appendix a geotechnical borehole logs (assignment 16-12)...borehole details as presented, do not...

147
Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)

Upload: others

Post on 15-Mar-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Appendix AGeotechnical Borehole Logs

(Assignment 16-12)

Page 2: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

141.9

141.7

140.6

137.8

0.2

0.4

1.4

4.3

11

30

26

36

29

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs

1

2

3

4

5

6

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

about 180 mm ASPHALT

dark brownGravelly Sand FILL

trace silt and clay, moist

dark brown to grey Clayey Silt FILL

trace sand

brown to brownish grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, sand pockets

very stiff to hard

--------grey

End of Borehole

100

67

100

67

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

146 Gracefield Avenue E:305645 N:4840891

10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

10 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 142.1 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 1

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

141

140

139

138

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

Scale: 1 : 53

2

13

16

18

14

17

13

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 3: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

144.2

143.5

140.7

0.2

0.9

3.7

3

11

14

32

31

1

2

3

4

5

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

23 48 26

about 200 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt,moist

brown to grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

stiff to hard

--------grey

End of Borehole

100

83

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

136 Gracefield Avenue E:305710 N:4840908

10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

10 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 144.4 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 2

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

144

143

142

141

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

Scale: 1 : 53

7

18

18

12

17

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 4: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

148.3

147.8

144.9

0.2

0.8

3.7

23

40

23

36

SS2 - tested for M/I and PHCs

1

2

3

4

5

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

about 200 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt,moist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,

very stiff to hard

End of Borehole

100

83

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

120 Gracefield Avenue E:305795 N:4840933

10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

10 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 148.5 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 3

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

148

147

146

145

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

Scale: 1 : 53

3

14

12

15

13

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 5: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

151.2

150.6

147.7

0.2

0.8

3.7

2

16

40

32

46

1

2

3

4

5

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS 27 50 21

about 185 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt,moist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

very stiff to hard

--------grey

End of Borehole

100

100

100

92

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

108 Gracefield Avenue E:305877 N:4840961

10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

10 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 151.4 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 4

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

151

150

149

148

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

Scale: 1 : 53

8

15

12

13

12

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 6: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

153.4

153.2

151.3

149.9

0.1

0.3

2.2

3.7

7

10

26

44

SS2 - tested for M/I and PHCs

Composite Sample - tested for TCLP

1

2

3

4

5

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

about 120 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

light brown Silty Sand FILL silty clay pockets

moist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

very stiff to hard

End of Borehole

75

25

100

83

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

96 Gracefield Avenue E:305940 N:4840980

10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

10 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 153.5 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 5

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

153

152

151

150

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

Scale: 1 : 53

3

15

12

17

14

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 7: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

155.6

154.9

152.1

0.2

0.9

3.7

2

12

33

40

30

1

2

3

4

5

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

28 51 19

about 190 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt,moist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

stiff to hard

--------grey

End of Borehole

100

100

100

83

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

80 Gracefield Avenue E:306013 N:4841002

10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

10 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 155.8 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 6

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

155

154

153

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

Scale: 1 : 53

6

15

15

12

13

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 8: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

158.0

157.8

156.8

154.5

0.2

0.4

1.4

3.7

1

8

20

25

39

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs

1

2

3

4

5

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

32 50 17

about 180 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

dark brown Silty Sand FILL

trace gravel,moist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

very stiff to hard

End of Borehole

67

50

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

72 Gracefield Avenue E:306094 N:4841027

10 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

10 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 158.2 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 7

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

158

157

156

155

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

Scale: 1 : 53

3

5

18

16

14

14

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 9: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

161.3

161.1

160.7

159.0

157.8

0.2

0.4

0.8

2.4

3.7

2

6

7

14

31

1

2

3

4

5

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS 30 50 18

about 200 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Sandy Gravel FILL

trace silt, moist

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

light brownSilty Sand FILL

moist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravelstiff to hard

End of Borehole

75

83

83

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

56 Gracefield Avenue E:306177 N:4841049

12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

12 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 161.5 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 8

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

161

160

159

158

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

Scale: 1 : 53

2

4

5

7

13

12

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 10: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

163.3

163.1

162.7

159.8

0.2

0.4

0.8

3.7

3

5

1

16

17

26

27

SS2 - tested for M/I and PHCs

1

2

3

4

5

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

30

29

31

51

49

51

16

17

17

about 160 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Sandy Gravel FILL

trace silt, moist

light brownGravelly Sand FILL

moist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

very stiff

End of Borehole

92

100

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

40 Gracefield Avenue E:306263 N:4841076

12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

12 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 163.5 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 9

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

163

162

161

160

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

Scale: 1 : 53

3

5

14

14

12

12

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 11: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

162.1

161.9

161.5

155.5

0.2

0.4

0.8

6.7

2

1

3

5

14

13

13

15

18

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

31

29

27

51

52

52

16

18

18

about 160 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

light brownSilty Sand FILL

trace gravel, moist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

firm to very stiff

--------grey

100

83

100

83

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

32 Gracefield Avenue E:306337 N:4841099

12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

12 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 162.2 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 10

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

162

161

160

159

158

157

156

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

4

6

14

13

14

13

11

14

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 3.3 m.

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 12: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

160.7

158.6

156.7

154.1

0.2

2.2

4.1

6.7

19

11

9

6

13

22

SS4 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs

SS6 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

about 150 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, silty clay pocketsmoist

greySilty Clay FILL

some sand, trace gravel

brownSANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

stiff to very stiff

End of Borehole

75

67

83

67

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

22 Gracefield Avenue E:306406 N:4841121

12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

12 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 160.8 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 11

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

160

159

158

157

156

155

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

4

5

5

16

23

16

14

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 13: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

162.5

162.3

159.8

153.0

0.2

0.4

3.0

9.8

1

2

15

19

7

22

15

25

21

19

SS8 - tested for Corrosivity

Composite Sample - tested for TCLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

24

29

52

49

23

20

about 200 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

brown to greyClayey Silt FILL

trace gravel

--------organics

grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

stiff to very stiff

100

96

29

58

100

100

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Intersection of Gracefield and Keele E:306482N:4841147

21 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

21 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 162.8 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 12

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

162

161

160

159

158

157

156

155

154

153

Page: 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Scale: 1 : 53

Continued on Next Page

3

16

15

20

22

15

15

12

13

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 7.9 m.

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 14: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 5.5 m Sand Filter: 5.5 - 9.1 m Screen: 6.1 - 9.1 m Sand: 9.1 - 9.8 m

Groundwater Level Measurement: 2 November 2018 7.9 m

Project Location:

Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 12

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

Page: 2 of 2

Scale: 1 : 53

Page 15: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

163.3

162.9

156.5

0.2

0.6

7.0

1

7

8

14

18

23

8

24

15

SS4 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS 31 50 18

about 230 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

brown to mottledSilty Clay FILL

mixed with sand pockets

--------organics

--------possibly cinder

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

trace sand pocketsstiff to hard

75

58

100

100

100

58

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

2460 Keele Street E:306475 N:4841228

21 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

21 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 163.5 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 13

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

163

162

161

160

159

158

157

156

155

154

Page: 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Scale: 1 : 53

Continued on Next Page

1

21

16

15

15

18

16

19

14

15

Groundwater depth observed on 21/11/2018 at a depth of: 12.7 m.

Groundwater encountered on completion of drilling on 21/09/2018 at a depth of: 9.1 m.

Page 16: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

147.615.8

7

14

23

30

39

SS12 - tested for Corrosivity

10

11

12

13

SS

SS

SS

SS 32 46 15

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

trace sand pocketsstiff to hard

--------grey

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 11.6 m Sand Filter: 11.6 - 15.2 m Screen: 12.2 - 15.2 m Sand: 15.2 - 15.8 m

Groundwater Level Measurement: 21 November 2018 12.7 m

42

100

100

100

Project Location:

Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 13

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

153

152

151

150

149

148

Page: 2 of 2

11

12

13

14

15

Scale: 1 : 53

20

16

14

11

Page 17: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

153.4

150.4

149.2

148.9

145.1

0.2

3.2

4.4

4.7

8.5

6

2

5

13

12

12

10

11

14

10

27

SS1 - tested for OC-Pesticides

SS3 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs

SS7 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

29

32

46

62

19

4

about 200 mm TOPSOIL

brown Sandy Silt FILL

trace clayey silt and topsoil pockets, trace gravel moist

brownClayey Silt FILL

trace sand, trace gravel

black ORGANIC SILTY CLAY

trace sand pockets, trace rootletsstiff

greySANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILLtrace gravel

stiff

greySANDY SILT / SAND AND SILT TILL

trace to some clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulderscompact to very dense

moist

67

92

100

67

83

100

100

92

83

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Backyard of 2460 Keele Street E:306412N:4841202

12 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

12 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 153.6 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 14

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

153

152

151

150

149

148

147

146

145

144

Page: 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Scale: 1 : 53

Continued on Next Page

16

12

10

8

13

16

12

12

12

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 7.0 m.

Groundwater encountered on completion of drilling on 12/09/2018 at a depth of: 4.6 m.

Page 18: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

139.314.3

6

2

25

37

68

10

11

12

SS

SS

SS

35

37

53

48

6

13

greySANDY SILT / SAND AND SILT TILL

trace to some clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulderscompact to very dense

moist

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 10.1 m Sand Filter: 10.1 - 13.7 m Screen: 10.7 - 13.7 m Sand: 13.7 - 14.3 m

Groundwater Level Measurement: 2 November 2018 7.0 m

75

83

83

Project Location:

Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 14

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

143

142

141

140

Page: 2 of 2

11

12

13

14

Scale: 1 : 53

11

14

9

Page 19: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

153.4

153.0

150.1

146.4

0.2

0.6

3.5

7.2

3

5

18

7

6

3

7

16

18

20

18

SS4 - tested for M/I and PHCs

SS7 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

34

33

47

53

16

9

brownSandy Gravel FILL

moistdark grey

Sandy Silt FILL trace gravel, moist

brown to dark brownClayey Silt FILL

trace sand, trace gravel

greySANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILLtrace gravel

very stiff

greySANDY SILT / SAND AND SILT TILL

trace clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulders

compactmoist

58

75

75

42

83

100

83

83

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Track Mounted Drill

North Park E:306518 N:4841225

24 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

24 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 153.6 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 15

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

153

152

151

150

149

148

147

146

145

144

Page: 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Scale: 1 : 53

Continued on Next Page

15

17

17

33

18

15

12

12

14

12

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 4.9 m.

Groundwater encountered on completion of drilling on 24/09/2018 at a depth of: 3.0 m.

Page 20: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

142.311.3

2710SS

greySANDY SILT / SAND AND SILT TILL

trace clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulders

compactmoist

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 7.0 m Sand Filter: 7.0 - 10.7 m Screen: 7.7 - 10.7 m Sand: 10.7 - 11.3 m

Groundwater Level Measurement: 2 November 2018 4.9 m

100

Project Location:

Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-12

Gracefield Avenue, Keele Street and Queen's Greenbelt

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 15

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

143

Page: 2 of 2

11

Scale: 1 : 53

8

Page 21: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Appendix BGeotechnical Borehole Logs

(Assignment 16-22)

Page 22: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

156.8

153.9

149.6

147.2

0.2

3.0

7.3

9.8

22

6

7

7

8

25

46

38

39

35

SS1 - tested for OCP

SS2 - tested for M/ISS2 - tested for Corrosivity

SS3 - tested for PHCs

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

73 (5)

about 150 mm TOPSOIL

brown Sandy Silt FILL

trace clayey silt pocketsmoist

brown to dark brown Sand FILL

trace siltmoist

--------with rubber pieces

grey SAND

gravelly, trace siltdense

wet

75

83

100

100

83

100

92

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Track Mounted Drill

Roding Park, South E:305285 N:4842680

24 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

24 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 156.9 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 16

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

156

155

154

153

152

151

150

149

148

Page: 1 of 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Scale: 1 : 53

Continued on Next Page

16

13

23

22

5

5

5

10

10

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 6.5 m.

Groundwater depth during drilling on 24/09/2018 at a depth of: 4.6 m.

Page 23: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 5.5 m Sand Filter: 5.5 - 9.1 m Screen: 6.1 - 9.1 m Sand: 9.1 - 9.8 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 6.5 m

Project Location:

Project Name:Project Number: TT183004 Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and Keele Street

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 16

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

Page: 2 of 2

Scale: 1 : 53

Page 24: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

159.4

155.6

152.9

0.2

4.0

6.7

-

4

12

8

8

24

36

53

SS1 - tested for OCP

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs

SS3 - tested for Corrosivity

Composite Sample - tested for TCLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS 75 (25)

about 180 mm TOPSOIL

brown Sandy Silt / Silty Sand FILL

trace silty clay pocketsmoist

brown SAND

trace to some silt,dense to very dense

moist

End of Borehole

83

100

100

100

100

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Track Mounted Drill

Roding Park, Middle E:305403 N:4842812

24 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

24 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 159.6 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 17

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

159

158

157

156

155

154

153

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

18

11

10

8

9

6

5

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 25: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

170.9

170.1

165.4

164.5

0.2

0.9

5.6

6.6

2

5

5

7

9

21

33

18

34

SS6 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

29

29

35

49

47

48

20

19

12

about 180 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace siltmoist

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

sand pocketsfirm to hard

grey SAND AND SILT TILL

some clay, trace gravel, trace cobbles/bouldersdensemoist

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.6 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 2.5 m

75

83

100

100

100

89

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

54 Ianhall Road E:305577 N:4842858

17 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

17 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 171.1 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 18

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

170

169

168

167

166

165

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

3

14

19

15

14

19

9

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 2.5 m.

