appendix b public involvement · 2019. 1. 2. · alternative i, is expected to provide the best...

APPENDIX B

S.P. No. H.011670.2 – I-10/Loyola Dr. Interchange Improvement

APPENDIX B

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

APPENDIX B


B.1 - Public Meeting

USI Project #: 16-011-2August 2018

Prepared by

2000 Tulane Ave, Suite 200New Orleans, Louisiana 70112504.523.5511 504.523.5522 f

I-10/Loyola Interchange ImprovementEnvironmental AssessmentS.P. H.011670

Public Meeting Event SummaryJuly 24, 2018

Prepared for

1 Public Meeting Event Summary August 2018

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 3

1.1 Meeting Format ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Station A: Entry/Sign-In Table ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.2 Station B: Presentation ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Station C: Initial Comparison – Tier I Matrix .................................................................................................. 3 1.1.4 Station D: Exhibits of Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.5 Station E: Traffic Models ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.6 Station F: Comparison of Alternatives – Tier III Matrix ................................................................................. 4 1.1.7 Station G: Susan Park Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.8 Station H: Interim Solutions ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1.9 Station I: LADOTD Real Estate ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1.10 Station J: Comment Submission .................................................................................................................... 5

2.0 MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS ......................................................................................... 5

2.1 Public Notice .......................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.2 Individual Notices .................................................................................................................................................. 6

3.0 PUBLIC INPUT ...................................................................................................................... 6

3.1 General Comments ................................................................................................................................................ 7

3.2 Susan Park Comments .......................................................................................................................................... 7

3.3 Comment Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 7

4.0 STAKEHOLDER INPUT ...................................................................................................... 7

4.1 Comment Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 7

5.0 MEETING ATTENDANCE .................................................................................................. 8


List of Appendices

Appendix A Project Information Handouts with Comment Forms Appendix B PowerPoint Presentation with Transcript Appendix C Initial Comparison - Tier I Matrix Appendix D Alternative Exhibits Appendix E Comparison of Alternatives - Tier III Matrix Appendix F Susan Park Exhibits Appendix G Interim Solutions Appendix H Public Notices, Affidavits, Social Media Appendix I Address for Individual Notices Appendix J Comments and Summary Appendix K Sign In Sheet Appendix L Meeting Photos


1.0 Introduction

The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD) authorized an Environmental Assessment for the I-1/Loyola Interchange Improvement. This project will evaluate alternatives to improve operational conditions and to increase the capacity of this interchange. A public meeting was held for this project on July 24, 2018 at the Kenner City Park Pavilion located at 3800 Loyola Dr. The purpose of this Public Meeting was to provide an overview of the proposed project and obtain input from the public regarding possible alternatives. The meeting also discussed seeking a Section 4(f) de minimis determination for Susan Park. This event summary provides a description of the meeting content, advertising efforts, public input, and attendance.

1.1 Meeting Format

The meeting was conducted using an open house format with ten (10) informational stations that the public could visit at their leisure. A brief description of the purpose and material presented at each station is provided below.

1.1.1 Station A: Entry/Sign-In Table

Meeting attendees were requested to sign in at the Sign-In Table, Station A, located in the lobby area of the Kenner City Park Pavilion. Each attendee was offered a general information packet that included a general comment form as well as a Susan Park Impacts information packet and with a Susan Park comment form. A copy of each of the handouts is included in Appendix A.

1.1.2 Station B: Presentation

After the live presentation in the main room of the Kenner City Park Pavilion, the same presentation with audio ran on a continuous loop throughout the course of the meeting in a separate room, Station B. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation slides with transcribed recording is included in Appendix B.

1.1.3 Station C: Initial Comparison – Tier I Matrix

Station C was located in the main room of the Kenner City Park Pavilion and showed the Tier I table comparing the initial eighteen (18) alternatives. The three alternatives which were further moved forward to Tier II and III (Alternatives E, I and L) were highlighted in yellow. A copy of this table is included in Appendix C.


1.1.4 Station D: Exhibits of Alternatives

Station D was also located in the main room of the Kenner City Park Pavilion and showed the details of each of the three (3) alternatives. Layouts of Alternatives E, I and L were presented on 36 x 54 inch boards. The eastern alignment of Alternatives I and L was also presented on a 36 x 54 inch board. Typical sections at various locations for Alternatives I and L were presented on 22 x 34 inch boards. The exhibits shown at Station D are included in Appendix D. A sample of the Alternative I and L Line and Grade sheets showing access Loyola Dr were presented on 22 x 34 inch roll plots.

1.1.5 Station E: Traffic Models

Station E was also in the main room of the Kenner City Park Pavilion and presented traffic models of Alternatives I and L. A 60 inch TV screen showing the traffic operations of the 2040 PM Peak Vissim models was run on a continuous loop throughout the meeting.

1.1.6 Station F: Comparison of Alternatives – Tier III Matrix

A detailed comparison of Alternatives E, I and L was presented on a 22 x 34 inch board at Station F in the main room of the Kenner City Park Pavilion. A copy of this comparison is included in Appendix E.

1.1.7 Station G: Susan Park Impacts

The detailed impacts Alternatives E, I and L could have to Susan Park were shown in detail on 22 x 34 inch boards at Station G in the lobby of the Kenner City Park Pavilion. The exhibits shown at Station G are included in Appendix F.

1.1.8 Station H: Interim Solutions

Station H was located in the main room of the Kenner City Park Pavilion and presented the interim solutions for airport access to the public. The interim solutions were shown on a 22 x 34 inch board. The interim solution includes a four lane extension of Loyola Dr to the new Airport Access Rd. The intersection of Veterans Blvd at Loyola Dr is also being modified to accommodate airport traffic. This exhibit is included in Appendix G.


1.1.9 Station I: LADOTD Real Estate

Also located in the main room of the Kenner City Park Pavilion was Station I which consisted of members of LADOTD’s Real Estate section and applicable brochures explaining the Acquisition of Right of Way and the Relocation Assistance program.

1.1.10 Station J: Comment Submission

Station J, the comment submission station, was located between the lobby and main room of the Kenner City Park Pavilion. The comment submission table was equipped with extra comment forms, pens, clipboards, a lock box for comment submission and a transcriber to record verbal comments. Attendees also had the opportunity to mail in their comment forms up to August 3, 2018.

2.0 Meeting Announcements

2.1 Public Notice

The paid public notice below ran in the official state journal, The Advocate, a daily newspaper published in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana on July 10 and July 22, 2018. It also ran twice in The Times-Picayune, a New Orleans newspaper, on July 15 and July 22, 2018. There was an announcement on City of Kenner’s website Facebook and Twitter account as well as a notice on NOLA.com. LADOTD also posted the notice on its website. The public notice affidavits, City of Kenner social media announcements and LADOTD’s announcement are included in Appendix H.


2.2 Individual Notices

A copy of the public notice was mailed directly to addresses expected to be directly affected by the project. A list of the addresses contacted is included in Appendix I.

3.0 Public Input

Two methods of collecting public input were provided at the public meeting. The first was a letter-sized comment form (Appendix A) where attendees could provide written statements and deposit them in the visibly marked comment box. The second option meeting attendees had was to provide verbal statements via a transcriber. In addition to the methods available during the public meeting, comments were also accepted outside of the public meeting via email and postal mail. Mailed comments were required to be postmarked by August 3, 2018. All comments received will become part of the EA document. All comments received as well as a summary of public comments are included in Appendix J.


3.1 General Comments

In total eleven (11) general comment forms were received. Of those, seven (7) were submitted in the drop box during the July 24, 2018 meeting. One (1) verbal comment was recorded during the July 24, 2018 meeting. In total, four (4) written comments without a formal comment form were received.

3.2 Susan Park Comments

In total 4 Susan Park Comment Forms were received. All of which were submitted in the drop box during the July 24, 2018 meeting.

3.3 Comment Summary

Based on form selection, one (1) respondent preferred Alternative E, seven (7) respondents preferred Alternative I, four (4) respondents preferred Alternative L and seven (7) respondents did not select a preferred alternative. Based on written comments, no one preferred Alternative E, fourteen (14) respondents preferred Alternative I, three (3) respondents preferred Alternative L and two (2) respondent did not indicate a preferred alternative.

Six (6) of the respondents indicated concern with Susan Park impacts. Eleven (11) of the respondents indicated concern with traffic congestion. Two (2) of the respondents indicated concern with transient/homeless presence under the southbound to eastbound flyover ramp. Four (4) of the respondents indicated concern with increased noise in the area.

4.0 Stakeholder Input

Five (5) comments were received during the comment period and referenced the Public Meeting held on July 24th. Four (4) of the comments were in letter format with three (3) e-mailed and one (1) mailed. One (1) comment was taken verbally during the Public Meeting. All comments received will become part of the EA document and are included in Appendix J.

4.1 Comment Summary

One (1) of the comments did not indicate an alternative preference and commented on the pedestrians in the area. The comment discussed the closure of 27th St and a possible pedestrian crossing south of Veterans Blvd. The comment also discussed a signalized crossing of Veterans Blvd near Susan Park playground.


Two (2) of the comments did not indicate an alternative preference and commented on the aesthetics/ beatification part of the project. These letters discussed the proposed sound walls, Loyola median and green space.

Two (2) of the comments indicated a preference for Alternative I. Both letters discuss the best traffic operations, least amount of right-a-way takings and possible fast construction time for Alternative I. Both letters also express the importance of the project for the local and entire metropolitan area.

5.0 Meeting Attendance

A sign-in sheet was maintained at the entrance and accurately reflects the meeting attendance. Table 1 is a summary of attendance according to the sign-in sheets. Public Officials includes FHWA personnel and Project Team includes LADOTD personnel.

Table 1: Meeting Attendance Summary

Group Number of Attendees General Public 83 Public Officials 15

Media 1 Project Team 29

Total 128

A total of 99 people signed in to the public meeting, excluding the project team. Seventeen (17) individuals from the consultant team were present. Twelve (12) of the attendees were from LADOTD representing various divisions including environmental, project management, road design, traffic, real estate, and the district office. The project team, including consultants and LADOTD staff were present to guide attendees through the series of exhibits, to explain the proposed project and to answer questions. Copies of the sign-in sheets are included in Appendix K. Photos taken during the meeting are included in Appendix L.

APPENDIX A Project Information Handouts

With Comment Forms

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Environmental Assessment

State Project No. H.011670 Federal Aid Project No. H011670

Open House Public Meeting

July 24, 2018 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM

Kenner City Park Pavilion 3800 Loyola Dr

Kenner, LA 70065

This public meeting is being conducted as an Open House. As you entered the building, you should have been asked to sign in, so a record of your participation can be maintained. A short presentation on the project will be shown continuously, and members of the project team and LADOTD will be available throughout tonight’s meeting to provide assistance and to answer any questions you may have.

Your views and participation are welcomed and are vital in ensuring that decisions made reflect the needs of the people affected by this proposed project. Comments may be submitted as follows:

1. In writing using the comment form provided in this handout (sheet 9). Written comments may be handed in tonight at the comment station or mailed to the address given on the form.

2. Verbal comments may be recorded tonight at the comment station. *Please include your name, address, email, phone, and the date on the comment form so you can be contacted if needed. Although comments are encouraged and valued throughout the process, they must be postmarked by August 3, 2018 to be included in the formal meeting transcript and the Environmental Assessment Document.

PUBLIC MEETING FORMAT

PUBLIC COMMENTS/PARTICIPATION

Throughout the public meeting, the following informational stations will be available:

Station A Entry/Sign In Table Station B Presentation Station C Initial Comparison Station D Exhibits of Alternatives Station E Traffic Models Station F Comparison of Alternatives

Station G Susan Park Impacts

Station H Interim Solutions

Station I LADOTD Real Estate

Station J Comment Submission To get the most from your visit to the meeting, it is

recommended that you visit all the stations.

In This Handout:

Meeting Format/Participation 1

Introduction 2

Purpose and Need 2

Descriptions of Alternative 2

Project Team 2

Station Map 3

Alternative E Layouts 4

Alternative I Layouts 5

Alternative L Layouts 6

Eastern Limits of Layouts 7

Comparison of Alternatives 8

Comment Response Form 9

This meeting and handout provides information on the proposed I-10/Loyola Interchange Project. The proposed I-10/Loyola Interchange will utilize federal funding. Federally funded projects must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NEPA process requires an Environmental Assessment (EA) to be completed for this project, including public involvement. The purpose of this public meeting is to inform you about the proposed project and to obtain your input as we go through the environmental review process. This meeting will also discuss seeking a Section 4(f) de minimis determination for Susan Park. A separate handout for the Susan park impacts is available at this public meeting.

The project’s purpose is to improve operational conditions and to increase the capacity of this interchange to accommodate future traffic demand in the area and is needed to serve as the primary ingress and egress for airline passenger traffic to the new MSY Airport terminal. To address this need, the LADOTD and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) initiated this project to identify and study potential modifications to the existing I-10/Loyola Drive interchange.

Alternative E Alternative E is described as a partial clover leaf interchange and includes a mixture of two at-grade “clover leaf” ramps in addition to three, one-way, elevated flyover ramps. The elevated flyover ramps for I-10 east of the Loyola Dr interchange include direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. A flyover ramp is also included for I-10 eastbound to Loyola Dr northbound. This layout is shown on page 4.

Alternative I Alternative I is described as a multi-level “stack” interchange and includes a mixture of at-grade ramps and three one-way elevated flyover ramps. The flyover ramps for I-10 east of the Loyola Dr interchange include direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. A flyover ramp is also included for Loyola Dr southbound to I-10 eastbound. This layout is shown on page 5.

Alternative L Alternative L is described as a “diverging diamond” interchange (DDI) and also includes one-way elevated flyover ramps to accommodate particular movements. A diverging diamond interchange routes traffic to the “opposite” side of the roadway via signalized cross-over locations in an effort to allow heavy left-turn movements to operate unimpeded, similar to common right-turn movements. The above-grade ramps for I-10 east of the Loyola Dr interchange include direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. This layout is shown on page 6.

All three alternatives include the addition of an auxiliary lane on I-10 from Loyola Dr to Williams Blvd in both directions. The auxiliary lane will begin at the Loyola Dr on-ramp and end at the Williams Blvd exit ramp. The eastern limits of the layouts are shown on page 7.

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE AND NEED

DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES

PROJECT TEAM

Lead Consultant Lead Agencies Subconsultants

E

F

G

I J C

BA

D

Legend:Station A - Entry/Sign In TableStation B - PresentationStation C - Initial ComparisonStation D - Exhibits of AlternativesStation E - Traffic Models Station F - Comparison of AlternativesStation G - Susan Park ImpactsStation H - Interim SolutionsStation I - LADOTD Real EstateStation J - Comment Submission

Entry

I-10/Loyola Interchange ImprovementEnvironmental AssessmentState Project No. H.011670Federal Aid Project No. H011670

Open House Public MeetingJuly 24, 20185:00 PM to 7:00 PM

Kenner City Park Pavilion 3800 Loyola DrKenner, LA 70065

Station Map

H

3

LegendExisting Features

Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement

Apparent Existing ROW or C of A

Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed FeaturesRequired ROW and C of A

Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway

Potential Noise Barrier

§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:

Date: Project Number:

I-10/Loyola Interchange ImprovementsRoute I-10

Environmental Assessment Jefferson Parish, LouisianaState Project No. H.011670F.A.P. Project No. H011670

DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FAY

ET

TE

ST.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.

VETERANS MEMORIAL BLVD


30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST.

CANAL NO. 14

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LE

NA

ST.

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

ALTERNATIVE E

4


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




ALTERNATIVE I

DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FAY

ET

TE

ST.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

5


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FAY

ET

TE

ST.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

ALTERNATIVE L

6


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




ALTERNATIVE I & L(EASTERN LIMITS)

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TO

N S

T.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.

WILLIAMS BLVDINTERCHANGE

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

Travel Lanes

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TO

N S

T.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

!I

0 250 500

Feet

0 250 500

Feet

ALTERNATIVE I

ALTERNATIVE L

7

Resources/Criteria Alternative E Alternative I Alternative L

Non-Commercial (undeveloped, residential, church) 15.5483 acres 3.6347 acres 5.4229 acresCommercial 20.2717 acres 3.6003 acres 6.0541 acres

Susan Park Impact 0.200 acres 0.065 acres 0.240 acres

Residential 158 13 55Commercial 49 5 8

Changes to 100 Yr Flood plain 0 0 0Wetlands 0 0 0

Prime Farmland 0 0 0Potential Impact to Threatened or Endangered Species No No No

Number of Known Archaeology Sites 0 0 0Number of Historic Structures Impacted 0 0 0

Effect on Known Archaeology Sites None None NoneEligibility of Standing Structures greater than 50 Years Old Not Eligible Not Eligible Not Eligible

Number 39 39 39Number of Sites Improvements May Impact 31 6 6

Oil and Gas Wells Located within Project Study Area None None None

Total Number of Impacts 375 426 418 Residential 367 416 409

Church, Recreation 6 8 7 Commercial 2 2 2

Operations UA A UASigning MC LC C

Safety A A A

Geometrics MC LC CConstructability MC C LC

Feasible No Yes YesPreliminary Total Cost Estimate $292.3 Million $147.0 Million $139.4 Million

*Key to Letter Grading:UA: unacceptableA: acceptableLC: least complexC: complexMC: most complex

I-10/Loyola Interchange ImprovementS.P. # H.011670

Tier III Matrix

Natural Resources (Acres)

Comparison of Alternatives

Design and Constructability

Traffic Analyses

Noise Sensitive Receptors

Hazardous Materials/UST Sites Within Project Study Area

Cultural Resources

Struture Impacts (Number)

Property Impacts - Land Only (Acres)

8

Comments mailed (see reverse self-addressed) must be postmarked no later than August 3, 2018 to become part of the public meeting record.

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement PUBLIC MEETING State Project No. H.011670 Environmental Assessment F.A.P. NO. H011670 July 24, 2018

General Comment Form Name: ________________________________________________________ Date:__________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________ Telephone:__________________________ 1. How often do you travel in the project area? Daily Weekly Monthly Once every six months Once a year Never

2. What transportation/traffic problems do you experience in the project area? Traffic Congestion Long Delays Unexpected Delays Many Accidents

Confusing Routes Lack of Alternative Routes Other __________________________ 3. Which Alternative do you prefer? (Please check one) Alternative E Alternative I Alternative L Other _________________________

Briefly explain the reason for your selection and what problems you think will be improved by the

selected Alternative. ____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

4. Would the Alternative you selected in Question 3 improve your travel experience to: Work School Airport Recreational/Entertainment Medical Care None of the above All of the above Other _________________

5. Do you have any other concerns, comments, or observations relative to social, environmental or

economic impacts in the project area or immediate surroundings? ____________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

9

Place tape here

Use this space for additional comments if needed.

Return Address Fold Over For Mailing Postage

Urban Systems, Inc. Re: Loyola Interchange Improvements

2000 Tulane Ave, Suite 200 New Orleans LA 70112

Attn: Mr. Brandon Perilloux P.E., PTOE

Comments mailed (see reverse self-addressed) must be postmarked no later than August 3, 2018 to become part of

the public meeting record.

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement PUBLIC MEETING

State Project No. H.011670 Environmental Assessment

F.A.P. NO. H011670 July 24, 2018

Susan Park Comment Form

Name: ________________________________________________________ Date:__________________

Address: _____________________________________________________________________________

Email: ___________________________________________ Telephone: _________________________

An important part of the Environmental Assessment process is to determine the impact that the

alternatives will have, if any, on Section 4(f) properties which include publicly owned parks,

recreation areas and wildlife or waterfowl refuges and to receive public input on these impacts.

Section 4(f) properties also include publicly or privately owned historic sites listed or eligible for

listing on the Nation Register of Historic Places. Susan Park, which is owned and operated by the

City of Kenner, is located in the southeast quadrant of the I-10/Loyola Dr interchange and is expected

to be impacted by the alternatives.

1. Do you utilize Susan Park?

Yes No If yes, how often? _______________________________________________

2. Do you expect the Alternatives to negatively impact your use of Susan Park?

Yes No If yes, how so? _________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

3. Is the impact to Susan Park important to your choice of a preferred Alternative?

Yes No

If yes, which Alternative do you prefer?

Alternative E Alternative I Alternative L

Briefly explain the reason for your selection._________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

5. Do you have any other concerns, comments, or observations relative to the impact to Susan

Park? _______________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

Place tape here



Urban Systems, Inc.

Re: Loyola Interchange Improvements

2000 Tulane Ave, Suite 200

New Orleans LA 70112



Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features

Required ROW and C of A

Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10§̈¦I-10

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


APPARENTPARCEL LINEAPPARENT

PARCEL LINE

REQUIRED R/W+/- 0.200 ACRES

+/- 24'+/- 40'

AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMP

I-10 EB AT-GRADE RAMP

LOYOLA SB TO I-10 EB CLOVER RAMP

!I

ALTERNATIVE ESUSAN PARK

Travel Lanes

APPROXIMATE PARCEL LINES AND EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINESSHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE TO BE CONSIDERED APPARENT AND

APPROXIMATE, FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY, AND SHALL NOT BEUSED IN ANY MANNER FOR THE SALE, CONVEYANCE OR TRANSFER OF

REAL ESTATE. NO PROPERTY SURVEY HAS BEEN CONDUCTED.


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


+/- 15' +/- 8'



PARCEL LINE

AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMP


LOYOLA SB TO I-10 EB FLYOVER RAMP

!IAPPROXIMATE PARCEL LINES AND EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY LINESSHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE TO BE CONSIDERED APPARENT AND



ALTERNATIVE ISUSAN PARK

Travel Lanes


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10§̈¦I-10

+/- 43'

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


+/- 28'


PARCEL LINE


AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMPI-10 EB AT-GRADE RAMP

!I

ALTERNATIVE LSUSAN PARK

Travel Lanes




APPENDIX B

PowerPoint Presentation with Transcript

Public Meeting

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement

Kenner, LouisianaState Project No. H.011670

F.A.P. NO. H011670

Environmental Assessment July 24, 2018

5:00 – 7:00 P.M.

1 of 28

On behalf of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration we would like to welcome you to the public meeting for the I‐10/ Loyola Interchange Improvement Project. The purpose of tonight’s meeting is to inform you about the proposed project and to obtain your input as we go through the environmental review process.

1

Station List/Map

■ Station A Entry/Sign In Table

■ Station B Presentation You are here!

■ Station C Initial Comparison

■ Station D Exhibits of Alternatives

■ Station E Traffic Models

■ Station F Comparison of Alternatives

■ Station G Susan Park Impacts

■ Station H Interim Solutions

■ Station I LADOTD Real Estate

■ Station J Comment Submission

2 of 28

A list and map of the stations for tonight’s public meeting is provided in the handout available at the sign in table, Station A.

2

Introduction to the Project

■ The I-10/Loyola Interchange improvements will utilize federal

funding

■ Federally funded projects require compliance with the National

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

■ The NEPA process requires an Environmental Assessment to be

completed for this project

■ Tonight’s meeting will be the first public involvement opportunity

3

The I‐10/Loyola Interchange Improvement will utilize federal funding.

Federally funded projects are required to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act known as NEPA.

Compliance with the NEPA process requires that an Environmental Assessment be

completed for this project.

Tonight’s meeting will be the public’s first opportunity to provide input.

3

What is the NEPA Process?

4 of 28

What is involved in the environmental review process?

4

The NEPA Process

Agency Identifies a Need for Action and Develops a Proposal

Are Environmental Effects Likely to be Significant?

Proposed Action is Described in Agency Categorical Exclusion

Significant Environmental Effects Uncertain or No

Agency CE

Significant Environmental Effects May or Will Occur

Categorical Exclusion

Environmental Assessment

Environmental Impact Statement

No Yes

No

5 of 28

NEPA requires that any proposed action involving federal funds and/or federal permitting must be evaluated by pertinent agencies to assess if, and to what degree, the environment would be effected.

In the case of the I‐10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Project, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration have determined that the potential impacts are such that an Environmental Assessment is the appropriate level of study. An environmental assessment may result in a FONSI by the reviewing agency or may become an Environmental Impact Statement.

5

Purpose and Need

■ Improve operational conditions at the I-10/Loyola Interchange

■ Increase the capacity of this interchange – To accommodate future traffic demand in the area– To serve as the primary ingress and egress for airline

passenger traffic to the new MSY Airport terminal

6 of 28

The project’s purpose is to improve operational conditions and to increase the capacity of this interchange to accommodate future traffic demand in the area and is needed to serve as the primary ingress and egress for airline passenger traffic to the new MSY Airport terminal.

To address this need, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration initiated a project to identify and study potential modifications to the existing I‐10/Loyola Drive interchange.

6

Where is the

Project?

7 of 28

Where is the proposed project location?

7

Project Study Area

I-10 West of I-310

Loyola Dr north of Georgetown

Dr

I-10 East of Williams Blvd

MSY Airport Rd Under Construction

Tie into Future Airport Rd

8

The project study area is located along I‐10 between the I‐310 and Williams Blvd interchanges. Along Loyola Dr the project area extends from north of Georgetown Dr southward across Veterans Blvd where it becomes Aberdeen St to the Airport.

This project will tie into the future Airport Rd currently under construction to the south.

8

How were the Alternatives Developed?

Interchange Modification Report

Tier I

Tier II

Tier III

9

How were the alternatives developed?

The interchange modification report and alternative assessment process involved 3 tiers with further refinement at each stage.

