waste, on the basis of sites and processing modules. The results of these calculations are presented in Tables P-5 to P-34. Information contained in these tables represent the highest level of cost detail per EA. The purpose of these tables is to present detailed cost for an individual EA not provided in the summary table.

Costs are calculated for each Decentralized, Regionalized and Centralized configurations on the basis of EA ID number and site. The results of these calculations are presented in Tables P-35 to P-37. The purpose of these tables is to provide a comparative view of site costs per EA.

Costs percentages are calculated on the basis of cost percentage of each EA cost attributed to a specific site for each EA. These results are presented in Tables P-38 to P-40. The purpose of these tables is to provide normalized view of the data presented in Tables P-35 to P-37 and in assist in comparing the site costs to each other for all configurations.

Cost percentages are calculated on the basis of cost percentage of the each EA total cost attributed to a specific cost module (front end, retrieval, waste characterization, etc.). The results of these calculations are presented in Tables P-41 to P-43. The purpose off these tables is to present a normalized view of the data presented in Tables P-5 to P-34 and in assist in comparing the module costs to each other for all configurations.

Cost percentages are calculated on the bases of cost percentage of the total cost attributed to a specific area of processing. The results are presented in Tables P-44 to P-46 For the basis of this comparison, the total processing scheme is divided into three sections. The first section is named 'Front-End Processing" and is a roll-up of the Front End, Retrieval and Waste Characterization processing modules. The second section is named "Treatment Process" and is a roll-up of the Maintenance and any EA specific treatment modules (e.g. Plasma,

,- - 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47

Supercompaction, etc.). The third processing area is named “Back-End Processing’ and is a roll- up of the Certification and Shipping, and the Storage modules. The purpose of these tables to determine how costs are distributed throughout the total processing scheme.

Similar results are available for RH waste process cost data. Table P-47 presents the Decentralized Base Case cost per module for each site processing or shipping RH waste. Table P-48 presents the cost percentage of the total cost on a per site basis. Table P-50 presents the costs attributed to each processing module. Table P-49 presents the cost percentages of the total cost attributed to each processing module and lastly, Table P-51 presents the cost percentages attributed to each area of processing (Front End, Treatment and Back End).

4.2

This section provides information on the results of the transportation cost estimations for the various EAs. For information regarding the sources and assumptions used to complete transportation cost estimations, refer to Section CS.2.2.

Transportation cost estimations are performed for each configuration and EA. Within the centralized, regionalized, and decentralized configurations, some of the EAs are identical from a transportation standpoint, making the transportation costs for these f3s the same. For example, the centralized configuration provides only one set of transportation requirements because all treatment occurs at the WIPP, making the transportation costs for all centralized EAs the same. Similarly, the regionalized and decentralized EAs that vary backfill options do not provide unique situations to transportation, so these cases have transportation costs equal to those of other EAs. EAs that present transportation with a unique scheme include base case EAs and EAs 1, 6, 10, and 94(a-f).

The transportation scheme chosen has little effect on cost for any given EA. This is clearly demonstrated by the decentralized, regionalized, and centralized base cases. The total costs for transportation of CH-TRU waste are $690 million, $701 million, and $61 1 million, respectively. The centralized scheme requires that all waste be transported directly from its current site to the WIPP. Even though not treated, the waste must be handled only one time. The regionalized transportation configuration resulted in the highest percentage of waste to be handled twice; once from its storage site to the treatment site, and then on to the WIPP. The decentralized case avoids some of this “double handling” by treating at more sites, allowing more waste to take a more direct route to the WIPP. The overwhelming factor in determining transportation costs, as described below, is the volume of waste being transported.

TRU Waste TransDortation Cost Estimation Results

1

As explained in Section 2.2, each case is found to be mass-limited. Logically, therefore, the effect each EA has on mass will have a proportional effect on transportation costs. The baseline EA and EA 94(a-f) treat sludges by grouting and enhanced cement, respectively. These are processes that increase the volume of waste. Solid organics and solid inorganics are treated by processes that have little effect on volume in these EAs. These are clearly the two most expensive EAs from a transportation point of view. Transportation of wastes treated with EAs 1, 6, and 10 are less expensive because they reduce volume. EA 6 grouts sludges, which initially increases their volume, but further shredding and compaction of solid wastes reduces volumes by a ratio of approximately 1.3:l. EA 1, which grouts sludges but supercompacts solid wastes,

fir;\\ [ \\i 1 k - 1 ’

P-34 763435.01 11/16/95 8:-

1 - 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 - 25 ?6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 -

is less expensive still. Supercompaction reduces solid wastes by a ratio of 2.9:l. EA 10 is the least expensive. It treats waste by plasma melting, reducing volume by a ratio of approximately 33.

The transportation costs range from a minimum of $61 1 million for centralized EA's, which are transported directly to the WIPP, to a maximum of $1,146 million for regionalized EA 94(a-f), which not only increases the original volume of waste by the largest percentage, but also has the highest percentage of "double handled" waste. An estimate to handle RH waste for the decentralized baseline is also prepared. In addition to the $61 1 million estimated to transport CH waste for this EA, $318.3 million is estimated to transport RH waste. Even though the volume of RH waste is significantly smaller than CH waste, to avoid radionuclide limitations during transportation, a much smaller volume is carried by each shipment. The Transportation Cost Estimation Summary, Table P-52 presents the estimated transportation costs for each EA.

Detailed costs are presented in Tables P-53 to P-77. These tables include site specific information used to calculate total site costs for shipping. This information includes waste destination, CPLM, number of shipments, total miles traveled, fixed cost, variable cost, and total cost. These tables present the costs in the highest level of detail and provide information not otherwise found in Table P-52.

The level of uncertainty in the cost estimates comes from two sources. One, the level of uncertainty in the stored and projected waste volumes in the Baseline Inventory Report (DOE, 1995d) and two, the level of uncertainty in the studies used as guidance to develop the transportation cost estimates. For guidance in estimating transportation costs, a report titled 'Waste Management Facilities Cost Information for Transportation of Radioactive and Hazardous Materials' (Feizollahi and Shropshire, 1994), was contracted by the DOE, and Revision 1 was completed in September, 1994. A report of this nature would be classified as a *study estimate" (Peters and Timmerhaus, 1991), and would have a probable accuracy only within plus or minus 30 percent.

4.3 Backfill Emplacement Cost Results

Backfill emplacement costs were performed for each of the EAs that specified backfill. The cost for emplacement activities was independent to the case of the EA (decentralized, regionalized, centralized) and was only affected by the mass and volume of the backfill. This costs for the EAs were dependent upon the amount and type of backfill that was to be utilized.

Table P-75 (Backfill Emplacement Cost Total Summary) provides a summary of the estimated cost total for each EA. The lowest cost for backfill are EAs 77 (a-d) which consists of the least amount of backfill material due to the reduced room height for waste. The highest cost for backfill are EAs 35 (a-b) and 94c, respectively. This is due to the increased complexity of emplacing a wet (grout) backfill.

Cost of backfill is categorized as a planning cost estimate and has an uncertainly of plus or minus 30 percent. In addition the estimation does not include the cost of the material to be utilized for backfill. It is assumed that backfill materials consisting of salt would utilize the existing mined materials.

P-35 763435.01 11/16/95 845anl

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

- 4.4

Incremental cost information for the emplacement activities associated with the waste handling at the WlPP are discussed in this section. The discussion includes the assumptions and limitations of the results.

The comparative analysis of the WlPP waste handling and emplacement activities is discussed is shown in Table P-76. The cost of WlPP handling and emplacing the waste is primarily independent of the cases (decentralized, regionalized, centralized) for this cost estimate study. For this estimate there were three waste handling/emplacement crew configuration that were utilized as input for the EAs. The crew sized was dependent upon the number of TRUPACT-lls that were processed per day as shown in Table P-77. The number of TRUPACT-lls that were proce&ed was based on the number of waste shipment and the limiting factor of a 35 year operational life for WIPP.

Baseline cost is established based on the required labor to handle and emplace the waste. The EAs 33, 35 (a-b) and 11 1 have the same comparable cost as the baseiine. The EA with the highest handling savings are number 10 and 94 (a-9 in ernplacement activities for 25 years instead of 35 years based on 100% processing of waste. This is due to the decrease in the total waste generated by approximately 3:l. EAs 1 and 6 have the same handling savings. EA 77(ad) has a reduced savings as compared to EA 1 . This is due to the reduced room height which does not accommodate the current remote handled underground handling equipment or emplacement configuration.

WlPP Waste Operations Emplacement Cost Results

The limitation of this estimate is that the total WlPP budget is not included in this estimate. The I

only costs included are labor and anticipated capital equipment or modifications. Additional cost not included in this comparative analysis is the required budget that would be needed to manage and operate the WIPP, departmental management, and any additional research and development. This estimate is only intended to provide a measure of the relative cost savings or burden for an EA.

P-36 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4

,- TABLE P-1

EXISTING TRU FACILITIES

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ?1

I

22 23 24 25 26 27

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40

28

Waste Processing Functions

Waste Front Certify/ Super Treatmen?

Site Retrieve Char End Ship Maint Storage Grout Cmpa Plasma

Majar Genemtor/Storage Sites

ANL-E - X X X Hanf X X X X X

ANL-W LANL X X X X X LLNL - X X X X X Mound - X X NTS - X X X ORNL - X X X X X RFETS - X X X X X X X SRS X X X

Small Quantity S i

A r e s . BCLDP - P BT - P

INEU X X X X X x3

- - - - - P P - 1

1

1 - - - - - P

P - - - - - ETEC KAPL LBL Pad Pantex SNL U Mo WVDP

Notes: X = Site has existing facilities to perform this function. No credii was given for planned facilfies. Costs only include 20 years of O&M and D&D. - = Site will not require this function. P = This function will be accomplished utilizing portable equipment. 'For sites which will use portaMe equipment for waste characterization and certification and shipment, it is assumed that existing facilities will be sufficient for administrative purposes. 2No facilities exist to treat TRU waste using shredkompact, shred/add clay, or enhanced cement. 31t is &umed that the INEL Pit 9 treatment facility will be available to treat stored waste.

P-37 763435.01 11/16/95 8:4%

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22

23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

_- TABLE P-2

SITE TRANSFERS FOR THE DECENTRALIZED, REGIONALIZED, AND CENTRALIZED CONFIGURATIONS

Decentralized Regionalized Centralized Site CH RH Site CH RH S i CH RH

ANL-E' WlPP ORNL+ ANL-E SRS ORNL ANL-E WlPP WlPP Ames BCLDP BT ETEC

INEU ANL-W' KAPL LANL' LBL LLNL' Mound' MU NTS'

ORNL'

PA Pantex RFETS' Hanford' SNIJNM

ANL-E#

Mound NTS

WlPP

Mound

(LLNL) WlPP WIPP ANL-E# WlPP

WlPP

ORNL LANL WlPP WlPP LANL

' WlPP

ORNL+ ORNL+

WlPP

ORNL+ WlPP

WlPP

WlPP

WlPP

Ames BCLDP BT ETEC

INEU ANL-W' KAPL LANL' LBL LLNL Mound MU NTS

ORNL'

PA (W

Pantex RFETS' Hanford' SNLMM

SRS ORNL

SRS ORNL INEU

WlPP Hanford ANL-W

SRS ORNL WlPP Hanford Hanford Hanford SRS SRS INEU Hanford ANL-W SRS WlPP

SRS LANL WlPP WlPP WlPP LANL

Ames BCLDP BT ETEC

INEU ANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL Mound MU NTS

ORNL

PA Pantex RFETS Hanford SNLMM

WlPP WlPP

WlPP WlPP WlPP

WlPP WlPP

WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP

WlPP WlPP A

WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP WlPP

SRS' WlPP WlPP SRS' WlPP ORNL SRS WlPP WlPP

Notes: . Denotes a processing site.

Remote handled wastes from BCLDP, BT, KAPL, (these are not discussed in the EM-PEIS) and ANL-E should be processed at ORNL instead of Mound because Mound currently does not process or store RH waste.

The EM-PEIS discusses that ANL-E will process and ship their own CH waste, but does not cover Ames and MU, which are closer to ANL-E than ORNL.

EM-PEIS indicates LBL waste will be shipped to Hanford. LBL waste should be shipped to LLNL because it is much closer.

