appendix i supplementary subsurface environmental … · 2014-05-01 · supplementary subsurface...

Environmental Assessment Lakeview Waterfront Connection

350500-000-003-010 – FINAL – April 2014 SENES Consultants

APPENDIX I

SUPPLEMENTARY SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS

Prepared By:

REPORT TO

TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

SUPPLEMENTARY SUBSURFACEENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION

LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT CONNECTION PROJECTMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

September 2013

REPORTTO

TORONTO AND REGION CONSERVATION AUTHORITY

SUPPLEMENTARY SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONLAKEVIEW WATERFRONT CONNECTION PROJECT

MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

Prepared by:

DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES121 Granton Drive, Unit II

Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3N4CANADA

Tel: (905) 882-5984Fax: (905) 882-8962E-Mail: engineers~dcsltd.caWeb Page: www.dcsltd.ca

September 2013

350500

netw

flI’C 121 Granton Drive, Unit 11Richmond Hill, Ontario

Canada L4B 3N4

DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES Tel: (905) 882-5984Fax: (905) 882-8962

E-mail: engineers~dcsltd.caWeb site http:llwww.dcsltd.ca

350500

13 September2013

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority70 Canuck AvenueDownsview, OntarioM3K 2C5

Attention: Mr. Ken Dion, M.Sc.

Re: Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection ProjectMississauga, Ontario

Dear Sirs:

We are pleased to submit, herewith, our report on the supplementary subsurface investigation atthe above-noted site.

Should you require additional information, or should you require clarification with respect to anyaspect of the enclosed, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Yours very truly,

DECOMMISSIONING CONSULTING SERVICES

‘S

Michael D. Weber, P.Geo., QPSenior Project Manager

Specialists in Property Assessments and Environmental Audits, Site Remediation and DecommissioningGeotechnical Engineering, Hydrogeology, Waste and Wastewater Management and Industrial Hygiene

Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA

350500-005 – September 2013 i

DCS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The purpose of the supplementary environmental investigation was to obtain current information

on the environmental conditions of the soil and groundwater adjacent to the proposed

development area. The results of the investigation will be used in the EA to undertake the

screening level assessment of the Alternative LWC Project Configurations under consideration

for the shoreline development as well as the detailed assessment of the Preferred Alternative for

the LWC Project. A secondary purpose of the investigation was the assessment of subsurface

(soil and groundwater) conditions in a proposed re-alignment routing of Serson Creek that would

connect Serson Creek to Applewood Creek and divert base flow from Serson Creek through a

newly constructed stream channel into Applewood Creek.

The locations of the boreholes and groundwater monitoring wells are shown on Drawing

350500-1 and were generally arranged in two groupings;

ten boreholes (identified as MW12-1 to MW12-10) were drilled to depths of

approximately three to 13 metres below ground surface (mbgs) adjacent to the proposed

land creation area that borders the southern limit of the Waste Water Treatment Facility

(WWTF). Groundwater monitoring wells were installed at each of these locations.

six boreholes (identified as MW12-11, MW12-12, BH12-13, MW12-14, BH12-15 and

MW12-16) were advanced to depths of approximately 8.0 mbgs within the proposed Serson

Creek re-alignment route of Serson Creek that would connect Serson Creek to Applewood Creek

and divert base flow from Serson Creek through a newly constructed stream channel into

Applewood Creek:

four (identified by the prefix MW12-) that were completed as groundwater

monitoring wells.

The soil and groundwater conditions, as encountered in the boreholes and groundwater

monitoring wells installed during the current investigation, are documented in the detailed

borehole logs contained in Appendix B and summarized in Section 3.2 of this report.


350500-005 – September 2013 ii

DCS

Soil and groundwater samples were collected at each borehole and groundwater monitoring well

location and tested for a selection of potential contaminants including inorganic substances,

petroleum hydrocarbon compounds (PHCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic

aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In addition, two

composite soil samples were prepared and subjected to distilled water leachate testing.

The results of the testing of fill and native soil along the shoreline near the proposed LWC

Project Area identified a number of instances where the soils did not meet the applicable

Ministry of the Environment (MOE) Site Condition Standards (SCS). These results were largely

represented by metals along with electrical conductivity (EC) and sodium absorption ratio (SAR)

reported in fill. Very localized concentrations of PHCs (in MW12-4 associated with fill that

exhibited petroleum hydrocarbon odours) and PAHs (MW12-8) were also reported. The source

of these soil impacts is attributed to the environmental condition of the fill used for land creation

to accommodate the past expansion to the WWTF. It is understood that land creation and

construction of the naturalization features will not involve the disturbance of any of the existing

land mass beyond the possible removal of armour stones where it is installed along portions of

the existing shoreline.

The primary concern with regards to the development of new terrestrial and wetland habitat is

the potential for the migration of contaminated groundwater discharging into these areas,

whether the source of the groundwater contamination is from the near shore soil conditions or

from some other source further upgradient. In this regard, testing of groundwater from the wells

installed along the shoreline did not report any concentrations of analytes that exceeded the

applicable generic MOE SCS for groundwater within 30 m of an open water body (Table 9 SCS)

except for one instance of F3 PHCs reported in MW12-1 located at the western end of the LWC

Project Study Area (530 ug/L versus 500 ug/L). These results indicate that the soil

contamination (identified as those compounds that exceed the applicable MOE SCS) has not

impacted groundwater quality in any significant manner.

The MOE SCS for F3 PHCs in groundwater is not an ecological-derived or human

health-derived risk-based value. The MOE SCS has been established based upon the relatively

low solubility of F3 PHC s in groundwater and thus the potential for the formation of non

aqueous phase liquid (NAPL). It should be noted that no evidence of a NAPL was identified

within the LWC Project Study Area and thus, the result reported in MW12-1 is not considered to

be a significant concern warranting further remedial or mitigative action. An on-going periodic

groundwater sampling program could be developed to monitor groundwater conditions going


350500-005 – September 2013 iii

DCS

forward to ensure that there are no future concerns to the land creation and naturalization

development.

Fill was encountered in thicknesses ranging from 0.61 to 2.44 mbgs along the proposed route of

the Serson Creek realignment. Fill thicknesses was most evident in the western-most boreholes

(MW12-11 to MW12-13) that were situated on top of a reported former rail spur (MW12-11 and

MW12-12) within a low-lying area into which Serson Creek currently discharges and where

baseflow is channelled through a buried pipe to Lake Ontario under the WWTF. Borehole

MW12-13 is located east of the low lying drainage area. Based on the field standard penetration

test results, the relative density of the soils were typically compact to very dense.

No reported concentrations of inorganic parameters, PHCs, PAHs or VOCs were reported in

soils analyzed from boreholes MW12-11 to MW12-16 except for a reported concentration of

cadmium reported in fill at MW12-14 (refer to Drawing 350500-3). The extent of this one

instance has not been delineated and, in and of itself, is not a significant issue in the absence of

confirmation sampling. Should serious consideration be given to the future realignment of

Serson Creek, then we would recommend that additional sampling be carried out in the vicinity

of the reported cadmium concentration in fill soil to confirm the significance and extent of this

soil condition.

Groundwater was measured at depths of 4.99 to 7.23 mbgs. Groundwater testing, including at

MW12-14, did not report any concerns with all analysis meeting the applicable MOE SCS.

Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013

DCS

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1-1

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK.......................................................................................................... 2-1

3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 FIELD METHODOLOGY.......................................................................................... 3-1

3.1.1 Borehole Advancement and Soil Sampling ............................................. 3-1 3.1.2 Headspace Soil Vapour Testing............................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring Installations..................................................... 3-2 3.1.4 Groundwater Levels & Sampling ............................................................ 3-3 3.1.5 In-situ Field Hydraulic Conductivity Tests.............................................. 3-3 3.1.6 Borehole and Groundwater Monitoring Well Elevation Survey ............. 3-4

3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS .................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.1 Shoreline .................................................................................................. 3-5

3.2.1.1 Fill ........................................................................................... 3-5 3.2.1.2 Native Soils ............................................................................. 3-6 3.2.1.3 Bedrock ................................................................................... 3-8

3.2.2 Proposed Serson Creek Re-alignment ..................................................... 3-8 3.2.2.1 Fill ........................................................................................... 3-8 3.2.2.2 Native Soils ............................................................................. 3-9 3.2.2.3 Bedrock ................................................................................. 3-10

3.3 VOLATILE SOIL GAS VAPOURS ........................................................................... 3-10 3.3.1 Shoreline ................................................................................................ 3-11 3.3.2 Proposed Serson Creek Realignment..................................................... 3-12

3.4 HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS....................................................................... 3-12 3.5 NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID ........................................................................... 3-14

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY TESTING......................................................... 4-1 4.1 SHORELINE ........................................................................................................... 4-1

4.1.1 Soil Analyses ........................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.2 Groundwater Analyses............................................................................. 4-2

4.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT .......................................................... 4-3 4.2.1 Soil Analyses ........................................................................................... 4-3 4.2.2 Groundwater Analyses............................................................................. 4-4

4.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL........................................................... 4-5 4.4 QA/QC RESULTS .................................................................................................. 4-6

5.0 CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION............................................................................... 5-1 5.1 SHORELINE ........................................................................................................... 5-1

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE


DCS

5.1.1 Soil ........................................................................................................... 5-1 5.1.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 5-3

5.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT .......................................................... 5-3 5.2.1 Soil ........................................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.2 Groundwater ............................................................................................ 5-4

6.0 DISCUSSION.................................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1 SHORELINE ........................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK REALIGNMENT............................................................ 6-2

7.0 CLOSURE ....................................................................................................................... 7-1

8.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS................................................................................. 8-1

LIST OF APPENDICES AT REAR OF REPORT A Standard Procedures B Borehole Logs C Laboratory Analytical Certificates LIST OF TABLES FOLLOWS PAGE 2-1 Supplementary Environmental Investigation..........................................on page 2-4 3-1 Summary of Soil Vapour Results >100 ppm ........................................on page 3-11 3-2 Summary of Groundwater Elevations...................................................on page 3-12 4-1 Results of Analysis for Inorganic Parameters in Soil .......................................... 4-2 4-2 Results of Analysis for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in

Soil ....................................................................................................................... 4-2 4-3 Results of Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Soil ...... 4-2 4-4 Results of Analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil ............... 4-2 4-5 Results of Analysis for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Soil ..................... 4-2 4-6 Results of Analysis for Distilled Water Leachate................................................ 4-2 4-7 Results of Analyses for Inorganic Parameters in Groundwater........................... 4-3 4-8 Results of Analyses for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in

Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 4-3 4-9 Results of Analyses for PAHs in Groundwater ................................................... 4-3 4-10 Results of Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in

Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 4-3 4-11 Results of Analysis for Inorganic Parameters in Soil .......................................... 4-4 4-12 Results of Analysis for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in Soil ..... 4-4

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) PAGE


DCS

4-13 Results of Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PAHs in Soil ......... 4-4 4-14 Results of Analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil ............... 4-4 4-15 Results of Analyses for Inorganic Parameters in Groundwater........................... 4-5 4-16 Results of Analyses for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in

Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 4-5 4-17 Results of Analyses for PAHs in Groundwater ................................................... 4-5 4-18 Results of Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in

Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 4-5 LIST OF FIGURES FOLLOWS PAGE 1-1 Key Plan............................................................................................................... 1-1 LIST OF DRAWINGS AT REAR OF REPORT 350500-1 Borehole/Monitoring Well Location Plan 350500-2 Groundwater Contour Plan 350500-3 Soil Contaminant Distribution 350500-4 Groundwater Contamination Distribution Plan

Supplementary Subsurface Investigation LWC EA 350500-005 – September 2013 1-1

DCS

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and the Region of Peel, with the assistance of the City of

Mississauga and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) are undertaking an

Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Lakeview Waterfront Connection Project (LWC

Project). TRCA is managing the EA on behalf of the CVC and the Region of Peel.

The goal of the LWC Project is to create a new natural waterfront park that will establish

ecological habitat and public linkages on the eastern Mississauga waterfront. The LWC Project

has the potential to re-establish wetlands, meadows, beaches, streams and forest habitats while

providing for passive recreation opportunities to allow the public to enjoy these re-established

features) that will provide access to and ecological enhancements on the eastern Mississauga

waterfront between Marie Curtis park and Ontario Power Generation’s Lakeview site.

The LWC Project intends to create a land base to the south of the existing G.E. Booth Waste

Water Treatment Facility (WWTF). Decommissioning Consulting Services (DCS) was retained

by the TRCA to conduct a supplementary environmental investigation within the lands

comprising the LWC Project Study Area, the area identified to create ecological habitat and

public linkages. The general location of the LWC Project Study Area is shown on Figure 1-1.

The purpose of the supplementary environmental investigation was to obtain current information

on the environmental conditions of the soil and groundwater adjacent to the proposed

development area. The results of the investigation will be used in the EA to undertake the

screening level assessment of Alternative LWC Project Configurations (‘Alternative Methods’)

for the shoreline development as well as the detailed assessment of the Preferred Alternative for

the LWC Project.

A secondary purpose of the investigation was the assessment of subsurface (soil and

groundwater) conditions in a proposed re-alignment routing of Serson Creek that would connect

Serson Creek to Applewood Creek and divert base flow from Serson Creek through a newly

constructed stream channel into Applewood Creek.

An interim memorandum was prepared describing the preliminary results of the investigation in

August 2012. This report provides details of the environmental investigation work undertaken at

the LWC Project Study Area including a description of the field methodologies employed during

the course of the work and a presentation and discussion of the findings of the investigation.

BH12-13

MW12-1

MW12-2

MW12-3

MW12-4

MW12-5

MW12-6

MW12-7

MW12-8

MW12-9

MW12-10

MW12-14

MW12-16

MW12-11

MW12-12

BH12-15

LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT

CONNECTION EA

BOREHOLE AND MONITORING WELL

LOCATION PLAN

SEPT. 2012 1:4000± 350500-1

P.A.L. M.W. 350500

Drawn By:

Date:

Scale:

NOTES:

REVISIONS:

No. Date: By: Revisions

APPROX. SCALE 1:4000±

00 100 150 metres

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:

BOREHOLE LOCATION (DCS, 2012)

MONITORING WELL LOCATION (DCS , 2012)

Approved By:

Drawing No:

Project No:

SUPPLEMENTARY ENVIRONMENTAL

INVESTIGATION

50

LAKE LEVEL ELEVATION MEASURING POINT


DCS

2.0 SCOPE OF WORK

The scope of the supplementary environmental investigation is summarized on Table 2-1.

TABLE 2-1

SUPPLEMENTARY ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION

LABORATORY TESTING BOREHOLE ID RATIONALE

DEPTH (m)

MONITORING

WELL SOIL GROUNDWATER

SHORELINE

MW12-1 Southwest corner of WWTF adjacent to proposed cool

water estuary, bank swallow habitat and

wetland.

Borehole location atop ridge constructed of

incinerator ash generated from sewage treatment

10.98 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (2) PAHs (2) VOCs(2)

Distilled Water Leach (1)

Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)

MW12-2 South of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed bank swallow habitat, wetland

and meadow.

Borehole location atop bank constructed of incinerator

ash generated from sewage treatment

13.11 Yes Inorganics (3) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1)

Distilled Water Leach (1)


MW12-3 South of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed cool

water estuary, bank swallows habitat and

wetland.

Borehole location atop bank reportedly constructed of incinerator ash generated from sewage treatment


--


DCS


DEPTH (m)

MONITORING


MW12-4 Southeast of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed

wetland and bank swallow habitat.

Borehole location at east

extent of ridge constructed of incinerator ash generated

from sewage treatment

6.4 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (3) VOCs (1) PAHs (2) PCBs(1)


MW12-5 East of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed wetland..



MW12-6 East of ash lagoons adjacent to proposed estuary .



MW12-7 Southeast of WWTF to characterize near shore

native soil and groundwater conditions in area of land

creation



MW12-8 Land creation portion of WWTF adjacent to

proposed wetland and meadow.



MW12-9 Land creation portion of WWTF adjacent to proposed wetland.



MW12-10 Western extent of Marie Curtis Park at eastern extent

of proposed shoreline improvements



PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT

MW12-11 Western extent of Serson Creek

7.93 Yes Inorganics (2)


MW12-12 Western extent of Serson Creek

9.15 Yes Inorganics (2)



DCS


DEPTH (m)

MONITORING


MW12-13 West extent of proposed realignment channel to characterize soil and

groundwater conditions along channel route.

7.32 No Inorganics (2)

--

MW12-14 Proposed re alignment channel to characterize soil and groundwater conditions

along channel route. Adjacent to parking lot.

7.93 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (3) VOCs (1) PAHs(1)

Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1


along channel route. Adjacent to parking lot.

6.10 No Inorganics (2) PAHs (1)

--


along channel route.

6.71 Yes Inorganics (2) PHCs (1)

Inorganics (1) PHCs (1) VOCs (1) PAHs (1

Quality Assurance/Quality

Control

Inorganics (4) PHCs (2) VOCs (1) PAHs (2) PCBs(1)


NOTES:

Inorganics – Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 153 metals, electrical conductivity, sodium absorption ratio, pH.

PHCs – Petroleum Hydrocarbon Compounds (fractions F1 to F4)/benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes.

PAHs – Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons.

VOCs – Volatile Organic Compounds.

PCBs – Polychlorinated Biphenyls.

The locations of the boreholes and groundwater monitoring wells are shown on

Drawing 350500-1 and were generally arranged in two groupings:

C ten boreholes (identified as MW12-1 to MW12-10) were drilled to depths of

approximately 8.0 metres below ground surface (mbgs) adjacent to the proposed

land creation development area that borders the southern limit of the WWTF.

Groundwater monitoring wells were installed at each of these locations; and


DCS

C six boreholes (identified as MW12-11, MW12-12, BH12-13, MW12-14, BH12-15

and MW12-16) were advanced to depths of approximately 8.0 mbgs within the

proposed Serson Creek re-alignment route; four (identified by the prefix MW12-)

that were completed as groundwater monitoring wells.

Excess soil cuttings generated during advancement of the boreholes were containerized in 205 L

steel drums with sealable lids and stored on site as directed by WWTF staff.

The groundwater information collected at each well location included:

• stabilized groundwater levels;

• observation of evidence of contamination including, discolouration, odours, and

sheen;

• presence of a non aqueous phase liquid layer;

• field sampling parameters including, temperature, pH, conductivity and redox

potential;

• samples: and

• hydraulic conductivity information from field tests conducted on selected wells.

Soil and groundwater samples were collected at each borehole and groundwater monitoring well

location and tested for a selection of potential contaminants including inorganic substances,

petroleum hydrocarbon compounds (PHCs), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polycyclic

aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). In addition, two

composite soil samples were prepared and subjected to distilled water leachate testing. Details

of the laboratory analyses carried out are included on Table 2-1.

Prior to the initiation of the field activities, DCS staff arranged for and completed (with the

assistance of WWTF staff), subsurface utility locates for the areas of investigation.

An elevation survey of the borehole and monitoring well locations was completed at the

conclusion of the field activities.


DCS

3.0 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION

The field work was completed under the full-time supervision of DCS field personnel. Detailed

field procedures can be found in Appendix A. This program was not intended to be consistent

with nor satisfy the requirements of Ontario Regulation (O.Reg.) 153/04 – Records of Site

Condition – Part XV.1 of the Act as amended. However, the field investigations were conducted

in general concordance with the requirements of O.Reg. 153/04.

3.1 FIELD METHODOLOGY

All work was carried out in general accordance with the Standard Field Procedures included in

Appendix A.

3.1.1 Borehole Advancement and Soil Sampling

The environmental subsurface characterization program was carried out from 25 June 2012 to

5 July 2012. A total of 16 boreholes (MW12-1 to BH12-16) were advanced to depths of 3.05 m

to 13.11 m with 14 of these locations completed as groundwater monitoring wells. The

boreholes were advanced using a Dietrich D-50 Turbo track mounted drill rig equipped with

hollow stem augers and operated by a two-man crew supplied by Profile Drilling.

Soil samples were recovered with the use of a 51 mm diameter, 760 mm long, split-spoon

sampler, over the full depth of the boreholes as shown on the individual borehole logs included

in Appendix B. The soil samples were examined at the time of collection for general soil

classification purposes (including type, texture, colour, and moisture characteristics) as well as

for evidence of environmental impacts (odour, staining, presence of foreign debris, sheens and

the presence of free product).

Following field logging, the soil samples were placed into clean 250 mR amber glass jars for all

analyses except VOCs and F1 fraction PHCs, which were collected with a “Terracore”

disposable sampling device and placed into laboratory supplied 40 mL amber glass vials

containing a fixed amount of methanol, as required by Ministry of the Environment (MOE) field

sampling protocols. Once the soil samples had been recovered, examined and placed into the

sterile glass jars, the samples were stored in an insulated cooler complete with freezer packs to

ensure a cool environment during shipment under chain-of-custody protocols to the laboratory

for analysis.


DCS

Field decontamination procedures of the sampling equipment are provided in Appendix A.

Excess soil cuttings were placed in sealable 205 L steel drums and stored on the property at a

location determined by WWTF staff.

3.1.2 Headspace Soil Vapour Testing

Headspace soil vapour measurements of the individual soil samples were collected with the use

of a Gastech model 1314 (Gastech), a portable instrument capable of measuring vapour

concentrations in parts per million (ppm in the range of 0 to 500 ppm) or lower explosive limit

(LEL in the range of 0 to 100 % LEL) ranges. The precision of the instrument is +- 5 ppm or +-

5% LEL depending on the operating mode of the instrument. Instrument accuracy is +- 5 %.

The readings were obtained from a small quantity of soil that was placed into sealable plastic

bags after which the soil sample was broken apart (as needed) to release soil vapour. The

readings were collected by piercing the top of the sealed plastic bag with the tip of the instrument

probe. The results were noted on the borehole logs for subsequent evaluation. The headspace

vapour profile for each borehole (included on the individual borehole logs in Appendix B) was

assessed to identify likely zones of elevated organic contaminants in the soil column and to assist

in the selection of samples for laboratory analytical purposes.

3.1.3 Groundwater Monitoring Installations

Boreholes MW12-1 to MW12-12, MW12-14 and MW12-16 were completed as groundwater

monitoring wells. The monitoring well locations are shown on Drawing 350500-1.

Monitoring well installation details are presented on the borehole logs in Appendix B.

Monitoring wells were constructed using 55 mm diameter Schedule 40 PVC Triloc riser pipe

with 3.0 m long No. 10 slot intake zone (screen) except foe MW12-10 that, due to its’ shallow

depth, was equipped with a 1.5 m long screen length. No glues or solvents were used in the

construction of the wells to avoid introducing volatiles into the well and, thereby, biasing the

analytical results. Silica sand was placed around and to a height of at least 300 mm above the top

of the well screen as a gravel pack. The remaining annular space was sealed with bentonite. A

metal stick-up lockable protective casing was grouted in place at the top of the well.


DCS

As required under O.Reg. 903 a well record must be submitted to the MOE for the monitoring

well array that was installed during this project. The well record was submitted to the MOE by

the MOE-licensed well driller who installed the well.

3.1.4 Groundwater Levels & Sampling

A “Waterra” inertial pump affixed to an appropriate length of PVC tubing was installed in each

well to facilitate well development and purging activities and the recovery of samples without

any opportunity for cross-contamination from other wells. After the initial development of the

wells on 30 July 2012 and a minimum 24-hour period of recovery, water levels were collected on

1 and 2 August 2012 from the monitoring wells. The water levels were collected with an

electronic interface probe capable of detecting both aqueous and non-aqueous liquids and

recorded on the individual borehole log (refer to Appendix B). During the collection of the

groundwater samples, observations of the evidence of environmental impacts in the groundwater

were noted including the presence of odours, sheens or the formation of a non-aqueous phase

liquid (NAPL).

After measurement of the water levels and prior to the collection of the groundwater samples, the

monitoring wells were purged to ensure that representative groundwater samples are recovered.

The collection of stabilized field groundwater quality parameters (pH, temperature, conductivity

and redox potential) after each groundwater purging event indicated that representative

groundwater conditions for sampling were achieved.

Groundwater samples were recovered from the monitoring well through the inertial pump

directly into sterile glass or plastic sample jars that have been pre-treated with preservatives,

where appropriate. Sample jars were obtained directly from the laboratory and, when filled,

shipped back to the laboratory for analysis in a sealed insulated cooler box. For analyses of

metals, the groundwater sample was pumped from the well through a WaTerra Hydropore

0.45 um cartridge filter to eliminate suspended solids. Samples destined for organic analyses

were obtained in an unfiltered condition. In both cases, the samples were retained in a marked

sample jar to which a sample label identifying the well number, date of recovery and other

pertinent information was affixed. The sample jars were filled to the brim to eliminate

headspace air to reduce the possibility of oxidation and degassing. Sample bottles were then

stored in the insulated cooler and protected from freezing pending shipment to the laboratory.


DCS

3.1.5 In-situ Field Hydraulic Conductivity Tests

Formation permeability (groundwater flow characteristics) was assessed by conducting field

falling head tests carried out in selected monitoring wells (MW12-1, MW12-8, MW12-12 and

MW12-16) on 1 and 2 August 2012. The change in water level effected through the falling head

test method was measured at set time intervals with a water level indicator and recorded in the

field. Well information recorded at the time of testing included well radius (r), screened interval

length (L), gravel pack radius (R), height of the phreatic surface above an arbitrary datum (H),

the height of the water column in the well at the cessation of pumping (Ho) and the height of the

water column in the well at each measurement interval t (h).

3.1.6 Borehole and Groundwater Monitoring Well Elevation Survey

At the completion of field activities an elevation survey was completed on 14 and

15 August 2012 to establish the geodetic elevation at each newly-installed borehole/monitoring

well location. Surveyed elevations for the newly-installed borehole and groundwater monitoring

wells were referenced to a geodetic elevation located on the north face at the east corner of an

office building located east of the site at 1352 Lakeshore Road East. The benchmark, identified

as BM #102 has a geodetic elevation of 184.401 m [source: KMK B&V Site Plan General

Legend and Notes, G.E. Booth (Lakeview) Waste Water Treatment Plant Aeration Tank

Extension, Drawing number G1 of 12, Sheet Number 3 of 86, January 2008 (file reference

2952-A-113)].

3.2 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

The soil and groundwater conditions, as encountered in the boreholes and groundwater

monitoring wells installed during the current investigation, are documented in the detailed

borehole logs contained in Appendix B and summarized in the following sections. It should be

noted that subsurface conditions may vary between and beyond the boreholes drilled across the

property.

In addition, standard penetration resistance (N-value) of the soil in the borehole was recorded

during the borehole drilling. The detailed blow counts are provided in the borehole logs

contained in Appendix B.


DCS

3.2.1 Shoreline

3.2.1.1 Fill

Sand and Gravel

A surface layer of sand and gravel fill was encountered in boreholes MW12-1 through MW12-9

extending to depths of 0.61 to 4.27 mbgs and at a depth of 6.55 to 8.54 mbgs in MW12-1. The

surficial sand and gravel fill layer is brown, dry to damp and contains trace silt. Locally at

MW12-1, it was intermixed with trace ash from 0.61 to 1.22 mbgs. The sand and gravel fill

identified at depth in MW12-1 is grey, moist to wet containing trace ash. A fragment of a plastic

bag was found within this fill layer.

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be dense based on the standard

penetration test “N” values. Trace to some asphalt fragments were found in the sand and gravel

fill in MW12-4 from surface to a depth of 2.44 mbgs. A moderate petroleum hydrocarbon odour

was detected in the sand and gravel layer in borehole MW12-4 from 0.61 to 4.27 mbgs.

Ash

An ash layer, generated from the WWTF incinerator process, was encountered underlying the

sand and gravel layer at MW12-1 (1.22 to 6.55 mbgs), MW12-2 (0.61 to 9.91 mbgs) and

MW12-3 (0.61–to 6.86 mbgs). The ash layer was described as red with a powdery texture, damp

to moist and locally intermixed with silty sand and gravel at MW12-1 and containing wood

fragments in MW12-2 from 7.32 to 7.93 mbgs.

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be very loose to loose based on

the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.

Silt

Silt fill was encountered in boreholes MW12-1 (8.54 to 10.36 mbgs) and MW12-3 (6.86 to

8.53 mbgs) underlying the ash fill layer. The silt fill is brown to grey/black, wet, with trace sand.

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be very loose to loose in

MW12-1 and compact to dense in MW12-3 based on the standard penetration test “N” values.


DCS

Trace asphalt fragments were identified in the silt fill in MW12-3 at 7.93 mbgs. A medium

petroleum hydrocarbon odour was noted in the silt fill in MW12-1 at depth of 9.76 to

10.21 mbgs and a solvent odour was noted in the interval 10.21 to 10.36 mbgs.