9

Tier I and II Recap

■ 18 alternatives were analyzed and screened for: Traffic Operations Right of Way requirements Environmental/Social Impacts Construction and Right of Way costs

■ Detailed Tier I comparison is presented at Station C■ Three alternatives were selected for further evaluation in

Tier II and moved to Tier III

10 of 28

The first step, tier I, involved developing 18 alternatives which were screened for traffic operations, right of way, environmental impacts and cost.

The detailed comparison matrix for the Tier I screening is presented at Station C.

Three alternatives were selected for further evaluation in Tier II and then moved forward to Tier III.

10

Tier III

■ The three alternatives evaluated in Tier III were Alternatives E, I, and L.

– Alternative E – 2 Cloverleaf and 3 Flyover Ramps – Alternative I – 3 Flyover Ramps – Alternative L – Diverging Diamond Interchange and 2

Flyovers Ramps

11 of 28

The three alternatives evaluated in Tier III and presented here tonight are alternatives E, I, and L.

11

Alternative E

Cloverleaf

12 of 28

Alternative E, includes two cloverleaf and three flyover ramps for directional movements at the interchange.

Flyover ramps for I‐10 east of the interchange provide direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. A flyover ramp is also included from I‐10 Eastbound to Loyola Dr Northbound.

Alternative E has the largest impacts of all of the alternatives.

A larger layout of this alternative is presented at Station D.

12

Alternative I

Flyovers

13 of 28

Alternative I, includes three flyover ramps for directional movements at the interchange.

Flyover ramps for I‐10 east of the interchange provide direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans intersection. A flyover ramp is also included from Loyola Southbound to I‐10 Eastbound.

A larger layout and typical roadway cross sections of Alternative I are presented at Station D.

Traffic models for Alternative I are presented at Station E.

13

Alternative L

Diverging Diamond Interchange

14 of 28

Alternative L, includes two flyover ramps and a diverging diamond interchange design.

Flyover ramps for I‐10 east of the interchange provide direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans intersection.

14

Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI)

Source: US 21 at I-40 Interchange in Statesville, North Carolina

15 of 28

The Diverging Diamond Interchange design eliminates conflicts with left turns on Loyola Dr at the interchange by shifting traffic to the left hand travel lane.

The traffic pattern of the DDI is presented on the left.

The right photo shows an example of a DDI in an urban environment with the mainline overpassing the DDI as it would in the I‐10/ Loyola interchange.

A larger layout and typical roadway cross sections of Alternative L are presented at Station D.

Traffic models for Alternative L are presented at Station E.

15

Additional features in Alternatives E, I, & L

■ All three Alternatives include the addition of:– An auxiliary lane on I-10 from Loyola Dr to Williams Blvd

in both directions– Four potential noise walls along the I-10 corridor

16 of 28

All three Alternatives include the addition of an auxiliary lane on I-10 from Loyola Dr to Williams Blvd in both directions. The auxiliary lane will begin at the Loyola Dr on-ramp and end at the Williams Blvd exit ramp. This auxiliary lane is shown at Station D.

All three Alternatives also include 4 potential noise walls along the I-10 corridor. The locations vary slightly between alternatives, but generally the walls will be in the northwest, northeast, southwest, and southeast quadrants of the Loyola Interchange. The noise walls are shown on the layouts at Stations D and G as orange lines.

16

Impact to Susan Park

Susan ParkSection 4(f) Property

Impacts

17 of 28

An important part of the Environmental Assessment process is to determine the impact that the alternatives will have, if any, on Section 4(f) properties which include publiclyowned parks, recreation areas and wildlife or waterfowl refuges and to receive public input on these impacts. Section 4(f) properties also include publicly or privately owned historic sites listed or eligible for listing on the Nation Register of Historic Places.

Susan Park, which is owned and operated by the City of Kenner, is located in the southeast quadrant of the I‐10/Loyola Dr interchange and is expected to be impacted by the alternatives. The alternatives are expected to have minimal impacts to the park and a Section 4(f) de minimis determination is being sought for this project.

17

Alternative E

Cloverleaf

18 of 28

This slide shows the expected impact to Susan Park for Alternative E.

A larger layout is shown at Station G.

18

Alternative I

Flyovers

19 of 28

This slide shows the expected impact to Susan Park for Alternative I.


19

Alternative L


20 of 28

This slide shows the expected impact to Susan Park for Alternative L.


Please take the opportunity to comment on the impacts to Susan Park at Station J.

20

Tier III

■ The comparison is presented at Station F and in the handout

*Key to Letter Grading: UA: unacceptable A: acceptable LC: least complex C: complex MC: most complex21 of 28


Non-Commercial 15.5483 acres 3.6347 acres 5.4229 acresCommercial 20.2717 acres 3.6003 acres 6.0541 acres



Total Number of Impacts 375 426 418

Operations UA A UASigning MC LC CSafety A A A



Traffic Analyses





This slide shows a summary of the Tier III comparison.

The detailed comparison matrix for Tier III is presented at Station F and is included in the handout.

21

• Interchange Modification Report (IMR) started: March 2016

• Environmental Assessment (EA) started: November 2017

• Public Meeting : July 24, 2018

• Draft EA Distribution: September 2018

• Finalized IMR: October 2018

• Public Hearing: October 2018

• Anticipated FONSI and Final EA Distribution: December 2018

What is the Environmental Schedule?

22 of 28

The project began with the Interchange Modification Report process in March of 2016.

The environmental review process began in November of 2017.

We are currently at the Public meeting task as shown here.

The anticipated completion of the Environmental Assessment Document is expected in December of this year.

22

• Review of Comments and Suggestions

• Refine Alternatives and Select a Preferred Alternative

• Prepare Draft Environmental Assessment

Other Opportunities for Public Involvement?

• Review and address Draft Environmental Assessment Comments

• Request FONSI

Anticipated FONSI Issuance

Public Hearing

Submit Final Environmental

Assessment

23 of 28

Comments and suggestions from this meeting will be reviewed, the alternatives may be refined in response, and a preferred alternative will be identified.

A draft Environmental Assessment will be prepared and then made available to the public. The preferred alternative will be presented along with justification for its selection at a public hearing.

After the public hearing, draft Environmental Assessment comments will be reviewed and addressed in the final Environmental Assessment document.

The Environmental Assessment document will be submitted to FHWA for FONSI approval. Once FHWA issues the decision, the final Environmental Assessment Document will be made available to the Public.

23

24 of 28

Interim Solutions

The current construction taking place in the vicinity of this project is not part of this project and is intended to be a short term solution to the traffic operations in the area.

The Interim Solutions are shown at Station H.

24

Interim Solutions

■ I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Project

■ The Design-Build process has begun and is concurrent with the environmental process.

■ The Design Build outcome will be determined after environmental clearance.

25 of 28

Long Term Solutions

■ Four lane extension of Loyola Dr from Veterans Blvd to the new Airport Road

■ Addition of turn lanes

The interim solutions include a four lane extension of Loyola Dr from Veterans to the new airport road and addition of turn lanes to existing Loyola Dr, Veterans Blvd and the I-10 Westbound off ramp.

The I‐10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Project is intended to be a long term solution.

The Design-Build procurement process has begun and is concurrent with the environmental process.

The Design Build outcome will be determined after environmental clearance.

25

Right of Way Acquisition and Relocation Information■ A Real Estate representative is located at Station I to explain the following:

– DOTD’s right of way acquisition

– Relocation procedures

■ If you have any questions regarding your individual situation, consult with the agent when he or she meets with you or contact the Region Real Estate Office.

LADOTD District 02 Real Estate Office

3108 Williams Blvd.

Kenner, LA 70065

(504) 465-3468

26 of 28

A Real Estate representative from the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development is here at the meeting to explain the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development’s right of way acquisition and relocation procedures.

The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Brochure explaining the Acquisition of Right of Way and Relocation Assistance Program is available at Station I.

If you have property affected by this project, we suggest you read the brochure carefully. If you have any questions regarding your individual situation, consult with the agent when he or she meets with you or contact the Region Real Estate Office.

26

QUESTIONS & COMMENTS?

Verbal and Written Comments may be made at Station J at tonight’s meeting.

Written Comments may also be mailed, postmarked by August 3, 2018.

Urban Systems, Inc.




Attn: Mr. Brandon Perilloux P.E., PTOE27 of 28

Please proceed to view the exhibits and speak with our project team, ask questions, and provide your comments. Your knowledge and opinions matter.

Public Meeting Handouts with comment forms are available where you signed in, Station Aand at Station J. The forms can be returned at Station J before you leave. There is also a transcriber here tonight to record your verbal statement at Station J.

If you choose to mail the comment form, please be sure that it is postmarked no later than August 3rd. The address for mailing is preprinted on the Comment Form.

27

Thank You For Attending

28 of 28

Thank you for attending this public meeting. We look forward to hearing your feedback on the alternatives.

28

APPENDIX C Initial Comparison - Tier I Matrix

INTERCHANGE FORM Description REMARKSCONSIDERATION

TIER 2

NewDirectional ramps for all eight movements

Very HighCapacity

Significant Moderate Very HighApplicable for Freeway to

Freeway OnlyNo

NewSB to EB Clover

EB to NB and SB At Grade RampNB to WB Clover

WB to NB and SB At Grade RampExisting

SB to WB At grade RampNB to EB At grade Ramp

Low Capacity Significant High Low

Heavy volume conflict between SB and WBL (am and

pm) and EBL (pm) and between NB and both

EBL/WBL (pm)

No

NewNB and SB to WB At Grade RampNB and SB to EB At Grade Ramp

EB to NB Clover WB to SB Clover

ExistingEB to NB At grade RampWB to NB At grade Ramp

ModerateCapacity

Significant Moderate LowHeavy volume conflict

between SBL and NB and NBL with SBT (pm)

No

NewSB to EB Clover

SB to WB At Grade RampEB to NB Clover

EB to SB At Grade RampNB to EB At Grade Ramp

NB to WB CloverWB to NB At Grade Ramp

WB to SB Clover

ModerateCapacity

Significant High Moderate

Weaving sections are undesirable for heavy conflict,

WB to SB with SB to EB (both peaks), and NB to WB

with EB to NB (pm)

No

NewSingle Point Urban Intersection for all eight movements

ExistingDiamond Ramps in all 4 quadrants

ModerateCapacity

Minimal Low ModerateVolumes well suited for SPUI

in the PM. Requires replacement of I-10 bridges.

No

NewTSM improvements TBD

Services all eight movementsExisting

Diamond Ramps in all 4 quadrants

Low Capacity Minimal Low Low

Inadequate storage between ramps. Heavy volume

conflicts with all left turning movements

No-Build Scenario/TSM

NewRealigned Loyola Drive

and modified ramp terminal intersectionsServices all eight movements


ModerateCapacity

Minimal Low LowPotentially inadequate storage

between ramps. No

NewEB to NB Directional Ramp

WB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransExisting

Diamond Ramps servicing all eight movements

ModerateCapacity

Moderate Low HighHeavy volume conflict NBL

with SBT and SBL with NBT (pm)

No


NB and SB to WB At grade RampWB to SB Clover

ExistingSB and NB to EB Diamond RampEB to NB and SB Diamond Ramp

WB to NB Diamond Ramp

ModerateCapacity

Moderate Moderate ModerateHeavy volume conflict NBL


No


NB to WB CloverWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans

WB to NB and SB At grade RampExisting

SB to WB Diamond RampSB and NB to EB Diamond RampEB to NB and SB Diamond Ramp

High Capacity

Moderate Moderate HighHeavy volume conflict SBL

with NBT (pm)No

NewNB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans

ExistingDiamond Ramps servicing all eight movements

Low Capacity Moderate Low ModerateHeavy volume conflict SBL

with NBT (pm), NBL/SBT and EBL with both SBT and NBT

No

NewSB to EB Clover

EB to NB Directional RampEB to NB and SB At grade Ramp

NB to WB CloverNB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans


SB to WB Diamond RampNB to EB Diamond Ramp

High Capacity

Significant High High Eliminates Left Turns Yes

NewFull Directional 3 Stack with Braided Ramps servicing all eight

movements between the existing Loyola and Williams interchanges. Includes elevated ramps over Veterans and 27th

High Capacity

Moderate Low High

Does not add capacity at existing interchange. May be

needed past design year. Would require separate IJR.

No

NewElevated I-10 with SPUI underneath between the existing Loyola

and Williams interchanges. Includes Braided Ramps on I-10 EB and an elevated road

crossings Veterans and 27th

Very HighCapacity

Moderate Low Very High



No

NewSB to EB Clover

EB to NB and SB At grade RampWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransNB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans

ExistingSB and NB to WB Diamond Ramp

NB to EB Diamond RampWB to NB and SB Diamond Ramp

High Capacity

Moderate Moderate High

Heavy volume conflict EBL with both NBT and SBT and NBL/SBT (pm). Potentially

two phase signalization.

No


SB to EB Directional RampExisting


High Capacity

Moderate Low HighHeavy volume conflict EBL with both NBT and SBT and

NBL/SBT (pm).Yes

NewSB to EB Directional Ramp at Loyola

NB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans near Bainbridge

WB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans near BainbridgeExisting

Diamond Ramps servicing all eight movements at Loyola

May be needed past design year. Would require separate

IJR.No

NewNB to WB Clover

WB to NB and SB At grade RampNB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans

EB to NB Directional RampExisting

SB and NB to WB Diamond RampSB and NB to EB Diamond RampEB to NB and SB Diamond Ramp

High Capacity

Moderate Moderate HighImprovement to Hybrid C, one clover less than Hybrid E. Will

be a backup for Hybrid ENo



Very HighCapacity

Moderate Low Moderate Hybrid D ramps with DDI Yes

Initial Compaison of AlternativesI-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement

S.P. # H.011670

Not Screened

TRAFFICOPERATIONS

RIGHT-OF-WAYENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL IMPACTS

COSTS

Tier I Matrix

Alternatives Selected for Further Evaluation in Tier II

Hybrid A

Hybrid B

Hybrid C

Hybrid D

Hybrid EHybrid E

Hybrid F (Located b/w Loyola & Williams)

Hybrid H

Hybrid G (Located b/w Loyola & Williams)

All Directional

Par Clo ‐ A

Par Clo ‐ B

Cloverleaf

Single Point Urban

Tight Urban Diamond

Hybrid I

Hybrid J

Hybrid K

Hybrid L

DivergingDiamond

APPENDIX D Alternative Exhibits


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FAY

ET

TE

ST.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST.

CANAL NO. 14

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LE

NA

ST.

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

ALTERNATIVE E


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




ALTERNATIVE I

DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FAY

ET

TE

ST.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FAY

ET

TE

ST.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

ALTERNATIVE L


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:





JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TO

N S

T.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

Travel Lanes

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TO

N S

T.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

!I

0 250 500

Feet

0 250 500

Feet

ALTERNATIVE I

ALTERNATIVE L

APPENDIX E Comparison of Alternatives - Tier III Matrix












Church, Recreation 6 8 7Commercial 2 2 2


Safety A A A





Tier III Matrix




Traffic Analyses



Cultural Resources



APPENDIX F Susan Park Exhibits


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10§̈¦I-10

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST



PARCEL LINE


+/- 24'+/- 40'

AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMP



!I


Travel Lanes





Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


+/- 15' +/- 8'



PARCEL LINE

AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMP







Travel Lanes


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10§̈¦I-10

+/- 43'

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


+/- 28'


PARCEL LINE


AIRPORT TO I-10 EB


!I


Travel Lanes




APPENDIX G Interim Solutions

Interim SolutionsNew Orleans Airport Connector Road

State Project Number H.011276Kenner, LA

Loyola Dr

Vet

eran

s B

lvd

10

To Airport

APPENDIX H Public Notes, Affidavits, Social Media

�� !�"#$%&'�� !�()*+, -./�0.1/2.3 -4567385. -.1372

9�:�;�<�<�=�9�>�?;�@�A�BCD�EC�>

F�GG�HI'�J '�G�%�HK�%!�LMH& G�N��G&��OL��P��MH��G�H�Q��GM!��&��!�R�N�Q& !��O��S�Q��OL��!�G'��&�O T!��IUL&V�H�H�W�IRH&W�X�'�O& G��YG��H'��Z#��&��P��G�X��''�GM�H��HWTG�!� G��H�Q&G'�H Q�T&G�&G [

�� !"# ��$%��!��!&�%�& ��'��% !��!&��(�)�&��& �� *��&+!��,�*�!!��(��&�� &��!� &!�-��!�.��&�!��!&�&�� (�,�$��/� ��!�� (�&�� *��.��!!�&�� &'��)�&��!&�&��01��2�*��&��&��'��!*��&�& ��2�.��*��&�*��!�&��*% � ��& �(��&��!&�&%!�'�&��,��3�4%�$�56��&�7�*��8��+!�9 &$�#��3*�. � ��:;11��$��2� .��<==:�>�� &�� !�!�&�&��*�� ?� �%��$��&��&��! ��'�&�� *��&��!%**��& �(�&��%��&&�� &��!�%&��! ��@%&�(�&& �(�&��&��,�&�� '��)"01�,��+&� ��! �*�� %!��&��%��&��-(%��& ��A% ��!��&�� !&!�&��B &�&�� (�,�$��&��$��2� .��(�& �&��(��%��"��.��&��/��&��!&&,��&��/��! (��!� �'�� (�&��&��! ��'�&�� *��&�)��&��(��%��&��!*��&�& ��2�*��&��&�*��!�&� % ��CD$�.��*C�'��,�!& �%��)"01�&��$��&& �(�!�� *��&" �%��&�� !&!��.� ��%��'�&��&��/��&+!�&��!% E��&��'�&��4%�$�56��& �(�

&��&��! ��'��% !��!&��()�&��& �� *��&��FG�*� $�H��(��I5JK� 570!��!

L

�� !�� "��#��$��%&��'(�� "�� )��*��*�� +� �$��,��*��*�� -��"��&��*��,�� .��/�� 0123��*�� "�� 4��$ ��&��05�� 6�� #��7��8��8�� 9�21�� :��;�7�� <�� 6��<��!�� =

�� !��"��#$%&�� '�� !� �!��!��$�� !��(��$��'��(�#$%&�� !� �!��'�� )��*�� +��%�� ,�� ,��(�*�� !��"��-��(��(�� !��(��"�� .�.�.�.�.�.�./�� 0�1��2 �� '�� ,��!��(�34'��5�� $2 ��6� ��"��7��+��"��/�� 2�� "��%��8��!��9��/�� :

�� !"��#�$%&'(�#)*$'(�&�+�,))-$��.�&�� !"/0��1 !�23��4��5�6� ��447/�255�� 3��8)9��"/�:��;�� 5�� ;��<��=� �� <��=��; ��=��> ��=��?��> �� >� ��; �� 23��4��5/,)��9�$�(�@9*��5��55��5��> ��<; �� /A)9��,&*$B)��$&�#�$%&'(�@$�C��+�,C)$'��

D

APPENDIX I Address for Individual Notices

3208 Loyola Drive Kenner, LA 70065






455 31st Street Kenner, LA 70065













404 Veterans Memorial Blvd

Kenner, LA 70062 2830 Loyola Drive Kenner, LA 70062



Kenner, LA 70062 502 Veterans Memorial Blvd

Kenner, LA 70062

2717 Decatur Street Kenner, LA 70062

2833 Virginia Street Kenner, LA 70062

2835 Virginia Street Kenner, LA 70062

1400 29th Street Kenner, LA 70062

1500 29th Street

Kenner, LA 70062

1506 29th Street #A

Kenner, LA 70062

1506 29th Street #B

Kenner, LA 70062




16 29th Street

Kenner, LA 70062 18 29th Street

Kenner, LA 70062


2843 Piedmont Street

Kenner, LA 70062

20 29th Street #A

Kenner, LA 70062

20 29th Street #B

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Sharon Street #A

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Sharon Street #B

Kenner, LA 70062

2826 Greenwood Street Kenner, LA 70062



2801 Loyola Drive #1

Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

331 Veterans Blvd #1

Kenner, LA 70062

331 Veterans Blvd #2

Kenner, LA 70062

2717 Aberdeen Street Kenner, LA 70062

3212 Loyola Dr

Kenner, LA 70065 3216 Loyola Dr

Kenner, LA 70065

3232 Loyola Dr Kenner, LA 70065

3236 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


3244 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065





3209 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


3201 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


3225 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


603 29th Street


Kenner, LA 70062


609 29th Street

Kenner, LA 70062 2809 Panama Street Kenner, LA 70062














413 27th Street


Kenner, LA 70062

2843 Kingston Street Kenner, LA 70062

2845 Kingston Street

Kenner, LA 70062 2841 Greenwood Street

Kenner, LA 70062

2840 Kingston Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2840 Kingston Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2832 Salem Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2832 Salem Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2829 Fayette Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2829 Fayette Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2611 Aberdeen Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2611 Aberdeen St B

Kenner, LA 70062

2607 Aberdeen St A

Kenner, LA 70062

2607 Aberdeen St B

Kenner, LA 70062

2847 Richland Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2847 Richland Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2847 Richland Street C

Kenner, LA 70062

2847 Richland Street D

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Salem Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Salem Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Salem Street C

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Salem Street D

Kenner, LA 70062

2848 Salem Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2848 Salem Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2848 Salem Street C

Kenner, LA 70062

2848 Salem Street D

Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

2837 Fayette Street C

Kenner, LA 70062

2837 Fayette Street D

Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

2818 Fayette Street

C Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

2813 Greenwood Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2813 Greenwood Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2813 Greenwood Street C

Kenner, LA 70062

2813 Greenwood Street D

Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #1

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #2

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #3

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #4

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #5

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #6

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #7

Kenner, LA 70062

3000 Dartmouth Street Kenner, LA 70065

321 Auburn Place

A Kenner, LA 70065

321 Auburn Place B

Kenner, LA 70065

321 Auburn Place C

Kenner, LA 70065

321 Auburn Place D

Kenner, LA 70065

323 Auburn Place A

Kenner, LA 70065

323 Auburn Place B

Kenner, LA 70065

323 Auburn Place C

Kenner, LA 70065

323 Auburn Place D

Kenner, LA 70065

325 Auburn Place A

Kenner, LA 70065

325 Auburn Place B

Kenner, LA 70065

325 Auburn Place C

Kenner, LA 70065

325 Auburn Place D

Kenner, LA 70065

327 Auburn Place A

Kenner, LA 70065

327 Auburn Place B

Kenner, LA 70065

327 Auburn Place C

Kenner, LA 70065

327 Auburn Place D

Kenner, LA 70065

3001 Emory Street Kenner, LA 70065


3005 Emory Street

A Kenner, LA 70065

3005 Emory Street B

Kenner, LA 70065

3005 Emory Street C

Kenner, LA 70065

3005 Emory Street D

Kenner, LA 70065

3007 Emory Street A

Kenner, LA 70065

3007 Emory Street B

Kenner, LA 70065

3007 Emory Street C

Kenner, LA 70065

3007 Emory Street D

Kenner, LA 70065



APPENDIX J Comments and Summary

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement State Project No. H.011670 F.A.P. NO. H011670

General Comment Form 10/4/2018

Response Number

How often do you travel in the

project area?

What transportation/traffic problems do you experience in the

project area?

Which Alternative do

you prefer?

Briefly explain the reason for your selection and what problems you think

will be improved by the selected Alternative

Would the Alternative you selected in Question 3 improve

your travel experience to:

Do you have any other concerns, comments, or observations relative to social, environmental or economic impacts in the project area or immediate

surroundings?Notes

1 Daily Traffic Congestion Alternative I Least impact to the area.Work,

Recreational/Entertainment

Noise from freeway is main the concern, would like noise barriers extended to cover the Susan Park. Plan for Alternative route during

construction because Susan Park area has just one exit to Veterans Blvd (via Tupelo St). Whenever traffic on I-10 is effected, it is difficult to

leave the Susan Park area because of congestion. Again, Tupelo Street is the only other way to Veterans for those living in Susan Park. Rarely, some kids come over the fence bordering the I-10 by the park. Just be

aware of that, as you will increase traffic flow in that area.

Noise barriers have been considered feasible during the development of the project and have been included along I-10 where feasible. Noise barriers were extended across Susan Park based on public input. The project's design will include a traffic management plan to reduce the impact to traffic patterns during construction. The noise walls from the NO Aiport Connector Rd project will be relocated on the eastside of Airport Rd. These walls will provide noise benefit and restricting pedestrian access.

2 Daily Traffic Congestion, Long Delays Not Sure Less impact to residents Work, School, AirportThe area that the public meeting was held, was to far away from area it will impact the most. Will the taxpayers (of Kenner) be footing the bill

for project?

A second meeting was held for the public at the Susan Park Gymnasium focused on the local community. (See Section 4.4). The interchange will be funded using various sources of revenues.

3 DailyTraffic Congestion, Long

Delays, Unexpected DelaysAlternative I

Speed limits Loyola, street lighting, Like the ideas

Work, Airport, All of the Above

N/A

4 Weekly None Alternative ILess impact on surrounding

communityAll of the Above Continue to consider public input Comment taken into consideration.


Delays, Lack of Alternative Routes

Alternative L A little less traffic, not much Work, School, Medical Care Firehouse should be somewhere on Vets not on Loyola by Duke StreetThe fire station relocation is not part of this project. The City of Kenner will determine the location of the firehouse relocation.

6 Daily Traffic Congestion, Long Delays Alternative L Further away from Susan Park None of the Above

Move the Fire Station on Susan Park side of Loyola Ave. More traffic on Veterans. Pretty bad now. Noise from the fly over and traffic. What is going to happen to the traffic when you get to Williams Blvd. You

already have three entrances and stops at Power Blvd. We will never be able to use I-10.

The fire station relocation is not part of this project. Noise barriers have been considered feasible during the development of the project and have been included along I-10 where feasible. The City of Kenner will determine the location of the firehouse relocation. The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.



