appendix - shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/925/19/19_appendices.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Appendix 1 showing the questionnaire Pan A used for collection of data on background information for the Ph.D. research entitled, "Human Resource management in the Natiodsed banks - A study focusing middle level of supe~sory officers of Coimbatore District".
1. BACKGROUND DATA
I Name
: Designation and level of Low I hi~ddle 1 H~gh management
; Age
4 Education < Graduation i Graduation 1 > Graduation
! No, of promotions (Career > I / 2 1 3 1 4 1 > 5 path)
6 Training
SI. So,
. .
Name of the training Month attended
Place of training
Any other institutional training if attended,
mention .-.
Appendix Eshowing the questionnaire Part B used for collection of data on 1 8 dimensions of HRD ISSUES for the Ph.D, research entitled, "Human Resource management in the Nationalised banks - A study focusing middle level of ,upenisory officers of Coimbatore District"
J refers to "I strongly agree" h refers to "I agree"
refers to "Undec~ded" j refers to "1 d~sagree" c refers to "I strongly d~sagree"
(Please "Tick in the appropriate column which you agree)
II. (i) Transparent Performance Appraisal (Guide to the column is given below)
-
I My self-assessment report has been taken into a b c d / account for Hntlng annual confidentla1 report I
: I Promotions in the banks are based on Annual 1 Confidential Repons
: , Some adverse remarks are e~ther not commun~cated a I at all or wmmun~cated after long delay
: My performance IS properly assessed and it 1s transparent in nature
(ii) Assistance for development and potential appraisal
1 There is scope to discuss with superiors regarding I the strengths and weaknesses of my work and ! conduct 1
There is counselling in my bank to improve myself a b c d e 1 I I I I I
1 Based on my potentials, 1 have been given a b c d 1 assignments and postingr -
a b
My superiors arc giving assistance for my I development in the department (weer 1 development)
c
a
d
b
e
c d e
Nhile u ses ing thc work of bank officers it is iesirable to take into account their contribution for
Subordinates are encouraged to acquire knowledge n banks
:iii) Feedback and Performance Helping I There is feedback from superiors to subordinates in ~ a n k s
The feedback from the public, press e tc , are helpful to improve, bank efficiency
We get only discouraging comments from everyone I a
(iv) Training for Scientific Performance
The training given to us by the bank is sufficient for our scientific performance
The present training programmes are adequate to meet professional standards
The 'in-service' Trainlng programmes are ylven to personnel In our bank who w~ll not later use the skills acquired
Our training institutions are inadequately equlpped for updated training - -
The '~n-service' training given IS Inadequate, not per~odlcal and not followed up effectively -~
(v) Career Planning and Development
Each person in the bank is fully developed --- - - - -
There is career planning for each person in the a banks
23
There is neither career planning nor development for individuals in banks a b c d e l
24
(vi) Employee Welfare and Quality of Worklife
Our living conditions are satisfactory
17 1 Our working conditions are satisfactory \ a / b I c / d / e I
1 am able to achieve my goal 1 aspiration in my official life
I i My present career in this bank is baud on my choice
2 8 1 My salary and increments are adequate a b c d
29 There IS "we" feel~ng among all ranks of the banks a b c d e
a
30 Our welfare is adequately taken care of by the bank a b
1 (vii) Rewards
b
a b
promotions and other recognitions in our bank , -
recognition in our bank
d c
33 The present promotion policies include extraneous I considerations eg. political recommendation
e
c
recognltlons and merlts
(viii) OD and Systems Development I 1 I /
d e (
1 have a feeling that I belong to service organisation
There is "hero" worship in the bank service
There are communal consideration in appreciating our work or conduct in our systems
a
a
b
b
c
a b c d e
c
d
d
e
e
Human resources development and other / a management concepts arc not practised in my bank
Bank p ~ o m e l are professionals like Engineers,
(K) Human Rerourecs Information
Adequate information and recording are kept on a personnel management i.e., recruitment, training, posting, promotion, transfer, retirement etc , at station, circle, sub-division, district, range and state levels
The system of 'Time and motion study' on various a functions of banking like file movement, processing of accounts etc , is available
The programme of work at all levels sub-division, a district and stare are adequate and effective
Programme drawn on investigation of cases is a effective (i e , repayment of loan, fraud activity by staff etc )
Adequate records are kept regarding number of a hours worked, leisure given, weekly offs, annual leaves, work-schedules, kept at station, circle, sub- division, d~strict, range and state
(I) Post-Retirement Rehabilitation 1 Bank personnel after retirement are respected by the a banks
Retired bank officers' views are taken into a consideration to improve the image of the banks
Retired bank officers' live long and with a satisfactory health
Retired bank officers are not at all respected by us I a
Retired bank officers are held in high esteem by the a public
111.
There is a feeling in the department h t only Branch Managers and upwards think originally, while the lower rungs do not think so l a l b I c
(i) Improved Inter-penonrl Relations
1 am treated as the most important link in the bank system
a
53
5 5 Leaders in my department are democratic and not autocratic I a I b I C d I e I
54
,
(ii) Erective Task Performance I l l
b
1 am satisfied with the present grievance redressel procedure in the bank
The most promising among all ranks must be identified and developed as future leaders in my bank a i b i c
There is two-way communlcatlon In the banks - from top to bonom and bottom to top
Inspections and supervision by supervisors are adequate and effective l a l b l c
c
I
a
58 1 There 1s panlclpative management In department - Compulsorily pald holrdays may be glven to all
stress ~nvolved In bank work ranks ~n bank, so as to break the monotony and
a
like rural urban or different seats dealing wlth bank records and transaction
(iii) Better Quality of Service
d
b
e
b
c
6 1
62
c
d
I
1 have been promoted as per my due datss
Recruitment traning and promotions in my department are done on merits
e
1
d e
a b
a b c d e
c d r
The suggestions of subordinates to improve the quality of service are taken with thanks in my department
improve the image of the banks
63
b6
, 6 8 1 Usage of HRD pr~nc~ples and management 1 ; 1 I 1 ; 1 1 ; concepts In the bank department alone wtll lmprove our status
69 We may use 'Suggest~on Box' to Improve matters In our bank
The honc4st and efficient officers are d~sappeanng from the miun stream of the banking service
67
(iv) Improved Status
Modernisat~on of the banks alone will glve us improved status
There is a feeling among us that we have to repon to too many authorities such as Zonal Managers. political people and departmental superiors
e a c
70
,
I
b d
a
I 7 1 '
1 am sat~sfied w~th non-monetary cons~deratlons wh~ch go to improve our Status (eg Pnor~ty In school admrss~on, not stand~ng in queue to get a txket etc )
72
b
(v) More Power
There IS a lot more to be done under modernlsat~on in my bank
73
I
c
a
r ,
If only we are pa~d h~gh salary compared to other pnvate banks, our real power w~ll Improve
I 74 ,
a
B d s must be autonomous as recommended by some p p l c so that poltt~cal mnfluence can be avuted
b
a
1 have a feeling that the w ~ a y has recogn~sed the bank w ~ c e as M Important profess~on
c
b
a
c
b
a
b
c
b
c
d
c
e
d e /
d c
1 (vi) Better Upward Communication I ' ! I l l 1
75
76
' 7
, -.