Silty Sand to Sandy Silt

Silty sand to sandy silt was identified underlying sand and gravel fill at MW12-5 from 1.68 to

2.44 mbgs, MW12-6 from 0.46 to 3.66 mbgs and at MW12-8 from 1.83 to 2.44 mbgs (silty sand)

and 2.44 to 3.66 mbgs (sandy silt). This fill layer is brown (MW12-5 and MW12-6) to grey

(MW12-8), damp to moist with trace to some sand and trace gravel. Locally in MW12-5, this

layer contains some clay.

The relative density of the silty sand to sandy silt fill was determined to be very loose at

MW12-5, loose to compact at MW12-6 and very loose to compact at MW12-8 based on the

standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.

Sand

Locally at MW12-9, a sand fill layer was identified from 3.05 to 3.81 mbgs separating the

overlying sand and gravel fill from the underlying native sand and gravel fill. This layer was

brown, moist to wet with trace gravel.

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be compact based on the

standard penetration test “N” values. A piece of geotextile was found in the sand fill at

MW12-9. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.

3.2.1.2 Native Soils

Silt Till

Silt till was identified underlying fill at MW12-1 (10.36 to 10.98 mbgs), MW12-2 (9.91 to

12.81 mbgs), MW12-3 (8.53 to 9.15 mbgs) and MW12-7 (4.27 to 4.88 mbgs). Boreholes

MW12-1, MW12-3 and MW12-7 were terminated in this unit.

The silt till is brown to grey, wet with trace to some sand and trace gravel.


DCS

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be loose to compact based on


Silty Sand

Silty sand was identified at MW12-4 from 4.27 to 4.88 mbgs and MW12-8 from 3.66 to 4.27

mbgs. This unit is brown to grey, wet with some clay (at MW12-4) and trace gravel.



Sandy Silt

Sandy silt was encountered underlying the native silty sand layer at MW12-4 (4.88 to 5.94

mbgs), silty sand to sandy silt fill at MW12-5 (2.44 to 4.27 mbgs), sandy silt fill at MW12-6

(3.66 to 4.27 mbgs) and MW12-8 (3.66 to 4.27 mbgs). Borehole MW12-5 was terminated in this

unit.

The sandy silt is brown to grey, wet with some clay and trace gravel and sand.



Sand

Sand was encountered underlying the silty sand from 4.11 to 4.88 mbgs in MW12-8 and

underlying sand and gravel in MW12-10 from 1.22 to 3.05 mbgs. Both boreholes were

terminated in this unit. The sand is described as brown to grey, wet with trace gravel.

The relative density of the sand was determined to be very loose to very dense based on the



DCS

Sand and Gravel

Sand and gravel was encountered in MW12-9 underlying sand fill from 3.81 m to 6.71 mbgs and

MW12-10 from surface to a depth of 1.22 mbgs. The sand and gravel is described as brown and

damp to moist.

The relative density of the sand was determined to be loose to compact based on the standard

penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.

3.2.1.3 Bedrock

Weathered dark grey shale bedrock was encountered underlying the silt till unit in MW12-2 at

12.81 mbgs and underlying sandy silt in MW12-4 at 5.94 mbgs.

No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.

3.2.2 Proposed Serson Creek Re-alignment

3.2.2.1 Fill

Sand and Gravel

Sand and gravel fill was encountered in boreholes MW12-11, MW12-12, BH12-13, MW12-14

and BH12-15 from the ground surface to a maximum depth of 1.52 mbgs at MW12-11. The

sand and gravel fill was generally described as brown to locally grey below 610 mm, dry to

damp, with trace silt in BH12-15. Locally at MW12-11, a crushed stone layer, most likely part

of the rail spur bedding material, was encountered from 0.91 to 1.52 m.

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be dense based on the standard


Silty Sand

Silty sand was identified in MW12-13 underlying sand and gravel from 0.61 to 2.44 mbgs. This

layer was grey to brown, moist and contained traced gravel. From 1.22 to 1.83 mbgs, this layer

comprised fine sand. Below 1.83 mbgs, the silty sand became more silty.


DCS

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be loose based on the standard


Sandy Silt

Sandy silt was encountered underlying the sand and gravel layer at MW12-14 from 0.61 to

1.83 mbgs. The sandy silt was described as grey and black, moist with trace gravel.

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be loose based on the standard

penetration test “N” values. A septic odour was noted in the sandy silt fill in MW12-14 from

0.61 to 1.22 mbgs. No other evidence of environmental impacts was reported.

3.2.2.2 Native Soils

Sandy Silt Till

Sandy silt till was encountered underlying fill at each of the boreholes placed along the proposed

realignment of Serson Creek (MW12-11 to MW12-16). It was identified from 1.52 to 3.66 mbgs

in MW12-11, 1.83 to 3.66 mbgs in MW12-12, 2.44 to 4.88 mbgs in BH12-13, 1.83 to 4.27 mbgs

in MW12-14, 1.37 to 3.05 mbgs in BH12-15 and 1.22 m to 3.05 mbgs in MW12-16.

The sandy silt till is generally brown, moist with trace gravel. Locally this unit becomes wet and

contains some gravel.

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be compact to very dense based

on the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.

Sand

Sand was encountered underlying the sandy silt till unit in boreholes MW12-11, MW12-14,

MW12-15 and MW12-16 at depths of 3.05 mbgs (MW12-15 and MW12-16, 3.66 mbgs

(MW12-11) and 4.27 mbgs (MW12-14) and underlying the sand and gravel unit at MW12-11

from 6.71 to 7.93 mbgs and in MW12-12 from 7.62 to 9.15 mbgs. The sand is generally brown

or grey, moist to wet with trace silt and gravel.


DCS

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be dense to very dense based

on the standard penetration test “N” values. No evidence of environmental impacts was noted.

Sand and Gravel

Sand and gravel was encountered underlying sand at MW12-11 from 5.49 to 6.71 mbgs and

underlying sandy silt till in MW12-12 from 3.66 to 7.62 mbgs and in BH12-13 from 4.88 to

7.32 mbgs. The sand and gravel is typically described as brown to grey, moist, with some silt and

some gravel.

The relative density of the sand and gravel fill was determined to be very dense based on the


3.2.2.3 Bedrock

Bedrock was not encountered in any of the boreholes put down within the proposed Serson

Creek realignment.

3.3 VOLATILE SOIL GAS VAPOURS

Each soil sample recovered from the individual boreholes put down during the DCS

investigation was monitored for the presence of total volatile organic vapours and these

observations were recorded on the field logs. Headspace measurements were taken for each

bagged sample recovered with the use of a portable vapour monitor (Gastech) to identify the

presence of volatile organic vapours in the soil. The headspace vapour profile for each borehole,

shown on the individual borehole logs included in Appendix B, was assessed to identify likely

zones of elevated organic contaminants in the soil column and to assist in the selection of

samples for analytical purposes.

Soil sample locations where soil vapour screening measurements were measured in excess of

100 ppm are summarized in Table 3-1.


DCS

TABLE 3-1

SUMMARY OF SOIL VAPOUR RESULTS >100 ppm

BOREHOLE I.D. SOIL SAMPLE

INTERVAL (m)

SOIL VAPOUR

CONCENTRATION (ppm)

OTHER OBSERVATIONS

SHORELINE

MW12-1 2.44 - 3.05 100 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.

3.05 - 3.66 100 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.



9.76 - 10.37 200 Silt fill, some sand, moderate petroleum hydrocarbon, solvent odour.

10.37 - 10.98 150 Silt till, no odour or staining.

MW12-2 6.10 - 6.74 150 Incinerator ash, no odour or staining.



PROPOSED SERSON CREEK REALIGNMENT

MW12-12 7.62 - 7.93 150 Sand, no odour or staining.

MW12-14 0.61 - 1.22 200 Sandy silt fill, septic odour.

1.22 - 1.83 100 Silt till, no odour or staining.

3.0 - 3.66 200 Sandy silt till, no odour or staining.



5.49 - 6.10 480 Sand, trace silt, no odour or staining.

3.3.1 Shoreline

The headspace vapour readings ranged from a minimum value of 0 ppm to a maximum value of

200 ppm, with the majority of the results measured below 100 ppm. Reviewing the results of the

soil vapour headspace screening measurements, the majority of the soil vapour measurements in

excess of 100 ppm were reported in MW12 -1 and MW12-2 within the incinerator ash layer.

The highest measurement reported (200 ppm) was found in MW12-1 in the interval of 9.76 to

10.37 m, comprising a silt (some sand) fill identified below the ash layer at this location that

exhibited moderate petroleum odours. Samples of soil from this interval were submitted to the

laboratory for testing of PHCs and VOCs.


DCS

3.3.2 Proposed Serson Creek Realignment

The headspace vapour readings ranged from a minimum value of 0 ppm to a maximum value of

480 ppm, with the majority of the results measured below 100 ppm. There was no evidence of

any significant staining or odours indicative of a potential environmental concern except for the

detection of a septic odour at MW12-14 in the interval 0.61 to 1.22 m.

3.4 HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

Groundwater levels were collected by DCS from the monitoring wells installed by DCS during

the current investigation on 1 and 2 August 2013. These well locations are shown on Drawing

350500-1. The recorded groundwater elevations collected by DCS on 1 and 2 August 2012 are

summarized on Table 3-2.

TABLE 3-2

SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS

MONITORING

WELL ID GROUND

SURFACE

ELEVATION (masl)

DATE OF

GROUNDWATER

MEASUREMENTS

STATIC

WATER DEPTH

MEASURED

FROM GROUND

SURFACE (m)

GROUNDWATER

ELEVATION (masl)

PRODUCT

LEVEL (mm)

DEPTH TO

BOTTOM

MEASURED

FROM GROUND

SURFACE (m)

SHORELINE

MW12-1 83.54 2-Aug-12 8.08 75.46 0 10.98

MW12-2 83.79 2-Aug-12 7.63 76.16 0 8.65

MW12-4 77.11 2-Aug-12 3.04 74.07 0 4.75

MW12-5 76.80 2-Aug-12 2.27 74.53 0 4.27

MW12-6 77.33 1-Aug-12 2.83 74.50 0 4.27

MW12-7 77.26 2-Aug-12 3.21 74.05 0 4.05

MW12-8 77.21 1-Aug-12 3.39 73.82 0 4.88

MW12-9 77.44 1-Aug-12 3.63 73.81 0 6.20

MW12-10 75.28 2-Aug-12 1.36 73.92 0 2.22

PROPOSED SERSON CREEK REALIGNMENT

MW12-11 82.67 1-Aug-12 6.39 76.28 0 7.32

MW12-12 82.21 1-Aug-12 7.23 74.98 0 8.78

MW12-14 83.35 1-Aug-12 6.20 77.15 0 7.92


DCS

MONITORING

WELL ID GROUND

SURFACE

ELEVATION (masl)

DATE OF

GROUNDWATER

MEASUREMENTS

STATIC

WATER DEPTH

MEASURED

FROM GROUND

SURFACE (m)

GROUNDWATER

ELEVATION (masl)

PRODUCT

LEVEL (mm)

DEPTH TO

BOTTOM

MEASURED

FROM GROUND

SURFACE (m)

MW12-16 81.11 1-Aug-12 4.99 76.12 0 6.30

NOTE: masl metres above sea level.

Groundwater within the overburden was measured at depths of 1.36 to 8.08 mbgs that

corresponds to elevations of 73.81 to 77.15 m above sea level (masl). Groundwater elevations

collected in August 2012 are shown on Drawing 350500-2 and infer a southerly direction of

lateral groundwater flow.

Lake surface elevations were also collected at the time of the groundwater levels. The two

locations where lake levels were collected (readily available access) are shown on Drawing

350500-3 (LL1 and LL2). The recorded elevations were 73.88 m (LL1) and 73.82 m, (LL2).

The groundwater elevations measured in the overburden monitoring wells aligned along the lake

front (MW12-1 to MW12-10) occurred approximately 0.2 to 2.3 m above the water elevation of

the lake with the groundwater elevation in three wells (MW12-8 to MW12-10) measured at

approximately lake level. The groundwater elevations measured in overburden of the wells

aligned along the proposed Serson Creek route (MW12-11, MW12-12, MW12-14 and

MW12-16) occurred approximately 1.1 to 3.3 m above the water elevation of the lake.

The horizontal gradient is calculated as the mathematical slope of the phreatic surface between

two reference points on a site, hence:

21 HH

i

where, i = the hydraulic gradient,

H1 - H2 = difference in hydraulic head, and

R = horizontal distance in metres.

A horizontal gradient of 0.027 was calculated for the overburden groundwater flow based on the

August 2012 results.


DCS

Field rising head permeability tests, completed by DCS in wells MW12-1, MW12-8, MW12-12

and MW12-16, indicated hydraulic conductivities of 4.8x10-7 m/sec in MW12-1, 2.2x10-6 m/sec

in MW12-8, 1.9x10-6 m/sec in MW12-12 and 1.1x10-6 m/sec in MW12-18. Assuming porosity

is 0.30, the calculated horizontal groundwater velocity in shallow overburden ranges from 1.36

to 6.23 m/year.

3.5 NON-AQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID

No evidence of a light (floating) or dense (sinking) phase separated NAPL was found in any of

the well locations monitored during the current program.


DCS

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY TESTING

The soil and groundwater samples recovered for environmental testing were submitted to AGAT

Laboratories, a CALA-certified commercial environmental laboratory facility located in

Mississauga, Ontario, for chemical analysis.

Soil samples and groundwater samples were collected for analytical testing during the course of

this investigation. The results of the testing have been compared against the applicable generic

site condition standards (SCS) provided in the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) document

entitled “Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use under Part XV.1 of the

Environmental Protection Act, dated 15 April 2011 (the MOE SCS). Samples collected from the

boreholes and monitoring wells placed within 30 m of the lake (MW12-1 to MW12-10), the

results were compared to the SCS provided in Table 9 of the MOE SCS. Samples collected from

the boreholes and monitoring wells placed within the proposed re-alignment of Serson Creek

(MW12-11 to MW12-16), the results were compared to the SCS provided in Table 3 of the MOE

SCS.

Soil samples, selected on the basis of visual, olfactory and headspace organic vapour evidence of

environmental impacts, were tested for the presence of inorganic and general chemistry

parameters, PAHs, PHCs, VOCs and PCBs. Where no readily identifiable evidence of such

contamination was present samples were selected to be representative of the strata encountered

4.1 SHORELINE

4.1.1 Soil Analyses

Laboratory chemical testing was carried out on a total of:

twenty-two samples (including two blind field duplicate samples) were selected

for metals and general inorganic analysis;

eighteen samples (including one blind field duplicate samples) for PHCs (F1 to F4

fractions plus BTEX) analysis;

fifteen samples (including one blind field duplicate samples) samples for the

presence of PAHs analysis;


DCS

fifteen samples (including one blind field duplicate samples) were selected for

VOCs analysis;

five samples (including one blind field duplicate samples) were selected for PCBs

analysis; and

two composite samples for distilled water leachate analysis.

The results of the current laboratory analyses, with reference to applicable MOE Standards, have

been incorporated into the following chemical summary tables:

Table 4-1 Results of Analysis for Inorganic Parameters in Soil;

Table 4-2 Results of Analysis for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs);

Table 4-3 Results of Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in

Soil;

Table 4-4 Results of Analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil;

Table 4-5 Results of Analysis for Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Soil; and

Table 4-6 Results of Analysis for Distilled Water Leachate.

4.1.2 Groundwater Analyses

Laboratory analyses were carried out on a total of:

ten samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) for metals and general

inorganic analysis;

ten samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) for PHCs (F1 to F4

fractions plus BTEX) analysis;

ten samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) for PAHs analysis; and

TABLE 4—i

RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN SOIL

. MWI 2-2 MWI 2-2 MWI2-B (Dup)MWI2-1 MWI2-1 SSI3 MWI2-2 SSII 6.10- SSIB 10.36- SS18 10.36-

MOE Standards SS7 3.66-4.27m 7.32-7.92m SS8 4.27-4.88m 6.Tlm lO.97m 10.9Th,Parameters Table 9* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6)28/2012(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

Antimony 1.3 0.8 6.8 0.8 6.2 7 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic 18 I 10 8 10 II 7 7Barium 220 2 1110 107 1050 1110 47 49Beryllium 2.5 0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 0.9Boron 36 5 8 14 9 8 15 16Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1.5 0.10 1.04 1.24 1.04 1.04 2.7 2.5Cadmium 1.2 0.5 5.5 1.4 6.7 8.2 <0.5 <0.5Chromium 70 2 179 49 169 250 26 28Cobalt 0.5 8.2 12.1 8 9.3 15.8 15.8Cope 92 — I 1630 115 1550 1640 27 26Lead 120 I 109 35 96 154 9 10.0Molybdenum 2 0.5 17.1 3.2 15.9 16 <0.5 0.5Nickel 82 I 68 32 66 79 32 33Selenium 1.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Silver 0.5 0.2 49.3 3.8 43.7 49.4 0.2 <U2Thallium 1 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium 2.5 0.5 7.1 0.8 7.6 7.1 0.6 0.6Vanadium 86 1 33 31 35 40 33 32Zinc — 290 5 1630 179 1470 1610 75 79Chromium VI 0.66 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ISQ <0.2 <0.2Cyanide 0.05i 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 — <0.040 —- <0.040 <0.040 — <0.040Mercury —~_________ 0.27 0.10 1.26 0.11 0.95 1.42 <0.10 <0.10Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.7 0.005 0.957 0.371 1.1 133 0.555 0.483Sodium Adsorption Ratio 5 N/A 1.11 0.663 1.11 1.11 1.49 2.2pH, 2:1 CaCI2 Extraction 6.95 7.6 6.74 ISQ 7.84 8.07

Note:All parameter values in pglg (ppm) un!eaa ollierwiae indicated

Bold Exceeds Rcaidential/Pakland/Tnstitutional/lndustrial/

CommerciallConia,unity Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards

for Use within 30 m ofa Waler Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition

* Province ofosrario Soil, Ground Waler and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.I ofthe EPA, April, 2011

RDL Reported Detection Limit

Not detected

ISQ insufficient sample

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 -005 - September 2013 Page I of 4

TABLE 4-1RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN SOIL

. MWI2-3 MWI2-3 MWI2-4 MWI2-5 MW12-5SS1O 5.49- 3814 7.92- MW12-4 MWI2-D (Dup) 886 3.05- SS3 1.22- SS5 2.44-

MOE Standards 6.lOm 8.53m SS2 0.61 -1 .22m SS2 O.61-1.22m 3.66m 1.83m 3.05mParameters

Table 9* ROLNon-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/28/2012 6/2812012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27120 12 6/27/2012 6/2712012

(t5/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

Antimony 1.3 0.8 10 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic 18 I 8 3 3 3 3 5 4Barium 220 -. — 2 1240 73 36 47 42 58 64Beryllium 2.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6Boron 36 5 5 6 <5 5 5 - 8 7Boron (Hot Water Soluble) -~ 1.5 0.10 0.93 — 1.33 0.82 - - 0.83 0.96 0.54 0.45Cadmium 1.2 0.5 17.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chromium —— 70 — 2 278 19 — 9 10 — II 19 19Cobalt 22 — 0.5 11.2 6.9 3.7 4.1 4.6 9.8 9.2Copper 92 I 1550 21 18 18 14 20 19Lead ~0 I 331 24 24 - 20 12 10 8Molybdenum 2 0.5 9.6 -— <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Nickel 82 — 1 108 14 8 .? 9 18 18Selenium 1.5 - 0.4 <04 <0.4 0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 -

Silver 0.5 -- 0.2 419 0.4 <0.2 <0.2 -- <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Thallium I 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 -- ~0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium 2.5 0.5 5.2 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.5Vanadium 86 I 32 26 20 21 21 26 27Zinc - 290 —~______ 5 1510 56 33 33 31 46 46Chromium VI 0.66 0.2 <0.2 <0,2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cyanide 0.051 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Mercury —________ 0.27 0.10 —— 1.38 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 - <0.10 <0.10Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.7 0.005 1.1 1.46 0.296 0.334 0.36 0.848 0.358Sodium AdsorptionRatio 5 N/A______ 0.878 7.14 0.336 0.358 1.41 0.313 0.294

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 6.91 7.75 7.52 7.55 7.4 7.64 7.55Note,

All paeaneter valuea in pg/g (ppn) unless oihtrwise indicated

Exceeds RosidentiaUpaklandllnatitutional/InduatriaY

Connercial/Conmunity Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards

for Use within 30 ne ofa Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition

Province ofontario Soil, Ground Waler and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.I ofilse EPA, April, 2011

Reported Detection Limit

Not detected

intufftcieat aanple

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013

Bold

*

RDL

lSQ

Page 2 of 4


. MW12-6 MWI2-6 MWI2-7 MW12-7 MW12-8 (Dup) MWI2-8 MWI2-9SSIA 0- 553 1.22- 552 0.61- 557 3.66- 553 1.22- SS3 1.22- S87 3.66- SS2 0.61-

MOEStandards 0.46m 1.83m 1.22m 4.lIm 1.83m l.83m 4.ZYm 1.22mParameters

Table 9* RDLNon-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/2712012 6/27/2012 6127/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012

(15104/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse CoarseAntimony t.3 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic 18 I 8 3 8 5 5 5 5 5Barium 220 2 51 43 50 44 70 77 66 72Beryllium 2.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5Boron 36 5 9 5 17 II 7 7 7 5Boron(HotWaterSoluble) 1.5 0.10 0.32 0.18 3.74 0.94 0.44 0.5 0.48 0.18Cadmium 1.2 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Chromium 70 2 16 II 27 22 21 24 23 19Cobalt 22 0.5 7.8 — 5.4 —- 18.3 10.4 8.8 9.6 10 8 -—

Copper 92 I 94 II 25 36 25 24 22 41Lead 120 I 38 5 37 20 23 19 19 20Molybdenum 2 0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9Nickel 82 I IS II 34 21 18 19 20 15Selenium 1.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Silver 0.5 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Thallium 1 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium — 2.5 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5Vanadium 86 I 23 19 —— - 32 23 28 31 29 25Zinc 290 5 98 27 70 68 59 61 53 58Chromium Vt 0.66 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cyanide 0.051 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Mercury 0.27 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.13Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.7 0005 0.207 0.151 2.7 0.767 0.506 0.513 0.298 0.62SodiumAdsorption Ratio - 5 N/A 0.153 0.587 0.556 0.91 1.81 1.96 2.4 8.15p11, 2:1 CaCI2 Extraction 7.6 7.74 7.71 9.62 7.64 166 7.68 7.66

Note:All parameter valuer in jtgig (ppm) unless otitenvise indicated

Bold Exceeds ResidentiallPaklandllnntitutionalflndnatsial/

Contn,ereint/Comninnity Land Use . Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards

far Uae within 30 m ot’a Water Body in a Non-potable Groundwater Condition

* Province ofontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.t ofthe EPA, April, 2011

RDL Reperted Detectien Limit

Not detected


Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 3 of4


. MW12-9 MWI2-108S4 2.29- 882 0.61-

MOE Standards 2.59m 1.22mParameters Table 9* RUt

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6/27/2012(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse

Anlimony 1.3 0.8 <0.8 <0.8Arsenic IS I 5 3Barium 220 2 38 45Beryllium -— 2.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Boron 36 5 5 <5Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1.5 0.10 0.34 0.24Cadmium 1.2 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 —

Chromium 70 — 2 19 IICobalt 22 0.5 4.1 3.3Copper 92 I 32 38Lead 120 I 24 29Molybdenum 2 0.5 1.7 0.6Nickel 82 I Il 8Selenium 1.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 -

Silver 0.5 0.2 <0.2 <0.2Thallium —_______ I 0.4 <0.4 <0.4Uranium - 2.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Vanadium -- 86 I 13 12Zinc 290 5! 53Chromium VI 0.66 0.2 ISQ <0.2Cyanide 0.051 — - 0.040 ISQ <0.040Mercury — 0.27 0.10 <0.10 <0.10Electrical Conduelivity (2:1) 0.7 0.005 0.451 0.151Sodium AdsoeptionRatio 5 N/A 4.1 1.02pH, 2:1 CaCI2 Extraction TSQ 7.85

Note:All parameter values in pgig (ppm) unless othenvise indicated

Bold Exceeds Reaidentiallpaklandflnstitutionaliladtsstrialj

CommercinllContmunity Land Use - Table 9 Geaeric Site Condition Standards

for Use within 30 m ofa Waler Body ia a Non-Potable Groundwater Conditisa

* rrovittce ofOntario Soil, Ground Water and Sedimeat Standards for Use

Under Pars XV.t ofthe EPA, April, 2011

RDL Reported Detection Linus

Not detected


Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 -005- September 2013 Page 4 of 4

TABLE 4-2

RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL. MWI2-1 MWI2-1 MWI2-2 MWI2-4

SSI7A9.75- 5S18 10.36- SSII 6.10- MWI2-3 SS3 1.22-MOE Standards 10.21m 10.97m 6.llm SSI2B 6.86-7.32m 1.83m

Parameters Table 9* ROL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/2912012 6/2912012 6128/2012 6128/2012 6/27/2012

(15/0412011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

Benzene 0.02 0.02

Toluene -- 0.2 0.08

Ethylbenzene 0.05 0.05

Xylene Mixture 0.05 0.05

Fl(C6toClO) 25 5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5

Fl (C6 to ClO) minus BTEX 5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5

F2(ClOtoCl6) 10 10 <10 <10 <10 48

F3(Cl6toC34) 240 50 <50 <50 <50 360

F4(C34toC5O) — 120 50 <50 —- <50 <50 <50

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA NA NA

Moisture Content - —— —__________ 0.1 13.8 -— 34 8.2 10.7

Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 118 140 128 73

Note:

All parameter values in pglg (ppm) unless otherwise indicated

Bold Exceeds Residential/Paklandllnstitutional/industrial/

Commercial/Community Land Use. Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards

for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province ofOntario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.t of the EPA, April, 2011


Not detected

Supplementary SLibstirface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page I of 4

TABLE 4-2

RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AN]) PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL. MWI2-4 MWI2-4 MWI2-5 MW12-6 MWI2-6 MWI2-7

SS5 2.44- SS8 4.27- SS5 2.44- SS5 2.44- 557 3.66- SS4 1.83-MOE Standards 3.05m 4.88m 3.05m 3.05m 4.27m 2.44m


Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6127/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

Benzene 0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Toluene 0.2 0.08 <0.08 <0.08Etliylbenzene 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Xylene Mixture 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fl(C6toC1O) 25 5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Fl (C6 to ClO) minus BTEX 5 6 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

F2(CIOtoCl6) 10 10 55 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

F3(Cl6toC34) 240 50 150 65 <50 76 <50 69

F4 (C34 to C50) 120 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Moisture Content 0.1 9.7 12.1 16.3 11.7 20.4 15.9

Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 91 72 -- - 95 69 65 94

Note:

All parameter values in pg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated

Bold Exceeds Residential/Paklandllnstitotional/lndustrial/

Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards

for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province ofOntario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.l of the EPA, April, 2011


Not detected

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfroat Connection LA350500—005- September 2013 Page 2 of 4

TABLE 4-2

RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AM) PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL

. MWI2-7 MWI2-8 MWI2-8 MWI2-9SS6 3.05- SS5 2.44- SS8 4.27- MWI2-H (Dup) SS5 3.05-

MOE Standards 3.66m 3.05m 4.88m SS8 4.27-4.88m 3.66mParameters Table 9* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Coaditioa 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse ~-. Coarse

Benzeae 0.02 0.02

Toluene -- 0.2 0.08


Xylene Mixture 0.05 0.05

F1(C6toCl0) 25 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Fl (C6toClO)minusBTEX 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

F2(ClOtoCl6) 10 10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10

F3(Cl6toC34) 240 50 <50 83 <50 <50 <50

P4 (C34 to C50) - 120 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA NA NA NA

MoistureContent 0.1 10.2 15.5 13.2 14.4 7.1

Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 81 102 126 116 127

Note:


Bold Exceeds Residential/Pakland/lnslitutional/tndustrial/


for Use within 30 m of a Waler Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.! of the EPA, April. 2011


Not detected

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page 3 of 4

TABLE 4-2

RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL. MWI2-9 MWI2-10

SS7 4.57- SS3 1.83-MOE Standards 5.18m 2.44m


Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6127/2012 6/27/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse

Benzene 0.02 0.02

Toluene 0.2 0.08


Xylene Mixture - 0.05 0.05F1(C6toClO) 25

Fl (C6 to ClO) minus BTEX 5 <5 <5

F2(ClOtoCl6) 10 10 <10 <10

F3(Cl6toC34) 240 50 100 <50

P4 (C34 to C50) 120 50 <50 <50

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA

Moisture Content 0.1 16.2 13

Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 123 135

Note:

All parameter values in pg/g (ppm) unless othenvise indicated

11 old Exceeds Residential/Pakland/tnstitutional/tndustrial/

Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Genetic Site Condition Standards

for Use within 3Cm of a Waler Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Pars XV.l of the EPA, April, 2011


Not detected

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLnkeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page 4 of 4

