appendix a geotechnical borehole logs (assignment 16-12)...borehole details as presented, do not...
TRANSCRIPT
Appendix AGeotechnical Borehole Logs
(Assignment 16-12)
141.9
141.7
140.6
137.8
0.2
0.4
1.4
4.3
11
30
26
36
29
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs
1
2
3
4
5
6
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
about 180 mm ASPHALT
dark brownGravelly Sand FILL
trace silt and clay, moist
dark brown to grey Clayey Silt FILL
trace sand
brown to brownish grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, sand pockets
very stiff to hard
--------grey
End of Borehole
100
67
100
67
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
146 Gracefield Avenue E:305645 N:4840891
10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
10 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 142.1 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 1
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
141
140
139
138
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
Scale: 1 : 53
2
13
16
18
14
17
13
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
144.2
143.5
140.7
0.2
0.9
3.7
3
11
14
32
31
1
2
3
4
5
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
23 48 26
about 200 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt,moist
brown to grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
stiff to hard
--------grey
End of Borehole
100
83
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
136 Gracefield Avenue E:305710 N:4840908
10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
10 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 144.4 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 2
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
144
143
142
141
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
Scale: 1 : 53
7
18
18
12
17
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
148.3
147.8
144.9
0.2
0.8
3.7
23
40
23
36
SS2 - tested for M/I and PHCs
1
2
3
4
5
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
about 200 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt,moist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,
very stiff to hard
End of Borehole
100
83
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
120 Gracefield Avenue E:305795 N:4840933
10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
10 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 148.5 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 3
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
148
147
146
145
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
Scale: 1 : 53
3
14
12
15
13
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
151.2
150.6
147.7
0.2
0.8
3.7
2
16
40
32
46
1
2
3
4
5
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS 27 50 21
about 185 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt,moist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
very stiff to hard
--------grey
End of Borehole
100
100
100
92
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
108 Gracefield Avenue E:305877 N:4840961
10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
10 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 151.4 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 4
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
151
150
149
148
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
Scale: 1 : 53
8
15
12
13
12
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
153.4
153.2
151.3
149.9
0.1
0.3
2.2
3.7
7
10
26
44
SS2 - tested for M/I and PHCs
Composite Sample - tested for TCLP
1
2
3
4
5
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
about 120 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
light brown Silty Sand FILL silty clay pockets
moist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
very stiff to hard
End of Borehole
75
25
100
83
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
96 Gracefield Avenue E:305940 N:4840980
10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
10 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 153.5 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 5
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
153
152
151
150
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
Scale: 1 : 53
3
15
12
17
14
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
155.6
154.9
152.1
0.2
0.9
3.7
2
12
33
40
30
1
2
3
4
5
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
28 51 19
about 190 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt,moist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
stiff to hard
--------grey
End of Borehole
100
100
100
83
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
80 Gracefield Avenue E:306013 N:4841002
10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
10 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 155.8 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 6
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
155
154
153
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
Scale: 1 : 53
6
15
15
12
13
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
158.0
157.8
156.8
154.5
0.2
0.4
1.4
3.7
1
8
20
25
39
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs
1
2
3
4
5
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
32 50 17
about 180 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
dark brown Silty Sand FILL
trace gravel,moist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
very stiff to hard
End of Borehole
67
50
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
72 Gracefield Avenue E:306094 N:4841027
10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
10 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 158.2 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 7
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
158
157
156
155
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
Scale: 1 : 53
3
5
18
16
14
14
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
161.3
161.1
160.7
159.0
157.8
0.2
0.4
0.8
2.4
3.7
2
6
7
14
31
1
2
3
4
5
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS 30 50 18
about 200 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Sandy Gravel FILL
trace silt, moist
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
light brownSilty Sand FILL
moist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravelstiff to hard
End of Borehole
75
83
83
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
56 Gracefield Avenue E:306177 N:4841049
12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
12 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 161.5 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 8
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
161
160
159
158
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
Scale: 1 : 53
2
4
5
7
13
12
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
163.3
163.1
162.7
159.8
0.2
0.4
0.8
3.7
3
5
1
16
17
26
27
SS2 - tested for M/I and PHCs
1
2
3
4
5
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
30
29
31
51
49
51
16
17
17
about 160 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Sandy Gravel FILL
trace silt, moist
light brownGravelly Sand FILL
moist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
very stiff
End of Borehole
92
100
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
40 Gracefield Avenue E:306263 N:4841076
12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
12 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 163.5 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 9
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
163
162
161
160
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
Scale: 1 : 53
3
5
14
14
12
12
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
162.1
161.9
161.5
155.5
0.2
0.4
0.8
6.7
2
1
3
5
14
13
13
15
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
31
29
27
51
52
52
16
18
18
about 160 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
light brownSilty Sand FILL
trace gravel, moist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
firm to very stiff
--------grey
100
83
100
83
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
32 Gracefield Avenue E:306337 N:4841099
12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
12 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 162.2 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 10
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
162
161
160
159
158
157
156
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
4
6
14
13
14
13
11
14
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 3.3 m.
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
160.7
158.6
156.7
154.1
0.2
2.2
4.1
6.7
19
11
9
6
13
22
SS4 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs
SS6 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
about 150 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, silty clay pocketsmoist
greySilty Clay FILL
some sand, trace gravel
brownSANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
stiff to very stiff
End of Borehole
75
67
83
67
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
22 Gracefield Avenue E:306406 N:4841121
12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
12 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 160.8 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 11
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
160
159
158
157
156
155
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
4
5
5
16
23
16
14
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
162.5
162.3
159.8
153.0
0.2
0.4
3.0
9.8
1
2
15
19
7
22
15
25
21
19
SS8 - tested for Corrosivity
Composite Sample - tested for TCLP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
24
29
52
49
23
20
about 200 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
brown to greyClayey Silt FILL
trace gravel
--------organics
grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
stiff to very stiff
100
96
29
58
100
100
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Intersection of Gracefield and Keele E:306482N:4841147
21 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
21 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 162.8 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 12
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
162
161
160
159
158
157
156
155
154
153
Page: 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Scale: 1 : 53
Continued on Next Page
3
16
15
20
22
15
15
12
13
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 7.9 m.
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 5.5 m Sand Filter: 5.5 - 9.1 m Screen: 6.1 - 9.1 m Sand: 9.1 - 9.8 m
Groundwater Level Measurement: 2 November 2018 7.9 m
Project Location:
Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 12
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
Page: 2 of 2
Scale: 1 : 53
163.3
162.9
156.5
0.2
0.6
7.0
1
7
8
14
18
23
8
24
15
SS4 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS 31 50 18
about 230 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
brown to mottledSilty Clay FILL
mixed with sand pockets
--------organics
--------possibly cinder
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
trace sand pocketsstiff to hard
75
58
100
100
100
58
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
2460 Keele Street E:306475 N:4841228
21 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
21 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 163.5 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 13
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
163
162
161
160
159
158
157
156
155
154
Page: 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Scale: 1 : 53
Continued on Next Page
1
21
16
15
15
18
16
19
14
15
Groundwater depth observed on 21/11/2018 at a depth of: 12.7 m.
Groundwater encountered on completion of drilling on 21/09/2018 at a depth of: 9.1 m.
147.615.8
7
14
23
30
39
SS12 - tested for Corrosivity
10
11
12
13
SS
SS
SS
SS 32 46 15
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
trace sand pocketsstiff to hard
--------grey
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 11.6 m Sand Filter: 11.6 - 15.2 m Screen: 12.2 - 15.2 m Sand: 15.2 - 15.8 m
Groundwater Level Measurement: 21 November 2018 12.7 m
42
100
100
100
Project Location:
Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 13
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
153
152
151
150
149
148
Page: 2 of 2
11
12
13
14
15
Scale: 1 : 53
20
16
14
11
153.4
150.4
149.2
148.9
145.1
0.2
3.2
4.4
4.7
8.5
6
2
5
13
12
12
10
11
14
10
27
SS1 - tested for OC-Pesticides
SS3 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs
SS7 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
29
32
46
62
19
4
about 200 mm TOPSOIL
brown Sandy Silt FILL
trace clayey silt and topsoil pockets, trace gravel moist
brownClayey Silt FILL
trace sand, trace gravel
black ORGANIC SILTY CLAY
trace sand pockets, trace rootletsstiff
greySANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILLtrace gravel
stiff
greySANDY SILT / SAND AND SILT TILL
trace to some clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulderscompact to very dense
moist
67
92
100
67
83
100
100
92
83
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Backyard of 2460 Keele Street E:306412N:4841202
12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
12 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 153.6 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 14
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
153
152
151
150
149
148
147
146
145
144
Page: 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Scale: 1 : 53
Continued on Next Page
16
12
10
8
13
16
12
12
12
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 7.0 m.
Groundwater encountered on completion of drilling on 12/09/2018 at a depth of: 4.6 m.
139.314.3
6
2
25
37
68
10
11
12
SS
SS
SS
35
37
53
48
6
13
greySANDY SILT / SAND AND SILT TILL
trace to some clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulderscompact to very dense
moist
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 10.1 m Sand Filter: 10.1 - 13.7 m Screen: 10.7 - 13.7 m Sand: 13.7 - 14.3 m
Groundwater Level Measurement: 2 November 2018 7.0 m
75
83
83
Project Location:
Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 14
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
143
142
141
140
Page: 2 of 2
11
12
13
14
Scale: 1 : 53
11
14
9
153.4
153.0
150.1
146.4
0.2
0.6
3.5
7.2
3
5
18
7
6
3
7
16
18
20
18
SS4 - tested for M/I and PHCs
SS7 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
34
33
47
53
16
9
brownSandy Gravel FILL
moistdark grey
Sandy Silt FILL trace gravel, moist
brown to dark brownClayey Silt FILL
trace sand, trace gravel
greySANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILLtrace gravel
very stiff
greySANDY SILT / SAND AND SILT TILL
trace clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulders
compactmoist
58
75
75
42
83
100
83
83
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Track Mounted Drill
North Park E:306518 N:4841225
24 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
24 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 153.6 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 15
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
153
152
151
150
149
148
147
146
145
144
Page: 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Scale: 1 : 53
Continued on Next Page
15
17
17
33
18
15
12
12
14
12
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 4.9 m.
Groundwater encountered on completion of drilling on 24/09/2018 at a depth of: 3.0 m.
142.311.3
2710SS
greySANDY SILT / SAND AND SILT TILL
trace clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulders
compactmoist
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 7.0 m Sand Filter: 7.0 - 10.7 m Screen: 7.7 - 10.7 m Sand: 10.7 - 11.3 m
Groundwater Level Measurement: 2 November 2018 4.9 m
100
Project Location:
Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12
Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 15
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
143
Page: 2 of 2
11
Scale: 1 : 53
8
Appendix BGeotechnical Borehole Logs
(Assignment 16-22)
156.8
153.9
149.6
147.2
0.2
3.0
7.3
9.8
22
6
7
7
8
25
46
38
39
35
SS1 - tested for OCP
SS2 - tested for M/ISS2 - tested for Corrosivity
SS3 - tested for PHCs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
73 (5)
about 150 mm TOPSOIL
brown Sandy Silt FILL
trace clayey silt pocketsmoist
brown to dark brown Sand FILL
trace siltmoist
--------with rubber pieces
grey SAND
gravelly, trace siltdense
wet
75
83
100
100
83
100
92
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Track Mounted Drill
Roding Park, South E:305285 N:4842680
24 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
24 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 156.9 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 16
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
156
155
154
153
152
151
150
149
148
Page: 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Scale: 1 : 53
Continued on Next Page
16
13
23
22
5
5
5
10
10
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 6.5 m.