Fire station on Loyola Dr must not be moved to north of I-10. Kenner is cut

in half by I-10. An accident congesting Loyola would force the

fire dept to respond by going around I-10 to Williams or responding from

City Hall. Too long a response time. Please reconsider station location.

N/A

8 DailyTraffic Congestion, Unexpected


Alternative I

Alternative I is the least disruptive to our community from both residential & commercial stand point. It costs slightly more then Alt L & it could

possibly be built faster than the other options.

Work, Airport

Considering this project may be completed 3+ years after the new terminal has opened is going to cause enough concerns for our

community, visitors, and economic development. This is obviously another typical Louisiana political blunder that only hurts the residents

of our community. I certainly do not know all of the intricate details of this project but it is an

embarrassment to Louisiana and especially the City of Kenner. I am hoping that our community can "make do" with a band aid approach

while the plans are finalized and construction takes place. It bothers me that we always appear

to look like idiots to the rest of the country because of times and situations like this.

Comment taken into consideration. A separate project to improve the Veterans Blvd. corridor is expected from the City of Kenner.


Delays, Unexpected Delays, Lack of Alternative Routes

Alternative I Will eliminate 3 traffic lightsWork, School, Airport,

Recreational/Entertainment, Medical Care

N/A



Alternative IImproved access to I-10, reduced

congestion

Work, School, Airport, Recreational/Entertainment,

Medical CareN/A



Alternative IAccess to I-10 improved, traffic congestion should be reduced

Work, School, Airport, Recreational/Entertainment,

Medical CareN/A

Comments involving the firehouse relocationComments involving 27 Street


Susan Park Comment Form 10/4/2018

Response Number

Do you utilize Susan Park?

If yes, how often?

Do you expect the Alternatives to

negatively impact your use of Susan Park?

If yes, how so?

Is the impact to Susan Park important to your

choice of a preferred Alternative?

If yes, which Alternative do

you prefer?

Briefly explain the reason for your

selection.

Do you have any other concerns, comments, or observations relative to the

impact to Susan Park? Notes

1 Yes Everyday No Yeswhichever has least

affect of Susan Park

Concern about the citizens that walk to the Family Dollar & Dollar General

and the Friendship Community Baptist Church. We need an access walking bridge for citizens to cross instead of

walking all the way to Veterans to access dollar store and church.

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project.

2 Yes Everyday 24-7 Yes

The shows 27st will close of the

neighborhood also a wall

Yesleave 27 street

open and not dead end

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project.

3 YesEveryday, I live

thereYes Noise Yes Alternative L

to try and keep traffic away

More traffic when I-10 backs up we can't even get out of our street to Vets

my husband works 5 minutes away now it takes 30 minutes to get home.

And fire station sound be on Vet somewhere not Duke.

The fire station relocation is not a part of this project. The City of Kenner will determine the location of the firehouse relocation. The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.

4 YesEveryday, I live

thereYes Noise and traffic Yes Alternative L

Move fire station on Susan Park side of Loyola

The fire station relocation is not part of this project. The City of Kenner will determine the location of the firehouse relocation.

Comments involving the firehouse relocationComments involving 27 Street


Additional Comments

10/4/2018

Response Number Verbal Comment Notes

1

My complaint is about closing Veteran’s Boulevard where the elderly cannot get to the Dollar Stores. They currently walk or are wheelchair bound. Can there be some time of pedestrian

crossing to take the place where the 27th St. access is going to be closed off? We would surely appreciate any thought to make it as pedestrian friendly as possible for the current residents.

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian

analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to

present the design to the public and address concerns

raised/expressed by local officials and the public during

the public outreach of this project.


Stakeholder Comments10/11/2018

Response Number

Notes

1Comments taken into

consideration.

2

Comments taken into consideration. LADOTD will

consider beautification features during design. However,

implementation of beautification efforts is dependent on agreements with local government agencies for

maintenance of beautification.

3

Comments taken into consideration. LADOTD will

consider beautification features during design. However,

implementation of beautification efforts is dependent on agreements with local government agencies for

maintenance of beautification.

4 (verbal)

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public

meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address

concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the

public outreach of this project.

Stakeholder Comment

This is to provide public comment on the proposed I-10 interchange project as presented at the public hearingat the Kenner City Park Pavilion on July 24, 2018.This major entrance to the city would be improved by making beautification part of the project, particularlyalong I-10 access both east and west of Loyola.1. Sound barriers are anticipated for all three options; use of stamped concrete art representative of NewOrleans and south Louisiana in the sound barriers would improve appearance, along with low maintenancedecorative shrubbery along the barriers.2. Where there are green spaces, trees would improve appearance3. The addition of a screen of decorative shrubbery along the I-10 overpass, and once construction iscompleted, discontinued use of the area underneath the overpass for parking of road equipment.4. Beautification of planned medians along Loyola to the airport, decorative plantings and trees to provide apositive impression of Kenner, and the New Orleans International Airport.Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the planning for this projectThis is to provide public comment on the proposed 1-10 interchange project as presentedat the public hearing at the Kenner City Park Pavilion on July 24, 2018.This major entrance to the city would be improved by making beautification part of theproj ect, particularly along 1-10 access both east and west of Loyola.1. Sound barriers are anticipated for all three options; use of stamped concrete artrepresentative of New Orleans and south Louisiana in the sound barriers would improveappearance, along with low maintenance decorative shrubbery along the barriers.2. Where there are green spaces, trees would improve appearance3. The addition of a screen of decorative shrubbery along the 1-10 overpass, and onceconstruction is completed, discontinued use of the area underneath the overpass forparking of road equipment.4. Beautification of planned medians along Loyola to the airport, decorative plantings andtrees to provide a positive impression of Kenner, and the New Orleans InternationalAirport.Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the planning for this project.

My comment relates to Aberdeen St that is going to go from 2 lanes to 8 lanes during this project. Also 27th St that will be dead ended during this project. Would it be possible to have a pedestrian cross over at 27th St? If not there could be somewhere on Aberdeen. This is a concern because of cutting off people’s access from each side of the street to services on the west side of the street. On Veterans there is Susan Park playground to the north and the population is to the south. What is the possibility of providing pedestrian crossing via push button light between Loyola and Panama St to stop traffic and provide a safe place to cross Veterans.

In lieu of the General Comment Form provided at the Environmental Assessment Public Meeting on July 24, 2018, please accept this letter regarding any concerns, comments or observations that we have in the Jefferson Parish District 4 office relative to the social, environmental or economic impacts for the 1-10/ Loyola Interchange Improvement Project. As the Jefferson Parish District 4 Councilman, the residents and commercial interests leading up to and surrounding the airport are significantly impacted by the Interchange Improvement. The residents most likely affected by the traffic changes and additional burden placed by the additional million vehicles expected to travel through this corridor live predominantly in JeffersonParish District 4. As a result, we submit these comments with the hope that these recommendations will be given their due consideration for the best interests of the citizens of Jefferson Parish, particularly those directly affected by this interchange and the airport construction as a whole.Alternative "I" appears to provide the best option overall. First, operationally, it provides the best traffic movement, while simultaneously requiring the least amount of right of way acquisition and displacement and relocation of residents and commercial interests. The three elevated ramps are major features of this project. I strongly urge that all three remain in the project. The south bound ramp from Loyola to east bound 1-10 is of major importance as the ramp will alleviate ground level congestion at the 1-10/Loyola intersection as well as benefit many Kenner residents. This will allow the airport traffic to remain separate from the ordinary current traffic pattern that exists today, thereby allowing the traffic pattern as it is currently to remain relatively undisturbed, if not even enhanced. This will allow the least burden to the residents of Jefferson Parish resulting from the airport relocation. As an elected representative of Kenner and Jefferson Parish, I want to ensure that traffic exiting the new airport terminal will have the options of taking the elevated ramp to east bound 1-10 or staying at ground level to go northbound on Loyola Drive or east-west on Veterans Boulevard. In line with this option, Veterans Boulevard currently has sufficient right-of-way to accommodate a roadway widening project from the west return wall (west) to the north-south runway (east). Being that Veterans Boulevard is in the federal network, suchwidening project would qualify for federal funds. Your report may want to consider these improvements as part of the solution to these major traffic concerns.This project has been on a fast track, and we appreciate all efforts in continuing the expeditious progress of the overall project, but specifically the interchange construction. The introduction of other alternatives or any other major changes at this time will have the potential of considerably delaying the project and perhaps jeopardizing established funding sources already committed for the project. Expediting the construction of the project is of essence, and therefore, on behalf of the citizens of Jefferson Parish District 4, we recommend implementation of Alternative I for the 1-10/Loyola I nterchange Improvement - State Project No. H. 011670 - F.A.P No. H011670.


Additional Comments

10/11/2018

Response Number

Notes

1

Comment taken into consideration. Respondent indicated they prefer Alt E due to that alternative having superior traffic operations; however, Alt I is expected to have the best traffic operations of

the alternatives. Alt E is expected to have unacceptable traffic operations due to geometric

constraints.

2

The proposed flyover from Loyola Dr. southbound to I-10 EB is necessary to remove the heavy Loyola Dr. SB traffic attempting to make a left turn from Loyola onto I-10 EB.

Traffic modeling indicates that the elimination ofthis movement via the fly over will significantly improve the Loyola Dr. traffic both NB and SB

via removing the conflict with the SB traffic destined for I-10 EB at grade. The area below

this ramp in particular will not be "open" as pier protection walls and incidental paving is

proposed under the bridge structure.

3

The proposed flyover from Loyola Dr. southbound to I-10 EB is necessary to remove the heavy Loyola Dr. SB traffic attempting to make a left turn from Loyola onto I-10 EB.

Traffic modeling indicates that the elimination ofthis movement via the fly over will significantly improve the Loyola Dr. traffic both NB and SB

via removing the conflict with the SB traffic destined for I-10 EB at grade. The area below

this ramp in particular will not be "open" as pier protection walls and incidental paving is

proposed under the bridge structure.

4

Comment taken into consideration. LADOTD will consider beautification features during

design. However, implementation of beautification efforts is dependent on agreements with local government agencies for maintenance

of beautification.

By way of introduction, PTP Investments, LLC owns and operates a shopping center located at 3100-3130 Loyola Drive Kenner, Louisiana. Upon review of the possible proposed interchange improvements called for by the new "North" Armstrong International Airport Terminal we noticed, with surprise, that at least two proposals included southbound, elevated ramps on Loyola Drive directing traffic onto eastbound I-10. In connection with public comment period on this project, we wish to express our strong objection to elevating a roadway in front of our property at 3100-3130 Loyola Drive. Our opposition is based on the following: 1. There is no demonstrable immediate need for the Loyola Drive south-bound ramp onto I-10. 2. There is no demonstrable evidence that the southbound Loyola ramp leading into I-10 has any connection whatsoever with traffic connecting I-10 over Claiborne Avenue and Westbank Expressway. 3. This ramp can be built at any time, should airport access traffic demonstrate a need. 4. Bypass elevated highways/ramps negatively affect local businesses along the elevated portion. Examples of negative businessseffect: I-10 over Claiborne Avenue and Westbank Expressway. 5. Loyola Drive is particularly susceptible to transient/homeless traffic because it is the first exit into the New Orleans metro areafrom the West and the last exit outbound from New Orleans. We are already experiencing this traffic in the area and we are in a constant battle with this element. Providing protection from the elements and shade will only worsen the situation. In summary, this plan for a southbound elevated ramp on Loyola Drive leading onto eastbound I-10 is unnecessary, expensive, a waste of public funds, and entails many risks for the businesses along Loyola Drive, while not exhibiting a demonstrated need created by I-10 access to and from the new airport terminal.

Written Comment

This is to provide public comment on the proposed I-10 interchange project as presented at the public hearing at the Kenner City Pavilion on July 24, 2018. The Chateau Estates Civic Organization represents about 1400 household in North Kenner. In June, we joined the Chateau Lakefront Civic Organization and the Cannes Brules Civic Organization in recommending and endorsing the inclusion of beautification into the forthcoming capital project to improve the Loyola Interchange. This major entrance to the city would be improved by making beautification part of the project, particularly along I-10 access both east and west Loyola. We make the following recommendation. 1. Sound barriers are anticipated for all three options; use of stamped concrete art representative of New Orleans and south Louisiana in the sound barriers would improve appearance, along with low maintenance to decorative shrubbery along the barriers. 2. Where there are green spaces, trees would improve appearance. 3. The addition of a screen of decorative shrubbery along the I-10 overpass, and once construction is completed, discontinued use of the area underneath the overpass for parking of road equipment. 4. Beautification of planned medians along Loyola to the airport, decorative plantings and trees to provide a positive impression of Kenner, and the New Orleans International Airport. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the planning for this project.

As owner of Kenner Seafood located at 3140 Loyola Dr. In Kenner, Louisiana. I attended the Open House Public Meeting on July 24, 2018 to learn with surprise, that at least two proposals included southbound, elevated ramps on Loyola Drive directing traffic onto eastbound I-10. In connection with the public comment period on this project. I am writing to you to express my strong objection on elevating a roadway in front of my property at 3140 Loyola Drive. My opposition is based on the following:1. There is no immediate need for the Loyola Drive south-bound ramp onto I-10.2. I see no evidence that the southbound Loyola ramp leading into I-10 has any connection with traffic connecting I-10 to the new airport terminal.3. The ramp can be built at any time, should airport access traffic demonstrate a need.4. Elevated highways/ramps negatively affect local businesses along the elevated portion.5. Loyola Drive is the first exit into New Orleans metro area from the west and the last exit outbound from New Orleans therefore I am already fighting the battle of transient/homeless traffic. Providing a ramp will only provide shade and housing for this element.In closing, I have been in business for 22 years and feel that a southbound elevated ramp on Loyola Drive leading onto eastbound I-10 is very expensive, a waste of public funds, and has many many many risks for the businesses that pay taxes along Loyola Drive.

My name is Mark Reynolds and I am a resident of New Orleans, Louisiana and the owner of a business located at 2423 Bainbridge Street in Kenner, Louisiana. I am writing this letter in support of the overall I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvements project and the specifically proposed cloverleaf interchange design identified at the recent public meeting and subsequent media coverage as “Option E”.As a business owner in the vicinity of the airport and a regular air traveler who uses Armstrong International Airport, I experience traffic congestion in the area on a daily basis. This heavy traffic is most severe on Interstate 10, Williams Boulevard, and Veterans Memorial Boulevard. It has been my experience that these streets in their current configuration are barely capable of moving the existing amounts of neighborhood and business traffic in the area north of the airport and that upcoming addition of airport terminal traffic into the mix will make the situation exponentially worse. While the cloverleaf “Option E” scheme is the most expensive and largest of the possible designs, I believe that its superior traffic capacity and safety features make it the most appropriate solution for the I-10/Loyola Interchange, which will soon become a vehicle thoroughfare of the highest regional importance. While the displacement of homes and businesses that the construction of Option E will require is unfortunate, the traffic congestion and accidents resulting from an inferior interchange design will certainly doom the users of nearby properties to a severe decline in quality of life, safety and mobility. It is far better to offer fair buyouts to affected properties and build the largest and safest interchange design. In addition, there are many vacant and/or underutilized properties in the city of Kenner where displaced residents and businesses can relocate to.

1

Alyssa Bienes

From: Brandon PerillouxSent: Friday, August 03, 2018 1:13 PMTo: Alyssa BienesSubject: Fwd: Kenner Seafood 3140 Loyola Dr. Kenner, LA 70065/ Loyola Interchange

Improvements

Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message:

From: Trudy Alexander <[email protected]> Date: August 3, 2018 at 12:56:23 PM CDT To: [email protected] Subject: Fwd: Kenner Seafood 3140 Loyola Dr. Kenner, LA 70065/ Loyola Interchange Improvements

-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject: Kenner Seafood 3140 Loyola Dr. Kenner, LA 70065/ Loyola Interchange ImprovementsDate: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 22:42:26 -0500 From:

To:

Dear Mr. Perilous, As owner of Kenner Seafood located at 3140 Loyola Dr. In Kenner, Louisiana. I attended The Open House Public Meeting on July 24, 2018 to learn with surprise, that at least two proposals included southbound, elevated ramps on Loyola Drive directing traffic onto eastbound I-10. In connection with the public comment period on this project. I am writing to you to express my strong objection on elevating a roadway in front of my property at 3140 Loyola Drive. My opposition is based on the following: 1. There is no immediate need for the Loyola Drive south-bound ramp onto I-10. 2. I see no evidence that the southbound Loyola ramp leading into I-10 has any connection with traffic connecting I-10 to the new airport terminal.

2

3. The ramp can be built at any time, should airport access traffic demonstrate a need. 4. Elevated highways/ramps negatively affect local businesses along the elevated portion. 5. Loyola Drive is the first exit into New Orleans metro area from the west and the last exit outbound from New Orleans therefore I am already fighting the battle of transient/homeless traffic. Providing a ramp will only provide shade and housing for this element. In closing, I have been in business for 22 years and feel that a southbound elevated ramp on Loyola Drive leading onto eastbound I-10 is very expensive, a waste of public funds, and has many many many risks for the businesses that pay taxes along Loyola Drive. Sincerely, Trudy Alexander Kenner Seafood 3140 Loyola Dr. Kenner, LA 70065 504-495-8383 Sent from my iPad

I-10 at Loyola Interchange Verbal Comments July 24, 2018

• Delores Windsor, President of Lincoln Manor Civic Association, 1521 Mayfield St., Kenner, LA 70065. Telephone No. 504-952-1609. My complaint is about closing Veteran’s Boulevard where the elderly cannot get to the Dollar Stores. They currently walk or are wheelchair bound. Can there be some time of pedestrian crossing to take the place where the 27th St. access is going to be closed off? We would surely appreciate any thought to make it as pedestrian friendly as possible for the current residents.

I-10 at Loyola Interchange Verbal Comments July 24, 2018

• Mr Gregory Carroll. Councilman District 1- My comment relates to Aberdeen St that is going to go from 2 lanes to 8 lanes during this project. Also 27th St that will be dead ended during this project. Would it be possible to have a pedestrian cross over at 27th St? If not there could be somewhere on Aberdeen. This is a concern because of cutting off people’s access from each side of the street to services on the west side of the street. On Veterans there is Susan Park playground to the north and the population is to the south. What is the possibility of providing pedestrian crossing via push button light between Loyola and Panama St to stop traffic and provide a safe place to cross Veterans.

Ways and Means Health and Welfare

Chair-Legislative Audit Advisory Council

4203 Williams Blvd., Suite 200 Kenner, LA 70065

Email: [email protected] Phone: 504.468.8603

Fax: 504.468.8605

JULIE STOKES State Representative ~ District 79

LOUISIANA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

Wednesday, August 1, 2018

Urban Systems, Inc. 2000 Tulane Ave., Suite 200 New Orleans LA 70112 Att: Mr. Brandon Perilloux PE, PTOE


Dear Mr. Perilloux:

This is to provide public comment on the proposed I-10 interchange project as presented at the public hearing at the Kenner City Park Pavilion on July 24, 2018.

This major entrance to the city would be improved by making beautification part of the project, particularly along I-10 access both east and west of Loyola.

1. Sound barriers are anticipated for all three options; use of stamped concrete art representative of New Orleans and south Louisiana in the sound barriers would improve appearance, along with low maintenance decorative shrubbery along the barriers.

2. Where there are green spaces, trees would improve appearance 3. The addition of a screen of decorative shrubbery along the I-10 overpass, and once construction is

completed, discontinued use of the area underneath the overpass for parking of road equipment. 4. Beautification of planned medians along Loyola to the airport, decorative plantings and trees to provide a

positive impression of Kenner, and the New Orleans International Airport.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the planning for this project.

Sincerely,

Julie Stokes, CPA State Representative, District 79

APPENDIX K Sign In Sheet

APPENDIX L Meeting Photos

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Public Meeting State Project No. H.011670 Environmental Assessment F.A.P. NO. H011670 July 24, 2018

APPENDIX B


B.2 – Community Outreach Meeting

USI Project #: 16-011-2August 2018

Prepared by



Community Outreach Event SummaryAugust 15, 2018

Prepared for

1 Community Outreach Event Summary August 2018

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 3

1.1 Meeting Format ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Station A: Entry/Sign-In Table ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.2 Station B: Presentation ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Station C: Initial Comparison – Tier I Matrix .................................................................................................. 3 1.1.4 Station D: Exhibits of Alternatives .................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.5 Station E: Traffic Models ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1.6 Station F: Comparison of Alternatives – Tier III Matrix ................................................................................. 4 1.1.7 Station G: Susan Park Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.8 Station H: Interim Solutions ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1.9 Station I: LADOTD Real Estate ...................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.10 Station J: Comment Submission .................................................................................................................... 5

2.0 MEETING ANNOUNCEMENTS ......................................................................................... 5

2.1 Public Notice .......................................................................................................................................................... 5

2.2 Individual Notices .................................................................................................................................................. 5

3.0 PUBLIC INPUT ...................................................................................................................... 6

3.1 General Comments Forms .................................................................................................................................... 7

3.2 Susan Park Comments Forms .............................................................................................................................. 7

3.3 Additional Comments ............................................................................................................................................ 7

3.4 Comment Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 7

4.0 STAKEHOLDER INPUT ...................................................................................................... 7

4.1 Comment Summary .............................................................................................................................................. 8

5.0 MEETING ATTENDANCE .................................................................................................. 8


List of Appendices

Appendix A Project Information Handouts with Comment Forms Appendix B PowerPoint Presentation with Transcript Appendix C Initial Comparison - Tier I Matrix Appendix D Alternative Exhibits Appendix E Comparison of Alternatives - Tier III Matrix Appendix F Susan Park Exhibits Appendix G Interim Solutions Appendix H Meeting Advertisements Appendix I Delivery Area for Individual Notices Appendix J Comments and Summary Appendix K Sign In Sheet Appendix L Meeting Photos


1.0 Introduction

The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD) authorized an Environmental Assessment for the I-1/Loyola Interchange Improvement. This project will evaluate alternatives to improve operational conditions and to increase the capacity of this interchange. A community outreach meeting was held for this project on August 15, 2018 at the Susan Park Gymnasium located at 502 Veterans Memorial Blvd in Kenner, Louisiana. The purpose of this Community Outreach Meeting was to give those affected in the surrounding area the opportunity to comment on the alternatives. The meeting also discussed seeking a Section 4(f) de minimis determination for Susan Park. This event summary provides a description of the meeting content, advertising efforts, public input, and attendance.

1.1 Meeting Format

The meeting was conducted using an open house format with ten (10) informational stations that the public could visit at their leisure. A brief description of the purpose and material presented at each station is provided below.


Meeting attendees were requested to sign in at the Sign-In Table, Station A, located at the entrance of the gym. Each attendee was offered a general information packet that included a general comment form as well as a Susan Park Impacts information packet and with a Susan Park comment form. A copy of each of the handouts is included in Appendix A.


The presentation with audio ran on a continuous loop throughout the course of the meeting at Station B. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation slides with transcribed recording is included in Appendix B.

1.1.3 Station C: Initial Comparison – Tier I Matrix

Station C showed the Tier I table comparing the initial eighteen (18) alternatives. The three alternatives which were further moved forward to Tier II and III (Alternatives E, I and L) were highlighted in yellow. A copy of this table is included in Appendix C.


1.1.4 Station D: Exhibits of Alternatives

Station D showed the details of each of the three (3) alternatives. Layouts of Alternatives E, I and L were presented on 36 x 54 inch boards. The eastern alignment of Alternatives I and L was also presented on a 36 x 54 inch board. Typical sections at various locations for Alternatives I and L were presented on 22 x 34 inch boards. The exhibits shown at Station D are included in Appendix D. A sample of the Alternative I and L Line and Grade sheets showing access Loyola Dr were presented on 22 x 34 inch roll plots.

1.1.5 Station E: Traffic Models

Station E presented traffic models of Alternatives I and L. A 60 inch TV screen showing the traffic operations of the 2040 PM Peak Vissim models was run on a continuous loop throughout the meeting.

1.1.6 Station F: Comparison of Alternatives – Tier III Matrix

A detailed comparison of Alternatives E, I and L was presented on a 22 x 34 inch board at Station F. A copy of this comparison is included in Appendix E.

1.1.7 Station G: Susan Park Impacts

The detailed impacts Alternatives E, I and L could have to Susan Park were shown in detail on 22 x 34 inch boards at Station G. The exhibits shown at Station G are included in Appendix F.

1.1.8 Station H: Interim Solutions

Station H presented the interim solutions for airport access to the public. An overall figure presenting the interim solutions were shown on a 22 x 34 inch board. This exhibit is included in Appendix G.

1.1.9 Station I: LADOTD Real Estate

Station I consisted of members of LADOTD’s Real Estate section and applicable brochures explaining the Acquisition of Right of Way and the Relocation Assistance program.


1.1.10 Station J: Comment Submission

Station J, the comment submission station, was located near the exit of the gym. The comment submission table was equipped with extra comment forms, pens, clipboards, a lock box for comment submission and a transcriber to record verbal comments. Attendees also had the opportunity to mail in their comment forms up to August 25, 2018.

2.0 Meeting Announcements

2.1 Public Notice

There were announcements on City of Kenner’s website, Facebook and Twitter account. LADOTD also posted a notice on its website. The City of Kenner social media announcements and LADOTD’s announcement are included in Appendix H.


The flyers, shown below in Figure 1, were hand delivered throughout the area shaded on the map included in Appendix I. Locations included residential houses as well as posting at business in the area. The list of businesses were the flyers were posted is presented in Appendix I. Approximately 650 flyers were given out total.