7R
,
YO The lower level personnel e afra~d to1 a
b 1 c d 1 r 1 ( communicate freely with h e higher-ups
e
1
I / (vii) Bettcr Financial Position I I I I I I
The bank personnel must be accountable only to the law
There is a need for upward mmmunication in the bank system from Junior Assistant upto General Manager
'Grapevine' (Whispers, gossips, loose talks e tc) t communication from the subordinates also must be
given due weight by the superiors of the banks
The feedback system in the banks IS only "one- way-traffic" I e from the above to below and never from the below to the above
Better upward communlcatlon 1s apprcc~ated 111 the banks
c d a
a
a
a
I
81 i The pay and other emoluments paid to the bank 1 staff are the lowest and must be raised upwards 1
84 There should be un~form pay scales throughout a b India and between the different banks
b
82
83
Non-monetary perks like "Admission Professional Colleges of bank oficer's children, scholarships for them, special medicinal care for members of bank officer's family etc., must be
(viii) Bcner Social Commitment
b
b
b
a b
c
c
c
I
Money may be pa~d towards the medical needs and ch~ldren's education needs etc
The bank personnel must be paid specla1 allowances 11ke " r ~ s k allowances handsomely
86
! L
b
b
a
a
d
d
d
The bank personnel do not feel that they have got a responsibility towards the community and society
e
e
e
--
c
c
a
d
d
e
e
-
b c d e
87 The social role of the banks is often forgotten by us - I and it is almost 'nil' l a i b i c l d l e l
s8
89
90
1 am over worked and so there is no time to think of social obligations
The bank officers are accountable to superiors of the department, the judiciary and the revenue
, authorities and also the politicians but not to the society 1 public
The bank officers think that they are the servants of the public
a
a
a
b
b
b
c
c
c
d
d
d
e
e
e
C Appendixfihowing the questionnaire Part& used for collection o f data on
45 dunensions of HRD CLIMATE SURVEY for the Ph.D. research entitled. "Human Resource management in the Nationalised banks - A study focusing middle level of supervisory officers of Coimbatore Dismct".
Give your assessment by encircling the appropnate number
5 = Almost always true 4 = Mostly true 3 = Sometimes true
2 = Rarely true I = Not at all true
The top management of bank goes out ~ t s way to ensure that the bank personnel enjoy the~r worh
bank~ng system are extremely Important and they should be treated more humanly
1 G o p i n g subord~nates IS cons~dered 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 I
I important part of their lob by the top management in banks
3
5
6
7
8 The top executive belleves that the behav~our of bank personnel can be changed and can be helped to develop at any stage In the~r l~ fe
I
The personnel po l~c~es are helpful to the human 1 5
19 People in b d s u c helpful to u c h o lho
l 10, j
4
4
4
4
development In banks
The top management IS w ~ l l ~ n g to invest tlme and other resources to ensure the development of the bank personnel
The senior officers gu~de the junlors w~th Interest to help them In the~r jobs In bank system
The personnel lacklng competence are helped to gain competence by the senlor and experienced people
5 4 3 2 1
5
- 5
5
r .
Junior bank people are very informal with their superiors
7
3
- 7
3
5
2
2
2
-.--,- .
2
1
1
1
1
4 3 2 1
11 The jun~or people In banks dlscuss thelr personal 5 problems with the senior officers and seek guidance for solving them
I ? Human relatrons in banks are so good that any 5 personnel wanting to aqulre new knowledge and sklH can do it I
I 13 Seniors guide their juniors to prepare for their 5 higher official responsibilities
14. The top executive scouts (searches for) for talent in the juniors and identify that and develop
incentives
17 Good work is always observed and special care is taken to appreciate it
based on objective (practical) and hll information and not based on favouritism
mental impression about each other
/ 20 The bank people are encouraged to experiment !21 1 with new ideas and try outcreatlve methods 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M~stakes made by the bank officers are corrected 1 and not punished by top management
23 The bank personnel are given feedback for future 5 correction and development
22 The mistakes and weaknesses are comrnun~cated to the junlors by the seniors In a pol~te and non- threatening way
24
, 1
5
The personnel In banks take efforts to find out their strengths and weaknesses from the11 supemslng officers and colleagues
5
26 The trained personnel are given opportunities to 5 practise their learning
21
27 Training is imparted based on needs
28 People trua each other in this organization / S 1 4 / 3 1 2 / I / 39 The junior bank personnel are not afraid to discuss
or express their feelings with their superiors
The training is taken seriously by the bank people and they learn from it
- - - -
10 The personnel do express and d~scuss the~r feel~ngs wlth the subordrnates and peers (colleagues)
4 5
The bank personnel are encouraged to take decisions and initiatives in their own sphere
develop handling higher responsibilities is quite common in this organization
When seniors delegate authority to juniors, the 5 juniors consider it as an opponunity for development
3 2
34
35
36
1
Team spirit is very high in this organization
Problems are discussed frankly and attempted to solve in mutually helpful way
Career development path is shown to the juniors by the seniors
37 The growth avenues of the organization are shown I to the bank personnel and are helped to prepare for 1 individual development
38
5
5
5
5 The bank personnel are aware of all the welfare 8 schemes and the welfare delivery system IS smooth
and helpful in the banking organizat~on
3
3
4
4
4
4
2
2
5 4 3 2 1
3
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
.?o 1 Job enrichment and job enlargement are practised in this organization ('Job enrichment' means motivated job performance 'Job enlargement' enlarging the dimensions of the job)
40
41
. .