Groundwater depth during drilling on 24/09/2018 at a depth of: 4.6 m.
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 5.5 m Sand Filter: 5.5 - 9.1 m Screen: 6.1 - 9.1 m Sand: 9.1 - 9.8 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 6.5 m
Project Location:
Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and Keele Street
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 16
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
Page: 2 of 2
Scale: 1 : 53
159.4
155.6
152.9
0.2
4.0
6.7
-
4
12
8
8
24
36
53
SS1 - tested for OCP
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs
SS3 - tested for Corrosivity
Composite Sample - tested for TCLP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS 75 (25)
about 180 mm TOPSOIL
brown Sandy Silt / Silty Sand FILL
trace silty clay pocketsmoist
brown SAND
trace to some silt,dense to very dense
moist
End of Borehole
83
100
100
100
100
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Track Mounted Drill
Roding Park, Middle E:305403 N:4842812
24 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
24 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 159.6 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 17
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
159
158
157
156
155
154
153
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
18
11
10
8
9
6
5
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
170.9
170.1
165.4
164.5
0.2
0.9
5.6
6.6
2
5
5
7
9
21
33
18
34
SS6 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
29
29
35
49
47
48
20
19
12
about 180 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace siltmoist
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
sand pocketsfirm to hard
grey SAND AND SILT TILL
some clay, trace gravel, trace cobbles/bouldersdensemoist
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.6 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 2.5 m
75
83
100
100
100
89
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
54 Ianhall Road E:305577 N:4842858
17 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
17 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 171.1 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 18
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
170
169
168
167
166
165
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
3
14
19
15
14
19
9
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 2.5 m.
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
173.5
172.7
172.2
169.7
166.5
165.4
0.1
0.9
1.4
4.0
7.2
8.2
2
3
13
27
31
28
14
7
15
SS2 - tested for M/I and PHCs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
30
20
50
47
18
30
about 130 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace siltmoist
brown SILTY CLAY
trace sand,stiff
brown to greyish brown SANDY SLITY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel and sand pockets
very stiff to hard
--------grey
grey SILTY CLAY
trace sand, trace oxidizationstiff to firm
grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,
stiff to very stiff
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 4.0 m Sand Filter: 4.0 - 7.6 m Screen: 4.6 - 7.6 m Sand: 7.6 - 8.2 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 4.3 m
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Intersection of Ianhall Road and Gade DriveE:305566 N:4842927
17 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
17 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 173.6 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 19
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
173
172
171
170
169
168
167
166
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Scale: 1 : 53
3
13
20
12
14
14
18
20
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 4.3 m.
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
169.6
169.3
165.7
163.4
163.2
0.2
0.5
4.1
6.4
6.6
-
18
9
4
5
10
15
33
60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
10 71 19
about 200 mm ASPHALT
brown Sandy Gravel FILL
trace silt, moist
dark brown Silty Sand FILL
trace clayey silt pocketsmoist
brown CLAYEY SILT
trace to some sand,stiff to hard
brownish grey SAND AND SILT TILL
some clay, trace gravel, trace cobbles/bouldersvery dense, moist
End of Borehole
41
25
67
67
100
58
83
83
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Intersection of Gade Drive and Roding StreetE:305479 N:4842888
25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
25 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 169.8 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 20
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
169
168
167
166
165
164
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
5
16
20
13
13
19
17
20
5
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
171.0
170.6
163.8
162.9
0.2
0.5
7.3
8.2
-
19
12
8
6
3
4
5
8
13
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS 21 56 23
about 160 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moistdark brown to brown
Clayey Silt / Silty Clay FILL trace sand
--------rotten wood pieces
trace organics
brown SILTY CLAY
sandy,stiff
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 4.0 m Sand Filter: 4.0 - 7.6 m Screen: 4.6 - 7.6 m Sand: 7.6 - 8.2 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:21 November 2018 Dry
88
42
25
42
100
75
25
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Entrance of Roding Park E:305446 N:4842942
25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
25 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 171.1 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 21
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
171
170
169
168
167
166
165
164
163
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Scale: 1 : 53
10
13
16
16
18
23
23
20
14
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
172.2
171.8
168.2
166.7
164.4
0.2
0.5
4.1
5.6
7.9
<1
3
-
14
14
12
14
57
50 /150mm
50 /150mm
SS7 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
15
38
75
40
48
45
11
(25)
about 180 mm TOPSOIL
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moistbrown
SILT AND CLAY some sand,
stiff
grey SANDY AND SILT TILL some clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulders
very densemoist
grey SAND
some silt, trace to some cobbles / bouldersvery dense
moist
End of Borehole
92
83
100
100
100
83
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Intersection of Roding Street and Nash DriveE:305440 N:4842982
25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
25 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 172.3 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 22
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
172
171
170
169
168
167
166
165
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Scale: 1 : 53
150 mm
50
150 mm
50
5
16
15
17
22
9
3
6
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
172.2
171.5
168.3
165.7
0.2
0.9
4.1
6.7
1
15
5
3
4
30
20
SS3 - tested for M/I, PHCs and PCBs
Composite Sample - tested for TCLP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS 27 43 29
about 230 mm ASPHALT
brown Sandy Gravel FILL
trace silt,moist
dark grey Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel, trace topsoil
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
hard to very stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 4.0 m Sand Filter: 4.0 - 6.1 m Screen: 4.6 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.7 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 1.7 m
75
67
42
58
83
67
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
87 Nash Drive E:305531 N:4843016
25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
25 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 172.4 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 23
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
172
171
170
169
168
167
166
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
5
21
20
34
23
13
18
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 1.7 m.
Groundwater depth during drilling on 25/09/2018 at a depth of: 4.6 m.
174.9
174.6
173.1
168.4
0.2
0.5
2.0
6.7
5
12
16
21
22
10
14
SS6 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS 29 47 19
about 160 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
dark grey Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel, trace organics and brickpieces
brown SANDY SLITY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
very stiff to stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
83
42
100
83
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
70 Nash Drive E:305629 N:4843047
25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
25 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 175.1 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 24
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
174
173
172
171
170
169
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
4
19
24
13
12
14
14
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
178.0
177.7
176.2
171.6
0.2
0.5
2.0
6.6
3
4
14
16
22
30
16
16
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
27
26
50
51
20
19
about 140 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
dark grey Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel and sand pockets
very stiff to hard
--------grey
End of Borehole
100
100
100
79
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Track Mounted Drill
53 Nash Drive E:305739 N:4843080
11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
11 Oct 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 178.2 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 25
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
178
177
176
175
174
173
172
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
3
15
15
15
16
14
12
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
181.1
180.9
179.1
174.6
0.2
0.4
2.2
6.7
2
2
8
12
27
26
28
11
SS5 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
27
29
51
50
20
19
about 180 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
brownClayey Silt / Silty Clay FILL
trace sand
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
very stiff to stiff
End of Borehole
100
100
100
42
100
83
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
43 Bunnell Crescent E:305870 N:4843226
26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
26 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 181.3 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 26
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
181
180
179
178
177
176
175
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
5
22
15
12
15
14
13
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
180.0
179.8
178.2
173.5
0.3
0.4
2.0
6.7
2
1
17
13
16
19
14
12
SS3 - tested for M/I and PHCs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
33
25
52
54
13
20
about 250 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
dark grey Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel,
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
very stiff to stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
100
100
100
75
100
42
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
60 Bunnell Crescent E:305804 N:4843183
11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
11 Oct 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 180.2 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 27
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
180
179
178
177
176
175
174
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
3
16
17
14
10
13
13
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
178.9
178.7
178.2
176.9
172.4
0.2
0.4
0.9
2.2
6.7
2
3
17
15
21
14
8
10
SS6 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
29
26
51
51
18
20
about 200 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
dark grey Clayey Silt FILL
trace sand and gravel
brownSILTY CLAY
trace to some sand, trace oxidizationvery stiff
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel
very stiff to firm
--------grey
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.7 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 1.5 m
75
67
42
58
83
67
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Intersection of Nash Drive and Bunnell CrescentE:305815 N:4843105
26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
26 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.1 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 28
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
179
178
177
176
175
174
173
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
3
15
14
13
14
14
15
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 1.5 m.
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
179.5
179.3
177.8
172.9
0.2
0.4
1.8
6.7
4
12
16
21
22
10
14
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs and PCBs
Composite Sample - tested for TCLP
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS 30 49 17
about 150 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
brown Silty Clay FILL
trace sand, contains sand pockets
brown to brownish grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
very stiff to stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.7 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 2.4 m
83
42
100
83
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Intersection of Bunnell Crescent and HallsportCrescent E:305835 N:4843013
26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
26 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.6 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 29
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
179
178
177
176
175
174
173
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
6
17
16
13
12
12
12
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 2.4 m.
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
179.1
178.9
177.2
172.6
0.2
0.4
2.1
6.7
1
1
6
12
11
15
23
17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
22
24
58
55
19
20
about 150 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
dark grey Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,
stiff to very stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
83
83
100
83
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
27 Hallsport Crescent E:305799 N:4842995
26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
26 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.3 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 30
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
179
178
177
176
175
174
173
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
2
17
16
16
14
12
12
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
179.1
178.9
177.1
172.7
0.2
0.4
2.2
6.6
3
20
12
26
26
17
21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS 26 52 19
about 180 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
dark grey Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravelcontains organics
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
very stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.6 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 1.8 m
75
83
100
100
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
11 Hallsport Crescent E:305828 N:4842923
26 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
26 Oct 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.3 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 31
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
179
178
177
176
175
174
173
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
4
18
26
14
14
13
13
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 1.8 m.
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
179.4
179.2
177.1
172.8
0.2
0.4
2.4
6.7
1
4
7
12
8
12
11
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs
SS5 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
24 55 20
about 150 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
gark grey Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization
firm to stiff--------
grey
End of Borehole
83
92
100
83
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
Intersection of Hallsport Crescent and E:305867N:4842938
26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
26 Sep 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.5 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 32
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
179
178
177
176
175
174
173
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
4
15
17
14
14
12
12
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
174.8
174.7
172.6
168.5
0.2
0.4
2.4
6.6
1
4
5
17
17
26
18
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
26 53 20
about 200 mm ASPHALT
dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
dark grey Silty Clay FILL
mix with sand and gravel
brown to grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,
very stiff
End of Borehole
Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.6 m
Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 4.6 m
58
83
100
83
100
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
54 Dorking Crescent E:305502 N:4843112
26 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
26 Oct 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 175.1 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 33
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
174
173
172
171
170
169
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
2
16
22
14
13
14
13
Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 4.6 m.