Figure 1: Meeting Announcement Flyer

3.0 Public Input

Two methods of collecting public input were made available at the public meeting. The first was a letter-sized comment forms (Appendix A) where attendees could provide written statements and deposit them in the visibly marked comment box. The second option meeting attendees had was to provide verbal statements via a transcriber. In addition to the methods available during the public meeting, comments were also accepted outside of the public meeting via email and regular mail. Mailed comments were required to be postmarked by August 25, 2018. All comments received will become part of the EA document. All comments received as well as a summary of public comments are included in Appendix J.


3.1 General Comments Forms

Seven (7) general comment forms submitted in the drop box during the August 15, 2018 meeting. No general comment forms were e-mailed or mailed.

3.2 Susan Park Comments Forms

In total six (6) Susan Park Comment Forms were received. Five (5) of which were submitted in the drop box during the July 24, 2018 meeting. One (1) was received vis postal mail.

3.3 Additional Comments

In total, four (4) written comments without a formal comment form were received via email or postal mail. In total, fourteen (14) verbal comments were recorded during the meeting on August 15, 2018.

3.4 Comment Summary

Based on form selection, four (4) respondents preferred Alternative E, two (2) respondents preferred Alternative I, and seven (7) respondents did not select a preferred alternative.

Two (2) of the respondents indicated concern with Susan Park impacts. Thirteen (13) of the respondents indicated concern with traffic congestion. Five (5) of the respondents indicated concern with increased noise in the area. Three (3) of the respondents indicated concern with the pedestrian accommodations at the Loyola Dr at Veterans Blvd intersection and along Veterans Blvd. Two (2) of the respondents indicated concern with loss of direct access to their commercial properties located south of Canal 14 on Aberdeen St. Eleven (11) respondents indicated concern with the closure of 27th St. Of the respondents who indicated concerns with the closure of 27th St, six (6) stated they were specifically concerned with pedestrian accommodations to cross Aberdeen St/Airport Rd.

4.0 Stakeholder Input

Three (3) comments were received during the comment period. All three (3) comments were in letter format with two (2) e-mailed and one (1) mailed. All comments received will become part of the EA document and are included in Appendix J.


4.1 Comment Summary

None of the comments indicated a preferred alternative. Two (2) of the comments expressed concern about the closure of 27th St and pedestrians in the area. Two (2) of the comments expressed concerns about the canal crossing of Aberdeen being removed and the impact to business south of the canal. One (1) of the comments expressed the need to mitigate impacts to the Kenner Police Department.

5.0 Meeting Attendance

A sign-in sheet was maintained at the entrance and accurately reflects the meeting attendance. Table 1 is a summary of attendance according to the sign-in sheets. Public Officials includes FHWA personnel and Project Team includes LADOTD personnel.


Group Number of Attendees General Public 129 Public Officials 14


Total 162

A total of 145 people signed in to the public meeting, excluding the project team. Eleven (11) individuals from the consultant team were present. Six (6) of the attendees were from LADOTD representing various divisions including environmental, project management, and real estate. The project team, including consultants and LADOTD staff were present to guide attendees through the series of exhibits, to explain the proposed project and to answer questions. Copies of the sign-in sheets are included in Appendix K. Photos taken during the meeting are included in Appendix L.


With Comment Forms



Community Outreach Meeting

August 15, 2018 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM

Susan Park Gym 502 Veterans Memorial Blvd

Kenner, LA 70062

This community outreach meeting is being conducted as an Open House. As you entered the building, you should have been asked to sign in, so a record of your participation can be maintained. A short presentation on the project will be shown continuously, and members of the project team and LADOTD will be available throughout tonight’s meeting to provide assistance and to answer any questions you may have.

Your views and participation are welcomed and are vital in ensuring that decisions made reflect the needs of the people affected by this proposed project. Comments may be submitted in writing using the comment form provided in this handout (sheet 8). Written comments may be handed in tonight at the comment station, emailed or mailed to the address given on the form.

*Please include your name, address, email, phone, and the date on the comment form so you can be contacted if needed. Although comments are encouraged and valued throughout the process, they must be postmarked by August 25, 2018 to be included in the formal meeting transcript and the Environmental Assessment Document.

PUBLIC MEETING FORMAT


Throughout the community outreach meeting, the following informational stations will be available:

Station A Entry/Sign In Table Station B Presentation Station C Initial Comparison Station D Exhibits of Alternatives Station E Traffic Models Station F Comparison of Alternatives Station G Susan Park Impacts Station H Interim Solutions Station I LADOTD Real Estate Station J Comment Submission

To get the most from your visit to the meeting, it is

recommended that you visit all the stations.

In This Handout:

Meeting Format/Participation 1 Introduction 2 Purpose and Need 2 Descriptions of Alternative 2 Project Team 2 Alternative E Layout 3 Alternative I Layout 4 Alternative L Layout 5 Eastern Limits of Layout 6 Comparison of Alternatives 7 Comment Response Form 8

abienes

Typewritten Text

1

This meeting and handout provides information on the proposed I-10/Loyola Interchange Project. The proposed I-10/Loyola Interchange will utilize federal funding. Federally funded projects must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NEPA process requires an Environmental Assessment (EA) to be completed for this project, including public involvement. The purpose of tonight’s meeting is to inform you about the proposed project and to obtain your input on how these alternatives affects your local community. This meeting will also discuss seeking a Section 4(f) de minimis determination for Susan Park. A separate handout for the Susan park impacts is available at this public meeting.


Alternative E Alternative E is described as a partial clover leaf interchange and includes a mixture of two at-grade “clover leaf” ramps in addition to three, one-way, elevated flyover ramps. The elevated flyover ramps for I-10 east of the Loyola Dr interchange include direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. A flyover ramp is also included for I-10 eastbound to Loyola Dr northbound. This layout is shown on page 3.

Alternative I Alternative I is described as a multi-level “stack” interchange and includes a mixture of at-grade ramps and three one-way elevated flyover ramps. The flyover ramps for I-10 east of the Loyola Dr interchange include direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. A flyover ramp is also included for Loyola Dr southbound to I-10 eastbound. This layout is shown on page 4.

Alternative L Alternative L is described as a “diverging diamond” interchange (DDI) and also includes one-way elevated flyover ramps to accommodate particular movements. A diverging diamond interchange routes traffic to the “opposite” side of the roadway via signalized cross-over locations in an effort to allow heavy left-turn movements to operate unimpeded, similar to common right-turn movements. The above-grade ramps for I-10 east of the Loyola Dr interchange include direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. This layout is shown on page 5.

All three alternatives include the addition of an auxiliary lane on I-10 from Loyola Dr to Williams Blvd in both directions. The eastern limits of the layouts are shown on page 6.

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE AND NEED

DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVES

PROJECT TEAM


abienes

Typewritten Text

2


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FA

YE

TT

E S

T.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST

.

CANAL NO. 14

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

ST

A S

T.

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

ST

A S

T.

HE

LE

NA

ST

.

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

ALTERNATIVE E

abienes

Typewritten Text

3


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




ALTERNATIVE I

DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FA

YE

TT

E S

T.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST

.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

abienes

Typewritten Text

4


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FA

YE

TT

E S

T.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST

.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

ALTERNATIVE L

abienes

Typewritten Text

5


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:





JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILLE

ST.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILLE

ST.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TO

N S

T.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

Travel Lanes

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILLE

ST.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILLE

ST.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TO

N S

T.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

!I

0 250 500

Feet

0 250 500

Feet

ALTERNATIVE I

ALTERNATIVE L

bperilloux

Typewritten Text

6














Safety A A A





Traffic Analyses



Cultural Resources




Tier III Matrix



Revised 8/6/18

abienes

Typewritten Text

7

Comments can be e-mailed ([email protected]) or mailed. Comments mailed (see reverse self-addressed) must be postmarked no later than August 25, 2018 to become part of the public meeting record.

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement COMMUNITY OUTREACH MEETING State Project No. H.011670 Environmental Assessment F.A.P. NO. H011670 August 15, 2018

General Comment Form Name: ________________________________________________________ Date:__________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________ Telephone:__________________________ 1. What transportation/traffic problems do you experience in the local community? Traffic Congestion Long Delays Unexpected Delays Many Accidents

Confusing Routes Lack of Alternative Routes Other __________________________ 2. Which Alternative do you prefer? (Please check one) Alternative E Alternative I Alternative L Other _________________________

Briefly explain the reason for your selection and what problems you think will be improved by the

selected Alternative. ____________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

3. Would the Alternative you selected in Question 2 improve your travel experience to: Work School Airport Recreational/Entertainment Medical Care None of the above All of the above Other _________________

4. Do you have any ideas/suggestion on how to improve the local community or help mitigate the

impacts of this project? _______________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

5. Do you have any other concerns, comments, or observations relative to social, environmental or

economic impacts in the local community or immediate surroundings? ________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

abienes

Typewritten Text

8

Place tape here



Urban Systems, Inc. Re: I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement



Comments can be e-mailed ([email protected]) or mailed. Comments mailed (see reverse self-addressed) must be postmarked no later than August 25, 2018 to become part of the public meeting record.

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement COMMUNITY OUTREACH MEETING State Project No. H.011670 Environmental Assessment F.A.P. NO. H011670 August 15, 2018

Susan Park Comment Form Name: ________________________________________________________ Date:__________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________ Telephone: _________________________ An important part of the Environmental Assessment process is to determine the impact that the alternatives will have, if any, on Section 4(f) properties which include publicly owned parks, recreation areas and wildlife or waterfowl refuges and to receive public input on these impacts. Section 4(f) properties also include publicly or privately owned historic sites listed or eligible for listing on the Nation Register of Historic Places. Susan Park, which is owned and operated by the City of Kenner, is located in the southeast quadrant of the I-10/Loyola Dr interchange and is expected to be impacted by the alternatives. 1. Do you utilize Susan Park? Yes No If yes, how often? _______________________________________________

2. Do you expect the Alternatives to negatively impact your use of Susan Park?

Yes No If yes, how so? _________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________ 3. Is the impact to Susan Park important to your choice of a preferred Alternative?

Yes No

If yes, which Alternative do you prefer?

Alternative E Alternative I Alternative L

Briefly explain the reason for your selection._________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ 5. Do you have any other concerns, comments, or observations relative to the impact to Susan Park? _______________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________

Place tape here



Urban Systems, Inc. Re: I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement




Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10§̈¦I-10

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


APPARENTPARCEL LINE

APPARENTPARCEL LINE


+/- 24'+/- 40'

AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMP



!I


Travel Lanes





Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


+/- 15' +/- 8'


APPARENTPARCEL LINE

APPARENTPARCEL LINE

AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMP







Travel Lanes


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10§̈¦I-10

+/- 43'

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


+/- 28'

APPARENTPARCEL LINE

APPARENTPARCEL LINE


AIRPORT TO I-10 EB


!I


Travel Lanes




APPENDIX B


Community Outreach Meeting



F.A.P. NO. H011670

Environmental Assessment August 15, 20185:00 – 7:00 P.M.

1 of 27

On behalf of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration we would like to welcome you to the community outreach meeting for the I-10/ Loyola Interchange Improvement Project. The purpose of tonight’s meeting is to inform you about the proposed project and to obtain your input on how these alternatives affect your local community.

1

Introduction to the Project

■ The I-10/Loyola Interchange improvements will utilize federal

funding



■ The NEPA process requires an Environmental Assessment to be

completed for this project

■ Tonight’s meeting will be the second public involvement opportunity

2 of 27

The I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement will utilize federal funding.




Tonight’s meeting will be the public’s second opportunity to provide input.

2

What is the NEPA Process?

3 of 27


3

The NEPA Process





Agency CE





No Yes

No

4 of 27


In the case of the I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Project, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration have determined that the potential impacts are such that an Environmental Assessment is the appropriate level of study. An environmental assessment may result in a Finding of No Significant Impact by the reviewing agency or may become an Environmental Impact Statement.

4

Purpose and Need




5 of 27


To address this need, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration initiated a project to identify and study potential modifications to the existing I-10/Loyola Drive interchange.

5

Where is the

Project?

6 of 27

Where is the proposed project location?

6

Project Study Area

I-10 West of I-310


Dr




7 of 27

The project study area is located along I-10 between the I-310 and Williams Blvd interchanges. Along Loyola Dr the project area extends from north of Georgetown Dr southward across Veterans Blvd where it becomes Aberdeen St to the Airport.


7



Tier I

Tier II

Tier III

8 of 27



8

Tier I and II Recap

■ 18 alternatives were analyzed and screened for: Traffic Operations Right of Way requirements Environmental/Social Impacts Construction and Right of Way costs

■ Detailed Tier I comparison is presented at Station C■ Three alternatives were selected for further evaluation in

Tier II and moved to Tier III

9 of 27


The detailed comparison matrix for the Tier I screening is presented at Station C.


9

Tier III

■ The three alternatives evaluated in Tier III were Alternatives E, I, and L.

– Alternative E – 2 Cloverleaf and 3 Flyover Ramps – Alternative I – 3 Flyover Ramps – Alternative L – Diverging Diamond Interchange and 2

Flyovers Ramps

10 of 27

The three alternatives evaluated in Tier III and presented here tonight are alternatives E, I, and L.

10

Alternative E

Cloverleaf

11 of 27

Alternative E, includes two cloverleaf and three flyover ramps for directional movements at the interchange.

Flyover ramps for I-10 east of the interchange provide direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. A flyover ramp is also included from I-10 Eastbound to Loyola Dr Northbound.

Alternative E has the largest impacts of all of the alternatives.

A larger layout of this alternative is presented at Station D.

11

Alternative I

Flyovers

12 of 27

Alternative I, includes three flyover ramps for directional movements at the interchange.

Flyover ramps for I-10 east of the interchange provide direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans intersection. A flyover ramp is also included from Loyola Southbound to I-10 Eastbound.

A larger layout and typical roadway cross sections of Alternative I are presented at Station D.

Traffic models for Alternative I are presented at Station E.

12

Alternative L


13 of 27

Alternative L, includes two flyover ramps and a diverging diamond interchange design.

Flyover ramps for I-10 east of the interchange provide direct access to the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans intersection.

13

Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI)

Source: US 21 at I-40 Interchange in Statesville, North Carolina

14 of 27

The Diverging Diamond Interchange design eliminates conflicts with left turns on Loyola Dr at the interchange by shifting traffic to the left hand travel lane.

The traffic pattern of the DDI is presented on the left.

The right photo shows an example of a DDI in an urban environment with the mainline overpassing the DDI as it would in the I-10/ Loyola interchange.

A larger layout and typical roadway cross sections of Alternative L are presented at Station D.

Traffic models for Alternative L are presented at Station E.

14

Additional features in Alternatives E, I, & L

■ All three Alternatives include the addition of:– An auxiliary lane on I-10 from Loyola Dr to Williams Blvd

in both directions– Four potential noise walls along the I-10 corridor

15 of 27

All three Alternatives include the addition of an auxiliary lane on I-10 from Loyola Dr to Williams Blvd in both directions. This auxiliary lane is shown at Station D.

All three Alternatives also include 4 potential noise walls along the I-10 corridor. The locations vary slightly between alternatives, but generally the walls will be in the northwest, northeast, southwest, and southeast quadrants of the Loyola Interchange. The noise walls are shown on the layouts at Stations D and G as orange lines.

15

Impact to Susan Park

Susan ParkSection 4(f) Property

Impacts

16 of 27

An important part of the Environmental Assessment process is to determine the impact that the alternatives will have, if any, on Section 4(f) properties which include publiclyowned parks, recreation areas and wildlife or waterfowl refuges and to receive public input on these impacts. Section 4(f) properties also include publicly or privately owned historic sites listed or eligible for listing on the Nation Register of Historic Places.

Susan Park, which is owned and operated by the City of Kenner, is located in the southeast quadrant of the I-10/Loyola Dr interchange and is expected to be impacted by the alternatives. The alternatives are expected to have minimal impacts to the park and a Section 4(f) de minimis determination is being sought for this project.

16

Alternative E

Cloverleaf

17 of 27

This slide shows the expected impact to Susan Park for Alternative E.


17

Alternative I

Flyovers

18 of 27

This slide shows the expected impact to Susan Park for Alternative I.


18

Alternative L


19 of 27

This slide shows the expected impact to Susan Park for Alternative L.


Please take the opportunity to comment on the impacts to Susan Park at Station J.

19

Tier III

■ The comparison is presented at Station F and in the handout

20 of 27


Non-Commercial 6.560 acres 3.6347 acres 5.4229 acresCommercial 12.957 acres 3.6003 acres 6.0541 acres



Total Number of Impacts 375 426 418

Operations UA A UASigning MC LC CSafety A A A





Traffic Analyses



*Key to Letter Grading: UA: unacceptable A: acceptable LC: least complex C: complex MC: most complex

This slide shows a summary of the Tier III comparison.

The detailed comparison matrix for Tier III is presented at Station F and is included in the handout.

20



• Public Meeting : July 24, 2018

• Community Outreach Meeting: August 15, 2018

• Draft EA Distribution: September 2018

• Finalized IMR: October 2018

• Public Hearing: October 2018

• Anticipated FONSI and Final EA Distribution: December 2018


21 of 27



We are currently at the community outreach meeting task as shown here.

The anticipated completion of the Environmental Assessment Document is expected in December of this year.

21

• Review of Comments and Suggestions

• Refine Alternatives and Select a Preferred Alternative

• Prepare Draft Environmental Assessment

Other Opportunities for Public Involvement?


• Request FONSI


Public Hearing


Assessment

22 of 27

Comments and suggestions from this meeting will be reviewed, the alternatives may be refined in response, and a preferred alternative will be identified.

A draft Environmental Assessment will be prepared and then made available to the public. The preferred alternative will be presented along with justification for its selection at a public hearing.

After the public hearing, draft Environmental Assessment comments will be reviewed and addressed in the final Environmental Assessment document.

The Environmental Assessment document will be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration for Finding of No Significant Impact approval. Once the Federal Highway Administration issues the decision, the final Environmental Assessment Document will be made available to the Public.

22

23 of 27

Interim Solutions

The current construction taking place in the vicinity of this project is not part of this project and is intended to be a short term solution to the traffic operations in the area.

The Interim Solutions are shown at Station H.

23

Interim Solutions




24 of 27

Long Term Solutions

■ Four lane extension of Loyola Dr from Veterans Blvd to the new Airport Road (closing 27th Street)


The interim solutions include a four lane extension of Loyola Dr from Veterans to the new airport road which results in the closure of 27th street. This project also includes the addition of turn lanes to existing Loyola Dr, Veterans Blvd and the I-10 Westbound off ramp.

The I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Project is intended to be a long term solution.



24

Right of Way Acquisition and Relocation Information■ A Real Estate representative is located at Station I to explain the following:

– DOTD’s right of way acquisition

– Relocation procedures

■ If you have any questions regarding your individual situation, consult with the agent when he or she meets with you or contact the Region Real Estate Office.

LADOTD District 02 Real Estate Office

3108 Williams Blvd.

Kenner, LA 70065

(504) 465-3468

25 of 27

A Real Estate representative from the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development is here at the meeting to explain the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development’s right of way acquisition and relocation procedures.

The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Brochure explaining the Acquisition of Right of Way and Relocation Assistance Program is available at Station I.

If you have property affected by this project, we suggest you read the brochure carefully. If you have any questions regarding your individual situation, consult with the agent when he or she meets with you or contact the Region Real Estate Office.

25


Written Comments may be made at Station J at tonight’s meeting.

Written Comments may be emailed or mailed, postmarked by August 25, 2018.

E-mail: [email protected]

Urban Systems, Inc.Re: I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement



Attn: Mr. Brandon Perilloux P.E., PTOE26 of 27

Please proceed to view the exhibits and speak with our project team, ask questions, and provide your comments. Your knowledge and opinions matter. We encourage you to provide feedback on whether or not these alternatives will have an impact on your local community. We look forward to your suggestions or ideas on how these impacts could be best mitigated.

Community Outreach Meeting Handouts with comment forms are available where you signed in, Station A and at Station J. The forms can be returned at Station J before you leave. Comment forms may also be emailed or mailed.

If you choose to mail the comment form, please be sure that it is postmarked no later than August 25th. The address for mailing is preprinted on the Comment Form.

26


27 of 27

Thank you for attending this community outreach meeting. We look forward to hearing your feedback on the alternatives.

27

APPENDIX C Initial Comparison - Tier I Matrix

INTERCHANGE FORM Description REMARKSCONSIDERATION

TIER 2

NewDirectional ramps for all eight movements

Very HighCapacity

Significant Moderate Very HighApplicable for Freeway to

Freeway OnlyNo

NewSB to EB Clover

EB to NB and SB At Grade RampNB to WB Clover

WB to NB and SB At Grade RampExisting

SB to WB At grade RampNB to EB At grade Ramp

Low Capacity Significant High Low

Heavy volume conflict between SB and WBL (am and

pm) and EBL (pm) and between NB and both

EBL/WBL (pm)

No

NewNB and SB to WB At Grade RampNB and SB to EB At Grade Ramp

EB to NB Clover WB to SB Clover

ExistingEB to NB At grade RampWB to NB At grade Ramp

ModerateCapacity

Significant Moderate LowHeavy volume conflict

between SBL and NB and NBL with SBT (pm)

No

NewSB to EB Clover

SB to WB At Grade RampEB to NB Clover

EB to SB At Grade RampNB to EB At Grade Ramp

NB to WB CloverWB to NB At Grade Ramp

WB to SB Clover

ModerateCapacity

Significant High Moderate

Weaving sections are undesirable for heavy conflict,

WB to SB with SB to EB (both peaks), and NB to WB

with EB to NB (pm)

No

NewSingle Point Urban Intersection for all eight movements


ModerateCapacity

Minimal Low ModerateVolumes well suited for SPUI

in the PM. Requires replacement of I-10 bridges.

No

NewTSM improvements TBD

Services all eight movementsExisting

Diamond Ramps in all 4 quadrants

Low Capacity Minimal Low Low

Inadequate storage between ramps. Heavy volume

conflicts with all left turning movements

No-Build Scenario/TSM

NewRealigned Loyola Drive

and modified ramp terminal intersectionsServices all eight movements


ModerateCapacity

Minimal Low LowPotentially inadequate storage

between ramps. No


WB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransExisting


ModerateCapacity

Moderate Low HighHeavy volume conflict NBL


No


NB and SB to WB At grade RampWB to SB Clover

ExistingSB and NB to EB Diamond RampEB to NB and SB Diamond Ramp

WB to NB Diamond Ramp

ModerateCapacity

Moderate Moderate ModerateHeavy volume conflict NBL


No


NB to WB CloverWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans


SB to WB Diamond RampSB and NB to EB Diamond RampEB to NB and SB Diamond Ramp

High Capacity

Moderate Moderate HighHeavy volume conflict SBL

with NBT (pm)No



Low Capacity Moderate Low ModerateHeavy volume conflict SBL

with NBT (pm), NBL/SBT and EBL with both SBT and NBT

No

NewSB to EB Clover

EB to NB Directional RampEB to NB and SB At grade Ramp

NB to WB CloverNB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans


SB to WB Diamond RampNB to EB Diamond Ramp

High Capacity

Significant High High Eliminates Left Turns Yes

NewFull Directional 3 Stack with Braided Ramps servicing all eight

movements between the existing Loyola and Williams interchanges. Includes elevated ramps over Veterans and 27th

High Capacity

Moderate Low High



No

NewElevated I-10 with SPUI underneath between the existing Loyola

and Williams interchanges. Includes Braided Ramps on I-10 EB and an elevated road

crossings Veterans and 27th

Very HighCapacity

Moderate Low Very High



No

NewSB to EB Clover

EB to NB and SB At grade RampWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransNB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans

ExistingSB and NB to WB Diamond Ramp

NB to EB Diamond RampWB to NB and SB Diamond Ramp

High Capacity

Moderate Moderate High

Heavy volume conflict EBL with both NBT and SBT and NBL/SBT (pm). Potentially

two phase signalization.

No


SB to EB Directional RampExisting


High Capacity

Moderate Low HighHeavy volume conflict EBL with both NBT and SBT and

NBL/SBT (pm).Yes

NewSB to EB Directional Ramp at Loyola

NB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans near Bainbridge

WB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans near BainbridgeExisting

Diamond Ramps servicing all eight movements at Loyola

May be needed past design year. Would require separate

IJR.No

NewNB to WB Clover

WB to NB and SB At grade RampNB to EB Directional Ramp elevated over VeteransWB to SB Directional Ramp elevated over Veterans

EB to NB Directional RampExisting

SB and NB to WB Diamond RampSB and NB to EB Diamond RampEB to NB and SB Diamond Ramp

High Capacity

Moderate Moderate HighImprovement to Hybrid C, one clover less than Hybrid E. Will

be a backup for Hybrid ENo



Very HighCapacity

Moderate Low Moderate Hybrid D ramps with DDI Yes

Initial Compaison of AlternativesI-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement

S.P. # H.011670

Not Screened

TRAFFICOPERATIONS

RIGHT-OF-WAYENVIRONMENTAL/SOCIAL IMPACTS

COSTS

Tier I Matrix

Alternatives Selected for Further Evaluation in Tier II

Hybrid A

Hybrid B

Hybrid C

Hybrid D

Hybrid EHybrid E

Hybrid F (Located b/w Loyola & Williams)

Hybrid H

Hybrid G (Located b/w Loyola & Williams)

All Directional

Par Clo ‐ A

Par Clo ‐ B

Cloverleaf

Single Point Urban

Tight Urban Diamond

Hybrid I

Hybrid J

Hybrid K

Hybrid L

DivergingDiamond

APPENDIX D Alternative Exhibits


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FA

YE

TT

E S

T.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST

.