4:
45 The bank personnel feel that a change of top executive will help to improve their lot
5
The job rotation helps the development of employees ('Job rotation' means changing from one branch to another branch of activities)
Employees do not feel suffocated in t h~s organization
Given an option, the employee will like to rejoin and work in this organization
43 ' The bank personnel feel that all their interests are
4
5
5 44
5
5
C
taken care of by the top management
The bank personnel feel that the superiors are not the real hindrance to their progress
3
4
4
4
4
4
2
3
3
1
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
I
1
1
Appendix IV showing the Mean. S.D, and Sum of the scores obtained by 120 respondents on the 18 dimensions identified on HRD ISSUES
,a ance : 603 ra rge I 9 :I I mum \{ax mum 1 i:
- . 2!87
%?ldl - - I .
total --- . w e , 120 Mising I 0
k a n 21 4
ar
a lance j 1 2 2 rrgc 5
!J " I T U ~ 19 'tdximum 24
total 1 5] totam 2;
1636 1777 1600 1850
1 75 3 54
3 0 6 1257
14 10
21 23 1963 21)73 ." "
Appendix V showing the correlation between background variables, age, education, promotion and training with the total scores of 18 dimensions of HRD ISSUES obtained for 120 respondents by Factor Analysis using SPSS package.
EDU
P D Ptdal FPh total
o DI total rcrl total
p total . 125 022 035 W2
~3 total \ s total
hhp total 050 1 ,024 1 Q U L total
Zrc. X!!-_-2___ -060 -- 067 1 AGE 070 / EDL 070 I plornot~on 447 I 481 I TRANG 269 104
yph TOTAL1 187 223 ID* total j 238 028
091 102
CP) tOUl EUU total
WR\ tdr l
PA t m ' I l k t d r l
kr) total ,,,J td'l
I S t d a r rp tdr l / n c c t d r l ' QF? total l lL tots1
AOE EW pcwnotm TRANG TOTALl r? total A w tob l t d r ~ r s (
total .c P rnl E W "
tOtPl I I I .277 total c-rt 206 total r5a.f ' 590 total Ir . . 691 lotal 'I' ' - 411 total O * C ' .684 total R F P ' 685 total a r c ; 602 - ---- AGE ' 162 EDU promotion TRANG TOTAL1 lots1 total total total total total
316 ( l . ta~kd) total total total
total tota:
total total IOMl total total total -----
-- -. I AGE 1 EDU I
AGE P e a m Correlat~on 1 (XX) 136 010 1 S g (2-tatled) 140 895 916 h
F DL) Pearson Conelatlon
- - - AGE Pearson Correlat~on
-- N 120 _ EDU 116
992 208 N -_ - _ - - - -.--l~o_--
3 ornollon Peamn Correlat~on 012 SIQ (2-taded) 1 895 992 000 000
120
000 I
-- 'otal Pearson conelaboh 060 067 583"
513 468 000 --
" Correlatlon a scgnlftcard at the 0 01 level (2-tailed)
S q (2-tailed) 140
N 120
" Correlat~on is s~gnlllcant at the 0 01 level (2-talledl
992 lrn
1WO
120 364' MX)
_ -120 - -680"- WO
120 promotion Peanon Correlation i 001
sg (Z-ta~led) 992
-RANG P e a ~ n Conelat~on - 057 116 SIQ (2-tad&) 538 208 N 12%- - 1 2 0 - -. -- - --
'otal Pearson Correlat~or~ 125
N - . . _.L- !20 120-
208 1 m 364" 000 120
1 000
120 - 339"- 000
- 1 ~ 0 - 1 20
172 1 120 -680" wo 120 339' 000
_ _ 120 1kiK
??O
Appendix V1 showing the factor analysis of 18 dimensions on HRD ISSUES, the conelation matrix between background variables, age, education, promotion and h-aining and 18 dimensions on HRD issues.
" Conelat~on IS slgn~tlcant at the 0 01 level (7.talled)
-. - AGF 1 .-- - -- - -&--
AGE Pearson Conelatlon 1 OOO
N L]L ~ e a m n ~orrelatlOn
SQ (2- t r l ld) N
N
Slp (24a1td) ' 538 N --- - -- ---- 120 I
ola Peancn Conelatlon , % (2-tailed) 1 MM
" N- .- .* -L-.. " Condahon a 8cpnlfmnt at the 0 01 Ievel(2-tailed)
Correlation n sgnlftcant at the 0 01 level (2 tatled)
Correlatlon 16 wgntflcant at the C 05 level (7 latled)
- . - N EDU P a m CwreYm
Correlation m rrgnlfiin! at Mc 0 01 Iwel(2~tnlsd)
--- 7p P e m Cam# &g (2C1led) ,
.-.- N 120 EDU ~a
- Correlrhon m m n t d tM 0 01 lsvel(2.blml c o r n * ~ o o ~ r ~ l c o n t ~ m c O ~ l a v a l ( P - W d l
I w ( 2 a l w - N , t f O m 4 l W l P ~ n ~ n c O n b l l h o n
I 8ip (2-bw
I N -TRANG ~wrwn ~ona*tmn I W (2aW.d)
-- N tohi PIIM ~ w r o ~ l o n
SCo (2*1w)
-.- -- tow12
. . 0 5 7 - " - - 3 5 284
--- 120 -018 837 - l?O
216' 018 120 IW3 370 120
1000
120 .--- A-
- EW
. I36 140 120 ~ Y I O " ~ - . G - . - ~ ~ ~ X . - - Z - ,
120 .ml 991 110 116 2W 120
- O ~ D 8 7 120 L .
140 120 012 895 120
-057 5s 120
. lo3 26(
I N - - . - 1 ? 2 2 * . .
-- p P r n o ( l o n q ~
012 U95 1 M
882 120
1 0#)
120 W* WQ 120 216- 018 120
SJB 120 116 108 120 Jb(" 000 120
1000
120 om 370
- 120
* Common m * N a r d at Ma 0 05 kval(241Ikd)
" C M e l m n qnlfiunl at the 0 01 level (2.trIld)
SIg (2-l)1ledl 538
- N EDU PouWicm%Gr - ;: 1 m) a 0 0 1
Sip (2-tallad) 902 208
Appendix V11 highli&bing f~ uulysis on tht follt fretors obtliaed by fgtor analysis of 18 d i m on the HRD ISSUES containing four fiiftors hog Eigm values m &ow one with their maximum loading details.