ORNL+

ANL-E#

(LLNL)

/' - - - +

P-38 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 - 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

TABLE P-3

CH PROCESS GRAND TOTALS ($4

Alternative ID # Decentralized Regional& Centralized

Base Case 3,576,954 3,418.650 3,202.376 1 4,379,357 3,974,696 3,411,991 6 4,117,678 3,757.294 3,329,333 10 5,966.427 4,992,885 3,460,139 33 3,576,954 3,418.650 3,202,376

. 35(a&b) 3,576,954 3,418,650 3,202,376 77 4.379.357 3,974,696 3,411,991 83 3,576,954 3,418,650 3,202,376

94 (a4 6.301.672 5,502,932 4,217,091 111 3,576,954 3.41 8,650 3,202,376

P-39 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

TABLE P-4

RH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE COST PER SITE

($K)

Site cost

BCLDP BT HANFORD INEUANL-W UAPL LANL ORNL SRS

0 0

173,279 170,849

0 206,932 339.1 90 121,730

GRANDTOTAL 1.011.980

P-40 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

i

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

TABLE P-5

CH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE COST SUMMARY

($K)

Waste Cerllflcatlon Slte Retrieval Characterlzatlon Malntenance Front End Grouting and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total

AMES LAB ANL-E BT ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNC MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNUNM SRS WlPP PORTABLE

Module Total

0 0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .o

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 50,674

Portable Portable 108,865 158,617 Portable 77,219

Portable 35,343 50,674 Portable 50,674 35,343

Portable Portable 35,343 Portabb 181,960

0 B

782.712

0 0 0 0

47,466 47,773

0 47,604

0 47,170

0 0 0

47,171 0 0

47,450 0 0 0 0

284.635

A 101,199

A A

1 19,034 117,412

A 108,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

1 16,492 0 0

1,073,005

0 0 0 0

88,819 117,717

0 76,332

0 88.819

0 0 0

0 0

72,326 0 0 0 0

532.831

88,819

Portable 14,123


Poltable 10.831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831

Portable Portable 22,109 Portable 66,413

0 79,848

398,857

0 4,850

0 0

15.878 14,413

0 9,727

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,850

0 0

4,650 0

9,705 0 0

80.380

0 170,847

0 0

513,712 693,385

0 451,057

0 288,556 172,502

0 171,177 288,786

0 0

285,810 0

461,273 0

79,848

GRANDTOTAL 3,576,954

P-41 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

TABLE P-6

CH DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #1 COST SUMMARY

($K)

Waste Certlflcatlon Slte Retrieval Characterlzatlon Malntenance Front End Qroullng Supercompaction and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total

AMES LAB ANL-E BT ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LEL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNUNM SRS WlPP PORTABLE

Module Total

0 0 0 0

80.387 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 50,674


Portable 35,343 50,674

Portable 50,874 35,343


0 B

762,712

0 0 0 0

52,786 50,556

0 48,920

0 47,274 47,199

0 47,272 47,348

0 0

47,918 0

52,015 0 0

441,285

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A 108,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

116,492 0 0

1,073,005

0 0 0 0

88,819 117,717

0 76,332

0 88,819

0 0 0

88,819 0 0

72,326 0 0 0 0

532.831

0 0 0 0

146,500 134,615

0 96,559

0 26,162 26,162

0 26,162 26,162

0 0

30,731 0

144,301 0 0

6 5 7.3 5 5

Portable 14,123

Portable Portable 55,705 55.708 Portable 55,150

Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


0 79,848

404,089

0 4,850

0 0

9,386 11,257

0 7,392

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,650

0 0

4,850 0

4,850 0 0

63,546

0 170,847

0 0

6 5 9,4 8 4 827,859

0 548.034

0 314,822 245,862

0 244.61 1 315,125

0 0

317,515 0

655,350 0

79.848


,' _.. , -9 1 .

\ "- "/ ..-..,'

AUOE-95IWP/EACBS:R3744-P P-42

1 1 763435.01 11/16/95 645am

1

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 0 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

TABLE P-7


($K)

Waste Shred and CerIlflcatlon Slte Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Qroutlng Compactlon and Shlpping Storage Slte Total

AMES LA0 ANL-E BT ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNUNM SRS WlPP PORTABLE

Module Total

GRAND TOTAL

0 0 0 0

80,387 181.977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 50,674 Portable Portable 108,865 158,617 Portable 77,219

Portable 35,343 50,674

Portable 50,674 35,343

Portable Portable 35,343

Portable 161,960

0 B

762,712

0 0 0 0

52,786 50,556

0 48,920

0 47,274 47,199

0 41,212 47,348

0 0

47,916 0

52,015 0 0

441,285

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A 108,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

116,492 0 0

1,073,005

0 0 0 0

88,819 117,717

0 76,332

0 88,819

0 0 0

88,819 0 0

72,326 0 0 0 0

532,831

0 0 0 0

83,714 78,923

0 55,177

0 14,950 14,950

0 14,950 14,950

0 0

26,661 0

82,458 0 0

304,731

Portable 14,123


Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831

Portable Portable 22,617 Portable 71,028 0

79,848

404,089

0 4,850

0 0

13,642 13.286

0 8,896

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,850

0 0

4.850 0

8,009 0 0

74,490

0 170,847

0 0

600,952 772,196

0 508,155

0 303,610 234,650

0 233,399 303,913

0 0

313,444 0

596,665 0

79,848

P-43 763435.01 11/16/95 845arn

TABLE P-8

CH DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID # lo COST SUMMARY ($K)

Waste Cerllflcatlon Slte Reirlavsl Characlerlzallon Malntenanca Front End Plasma and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

AMES LAB ANL-E BT ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNUNM SRS WlPP PORTABLE

Module Total

0 0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 0 50,874 47,169 Portable 0 Portable 0 106,865 52,787 158,817 52,384 Portable 0 77,219 49,648

Portable 0 35,343 47,276 50,674 47,200 Portable 0 50,674 47,272 35,343 47,363 Portable 0 Portable 0 35.343 47,980 Portable 0 181,960 52,015

0 0 B 0

762,712 491,074

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A 108,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,819

0 A

103,732 A

116,492 0 0

1,073,051

0 67,478

0 0

501,386 267,218

0 423,349

0 168,035 76,105

0 163,545 250,235

0 0

360,578 0

485,036 0 0

2,762,986

Portable 14,123

Portable Portable 54,724 54,390 Portable 42.885 Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


Portable 68,413

0 79.848

379,080

0 4,850

0 0

6,721 5,930

0 4,850

0 4,650 6,405

0 4,850 4,850

0 0

4,850 0

4,850 0 0

53,009

0 285,494

0 0

921,904 837,927

0 784.392

0 367,879 295.607

0 381.994 450,441

0 0

567,272 0

993,469 0

79,848

GRAND TOTAL 5,966,427 ~~~

/ *. .. .'\

w ( &"p ;

AUOB.95/WP/EACBS:R3744.P

1 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 P-44

1

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

TABLE P-9


(W Waste Certlflcatlon

Slte Retrleval Characterlzatlon Malntenance Front End Oroutlng and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total


Module Total

0 0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0 77,466

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 50,674




Portable 161,960

0 B

762,712

0 0 0 0

47,466 47,773

0 47,604

0 47,170

0 0 0

47,171 0 0

47,450 0 0 0 0

284,635

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

119,034 88,819 117,412 117,717

A 0 108,993 76,332

A 0 101,543 68,819

A 0 101,529 0 101,772 88,819

A 0 A 0

103,732 72,326 A 0

116,492 0 0 ' 0 0 0

101,299 0

1,073,005 532,831

Portable 14,123


Portable 10,631 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


0 79,846

398,857

0 4,850

0 0

15,878 14,413

0 9,727

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,650

0 0

4,650 0

9,705 0 0

80,380

0 170,847

0 0

513,712 693,385

0 451,057

0 288,556 172,502

0 171,177 286,788

0 0

285,810 0

461,273 0

79,848

GRAND TOTAL 3,576,954

AUOB-95MIPIEACBSR3744-P P-45 763435.01 11/16/95 845arn

TABLE P-10

CH DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #35 (A&B) COST SUMMARY

($K) Waste Certlllcatlon

Site Retrleval Characterlzatlon Malntenance Front End Groutlng and Shlpplng Storage SIte Total

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

AMES LAB ANL-E 0T ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNUNM SRS WlPP PORTABLE

Module Total

0 0 0 0

80,387 181.977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 0 50,674 0

Portable 0 Portable 0 106,885 47,466 158,617 47.773 Portable 0 77,219 47,604 Portable 0 35,343 47.170 50,674 0

Portable 0 50,874 0 35,343 47,171 Portable 0 Portable 0 35,343 47,450 Portable 0 161,960 0 0 0 B 0

762,712 284,635

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

119,034 88.819 117.412 11 7,717

A 0 108,993 76,332

A 0 101,543 88,819 101,299 0

A 0 101,529 0 101,772 88,819

A 0 A 0

103,732 72,326 A 0

1 16,492 0 0 0 0 0

1,073,005 532,831


Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


Portable 68,413

0 79.848

398,857

0 4,850

0 0

15,878 14,413

0 9,727

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,850

0 0

4,850 0

9,705 0 0

80,380

0 170,847

0 0

513,712 693,385

0 451,057

0 288.556 172,502

0 171.177 288.786

0 0

285.810 0

461,273 0

79,848


AU08-95MIPIEACBSR3744-P

1 P-46

1 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

1

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

TABLE P-11

CH DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID t77 (A-D) COST SUMMARY

(OK)

Waste Certlllcallon Slte Retrieval Characterlzatlon Wlntenance Front End Groutlng SupercompacIlon end Shlpplng Storage Slte Total


0 0 0 0

80.387 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

Portable 50,674 Portable Portable 106,865 156,617 Portable 77,219 Portable 35,343 50,674

Portable 50,674 35,343 Portable Portable 35,343 Portable 161,960

0 B

0 0 0 0

52,786 50,556

0 48.920

0 47,274 47,199

0 47,272 47,348

0 0

47,916 0

52,015 0 0

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A 106,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

116,492 0 0

0 0 0 0

86,819 117,717

0 76,332

0 88.819

0 0 0

88,819 0 0

72,326 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0

146,500 134,615

0 96,559

0 26,162 26,162

0 26,162 26,162

0 ' 0

30,731 0

144,301 0 0

Portable 14,123

Portable Portable 55,705 55,708

Portable 55,150 Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


Portable 71,028 0

79,848

0 4,850

0 0

9,388 11,257

0 7,392

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,850

0 0

4.850 0

4.850 0 0

0 170,847

0 0

859.484 827,859

0 548,034

0 314,822 245,862

0 244.61 1 315,125

0 0

317,515 0

655,350 0

79,848

Module Total 444,535 762,712 441,285 1,073,005 532,831 657,355 404,089 63,546


P-47 763435.01 11/16/05 8:45am

TABLE P-12


(SK)

Waste Certlflcatlon Slte Retrleval Chsracterlzatlon Malntenance Front End Grouting and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

AMES LAB ANC-E BT ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNUNM SRS WlPP PORTABLE

Module Total

0 0 0 0

80.387 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 50,674 Portable Portable 106,865 158.617 Portable 77,219

Portable 35,343 50,674

Portable 50,674 35,343 Poliabla Portable 35,343

Portable 161,960

0 B

762,712

0 0 0 0

47,468 47.773

0 47,604

0 47,170

0 0 0

47.171 0 0

47,450 0 0 0 0

284,635

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

119,034 88,819 117,412 117,717

A 0 108,993 76,332

A 0 101,543 88,819

A 0 101,529 0 101,772 88,819

A 0 A 0

103,732 72,326 A 0

1 16,492 0 0' 0 0 0

1,073,005 532,831

101,299 0

Portable 14,123


Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


0 79,848

398,857

0 4,850

0 0

15,878 14,413

0 9,727

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,850

0 0

4.850 0

9,705 0 0

80,380

0 170,847

0 0

513,712 693,385

0 451,057

0 286,556 172,502

0 171,177 288,786

0 0

285,810 0

461,273 0

79,848

3.576.954 GRANDTOTAL . .

P-48

1 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

TABLE P-13

CH DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE #94 COST SUMMARY

Waste Enhanced Shred and Certlflcatlon Slte Retrlaval Characterlzallon Malntenance Front End Cement Add Clay and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total

AMES LAB 0 ANL-E 0 BT 0 ETEC 0 HANFORD 80,387 INEUANL-W 181,977 KAPL 0 LANL 77,468 LBL 0 LLNL 0 MOUND 0 MU 0 NTS 0 ORNL 0 PANTEX 0 PA 0 RFETS 0 SNUNM 0 SRS 104,703 WlPP 0 PORTABLE 0

Module Total 444,535

Portable 50,674 Portable Portable 106,885 158.817 Portable 77,219 Portable 35,343 50,674

Portable 50,674 35,343 Portable Portable 35,343 Portable ,

161,960 0 B

762,712

0 47,169

0 0

52,787 52.384

0 49.648

0 47,278 47,200

0 47,272 47,363

0 0

47,960 0

52,015 0 0

491,074

A 101,199

A A

1 1 9,034 117,412

A 108,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,819

A A

103,732 A

116,492 0 0

1,073,051

0 92,751

0 0

92,751 324,409

0 193,928

0 92,751 92,751

0 0

92,751 0 0

92,751 0 0 0 0

1,074,840

0 0 0 0

500,396 348.839

0 206,476

0 90.879 90,879

0 90,879 90,879

0 0

99,766 0

484.177 0 0

2,003,170

Portable 14,123

Portable Portable 61,239 61,865 Portable 72,403 Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831

Portable Portable 29,556 Portable 77,132 0 0

366,307

0 4,850

0 0

15,879 18.639

0 11,102

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,850

0 0

4,850 0

9,705 0 0

65,981

0 31 0,767

0 0

1,029,337 1,264,140

0 797,317

0 383.473 403,332

0 309,328 383,836

0 0

413.958 0

1,006,183 0 0


P-49 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 0 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

TABLE P-14

CH DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE #111 COST SUMMARY (m.