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 26: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

173.5

172.7

172.2

169.7

166.5

165.4

0.1

0.9

1.4

4.0

7.2

8.2

2

3

13

27

31

28

14

7

15

SS2 - tested for M/I and PHCs

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

30

20

50

47

18

30

about 130 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace siltmoist

brown SILTY CLAY

trace sand,stiff

brown to greyish brown SANDY SLITY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel and sand pockets

very stiff to hard

--------grey

grey SILTY CLAY

trace sand, trace oxidizationstiff to firm

grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,

stiff to very stiff

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 4.0 m Sand Filter: 4.0 - 7.6 m Screen: 4.6 - 7.6 m Sand: 7.6 - 8.2 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 4.3 m

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Intersection of Ianhall Road and Gade DriveE:305566 N:4842927

17 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

17 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 173.6 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 19

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

173

172

171

170

169

168

167

166

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Scale: 1 : 53

3

13

20

12

14

14

18

20

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 4.3 m.

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 27: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

169.6

169.3

165.7

163.4

163.2

0.2

0.5

4.1

6.4

6.6

-

18

9

4

5

10

15

33

60

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

10 71 19

about 200 mm ASPHALT

brown Sandy Gravel FILL

trace silt, moist

dark brown Silty Sand FILL

trace clayey silt pocketsmoist

brown CLAYEY SILT

trace to some sand,stiff to hard

brownish grey SAND AND SILT TILL

some clay, trace gravel, trace cobbles/bouldersvery dense, moist

End of Borehole

41

25

67

67

100

58

83

83

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Intersection of Gade Drive and Roding StreetE:305479 N:4842888

25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

25 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 169.8 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 20

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

169

168

167

166

165

164

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

5

16

20

13

13

19

17

20

5

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 28: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

171.0

170.6

163.8

162.9

0.2

0.5

7.3

8.2

-

19

12

8

6

3

4

5

8

13

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS 21 56 23

about 160 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moistdark brown to brown

Clayey Silt / Silty Clay FILL trace sand

--------rotten wood pieces

trace organics

brown SILTY CLAY

sandy,stiff

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 4.0 m Sand Filter: 4.0 - 7.6 m Screen: 4.6 - 7.6 m Sand: 7.6 - 8.2 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:21 November 2018 Dry

88

42

25

42

100

75

25

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Entrance of Roding Park E:305446 N:4842942

25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

25 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 171.1 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 21

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

171

170

169

168

167

166

165

164

163

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Scale: 1 : 53

10

13

16

16

18

23

23

20

14

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 29: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

172.2

171.8

168.2

166.7

164.4

0.2

0.5

4.1

5.6

7.9

<1

3

-

14

14

12

14

57

50 /150mm

50 /150mm

SS7 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

15

38

75

40

48

45

11

(25)

about 180 mm TOPSOIL

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moistbrown

SILT AND CLAY some sand,

stiff

grey SANDY AND SILT TILL some clay, trace gravel,trace cobbles/boulders

very densemoist

grey SAND

some silt, trace to some cobbles / bouldersvery dense

moist

End of Borehole

92

83

100

100

100

83

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Intersection of Roding Street and Nash DriveE:305440 N:4842982

25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

25 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 172.3 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 22

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

172

171

170

169

168

167

166

165

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Scale: 1 : 53

150 mm

50

150 mm

50

5

16

15

17

22

9

3

6

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 30: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

172.2

171.5

168.3

165.7

0.2

0.9

4.1

6.7

1

15

5

3

4

30

20

SS3 - tested for M/I, PHCs and PCBs

Composite Sample - tested for TCLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS 27 43 29

about 230 mm ASPHALT

brown Sandy Gravel FILL

trace silt,moist

dark grey Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel, trace topsoil

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

hard to very stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 4.0 m Sand Filter: 4.0 - 6.1 m Screen: 4.6 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.7 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 1.7 m

75

67

42

58

83

67

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

87 Nash Drive E:305531 N:4843016

25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

25 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 172.4 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 23

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

172

171

170

169

168

167

166

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

5

21

20

34

23

13

18

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 1.7 m.

Groundwater depth during drilling on 25/09/2018 at a depth of: 4.6 m.

Page 31: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

174.9

174.6

173.1

168.4

0.2

0.5

2.0

6.7

5

12

16

21

22

10

14

SS6 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS 29 47 19

about 160 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

dark grey Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel, trace organics and brickpieces

brown SANDY SLITY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

very stiff to stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

83

42

100

83

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

70 Nash Drive E:305629 N:4843047

25 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

25 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 175.1 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 24

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

174

173

172

171

170

169

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

4

19

24

13

12

14

14

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 32: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

178.0

177.7

176.2

171.6

0.2

0.5

2.0

6.6

3

4

14

16

22

30

16

16

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

27

26

50

51

20

19

about 140 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

dark grey Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel and sand pockets

very stiff to hard

--------grey

End of Borehole

100

100

100

79

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Track Mounted Drill

53 Nash Drive E:305739 N:4843080

11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

11 Oct 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 178.2 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 25

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

178

177

176

175

174

173

172

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

3

15

15

15

16

14

12

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 33: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

181.1

180.9

179.1

174.6

0.2

0.4

2.2

6.7

2

2

8

12

27

26

28

11

SS5 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

27

29

51

50

20

19

about 180 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

brownClayey Silt / Silty Clay FILL

trace sand

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

very stiff to stiff

End of Borehole

100

100

100

42

100

83

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

43 Bunnell Crescent E:305870 N:4843226

26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

26 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 181.3 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 26

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

181

180

179

178

177

176

175

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

5

22

15

12

15

14

13

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 34: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

180.0

179.8

178.2

173.5

0.3

0.4

2.0

6.7

2

1

17

13

16

19

14

12

SS3 - tested for M/I and PHCs

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

33

25

52

54

13

20

about 250 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

dark grey Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel,

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

very stiff to stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

100

100

100

75

100

42

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

60 Bunnell Crescent E:305804 N:4843183

11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

11 Oct 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 180.2 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 27

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

180

179

178

177

176

175

174

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

3

16

17

14

10

13

13

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 35: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

178.9

178.7

178.2

176.9

172.4

0.2

0.4

0.9

2.2

6.7

2

3

17

15

21

14

8

10

SS6 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

29

26

51

51

18

20

about 200 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

dark grey Clayey Silt FILL

trace sand and gravel

brownSILTY CLAY

trace to some sand, trace oxidizationvery stiff

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel

very stiff to firm

--------grey

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.7 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 1.5 m

75

67

42

58

83

67

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Intersection of Nash Drive and Bunnell CrescentE:305815 N:4843105

26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

26 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.1 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 28

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

179

178

177

176

175

174

173

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

3

15

14

13

14

14

15

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 1.5 m.

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 36: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

179.5

179.3

177.8

172.9

0.2

0.4

1.8

6.7

4

12

16

21

22

10

14

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs and PCBs

Composite Sample - tested for TCLP

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS 30 49 17

about 150 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

brown Silty Clay FILL

trace sand, contains sand pockets

brown to brownish grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

very stiff to stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.7 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 2.4 m

83

42

100

83

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Intersection of Bunnell Crescent and HallsportCrescent E:305835 N:4843013

26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

26 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.6 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 29

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

179

178

177

176

175

174

173

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

6

17

16

13

12

12

12

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 2.4 m.

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 37: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

179.1

178.9

177.2

172.6

0.2

0.4

2.1

6.7

1

1

6

12

11

15

23

17

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

22

24

58

55

19

20

about 150 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

dark grey Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,

stiff to very stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

83

83

100

83

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

27 Hallsport Crescent E:305799 N:4842995

26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

26 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.3 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 30

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

179

178

177

176

175

174

173

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

2

17

16

16

14

12

12

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 38: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

179.1

178.9

177.1

172.7

0.2

0.4

2.2

6.6

3

20

12

26

26

17

21

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS 26 52 19

about 180 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

dark grey Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravelcontains organics

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

very stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.6 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 1.8 m

75

83

100

100

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

11 Hallsport Crescent E:305828 N:4842923

26 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

26 Oct 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.3 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 31

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

179

178

177

176

175

174

173

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

4

18

26

14

14

13

13

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 1.8 m.

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 39: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

179.4

179.2

177.1

172.8

0.2

0.4

2.4

6.7

1

4

7

12

8

12

11

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs

SS5 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

24 55 20

about 150 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

gark grey Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel, trace oxidization

firm to stiff--------

grey

End of Borehole

83

92

100

83

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

Intersection of Hallsport Crescent and E:305867N:4842938

26 Sep 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

26 Sep 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 179.5 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 32

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

179

178

177

176

175

174

173

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

4

15

17

14

14

12

12

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 40: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

174.8

174.7

172.6

168.5

0.2

0.4

2.4

6.6

1

4

5

17

17

26

18

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

26 53 20

about 200 mm ASPHALT

dark brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

dark grey Silty Clay FILL

mix with sand and gravel

brown to grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,

very stiff

End of Borehole

Monitoring Well Installation Details (50 mm Dia.): Concrete: 0 - 0.15 m Sand: 0.15 - 0.3 m Bentonite: 0.3 - 2.5 m Sand Filter: 2.5 - 6.1 m Screen: 3.1 - 6.1 m Sand: 6.1 - 6.6 m

Groundwater Level Measurement:2 November 2018 4.6 m

58

83

100

83

100

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

54 Dorking Crescent E:305502 N:4843112

26 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

26 Oct 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 175.1 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 33

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

174

173

172

171

170

169

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

2

16

22

14

13

14

13

Groundwater depth observed on 02/11/2018 at a depth of: 4.6 m.

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 41: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

176.0

175.8

173.8

173.5

169.7

0.2

0.4

2.4

2.7

6.6

3

6

4

20

13

15

15

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

26 45 26

about 180 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

brown Sandy Silt FILL trace gravel, moist

brown Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel

brown SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,

stiff to very stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

83

75

67

100

75

56

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

42 Dorking Crescent E:305562 N:4843130

11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

11 Oct 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 176.2 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 34

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

176

175

174

173

172

171

170

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

4

26

19

16

12

16

14

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 42: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

177.3177.2

175.3

170.9

0.20.3

2.2

6.6

2

5

5

35

17

19

13

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCsand PAHs

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

27 52 19

about 200 mm ASPHALT

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

mottled Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel,trace organics

brown to brownish grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,hard to stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

75

58

75

100

75

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

34 Dorking Crescent E:305633 N:4843152

11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

11 Oct 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 177.5 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 35

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

177

176

175

174

173

172

171

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

4

12

25

24

13

13

13

13

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 43: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

178.5178.4

178.3

177.5

172.2

0.20.3

0.5

1.2

6.6

1

12

17

25

26

21

26

SS5 - tested for Corrosivity

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

AS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS 29 51 19

about 200 mm ASPHALT

brown Sandy Gravel FILL

trace silt, moist

brown Gravelly Sand FILL

trace silt, moist

brown Silty Clay FILL

trace sand

brown to brownish grey SANDY SILTY CLAY /

SANDY CLAYEY SILT TILL trace gravel,

very stiff

--------grey

End of Borehole

100

100

83

75

83

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Truck Mounted Drill

20 Dorking Crescent E:305705 N:4843164

11 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augering

Logged by:

11 Oct 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 178.7 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 36

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

178

177

176

175

174

173

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

Scale: 1 : 53

13

14

15

17

14

12

13

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 44: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

162.8

162.5

160.5

155.9

154.8

0.2

0.4

2.4

7.0

8.1

-

6

11

9

20

6

6

6

77

SS1 - tested for OCP

SS2 - tested for M/I, PHCs, VOCs,PAHs and PCBs

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

SS

80 (20)

about 160 mm TOPSOIL

dark brown Sandy Silt FILL

trace clay and gravel, trace rootletsmoist

dark brown Silty Clay FILL

trace sand and gravel

trace rootlets

brownSand FILL

moist

brown SAND

trace to some silt,very dense

moist

End of Borehole

83

83

100

75

83

100

67

100

Project Client: Drilling Method:

Project Number:

Date Started:

Project Name: Drilling Machine:

Project Location:

Drilling Location:TT183004

Roding Park, Various Roads Between Roding Park and KeeleStreet

Date Completed:

Geotechnical Investigation BFPP4, Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

Track Mounted Drill

Roding Park, Headwall E:305398 N:4842927

26 Oct 18 1, 11/3/19

Reviewed by:

150 mm Solid Stem Augers

Logged by:

26 Oct 18 Revision No.:

WJ

Compiled by: MD

Moctar Diallo

SOIL SAMPLING

Sam

ple

Type

Sam

ple

Num

ber

LITHOLOGY PROFILE FIELD TESTING

Recovery

(%

)

Litholo

gy P

lot

LAB TESTING

COMMENTS&

GRAIN SIZEDISTRIBUTION

(%)

SP

T 'N

' / R

QD

(%

)

(m)

(m)

EL

EV

AT

IONDESCRIPTION

20 40 60 80

Intact

INS

TR

UM

EN

TA

TIO

NIN

ST

ALLA

TIO

N

Remould

PenetrationTesting

SPT PPT DCPT

* Undrained Shear Strength (kPa)

DE

PT

H RemouldIntact

Nilcon Vane*MTO Vane*

Geodetic Ground Surface Elevation: 162.9 m

COV (ppm)

COV (LEL) TOV (LEL)

PlasticCLSISAGR

Liquid

WP

20 40 60 80

Soil Vapour Reading

W WL

TOV (ppm)

100 200 300 400

2 4 6 8

Wood E&IS, a Division of WoodCanada Limited

50 Vogell Road, Units 3 & 4Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3K6CanadaTel. No.: (905) 415-2632www.woodplc.com

RECORD OF BOREHOLE No. BH 37

Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require interpretative assistance froma qualified Geotechnical Engineer. Also, borehole information should be read in conjunction with the geotechnical report for which it wascommissioned and the accompanying'Explanation of Borehole Log'.