143 158 756 742 7 M E 4 2 - 1 s 428 5 1 W m lea 682 4740E.02 871 241 2 WbE01 873 135 8 4 0 ~ 0 1 875 .314 7889E-02 m 173 128 w -203 ~ I ~ E Q J 804 6341842 3826.542
-040 55WE-02 tlSWE42 - 703 332 158
314 811 165 .U)4 554 56024E-02
231 7 M -256 720 480 - 2 2 j M a
1 1 -258 1435E.02 4DQ 103 -83SE-02
.B80 - 128 3 877E42
.928 137 -2 575E-03 8 6 3 , ..- 140, 2831t g7
rod Pnnc~pl Comwnenl A n D l V
wm edrlchd
Appmdix Vlll showing the uniwiate -is (ANOVA) of paccpaon on 18 dimensions of HRD ISSUES with Wgmund variables, age, education, pmmoti~n md hlining far the four fictors obbiaed in the Factor Andysis.
Tm Ill Sum of S w r n dl M@an 6pwq F Slp
cotroctad ~ o d e l 1 IM 455.1 2 1 82227 1 1529 1 22 1
119 1 I a R Square3 = 025 (Adjurted R Squared = 008)
Tnlr ol Eoh*rrn$ub)rclr C W
Dcpmanl VahlMe FACI
Typr Ill Sum of Squwm
Terb d EoWew-SuWtl E W
Depndent VanrMe FAC 1
Intercap EDU Error T o l ~ l Conedcd Total
CwnadModcl I 90 4 9 9 1 1 I SQ495 1 1878 1 198 dl
a R Squared 5 014 (Adlt~sled R Squared : WI
2237355 295 1 90 495 1
6365 297 1 :;: 4167281 WO
F Mamn Squara 811
6455 792 119 ,
2237355 295 90 495 53 943
41478 139 1678
000 198
T.rbd-Emcb
Vulabls FACI
lyp 111 Sum of S q w dl MemQQtut~ F Sa
c m r d d w o b e ~ I a 184'1 2 I i j m 2 I 8% I 411
intercept RANG Error Total CorrWd total
8 R SqullOd 1 064 ( M l u $ l ~ d R Squared * M8)
121045 512 110 588 1626 878
631328 000 1737 467
1 / 121045512 8705214 3 977 2
117 120 119
lXKl 021 55 794
13 905
I . R Squared : 000 (4djwl.d R Squared a . 00gl
Torb of 8.kmn-SubJ.cb Elhcl l
b p n d e n l Varlsblc HRI
~ y p e III sum of $querm Uf Moan $quota F Sb
7 3M11 2 1 3678 I 1 302 1 278
D e p m t Varuble HRI
Error Total Corrected Total
a R Squared = 422 i~d~med R squares = 6121
195 398 39146 000
337 967
117 120 119
1670 1
T r b of -ubJKb Elhetl
k p W n t V 8 f W : FAC4
0. R Gqwrrd = ,021 (Adlurtad R Squared v OM)
Sourcr ? ~ t d I d MOdd I M r r ~ d EDU Error Tol l1
Mean Square 1 446
8636d646
T y p Ill Sum of Squara
1 446' 86364 646
,~amdad TOW 537 582 119
r R W u r r d * 003 (Mjmtld R SQu0nd -. OC6)
1 446 536 146
161651 000
dl 1 1
F 318
19007 938
SIP 574 WO
1 118 1 3
1 446 4 544
318 574
Twin d k h r m d u b j u a C m e b
Dmpmndent V m W I F A U
2 S ; 2 5 :
~~ I '= ! 0075 i ~ 7 5 j KT75 '"I L
7
M - 120 0
5683 SOW ' 50
19 30
372 51
- 190
221
- ma
438
25
1"
m75 -
120 0
5313 5000
1792
321 03
507
ni
915 5024
43n 4
25
l o o 75 1w
6375 1 5775 5660
120 0
4813 so.w
1262
t5927
- 141
zzi
120 a
4875 woo
1 4 0
21901
loo0
zz*
a V 2 5 m 3 v n v 2 s : 120 0
4675 wrn
S O ! W 5 0 S O 5 0
1116
l2447
343
nr
1 P 0
SZ.01) w.w
18-
35897
117
m
3705
4
25
100
5(150
-2S3
439
25
Appeadix X Bbowiog the comlatim rmJlix moag tbe bnckgmmd 251 wiabla md 45 dimcnsim idmtified for HRD CLIMATE SURVEY &mined by Factor dyds .