TABLE 4-3RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAils) IN SOIL

. MWI2-1 MWI2-2 MWI2-3 MWI2-4SSI3 7.32- MWI2-1 SS8 4.27- SSI4 8.08- SS2 0.61-

MOE Standards 7.92m SSI7A 9.75-10.21 4.88m 8.53m I .22mParameters Table 9* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/2812012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/28/2012 6/27/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

Naphthalene 0.09 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acenaphtliylene 0.093 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acennphthene 6.072 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fluorene 0.19 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Phenanthrene 0.69 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13

Anthracene -- - -- 0.22 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fluoranthene - 6.69 0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 0.07

Pyrene 1 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.24

Benz(a)anthracene 036 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06

Chrysene 2S 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.14

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.47 0.05 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 0.05

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.48 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.05 <0.05 — 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 0.07

Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.23 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 03 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.68 0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06

2-and I-methyl Naphthalene 0.59 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.23

Moisture Content 0.10% 6.8

Chtysene-dlZ (Surrogate) 50-140% 60.00 62 78 59 106

Note:

All parameter values in pgig (ppm) unless othenvise indicated

B old Exceeds Residential/Pakland)lnstitutional)lndustrial/


for Use within 30 m ofa Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.I of the EPA, April, 2011

RUL Reported Detection Limit

Not detected

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005-September 2013 Page I of 3

TABLE 4-3

RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PATh) IN SOIL

. MWI2-4 MWI2-5 MWI2-6 MWI2-7MWI2-D (Dup) SS6 3.05- SS3 1.22- SSS 1.22- S53 1.22-

MOE Standards SS2 O.61-1.22m 3.66m I .83m 1.83m I .83mParameters Table 9* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6127/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

Naphthalene 0.09 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acenaphthylene 0.093 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acenaphthene 0.072 0.05 <0.05 <OMS <0.05 <DM5 <0.05

Fluorene - -— -~ 0.19 DM5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Phenanthrene 0.69 0.05 0.13 0.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Anthracene 0.22 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fluoranthene 0.69 0.05 0.12 0.08 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Pyrene 1 0.05 0.21 0.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benz(a)anthracene 0.36 0.05 0.07 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Chrysene 2.8 0.05 0.13 0.08 <DM5 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(b)tluorarithene 0.47 005 0.08 0.05 <0.05 <0M5 <DM5

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.48 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.05 0.09 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

lndeno(l ,2,3-cd)pyrene 023 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Dibenz(a,h)aathracene 0.1 - 0.05 <0.05 <DM5 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.68 0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0M5 <0.05

2-and I-methyl Naphthalene 0.59 0.05 0.13 0.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Moisture Content -- 0.10% 6.6 16.2 10 9.2 11.3

Chrysene-d12 (Surrogate) 50-140% 106 93 86 78 76

Note:


Bold Exceeds Residentiat/Paklandllnstitutional/tndustrial/


for Use within 3Dm of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.t of the EPA, April, 2011


Not detected


TABLE 4-3

RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PARS) IN SOIL

. MWI2-7 MWI2-8 MWI2-8 MWI2-9 MWI2-9 MWI2-10SS5 2.44- SS2 0.61- SS6 3.05- SS2 0.61- SS6 3.81- SS2 0.61-

MOE Standards 3.05m 1.22m 3.66m 1.22m 4.27m 1.22mParameters Table 9* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012


Naphthalene 0.09 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene 0.093 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acenaphthene 0.072 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fluorene 0.19 — 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Phenanthrene 0.69 - 0.05 <0.05 0.19 0.53 <0.05 0.05 <0.05

Aiwacene 0.22 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fluoranthene —~ 0.69 0.05 <0.05 0.27 0.83 0.05 0.09 0.06

Pyrene 1 0.05 <0.05 0.24 0.67 <0.05 0.12 0.05

Benz(a)anthracene 036 0.05 <0.05 — 0.12 0.35 <0.05 0.05 <0.05

Chrysene 2.8 0.05 <0.05 0.11 0.33 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.47 0.05 <0.05 0.13 0.29 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.48 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.11 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.05 <0.05 0.12 0.3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

lndeno(I,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.23 0.05 <0.05 — 0.06 0.15 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.1 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene —- 0.68 0.05 <0.05 0.06 0.14 —— <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

2-and I-methyl Naphthalene 0.59 0.05 <0.05 —— <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Moisture Content 0.10% 9.3 8.9 17.1 7.7 II 8.5

Chrysene-d12 (Surrogate) 50-140% 81 74 86 72 79 63

Note:

All parameler values in pg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated

Bold Exceeds Residential/Pakland/tnstitulional/lndustrial/

Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Slandards

for Use within 30 m of a Waler Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition* Province of Ontario Snil, Ground Waler and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.l of the EPA, April, 2011


Not detected


TABLE 4-4RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN SOIL

. MWI2-i MWI2.1 MWI2-6 MWI2-7 MWI2-85517*9.75- 5518 10.36- MWI2-2 MWI2-3 MW124 MWI2.5 5552.44- MWI2-0 554 1.93• MWI2-7 SS5 2.44-

MOE Stondurdo 10.21m W.07m 5/Oh 6.10-SlIm 55120 6.06-7.32m 553 1.22-l.83m 555 2.44-3.05m 3.05m 557 3.66-4.27m 2.44m 556 3.05-3.6Gm 3.05mParameters T.bleS° ROT.

Non-Potable Grnuodw.Ier CondItIon 6(21(2012 612912012 6(2812012 6(2012012 6(2712012 6(21(2012 6(27/2012 611712012 6(2111012 6(2712012 6.’27/2012(15/0412011) resTore Coarse Coorse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coorse Coarse Coarse Coarse Ceerse

Dieletorodi000romelhaoe 0.05 0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <005

~j5/yl Chiseide —— 0.02 —— - 0 <0,02 - <0,02 <0.02 — <0,02 <0,02 <0.02 — (0.02 <0.02 <0,02 <0,02 — <0.02

Beomotoethane 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05

Teiehloeofluoeoroeahnce 0.25 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acetone 0.5 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 — <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

.1~!oipcrnyIcoe ~._._~!~__~___ ..5°r~ 10555 <0.05_. <0.05 —- <0.05 -— <0,05 5

~5~!iYi9S!#2~! — — 0.05 —~ 0.05 -— ‘c~ —— <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05Tmot-I.2-Oicldoroelhylene 005 0.05 cOOS -— — cOOS <005 - <0555 <0555 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <5/05 .05 4005

MeIIeyIOeeO.bcIylEther 0.00 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0005

l,I-Dichloeeetltnne 0.05 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.01 <002

Mb~!Jç9!20L, 0.5 050 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 —- <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <050 -

Cit. I,2-Oiclnloeoellrylec< 0.05 0.01 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 wO.02__ <0.01 <0.02 <0.02 —— <0.02 <002

Chtsesfoms 005 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <9,04

I .2-Dicltloeocthane 0.05 0.03 <0.01 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0.01 <0.01 <0.03 <0.03 <0.02 <0,05

I,l,I-Teichloroclhnec 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

CanbotoTeleachloride 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Bennzeoe 0.02 0.02 <0.02 <0,02 <0,02 <0,92 <0,02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

I,2-Oiehloenpeopane — 0.05 0.02 <0.02 ~ <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 — <0.03 <0.05 <0.02

Trichloroelleylme 005 0.05 <0.02 <0.05 — — <0.0! <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0.03 <0.05 <0.02

Beomodichloromeileaee 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Melhy,ll79~ynI (clone 0.5 -— 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 — <0.50 <0.50 -— <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

Ij.I’Tdchloreethnne 0.05 0554 <004 <004 <004 <004 <004 <024 .04 <024<004 <0554 <0004

Tolurne 0.2 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Dibromochloromelhace 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Ethylene Dibromide - 0.05 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0,04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04

Telrochlorselhylene - 0.05 0.05 <0.05 -— <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.03

1.1.1 .I’Tcirnclnloroctlrune 0.05 -.______________ 0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 —— - <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04

Chlorobeozeec 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Elloylbeocene 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

m & p-Xyleene —____________________________________ 0.05 — — <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 —. <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 -~ — <0.05 <0,05

j~0-0m, 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05

S55tecne 0.05 0.05 <0,05 —— <0.05 —. <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 —

I,O.2.2-Teeeuclnloeoenhaec 0.05 0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.02

o-Xylece -________________________________________ 0.05 — -— <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05

l.5-Dichlorohenzene 0.05 0.05 <0,05 — <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05

0,4-Diehlorobcnzene 0.05 0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

l,2-Oirltlorobcnzeoe 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05

Xylene Mixoure 0.05 0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 — <0,05 <0,05 <0555 <0,05

13-Dicitloropropcne 0.05 0.04 <0.04 <004 <5/04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0,04 <0,04 <0,04 <0,04

o-Hercarte 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05

Toluene-d0 122 03 022 102 90 97 97 97 90 97 97

4-rsrounolluorohenzene —- 94 92 95 70 00 96 97 94 05 90 90

All pnneelee ‘duos is ~ig (ppm) ootess otlieraire indicated

Bold Enceedo OeoidontjaliPoklasdjlonnjiaeiso,Orodosldal(

CmnrnnereiaVCsrsn,onity Land Use- Table9 Generic Sian Cosditiso Stasdando

Is, Use within Sonora Ovate, Body inn Nor’Pot.ble Geosuodsoote, Condition

Prancer ofOolaria Soil, Ground Water and Sod/rent Sloe/arIa I<~ Use

Undo, Paso XV. I <(line EPA, April, 1011

ROT. Reposnod Dotoeliona List/I

Non detected

Sopplemeolary Soboorrace Toveoolgaolo.oLaken’iew WalerfrooO Coooecllon F_A350500-005-Se1nle’oh,r2013 Pagel ofl

TABLE 4-4RESULTS 01? ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN SOIL

MW12~ MWI2-i4 (Sup) MWI2-9 MWI1-9 MWI2-10MOE Sl.nrlardo 558 4.27-4.88m 558 4.27-4.88m SOS 3.05-loom SOT 4.57-Slam SOS l.8S-2.44m

roromelers Table 9° ROL

Nou-PoiabIc Groundwaler ConditIon 6/27/2012 6127/2012 6127/1012 6/17/1012 6/17/1002

(15104/20115 Tcxtnre Cn.rne Coot*e Coarse Coarse Coarse

Diololoredinusoro’neiha’ae 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05

Vinyl COlon/c 0.02 — 0.02 <0.02 — <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0,02

Bromometlisne 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Triehloeofloornmelhane —~ - - 025 — 0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Aeelnne 0.5 0,50 <0,50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

1.LPSS~Y?0L~ 0.05 ~ -

MelliyleneChIo*ide 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 —

Trans’ l,2-Oichlorneilsylene 0.05 0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Methyl ient.bntyl Eisner 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0,05

I,l’Diehlnroellisne 0.05 0.02 <0.02 <002 <0,02 <0,02 <0.02

MeihylEthylKes’ne -- 0.5 0.50 <0.50<030 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

Cis- l.2-Oichloenenlsylene — 0.05 0.02 <0.02 <002 <0.02 <0.02 <0,02

Chloroform 0.05 0.04 *0.04 <0,04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04

l,2-Dichlorneibnne 0.05 0.03 <0.03 <0,05 <0,03 <0.03 <0.05

l,l,l-Teichlonoeihase 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05

Carbon Telraclilonide 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05

loenzene 0.02 0.02 <0.02 <002 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

l,2-Diclaloeopeopane - 0.05 0.03 <0.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.05 <0,03 ——

Tnichlornciliylcne 0.05 0,05 <0,03 <0,05 <0.03 <0.03 — <0.03

Bromodichlnromethane 0.05 0,05 -- <0,05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

MeIhyIlcobolyl Kcioae 0.5 , — 0,50 <0.50 <0,50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

l,l,2-Tnichloroeihaoe 0.05 0.04 ‘*0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0,04 <0.04

Totoene 0.2 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 “*0.05

Oibroonochloromeihaae 0.05 0.05 ‘*0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

ç9~~yIeoe Dibromide , 0.05 0.04 <0.04 <004 <0.04 <0554 <0.04

Teieachloro*ihyleec 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 , <0.05

l,l,I,2-Tcieachlorocihae* 0.05 - 0.04 <0.04 <004 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04

Chloroheozeine —~ 0.05 —— 0,05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Ethylbenzeoe 0.05 0.05 — <0.05 — <0,05 ‘*0.05 <0.05 <0.05

m&p-Xyleme 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 ‘*0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Bromol’orei 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 ‘*0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Siyrcne 0.05 0.05 <0.03 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

l,l,2,2-Telraclnloreelhane — 0.05 0.05 ‘*0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

n-Xylem 0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

l.3-Dichlombcnzene 0.05 0.03 <0.05 <005 <0.05 ‘*005 <0.05

l,4-Diclilorobenzene 0.05 —~ — 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

l,2-Diehloeobenzene 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05

Xylcne Mirelore 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <005 <0,05 <0.05 <0.05

l,3’D,j5j5~owsropeec 0.05 —— 0.04 <0.04 <004 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04

n’llexane 0,05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 ~0.05 <0.05 <0.05

ToloemedO - 0 05 50 97 95

4.Bromofloorobcszene 00 95 57 02 95

~51~All paeae*eier ssiues ri pe’g non) ‘elms oihees4it lodiesied

Bold En-reds eenjdetisi/Oelciar.djirniiineiioesrJindsot.isr/

Ce.emeitiol/Cemsriarriiy Land Ui’ - Table 0 Generic S/in Coed/i/on Stosdord.

lee Use esiihio 300 ols Water Body in a Nen-Perobie Greondonoer Coed/i/en

* PeooireeofoensoioSoil. Giossd Wareranid Sediment Sian/se/n lorUne

Under Pant XV. I nOb. EPA, April, 2011

ROL Reported Deieeiioe Liniii

* N<deieored

Supplementary Sobsorfnce loses liguliooLukesrieno W’oierlrnni Conneellon EA350500—005’ Seplember 2003 Psgc 2 *12

TABLE 4-5RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS (PCBs) IN SOIL

MWI2-1 MWI2-4 MWI2-4 MWI2-6 MWI2-8SSI7A 9.75- SS3 1.22- 5852.44- S83 1.22- SSS 1.22- MWI2-H(Dup)

MOE Standards 10.21m 1.83m 3.05m 1.83m 1.83m SS3 1.22-1.83mParameters Table 9* RDL RilE

Noa-Potable Groundwater Condition 6/29/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012 6/27/2012


Aroclor 1242 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.! 0.3 <0.3

Aroelor 1248 0.! <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.! 0.3 <0.3

Aroc!or 1254 0.! <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3

Aroclor 1260 0.! <0.! <0.! <0.! <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3

Polychiorinated Biphenyls 0.3 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3

Decachlorobiphenyl (Surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60-140% 0.1 88 92 88 73 92 0.3 84

Moishare Content 0.1 10.7 9.7 8 11.2 0.1 11.4

Note:

All parameter values in itg1g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated

Bold Exceeds Residential/Pakland/lnstitutional/lndustriall

Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 9 Genetic Site Condition Standards

for Use within 30 m ofa Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Coadition* Province ofOntario Soil, Grouad Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.! of the EPA, April, 2011


Not detected

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page I of!

TABLE 4-6RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR DISTILLED WATER LEACHATE

Composite of MWI2-1 Composite of MWI2-2Parameters SS17A & MWI2.4 17B SS8, SSII, SSI8, SS4

Unit RDL

6/2812012 6/28/2012Metals and Inorganics in Soil

Arsenic Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.0 10 0.044Barium Leachate mg/U 0.100 0.549 0.183

Boron Leachate mg/U 0.050 <0.050 0.077

Cadmium Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010

Chromium Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010

Lead Leachate mg/L 0.010 0.036 <0.010

Mercury Leachate mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.0!

Selenium Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010

Silver Leachate mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010

Uranium Leachate mg/U 0.050 <0.050 <0.050

FluorideUeachate mg/L 0.05 0.3 0.13

Cyanide Ueachate mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05

(Nitrate + Nitrite) as N Ucachate mg/L 0.7 <0.7 <0.7

PAHs in Soil

Benzo(a)pyrene mg/U 0.001 <0.001 <0.001

VOCs in Soil

Vinyl Chloride mg/L 0.03 <0.030 <0.030

1,1 Dichloroethene mg/U 0.020 <0.020 <0.020

Dichioromethane mg/U 0.030 <0.030 <0.030

Methyl Ethyl Ketone mg/L 0.090 <0.090 <0.090

Chloroform mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020

I 2-Dichloroethane mg/U 0.020 <0.020 <0.020

Carbon Tetrachloride mg/U 0.020 <0.020 <0.020

Benzene mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020

Trichloroethene mg/U 0.020 <0.020 <0.020

Tetrachloroethene mg/U 0.050 <0.050 <0.050

Clilorobenzene mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010

1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010

1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/U 0.010 <0.010 <0.010

Toluene-d8 mgJL 108 122

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page I of 2

TABLE 4-6RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR DISTILLED WATER LEACIIATE

Composite of MW12-1 Composite of MWI2-2Parameters SSI7A& MW124 17B SS8, SSII, SSI8, SS4

Unit RDL

6/28/2012 6/28/2012

PHCs in Soil -

Benzene ~WL 20 <20 <20

Toluene pg/L 20 <20 <20

Ethylbenzene ig/L 10 <10 <10Xylenes (Total) 1sg/L 14 <14 <14C6-C10(Fl) ~sg/L 1000 <1000 <1000C6-C10(FlminusBTEX) gg)L 1000 <1000 <1000

c”lO - C16 (F2) gg/L. 100 3000 <100

016-C34(F3) 1ig/L 500 6400 850

C>34-C50 ggJL 500 1200 <500

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons ~ig/L 500 NA NA

Note:Not detected

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500-005- September 2013 Page 2 of2


DCS

ten soil samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) were selected for

VOCs analysis.

The results of the current laboratory analyses have been incorporated into the following chemical

summary tables that, with reference to applicable MOE Standards, are provided in the tables

listed below:

Table 4-7 Results of Analyses for Inorganic Parameters in Groundwater;

Table 4-8 Results of Analyses for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in

Groundwater;

Table 4-9 Results of Analyses for PAHs in Groundwater; and

Table 4-10 Results of Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in

Groundwater.

The laboratory analytical reports for the testing carried out are included in Appendix C. A

discussion of the laboratory quality control and quality assurance (QA/QC) procedures is

included in Appendix A.

4.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT

4.2.1 Soil Analyses

Laboratory chemical testing was carried out on a total of:

fourteen samples (including two blind field duplicate sample) were selected for

metals and general inorganic analysis;

four samples for PHCs (F1 to F4 fractions plus BTEX) analysis;

three samples (including one blind field duplicate sample) samples for the

presence of PAHs analysis;

TABLE 4-7RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR INORGANIC PARAMETERS IN GROUNDWATER

MOE StandardsMW12-1 MW12-2 MW12-4 MW12-5 MW12-6 MW12-7

Table 9*

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures

Antimony 16000 0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 1.1 0.8

Arsenic 1500 1.0 33.4 16.5 2.8 6.4 6.0 5.7

Barium 23000 2.0 202.0 251.0 359.0 115.0 88.3 126.0

Beryllium 53 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Boron 36000 10.0 596.0 947.0 438.0 450.0 89.6 777.0

Cadmium 2.1 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Chromium 640 2.0 5.3 3.9 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0

Cobalt 52 0.5 20.8 24.7 7.3 44.6 19.4 9.1

Copper 69 1.0 1.9 1.9 1.6 2.1 1.5 1.3

Lead 20 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Molybdenum 7300 0.5 55.1 37.5 1.1 8.2 4.9 2.3

Nickel 390 1.0 27.2 32.7 13.6 46.7 29.8 14.2

Selenium 50 1.0 3.3 3.1 2.1 <1.0 1.2 <1.0

Silver 1.2 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Thallium 400 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 0.3 <0.3

Uranium 330 0.5 6.5 16.1 0.5 28.2 16.5 2.7

Vanadium 200 0.4 4.8 3.7 2.6 3.1 1.7 3.4

Zinc 890 5.0 52.1 <5.0 32.9 42.7 17.1 19.2

Mercury 0.29 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Chromium VI 110 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Cyanide 52 2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2

Sodium 1800000 500 231000.0 172000.0 217000.0 48400.0 29400.0 153000.0

Chloride 1800000 100 176000.0 223000.0 257000.0 157000.0 63000.0 374000.0

Nitrate as N 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 401.0

Nitrite as N 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50

Electrical Conductivity (uS/cm) 2 2660.0 2670.0 2140.0 1960.0 1300.0 1920.0

pH (pH Units) NA 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.8 8.0

Note:

All parameter values in µg/L (ppm) unless otherwise indicated

Bold Exceeds All Types of Property Use - Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards

for Use within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition

* Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use

Under Part XV.1 of the EPA, April, 2011


< Not detected

ParametersRDL

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLakeview Waterfront Connection EA350500 - 005 - September 2013 Page 1 of 2


MOE Standards

Table 9*

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition

(15/04/2011) Texture

Antimony 16000 0.5

Arsenic 1500 1.0

Barium 23000 2.0

Beryllium 53 0.5

Boron 36000 10.0

Cadmium 2.1 0.2

Chromium 640 2.0

Cobalt 52 0.5

Copper 69 1.0

Lead 20 0.5

Molybdenum 7300 0.5

Nickel 390 1.0

Selenium 50 1.0

Silver 1.2 0.2

Thallium 400 0.3

Uranium 330 0.5

Vanadium 200 0.4

Zinc 890 5.0

Mercury 0.29 0.02

Chromium VI 110 5

Cyanide 52 2

Sodium 1800000 500

Chloride 1800000 100

Nitrate as N 50

Nitrite as N 50

Electrical Conductivity (uS/cm) 2

pH (pH Units) NA

Note:







< Not detected

ParametersRDL

MW12-8 MW12-9 MW12-10 MW12-D

8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012

All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures

1.0 0.8 0.9 <0.5

7.9 4.0 3.9 3.0

92.9 109.0 699.0 486.0

<0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

95.1 64.8 477.0 472.0

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0

5.2 <0.5 0.9 7.8

1.6 <1.0 1.2 1.7

1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

4.5 4.3 0.8 1.0

10.0 <1.0 1.3 17.0

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.5

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

<0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3

3.6 0.7 <0.5 0.6

1.8 2.0 3.2 3.7

37.7 36.7 68.2 55.7

<0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

<5 <5 <5 <5

<2 <2 <2 <2

81000.0 83300.0 154000.0 223000.0

168000.0 87200.0 410000.0 257000.0

<50 <50 <50 <50

<50 <50 <50 <50

972.0 717.0 1960.0 2150.0

7.9 7.9 7.9 8.1


TABLE 4-8RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN GROUNDWATER

MOE Standards MW12-1 MW12-2 MW12-4 MW12-5

Table 9* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures

F1 (C6 to C10) 25 <25 <25 <25 <25

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 420 25 <25 <25 <25 <25

F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene NV 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100 530 <100 <100 <100

F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 100 530 <100 <100 <100

F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500 500 NA NA NA NA

Terphenyl 60-140 (% Acceptable Limits) 82 88 68 67

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters



MOE Standards

Table 9* RDL


(15/04/2011) Texture

F1 (C6 to C10) 25

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 420 25

F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene NV 100

F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100

F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 100

F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500 500

Terphenyl 60-140 (% Acceptable Limits)

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters

MW12-6 MW12-7 MW12-8 MW12-9 MW12-10

8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012

All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures

<25 <25 <25 <25 <25

<25 <25 <25 <25 <25

<100 <100 <100 <100 <100

<100 <100 <100 <100 <100

<100 <100 <100 <100 <100

<100 <100 <100 <100 <100

<100 <100 <100 <100 <100

NA NA NA NA NA

116 84 125 88 103



MOE Standards

Table 9* RDL


(15/04/2011) Texture

F1 (C6 to C10) 25


F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene NV 100

F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100


F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100


Terphenyl 60-140 (% Acceptable Limits)

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters

MW12-D

8/2/2012

All Textures

<25

<25

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

NA

96


TABLE 4-9RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR PAHs IN GROUNDWATER

MOE Standards MW12-1 MW12-2 MW12-4 MW12-5 MW12-6

Table 9* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures

Naphthalene 1400 0.20 0.32 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Acenaphthylene 1.4 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Acenaphthene 600 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Fluorene 290 0.20 0.22 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Phenanthrene 380 0.10 0.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Anthracene 1 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Fluoranthene 73 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Pyrene 5.7 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Benz(a)anthracene 1.8 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Chrysene 0.7 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.75 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.81 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.2 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.4 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1500 0.20 0.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Chrysene-d12 50 -140 (% Acceptable Limits) 85 75 90 80 84

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters



MOE Standards

Table 9* RDL


(15/04/2011) Texture

Naphthalene 1400 0.20

Acenaphthylene 1.4 0.20

Acenaphthene 600 0.20

Fluorene 290 0.20

Phenanthrene 380 0.10

Anthracene 1 0.10

Fluoranthene 73 0.20

Pyrene 5.7 0.20

Benz(a)anthracene 1.8 0.20

Chrysene 0.7 0.10

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.75 0.10

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 0.10

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.81 0.01

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.2 0.20

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.4 0.20

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 0.20

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1500 0.20

Chrysene-d12 50 -140 (% Acceptable Limits)

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters

MW12-7 MW12-8 MW12-9 MW12-10 MW12-D

8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012

All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.64 <0.20

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

<0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

<0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

64 81 90 86 91


TABLE 4-10RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN GROUNDWATER

MOE Standards

MW12-1 MW12-2 MW12-4 MW12-5 MW12-6 MW12-7 MW12-8 MW12-9 MW12-10 MW12-D

Table 9* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/1/2012 8/1/2012 8/2/2012 8/2/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures All Textures

Dichlorodifluoromethane 3500 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Vinyl Chloride 0.5 0.17 <0.17 <0.34 <0.17 <0.34 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17

Bromomethane 5.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Trichlorofluoromethane 2000 0.40 <0.40 <0.80 <0.40 <0.80 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40

Acetone 100000 1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 690 340 <1.0 120 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

1,1-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

Methylene Chloride 610 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Methyl tert-butyl ether 190 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,1-Dichloroethane 320 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 470000 1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 27 26 <1.0 4.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Chloroform 2.4 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,2-Dichloroethane 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

Carbon Tetrachloride 0.79 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Benzene 44 0.20 0.34 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,2-Dichloropropane 16 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Trichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Bromodichloromethane 670000 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 140000 1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.7 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Toluene 14000 0.20 0.26 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Dibromochloromethane 65000 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Ethylene Dibromide 0.25 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Tetrachloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.3 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Chlorobenzene 500 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 2.2 <0.10

Ethylbenzene 1800 0.10 0.11 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

m & p-Xylene 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Bromoform 380 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Styrene 1300 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.2 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

o-Xylene 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 7600 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 8 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.34 <0.10

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4600 0.10 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.20 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

1,3-Dichloropropene 5.2 0.30 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.60 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

Xylene Mixture 3300 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

n-Hexane 51 0.20 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.40 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Toluene-d8 50-150 (% Recovery) 98 101 105 102 97 101 96 104 99 102

4-Bromofluorobenzene 50-150 (% Recovery) 104 88 90 89 94 88 95 89 94 98

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters



MOE Standards

Table 9* RDL


(15/04/2011) Texture

Dichlorodifluoromethane 3500 0.20

Vinyl Chloride 0.5 0.17

Bromomethane 5.6 0.20

Trichlorofluoromethane 2000 0.40

Acetone 100000 1.0

1,1-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.30

Methylene Chloride 610 0.30

trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20

Methyl tert-butyl ether 190 0.20

1,1-Dichloroethane 320 0.30

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 470000 1.0

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20

Chloroform 2.4 0.20

1,2-Dichloroethane 1.6 0.20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640 0.30

Carbon Tetrachloride 0.79 0.20

Benzene 44 0.20

1,2-Dichloropropane 16 0.20

Trichloroethylene 1.6 0.20

Bromodichloromethane 670000 0.20

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 140000 1.0

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.7 0.20

Toluene 14000 0.20

Dibromochloromethane 65000 0.10

Ethylene Dibromide 0.25 0.10

Tetrachloroethylene 1.6 0.20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.3 0.10

Chlorobenzene 500 0.10

Ethylbenzene 1800 0.10

m & p-Xylene 0.20

Bromoform 380 0.10

Styrene 1300 0.10

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.2 0.10

o-Xylene 0.10

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 7600 0.10



1,3-Dichloropropene 5.2 0.30

Xylene Mixture 3300 0.20

n-Hexane 51 0.20

Toluene-d8 50-150 (% Recovery)

4-Bromofluorobenzene 50-150 (% Recovery)

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters

Trip Blank

8/1/2012

All Textures

<0.20

<0.17

<0.20

<0.40

<1.0

<0.30

<0.30

<0.20

<0.20

<0.30

<1.0

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

<0.30

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

<1.0

<0.20

<0.20

<0.10

<0.10

<0.20

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.20

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.30

<0.20

<0.20

97

89



DCS

one sample was selected for VOCs analysis.