162

161

160

159

158

157

156

155

Page: 1 of 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Scale: 1 : 53

13

39

30

16

15

7

10

9

4

No freestanding groundwater measured in open borehole on completion of drilling.

Page 45: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Appendix CHydraulic Conductivity

Test Results(Assignment 16-12)

Page 46: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

0. 4. 8. 12. 16. 20.0.01

0.1

Time (min)

Displacement

(m)

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

Data Set: P:\...\BH 10_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 11:59:36

PROJECT INFORMATION

Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 10Test Date: 10/05/2019

AQUIFER DATA

Saturated Thickness: 2.45 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1

WELL DATA (BH 10)

Initial Displacement: 0.08 m Static Water Column Height: 2.45 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 2.45 m Screen Length: 1.53 mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m

SOLUTION

Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice

K = 1.103E-6 m/sec y0 = 0.0623 m

Page 47: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

0. 100. 200. 300. 400. 500.0.01

0.1

1.

Time (min)

Nor

ma

lize

d H

ead

(m

/m)

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

Data Set: Z:\...\BH 13_risingheadtest.aqtDate: 06/25/19 Time: 16:38:27

PROJECT INFORMATION

Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 13Test Date: 6/5/2019

AQUIFER DATA

Saturated Thickness: 1.79 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1

WELL DATA (BH 13)

Initial Displacement: 1.12 m Static Water Column Height: 1.79 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 1.79 m Screen Length: 1.79 mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m

SOLUTION

Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice

K = 8.371E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.955 m

Page 48: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

0. 100. 200. 300. 400. 500.0.01

0.1

1.

Time (min)

Normalized

Head

(m/

m)

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

Data Set: P:\...\BH 14_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 12:01:29

PROJECT INFORMATION

Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 14Test Date: 10/05/2019

AQUIFER DATA

Saturated Thickness: 6.83 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1

WELL DATA (BH 14)

Initial Displacement: 2.04 m Static Water Column Height: 6.83 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 6.83 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m

SOLUTION

Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice

K = 8.974E-8 m/sec y0 = 2.716 m

Page 49: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

0. 500. 1000. 1.5E+3 2.0E+3 2.5E+3 3.0E+30.01

0.1

1.

Time (min)

Normalized

Head

(m/

m)

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

Data Set: P:\...\BH 15_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 12:11:19

PROJECT INFORMATION

Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 15Test Date: 27/05/2019

AQUIFER DATA

Saturated Thickness: 5.86 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1

WELL DATA (BH 15)

Initial Displacement: 3.12 m Static Water Column Height: 5.86 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 5.86 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m

SOLUTION

Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice

K = 8.078E-8 m/sec y0 = 2.672 m

Page 50: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Appendix DHydraulic Conductivity

Test Results(Assignment 16-22)

Page 51: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Constant Head Calculations

BFPP4 Assignment 16-22

Hydro-Geotechnical InvestigationTT183004.7000

Q (L/min) Q (m3/s) L (m) r (m) H (m) K (m/s) GWL: 6.39 mbgs

0.04 4.1E-05 3 0.025 0.25 4.2E-05

Q= average pumping rateL= length of screen over which drawdown occurs, in this case taken as the length of the confined soil unitr= well radiusH= drawdown, difference between static level and average water level during the constant head period of test

K=

GWL= groundwater level

Constant Head Test Analysis for BH 16

Q/(2πLH) x ln(L/r)

Page 52: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.0.01

0.1

1.

Time (min)

Normalized

Head

(m/

m)

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

Data Set: P:\...\BH 18_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 11:44:25

PROJECT INFORMATION

Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 18Test Date: 6/5/2019

AQUIFER DATA

Saturated Thickness: 2.35 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1

WELL DATA (BH 18)

Initial Displacement: 0.2 m Static Water Column Height: 2.35 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 2.35 m Screen Length: 2.35 mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m

SOLUTION

Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice

K = 7.749E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.1795 m

Page 53: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

0. 750. 1.5E+3 2.25E+3 3.0E+30.01

0.1

1.

Time (min)

Normalized

Head

(m/

m)

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

Data Set: P:\...\BH 19_risingheadtest_BF - kbg.aqtDate: 06/26/19 Time: 11:41:43

PROJECT INFORMATION

Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 19Test Date: 6/5/2019

AQUIFER DATA

Saturated Thickness: 3.18 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1

WELL DATA (BH 19)

Initial Displacement: 0.22 m Static Water Column Height: 3.18 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 3.18 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m

SOLUTION

Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice

K = 1.862E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.1641 m

Page 54: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

0. 40. 80. 120. 160. 200.0.01

0.1

1.

Time (min)

Nor

ma

lize

d H

ead

(m

/m)

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

Data Set: Z:\...\BH 29_risingheadtest.aqtDate: 06/25/19 Time: 16:37:13

PROJECT INFORMATION

Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 29Test Date: 5/17/2019

AQUIFER DATA

Saturated Thickness: 4.41 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1

WELL DATA (BH 29)

Initial Displacement: 0.68 m Static Water Column Height: 4.41 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 4.41 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m

SOLUTION

Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice

K = 8.527E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.5818 m

Page 55: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

0. 50. 100. 150. 200. 250.0.01

0.1

1.

Time (min)

Nor

ma

lize

d H

ead

(m

/m)

WELL TEST ANALYSIS

Data Set: Z:\...\BH 33_risingheadtest.aqtDate: 06/25/19 Time: 16:38:49

PROJECT INFORMATION

Company: Wood E&ISClient: CIMAProject: TT183004.7000Location: BFPP4 Area 16Test Well: BH 33Test Date: 5/17/2019

AQUIFER DATA

Saturated Thickness: 4.01 m Anisotropy Ratio (Kz/Kr): 0.1

WELL DATA (BH 33)

Initial Displacement: 0.13 m Static Water Column Height: 4.01 mTotal Well Penetration Depth: 4.01 m Screen Length: 3. mCasing Radius: 0.025 m Well Radius: 0.076 m

SOLUTION

Aquifer Model: Unconfined Solution Method: Bouwer-Rice

K = 7.633E-8 m/sec y0 = 0.1515 m

Page 56: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Appendix EDewatering Rate Calculations

(Assignment 16-12)

Page 57: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.1 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 5.1 3.9 1.0 2.9 9.1 2.9

2.91.1E-06 5.10 3.90 1.00 2.90 9.1 2.91.1E-06 5.10 3.90 1.00 2.90 9.1 2.9

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

K Arithmetic Mean

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.

Comments

MaximumK Geometric Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 8.8 8.8 8.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 15.8 15.8 15.8

KG

GV

EXCAVATION INFO

Checked by:

Performed by:Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario

Manhole GA1Description:

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 58: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 83.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.9 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 7.4 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 8.4 7.2 1.0 6.2 19.5 25.7

25.71.1E-06 8.40 7.20 1.00 6.20 19.5 25.71.1E-06 8.40 7.20 1.00 6.20 19.5 25.7

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

KGDescription: Trench between GA1 and KS1

Checked by: GV

Performed by:Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, OntarioCIMA Canada Inc.

Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12TT183004.7000

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Comments

(K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF(K Geometric Mean) × SF77.0 77.0

Maximum × SF77.0Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d)

Safety Factor

Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 33.8 33.8 33.8

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 59: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 8.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 9.5 8.3 1.0 7.3 23.0 9.2BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 9.5 -0.9 1.0 -1.9 -1.6 0.0

9.23.0E-07 9.50 3.70 1.00 2.70 4.5 1.15.9E-07 9.50 3.70 1.00 2.70 6.2 1.7

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 14.7 7.7 10.8

Comments

Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 27.5 3.3 5.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF

KGDescription: Manhole KS1

Checked by: GV

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 60: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 79.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.9 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 8.4 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 9.4 8.2 1.0 7.2 22.7 28.3BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 9.4 -1.0 1.0 -2.0 -1.7BH 14 6.9 2.0 9.0E-08 9.4 4.5 1.0 3.5 3.1 4.1BH 15 3.8 2.0 8.1E-08 9.4 7.6 1.0 6.6 5.6 6.2

28.31.6E-07 9.40 4.83 1.00 3.83 4.6 5.93.4E-07 9.40 4.83 1.00 3.83 6.7 8.8

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 20.9 8.0 11.6

Comments

Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 84.9 17.7 26.3Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF

KGDescription: Trench between GA1 and KS1

Checked by: GV

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 61: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 13.8 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 4.60 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 14.8 13.6 1.0 12.6 39.7 24.3BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 14.8 4.4 1.0 3.4 3.0 0.8

24.33.0E-07 14.80 9.00 1.00 8.00 13.2 4.95.9E-07 14.80 9.00 1.00 8.00 18.5 8.0

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 43.7 22.9 32.0

Comments

Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 73.0 14.6 24.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF

KGDescription: Manhole KS2

Checked by: GV

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 62: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 37.1 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 13.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 14.2 13.0 1.0 12.0 37.8 31.7BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 14.2 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.4BH 15 3.8 2.0 8.1E-08 14.2 12.4 1.0 11.4 9.7 5.8

31.72.0E-07 14.20 9.73 1.00 8.73 11.6 7.54.2E-07 14.20 9.73 1.00 8.73 17.0 11.9

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 47.7 20.1 29.5

Comments

Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 95.1 22.5 35.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF

KGDescription: Trench between KS2 and existing headwall

Checked by: GV

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 63: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 62.7 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 4.8 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 5.8 4.6 1.0 3.6 11.3 13.6BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 5.8 -4.6 1.0 -5.6 -4.9BH 14 6.9 2.0 9.0E-08 5.8 0.9 1.0 -0.1 -0.1 1.1

13.62.0E-07 5.80 0.30 1.00 -0.70 -0.9 1.14.3E-07 5.80 0.30 1.00 -0.70 -1.4 1.6

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) -3.8 -1.6 -2.4

Comments

Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 40.8 3.4 4.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF

KGDescription: Trench between KS2 and existing manhole

Checked by: GV

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 64: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 7.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.80 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 8.6 7.4 1.0 6.4 20.2 7.6BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 8.6 -1.8 1.0 -2.8 -2.4 0.0BH 14 6.9 2.0 9.0E-08 8.6 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.4 0.5BH 15 3.8 2.0 8.1E-08 8.6 6.8 1.0 5.8 4.9 1.0

7.61.6E-07 8.60 4.03 1.00 3.03 3.6 0.83.4E-07 8.60 4.03 1.00 3.03 5.3 1.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 16.5 6.3 9.2

Comments

Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 22.9 2.4 4.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF

KGDescription: Manhole KS3

Checked by: GV

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 65: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 1.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 2.1 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 13.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 10 3.2 2.0 1.1E-06 14.2 13.0 1.0 12.0 37.8 14.5BH 13 12.4 2.0 8.4E-08 14.2 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.4BH 14 6.9 2.0 9.0E-08 14.2 9.3 1.0 8.3 7.5 1.1BH 15 3.8 2.0 8.1E-08 14.2 12.4 1.0 11.4 9.7 1.6

14.51.6E-07 14.20 9.63 1.00 8.63 10.4 1.83.4E-07 14.20 9.63 1.00 8.63 15.1 3.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 47.1 18.0 26.1

Comments

Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 43.4 5.5 10.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF

KGDescription: Trench between KS2 and KS3

Checked by: GV

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-12

CIMA Canada Inc.Gracefield Avenue, Toronto, Ontario Performed by:

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 66: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Appendix FDewatering Rate Calculations

(Assignment 16-22)

Page 67: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.4 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.4 4.3 1.0 3.3 1.4 0.2BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.4 6.2 1.0 5.2 4.3 0.8

0.83.8E-08 6.40 5.25 1.00 4.25 2.5 0.44.7E-08 6.40 5.25 1.00 4.25 2.8 0.5

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.1 4.3 4.8

KG

GV

EXCAVATION INFO

Checked by:

Performed by:Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario

Manhole RS1Description:

Comments

MaximumK Geometric Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.5 1.3 1.5Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

K Arithmetic Mean

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 68: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 56.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 6.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 7.6 5.5 1.0 4.5 1.8 1.6BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 7.6 7.4 1.0 6.4 5.3 4.3

4.33.8E-08 7.60 6.45 1.00 5.45 3.2 2.64.7E-08 7.60 6.45 1.00 5.45 3.6 3.0

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between RS1 and RS2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 13.0 7.9 8.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.8 5.5 6.2

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 69: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 7.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 8.6 6.5 1.0 5.5 2.3 0.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 8.6 8.4 1.0 7.4 6.1 1.4

1.43.8E-08 8.60 7.45 1.00 6.45 3.8 0.74.7E-08 8.60 7.45 1.00 6.45 4.2 0.9

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole RS2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 4.2 2.2 2.6Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 9.2 6.5 7.3

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 70: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 46.6 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.9 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 6.4 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 7.4 5.3 1.0 4.3 1.8 1.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 7.4 7.2 1.0 6.2 5.1 3.6

3.63.8E-08 7.40 6.25 1.00 5.25 3.1 2.24.7E-08 7.40 6.25 1.00 5.25 3.4 2.4

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between RS2 and RS3Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 10.8 6.5 7.3Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.5 5.3 5.9

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 71: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 6.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 7.7 5.6 1.0 4.6 1.9 0.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 7.7 7.5 1.0 6.5 5.4 1.2

1.23.8E-08 7.70 6.55 1.00 5.55 3.2 0.64.7E-08 7.70 6.55 1.00 5.55 3.6 0.7

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole RS3Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 3.6 1.9 2.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 8.0 5.6 6.3

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 72: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 94.7 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.7 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 7.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 8.2 7.7 1.0 6.7 5.6 7.2BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 8.2 6.1 1.0 5.1 2.1 2.8BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 8.2 8.0 1.0 7.0 5.8 7.4

7.44.8E-08 8.20 7.27 1.00 6.27 4.1 5.35.7E-08 8.20 7.27 1.00 6.27 4.5 5.8

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 9.1 7.1 7.8

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Comments

(K Arithmetic Mean ) × SF(K Geometric Mean) × SF22.2 15.9

Maximum × SF17.5Q Groundwater Inflow (m3/d)

Safety Factor

Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

KGDescription: Trench between RS1 and GD1

Checked by: GV

Performed by:Roding Street and Gade Drive, Toronto, OntarioCIMA Canada Inc.

Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22TT183004.7000

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 73: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 99.4 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.9 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 6.9 6.4 1.0 5.4 4.5 6.4BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.9 4.8 1.0 3.8 1.6 2.4BH 29 1.7 2.0 8.5E-08 6.9 7.2 1.0 6.2 5.4 7.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.9 6.7 1.0 5.7 4.7 6.6

7.55.5E-08 6.90 6.27 1.00 5.27 3.7 5.36.4E-08 6.90 6.27 1.00 5.27 4.0 5.7

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Roding Street and Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between RS3 and DC1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 22.4 15.8 17.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 8.0 6.4 6.9

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 74: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 7.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 8.5 8.0 1.0 7.0 5.8 1.2BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 8.5 6.4 1.0 5.4 2.2 0.3

1.23.8E-08 8.50 7.20 1.00 6.20 3.6 0.64.8E-08 8.50 7.20 1.00 6.20 4.1 0.7

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Gade Drive, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole GD1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 3.5 1.9 2.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 9.0 6.3 7.1

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 75: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.7 4.2 1.0 3.2 2.7 0.5BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.7 2.6 1.0 1.6 0.7 0.1

0.53.8E-08 4.70 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.4 0.34.8E-08 4.70 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.6 0.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Ianhall Road, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole IR1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.6 0.8 0.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.5 2.4 2.7

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 76: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 74.7 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.7 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 6.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 7.9 7.4 1.0 6.4 5.3 5.6BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 7.9 5.8 1.0 4.8 2.0 2.1

5.63.8E-08 7.90 6.60 1.00 5.60 3.3 3.54.8E-08 7.90 6.60 1.00 5.60 3.7 3.9

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Gade Drive and Ianhall Road, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between GD1 and IR1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 16.8 10.4 11.7Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 8.1 5.7 6.4

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 77: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 3.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 5.6 5.1 1.0 4.1 3.4 0.8BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.6 5.6 1.0 4.6 4.0 0.9BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.6 5.4 1.0 4.4 3.6 0.8

0.97.9E-08 5.60 5.37 1.00 4.37 3.7 0.87.9E-08 5.60 5.37 1.00 4.37 3.7 0.8

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole DC1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.7 2.4 2.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.6 6.4 6.4

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 78: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 62.6 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.7 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.7BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.7 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.4 2.7BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.7 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 2.4

2.74.9E-08 3.70 2.93 1.00 1.93 1.3 1.76.0E-08 3.70 2.93 1.00 1.93 1.4 1.8

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between DC1 and DC2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 8.0 5.0 5.5Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 2.9 2.2 2.5

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 79: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 105.8 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.7 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 1.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.7 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.4 4.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.7 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 4.0

4.44.9E-08 3.70 2.93 1.00 1.93 1.3 2.86.0E-08 3.70 2.93 1.00 1.93 1.4 3.1

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent and Nash Drive, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between DC1 and ND1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 13.2 8.3 9.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 2.9 2.2 2.5

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 80: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.0 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.0 3.9 1.0 2.9 1.2 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.0 6.0 1.0 5.0 4.4 0.8BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.0 5.8 1.0 4.8 4.0 0.7

0.84.9E-08 6.00 5.23 1.00 4.23 2.8 0.56.0E-08 6.00 5.23 1.00 4.23 3.1 0.5

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Nash Drive, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole ND1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.4 1.4 1.6Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.4 4.9 5.4

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 81: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.6 4.5 1.0 3.5 1.4 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.6 6.6 1.0 5.6 4.9 0.9BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.6 6.4 1.0 5.4 4.5 0.8

0.94.9E-08 6.60 5.83 1.00 4.83 3.2 0.56.0E-08 6.60 5.83 1.00 4.83 3.5 0.6

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Nash Drive, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole ND2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.7 1.6 1.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.3 5.6 6.1

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 82: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 93.1 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.5 4.4 1.0 3.4 1.4 2.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.5 6.5 1.0 5.5 4.8 6.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.5 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.4 5.8

6.44.9E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.2 4.36.0E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.5 4.7

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Nash Drive and Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between ND2 and BC2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 19.1 12.9 14.2Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.2 5.5 6.0

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 83: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 9.0 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.3 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.5 4.4 1.0 3.4 1.4 0.3BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.5 6.5 1.0 5.5 4.8 1.0BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.5 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.4 0.9

1.04.9E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.2 0.66.0E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.5 0.7

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between BC1A and BC2AChecked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 3.0 1.9 2.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.2 5.5 6.0

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 84: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.8 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.8 3.7 1.0 2.7 1.1 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.8 5.8 1.0 4.8 4.2 0.7BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.8 5.6 1.0 4.6 3.8 0.6

0.74.9E-08 5.80 5.03 1.00 4.03 2.7 0.46.0E-08 5.80 5.03 1.00 4.03 3.0 0.5

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole BC1AChecked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.1 1.2 1.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.1 4.7 5.1

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 85: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.9 3.8 1.0 2.8 1.1 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.9 5.9 1.0 4.9 4.3 0.7BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.9 5.7 1.0 4.7 3.9 0.6

0.74.9E-08 5.90 5.13 1.00 4.13 2.8 0.46.0E-08 5.90 5.13 1.00 4.13 3.0 0.5

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole BC2AChecked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.2 1.3 1.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.3 4.8 5.3

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 86: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.6 4.5 1.0 3.5 1.4 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.6 6.6 1.0 5.6 4.9 1.0BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.6 6.4 1.0 5.4 4.5 0.9

1.04.9E-08 6.60 5.83 1.00 4.83 3.2 0.66.0E-08 6.60 5.83 1.00 4.83 3.5 0.7

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole BC2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.9 1.7 2.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.3 5.6 6.1

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 87: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 99.3 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.9 1.8 1.0 0.8 0.3 1.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.9 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.5 4.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.9 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.2 3.9

4.34.9E-08 3.90 3.13 1.00 2.13 1.4 2.76.0E-08 3.90 3.13 1.00 2.13 1.6 3.0

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between BC2 and BC3Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 12.9 8.2 9.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.2 2.5 2.7

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 88: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 94.3 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.7 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.3 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.3 4.2 1.0 3.2 1.3 2.0BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.3 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.6 6.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.3 6.1 1.0 5.1 4.2 5.7

6.34.9E-08 6.30 5.53 1.00 4.53 3.0 4.26.0E-08 6.30 5.53 1.00 4.53 3.3 4.6

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between BC2 and BC1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 18.8 12.6 13.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.9 5.2 5.8

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 89: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 5.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.8 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.5 4.4 1.0 3.4 1.4 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.5 6.5 1.0 5.5 4.8 1.0BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.5 6.3 1.0 5.3 4.4 0.8

1.04.9E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.2 0.66.0E-08 6.50 5.73 1.00 4.73 3.5 0.6

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole BC1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.9 1.7 1.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 7.2 5.5 6.0

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 90: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 81.6 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.9 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.9 1.8 1.0 0.8 0.3 0.9BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.9 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.5 3.6BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.9 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.2 3.2

3.64.9E-08 3.90 3.13 1.00 2.13 1.4 2.36.0E-08 3.90 3.13 1.00 2.13 1.6 2.5

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between BC3 and BC4Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 10.7 6.8 7.5Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.2 2.5 2.7

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 91: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.2 2.1 1.0 1.1 0.5 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.2 4.2 1.0 3.2 2.8 0.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.2 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.5 0.4

0.54.9E-08 4.20 3.43 1.00 2.43 1.6 0.36.0E-08 4.20 3.43 1.00 2.43 1.8 0.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole BC3Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.4 0.8 0.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.7 2.8 3.1

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 92: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 76.6 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 4.3 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.3 3.2 1.0 2.2 0.9 1.3BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.3 5.3 1.0 4.3 3.8 4.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.3 5.1 1.0 4.1 3.4 4.0BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 5.3 4.8 1.0 3.8 3.2 3.8

4.45.5E-08 5.30 4.60 1.00 3.60 2.5 3.16.4E-08 5.30 4.60 1.00 3.60 2.7 3.4

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Hallsport Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between HC1 and HC2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 13.2 9.3 10.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 5.5 4.4 4.7

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 93: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 56.5 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 5.1 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 6.1 4.0 1.0 3.0 1.2 1.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 6.1 6.1 1.0 5.1 4.5 3.8BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 6.1 5.9 1.0 4.9 4.1 3.5BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 6.1 5.6 1.0 4.6 3.8 3.3

3.85.5E-08 6.10 5.40 1.00 4.40 3.1 2.76.4E-08 6.10 5.40 1.00 4.40 3.3 2.9

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Hallsport Crescent and Bunnell Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between HC2 and BC1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 11.4 8.1 8.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 6.7 5.4 5.8

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 94: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.6 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.5 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.6 3.5 1.0 2.5 1.0 0.2BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.6 5.6 1.0 4.6 4.0 0.7BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.6 5.4 1.0 4.4 3.6 0.6BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 5.6 5.1 1.0 4.1 3.4 0.6

0.75.5E-08 5.60 4.90 1.00 3.90 2.8 0.56.4E-08 5.60 4.90 1.00 3.90 3.0 0.5

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Hallsport Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole HC2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 2.2 1.4 1.5Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 5.9 4.8 5.1

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 95: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 4.2 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 5.2 3.1 1.0 2.1 0.9 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 5.2 5.2 1.0 4.2 3.7 0.6BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 5.2 5.0 1.0 4.0 3.3 0.5BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 5.2 4.7 1.0 3.7 3.1 0.5

0.65.5E-08 5.20 4.50 1.00 3.50 2.5 0.46.4E-08 5.20 4.50 1.00 3.50 2.7 0.4

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Hallsport Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole HC1Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.8 1.2 1.3Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 5.3 4.3 4.6

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 96: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 39.3 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 3.0 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.0 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.5BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.6 1.9BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.0 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 1.7BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.0 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 1.6

1.95.5E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.6 1.36.4E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.7 1.4

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between DC2 and DC3Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 5.6 3.8 4.1Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.5 2.8 3.0

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 97: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.3 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.3 2.2 1.0 1.2 0.5 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.3 4.3 1.0 3.3 2.9 0.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.3 4.1 1.0 3.1 2.6 0.4BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.3 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 0.4

0.55.5E-08 4.30 3.60 1.00 2.60 1.8 0.36.4E-08 4.30 3.60 1.00 2.60 2.0 0.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole DC2Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.4 0.9 1.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.9 3.2 3.4

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 98: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 2.5 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.5 1.4 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.5 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.2 0.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.5 3.3 1.0 2.3 1.9 0.3BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 3.5 3.0 1.0 2.0 1.7 0.3

0.45.5E-08 3.50 2.80 1.00 1.80 1.3 0.26.4E-08 3.50 2.80 1.00 1.80 1.4 0.2

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole DC3Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.1 0.7 0.7Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 2.7 2.2 2.4

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 99: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 74.3 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.4 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 3.0 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.0 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.9BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.6 3.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.0 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 3.0BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.0 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 2.8

3.35.5E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.6 2.36.4E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.7 2.5

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between DC3 and DC4Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 10.0 6.9 7.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.5 2.8 3.0

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 100: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.1 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.1 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.1 4.1 1.0 3.1 2.7 0.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.1 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.4 0.4BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.1 3.6 1.0 2.6 2.2 0.4

0.55.5E-08 4.10 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.7 0.36.4E-08 4.10 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.8 0.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole DC4Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.4 0.8 0.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.6 2.9 3.2

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 101: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 73.8 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.3 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 2.7 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 3.7 1.6 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.8BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 3.7 3.7 1.0 2.7 2.4 3.1BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 3.7 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 2.8BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 3.7 3.2 1.0 2.2 1.8 2.6

3.15.5E-08 3.70 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.4 2.16.4E-08 3.70 3.00 1.00 2.00 1.5 2.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between DC4 and DC5Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 9.3 6.3 6.8Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.0 2.4 2.6

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 102: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.0 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.0 1.9 1.0 0.9 0.4 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.0 4.0 1.0 3.0 2.6 0.4BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.0 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 0.4BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.0 3.5 1.0 2.5 2.1 0.4

0.45.5E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.6 0.36.4E-08 4.00 3.30 1.00 2.30 1.7 0.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole DC5Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.3 0.8 0.9Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.5 2.8 3.0

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 103: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length, l (m) 72.8 + 0.5 m to each end (+ 1.0 m total)Width, w (m) 1.3 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)Depth (mbgs) 3.1 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution combining:1) radial steady-state for inflow to trench ends; and2) linear steady-state for inflow to trench sides.