TRAN G
104
000
029 358 401 057 W1 473 W l 324 273 410 Mn 494 053 008 000 201 022 000 000 030 031 000 359 000 301 455 255 024 WB 005 171 298 433 000 Wtl 743 107 018 016 om OSB 001 DM am 711
000 001 000
OM 000 000 000 081 133
m i m 095 012 001 OM)
107 OM 475 1JB 128 070 O#r 341 170 003 m 054 M 454 WO 01 0 421 1 0 -a8 OU 1 1 m -
mi r)l om ~ t 2 rw ms W O a m 0 0 0 235 Do0 018 037 096 Kt2 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 WO 036 000 294 143 237 001 m 1 0#)
010 076 #)(I 035 000 000 m D o 0 o m
om 000 018 WO OM) 000 W O W O W O W O O ( K 1 W O 172 737 344 W O O M ) W O O ( X 1 O M ) m m m m 142 W6 076 350 MC 471 WO 087 000 DM 055 001 001 003 004 091 oQ2 nj 455 059 055 007 492 001 OM ma 257 014 297 051 093 227 132 Z$4 106 172 003 462 o m 0 0 1 D 5 5 m m m m m 2 m 109 431 113 132 073 X# 007 Do0 m 038 457 #W mo loo 082 249 om a?a 1(D OD7 OW 001 O S 015 Zrs aa la
.*?e..-4-%- @Q-
WO sol mi om M3 I 1 3m 203 001 312 401 m ssp 007 031 1 1 m3 02P 00J 167 107 038 001 091 om osl OM Otz am as ms 054 D53 017 001 1311 m 004 001 WO
279 W(I on am 008 223 173
148 149 472 0% 003 017 322 a3 001 448 175 ZM 101 118 #Y) WS 017 495 248 322 020 Otz
B s 591 099 000 003 111 231 c62 Gs 1 s ZW 477 4 1 ml 010 1 1 357 4 L - 0 7 6
- - -*-
175 275
000
014 121 OX)
044 234 000 073 a73 257 W l 120 mi 005 D(A
010 000 248 m5 003 WO 321 019 000 104 322 283 216 ooa
OW 000 218 m 000 000 000 001 418 , 474
n "---- AGE
( I 4 Em
? 1 TRANG v1
V2 V3 V4 Y5 uB
i ::
v a om 219
476
271 in 051 100 W 403 053 1 M 020
1 002 W1 168 048 450 165 262 214 v10 OW 010 421 1 Q 3 9 044 125 005 ~ 1 1 007 039 008 an 1~ 001 ~ 2 0 lee
V13 OW 004 082 OW 015 136 030
vu 3ag
031
## ia W 131 397 trio 134 1M 233
- --. -. vlg v41 w v u
) 1 V15
I vie V17 I vld
1 V1B ' VM ' V21
Vn V23 v14 V25
, VZCl ~ 2 7
3 2 474
035
018 OW 018 022 OW 019 UB 000 0%
OW OW is OW OW 000 040 233
036 000 003 184 XT)
0 061
018 230 104 2*
WI)
109 OX! 200
474 038 WO WO aos 067 a0 357
195 W1 450 121 008 089 314 472 072 04CI 112 237 491 087
1 "30 V31 V32 V33
~ 3 6 m v37 vJ( 'm VIO
vu V~
4
2e4 1 Y
002
## 323 131 Yi 1 000 325 045 470
M7 W3 i 031 021 OIiO 478 OW 003 3M 052 bBO 101 W7
458 3~11 m2 1
ma 012 1~10
025 w
V 4 1 2 0 4 ~
m ~7 121
ofa lB1
001
051) ni 132 071 U5 ma 105 Ml OBB
273 W3 460 300 114 181 082 MB 001 337 139
JO(]
OW
185 1 s 381 W
014 117 474 a
049
v ( l 0 0 3 a 5 O d 0 ~ 001 am ,112
110 lm 015
001 3sz U# 247 077 mi 202 a# Jsa
201 012
004
00J 07s 46 1TO 011 w 158 127 WO
W 013 m 010 001 001 M4 W4 005 111 477 441 314 054
012 m 000 00(
W3 1 1 211
O(s
427 za 007
OP1 MO 210 001 #IZ 000
031 000 321 001 010 141 O S
000 w i 300 om
~ U m ~ w s D o s ~
OM 291
3 4
s31 310 43U
rJd 000 KK)
213 003 367 C4U la 005 003 145 357 440 PB
087 oio Sso 007
032 mi 3M
y s 2 M t Q J W 7 PZS
0 3 0 W O 4 7 Y ~ rm
m m f S O _ O ? O
112 1% 41s OW 017 132 085 200 137 3(1(1
478 1 076 300 124
014 w I ? 21s
011 147 s4
007
a33 rn
no -.
108
= 057
M 7 sca W2
m
.3lo P) MO
285 ia 405 457
240 oio nS 128 112 007 4 s 339 070 3 8 ~
A ~ i x XI rhowing hc corn-! mrtlix misting of IS frctm 256 MOT analysis MI WRD CLIMATE SURVEY rmdc on 120
-b W n g the bwkground wirblcs 4 45 d i m i o n s identified for &study.
la .253
170 4m 1 w 901 1311 425 12a
.X)8 -3M
4 451E42 320 34 1
Q WE42 159 838 618 602 571 w9 330 519 518 484 472 359
.28r - 125 223 436
6 b13E-02 WIB 189
9 S14EQ2 1 1
8 9071-02 35 1
5m.02 lea 1 to 179 ZJO 121
-149 712
dm-02 167
Gapanl
coinpmult Mlr. 257
- . - . * - , - -- 0 10 11 12 13
180 8245F03 43951r-03 -3 161E-02 4 708t 07 j 5 8 8 7 ~ 0 2 -1 838~-02 188 i aixm swe~m 9 4x1~ 02 : 837%-02 4905E-02 3841t-W 44SBL42 4 b O n 0 7 133
195 123 2 ni l t -02 5354EU3 143 9 833E-m 4 s s a 4 ~ 4 ~ 4 2 i n ~ - m 3 ~ ~ - ( l l 11s 1 2 5 3 E a 9 W Q E 4 7429E-W 4 3 m - 0 2 . I49 . 173
1 3 112 1 418EU2 4 2WE-02 . 102 ' 1013E-02 - 114 3 D68&o2 J014E-02 - 1%
4767E02 4 776E-02 - a 7 -118 -7 70BE-02 3 4UE.01 145 -7 182E-02 860BE-03 153 -9 W E 4 3 -3 W E 4 2 " 142 -1 052E-03 -5 735E42 -3 283E-02 6 W E 4 2 - 187
125 4MOE-02 118 -80171.02 110 ; - 2 ~ 2 8 4 1 7 ~ ~ ~ N ~ E - O Z -1 103~m ne
153 - @ W E 4 2 -239 8SSOE.02 6WWO? 27D / -287 -7 BOeE.02 B(lbOE42 250 -1 DllE-02 293 1 -350
: v l l 5 2 6 x 4 3 j 7089€42 jV34 120 ! V33 - 137
/ V43 7431E02 - '1% . 107 149 309BE-02 .203 , 210 260 897KU2 6 014E.0;) 4 662E-02
Vg
181 137 -5439E-02 237 .~stt;~m
'85 1 - 174 260 74W€Q2 174
t VlS l M l .*$a 4%3E42 921 69
43s
~ u a h o 6 . R n s * ~ A N y r
- 144 197
5 0 4 2 E M 112
957BE-03 -439
4 2511E-02 -242
6 5 8 5 E M 341
1 - 3 6 7 8 ~ 4 2 141
341ZE42 188
- 215 8 929tr-02
146 - 3 6 1 - I @
* V41
130 2815E-02
- 320 -280
2 l l l E Q 2 lm
.2761F.01 180
4 2 1 E - 0 2 3 335E42
-267 127
-0 163E-02 -1 tss~-02 -1 863E-02
- 188 115 263
-2-E-01 - O W 4 2
329 336 3 4 171 134
' ~ 4 0 1 113 1 b32 I . l@
EDU 333 VZi ; 122 V27 ! 139
* V j l I 10s ' v14 , 131
V23 : 406K-02
1DB .3 18X-02
. I29 5 963E57
.162 .7 009E.01
110 1 ea
9422642 378
2 WlE-02 d794E-01 8slar-02
176 3429F-02
-9 D05F 02 .410 - 126
.7A08E-Q2 ,
.3427E42 232
-2480E-03 8 645Ed2
.1W 28ME-02
214 210
7WE-02 - 107 6 603E-02 7303E-02
172 1 6pE-03
.1563E-02 177 191
6 012(.-02 . I55
143 -2 318k 02 1
165 i .3 770E 07 ' ,2 199f-03 ' -2 938E.02
.I50 1 -237 :
146lE-02
236 i lO83E-W
2W - 135 1 3 5QlE-02 i .2 WOt 03 2431C U3 , 1038E. 0:d 6 0785 02
191 ,
258 Appendix XI1 lowing the total vuiancc explaining ~ I C I5 frcton; obtained
on factor uulysis of HRD CLIMATE SURVEY including 45 facton on IIRI) with background variables.