CANAL NO. 14

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

ST

A S

T.

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

AL

BA

NY

ST.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

ST

A S

T.

HE

LE

NA

ST

.

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

ALTERNATIVE E


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




ALTERNATIVE I

DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FA

YE

TT

E S

T.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST

.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST

.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FA

YE

TT

E S

T.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

LO

YO

LA

DR

.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST

.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

ALTERNATIVE L


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:





JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILLE

ST.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILLE

ST.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TO

N S

T.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

Travel Lanes

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

29th ST


HU

NT

SV

ILLE

ST.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILLE

ST.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TU

PE

LO S

T.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DA

WS

ON

ST.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIF

TO

N S

T.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TO

N S

T.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TO

N S

T.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

!I

0 250 500

Feet

0 250 500

Feet

ALTERNATIVE I

ALTERNATIVE L

APPENDIX E Comparison of Alternatives - Tier III Matrix














Safety A A A





Tier III Matrix




Traffic Analyses



Cultural Resources



APPENDIX F Susan Park Exhibits


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10§̈¦I-10

+/- 43'

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


+/- 28'

APPARENTPARCEL LINE

APPARENTPARCEL LINE


AIRPORT TO I-10 EB


!I


Travel Lanes





Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


+/- 15' +/- 8'


APPARENTPARCEL LINE

APPARENTPARCEL LINE

AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMP







Travel Lanes


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

Figure No.:




§̈¦I-10§̈¦I-10

SUSANPARK

KENNERPOLICE

COMPLEXGERRY DR.

29th ST


APPARENTPARCEL LINE

APPARENTPARCEL LINE


+/- 24'+/- 40'

AIRPORT TO I-10 EB

FLYOVER RAMP



!I


Travel Lanes




APPENDIX G Interim Solutions

Interim SolutionsNew Orleans Airport Connector Road


Loyola Dr

Vet

eran

s B

lvd

10

To Airport

APPENDIX H Meeting Advertisements

APPENDIX I Delivery Area for Individual Notices

LEGEND:

Posted in Window

15 Flyers TakenFlyer Placed on Doorsor Inside Business

#

#

1

2

3

4Dollar General

Sam’s Club

New Hope Community Church Center

Circle K

5 Friendship Community Missionary

6 Fresenius Kidney Care Center

Delivery Area for Individual Notices

1

2

3

45

6

2

APPENDIX J Comments and Summary


General Comment Form 10/4/2018

Response Number

What transportation/traffic problems do you experience in the project area?

Which Alternative do you prefer?

Briefly explain the reason for your selection and what problems you think

will be improved by the selected Alternative

Would the Alternative you selected in Question 2 improve your travel

experience to:

Do you have any ideas/suggestion on how to improve the local community or help mitigate the impacts of this project?

Notes

1Traffic Congestion, Long Delays, Many

AccidentsAlternative I Work N/A

2Traffic Congestion, Long Delays, Unexpected

delays, Many accident, Confusing Routes, Lack of Alternative Routes, Other

Alternative ISeems the least intrusive into

neighborhoodsWork, Airport

Better outreach and more attention to recreational programs since Susan Park

gym may be torn downComment taken into consideration.

3 Alternative E Work, Airport Start 5 years agoComment taken into consideration. The preferred

alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.


Delays, Many Accident, Confusing Routes, Lack of Alternative Routes

Alternative E None of the above New sidewalks, Lighting Aberdeen St

Sidewalks will be provided along Loyola Dr. north of Veterans Blvd. Sidewalk will also be provided on the

westside of Aberdeen St./Airport Rd. south of Veterans Blvd. During the design build phase of this project, a

pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials

and the public during the public outreach of this project.


Delays, Many Accident, Confusing Routes, Lack of Alternative Routes

None

After your Circuit displays and video presentation - allow time for residents to

communicate their/our concern in an open forum. 2-3 minutes each

maximum!

An air quality analysis for the project was conducted for this project and results did not indicate a short-term or

long-term increase in Mobile Source Air Toxics


Delays, Lack of Alternative Routes, Work Traffic in AM+PM

Any for airport none for restaurants

between Williams + airport

None to help between Williams+ new airport road.

None of the aboveWiden Vets + have cops on Vets during

working AM+PM hours for trafficThe preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.

7Traffic Congestion, Long Delays,

Lack of Alternative RoutesAlternative E

Less disruption for local traffic on Vets, especially Vets west at Loyola.

Work, Recreational/Entertainment,

Medical CarePLAN AHEAD!!

The Build Alternatives will retain the majority of existing access to businesses. During the design build

phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present

the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during

the public outreach of this project.

You've given no regard to the local business beyond Loyola and less regard to residents in the area, especially on and around Decatur and 27th St. The City of New Orleans and Mitch

Landrieu got its airport and Kenner gets screwed. Again, no regard for local residents. None whatsoever.

Susan Park in AM+PM, you cant leave or come home during work traffic.

The air pollutants are really effecting my health and the health of other residents, the environment in which we live; EPA should come out periodically to test our air.

We need sidewalks, we don’t

Do you have any other concerns, comments, or observations relative to social, environmental or economic impacts in the project area or immediate surroundings?

I believe this will be the laughing stock of the country. The entrance and exit to this art facility will be worse than LAX. I travel out of MSY a lot. I feel the interim plan will cause

dramatic traffic snafu at Loyola and Vets. I expect it to add 1 hour each way to the airport for me and I live in Chateau Estates. I flew 175k miles out of MSY last year.

Why didn’t this project begin or better outlined along with the terminal project


Susan Park Comment Form 10/11/2018

Response Number

Do you utilize Susan Park?

If yes, how often?

Do you expect the Alternatives to negatively impact your use of Susan

Park?

If yes, how so?Is the impact to Susan Park important to your choice of

a preferred Alternative?

If yes, which Alternative do

you prefer?

Briefly explain the reason for your selection.

Do you have any other concerns, comments, or observations relative to the impact to Susan Park?

Notes

1 Yes Everyday Yes Yes Alternative EDon’t block 27th St.

Near B ChurchWe need better sidewalks. We don’t want 27th street blocked at

all. We need a walk way for kids + elderly people.

Sidewalks will be provided along Loyola Dr. north of Veterans Blvd. Sidewalk will also be provided on the westside of Aberdeen St./Airport Rd. south of Veterans Blvd. During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project.

2 Yes Live there YesCan't get in or out to

VetsYes

None help traffic using Vets to travel local

businesses to shops. Will impact getting to and

from Williams + Loyola Dr businesses

Not being able to ride local roads without more trafficThe preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.

3 No

How can we when all games were removed from the site!

Yes

Major traffic problem will increase. Motorists

will use 27th St as a thoroughfare.

Have the flyover beyond 27th Street. This is the only East-West street in Veterans Heights neighborhood. If the street is blocked,

construct a complete 20ft wall noise. Wall at 27th Aberdeen/ Decatur St and beyond to keep residents comfortable/ noise free.

What about crosswalks for children to the gym, residents access to businesses.

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project. Noise barriers have been considered as feasible during the development of the project and have been included on I-10 where feasible. Noise barriers were extended across Susan Park based on public input.

4 Yes 2-3 times daily Yes

I built my house on Fayette Street in 2003,

the traffic is already horrible and I know it

can only get worse

There is no good option for me. This will

negatively impact our lives. We would like to

sell our house.

We did not know that this was going to happen. Please do not close off 27th St. The traffic is going to be so difficult for this

community. I want to sell my home

The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives. During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project.

5

All three of these plans are terrible. They will unnecessarily impact poor people and thriving businesses. There simply must be a way to be less disruptive and leave the entrances as they are on

Airline Hwy and from Veterans Blvd. Come up with shuttle buses to move people around. No flyovers! No alternative LIE!

Comment taken into consideration. The main entrance to the MSY Airport will be located on Loyola Dr. Access on Airline Hwy and Veterans Blvd will not be provided.

6 No Concerned about traffic and safety

This form only state Susan Park I live in Veterans Heights - the change being made is affecting many seniors in the area there

should be more concern for them. Maybe considering to address them personally. Their life is being uprooted. I believe there

should have been more advertisement for jobs for the Community. I believe if a state of the art airport is being built through the

community, I would like to see improvements in our community beautification. Gyms, tennis facilities not just for recreation but to

educate and mentor youths and adults. The airport needed improvement so do the community. This would also improve

visitors and travelers. Thanks.

Comment taken into consideration. LADOTD will consider beautification features during design. However, implementation of beautification efforts is dependent on agreements with

local government agencies for maintenance of beautification.

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement State Project No. H.011670 F.A.P. NO. H011670 Additional Comments

10/4/2018

Response Number

Verbal Comment Notes

1

27th Street between Bessemer and Gadsen - Speeding is a problem on East Loyola between Vintage and Lake Ponchartrain. At the intersection of East Loyola and Vintage, westbound right turn lane, people are using the parking lane to make a right turn. This was observed several times just this week. Same thing occurs at Williams and Chateau/Vintage at Chateau. Concerned about this project and it causing real traffic problems.

Specific traffic concerns are not in this project study area. The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.

2 2307 Aberdeen, Johnny’s welding service - Concerned about the loss of direct access.Based on public input, the Aberdeen St crossing of Canal 14 will remain with similar access to the existing condition.

32319 Aberdeen, Bobcat business - Concerned about the loss of direct access. Also concerned about the 36’ travel trailer, concerned about accessibility for the travel trailer with the dead end. Earlier plan was to use Aberdeen as a 4-lane highway to use the tunnel for access.

Based on public input, the Aberdeen St crossing of Canal 14 will remain with similar access to the existing condition.

4515 27th Street, residential property - Concerned about parking lots under construction in the area of Bessemer at 27th street. Is this area zoned residential or commercial?

Any construction going on at this time is not part of this project. Zones 201 and 103 that on the map are 2-family residential, not commercial.

5

Request to not move the fire station, please and thank-you. If it does have to be moved, it needs to be relocated to somewhere south of the interstate on the interstate side of the Railroad Tracks. It staying put and being under the ramps would be better than moving it. The interchanges at Loyola and/or Williams have congestion often and would be hindrance/delay to fire truck access if the fire station was moved north of I-10.

The fire station relocation is not part of this project. The City of Kenner will determine the location of the firehouse relocation. The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.

6 2613 Bessemer Street, right across from the canal - Who do they talk to about the dust from the construction site?An air quality analysis for the project was conducted for this project and results did not inducate a short-term or long-term increase in Mobile Source Air Toxics

7

411 and 409 27th Street - Concerned about the current construction and the construction for this project to follow. The Barriere construction project is impacting them currently due to shifting of their house. They spoke to someone about removing the fence, but said it would be replaced. Caused a pipe to rust.

This project will take actions to minimize construction impacts.

8

220 Veterans, Guiding Missionary Baptist Church, 3 blocks past on Vets and Salem - Concerned that all the projects, will impact people getting to church. Concerned about people being able to get church from now, through construction ongoing and future construction of the interchange project. This will impact their finances if people can’t get to church. The construction is a deterrent to people going to church.

During construction plans to minimize pedestrian and traffic impacts will be implemented by the contractor. During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project.

9Kenneth Jackson , 331 27th Street, by Aberdeen at 27th - They were told there would be a 3’ barrier on Aberdeen, but believe that won’t help reduce the sound. A sound wall is needed. Kids will be a problem running across the road. Kids will jump the 3’ wall.

The noise walls from the NO Airport Connector Rd project will be relocated on the eastside of Airport Rd. These walls will provide noise benefit and restricting pedestrian access.

10

2727 Greenwood, next to Aberdeen - The noise is the most important concern. Also kids cross Aberdeen anywhere from Bessemer east to/from the Dollar General. Need a pedestrian crossing that stops vehicular traffic, flashing lights is not enough. Her son was hit by a vehicle when crossing at the existing crosswalk to get to the park. A truck had stopped, but another motorist drove around the stopped vehicle and hit her son.

Noise walls along Aberdeen St are not feasible due to residential access and cost benefit ratio. The noise walls from the NO Airport Connector Rd project will be relocated on the eastside of Airport Rd. These walls will provide noise benefit and restricting pedestrian access. During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project. Flying over 27th St was looked into and determined to be costly and not feasible due to impacting the Airport roundabout.

11

3027 Greenwood Street - does not have a vehicle, has two kids. Does not feel comfortable walking along Veterans. Has to get to church on Aberdeen and to family members on the other side of Aberdeen on 27th at Decatur. Needs a safe place to cross, either make the bridge longer to span 27th St or provide a signalized crossing that stops the vehicles for pedestrians.

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project. Flying over 27th St was looked into and determined to be costly and not feasible due to impacting the Airport roundabout.

12 2023 Aberdeen St – Concerned about the noise, wants a noise barrier, and also about the truck traffic (18 wheelers). The noise walls from the NO Airport Connector Rd project will be relocated on the eastside of Airport Rd. These walls will provide noise benefit and restricting pedestrian access.

13

2705 Salem St – Concerned about the flyover ramps. After the construction is completed and kids are walking across Aberdeen and/or along Veterans. Will a sidewalk on Veterans be available? A lot of the residents in the area do not have their own transportation, so they are walking (children and parents) get to/from to stores, bus stops, work, etc. The bus stop is in a horrible place because you have to cross at the intersection of Veterans at Loyola. Pedestrians have to navigate the intersection which is difficult because vehicles are coming from all directions. More bus stops are needed along Veterans, there may only be two. If they move the fire station, will the bus stop move as well? The current bus stop is near the strip mall. With the work for the turning lane, it is even more difficult for pedestrians and drivers.

Improvements along Veterans Blvd are not part of this project. During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project. Flying over 27th St was looked into and determined to be costly and not feasible due to impacting the Airport roundabout. The noise walls from the NO Airport Connector Rd project will be relocated on the eastside of Airport Rd. These walls will provide noise benefit and restricting pedestrian access.

14

2735 Greenwood St – Concerned about the closure of 27th Street at Aberdeen Street. Now all the traffic turns on 27th and turns down Greenwood going past the house to Veterans. The traffic is heavy, especially in the afternoon. At times it is difficult to get out of the residential driveway and/or even down the street because it is blocked up back to back. If at this time she is trying to get back to her house, the eastbound queue on Veterans extends past the median opening at Greenwood and the traffic is so heavy, it’s impossible to make a left turn. She is currently crossing Veterans at Aberdeen and cutting through the Family Dollar parking lot to access Greenwood St. The only exit for everyone west of Aberdeen only has Veterans to get east out of the neighborhood.

The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.. During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project.

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement State Project No. H.011670 F.A.P. NO. H011670 Additional Comments

10/4/2018

Response Number

Notes

2

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the

public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of

this project.

3

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the

public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project. Flying over 27th St was looked into and

determined to be costly and not feasible due to impacting the Airport roundabout.

Written Comment

Traffic operations are expected to be unacceptable for Alternative L the DDI option. The preferred

alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives.

I was an attendee at the Susan Park Public Information Meeting for a proposed reconfiguration of the Loyola Drive interchange at I-10 in Kenner. I also represent a transportation advocate’s group which works closely

with APTA, DOTD, local agencies, and nonprofits such as the Strong Towns Project, Transportation for America, Smart Growth USA, and other partners. I have a long term goal of seeing surface transportation options consisting of multiple modes serving the New Orleans International Airport: namely light rail or dedicated-lane Bus Rapid Transit in addition to conventional limited-access-highway travel. I have made comments to some including Tim Nickel of DOTD that Alternative L appears to offer the least cost to the

taxpayers, it brings the diverging diamond traffic management method to the project, and thereby relieves the current heavy set of left-turn movements which require signal protection. That being said I am deeply

concerned that Alternative I [the current preferred option] will place an entrance ramp (one which would not even serve the airport, but would carry city-bound traffic from the Loyola Drive suburban corridor) into the

passing lane of I-10 East less than a mile before the eastbound passing lane is again encroached upon by slower onramp traffic at the Williams Blvd I-10 East ramp. Furthermore the placing of an eastbound flyover-style

onramp to carry Loyola Drive corridor commuters from housing subdivisions toward the city creates an externality which Alternative L does not establish: a lack of space in the median of I-10 to potentially place a future HOV or transit bus-only, or potentially even a median light rail alignment. The planning of this project must be able to accommodate a future rapid transit link to serve the airport, as the vicinity of the new terminal is very sensitive (perhaps an example of haphazard) given that a rapid transit corridor cannot bisect an existing

aircraft tarmac or runway.The only project on the table which properly addresses the concerns I have is the Alternative 'L' DDI build option. I have been made aware that the DDI build process will involve substantial

demolition, however it is understood by all affected parties that pollution, noise, traffic, and construction disturbances to the surroundings of this interchange became a matter of certainty at the very moment when an

airport terminal was slated rather abruptly to be built in a previously low-profile low rise commercial and disadvantaged residential corridor.

My name is Mary Smith and I am in favor of reopening 27th Street at Aberdeen and Decatur Streets. Sometimes I walk to church and to the dollar store. With the street closed I have to take a detour.

Thank you. Mary Smith, 633 27th St, Kenner, LA 70069

1

4

The closure of 27th street is part of LADOTD Project No. H.011276 N.O. Airport Connector Rd. The

closure will of 27th Street is an existing condition for this project. During the design build phase of this

project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by

local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project. Flying over 27th St was looked into and determined to be costly and not

feasible due to impacting the Airport roundabout.

I am writing this email as a concerned citizen of Kenner, A member of Friendship Community Missionary Baptist Church, and a concern mother. I will like to start by stating my interest in the blocking of 27th &

Aberdeen street. This street serves as a main access road to many of the Veterans Heights residents. The street connects many families. It is the main avenue to many residents of this area getting to and from the grocery

store. The only two shopping stores are located to the West of Aberdeen. Many residents’ livings on the East side of Aberdeen use the street as a walking path to the stores. Most of these residents are without

transportation and are also elderly. Cutting their walking path forces them to take the Highway, which is not safe at all. Being forced to take another route causes safety and timing issues. The youth of this area takes the

street to connect with school friends and store needs as well. Finally, I will like to speak out for my church. The street being sanded off has caused members to not attend church. These members are both youth and elders.

My church is located at 2717 Aberdeen street, and the membership has already been affected by the closing of the street. Closing the street permanently will only add to the interruption of membership. Most of our members

are youth and older individuals, who walk to and from church, using 27st street as a main road. Keeping any one out of church is going against God’s will. Keeping the youth our of church, in Kenner asking for trouble. Taking the youth out of the church is kicking them to the street. We know what the street has in stored for the youth of today. I for one do not want anyone lost, especially the little Black Kids. We all know that the clear majority race of the Veterans Heights area is Black. With this little fact I must say; if this was an issue in any

other race community, it would “not” be happening. Maybe no one else cares about the black little kids and the lonely black grandmothers of the area, but I do. I will voice my concerns to the end, for my Church, My Black

Elders and my Black little kids. I for one will not stand by and allow this to happen.

We do not want 27 the street closed due to children and elderly going to church and stores that are close to us in the community. Please consider keeping the community safe for our people. If you close down 27th street, it

will not be safe. Bad things will happen. You will risk losing the community that we built.

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement State Project No. H.011670 F.A.P. NO. H011670 Stakeholder Comments

10/11/2018

Response Number

Stakeholder Comment Notes

1

Please accept my comments on the proposed I-10 Loyola Drive Interchange Improvement Project as presented at the public hearings at the Kenner City Park Pavilion on July 24, 2018 and Susan Park Gymnasium on August 15, 2018 as well as the Stakeholders meeting on August 10, 2018.Residents located in the neighborhoods to the east and west of Aberdeen Street, just south of Veterans Blvd., will be negatively impacted by closure of 27th Street at Aberdeen. Pedestrian access to churches, retail businesses and Susan Park Playground will be negatively impacted unless signaled pedestrian crossings are designed and constructed at ground level under the flyover just north of 27th and Aberdeen.Additionally, signaled pedestrian crossings should be designed and constructed at the Loyola Drive - Veterans Blvd. Interchange in all directions to insure pedestrian access to the churches, businesses and the park. The Aberdeen Street road removal at Canal # 14 will negatively impact businesses and other properties (south of Canal # 14 and west of Aberdeen) by limiting their ingress and egress. Aberdeen Street needs to remain open and intact crossing Canal # 14 to provide proper ingress and egress to these business properties.This project is a major renovation to an entrance to the city, the interchange and the first visual tourists see after arriving at the airport. Beautification is essential. Sound barriers with the use of stamped concrete art (representative of New Orleans and south LA) along with low maintenance shrubbery. Trees would improve appearance of any green spaces. Decorative shrubbery along the I-10 overpass, beautification of planned medians and decorative plantings should be reflective of Kenner and the New Orleans and possibly themed similar to the airport. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the planning for this project.

During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the

design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this

project. Flying over 27th St was looked into and determined to be costly and not feasible due to impacting the Airport roundabout. Access across the canal is provided via Richland St. this will be

documented in the EA for consideration during design. Based on public input, the Aberdeen St crossing of Canal 14 will remain

with similar access to the existing condition. LADOTD will consider beautification features during design. However, implementation of beautification efforts is dependent on

agreements with local government agencies for maintenance of beautification.

2

In the three options for the flyover from the New Orleans International Airport to the Eastbound entrance to Interstate 10, they all show an impact to the operations of the City of Kenner Police Department Complex. The impacts will be as follows;1) the complex has three points of entry and exit, one in the North/West corner will be eliminated2) parking for 6 flatboats used for water rescue, 3 high water rescue military vehicles, 1 prisoner transport vehicle, 1 vehicle for transporting rescue equipment, 1 boat for lake patrol or rescue activities will be eliminated3) 1 enclosed metal building used dry vehicle storage and equipment storage will be eliminated4) the department's vehicle fuel depot (fuel storage tank and 4 gas pumps) will be eliminated5) storage tank used for diesel fuel to run department's emergency generator will be eliminatedA two-story building used for vehicle maintenance offices, uniform and officer equipment storage, and records storage will be impacted by either limiting access or elimination. These impact items need to be factored into the final design and how they will be remediated. Thank you for your help in this matter.

Comments taken into consideration.

3

After attending the recent town hall meeting on the Loyola interchange improvements, I have grave concern. The main thoroughfare accessing a significantportion of the businesses south of Canal 14 is being cut off and leaving only one enter and exit for the many businesses in that area causing hurt to them. Please do all you can to maintain access down Aberdeen Street. We also need to figure how to bridge the two communities of residents over the Loyola extension to prevent dividing this community by a major throughway.

Based on public input, the Aberdeen St crossing of Canal 14 will remain with similar access to the existing condition.LADOTD will

consider beautification features during design. However, implementation of beautification efforts is dependent on

agreements with local government agencies for maintenance of beautification.. During the design build phase of this project, a

pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns

raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project.

1

Alyssa Bienes

From: Brandon PerillouxSent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 1:45 PMTo: Alyssa BienesSubject: Fwd: 27th & Aberdeen Street Closing


From: adamsc37 <[email protected]> Date: August 12, 2018 at 12:51:06 PM CDT To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: 27th & Aberdeen Street Closing

TO: LADOTD

FROM: Cheryl L Adams

2613 August St KENNER, LA 70062

I am writing this email as a concerned citizen of Kenner, A member of Friendship Community Missionary Baptist Church, and a concern mother.

I will like to start by stating my interest in the blocking of 27th & Aberdeen street. This street serves as a main access road to many of the Veterans Heights residents. The street connects many families. it is the main avenue to many residents of this area getting to and from the grocery store. The only two shopping stores are located to the West of Aberdeen. Many residents’ livings on the East side of Aberdeen use the street as a walking path to the stores. Most of these residents are without transportation and are also elderly. Cutting their walking path forces them to take the Highway, which is not safe at all. Being forced to take another route causes safety and timing issues. The youth of this area takes the street to connect with school friends and store needs as well. Finally, I will like to speak out for my church. The street being sanded off has caused members to not attend church. These members are both youth and elders. My church is located at 2717 Aberdeen street, and the membership has

2

already been affected by the closing of the street. Closing the street permanently will only add to the interruption of membership. Most of our members are youth and older individuals, who walk to and from church, using 27st street as a main road. Keeping any one out of church is going against God’s will. Keeping the youth our of church, is Kenner asking for trouble. Taking the youth out of the church is kicking them to the street. We know what the street has in stored for the youth of today. I for one do not want anyone lost, especially the little Black Kids.

We all know that the clear majority race of the Veterans Heights area is Black. With this little fact I must say; if this was an issue in any other race community, it would “not” be happening. Maybe no one else cares about the black little kids and the lonely black grandmothers of the area, but I do. I will voice my concerns to the end, for my Church, My Black Elders and my Black little kids. I for one will not stand by and allow this to happen.

Signed: Cheryl L Adams

1

Alyssa Bienes

From: Brandon PerillouxSent: Sunday, August 12, 2018 11:49 AMTo: Alyssa BienesSubject: Fwd: Street closure on 27th street


From: Clara Butler <[email protected]> Date: August 12, 2018 at 10:47:11 AM CDT To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Street closure on 27th street

We do not want 27 th street closed due to children and eldery going to church and stores that are close to us in the community. Please consider keeping the community safe for our people. If you close down 27th streer, it will not be safe. Bad things will happen. You will risk losing the community that we built.

