appendix a - supreme court of the united states · general; office of the attorney general,...

Appendix A Judgment and Opinion of Ninth Circuit to Be Reviewed

Upload: others

Post on 21-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents

0 download

Report

Download

Embed Size (px):

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Appendix A Judgment and Opinion of Ninth Circuit to Be Reviewed

Page 2: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 3: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 4: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 5: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 6: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 7: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 8: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 9: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 10: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 11: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Page 12: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

Appendix B Order of Ninth Circuit Denying Rehearing En Banc

Page 13: Appendix A - Supreme Court of the United States · General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, Argued and Submitted December California; for Defendant-Appellant. 7, 2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ASSOCIATION DES ÉLEVEURS DE

CANARDS ET D’OIES DU QUÉBEC, a

Canadian nonprofit corporation; HVFG,

LLC, a New York limited liability company;

HOT’S RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., a

California corporation,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

XAVIER BECERRA, Attorney General,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-55192

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-05735-SVW-RZ

U.S. District Court for the Central

District of California,

Los Angeles

ORDER

Before: PREGERSON, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

The panel voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Nguyen

and Judge Owens voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge

Pregerson has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for

rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the

matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED.

FILED

NOV 9 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case: 15-55192, 11/09/2017, ID: 10649140, DktEntry: 53, Page 1 of 1

New Doc 4srb.gos.pk/contents/Circulars/Appeal_No_AT_29_2016... · 2016. 11. 3. · Mr. Musthaq Hussain Qazi, Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellant and argued the case. Mr

IN SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES...Charles V. Holmes, and Paul F. Goodman. W. J. Michael Cody, Attorney General of Tennessee, argued the cause for appellant in No. 83-1035. With

United States Court of Appeals · (No. 1:13 -cv-00324) Gregory L. Lattimer argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. Lucy E. Pittman, Assistant Attorney General, Office

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT · 2020. 8. 19. · Keane LLP, Boise, Idaho, for Claimant-Appellant. William M. Humphries (argued), Assistant United States

PRECEDENTIAL · Leticia C. Chavez-Freed [Argued] Chavez-Freed Law 2600 North 3rd Street, 2nd Floor Harrisburg, PA 17110 Counsel for Appellant Michael C. Hamilton Emily B. Ryan-Fiore

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF … · BRIAN DUNKLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S. CORALUZZO PETROLEUM TRANSPORTERS, Defendant-Respondent. _____ Argued June 4, 2014

S.C.C. File No. 34524 IN THE SUPRE:ME COURT OF CANADA (ON ... · mandeep singh chehil -and-her majesty the queen -and-appellant (respondent) respondent (appellant) attorney general

PUBLISHED · ARGUED: Emily S. Mordecai, Joshua K. Day, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Trevor Stephen Cox, ... Thompson’s first arrival

United States Court of Appeals€¦ · (No. 1:12-cv-00726) Eden Brown Gaines argued the cause and filed briefs for the appellant. Alexander D. Shoaibi, Assistant United States Attorney,

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE …...2010/05/08 · COUNSEL Michael G. Doan, Doan Law Firm, Carlsbad, California, argued the cause for appellant-debtor and filed briefs. 13408

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR …1313 North Market Street – Suite 1201 Wilmington, DE 19801 Counsel for Appellant Jonathan D. Janow [ARGUED] Chance Lyman Buchanan

ATTORNEY-GENERAL Appellant · Civil Appeal No 27 of 2016 Between ATTORNEY-GENERAL … Appellant And (1) LEE KWAI HOU HOWARD (2) XU YUAN CHEN (3) LOH HONG PUEY ANDREW (4) CHOO ZHENG

Hierarchical Task Analysis: Developments, Applications and ... · general approach to task critique. Annett (1996) has certainly argued that HTA Annett (1996) has certainly argued

(Argued: April 11, 2013 Decided: June 17, 2014) Docket No ... · tax evasion. Defendant-appellant appeals on the grounds that: (1) the district court (Thompson, J.) erred in denying