Waste Cettlflcatlon Slte Retrleval Characterlzatlon Melntenance Front End Groutlng and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total

AMES LAB ANL-E BT ETEC HANFORD INEVANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNWM SRS WlPP PORTABLE

Module Total

0 0 0 0

80,387 181.977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 50,674

Portable Portable 106,865 158,617 Portable 77,219 Portable 35,343 50,674

Portabb 50,674 35,343 Portable Pollable 35,343

Portable 161,960

0 0

762,712

0 0 0 0

47,486 47,773

0 47,604

0 47,170

0 0 0

47,171 0 0

47,450 0 0 0 0

284,635

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

119,034 88,819 117,412 117,717

A 0 108,993 76,332

A 0 101,543 88,819 101,299 0

A 0 101,529 0 101,772 88.819

A 0 A 0

103,732 72,326 A 0

116,492 0 0 0 0 0

1,073,005 532,831

Portable 14,123

Portable Portable 55,263 55.477

Portable 53,714

Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831

Portable Poll able 22,109

Portable 68,413

0 79,848

398,857

0 4,850

0 0

15,878 14,413

0 9,727

0 4,850 6,405

0 4,850 4,850

0 0

4,850 0

9,705 0 0

80.380

0 170,847

0 0

513,712 693.385

0 451,057

0 288,556 172,502

0 171,177 288.786

0 0

285,810 0

461,273 0

79,848


P-50

1 763435.01 11/16/95 645arn

1

I I i

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

TABLE P-15

CH REGIONALIZED BASELINE COST SUMMARY

($K)

Waste Certiflcation Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting and Shipping Storage Site Total

AMES LAB ANL-E ET ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNUNM SRS WlPP PORTABLE

Module Total

GRANDTOTAL

0 0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 50,674

Portable Portable 106.865 158.617 Portable 77,219



0 B

762,712

0 0 0 0

47.472 47,773

0 47,604

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

47,450 0

47,171 0 0

237,471

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

119,034 88,819 117,412 117,717

A 0 108,993 76,332

A 0 101,543 0 101,299 0

A 0 101,529 0 101.772 0

A 0 A 0

103,732 72,326 A 0

11 6,492 88,819 0 0 0 0

1,073,005 444,012

Portable 14,123


Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


0 79,848

401,478

0 0 0 0

16,141 14,545

0 9,727

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4.850 0

10,174 0 0

55,438

0 165,997

0 0

514,087 693,609

0 451,057

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

285,810 0

600,156 0

79,848

P-51 763435.01 I 1/15/95 8:45am

TABLE P-16

CH REGIONALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #1 COST SUMMARY

($K) .

Waste Charecterkatlo Certlflcatlon

Slte Retrleval n Malntenance Front End Grouting Supsrcompactlon and Shipping Storage Slte Total

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35


Module Total

0 0

- 0 0

80,367 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 50,674


Portable 35,343 50,674


0 B

762.712

0 0 0 0

52,897 50,666

0 48,923

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

47,916 0

52,286 0 0

252,688

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A 108,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

1 16,492 0 0

1,073,005

0 0 0 0

88.819 117,717

0 76,332

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

72,326 0

86,819 0 0

444.012

0 0 0 0

146,991 135,129

0 96,719

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

30,731 0

145,543 0 0

555,112

Portable 14,123

Po rt ab l e Portable 55,819 55,806 Portable 55,150

Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


0 79,848

404.626

0 0 0 0

9,541 11,309

0 7,392

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4,850 0

4,912 0 0

38.005

0 165,997

0 0

680.353 828,835

0 548,196

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

317,515 0

746,066 0

79,848

GRAND TOTAL /----. 3,074,696

P-52 1

763435.01 11/16/95 Rd5arn

1

i

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

TABLE P-17


Waste Characterlzatlo Shred and Certltlcatlon

Site Retrieval n Maintenance Front End Grouting Compaction and Shipping Storage Site Total

AMES LAB 0 ANL-E 0 BT 0 ETEC 0 HANFORD 80,387 INEUANL-W 181,977 KAPL 0 LANL 77,468 LBL 0 LLNL 0 MOUND 0 MU 0 NTS 0 ORNL 0 PANTEX 0 PA 0 RFETS 0 SNUNM 0 SRS 104,703 WlPP 0 PORTABLE 0


Portable 50,674


Portable 35,343 50,674 Portable 50,674 35,343 Portable Portable 35,343 Portable 161,960

0 B

762,712

0 0 0 0

52,897 50,666

0 48,923

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

47.916 0

52,286 0 0

252,686

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A 108,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

1 16,492 0 0

1,073,005

0 0 0 0

88,819 117,717

0 76,332

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

72,326 0

88,819 0 0

444,012

0 0 0 0

83,995 77,217

0 55,268

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

26,661 0

83.167 0 0

326,307

Portable 14.123


Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


0 79,848

404,626

0 0 0 0

13,887 13,390

0 8,896

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4,850 0

8.406 0 0

49,409

0 165,997

0 0

601.683 772.803

0 508,249

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

313,444 0

687.184 0

79.848


P-53 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

TABLE P-18

CH REGIONALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #lo COST SUMMARY

($K) Waste Certltlcatlon

Slte Retrleval Characterlzatlon Malntenance Front End Plasma end Shlpping Storage Site Total

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35


0 0 0 0

80.387 181,977

0 77,488

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0


Portable 50,674

Portable Portable 106,865 158,617 Poilable 77,219 Portable 35,343 50,674 Portable 50.674 35,343 Portabje Portable 35,343 Portable 161,960

0 B

782,712

0 0 0 0

52,900 52,494

0 49,651

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

47,960 0

52,309 0 0

255,314

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A 108.993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,819

A A

103,732 A

11 6,492 0 0

1,073,051

0 0 0 0

503,717 269,074

0 423,447

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

360,578 0

491,390 0 0

2,048,205

Portable 0 14,123 0

Portable 0 Portable 0 54,818 6,834 54,481 5,994 Portable 0 42,865 4,850

Portable 0 10,831 0 14,123 0

Portable 0 14,123 0 10,831 0

Portable 0 Portable 0 14,808 4,850

Portable 0 70,837 4,650

0 0 79,848 0

381,889 27,379

0 165,997

0 0

924,555 840.048

0 784,492

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,993

0 0

567,272 0

1,002,541 0

79.848

P-54

t


AU08.95MIPIEACBSR3744-P

! 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34

i i 1

TABLE P-19


($K)

Certlflcallon Waste Slte Retrieval CherscterlZation Maintenance Front End Grouting and Shipping Storage Slte Total


Module Total

GRANDTOTAL

0 0 0 0

80,387 181.977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 0 50,674 0 Portable 0 Portable 0 106,865 47,472 158.61 7 47,773 Portable 0 77,219 47,604 Portable 0 35,343 0 50,674 0 Portable 0 50,674 0 35,343 0

Portable 0 Portable 0 35,343 47,450

Portable 0 161,960 47,171

0 0 B 0

762,712 237,471

A 101,199

A A

1 19,034 117,412

A 106,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

11 6,492 0 0

1,073,005

0 0 0 0

88,819 117,717

0 76,332

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

72,326 0

88.619 0 0

444,012

Portable 14,123


Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


Portable 70,637

0 79,848

401,476

0 0 0 0

16,141 14,545

0 9,727

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4,850 0

10,174 0 0

55,438

0 165,997

0 0

514,087 693,609

0 451,057

0 147,717 166,096

0 166.327 147,946

0 0

285,810 0

600,156 0

79,848

3.418.650

P-55 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

TABLE P-20


(SKI

Waste Certification Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Fronl End Grouting and Shlpplng Storage Site Total

AMES LAB 0 Portable 0 Portable 0 0 ANL-E

BT ETEC

HANFORD INEUANL-W

KAPL LANL LBL

LLNL MOUND

MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNL/NM

SRS WiPP

PORTABLE Module Total

QRAND TOTAL

0 0 0

80,367 161,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444.535

50,674 Portable Portable 108,865 156,617 Portable 77,219

Portable 35,343 50,674 Portable 50,674 35,343 Portable Portable 35,343

Portable 161,960 0 B

762,712'

0 0 0

47,472 47,773

0 47,604

0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 47,450

0 47,171

0 0

237,471

A 0

101,199 0 A 0 A 0

1 19,034 68,619 117,412 117,717

A 0 106,993 76,332

A 0

101,543 0

101,299 0 A 0

101,529 0 101,772 0

A 0 A 0

103,732 72,326 A 0

1 16,492 88,619 0 0 0 0

1,073,005 444,012

P-56

1


Portable 10,631 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


0 79,646

401,470

0 0 0

16,141 14,545

0 9,727

0 0

0 0 0 0

0

0 4,650

0 10,174

0 0

55,436

165,997 0 0

514,087 693,609

0 451,057

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

265,610 0

600,156 0

79,648

3,416,650

AU08-95MIP/EACBS:R3744-P \<> )

763435.01 11/16/95 845am

1

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 I 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

t I 1 /71\ i = 3 )

/ \ *' '.-, TABLE P-21

CH REGIONALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #77 (A-D) COST SUMMARY

($K)

Certification Waste Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting Supercompactlon and Shipping Storage Site Total

~~

AMES LAB 0 ANL-E 0

BT 0 ETEC 0

HANFORD 80,367 INEUANL-W 161,977

KAPL 0 LANL 77,468 LBL 0

LLNL 0 MOUND 0

MU 0

NTS 0 ORNL 0

PANTEX 0 PA 0

RFETS 0 SNVNM 0

SRS 104,703 WlPP 0

PORTABLE 0 Module Total 444,535

Portable 50,674

Portable Portable 106,865 156,617 Portable 77,219 Portable 35,343 50,674 Portable 50,674 35,343 Portable Portable 35,343 Portable 161,960

0 B

762,712

0 0 0 0

52,697 50,666

0 46,923

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

47,916 0

52,266 0

0 252,686

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A

106,993 A

101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

1 16,492 0 0

1,073,005

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

66,619 146,991 117,717 135,129

0 0 76,332 96,719

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

72,326 30,731 0 0

66,619 145,543 0 0 0 0

444,012 555,112

Portable 0

14,123 0

Portable 0 Portable 0 55,619 9,541 55,606 11,309 Port a b I e 0 55,150 7,392 Portable 0 10,831 0

14,123 0 Portable 0 14,123 0 10,631 0

Portable 0 Portable 0 22,617 4,850 Portable 0 71,351 4,912

0 0

79,648 0 404,626 38,005

0 165,997

0 0

660,353 826,635

0

546,196 0

147.71 7 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

317,515 0

746,066 0

79,648


P-57 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

TABLE P-22 1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31


($K)

Waste Certification Site Retrieval Characteriratlon Maintenance Front End Grouting and Shipping Storage Site Total

AMES LAB 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0 ANL-E 0 50,674 0 101,199 0 14,123 0 165,997

BT 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0 ETEC 0 Porlable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

HANFORD 80,367 106,865 47,472 119,034 88,819 55,369 16,141 514,087 I NEUANL-W 181,977 158,617 47,773 117,412 117,717 55.568 14,545 693,609

KAPL 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0 LANL 77,466 77,219 47,804 108,993 76,332 53,714 9,727 451,057 LBL 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0 LLNL 0 35,343 0 101,543 0 10,831 0 147,717

MOUND 0 50,674 0 101,299 0 14,123 0 166,096 MU 0 Portable 0 A 0 Potiable 0 0 NTS 0 50,674 0 101,529 0 14,123 0 166,327

ORNL 0 35,343 0 101,772 0 10,631 0 147,946 PANTEX 0 Portable 0 A 0 Potiable 0 0

PA 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0 RFETS 0 35,343 47,450 103,732 72.328 22,109 4.850 285,810 SNUNM 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

SRS 104,703 161,960 47,171 116,492 88,619 70,637 10,174 600,156 WlPP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PORTABLE 0 B 0 0 0 79,846 0 79,848 Module Total 444,535 762,712 237,471 1,073,005 444,012 401,410 55,438


,’ *- J, I -’ I

AU08-95/WP/EACBS:R3744-P c,’ P-58

1 763435.01 11/16/95 845arn

1

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

TABLE P-23


(SKI.