1

Alyssa Bienes

From: Brandon PerillouxSent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 8:28 AMTo: Alyssa BienesSubject: Fwd: Information for EA Consideration


From: Andrew Lodriguss <[email protected]> Date: August 22, 2018 at 5:25:44 PM CDT To: [email protected] Subject: Information for EA Consideration

Good evening, I was an attendee at the Susan Park Public Information Meeting for a proposed reconfiguration of the Loyola Drive interchange at I-10 in Kenner. I also represent a transportation advocate’s group which works closely with APTA, DOTD, local agencies, and nonprofits such as the Strong Towns Project, Transportation for America, Smart Growth USA, and other partners. I have a long term goal of seeing surface transportation options consisting of multiple modes serving the New Orleans International Airport: namely light rail or dedicated-lane Bus Rapid Transit in addition to conventional limited-access-highway travel. I have made comments to some including Tim Nickel of DOTD that Alternative L appears to offer the least cost to the taxpayers, it brings the diverging diamond traffic management method to the project, and thereby relieves the current heavy set of left-turn movements which require signal protection. That being said I am deeply concerned that Alternative I [the current preferred option] will place an entrance ramp (one which would not even serve the airport, but would carry city-bound traffic from the Loyola Drive suburban corridor) into the passing lane of I-10 East less than a mile before the eastbound passing lane is again encroached upon by slower onramp traffic at the Williams Blvd I-10 East ramp. Furthermore the placing of an eastbound flyover-style onramp to carry Loyola Drive corridor commuters from housing subdivisions toward the city creates an externality which Alternative L does not establish: a lack of space in the median of I-10 to potentially place a future HOV or transit bus-only, or potentially even a median light rail alignment.

2

The planning of this project must be able to accommodate a future rapid transit link to serve the airport, as the vicinity of the new terminal is very sensitive (perhaps an example of haphazard) given that a rapid transit corridor cannot bisect an existing aircraft tarmac or runway. The only project on the table which properly addresses the concerns I have is the Alternative 'L' DDI build option. I have been made aware that the DDI build process will involve substantial demolition, however it is understood by all affected parties that pollution, noise, traffic, and construction disturbances to the surroundings of this interchange became a matter of certainty at the very moment when an airport terminal was slated rather abruptly to be built in a previously low-profile low rise commercial and disadvantaged residential corridor. I hope my concerns will be noted. Thanks kindly, Andrew C. Lodriguss Daytime tel: 504 319 1445 Gretna, LA

DISTRICT OFFICE:

P.O. Box 189

#9 Apple Street

Norco, Louisiana 70079

Telephone: (985) 7 64-9122

Fax: (985) 764-6710

Email: [email protected]. govGARY L. SMITH JR.

LOUISIANA STATE SENATEDiStrict L9

COMMITTEES:

Judiciary B-Chairman

Insurance

Revenue and Fiscal Affairs

Transportation, Highwaysand Public Works

Joint Legislative Committee- on Capital Outlay

August 23,2018

Mr. Brandon D. Perilloux, P.E.Associate Transportation EngineerUrban Systems2000 Tulane Avenue, Suite 200New Orleans, LA 70112

Dear Mr. Perilloux:

After attending the recent town hall meeting on the Loyola interchange improvements, I havegrave concem. The main thoroughfare accessing a significant portion of the businesses south ofCanal 14 is being cut off and leaving only one enter and exit for the many businesses in that areacausing hurt to them.

Please do all you can to maintain access down Aberdeen Street. We also need to figure howto bridge the two communities of residents over the Loyola extension to prevent dividing thiscommunity by a major throughway.

Thank you for your consideration.

With kindest regards, I am

Very sincerely yours,

GLSJr:gcn

1

Alyssa Bienes

From: Brandon PerillouxSent: Friday, August 17, 2018 11:21 AMTo: Alyssa BienesSubject: Fwd: Interstate 10 - Loyola Drive Interchange Improvements


From: "Stagni, Rep. (Chamber Laptop)" <[email protected]> Date: August 17, 2018 at 11:19:26 AM CDT To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc: "Stagni, Rep. (District Office)" <[email protected]> Subject: Interstate 10 - Loyola Drive Interchange Improvements

Att: Mr. Brandon Perilloux PE, PTOE Urban Systems, Inc. 2000 Tulane Ave., Suite 200 New Orleans LA 70112 Dear Mr. Perilloux: Please accept my comments on the proposed I-10 Loyola Drive Interchange Improvement Project as presented at the public hearings at the Kenner City Park Pavilion on July 24, 2018 and Susan Park Gymnasium on August 15, 2018 as well as the Stakeholders meeting on August 10, 2018. Residents located in the neighborhoods to the east and west of Aberdeen Street, just south of Veterans Blvd., will be negatively impacted by closure of 27th Street at Aberdeen. Pedestrian access to churches, retail businesses and Susan Park Playground will be negatively impacted unless signaled pedestrian crossings are designed and constructed at ground level under the flyover just north of 27th and Aberdeen.

2

Additionally, signaled pedestrian crossings should be designed and constructed at the Loyola Drive - Veterans Blvd. Interchange in all directions to insure pedestrian access to the churches, businesses and the park. The Aberdeen Street road removal at Canal # 14 will negatively impact businesses and other properties (south of Canal # 14 and west of Aberdeen) by limiting their ingress and egress. Aberdeen Street needs to remain open and intact crossing Canal # 14 to provide proper ingress and egress to these business properties. This project is a major renovation to an entrance to the city, the interchange and the first visual tourists see after arriving at the airport. Beautification is essential. Sound barriers with the use of stamped concrete art (representative of New Orleans and south LA) along with low maintenance shrubbery. Trees would improve appearance of any green spaces. Decorative shrubbery along the I-10 overpass, beautification of planned medians and decorative plantings should be reflective of Kenner and the New Orleans and possibly themed similar to the airport. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input into the planning for this project. Sincerely, Joe Stagni Joe Stagni, State Representative Dist.92 2002 20th Street, Ste. 204-A Kenner, LA 70062. Cell 504-301-8396 [email protected]. Sent from my iPhone

APPENDIX K Sign In Sheets

APPENDIX L Meeting Photos

APPENDIX B

S.P. No. H.011670 – I-10/Loyola Dr. Interchange Improvement

B.3 - Public Hearing

USI Project #: 16-011-2December 2018

Prepared by



Public Hearing TranscriptNovember 20, 2018

Prepared for

1 Public Hearing Transcript December 2018

Table of Contents

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 3

1.1 Hearing Format ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.1 Station A: Entry/Sign-In Table .......................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Station B: Presentation ....................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Station C: Interim Improvements....................................................................................... 3 1.1.4 Station D: Preferred Alternative ........................................................................................ 3 1.1.5 Station E: Traffic Model .................................................................................................... 4 1.1.6 Station F: LADOTD Real Estate ....................................................................................... 4 1.1.7 Station G: Comment Submission ....................................................................................... 4

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION ....................................................... 4

3.0 HEARING ANNOUNCEMENTS ......................................................................................... 5

3.1 Public Notice ............................................................................................................................ 5

3.2 Individual Notices ................................................................................................................... 5

4.0 PUBLIC INPUT ...................................................................................................................... 6

4.1 Comments Forms .................................................................................................................... 7

4.2 Additional Comments ............................................................................................................. 7

4.3 Comment Summary ................................................................................................................ 7

5.0 HEARING ATTENDANCE .................................................................................................. 7


List of Appendices

Appendix A Project Information Handouts with Comment Forms Appendix B PowerPoint Presentation with Transcript Appendix C Interim Improvements Appendix D Preferred Alternative Exhibits Appendix E Environmental Document Distribution Appendix F Meeting Advertisements Appendix G Mailing List for Individual Notices Appendix H Comments and Summary Appendix I Sign In Sheets Appendix J Meeting Photos


1.0 Introduction

The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD) authorized an Environmental Assessment for the I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement. This project will evaluate alternatives to improve operational conditions and to increase the capacity of this interchange. A public hearing was held for this project on November 20, 2018 at the Susan Park Gymnasium located at 502 Veterans Memorial Blvd in Kenner, Louisiana. The purpose of this Public Hearing was to give those affected in the surrounding area the opportunity to comment on the preferred alternative. This transcript provides a description of the hearing content, advertising efforts, public input, and attendance.

1.1 Hearing Format

The hearing was conducted using an open house format with seven (7) informational stations that the public could visit at their leisure. A brief description of the purpose and material presented at each station is provided below.


Hearing attendees were requested to sign in at the Sign-In Table, Station A, located at the entrance of the gym. Each attendee was offered a general information packet that included a comment form. A copy of the handout is included in Appendix A.


A PowerPoint presentation with audio ran on a continuous loop throughout the course of the hearing at Station B. A copy of the PowerPoint presentation slides with transcribed recording is included in Appendix B.

1.1.3 Station C: Interim Improvements

Station C presented the interim improvements for LADOTD N.O. Airport Connector Road project to the public. An overall figure presenting the interim improvements was shown on a 22 x 34 inch board. This exhibit is included in Appendix C.

1.1.4 Station D: Preferred Alternative

Station D showed the details of the preferred alternative, Alternative I. The layout of Alternatives I was presented on 36 x 54 inch boards. The eastern alignment was also presented on a 36 x 54 inch board. Typical sections at various locations for


were presented on 22 x 34 inch boards. The exhibits shown at Station D are included in Appendix D.

1.1.5 Station E: Traffic Model

Station E presented traffic model of the preferred alternative, Alternative I. A 60 inch TV screen showing the traffic operations of the 2040 PM Peak Vissim model was run on a continuous loop throughout the hearing.

1.1.6 Station F: LADOTD Real Estate

Station F consisted of members of LADOTD’s Real Estate section and applicable brochures explaining the Acquisition of Right of Way and the Relocation Assistance program.

1.1.7 Station G: Comment Submission

Station G, the comment submission station, was located near the exit of the gym. The comment submission table was equipped with extra comment forms, pens, clipboards, a box for comment submission and a transcriber to record verbal comments. Attendees also had the opportunity to mail in their comment forms up to November 30, 2018.

2.0 Environmental Document Distribution

Hard copies of the environmental document were made available for public viewing at the following locations:

• 15 state libraries • North Kenner Library • Charles A Wagner Library • East Bank Regional Library • LADOTD District 02

Hard copies of the environmental document were also distributed to the City of Kenner and the MSY Airport. The submittal letters are included in Appendix E. The executive summary for the environmental document was distributed to other stakeholders. The submittal letter and list of stakeholders who received the executive summary is also included in Appendix E.


3.0 Hearing Announcements

3.1 Public Notice

The paid public notice below ran in the official state journal, The Advocate, a daily newspaper published in New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana on October 19 and November 11, 2018. It also ran twice in The Times-Picayune, a New Orleans newspaper, October 24 and November 9, 2018. There were announcements posted on the City of Kenner’s and LADOTD’s websites. The documentation of meeting advertisement is included in Appendix F.


A copy of the public notice presented in Figure 1 was mailed directly to addresses expected to be directly affected by the project and to members of the public and officials who have shown interest in the project through previous public involvement opportunities. A list of the addresses contacted is included in Appendix G.


Figure 1: Hearing Announcement Flyer

4.0 Public Input

Two methods of collecting public input were made available at the public hearing. The first was a letter-sized comment forms (Appendix A) where attendees could provide written statements and deposit them in the visibly marked comment box. The second option hearing attendees had was to provide verbal statements via a transcriber. In addition to the methods available during the public hearing, comments were also accepted outside of the public hearing via email and postal mail. Mailed comments were required to be postmarked by November 30, 2018. All comments received will become part of the EA document. All comments received as well as a summary of public comments are included in Appendix H. No stakeholders comments were received for this meeting.


4.1 Comments Forms

Seven (7) attendees submitted comment forms in the drop box during the November 20, 2018 hearing. Two (2) comments were received via email. One (1) comment was received via postal mail.

4.2 Additional Comments

In total, three (3) verbal comments were recorded during the hearing on November 20, 2018. One (1) hearing attendee requested the link to the Environmental Assessment document via email.

4.3 Comment Summary

Four (4) respondents indicated provided comments involving relocation. Three (3) respondents indicated concern with the timeline or sequence of construction of the project. Ten (10) respondents indicated concern with traffic operations. Two (2) respondents provided comments involving access to the MSY Airport. Two (2) respondents provided comments involving alternative interchange locations.

5.0 Hearing Attendance

A sign-in sheet was maintained at the entrance and accurately reflects the hearing attendance. Table 1 is a summary of attendance according to the sign-in sheets. Public Officials includes FHWA personnel and Project Team includes LADOTD personnel.


Group Number of AttendeesGeneral Public 86 Public Officials 9


Total 123 A total of 97 people signed in to the public hearing, excluding the project team. Twenty-six (26) individuals from the consultant team were present. Nine (9) of the attendees were from LADOTD representing various divisions including environmental, project management, and real estate. The


project team, including consultants and LADOTD staff were present to guide attendees through the series of exhibits, to explain the proposed project and to answer questions. Copies of the sign-in sheets are included in Appendix I. Photos taken during the hearing are included in Appendix J.


With Comment Forms



Public Hearing

November 20, 2018 5:00 PM to 7:00 PM

Susan Park Gym 502 Veterans Memorial Blvd

Kenner, LA 70062

This public hearing is being conducted as an Open House. As you entered the building, you should have been asked to sign in, so a record of your participation can be maintained. A short presentation on the project will be shown continuously, and members of the project team and LADOTD will be available throughout tonight’s hearing to provide assistance and to answer any questions you may have.

Your views and participation are welcomed and are vital in ensuring that decisions made reflect the needs of the people affected by this project. Comments may be submitted as follows:

1. In writing using the comment form provided in this handout (sheet 6). Written comments may be handed in tonight at the comment station or mailed to the address given on the form.

2. Verbal comments may be recorded tonight at the comment station. *Please include your name, address, email, phone, and the date on the comment form so you can be contacted if needed. Although comments are encouraged and valued throughout the process, they must be postmarked by November 30, 2018 to be included in the formal hearing transcript and the Environmental Assessment Document.


Throughout the public hearing, the following informational stations will be available:

Station A Entry/Sign In Table Station B Presentation Station C Interim Improvements Station D Preferred Alternative Station E Traffic Model Station F LADOTD Real Estate Station G Comment Submission

To get the most from your visit, it is recommended that you visit all the stations.

In This Handout:

Hearing Format/Participation 1 Introduction 2 Purpose and Need 2 Preferred Alternative 2 Project Team 2 Station Map 3 Preferred Alternative Layout 4 Eastern Limits of Layout 5 Comment Form 6

PUBLIC HEARING FORMAT

abienes

Typewritten Text

1

This hearing and handout provide information on the proposed I-10/Loyola Interchange Project. The proposed I-10/Loyola Interchange will utilize federal funding. Federally funded projects must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NEPA process requires an Environmental Assessment (EA) to be completed for this project, including public involvement. The purpose of tonight’s hearing is to present the Preferred Alternative and discuss the acquisition of Right of Way and the project schedule.


The interchange modification report and alternative assessment process involved three tiers with further refinement at each stage. The first step, Tier I, involved developing 18 alternatives which were screened for traffic operations, right of way, environmental impacts and cost. Three alternatives were selected for further evaluation in Tier II and then moved forward to Tier III. The Tier III analysis led to the identification of Alternative I as the preferred alternative. Alternative I is described as a multi-level “stack” interchange and includes a mixture of at-grade ramps and three one-way elevated flyover ramps. The flyover ramps for I-10 east of the Loyola Dr interchange include direct access to and from the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans Blvd intersection. A flyover ramp is also included for Loyola Dr southbound to I-10 eastbound. This layout is shown on page 4. This alternative also includes the addition of an auxiliary lane on I-10 from Loyola Dr to Williams Blvd in both directions. The eastern limits of the layouts are shown on page 5. Alternative I is the preferred alternative because it eliminates queuing on the I-10 mainline, has no impact to Susan Park, improves operational conditions, and increases the capacity of the interchange while serving as the primary ingress and egress for passenger traffic to the new MSY Airport terminal.

INTRODUCTION

PURPOSE AND NEED

PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE

PROJECT TEAM


abienes

Typewritten Text

2

A

B

Legend:Station A - Entry/Sign In TableStation B - PresentationStation C - Interim ImprovementsStation D - Preferred AlternativeStation E - Traffic ModelStation F - LADOTD Real EstateStation G - Comment Submission

Entry

I-10/Loyola Interchange ImprovementEnvironmental AssessmentState Project No. H.011670Federal Aid Project No. H011670

Open House Public HearingNovember 20, 20185:00 PM to 7:00 PM

Susan Park Gym 502 Veterans Memorial BlvdKenner, LA 70062

Station Map

F

D

EC

G

abienes

Typewritten Text

3


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed

Noise Barrier To Be Relocated


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

£¤61

Figure No.:




ALTERNATIVE I

DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FAY

ET

TE

ST.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

0 500 1,000

Feet

abienes

Typewritten Text

4


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

£¤61

Figure No.:



Environmental Assessment Jefferson Parish, Louisiana

State Project No. H.011670F.A.P. Project No. H011670

ALTERNATIVE I(EASTERN LIMITS)

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TUP

ELO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DAW

SO

N S

T.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIFT

ON

ST.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TON

ST.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TUP

ELO

ST.

29th ST


HU

NTS

VIL

LE S

T.

PAN

AM

A S

T.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NTS

VIL

LE S

T.

PAN

AM

A S

T.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TUP

ELO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DAW

SO

N S

T.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIFT

ON

ST.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TON

ST.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TON

ST.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

Travel Lanes

!I 0 500 1,000

Feet

abienes

Typewritten Text

5

Comments mailed (see reverse self-addressed) must be postmarked no later than November 30, 2018 to become part of the public hearing record.

I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement PUBLIC HEARING State Project No. H.011670 Environmental Assessment F.A.P. NO. H011670 November 20, 2018

Comment Form Name: ________________________________________________________ Date:__________________ Address: _____________________________________________________________________________ Email: ___________________________________________ Telephone:__________________________ Your views and participation are welcomed and are vital in ensuring that decisions made reflect the needs of the people affected by this project. The preferred alternative includes flyover ramps providing direct access to/from the new MSY terminal as well as a flyover ramp providing direct access from southbound Loyola Dr to I-10 eastbound. Please use this space to write any concerns, comments, or observations relative to social, environmental or economic impacts from the Preferred Alternative.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________________

abienes

Typewritten Text

6

Place tape here



Urban Systems, Inc. Re: I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvements



APPENDIX B


Public Hearing



F.A.P. NO. H011670

Environmental Assessment November 20, 2018

5:00 – 7:00 P.M.

1 of 28

On behalf of the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration we would like to welcome you to the public hearing for the I-10/ Loyola Interchange Improvement Project. The purpose of tonight’s hearing is to present the Preferred Alternative and project schedule and to discuss the acquisition of Right of Way.

1

Introduction to the Project■ The I-10/Loyola Interchange improvements will utilize federal funding



■ The NEPA process requires an Environmental Assessment to be completed

for this project

■ Tonight’s hearing will be the third public involvement opportunity

– Public Meeting July 24, 2018

– Community Outreach Meeting August 15, 2018

– Public Hearing November 20, 2018 (tonight)2 of 28

The I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvements will utilize federal funding.




Tonight’s hearing will be the public’s third opportunity to provide input.

2

The NEPA Process





Agency CE





No Yes

No

3 of 28



In the case of the I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Project, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration have determined that the potential impacts are such that an Environmental Assessment is the appropriate level of study. An environmental assessment may result in a Finding of No Significant Impact by the reviewing agency or may become an Environmental Impact Statement.

3

Purpose and Need




4 of 28


To address this need, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development and the Federal Highway Administration initiated a project to identify and study potential modifications to the existing I-10/Loyola Drive interchange.

4

Project Study Area

I-10 West of I-310


Dr




5 of 28

The project study area is located along I-10 between the I-310 and Williams Blvd interchanges. Along Loyola Dr the project area extends from north of Georgetown Dr southward across Veterans Blvd where it becomes Aberdeen St to the Airport.


5

6 of 28

Interim Improvements

The current construction taking place in the vicinity of this project is not part of this project and is intended to be short term improvements to the traffic operations in the area.

The Interim Improvements are shown at Station C.

6

Interim Improvements




7 of 28

Long Term Improvements

■ Four lane extension of Loyola Dr from Veterans Blvd to the new Airport Road (closing 27th Street)


The interim improvements include a four lane extension of Loyola Dr from Veterans to the new airport road resulting in the closure of 27th street. This project also includes the addition of turn lanes on Loyola Dr, Veterans Blvd and the I-10 Westbound off ramp.

The I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement Project is intended to be a long term improvement.



7



Tier I

Tier II

Tier III

8 of 28



8

Tier I Recap

■ 18 alternatives were analyzed and screened for:

Traffic Operations

Right of Way requirements

Environmental/Social Impacts

Construction and Right of Way costs

9 of 28

Tier II and III Recap

■ Three alternatives were selected for further evaluation in Tier II and moved to Tier III

Alternative E – 2 Cloverleaf and 3 Flyover Ramps

Alternative I – 3 Flyover Ramps

Alternative L – Diverging Diamond Interchange and 2 Flyovers Ramps

Alternative I was identified as the preferred alternative during Tier III.



Alternative I was identified as the preferred alternative during Tier III.

9

Alternative I

Flyovers

10 of 28

Preferred Alternative

The preferred alternative, Alternative I, includes three flyover ramps for directional movements at the interchange, shown here in yellow.

Flyover ramps for I-10 east of the interchange provide direct access to and from the new airport terminal overpassing the Veterans intersection. A flyover ramp is also included from Loyola Southbound to I-10 Eastbound.

A larger layout and typical roadway cross sections of the preferred alternative are presented at Station D.

The traffic model for the preferred alternative is presented at Station E.

10

11 of 28

Additional Features

The preferred alternative includes the addition of an auxiliary lane in both directions on I-10 from Loyola Dr to Williams Blvd, shown here in pink. This layout is shown at Station D.

The preferred alternative also includes potential noise walls along the I-10 corridor. The general locations of the walls will be in the northwest, northeast, southwest, and southeast quadrants of the Loyola Interchange. The noise walls are shown on the layouts at Station D as orange lines.

11

Alternative I is the Preferred Alternative Because…

■ Prevents vehicles backing up onto the I-10 mainline

■ Has no impact to Susan Park

■ Improves operational conditions and increases capacity of the interchange

■ Has the lowest impact to commercial property and structures

■ Has the lowest impact to residential structures

■ Has the second lowest construction cost

■ Is the publicly preferred alternative

12 of 28

Read slide

12

Alternative I

Flyovers

13 of 28

This slide shows that Alternative I is not expected to impact Susan Park.

A larger layout is shown at Station D.

13

Environmental Assessment Document

■ EA Document made available on October 19, 2018

– Libraries

– LADOTD Website

– Key Stakeholders

■ Includes records of agency, stakeholder and public involvement

■ Includes the environmental technical reports

■ Detailed description of Preferred Alternative

14 of 28

The Environmental Assessment was made available to the public at local libraries and on the LADOTD website on October 19, 2018. The document was distributed to key stakeholders and executive summaries where provided to key agencies and personnel.

The document includes detailed records of agency and stakeholder coordination as well as public involvement.

Environmental technical reports such as the Wetlands Analysis and Threatened and Endangered Species, Conceptual Stage Relocation Plan, Noise Analysis and Air Quality Analysis for this project are included in the EA document.

The EA Document can be found at local libraries and on the LADOTD website.

14

Mitigations

■ Steps to minimize construction impacts

■ Coordination and agreements with local entities

■ Pedestrian analysis during Design Build

15 of 28

Commitments

■ Provide noise barriers in the four quadrants of the interchange

■ Extend noise barriers across Susan Park

■ Relocate noise barriers along Airport Rd

The Environmental Assessment identified mitigations and commitments for this project. The proposed project will result in noise impacts within the study area. Noise barriers were found to be both feasible and reasonable in the four quadrants of the interchange. The noise barriers will be extended across Susan Park. Noise barriers constructed on Airport Rd by the interim improvements project will be relocated to the required right of way of this project.

This project is committed to minimizing traffic impacts during construction and coordinating with local entities.

During the public involvement and community meetings held for the proposed I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement project, comments were received stating that the closure of 27th St. to vehicle and pedestrian traffic for the new access road has adversely affected the community. As a result, the LADOTD has committed to require the successful Design-Build proposer to perform a pedestrian analysis. The analysis will evaluate improving pedestrian accommodations at the Loyola Dr. and Veterans Blvd. intersection or providing a mid-block crossing. The successful Design-Build proposer will also be required to host a public meeting to present their design addressing concerns expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project.

15

The detailed mitigations and commitments for this project can be found in the Environmental Assessment Document.

15

A representative of the LADOTD Real Estate Section has a table here tonight and is available to answer any questions pertaining to LADOTD’s Right of Way Acquisition

and Relocation Assistance Program.

The LADOTD Brochure explaining Acquisition of Right of Way and Relocation Assistance Program is available tonight at that table or can be obtained later from:

District 02 Real Estate Office3108 Williams Blvd.Kenner, LA 70065

(504) 465-3468

We suggest you read the brochure carefully. If you have any questions regarding your individual situation, consult with the agent when s/he meets with you, or contact the

Region Real Estate Office.

The Right of Way information at Station F

Right-of-Way Acquisition and Relocation Information

16 of 28

READ SLIDE.

16

Steps in the Acquisition Process

It is the DOTD's objective to pay just compensation for all properties required for the project.

■ Owners of required properties may be contacted by an appraiser or appraisers and given the opportunity to go with them on the inspection of the property.

■ This will provide owners an opportunity to point out things that may be important to the evaluation of the property.

■ All evaluations will be reviewed by a review appraiser and approved by DOTD.