United States Court of Appeals...(No. 1:10-cv-01414) Karen A. Khan argued the cause for the appellant. Alexander D. Shoaibi, Assistant United States Attorney, argued the cause for

PRECEDENTIAL - CourtListener€¦ · 03/08/2011 · Leonard B. Francis, Jr., Esq. (argued) 4A Dronningens P.O. Box 8838 Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, VI 000801 Counsel for Appellant

HRISTOPHER ARD Appellant - kscourts.org€¦ · Prester, legal intern, was with him on the brief for appellant. Jacob M. Gontesky, assistant district attorney, argued the cause,

SAFLII Home | SAFLIISHEIK DAWOOD HOOSAIN NAZREEN HOOSAIN And ABSA BANK LIMITED 1st Appellant 2 Appellant 3rd Appellant 4th Appellant 5th Appellant Respondent JUDGMENT DELIVERED: C

File No. 35591 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON · PDF file(appellant/cross-respondent) - and — attorney general of british columbia respondent (appellant) - and — attorney general

Attorney General of Canada Appellant Procureur général du … · 2020-03-13 · 504 CANADA (ATTORNEY GENERAL) v. MAVI [2011] 2 S.C.R. Attorney General of Canada Appellant v. Pritpal

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · STUART ALAN RAPHAEL, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant in 2018-1205. Also represented by ANIEL

Appellate Division. · 2017. 3. 20. · SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY . A-66 September Term 1994 . ALAN GUBERNAT, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. KAREN E. DEREMER, Defendant-Appellant. Argued

Sindh Revenue Boardsrb.gos.pk/contents/appellate_tribunal_order/ApealNo_AT... · 2016. 11. 10. · Mr. Musthaq Hussain Qazi, Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellant and argued

Before the High Court - Australasian Legal Information ... · In 1984, the appellant, Campomar Sociedad Lirnitada ('Campomar'), a ... In the case of Nike it was argued that s22(l)(b)

United States Court of Appeals...Joseph Scarborough, Student Counsel, argued the cause as amicus curiae in support of appellant. On the briefs were Thomas Burch, appointed by the court,

United States Court of Appeals · Argued April 11, 2016 Decided July 19, 2016 . No. 14-5305 . MINGO LOGAN COAL COMPANY, APPELLANT. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, APPELLEE. Appeal

(seventh appellant) (eighth appellant) SUPREME COURT OF

beckerdcPublic00 USSCFolajtar PFC (Brown)Folajtar Appendix...Adam J. Kraut Joshua Prince (Argued) Prince Law Offices 646 Lenape Road Bechtelsville, PA 19505 Counsel for Appellant Joseph

United States Court of Appeals - Federal Trade Commission · (No. 1:17-cv-00150) Karen Donnelly . argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was . Errol Copilevitz. Daniel

PRECEDENTIAL FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT · Philadelphia, PA 19106 Attorneys for Appellant ROBERT D. FOX, ESQ. (Argued) Manko, Gold, Katcher & Fox, LLP 401 City Avenue, Suite 500 Bala Cynwyd,

C:Documents and SettingsLorIE52XQRHVY3Document[1] · General Counsel Jacob M. Lewis (Argued) Acting Deputy General Counsel Daniel M. Armstrong, III Associate General Counsel Matthew

FILED - United States Court of Appeals for the …cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/bap/2013/06/10/Shaverdi...Tilem argued for Appellant Mehran Shahverdi; John D. Faucher of Faucher &

P:00 USSCPetter Investments PFC (Lobbin)Petter Investments ... · STEPHEN M. LOBBIN, One LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. App. 2 MARK A. MILLER, Holland & Hart

ELBERT C ROOM Appellant. - kscourts.org · Appeal from Osborne District Court; WILLIAM B. ELLIOTT, judge. Opinion filed June 6, 2014. Affirmed. Gerald E. Wells, of Lawrence, argued

Page 1 LEXSEE 2010 N.J. SUPER. LEXIS 201landuselaw.wustl.edu/cases/A Growth Share Case.pdf · Christopher J. Norman argued the cause for appellant Township of Mount Laurel in A-5429-07