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
176.0
175.8
173.8
173.5
169.7
0.2
0.4
2.4
2.7
6.6
3
6
4
20
13
15
15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
26 45 26
about 180 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
brown Sandy Silt FILL trace gravel, moist
brown Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel
brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,
stiff to very stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
83
75
67
100
75
56
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
42 Dorking Crescent E:305562 N:4843130
11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
11 Oct 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 176.2 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 34
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
176
175
174
173
172
171
170
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
4
26
19
16
12
16
14
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
177.3177.2
175.3
170.9
0.20.3
2.2
6.6
2
5
5
35
17
19
13
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
27 52 19
about 200 mm ASPHALT
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
mottled Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel,trace organics
brown to brownish grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,hard to stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
75
58
75
100
75
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
34 Dorking Crescent E:305633 N:4843152
11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
11 Oct 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 177.5 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 35
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
177
176
175
174
173
172
171
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
4
12
25
24
13
13
13
13
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
178.5178.4
178.3
177.5
172.2
0.20.3
0.5
1.2
6.6
1
12
17
25
26
21
26
SS5 - tested for Corrosivity
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS 29 51 19
about 200 mm ASPHALT
brown Sandy Gravel FILL
trace silt, moist
brown Gravelly Sand FILL
trace silt, moist
brown Silty Clay FILL
trace sand
brown to brownish grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /
SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,
very stiff
--------grey
End of Borehole
100
100
83
75
83
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Truck Mounted Drill
20 Dorking Crescent E:305705 N:4843164
11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augering
Logged by:
11 Oct 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 178.7 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 36
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
178
177
176
175
174
173
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
Scale: 1 : 53
13
14
15
17
14
12
13
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
162.8
162.5
160.5
155.9
154.8
0.2
0.4
2.4
7.0
8.1
-
6
11
9
20
6
6
6
77
SS1 - tested for OCP
SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
80 (20)
about 160 mm TOPSOIL
dark brown Sandy Silt FILL
trace clay and gravel, trace rootletsmoist
dark brown Silty Clay FILL
trace sand and gravel
trace rootlets
brownSand FILL
moist
brown SAND
trace to some silt,very dense
moist
End of Borehole
83
83
100
75
83
100
67
100
Project Client: Drilling Method:
Project Number:
Date Started:
Project Name: Drilling Machine:
Project Location:
Drilling Location:TT183004
Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet
Date Completed:
Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
Track Mounted Drill
Roding Park, Headwall E:305398 N:4842927
26 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19
Reviewed by:
150 mm Solid Stem Augers
Logged by:
26 Oct 18 Revision No.:
WJ
Compiled by: MD
Moctar Diallo
SOIL SAMPLING
Sam
ple
Type
Sam
ple
Num
ber
LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING
Recovery
(%
)
Litholo
gy P
lot
LAB TESTING
COMMENTS&
GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION
(%)
SP
T 'N
' / R
QD
(%
)
(m)
(m)
EL
EV
AT
IONDESCRIPTION
20 40 60 80
Intact
INS
TR
UM
EN
TA
TIO
NIN
ST
ALLA
TIO
N
Remould
PenetrationTesting
SPT PPT DCPT
* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)
DE
PT
H RemouldIntact
Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*
Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 162.9 m
COV (ppm)
COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)
PlasticCLSISAGR
Liquid
WP
20 40 60 80
Soil Vapour Reading
W WL
TOV (ppm)
100 200 300 400
2 4 6 8
Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited
50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com
RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 37
Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.
162
161
160
159
158
157
156
155
Page: 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Scale: 1 : 53
13
39
30
16
15
7
10
9
4
No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.
Appendix CHydraulic Conductivity
Test Results(Assignment 16-12)
0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.0.01
0.1
Time (min)
Displacement
(m)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\...\BH 10_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 11:59:36
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 10Test Date: 10/05/2019
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 2.45 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (BH 10)
Initial Displacement: 0.08 m Static Water Column Height: 2.45 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 2.45 m Screen Length: 1.53 mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 1.103E-6 m/sec y0 = 0.0623 m
0. 100. 200. 300. 400. 500.0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)
Nor
ma
lize
d H
ead
(m
/m)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: Z:\...\BH 13_risingheadtest.aqtDate: 06/25/19 Time: 16:38:27
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 13Test Date: 6/5/2019
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 1.79 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (BH 13)
Initial Displacement: 1.12 m Static Water Column Height: 1.79 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 1.79 m Screen Length: 1.79 mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 8.371E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.955 m
0. 100. 200. 300. 400. 500.0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)
Normalized
Head
(m/
m)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\...\BH 14_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 12:01:29
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 14Test Date: 10/05/2019
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 6.83 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (BH 14)
Initial Displacement: 2.04 m Static Water Column Height: 6.83 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 6.83 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 8.974E-8 m/sec y0 = 2.716 m
0. 500. 1000. 1.5E+3 2.0E+3 2.5E+3 3.0E+30.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)
Normalized
Head
(m/
m)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\...\BH 15_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 12:11:19
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 15Test Date: 27/05/2019
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 5.86 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (BH 15)
Initial Displacement: 3.12 m Static Water Column Height: 5.86 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 5.86 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 8.078E-8 m/sec y0 = 2.672 m
Appendix DHydraulic Conductivity
Test Results(Assignment 16-22)
Constant Head Calculations
BFPP4 Assignment 16-22
Hydro-Geotechnical InvestigationTT183004.7000
Q (L/min) Q (m3/s) L (m) r (m) H (m) K (m/s) GWL: 6.39 mbgs
0.04 4.1E-05 3 0.025 0.25 4.2E-05
Q= average pumping rateL= length of screen over which drawdown occurs, in this case taken as the length of the confined soil unitr= well radiusH= drawdown, difference between static level and average water level during the constant head period of test
K=
GWL= groundwater level
Constant Head Test Analysis for BH 16
Q/(2πLH) x ln(L/r)
0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)
Normalized
Head
(m/
m)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\...\BH 18_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 11:44:25
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 18Test Date: 6/5/2019
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 2.35 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (BH 18)
Initial Displacement: 0.2 m Static Water Column Height: 2.35 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 2.35 m Screen Length: 2.35 mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 7.749E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.1795 m
0. 750. 1.5E+3 2.25E+3 3.0E+30.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)
Normalized
Head
(m/
m)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: P:\...\BH 19_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 11:41:43
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 19Test Date: 6/5/2019
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 3.18 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (BH 19)
Initial Displacement: 0.22 m Static Water Column Height: 3.18 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 3.18 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 1.862E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.1641 m
0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)
Nor
ma
lize
d H
ead
(m
/m)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: Z:\...\BH 29_risingheadtest.aqtDate: 06/25/19 Time: 16:37:13
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 29Test Date: 5/17/2019
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 4.41 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (BH 29)
Initial Displacement: 0.68 m Static Water Column Height: 4.41 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 4.41 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 8.527E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.5818 m
0. 50. 100. 150. 200. 250.0.01
0.1
1.
Time (min)
Nor
ma
lize
d H
ead
(m
/m)
WELL TEST ANALYSIS
Data Set: Z:\...\BH 33_risingheadtest.aqtDate: 06/25/19 Time: 16:38:49
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 33Test Date: 5/17/2019
AQUIFER DATA
Saturated Thickness: 4.01 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1
WELL DATA (BH 33)
Initial Displacement: 0.13 m Static Water Column Height: 4.01 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 4.01 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m
SOLUTION
Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice
K = 7.633E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.1515 m
Appendix EDewatering Rate Calculations
(Assignment 16-12)
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.1 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 5.1 3.9 1.0 2.9 9.1 2.9
2.91.1E-06 5.10 3.90 1.00 2.90 9.1 2.91.1E-06 5.10 3.90 1.00 2.90 9.1 2.9
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
K Arithmetic Mean
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.
Comments
MaximumK Geometric Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 8.8 8.8 8.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 15.8 15.8 15.8
KG
GV
EXCAVATION INFO
Checked by:
Performed by:Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario
Manhole GA1Description:
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 83.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.9 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 7.4 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 8.4 7.2 1.0 6.2 19.5 25.7
25.71.1E-06 8.40 7.20 1.00 6.20 19.5 25.71.1E-06 8.40 7.20 1.00 6.20 19.5 25.7
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
KGDescription: Trench between GA1 and KS1
Checked by: GV
Performed by:Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, OntarioCIMA Canada Inc.
Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12TT183004.7000
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Comments
(K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF(K Geometric Mean) × SF77.0 77.0
Maximum × SF77.0Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d)
Safety Factor
Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 33.8 33.8 33.8
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 8.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 9.5 8.3 1.0 7.3 23.0 9.2BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 9.5 -0.9 1.0 -1.9 -1.6 0.0
9.23.0E-07 9.50 3.70 1.00 2.70 4.5 1.15.9E-07 9.50 3.70 1.00 2.70 6.2 1.7
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 14.7 7.7 10.8
Comments
Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 27.5 3.3 5.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF
KGDescription: Manhole KS1
Checked by: GV
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 79.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.9 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 8.4 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 9.4 8.2 1.0 7.2 22.7 28.3BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 9.4 -1.0 1.0 -2.0 -1.7BH 14 6.9 2.0 9.0E-08 9.4 4.5 1.0 3.5 3.1 4.1BH 15 3.8 2.0 8.1E-08 9.4 7.6 1.0 6.6 5.6 6.2
28.31.6E-07 9.40 4.83 1.00 3.83 4.6 5.93.4E-07 9.40 4.83 1.00 3.83 6.7 8.8
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 20.9 8.0 11.6
Comments
Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 84.9 17.7 26.3Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF
KGDescription: Trench between GA1 and KS1
Checked by: GV
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 13.8 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 4.60 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 14.8 13.6 1.0 12.6 39.7 24.3BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 14.8 4.4 1.0 3.4 3.0 0.8
24.33.0E-07 14.80 9.00 1.00 8.00 13.2 4.95.9E-07 14.80 9.00 1.00 8.00 18.5 8.0
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 43.7 22.9 32.0
Comments
Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 73.0 14.6 24.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF
KGDescription: Manhole KS2
Checked by: GV
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 37.1 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 13.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 14.2 13.0 1.0 12.0 37.8 31.7BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 14.2 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.4BH 15 3.8 2.0 8.1E-08 14.2 12.4 1.0 11.4 9.7 5.8
31.72.0E-07 14.20 9.73 1.00 8.73 11.6 7.54.2E-07 14.20 9.73 1.00 8.73 17.0 11.9
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 47.7 20.1 29.5
Comments
Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 95.1 22.5 35.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF
KGDescription: Trench between KS2 and existing headwall
Checked by: GV
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 62.7 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 4.8 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 5.8 4.6 1.0 3.6 11.3 13.6BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 5.8 -4.6 1.0 -5.6 -4.9BH 14 6.9 2.0 9.0E-08 5.8 0.9 1.0 -0.1 -0.1 1.1
13.62.0E-07 5.80 0.30 1.00 -0.70 -0.9 1.14.3E-07 5.80 0.30 1.00 -0.70 -1.4 1.6
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) -3.8 -1.6 -2.4
Comments
Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 40.8 3.4 4.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF
KGDescription: Trench between KS2 and existing manhole
Checked by: GV
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 7.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.80 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 8.6 7.4 1.0 6.4 20.2 7.6BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 8.6 -1.8 1.0 -2.8 -2.4 0.0BH 14 6.9 2.0 9.0E-08 8.6 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.4 0.5BH 15 3.8 2.0 8.1E-08 8.6 6.8 1.0 5.8 4.9 1.0
7.61.6E-07 8.60 4.03 1.00 3.03 3.6 0.83.4E-07 8.60 4.03 1.00 3.03 5.3 1.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 16.5 6.3 9.2
Comments
Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 22.9 2.4 4.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF
KGDescription: Manhole KS3
Checked by: GV
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 1.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 2.1 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 13.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 14.2 13.0 1.0 12.0 37.8 14.5BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 14.2 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.4BH 14 6.9 2.0 9.0E-08 14.2 9.3 1.0 8.3 7.5 1.1BH 15 3.8 2.0 8.1E-08 14.2 12.4 1.0 11.4 9.7 1.6
14.51.6E-07 14.20 9.63 1.00 8.63 10.4 1.83.4E-07 14.20 9.63 1.00 8.63 15.1 3.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 47.1 18.0 26.1
Comments
Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 43.4 5.5 10.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF
KGDescription: Trench between KS2 and KS3
Checked by: GV
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12
CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Appendix FDewatering Rate Calculations
(Assignment 16-22)
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.4 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.4 4.3 1.0 3.3 1.4 0.2BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.4 6.2 1.0 5.2 4.3 0.8
0.83.8E-08 6.40 5.25 1.00 4.25 2.5 0.44.7E-08 6.40 5.25 1.00 4.25 2.8 0.5
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.1 4.3 4.8
KG
GV
EXCAVATION INFO
Checked by:
Performed by:Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario
Manhole RS1Description:
Comments
MaximumK Geometric Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.5 1.3 1.5Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
K Arithmetic Mean
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 56.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 6.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 7.6 5.5 1.0 4.5 1.8 1.6BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 7.6 7.4 1.0 6.4 5.3 4.3
4.33.8E-08 7.60 6.45 1.00 5.45 3.2 2.64.7E-08 7.60 6.45 1.00 5.45 3.6 3.0
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between RS1 and RS2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 13.0 7.9 8.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.8 5.5 6.2
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 7.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 8.6 6.5 1.0 5.5 2.3 0.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 8.6 8.4 1.0 7.4 6.1 1.4
1.43.8E-08 8.60 7.45 1.00 6.45 3.8 0.74.7E-08 8.60 7.45 1.00 6.45 4.2 0.9
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole RS2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 4.2 2.2 2.6Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 9.2 6.5 7.3
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 46.6 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.9 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 6.4 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 7.4 5.3 1.0 4.3 1.8 1.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 7.4 7.2 1.0 6.2 5.1 3.6
3.63.8E-08 7.40 6.25 1.00 5.25 3.1 2.24.7E-08 7.40 6.25 1.00 5.25 3.4 2.4
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between RS2 and RS3Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 10.8 6.5 7.3Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.5 5.3 5.9
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 6.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 7.7 5.6 1.0 4.6 1.9 0.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 7.7 7.5 1.0 6.5 5.4 1.2
1.23.8E-08 7.70 6.55 1.00 5.55 3.2 0.64.7E-08 7.70 6.55 1.00 5.55 3.6 0.7
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole RS3Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 3.6 1.9 2.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 8.0 5.6 6.3
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 94.7 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.7 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 7.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 8.2 7.7 1.0 6.7 5.6 7.2BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 8.2 6.1 1.0 5.1 2.1 2.8BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 8.2 8.0 1.0 7.0 5.8 7.4
7.44.8E-08 8.20 7.27 1.00 6.27 4.1 5.35.7E-08 8.20 7.27 1.00 6.27 4.5 5.8
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 9.1 7.1 7.8
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Comments
(K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF(K Geometric Mean) × SF22.2 15.9
Maximum × SF17.5Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d)
Safety Factor
Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
KGDescription: Trench between RS1 and GD1
Checked by: GV
Performed by:Roding Street and Gade Drive, Toronto, OntarioCIMA Canada Inc.
Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22TT183004.7000
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 99.4 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.9 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 6.9 6.4 1.0 5.4 4.5 6.4BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.9 4.8 1.0 3.8 1.6 2.4BH 29 1.7 2.0 8.5E-08 6.9 7.2 1.0 6.2 5.4 7.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.9 6.7 1.0 5.7 4.7 6.6
7.55.5E-08 6.90 6.27 1.00 5.27 3.7 5.36.4E-08 6.90 6.27 1.00 5.27 4.0 5.7
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street and Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between RS3 and DC1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 22.4 15.8 17.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 8.0 6.4 6.9
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 7.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 8.5 8.0 1.0 7.0 5.8 1.2BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 8.5 6.4 1.0 5.4 2.2 0.3
1.23.8E-08 8.50 7.20 1.00 6.20 3.6 0.64.8E-08 8.50 7.20 1.00 6.20 4.1 0.7
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Gade Drive, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole GD1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 3.5 1.9 2.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 9.0 6.3 7.1
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.7 4.2 1.0 3.2 2.7 0.5BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.7 2.6 1.0 1.6 0.7 0.1
0.53.8E-08 4.70 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.4 0.34.8E-08 4.70 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.6 0.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Ianhall Road, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole IR1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.6 0.8 0.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.5 2.4 2.7
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 74.7 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.7 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 6.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 7.9 7.4 1.0 6.4 5.3 5.6BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 7.9 5.8 1.0 4.8 2.0 2.1
5.63.8E-08 7.90 6.60 1.00 5.60 3.3 3.54.8E-08 7.90 6.60 1.00 5.60 3.7 3.9
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Gade Drive and Ianhall Road, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between GD1 and IR1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 16.8 10.4 11.7Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 8.1 5.7 6.4
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 5.6 5.1 1.0 4.1 3.4 0.8BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.6 5.6 1.0 4.6 4.0 0.9BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.6 5.4 1.0 4.4 3.6 0.8
0.97.9E-08 5.60 5.37 1.00 4.37 3.7 0.87.9E-08 5.60 5.37 1.00 4.37 3.7 0.8
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole DC1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.7 2.4 2.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.6 6.4 6.4
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 62.6 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.7 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.7BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.7 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.4 2.7BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.7 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 2.4
2.74.9E-08 3.70 2.93 1.00 1.93 1.3 1.76.0E-08 3.70 2.93 1.00 1.93 1.4 1.8
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between DC1 and DC2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 8.0 5.0 5.5Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 2.9 2.2 2.5
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 105.8 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.7 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 1.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.7 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.4 4.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.7 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 4.0
4.44.9E-08 3.70 2.93 1.00 1.93 1.3 2.86.0E-08 3.70 2.93 1.00 1.93 1.4 3.1
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent and Nash Drive, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between DC1 and ND1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 13.2 8.3 9.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 2.9 2.2 2.5
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.0 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.0 3.9 1.0 2.9 1.2 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.0 6.0 1.0 5.0 4.4 0.8BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.0 5.8 1.0 4.8 4.0 0.7
0.84.9E-08 6.00 5.23 1.00 4.23 2.8 0.56.0E-08 6.00 5.23 1.00 4.23 3.1 0.5
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Nash Drive, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole ND1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.4 1.4 1.6Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.4 4.9 5.4
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.6 4.5 1.0 3.5 1.4 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.6 6.6 1.0 5.6 4.9 0.9BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.6 6.4 1.0 5.4 4.5 0.8
0.94.9E-08 6.60 5.83 1.00 4.83 3.2 0.56.0E-08 6.60 5.83 1.00 4.83 3.5 0.6
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Nash Drive, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole ND2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.7 1.6 1.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.3 5.6 6.1
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 93.1 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.5 4.4 1.0 3.4 1.4 2.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.5 6.5 1.0 5.5 4.8 6.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.5 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.4 5.8
6.44.9E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.2 4.36.0E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.5 4.7
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Nash Drive and Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between ND2 and BC2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 19.1 12.9 14.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.2 5.5 6.0
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 9.0 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.3 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.5 4.4 1.0 3.4 1.4 0.3BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.5 6.5 1.0 5.5 4.8 1.0BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.5 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.4 0.9
1.04.9E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.2 0.66.0E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.5 0.7
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between BC1A and BC2AChecked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 3.0 1.9 2.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.2 5.5 6.0
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.8 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.8 3.7 1.0 2.7 1.1 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.8 5.8 1.0 4.8 4.2 0.7BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.8 5.6 1.0 4.6 3.8 0.6
0.74.9E-08 5.80 5.03 1.00 4.03 2.7 0.46.0E-08 5.80 5.03 1.00 4.03 3.0 0.5
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole BC1AChecked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.1 1.2 1.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.1 4.7 5.1
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.9 3.8 1.0 2.8 1.1 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.9 5.9 1.0 4.9 4.3 0.7BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.9 5.7 1.0 4.7 3.9 0.6
0.74.9E-08 5.90 5.13 1.00 4.13 2.8 0.46.0E-08 5.90 5.13 1.00 4.13 3.0 0.5
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole BC2AChecked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.2 1.3 1.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.3 4.8 5.3
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.6 4.5 1.0 3.5 1.4 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.6 6.6 1.0 5.6 4.9 1.0BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.6 6.4 1.0 5.4 4.5 0.9
1.04.9E-08 6.60 5.83 1.00 4.83 3.2 0.66.0E-08 6.60 5.83 1.00 4.83 3.5 0.7
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole BC2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.9 1.7 2.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.3 5.6 6.1
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 99.3 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.9 1.8 1.0 0.8 0.3 1.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.9 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.5 4.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.9 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.2 3.9
4.34.9E-08 3.90 3.13 1.00 2.13 1.4 2.76.0E-08 3.90 3.13 1.00 2.13 1.6 3.0
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between BC2 and BC3Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 12.9 8.2 9.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.2 2.5 2.7
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 94.3 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.7 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.3 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.3 4.2 1.0 3.2 1.3 2.0BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.3 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.6 6.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.3 6.1 1.0 5.1 4.2 5.7
6.34.9E-08 6.30 5.53 1.00 4.53 3.0 4.26.0E-08 6.30 5.53 1.00 4.53 3.3 4.6
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between BC2 and BC1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 18.8 12.6 13.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.9 5.2 5.8
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.5 4.4 1.0 3.4 1.4 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.5 6.5 1.0 5.5 4.8 1.0BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.5 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.4 0.8
1.04.9E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.2 0.66.0E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.5 0.6
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole BC1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.9 1.7 1.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.2 5.5 6.0
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 81.6 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.9 1.8 1.0 0.8 0.3 0.9BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.9 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.5 3.6BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.9 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.2 3.2
3.64.9E-08 3.90 3.13 1.00 2.13 1.4 2.36.0E-08 3.90 3.13 1.00 2.13 1.6 2.5
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between BC3 and BC4Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 10.7 6.8 7.5Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.2 2.5 2.7
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.2 2.1 1.0 1.1 0.5 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.2 4.2 1.0 3.2 2.8 0.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.2 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 0.4
0.54.9E-08 4.20 3.43 1.00 2.43 1.6 0.36.0E-08 4.20 3.43 1.00 2.43 1.8 0.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole BC3Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.4 0.8 0.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.7 2.8 3.1
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 76.6 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 4.3 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.3 3.2 1.0 2.2 0.9 1.3BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.3 5.3 1.0 4.3 3.8 4.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.3 5.1 1.0 4.1 3.4 4.0BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 5.3 4.8 1.0 3.8 3.2 3.8
4.45.5E-08 5.30 4.60 1.00 3.60 2.5 3.16.4E-08 5.30 4.60 1.00 3.60 2.7 3.4
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Hallsport Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between HC1 and HC2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 13.2 9.3 10.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 5.5 4.4 4.7
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 56.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.1 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.1 4.0 1.0 3.0 1.2 1.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.1 6.1 1.0 5.1 4.5 3.8BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.1 5.9 1.0 4.9 4.1 3.5BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 6.1 5.6 1.0 4.6 3.8 3.3
3.85.5E-08 6.10 5.40 1.00 4.40 3.1 2.76.4E-08 6.10 5.40 1.00 4.40 3.3 2.9
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Hallsport Crescent and Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between HC2 and BC1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 11.4 8.1 8.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.7 5.4 5.8
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.6 3.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.6 5.6 1.0 4.6 4.0 0.7BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.6 5.4 1.0 4.4 3.6 0.6BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 5.6 5.1 1.0 4.1 3.4 0.6
0.75.5E-08 5.60 4.90 1.00 3.90 2.8 0.56.4E-08 5.60 4.90 1.00 3.90 3.0 0.5
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Hallsport Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole HC2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.2 1.4 1.5Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 5.9 4.8 5.1
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.2 3.1 1.0 2.1 0.9 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.2 5.2 1.0 4.2 3.7 0.6BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.2 5.0 1.0 4.0 3.3 0.5BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 5.2 4.7 1.0 3.7 3.1 0.5
0.65.5E-08 5.20 4.50 1.00 3.50 2.5 0.46.4E-08 5.20 4.50 1.00 3.50 2.7 0.4
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Hallsport Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole HC1Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.8 1.2 1.3Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 5.3 4.3 4.6
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 39.3 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 3.0 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.0 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.5BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.6 1.9BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.0 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 1.7BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.0 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 1.6
1.95.5E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.6 1.36.4E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.7 1.4
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between DC2 and DC3Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 5.6 3.8 4.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.5 2.8 3.0