■ After review and approval, a Real Estate Agent will contact each property owner, and present a letter setting forth the amount of the DOTD's cash offer for the purchase of the property. He also will explain the property value and discuss any alternate offers including possible options to keep and move any buildings, fencing, etc.

17 of 28

READ SLIDE

17

Relocation Assistance

■ Relocation Advisory Services– Current and continuing information on:

■ Availability and prices of comparable, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings for displaced residents

■ Comparable commercial properties and locations for displaced businesses

■ Finance charges■ Federal and State programs offering assistance to

displaced persons

18 of 28

Advisory services shall include current and continuing information on the availability and prices of comparable decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings, comparable commercial properties, and locations for displaced businesses; supplying information concerning finance charges; and Federal and State programs offering assistance to displaced persons.

18

Relocation Assistance

Relocation Assistance PaymentsRelocation assistance payments are separate and in addition to

payments for the purchase of your property. They are made for: Moving expenses Replacement housing Business re-establishment expense

Moving expense payments will be made to any individual, family, or business, in legal occupancy of the property either at the start of negotiations or at the time of purchase.

19 of 28

Relocation assistance payments are separate and in addition to payments made by the Department for the purchase of your property. These are moving expense payments, replacement housing payments, and business re-establishment expense payments.

Moving expense payments will be made to any individual, family, or business in legal occupancy of the property either at the start of negotiations or at the time of purchase by the Department.

The amount of the payment to residential displaces will depend on actual costs supported by receipts, or a fixed cost based on room count. More detailed information is available beginning on Page 13 of the brochure.

19

Relocated Businesses

■ Displaced businesses, farms and non-profit organizations may be paid the actual, reasonable expenses of moving, together with certain eligible costs incident to the move.

■ Some businesses may also be eligible for certain actual costs incidental to re-establishing their businesses.

■ Instead of payment for moving expenses, some business owners may be eligible to receive a payment based on the average annual net earnings of the business. If the business meets the qualifications, this payment shall not be less than $1,000.00 nor more than $40,000.00.

■ Moving payment information for businesses may be found beginning on Page 22 of the brochure.

20 of 28

Displaced businesses, farms, and non-profit organizations may be paid the actual, reasonable expenses of moving, together with certain eligible costs incidental to the move. Some businesses may also be eligible for certain actual costs incidental to re-establishing their businesses. Instead of payment for moving expenses, some business owners may be eligible to receive a payment based on the average annual net earnings of the business. If the business meets the qualifications, this payment shall not be less than $1,000.00 or more than $40,000.00. Moving payment information for businesses may be found beginning on Page 22 of the brochure.

20

Replacement Housing PaymentsReplacement housing payments are also available to qualifying owners and tenants:

■ Must occupy property at start of negotiations

■ Must have been there at least 90 days

■ Must move into decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing

The amount of your maximum supplemental payment will be given to you in writing. Additional requirements and payment limits may be found beginning on Page 14 of the brochure.

Certain owners and tenants not in occupancy for at least 90 days or who become occupants after negotiations have started may qualify for replacement housing payments:

■ Must have been in occupancy at the time the property was acquired by the Department

■ Must move into decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing

21 of 28

Replacement housing payments are also available to qualifying owners and tenants. Three of the basic requirements are as follows: first, you must be occupying the property at the start of negotiations; second, you must have been there at least 90 days; and third, you must move into decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing. The amount of your maximum supplemental payment will be given to you in writing. Additional requirements and payment limits may be found beginning on Page 14 of the brochure.

Certain owners and tenants not in occupancy for at least 90 days or who become occupants after negotiations have started may qualify for replacement housing payments. Two of the basic requirements are that you must have been in occupancy at the time the property was acquired by the Department and you must move into decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing.

21

22

Right to Appeal

Applicants for a relocation payment have the right to appeal the DOTD's Determination of their eligibility for payment and/or the amount of payment.

■ Appeals must be submitted to the Real Estate District Manager within 60 days after the applicant has been notified that his claim has not been approved.

■ Final decisions on eligibility and payments will be made by the DOTD's Real Estate Administrator in Baton Rouge.

■ Additional information on appeals may be found on Page 26 of the brochure.

22 of 28

Applicants for a relocation payment have the right to appeal the Department’s determination of their eligibility for payment and/or the amount of payment. Appeals must be submitted to the Right of Way Regional Manager or Right of Way Consultant Project Manager within 60 days after the applicant has been notified that his claim has not been approved. Final decisions on eligibility and payments will be made by the Department’s Real Estate Administrator in Baton Rouge. Additional information on appeals may be found on Page 26 of the brochure.

Other Terms and Conditions■ To the greatest extent practicable, no person lawfully occupying real

property shall be required to move without at least 90 days written notice from DOTD.

■ The notice will indicate the specific date the property must be vacated.■ No person lawfully occupying a dwelling will be required to move unless,

and until, comparable, decent, safe and sanitary replacement housing is made available within the general area of the project.

■ The replacement housing must be available within a reasonable time prior to the scheduled move of the occupants, and must be within the occupants' financial means.

■ Replacement housing must be fair, open and offered to all persons regardless of race, color, religion, sex or national origin.

23 of 28

To the greatest extent practicable, no person lawfully occupying real property shall be required to move without at least 90 days written notice from the Department. The notice will indicate the specific date the property must be vacated. No person lawfully occupying a dwelling will be required to move unless, and until, comparable, decent, safe, and sanitary replacement housing is made available within the general area of the project. The replacement housing must be available within a reasonable time prior to the scheduled move of the occupants, and must be within the occupants’ financial means. Replacement housing must be fair, open, and offered to all persons regardless of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.

23

Other Terms and Conditions

Prior to negotiating for purchase of your property, a District Real Estate Specialist will personally contact and interview all persons who will be required to relocate. The benefits will be explained and a determination

made of individual needs and intentions for relocating.

A SPECIAL WORD OF CAUTION

Before moving or purchasing replacement housing, contact DOTD to assure your eligibility and the prompt payment of your relocation benefits.

If you move without prior notification to DOTD, you risk losing all possible benefits provided by the Relocation Assistance Program.

24 of 28

Prior to the negotiating for purchase of your property, a Representative of the Department will personally contact and interview all persons who will be required to relocate. The benefits will be explained and a determination made of individual needs and intentions for relocating.

A SPECIAL WORD OF CAUTION – Relocation benefits cannot be paid until the property is acquired by the Department. Before moving or purchasing replacement housing, contact the Department to assure your eligibility and the prompt payment of your relocation benefits. If you move or purchase replacement housing without prior notification to the Department, you risk losing all possible benefits provided by the Relocation Assistance Program.

24



• Public Meeting: July 24, 2018

• Community Outreach Meeting: August 15, 2018

• Draft EA Made Available to the Public: October 19, 2018

• Public Hearing: November 20, 2018

• Finalize IMR: December 2018

• Anticipated Request for FONSI: December 2018


25 of 28




We are currently at the public hearing task as shown here.

The request for a Finding of No Significant Impact is anticipated for December of this year.

25

Next Steps


• Request FONSI


Public Hearing


Assessment

26 of 28

After this public hearing, the comments on the draft Environmental Assessment will be incorporated in the final Environmental Assessment document.

The Environmental Assessment document will be submitted to the Federal Highway Administration for Finding of No Significant Impact approval. Once the Federal Highway Administration issues the decision, the final Environmental Document will be made available to the public.

26


Verbal and Written Comments may be made at Station G at tonight’s hearing.

Written Comments may be emailed or mailed, postmarked by November 30, 2018.

E-mail: [email protected]

Urban Systems, Inc.

Re: I-10/Loyola Interchange Improvement




27 of 28

Please proceed to view the exhibits and speak with our project team, ask questions, and provide your comments. Your knowledge and opinions matter. We encourage you to provide feedback on whether or not this project will have an impact on your local community. We look forward to your suggestions or ideas on how these impacts could be best mitigated.

Public Hearing Handouts with comment forms are available where you signed in, Station Aand at Station G. The forms can be returned at Station G before you leave. Comment forms may also be emailed or mailed. There is also a transcriber here tonight to record your verbal statement at Station G.

If you choose to mail the comment form, please be sure that it is postmarked no later than November 30th. The address for mailing is preprinted on the Comment Form.

27


28 of 28

Thank you for attending this public hearing. We look forward to hearing your feedback.

28

APPENDIX C Interim Improvements

Interim ImprovementsN.O. Airport Connector Road Project


Loyola Dr

Vet

eran

s B

lvd

10

To Airport

APPENDIX D Preferred Alternative Exhibits


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed



Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

£¤61

Figure No.:




ALTERNATIVE I

DA

RT

MO

UT

H S

T. EMERSON ST.

DUKE DR.

CLEMSON DR.31st ST

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

29th ST

GERRY DR.

TU

PE

LO

ST.

HU

NT

SV

ILL

E S

T.

PA

NA

MA

ST.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

GA

DS

DE

N A

VE

.

BE

SS

EM

ER

ST.

DE

CA

TU

R S

T.

GR

EE

NW

OO

D S

T.

FAY

ET

TE

ST.

SA

LE

M S

T.

KIN

GS

TO

N S

T.

RIC

HL

AN

D S

T.

PIE

DM

ON

T S

T.



30th ST

FURMAN DR.

GEORGETOWN DR.

HOLY CROSS PL.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

LOY

OL

A D

R.

27TH ST.27TH ST.

AB

ER

DE

EN

ST.

CANAL NO. 14

§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

!I

Travel Lanes

0 500 1,000

Feet


Lane Lines

Edge Of Pavement


Existing Bridge

Existing Roadway

Road To Be Removed


Proposed Features


Required ROW

New Bridge

New Roadway


§̈¦I-10

§̈¦310

§̈¦I-10

£¤61

Figure No.:



Environmental Assessment Jefferson Parish, Louisiana

State Project No. H.011670F.A.P. Project No. H011670

ALTERNATIVE I(EASTERN LIMITS)

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TUP

ELO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DAW

SO

N S

T.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIFT

ON

ST.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TON

ST.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


GERRY DR.

TUP

ELO

ST.

29th ST


HU

NTS

VIL

LE S

T.

PAN

AM

A S

T.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

HU

NTS

VIL

LE S

T.

PAN

AM

A S

T.

PH

OE

NIX

ST.

30th ST

27TH ST.27TH ST.

JAS

PE

R S

T.

TUP

ELO

ST.

AC

RO

N S

T.

ALB

AN

Y S

T.

DAW

SO

N S

T.

AU

GU

STA

ST.

HE

LEN

A S

T.

TIFT

ON

ST.

MA

RIE

TTA

ST.

LEX

ING

TON

ST.

OH

IO S

T.

BA

INB

RID

GE

ST.

WA

SH

ING

TON

ST.

UTA

H S

T.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

MAYFIELD AVE.

30th ST

29th ST

HICKMAN ST.

VIR

GIN

IA S

T.

DANVILLE ST.

CARROLL ST.


§̈¦I-10 §̈¦I-10

Travel Lanes

!I 0 500 1,000

Feet

APPENDIX E

Environmental Document Distribution

APPENDIX F Meeting Advertisements

APPENDIX G Mailing List for Individual Notices







455 31st Street Kenner, LA 70065






2733 Acron Street Kenner, LA 70062












Kenner, LA 70062


515 27th Street

Kenner, LA 70062 2835 Virginia Street Kenner, LA 70062


1500 29th Street

Kenner, LA 70062

1506 29th Street #A

Kenner, LA 70062

1506 29th Street #B

Kenner, LA 70062




16 29th Street

Kenner, LA 70062 1801 Williams Blvd Kenner, LA 70062


2843 Piedmont Street

Kenner, LA 70062

20 29th Street #A

Kenner, LA 70062

2745 Bessemer Street Kenner, LA 70062

3440 Roosevelt Blvd Kenner, LA 70065

2844 Sharon Street #B

Kenner, LA 70062


3009 Panama Street Kenner, LA 70065



Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

2725 Fayette Street Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

4404 Burke Drive Metairie, LA 70003

517 Beverly Garden Drive

Metairie, LA 70001 702 Gerry Drive

Kenner, LA 70062


3212 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


3236 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


3244 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065





3209 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


3201 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


3225 Loyola Dr


Kenner, LA 70065


603 29th Street


Kenner, LA 70062


609 29th Street

Kenner, LA 70062 2809 Panama Street Kenner, LA 70062














413 27th Street


Kenner, LA 70062


2845 Kingston Street


Kenner, LA 70062

2840 Kingston Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2840 Kingston Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2832 Salem Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

818 Veterans Memorial Blvd Kenner, LA 70062

2829 Fayette Street

A Kenner, LA 70062

22 Acadia Street Kenner, LA 70065

2611 Aberdeen Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2611 Aberdeen St B

Kenner, LA 70062

2607 Aberdeen St A

Kenner, LA 70062

2607 Aberdeen St B

Kenner, LA 70062


2847 Richland Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2847 Richland Street C

Kenner, LA 70062

2847 Richland Street D

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Salem Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Salem Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Salem Street C

Kenner, LA 70062

2844 Salem Street D

Kenner, LA 70062

2848 Salem Street A

Kenner, LA 70062

2848 Salem Street B

Kenner, LA 70062

2848 Salem Street C

Kenner, LA 70062

2848 Salem Street D

Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

2715 Gadsden Street Kenner, LA 70062

2618 Bessemer Street Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062 3000 Jasper Street Kenner, LA 70065


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

7809 Monett Street Metairie, LA 70003


2848 Fayette Street

B Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

1521 Mayfield Street Kenner, LA 70065

2836 Fayette Street

C Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

2818 Fayette Street

B Kenner, LA 70062

2818 Fayette Street

C Kenner, LA 70062

2714 Greenwood St Kenner, LA 70062


2813 Greenwood Street

B Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


2821 Greenwood Street

A Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

PO Box 74631 Metairie, LA 70033


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062

818 North Boulevard Baton Rouge, LA 70802

332 27th Street

#2 Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #3

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #4

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #5

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #6

Kenner, LA 70062

332 27th Street #7

Kenner, LA 70062

4161 Pommard Drive Kenner, LA 70065

PO Box 1952 Kenner, LA 70063

3000 Dartmouth Street Kenner, LA 70065

321 Auburn Place

A Kenner, LA 70065

321 Auburn Place B

Kenner, LA 70065

321 Auburn Place C

Kenner, LA 70065

321 Auburn Place D

Kenner, LA 70065

323 Auburn Place A

Kenner, LA 70065

323 Auburn Place B

Kenner, LA 70065

323 Auburn Place C

Kenner, LA 70065

323 Auburn Place D

Kenner, LA 70065

325 Auburn Place A

Kenner, LA 70065

325 Auburn Place B

Kenner, LA 70065

325 Auburn Place C

Kenner, LA 70065

325 Auburn Place D

Kenner, LA 70065

327 Auburn Place A

Kenner, LA 70065

327 Auburn Place B

Kenner, LA 70065

327 Auburn Place C

Kenner, LA 70065

327 Auburn Place D

Kenner, LA 70065



3005 Emory Street

A Kenner, LA 70065

3005 Emory Street B

Kenner, LA 70065

3005 Emory Street C

Kenner, LA 70065

3005 Emory Street D

Kenner, LA 70065

3007 Emory Street A

Kenner, LA 70065

3007 Emory Street B

Kenner, LA 70065

3007 Emory Street C

Kenner, LA 70065

3007 Emory Street D

Kenner, LA 70065



39 Oakley Drive Destrehan, LA 70047


3137 Lexington Street

Kenner, LA 70065

4104 Chateau Boulevard Apt A

Kenner, LA 70065

9909 Debra Drive River Ridge, LA 70123

PO Box 641116


Kenner LA 70062

606 Gerry Drive Kenner, LA 70062

18484 E. Petroleum Drive Baton Rouge, LA 70809

4813 Carondelet Street New Orleans, LA 70115

503 Marguerite Rd Metairie, LA 70003

7 Charlene Ct Kenner, LA 70065

321 Georgetown Dr Kenner, LA 70065

400 Pellerin Dr Kenner, LA 70065

607 Gerry Dr

Kenner, LA 70062 2733 Tifton Ave

Kenner, LA 70062

2711 Piedmont St Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062 608 Gerry Dr

Kenner, LA 70062


616 Petit Berdot Dr Kenner, LA 70065


2834 Salem St Kenner, LA 70062


Kenner, LA 70062 2751 Gadsden St

Kenner, LA 70062

110 Miami Pl Kenner, LA70065

2622 Huntsville St Kenner, LA 70062

5212 Purdue Dr Metairie, LA 70003

2811 Tupelo St Kenner, LA 70062

304 27th St

Kenner, LA 70062 308 27th St

Kenner, LA 70062

48 Chateau Trianon Dr Kenner, LA 70065

517 Webster St

Kenner, LA 70062 154 Miami Pl

Kenner, LA 70065

705 Gerry Dr Kenner, LA 70062

708 Gerry Dr

Kenny, LA 70062 100 Holy Cross Pl Kenner, LA 70065

1107 Madison St Gretna, LA 70053

2705 Salem St

Kenner, LA 70062 P.O. Box 27

St Rose, LA 70087

1614 Maloney Dr Des Allemands, LA 70030

2307 Aberdeen St Kenner, LA 70062

365 Canal St #1660 New Orleans, LA 70130

604 Gerry Dr Kenner, LA 70062

331 27th St

Kenner, LA 70062 4331 Canal St

New Orleans, LA 70119

707 29th St Kenner, LA 70062

130 Veterans Blvd Kenner, LA 70062

P.O. Box 2 Kenner, LA 70063

1507 Garden St Kenner, LA 70065

2727 Gadsden St


Kenner, LA 70062

1903 Short St Kenner, LA 70062

35 Mesa St


Kenner, LA 70063


613 29th St

Kenner, LA 70062 2816 Kingston St

Kenner, LA 70062

3129 Huntsville St Kenner, LA 70065

126 Kilgore Pl

Kenner, LA 70065 51 McKinley St

Kenner, LA 70065

424 27th St Kenner, LA 70062

4021 E Loyola Dr Kenner, LA 70065

2610 Decatur St Kenner, LA 70062

5248 Kawanee Ave Metairie, LA 70006

5709 New York Ave Alexandria, LA 71302

4200 Beaujolais Dr Kenner, LA 70065

4731 Canal St New Orleans, LA 70119

3720 W Loyola Dr Kenner, LA 70065

4 St Christopher Dr Kenner, LA 70065

4220 St Elizabeth Dr Kenner, LA 70065

3108 Indiana Ave Kenner, LA 70065

4029 W Loyola Dr Kenner, LA 70065

P.O. Box 7044 Metairie, LA 70010

4337 Delaware Ave Kenner, LA 70065

2401 Chester St Metairie, LA 70001

2433 Connecticut Ave Kenner, LA 70062

2305 Kingston St Kenner, LA 70062

4728 Green Acres Ct Metairie, LA 70003

4344 Connecticut Ave Kenner, LA 70065

14 Rue Dijon Kenner, LA 70065

228 Little Bayou Ln Kenner, LA 70065

500 Main St Baton Rouge, LA 70801

1100 Poydras St New Orleans, LA 70163

2724 Phoenix St Kenner, LA 70062

2518 Longwood Dr Metairie, LA 70003

2304 N Bengal Rd Metairie, LA 70003

2412 Veterans Blvd Kenner, LA 70062

18 Normandy Dr Kenner, LA 70065

500 E Louisiana State Dr Kenner, LA 70065

29 Zion St Kenner, LA 70065

2340 Aberdeen St Kenner, LA 70062

4077 Tulane Dr Kenner, LA 70065

58 McKinley St Kenner, LA 70065

7 Traminer Dr Kenner, LA 70065

131 23rd St Kenner, LA 70062

1415 Short St Kenner, LA 70062

P.O. Box 141 Kenner, LA 70063

14 St Bridget Dr

Kenner, LA 70065

7 Bistineau Ct Kenner, LA 70065

313 Pellerin Dr Kenner, LA 70065

1807 W Esplanade Ave Kenner, LA 70065

15125 Bluffwood Cir Prairieville, LA 70769

2423 Bainbridge St Kenner, LA 70062

P.O. Box 64033


Norco, LA 70079

3548 Tulane Dr. Kenner, LA 70065

APPENDIX H Comments and Summary

1

Alyssa Bienes

From: Brandon PerillouxSent: Saturday, November 24, 2018 4:12 PMTo: Alyssa BienesSubject: Fwd: Comment form regarding 2727 Aberdeen street rental property


From: April Spears <[email protected]> Date: November 24, 2018 at 4:05:36 PM CST To: [email protected] Cc: Josh <[email protected]> Subject: Comment form regarding 2727 Aberdeen street rental property

Mr. Perriloux, Thank you for taking the time to listen to my concerns at the meeting. As I mentioned my brother and I own the property located at 2727/2729 Aberdeen St (located next to the church). The property is currently used as a rental property. We would like to voice our concerns regarding the impact this project will have on our tenants, property value, and rental income. We are concerned that we will not be able to keep the property rented as our tenants have already mentioned moving due to the impending changes, high traffic, and lack of access. The tenants have already had their vehicles damaged. They have also mentioned wanting to move because of all of the inconveniences they are dealing with on a daily basis (i.e. construction, noise and constant changes). We have also had damage to the property from the ongoing construction. My brother has called the general contractor in charge of the project and the city of Kenner to complain about damage to the building and has gotten little to no response. They are constantly passing the blame to someone else and the costs of these repairs are piling up on us. If the initial stages of the project have already caused this many problems, I am afraid that with future drilling of pilings, construction for the overpass, and lack of

2

sound barrier that there will undoubtedly be a negative impact on our business (as property owners and landlords). The way that I am looking at this now is that our best option would be for Kenner to purchase the property from us so that it will not be an ongoing issue of problems. As I mentioned our costs are already increasing. Please also let me know whom we should contact to have the house evaluated and discuss present damages that need to be addressed. Regards, April Spears and Josh Spears 504-512-0111 or 504 220-0206

1

Brandon Perilloux

From: Brandon PerillouxSent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 8:38 AMTo: 'Webber, Kenyon'Cc: Kenyon Webber; Alyssa BienesSubject: RE: Link to Environment AssessmentAttachments: Handout Packet.pdf

Good Morning, The EA document can be found on LADOTD’s website here: http://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside_LaDOTD/Divisions/Engineering/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx?RootFolder=%2FInside%5FLaDOTD%2FDivisions%2FEngineering%2FEnvironmental%2FDocuments%2FH%2E011670%20%20I%2D10%20%40%20LOYOLA%20INTERCHANGE%20IMPROVEMENTS%2FEnvironmental%20Assessment&FolderCTID=0x012000C055341479DCD84E95C80E77E7755A9A&View={993143B3-FC7F-4567-86C2-C8EE52788C8D} Hard Copies are available for review at the following Jefferson Parish Libraries: 4747 West Napoleon Ave., Metairie, LA; 630 West Esplanade Ave., Kenner, LA; 6646 Riverside Drive, Metairie, LA. The EA is also available at the DOTD District office (1440 US-90, Bridge City, LA) for viewing and purchase. I also attached a copy of the handout from last night’s meeting for your reference. Please note that all comments are to be post marked by November 30th, 2018. Please let me know if you have any questions, thanks. Brandon D. Perilloux P.E., PTOE Associate/ Transportation Engineer Urban Systems 2000 Tulane Avenue, Suite 200 New Orleans, LA 70112 504-523-5511 ext 3966| Follow us at www.urbansystems.com This E‐mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. If this document, the information contained herein, and/or any document attached to this email was prepared solely for the purpose of identifying, evaluating and planning safety improvements on public roads which may be implemented utilizing federal aid highway funds; it may be exempt from discovery or admission into evidence pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 409. If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the sender immediately by return E‐mail. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus‐free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.

From: Webber, Kenyon <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:52 AM To: Brandon Perilloux <[email protected]> Cc: Kenyon Webber <[email protected]> Subject: Link to Environment Assessment Brandon, I am reaching out to you this morning to get the link to the Environmental Assessment the DOT has submitted per our conversation last night at the public hearing on the I‐10/ Loyola Interchange Improvement project. When you respond to this email, please reply all.

2

Thank you for your assistance. Kenyon Webber

^xÇçÉÇ aA jxuuxÜ Sr. Engineer ‐ Standards Design Basis Entergy Transmission Services Internal 8‐576‐7283 External 504‐576‐7283 [email protected] This message is intended for the exclusive use of the intended addressee. If you have received this message in error or are not the intended addressee or his or her authorized agent, please notify me immediately by e‐mail, discard any paper copies and delete all electronic files of this message.

WEST VETERANS BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENTOPTION 1 - PREFERRED PLAN

Existing Airport Access

I-10

Veterans Boulevard

New Airport Access

Proposed Access Route

Proposed Access Route - Elevated

WEST VETERANS BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENTOPTION 1A - PREFERRED PLAN AND INCREASED CAPACITY VIA BAINBRIDGE


I-10

Veterans Boulevard

New Airport Access



WEST VETERANS BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENTOPTION 2 - NEW ORLEANS AND BATON ROUGE ACCESS VIA BAINBRIDGE INTERCHANGE


I-10

Veterans Boulevard

New Airport Access



WEST VETERANS BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENTOPTION 2A - NEW ORLEANS AND BATON ROUGE ACCESS VIA BAINBRIDGE INTERCHANGE

AND INCREASED CAPACITY


I-10

Veterans Boulevard

New Airport Access



OPEN HOUSE MEETING PUBLIC COMMENTS November 20, 2018

JOHNS, PENDLETON, FAIRBANKS AND FREESE 504 219-1993

1

************************************************

I-10/LOYOLA INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

STATE PROJECT NO. H.011670

JEFFERSON PARISH

************************************************

OPEN HOUSE MEETING

PUBLIC COMMENTS

************************************************

Taken on November 20, 2018

At the Susan Park Gymnasium, 502 Veterans

Memorial Boulevard, Kenner, Louisiana 70062



2

1 PUBLIC COMMENTS

2

3 RESIDENT NUMBER 1.

4 MISS PATTERSON:

5 My name is Carolyn C. Patterson, and I

6 live at 2707 Greenwood, Kenner, Louisiana

7 70062-5039.