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.1 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.4 0.9BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.1 4.1 1.0 3.1 2.7 3.3BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.1 3.9 1.0 2.9 2.4 3.0BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.1 3.6 1.0 2.6 2.2 2.9

3.35.5E-08 4.10 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.7 2.36.4E-08 4.10 3.40 1.00 2.40 1.8 2.5

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt Ri calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. he = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Trench

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Trench between DC5 and DC6Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 10.0 6.9 7.4Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.6 2.9 3.2

Comments

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

w Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width (w)

Length (l)

Plan View

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln 2 + + 2 ( 02 − ℎ2)2

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 104: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Project No.:Project Name:Client:Location:

Date: June 29, 2019

Length (m)Width (m)Depth (mbgs) 3.3 + 0.5 m to maximum depth

re Equivalent Radius of Excavation (m) 2.2 + 0.5 m to each side (+ 1.0 m total)

Radius of Influence (Ri) calculated with the Sichardt equation

Groundwater Inflow (Q) to the excavation calculated with the Dupuit solution for radial steady-state for unconfined conditions

Bh

GwlMeasured

GroundwaterLevel

(mbgs)

SwlEstimated Seasonal

Fluctuation above Gwl(m)

KHydraulic

Conductivity(m/s)

At'Aquifer'

Thickness(mbgs)

H0

Ambient Headabove

'Aquitard'(m)

he

Head above'Aquitard' atExcavation

(m)

DdDrawdown

(m)

Ri

SichardtCalculation

(m)

Ri

User Defined(m)

QGroundwater

Inflow(m3/d)

BH 19 4.1 2.0 1.9E-08 4.3 2.2 1.0 1.2 0.5 0.1BH 29 1.7 1.7 8.5E-08 4.3 4.3 1.0 3.3 2.9 0.5BH 33 2.2 2.0 7.6E-08 4.3 4.1 1.0 3.1 2.6 0.4BH 18 2.5 2.0 7.7E-08 4.3 3.8 1.0 2.8 2.3 0.4

0.55.5E-08 4.30 3.60 1.00 2.60 1.8 0.36.4E-08 4.30 3.60 1.00 2.60 2.0 0.3

3

3

Notes1 mbgs = meters below ground surface2 The user defined Ri is used for the calculation of groundwater inflow (Q) if specified3 Geometric mean calculation is applied only to the hydraulic conductivity (K) - other input parameters for the Dupuit and Sichardt equation use the arithmetic average4 The calculated groundwater inflows for the arithmetic and geometric mean both use the Sichardt R i calculated from the respective mean K5 If the depth of the excavation is below the base of the 'Aquifer' then the head at the excavation is set at the top of the 'Aquitard' (i.e. h e = 0)

Dewatering Rate Estimation - Unconfined Equivalent Radius Method

TT183004.7000Basement Flooding Protection Program, Phase 4 (BFPP4), Assignment 16-22

CIMA Canada Inc.Dorking Crescent, Toronto, Ontario Performed by: KG

Description: Manhole DC6Checked by: GV

EXCAVATION INFO

MaximumK Geometric MeanK Arithmetic Mean

Safety Factor Maximum × SF (K Geometric Mean) × SF (K Arithmetic Mean ) × SFQ Groundwater Inflow (m3/d) 1.4 0.9 1.0Safety Factor S(Maximum K × SF) S(K Geometric Mean × SF) S(K Arithmetic Mean × SF)Ri Radius of Influence, Sichert (m) 3.9 3.2 3.4

Comments

= ℎ × ℎ

= 3000( 0 − ℎ )√

Depthp

‘Aquifer’Bedrock

H0

At

‘Aquitard’Bedrock

Dd

he

Gwl

re Ri

Cross Section

Swl

Width

Length

Plan View

re

= ( 02 − ℎ2)ln +

HA-TEM-HYD-08-01-EN

Page 105: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Appendix GGroundwater Chemistry Results

Page 106: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Table G-1: Summary of Groundwater Chemistry Results - Assignment 16-12Wood Reference No.: TT183004.7000

BH 10 BH 14

20-Jun-19 20-Jun-19

L2295725-2 L2295725-1

Value Units Value Units RDL Units Groundwater Groundwater

INORGANIC PARAMETERS AND METALSpH 7.48 7.50

Fluoride 10 mg/L - mg/L 0.1 / 0.2 mg/L <0.20 <0.10Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 100 mg/L - mg/L 0.20 mg/L 2.4 19

Total Phosphorus 10 mg/L 0.4 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 0.65 8.52BOD (5) 300 mg/L 15 mg/L 3 mg/L <3.0 4.6

Total Cyanide 2 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.002 mg/L <0.0020 <0.0020Phenols 1.0 mg/L 0.008 mg/L 0.002 mg/L 0.0062 <0.0020

Total Suspended Solids 350 mg/L 15 mg/L 2.0 mg/L 408 40,500Total Aluminum 50 mg/L - mg/L 0.05 mg/L 2.60 75.4Total Antimony 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L <0.0010 <0.010Total Arsenic 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0027 0.040Total Cadmium 0.7 mg/L 0.008 mg/L 0.00005 mg/L 0.000128 0.00079

Total Chromium 4 mg/L 0.08 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.0055 0.143Total Cobalt 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0024 0.076

Total Copper 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.01 mg/L <0.010 0.20Total Lead 1 mg/L 0.12 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L 0.00303 0.0994

Total Manganese 5 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.336 5.83Total Mercury 0.01 mg/L 0.0004 mg/L 0.00001 mg/L 0.000015 <0.000010

Total Molybdenum 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.00219 <0.0050Total Nickel 2 mg/L 0.08 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.0067 0.170

Total Selenium 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.00079 <0.0050Total Silver 5 mg/L 0.12 mg/L 0.005 / 0.0005 mg/L <0.00050 <0.0050

Total Tin 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.01 mg/L 0.0016 <0.010Total Titanium 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.003 mg/L 0.0614 1.38

Total Zinc 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.03 mg/L <0.030 0.40Chromium VI 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L <0.00050 <0.00050

ORGANIC PARAMETERSOil and Grease (animal/vegetable) in water 150 mg/L 5 mg/L <5.0 <5.0Oil and Grease (mineral) in water 15 mg/L 2.5 mg/L <2.5 <2.5trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 140 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 4000 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Chloroform 40 ug/L 2 ug/L 1 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Benzene 10 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Tetrachloroethylene 1000 ug/L 4.4 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Toluene 16 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Trichloroethlyene 400 ug/L 7.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Ethylbenzene 160 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1400 ug/L 17 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,2-Dichlorobenzene 50 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.501,4-Dichlorobenzene 80 ug/L 6.8 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Total Xylenes 1400 ug/L 4.4 ug/L 1.1 ug/L <1.1 <1.1PCBs 1 ug/L 0.4 ug/L 0.04 ug/L <0.040 <0.040Pentachlorophenol 5 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50Di-n-butyl phthalate 80 ug/L 15 ug/L 1 ug/L <1.0 <1.03,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2 ug/L 0.8 ug/L 0.4 ug/L <0.40 <0.40Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 12 ug/L 8.8 ug/L 2 ug/L <2.0 <2.0Total PAHs 5 ug/L 2 ug/L 1.7 ug/L <1.7 12.9Nonylphenols 20 ug/L 1 ug/L 1 ug/L <1.0 <1.0Nonylphenol Ethoxylates 200 ug/L 10 ug/L 2 ug/L <2.0 <2.0

Notes:RDL = Reported Detection Limit* = Refers to Table 1 in Section 681-2 of Toronto Municipal Code - Chapter 681$ = Refers to Table 2 in Section 681-4 of Toronto Municipal Code - Chapter 681n/a = not applicable

highlight = exceedance of Table 1 (Sanitary/CSO Sewer Bylaw)highlight = exceedance of both Table 1 and Table 2highlight = exceedance of Table 2 (Storm Sewer Bylaw)

--

Parameter

Borehole ID:

Sample Date: City of TorontoSanitary SewerBylaw Criteria*

6.0-11.5 0.1

Lab Sample ID:

City of TorontoStorm Sewer

Bylaw Criteria$

6.0-9.5

Page 107: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Table G-2: Groundwater Chemistry Results - Assignment 16-22Wood Reference No.: TT183004.7000

BH16 BH31 BH33

20-Jun-19 20-Jun-19 20-Jun-19

L2295725-3 L2295725-5 L2295725-4

Value Units Value Units RDL Units Groundwater Groundwater Groundwater

INORGANIC PARAMETERS AND METALSpH 7.48 7.60 7.59

Fluoride 10 mg/L - mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.035 0.109 <0.10Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 100 mg/L - mg/L 1.5 mg/L 19 <1.5 0.29

Total Phosphorus 10 mg/L 0.4 mg/L 0.003 mg/L 5.11 0.247 0.211BOD (5) 300 mg/L 15 mg/L 3.0 mg/L <3.0 2.2 2.6

Total Cyanide 2 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.002 mg/L <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020Phenols 1.0 mg/L 0.008 mg/L 0.002 mg/L <0.0020 0.0050 0.0063

Total Suspended Solids 350 mg/L 15 mg/L 2.0 mg/L 23,600 586 149Total Aluminum 50 mg/L - mg/L 0.05 mg/L 47.7 3.95 3.50Total Antimony 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010Total Arsenic 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0279 0.0061 0.0030Total Cadmium 0.7 mg/L 0.008 mg/L 0.00005 mg/L 0.00106 <0.000050 0.000054

Total Chromium 4 mg/L 0.08 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.0835 0.0096 0.0065Total Cobalt 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0957 0.0028 0.0027

Total Copper 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.01 mg/L 0.258 <0.010 <0.010Total Lead 1 mg/L 0.12 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L 0.152 0.00561 0.00345

Total Manganese 5 mg/L 0.05 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 6.52 0.324 0.448Total Mercury 0.01 mg/L 0.0004 mg/L 0.00001 mg/L 0.000133 <0.000010 <0.000010

Total Molybdenum 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.0005 mg/L 0.00145 0.00241 0.00469Total Nickel 2 mg/L 0.08 mg/L 0.005 mg/L 0.167 0.0063 0.0069

Total Selenium 1 mg/L 0.02 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L 0.00129 <0.00050 <0.00050Total Silver 5 mg/L 0.12 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050

Total Tin 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.001 mg/L 0.0020 0.0023 <0.0010Total Titanium 5 mg/L - mg/L 0.003 mg/L 0.480 0.0744 0.104

Total Zinc 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.03 mg/L 0.493 <0.030 <0.030Chromium VI 2 mg/L 0.04 mg/L 0.0005 mg/L <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050

ORGANIC PARAMETERSOil and Grease (animal/vegetable) in water 150 mg/L 5.0 mg/L <5.0 6.1 <5.0

Oil and Grease (mineral) in water 15 mg/L 2.5 mg/L <2.5 <2.5 <2.5trans-1,3-Dichloropropylene 140 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

cis- 1,2-Dichloroethylene 4000 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Chloroform 40 ug/L 2 ug/L 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0Benzene 10 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

Tetrachloroethylene 1000 ug/L 4.4 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Toluene 16 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

Trichloroethlyene 400 ug/L 7.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50Ethylbenzene 160 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1400 ug/L 17 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.501,2-Dichlorobenzene 50 ug/L 5.6 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.501,4-Dichlorobenzene 80 ug/L 6.8 ug/L 0.5 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

Total Xylenes 1400 ug/L 4.4 ug/L 1.1 ug/L <1.1 <1.1 <1.1PCBs 1 ug/L 0.4 ug/L 0.04 ug/L <0.040 <0.040 <0.040

Pentachlorophenol 5 ug/L 2 ug/L 0.5 / 1.0 ug/L <0.50 <0.50 <1.0Di-n-butyl phthalate 80 ug/L 15 ug/L 1.0 / 2.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <2.0

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2 ug/L 0.8 ug/L 0.4 / 0.8 ug/L <0.40 <0.40 <0.80Bis(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 12 ug/L 8.8 ug/L 2.0 / 4.0 ug/L <2.0 <2.0 <4.0

Total PAHs 5 ug/L 2 ug/L 1.7 / 8.7 ug/L <1.7 <1.7 <8.7Nonylphenols 20 ug/L 1 ug/L 1.0 ug/L <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

Nonylphenol Ethoxylates 200 ug/L 10 ug/L 2.0 ug/L <2.0 <2.0 <2.0

MICROBIOLOGICAL PARAMETERSEscherichia coli 200 CFU/100mL 10 CFU/100mL >2000 0 1

Notes:RDL = Reported Detection Limit* = Refers to Table 1 in Section 681-2 of Toronto Municipal Code - Chapter 681$ = Refers to Table 2 in Section 681-4 of Toronto Municipal Code - Chapter 681n/a = not applicable

highlight = exceedance of Table 1 (Sanitary/CSO Sewer Bylaw)highlight = exceedance of both Table 1 and Table 2highlight = exceedance of Table 2 (Storm Sewer Bylaw)

n/a

6.0-11.5 n/a

Parameter

City of TorontoSanitary Sewer Bylaw

Criteria*

Borehole ID:

Sample Date:

Lab Sample ID:

City of Toronto StormSewer Bylaw Criteria*

6.0-9.5

--

Page 108: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

[This report shall not be reproduced except in full without the written authority of the Laboratory.]