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.3 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.3 2.2 1.0 1.2 0.5 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.3 4.3 1.0 3.3 2.9 0.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.3 4.1 1.0 3.1 2.6 0.4BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.3 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 0.4
0.55.5E-08 4.30 3.60 1.00 2.60 1.8 0.36.4E-08 4.30 3.60 1.00 2.60 2.0 0.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole DC2Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.4 0.9 1.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.9 3.2 3.4
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 2.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.5 1.4 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.5 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.2 0.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.5 3.3 1.0 2.3 1.9 0.3BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 3.5 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.7 0.3
0.45.5E-08 3.50 2.80 1.00 1.80 1.3 0.26.4E-08 3.50 2.80 1.00 1.80 1.4 0.2
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole DC3Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.1 0.7 0.7Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 2.7 2.2 2.4
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 74.3 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 3.0 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.0 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.9BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.6 3.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.0 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 3.0BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.0 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 2.8
3.35.5E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.6 2.36.4E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.7 2.5
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between DC3 and DC4Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 10.0 6.9 7.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.5 2.8 3.0
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.1 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.1 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.1 4.1 1.0 3.1 2.7 0.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.1 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.4 0.4BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.1 3.6 1.0 2.6 2.2 0.4
0.55.5E-08 4.10 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.7 0.36.4E-08 4.10 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.8 0.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole DC4Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.4 0.8 0.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.6 2.9 3.2
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 73.8 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.3 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.7 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.8BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.7 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.4 3.1BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.7 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 2.8BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 3.7 3.2 1.0 2.2 1.8 2.6
3.15.5E-08 3.70 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.4 2.16.4E-08 3.70 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.5 2.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between DC4 and DC5Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 9.3 6.3 6.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.0 2.4 2.6
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.0 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.0 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.6 0.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.0 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 0.4BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.0 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 0.4
0.45.5E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.6 0.36.4E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.7 0.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole DC5Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.3 0.8 0.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.5 2.8 3.0
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length, l (m) 72.8 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.3 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 3.1 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.1 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.9BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.1 4.1 1.0 3.1 2.7 3.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.1 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.4 3.0BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.1 3.6 1.0 2.6 2.2 2.9
3.35.5E-08 4.10 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.7 2.36.4E-08 4.10 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.8 2.5
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Trench between DC5 and DC6Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 10.0 6.9 7.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.6 2.9 3.2
Comments
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
w Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width (w)
Length (l)
Plan View
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:
Date: June 29, 2019
Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.3 + 0.5 m to maximum depth
re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)
Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation
Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions
Bh
GwlMeasured
GroundwaterLevel
(mbgs)
SwlEstimated Seasonal
Fluctuation above Gwl(m)
KHydraulic
Conductivity(m/s)
At'Aquifer'
Thickness(mbgs)
H0
Ambient Headabove
'Aquitard'(m)
he
Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation
(m)
DdDrawdown
(m)
Ri
SichardtCalculation
(m)
Ri
User Defined(m)
QGroundwater
Inflow(m3/d)
BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.3 2.2 1.0 1.2 0.5 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.3 4.3 1.0 3.3 2.9 0.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.3 4.1 1.0 3.1 2.6 0.4BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.3 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 0.4
0.55.5E-08 4.30 3.60 1.00 2.60 1.8 0.36.4E-08 4.30 3.60 1.00 2.60 2.0 0.3
3
3
Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)
Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method
TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22
CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG
Description: Manhole DC6Checked by: GV
EXCAVATION INFO
MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean
Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.4 0.9 1.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.9 3.2 3.4
Comments
= ℎ × ℎ
= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√
Depthp
‘Aquifer’Bedrock
H0
At
‘Aquitard’Bedrock
Dd
he
Gwl
re Ri
Cross Section
Swl
Width
Length
Plan View
re
= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +
HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN
Appendix GGroundwater Chemistry Results
Table G-1: Summary of Groundwater Chemistry Results - Assignment 16-12Wood Reference No.: TT183004.7000
BH 10 BH 14
20-Jun-19 20-Jun-19
L2295725-2 L2295725-1
Value Units Value Units RDL Units Groundwater Groundwater
INORGANIC PARAMETERS AND METALSpH 7.48 7.50
Fluoride 10 mg/L - mg/L 0.1 / 0.2 mg/L <0.20 <0.10Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 100 mg/L - mg/L 0.20 mg/L 2.4 19
Total Phosphorus 10 mg/L 0.4 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 0.65 8.52BOD (5) 300 mg/L 15 mg/L 3 mg/L <3.0 4.6
Total Cyanide 2 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.002 mg/L <0.0020 <0.0020Phenols 1.0 mg/L 0.008 mg/L 0.002 mg/L 0.0062 <0.0020
Total Suspended Solids 350 mg/L 15 mg/L 2.0 mg/L 408 40,500Total Aluminum 50 mg/L - mg/L 0.05 mg/L 2.60 75.4Total Antimony 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L <0.0010 <0.010Total Arsenic 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0027 0.040Total Cadmium 0.7 mg/L 0.008 mg/L 0.00005 mg/L 0.000128 0.00079
Total Chromium 4 mg/L 0.08 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.0055 0.143Total Cobalt 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0024 0.076
Total Copper 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.01 mg/L <0.010 0.20Total Lead 1 mg/L 0.12 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L 0.00303 0.0994
Total Manganese 5 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.336 5.83Total Mercury 0.01 mg/L 0.0004 mg/L 0.00001 mg/L 0.000015 <0.000010
Total Molybdenum 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.00219 <0.0050Total Nickel 2 mg/L 0.08 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.0067 0.170
Total Selenium 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.00079 <0.0050Total Silver 5 mg/L 0.12 mg/L 0.005 / 0.0005 mg/L <0.00050 <0.0050
Total Tin 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.01 mg/L 0.0016 <0.010Total Titanium 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.003 mg/L 0.0614 1.38
Total Zinc 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.03 mg/L <0.030 0.40Chromium VI 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L <0.00050 <0.00050
ORGANIC PARAMETERSOil and Grease (animal/vegetable) in water 150 mg/L 5 mg/L <5.0 <5.0Oil and Grease (mineral) in water 15 mg/L 2.5 mg/L <2.5 <2.5trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 140 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 4000 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Chloroform 40 ug/L 2 ug/L 1 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Benzene 10 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Tetrachloroethylene 1000 ug/L 4.4 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Toluene 16 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Trichloroethlyene 400 ug/L 7.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Ethylbenzene 160 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1400 ug/L 17 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,2-Dichlorobenzene 50 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,4-Dichlorobenzene 80 ug/L 6.8 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Total Xylenes 1400 ug/L 4.4 ug/L 1.1 ug/L <1.1 <1.1PCBs 1 ug/L 0.4 ug/L 0.04 ug/L <0.040 <0.040Pentachlorophenol 5 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Di-n-butyl phthalate 80 ug/L 15 ug/L 1 ug/L <1.0 <1.03,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2 ug/L 0.8 ug/L 0.4 ug/L <0.40 <0.40Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 12 ug/L 8.8 ug/L 2 ug/L <2.0 <2.0Total PAHs 5 ug/L 2 ug/L 1.7 ug/L <1.7 12.9Nonylphenols 20 ug/L 1 ug/L 1 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Nonylphenol Ethoxylates 200 ug/L 10 ug/L 2 ug/L <2.0 <2.0
Notes:RDL = Reported Detection Limit* = Refers to Table 1 in Section 681-2 of Toronto Municipal Code - Chapter 681$ = Refers to Table 2 in Section 681-4 of Toronto Municipal Code - Chapter 681n/a = not applicable
highlight = exceedance of Table 1 (Sanitary/CSO Sewer Bylaw)highlight = exceedance of both Table 1 and Table 2highlight = exceedance of Table 2 (Storm Sewer Bylaw)
--
Parameter
Borehole ID:
Sample Date: City of TorontoSanitary SewerBylaw Criteria*
6.0-11.5 0.1
Lab Sample ID:
City of TorontoStorm Sewer
Bylaw Criteria$
6.0-9.5
Table G-2: Groundwater Chemistry Results - Assignment 16-22Wood Reference No.: TT183004.7000
BH16 BH31 BH33
20-Jun-19 20-Jun-19 20-Jun-19
L2295725-3 L2295725-5 L2295725-4
Value Units Value Units RDL Units Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater
INORGANIC PARAMETERS AND METALSpH 7.48 7.60 7.59
Fluoride 10 mg/L - mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.035 0.109 <0.10Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 100 mg/L - mg/L 1.5 mg/L 19 <1.5 0.29
Total Phosphorus 10 mg/L 0.4 mg/L 0.003 mg/L 5.11 0.247 0.211BOD (5) 300 mg/L 15 mg/L 3.0 mg/L <3.0 2.2 2.6
Total Cyanide 2 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.002 mg/L <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020Phenols 1.0 mg/L 0.008 mg/L 0.002 mg/L <0.0020 0.0050 0.0063
Total Suspended Solids 350 mg/L 15 mg/L 2.0 mg/L 23,600 586 149Total Aluminum 50 mg/L - mg/L 0.05 mg/L 47.7 3.95 3.50Total Antimony 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010Total Arsenic 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0279 0.0061 0.0030Total Cadmium 0.7 mg/L 0.008 mg/L 0.00005 mg/L 0.00106 <0.000050 0.000054
Total Chromium 4 mg/L 0.08 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.0835 0.0096 0.0065Total Cobalt 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0957 0.0028 0.0027
Total Copper 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.01 mg/L 0.258 <0.010 <0.010Total Lead 1 mg/L 0.12 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L 0.152 0.00561 0.00345
Total Manganese 5 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 6.52 0.324 0.448Total Mercury 0.01 mg/L 0.0004 mg/L 0.00001 mg/L 0.000133 <0.000010 <0.000010
Total Molybdenum 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.0005 mg/L 0.00145 0.00241 0.00469Total Nickel 2 mg/L 0.08 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.167 0.0063 0.0069
Total Selenium 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L 0.00129 <0.00050 <0.00050Total Silver 5 mg/L 0.12 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050
Total Tin 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0020 0.0023 <0.0010Total Titanium 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.003 mg/L 0.480 0.0744 0.104
Total Zinc 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.03 mg/L 0.493 <0.030 <0.030Chromium VI 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050
ORGANIC PARAMETERSOil and Grease (animal/vegetable) in water 150 mg/L 5.0 mg/L <5.0 6.1 <5.0
Oil and Grease (mineral) in water 15 mg/L 2.5 mg/L <2.5 <2.5 <2.5trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 140 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 4000 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Chloroform 40 ug/L 2 ug/L 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Benzene 10 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Tetrachloroethylene 1000 ug/L 4.4 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Toluene 16 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Trichloroethlyene 400 ug/L 7.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Ethylbenzene 160 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1400 ug/L 17 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.501,2-Dichlorobenzene 50 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.501,4-Dichlorobenzene 80 ug/L 6.8 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
Total Xylenes 1400 ug/L 4.4 ug/L 1.1 ug/L <1.1 <1.1 <1.1PCBs 1 ug/L 0.4 ug/L 0.04 ug/L <0.040 <0.040 <0.040