' Waste Enhanced Shred and Certification Site Retrieval Characterlzatlon Maintenance Front End Cement Add Clay and Shipping Storage Site Total

AMES LAB Portable 0 0 Portable 0 0 ANL-E

BT ETEC

HANFORD INEUANL-W

KAPL LANL LBL LLNL

MOUND MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNUNM

SRS WlPP


GRAND TOTAL

0 0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0

77,468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

50,674 0 Portable 0 Portable 0 106,865 52,900 158,817 52,494 Portable 0

77,219 49,651 Portable 0 35,343 0 50,674 0

Portable 0 50,674 0 35,343 0

Portable 0

Portable 0 35,343 47,960 Portable 0 161,960 52,309 0 0 B 0 762,712 255,314

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

1 19,034 92,751 117,412 324,409

A ' 0 108,993 193,926

A 0 101,543 0 101,299 0

A 0 101,529 0 101,819 0

A 0 A 0

103,732 92,751 A 0

116,492 92,751 0 0 0 0

1,073,051 796,588

0

0 0

503,907 358.409

0

206,816 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

99,766 0

493,433 0

0 1,662,331

14,123 Portable Portable 61,467 62,079 Portable 72,483 Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


0 79,848

447,315

0 0 0

16,146 16,757

0 11,102

0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

4.850 0

10,229 0 0

61,084

165,997 0 0

1,033,457 1,274,152

0 797,660

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,993

0 0

413,958 0

1,109,726 0

79,848

5,502,932

P-59 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

TABLE P-24


($K)

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Waste Certification and Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting Shipping Storage Sile Total

AMES LAB Portable 0 Portable ANL-E

BT ETEC

HANFORD INEUANL-W

KAPL LANL LBL LLNL

MOUND MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA AFETS

SNUNM SRS

WlPP PORTABLE Module Total

3,418,650 GRAND TOTAL

0 0 0 0

80,387 181.977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535



Portable 161,960

0 B

762,712

0 0 0

47,472 47,773

0 47,604

0 0 0

0 0

0 0 0

47,450 0

47,171 0

0 237,471

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

119,034 88,819 117,412 117,717

A 0 108,993 76,332

A 0 101,543 0

101,299 0 A 0

101,529 0 101,772 0

A 0 A 0

103,732 72.328 A . 0

1 16,492 88,819 0 0

0 0 1,073,005 444,012

14,123 Portable Portable 55,369 55,568

Portable 53,714

Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831

Portable Portable 22,109 Portable 70.837

0 79,848

401.476

0 0 0 165,997 0 0 0 0

16,141 514,067 14,545 693,609

0 0 9,727 451,057

0 0 0 147,717 0 166,096 0 0 0 166,327 0 147,946 0 0 0 0

4,850 285,810 0 0

10,174 600,156 0 0 0 79,848

55,438

P-60

1 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1

i

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 0 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 31 32

TABLE P-25

CH CENTRALIZED BASELINE COST SUMMARY

Waste Certilication and Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting Shipping Storage Site Total

AMES LAB ANL-E

BT ETEC

HANFORD INEUANL-W

KAPL LANL LBL

LLNL MOUND

MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNUNM

SRS WiPP


0 0 0 0

60,367 181.977

0

77,466 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 0 50,674 0 Portable 0 Portable 0

106,665 0 156,617 0

Portable 0

77,219 0 Portable 0 35,343 0

50,674 0 Portable 0

50,674 0 35,343 0 Portable 0 Portable 0 35,343. 0 Portable 0 161,960 0

0 48,815 B 0

762,712 46,615

A 0 Portable 0 0

101,199 A A

119,034 117,412

A 106,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

11 6,492 162,552

0 1,235,557

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

236,5 13 0

236,513

14,123 Portable Portable 54,724 54,390

Portable 42,627 Portable 10,631 14,123

Portable 14,123 10.831


Portable 68.413 68,797 79,646

467,839

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6,405 0

6,405

165,997 0 0

361,010 512,395

0

306,507 0

147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

153,663 0

451,566 543,082 79,646


P-61 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

TABLE P-26 1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

CH CENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #1 COST SUMMARY

(SK)

Waste Certificstlon site Retrieval Characterialion Maintenance Front End Groutlng Supercompaction and Shipping Storage Site Total

AMES LAB Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0

ANL-E BT

ETEC HANFORD

INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL

MOUND MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNUNM

SRS WlPP


0 0 0 0

60,367 161,977

0

77,466 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 104,703

0 0

444,535



Portable 161,960

0 B

762,712

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

64,032 0

64,032

101,199 A A

119,034 117,412

A 106,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

116,492 162,552

0 1,235,557

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

236,513 0

236,513

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

. o 0 0 0 0

192,669 0

192,869


Portable 10,631 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831

Portable Poflable 14,608

Portable 68,413 90,325 79,846

469,366

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6,405 0

6,405

0 165,997

0 a

361,010 512,395

0 306,507

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

153.683 0

451,566 752,697 79,846


\

AU08-95MIP/EACBS:R3744-P P-62

1 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

1

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

TABLE P-27


($K) ~

Waste Charac6rizatio Shred and Certification

Site Retrieval n Malntenance Front End Grouting Compaction and Shlpping Storage Site Total

AMES LAB ANL-E

BT ETEC

HANFORD INEUANL-W

KAPL LANL LBL LLNL

MOUND MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNUNM

SRS WlPP


0 0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 0 50,674 0 Portable 0 Portable 0 106,865 0 158,617 0 Portable 0 77,219 0

Portable 0 35,343 0 50,674 0

Portable 0 50,674 0 35,343 0 Portable 0 Portable 0

35,343 0 Portable 0 161,980 0

0 64,032 B 0 762,712 64,032

A 101,199

A A

119,034 117,412

A 108,993

A 101,543 101.299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

116,492 162,552

0

1,235,557

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

236,513 0

236,513

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

110,211 ' 0 110.211

Portable 0 0

14,123 Portable Portable 54,724 54,390 Portable 42.827 Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


Portable 68,413 90,325 79,848

469,368

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6,405 0

6,405

165,997 0 0

361,010 512,395

0 306,507

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

153,883 0

451,568 670,039 79,848


AU08-95AnlP/EACBS:R3744-P P-63 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

TABLE P-28 1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 29 30 31 32


AMES LAB ANL-E

BT ETEC

HANFORD INEUANL-W

KAPL LANL LBL LLNL

MOUND MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNLINM

SRS WlPP


0 0 0 0

60,367 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

~~

Waste Certlflcatlon and Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Plasma Shipping Storage Site Total


Portable 50,674 Portable Portable 106,865 158.617 Portable 77,219



0 B 762,712

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

66,658 0

86,658

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

1 19,034 0 117,412 0

A 0 108,993 0

A 0 101,543 0 101,299 0

A 0 101,529 0 101,819 0

A 0 A 0

103,732 0 A 0

1 1 6,492 0 162,599 979.888

0 0 1,235,650 979,868

Portable 0 14,123 0

Portable 0 Portable 0 54,724 0 54,390 0 Portable 0 42.827 0

Portable 0 10,631 0 14,123 0

Portable 0 14,123 0 10,631 0

Pottable 0 Portable 0 14,808 0

Portable 0 68,413 0 65,247 6,405 79,648 0

464,290 6,405

0 165,997

0 0

361,010 512,395

0 306,507

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,993

0 0

153,863 0

451,566 1,300,797 79,848

P-64 )

763435.01 11/16/85 8:45am

1

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

1

TABLE P-29


(SKI

Waste Certification and Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting Shipping Storage Site Total

AMES LAB 0

ANL-E BT

ETEC HANFORD

INEUANL-W KAPL IANL LBL

LLNL MOUND

MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNUNM

SRS WlPP


0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0

77,468 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

Portable 0


Portable 35,343 50,674

Portable 50,674 35,343 Portable Portable 35,343 Portable 161,960 0 0

782,712

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

48,815 0

48,815

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

119,034 0 117,412 0

A 0 108,993 0

A 0 101,543 0 101,299 0

A 0 101,529 0 101,772 0

A 0 A 0

103,732 0 A 0

118,492 0 162,552 236,513

0 0 1,235,557 236,513

Portable 14,123

Portable Portable 54,724 54,390

Portable

Portable 42,827

10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


Portable 68,413 88,797 79,848

467,839

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6,405 0

6,405

0 165,997

0 0

361,010 512,395

0

308,507 0

147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

153.883 0

451.568 543,082 79,848


P-65 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

TABLE P-30 1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

CH CENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #35 (A & B) COST SUMMARY

($K)

Waste Certlllcatlon and Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting Shlpplng Storage Site Total

AMES LAB 0 Portable 0

ANL-E BT

ETEC HANFORD


MOUND MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS

SNUNM SRS


0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0 77,488

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535


Portable 35,343 50,674 Portable 50,674 35,343 Portable Portable 35,343 Portable 161,960

0

B 762,712

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

48.815 0

48,815

A 0 101,199 0

A 0 A 0

119,034 0

117,412 0 A 0

108,993 0 A 0

101,543 0

101,299 0

A 0 101,529 0

101.772 0

A 0

A 0

103,732 0

A 0

116,492 0 162,552 236,513

0 0 1,235,557 236,513


Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831

Portable Portable

Portable 14,808

88,413 88.797 79,848

467.839

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6,405 0

8.405

0

165,997 0 0

381,010 512,395

0 308.507

0 147,717 166.096

0 166,327 147,948

0

0 153,883

0

451,568 543,082 79,848


P-66

1 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

) i

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

1

TABLE P-31

CH CENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #77 (A-D) COST SUMMARY

Waste Supercompactl Certlllcatlon Slte Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting on and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total

AMES LAB Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 ANL-E

BT ETEC

HANFORD INEUANL-W

KAPL LANL LBL LLNL

MOUND MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNUNM SRS


0 0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0

77,468 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535


Portable 35,343 50,674


0 B 762,712

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

64,032 0

64,032

101,199 A A

119,034 117,412

A 106,993

A 101,543 101,299

A 101,529 101,772

A A

103,732 A

1 18,492 162,552

0 1,235,557

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

236,513 0

236,513

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

192,669 0

192,669


Portable 10,831 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


Portable 68,413 90,325 79,846

469,366

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6,405 0

6,405

0 165,997

0 0

361,010 512,395

0

306,507 0

147,717 166,096

0

166,327 147,946

0 0

153,883 0

451,568 752,697 79,848


P-67 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

TABLE P-32


($K)

Waste Certification Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting and Shlpphg Storage Site Total

AMES LAB 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

ANL-E 0 50,674 0 101,199 0 14,123 0 165,997 BT 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

ETEC 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

HANFORD 80,387 106,865 0 119,034 0 54,724 0 361,010 INEUANL-W 181.977 158.617 0 117,412 0 54,390 0 512,395

KAPL 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0 LANL 77,466 77,219 0 108,993 0 42,827 0 308,507 LBL 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

LLNL 0 35,343 0 101,543 0 10.831 0 147,717

MOUND 0 50,674 0 101,299 0 14,123 0 166,006 MU 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

NTS 0 50,674 0 101,529 0 14,123 0 168,327 ORNL 0 35,343 0 101,772 0 10,831 0 147,946

PANTEX 0 Portable 0 A 0 Porlable 0 0 PA 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

RFETS 0 35,343 0 103,732 0 14.808 0 153.883 SNUNM 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

SRS 104,703 161,960 0 116,492 0 68,413 0 451,568 WlPP 0 0 48,815 162,552 236,513 88.797 6,405 543,082

PORTABLE 0 B 0 0 0 79,648 0 79,848

GRANDTOTAL 3,202,376 Module Total 444,535 762,712 48,815 1,235,557 236,513 467,839 6,405

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

I 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 _. 32

P-68 1

763435.01 I 1/16/95 8:45am

i

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 20 29

1

TABLE P-33


($K)

Waste Enhanced Shred and Certlflcatlon Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Cement Add Clay and Shlpplng Storage Slte Total

AMES LAB 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0

ANL-E 0 50,674 0 101,199 0 0 14,123 0 165,997 BT 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0

ETEC 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0

HANFORD 80,387 106,865 0 119,034 0 0 54,724 0 361,010 INEUANL-W 181,977 158,617 0 117,412 0 0 54,390 0 512,395

KAPL 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0

LANL 77,468 77,219 0 108,993 0 0 42,827 0 306,507 LBL 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0 LLNL 0 35.343 0 101,543 0 0 10.831 0 147,717

MOUND 0 50,674 0 101,299 0 0 14,123 0 166,096 MU 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0

NTS 0 50,674 0 101,529 0 0 14,123 0 166.327 ORNL 0 35,343 0 101,819 0 0 10,831 0 147,993

PANTEX 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0

PA 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0

RFETS 0 35,343 0 103,732 0 0 14,808 0 153,883 SNUNM 0 Portable 0 A 0 0 Portable 0 0

SRS 104,703 161,980 0 116,492 0 0 68,413 0 451,568 WlPP 0 0 66,658 162,599 498,895 708.036 115,157 6,405 1,557,749

PORTABLE 0 B 0 0 0 0 79,848 0 79,848 Module Total 444,535 762,712 66,658 1,235,650 498,895 708,036 494,200 6,405


P-69 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

TABLE P-34

CH CENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID d l 11 COST SUMMARY

($K)

Waste Certification and Site Retrieval Charactedzatbn Malntenance Front End Grouting Shlpplng Storage Site Total

AMES LAB 0 Portable 0 Portable 0 0

ANL-E BT

ETEC HANFORD


MOUND MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS

SNUNM SRS


GRAND TOTAL

0 0 0

80,387 181,977

0 77,468

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

104,703 0 0

444,535

50,674 0 Portable 0 Portable 0 106,865 0

158,617 0

Portable 0 77,219 0

Portable 0

35,343 0 50,674 0

Portable 0 50,674 0 35,343 0

Portable 0 Portable 0 35,343 0

Portable 0 161,960 0

0 48,815 B 0 762,712 46,615

A 0

101,199 0 A 0 A 0

119,034 0 117,412 0

A 0

108,993 0 A 0

101,543 0 101,299 0

A 0 101,529 0 101,772 0

A 0 A 0

103,732 0

A 0 11 6,492 0 162,552 236,513

0 0

1,235,557 236,513

14,123 Portable Portable 54,724 54,390 Portable 42,627 Portable 10,631 14,123

Portable 14,123 10,831


Portable 68,413 88,797 79,848

467,839

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6,405 0

6,405

165,997 0 0

361,010 512,395

0

306,507 0

147,717 168,096

0 168,327 147,946

0 0

153,883 0

451,568 543.082 79.848

3.202.376

'W AU08-95MIPIEACBS:R3744-P P-70 1

763435.01 11/16/95 ~ - m m

)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

1 i

TABLE P-35

DECENTRALIZED CONFIGURATION CH ALTERNATIVE COST PER SITE

COST SUMMARY ($K)