The results of the current laboratory analyses, with reference to applicable MOE Standards, have

been incorporated into the following chemical summary tables:

Table 4-11 Results of Analysis for Inorganic Parameters in Soil;

Table 4-12 Results of Analysis for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in

Soil;

Table 4-13 Results of Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PAHs in Soil;

and

Table 4-14 Results of Analysis for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in Soil.




4.2.2 Groundwater Analyses

Laboratory analyses were carried out on a total of:

five samples (including one blind duplicate sample) for metals and general

inorganic analysis;

five samples (including one blind duplicate sample) for PHCs (F1 to F4 fractions

plus BTEX) analysis;

five samples (including one blind duplicate sample) for PAHs analysis; and

five soil samples (including one blind duplicate sample) were selected for VOCs

analysis.


MOE Standards

MW12-11 SS2 0.61-

1.22m

MW12-11 SS5 2.44-

3.05m

MW12-12 SS3 1.22-

1.83m MW12-L (Dup)SS3 1.22-1.83m

MW12-12 SS10 5.49-

6.10m BH12-13

SS1 0-0.61m

BH12-13 SS4 1.83-

2.44m

Table 3* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012 7/4/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

Antimony 40 0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8

Arsenic 18 1 2 5 5 5 8 3 4

Barium 670 2 34 92 69 69 63 55 60

Beryllium 8 0.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.6

Boron 120 5 6 11 14 14 12 6 7

Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 2 0.10 0.4 0.14 0.6 0.54 0.26 0.17 0.46

Cadmium 1.9 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Chromium 160 2 9 25 17 18 23 17 19

Cobalt 80 0.5 3.5 13.7 5.8 5.9 15.2 6.6 8.9

Copper 230 1 9 26 27 27 41 23 19

Lead 120 1 17 9 34 32 5 9 12

Molybdenum 40 0.5 0.5 <0.5 1.2 1.6 0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Nickel 270 1 7 27 12 12 27 15 17

Selenium 5.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4

Silver 40 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Thallium 3.3 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4

Uranium 33 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.5 0.9 <0.5 0.6

Vanadium 86 1 15 35 27 25 32 25 27

Zinc 340 5 71 62 91 93 68 46 54

Chromium VI 8 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Cyanide 0.051 0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040

Mercury 3.9 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1.4 0.005 0.833 0.288 0.884 0.244 0.224 0.209 0.24

Sodium Adsorption Ratio 12 N/A 0.656 0.446 0.292 0.303 0.79 0.385 0.132

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 9.96 7.73 11.6 11.5 8.03 7.61 7.34

Note:

All parameter values in µg/g (ppm) unless otherwise indicated

Bold Exceeds Industrial/Commercial/Community Land Use - Table 3 Full Depth

Generic Site Condition Standards in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition




< Not detected

Parameters



MOE Standards

Table 3* RDL


(15/04/2011) Texture

Antimony 40 0.8

Arsenic 18 1

Barium 670 2

Beryllium 8 0.5

Boron 120 5

Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 2 0.10

Cadmium 1.9 0.5

Chromium 160 2

Cobalt 80 0.5

Copper 230 1

Lead 120 1

Molybdenum 40 0.5

Nickel 270 1

Selenium 5.5 0.4

Silver 40 0.2

Thallium 3.3 0.4

Uranium 33 0.5

Vanadium 86 1

Zinc 340 5

Chromium VI 8 0.2

Cyanide 0.051 0.040

Mercury 3.9 0.10

Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1.4 0.005

Sodium Adsorption Ratio 12 N/A

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters

MW12-14 SS2 0.61-

1.22m

MW12-14 SS6 3.05-

3.66m MW12-15

SS1 0-0.61m

MW12-15 SS6 3.05-

3.66m MW12-16 SS2 0.61-1.22m

MW12-P (Dup)SS2 0.61-1.22m

MW12-16 SS4 1.83-

2.44m

7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012

Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

1.2 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8

5 4 5 2 5 5 5

84 66 72 17 72 62 67

0.6 0.6 0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6 0.7

8 8 8 <5 7 6 8

1.19 0.12 0.72 0.1 0.17 0.16 0.15

2.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

50 20 20 7 21 18 19

8.2 12.6 6.6 2.8 9.9 8.9 11.7

54 23 26 7 24 20 25

98 9 20 3 8 7 10

1.6 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

30 25 16 6 23 21 28

<0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4

1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

<0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4

0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

25 28 25 13 28 25 26

164 61 74 16 55 48 63

<0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

<0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040

0.83 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

0.364 0.188 0.558 0.102 0.124 0.123 0.122

0.914 0.209 3.05 0.187 0.218 0.202 0.148

7.59 7.68 8.62 7.69 7.65 7.58 7.71


TABLE 4-12RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR BTEX AND PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS (PHCs) IN SOIL

MOE Standards

MW12-14 SS2 0.61-

1.22m

MW12-14 SS6 3.05-

3.66m

MW12-14 SS13 7.32-

7.92m

MW12-16 SS10 5.49-

6.10m

Table 3* RDL


(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse Coarse

Benzene 0.32 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Toluene 68 0.08 <0.08 <0.08 <0.08

Ethylbenzene 9.5 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Xylene Mixture 26 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

F1 (C6 to C10) 55 5 8 12 <5 <5

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 5 12 <5 <5

F2 (C10 to C16) 230 10 <10 <10 <10 <10

F3 (C16 to C34) 1700 50 <50 <50 <50 <50

F4 (C34 to C50) 3300 50 <50 <50 <50 <50

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 50 NA NA NA NA

Moisture Content 0.1 13.60 13.6 13.1 17.6

Terphenyl (surrogate) Acceptable Limits 60 - 140% 93 74 78 79

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters


TABLE 4-13RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHs) IN SOIL

MOE Standards

MW12-14 SS2 0.61-

1.22m MW12-N (DUP IL)

SS2 0.61-1.22m MW12-15

SS1 0-0.61m

Table 3* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 7/3/2012 7/3/2012 7/3/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse Coarse Coarse

Naphthalene 9.6 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acenaphthylene 0.15 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Acenaphthene 96 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fluorene 62 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Phenanthrene 12 0.05 0.11 <0.05 0.05

Anthracene 0.67 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Fluoranthene 9.6 0.05 0.16 <0.05 0.22

Pyrene 96 0.05 0.14 <0.05 0.23

Benz(a)anthracene 0.96 0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.1

Chrysene 9.6 0.05 0.08 <0.05 0.16

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.96 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.15

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.96 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.3 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.76 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.08

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.1 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 9.6 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.08

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 76 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05

Moisture Content 0.10% 13.5 14.2 7.8

Chrysene-d12 (Surrogate) 50-140 % 101 90 104

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters


TABLE 4-14RESULTS OF ANALYSES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (VOCs) IN SOIL

MOE Standards MW12-14

SS2 0.61-1.22m

Table 3* RDL

Non-Potable Groundwater Condition 7/3/2012

(15/04/2011) Texture Coarse

Dichlorodifluoromethane 16 0.05 <0.05

Vinyl Chloride 0.032 0.02 <0.02

Bromomethane 0.05 0.05 <0.05

Trichlorofluoromethane 4 0.05 <0.05

Acetone 16 0.50 <0.50

1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.064 0.05 <0.05

Methylene Chloride 1.6 0.05 <0.05

Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.3 0.05 <0.05

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 11 0.05 <0.05

1,1-Dichloroethane 17 0.02 <0.02

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 70 0.50 <0.50

Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 55 0.02 <0.02

Chloroform 0.47 0.04 <0.04

1,2-Dichloroethane 0.05 0.03 <0.03

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 6.1 0.05 <0.05

Carbon Tetrachloride 0.21 0.05 <0.05

Benzene 0.32 0.02 <0.02

1,2-Dichloropropane 0.16 0.03 <0.03

Trichloroethylene 0.91 0.03 <0.03

Bromodichloromethane 18 0.05 <0.05

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 31 0.50 <0.50

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.05 0.04 <0.04

Toluene 68 0.05 <0.05

Dibromochloromethane 13 0.05 <0.05

Ethylene Dibromide 0.05 0.04 <0.04

Tetrachloroethylene 4.5 0.05 <0.05

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.087 0.04 <0.04

Chlorobenzene 2.4 0.05 <0.05

Ethylbenzene 9.5 0.05 <0.05

m & p-Xylene 0.05 <0.05

Bromoform 0.61 0.05 <0.05

Styrene 34 0.05 <0.05

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.05 0.05 <0.05

o-Xylene 0.05 <0.05

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 9.6 0.05 <0.05



Xylene Mixture 26 0.05 <0.05

1,3-Dichloropropene 0.18 0.04 <0.04

n-Hexane 46 0.05 <0.05

Toluene-d8 83

4-Bromofluorobenzene 129

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters



DCS

The results of the current laboratory analyses have been incorporated into the following chemical

summary tables that, with reference to applicable MOE Standards, are provided in the tables

listed below:

Table 4-15 Results of Analyses for Inorganic Parameters in Groundwater;

Table 4-16 Results of Analyses for BTEX and Petroleum Hydrocarbons (PHCs) in

Groundwater;

Table 4-17 Results of Analyses for PAHs in Groundwater; and

Table 4-18 Results of Analyses for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in

Groundwater.




4.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

Laboratory or field control checks are utilized to ensure that the quality of the analytical data is

maintained at an acceptable level. AGAT Laboratories is CALA-certified and participates in

applicable inter-laboratory testing rounds administered by provincial and federal agencies. The

procedures detailed in the MOE Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in Assessment of

Properties Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, dated 9 March 2004,

constitutes the accepted standards for chemical testing for environmental evaluation purposes in

the province (where available). In accordance with this protocol, all appropriate laboratory

quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures, including the use of spikes, replicates and

blanks, are incorporated and run a minimum of once per sample set. The QA/QC data are

returned with the laboratory reports received.

Blind field duplicate samples were prepared by obtaining a soil or groundwater sample split from

pre-selected sample locations. The splits were provided with fictitious sample identification

designations and submitted to the laboratory for analysis to permit a determination of the internal

quality control and repeatability of analyses to be determined.


MOE StandardsMW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-14 MW12-16 MW12-P

Table 3*



Antimony 20000 0.5 0.6 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5

Arsenic 1900 1.0 2.8 1.1 1.4 <1.0 1.0

Barium 29000 2.0 66.5 29.2 104.0 63.0 68.5

Beryllium 67 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Boron 45000 10.0 37.7 55.8 255.0 32.7 30.8

Cadmium 2.7 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Chromium 810 2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0

Cobalt 66 0.5 6.3 3.2 8.2 0.8 0.8

Copper 87 1.0 2.3 <1.0 5.1 1.4 1.2

Lead 25 0.5 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5

Molybdenum 9200 0.5 2.9 1.7 3.2 0.8 0.8

Nickel 490 1.0 8.6 3.9 17.8 2.5 2.0

Selenium 63 1.0 1.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

Silver 1.5 0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2

Thallium 510 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3

Uranium 420 0.5 5.3 1.8 17.8 2.9 3.1

Vanadium 250 0.4 2.2 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.8

Zinc 1100 5.0 44.8 <5.0 38.2 <5.0 <5.0

Mercury 0.29 0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02

Chromium VI 140 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5

Cyanide 66 2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2

Sodium 2300000 500 25000.0 23600.0 45100.0 51000.0 16300.0

Chloride 2300000 100 233000.0 80600.0 119000.0 92200.0 20400.0

Nitrate as N 50 <50 <50 2440.0 1090.0 1160.0

Nitrite as N 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50

Electrical Conductivity (uS/cm) 2 1430.0 1430.0 1550.0 951.0 732.0

pH (pH Units) NA 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.1

Note:



in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition




< Not detected

ParametersRDL




Table 3* RDL



F1 (C6 to C10) 25 <25 <25 <25 <25

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX 750 25 <25 <25 <25 <25

F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene 150 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100 <100 <100 <100 <100

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons 500 500 NA NA NA NA

Terphenyl 117 124 133 130

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters



MOE Standards

Table 3* RDL


(15/04/2011) Texture

F1 (C6 to C10) 25


F2 (C10 to C16) 150 100

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene 150 100

F3 (C16 to C34) 500 100


F4 (C34 to C50) 500 100


Terphenyl

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters

MW12-P

8/1/2012

All Textures

<25

<25

<100

<100

<100

<100

<100

NA

91




Table 3* RDL



Naphthalene 1400 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Acenaphthylene 1.8 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Acenaphthene 600 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Fluorene 400 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Phenanthrene 580 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Anthracene 2.4 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Fluoranthene 130 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Pyrene 68 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Benz(a)anthracene 4.7 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Chrysene 1 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.75 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.81 0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.2 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.52 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1800 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Chrysene-d12 50 -140 (% Acceptable Limits) 86 89 86 77

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters



MOE Standards

Table 3* RDL


(15/04/2011) Texture

Naphthalene 1400 0.20

Acenaphthylene 1.8 0.20

Acenaphthene 600 0.20

Fluorene 400 0.20

Phenanthrene 580 0.10

Anthracene 2.4 0.10

Fluoranthene 130 0.20

Pyrene 68 0.20

Benz(a)anthracene 4.7 0.20

Chrysene 1 0.10

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.75 0.10

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.4 0.10

Benzo(a)pyrene 0.81 0.01

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.2 0.20

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.52 0.20

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.2 0.20

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1800 0.20

Chrysene-d12 50 -140 (% Acceptable Limits)

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters

MW12-P

8/1/2012

All Textures

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

<0.10

<0.10

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

<0.10

<0.10

<0.10

<0.01

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

<0.20

90



MOE Standards

MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-14 MW12-16 MW12-P

Table 3* RDL



Dichlorodifluoromethane 4400 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Vinyl Chloride 0.5 0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17

Bromomethane 5.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Trichlorofluoromethane 2500 0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40

Acetone 130000 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

1,1-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

Methylene Chloride 610 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Methyl tert-butyl ether 190 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,1-Dichloroethane 320 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 470000 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Chloroform 2.4 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,2-Dichloroethane 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 640 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

Carbon Tetrachloride 0.79 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Benzene 44 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,2-Dichloropropane 16 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Trichloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Bromodichloromethane 85000 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 140000 1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.7 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Toluene 18000 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Dibromochloromethane 82000 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Ethylene Dibromide 0.25 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Tetrachloroethylene 1.6 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.3 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Chlorobenzene 630 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Ethylbenzene 2300 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

m & p-Xylene 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Bromoform 380 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

Styrene 1300 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 3.2 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

o-Xylene 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

1,3-Dichlorobenzene 9600 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10



1,3-Dichloropropene 5.2 0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30

Xylene Mixture 4200 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

n-Hexane 51 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20

Toluene-d8 105 102 97 99 100

4-Bromofluorobenzene 90 90 94 90 92

Note:







< Not detected

Parameters



DCS

A trip blank comprising deionized water was prepared by the contracted laboratory to

accompany groundwater sample containers to determine whether contamination of the containers

or of the samples had occurred during shipment to the field or, following recovery, during

storage and shipment from the field to the laboratory. The trip blank was enclosed with sample

sets recovered for analysis for the presence of volatile organic compounds in groundwater.

The QA/QC test results were included on the laboratory analytical certificates included in

Appendix C. The results of the blind duplicate sample results and trip blank results were also

included on the summary chemical tables.

4.4 QA/QC RESULTS

The results of the QA/QC samples were reviewed to assess the representativeness

(reproducibility) of the laboratory data. This is often reported as relative percent difference

(RPD) according to the following equation:

100

X

XXRPD 21

Where:

X1 = concentration of original sample.

X2 = concentration of duplicate sample.

X = mean concentration of original and duplicate sample.

Eleven blind field duplicates of soil and eight blind field duplicates of groundwater were

submitted as part of the shipment of samples to the laboratory. The results of the analyses of the

blind field duplicate samples are included in the laboratory certificates in Appendix C. The

relative percent difference (RPD) was calculated for the duplicates and the original soil samples

and groundwater samples, respectively, using the formula above. RPD could not be calculated

for various chemical parameters where no measureable concentrations were reported in either the

original or duplicate sample or where the measured concentrations in either the original or

duplicate sample were less than five times the Reportable Detection Limit (RDL).

The calculated RPD for the soil samples and their field duplicates were all reported within 30%

except for the following two instances:


DCS

C 38.48% for sodium absorption ratio (SAR) in sample MW12-2 (SS2, 10.37m-

10.98m); and

C 113.48% for electrical conductivity (EC) in sample SS1-12 (1.22m-1.83m).

It is noted that each of these compounds reported both the respective duplicate and original

samples were below the applicable MOE standard, thus the variability does not affect the

interpretation of the results.

The calculated RPD for the groundwater samples and their field duplicates were all reported

within 30% except for the following four instances:

C 34.92% for vanadium in sample MW12-4;

C 51.47% for zinc in sample MW12-4;

C 103.12% for sodium in sample MW12-16; and

C 127.53% for chloride in sample MW12-16.

It is noted that SAR and EC in both the respective duplicate and original samples were reported

below the applicable MOE SCS, thus the variability does not affect the interpretation of the

results.

The surrogate recoveries reported on the laboratory certificates were also examined to ensure

that the percentage recoveries fell within the laboratory’s stated acceptable range.

It has been concluded, based on the foregoing, that the laboratory test results are acceptable and

were representative of the environmental quality of the soils and groundwater at the property for

the locations tested and on the sampling date.


DCS

5.0 CONTAMINANT DISTRIBUTION

The distribution of the results of the laboratory analyses carried out on selected soil and

groundwater samples during the current investigation that met and exceeded the referenced

generic MOE SCS are described herein. Drawings 350550-3 and 350500-4 show the results of

the chemical analyses in soil and groundwater respectively that exceeded the applicable MOE

SCS.

5.1 SHORELINE

5.1.1 Soil

The reported results of the shoreline soil sampling (summarized in Tables 4-1 to 4-5) identified a

number of instances environmental impacts, largely represented by concentrations of metals in

excess of the MOE Table 9 SCS. The majority of these reported instances occurred in borehole

locations MW12-1 and MW12-2, located at the western end of the investigation area where the

residual ash treatment waste was deposited in a large ridge. At these two locations (MW12-1

and MW12-2 on Drawing 350500-3), reported concentrations of a number of metals (antimony,

barium, cadmium, chromium, copper, molybdenum, silver, uranium, zinc and mercury) along

with electrical conductivity (EC) exceeded the applicable MOE Table 9 SCS. These results were

reported in the ash fill zone that extended to a depth of approximately 6.5 m at MW12-1 and

10 m at MW12-2 and the uppermost sand and gravel fill layer underlying the ash at MW12-1.

Silt till was identified immediately underlying the ash fill zone at MW12-2 at a depth of

approximately 10 m. Hot water soluble boron was reported in the uppermost silt till underlying

the ash at MW12-2 in a concentration (2.6 ug/g averaged between the original sample and blind

field duplicate sample) that exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS of 1.5 ug/g.

At MW12-3, located at the eastern extent of the ridge created from the burial of the ash, a SAR

value of 7.14 reported from the bottom extent of the ash layer (7.93 to 8.54 m) exceeded the

MOE Table 9 SCS of 5. A second sample collected from the ash layer (5.49 to 6.10 m) did not

report any elevated concentrations of analytes. The ash layer was determined to extend for a

thickness of approximately 7 m at MW12-3.

Reported concentrations of PHCs, PAHs, VOCs and PCBs from samples collected and tested

from these three borehole locations (MW12-1 to MW12-3) located atop the ridge reported no

concentrations that exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS.


DCS

East of the ash burial area along the shoreline, (boreholes MW12-4 to MW12-10), relatively

minor issues were reported as summarized below:

copper marginally exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS (92 ug/g) in the surface

sample collected at MW12-6 (94 ug/g);

boron (hot water soluble) was reported at MW12-7 (0.6 to 1.2 m) in a

concentration of 3.74 ug/g that exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS of 1.5 ug/g;

EC measurements exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS at MW12-5 (1.2 to 1.8 m) and

MW12-7 (0.6 to 1.2 m and 3.6 to 4.1 m);

SAR exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS at MW12-9 (0.6 to 1.2 m);

PHCs (F2 and F3 fractions) were reported in the fill at MW12-4 in the sample

intervals of 1.2 to 1.8 m and 2.4 to 3 m in concentrations that exceeded the MOE

Table 9 SCS. This was the only instance where PHCs were reported in excess of

the MOE Table 9 SCS in the LWC Project Study Area. The sand and gravel fill

at this location, extending to a depth of approximately 4.3 m, was characterized

by a faint petroleum hydrocarbon odour and the presence of some asphalt

fragments. The results reported from the uppermost native soil underlying the fill

at this location that did not exhibit any odours or contain foreign debris (asphalt)

and reported no analytical results that exceeded the MOE Table 9 SCS; and

a reported concentration of fluoranthene (PAH) of 0.83 ug/g exceeded the MOE

Table 9 SCS of 0.69 ug/g at MW12-8 from 0.61 to 1.22 mbgs. This was the only

instance where PAHs were reported in excess of the MOE Table 9 SCS in the

LWC Project Study Area.

A distilled water leach test was carried out on two composite samples collected from MW12-1

and MW12-2 for inorganic compounds, PHCs, PAHs and VOCs. The results of the leachate test

results are shown on Table 4-6. The majority of the results reported no detectable or very low

concentrations of these parameters. The notable exception was the presence of PHCs (F2 to F4

fractions) reported in the composite sample collected from MW12-1. This sample, comprising


DCS

the sampling interval 9.76 to 10.37 m that exhibited a moderate hydrocarbon odour, reported the

following results in leachate:

F2 – 3,000 ug/L;

F3 – 6,400 ug/L; and

F4 – 1,200 ug/L.

In MW12-2, a concentration of 850 ug/L F3 PHCs was reported only.

There are no applicable guidelines or standard against which to compare the distilled water leach

test results. The distilled water leachate test carried out at MW12-1 included only the relatively

narrow fill layer that exhibited the petroleum hydrocarbon odours that reflects a very small

percentage of the total soil column in this apart of the investigation area and thus are biased in

this regard.

5.1.2 Groundwater

No reported concentrations of analytes exceeded the applicable MOE Table 9 SCS except for

one reported instance of F3 fraction PHCs (530 ug/L) reported in a groundwater sample collected

from MW12-1 that exceeded the Table 9 SCS of 500 ug/L (refer to Tables 4-7 to 4-10).

5.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK RE-ALIGNMENT

5.2.1 Soil

Boreholes MW12-11 to MW12-16 were drilled along a potential re-alignment route of Serson

Creek. The results of the testing on soils (summarized in Tables 4-11 to 4-14) reported no

concentrations of substances that exceeded the MOE Table 3 SCS except for one instance at

MW12-14 where cadmium (2.9 ug/g) in the sample interval 0.6 to 1.2 m exceeded the Table 3

SCS of 1.5 ug/g.


DCS

5.2.2 Groundwater

No reported concentrations of analytes exceeded the applicable MOE Table 3 SCS (refer to

Tables 4-15 to 4-18).


DCS

6.0 DISCUSSION

A discussion of the findings of the DCS investigation is presented below. The key objective of

the work was to characterize the near shore soil and groundwater environmental conditions to

identify any resulting potential environmental liabilities in regards to the land creation and

naturalization. In addition, a series of boreholes and groundwater monitoring wells were

installed along the proposed Serson Creek realignment route to assess soil and groundwater

conditions in relation to the realignment of the Serson Creek flow channel.

6.1 SHORELINE

The results of the testing of fill and native soil along the shoreline near the proposed LWC

Project Study Area identified a number of instances where the soils did not meet the applicable

MOE SCS. These results, shown in Drawing 350500-3, were largely represented by metals

along with EC and SAR reported in fill. Very localized concentrations of PHCs (in MW12-4

associated with fill that exhibited petroleum hydrocarbon odours) and PAHs (MW12-8) were

also reported. The source of these soil impacts is attributed to the environmental condition of the

fill used for land creation to accommodate the past expansion to the WWTF. It is understood

that land creation and naturalization will not involve the disturbance of any of the existing land

mass beyond the possible removal of armour stones where it is installed along portions of the

existing shoreline.

The primary concern with regards to the development of new terrestrial and wetland habitat is

the potential for the migration of contaminated groundwater discharging into these areas,

whether the source of the groundwater contamination is from the near shore soil conditions or

form some other farther upstream source. In this regard, testing of groundwater from the wells

installed along the shoreline did not report any concentrations of analytes that exceeded the

applicable generic MOE SCS for groundwater within 30 m of an open water body (Table 9 SCS)

except for one instance of F3 PHCs reported in MW12-1 located at the western end of the LWC

Project Study Area (530 ug/L versus 500 ug/L). These results indicate that the soil

contamination (identified as those compounds that exceed the applicable MOE SCS) has not

impacted groundwater quality in any significant manner.

The MOE SCS for F3 PHCs ion groundwater is not an ecological-derived or human health –

derived risk-based value. The MOE SCS has been established based upon the relatively low

solubility of F3 PHC s in groundwater and thus the potential for the formation of NAPL. It


DCS

should be noted that no evidence of a NAPL was identified within the LWC Project Study Area

and thus, the result reported in MW12-1 is not considered to be a significant concern warranting

further remedial or mitigative action. An on-going periodic groundwater sampling program

could be developed to monitor groundwater conditions going forward to ensure that there are no

future concerns to the land creation and naturalization.

As discussed below, there was no reported concentrations of any analytes in groundwater

reported further upgradient within the monitoring wells installed along the proposed Serson

Creek realignment route.

6.2 PROPOSED SERSON CREEK REALIGNMENT

Fill was encountered in thicknesses ranging from 0.61 to 2.44 mbgs. Fill thicknesses was most

evident in the western-most boreholes (MW12-11 to MW12-13) that were situated on top of a

reported former rail spur (MW12-11 and MW12-12) within a low-lying area into which Serson

Creek currently discharges and where base flow is channelled through a buried pipe to Lake

Ontario under the WWTF. Borehole MW12-13 is located east of the low lying drainage area.

Based on the field standard penetration test results, the relative density of the soils were typically

compact to very dense.

No reported concentrations of inorganic parameters, PHCs, PAHs or VOCs were reported in

soils analyzed from boreholes MW12-11 to MW12-16 except for a reported concentration of

cadmium reported in fill at MW12-14 (refer to Drawing 350500-3). The extent of this one

instance has not been delineated and, in of itself, is not a significant issue in the absence of

confirmation sampling. Should serious consideration be given to the future realignment of

Serson Creek, then we would recommend that additional sampling be carried out in the vicinity

of the reported cadmium concentration in fill soil to confirm the significance and extent of this

soil condition.

Groundwater was measured at depths of 4.99 to 7.23 mbgs. Groundwater testing, including at

MW12-14, did not report any concerns with all analysis meeting the applicable MOE SCS.

7.0 CLOSURE

The field program for this investigation was undertaken by Mr. Ilir Liko, M.E.Sc., P,Geo,working under the supervision of Mr. Michael Weber, P.Geo, QP. The report was prepared byIvir. Michael Weber, P.Geo., QP. Mr. Weber is a Qualified Persons in accordance withO.Reg. 153/04.

Yours very truly,


Michael B. Weber, P.Geo., QP Ilir Liko, M.E.Sc., P.Geo.Senior Project Manager Environmental Geoscientist

Supplementary Subsurface InvestigationLWC E4350500-005— September 2013 7-1

Dcs


DCS

8.0 STATEMENT OF LIMITATIONS

This report, prepared for Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, does not provide

certification or warranty, expressed or implied, that the investigation conducted by DCS

uncovered all potential contaminants of environmental concern at the site. The work undertaken

by DCS was directed to provide information on potential contamination that might have accrued

from its historic use. Based on the results of the investigation, DCS found some evidence of

chemical parameters in concentrations exceeding the evaluation criteria selected for the site. The

test data, chemical analyses and conclusions given in the reports, however, are the results of a

sampling of the subsoils and groundwater encountered during the program and, based upon the

total number of boreholes and monitoring wells performed, are considered to fairly represent the

subsurface conditions within each area tested. It should be noted, however, that any assessment

regarding the presence of contamination at the site is based on interpretation of conditions

determined at specific locations and depths. This assessment cannot warrant that other isolated

pockets of impacted soils are not located on the site. Chemical parameters were chosen based on

potential contamination sources and, therefore, results are limited to those parameters tested.

Further, the report was prepared by DCS for the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

The material in it reflects DCS’ best judgement in light of the information available at the time

of preparation, September 2013. Changes to soil and/or groundwater quality in the areas

investigated can occur following the date of testing. Any use which a third party makes of the

report, or reliance on, or decisions to be based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties.