20-JUN-19

Lab Work Order #: L2295725

Date Received:Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham

50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6

ATTN: Kim Gilder FINAL 27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)Report Date:

Version:

Certificate of Analysis

ALS CANADA LTD Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

____________________________________________

Mary-Lynn PikeClient Services Supervisor

ADDRESS: 95 West Beaver Creek Road, Unit 1, Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1H2 Canada | Phone: +1 905 881 9887 | Fax: +1 905 881 8062

Client Phone: 905-415-2632

TT183004.7000Job Reference: NOT SUBMITTEDProject P.O. #:

17-820670C of C Numbers:Legal Site Desc:

Page 109: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

2PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Summary of Guideline Exceedances

GuidelineALS ID Client ID Grouping Analyte Result Guideline Limit Unit

Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-Law 100-2016 (FEB 4,2016) - Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-Law

Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-Law 100-2016 (FEB 4,2016) - Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

L2295725-1

L2295725-2

L2295725-3

L2295725-4

L2295725-5

L2295725-1

L2295725-2

L2295725-3

L2295725-4

BH14

BH10

BH16

BH33

BH31

BH14

BH10

BH16

BH33

Total Suspended Solids

Aluminum (Al)-TotalManganese (Mn)-Total

Total PAHs

Total Suspended Solids

Total Suspended Solids

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Total PAHs

Total Suspended Solids

Total Suspended Solids

Phosphorus, Total

Arsenic (As)-TotalChromium (Cr)-TotalCopper (Cu)-TotalManganese (Mn)-TotalNickel (Ni)-TotalZinc (Zn)-Total

Total PAHs

Total Suspended Solids

Phosphorus, Total

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Total Suspended Solids

Phosphorus, Total

Arsenic (As)-TotalChromium (Cr)-TotalCopper (Cu)-TotalLead (Pb)-TotalManganese (Mn)-TotalNickel (Ni)-TotalZinc (Zn)-Total

Total Suspended Solids

mg/L

mg/Lmg/L

ug/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

ug/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

ug/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/Lmg/L

mg/L

350

505

5

350

350

5

5

350

15

0.4

0.020.080.040.050.080.04

2

15

0.4

0.05

15

0.4

0.020.080.040.120.050.080.04

15

40500

75.45.83

12.9

408

23600

6.52

<8.7

586

40500

8.52

0.0400.1430.205.830.1700.40

12.9

408

0.645

0.336

23600

5.11

0.02790.08350.2580.1526.520.1670.493

149

Physical Tests

Total Metals

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPhysical Tests

Physical Tests

Total Metals

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPhysical Tests

Physical Tests

Anions and Nutrients

Total Metals

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPhysical Tests

Anions and Nutrients

Total Metals

Physical Tests

Anions and Nutrients

Total Metals

Physical Tests

Page 110: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

3PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Summary of Guideline Exceedances

GuidelineALS ID Client ID Grouping Analyte Result Guideline Limit Unit

Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-Law 100-2016 (FEB 4,2016) - Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-LawL2295725-4

L2295725-5

BH33

BH31

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Total PAHs

Total Suspended Solids

Manganese (Mn)-Total

mg/L

ug/L

mg/L

mg/L

0.05

2

15

0.05

0.448

<8.7

586

0.324

Total Metals

Polycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPhysical Tests

Total Metals

Page 111: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

4PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Physical Tests - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

pH

Total Suspended Solids

6.00-11.5350

6.0-9.5

15

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

pH units

mg/L

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

7.50 7.48 7.48 7.59 7.60

40500 408 23600 149 586DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

Page 112: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

5PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Anions and Nutrients - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Fluoride (F)

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Phosphorus, Total

10

100

10

-

-

0.4

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<0.10 <0.20 0.035 <0.10 0.109

19 2.4 19 0.29 <1.5

8.52 0.645 5.11 0.211 0.247

DLDS DLDS DLDS

DLM DLM DLM DLM

DLM DLM DLM

Page 113: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

6PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Cyanides - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Cyanide, Total 2 0.02

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

mg/L

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020 <0.0020

Page 114: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

7PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Bacteriological Tests - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

E. Coli - 200

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

CFU/100mL

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<10 172 >2000 1 0DLM DLM DLM

Page 115: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

8PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Total Metals - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Mercury (Hg)-Total

Molybdenum (Mo)-Total

Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

50

5

1

0.7

4

5

2

1

5

0.01

5

2

1

5

5

5

2

-

-

0.02

0.008

0.08

-

0.04

0.12

0.05

0.0004

-

0.08

0.02

0.12

-

-

0.04

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

75.4 2.60 47.7 3.50 3.95

<0.010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010 <0.0010

0.040 0.0027 0.0279 0.0030 0.0061

0.00079 0.000128 0.00106 0.000054 <0.000050

0.143 0.0055 0.0835 0.0065 0.0096

0.076 0.0024 0.0957 0.0027 0.0028

0.20 <0.010 0.258 <0.010 <0.010

0.0994 0.00303 0.152 0.00345 0.00561

5.83 0.336 6.52 0.448 0.324

<0.000010 0.000015 0.000133 <0.000010 <0.000010

<0.0050 0.00219 0.00145 0.00469 0.00241

0.170 0.0067 0.167 0.0069 0.0063

<0.0050 0.00079 0.00129 <0.00050 <0.00050

<0.0050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050

<0.010 0.0016 0.0020 <0.0010 0.0023

1.38 0.0614 0.480 0.104 0.0744

0.40 <0.030 0.493 <0.030 <0.030

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC DLHC

Page 116: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

9PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Speciated Metals - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Chromium, Hexavalent 2 0.04

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

mg/L

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050 <0.00050

Page 117: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

10PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Aggregate Organics - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

BOD

Oil and Grease, Total

Animal/Veg Oil & Grease

Mineral Oil and Grease

Phenols (4AAP)

300

-

150

15

1.0

15

-

-

-

0.008

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

4.6 <3.0 <3.0 2.6 2.2

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6.1

<5.0 <5.0 <5.0 <5.0 6.1

<2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5 <2.5

<0.0020 0.0062 <0.0020 0.0063 0.0050

BODL BODL

DLM DLM

Page 118: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

11PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Volatile Organic Compounds - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Benzene

Chloroform

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Dichloromethane

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

Ethylbenzene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

Trichloroethylene

o-Xylene

m+p-Xylenes

Xylenes (Total)

Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene

10

40

50

80

4000

2000

140

160

1400

1000

16

400

-

-

1400

-

-

2

2

5.6

6.8

5.6

5.2

-

2

17

4.4

2

7.6

-

-

4.4

-

-

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.50

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

<1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1

100.6 100.8 100.4 106.8 99.8

104.1 104.0 103.9 106.6 104.0

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

VOCHS

VOCHS

VOCHS

VOCHS

OWP OWP

OWP OWP

Page 119: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

12PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Acenaphthene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(e)pyrene

Benzo(ghi)perylene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Chrysene

Dibenz(a,h)acridine

Dibenz(a,j)acridine

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene

7H-Dibenzo(c,g)carbazole

1,3-Dinitropyrene

1,6-Dinitropyrene

1,8-Dinitropyrene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

Naphthalene

Perylene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

Surrogate: d14-Terphenyl

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

Total PAHs

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

5

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

ug/L

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

0.413 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010

0.687 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010

0.784 0.027 0.012 0.012 <0.010

0.567 0.048 0.012 0.026 0.014

0.676 0.083 0.018 0.030 0.025

<0.80 0.104 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050

0.321 0.202 0.011 0.042 0.025

0.253 0.026 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010

0.836 0.070 0.048 0.044 0.025

<0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050

<0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050

0.086 0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010

<0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050

<0.10 <0.050 <0.050 <0.50 <0.050

<2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0

<2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0

<2.0 <1.0 <1.0 <5.0 <1.0

2.21 0.100 0.031 0.016 0.027

0.544 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010 <0.010

0.288 0.055 <0.010 0.014 0.012

0.426 0.014 0.014 <0.010 0.012

0.590 0.030 <0.010 0.044 <0.010

2.46 0.048 0.039 0.015 0.016

1.81 0.111 0.029 0.040 0.025

77.3 83.6 87.0 87.5 90.8

37.9 57.4 53.5 55.9 66.3

47.3 74.4 67.2 80.7 83.5

12.9 <1.7 <1.7 <8.7 <1.7

R

RRR DLM

RRR DLM

RRR DLM

RRR DLM

RRR DLM

RRR DLM

RRR DLM

RRR DLM

RRR

Page 120: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

13PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Phthalate Esters - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

Surrogate: 2-fluorobiphenyl

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

12

-

-

8.8

-

-

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

ug/L

%

%

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <4.0 <2.0

70.3 80.7 86.6 81.1 88.0

46.9 76.8 77.4 81.9 87.6

DLM

Page 121: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

14PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Semi-Volatile Organics - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine

Di-n-butylphthalate

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

2

80

-

-

0.8

15

-

-

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<0.40 <0.40 <0.40 <0.80 <0.40

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <2.0 <1.0

70.3 80.7 86.6 81.1 88.0

46.9 76.8 77.4 81.9 87.6

DLM

DLM

Page 122: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

15PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Phenolics - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Pentachlorophenol

Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol

5

-

2

-

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

ug/L

%

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <1.0 <0.50

68.0 82.5 87.3 77.6 80.9

DLM

Page 123: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

16PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Polychlorinated Biphenyls - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Total PCBs

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

-

-

-

-

1

-

-

-

-

-

0.4

-

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020 <0.020

<0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040 <0.040

78.0 75.4 75.1 68.2 73.7

Page 124: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)ANALYTICAL REPORT

L2295725 CONT’D....

17PAGE of

* Please refer to the Reference Information section for an explanation of any qualifiers noted.

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Organic Parameters - WATER

Guide Limit #1: Ontario Toronto Sanitary Discharge Sewer By-LawGuide Limit #2: Ontario Toronto Storm Sewer By-Law

Nonylphenol

Nonylphenol Diethoxylates

Total Nonylphenol Ethoxylates

Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates

20

-

200

-

1

-

10

-

L2295725-1 L2295725-2 L2295725-3 L2295725-4 L2295725-520-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19 20-JUN-19

BH14 BH10 BH16 BH33 BH31

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

Lab IDSample Date

Sample ID

Guide LimitsUnit #1 #2Analyte

Analytical result for this parameter exceeds Guide Limits listed. See Summary of Guideline Exceedances.Detection Limit for result exceeds Guideline Limit. Assessment against Guideline Limit cannot be made.

<1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0

<0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10 <0.10

<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0

<2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0

Page 125: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Reference Information

VOCHS

R

DLDS

BODL

DLM

OWP

VOC analysis was conducted for a water sample that contained > 5% headspace. Results may be biased low.

The ion abundance ratio(s) did not meet the acceptance criteria. Value is an estimated maximum.

Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high Dissolved Solids / Electrical Conductivity.

Limit of Reporting for BOD was increased to account for the largest volume of sample tested.

Detection Limit Adjusted due to sample matrix effects (e.g. chemical interference, colour, turbidity).

Organic water sample contained visible sediment (must be included as part of analysis). Measured concentrations of organic substances in water can be biased high due to presence of

Qualifiers for Individual Parameters Listed:

Qualifiers for Sample Submission Listed:

CINT Cooling initiated. Samples were received packed with ice or ice packs and were sampled the same day as received.

Description Qualifier

Description Qualifier

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)

L2295725 CONT’D....

18PAGE of

Additional Comments for Sample Listed:

Samplenum Matrix Sample Comments

L2295725-1

L2295725-1

L2295725-3

Water

Water

Water

Note: RRR; Surrogate recovery is outside ALS control limits; reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly.Note: OWP - Organic water sample contained visible sediment (must be included as part of analysis). Measured concentrations of organic substances in water can be biased high due to presence of sediment.Note: OWP - Organic water sample contained visible sediment (must be included as part of analysis). Measured concentrations of organic substances in water can be biased high due to presence of sediment.

Report Remarks

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Page 126: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Reference Information

DLHC

RRR

sediment.

Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required due to high concentration of test analyte(s).

Refer to Report Remarks for issues regarding this analysis

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)

L2295725 CONT’D....

19PAGE of

625-33DCBENZIDINE-WT

625-BIS-2-PHTH-WT

625-DNB-PHTH-WT

625-PAH-LOW-WT

625-PCP-WT

BOD-WT

CN-TOT-WT

CR-CR6-IC-WT

EC-SCREEN-WT

EC-WW-MF-WT

3,3-Dichlorobenzidine

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

Di-n-Butyl Phthalate

EPA 8270 PAH (Low Level)

Pentachlorophenol

BOD

Cyanide, Total

Chromium +6

Conductivity Screen (Internal Use Only)

E. Coli

Methods Listed (if applicable):ALS Test Code Test Description

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

SW846 8270

SW846 8270

SW846 8270

SW846 8270

SW846 8270

APHA 5210 B

ISO 14403-2

EPA 7199

APHA 2510

SM 9222D

Method Reference** Matrix

Aqueous samples are extracted and extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD.

Aqueous samples are extracted and extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD.

Aqueous samples are extracted and extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD.

Aqueous samples are extracted and extracts are analyzed on GC/MSD. Depending on the analytical GC/MS column used benzo(j)fluoranthene may chromatographically co-elute with benzo(b)fluoranthene or benzo(k)fluoranthene.

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 5210B - "Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD)". All forms of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) are determined by diluting and incubating a sample for a specified time period, and measuring the oxygen depletion using a dissolved oxygen meter. Dissolved BOD (SOLUBLE) is determined by filtering the sample through a glass fibre filter prior to dilution. Carbonaceous BOD (CBOD) is determined by adding a nitrification inhibitor to the diluted sample prior to incubation.

