appendix d - section 106 coordination
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
1/13
APPENDIXD
S
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
2/13
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
3/13
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
4/13
CLIENT
PROJ
REVISION NO
SCALE
MTA
MARC Facility Phase I Survey
0 DES BY
DR BY
CHK BY
RXK
RXK
SS
10/04/13
10/07/13
10/07/13
PROJ NO
1
TITLE
Project Location
FIGURE
20836023
12420 Milestone Center Dr.
Germantown, MD 20876\\10.90.4.1\erm\MTA\MARC Facility 2013\
E. Data\E.4 GIS\Projects
1:24,000
0 500 1,000 Meters
_Baltimore Metro Area
Camden
76
83
476
81
295
P A
M D
D E
V A
N J
D C
Source: USGS 7.5' Series quads:Havre De Grace, MD 1993
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
Legend
LOD
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
5/13
CLIENT
PROJ
REVISION NO
SCALE
MTA
MARC Facility Phase I Survey
0 DES BY
DR BY
CHK BY
RXK
RXK
SS
10/04/13
10/07/13
10/07/13
PROJ NO
2
TITLE
Project LOD
FIGURE
20836023
12420 Milestone Center Dr.
Germantown, MD 20876\\10.90.4.1\erm\MTA\MARC Facility 2013\
E. Data\E.4 GIS\Projects
1:11,999
0 500 1,000 Meters
_Baltimore Metro Area
Camden
76
83
476
81
295
P A
M D
D E
V A
N J
D C
Source: Bing Maps
0 1,000 2,000 Feet
Legend
LOD
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
6/13
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
7/13
CLIENT
PROJ
REVISION NO
SCALE
MTA
MARC Facility Phase I Survey
0 DES BY
DR BY
CHK BY
KJM
RXK
SS
10/22/13
10/22/13
10/22/13
PROJ NO
4
TITLE
APE Boundaries
FIGURE
20836023
12420 Milestone Center Dr.
Germantown, MD 20876\\10.90.4.1\erm\MTA\MARC Facility 2013\E. Data
\E.4 GIS\Projects\LocatorMap.mxd
Source: Bing Maps
Above Ground APE
Archaeological APE
1:18,000
0 250 500 Meters
0 500 1,000 Feet
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
8/13
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
9/13
Attachment 6: Methodology, Potentially Affected Resources, and Potential Consulting
Parties
MTA will undertake investigations to determine the presence of historic properties, such as above-
ground resources and archaeological sites, defined as those that are listed, or eligible for listing, in
the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). All work will be conducted or directed by staffthat meet the Secretary of the Interiors Professional Qualification Standards (36 CFR Part 61) in
Architectural History, History, and Archaeology. Resumes for project personnel are available upon
request.
Research Methodology
The methodology used to research, inventory, and analyze the property will follow the Secretary of
the Interiors Guidelines for Historical Documentation and the Standards and Guidelines for
Historical and Architectural Investigations in Maryland. The methodology statement will define
documentation objectives and research designs. Research methods and the results of analysis will
be incorporated into new or revised Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties (MIHP) inventoryforms.
Research methodologies will target repositories with high potential for containing relevanthistorical materials. Selection of repositories with the highest potential to contain useful
background information will result from discussions with MTA staff, URS project staff, and local
property owners, as well as past reports, and review of on-line research catalogs. Data collectionefforts will emphasize review of historic photographs, maps, accounts, and period descriptions.
These will be used to document the design, setting, and alterations to the properties within the
project area. Research materials will include MIHP forms, photographs, historic newspaperaccounts, and histories related to the project area and buildings or sites contained in the project
area. URS and SEI will review existing background information relevant to this study, including
the 1977 MIHP Form CE145 for Woodlands and preliminary research, photographs, maps, and
other information provided by MTA. Additionally, URS and SEI will access information on file at
the MHT regarding previously recorded archaeological sites and previously conductedarchaeological investigations in and within a one-mile radius of the project area.
SEI will conduct original, primary, and secondary-source research at key historical repositories inCecil County, Baltimore, Annapolis, and other locations in Maryland and Washington, D.C. The
following table provides an overview of recommended research materials with names of
repositories and brief descriptions of relevant source material.
Table 1
Locations of Repositories and Research
Location Repository Resources LocatedBaltimore,
Maryland
Enoch Pratt Library Cecil County Vertical Files and County
Histories including 300th
Anniversary
Commemorative Book(1974), BlumgartsAt
the Head of the Bay(1996), Cecil County
Reference Book(1956), and JohnsonsHistoryof Cecil County(1967) and 1858 Martenet and1877 Lake, Griffing & Stephenson maps
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
10/13
Location Repository Resources Located
Baltimore,Maryland
Maryland HistoricalSociety
Same county histories at Enoch Pratt Library
Elkton,
Maryland
Historical Society of
Cecil County
Vertical files on agriculture; 1880 Agricultural
Census; post card and photo files; andadditional histories as relevant
Elkton,Maryland
Cecil County PublicLibrary, Elkton Central
Branch
Available local histories or genealogies
Crownsville,
Maryland
Maryland Historical
Trust Library,
Archaeological files; 1850 to 1880
Agricultural Census for relevant district, Cecil
County
Washington
D.C.