DCS

APPENDIX A

STANDARD PROCEDURES

350500 – September 2013 Appendix A – Page 1 of 7

DCS

APPENDIX A

STANDARD PROCEDURES A.1 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES A.1.1 OVERBURDEN DRILLING AND SAMPLING Drilling and sampling operations are typically conducted with the use of a mobile power auger equipped to advance holes through overburden using hollow-stem and continuous flight augers; diamond drills using wash-boring techniques; rotary drills using mud or air reverse circulation. For shallow boreholes or sampling indoors Pionjar percussion drill sampling is frequently used. Soil samples are generally recovered on a continuous basis, with the use of a 51 mm diameter, 600 mm or 750 mm long, split-spoon sampler, over the full depth of the boreholes. In addition, direct push drills have become regularly used for holes of shallow depth. When utilizing the direct push method with a dual tube sampling system, soil samples are retrieved on a continuous basis in 1.2 m lengths in individual, disposable sampling tubes. No lubricants are used in the make-up of the augers, drill rods or samplers, and appropriate sampling and drilling control procedures are adopted to avoid cross-contamination between the samples and sampling locations. The split spoon sampling is carried out in conjunction with the Standard Penetration Test used to provide ‘N’ values for the determination of relative density in cohesionless soils and consistency in cohesive soils. This information is not collected when utilizing direct push drilling techniques or when utilizing a Pionjar drill. Individual soil samples are examined upon recovery by the field engineer or technician for purposes of describing and recording texture, colour, odour and moisture content. Borehole logs are prepared on the basis of sample and drilling process observations in the field describing the encountered strata and visual or olfactory evidence of subsurface contamination, if present. Following field logging, samples are placed into labelled, sterile, 500 mR wide-mouth glass jars with polymer interleaf -lined lids for shipment to the DCS laboratory for detailed inspection. Glass 50 mR septum jars, with Teflon-lined caps, are used to collect soil subsamples for volatile organic analysis. The septum jars are required to be completely filled with soil to ensure that no headspace is available to accommodate desorbed organics. Once the soil samples have been recovered and placed into the sterile glass jars, the samples are temporarily stored in cardboard containers, in the field vehicle awaiting shipment to the DCS office for examination. Following selection in the office laboratory, the samples are forwarded to a commercial environmental testing laboratory for analysis. Where high levels of contamination are anticipated or where evidence of high levels of contamination (strong odours, staining, evident presence of wastes or dangerous materials) are noted during drilling, drill cuttings from the boreholes are placed in 16 gauge steel, ring-topped, 205 R drums for storage and off-site disposal. Where no evidence of untoward level of contamination is


DCS

present, cuttings are used to backfill the boring and are tamped into place prior to reinstatement of any surface covering, such as asphalt or concrete pavements or slabs. Where excess cuttings are generated (i.e., because of monitoring well installations, etc.), surplus clean soil is spread on unpaved ground surfaces in the vicinity of the borehole or placed in clean ring-topped 205 R steel drums and removed for off-site disposal. A.1.2 EQUIPMENT DECONTAMINATION Prior to the start of the drilling program, all augers and centre plugs are cleaned at the shop by the drilling contractor. The lead augers and centre plugs are hand-cleaned between boreholes to remove any residual soil or debris adhering to the down-hole tools, well away from the location of any boreholes, to avoid the possibility of cross-contamination. All sampling tools used (split-spoons, putty knives, trowels, etc.) are thoroughly cleaned following the recovery of each sample. The samplers are first wiped clean of free soil or any other materials adhering to inner and outer surfaces, and then washed with a wire brush in a solution of water and laboratory-grade phosphate-free detergent (Sparkleen). Detergent residues are removed by rinsing with municipally-treated clean tap water. In the event that persistent organic contaminants or stains adhere to the surface of the sampler, it is sprayed with hexane, a highly volatile solvent followed by a spray of methanol. The final stage of the sampler tool decontamination process comprises a spray with distilled water to eliminate any surficial residues. A.1.3 SOIL GAS VAPOUR MONITORING Headspace measurements are taken in the field a set period after recovery of the soil samples with the use of either a photoionization detector (HNu) or explosimeter (GasTech 1238ME) to identify the presence of ionizable volatile organic vapours in the soil. The readings obtained using either meter are obtained by gently inserting the tip of the meter probe through the polymer interleaf cover placed over the mouth of each 500 mR sample jar and aspirating a vapour aliquot for testing. The 50 mR teflon-lined septum jars which contain a split sample of the soil within the 500 mR jar for volatile organic analyses are not disturbed. Where samples are to be recovered for headspace testing purposes only, the soil sample is placed in a “Ziploc” LDPE bag and allowed to come to room temperature for a period of two hours before testing. The tip of the meter probe is used to puncture the side of the bag to facilitate aspiration of the vapour sample. The HNu photoionization meter used to read soil gas vapour concentrations is calibrated to a hexane gas standard and all measurements are reported in parts per million by volume. The GasTech meter is equipped with two ranges of measurement, reading concentrations in the parts per million (0 to 500 ppm) range and as a percentage of the lower explosive limit (0 to 100% LEL) also calibrated to hexane. LEL is a measure of the propensity for an atmosphere to detonate or deflagrate with 100% LEL being the minimum concentration of gas, in air, required for ignition. The monitoring results are noted on the borehole logs for subsequent evaluation purposes. The headspace vapour profile for each borehole or test pit is assessed to identify likely zones of elevated organic contaminants in the soil column and to assist in the selection of samples stored within 50 mR


DCS

septum jars for analytical purposes. Soil gas vapour monitoring results are shown on the logs generated for each borehole. An additional feature of the GasTech monitor allows its use to measure soil gas with or without methane gas elimination. This allows for soil gas measurements to be taken without the influence of methane gas on the readings which may be present in the soil, however, not contributing to the vapour contaminant of concern. A.1.4 BOREHOLE SURVEYS Borehole and test pit locations are laid out in the field by a two-person field crew, using a chain, stadia measurement or total station instrument, with reference to existing buildings and other permanent structures and features identified on the site plan. Ground surface elevations at borehole and monitoring well collars are established in the field using an automatic level survey instrument. A closed level loop is carried out to complete the survey. Ground surface elevations are referenced to the elevation of a municipal, geodetic or hydrographic survey benchmark, unless a local datum referenced to a known or assumed elevation is to be used for the survey. Details of the location of the benchmark or local datum used are presented in the report. A.2 GROUNDWATER MONITORING A.2.1 WELL INSTALLATION Monitoring wells are typically completed using 37.5 or 55 mm diameter Schedule 40 PVC Triloc riser pipes with a 1.5 or 3 m long No. 10 slot intake zone (screen). No glues or solvents are used in the construction of the wells to avoid introducing volatiles into the well and, thereby, biasing the analytical results. Silica sand is placed around and to a height of at least 300 mm above the top of the well screen as a gravel pack. The remaining annular is sealed with Holeplug, Benseal or other bentonite seal. A protective steel casing or a ground-level, flush-mounted, steel casing is then grouted in place at the top of the well to protect the installation from damage or vandalism. All elevated casings are locked with 2402 keyed mortice locks. Flush-mounted casing protectors are generally bolted in place. Where wells are to penetrate through low permeability confining strata separating an upper and lower aquifer, a lower seal is set in the confining layer to ensure against the transmission and possible migration of contaminants between aquifers. In accordance with O.Reg. 903 there is a requirement for a well record to be submitted to the MOE for each monitoring well or group of monitoring wells installed. The well tag and well record is submitted by the subcontract licensed well driller who install the well. Also under this regulation the property owner is required to have unused or abandoned wells properly decommissioned by a licensed well driller prior to abandoning the well. The regulation provides details of well abandonment procedures and requires that a well abandonment record be filed with the MOE.


DCS

A.2.2 GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENT A dedicated WaTerra inertial pump is installed in each well to ensure that samples representative of subsurface water conditions at the location at which the screen is set are recovered without the threat of cross-contamination. Following completion of drilling, the depth from ground surface (borehole collar) to the phreatic surface is measured with the use of a Solinst SOL1 water level indicator or interface meter and recorded on the borehole log. The wells are developed by hand-pumping the WaTerra sampler to ensure that at least three and as many as ten well volumes of water (depending on recovery periods) are removed to reduce the potential effects of contamination introduced through drilling, and to maximize the responsiveness to the surrounding geological materials. Following development, the phreatic surface is allowed to reinstate itself prior to obtaining final groundwater elevations. Measurements of the water levels are made from all wells within the same time period to ensure that the results are representative of conditions across the entire site. Any unusual weather conditions and modifying features encountered are noted on the log. Field data are reduced with reference to collar elevations and are tabulated with the date of the measurements. A.2.3 GROUNDWATER SAMPLING Groundwater samples are recovered from the well through the inertial pump directly into sterile glass or plastic sample jars that have been pretreated with preservatives, where appropriate. Sample jars are obtained directly from the laboratory and are received, stored and, when filled, shipped back to the laboratory for analysis in a sealed insulated cooler box. For analyses of inorganic species, the sample is pumped from the well through a WaTerra Hydropore 0.45 Fm cartridge filter to eliminate suspended solids. Samples destined for organic analyses are obtained unfiltered. In both cases, the samples are retained in a marked sample jar to which a sample label identifying the well number, date of recovery and other pertinent information is affixed. The sample jars are filled to the brim to eliminate headspace air to reduce the possibility of oxidation and degassing. Sample bottles are then stored in the insulated cooler and either protected from freezing during winter weather or cooled with freezer packs to an optimum temperature of less than 8ºC during warm weather pending shipment to the laboratory. A.2.4 IN SITU RESPONSE TESTS Formation permeability is determined through application of a falling (slug) or rising head test carried out in the monitoring well. Where the screened section is fully contained below the phreatic surface, additional water can be added to the well riser to provide a head to force flow into the soil or rock formation. When the screen intersects the phreatic surface, resulting in exposure of open screen to unsaturated soil above the water table, the monitoring well is pumped down and then allowed to recharge from the surrounding soil. In both cases, the change in water level is measured at set time intervals with a water level indicator and recorded in the field. Where response time is too short to permit manual measurement with the Solinst indicator, a pressure transducer can be used to provide the rate of head change with time to be recorded. Well information recorded at the time of testing includes well radius (r), screened interval length (L), gravel pack radius (R), height of the phreatic surface above an arbitrary datum (H), the height of the water column in the well at the cessation of pumping or surcharging (Ho) and the height of the water column in the well at each measurement interval t (h).


DCS

A.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL The principal reason for the recovery of soil and groundwater samples in the field is to permit their inspection and analysis to determine whether contaminants or foreign matter is present at levels that constitute a health-, environmental- or construction-related liability, the discharge of which will require remedial or mitigative action. The accuracy with which the analytical results returned from chemical testing at the laboratory reflects the in-place condition is critical to the success of the site characterization program and thus every effort must be taken to ensure that the samples are recovered, handled, stored, shipped to and received at the laboratory in a condition that is representative of the material on site. A.3.1 SAMPLE PRESERVATION Preservation of soil samples quality is critical in the case of volatile organic compounds only, where the use of glass, Teflon-lined 50 mR septum jars, filled to the brim to avoid residual headspace into which volatiles can degas, as required. Volatiles samples are kept in a refrigerated condition at an ideal temperature of less than 4ºC and of no more than 10ºC and are delivered to the laboratory as soon after recovery as is practicable and in no case after more than 14 days from the date of recovery. Samples recovered for testing for the presence of inorganic contaminants have no time limit restriction between recovery and testing, if sealed. Where samples are tested for the presence of semi-volatile and non-volatile organics, they are analyzed within 60 days of recovery to ensure that biodegradation does not materially affect the chemical loading in the soil. All sample jars should be maintained in a sealed condition in the dark under refrigerated conditions. Preservation requirements for groundwater samples are dependent on the contaminant parameters for which the analyses are being conducted. MOE requirements are widely adopted by the industry in Ontario and listed in the MOE document entitled Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act dated March 2004 (amended as of 1 July 2011). The sample preservation procedures and holding time limits applied and the container types used are consistent with the requirements of the guidance document. A.3.2 SAMPLE SEALS On samples collected for volatile organic analyses, adhesive sample seals are affixed across the lids of all sample jar and bottle containers or sample shipment container lid in such a way as to ensure that the seal must be broken on opening. Seals are placed to provide evidence of tampering with samples while in transit or temporary storage between the time of recovery and delivery to the laboratory. A.3.3 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY Full chain-of-custody procedures are applied from the point at which field staff surrenders responsibility for the samples in the field or, where that individual is responsible for transit from the field location to the office, at their place of work. Chain-of-custody forms, which log the date of transfer and identity of the parties by and to whom the transfer has been made, also record the identity of the samples included in the shipment, the date sampled and sample location, the analyses


DCS

requested for each sample, the name and address of the laboratory to which the samples are assigned, and any clarifying notes that may be required. A.3.4 SAMPLE QUALITY MANAGEMENT Laboratory or field control checks are utilized to ensure that the quality of the analytical data is maintained at an acceptable level. All laboratories to which samples are sent for chemical analysis are CALA-certified and participate in applicable inter-laboratory testing rounds administered by provincial and federal agencies. Field duplicate samples, where used, are prepared by obtaining a soil or groundwater sample split from preselected sample locations. The splits are provided with fictitious sample identification designations and submitted to the laboratory for analysis to permit a determination of the internal quality control and repeatability of analyses from the selected laboratory to be determined. Trip blanks comprising deionized water may be prepared by the contracted laboratory to accompany groundwater sample containers to determine whether contamination of the containers or of the samples had occurred during shipment to the field or, following recovery, during storage and shipment from the field to the laboratory. Trip blanks are generally enclosed with sample sets recovered for analysis for the presence of volatile organic compounds. As described under the Laboratory Analysis section, matrix spikes are conducted a minimum of once during each project run by the laboratory. Field duplicate matrix spikes are normally not prepared. Laboratory duplicates are run in the laboratory on ten percent of the samples subject to testing. Laboratory analysis results and QA/QC program results are carefully scrutinized on receipt to determine whether the results returned are representative. The laboratory customer services representative is contacted for clarification, if any uncertainty associated with the veracity or quality of the results is noted.


DCS

A.4 LABORATORY ANALYSIS The procedures detailed in the MOE Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in Assessment of Properties Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act, dated 9 March 2004 (amended as of 1 July 2011), constitutes the accepted standards for chemical testing for environmental evaluation purposes in the province (where available). In accordance with this protocol, all appropriate laboratory quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures, including the use of spikes, replicates and blanks, are incorporated and run a minimum of once per sample set. The QA/QC data are returned with the laboratory reports received.

DCS

APPENDIX B

BOREHOLE LOGS

SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown

- trace silt, trace ash @ 0.61-1.22m

ASH - red, powdery texture, damp to moist

- intermixed silty sand and gravel @ 2.70m

- some silty sand and gravel @ 6.10m

SILTY SAND and GRAVEL - grey, moist, traceof ash

- seam of ash @ 6.71m

- plastic bag @ 7.32-7.93m

82.321.22

76.996.55

80

80

80

90

80

80

80

80

90

90

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

NN

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10

SS-11A

SS-11BSS-12

SS-13

Metals & Inorganicsanalyses

Metals & Inorganics

7141615

7788

55711

6554

3222

2222

1122

1111

1121

2125

2235

77710

6

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Lakeview Waterfront Connection EA29/06/2012

Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:

Project: Contract No:

ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

Continued

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur

Profile DrillingD-50 Turbo Track Mount

I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-1

Installed

NTMSVS

- None- Trace- Moderate- Strong- Very Strong

Wel

lD

etai

ls

Remarks andSample Analyses

(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:

Ground Surface Elevation: 83.54m 20 40 60 80

- becomes wet @ 7.93m

- SILT - brown to grey/black, wet, some sand.

- hydrocarbon odour @ 9.76-10.21m, solvent odour@ 10.21 - 10.36 m.

- wet to saturated @ 9.76-10.22m.

SILT TILL (Native) - brown to greyish brown,some sand, no odour.

END of BOREHOLE @ 10.98m

Groundwater elevation @ 75.46m asl. on 2 August2012

75.008.54

73.1810.36

72.5610.98

N

NN

N

Y

YN

SS-14A

SS-14BSS-15

SS-16

SS-17A

SS-17BSS-18

and PAHsanalyses

PAHs, PHCs andVOCs analyses

VOCs and PHCsanalyses

Groundwateranalysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs

910122132

2122

2122

4446

7466

Supervised by:

8

9

10


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-1

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 2 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:

20 40 60 80

SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - trace silt


- becomes moist @ 6.10m


- trace wood fragments @ 7.32-7.93m

83.180.61

80

70

60

80

70

90

90

90

90

40

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10

SS-11

SS-12

SS-13

Metals & Inorganicsand PAHs analyses

Metals &Inorganics, VOCsand PHCs analyses

6989

5567

4544

22410

6567

3255

2322

1/600

4336

8987

4689

3556

4

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

Continued

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-2

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


SILT TILL (Native) - brown to grey, wet.

WEATHERED SHALE BEDROCK - dark grey



73.889.91

70.9812.8170.6813.11

20

80

60

80

60

30

50

60

70

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-14

SS-15

SS-16

SS-17

SS-18

SS-19

SS-20

SS-21

SS-22



4344224

3222

1111

1155

8534

2235

4345

447

27/15

Supervised by:

8

9

10

11

12

13


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-2

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 2 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:

20 40 60 80

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7



(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:

Ground Surface Elevation: 83.84m 20 40 60 80Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

Continued

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-3

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls

SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, trace to somesilt.



- becomes dark brown, moist to saturated @ 5.79m

- becomes wet to saturated @ 6.10m

SILT - grey, trace sand, trace gravel

83.230.61

76.986.86

90

90

90

80

80

80

90

70

100

90

90

80100

90

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

NN

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10

SS-11

SS-12ASS-12B

SS-13


PHCs and VOCsanalyses

4868

6677

3233

1111

1122

1112

1111

1/600

2455

3544

2212

11142024

9

Supervised by:

- becomes brown, trace asphalt fragments @ 7.93m

SILT TILL (Native) - grey, damp.

- 0.05m seam of sand and gravel @ 8.84m


Well dry on 2 August 2012

75.318.53

74.699.15

70

60

N

N

SS-14

SS-15


1313144171411

5456

8

9


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-3

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 2 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:

20 40 60 80

SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown and grey,some silt, trace to some asphalt

- becomes brown to grey/black, with moderatehydrocarbon odour @ 0.61 - 4.27m

- becomes moist to wet sand, some gravel @ 1.22m

SILTY SAND (Native) - brown to grey, wet, tracegravel, some clay, no odour

SANDY SILT - brown, wet, some clay

SHALE BEDROCK - dark grey



72.844.27

72.234.88

71.175.94

70.716.40

90

90

90

80

80

80

90

70

100

90

90

N

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10A

SS-10BSS-11


VOCs, PHCs andPCBs analyses

PHCs and PCBsanalyses


PHCs analyses


8111520

14252221

11161210

610128

3335

1112

1112

1223

2223

120

50/130

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-4

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, dry, trace silt


SILTY SAND to SANDY SILT - brown, moist,some clay, trace gravel


SANDY SILT (Native) - brown, moist, tracegravel

- becomes brown and grey, with trace to some clay@ 3.66m


Groundwater elevation @ 74.53m als. on 2 August2012

75.121.68

74.362.44

72.534.27

80

75

70

10040

30

30

80

N

N

N

NN

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3A

SS-3BSS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7


Metals &Inorganics, VOCsand PHCs analyses


2347

10161011

3322

0000

1111

1212

1112

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-5

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)


SANDY SILT - brown, damp, trace to some sand,trace gravel

- becomes moist, with trace clay below 1.83m

- becomes more sandy, brown to grey @ 2.44m

- no recovery from 3.05 - 3.66m

SANDY SILT (Native) - dark grey



76.870.46

73.673.66

73.064.27

80

10080

80

80

50

0

N

NN

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1A

SS-1BSS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7


Metals &Inorganics, PAHsand PCBs analyses




6142014

117714

47712

46812

5754

3233

1124

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-6

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - grey, some silt

- becomes saturated @ 1.22m

- some silt & clay @ 1.83-3.66m


- becoming grey, silty @ 4.11mSILT TILL (Native) - grey, trace sand, trace gravel



72.994.27

72.384.88

70

70

60

70

70

85

55

85

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8


PAHs analyses


PAHs analyses




6111314

191917

3355

1248

3355

362121

630

28/30

6431715

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-7

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


PAHs analyses




SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, trace silt,trace rootlets

SILTY SAND - grey, moist, trace gravel

SANDY SILT - grey, moist, trace gravel

SILTY SAND (Native) - brown, wet, trace gravel

SAND - brown to grey, wet, trace gravel



75.481.73

74.772.44

73.553.66

73.104.11

72.334.88

90

70

85

50

65

65

80

100

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

PAHs analyses

Metals & Inorganicsand PCBs analyses


3579

9101111

3566

1222

1122

11052

13517

27353133

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-8

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, damp, tracerootlets

- trace limestone @ 0.61m

- becomes moist to wet @ 1.22m

- becomes moist to wet, with trace silt and trace clay@ 1.83m

- brown to black @ 2.29m

- becomes brown, with trace limestone @ 2.59m

SAND - brown, moist to wet, with trace gravel,piece of geotextile

SAND and GRAVEL (Native) - brown to darkgrey, moist to wet

- becomes brown to black @ 4.57m

- becomes dark grey @ 5.33m



74.393.05

73.633.81

70.736.71

90

80

80

50

70

85

90

90

95

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

Metals & Inorganicsand PCBs analyses

Metals & Inorganicsand PHCs analyses

PAHs analyses



46610

12887

00107

450/80

15131414

3555

2476

6887

7986

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-9

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


SAND and GRAVEL (Native) - brown, damp,trace rootlets


SAND - dark grey, trace gravel

- becomes grey to brown, wet @ 1.83m

- some gravel @ 2.29-3.05m



74.061.22

72.233.05

60

90

50

0

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4




210107

9121310

3656

7533

Supervised by:

1

2

3


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-10

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, dry to damp

- becomes brown to grey @ 0.61m

- crushed stones @ 0.91-1.52m

SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist

- trace gravel from 2.44-3.66m

SAND - brown, moist, trace silt, trace gravel


- fine grained @ 4.88-5.49m

SAND and GRAVEL - grey, moist

SAND - grey, wet

81.151.52

79.013.66

77.185.49

75.966.71

70

80

70

70

100

80

80

80

90

90

100

90

70

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3A

SS-3B

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10

SS-11

SS-12

SS-13



7172019

6132820

161265561013

691720

5162124

9233030

9162832

142869

7555/80

30755565

12252032

4

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

Continued

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-11

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:




74.747.93 Groundwater

analysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs

142428

Supervised by:


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-11

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 2 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:

20 40 60 80

SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, trace silt, dryto damp

- becomes brown to grey @ 0.61m

SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist, tracesand

SAND and GRAVEL - brown and grey, moist,some silt, some angular rock fragments

80.381.83

78.553.66

70

50

90

70

100

100

70

60

50

50

50

90

90

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10

SS-11

SS-12

SS-13A



69108

54926

27261911

24710

5101520

5111820

1728

26/15

2962

60/100

6361

60/100

2353

70/100

160/150

20496875

16

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

Continued

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-12

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


SAND - brown and grey, wet



74.597.62

73.069.15

100

100

100

N

N

N

SS-13B

SS-14

SS-15


30282516302825

13152425

Supervised by:

8

9


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-12

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 2 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:

20 40 60 80


SILTY SAND - grey, moist, some gravel

- trace gravel @ 1.22-2.44m

- becoming sandy silt, brown @ 1.83m

SANDY SILT TILL (Native) - brown, moist, tracegravel

SAND and GRAVEL - brown

- becomes brown to grey, with trace silt @ 5.49m



82.930.61

81.102.44

78.664.88

76.227.32

70

80

40

80

80

95

95

100

50

80

60

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10

SS-11

SS-12



71086

2236

2422

1221

2349

261211

8162326

5112050

6050/50

2574

60/150

3570

50/80

42825257

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 BH12-13

n/a

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, moist

SANDY SILT - grey and black, moist, tracegravel, septic odour from 0.61 to 1.22 m


- some sand @ 2.90-3.00m- some gravel @ 3.05-4.27m

SAND - brown, some silt, trace gravel, moist

- no recovery @ 4.88-6.10m


82.740.61

81.521.83

79.084.27

70

60

40

60

95

100

80

N

Y

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-11

SS-12

SS-13

Metals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCsanalyses

Metals & Inorganicsand PHCs analyses

PHCs analyses

10151511

3346

2236

581220

8142228

5132025

8132127

5222742

40433035

12213037

13

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6

7


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Driller:

Continued

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-14

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


- some silt @ 7.75-7.88mEND of BOREHOLE @ 7.93m


75.427.93 Groundwater

analysed forMetals &Inorganics, PAHs,VOCs and PHCs

182534

Supervised by:


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-14

Installed

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 2 of 2

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:

20 40 60 80

SAND and GRAVEL (Fill) - brown, some asphalt,trace of silt

- becoming silty sand to sandy silt, some of gravel@ 0.61-1.37m


- becomes moist to wet @ 1.83m

SAND - brown, moist

- coarser-grained, some gravel below 3.66m


- becomes grey @ 5.79m


80.681.37

79.003.05

75.956.10

80

90

95100

95

20

80

15

100

100

N

N

NN

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3ASS-3B

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10A

SS-10B



111377

12131814

12131312

12133246

28253250

12233652

35

50/130

19242123

14182024

10182540

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 BH12-15

n/a

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


RQ

D

Prepared by:

Checked by:

Date:

Monitoring Well:

100 200 300 400

Borehole:

Odo

ur


I.Liko350500-000-005 MW12-16

Installed

SILTY SAND (Fill) - brown


- some gravel @ 1.83-3.05m

SAND - brown, moist, trace silt

- becomes moist to wet, silty @ 4.27-6.1m


- becomes grey, with trace silt @ 5.33m



79.891.22

78.063.05

74.406.71

50

90

80

100

90

90

100

90

100

100

100

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

SS-1

SS-2

SS-3

SS-4

SS-5

SS-6

SS-7

SS-8

SS-9

SS-10

SS-11



PHCs analyses


3456

34710

7131722

8162738

7142535

9182531

7172231

8172228

8161727

10222531

261215

Supervised by:

1

2

3

4

5

6


Sam

ple

Type

and

Num

ber

J.Jones

M.D.Weber

19/07/12

Wat

er L

evel

Con

dito

n

% R

ecov

ery

Boring date:


ODOUR:

Stratigraphy

Blo

ws/

300m

m


Elev.(m )

Depth(m)

Driller:

NTMSVS


Wel

lD

etai

ls


(%LEL)

Sheet 1 of 1

Scale(m)

Headspace TOV

Headspace TOV

Sym

bol

(ppm)

Borehole Location:

Samples

Description

Drilling Method:


DCS

APPENDIX C

LABORATORY ANALYTICAL CERTIFICATES

CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.121 GRANTON DRIVE, UNIT #11,RICHMOND HILL, ON L4B3N4 (905) 882-5984

5835 COOPERS AVENUEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO

CANADA L4Z 1Y2TEL (905)712-5100FAX (905)712-5122

http://www.agatlabs.com

Mike Muneswar, BSc (Chem), Senior Inorganic AnalystSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

Inga Kuzmina, Organic Laboratory SupervisorTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:

PAGES (INCLUDING COVER): 21

Jul 12, 2012

VERSION*: 1

Should you require any information regarding this analysis please contact your client services representative at (905) 712-5100

12T615770AGAT WORK ORDER:

ATTENTION TO: Mike Weber

PROJECT NO: 350500-005

Laboratories (V1) Page 1 of 21

All samples will be disposed of within 30 days following analysis. Please contact the lab if you require additional sample storage time.

AGAT Laboratories is accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) and/or Standards Council of Canada (SCC) for specific tests listed on the scope of accreditation. AGAT Laboratories (Mississauga) is also accredited by the Canadian Association for Laboratory Accreditation Inc. (CALA) for specific drinking water tests. Accreditations are location and parameter specific. A complete listing of parameters for each location is available from www.cala.ca and/or www.scc.ca. The tests in this report may not necessarily be included in the scope of accreditation.

Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysicists of Alberta (APEGGA)Western Enviro-Agricultural Laboratory Association (WEALA)Environmental Services Association of Alberta (ESAA)

Member of:

*NOTES

Results relate only to the items tested and to all the items tested

MW12-5 SS5

8-10'

MW12-7 SS7

12-13.5'

MW12-4 SS2

2-4'

MW12-4 SS6

10-12'

MW12-6 SS1A

0-1.5'

MW12-6 SS3

4-6'

MW12-5 SS3

4-6'

MW12-7 SS2

2-4'

3475472 3475488 3475510 3475517 3475519 3475575Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475509 3475550

µg/g 0.81.3 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Antimony <0.8

µg/g 118 3 3 5 4 8 3 8Arsenic 5

µg/g 2220 36 42 58 64 51 43 50Barium 44

µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 0.9Beryllium 0.6

µg/g 536 <5 5 8 7 9 5 17Boron 11

µg/g 0.10 0.82 0.96 0.54 0.45 0.32 0.18 3.74Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 0.94

µg/g 0.51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium <0.5

µg/g 270 9 11 19 19 16 11 27Chromium 22

µg/g 0.521 3.7 4.6 9.8 9.2 7.8 5.4 18.3Cobalt 10.4

µg/g 192 18 14 20 19 94 11 25Copper 36

µg/g 1120 24 12 10 8 38 5 37Lead 20

µg/g 0.52 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.5Molybdenum 0.6

µg/g 182 8 9 18 18 15 11 34Nickel 21

µg/g 0.41.5 0.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium <0.4

µg/g 0.20.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver <0.2

µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium <0.4

µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 <0.5 0.7Uranium <0.5

µg/g 186 20 21 26 27 23 19 32Vanadium 23

µg/g 5290 33 31 46 46 98 27 70Zinc 68

µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI <0.2

µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide <0.040

µg/g 0.100.27 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Mercury <0.10

mS/cm 0.0050.57 0.296 0.360 0.848 0.358 0.207 0.151 2.70Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.767

N/A N/A2.4 0.336 1.41 0.313 0.294 0.153 0.587 0.556Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.910

pH Units 7.52 7.40 7.64 7.55 7.60 7.74 7.71pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 9.62


DATE RECEIVED: Jun 29, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 27, 2012

Certificate of Analysis

ATTENTION TO: Mike WeberCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.