35 77 94 Site Base Case 1 6 10 33 ( a W 80 ( 8 4 83 (a-f) 111

AMES LAB 0 ANL-E 170,847

BT 0 ETEC 0

HANFORD 513,712 INEUANL-W 693,385

KAPL 0 IANL 451,057 LBL 0

LLNL 280,556 MOUND 172,502

MU 0 NTS 171,177

ORNL 280,786 PANTEX 0

PA 0 RFETS 285.810 SNUNM 0

SRS 461,273 WlPP 0

PORTABLE 79,848

0 0

170,847 170,847 0 0 0 0

659,484 600,952 827,859 772,196

0 0

548.034 508,155 0 0

314,822 303,610 245,862 234,650

0 0 244.61 1 233,399 315,125 303,913

0 0 0 0

317,515 313,444 0 0

655,350 598,665 0 0

79,848 79,848

0 0

285,494 170.847 0 0 0 0

921,904 513,712 837,927 693.385

0 0 784,392 451,057

0 ' 0 367.879 288.556 295,807 172,502

0 0

381,994 171,177 450,441 288,786

0 0 0 0

567,272 285,810 0 0

993,469 461.273 0 0

79,048 79,848

0 0 170,847 170,847

0 0 0 0

513,712 513,712 693,365 693,385

0 0

451,057 451,057 0 0

288,556 288,556 172,502 172,502

0 0 171,177 171,177 288,786 288,786

0 0 0 0

285,810 285,810 0 0

461,273 461,273 0 0

79,848 79,848

0

170,847 0

0 659.484 827,859

0 548,034

0 314,822 245,862

0 244.61 1 315,125

0 0

317,515 0

655,350 0

79,848

0 170,847

0 0

513,712 693,385

0 451,057

0 288,556 172,502

0 171,177 288,788

0 0

285,810 0

461,273 0

79.848

0 310,767

0

0 1,029,337 1,264,140

0 797,317

0 383,473 403,332

0 309,328 383.836

0 0

413,958 0

1,006,183 0

0

0 170,847

0 0

513,712 693,385

0 451,057

0 288,556 172,502

0 171,177 288,786

0 0

285,810 0

461,273 0

79,848 GRAND TOTAL 3,576,954 4,370,357 4,117,678 5,968,427 3,576,954 3,576,954 3,576.954 4,379,357 3,576,954 6,301,672 3,576,954

P-71 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

TABLE P-36

REGIONALIZED CONFIGURATION CH ALTERNATIVE COST PER SITE

COST SUMMARY (W

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

35 77 94 . Site Base Case 1 6 10 33 ( a W 60 ( a 4 83 ( a 4 111

AMES LAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANL-E

BT ETEC

HANFORD INEUANL-W

KAPL LANL LBL

LLNL MOUND

MU NTS

ORNL PANTEX

PA RFETS SNUNM

SRS WlPP

PORTABLE

165,997 0

0 514.087 693,609

0 451,057

0 147,717 166,096

0

166,327 147,946

0 0

285,810 0

600,156 0

79,848

165,997 0 0

660,353 828,635

0 548,196

0 147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

317,515 0

746,066 0

79,848

185,997 0 0

801,683 772,803

0

508,249 0

147,717 166,096

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

313,444 0

687,184 0

79,848

165,997 0

0 924,555 840,048

0 784,492

0 147,717 166,096

0

166,327 147,993

0 0

567,272 0

1,002,541 0

79,848

165,997 0 0

514.087 693,609

0

451,057 0

147,717 166,096

0

168,327 147,946

0 0

285,810 0

600,156 0

79,848

165,997 0 0

514,087 693,609

0

451,057 0

147,717 166,096

0

166,327 147,946

0 0

285,810 0

600,156 0

79,848

185,997 0 0

514,087 893,609

0 451,057

0

147,717 186.098

0 166,327 147,946

0 0

285.810 0

600,156 0

79,848

165,997 0

0 680.353 828,635

0 548.196

0

147,717 166,096

0

168,327 147,946

0 0

317,515 0

746,066 0

79,848

165,997 0 0

514,087 693,609

0 451,057

0 147,717 166.096

0

166,327 147,946

0 0

285,810 0

600,156 0

79,848

165,997 0 0

1,033,457 1,274,152

0 797,660

0

147,717 166,096

0

166.327 147,993

0 0

413,958 0

1,109,726 0

79,848

165,997 0 0

514,087 693,609

0 451,057

0 147,717 166,096

0

166,327 147,946

0 0

285,810 0

600,156 0

79,848 GRAND TOTAL 3,418,650 3,974,696 3,757,294 4,992,865 3,418,650 3,418,650 3,418,650 3,974,896 3,418,650 5,502,932 3,418,650

AUOS-95IWP/EACBS:R3744-P

1 P-72

1 763435.01 I 1/18/95 8:45am

1

1

n TABLE P-37

2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31

W CENTRALIZED CONFIGURATION CH ALTERNATIVE COST PER SITE

COST SUMMARY ($K)

35 77 94 Site Base Case 1 6 10 33 ( a W 60 ( a 4 83 (a-f) 111

AMES LAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ANL-E 165,997 165,997 165,997 165,997 165,997 165,997 165,997 165,997 165,997 165,997 165,997

BT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ETEC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HANFORD 361,010 361,010 361,010 361,010 361,010 361,010 361,010 361,010 361,010 361,010 361,010

INEUANL-W 512,395 512,395 512,395 512,395 512,395 512,395 512,395 512,395 512,395 512,395 512,395

KAPL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LANL 306,507 306,507 306,507 306,507 306,507 306,507 306,507 306,507 306,507 306,507 306,507

LBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LLNL 147,717 147,717 147,717 147,717 147,717 147,717 147,717 147,717 147,717 147,717 147,717

MOUND 166,095 166,096 166,096 166,096 166,096 166,096 166,096 166,096 166,096 166,096 155,096

MU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NTS 166,327 166,327 166,327 166,327 166,327 166,327 166,327 166,327 166,327 166,327 166,327

ORNL 147,946 147,946 147,946 147,993 147,946 147,946 147,946 147.946 147,946 147,993 147,946

PANTEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PA 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RFETS 153,883 153,883 153,883 153,853 153,883 , 153,883 153,683 153,863 153,883 153,883 153,883

SNUNM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SRS 451,568 451,568 451,568 451,568 451,565 451,568 451,568 451,568 451,568 451,568 451.565

WlPP 543,082 752,697 670,039 1,300,797 543,082 543,082 543,082 752,697 543,082 1,557,749 543.052

PORTABLE . 79,848 79,848 79,848 79.848 79,848 79.848 79,848 79.848 79,848 79,848 79,845

GRAND TOTAL 3,202,376 3,411,991 3,329,333 3,960,139 3,202,376 3,202,376 3,202,376 3,411,991 3,202,376 4,217,091 3,202,376

AU08-95MIPIEACBSR3744-P P-73 763435.01 11/16/95 845arn

TABLE P-38

DECENTRALIZED CONFIGURATION CH COST PERCENT PER SITE

Base 35 77 94 Site Case 1 6 10 33 ( a W 60 (8-4 83 (a4 111

AMES LAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ANL-E 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 BT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ETEC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HANFORD 14 15 15 15 14 14 14 15 14 16 14 INEUANL-W 19 19 19 14 19 19 19 19 19 20 19

KAPL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LANL 13 13 12 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 LBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LLNL 8 7 7 6 8 8 8 7 8 6 8

MOUND 5 6 6 5 5 5 5 6 5 6 5 MU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

NTS 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 5 5 5 ORNL 8 7 7 8 8 8 8 7 8 6 8

PANTEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RFETS 6 7 8 10 8 8 8 7 8 7 8 SNUNM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SRS 13 15 14 17 13 13 13 15 13 16 13 WlPP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PORTABLE 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

P-74

1 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

1

i

TABLE P-39

REGIONALIZED CONFIGURATION CH COST PERCENT PER SITE

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Base 35 77 94 Site Case 1 6 10 33 ( a W 60 ( a 4 83 (a4 111

AMES LAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANL-E 5 4 4 3 5 5 5 4 5 3 5

BT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ETEC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HANFORD 15 17 16 19 15 15 15 17 15 19 15

INEUANL-W 20 21 21 17 20 20 20 21 20 23 20 KAPL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LANL 13 14 14 16 13 13 13 14 13 14 13 LBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LLNL 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 MOUND 5 4 4 3 5 5 5 4 5 3 5

MU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NTS 5 4 4 3 5 5 5 4 5 3 5

ORNL 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 PANTEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

RFETS 8 8 8 11 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 SNUNM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SRS 18 19 18 20 18 18 18 19 18 20 18 WlPP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PORTABLE 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

P-75 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

1 2 3

TABLE P-40

CENTRALIZED CONFIGURATION CH COST PERCENT PER SITE

Base 35 77 94 Site Case 1 8 10 33 ( a W 60 ( 4 83 (a4 111

AMES LAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ANL-E 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5

BT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ETEC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HANFORD 11 11 11 9 11 11 11 11 11 9 11

KAPL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LANL 10 9 9 8 10 10 10 9 10 7 10 LBL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

LLNL 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 MOUND 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5

MU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NTS 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5

ORNL 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 5 4 5 PANTEX 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

PA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RFETS 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 SNUNM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

INEUANL-W 16 15 15 13 16 16 16 15 16 12 16

SRS 14 13 14 11 14 14 14 13 14 11 14 WlPP 17 22 20 33 17 17 17 22 17 37 17

PORTABLE 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

P-76

1 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

1 AUO8-95NYP/EACBSR3744-P

1

TABLE P-41 1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

DECENTRALIZED CONFIGURATION CH COST PERCENT PER MODULE

Base 35 77 94 Module Case 1 6 10 33 ( a W 60 (a-d) 83 (a4 111

Front End 30 25 26 18 30 30 30 25 30 17 30 Retrieval 12 10 11 7 12 12 12 10 12 7 12

Waste Characterization 21 17 19 13 21 21 21 17 21 12 21 Maintenance 8 10 11 8 8 8 8 10 8 B 8

Grout 15 12 13 0 15 15 15 12 15 0 15 Supercompact 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0

Shred & Compact 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Plasma 0 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Enhanced Cement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0

Shred &Add Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0

Certification & Shipping 11 9 10 6 11 11 11 9 11 6 11 Storage 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2

Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

P-77 763435.01 11/16/95 945am

TABLE P-42

REGIONALIZED CONFIGURATION CH COST PERCENT PER MODULE

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Base 35 77 94 Modu\e Case 1 6 10 33 (aab) 60 (a-d) 83 ( a 4 111

Front End 31 27 29 21 31 31 31 27 31 19 31

Retrieval 13 11 12 9 13 13 13 11 13 0 13

Waste Characterizatlon 22 19 20 15 22 22 22 19 22 14 22

Maintenance 7 6 7 5 7 7 7 6 7 5 7

Grout 13 11 12 0 13 13 13 11 13 0 13

Supercompact 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0

Shred 8 Compact 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Plasma 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Enhanced Cement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0

Shred & Add Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0

Catiilication 8. Shipping 12 10 11 8 12 12 12 10 12 8 12

Storage 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

P-78

1 763435.01 11/16/95 845am

1

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

TABLE P-43

CENTRALIZED CONFIGURATION CH COST PERCENT PER MODULE

0 “.t, ‘ L - 1

35 77 94 Ease 33 (aab) 60 63 (a-f) 111 Module Case 1 6 10

39 39 36 39 29 39 Front End 39 36 37 31 39

Malntenance 2 2 2 2 2 Grout 7 7 7 0 7

Supercompact 0 6 0 0 0 0

14 13 14 11 14 24 24 22 24 16 24

14 13 13 11 14 14 Retrieval Waste Characterizatlon 24 22 23 I 9 24

2 2 2 2 2 2 7 7 7 7 0 7

0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0

0 0 0 0 17 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 3 0 . 0 0 0 25 0

0 0 0 0 0

Storage 0 0 0 0 0 Sum 100 100 100 too 100

Shred & Compact Plasma

Shred & Add Clay Certificallon & Shipping

Enhanced Cement 0 0 0 0

15 14 15 12 15 15 14 14 12 15 15

100 100 100 100 100 100

P-79 763435.01 11/16/96 845arn

I 2

TABLE P-44

3 4 5

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15

DECENTRALIZED CONFIGURATION CH COST PERCENT PER AREA OF PROCESSING

Base 35 77 94 Area of Processing Ease 1 6 10 33 ( a W 60 ( a 4 63 ( a 4 111

Front End Processing' 64 52 55 36 64 64 64 52 64 36 64 Treatment' 23 37 33 55 23 23 23 37 23 57 23

Back End Processlng3 13 11 12 7 13 13 13 11 13 7 13 Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

'Front End processlng includes Front End, Retrieval, and Waste Characlerization Modules. 2Treatment includes Maintenance and specific alternative treatment modules (e.g., Plasma, Grout. etc.). %ack End processing includes Certilication and Shipping and Storage Modules.

k77 AL/08.95NVP/EACBS:R3744-P

t P-80

1 763435.01 11/16/95 8:458m

)

i I

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15

0 TABLE P-45

REGIONALIZED CONFIGURATION CHCOSTPERCENTPERAREAOFPROCESSING

Base 35 77 94 Area of Processing Case 1 6 10 33 ( a W 60 ( 4 63 ( a 4 111

Front End Processing' 67 57 61 46 67 67 67 57 67 41 67

Back End Processing3 13 11 12 6 13 13 13 11 13 9 13 Treatment' 20 31 27 46 20 20 20 31 20 49 20

Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

'Front End processing includes Front End, Retrieval, and Waste Characterization Modules. 'Treatment includes Maintenance and specific alternative treatment modules (e.g., Plasma, Grout, etc.) %ack End processing includes Certification and Shipping and Storage Modules.