Pentachlorophenol 5 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 / 1.0 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <1.0Di-n-butyl phthalate 80 ug/L 15 ug/L 1.0 / 2.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <2.0
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2 ug/L 0.8 ug/L 0.4 / 0.8 ug/L <0.40 <0.40 <0.80Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 12 ug/L 8.8 ug/L 2.0 / 4.0 ug/L <2.0 <2.0 <4.0
Total PAHs 5 ug/L 2 ug/L 1.7 / 8.7 ug/L <1.7 <1.7 <8.7Nonylphenols 20 ug/L 1 ug/L 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Nonylphenol Ethoxylates 200 ug/L 10 ug/L 2.0 ug/L <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
MICROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERSEscherichia coli 200 CFU/100mL 10 CFU/100mL >2000 0 1
Notes:RDL = Reported Detection Limit* = Refers to Table 1 in Section 681-2 of Toronto Municipal Code - Chapter 681$ = Refers to Table 2 in Section 681-4 of Toronto Municipal Code - Chapter 681n/a = not applicable
highlight = exceedance of Table 1 (Sanitary/CSO Sewer Bylaw)highlight = exceedance of both Table 1 and Table 2highlight = exceedance of Table 2 (Storm Sewer Bylaw)
n/a
6.0-11.5 n/a
Parameter
City of TorontoSanitary Sewer Bylaw
Criteria*
Borehole ID:
Sample Date:
Lab Sample ID:
City of Toronto StormSewer Bylaw Criteria*
6.0-9.5
--
[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]
20-JUN-19
Lab Work Order #: L2295725
Date Received:Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham
50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6
ATTN: Kim Gilder FINAL 27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)Report Date:
Version:
Certificate of Analysis
ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company
____________________________________________
Mary-Lynn PikeClient Services Supervisor
ADDRESS: 95 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 1, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1H2 Canada | Phone: +1 905 881 9887 | Fax: +1 905 881 8062
Client Phone: 905-415-2632
TT183004.7000Job Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:
17-820670C of C Numbers:Legal Site Desc:
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
2PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Summary of Guideline Exceedances
GuidelineALS ID Client ID Grouping Analyte Result Guideline Limit Unit
Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-Law 100-2016 (FEB 4,2016) - Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-Law
Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-Law 100-2016 (FEB 4,2016) - Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
L2295725-1
L2295725-2
L2295725-3
L2295725-4
L2295725-5
L2295725-1
L2295725-2
L2295725-3
L2295725-4
BH14
BH10
BH16
BH33
BH31
BH14
BH10
BH16
BH33
Total Suspended Solids
Aluminum (Al)-TotalManganese (Mn)-Total
Total PAHs
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Total PAHs
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Phosphorus, Total
Arsenic (As)-TotalChromium (Cr)-TotalCopper (Cu)-TotalManganese (Mn)-TotalNickel (Ni)-TotalZinc (Zn)-Total
Total PAHs
Total Suspended Solids
Phosphorus, Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Total Suspended Solids
Phosphorus, Total
Arsenic (As)-TotalChromium (Cr)-TotalCopper (Cu)-TotalLead (Pb)-TotalManganese (Mn)-TotalNickel (Ni)-TotalZinc (Zn)-Total
Total Suspended Solids
mg/L
mg/Lmg/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L
mg/L
350
505
5
350
350
5
5
350
15
0.4
0.020.080.040.050.080.04
2
15
0.4
0.05
15
0.4
0.020.080.040.120.050.080.04
15
40500
75.45.83
12.9
408
23600
6.52
<8.7
586
40500
8.52
0.0400.1430.205.830.1700.40
12.9
408
0.645
0.336
23600
5.11
0.02790.08350.2580.1526.520.1670.493
149
Physical Tests
Total Metals
Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPhysical Tests
Physical Tests
Total Metals
Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPhysical Tests
Physical Tests
Anions and Nutrients
Total Metals
Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPhysical Tests
Anions and Nutrients
Total Metals
Physical Tests
Anions and Nutrients
Total Metals
Physical Tests
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
3PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Summary of Guideline Exceedances
GuidelineALS ID Client ID Grouping Analyte Result Guideline Limit Unit
Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-Law 100-2016 (FEB 4,2016) - Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-LawL2295725-4
L2295725-5
BH33
BH31
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Total PAHs
Total Suspended Solids
Manganese (Mn)-Total
mg/L
ug/L
mg/L
mg/L
0.05
2
15
0.05
0.448
<8.7
586
0.324
Total Metals
Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPhysical Tests
Total Metals
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
4PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Physical Tests - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
pH
Total Suspended Solids
6.00-11.5350
6.0-9.5
15
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
pH units
mg/L
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
7.50 7.48 7.48 7.59 7.60
40500 408 23600 149 586DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
5PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Anions and Nutrients - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Fluoride (F)
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Phosphorus, Total
10
100
10
-
-
0.4
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<0.10 <0.20 0.035 <0.10 0.109
19 2.4 19 0.29 <1.5
8.52 0.645 5.11 0.211 0.247
DLDS DLDS DLDS
DLM DLM DLM DLM
DLM DLM DLM
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
6PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Cyanides - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Cyanide, Total 2 0.02
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
mg/L
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
7PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Bacteriological Tests - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
E. Coli - 200
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
CFU/100mL
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<10 172 >2000 1 0DLM DLM DLM
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
8PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Total Metals - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Mercury (Hg)-Total
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
50
5
1
0.7
4
5
2
1
5
0.01
5
2
1
5
5
5
2
-
-
0.02
0.008
0.08
-
0.04
0.12
0.05
0.0004
-
0.08
0.02
0.12
-
-
0.04
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
75.4 2.60 47.7 3.50 3.95
<0.010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010
0.040 0.0027 0.0279 0.0030 0.0061
0.00079 0.000128 0.00106 0.000054 <0.000050
0.143 0.0055 0.0835 0.0065 0.0096
0.076 0.0024 0.0957 0.0027 0.0028
0.20 <0.010 0.258 <0.010 <0.010
0.0994 0.00303 0.152 0.00345 0.00561
5.83 0.336 6.52 0.448 0.324
<0.000010 0.000015 0.000133 <0.000010 <0.000010
<0.0050 0.00219 0.00145 0.00469 0.00241
0.170 0.0067 0.167 0.0069 0.0063
<0.0050 0.00079 0.00129 <0.00050 <0.00050
<0.0050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050
<0.010 0.0016 0.0020 <0.0010 0.0023
1.38 0.0614 0.480 0.104 0.0744
0.40 <0.030 0.493 <0.030 <0.030
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
9PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Speciated Metals - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Chromium, Hexavalent 2 0.04
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
mg/L
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
10PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Aggregate Organics - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
BOD
Oil and Grease, Total
Animal/Veg Oil & Grease
Mineral Oil and Grease
Phenols (4AAP)
300
-
150
15
1.0
15
-
-
-
0.008
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
4.6 <3.0 <3.0 2.6 2.2
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6.1
<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6.1
<2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5
<0.0020 0.0062 <0.0020 0.0063 0.0050
BODL BODL
DLM DLM
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
11PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Volatile Organic Compounds - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Benzene
Chloroform
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethylbenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
Trichloroethylene
o-Xylene
m+p-Xylenes
Xylenes (Total)
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
10
40
50
80
4000
2000
140
160
1400
1000
16
400
-
-
1400
-
-
2
2
5.6
6.8
5.6
5.2
-
2
17
4.4
2
7.6
-
-
4.4
-
-
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
<1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1
100.6 100.8 100.4 106.8 99.8
104.1 104.0 103.9 106.6 104.0
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
VOCHS
VOCHS
VOCHS
VOCHS
OWP OWP
OWP OWP
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
12PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(e)pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenz(a,h)acridine
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene
7H-Dibenzo(c,g)carbazole
1,3-Dinitropyrene
1,6-Dinitropyrene
1,8-Dinitropyrene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Perylene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: d14-Terphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
Total PAHs
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
ug/L
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
0.413 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010
0.687 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010
0.784 0.027 0.012 0.012 <0.010
0.567 0.048 0.012 0.026 0.014
0.676 0.083 0.018 0.030 0.025
<0.80 0.104 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050
0.321 0.202 0.011 0.042 0.025
0.253 0.026 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010
0.836 0.070 0.048 0.044 0.025
<0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050
<0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050
0.086 0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010
<0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050
<0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050
<2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0
<2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0
<2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0
2.21 0.100 0.031 0.016 0.027
0.544 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010
0.288 0.055 <0.010 0.014 0.012
0.426 0.014 0.014 <0.010 0.012
0.590 0.030 <0.010 0.044 <0.010
2.46 0.048 0.039 0.015 0.016
1.81 0.111 0.029 0.040 0.025
77.3 83.6 87.0 87.5 90.8
37.9 57.4 53.5 55.9 66.3
47.3 74.4 67.2 80.7 83.5
12.9 <1.7 <1.7 <8.7 <1.7
R
RRR DLM
RRR DLM
RRR DLM
RRR DLM
RRR DLM
RRR DLM
RRR DLM
RRR DLM
RRR
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
13PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Phthalate Esters - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Surrogate: 2-fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
12
-
-
8.8
-
-
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
ug/L
%
%
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0
70.3 80.7 86.6 81.1 88.0
46.9 76.8 77.4 81.9 87.6
DLM
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
14PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Semi-Volatile Organics - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine
Di-n-butylphthalate
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
2
80
-
-
0.8
15
-
-
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.80 <0.40
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0
70.3 80.7 86.6 81.1 88.0
46.9 76.8 77.4 81.9 87.6
DLM
DLM
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
15PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Phenolics - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Pentachlorophenol
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
5
-
2
-
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
ug/L
%
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50
68.0 82.5 87.3 77.6 80.9
DLM
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
16PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Polychlorinated Biphenyls - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Total PCBs
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
0.4
-
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020
<0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040
78.0 75.4 75.1 68.2 73.7
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT
L2295725 CONT’D....
17PAGE of
* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Organic Parameters - WATER
Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law
Nonylphenol
Nonylphenol Diethoxylates
Total Nonylphenol Ethoxylates
Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates
20
-
200
-
1
-
10
-
L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19
BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
Lab IDSample Date
Sample ID
Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte
Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.
<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10
<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
Reference Information
VOCHS
R
DLDS
BODL
DLM
OWP
VOC analysis was conducted for a water sample that contained > 5% headspace. Results may be biased low.
The ion abundance ratio(s) did not meet the acceptance criteria. Value is an estimated maximum.
Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high Dissolved Solids / Electrical Conductivity.
Limit of Reporting for BOD was increased to account for the largest volume of sample tested.
Detection Limit Adjusted due to sample matrix effects (e.g. chemical interference, colour, turbidity).
Organic water sample contained visible sediment (must be included as part of analysis). Measured concentrations of organic substances in water can be biased high due to presence of
Qualifiers for Individual Parameters Listed:
Qualifiers for Sample Submission Listed:
CINT Cooling initiated. Samples were received packed with ice or ice packs and were sampled the same day as received.
Description Qualifier
Description Qualifier
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)
L2295725 CONT’D....
18PAGE of
Additional Comments for Sample Listed:
Samplenum Matrix Sample Comments
L2295725-1
L2295725-1
L2295725-3
Water
Water
Water
Note: RRR; Surrogate recovery is outside ALS control limits; reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.Note: OWP - Organic water sample contained visible sediment (must be included as part of analysis). Measured concentrations of organic substances in water can be biased high due to presence of sediment.Note: OWP - Organic water sample contained visible sediment (must be included as part of analysis). Measured concentrations of organic substances in water can be biased high due to presence of sediment.
Report Remarks
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Reference Information
DLHC
RRR
sediment.
Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high concentration of test analyte(s).
Refer to Report Remarks for issues regarding this analysis
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)
L2295725 CONT’D....