AGAT WORK ORDER: 12T615770

O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil)

DATE REPORTED: Jul 12, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Soil





CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS (V1)

Certified By:Page 2 of 21

MW12-9 SS4 7.

5-8.5

MW12-8 SS3

4-6'

MW12-8 SS7

12-14'

MW12-10 SS2

2-4'

MW12-D SS2

DUP

MW12-9 SS2

2-4'

MW12-H SS3

DUP

3475580 3475585 3475591 3475600 3475604Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475590 3475608

µg/g 0.81.3 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Antimony

µg/g 118 5 5 5 5 3 3 5Arsenic

µg/g 2220 70 66 72 38 45 47 77Barium

µg/g 0.52.5 0.5 0.6 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6Beryllium

µg/g 536 7 7 5 5 <5 5 7Boron

µg/g 0.10 0.44 0.48 0.18 0.34 0.24 0.83 0.50Boron (Hot Water Soluble)

µg/g 0.51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium

µg/g 270 21 23 19 19 11 10 24Chromium

µg/g 0.521 8.8 10.0 8.0 4.1 3.3 4.1 9.6Cobalt

µg/g 192 25 22 41 32 38 18 24Copper

µg/g 1120 23 19 20 24 29 20 19Lead

µg/g 0.52 <0.5 <0.5 0.9 1.7 0.6 <0.5 <0.5Molybdenum

µg/g 182 18 20 15 11 8 9 19Nickel

µg/g 0.41.5 0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium

µg/g 0.20.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver

µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium

µg/g 0.52.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.6Uranium

µg/g 186 28 29 25 13 12 21 31Vanadium

µg/g 5290 59 53 58 51 53 33 61Zinc

µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ISQ <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI

µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 ISQ <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide

µg/g 0.100.27 <0.10 <0.10 0.13 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Mercury

mS/cm 0.0050.57 0.506 0.298 0.620 0.451 0.151 0.334 0.513Electrical Conductivity (2:1)

N/A N/A2.4 1.81 2.40 8.15 4.10 1.02 0.358 1.96Sodium Adsorption Ratio

pH Units 7.64 7.68 7.66 ISQ 7.85 7.55 7.66pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T1(ALL) - CurrentComments:

3475472-3475590 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio.

3475591 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). ISQ = Insuffecient Sample















MW12-6 SS3

4-6'

MW12-8 SS6

10-12'

MW12-4 SS2

2-4'

MW12-4 SS6

10-12'

MW12-7 SS3

4-6'

MW12-7 SS5

8-10'

MW12-5 SS3

4-6'

MW12-8 SS2

2-4'


µg/g 0.050.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene <0.05

µg/g 0.050.093 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene <0.05

µg/g 0.050.072 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene <0.05

µg/g 0.050.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene 0.05

µg/g 0.050.69 0.13 0.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.19Phenanthrene 0.53

µg/g 0.050.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene 0.13

µg/g 0.050.56 0.07 0.08 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.27Fluoranthene 0.83

µg/g 0.051 0.24 0.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.24Pyrene 0.67

µg/g 0.050.36 0.06 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.12Benz(a)anthracene 0.35

µg/g 0.052.8 0.14 0.08 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.11Chrysene 0.33

µg/g 0.050.47 0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13Benzo(b)fluoranthene 0.29

µg/g 0.050.48 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene 0.11

µg/g 0.050.3 0.07 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.12Benzo(a)pyrene 0.30

µg/g 0.050.23 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 0.15

µg/g 0.050.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.05

µg/g 0.050.68 0.06 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 0.14

µg/g 0.050.59 0.23 0.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.052-and 1-methyl Naphthalene <0.05

% 0.1 6.8 16.2 10.0 9.2 11.3 9.3 8.9Moisture Content 17.1

Acceptable LimitsSurrogate Unit

% 106 93 86 78 76 81 74Chrysene-d12 8650-140






O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil)








MW12-D SS2

DUP

MW12-9 SS2

2-4'

MW12-9 SS6

12.5-14'

MW12-10 SS2

2-4'

3475590 3475595 3475604Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475600

µg/g 0.050.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene

µg/g 0.050.093 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene

µg/g 0.050.072 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene

µg/g 0.050.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene

µg/g 0.050.69 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.13Phenanthrene

µg/g 0.050.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene

µg/g 0.050.56 0.05 0.09 0.06 0.12Fluoranthene

µg/g 0.051 <0.05 0.12 0.05 0.21Pyrene

µg/g 0.050.36 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 0.07Benz(a)anthracene

µg/g 0.052.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.13Chrysene

µg/g 0.050.47 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.08Benzo(b)fluoranthene

µg/g 0.050.48 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene

µg/g 0.050.3 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.09Benzo(a)pyrene

µg/g 0.050.23 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

µg/g 0.050.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

µg/g 0.050.68 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.06Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

µg/g 0.050.59 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 0.132-and 1-methyl Naphthalene

% 0.1 7.7 11.0 8.5 6.6Moisture Content


% 72 79 63 106Chrysene-d12 50-140


3475472-3475604 Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.Note: The result for Benzo(b)Fluoranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Fluoranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.














MW12-8 SS3

4-6'

MW12-4 SS3

4-6'

MW12-4 SS5

8-10'

MW12-H SS3

DUP

MW12-6 SS3

4-6'

3475481 3475484 3475580 RDL 3475608Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3475519

µg/g 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Aroclor 1242

µg/g 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Aroclor 1248

µg/g 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Aroclor 1254

µg/g 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Aroclor 1260

µg/g 0.10.3 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.3 <0.3Polychlorinated Biphenyls

% 0.1 10.7 9.7 8.0 11.2 0.1 11.4Moisture Content


% 92 88 73 92 84Decachlorobiphenyl 60-140


3475481-3475580 Results are based on the dry weight of soil extracted.

3475608 Results are based on the dry weight of soil extracted.Sample was diluted and Reporting Detection Limit raised due to chromatographic interference.






O. Reg. 153(511) - PCBs (Soil)








MW12-6 SS7

12-14

MW12-8 SS8

14-16'

MW12-4 SS3

4-6'

MW12-5 SS5

8-10'

MW12-7 SS4

6-8'

MW12-7 SS6

10-12'

MW12-6 SS5

8-10'

MW12-8 SS5

8-10'


µg/g 5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) <5

µg/g 525 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX <5

µg/g 1010 48 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16) <10

µg/g 50240 360 <50 76 <50 69 <50 83F3 (C16 to C34) <50

µg/g 50120 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50) <50

µg/g 50120 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons NA

% 0.1 10.7 16.3 11.7 20.4 15.9 10.2 15.5Moisture Content 13.2


% 73 95 69 65 94 81 102Terphenyl 12660-140

MW12-H SS8

DUP

MW12-9 SS5

10-12'

MW12-9 SS7

15-17'

MW12-10 SS3

6-8'


µg/g 5 <5 <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/g 525 <5 <5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX

µg/g 1010 <10 <10 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16)

µg/g 50240 <50 100 <50 <50F3 (C16 to C34)

µg/g 50120 <50 <50 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50)

µg/g 50120 NA NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons

% 0.1 7.1 16.2 13.0 14.4Moisture Content


% 127 123 135 116Terphenyl 60-140






O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil)




















3475481-3475605 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.



MW12-4 SS5

8-10'

MW12-4 SS8

14-16'

3475484 3475489Parameter G / S RDLUnit

µg/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene

µg/g 0.080.2 <0.08 <0.08Toluene

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture

µg/g 5 6 <5F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/g 525 6 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX

µg/g 1010 55 <10F2 (C10 to C16)

µg/g 50240 150 65F3 (C16 to C34)

µg/g 50120 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50)

µg/g 50120 NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons

% 0.1 9.7 12.1Moisture Content


% 91 72Terphenyl 60-140


3475484-3475489 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified with the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.Quality Control Data is available upon request.






O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil)








MW12-6 SS7

12-14

MW12-8 SS8

14-16'

MW12-4 SS3

4-6'

MW12-5 SS5

8-10'

MW12-7 SS4

6-8'

MW12-7 SS6

10-12'

MW12-6 SS5

8-10'

MW12-8 SS5

8-10'


µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.05

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride <0.02

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromomethane <0.05

ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane <0.05

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Acetone <0.50

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether <0.05

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane <0.02

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone <0.50

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.02

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Chloroform <0.04

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane <0.03

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride <0.05

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene <0.02

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane <0.03

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03Trichloroethylene <0.03

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane <0.05

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone <0.50

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.04

ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Toluene <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane <0.05

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide <0.04

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene <0.05

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.04

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene <0.05

ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromoform <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Styrene <0.05






O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Soil)








MW12-6 SS7

12-14

MW12-8 SS8

14-16'

MW12-4 SS3

4-6'

MW12-5 SS5

8-10'

MW12-7 SS4

6-8'

MW12-7 SS6

10-12'

MW12-6 SS5

8-10'

MW12-8 SS5

8-10'


ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.05

ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05o-Xylene <0.05

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.05



ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture <0.05

µg/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene <0.04

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05n-Hexane <0.05


% Recovery 98 97 97 97 98 97 97Toluene-d8 1050-140

% Recovery 100 96 97 94 99 98 984-Bromofluorobenzene 9850-140














MW12-H SS8

DUP

MW12-9 SS5

10-12'

MW12-9 SS7

15-17'

MW12-10 SS3

6-8'


µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromomethane

ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Acetone

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Chloroform

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03Trichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane

ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Toluene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene

ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromoform

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Styrene














MW12-H SS8

DUP

MW12-9 SS5

10-12'

MW12-9 SS7

15-17'

MW12-10 SS3

6-8'


ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05o-Xylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene



ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture

µg/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05n-Hexane


% Recovery 98 97 95 95Toluene-d8 50-140

% Recovery 97 92 95 954-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140


3475481-3475605 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample wasextracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.














3475481 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil) F2 (C10 to C16) 10 48MW12-4 SS3 4-6'

3475481 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (-BTEX) (Soil) F3 (C16 to C34) 240 360MW12-4 SS3 4-6'

3475484 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil) F2 (C10 to C16) 10 55MW12-4 SS5 8-10'

3475509 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.848MW12-5 SS3 4-6'

3475517 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Copper 92 94MW12-6 SS1A 0-1.5'


3475575 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.767MW12-7 SS7 12-13.5'

3475584 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Soil) Fluoranthene 0.56 0.83MW12-8 SS6 10-12'


3475590 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 8.15MW12-9 SS2 2-4'

3475591 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 4.10MW12-9 SS4 7.5-8.5


Guideline Violation




SAMPLEID GUIDELINE ANALYSIS PACKAGE PARAMETER GUIDEVALUE RESULTSAMPLE TITLE




GUIDELINE VIOLATION (V1) Page 14 of 21


Antimony 1 3475608 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 128% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 82% 70% 130%

Arsenic 1 3475608 5 5 0.0% < 1 108% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%

Barium 1 3475608 77 71 8.1% < 2 98% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 104% 70% 130%

Beryllium 1 3475608 0.6 0.6 0.0% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Boron

1 3475608 7 7 0.0% < 5 78% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1 3475509 0.54 0.55 0.7% < 0.10 92% 60% 140% 95% 70% 130% 95% 60% 140%

Cadmium 1 3475608 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 105% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Chromium 1 3475608 24 23 4.3% < 2 97% 70% 130% 118% 80% 120% 116% 70% 130%

Cobalt 1 3475608 9.6 9.3 3.2% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Copper

1 3475608 24 24 0.0% < 1 95% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Lead 1 3475608 19 20 5.1% < 1 109% 70% 130% 112% 80% 120% 106% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 1 3475608 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 106% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%

Nickel 1 3475608 19 19 0.0% < 1 95% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Selenium 1 3475608 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 74% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Silver

1 3475608 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 76% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Thallium 1 3475608 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 95% 70% 130% 90% 80% 120% 85% 70% 130%

Uranium 1 3475608 0.6 0.6 0.0% < 0.5 114% 70% 130% 117% 80% 120% 119% 70% 130%

Vanadium 1 3475608 31 30 3.3% < 1 92% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Zinc 1 3475608 61 60 1.7% < 5 95% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Chromium VI

1 3475472 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 102% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 105% 70% 130%

Cyanide 1 3475608 < 0.040 < 0.040 0.0% < 0.040 101% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%

Mercury 1 3475608 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 120% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 105% 70% 130%

Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1 3475509 0.848 0.840 0.9% < 0.005 92% 90% 110% NA NA

Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1 3475509 0.313 0.297 5.1% N/A NA NA NA


1 3475585 7.68 7.64 0.5% NA 99% 90% 110% NA NA

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured

ValueRecovery Recovery

Quality Assurance


CLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.


Soil Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

BatchPARAMETERSample

IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Jul 12, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL

MethodBlank




QUALITY ASSURANCE REPORT (V1) Page 15 of 21



Naphthalene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 80% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 89% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140% 71% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140% 72% 50% 140%

Fluorene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140% 93% 50% 140%

Anthracene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 104% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140%

Pyrene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 108% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%

Benz(a)anthracene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 90% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 103% 50% 140%

Chrysene

1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140%

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 82% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140%

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 86% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140%

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 114% 50% 140% 111% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 3475552 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140%

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 3475552 0.06 0.06 0.0% < 0.05 83% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%


F2 (C10 to C16) 1 <10 <10 0.0% < 10 98% 60% 140% 94% 80% 120% 93% 60% 140%

F3 (C16 to C34) 1 <50 <50 0.0% < 50 101% 60% 140% 95% 80% 120% 122% 60% 140%

F4 (C34 to C50) 1 <50 < 50 0.0% < 50 103% 60% 140% 118% 80% 120% 97% 60% 140%


Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%

Vinyl Chloride 1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 83% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%

Trichlorofluoromethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 116% 50% 140%

Acetone

1 3475596 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 106% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140% 108% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 76% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%

Methylene Chloride 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 127% 50% 140% 79% 60% 130% 72% 50% 140%

Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 74% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 82% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 77% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 80% 50% 140%

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 3475596 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 99% 50% 140% 106% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%

Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 71% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 83% 50% 140%

Chloroform 1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 80% 50% 140% 95% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 1 3475596 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 85% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%

1,1,1-Trichloroethane

1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 111% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%

Carbon Tetrachloride 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Trace Organics Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Benzene 1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 80% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloropropane 1 3475596 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 70% 50% 140% 85% 60% 130% 77% 50% 140%

Trichloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 86% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%

Bromodichloromethane

1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 97% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 3475596 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 121% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140%

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 85% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 84% 50% 140%

Toluene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 97% 50% 140% 88% 60% 130% 79% 50% 140%

Dibromochloromethane 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%

Ethylene Dibromide

1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 83% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 88% 50% 140%

Tetrachloroethylene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 78% 50% 140% 107% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 NA 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 89% 50% 140%

Chlorobenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 91% 50% 140% 95% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 76% 50% 140% 95% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%

Bromoform 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 87% 50% 140% 117% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%

Styrene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 83% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 91% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 88% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 110% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 100% 50% 140%


Xylene Mixture 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 88% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichloropropene 1 3475596 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 79% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 89% 50% 140%

n-Hexane

1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 75% 50% 140%

O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil)

Benzene 1 3475596 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 96% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%

Toluene 1 3475596 < 0.08 < 0.08 0.0% < 0.08 118% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%

Xylene Mixture 1 3475596 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 108% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

F1 (C6 to C10)

1 3475596 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 90% 60% 140% 80% 80% 120% 77% 60% 140%


Aroclor 1242 1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1248 1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1254 1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1260 1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

1 3475481 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 112% 60% 140% 92% 60% 140% 91% 60% 140%


Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 71% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 83% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 86% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Trace Organics Analysis (Continued)

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Fluorene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 67% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%

Anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 71% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 125% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%

Pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 126% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140%

Benz(a)anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 128% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140%

Chrysene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 117% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 79% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 67% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 79% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 79% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Soil Analysis

Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Boron (Hot Water Soluble) MET-93-6104EPA SW 846 6010C; MSA, Part 3, Ch.21

ICP/OES

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Chromium VI INOR-93-6029 SM 3500 B; MSA Part 3, Ch. 25 SPECTROPHOTOMETER

Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE CN-3015 & E 3009 A;SM 4500 CN

TECHNICON AUTO ANALYZER

Mercury MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 3050B & 6020A ICP-MS

Electrical Conductivity (2:1) INOR-93-6036 McKeague 4.12, SM 2510 B EC METER

Sodium Adsorption Ratio INOR-93-6007McKeague 4.12 & 3.26 & EPA SW-846 6010C

ICP/OES

pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction INOR-93-6031 MSA part 3 & SM 4500-H+ B PH METER



Method Summary




AGAT S.O.P ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUELITERATURE REFERENCEPARAMETER




METHOD SUMMARY (V1) Page 19 of 21


Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluorene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Phenanthrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Moisture Content Org 5506 EPA SW-846 3540 & 8270 BALANCE

Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5106 EPA SW846 3541 & 8270 GC/MS

Aroclor 1242 ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD




Polychlorinated Biphenyls ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD

Decachlorobiphenyl ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD

Moisture Content MOE E3139 BALANCE

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P &T GC / FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035 P & T GC / FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID



Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS

Moisture Content VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035,8015

BALANCE

Terphenyl VOL-91-5009 GC/FID

Benzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Toluene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method P & T GC/FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method P & T GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, EPA SW846 8015

GC / FID


GC / FID


GC / FID

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE

Moisture Content VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE




Method Summary









Dichlorodifluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Bromomethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trichlorofluoromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Acetone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methylene Chloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl Ether VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Chloroform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS


1,1,1-Trichloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Benzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,2-Dichloropropane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trichloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Bromodichloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS


Toluene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Dibromochloromethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Ethylene Dibromide VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Tetrachloroethylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

m & p-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Bromoform VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Styrene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS


o-Xylene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,3-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,3-Dichloropropene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

n-Hexane VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

4-Bromofluorobenzene VOL-91-5002 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Method Summary














Jacky Takeuchi, BScH (Chem Eng), BSc (Bio), C.Chem, Laboratory Manager

TRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Jul 24, 2012

VERSION*: 1









Member of:

*NOTES


Comp. of

MW12-1 SS17A

& MW12-1 17B

Comp. of

MW12-2 SS8,

SS11, SS18,

SS4


mg/L 0.010 <0.010 0.044Arsenic Leachate

mg/L 0.100 0.549 0.183Barium Leachate

mg/L 0.050 <0.050 0.077Boron Leachate

mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Cadmium Leachate

mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Chromium Leachate

mg/L 0.010 0.036 <0.010Lead Leachate

mg/L 0.01 <0.01 <0.01Mercury Leachate

mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Selenium Leachate

mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Silver Leachate

mg/L 0.050 <0.050 <0.050Uranium Leachate

mg/L 0.05 0.30 0.13Fluoride Leachate

mg/L 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Cyanide Leachate

mg/L 0.7 <0.7 <0.7(Nitrate + Nitrite) as N Leachate

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / StandardComments:


DATE RECEIVED: Jul 04, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jun 28, 2012




Metals & Inorganics (Leachate)








MW12-2 SS11

20-22

MW12-2 SS18

34-36

MW12-1 SS7

12-14

MW12-1 SS13

24-26

MW12-3 SS10

18-20

MW12-3 SS14

26-28

MW12-2 SS8

14-16

MW12-B SS18

34-36


µg/g 0.81.3 6.8 0.8 6.2 7.0 10.0 <0.8 <0.8Antimony <0.8

µg/g 118 10 8 10 11 8 3 7Arsenic 7

µg/g 2220 1110 107 1050 1110 1240 73 47Barium 49

µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.9Beryllium 0.9

µg/g 536 8 14 9 8 5 6 15Boron 16

µg/g 0.10 1.04 1.24 1.04 1.04 0.93 1.33 2.70Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 2.50

µg/g 0.51.2 5.5 1.4 6.7 8.2 17.6 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium <0.5

µg/g 270 179 49 169 250 278 19 26Chromium 28

µg/g 0.521 8.2 12.1 8.0 9.3 11.2 6.9 15.8Cobalt 15.8

µg/g 192 1630 115 1550 1640 1550 21 27Copper 26

µg/g 1120 109 35 96 154 331 24 9Lead 10

µg/g 0.52 17.1 3.2 15.9 16.0 9.6 <0.5 <0.5Molybdenum 0.5

µg/g 182 68 32 66 79 108 14 32Nickel 33

µg/g 0.41.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium <0.4

µg/g 0.20.5 49.3 3.8 43.7 49.4 43.9 0.4 0.2Silver <0.2

µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium <0.4

µg/g 0.52.5 7.1 0.8 7.6 7.1 5.2 <0.5 0.6Uranium 0.6

µg/g 186 33 31 35 40 32 26 33Vanadium 32

µg/g 5290 1630 179 1470 1610 1510 56 75Zinc 79

µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 ISQ <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI <0.2

µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide <0.040

µg/g 0.100.27 1.26 0.11 0.95 1.42 1.38 <0.10 <0.10Mercury <0.10

mS/cm 0.0050.57 0.957 0.371 1.10 1.33 1.10 1.46 0.555Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.483

N/A N/A2.4 1.11 0.663 1.11 1.11 0.878 7.14 1.49Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.20

pH Units 6.95 7.60 6.74 ISQ 6.91 7.75 7.84pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction 8.07


3498232-3498273 EC & SAR were determined on the DI water extract obtained from the 2:1 leaching procedure (2 parts DI water:1 part soil). pH was determined on the 0.01M CaCl2 extract prepared at 2:1 ratio. Revised Jul 18, 2012.Revision: This report replaces the Certificate of Analysis issued on Jul 13, 2012 - Values for pH & Cr VI for sample 3498244 are included in this report.






O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised Final Report








Comp. of

MW12-1 SS17A

& MW12-1 17B

Comp. of

MW12-2 SS8,

SS11, SS18,

SS4


mg/L 0.001 <0.001 <0.001Benzo(a)pyrene


3498271-3498272 The sample was leached according to Regulation 558 protocol. Analysis was performed on the leachate.






Benzo(a) pyrene (Leachate)








MW12-3 SS14

26-28

MW12-1 SS13

24-26

MW12-1 SS17A

32-33.5

MW12-2 SS8

14-16


µg/g 0.050.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene

µg/g 0.050.093 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene

µg/g 0.050.072 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene

µg/g 0.050.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene

µg/g 0.050.69 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Phenanthrene

µg/g 0.050.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene

µg/g 0.050.56 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05Fluoranthene

µg/g 0.051 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Pyrene

µg/g 0.050.36 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benz(a)anthracene

µg/g 0.052.8 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chrysene

µg/g 0.050.47 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(b)fluoranthene

µg/g 0.050.48 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene

µg/g 0.050.3 <0.05 0.06 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(a)pyrene

µg/g 0.050.23 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

µg/g 0.050.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

µg/g 0.050.68 <0.05 0.05 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

µg/g 0.050.59 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.052-and 1-methyl Naphthalene


% 60 62 78 59Chrysene-d12 50-140
















MW12-1 SS17A

32-33.5

3498235Parameter G / S RDLUnit

µg/g 0.1 <0.1Aroclor 1242




µg/g 0.10.3 <0.1Polychlorinated Biphenyls


% 88Decachlorobiphenyl 60-140


3498235 Results are based on the dry weight of soil extracted.














MW12-2 SS11

20-22

MW12-3 SS12B

22.5-24


µg/g 5 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/g 525 <5 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX

µg/g 1010 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16)

µg/g 50240 <50 <50F3 (C16 to C34)

µg/g 50120 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50)

µg/g 50120 NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons

% 0.1 34.0 8.2Moisture Content


% 140 128Terphenyl 60-140


3498245-3498267 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.














MW12-1 SS17A

32-33.5


µg/g 5 6F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/g 525 6F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX

µg/g 1010 <10F2 (C10 to C16)

µg/g 1010 <10F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene

µg/g 50240 <50F3 (C16 to C34)

µg/g 50240 <50F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs

µg/g 50120 <50F4 (C34 to C50)

µg/g 50120 NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons

% 0.1 13.8Moisture Content


% 118Terphenyl 60-140


3498235 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.






O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Soil)








MW12-1 SS17A

32-33.5

MW12-2 SS11

20-22

MW12-3 SS12B

22.5-24

3498235 3498245Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3498267

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromomethane

ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Acetone

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Chloroform

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloroethane

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03 <0.03 <0.03Trichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,2-Trichloroethane

ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Toluene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene

ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Bromoform

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Styrene














MW12-1 SS17A

32-33.5

MW12-2 SS11

20-22

MW12-3 SS12B

22.5-24


ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

ug/g 0.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05o-Xylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene



ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture

µg/g 0.040.05 <0.04 <0.04 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05n-Hexane


% Recovery 122 122 102Toluene-d8 50-140

% Recovery 94 95 704-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140


3498235-3498267 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample wasextracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.














MW12-1 SS18

34-36


µg/g 5 <5F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/g 525 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX


3498238 Results are based on sample WET weight. No soil jar was provided by the client to determine moisture content.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified without the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.






PHCs F1 (Soil)








Comp. of

MW12-1 SS17A

& MW12-1 17B

Comp. of

MW12-2 SS8,

SS11, SS18,

SS4


µg/L 20 <20 <20Benzene

µg/L 20 <20 <20Toluene

µg/L 10 <10 <10Ethylbenzene

µg/L 14 <14 <14Xylenes (Total)

µg/L 1000 <1000 <1000C6 - C10 (F1)

µg/L 1000 <1000 <1000C6 - C10 (F1 minus BTEX)

µg/L 100 3000 <100C>10 - C16 (F2)

µg/L 500 6400 850C>16 - C34 (F3)

µg/L 500 1200 <500C>34 - C50

µg/L 500 NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons


3498271-3498272 Sample was prepared using Regulation 558 protocol and a zero headspace extractor for BTEX/F1.Analysis performed on leachate.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified with the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.






Petroleum Hydrocarbon F1 - F4 (Leachate)








Comp. of

MW12-1 SS17A

& MW12-1 17B

Comp. of

MW12-2 SS8,

SS11, SS18,

SS4


mg/L 0.030 <0.030 <0.030Vinyl Chloride

mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.0201,1 Dichloroethene

mg/L 0.030 <0.030 <0.030Dichloromethane

mg/L 0.090 <0.090 <0.090Methyl Ethyl Ketone

mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020Chloroform

mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.0201,2-Dichloroethane

mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020Carbon Tetrachloride

mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020Benzene

mg/L 0.020 <0.020 <0.020Trichloroethene

mg/L 0.050 <0.050 <0.050Tetrachloroethene

mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.010Chlorobenzene

mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.0101,2-Dichlorobenzene

mg/L 0.010 <0.010 <0.0101,4-Dichlorobenzene


% Recovery 108 122Toluene-d8 60-130


3498271-3498272 Sample was prepared using Regulation 558 protocol and a zero headspace extractor.






VOCs (Leachate)








MW12-1 SS18

34-36


µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromomethane

ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Acetone

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.021,1-Dichloroethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04Chloroform


ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1,1-Trichloroethane

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02Benzene

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03Trichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone


ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05Toluene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.041,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene

ug/g 0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromoform

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Styrene






VOCs (Soil)








MW12-1 SS18

34-36



ug/g 0.05 <0.05o-Xylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,3-Dichlorobenzene



ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture

µg/g 0.040.05 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05n-Hexane


% Recovery 83Toluene-d8 50-140

% Recovery 924-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140


3498238 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample wasextracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on sample WET weight. No soil jar was provided by the client to determine moisture content.