P-81 763435.01 11/16/95 B:45em

TABLE P-46

6 7 8 9

10

CENTRALIZED CONFIGURATION CH COST PERCENT PER AREA OF PROCESSING

Base 35 77 94 Area of Processina Case 1 6 10 33 la&b) 60 (a-dl 83 fa-11 1 1 1

Front End Processing’ 76 72 73 62 76 76 76 72 76 58 76

Back End Processing3 15 14 14 12 15 15 15 14 15 12 15 Treatment‘ 9 14 12 26 9 9 9 14 9 30 9

Sum 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

‘Front End processing includes Front End, Retrieval, and Waste Characterization Modules. ‘Treatment includes Maintenance and specific alternative treatment modules (e.g., Plasma. Grout, etc.). 3Back End processing includes Certification and Shipping and Storage Modules. ,

15

P-82

I 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

)

1 TABLE P-47

RH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE COST SUMMARY

($K)

2 3 4 5 6

7 8 9

10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Waste Certification Site Retrieval Characterization Maintenance Front End Grouting and Shipping Storage Site Total

BCLDP 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

BT 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

HANFORD 0 50,674 0 102,076 0 14,123 6,405 173,279 INEUANL-W 0 50,674 0 101,201 0 14,123 4,850 170.849

KAPL 0 Portable 0 A 0 Portable 0 0

LANL 34,458 50,674 0 101,272 0 14,123 6,405 206,932 ORNL 0 50,674 57.884 101,501 108,602 14,123 6,405 339,190 SRS 0 0 0 101,202 0 14,123 6,405 121,730

Portable 0 B 0 0 0 C 0 0

GRAND TOTAL 1,011,980 Module Total 34,458 202,697 57,884 507,251 108,602 70,617 30,471

P-83 763435.01 11/18/95 645am

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

- TABLE P-48

RH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE COST PERCENTAGE BY SITE

cost Site Percentage

BCLDP

BT HANFORD

INEUANL-W

KAPL

IANL ORNL

SRS

0

0

17

17

0 20 34 12

Sum 100 18 19

P-84 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 - 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

TABLE P-49

RH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE COST PER MODULE

Module Cost

Front End

Retrieval

Waste Characterization

Maintenance

GmUt Certification 8 Shipping

storage

507,251 34,458 202,697

57,884

108,M)2 70,617 30,471

GRAND TOTAL 1.011.980

P-85 763435.01 11/16/95 8:-

1 2 3 4 5

6 7

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

a

16 17

TABLE P-50

RH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE COST PERCENTAGE PER MODULE

Cost Module Percentage

Front End Retrieval

Waste Characterization

Maintenance Grout

Certification and Shipping

Storage

50 3 20 6

11

7

3

Sum 100

P-86 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 .- 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 . . 12 13 14 i s 16

TABLE P-51

RH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE COST PERCENTAGE PER PROCESSING AREA

Processing Area Cost Percentage

Front End Processing' 74

Back End Processing3 10

Treatmen? 16

Sum 100

'Front End processing includes Front End, Retrieval, and Waste Characterization Modules. %reatmen! includes Maintenance and specific alternative treatment modules (e.g., Plasma, Grout, etc.). %ack End processing includes Certification and Shipping and Storage Modules.

P-87 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5

6

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44

TABLE P-52

TRANSPORTATION COST GRAND TOTAL SUMMARY

Fixed Variable Total Number of Total Miles Shipments Traveled costs($K) CosW$K) COSts($K)

CH Centralized Baseline CH Centralized Alternative 1 CH Centralized Alternative 6 CH Centralized Alternative 10 CH centralized Alternative 33 CH Centralized Alternative 35 CH Centralized Alternative 60 CH Centralized Alternative 77 CH Centralized Alternative 83 CH Centralized Alternative 94 CH Centralized Alternative 11 1

CH Regionalized Baseline CH Regionalized Alternative 1 CH Regionalized Alternative 6 CH Regionalized Alternative 10 CH Regionalized Alternative 33 CH Regionalized Alternative 35 CH Regionalized Alternative 60 CH Regionalized Alternative 77 CH Regionalized Alternative 83 CH Regionalized Alternative 94 CH Regionalized Alternative 11 1

CH Decentralized Baseline RH Decentralized Baseline CH Decentralized Alternative 1 CH Decentralized Alternative 6 CH Decentralized Alternative 10 CH Decentralized Alternative 33 CH Decentralized Alternative 35 CH Decentralized Alternative 60 CH Decentralized Alternative 77 CH Decentralized Alternative 83

17,662 17,662 17.662 17,662 17.662 17,662 17,662 17,662 17,662 17,662 17,662

18,045 10,539 15,576 5,593

18,045 18,045 18,045 10.539 18,045 18,526 18,045

17,690 7.958

10,182 15,227 5.237

17,690 17,690 17,690 10;182 17,690 18.181

47,388,994 47,388.994 47,386,994 47,388.994 47,388,994 47,388,994 47,388.994 47,388,994 47,388,994 47,386,994 47,388,994

48,001,334 26,366,812 40,837,024 14,831,054 48,001,334 48,001,334 48,001,334 26,366,812 48,001,334 48,425,946 48,001,334

47,397,822 26,210,998 25,845,272 40,280,216 14,331,254 47,397,822 47,397,822 47,397,822 25,845,272 47,397,822

163,550 163550 163,550 163,550 163,550 163,550 163,550 163.550 163,550 163,550 163.550

167,097 97,591

144.234 51,791

167,097 167,097 167,097 97,591

167,097 171,551 167,097

163,809 73,691 94,285

141,002 48,495

163,809 163,809 163,809 94,285

CH Decentralized Alternative 94 -. - 47,862,978 CH Decentralized Alternative 11 1 17,690 47,397,822

163,809 168,356 163.809

446,272 446.272 446,272 446,272 446,272 446,272 446,272 446,272 446,272 446,272 446,272

452,756 249,770 385,541 140,129 452.756 452,756 452,756 249,770 452,756 456,701 452,756

446.380 244,610 244,174 379,625 134,734 446,380 446,380 446,380 244,174 446,380 450,731 446.380

609.822 609,822 609,822 609,822 609,822 609,822 609,822 609,822 609,822 609,822 609,822

619,852 347,361 529,775 191,920 61 9,852 619,852 - 619,852 347,361 61 9,852 628,252 619.852

610,190 316,301 338,459 520,627 183,229 610,190 610,190 610,190 338,459 610,190 619,087 610.190

P-88 763435.01 11/16/95 8:45am

TABLE P-53 1 2 3 4 5

-

6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 '8 19 30 31 32

35 36 37

3

CH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE TRANSPORTATION COSTS

Number Of Fixed Variable Total

Destinatio One-way C P U n Shipment TotalMiles Costs costs costs Origin n Mileage (Smile) S Traveled ($0 (SK) (SK)

AMES ANL-E BT . ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNL-NM SRS

ANL-E WlPP MOUND NTS WlPP WlPP MOUND WlPP W L WlPP WlPP ANL-E WlPP WlPP LANL ORNL WlPP WlPP WlPP

353 10.87 1,455 9.31

289 ' 10.87 375 10.87

1.808 9.31 1,392 9.31 694 10.87 342 10.87 75 19.65

1 .m 9.31 1,557 9.31 393 10.87

1,214 9.31 1.521 9.31

335 10.87 317 10.87

104 19.65 1,509 9.31

704 10.87

1 706 9 a 17 7

17 2

5.712 4,974

2.899 1

m.3i0 9,826 1,500

20,654,592 13.847.616

1,388 1.941.876

150

65 157 19

52.893 46,059

190 107 16

192.294 128,921

9 15 26289 21,108

9 3

.. 254 264 35

245.187 174.981

24 47,397

12 137 397,848 1.269 3.704 4,973 47 146,358 435 1,363 1.798

1 786 9 9 18 &a 165,104 630 1,537 2,167

120 365,040 1,111 3,399 4,510 1 670 9 7 17 1 634 9 7 16

931 1.310.848 8,621 14,249 22,870 3 624 28 12 40

2.827 8,531,886 26.178 73,432 105,610

TOTAL 17,690 47,397,822 163,809 446.380 610,190

'Source: ORNL. 1993 *Source: INEL, 1994b

Noles: This table presents the msts for tramsporting CH TRU waste by truck Assume that shipments m'll be vOlWe limited. Volums represent total stored and projected Mlumes. Volume at sites lhat receive waste includes the waste received for treah?nI aodlor interim storage from other sites.

763435.01 11/16/95 8:- P-89

>

4E

; 5 3

6 2

7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 p 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

20 g

33 0 34 -

!?

3 0 1)

TABLE P-54

CH DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATIVE ID #1 TRANSPORTATION COSTS

Number Flxed Varlable Total Destlnatlo One-way CPLM2 Volume of Number Number of Number of Total Mlles Costs Costs Costs

Orlgln n Mlleage (Slmlle) (m3) Drums of SWBe TRUPACTs Shlpments Traveled (SK) (SK) (SK)

AMES ANL-E BT ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MI I NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNL-NM SRS

ANL-E 353 WlPP 1,455 MOUND 289 NTS 375 WlPP 1,808 WlPP 1.392 MOUND 694 WlPP 342 LLNL 75 WlPP 1.452 WlPP 1,557 ANL-E 393 WlPP 1,214 WlPP 1.521

ORNL WlPP

WlPP 1,509

10.87 931

10.87 10.87 9.31 9.31

10.87 10.87 19.65 9.31 9.31

10.87 9.31 9.31

10.87 10.87 10.87 19.65 9.31

0 30 56 3

25.688 33,295

1 18.257

2 601 259

1 217 467

0 2

6,061 6

9,427

1 90

167 9

76,301 98.096

3 54.229

7 1,784

770 3

646 1.389

1 7

18,003 18

28,001

0 7

13 1

5,709 7,399

1 4,058

1 134 58

1 49

104 0 1

1,347 2

2,095

1 I 0 19 2

8,305 10,764

1 5,903

1 195 04

1 71

152 1 1

1,960 3

3,048

1 4 7 1

2,769 3,508

1 1.968

1 65 28

1 24 51

1 1

654 1

1,016

706 11,640 4,046

750 10,012,704 9.988.992 ' 1;308

1,346.1 12 150

188,760 87.192

786 58.272

155.142 870 634

920.832 208

3,068,288

9 37 65 9

25,841 33,225

9 18.224

9 602 259

9 222 472

9 9

6,056 9

9,408

8 100 44 8

93.218 92,998

15 14.632

3 1,757

812 9

543 1.444

7 7

10,009 4

28,547

17 145 109 17

118,859 126,222

24 32.856

12 2.359 1,071

I 0 765

1,917 17 16

16,065 13

37,955

TOTAL 10,182 25,045,272 94,285 244,174 338,459

'Source: ORNL, 1993 'Source: INEL, 1994~1 Notes: This table presents the cosis lor transporting CH TRU waste by truck. Assume that shlpments will be volume Ilmlted. Volumes represent total stored and prolected volumes. Volume at sites that recelve waste Includes the waste recelved for treatment and/or Interim storage from other sltes.

!

' 3 * z 38

2

4 n 53

7 P

6 7 8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 A 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 v

17 lJ

% ! 8$2 32 2

35 s! 36 37 5

0 n 3

TABLE P-55


Number of Flxed Variable

One-way CPLM2 Volume Number Number Number of Shipment Total Mlles costs Costs Orlgln Destlnatlon Mileage (Slmlle) (m3) of Drums of SWBs TAUPACTs 0 Traveled (SK) (SK) Total

AMES ANL-E BT ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNL-NM SRS

ANL-E 353 10.87 WlPP 1,455 9.31 MOUND 289 10.87 NTS 275 WlPP WlPP MOUND WlPP CLNL WlPP

-. . 1,808 1,392

694 342 75

1.452 WlPP 1;557 931 ANL-E 393 10.87 WlPP 1~214 S.2t WlPP 1,521 931 LANL 335 10.87 ORNL 317 10.87 WlPP 704 10.87 WlPP 104 19.65 WlPP 1,509 9.31

0 1 24 101 _ .