19PAGE of
625-33DCBENZIDINE-WT
625-BIS-2-PHTH-WT
625-DNB-PHTH-WT
625-PAH-LOW-WT
625-PCP-WT
BOD-WT
CN-TOT-WT
CR-CR6-IC-WT
EC-SCREEN-WT
EC-WW-MF-WT
3,3-Dichlorobenzidine
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-Butyl Phthalate
EPA 8270 PAH (Low Level)
Pentachlorophenol
BOD
Cyanide, Total
Chromium +6
Conductivity Screen (Internal Use Only)
E. Coli
Methods Listed (if applicable):ALS Test Code Test Description
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
SW846 8270
SW846 8270
SW846 8270
SW846 8270
SW846 8270
APHA 5210 B
ISO 14403-2
EPA 7199
APHA 2510
SM 9222D
Method Reference** Matrix
Aqueous samples are extracted and extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD.
Aqueous samples are extracted and extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD.
Aqueous samples are extracted and extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD.
Aqueous samples are extracted and extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD. Depending on the analytical GC/MS column used benzo(j)fluoranthene may chromatographically co-elute with benzo(b)fluoranthene or benzo(k)fluoranthene.
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 5210B - "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)". All forms of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) are determined by diluting and incubating a sample for a specified time period, and measuring the oxygen depletion using a dissolved oxygen meter. Dissolved BOD (SOLUBLE) is determined by filtering the sample through a glass fibre filter prior to dilution. Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) is determined by adding a nitrification inhibitor to the diluted sample prior to incubation.
Total cyanide is determined by the combination of UV digestion and distillation. Cyanide is converted to cyanogen chloride by reacting with chloramine-T, the cyanogen chloride then reacts with a combination of barbituric acid and isonicotinic acid to form a highly colored complex.
When using this method, high levels of thiocyanate in samples can cause false positives at ~1-2% of the thiocyanate concentration. For samples with detectable cyanide analyzed by this method, ALS recommends analysis for thiocyanate to check for this potential interference
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" SW-846, Method 7199, published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The procedure involves analysis for chromium (VI) by ion chromatography using diphenylcarbazide in a sulphuric acid solution. Chromium (III) is calculated as the difference between the total chromium and the chromium (VI) results.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
Qualitative analysis of conductivity where required during preparation of other tests - e.g. TDS, metals, etc.
A 100 mL volume of sample is filtered through a membrane, the membrane is placed on mFC-BCIG agar and incubated at 44.5 –0 .2 °C for 24 – 2 h. Method ID: WT-TM-1200
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Reference Information27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)
L2295725 CONT’D....
20PAGE of
F-IC-N-WT
HG-T-CVAA-WT
MET-T-CCMS-WT
NP,NPE-LCMS-WT
OGG-SPEC-CALC-WT
OGG-SPEC-WT
P-T-COL-WT
PAH-EXTRA-WT
PAH-SUM-CALC-WT
PCB-WT
PH-WT
Fluoride in Water by IC
Total Mercury in Water by CVAAS
Total Metals in Water by CRC ICPMS
Nonylphenols and Ethoxylates by LC/MS-MS
Speciated Oil and Grease A/V Calc
Speciated Oil and Grease-Gravimetric
Total P in Water by Colour
Sanitary Sewer Use By-Law Additional PAH
TOTAL PAH’s
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
pH
Methods Listed (if applicable):ALS Test Code Test Description
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
EPA 300.1 (mod)
EPA 1631E (mod)
EPA 200.2/6020A (mod)
J. Chrom A849 (1999) p.467-482
CALCULATION
APHA 5520 B
APHA 4500-P PHOSPHORUS
SW846 8270
CALCULATION
EPA 8082
APHA 4500 H-Electrode
Method Reference** Matrix
Inorganic anions are analyzed by Ion Chromatography with conductivity and/or UV detection.
Water samples undergo a cold-oxidation using bromine monochloride prior to reduction with stannous chloride, and analyzed by CVAAS.
Water samples are digested with nitric and hydrochloric acids, and analyzed by CRC ICPMS.
Method Limitation (re: Sulfur): Sulfide and volatile sulfur species may not be recovered by this method.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).
Water samples are filtered and analyzed on LCMS/MS by direct injection.
Sample is extracted with hexane, sample speciation into mineral and animal/vegetable fractions is achieved via silica gel separation and is then determined gravimetrically.
The procedure involves an extraction of the entire water sample with hexane. Sample speciation into mineral and animal/vegetable fractions is achieved via silica gel separation and is then determined gravimetrically.
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-P "Phosphorus". Total Phosphorus is deteremined colourimetrically after persulphate digestion of the sample.
Total PAH represents the sum of all PAH analytes reported for a given sample. Note that regulatory agencies and criteria differ in their definitions of Total PAH in terms of the individual PAH analytes to be included.
PCBs are extracted from an aqueous sample at neutral pH with aliquots of dichloromethane using a modified separatory funnel technique. The extracts are analyzed by GC/MSD.
Water samples are analyzed directly by a calibrated pH meter.
Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011). Holdtime for samples under this regulation is 28 days
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Reference Information
GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS
Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of samplemg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of samplemg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/L - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million.< - Less than.D.L. - The reporting limit.N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.
Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.
Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information. Guideline limits are not adjusted for the hardness, pH or temperature of the sample (the most conservative values are used). Measurement uncertainty is not applied to test results prior to comparison with specified criteria values.
27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)
L2295725 CONT’D....
21PAGE of
PHENOLS-4AAP-WT
SOLIDS-TSS-WT
TKN-WT
VOC-ROU-HS-WT
XYLENES-SUM-CALC-WT
Phenol (4AAP)
Suspended solids
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Volatile Organic Compounds
Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations
Methods Listed (if applicable):ALS Test Code Test Description
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
EPA 9066
APHA 2540 D-Gravimetric
APHA 4500-Norg D
SW846 8260
CALCULATION
Method Reference**
**ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.
Matrix
An automated method is used to distill the sample. The distillate is then buffered to pH 9.4 which reacts with 4AAP and potassium ferricyanide to form a red complex which is measured colorimetrically.
A well-mixed sample is filtered through a weighed standard glass fibre filter and the residue retained is dried in an oven at 104–1°C for a minimum of four hours or until a constant weight is achieved.
This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-Norg "Nitrogen (Organic)". Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen is determined by sample digestion at 380 Celsius with analysis usingan automated colorimetric method.
Aqueous samples are analyzed by headspace-GC/MS.
Total xylenes represents the sum of o-xylene and m&p-xylene.
Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location
WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA
The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:
Chain of Custody Numbers:
17-820670
Job Reference: TT183004.700021
Quality Control ReportPage 1 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
625-33DCBENZIDINE-WT
625-BIS-2-PHTH-WT
625-DNB-PHTH-WT
625-PAH-LOW-WT
Water
Water
Water
Water
R4687031
R4687031
R4687031
R4686907
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
LCS
MB
LCS
MB
LCS
MB
LCS
WG3085921-2
WG3085921-1
WG3085921-2
WG3085921-1
WG3085921-2
WG3085921-1
WG3085921-2
3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine
3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Surrogate: 2-fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
Di-n-butylphthalate
Di-n-butylphthalate
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
88.8
<0.40
96.1
119.3
<2.0
87.3
96.1
108.4
<1.0
87.3
96.1
81.3
94.0
99.1
93.7
86.6
93.6
99.6
101.2
93.6
96.0
89.3
86.1
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
50-140
50-140
50-150
50-140
50-140
50-140
60-130
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
%
ug/L
%
%
ug/L
%
%
%
ug/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
0.4
40-130
2
40-130
40-130
1
40-130
40-130
15
Quality Control ReportPage 2 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
625-PAH-LOW-WT
625-PCP-WT
BOD-WT
Water
Water
Water
R4686907
R4687031
Batch
Batch
LCS
MB
LCS
MB
WG3085921-2
WG3085921-1
WG3085921-2
WG3085921-1
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Perylene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Acenaphthene
Anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Chrysene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Fluoranthene
Fluorene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Naphthalene
Perylene
Phenanthrene
Pyrene
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14
Pentachlorophenol
Pentachlorophenol
Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol
86.1
67.7
86.9
92.5
93.6
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010
82.0
79.9
84.8
<0.50
81.4
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
50-140
50-130
50-140
50-140
50-140
50-140
%
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
ug/L
%
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
40-130
40-130
0.5
40-150
15
Quality Control ReportPage 3 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
BOD-WT
CN-TOT-WT
CR-CR6-IC-WT
Water
Water
Water
R4688318
R4682852
R4682293
Batch
Batch
Batch
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
DUP
LCS
LCS
MB
MB
MS
MS
DUP
DUP
LCS
LCS
MB
MB
WG3084653-2
WG3084653-3
WG3084653-1
WG3084328-11
WG3084328-7
WG3084328-10
WG3084328-6
WG3084328-5
WG3084328-9
WG3084328-12
WG3084328-8
WG3084768-4
WG3084768-9
WG3084768-2
WG3084768-7
WG3084768-1
WG3084768-6
L2295690-1
L2295725-5
L2295776-2
L2295725-5
L2295776-2
WG3084768-3
WG3084768-8
BOD
BOD
BOD
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Cyanide, Total
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chromium, Hexavalent
<3.0
90.4
<2.0
<0.0020
<0.0020
86.1
85.8
<0.0020
<0.0020
81.3
82.6
0.103
<0.00050
98.9
100.2
<0.00050
<0.00050
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.6
N/A
20
20
20
20
20
85-115
80-120
80-120
70-130
70-130
80-120
80-120
mg/L
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
<3.0
<0.0020
<0.0020
0.104
<0.00050
2
0.002
0.002
0.0005
0.0005
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 4 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
CR-CR6-IC-WT
EC-WW-MF-WT
F-IC-N-WT
HG-T-CVAA-WT
Water
Water
Water
Water
R4682293
R4681780
R4682443
R4681107
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
MS
MS
DUP
MB
DUP
DUP
LCS
LCS
MB
MB
MS
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
WG3084768-10
WG3084768-5
WG3083999-3
WG3083999-1
WG3084625-10
WG3084625-15
WG3084625-12
WG3084625-7
WG3084625-11
WG3084625-6
WG3084625-14
WG3084625-9
WG3084177-3
WG3084177-2
WG3084177-1
WG3084177-4
WG3084768-8
WG3084768-3
L2295801-4
WG3084625-8
L2295756-1
L2295756-1
WG3084625-8
L2295297-1
L2295425-1
Chromium, Hexavalent
Chromium, Hexavalent
E. Coli
E. Coli
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Fluoride (F)
Mercury (Hg)-Total
Mercury (Hg)-Total
Mercury (Hg)-Total
97.5
N/A
0
0
0.047
0.271
102.0
101.4
<0.020
<0.020
100.0
99.2
<0.000010
91.8
<0.000010
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
22-JUN-19
22-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
0.0
1.1
2.9
N/A
65
20
20
20
70-130
-
90-110
90-110
75-125
75-125
80-120
%
%
CFU/100mL
CFU/100mL
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
MS-B
0
0.046
0.279
<0.000010
1
0.02
0.02
0.00001
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 5 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
HG-T-CVAA-WT
MET-T-CCMS-WT
Water
Water
R4681107
R4681083
Batch
Batch
MS
DUP
LCS
WG3084177-4
WG3083854-4
WG3083854-2
L2295425-1
WG3083854-3
Mercury (Hg)-Total
Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
75.6
<0.050
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.000050
<0.0050
0.0024
<0.010
<0.00050
0.518
0.00573
0.0066
<0.00050
<0.00050
<0.0010
<0.0030
<0.030
98.7
101.3
96.6
96.0
97.8
97.2
95.9
100.6
99.3
99.6
96.5
96.5
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.1
N/A
N/A
0.6
1.8
3.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
70-130
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
<0.050
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.000050
<0.0050
0.0024
<0.010
<0.00050
0.521
0.00584
0.0064
<0.00050
<0.00050
<0.0010
<0.0030
<0.030
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 6 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-T-CCMS-WT Water
R4681083BatchLCS
MB
MS
WG3083854-2
WG3083854-1
WG3083854-5 WG3083854-3
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
Aluminum (Al)-Total
Antimony (Sb)-Total
Arsenic (As)-Total
Cadmium (Cd)-Total
Chromium (Cr)-Total
Cobalt (Co)-Total
Copper (Cu)-Total
Lead (Pb)-Total
Manganese (Mn)-Total