8 Number one, the traffic is bad. That's one

9 of my main complaints. I live on Greenwood.

10 The traffic is coming from the airport and you

11 cannot even get from our street, from Loyola,

12 off of Loyola to Greenwood going down 27;

13 anyplace around there you cannot get to because

14 of the traffic.

15 And the traffic coming from the airport

16 from the airport have bunched on Greenwood. We

17 never had that problem, because children be out

18 there, you know, and you got traffic just backed

19 up. It's awful.

20 And you can't even turn in your driveway

21 half of the time because they're trying to stay

22 back-to-back. And by them being so close, they

23 don't let you turn into your driveway; so, that

24 creates another problem.

25 But what they are trying to do from -- I



3

1 owns the property back there. This is my

2 retirement property, and what I'm going to do?

3 If they want to buy me out, they're going to buy

4 me out from this. Are they going to pay me for

5 20 years? That's what I got it for; so, pay me

6 my rent for 20 years. At least give me the

7 amount of money, but don't try to give me five

8 or ten dollars, which I know it's going to be

9 more, but don't give me a few dollars, which I

10 can't go anywhere and buy me another place. So,

11 that's part of my complaint, too.

12 And the barriers is going to be around

13 Kenner on the street when they put all these

14 barriers up. It's a big problem for Kenner on

15 crime. Kenner is going to have to hire more

16 policemen because crime is going to get really

17 bad.


19 MR. RUNYAN:

20 My name is Lloyd Runyan, and I live

21 at 11 Guadalupe Street, Kenner, Louisiana. My

22 main concern is that I own a limousine company

23 here, right here in Kenner. And my main concern

24 is, the first thing was the waiting of working

25 on a project like this, when you have an airport



4

1 that's almost finished and nothing has been done

2 about roadways or overpasses.

3 It shows that we're a little bit not

4 together with community leadership between New

5 Orleans, Kenner and the State to get this done.

6 And now we're fixing to go into the next

7 few years of combustion, traffic and a lot of

8 unnecessary -- this should have been done before

9 it opens, instead of after the airport opens.

10 I'm concerned about safety issues on the

11 interstate. Everybody is going to hit Loyola.

12 Many people are going down the airport service

13 road, and all of that is going to hit the Loyola

14 exit. We're talking about -- we're going to

15 have crashes, there's going to be rear-ends,

16 everybody is going to try to cut in line, and

17 they need to put up those little stick-ups that

18 keep people from trying to come up front and to

19 cut in. They need to get way back. It's going

20 to be terrible.

21 It hurts my business, because we usually do

22 two-hour intervals between airport runs, and now

23 we're looking at, at least three. So, now I've

24 got to spread out my business. I'm going to

25 lose more money. I can't do quick turnarounds.



5

1 So, it hurts me on that part of it.

2 I'm more concerned about why we waited now,

3 when you know there's an airport, we knew about

4 this airport five years ago and we're just now

5 working on the ramps.

6 I have a lot of people from other cities

7 that are laughing at us, because I deal with the

8 limousine industry, I meet a lot of people, I

9 drive, I see people, I also talk on my phone,

10 people questioning how will we get to the

11 airport.

12 And I'm sorry, we have to get ready for a

13 mess, and I have nothing else to say. There's

14 no way to make it any nicer because of all the

15 red lights, and they want easy access, and

16 that's my main concern because we're not working

17 to forego to make it work for our city or the

18 State of Louisiana. We're working against each

19 other, and now we're fixing to go into a mess

20 and especially with dealing with traffic.

21 I'm a driver, I drive a lot, and I see

22 what's going to happen. I foresee that traffic

23 problem on the interstate, and I'm concerned

24 about all that until we get roadways. I'm

25 concerned about -- I have friends that own a



6

1 little duplex, that's my second main concern,

2 and simple people that worked all their lives to

3 buy a duplex, and now they're retired. Now it's

4 one of the homes that's going to be taken away,

5 and they were counting on this rent every month

6 to help them supplement their retirement.

7 That's what we wanted for them. We wanted them

8 to work all their lives and now they're in

9 retirement age, now they feel like they have to

10 give it up.

11 I did find some information to help them,

12 but they're scared, and I'm trying to help them

13 get information they need, because they feel

14 like they're being kicked out of their home and

15 getting it torn down and only given a partial

16 value of the place they bought that they thought

17 they'd be using for their retirement; so, that's

18 another concern of mine, that it's too close to

19 the thruway to the airport off Decatur Street

20 near the thruway.

21 So that's another part I'm concerned about,

22 those people, when they worked all their lives

23 to do something for themselves and they did, and

24 now it's not a storm, it's not a fire, it's not

25 a hurricane. It's the government that's telling



7

1 them, we're going to buy your place out, and

2 they're just concerned about not having

3 something to do with what they earned all their

4 life for. That was their mansion. That was

5 their everything that they put in to make sure

6 they're safe for their retirement age, and now

7 it's going to be taken away.

8 I just hope they get taken care of. That's

9 all I have to say. Thank you.


11 PASTOR JACKIE BROWN COCKERHAM:

12 My name is Pastor Jackie Brown

13 Cockerham, and my address is 2610 Decatur

14 Street, Apartment A, in Kenner, Louisiana.

15 My concerns regarding the Airport Expansion

16 Road Project is that on 27th Street you have

17 completely divided the neighborhood. It is our

18 only east-west thoroughfare, and now we have to

19 go around. It rocked our whole neighborhood.

20 The other concern that I have is having an

21 eight to ten foot wall, sound wall that runs

22 along the side of that new road. I've been told

23 that there will be a barricade or a barrier.

24 That's not going to work for us. We need a

25 sound wall, an eight to ten foot sound wall that



8

1 runs along I-10 in Metairie, in the Metairie-New

2 Orleans area.

3 My other concern is that there is a ramp

4 that's coming down off of Loyola. It would have

5 been a great idea if you had brought that ramp

6 over 27th Street so that we would have access to

7 the west side of 27th. You've blocked the

8 entire neighborhood, and that is terribly unfair

9 to us, to our children.

10 You have no signs or traffic signals for

11 those children to cross and go to Susan Park

12 gym, which is the only gym and playground area

13 that they have for Veteran Heights and Susan

14 Park Subdivisions.

15 We pray that you would reconsider what

16 you're doing, or get another set of engineers,

17 because this is something that should have been

18 considered initially, to have a pathway or some

19 type of walkway for the children and the other

20 pedestrians, as well as for vehicular traffic.

21 We're going to be dealing with eight lanes

22 of noise throughout the day, and it's unfair, as

23 far as I'm concerned, what you've done and how

24 you constructed this access road. Thank you for

25 your time.



9

1 C E R T I F I C A T E

2

3 This certification is valid only for a transcript accompanied by my original signature

4 and original required seal on this page, which I attest said seal number is in good standing with

5 the State of Louisiana.

6

7 I, Louis Jankowski, Certified Court Reporter, in and for the State of Louisiana, as

8 the officer before whom this testimony was taken, do hereby certify that CAROLYN PATTERSON,

9 LLOYD RUNYAN AND PASTOR JACKIE BROWN-COCKERHAM, did testify as hereinbefore set forth in the

10 foregoing 8 pages; that this testimony was reported by me in the stenotype reporting

11 method, was prepared and transcribed by me or under my personal direction and supervision, and

12 is a true and correct transcript to the best of my ability and understanding; that the

13 transcript has been prepared in compliance with transcript format guidelines required by statute

14 or by rules of the board, that I have acted in compliance with the prohibition on contractual

15 relationships, as defined by Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 1434 and in rules and

16 advisory opinions of the board; that I am not related to counsel or to the parties herein, nor

17 am I otherwise interested in the outcome of this matter.

18

19

20

21

22

23 ------------------------- Louis Jankowski, CCR

24 Certified Court Reporter 78010

25

1

Alyssa Bienes

From: Brandon PerillouxSent: Monday, November 05, 2018 12:57 PMTo: Steven PsarellisCc: Alyssa Bienes; Urban FilesSubject: RE: Loyola Interchange (16-011-2)

Good Afternoon Mr. Psarellis, Alternative I is the preferred alternative for this project. The environmental document is available on LADOTD’s website below: http://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside_LaDOTD/Divisions/Engineering/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx?RootFolder=%2FInside%5FLaDOTD%2FDivisions%2FEngineering%2FEnvironmental%2FDocuments%2FH%2E011670%20%20I%2D10%20%40%20LOYOLA%20INTERCHANGE%20IMPROVEMENTS%2FEnvironmental%20Assessment&FolderCTID=0x012000C055341479DCD84E95C80E77E7755A9A&View={993143B3-FC7F-4567-86C2-C8EE52788C8D} The environmental document includes the preferred alternative selection as well as the public comment and response. We offer the public the opportunity to comment on the preferred alternative at the Public Hearing referenced in your e-mail. Please let me know if you require any additional information, thanks. Brandon D. Perilloux P.E., PTOE Associate/ Transportation Engineer Urban Systems 2000 Tulane Avenue, Suite 200 New Orleans, LA 70112 504-523-5511 ext 3966| Follow us at www.urbansystems.com This E-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. If this document, the information contained herein, and/or any document attached to this email was prepared solely for the purpose of identifying, evaluating and planning safety improvements on public roads which may be implemented utilizing federal aid highway funds; it may be exempt from discovery or admission into evidence pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 409. If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the sender immediately by return E-mail. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions. From: Steven Psarellis <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2018 12:43 PM To: Brandon Perilloux <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Loyola Interchange

2

Good afternoon Mr. Perilloux: Just got your notice of a public hearing on the Loyola/I-10 Interchange Improvement. Which alternative option are you proposing? Sincerely, Steve Psarellis On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:15 PM Steven Psarellis <[email protected]> wrote:

Dear Mr. Perilloux: Pursuant to our recent telcom, I am attaching PTP Investments' opposition to construction of a Loyola Drive southbound expressway/ramp leading into eastbound I-10. Regards,

Steven E. Psarellis

Psarellis & Associates, P.L.C. One Canal Place, Suite 1660 365 Canal Street New Orleans, LA 70130 TEL: (504) 596-6777 FAX: (504) 524-0713 [email protected]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged material. If you have received this transmission in error, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

--

Steven E. Psarellis

Psarellis & Associates, P.L.C. One Canal Place, Suite 1660 365 Canal Street New Orleans, LA 70130 TEL: (504) 596-6777 FAX: (504) 524-0713 [email protected]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential or privileged material. If you have received this transmission in error, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or

3

reproduction of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.


Written Comments

12/18/2018

Response Number

Responses

1

LADOTD will handle this project as a Design Build to expedite the construction process. The Design Build procurement process has begun and construction is expected to begin in mid 2019. Per the LADOTD 2018 Acquisition Brochure: "If your property, or a portion of it, needs to be acquired, you will be notified as soon as possible of (1) the agency’s interest in acquiring your property, (2) the agency’s obligation to secure any necessary appraisals, and (3) any other useful information. When an agency begins the acquisition process, the first personal contact with you, the property owner, should be no later than during the appraisal of the property. Before moving or purchasing replacement housing, contact DOTD to assure your eligibility and the prompt payment of your relocation benefits. If you move without prior notification to DOTD, you risk losing all possible benefits provided by the Relocation Assistance Program."

2The sequence of construction for this project will be developed to minimize construction impacts and time. Land exchange for the fire station is not part of this project.

3The contractor will implement plans to minimize impacts during construction. Properties identified as possible acquisition or relocations where chosen basedon geometric impacts. These properties are documented in the EA.

4The fire station relocation is not part of this project. The City of Kenner will determine the location of the firehouse relocation.

5

The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives. The flyover ramps will remove traffic from the surface streets of Loyola Dr and Veterans Blvd improving traffic operations over a No Build condition.

6

The preferred alternative, Alternative I, will provide access to the airport via the flyover ramps and the at grade intersections. If an accident occurs on the flyover ramps, vehicles will be able to reroute to the at grade intersection. Additionally, the flyover ramps are designed to be wide enough for traffic flow to continue with a stalled vehicle.

7

The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives. The flyover ramps will remove traffic from the Loyola Dr at Veterans Blvd intersection improving traffic operations over a No Build condition. Noise barriers are recommended due to noise impacts as well as public input.

8

The current construction is for LADOTD Project No. H.011276 N.O. Airport Connector Rd and not part of this project. The contractor for this project will implement plans to minimize impacts during construction. Properties identified as possible acquisitions or relocations where chosen based on geometric impacts. The proposed design allows access to be maintained for this property via right-in/ right-out at the existing driveway. Relocation of this property is not recommended based on geometric impacts.

9

Accessing the Airport via I-310 would require the construction of a bridge of considerable length which is expected to be highly costly. The presence of the I-310 and I-10 bridge over this area does not indicate there would be no wetland impacts. The preferred alternative was determined to have no wetland impacts.

10

Providing a separate interchange just west of the Williams Blvd interchange and access via Bainbridge St would require flyover ramps and improvements to the at-grade roadway to accommodate the increase in traffic volume.Interchange flyover ramps could impact multiple business both north and south of Veterans Blvd based on geometric requirements. The flyover ramps could also impact the MSY Airport’s runway protection zone. Widening of at-grade roadway of Bainbridge St from a two-lane to four-lane or a possible six-lane roadway could impact over 15 businesses located along Bainbridge St south of Veterans Blvd. The proposed action does not preclude Bainbridge St from being improved and used as a public access point to the MSY Airport in the future nor does it preclude consideration of an additional interchange as proposed in the comment. An interchange as proposed in the comment would require a separate NEPA document and a separate interchange justification report.

I believe it would be better if the entry to the new airport would come through the west end of the airport by I-310. This would eliminate the traffic jam on Loyola Dr and be more cost effective than the plans you have now, because the flyover would come down on airport property. With no impact on the wetland because I-310 and I-10 are already there.

Per the public hearing November 20, 2018 please see attached options for the airport traffic flow.

Thank you for taking the time to listen to my concerns at the meeting. As I mentioned my brother and I own the property located at 2727/2729 Aberdeen St (located next to the church). The property is currently used as a rental property. We would like to voice our concerns regarding the impact this project will have on our tenants, property value, and rental income. We are concerned that we will not be able to keep the property rented as our tenants have already mentioned moving due to the impending changes, high traffic, and lack of access. The tenants have already had their vehicles damaged. They have also mentioned wanting to move because of all of the inconveniences they are dealing with on a daily basis (i.e. construction, noise and constant changes). We have also had damage to the property from the ongoing construction. My brother has called the general contractor in charge of the project and the city of Kenner to complain about damage to the building and has gotten little to no response. They are constantly passing the blame to someone else and the costs of these repairs are piling up on us. If the initial stages of the project have already caused this many problems, I am afraid that with future drilling of pilings, construction for the overpass, and lack of sound barrier that there will undoubtedly be a negative impact on our business (as property owners and landlords).The way that I am looking at this now is that our best option would be for Kenner to purchase the property from us so that it will not be an ongoing issue of problems. As I mentioned our costs are already increasing. Please also let me know whom we should contact to have the house evaluated and discuss present damages that need to be addressed.

My concern from 27th Street. Getting on Veterans to cross over to Loyola with (1) traffic light. (excuse my writing) Traffic now is horrible. I can barely get home from Vets to 27th Street because the traffic is blocking the intersection. Now traffic cameras will be installed to ticket innocent law abiding citizens trying to go to work and home with ONE traffic LIGHT. I can explain in detail verbally. We need the right people to come out and observe the traffic and we also need City ofKenner to take care of their neighbors. Genell LeBoeuf PattersonAlso, I see you are placing barriers around the neighborhood - that is more CRIME! Very disappointed.

This is a very poorly planned concept. No one involved in the planning process is taking into account the 100% certainty that an accident (involving 2 or more cars) will shutdown access to the airport. There needs to be more than one access point to the airport otherwise in the event of an accident, you will have a lot of people missing flights. I've been in this exact situation where I'vemissed a flight because of an accident on the current (existing) flyover from I-10. (I wasn't involved in the accident, but the resulting traffic jam caused many people to miss flights. The current airport has multiple ways to get to it. There needs to be more than one way to access the new airport!!!!

"very" concerned about emergency response west of Loyola & Vets due to only one way in & out

Written Comment

How soon can we get a idea when all this construction well happen just siting and waiting is a disadvantage to the people like me that will have to sell and relocate to start all over agin I wish I could start looking right now to get my life back on trackbecause right now its uncertain where I will be going everything is at a standstill.

Please build section from airport to I-10 east first to eliminate the added traffic.Exchange land under old terminal for the Kenner fire station.Boh Bros.

My business is located on Decatur St one block off of Loyola D. The construction & the upcoming construction will adversely affect my business. The traffic along will cause loss of business as my clients will be inconvenienced by the traffic & may choose another printer.We have equipment that is very sensitive to movement. I am concerned that the construction will cause movement to the ground which will adversely affect my equipment. Also, the overpass will be directly across the street from my shop. I will be requesting to be considered for relocation.

Fire department location to support community closed to airport


Verbal Comments

12/4/2018

Response Number

Responses

1

The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives. The flyover ramps will remove traffic from the surface streets of Loyola Dr and Veterans Blvd improving traffic operations over a No Build condition. Properties identified as possible acquisitions or relocations where chosen based on geometric impacts. Relocation of this property is not recommended based on geometric impacts. Noise barriers are recommended due to noise impacts as well as public input.

2

LADOTD will handle this project as a Design Build to expedite the construction process. The Design Build procurement process has begun and construction is expected to begin in mid 2019. The preferred alternative, Alternative I, is expected to provide the best traffic operations of the alternatives. Alternative I is also expected to be a safety improvement from the No Build conditions based on conflict point analysis. Alternative I was also identified as the safest option of the alternatives based on the conflict point analysis. Any properties selected for acquisition and relocation will go through the LADOTD Right of Way Acquisition Process and will be justly compensated.

3

The closure of 27th street is part of LADOTD Project No. H.011276 N.O. Airport Connector Rd. The closure of 27th Street is an existing condition for this project. Flying over 27th St was looked into and determined to be costly and not feasible due to impacting the Airport roundabout. During the design build phase of this project, a pedestrian analysis will be conducted and a public meeting will be held to present the design to the public and address concerns raised/expressed by local officials and the public during the public outreach of this project. Noise barriers have been considered during the development of the project and have been included where feasible. Noise barriers were extended across Susan Park based on public input. The noise walls from the NO Airport Connector Rd project will be relocated on the eastside of Airport Rd. These walls will provide noise benefit and restricting pedestrian access.

My name is Pastor Jackie Brown Cockerham, and my address is 2610 Decatur Street, Apartment A, in Kenner, Louisiana. My concerns regarding the Airport Expansion Road Project is that on 27th Street you have completely divided the neighborhood. It is our only east-west thoroughfare, and now we have to go around. It rocked our whole neighborhood. The other concern that I have is having an eight to ten foot wall, sound wall that runs along the side of that new road. I've been told that there will be a barricade or a barrier. That's not going to work for us. We need a sound wall, an eight to ten foot sound wall that runs along I-10 in Metairie, in the Metairie-New Orleans area. My other concern is that there is a ramp that's coming down off of Loyola. It would have been a great idea if you had brought that ramp over 27th Street so that we would have access to the west side of 27th. You've blocked the entire neighborhood, and that is terribly unfair to us, to our children. You have no signs or traffic signals for those children to cross and go to Susan Park gym, which is the only gym and playground area that they have for Veteran Heights and Susan Park Subdivisions. We pray that you would reconsider what you're doing, or get another set of engineers, because this is something that should have been considered initially, to have a pathway or some type of walkway for the children and the other pedestrians, as well as for vehicular traffic. We're going to be dealing with eight lanes of noise throughout the day, and it's unfair, as far as I'm concerned, what you've done and how you constructed this access road. Thank you for your time.

Verbal Comment

My name is Lloyd Runyan, and I live at 11 Guadalupe Street, Kenner, Louisiana. My main concern is that I own a limousine company here, right here in Kenner. And my main concern is, the first thing was the waiting of working on a project like this, when you have an airport that's almost finished and nothing has been done about roadways or overpasses. It shows that we're a little bit not together with community leadership between New Orleans, Kenner and the State to get this done. And now we're fixing to go into the next few years of combustion, traffic and a lot of unnecessary -- this should have been done before it opens, instead of after the airport opens. I'm concerned about safety issues on the interstate. Everybody is going to hit Loyola. Many people are going down the airport service road, and all of that is going to hit the Loyola exit. We're talking about -- we're going to have crashes, there's going to be rear-ends, everybody is going to try to cut in line, and they need to put up those little stick-ups that keep people from trying to come up front and to cut in. They need to get way back. It's going to be terrible. It hurts my business, because we usually do two-hour intervals between airport runs, and now we're looking at, at least three. So, now I've got to spread out my business. I'm going to lose more money. I can't do quick turnarounds. So, it hurts me on that part of it. I'm more concerned about why we waited now, when you know there's an airport, we knew about this airport five years ago and we're just now working on the ramps. I have a lot of people from other cities that are laughing at us, because I deal with the limousine industry, I meet a lot of people, I drive, I see people, I also talk on my phone, people questioning how will we get to the airport. And I'm sorry, we have to get ready for a mess, and I have nothing else to say. There's no way to make it any nicer because of all the red lights, and they want easy access, and that's my main concern because we're not working to forego to make it work for our city or the State of Louisiana. We're working against each other, and now we're fixing to go into a mess and especially with dealing with traffic. I'm a driver, I drive a lot, and I see what's going to happen. I foresee that traffic problem on the interstate, and I'm concerned about all that until we get roadways. I'm concerned about -- I have friends that own a little duplex, that's my second main concern, and simple people that worked all their lives to buy a duplex, and now they're retired. Now it's one of the homes that's going to be taken away, and they were counting on this rent every month to help them supplement their retirement. That's what we wanted for them. We wanted them to work all their lives and now they're in retirement age, now they feel like they have to give it up. I did find some information to help them, but they're scared, and I'm trying to help them get information they need, because they feel like they're being kicked out of their home and getting it torn down and only given a partial value of the place they bought that they thought they'd be using for their retirement; so, that's another concern of mine, that it's too close to the thruway to the airport off Decatur Street near the thruway. So that's another part I'm concerned about, those people, when they worked all their lives to do something for themselves and they did, and now it's not a storm, it's not a fire, it's not a hurricane. It's the government that's telling them, we're going to buy your place out, and they're just concerned about not having something to do with what they earned all their life for. That was their mansion. That was their everything that they put in to make sure they're safe for their retirement age, and now it's going to be taken away. I just hope they get taken care of. That's all I have to say. Thank you.

My name is Carolyn C. Patterson, and I live at 2707 Greenwood, Kenner, Louisiana 70062-5039. Number one, the traffic is bad. That's one of my main complaints. I live on Greenwood. The traffic is coming from the airport and you cannot even get from our street, from Loyola, off of Loyola to Greenwood going down 27; anyplace around there you cannot get to because of the traffic. And the traffic coming from the airport from the airport have bunched on Greenwood. We never had that problem, because children be out there, you know, and you got traffic just backed up. It's awful. And you can't even turn in your driveway half of the time because they're trying to stay back-to-back. And by them being so close, they don't let you turn into your driveway; so, that creates another problem. But what they are trying to do from - I owns the property back there. This is my retirement property, and what I'm going to do? If they want to buy me out, they're going to buy me out from this. Are they going to pay me for 20 years? That's what I got it for; so, pay me my rent for 20 years. At least give me the amount of money, but don't try to give me five or ten dollars, which I know it's going to be more, but don't give me a few dollars, which I can't go anywhere and buy me another place. So, that's part of my complaint, too. And the barriers is going to be around Kenner on the street when they put all these barriers up. It's a big problem for Kenner on crime. Kenner is going to have to hire more policemen because crime is going to get really bad.


Follow Up Questions

12/3/2018

Response Number Responses

1

The EA document can be found on LADOTD’s website here:

http://wwwsp.dotd.la.gov/Inside_LaDOTD/Divisions/Engineering/Environmental/Pages/default.aspx?RootFolder=%2FInside%5FLaDOTD%2FDivisions%2FEngineering%2FEnvironmental%2FDocuments%2FH%2E011670%20%20I%2D10%20%40%20LOYOLA%20INTERCHANGE%20IMPROVEMENTS%2FEnvironmental%20Assessment&FolderCTID=0x012000C055341479DCD84E95C80E77E7755A9A&View={993143B3-FC7F-4567-86C2-C8EE52788C8D}

Hard Copies are available for review at the following Jefferson Parish Libraries: 4747 West Napoleon Ave., Metairie, LA; 630 West Esplanade Ave., Kenner, LA; 6646 Riverside Drive, Metairie, LA. The EA is also available at the DOTD District office (1440 US-90, Bridge City, LA) for viewing and purchase. I also attached a copy of the handout from last night’s meeting for your reference. Please note that all comments are to be post marked by November 30th, 2018. Please let me know if you have any questions, thanks.

Follow Up Questions

I am reaching out to you this morning to get the link to the Environmental Assessment the DOT has submitted per our conversation last night at the public hearing on the I-10/ Loyola Interchange Improvement project. When you respond to this email, please reply all.

APPENDIX I Sign - In Sheets

APPENDIX J Hearing Photos