IF-
Univarlate Analysis of Varlance + \ q ~ CLIMATE 260
r .- A tpc&J Dl k '
1rbd-m
Univarlate Analysis of Variance
40 Errs TO^ COmctOd f0hl
Tub d Blkmn-8- E M
Dependent Vanable F1
a R squared r 015 ( ~ j u d o d R squared = 007)
a R Squared = ,032 (Mluded R murod = 016)
81537495 2429191.671 4mn75a.w 2510729.167
Univarlate Analysts of Variance Tosb d ~ S u ~ E(hctr
Cepmaent Vanable F1
2 117 120 119
Univariate Analysis of Varlance
4
4071748 10762322
.
1864
F 26 103
1110065
MeanSquan 387323470
16633515W
8wrw ConeUed Model InlerorM
145
Slp 000 000
Tm III Sum of SQLUIU 774648 MI*
16633515.91
df 2 1
-2 r 3 Turn of E n a s Dep.ndnt V W k OUTPUT2
S o w Type )ti di Mern F Sun Of &UM
Sqmm
In(erCOpt ls2aO665. 116260855. 1351.312 411 41 1
AOE 855a9.W 2 42781.022 3.7M Emrl9213015.1 117 11263.215
40 ToW17mim. 120
000 Comc(dl*Oo(ID.7 110
Total W a R Squsnd - .mi (Adjutad R Squud .. .045)
T-to of S D I M W W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ En- w e n t VulebC: OUT PUT2
S a m Type Ill df M u n F Sun of Sq-
Qq- Corrotd 0070.278 1 BOTB.276 ,788
Madrl
EDU 8079278 19079.270 ,786 Error 13W700.5 118 11845.682
16
Comad1-.7 118 Total 92
R S q W = .DOB (4- R Sqrvrd - a.002)
T ~ t n of B~~ En- Dapuldm v u l w : OUTPUT2
scuw Type 111 df M e a n F Svnof S p w e
Tesb of Between-Subjects Effeclr Daperdenl VarkMe: OUTPUT2
Sourw Type Ill dl Mwn F Sig Swn of Sqwm
Squarw C o ~ l m d 33808.534 2 lBBOj.267 1.432 ,243
- . .
TRANQ 33808.530 216803287 1.432 ,243 Emr1373263.2 117 11737.293
58 Tola167081 875. 120
000 Cofracled 1406689.7 119
Total 02 a R Squared r ,024 (Adjusld R Squared - ,007)
a R Squared 8 040 (Adjrnted R Squared = .0291
~ e ~ b of Betwmn-$ubjrta Enwtr
Dependent Var~able EDU
a R Squafad = 221 (Adjusled R Squared = 1651
Source Corrected Modal ~n~ercept TOTAL Error Total Corrected Total
Type Ill Sum of Squaros dl Mean Square F SIP
1 $61'1 0 / 155 1 511 1 846
Type 1 1 1 Sum of Square8
3 534' 798 683
3 534 12 457
1213 000 15 992
Intercept TOTAL Enac Tohl C O f r W Total
dl B 1 8
111 120 119
r R S p w r N t 036 (Adlustad R Spwrd a 054)
458 095 1 561
42 364 779 000
43 925
Mean Square 442
798683 442 112
1
8 111
120 l l B
F 3 936
7116513 3 936
Slp 000 OW 000
458 895 195 382
1202 562
$11
OW 846
HPD ~ l \ m & T-b d b t m n b U b J . c t l E m ,, pd .s
C~~pondrnnt Var~oMo TRANG
a R Squared 048 IMjurled R Squared - 021 1
a R Squared = 015 (Adjusted R Squartd .OlOl
Wr*u of V m r
Testa of BetwnnSubjrotr Eflrob
Dependent VarlaMc EDU
U~(VYUI AMIYUS of V u ( m r
Testr of BehmnSubjnetr EIIwU
Dependent Var~aM* promotion
Sip w3 OM)
003
r R Squared = 11 1 (Adjuttd R Squwed = 088)
F 4 842
6007 070 4 842
Source c o m c ~ ~ o d e l Intercepl TOTAL Error Total Conadd Total
dl 3 1
3 116 120 119
Type 111 Sum olSguam
r 780' 735 966
1 780 14 212
1213 000 15 882
Maan Square 593
735 966 593 133
t.co d R.Nmn-S"b).cb E W b L- 4 Depndont Varuble TRANG
Typa Ill Sum of Luarm
Intercept TOTAL Error Total Corrected Total
2OB3'1 3 [ 698 1 2 507 1 061 dl
a R Squared = Cbl (Adjusted R Sguarsd a 0371
8lB4W 2 093 32 274
1408 000 )s 367
Mean Sam F
120 119
WO 062
A
Test8 of BehmnSubJrch Ethctr
Dcpenclrnl Var~able EDU
Source C o n e d d Model Intercept OUTPUT5 Error T o l ~ l Corfectd Tot11 r R Squarrd = 023 IAdjWed R Squared = .W2l
Tyw III sum of Squarer
365' 729 510
365
$19 093 OGQ 043
a R Spusrd = 0% (Adptw R Spurrce = 0291
Source Comdsd Modal Intmp OUTPUT5 Enoc Toml CamUrd T d
of 3 1
3
d l 3 I
3 116 120 119
~ype 111 Sum of Squarm
2 352 437 913
2 352 41 573
779 000 43 925
Moan Sguar* F $10 122 903 142
000 442
135 15627 , 116
Mean Square 784
437 B13 784 358
1213 W O 15 892
F 2 188
1221 9C6 2 188
120 119
Typa Ill Sum of Sguafn d Mnan Spuafe
lntlwerpt OUTPUTS Enor Total Cwreded Total
287' 1 3 1 9M1E-02 I 326 I 806 F SIP
I R Spunred = 008 (Adjuded R QusrM = .0171
831 325 287
34 079 1408 DM]
34 367
1
3 116
120 119
831 3 3 1 , 21129693 9 58tE.02 3 3
29.1 I I I
, WO 806
!Jnkwhm Wits d V r i r r e C ~ M h r f
Tab d ~hnmnBubJmds Cnlcb
Dopndont V8nPble: AGE
Typa Ill Sum of Squaroa
Waim W y * s Of VYWC.