VOCs (Soil)








3498232 T1(ALL) - CurrentO. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised

Final ReportAntimony 1.3 6.8MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportBarium 220 1110MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportCadmium 1.2 5.5MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportChromium 70 179MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportCopper 92 1630MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportElectrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.957MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportMercury 0.27 1.26MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportMolybdenum 2 17.1MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportSilver 0.5 49.3MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportUranium 2.5 7.1MW12-1 SS7 12-14


Final ReportZinc 290 1630MW12-1 SS7 12-14




























Guideline Violation


























Final ReportLead 120 154MW12-2 SS11 20-22
























Final ReportLead 120 331MW12-3 SS10 18-20






Final ReportNickel 82 108MW12-3 SS10 18-20


Guideline Violation


















Final ReportSodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 7.14MW12-3 SS14 26-28


Guideline Violation









O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) - Revised Final Report

Antimony 1 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 114% 70% 130% 82% 80% 120% 82% 70% 130%

Arsenic 1 3 3 0.0% < 1 111% 70% 130% 111% 80% 120% 108% 70% 130%

Barium 1 57 59 3.4% < 2 101% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Beryllium 1 0.5 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Boron

1 7 6 15.4% < 5 80% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1 3498268 1.33 1.40 4.8% < 0.10 100% 60% 140% 103% 70% 130% 107% 60% 140%

Cadmium 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Chromium 1 18 18 0.0% < 2 100% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Cobalt 1 7.8 8.0 2.5% < 0.5 104% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Copper

1 20 21 4.9% < 1 101% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Lead 1 8 8 0.0% < 1 98% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 102% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 107% 70% 130%

Nickel 1 17 17 0.0% < 1 105% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Selenium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 86% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Silver

1 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 98% 70% 130% 81% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%

Thallium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 101% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 106% 70% 130%

Uranium 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 98% 70% 130% 92% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Vanadium 1 26 26 0.0% < 1 95% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Zinc 1 43 43 0.0% < 5 101% 70% 130% 112% 80% 120% 110% 70% 130%

Chromium VI

1 3498257 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 94% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Cyanide 1 3498232 < 0.040 < 0.040 0.0% < 0.040 99% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%

Mercury 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 118% 70% 130% 114% 80% 120% 112% 70% 130%




1 3498232 6.95 6.95 0.0% < 93% 90% 110% NA NA

Comments: NA - Not Applicable.

Metals & Inorganics (Leachate)

Arsenic Leachate 1 0.010 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 105% 90% 110% 106% 80% 120% 113% 70% 130%

Barium Leachate 1 0.671 0.645 4.0% < 0.100 104% 90% 110% 104% 80% 120% 118% 70% 130%

Boron Leachate 1 0.085 0.084 1.2% < 0.050 103% 90% 110% 88% 80% 120% 83% 70% 130%

Cadmium Leachate 1 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 106% 90% 110% 97% 80% 120% 111% 70% 130%

Chromium Leachate

1 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 103% 90% 110% 95% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Lead Leachate 1 0.0249 0.0245 1.6% < 0.010 93% 90% 110% 91% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Mercury Leachate 1 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.0% < 0.01 106% 90% 110% 105% 80% 120% 111% 70% 130%

Selenium Leachate 1 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 101% 90% 110% 98% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Silver Leachate 1 < 0.010 < 0.010 0.0% < 0.010 102% 90% 110% 82% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Uranium Leachate

1 < 0.050 < 0.050 0.0% < 0.050 100% 90% 110% 91% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Fluoride Leachate 1 0.18 0.17 5.7% < 0.05 102% 90% 110% 104% 90% 110% 81% 70% 130%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Soil Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Cyanide Leachate 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 99% 90% 110% 98% 90% 110% 94% 70% 130%

(Nitrate + Nitrite) as N Leachate 1 < 0.70 < 0.70 0.0% < 0.70 103% 80% 120% 102% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Soil Analysis (Continued)

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







F1 (C6 to C10) 1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 82% 60% 140% 81% 80% 120% 81% 60% 140%

F2 (C10 to C16) 1 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 97% 60% 140% 90% 80% 120% 86% 60% 140%

F3 (C16 to C34) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 104% 60% 140% 85% 80% 120% 98% 60% 140%

F4 (C34 to C50) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 93% 60% 140% 103% 80% 120% 99% 60% 140%


Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 90% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 96% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%

Fluorene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%

Anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 97% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 92% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%

Pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%


Chrysene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 80% 50% 140%



Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 125% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140% 108% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 124% 50% 140% 117% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140%




Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 120% 50% 140% 112% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140%

Vinyl Chloride 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 111% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140% 115% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 119% 50% 140% 118% 50% 140%

Trichlorofluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 114% 50% 140% 111% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%

Acetone

1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 99% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 65% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%

Methylene Chloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 77% 50% 140%

Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 71% 50% 140% 66% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 106% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 64% 50% 140% 104% 50% 140% 66% 50% 140%

Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 95% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%

Chloroform 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 97% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 96% 50% 140% 101% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 100% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Carbon Tetrachloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 95% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 100% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloropropane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 95% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%

Trichloroethylene 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 95% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 87% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 69% 50% 140%

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 109% 50% 140% 98% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%

Toluene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Dibromochloromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 108% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

Ethylene Dibromide

1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 107% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%

Tetrachloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 106% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%

1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 NA 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 94% 50% 140%

Chlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 102% 50% 140%

Bromoform 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 110% 50% 140%

Styrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 86% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%

1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 104% 50% 140%


Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 111% 50% 140% 91% 60% 130% 103% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichloropropene 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 104% 50% 140% 96% 60% 130% 96% 50% 140%

n-Hexane

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%


Aroclor 1242 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1248 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1254 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Aroclor 1260 1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140% NA 60% 140%

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

1 < 0.1 < 0.1 0.0% < 0.1 98% 60% 140% 108% 60% 140% 103% 60% 140%

Benzo(a) pyrene (Leachate)

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.001 < 0.001 0.0% < 0.001 96% 70% 130% 100% 70% 130% 98% 70% 130%


Benzene 1 < 20 < 20 0.0% < 20 89% 70% 130% 101% 70% 130% 100% 70% 130%

Toluene 1 < 20 < 20 0.0% < 20 87% 70% 130% 99% 70% 130% 97% 70% 130%

Ethylbenzene 1 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 84% 70% 130% 98% 70% 130% 95% 70% 130%

Xylenes (Total) 1 < 14 < 14 0.0% < 14 89% 70% 130% 98% 70% 130% 97% 70% 130%

C6 - C10 (F1)

1 < 1000 < 1000 0.0% < 1000 94% 70% 130% 75% 70% 130% 72% 70% 130%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






C>10 - C16 (F2) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 101% 70% 130% 67% 70% 130% 64% 70% 130%

C>16 - C34 (F3) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 500 101% 70% 130% 101% 70% 130% 106% 70% 130%


C>10 - C16 (F2) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 100 101% 70% 130% 67% 70% 130% 64% 70% 130%

C>16 - C34 (F3) 1 < 100 < 100 0.0% < 500 101% 70% 130% 101% 70% 130% 106% 70% 130%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







C>10 - C16 (F2) 101% 70% 130% 67% 70% 130% 64% 70% 130%Comp. of MW12-1 SS17A & MW12-1


C>10 - C16 (F2) 101% 70% 130% 67% 70% 130% 64% 70% 130%Comp. of MW12-2 SS8, SS11, SS18,


Sample DescriptionMeasured

Value


Recovery Recovery

QA Violation




UpperLower

AcceptableLimitsPARAMETER Sample Id

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKERPT Date: Jul 24, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL






Soil Analysis

Arsenic Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Barium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Boron Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Cadmium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Chromium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Lead Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Mercury Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Selenium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Silver Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Uranium Leachate MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 1311 & 3010A & 6020A ICP-MS

Fluoride Leachate INOR-93-6018 EPA SW-846-1311 & SM4500-F- C ION SELECTIVE ELECTRODE

Cyanide Leachate INOR-93-6052EPA SW-846-1311 & MOE 3015 & SM 4500 CN- I


(Nitrate + Nitrite) as N Leachate INOR-93-6053EPA SW 846-1311 & SM 4500 - NO3- I

LACHAT FIA







ICP/OES




















ICP/OES




Method Summary

































Polychlorinated Biphenyls ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD

Decachlorobiphenyl ORG-91-5113 EPA SW-846 3541 & 8082 GC/ECD







Moisture Content VOL-91-5009CCME Tier 1 Method, SW846 5035,8015

BALANCE



F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID


F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID


F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID












Method Summary
















































Benzene VOL 5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Toluene VOL 5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Ethylbenzene VOL 5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Xylenes (Total) VOL 5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

C6 - C10 (F1) VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

C6 - C10 (F1 minus BTEX) VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

C>10 - C16 (F2) VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 GC/FID

C>16 - C34 (F3) VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 GC/FID

C>34 - C50 VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 GC/FID

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL - 5010 MOE E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

Vinyl Chloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



Method Summary









1,1 Dichloroethene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Dichloromethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl Ethyl Ketone VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Chloroform VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,2-Dichloroethane VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Carbon Tetrachloride VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Benzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Trichloroethene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Tetrachloroethene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Chlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,2-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

1,4-Dichlorobenzene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Toluene-d8 VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5230B & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS








































Method Summary
















Method Summary














Jacky Takeuchi, BScH (Chem Eng), BSc (Bio), C.Chem, Laboratory Manager

TRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Jul 17, 2012

VERSION*: 1









Member of:

*NOTES


MW12-15 SS6

10'-12'

MW12-16 SS2

2'-4'

MW12-16 SS4

6'-8'

MW12-14 SS2

2'-4'

MW12-14 SS6

10'-12'

MW12-15 SS1

0'-2' MW12-P SS2


µg/g 0.81.3 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 1.2 <0.8 <0.8Antimony

µg/g 118 5 5 5 2 5 4 5Arsenic

µg/g 2220 72 67 72 17 84 66 62Barium

µg/g 0.52.5 0.6 0.7 0.5 <0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6Beryllium

µg/g 536 7 8 8 <5 8 8 6Boron


µg/g 0.51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 2.9 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium

µg/g 270 21 19 20 7 50 20 18Chromium

µg/g 0.521 9.9 11.7 6.6 2.8 8.2 12.6 8.9Cobalt

µg/g 192 24 25 26 7 54 23 20Copper

µg/g 1120 8 10 20 3 98 9 7Lead

µg/g 0.52 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 1.6 <0.5 <0.5Molybdenum

µg/g 182 23 28 16 6 30 25 21Nickel

µg/g 0.41.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium

µg/g 0.20.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 1.0 <0.2 <0.2Silver

µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium

µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 <0.5 <0.5Uranium

µg/g 186 28 26 25 13 25 28 25Vanadium

µg/g 5290 55 63 74 16 164 61 48Zinc

µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI

µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide

µg/g 0.100.27 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.83 <0.10 <0.10Mercury



pH Units 7.65 7.71 8.62 7.69 7.59 7.68 7.58pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction




DATE RECEIVED: Jul 05, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 03, 2012












MW12-15 SS1

0'-2'

MW12-14 SS2

2'-4' DUP 1L SS2


µg/g 0.050.09 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Naphthalene

µg/g 0.050.093 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthylene

µg/g 0.050.072 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Acenaphthene

µg/g 0.050.12 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Fluorene

µg/g 0.050.69 0.05 0.11 <0.05Phenanthrene

µg/g 0.050.16 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Anthracene

µg/g 0.050.56 0.22 0.16 <0.05Fluoranthene

µg/g 0.051 0.23 0.14 <0.05Pyrene

µg/g 0.050.36 0.10 0.05 <0.05Benz(a)anthracene

µg/g 0.052.8 0.16 0.08 <0.05Chrysene

µg/g 0.050.47 0.15 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(b)fluoranthene

µg/g 0.050.48 0.06 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(k)fluoranthene

µg/g 0.050.3 0.13 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(a)pyrene

µg/g 0.050.23 0.08 <0.05 <0.05Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

µg/g 0.050.1 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

µg/g 0.050.68 0.08 <0.05 <0.05Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

µg/g 0.050.59 <0.05 <0.05 <0.052-and 1-methyl Naphthalene

% 0.1 7.8 13.5 14.2Moisture Content


% 104 101 90Chrysene-d12 50-140
















MW12-16 SS10

18'-20'

MW12-14 SS6

10'-12'

MW12-14 SS13

24'-26'


µg/g 0.020.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Benzene

µg/g 0.080.2 <0.08 <0.08 <0.08Toluene

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05 <0.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture

µg/g 5 <5 12 <5F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/g 525 <5 12 <5F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX

µg/g 1010 <10 <10 <10F2 (C10 to C16)

µg/g 50240 <50 <50 <50F3 (C16 to C34)

µg/g 50120 <50 <50 <50F4 (C34 to C50)

µg/g 50120 NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons

% 0.1 17.6 13.6 13.1Moisture Content


% 79 74 78Terphenyl 60-140


3488627-3488643 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.Fractions 1-4 are quantified with the contribution of PAHs. Under Ontario Regulation 153, results are considered valid without determining the PAH contribution if not requested by the client.Quality Control Data is available upon request.






O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil)








MW12-14 SS2

2'-4'


µg/g 5 8F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/g 525 8F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX

µg/g 1010 <10F2 (C10 to C16)

µg/g 1010 <10F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene

µg/g 50240 <50F3 (C16 to C34)

µg/g 50240 <50F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs

µg/g 50120 <50F4 (C34 to C50)

µg/g 50120 NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons

% 0.1 13.6Moisture Content


% 93Terphenyl 60-140


3488635 Results are based on sample dry weight.The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and n-C34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16-C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 hydrocarbons indicates that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6 - C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 + nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.














MW12-14 SS2

2'-4'


µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05Dichlorodifluoromethane

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02Vinyl Chloride

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromomethane

ug/g 0.050.25 <0.05Trichlorofluoromethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Acetone

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.051,1-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Methylene Chloride

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Methyl tert-butyl Ether


ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Methyl Ethyl Ketone

ug/g 0.020.05 <0.02Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04Chloroform



ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Carbon Tetrachloride

ug/g 0.020.02 <0.02Benzene

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.031,2-Dichloropropane

ug/g 0.030.05 <0.03Trichloroethylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromodichloromethane

ug/g 0.500.5 <0.50Methyl Isobutyl Ketone


ug/g 0.050.2 <0.05Toluene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Dibromochloromethane

ug/g 0.040.05 <0.04Ethylene Dibromide

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Tetrachloroethylene


ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Chlorobenzene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Ethylbenzene

ug/g 0.05 <0.05m & p-Xylene

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Bromoform

ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Styrene














MW12-14 SS2

2'-4'



ug/g 0.05 <0.05o-Xylene




ug/g 0.050.05 <0.05Xylene Mixture

µg/g 0.040.05 <0.041,3-Dichloropropene

µg/g 0.050.05 <0.05n-Hexane


% Recovery 83Toluene-d8 50-140

% Recovery 1294-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140


3488635 The sample was analysed using the high level technique. The sample wasextracted using methanol, a small amount of the methanol extract was diluted in water and the purge & trap GC/MS analysis was performed.Results are based on the dry weight of the soil.














3488633 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.4 3.05MW12-15 SS1 0'-2'

3488635 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Cadmium 1.2 2.9MW12-14 SS2 2'-4'

3488635 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Mercury 0.27 0.83MW12-14 SS2 2'-4'

3488635 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Silver 0.5 1.0MW12-14 SS2 2'-4'


Guideline Violation










Antimony 1 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 112% 70% 130% 88% 80% 120% 91% 70% 130%

Arsenic 1 7 8 13.3% < 1 107% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Barium 1 39 40 2.5% < 2 101% 70% 130% 86% 80% 120% 84% 70% 130%

Beryllium 1 1.0 1.0 0.0% < 0.5 92% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 88% 70% 130%

Boron

1 17 17 0.0% < 5 71% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 84% 70% 130%

Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1 0.41 0.39 5.5% < 0.10 97% 60% 140% 99% 70% 130% 98% 60% 140%

Cadmium 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 99% 70% 130% 104% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Chromium 1 25 26 3.9% < 2 86% 70% 130% 91% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Cobalt 1 14.6 15.3 4.7% < 0.5 86% 70% 130% 84% 80% 120% 75% 70% 130%

Copper

1 24 24 0.0% < 1 95% 70% 130% 91% 80% 120% 76% 70% 130%

Lead 1 5 5 0.0% < 1 93% 70% 130% 86% 80% 120% 81% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 105% 70% 130% 95% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Nickel 1 36 38 5.4% < 1 93% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 83% 70% 130%

Selenium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 82% 70% 130% 87% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Silver

1 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 101% 70% 130% 88% 80% 120% 86% 70% 130%

Thallium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 104% 70% 130% 109% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Uranium 1 0.6 0.6 0.0% < 0.5 87% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%

Vanadium 1 29 31 6.7% < 1 91% 70% 130% 87% 80% 120% 78% 70% 130%

Zinc 1 71 74 4.1% < 5 109% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Chromium VI

1 3488644 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 95% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Cyanide 1 3488635 < 0.040 < 0.040 0.0% < 0.040 96% 70% 130% 98% 80% 120% 88% 70% 130%

Mercury 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 112% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 104% 70% 130%

Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 1 0.220 0.221 0.5% < 0.005 103% 90% 110% NA NA

Sodium Adsorption Ratio 1 0.129 0.130 1.1% N/A NA NA NA


1 3488633 8.62 8.59 0.3% NA 95% 90% 110% NA NA

Comments: NA signifies Not Applicable.

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Soil Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 71% 50% 140% 84% 50% 140% 120% 50% 140%

Vinyl Chloride 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 80% 50% 140% 116% 50% 140% 125% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 124% 50% 140% 107% 50% 140% 104% 50% 140%

Trichlorofluoromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140% 112% 50% 140%

Acetone

1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 94% 50% 140% 114% 50% 140% 101% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 112% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%

Methylene Chloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 98% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 105% 50% 140%

Trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 114% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl Ether 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 122% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 101% 50% 140% 122% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 101% 50% 140% 117% 50% 140% 102% 50% 140%

Cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 108% 50% 140% 110% 60% 130% 114% 50% 140%

Chloroform 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 113% 50% 140% 102% 60% 130% 120% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 96% 50% 140% 103% 60% 130% 117% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 123% 50% 140% 84% 60% 130% 115% 50% 140%

Carbon Tetrachloride 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 102% 50% 140% 105% 60% 130% 93% 50% 140%

Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 86% 50% 140% 118% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloropropane 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 102% 50% 140% 117% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%

Trichloroethylene 1 < 0.03 < 0.03 0.0% < 0.03 99% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 109% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 114% 60% 130% 111% 50% 140%

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 < 0.50 < 0.50 0.0% < 0.50 88% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 91% 50% 140% 99% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%

Toluene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 106% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

Dibromochloromethane 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 113% 50% 140% 104% 60% 130% 113% 50% 140%

Ethylene Dibromide

1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 106% 50% 140% 106% 60% 130% 106% 50% 140%

Tetrachloroethylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 109% 50% 140% 105% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%


Chlorobenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 104% 50% 140% 107% 60% 130% 107% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 110% 60% 130% 95% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 110% 50% 140% 111% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%

Bromoform 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 107% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 118% 50% 140%

Styrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 116% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 110% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%



Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 103% 50% 140% 108% 60% 130% 108% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichloropropene 1 < 0.04 < 0.04 0.0% < 0.04 93% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






n-Hexane

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 NA 50% 140% 109% 60% 130% 97% 50% 140%


F1 (C6 to C10) 1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 75% 60% 140% 85% 80% 120% 73% 60% 140%


Naphthalene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 115% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 89% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 70% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 102% 50% 140% 79% 50% 140% 74% 50% 140%

Fluorene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 93% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 105% 50% 140% 82% 50% 140% 85% 50% 140%

Anthracene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 80% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140% 75% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 78% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140% 76% 50% 140%

Pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 77% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140%


Chrysene

1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 84% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140%



Benzo(a)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 80% 50% 140% 73% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 86% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 77% 50% 140%


1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 90% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140% 81% 50% 140%



O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (Soil)

Benzene 1 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 114% 50% 140% 115% 60% 130% 101% 50% 140%

Toluene 1 < 0.08 < 0.08 0.0% < 0.08 120% 50% 140% 113% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 121% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%

Xylene Mixture 1 < 0.05 < 0.05 0.0% < 0.05 94% 50% 140% 112% 60% 130% 98% 50% 140%

F1 (C6 to C10)

1 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 94% 60% 140% 80% 80% 120% 85% 60% 140%

F2 (C10 to C16) 1 < 10 < 10 0.0% < 10 99% 60% 140% 95% 80% 120% 66% 60% 140%

F3 (C16 to C34) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 97% 60% 140% 96% 80% 120% 107% 60% 140%

F4 (C34 to C50) 1 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 92% 60% 140% 94% 80% 120% 79% 60% 140%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance





UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Soil Analysis







ICP/OES




















ICP/OES




Method Summary



























Moisture Content Org 5506 EPA SW-846 3540 & 8270 BALANCE


Benzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Toluene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Ethylbenzene VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

Xylene Mixture VOL-91-5009 EPA SW-846 5035 & 8260 P & T GC/MS

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method P & T GC/FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method P & T GC/FID


GC / FID


GC / FID


GC / FID

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method BALANCE




F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID


F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID


F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5009 CCME Tier 1 Method GC / FID













Method Summary















































Method Summary













Anthony Dapaah, PhD (Chem), Inorganic Lab ManagerSOIL ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Jul 20, 2012

VERSION*: 1









Member of:

*NOTES


MW12-12 SS10

18' - 20'

MW12-11 SS2 2'

- 4'

MW12-11 SS5 8'

- 10'

BH12-13 SS1 0'

- 2'

BH12-13 SS4 6'

- 8'

MW12-12 SS3 4'

- 6' MW12-L


µg/g 0.81.3 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8 <0.8Antimony

µg/g 118 2 5 5 8 3 4 5Arsenic

µg/g 2220 34 92 69 63 55 60 69Barium

µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 0.7 <0.5 0.6 <0.5Beryllium

µg/g 536 6 11 14 12 6 7 14Boron


µg/g 0.51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Cadmium

µg/g 270 9 25 17 23 17 19 18Chromium

µg/g 0.521 3.5 13.7 5.8 15.2 6.6 8.9 5.9Cobalt

µg/g 192 9 26 27 41 23 19 27Copper

µg/g 1120 17 9 34 5 9 12 32Lead

µg/g 0.52 0.5 <0.5 1.2 0.5 <0.5 <0.5 1.6Molybdenum

µg/g 182 7 27 12 27 15 17 12Nickel

µg/g 0.41.5 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Selenium

µg/g 0.20.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver

µg/g 0.41 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4 <0.4Thallium

µg/g 0.52.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.5 0.9 <0.5 0.6 0.5Uranium

µg/g 186 15 35 27 32 25 27 25Vanadium

µg/g 5290 71 62 91 68 46 54 93Zinc

µg/g 0.20.66 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Chromium VI

µg/g 0.0400.051 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040Cyanide

µg/g 0.100.27 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Mercury



pH Units 9.96 7.73 11.6 8.03 7.61 7.34 11.5pH, 2:1 CaCl2 Extraction
















3516636 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.833MW12-11 SS2 2' - 4'

3516645 T1(ALL) - Current O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Soil) Electrical Conductivity (2:1) 0.57 0.884MW12-12 SS3 4' - 6'


Guideline Violation










Antimony 1 < 0.8 < 0.8 0.0% < 0.8 117% 70% 130% 80% 80% 120% 82% 70% 130%

Arsenic 1 9 8 11.8% < 1 108% 70% 130% 109% 80% 120% 112% 70% 130%

Barium 1 80 77 3.8% < 2 100% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Beryllium 1 0.9 0.9 0.0% < 0.5 106% 70% 130% 92% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Boron

1 20 18 10.5% < 5 101% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 104% 70% 130%

Boron (Hot Water Soluble) 1 0.38 0.40 4.1% < 0.10 99% 60% 140% 99% 70% 130% 101% 60% 140%

Cadmium 1 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 98% 70% 130%

Chromium 1 29 27 7.1% < 2 100% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%

Cobalt 1 16.3 15.8 3.1% < 0.5 97% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Copper

1 43 41 4.8% < 1 104% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 90% 70% 130%

Lead 1 84 69 19.6% < 1 102% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 1 0.5 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 102% 70% 130% 102% 80% 120% 113% 70% 130%

Nickel 1 33 32 3.1% < 1 96% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Selenium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 101% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Silver

1 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 75% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 71% 70% 130%

Thallium 1 < 0.4 < 0.4 0.0% < 0.4 101% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 94% 70% 130%

Uranium 1 0.7 0.7 0.0% < 0.5 99% 70% 130% 94% 80% 120% 89% 70% 130%

Vanadium 1 37 34 8.5% < 1 102% 70% 130% 104% 80% 120% 103% 70% 130%

Zinc 1 139 139 0.0% < 5 99% 70% 130% 119% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Chromium VI

1 3516649 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 100% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 95% 70% 130%

Cyanide 1 < 0.040 < 0.040 0.0% < 0.040 100% 70% 130% 109% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Mercury 1 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 115% 70% 130% 112% 80% 120% 111% 70% 130%




1 3516645 11.6 11.6 0.0% N/A 98% 90% 110% NA NA

Comments: NA signifies Not Applicable.

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance




Soil Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank






Soil Analysis







ICP/OES




















ICP/OES




Method Summary













Inga Kuzmina, Organic Laboratory SupervisorTRACE ORGANICS REVIEWED BY:

Elizabeth Polakowska, MSc (Animal Sci), PhD (Agri Sci), Inorganic Lab Supervisor

WATER ANALYSIS REVIEWED BY:

DATE REPORTED:


Aug 17, 2012

VERSION*: 2



ATTENTION TO: Ilir Liko

PROJECT NO: 350500





Member of:

VERSION 2:CCME F3 value corrected on sample MW12-1.

*NOTES


MW12-1 MW12-10MW12-6 MW12-8 MW12-4 MW12-5MW12-9 MW12-7


µg/L 0.201400 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.32 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Naphthalene <0.20

µg/L 0.201.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthylene <0.20

µg/L 0.20600 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthene 0.64

µg/L 0.20290 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.22 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Fluorene <0.20

µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.30 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene <0.10

µg/L 0.101 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Anthracene <0.10

µg/L 0.2073 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Fluoranthene <0.20

µg/L 0.205.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Pyrene <0.20

µg/L 0.201.8 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benz(a)anthracene <0.20

µg/L 0.100.7 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Chrysene <0.10

µg/L 0.100.75 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(b)fluoranthene <0.10

µg/L 0.100.4 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(k)fluoranthene <0.10

µg/L 0.010.81 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo(a)pyrene <0.01

µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene <0.20

µg/L 0.200.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.20

µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benzo(g,h,i)perylene <0.20

µg/L 0.201500 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.202-and 1-methyl Naphthalene <0.20


% 84 81 90 85 90 80 64Chrysene-d12 8650-140


DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Aug 01, 2012


ATTENTION TO: Ilir LikoCLIENT NAME: DCS LTD.


O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water)

DATE REPORTED: Aug 17, 2012 SAMPLE TYPE: Water

PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-D MW12-2


µg/L 0.201400 <0.20 <0.20Naphthalene

µg/L 0.201.4 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthylene

µg/L 0.20600 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthene

µg/L 0.20290 <0.20 <0.20Fluorene

µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene

µg/L 0.101 <0.10 <0.10Anthracene

µg/L 0.2073 <0.20 <0.20Fluoranthene

µg/L 0.205.7 <0.20 <0.20Pyrene

µg/L 0.201.8 <0.20 <0.20Benz(a)anthracene

µg/L 0.100.7 <0.10 <0.10Chrysene

µg/L 0.100.75 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(b)fluoranthene

µg/L 0.100.4 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(k)fluoranthene

µg/L 0.010.81 <0.01 <0.01Benzo(a)pyrene

µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

µg/L 0.200.4 <0.20 <0.20Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

µg/L 0.201500 <0.20 <0.202-and 1-methyl Naphthalene


% 91 75Chrysene-d12 50-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T9 (ALL-GW) - NEWComments:

3589313-3589733 Note: The result for Benzo(b)Flouranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Flouranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.








PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14

3589409 3589422 3589459 3589476Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589436

µg/L 0.201400 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Naphthalene

µg/L 0.201.8 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthylene

µg/L 0.20600 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Acenaphthene

µg/L 0.20400 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Fluorene

µg/L 0.10580 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Phenanthrene

µg/L 0.102.4 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Anthracene

µg/L 0.20130 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Fluoranthene

µg/L 0.2068 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Pyrene

µg/L 0.204.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benz(a)anthracene

µg/L 0.101 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Chrysene

µg/L 0.100.75 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(b)fluoranthene

µg/L 0.100.4 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Benzo(k)fluoranthene

µg/L 0.010.81 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01Benzo(a)pyrene

µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

µg/L 0.200.52 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Dibenz(a,h)anthracene

µg/L 0.200.2 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

µg/L 0.201800 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.202-and 1-methyl Naphthalene


% 86 89 86 77 90Chrysene-d12 50-140

RDL - Reported Detection Limit; G / S - Guideline / Standard: Refers to T3(NPGW) - CurrentComments:

3589409-3589476 Note: The result for Benzo(b)Flouranthene is the total of the Benzo(b)&(j)Flouranthene isomers because the isomers co-elute on the GC column.