Total cyanide is determined by the combination of UV digestion and distillation. Cyanide is converted to cyanogen chloride by reacting with chloramine-T, the cyanogen chloride then reacts with a combination of barbituric acid and isonicotinic acid to form a highly colored complex.

When using this method, high levels of thiocyanate in samples can cause false positives at ~1-2% of the thiocyanate concentration. For samples with detectable cyanide analyzed by this method, ALS recommends analysis for thiocyanate to check for this potential interference

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste" SW-846, Method 7199, published by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The procedure involves analysis for chromium (VI) by ion chromatography using diphenylcarbazide in a sulphuric acid solution. Chromium (III) is calculated as the difference between the total chromium and the chromium (VI) results.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).

Qualitative analysis of conductivity where required during preparation of other tests - e.g. TDS, metals, etc.

A 100 mL volume of sample is filtered through a membrane, the membrane is placed on mFC-BCIG agar and incubated at 44.5 –0 .2 °C for 24 – 2 h. Method ID: WT-TM-1200

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Page 127: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Reference Information27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)

L2295725 CONT’D....

20PAGE of

F-IC-N-WT

HG-T-CVAA-WT

MET-T-CCMS-WT

NP,NPE-LCMS-WT

OGG-SPEC-CALC-WT

OGG-SPEC-WT

P-T-COL-WT

PAH-EXTRA-WT

PAH-SUM-CALC-WT

PCB-WT

PH-WT

Fluoride in Water by IC

Total Mercury in Water by CVAAS

Total Metals in Water by CRC ICPMS

Nonylphenols and Ethoxylates by LC/MS-MS

Speciated Oil and Grease A/V Calc

Speciated Oil and Grease-Gravimetric

Total P in Water by Colour

Sanitary Sewer Use By-Law Additional PAH

TOTAL PAH’s

Polychlorinated Biphenyls

pH

Methods Listed (if applicable):ALS Test Code Test Description

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

EPA 300.1 (mod)

EPA 1631E (mod)

EPA 200.2/6020A (mod)

J. Chrom A849 (1999) p.467-482

CALCULATION

APHA 5520 B

APHA 4500-P PHOSPHORUS

SW846 8270

CALCULATION

EPA 8082

APHA 4500 H-Electrode

Method Reference** Matrix

Inorganic anions are analyzed by Ion Chromatography with conductivity and/or UV detection.

Water samples undergo a cold-oxidation using bromine monochloride prior to reduction with stannous chloride, and analyzed by CVAAS.

Water samples are digested with nitric and hydrochloric acids, and analyzed by CRC ICPMS.

Method Limitation (re: Sulfur): Sulfide and volatile sulfur species may not be recovered by this method.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011).

Water samples are filtered and analyzed on LCMS/MS by direct injection.

Sample is extracted with hexane, sample speciation into mineral and animal/vegetable fractions is achieved via silica gel separation and is then determined gravimetrically.

The procedure involves an extraction of the entire water sample with hexane. Sample speciation into mineral and animal/vegetable fractions is achieved via silica gel separation and is then determined gravimetrically.

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-P "Phosphorus". Total Phosphorus is deteremined colourimetrically after persulphate digestion of the sample.

Total PAH represents the sum of all PAH analytes reported for a given sample. Note that regulatory agencies and criteria differ in their definitions of Total PAH in terms of the individual PAH analytes to be included.

PCBs are extracted from an aqueous sample at neutral pH with aliquots of dichloromethane using a modified separatory funnel technique. The extracts are analyzed by GC/MSD.

Water samples are analyzed directly by a calibrated pH meter.

Analysis conducted in accordance with the Protocol for Analytical Methods Used in the Assessment of Properties under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act (July 1, 2011). Holdtime for samples under this regulation is 28 days

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Page 128: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Reference Information

GLOSSARY OF REPORT TERMS

Surrogates are compounds that are similar in behaviour to target analyte(s), but that do not normally occur in environmental samples. For applicable tests, surrogates are added to samples prior to analysis as a check on recovery. In reports that display the D.L. column, laboratory objectives for surrogates are listed there.mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram based on dry weight of samplemg/kg wwt - milligrams per kilogram based on wet weight of samplemg/kg lwt - milligrams per kilogram based on lipid-adjusted weight mg/L - unit of concentration based on volume, parts per million.< - Less than.D.L. - The reporting limit.N/A - Result not available. Refer to qualifier code and definition for explanation.

Test results reported relate only to the samples as received by the laboratory.UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED, ALL SAMPLES WERE RECEIVED IN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION.Analytical results in unsigned test reports with the DRAFT watermark are subject to change, pending final QC review.

Application of guidelines is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. ALS assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the information. Guideline limits are not adjusted for the hardness, pH or temperature of the sample (the most conservative values are used). Measurement uncertainty is not applied to test results prior to comparison with specified criteria values.

27-JUN-19 14:49 (MT)

L2295725 CONT’D....

21PAGE of

PHENOLS-4AAP-WT

SOLIDS-TSS-WT

TKN-WT

VOC-ROU-HS-WT

XYLENES-SUM-CALC-WT

Phenol (4AAP)

Suspended solids

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Volatile Organic Compounds

Sum of Xylene Isomer Concentrations

Methods Listed (if applicable):ALS Test Code Test Description

Water

Water

Water

Water

Water

EPA 9066

APHA 2540 D-Gravimetric

APHA 4500-Norg D

SW846 8260

CALCULATION

Method Reference**

**ALS test methods may incorporate modifications from specified reference methods to improve performance.

Matrix

An automated method is used to distill the sample. The distillate is then buffered to pH 9.4 which reacts with 4AAP and potassium ferricyanide to form a red complex which is measured colorimetrically.

A well-mixed sample is filtered through a weighed standard glass fibre filter and the residue retained is dried in an oven at 104–1°C for a minimum of four hours or until a constant weight is achieved.

This analysis is carried out using procedures adapted from APHA Method 4500-Norg "Nitrogen (Organic)". Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen is determined by sample digestion at 380 Celsius with analysis usingan automated colorimetric method.

Aqueous samples are analyzed by headspace-GC/MS.

Total xylenes represents the sum of o-xylene and m&p-xylene.

Laboratory Definition Code Laboratory Location

WT ALS ENVIRONMENTAL - WATERLOO, ONTARIO, CANADA

The last two letters of the above test code(s) indicate the laboratory that performed analytical analysis for that test. Refer to the list below:

Chain of Custody Numbers:

17-820670

Job Reference: TT183004.700021

Page 129: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 1 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

625-33DCBENZIDINE-WT

625-BIS-2-PHTH-WT

625-DNB-PHTH-WT

625-PAH-LOW-WT

Water

Water

Water

Water

R4687031

R4687031

R4687031

R4686907

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

LCS

MB

LCS

MB

LCS

MB

LCS

WG3085921-2

WG3085921-1

WG3085921-2

WG3085921-1

WG3085921-2

WG3085921-1

WG3085921-2

3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine

3,3’-Dichlorobenzidine

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate

Surrogate: 2-fluorobiphenyl

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

Di-n-butylphthalate

Di-n-butylphthalate

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

Acenaphthene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(ghi)perylene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Chrysene

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

88.8

<0.40

96.1

119.3

<2.0

87.3

96.1

108.4

<1.0

87.3

96.1

81.3

94.0

99.1

93.7

86.6

93.6

99.6

101.2

93.6

96.0

89.3

86.1

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

50-140

50-140

50-150

50-140

50-140

50-140

60-130

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

%

ug/L

%

%

ug/L

%

%

%

ug/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

0.4

40-130

2

40-130

40-130

1

40-130

40-130

15

Page 130: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 2 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

625-PAH-LOW-WT

625-PCP-WT

BOD-WT

Water

Water

Water

R4686907

R4687031

Batch

Batch

LCS

MB

LCS

MB

WG3085921-2

WG3085921-1

WG3085921-2

WG3085921-1

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

Naphthalene

Perylene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Acenaphthene

Anthracene

Benzo(a)anthracene

Benzo(a)pyrene

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

Benzo(ghi)perylene

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

Chrysene

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene

Fluoranthene

Fluorene

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene

Naphthalene

Perylene

Phenanthrene

Pyrene

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

Surrogate: p-Terphenyl d14

Pentachlorophenol

Pentachlorophenol

Surrogate: 2,4,6-Tribromophenol

86.1

67.7

86.9

92.5

93.6

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

<0.010

82.0

79.9

84.8

<0.50

81.4

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

50-140

50-130

50-140

50-140

50-140

50-140

%

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

ug/L

%

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

0.01

40-130

40-130

0.5

40-150

15

Page 131: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 3 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

BOD-WT

CN-TOT-WT

CR-CR6-IC-WT

Water

Water

Water

R4688318

R4682852

R4682293

Batch

Batch

Batch

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

DUP

LCS

LCS

MB

MB

MS

MS

DUP

DUP

LCS

LCS

MB

MB

WG3084653-2

WG3084653-3

WG3084653-1

WG3084328-11

WG3084328-7

WG3084328-10

WG3084328-6

WG3084328-5

WG3084328-9

WG3084328-12

WG3084328-8

WG3084768-4

WG3084768-9

WG3084768-2

WG3084768-7

WG3084768-1

WG3084768-6

L2295690-1

L2295725-5

L2295776-2

L2295725-5

L2295776-2

WG3084768-3

WG3084768-8

BOD

BOD

BOD

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Cyanide, Total

Chromium, Hexavalent

Chromium, Hexavalent

Chromium, Hexavalent

Chromium, Hexavalent

Chromium, Hexavalent

Chromium, Hexavalent

<3.0

90.4

<2.0

<0.0020

<0.0020

86.1

85.8

<0.0020

<0.0020

81.3

82.6

0.103

<0.00050

98.9

100.2

<0.00050

<0.00050

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.6

N/A

20

20

20

20

20

85-115

80-120

80-120

70-130

70-130

80-120

80-120

mg/L

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

<3.0

<0.0020

<0.0020

0.104

<0.00050

2

0.002

0.002

0.0005

0.0005

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

15

Page 132: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 4 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

CR-CR6-IC-WT

EC-WW-MF-WT

F-IC-N-WT

HG-T-CVAA-WT

Water

Water

Water

Water

R4682293

R4681780

R4682443

R4681107

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

MS

MS

DUP

MB

DUP

DUP

LCS

LCS

MB

MB

MS

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

WG3084768-10

WG3084768-5

WG3083999-3

WG3083999-1

WG3084625-10

WG3084625-15

WG3084625-12

WG3084625-7

WG3084625-11

WG3084625-6

WG3084625-14

WG3084625-9

WG3084177-3

WG3084177-2

WG3084177-1

WG3084177-4

WG3084768-8

WG3084768-3

L2295801-4

WG3084625-8

L2295756-1

L2295756-1

WG3084625-8

L2295297-1

L2295425-1

Chromium, Hexavalent

Chromium, Hexavalent

E. Coli

E. Coli

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Fluoride (F)

Mercury (Hg)-Total

Mercury (Hg)-Total

Mercury (Hg)-Total

97.5

N/A

0

0

0.047

0.271

102.0

101.4

<0.020

<0.020

100.0

99.2

<0.000010

91.8

<0.000010

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

22-JUN-19

22-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

0.0

1.1

2.9

N/A

65

20

20

20

70-130

-

90-110

90-110

75-125

75-125

80-120

%

%

CFU/100mL

CFU/100mL

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

MS-B

0

0.046

0.279

<0.000010

1

0.02

0.02

0.00001

RPD-NA

15

Page 133: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 5 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

HG-T-CVAA-WT

MET-T-CCMS-WT

Water

Water

R4681107

R4681083

Batch

Batch

MS

DUP

LCS

WG3084177-4

WG3083854-4

WG3083854-2

L2295425-1

WG3083854-3

Mercury (Hg)-Total

Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Molybdenum (Mo)-Total

Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Molybdenum (Mo)-Total

Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

75.6

<0.050

<0.0010

<0.0010

<0.000050

<0.0050

0.0024

<0.010

<0.00050

0.518

0.00573

0.0066

<0.00050

<0.00050

<0.0010

<0.0030

<0.030

98.7

101.3

96.6

96.0

97.8

97.2

95.9

100.6

99.3

99.6

96.5

96.5

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.1

N/A

N/A

0.6

1.8

3.6

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

70-130

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

<0.050

<0.0010

<0.0010

<0.000050

<0.0050

0.0024

<0.010

<0.00050

0.521

0.00584

0.0064

<0.00050

<0.00050

<0.0010

<0.0030

<0.030

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

15

Page 134: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 6 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

MET-T-CCMS-WT Water

R4681083BatchLCS

MB

MS

WG3083854-2

WG3083854-1

WG3083854-5 WG3083854-3

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Molybdenum (Mo)-Total

Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

Aluminum (Al)-Total

Antimony (Sb)-Total

Arsenic (As)-Total

Cadmium (Cd)-Total

Chromium (Cr)-Total

Cobalt (Co)-Total

Copper (Cu)-Total

Lead (Pb)-Total

Manganese (Mn)-Total

Molybdenum (Mo)-Total

Nickel (Ni)-Total

Selenium (Se)-Total

101.3

98.0

95.7

93.7

<0.0050

<0.00010

<0.00010

<0.0000050

<0.00050

<0.00010

<0.0010

<0.000050

<0.00050

<0.000050

<0.00050

<0.000050

<0.000050

<0.00010

<0.00030

<0.0030

99.3

97.6

97.1

95.0

96.3

94.6

93.8

94.7

N/A

90.9

94.4

98.1

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

80-120

80-120

80-120

80-120

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

-

70-130

70-130

70-130

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

MS-B

0.005

0.0001

0.0001

0.000005

0.0005

0.0001

0.001

0.00005

0.0005

0.00005

0.0005

0.00005

0.00005

0.0001

0.0003

0.003

15

Page 135: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 7 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