TOIU of Eo(wnn4ubjoeM Cfhcta
Dependenl V8r11blc EDU
Interecpl OUTPUTS Error T O M Cometd Tolal
1 2tv I s I 2% I ers I 500 dl
8 R Squared = 037 (Adjusted R S q u a r ~ = .0051
172 096 1 270
33 055 1361 000
34 325
S I ~ Mean Square
1 5
114 120 11s
F
172 096 254 280
593 528 876
000 500
T u b of B.huunSub).cb Emsb
D.p.ndent VarteMe: TRANG
Type III sum of Spuares
Intercepl OUTPUT6 Error Total ComoWd Totel
1 271' 1 5 1 254 1 676 I 500 SIP dl
a R Squered 9 037 (Adjurted R Squared = - 005)
181 558 1271
33 098 1408 000
34 587
Mean Sguare
1 5
114 120 119
F
181 558 254 290
G25 389 876
a
000 500
Oepmdcnt Varlrbh AGE
a R Squared = 004 (Adjusted R Squared = ,0041
Dependent Var~able EDU
Typo Ill Sum of Squrres
Dependent Variable promotion
Intercep OUTPUT? Error Total Corraded Total
3 7 ' 1 1 I 2 6 7 1 2 0 0 1 1 160 dl
a R Squared = 017 (Adjustbd R Squared = 008)
1075 267 287
15 725 1213 000
15 992
+
Mean Spurre
Intercap OUTPUT7 Error Tobl Cornded Tohl
1 1
118 120 119
Type Ill Sum of 5quares
F
150'1 1 I 150 1 404 1 526 df
I R Squared = ,003 (Mpd R Squrrd = - 005)
646 817 150
43 775 779.000
4 3 3
SIP
1075 267 267 133
Slg Mean Square F
1 1
118 120
8068 774 2 001
000 160
646 817 150 37 1
1743 561 4 0 4
000 526
T n b 01 DahvwnSubjoob Elhcb
M&l lnterwpt OLITPCIT7 E m Total
Type Ill 6um of Squara
204' 1210 504
.Corr.ctrd TOMI 34 387 119 a R Squared = 006 (Adjusted R Squared = .002)
204 34 162
1408.000
df 1 1 1
118 120
Slp. 403 OW
Mean Square 204
1210.504 204 290
F 706
4181 178 705 403
W r u ~ o ( V U b I M
f e s a d Iklwnn-sub).cm e w t a
Dependent Vanabla AGE
Tasb) of Ikhu*.nlubJutr e n u m
Dependent Variable EDU
SWIM Conectnl Modal I-@ dClTPVT8 ER# T oml Conedd Total
Corrected Total 1 15992 1 119 1 I a R Squared = 063 (Nlustcd R Squared = 0531
a R Squarad = 057 lAd)ur\sd R Spuarcd = 0151
Type Ill Sum of % ~ l l @ S
1 WP 145.514
1.948 32.378
1381.000 34.325
Source Cofmctd Model lntercep OUTPUT8 Error TOW
Testa of L l w r m - S u b J ~ b E n ~ h
Dependent Variable prornot~on
5f 5 1 5
114 120 119
of Sguarn .
1 488' 150 M 3
1 488 14 504
1213 000
Source Conec!ed Model lntercep OUTPUT8 Error TOM
Conectad Total
Mean Square 3W
145.514 ,390 .2(U
df 5 1 5
114 120
4 R Squared a 028 (Adju~td R Squ81d - 015)
W r u r ~ d V * I Y I U
rype III sum of Squares
1 223' 78 959
1 223 42 702
779 MX, 43 925
F 1 373
512.380 1.373
Mean Square 29b
150 &I3 298 127
Sg 240 ,000 ,240
dl 5 1 5
114 r 20 119
F 2 338
1184 024 2 338
SM 046 000 046
Mean Square 245
78959 245 375
F 653
210 793 853
SIP 680 000 660
Demndant Variable: TRANG
T y p 111 Sum of Squatm
Intercept OUTPUT8 Error Total Corrected Total
2 1 l . I 5 1 437 1 154B 1 180 dl Mean Square F Su
a R Squared = 064 (Adjusted R Squared : 023
160 756 2 186
32 180 1408 000
34 367
1 5
110
120 119
180 281
-
Univariate Analysis of Variance
a R SquareU = ,027 (Adjusted R Squared 8 010)
Univarlate Analysls of Varlance
a. R Squared = 001 (MJusted R Squared = - 008)
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Unlvariate Analysis of Variance
Tub d BdwanSubjecb E M
Tesb al [ k h m n - s u q ~ b Dwpondmnt Vanable. AGE
Temb d k h m n l u b j r b En-
Depmdmt Variable EDU
Testr of B.twwnSubjcctr Ef iu t r
Dependenl Var~able TRANG
T y p Ill Sum of Squares
Intercept OUTPUT 10 Error Total Corrected Total
669' 1 3 1 223 I 1689 I 173 Maan Squara dl
I R Squared m 042 (AdjuQsd R Squared = 017)
324 134 669
15 322 1213 000
15 992
F
Source Conedad Modal lntarcep OUfPUTlO Enor Total Corrected Tolal
SIP
1 3
116 120 119
a R Squared = 020 tAdjuslad R Squard =. 0-351
S I ~ 498 000 498
Type Ill Sum of Squafe~
694' 387 442
694 33 672
1408 000 34 367
I Mean Square F .