Library of Congress, Maps including 1799 Hauducoeur map of the
head of the Chesapeake and SusquehannaRiver, 1858 Martenets Map of Cecil County,
1877 Lake, Griffing & Stephenson Illustrated
Atlas, 1900 and 1902 Maps of Cecil County
Showing Agricultural Soils, 1908 Post OfficeDepartment Rural Delivery Map, 1950
Topographic map showing election districts
All appropriate published resources will be utilized. SEI will also provide text on the cultural
history of the project area and on previously recorded sites and archaeological investigations in andwithin a one-mile radius of the project area for inclusion in the report of archaeological
investigations.
Based on desktop research and a brief field reconnaissance, URS and SEI have identified the
following 13 architectural resources within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) (see Attachments
4 and5). These resources require research, analysis, and completion/revision of long form MHT
Determinations of Eligibility (DOE) due to anticipated physical, visual, or noise effects associated
with construction and operation of the MARC Maintenance Facility:
HouseThe Anchorage (MIHP, CE-1230); 50 Mill Creek Lane;
HouseLindenwood (MIHP, CE-700; 1287 Principio Furnace Road;
HouseThe Woodlands (MIHP, CE-145); 93 Mill Creek Lane;
HouseFurnace Bay Golf Course Clubhouse; 79 Chesapeake View Road;
House75 Chesapeake View Road
House1096 Principio Furnace Road;
House1050 Principio Furnace Road;
House1323 Principio Furnace Road
House2 Mill Creek Lane; Farm Complex (appears to include 3 houses and multiple outbuildings); Woodlands Farm
Lane South;
BridgeWoodlands Farm Lane South over railroad tracks;
BridgeChesapeake View Road over railroad tracks; and
BridgeUnnamed farm road over railroad tracks.
The Above-Ground Area of Potential Effects (APE) for above-ground resources, to include the
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
11/13
area of anticipated physical, visual, and noise effects. It is anticipated that this APE will be located
within a 0.25-mile radius from the project site and will include any properties 50 or more years oldlocated within the vista to and from the project site. The Archaeological APE will be the
approximately 120-acre project site. URS will conduct a Phase I archaeological survey of the
APE. Approximately 115 acres of the APE, which consists of agricultural fields, will be subjected
to pedestrian inspection and shovel testing at 20-meter intervals with 10-meter radial tests ifarchaeological resources are encountered. The approximately 5 acre farmstead in the southwestern
portion of the APE will be subjected to pedestrian inspection and shovel testing at 10-meter
intervals. If necessary, URS will conduct a Phase II archaeological evaluation of anyarchaeological resources encountered during the Phase I investigation that have the potential to be
eligible for listing in the NRHP.
A preliminary list of Section 106 consulting parties include local government representatives,recognized tribal representatives that attach significance to the property, and other parties that, due
to the nature of the undertaking and their likely effects on historic properties, may have a
demonstrated interest, including legal and economic interests, on the effect of the undertaking on
historic properties. URS will work with MTA, MHT, FTA, and the Marylands Governors
Commission on Indian Affairs to identify tribal representatives to be notified of the undertaking
and provided them the opportunity to comment. Potential consulting parties include:
The Town of Perryville Office of Planning and Zoning
Cecil County Office of Planning and Zoning
Cecil County Historical Society
Piscataway-Conoy Tribe
Piscataway Indian Nation
Accohannock Indian Tribe, Inc.
Assateague Peoples Tribe
Nause-Waiwash Band of Indians, inc.
Pocomoke Indian Tribe, Inc.
Youghiogheny River Band of Shawnee Indians, Inc.
Public participation will be coordinated with the MTA and follow their established protocol.
Written notification will be provided to adjacent property owners, local government groups, andother interested parties as appropriate, providing them an opportunity to comment on the proposed
project and its effect on historic properties. The following is URSs working schedule for the
CRM tasks associated with this undertaking.
Table 2
Section 106 Timeline Tasks Milestones and Delivery Dates
Task Milestone Delivery Dates
1 Task 1Section 106 Initiation and Research November/December 2013
2
Phase I Archaeological SurveyPhase II Archaeological Evaluation (if
necessary)
(Artifact Analysis/Curation)
Phase IMarch 1, 2014
Phase IIApril 29, 2014
Analysis: 30 days after completionof field investigations;
Curation: 45 days following
acceptance of Final Report
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
12/13
Task Milestone Delivery Dates
3 Architectural Historic Survey/ NRHP December 2013
4Archaeological Resources Report
AboveGround Resources Report
Draft Report: 60 days after
completion of field investigations;
Final Report: 30 days followingreceipt of comments
5 Memorandum of Agreement, if needed
90 days after receipt of MHT
concurrence with NRHP eligibilitydeterminations and effects analysis
-
8/10/2019 Appendix D - Section 106 Coordination
13/13