122 361 7 20

43.809 130,125 42,186 125,304

2 6 23.787 70,654

5 15 1,037 3,082

549 1.631 . ~. 2 5

472 1,403 883 2,625

0 2

0 8

, 28 2

9,736 9,375

1 5.286

2 231 122

1 105 197

0

1 12 40 3

14,163 13,638

1 7,690

3 336 178

1 153 286

1

1 4

14 1

4,721 4,546

1 2,564

1 112 60

1 51 96

1

706 11,640 8,092

750 17,071,138 12,656,064

1.388 1,753,776

150 325.248 186.840

786 123.828 292,032

670

9 8 37 108

130 88 9 8

43,716 158,932 42,096 11 7,828

9 15 23,743 19,064

5 R 1,037 3.028

556 1,739 9 9

472 1,153 889 2,719

n 7

17 145 218

17 202.649 159,924

24 42.806

12 4,065 2,295

18 1,625 3.608

17 2 7 1 1 1 634 9 7 16

7,830 23,259 1,741 2,532 844 1,188,352 7.815 12.917 20,733

20,469 60,801 4,549 6,618 2.206 6,657.708 20,428 61,983 82,411 13 39 3 5 2 416 19 8 27

TOTAL 15,227 40,280,216 141,002 379,625 520,627

'Source: ORNL, 1993 2Source: INEL, 1994b Notes: This table presents the costs for transporting CH TRU waste by truck. Assume that shipments wlll be volume limited. Volumes represent total stored and projected volumes. Volume at sltes that recelve waste Includes the waste received for treatmonl andlor Interim storage from other sites

$ 1 $

2 $ 3E 5 3 4 (.

r 6 2 7 8 9

10 11

14 15 16 17

1;

22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

34 0

37 30 5

2

TABLE P-56


Flxed Variable Total

(ma) Drums of SWBS TRUPACTs Shipments Traveled (SK) (SK) (SK) One-way CPLM2 Volume Number of Number Number of Number of Total Mlles Costs costs costs

Orlgln Destlnatlon Mlleage (Slmlle)

AMES ANL-E CLT

ETEC HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL ~~~~

LANL LBL LLNL MOUND MU NTS ORNL PANTEX PA RFETS SNL-NM SRS

ANL-E 353 10.87 0 1 0 1 1 WlPP 1,455 9.31 11 33 3 4 2 MOUND 289 10.87 53 157 12 18 6 NTS 375 10.87 3 9 I 2 1 WlPP 1,808 9.31 15,934 47,331 3,541 5,152 1,718 WlPP 1,392 9.31 13,325 39,580 2,962 4,309 1,437 MOUND 694 10.87 1 3 1 1 1 WlPP 342 10.87 6,979 20,730 1,551 2,257 753 LLNL 75 19.65 2 7 1 1 I

ANL-E 393 10.87 1 3 1 1 1

LANL 335 10.87 0 1 0 1 1 ORNL 317 10.87 1 3 1 1 1

WlPP 104 19.65 6 17 2 3 1 WlPP 1,509 9.31 8.888 26,401 1,976 2,874 958

WlPP 1,452 9.31 384 1,142 86 125 42 WlPP 1,557 9.31 237 705 53 77 26

WlPP 1,214 9.31 205 609 46 67 23 WlPP 1,521 9.31 372 1,105 83 121 41

WlPP 704 10.87 2,062 6,126 459 668 223

706 5,820 3,468

750 6,212,288 4,000,608

1,388 515,052

150 121,968 80,964

786 55,844

124,722 670 634

313.984 208

2,891,244

9 19 56 9

15,909 13,307

9 6,973

9 389 241

9 213 380

9 9

2,065 9

8,871

8 17 54 73 38 93 8 17

57,836 73.745 37,246 50,552

15 24 5,599 12,571

3 12 1,136 1,524

754 995 9 18

520 733 1,161 1,541

7 17 ~~

7 16 3,413 5,476

4 13 26,917 35.789

TOTAL 5,237 14,331,254 48,495 134,734 183,229

'Source: ORNL. 1993 'Source: INEL, 1994b

Notes: This table presents the costs lor Iransportlng CH TRU waste by truck. Assume that shlpments will be volume Ilmlted. Volumes represent total stored and projected volumes. Volume at sltes that recelve waste Includes the waste received lor treatment andlor Interim storage from other sites.

1 2 3 4 5

c4

6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

- 28

29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37

TABLE P-57


Fixed Variable Total One-way CPLMZ Numkrof TotalMiles Costs costs costs

Origin Destination Milage ($/mile) Shipments Traveled (SK) (SK) (SK)

AMES ANL-E BT ETEC . HANFORD INEL’ANL-W

ANL-E WlPP MOUND M S WlPP WlPP

353 1,455

289 375

1,808 1.392

10.87 1 706 9 9.31 7 20,370 65

10.87 17 9.826 157 10.87 , 2 1,500 19 9.31 5.712 B0,654,592 52,893 9.31 4.974 13.847.616 46.059

KAPL MOUND 694 10.87 1 1 :388 9 LANL WlPP LBL LLNL LLNL WlPP MOUND WlPP MU ANL-E NTS WlPP ORNL WlPP PANTEX LANL PA ORNL RFETS WlPP SNL-NM WlPP SRS WlPP

342 75

1,452 1.557

393 1.214 1.521 335 317 704 104

1,509

10.87 19.65 9.31 9.31

10.87 9.31 9.31

10.87 10.87 10.87 19.65 9.31

2.839 1

137 47 1 68

120 1 1

931 3

2.827

1,941 ;876 150

397.848 146.358

786 165,104 365,040

670 634

1,310,848 624

8,531.886

26,289 9

1,269 435

9 630

1,111 9 9

8,621 28

26,178

TOTAL 17,690 47,397,822 163,809

8 190 107 16

192,294 128,921

15 21,108

3 3,704 1,363

9 1.537 3.399

7 7

14,249 12

79,432

446,380

17 254 264 35

245.187 174.981

24 47,397

12 4.973 1,798

18 2.167 4.510

17 16

P.870 40

105.610

610,190

‘Source: ORNL. 1993 2sMlrce: INEL, 1994b

Notes: This table presents the msts lor Uanspwting CH TRU waste by ltwic. Assume that shipmems will be volume limited. Volumes represent tdal stored ard project& volumes. Volume at sites that receive waste indudes the waste received for trealment and/or interim storage from other sites

P-93 763435.01 11/1&195 84%

1 2 3 4 5

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

32 33 34 35 36 37 38

3

TABLE P-58

CH DECENTRALIZED ALTERNATNE ID #35 (a & b) TRANSPORTATION COSTS

Fixed Variable Total One-way C P d Numberof TotalMiles Costs costs Costs

Origin Destination Mileage (slmik) Shipments Traveled (SKI (SK) (SKI

AMES ANL-E ANL-E WlPP ET MOUND m c - NTS HANFORD WIFP INEUANL-W WlPP KAPL MOUND LANL WlPP LBL U N L UNL WlPP MOUND WlPP MU ANL-E NTS WlPP ORNL WlPP PANTEX . LANL PA ORNL RFETS WlPP SNL-NM WlPP SRS WlPP

353 1,455

289 375

1,808 1,392 694 342 75

1,452 1.551 393

1,214 1,521 335 317 704 104

1,509

10.87 9.31 10.87 10.87 9.31 9.31 10.87 10.87 19.65 9.31 9.31 10.87 9.31 9.31 10.87 10.87 10.87 19.65 9.31

1 7 77 2

5,712 4,974

1 2,839

1 137 47 1

€a 120

1 1

931 3

2,827

706 9 M.370 65 9.826 157 1.500 19

20,654,592 52,893 13,847,616 46,059

1.388 9 1,941,876 26,289

150 9 397.848 1.269 146,358 435

786 9 165.104 630 365.040 1,111

670 9 .. . 634 9

1,310,848 8,621 624 28

8,531,886 26.178

8 190 ‘107 16

192,294 128,921

15 21,108

3 3,704 1.363

9 1,537 3.399

7 7

14245 12

79,432

17 254 234 35

245,187 174,981

24 47,397

12 4,973 1,798 18

2.167 4.510 17 16

22,870 40

105,610

TOTAL 17,690 47,397,822 163,809 446,380 610,190 - ‘Source: ORNL, 1533 *Swrce: INEL. i s w Notes: This table presents the msk for transporting CH TRU waste by truck. Assume that shipments will be volume limited. Volumes represant total stored and pmjected volumes. Volume at siles mat reCeiw waste includes mS waste recenred for treatment andlor interim stomge fnnn other sites.

69 P-94

-.

763435.01 1111WS 8 4 5 m

Table P-59 CH Decentralized A'krnative ID #77 (a-d)

Transporlatiun Costs

L

I)

I, .I

0

C

.I

I)

XI

C

I

I. I. I. I" c c I. I,

P-95 DoWlPP95-2135 lWl3/95

Tahlc P-60 CH Decentralized Alternative ID #83

Transport at ion Costs

I MASS LlMIllffi CALCULAllWS I VOLUME LlYlllffi CALCULATIONS I

ANL E

WlPP

MOUND

HIS WlPP

WlPP

UOVNO

WlPP

LLWL

WlPP

WlPP

ANL E

WlPP

WlPP

U N L

O W L

WlPP

WlPP

WlPP

1OlAL 10,971 59,913 51 .7U.W 104.959 m.929 6W.W

76343501 oOCQE23 4 P-96 DOElWlPP95.2135 10113/95

U I L E

WWP

UWNO

N1S

WlPP

WlpP

MOUND

WlPP

LLNL

WlPP

WlPP

UIL.C

WlPP

WlPP

U U L

ORNL

WlPP

WlPP

WlPP

1

c E

E

c c E

c E

c D

E

E

L

E

E

C E E

WLUUE

MASS

YL55

MASS

MASS

Y*S*

VOLUME

MASS

MISS MASS

M A I S

VOLUME

UASS

MASS

VOLUME

MASS

MASS

Y*SS

MASS

DOEWIPP 95-2135 10/13/95

ANL E WlPP

UOUNO

NTS WlPP

WlPP

UWNO

WlPP

LLWL

WlPP

WlPP

ANL E

WlPP

WlPP

U N L

DRNL

WlPP

WlPP

WlPP

16343s 01 alal a23 P-98

WWlPP 95.2135 IOllM5

A M 5 AN1 E

BT

ETEC

HANFORO

INEUANL W

KAFi

U W L

Let LLNL

MOUNO

MU

M E ORNL

PANTEX

P I

AFP

SNL NU

SRS

TOTAL

yls

SRS

SRS

INEUANL W

WIPP mw

mpP SRS

HANFOAD

HANFORO

SRS

SRS WEUANLW

SAS

LANL

SRS mpP unt WIW

$ 1

52

3 180010

15522

2

1137

3

375

es

qw w

2867

6

0316

A

A

e B A

6

8

&

B A

* B

B

A

8

E

A

8

8

.2

.2

IS 35

.2

'2 15

r2

15

42

.2

15

35

42

35 I.

.2

33 35

M L U U E

WCUYE

MASS

MASS

YASS

MASS

VOLUME

YASS

VMUME

MASS

MASS

W + W I E MASS

YASS

VOLUYE

VOLUME

YASS

MASS

YASS

P-99 OOEIWIPP 95~2135 10113/95

Tahli: P-64 CH Regionalized Alternative ID #I

Transportation Costs

AUEE

AWL E B l

E l E C

HANFORO

INEUANL-W

W R

U N L

LBL

LLNL

YOUND

uu Nrs OAHL

PAHTEX

PA

AFP

EN1 NU

sns

ERS

SRS SRS

INEUANL-W

mw Wlw SRE

V.lW

HANFORO

HAWFORD

SRS

SRS

INEUANL W

SRS

U N L

EAS

mw U N L

wlw

0

I

36 2

5M2

I448

,058

2

m JO

137

2w 0

1 y I 7

2261

A

A

B

B 0

C

0

n B

A

A

n B

A

B

E C

B

xx

.2 42

15 15

21

m 15

I J

1J .2 42

1J

15 .2

15 8 .

m 15

11

VOLLNE

V N W E

YASS

YASS

YA5S

YASS

MLUUE

YASS

VOlWlE UASS

YA5S

VOLUME

UASS

UASS

VOLUME

VOLUME

MASS UASS

YASS

0

37 m 10

55.7%

11.201 0

n.a4

0

1.212

287

0 787

1.105

0

0

0,640

n M.W5

22 78

128

.2 202.620

,.0,,64

? I

11.M7 10

1,513

.32 10

1.316

1.m

1

12

1$,012

12 118.201

l O l A L lS,Y8 42.- M114.8W 184.718 61O.MS m1u

WElWlPP 952135 lWt3195

AHES

ANL E

B l ETEC

HANFORD

INEUANL W

UPL U N L

Lnc LLNL

UOUYD

MU

Nls ORNL

PANIEX

PI.

RFP

SNL NU

SRS

SRS

SRS

SRS

INEUANL~W

WW mw SRS

W W HINFORD

HANfORD

5-5 SRS

lNEUANL.W

SRS

U N L

SRS WW

U N L

mw

0 O

31 31

139 w 861

44845 Cd

42657 74

2 .O

n7ffi 64

8 37 ,15801

20329 2 t 4

61260

112.94

0 62

2 10

7830 33 , 7 1 1

2101547

0

I

36 2

G%P

MP

I

5286 2

258 30

111

230 0

(1.1

,873

A

A

B

n A

A

B

A

B

A

A

n 0 A

B

E

B

B

0

42

.2 35

I3 42

.2 35

.2 35

42

.2

15

35 42

1s 1.

1s 13 21

W X W E

VOLLME

YASS

MASS

UASS

MASS

VOLUME

MASS

VOLUUE

YISS

MASS VOLUME

YASS

MASS W L M E

VOLUME

YASS

UASS

UASS

P-101 WEIWIPP 95-2135 lO/13195 763435 01 OOOO823

I I

I I

!

AUES

AWL E

81

EIEC nmFoRo INEUAUL W

KAR

U N L LBL

LLNL

MOUND

MU

Nls ORNL

PhNlEX

PA

Rip

SNL NU

SRS

SRS

SRS

SAS

HEUkNL-W

wlw mw

mw SRS

HANFORD

HANFORO

SRS

LAO

INEUANL~W

SRS

U N L

SAS

wlw U N L

wtw

,3W

877

686

OM

1808

I l O 2 MO

242

870

800

MI 863

713

158

135

560

TO4

104

tm

9 ,

52

1

5216

m s 2

7237 3

3?5 86

1

I W

?u I

668

6

am

A

A

B B

E

E

B

E

B

A

A

0 B

B 8 E

E

8

D

.2

.2

35

35

1.