Molybdenum (Mo)-Total
Nickel (Ni)-Total
Selenium (Se)-Total
101.3
98.0
95.7
93.7
<0.0050
<0.00010
<0.00010
<0.0000050
<0.00050
<0.00010
<0.0010
<0.000050
<0.00050
<0.000050
<0.00050
<0.000050
<0.000050
<0.00010
<0.00030
<0.0030
99.3
97.6
97.1
95.0
96.3
94.6
93.8
94.7
N/A
90.9
94.4
98.1
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
80-120
80-120
80-120
80-120
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
-
70-130
70-130
70-130
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
MS-B
0.005
0.0001
0.0001
0.000005
0.0005
0.0001
0.001
0.00005
0.0005
0.00005
0.0005
0.00005
0.00005
0.0001
0.0003
0.003
15
Quality Control ReportPage 7 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
MET-T-CCMS-WT
NP,NPE-LCMS-WT
OGG-SPEC-WT
P-T-COL-WT
Water
Water
Water
Water
R4681083
R4684448
R4682778
R4689242
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
WG3083854-5
WG3086043-3
WG3086043-2
WG3086043-1
WG3086043-4
WG3084489-2
WG3084489-1
WG3089387-3
WG3089387-2
WG3083854-3
L2296652-1
L2296652-1
L2294496-1
Silver (Ag)-Total
Tin (Sn)-Total
Titanium (Ti)-Total
Zinc (Zn)-Total
Nonylphenol
Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates
Nonylphenol Diethoxylates
Nonylphenol
Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates
Nonylphenol Diethoxylates
Nonylphenol
Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates
Nonylphenol Diethoxylates
Nonylphenol
Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates
Nonylphenol Diethoxylates
Oil and Grease, Total
Mineral Oil and Grease
Oil and Grease, Total
Mineral Oil and Grease
Phosphorus, Total
96.7
97.6
93.0
92.3
<1.0
<10
<0.50
101.0
106.0
80.0
<1.0
<2.0
<0.10
92.4
116.5
61.4
101.1
94.0
<5.0
<2.5
0.0245
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
N/A
N/A
N/A
18
30
30
30
20
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
75-125
75-125
75-125
50-150
50-150
50-150
70-130
70-130
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
%
%
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
<1.0
<10
<0.50
0.0206
1
2
0.1
5
2.5
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 8 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
P-T-COL-WT
PAH-EXTRA-WT
Water
Water
R4689242
R4689276
R4686762
Batch
Batch
Batch
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
LCS
MB
WG3089387-2
WG3089387-1
WG3089387-4
WG3089023-3
WG3089023-2
WG3089023-1
WG3089023-4
WG3085921-2
WG3085921-1
L2294496-1
L2295701-1
L2295701-1
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
Phosphorus, Total
Benzo(e)pyrene
1,3-Dinitropyrene
1,6-Dinitropyrene
Dibenz(a,h)acridine
1,8-Dinitropyrene
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
7H-Dibenzo(c,g)carbazole
Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene
Benzo(e)pyrene
1,3-Dinitropyrene
1,6-Dinitropyrene
Dibenz(a,h)acridine
1,8-Dinitropyrene
Dibenz(a,j)acridine
7H-Dibenzo(c,g)carbazole
Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene
Surrogate: d14-Terphenyl
101.2
<0.0030
107.6
0.125
105.8
<0.0030
N/A
91.4
125.1
101.4
91.8
92.4
66.7
80.3
93.8
<0.050
<1.0
<1.0
<0.050
<1.0
<0.050
<0.050
<0.050
64.2
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
5.0 20
80-120
70-130
80-120
-
60-130
60-130
60-130
60-130
60-130
60-130
60-130
60-130
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
MS-B
0.131
0.003
0.003
0.05
1
1
0.05
1
0.05
0.05
0.05
40-130
15
Quality Control ReportPage 9 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PCB-WT
PH-WT
PHENOLS-4AAP-WT
Water
Water
Water
R4687938
R4682005
R4682010
R4682391
R4684867
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
DUP
LCS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
WG3085982-2
WG3085982-1
WG3085307-3
WG3085307-1
WG3085312-3
WG3085312-1
WG3083973-11
WG3083973-10
WG3083973-9
WG3083973-12
WG3086182-3
WG3086182-2
WG3085307-2
WG3085312-2
L2295808-1
L2295808-1
L2294966-1
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl
pH
pH
pH
pH
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
103.4
90.4
109.2
99.4
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
<0.020
75.9
7.55
6.98
7.63
7.03
0.0035
95.0
<0.0010
93.2
<0.0010
95.4
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
22-JUN-19
22-JUN-19
22-JUN-19
22-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
21-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
0.06
0.00
6.1
N/A
0.2
0.2
20
20
65-130
65-130
65-130
65-130
6.9-7.1
6.9-7.1
85-115
75-125
85-115
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
pH units
pH units
pH units
pH units
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
7.61
7.63
0.0037
<0.0010
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
50-150
0.001
J
J
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 10 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
PHENOLS-4AAP-WT
SOLIDS-TSS-WT
TKN-WT
VOC-ROU-HS-WT
Water
Water
Water
Water
R4684867
R4686888
R4685548
R4688055
R4688206
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
Batch
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
LCS
MB
MS
DUP
WG3086182-1
WG3086182-4
WG3087101-3
WG3087101-2
WG3087101-1
WG3087177-3
WG3087177-2
WG3087177-1
WG3087177-4
WG3087806-3
WG3087806-2
WG3087806-1
WG3087806-4
WG3088410-4
L2294966-1
L2295779-10
L2293494-1
L2293494-1
L2293921-1
L2293921-1
WG3088410-3
Phenols (4AAP)
Phenols (4AAP)
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Total Suspended Solids
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
<0.0010
90.6
414
100.2
<2.0
0.17
101.9
<0.15
96.5
<0.15
105.2
<0.15
123.9
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
24-JUN-19
24-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
25-JUN-19
25-JUN-19
25-JUN-19
25-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
3.9
0.12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
20
0.3
20
30
30
30
75-125
85-115
75-125
70-130
75-125
70-130
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
mg/L
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
398
0.29
<0.15
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.001
2
0.15
0.15
J
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 11 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4688206BatchDUP
LCS
MB
WG3088410-4
WG3088410-1
WG3088410-2
WG3088410-3Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethylene
3.42
316
123
95.6
367
126
247
<0.50
97.8
104.1
108.0
105.4
105.3
102.7
103.1
104.0
104.0
101.0
106.8
104.8
106.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<2.0
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
6.5
6.3
4.7
9.5
9.5
8.5
8.9
N/A
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
3.65
337
129
105
N/A
137
269
<0.50
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
2
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 12 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4688206
R4688474
Batch
Batch
MB
MS
DUP
WG3088410-2
WG3088410-5
WG3088151-4
WG3088410-3
WG3088151-3
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
<0.50
<0.50
103.6
102.2
93.0
108.7
115.9
105.6
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
108.4
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<2.0
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
50-150
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
MS-B
MS-B
MS-B
MS-B
MS-B
MS-B
MS-B
MS-B
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<2.0
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
0.5
0.5
70-130
70-130
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 13 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4688474BatchDUP
LCS
MB
MS
WG3088151-4
WG3088151-1
WG3088151-2
WG3088151-5
WG3088151-3
WG3088151-3
Trichloroethylene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene
Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene
Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene
<0.50
87.8
101.9
107.0
100.8
102.3
100.9
102.9
93.2
94.4
90.0
111.6
95.7
84.7
114.1
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<2.0
<0.50
<1.0
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
107.5
106.8
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
N/A 30
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130
ug/L
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
%
%
<0.50
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1
0.5
2
0.5
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
70-130
70-130
RPD-NA
15
Quality Control ReportPage 14 of
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed
VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water
R4688474
R4689395
Batch
Batch
MS
LCS
MB
WG3088151-5
WG3089572-1
WG3089572-2
WG3088151-31,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Benzene
Chloroform
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Ethylbenzene
m+p-Xylenes
o-Xylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Trichloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
Trichloroethylene
89.2
101.6
104.4
101.2
103.7
98.7
104.3
90.0
91.4
87.5
107.0
93.0
78.0
113.8
113.5
<0.50
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
26-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
27-JUN-19
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
50-150
70-130
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
ug/L 0.5
15
Quality Control Report
Page 15 of
Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725
Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:
Description Qualifier
DLI
J
MS-B
RPD-NA
Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required to address Internal Standard response problems caused by matrix interference.Duplicate results and limits are expressed in terms of absolute difference.
Matrix Spike recovery could not be accurately calculated due to high analyte background in sample.
Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.
Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate
Legend:
The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.
Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.
Hold Time Exceedances:
All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times.
ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.
Client:
Contact:
Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder
15
Appendix HReport Limitations
Limitations
1. The work performed in the preparation of this report and the conclusions presented are subject to the
following:
(a) The Standard Terms and Conditions which form a part of our Professional Services Contract;
(b) The Scope of Services;
(c) Time and Budgetary limitations as described in our Contract; and
(d) The Limitations stated herein.
2. No other warranties or representations, either expressed or implied, are made as to the professional services
provided under the terms of our Contract, or the conclusions presented.
3. The conclusions presented in this report were based, in part, on visual observations of the site and attendant
structures. Our conclusions cannot and are not extended to include those portions of the site or structures
which were not reasonably available, in Wood’s opinion, for direct observation.
4. The environmental conditions at the site were assessed, within the limitations set out above, having due
regard for applicable environmental regulations as of the date of the inspection. A review of compliance by
past owners or occupants of the site with any applicable local, provincial or federal by-laws, orders-in-
council, legislative enactments and regulations was not performed.
5. The site history research included obtaining information from third parties and employees or agents of the
owner. No attempt has been made to verify the accuracy of any information provided, unless specifically
noted in our report.
6. Where testing was performed, it was carried out in accordance with the terms of our contract providing for
testing. Other substances, or different quantities of substances testing for, may be present on site and may
be revealed by different of other testing not provided for in our contract.
7. Because of the limitations referred to above, different environmental conditions from those stated in our
report may exist. Should such different conditions be encountered, Wood must be notified in order that it
may determine if modifications to the conclusions in the report are necessary.
8. The utilization of Wood’s services during the implementation of any remedial measures will allow Wood to
observe compliance with the conclusions and recommendations contained in the report. Wood’s
involvement will also allow for changes to be made as necessary to suit field conditions as they are
encountered.
9. This report is for the sole use of the party to whom it is addressed unless expressly stated otherwise in the
report or contract. Any use which any third party makes of the report, in whole or in part, or any reliance
thereon, or decisions made based on any information of conclusions in the report, is the sole responsibility
of such third party. Wood accepts no responsibility whatsoever for damages or loss of any nature or kind
suffered by any such third party as a result of actions taken or not taken or decisions made in reliance on the
report or anything set out therein.
10. This report is not to be given over to any third party for any purpose whatsoever without the written
permission of Wood.
11. Provided that the report is still reliable, and less than 12 months old, Wood will issue a third-party reliance
letter to parties client identifies in writing, upon payment of the then current fee for such letters. All third
parties relying on Wood’s report, by such reliance agree to be bound by our proposal and Wood’s standard
reliance letter. Wood’s standard reliance letter indicates that in no event shall Wood be liable for any
damages, howsoever arising, relating to third-party reliance on Wood’s report. No reliance by any party is
permitted without such agreement.