O. Reg. 153(511) - PAHs (Water).


PROJECT NO: 350500








µg/L 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) <25

µg/L 25420 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX <25

µg/L 100150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) <100

µg/L 100NV <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene <100

µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 530 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) <100

µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 530 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs <100

µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F4 (C34 to C50) <100

µg/L 500500 NA NA NA NA NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons NA


% 116 125 88 82 68 67 84Terphenyl 10360-140

MW12-D MW12-2


µg/L 25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/L 25420 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX

µg/L 100150 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16)

µg/L 100NV <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene

µg/L 100500 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34)

µg/L 100500 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs

µg/L 100500 <100 <100F4 (C34 to C50)

µg/L 500500 NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons


% 96 88Terphenyl 60-140


3589313-3589733 The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.






O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water)


PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14


µg/L 25 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10)

µg/L 25750 <25 <25 <25 <25 <25F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX

µg/L 100150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16)

µg/L 100150 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene

µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34)

µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs

µg/L 100500 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100F4 (C34 to C50)

µg/L 500500 NA NA NA NA NAGravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons


% 117 124 133 130 91Terphenyl 60-140


3589409-3589476 The C6-C10 fraction is calculated using Toluene response factor.The C10 - C16, C16 - C34, and C34 - C50 fractions are calculated using the average response factor for n-C10, n-C16, and nC34.Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons are not included in the Total C16 - C50 and are only determined if the chromatogram of the C34 - C50 Hydrocarbons indicated that hydrocarbons >C50 are present.Total C6-C50 results are corrected for BTEX and PAH contributions.This method complies with the Reference Method for the CWS PHC and is validated for use in the laboratory.nC6 and nC10 response factors are within 30% of Toluene response factor.nC10, nC16 and nC34 response factors are within 10% of their average.C50 response factor is within 70% of nC10 + nC16 nC34 average.Linearity is within 15%.Extraction and holding times were met for this sample.






O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water).


PROJECT NO: 350500






Trip Blank MW12-5MW12-6 MW12-8 MW12-1 MW12-4MW12-9

3589313 3589381 3589495 3589603 3589635 3589671Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589395 RDL

µg/L 0.203500 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.40

µg/L 0.170.5 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 0.34Vinyl Chloride <0.34

µg/L 0.205.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Bromomethane <0.40

µg/L 0.402000 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 0.80Trichlorofluoromethane <0.80

µg/L 1.0100000 340 120 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0Acetone 690

µg/L 0.301.6 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.601,1-Dichloroethylene <0.60

µg/L 0.30610 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60Methylene Chloride <0.60

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.40

µg/L 0.20190 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.40

µg/L 0.30320 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.601,1-Dichloroethane <0.60

µg/L 1.0470000 26 4.9 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone 27

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene <0.40

µg/L 0.202.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Chloroform <0.40

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.401,2-Dichloroethane <0.40

µg/L 0.30640 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.601,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.60

µg/L 0.200.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Carbon Tetrachloride <0.40

µg/L 0.2044 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.34 <0.20 0.40Benzene <0.40

µg/L 0.2016 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.401,2-Dichloropropane <0.40

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Trichloroethylene <0.40

µg/L 0.2067000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Bromodichloromethane <0.40

µg/L 1.0140000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0Methyl Isobutyl Ketone <2.0

µg/L 0.204.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.401,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.40

µg/L 0.2014000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.26 <0.20 0.40Toluene <0.40

µg/L 0.1065000 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Dibromochloromethane <0.20

µg/L 0.100.25 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Ethylene Dibromide <0.20

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Tetrachloroethylene <0.40

µg/L 0.103.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.201,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.20

µg/L 0.10500 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Chlorobenzene <0.20

µg/L 0.101800 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.11 <0.10 0.20Ethylbenzene <0.20

µg/L 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40m & p-Xylene <0.40

µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Bromoform <0.20

µg/L 0.101300 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20Styrene <0.20

µg/L 0.103.2 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.201,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.20


DATE RECEIVED: Aug 07, 2012DATE SAMPLED: Jul 30, 2012




O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water)


PROJECT NO: 350500






Trip Blank MW12-5MW12-6 MW12-8 MW12-1 MW12-4MW12-9

3589313 3589381 3589495 3589603 3589635 3589671Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589395 RDL

µg/L 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20o-Xylene <0.20

µg/L 0.107600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.201,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.20



µg/L 0.305.2 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.601,3-Dichloropropene <0.60

µg/L 0.203300 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40Xylene Mixture <0.40

µg/L 0.2051 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40n-Hexane <0.40


% Recovery 97 96 104 97 98 105Toluene-d8 10250-140

% Recovery 94 95 89 89 104 904-Bromofluorobenzene 8950-140








PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-7 MW12-10 MW12-2MW12-D

3589688 3589702 RDL 3589733Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589717

µg/L 0.203500 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Dichlorodifluoromethane

µg/L 0.170.5 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 0.34 <0.34Vinyl Chloride

µg/L 0.205.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Bromomethane

µg/L 0.402000 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 0.80 <0.80Trichlorofluoromethane

µg/L 1.0100000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 <2.0Acetone

µg/L 0.301.6 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.601,1-Dichloroethylene

µg/L 0.30610 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.60Methylene Chloride

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

µg/L 0.20190 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Methyl tert-butyl ether

µg/L 0.30320 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.601,1-Dichloroethane

µg/L 1.0470000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 <2.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

µg/L 0.202.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Chloroform

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.401,2-Dichloroethane

µg/L 0.30640 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.601,1,1-Trichloroethane

µg/L 0.200.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Carbon Tetrachloride

µg/L 0.2044 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Benzene

µg/L 0.2016 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.401,2-Dichloropropane

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Trichloroethylene

µg/L 0.2067000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Bromodichloromethane

µg/L 1.0140000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 2.0 <2.0Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

µg/L 0.204.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.401,1,2-Trichloroethane

µg/L 0.2014000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Toluene

µg/L 0.1065000 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Dibromochloromethane

µg/L 0.100.25 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Ethylene Dibromide

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Tetrachloroethylene

µg/L 0.103.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

µg/L 0.10500 <0.10 2.2 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Chlorobenzene

µg/L 0.101800 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Ethylbenzene

µg/L 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40m & p-Xylene

µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Bromoform

µg/L 0.101300 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20Styrene

µg/L 0.103.2 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane








PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-7 MW12-10 MW12-2MW12-D

3589688 3589702 RDL 3589733Parameter G / S RDLUnit 3589717

µg/L 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.20o-Xylene

µg/L 0.107600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,3-Dichlorobenzene

µg/L 0.108 <0.10 0.34 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,4-Dichlorobenzene

µg/L 0.104600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 0.20 <0.201,2-Dichlorobenzene

µg/L 0.305.2 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 0.60 <0.601,3-Dichloropropene

µg/L 0.203300 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40Xylene Mixture

µg/L 0.2051 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 0.40 <0.40n-Hexane


% Recovery 101 99 102 101Toluene-d8 50-140

% Recovery 88 94 98 884-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140


3589381 Dilution factor=2The sample was diluted because it was foamy and cloudy. The reporting detection limit has been corrected for the dilution factor used.

3589671 Dilution factor=2The sample was diluted because it was foamy. The reporting detection limit has been corrected for the dilution factor used.

3589733 Dilution factor=2The sample was diluted because it was oily and cloudy. The reporting detection limit has been corrected for the dilution factor used.








PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14


µg/L 0.204400 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Dichlorodifluoromethane

µg/L 0.170.5 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17 <0.17Vinyl Chloride

µg/L 0.205.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Bromomethane

µg/L 0.402500 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.40Trichlorofluoromethane

µg/L 1.0130000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Acetone

µg/L 0.301.6 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.301,1-Dichloroethylene

µg/L 0.30610 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30Methylene Chloride

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

µg/L 0.20190 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Methyl tert-butyl ether

µg/L 0.30320 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.301,1-Dichloroethane

µg/L 1.0470000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Methyl Ethyl Ketone

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene

µg/L 0.202.4 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Chloroform

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.201,2-Dichloroethane

µg/L 0.30640 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.301,1,1-Trichloroethane

µg/L 0.200.79 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Carbon Tetrachloride

µg/L 0.2044 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Benzene

µg/L 0.2016 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.201,2-Dichloropropane

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Trichloroethylene

µg/L 0.2085000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Bromodichloromethane

µg/L 1.0140000 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

µg/L 0.204.7 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.201,1,2-Trichloroethane

µg/L 0.2018000 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Toluene

µg/L 0.1082000 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Dibromochloromethane

µg/L 0.100.25 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Ethylene Dibromide

µg/L 0.201.6 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Tetrachloroethylene

µg/L 0.103.3 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.101,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane

µg/L 0.10630 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Chlorobenzene

µg/L 0.102300 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Ethylbenzene

µg/L 0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20m & p-Xylene

µg/L 0.10380 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Bromoform

µg/L 0.101300 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10Styrene

µg/L 0.103.2 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.101,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane






O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water).


PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14


µg/L 0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10o-Xylene

µg/L 0.109600 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.101,3-Dichlorobenzene



µg/L 0.305.2 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.30 <0.301,3-Dichloropropene

µg/L 0.204200 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20Xylene Mixture

µg/L 0.2051 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20 <0.20n-Hexane


% Recovery 105 102 97 99 100Toluene-d8 50-140

% Recovery 90 90 94 90 924-Bromofluorobenzene 50-140







O. Reg. 153(511) - VOCs (Water).


PROJECT NO: 350500








µg/L 0.516000 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 <0.5 0.9 0.8Antimony 0.9

µg/L 1.01500 6.0 7.9 4.0 33.4 2.8 6.4 5.7Arsenic 3.9

µg/L 2.023000 88.3 92.9 109 202 359 115 126Barium 699

µg/L 0.553 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Beryllium <0.5

µg/L 10.036000 89.6 95.1 64.8 596 438 450 777Boron 477

µg/L 0.22.1 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cadmium <0.2

µg/L 2.0640 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 5.3 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0Chromium <2.0

µg/L 0.552 19.4 5.2 <0.5 20.8 7.3 44.6 9.1Cobalt 0.9

µg/L 1.069 1.5 1.6 <1.0 1.9 1.6 2.1 1.3Copper 1.2

µg/L 0.520 <0.5 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Lead <0.5

µg/L 0.57300 4.9 4.5 4.3 55.1 1.1 8.2 2.3Molybdenum 0.8

µg/L 1.0390 29.8 10.0 <1.0 27.2 13.6 46.7 14.2Nickel 1.3

µg/L 1.050 1.2 <1.0 <1.0 3.3 2.1 <1.0 <1.0Selenium <1.0

µg/L 0.21.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver <0.2

µg/L 0.3400 0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3Thallium <0.3

µg/L 0.5330 16.5 3.6 0.7 6.5 0.5 28.2 2.7Uranium <0.5

µg/L 0.4200 1.7 1.8 2.0 4.8 2.6 3.1 3.4Vanadium 3.2

µg/L 5.0890 17.1 37.7 36.7 52.1 32.9 42.7 19.2Zinc 68.2

µg/L 0.020.29 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Mercury <0.02

µg/L 5110 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5Chromium VI <5

µg/L 252 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2Cyanide <2

µg/L 5001800000 29400 81000 83300 231000 217000 48400 153000Sodium 154000

µg/L 1001800000 63000 168000 87200 176000 257000 157000 374000Chloride 410000

µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 401Nitrate as N <50

µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50Nitrite as N <50

uS/cm 2 1300 972 717 2660 2140 1960 1920Electrical Conductivity 1960

pH Units NA 7.82 7.93 7.88 8.11 8.09 8.05 7.99pH 7.86






O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water)


PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-D MW12-2


µg/L 0.516000 <0.5 <0.5Antimony

µg/L 1.01500 3.0 16.5Arsenic

µg/L 2.023000 486 251Barium

µg/L 0.553 <0.5 <0.5Beryllium

µg/L 10.036000 472 947Boron

µg/L 0.22.1 <0.2 <0.2Cadmium

µg/L 2.0640 <2.0 3.9Chromium

µg/L 0.552 7.8 24.7Cobalt

µg/L 1.069 1.7 1.9Copper

µg/L 0.520 <0.5 <0.5Lead

µg/L 0.57300 1.0 37.5Molybdenum

µg/L 1.0390 17.0 32.7Nickel

µg/L 1.050 1.5 3.1Selenium

µg/L 0.21.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver

µg/L 0.3400 <0.3 <0.3Thallium

µg/L 0.5330 0.6 16.1Uranium

µg/L 0.4200 3.7 3.7Vanadium

µg/L 5.0890 55.7 <5.0Zinc

µg/L 0.020.29 <0.02 <0.02Mercury

µg/L 5110 <5 <5Chromium VI

µg/L 252 <2 <2Cyanide

µg/L 5001800000 223000 172000Sodium

µg/L 1001800000 257000 223000Chloride

µg/L 50 <50 <50Nitrate as N

µg/L 50 <50 <50Nitrite as N

uS/cm 2 2150 2670Electrical Conductivity

pH Units NA 8.13 8.12pH









PROJECT NO: 350500






MW12-16MW12-11 MW12-12 MW12-PMW12-14


µg/L 0.520000 0.6 <0.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5Antimony

µg/L 1.01900 2.8 1.1 1.4 <1.0 1.0Arsenic

µg/L 2.029000 66.5 29.2 104 63.0 68.5Barium

µg/L 0.567 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Beryllium

µg/L 10.045000 37.7 55.8 255 32.7 30.8Boron

µg/L 0.22.7 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Cadmium

µg/L 2.0810 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0Chromium

µg/L 0.566 6.3 3.2 8.2 0.8 0.8Cobalt

µg/L 1.087 2.3 <1.0 5.1 1.4 1.2Copper

µg/L 0.525 0.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5Lead

µg/L 0.59200 2.9 1.7 3.2 0.8 0.8Molybdenum

µg/L 1.0490 8.6 3.9 17.8 2.5 2.0Nickel

µg/L 1.063 1.4 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Selenium

µg/L 0.21.5 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2 <0.2Silver

µg/L 0.3510 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3 <0.3Thallium

µg/L 0.5420 5.3 1.8 17.8 2.9 3.1Uranium

µg/L 0.4250 2.2 1.0 1.5 1.6 1.8Vanadium

µg/L 5.01100 44.8 <5.0 38.2 <5.0 <5.0Zinc

µg/L 0.020.29 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02Mercury

µg/L 5140 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5Chromium VI

µg/L 266 <2 <2 <2 <2 <2Cyanide

µg/L 5002300000 25000 23600 45100 51000 16300Sodium

µg/L 1002300000 233000 80600 119000 92200 20400Chloride

µg/L 50 <50 <50 2440 1090 1160Nitrate as N

µg/L 50 <50 <50 <50 <50 <50Nitrite as N

uS/cm 2 1430 1430 1550 951 732Electrical Conductivity

pH Units NA 7.98 7.95 8.00 8.10 8.11pH







O. Reg. 153(511) - Metals & Inorganics (Water).


PROJECT NO: 350500






3589603 T9 (ALL-GW) - NEW O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water) F3 (C16 to C34) 500 530MW12-1

3589603 T9 (ALL-GW) - NEW O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water) F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs 500 530MW12-1


Guideline Violation



PROJECT NO: 350500






O. Reg. 153(511) - PHCs F1 - F4 (with PAHs) (Water)

F1 (C6 to C10) 1 3589409 < 25 < 25 0.0% < 25 90% 60% 140% 80% 60% 140% 71% 60% 140%

F2 (C10 to C16) 1 <100 <100 0.0% < 100 100% 60% 140% 81% 60% 140% 65% 60% 140%

F3 (C16 to C34) 1 <100 <100 0.0% < 100 100% 60% 140% 76% 60% 140% 74% 60% 140%

F4 (C34 to C50) 1 <100 <100 0.0% < 100 97% 60% 140% 108% 60% 140% 86% 60% 140%


Naphthalene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 92% 50% 140% 68% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140%

Acenaphthylene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 100% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%

Acenaphthene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 99% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%

Fluorene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 100% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%

Phenanthrene

1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 97% 50% 140% 90% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%

Anthracene 1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 101% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140%

Fluoranthene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 101% 50% 140% 94% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%

Pyrene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 102% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 98% 50% 140%

Benz(a)anthracene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 96% 50% 140% 99% 50% 140% 93% 50% 140%

Chrysene

1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 104% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 93% 50% 140% 93% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 3589671 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 103% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 3589671 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.0% < 0.01 93% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140%

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 89% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140%


1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 92% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140%

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 91% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140%

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene 1 3589671 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 93% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140% 92% 50% 140%


Dichlorodifluoromethane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 103% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 96% 50% 140%

Vinyl Chloride 1 3589422 < 0.17 < 0.17 0.0% < 0.17 116% 50% 140% 91% 50% 140% 95% 50% 140%

Bromomethane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 110% 50% 140% 86% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140%

Trichlorofluoromethane 1 3589422 < 0.40 < 0.40 0.0% < 0.40 105% 50% 140% 83% 50% 140% 88% 50% 140%

Acetone

1 3589422 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 114% 50% 140% 89% 50% 140% 97% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 120% 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%

Methylene Chloride 1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 110% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 111% 50% 140% 85% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%

Methyl tert-butyl ether 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 88% 50% 140% 85% 60% 130% 71% 50% 140%

1,1-Dichloroethane

1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 115% 50% 140% 83% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%

Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1 3589422 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 81% 50% 140% 87% 50% 140% 100% 50% 140%

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 118% 50% 140% 86% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%

Chloroform 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 114% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloroethane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 117% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 91% 50% 140%


1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 98% 50% 140% 73% 60% 130% 71% 50% 140%



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT NO: 350500


UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

MATRIX SPIKEMETHOD BLANK SPIKEDUPLICATERPT Date: Aug 17, 2012 REFERENCE MATERIAL

MethodBlank






Carbon Tetrachloride 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 112% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%

Benzene 1 3589422 0.77 1.0 26.0% < 0.20 110% 50% 140% 90% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%

1,2-Dichloropropane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 106% 50% 140% 81% 60% 130% 81% 50% 140%

Trichloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 109% 50% 140% 93% 60% 130% 93% 50% 140%


1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 118% 50% 140% 84% 60% 130% 85% 50% 140%

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1 3589422 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 82% 50% 140% 113% 50% 140% 78% 50% 140%

1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 117% 50% 140% 84% 60% 130% 84% 50% 140%

Toluene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 107% 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 90% 50% 140%

Dibromochloromethane 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 110% 50% 140% 80% 60% 130% 80% 50% 140%

Ethylene Dibromide

1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 106% 50% 140% 75% 60% 130% 81% 50% 140%

Tetrachloroethylene 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 109% 50% 140% 94% 60% 130% 92% 50% 140%


Chlorobenzene 1 3589422 2.6 3.1 17.5% < 0.10 119% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%

Ethylbenzene 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 113% 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%

m & p-Xylene

1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 124% 50% 140% 89% 60% 130% 87% 50% 140%

Bromoform 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 99% 50% 140% 72% 60% 130% 72% 50% 140%

Styrene 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 95% 50% 140% 75% 60% 130% 72% 50% 140%


o-Xylene 1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 110% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%

1,3-Dichlorobenzene

1 3589422 < 0.10 < 0.10 0.0% < 0.10 106% 50% 140% 80% 60% 130% 76% 50% 140%



1,3-Dichloropropene 1 3589422 < 0.30 < 0.30 0.0% < 0.30 95% 50% 140% 100% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

Xylene Mixture 1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 110% 50% 140% 87% 60% 130% 86% 50% 140%

n-Hexane

1 3589422 < 0.20 < 0.20 0.0% < 0.20 NA 50% 140% 92% 60% 130% 99% 50% 140%

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT NO: 350500


UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







Antimony 1 3589476 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 105% 70% 130% 82% 80% 120% 74% 70% 130%

Arsenic 1 3589476 1.0 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 103% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 115% 70% 130%

Barium 1 3589476 68.5 65.2 4.9% < 2.0 106% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 105% 70% 130%

Beryllium 1 3589476 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 92% 70% 130% 106% 80% 120% 96% 70% 130%

Boron

1 3589476 30.8 27.1 12.8% < 10.0 107% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 113% 70% 130%

Cadmium 1 3589476 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 99% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Chromium 1 3589476 < 2.0 < 2.0 0.0% < 2.0 103% 70% 130% 101% 80% 120% 115% 70% 130%

Cobalt 1 3589476 0.8 0.8 0.0% < 0.5 101% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Copper 1 3589476 1.2 1.1 8.7% < 1.0 99% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 99% 70% 130%

Lead

1 3589476 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.0% < 0.5 96% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%

Molybdenum 1 3589476 0.8 0.7 13.3% < 0.5 105% 70% 130% 108% 80% 120% 97% 70% 130%

Nickel 1 3589476 2.0 2.2 9.5% < 1.0 100% 70% 130% 97% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Selenium 1 3589476 < 1.0 < 1.0 0.0% < 1.0 105% 70% 130% 107% 80% 120% 119% 70% 130%

Silver 1 3589476 < 0.2 < 0.2 0.0% < 0.2 106% 70% 130% 108% 80% 120% 115% 70% 130%

Thallium

1 3589476 < 0.3 < 0.3 0.0% < 0.3 97% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 101% 70% 130%

Uranium 1 3589476 3.1 2.9 6.7% < 0.5 95% 70% 130% 105% 80% 120% 93% 70% 130%

Vanadium 1 3589476 1.8 1.8 0.0% < 0.4 97% 70% 130% 93% 80% 120% 102% 70% 130%

Zinc 1 3589476 < 5.0 < 5.0 0.0% < 5.0 101% 70% 130% 99% 80% 120% 107% 70% 130%

Mercury 1 3589313 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.0% < 0.02 105% 70% 130% 103% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Chromium VI

1 3589313 < 5 < 5 0.0% < 5 101% 70% 130% 100% 80% 120% 100% 70% 130%

Cyanide 1 3589381 < 2 < 2 0.0% < 2 106% 70% 130% 110% 80% 120% 85% 70% 130%

Sodium 1 3589395 83300 84100 1.0% < 500 95% 70% 130% 96% 80% 120% 92% 70% 130%

Chloride 1 3589381 168000 166000 1.2% < 100 91% 70% 130% 92% 70% 130% 95% 70% 130%

Nitrate as N 1 3589381 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 96% 70% 130% 96% 70% 130% 96% 70% 130%

Nitrite as N

1 3589381 < 50 < 50 0.0% < 50 NA 70% 130% 90% 70% 130% 105% 70% 130%

Electrical Conductivity 1 3589603 2660 2670 0.4% < 2 108% 90% 110% NA NA

pH 1 3589603 8.11 8.11 0.0% NA 100% 90% 110% NA NA

Comments: NA - Not Applicable.

Certified By:



Dup #1 RPDMeasured


Quality Assurance



PROJECT NO: 350500

Water Analysis

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


IdDup #2

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits

UpperLower

AcceptableLimits


MethodBlank







Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluorene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Phenanthrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Acenaphthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluorene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Phenanthrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benz(a)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(b)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(k)fluoranthene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(a)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Dibenz(a,h)anthracene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

2-and 1-methyl Naphthalene ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

Chrysene-d12 ORG-91-5105 EPA SW-846 3510 & 8270 GC/MS

F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID


F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F4 (C34 to C50) VOL -91- 5010 MOE PHC- E3421 GC/FID

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 BALANCE


F1 (C6 to C10) VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID

F1 (C6 to C10) minus BTEX VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 (P&T)GC/FID


F2 (C10 to C16) minus Naphthalene VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID



Method Summary



PROJECT NO: 350500







F3 (C16 to C34) minus PAHs VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 GC/FID

F4 (C34 to C50) VOL -91- 5010 MOE PHC- E3421 GC/FID

Gravimetric Heavy Hydrocarbons VOL-91-5010 MOE PHC E3421 BALANCE









trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl ether VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS




































Method Summary



PROJECT NO: 350500










trans- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

Methyl tert-butyl ether VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS



cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene VOL-91-5001 EPA SW-846 5030 & 8260 (P&T)GC/MS

































Method Summary



PROJECT NO: 350500






Water Analysis

Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Mercury MET-93-6100 EPA SW-846 7470 & 245.1 CVAAS

Chromium VI INOR-93-6034 SM 3500-Cr B SPECTROPHOTOMETER

Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE METHOD CN- 3015 & SM 4500 CN- I


Sodium MET-93-6105 EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 ICP/OES

Chloride INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Nitrate as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Nitrite as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Electrical Conductivity INOR-93-6000 SM 2510 B PC TITRATE

pH INOR-93-6000 SM 4500-H+ B PC TITRATE

Antimony MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Arsenic MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Barium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Beryllium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Boron MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Cadmium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Chromium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Cobalt MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Copper MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Lead MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Molybdenum MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Nickel MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Selenium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Silver MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Thallium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Uranium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Vanadium MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Zinc MET-93-6103 EPA SW-846 6020A & 200.8 ICP-MS

Mercury MET-93-6100 EPA SW-846 7470 & 245.1 CVAAS

Chromium VI INOR-93-6034 SM 3500-Cr B SPECTROPHOTOMETER



Method Summary



PROJECT NO: 350500






Cyanide INOR-93-6052MOE METHOD CN- 3015 & SM 4500 CN- I


Sodium MET-93-6105 EPA SW-846 6010C & 200.7 ICP/OES

Chloride INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Nitrate as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Nitrite as N INOR-93-6004 SM 4110 B ION CHROMATOGRAPH

Electrical Conductivity INOR-93-6000 SM 2510 B PC TITRATE

pH INOR-93-6000 SM 4500-H+ B PC TITRATE



Method Summary



PROJECT NO: 350500






BH12-13

MW12-1

MW12-2

MW12-3

MW12-4

MW12-5

MW12-6

MW12-7

MW12-8

MW12-9

MW12-10

MW12-14

MW12-16

MW12-11

MW12-12

BH12-15

LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT

CONNECTION EA

BOREHOLE AND MONITORING WELL

LOCATION PLAN

SEPT. 2012 1:4000± 350500-1

P.A.L. M.W. 350500

Drawn By:

Date:

Scale:

NOTES:

REVISIONS:



00 100 150 metres

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Approved By:

Drawing No:

Project No:


INVESTIGATION

50


BH12-13

MW12-1

MW12-2

MW12-3

MW12-4

MW12-5

MW12-6

MW12-7

MW12-8

MW12-9

MW12-10

MW12-14

MW12-16

MW12-11

MW12-12

BH12-15

LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT

CONNECTION EA

GROUNDWATER CONTOUR AND

ELEVATION PLAN

SEPT. 2013 1:4000± 350500-2

P.A.L. M.W. 350500

Drawn By:

Date:

Scale:

NOTES:

REVISIONS:


metres

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Approved By:

Drawing No:

Project No:


INVESTIGATION

00 100 150


50

LAKE LEVEL ELEVATION m (DCS) 2012

GROUNDWATER CONTOURS (Aug 2013)

GROUNDWATER ELEVTIONS in m (Aug 2013)


BH12-13

MW12-1

MW12-2

MW12-3

MW12-4

MW12-5

MW12-6

MW12-7

MW12-8

MW12-9

MW12-10

MW12-14

MW12-16

MW12-11

MW12-12

BH12-15

LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT

CONNECTION EA

SOIL CONTAMINATION DISTRIBUTION

SEPT. 2013 1:4000± 350500-3

P.A.L. M.W. 350500

Drawn By:

Date:

Scale:

REVISIONS:


metres

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Approved By:

Drawing No:

Project No:


INVESTIGATION

00 100 150


50

All parameter values in µg/g unless otherwise indicated

Table 3 Table 3 Full Depth Generic Site Condition Standards

for Use in a Non-Potable Groundwater Condition

Province of Ontario Soil, Ground Water and

Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the

EPA, April, 2011

Table 9 Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards for Use

within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable

Groundwater Condition Province of Ontario Soil,

Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use


M Meets applicable MOE standards

NOTES:

BH12-13

MW12-1

MW12-2

MW12-3

MW12-4

MW12-5

MW12-6

MW12-7

MW12-8

MW12-9

MW12-10

MW12-14

MW12-16

MW12-11

MW12-12

BH12-15

LAKEVIEW WATERFRONT

CONNECTION EA

GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION

DISTRIBUTION

SEPT. 2013 1:4000± 350500-4

P.A.L. M.W. 350500

Drawn By:

Date:

Scale:

NOTES:

REVISIONS:


metres

REFERENCE:

LEGEND:



Approved By:

Drawing No:

Project No:


INVESTIGATION

00 100 150


50

All parameter values in µg/L unless otherwise indicated

Table 9 Table 9 Generic Site Condition Standards for Use

within 30 m of a Water Body in a Non-Potable

Groundwater Condition Province of Ontario Soil,

Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use


M Meets applicable MOE standards

appendix i supplementary subsurface environmental … · 2014-05-01 · supplementary subsurface...

Documents