324 134 223 132
df 3 1 3
116 120 119
231 387 442
231 290
797 1334 728
797
2453 925 1689
OW 173
Error 42 172 116 Total 779 000 120 , CO~~OCIW 10ta1 43 925 119
a R Squared = 040 l AdlUded R Squared = 0151
Y4 I
Intereepl 74921 041 74921 041 513 471 1 240 931 1 : , I 1 2 0 4 6 5 1 ..I $ 1 AGE Error 17071 569 145 91 1 Tolal 332500 000 Correded Total 17312 500 119
a R Squared = 014 (Adjusted R Squared - W3I
dl Mean Square
un~vu*le M y 8 1 8 ol VUWO
T n b of BmWeenSubjl~tl EHocta
Dcpndenl Varlablc OUTPUT! l
2 1 120465 I 826 1 44 1 F
Intercept 178863 568 178883 568 1245 264 I 363 568 ll:i 3 6 3 5 6 6 1 2 5 3 1 ': Error 16948 932 143 635 Total 332500 000 120 Corracted Total 17312 500 119
a R Squared = 021 (Adlusled R Squarad = 0131
SIP
irnrvvina W y d l Ol vulvre
Tasb of BeIw.mbubjuU EfluU
Depndenl Var~ablc OUTPUT1 1
F dl
a R Squornd r 018 (AdjMed R Squared OQll
1 1 363 568 1 2 531 I Mean Squara
Tmmtr d w n b u b h t s Emb
Dependent Var~rMe. OUTPUT11
Swnn CON&^^ M ~ d d 1- TRANG Enor Total Corrected Total
Typa Ill Sum of aumrr
la3 928' 69684 289
193 926
a R Squared. 011 (Adlustod R Squared = - Od61
17118 574 332500 OW
17312,500
df 2 1 2
117 120 119
r46 313
Sa 517 OM, 517
Mean Squuo 96 1 3
69684 209 96 %3
F 663
476 270 663
T r b 01 8aIwamSubJ.Sb E b c b
a. R Squared = G€4 (Adjmted R Squared = - 011)
a R Squared = 000 IAdjusted R Squared OOOl
a. R Wuarsd r 011 (Adju6ted R Squared = .0061
Toab of BoWmnSubjecb Eff lcb
Dependent Var~able OUTPUT13
Sour= Corroded Modal Inlercept AGE Error Total Corrected Total
a R Squared = 003 (Adlusted R Squared = .0141
T y p Ill Sum of Sawre8
74 307' 83536 630
74 307 21675 693
352500 000 21750 000
Un~vuldr M y u s ol V w w r
Toab of BotwoonSubJoctr Effocta
Dependant Variable OUTPUT 13
SIQ
Intercept EDU Error Total Corrected Total
df 2 1 2
117 120 119
31 657' 1 1 1 31 657 1 172 679
Type Ill Sum of $4uare6 Mean Square df
a R Squared = 001 (Adjusted R Squared = .007)
173094 157 31 657
21718 343 352500 000
21750 000
Mean Square 37 154
83538630 37 154
185 262
F
1
1 118 120 119
F 201
450910 201
SIQ 810 000 810
A
173094 157 31 657
11)4 054
940 454 172
000 679
dl Mean Square I F 1 SQ 2 1 608462 1 3 467 1 034
Intercept 63038 586 1 63038 586 TRANG 1216 924 2 608 462 Error 20533 076 117 175 496 Total 3525M) 000 120 Corrrctod Total 21750 000 119
a R Spuared + 056 (Adjusled R Squares 040)
359 202 3 467
000 034
a R Squared = 057 IMjumted R Squared = 041)
Wwh bndyr 01 uwlncr
T n b O( B o h m n l u b j l c b L l h c b
Dt#neml Varlabla OUTPUT14
8 R Sguared - GO7 (Adjusted R Squared a . 0 0 1 I
T n t l of BatwnnSubjub Enact8
D a p M t n t Var~aMt OUTPUT 14
a. R Bquard = 018 (Mjuctd R Squard W l I
dl Mean Square
ItWcep4 PROMOTIO Error Total CorrectMl Total
2 1 462728 1 2531 ( 0 F SIQ
a R Squared = 041 (Ad)uatad R Squarcd : 0251
284996 145 BX 457
21387 043 675000 000 22312 500
1 2
117 120 119
284998 145 462 ne 182 705
1558 100 2 531
000 OM
Univariate Analysis of Variance
Intercept 114345.248 1 114345.248 202 616 ,000 AGE 1259.192 2 829596 1611 204 Error 45719.975 117 390,768 Total 547500.000 120 Correctad T h l 46979.187 119
a R Squared = 027 (AdjMed R Squared = .010)
Twtr of B.(WI.n4ubJ.C(1 ERacb
Depclndmt Vanable. FlS
a. R Squared = 001 ( M j W R Squared = ..WE)
Intercept 185029.34 1 1 185029.341 479380 000 PROM 1619~DOB 2 800.953 2358 009 EflOf 45158.31 117 365 977 Totll 547500.00(1 120 CmwW T&l 4M79.187 110 a. R Sgurnd .OJO (AdW R SquIrod = ,4221
r w r k c w m - s u m E-
Dependent VarlaMc FIS
mdix XI11 showing the communrlities on factor analysis of HRD 290
CLIMATE SURVEY made on 120 nspondmts using 45 dimensions and the background wiablcs.
APPENDLX XIV rhowing the traininp offered by RBI during the ymrr 1998-
99 and 1999-2000
S. Nuedlbetnhirg Nad Na d Wad Na d Na p n p r u a pvtkipuu p r g u u a o put*lpmu
trrhi*L 1999-1600 kwlloed L 1-99 k#ll(ed 1991.1999
,.,-,,-... . -,--, -..--."".-"..-- ,.... ."- .-..,, "-"...,,....-....~.....,.. ...... ,...,, ..... ,,,.... ",,..,,.," .,.,...... .. "..,....".. ., , I . mlKuS'l'nL*lg 93 2137 63 1490
Colkge, Mumbai