,. 35

1.

15

42

.2

35

I5

35 I5 (1

14

15

94

WLWE

VOLUME

M N S

Y N S

U N S

M I I S

VMUUE M I I S

WLWE UASS MASS

VOLUME

U N S

U N S VOLUME

VMUUE

M N S

Y N S

Y*sS

0

1, 10(

10

51.801

41.011

0

Z1.!0(

0 I 1 u n7 s

787

1.415

0

0 6.565

n 15,457

P-102 DOEWIPP 95-2135 lOl13P5

AUES

AWL E

B l ETEC

HANFORO

UEUANL W

KAPL

U N L

LBL

LLNL

UOUNO

MU

Nrs O"NL

PANTEX

PA

AFP

SNL NU

SAS

TOTAL

SRS

UIS SRS

lNEUANL.W

ww w SRS

WlPP

HANFOAO

HANFOAO

SRS

SAT

INEUANL~W

SRS

U N L

SAS

wlw LANL

ww

VOlWE VMUUE

W S

U S S

W S

MASS VOLUUE

UASS

VOLUME

ulss ulss

VOLUME

uA5s

MASS

VOLUUE

VOLUME

ulss ulss U l s S

76343501 M00823 P-103 W W l P P 95-2135 10113195

AMES

ANL E

Br ETEC

HANFOAD

WUANL-VI

UPL U N L LBL LLNL

MOUND

MU

N15

OANL PANTEX

PA

RFP

SNL NU

SRS

r o i u

SRS

SRS

SAS

W4EUANL.W

WPP WPP

SAS

W w MANFORD

HANFOAO

$AS

LAS

INEUANL-W

SAS

U N L SRS

mw LANL

WPP

03

475

26

165173 M

1.m

I

rn m

$440

7 8 1

7

,810

3342 2 I

26136 53

8558s

I t

52

3

15522

2

8737

1

375

86

f

100

364

t

n67 6

0116

L

1

B

B

A

A

B A

B

A

A

B

B

A

B E

A

B B

.2

42

I5 31 4 42

15

42

15

42

42

IS 15

.2

15

1.

.2 35

35

WLUUE

VOLUME

urns

rims

M I I S

M N S

VOLUME

MASS

WLUUE

Y N S

urns WLUYE

M N S

MASS

VOLUME

MLUME

M N S

U N S

M r n I

It 111

w 00

211.111

I O I Y

30 5l .655

3.005 ,to

20

2.3m 2.tW

I 7

n 24.011

a t47.8W

n

7 0 , . n ,

763435 01 MOO B23 1 P-104 W W l P P 95-2135 10/13/95

Tahle P-69 CH Regionalized Alternative ID #77 (a-d)

Transpurlation Costs

AUES

ANL E 01 ETEC

nkwom INEUANL W

xlpl

U N L

LBL

LLNL

MOUND

Y"

N lS

ORNL

wmEx PA

RFP

SNL NU

SRS

l O l * L

SRS

SRS

SUE

INEUANL W

ww WlPP

SRS

wlw HANFORD

HANFORD

SRS

SRS

INEUANL-W

SAS

U N L

SRS

mw

mw U N L

1.1ww D Y I

077 W l087

606 W ,087

958 W 1087

Id08 w 0 31

1.392 W 031

M9 W , O B I w2 w 1087

870 w 8007

IIW w 100I M1 W I087

S I M 1081

113W 1081

Y58W I087 YY5W 108I

a9 00 '087

1M W I087 1 0 4 W 1065

,.Mew 931

0 I3

31 31

15DW

8 6 ,

m.28831 33.5922)

2 40

l8.25103

8 57

I . I L M

263 29

2 I4

6,160

1.l2.0.

0 62

2 I0

6.060 69

(7 I t

10.189 YO

1 W

03 W

475 W

26W mw5w W Y ( 2 W

OW Y229 W

20 w 3uow

78Y w 7 W

I 8 2 0 W

Y Y 2 W

2w

7 W

I 8 W 3 W

st 00 m2.1100

OW

7w M W 2w

504200

7 . w W

l W

..G% m 2w

25aw 59 m

I W I17W 2yI w

OW

I W <.%I w

am 2 2 6 3 w

42w

.2 w Y5 w 15 w 21 w mw 35w

15 w Y5 w .z w 42 m YSW

35 w .2 w 35 w I. W

20m 15 w !. w

>.MOW

VMUYE

VMUME

UMS

U N S

Y N S

UMS VOLUUE

UMS VOLUUE

Y M S MASS

VOLUUE

U N S

Y N S

VOLUME

VOLUME M N S

"MI Y S S

om 1104

203 72

1852

55.13101

51.201 m 026

23.12. w 026

l .23l50

a7 06

026

787 10

LIMY

026

om 0.63066

27 I8

2d.W 60

,04,7!8.8

13.2

,1530

53I42

W I I

2y1.365 13

202,455 2d

a m .1.171 26

26 I ,

3 . W M

ItODs n 02

2.4M6I

2,108 Y

16 54

21 61

25.511 I 2 40 M

I57.275 4,

8 a . x I ,I

76343501 MMW3 -9 P-105 WEmlPP 95-2115 10/13/95

AUES

AN1 E

nr ETEC

HANFORD

INEUANL W

UPI LAN1

LBL

LLNL

UOUND

uu WIS

OANL

PAIMEX

P I

RFP

SNL NU

SRS

SAS

SRS

SRS

INEUAULW

WlW

UIW

SRS

WIW

HANFORD

MU(FMID

SRS

SAS

W4EULNL.W

SRS

U N L SRS UIW

UNL

UIW

1

03 .75

18 < S Y l l

142608

0

m a m

wo 163

I

I 82Q

lY2 2 I

26336 31

35599

$1

52

3

l 0 I O

15522

2

8731

3 115

86

2867

s 9116

j25

29

67

$22

0%

2

l l o d

.2

.2

3s 15

.2 I2

35

.2

35

42

42

35

I5

42

35 1.

12

I5

35

4

n 1

6371

54%

1015

3

1g50

M L W E

MLUYE

uA5s

YASS

uA5s UASS

VOLUME

UASS

VmWE UASS

UASS

V M W E

MA51 YA5S

MLUUE

VMUUE

ULSS

MASS

YA5S

12 2

a77 9 0 6 , 3m4

1

701s

1

l*O

, 3015

0 !I077

n 7s

320 .2

Z~..WI

I42.454

21

23.w 1s

2.531

412

IS ,318

I .w 7

12

45.535

I 2

ttV239

P-106 DoElWlPP 95-2135 10/13/95

P-107 DOElWlPP 95-2135 lOIlU95

AMES

AN1 E

n i ETEC

HANFORD

INEUANL W

UPL WNL

LnL

LLNL

UOUND

uu NIS

ORNL

PANTEX

PA

RFP

SNL NU

SRS

1 0 l l L

SRS

SRS

SRS

INEUAt4L.W

fflFQ

WFQ

sns fflw

HA N F 0 A D HANFOAD

5RS

SRS

INEUANL W

SRS

U N L

SRS

WlFQ

LANL

WlPP

.2

.2

1s IS .2

.2 35

' 2

35

.2

.2

15

1s r2 31 I.

r2

35

3s

YOLWE

MLUUE

UASS MASS UASS urns

VMUUE

UASS

VOLUUE

UASS

YASS

M L W E

urns UA5S

VOLUME

YDLUUE

uA5s YASS

MA5S

. a 2

9371

Yffi

lm4

1

I 3 3 3,

ns 110

I

101s

1

30so

10.311

P- 1 08 DOEWIPP 952135 1W13195

Tahl: P-73 CH Centralized Baseline

Transportation Costs

AMES

ANL E

BT

ETEC

HANFORD

HEUANL W UR LANL

LBL

LLNL

UOUND

UU

N l S

DANL

P A M E X PA

AFETS

SNL NU

SAS

mw mw

mw mw mw

WlW

WFQ

mw mw mw mw Wlw mw m w mw mw WIw W W mw

03 115

26 1.2425

I t W O

8

62766

m 3 u Q

701

7

1020

3342

2

7

,8%3

5t

MXYI,

1 12

66

6

,6584

I3469

I 7257

3

IW 01 1

255

9 7

3

2 2 1 9

0

t f l M

MLW VOLUYE

Y N S

U S S UASs MASS

VDLUUE

U N S

YOLUUE U N S

UA5S

M L W E UASS U N S

M L W E

VMWE U N S

UA5S

UA5S

P-109 W W l P P 9Wt35 10113195

1 TABLE P-74

3 4 5

RH DECENTRALIZED BASELINE TRANSPORTATION COSTS

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 I

Fixed Variable Total

Origin Destination Mileage mile) of Shipments Traveled ($0 ($0 ($0 One-Wy CP&(U Number TotalMiies Costs COStS costs

BATELLE BT HANFORD INEUANL-W KAPL - LANL ORNL SRS

ORNL ORNL WlPP WlPP ORNL WlPP WlPP WiPP

409 607

1.808 1,392

884 342

1,521 1,509

10.87 10.87 9.31 9.31 10.87 10.87 9.31 9.31

123 3

5,176 109 57 249

2.185 56

100.614 3.642

18,716,416 303,456 100.776 170,316

6,646,770 169.008

1,139 28

47.930 1.009 528

2,306 20.233 519

1,094 40

174,250 2.825 1,095 1.851 61,881 1.513

2,233 67

222,180 3,835 1,623 4,157 82,115 2.092

TOTAL 7,958 26,210,998 73,691 244,610 318,301

'Swrce: ORNL. 1993 'Swrce: INEL, 1994b

Notes: This table presents me cask fur transporting CH TRU waste by truck. Assume ihat shipments will be volume limited. Volumes represent total stored and projected volumes. Volume at sites mat receive waste indudes lhe waste received for treatment andlor interim storage from &er sites.

......

P-110 763435.01 11116r95 845m

1 2 3 4 5

TABLE P-75

BACKFILL EMPLACEMENT COST TOTALS SUMMARY

-..

6 7

Operations Alternative Capital Design and and Total Cost'

ID# Equipment Development Maintenance (W 8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22 23 24

33

35a

35b

77a

77b

7 7 C

77d

83

94b

94c

94d

94e

94f

111

1,007

1,199

1,200

1.110

760

820

805

981

1,165

1,418

1,679

1,037

1,131

91 0

302

360

360

333

228

246

241

294

350

425

504

31 1

340

273

43,114

67,352

67,352

46,871

24,052

28,923

27,669

41,241

39,051

61,025

61,104

32,462

37,355

35,839

55,527

86,139

86,141

60,394

31,299

34,487

35,894 .

53,146

50,707

78,536

79,057

42,262

48,533

46,272

'Includes a 25% contingency factor.

P-111

I

763435.01 11116195 8 4 5 m

TABLE P-76

WlPP WASTE HANDLING COMPARATIVE COST IMPACTS

1 - 2

3 4 5 6

7

8

9

10 11

12

13

14

15

16

7 18 19

20 21

22

,-

23 24 25 26 27 28

Cost Impacts Alternative ID# (SW'

1' (61,440)

6' (61,4401

10 (Decentralizzd, (80,640) Regionalized)

10 (centralized)' (61,440)

33 0

35(a-b) 0

77(ad)' (621,440)

83 0

94k3-9 (39,322) (Decentralized Regionalized)2sS

(Centralized) 94(a-f) (61,440)

111 0

P-112 763435.01 11116195 8:45am

1 2 3 4 5

6 7

8 9

10

1 1

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

TABLE P-77

WlPP WASTE EMPLACEMENT WORKOFF AND LABOR COST ESTIMATE

Change in

Engineered CH TRUPACT-lls FTEs for labor cost Number of Number Number of emplacement

Aiternatie Case shipments' per day operations2 ($K)

Baseline, 33, Wab),

83,111

l3

63

1 o3

77(a-d)3

wa-f)

Decentralized

Regionalized

Centraliied

Decentralized

Regionalized

Centralized

Decentralized

Regionalized

Centralized

Decentralized

Regionalized

Centralized

Decentralized

Regionalized

Centralized

pn t ra I i ze&

Regionalized3"

Centralized

19,944

19.944

17,401

19,571

19,548

17,401

18,794

18,838

17,401

17,174

17,186

17,401

19,571

19,548

17,401

33,225

33,214

17,401

7.12

7.12

6.21

6.94

6.93

8.70

8.52

8.58

8.70

5.72

5.80

8.70

6.94

6.93

8.70

9.70

9.70

9.70

64

64

64

64

64

64

64

64

64

56

56

64

64

64

64

64

64

64

215,040

215,040

215,040

153,600

153,600

153,600

153,600

153,600

188,160

134,400

134,400

153,600

153.600

153,600

153,600

175,718

175,718

153.600

yotes. The number of shipments is for waste transported to the WlPP site. The number of FTEs is based on the crew directly involved in emplacement activities only. The number of TRUPACT-11s and dollars for emplacement is based on a 25 year emplacement actiity due to the lag

The waste emplacement for this alternative exceeds the 25 year constraint by 3.6 years. 1 in processing capability.

~-95rWPEACBSQ.3744-P.NRU P-I13 763435.01 11116195 845m

appendix p cost associated with screened engineering

Documents