MET-T-CCMS-WT

NP,NPE-LCMS-WT

OGG-SPEC-WT

P-T-COL-WT

Water

Water

Water

Water

R4681083

R4684448

R4682778

R4689242

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

WG3083854-5

WG3086043-3

WG3086043-2

WG3086043-1

WG3086043-4

WG3084489-2

WG3084489-1

WG3089387-3

WG3089387-2

WG3083854-3

L2296652-1

L2296652-1

L2294496-1

Silver (Ag)-Total

Tin (Sn)-Total

Titanium (Ti)-Total

Zinc (Zn)-Total

Nonylphenol

Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates

Nonylphenol Diethoxylates

Nonylphenol

Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates

Nonylphenol Diethoxylates

Nonylphenol

Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates

Nonylphenol Diethoxylates

Nonylphenol

Nonylphenol Monoethoxylates

Nonylphenol Diethoxylates

Oil and Grease, Total

Mineral Oil and Grease

Oil and Grease, Total

Mineral Oil and Grease

Phosphorus, Total

96.7

97.6

93.0

92.3

<1.0

<10

<0.50

101.0

106.0

80.0

<1.0

<2.0

<0.10

92.4

116.5

61.4

101.1

94.0

<5.0

<2.5

0.0245

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

N/A

N/A

N/A

18

30

30

30

20

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

75-125

75-125

75-125

50-150

50-150

50-150

70-130

70-130

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

%

%

mg/L

mg/L

mg/L

<1.0

<10

<0.50

0.0206

1

2

0.1

5

2.5

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

15

Page 136: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 8 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

P-T-COL-WT

PAH-EXTRA-WT

Water

Water

R4689242

R4689276

R4686762

Batch

Batch

Batch

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

LCS

MB

WG3089387-2

WG3089387-1

WG3089387-4

WG3089023-3

WG3089023-2

WG3089023-1

WG3089023-4

WG3085921-2

WG3085921-1

L2294496-1

L2295701-1

L2295701-1

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

Phosphorus, Total

Benzo(e)pyrene

1,3-Dinitropyrene

1,6-Dinitropyrene

Dibenz(a,h)acridine

1,8-Dinitropyrene

Dibenz(a,j)acridine

7H-Dibenzo(c,g)carbazole

Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene

Benzo(e)pyrene

1,3-Dinitropyrene

1,6-Dinitropyrene

Dibenz(a,h)acridine

1,8-Dinitropyrene

Dibenz(a,j)acridine

7H-Dibenzo(c,g)carbazole

Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene

Surrogate: d14-Terphenyl

101.2

<0.0030

107.6

0.125

105.8

<0.0030

N/A

91.4

125.1

101.4

91.8

92.4

66.7

80.3

93.8

<0.050

<1.0

<1.0

<0.050

<1.0

<0.050

<0.050

<0.050

64.2

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

5.0 20

80-120

70-130

80-120

-

60-130

60-130

60-130

60-130

60-130

60-130

60-130

60-130

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

MS-B

0.131

0.003

0.003

0.05

1

1

0.05

1

0.05

0.05

0.05

40-130

15

Page 137: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 9 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

PCB-WT

PH-WT

PHENOLS-4AAP-WT

Water

Water

Water

R4687938

R4682005

R4682010

R4682391

R4684867

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

DUP

LCS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

WG3085982-2

WG3085982-1

WG3085307-3

WG3085307-1

WG3085312-3

WG3085312-1

WG3083973-11

WG3083973-10

WG3083973-9

WG3083973-12

WG3086182-3

WG3086182-2

WG3085307-2

WG3085312-2

L2295808-1

L2295808-1

L2294966-1

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl

pH

pH

pH

pH

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

103.4

90.4

109.2

99.4

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

<0.020

75.9

7.55

6.98

7.63

7.03

0.0035

95.0

<0.0010

93.2

<0.0010

95.4

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

22-JUN-19

22-JUN-19

22-JUN-19

22-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

21-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

0.06

0.00

6.1

N/A

0.2

0.2

20

20

65-130

65-130

65-130

65-130

6.9-7.1

6.9-7.1

85-115

75-125

85-115

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

pH units

pH units

pH units

pH units

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

7.61

7.63

0.0037

<0.0010

0.02

0.02

0.02

0.02

50-150

0.001

J

J

RPD-NA

15

Page 138: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 10 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

PHENOLS-4AAP-WT

SOLIDS-TSS-WT

TKN-WT

VOC-ROU-HS-WT

Water

Water

Water

Water

R4684867

R4686888

R4685548

R4688055

R4688206

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

Batch

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

LCS

MB

MS

DUP

WG3086182-1

WG3086182-4

WG3087101-3

WG3087101-2

WG3087101-1

WG3087177-3

WG3087177-2

WG3087177-1

WG3087177-4

WG3087806-3

WG3087806-2

WG3087806-1

WG3087806-4

WG3088410-4

L2294966-1

L2295779-10

L2293494-1

L2293494-1

L2293921-1

L2293921-1

WG3088410-3

Phenols (4AAP)

Phenols (4AAP)

Total Suspended Solids

Total Suspended Solids

Total Suspended Solids

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

<0.0010

90.6

414

100.2

<2.0

0.17

101.9

<0.15

96.5

<0.15

105.2

<0.15

123.9

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

24-JUN-19

24-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

25-JUN-19

25-JUN-19

25-JUN-19

25-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

3.9

0.12

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

20

0.3

20

30

30

30

75-125

85-115

75-125

70-130

75-125

70-130

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

mg/L

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

398

0.29

<0.15

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

0.001

2

0.15

0.15

J

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

15

Page 139: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 11 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4688206BatchDUP

LCS

MB

WG3088410-4

WG3088410-1

WG3088410-2

WG3088410-3Benzene

Chloroform

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Toluene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene

Chloroform

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene

Chloroform

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Tetrachloroethylene

3.42

316

123

95.6

367

126

247

<0.50

97.8

104.1

108.0

105.4

105.3

102.7

103.1

104.0

104.0

101.0

106.8

104.8

106.0

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<2.0

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

6.5

6.3

4.7

9.5

9.5

8.5

8.9

N/A

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

3.65

337

129

105

N/A

137

269

<0.50

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

1

0.5

2

0.5

1

0.5

0.5

RPD-NA

15

Page 140: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 12 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4688206

R4688474

Batch

Batch

MB

MS

DUP

WG3088410-2

WG3088410-5

WG3088151-4

WG3088410-3

WG3088151-3

Toluene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene

Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene

Chloroform

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene

Chloroform

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

<0.50

<0.50

103.6

102.2

93.0

108.7

115.9

105.6

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

108.4

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<2.0

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

30

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

50-150

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

MS-B

MS-B

MS-B

MS-B

MS-B

MS-B

MS-B

MS-B

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<2.0

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

0.5

0.5

70-130

70-130

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

RPD-NA

15

Page 141: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 13 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4688474BatchDUP

LCS

MB

MS

WG3088151-4

WG3088151-1

WG3088151-2

WG3088151-5

WG3088151-3

WG3088151-3

Trichloroethylene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene

Chloroform

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

Trichloroethylene

1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene

Chloroform

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

Trichloroethylene

Surrogate: 1,4-Difluorobenzene

Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene

<0.50

87.8

101.9

107.0

100.8

102.3

100.9

102.9

93.2

94.4

90.0

111.6

95.7

84.7

114.1

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<2.0

<0.50

<1.0

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

<0.50

107.5

106.8

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

N/A 30

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

70-130

ug/L

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

ug/L

%

%

<0.50

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

1

0.5

2

0.5

1

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

70-130

70-130

RPD-NA

15

Page 142: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control ReportPage 14 of

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Test Matrix Reference Result Qualifier Units RPD Limit Analyzed

VOC-ROU-HS-WT Water

R4688474

R4689395

Batch

Batch

MS

LCS

MB

WG3088151-5

WG3089572-1

WG3089572-2

WG3088151-31,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

1,4-Dichlorobenzene

Benzene

Chloroform

cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Dichloromethane

Ethylbenzene

m+p-Xylenes

o-Xylene

Tetrachloroethylene

Toluene

trans-1,3-Dichloropropene

Trichloroethylene

Trichloroethylene

Trichloroethylene

89.2

101.6

104.4

101.2

103.7

98.7

104.3

90.0

91.4

87.5

107.0

93.0

78.0

113.8

113.5

<0.50

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

26-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

27-JUN-19

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

50-150

70-130

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

ug/L 0.5

15

Page 143: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Quality Control Report

Page 15 of

Report Date: 27-JUN-19Workorder: L2295725

Sample Parameter Qualifier Definitions:

Description Qualifier

DLI

J

MS-B

RPD-NA

Detection Limit Raised: Dilution required to address Internal Standard response problems caused by matrix interference.Duplicate results and limits are expressed in terms of absolute difference.

Matrix Spike recovery could not be accurately calculated due to high analyte background in sample.

Relative Percent Difference Not Available due to result(s) being less than detection limit.

Limit ALS Control Limit (Data Quality Objectives)DUP DuplicateRPD Relative Percent DifferenceN/A Not AvailableLCS Laboratory Control SampleSRM Standard Reference MaterialMS Matrix SpikeMSD Matrix Spike DuplicateADE Average Desorption EfficiencyMB Method BlankIRM Internal Reference MaterialCRM Certified Reference MaterialCCV Continuing Calibration VerificationCVS Calibration Verification StandardLCSD Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate

Legend:

The ALS Quality Control Report is provided to ALS clients upon request. ALS includes comprehensive QC checks with every analysis to ensure our high standards of quality are met. Each QC result has a known or expected target value, which is compared against pre-determined data quality objectives to provide confidence in the accuracy of associated test results.

Please note that this report may contain QC results from anonymous Sample Duplicates and Matrix Spikes that do not originate from this Work Order.

Hold Time Exceedances:

All test results reported with this submission were conducted within ALS recommended hold times.

ALS recommended hold times may vary by province. They are assigned to meet known provincial and/or federal government requirements. In the absence of regulatory hold times, ALS establishes recommendations based on guidelines published by the US EPA, APHA Standard Methods, or Environment Canada (where available). For more information, please contact ALS.

Client:

Contact:

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions - Markham50 Vogel Road, Unit 3 & 4 Richmond Hill ON L4B 3K6Kim Gilder

15

Page 144: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require
Page 145: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require
Page 146: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Appendix HReport Limitations

Page 147: Appendix A Geotechnical Borehole Logs (Assignment 16-12)...Borehole details as presented, do not constitute a thorough understanding of all potential conditions present and require

Limitations

1. The work performed in the preparation of this report and the conclusions presented are subject to the

following:

(a) The Standard Terms and Conditions which form a part of our Professional Services Contract;

(b) The Scope of Services;

(c) Time and Budgetary limitations as described in our Contract; and

(d) The Limitations stated herein.

2. No other warranties or representations, either expressed or implied, are made as to the professional services

provided under the terms of our Contract, or the conclusions presented.

3. The conclusions presented in this report were based, in part, on visual observations of the site and attendant

structures. Our conclusions cannot and are not extended to include those portions of the site or structures

which were not reasonably available, in Wood’s opinion, for direct observation.

4. The environmental conditions at the site were assessed, within the limitations set out above, having due

regard for applicable environmental regulations as of the date of the inspection. A review of compliance by

past owners or occupants of the site with any applicable local, provincial or federal by-laws, orders-in-

council, legislative enactments and regulations was not performed.

5. The site history research included obtaining information from third parties and employees or agents of the

owner. No attempt has been made to verify the accuracy of any information provided, unless specifically

noted in our report.

6. Where testing was performed, it was carried out in accordance with the terms of our contract providing for

testing. Other substances, or different quantities of substances testing for, may be present on site and may

be revealed by different of other testing not provided for in our contract.

7. Because of the limitations referred to above, different environmental conditions from those stated in our

report may exist. Should such different conditions be encountered, Wood must be notified in order that it

may determine if modifications to the conclusions in the report are necessary.

8. The utilization of Wood’s services during the implementation of any remedial measures will allow Wood to

observe compliance with the conclusions and recommendations contained in the report. Wood’s

involvement will also allow for changes to be made as necessary to suit field conditions as they are

encountered.

9. This report is for the sole use of the party to whom it is addressed unless expressly stated otherwise in the

report or contract. Any use which any third party makes of the report, in whole or in part, or any reliance

thereon, or decisions made based on any information of conclusions in the report, is the sole responsibility

of such third party. Wood accepts no responsibility whatsoever for damages or loss of any nature or kind

suffered by any such third party as a result of actions taken or not taken or decisions made in reliance on the

report or anything set out therein.

10. This report is not to be given over to any third party for any purpose whatsoever without the written

permission of Wood.

11. Provided that the report is still reliable, and less than 12 months old, Wood will issue a third-party reliance

letter to parties client identifies in writing, upon payment of the then current fee for such letters. All third

parties relying on Wood’s report, by such reliance agree to be bound by our proposal and Wood’s standard

reliance letter. Wood’s standard reliance letter indicates that in no event shall Wood be liable for any

damages, howsoever arising, relating to third-party reliance on Wood’s report. No reliance by any party is

permitted without such agreement.