appendix 9 - trics data · 2020. 4. 2. · survey date: thursday 24/09/15 survey type: manual 8...
TRANSCRIPT
Manor Park, Drayton Transport Assessment © MLM Consulting Engineers Limited
\\mlmips.com\work\Tier2MLM\6100000\6100905\MLM\REP\6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-RP-TP-0001-R04-TA-Manor Park_Drayton.docx
Appendix 9 - TRICS Data
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 1
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
Calculation Reference: AUDIT-532501-191123-1111
TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:
Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL
Category : A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES
Selected regions and areas:
02 SOUTH EAST
ES EAST SUSSEX 1 days
KC KENT 1 days
SC SURREY 1 days
03 SOUTH WEST
SM SOMERSET 1 days
06 WEST MIDLANDS
SH SHROPSHIRE 1 days
ST STAFFORDSHIRE 1 days
08 NORTH WEST
CH CHESHIRE 1 days
09 NORTH
DH DURHAM 1 days
This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set
Secondary Filtering selection:
This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range
are included in the trip rate calculation.
Parameter: Number of dwellings
Actual Range: 24 to 288 (units: )
Range Selected by User: 6 to 918 (units: )
Parking Spaces Range: All Surveys Included
Percentage of dwellings privately owned: All Surveys Included
Public Transport Provision:
Selection by: Include all surveys
Date Range: 01/01/11 to 08/07/19
This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are
included in the trip rate calculation.
Selected survey days:
Monday 2 days
Wednesday 2 days
Thursday 3 days
Friday 1 days
This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.
Selected survey types:
Manual count 8 days
Directional ATC Count 0 days
This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding
up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys
are undertaking using machines.
Selected Locations:
Edge of Town 8
This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories
consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and
Not Known.
Selected Location Sub Categories:
Residential Zone 8
This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories
consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village,
Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 2
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
Secondary Filtering selection:
Use Class:
C 3 8 days
This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005
has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.
Population within 1 mile:
5,001 to 10,000 3 days
10,001 to 15,000 4 days
20,001 to 25,000 1 days
This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.
Population within 5 miles:
25,001 to 50,000 1 days
50,001 to 75,000 2 days
75,001 to 100,000 2 days
100,001 to 125,000 1 days
125,001 to 250,000 2 days
This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.
Car ownership within 5 miles:
1.1 to 1.5 8 days
This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling,
within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.
Travel Plan:
No 8 days
This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place,
and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans.
PTAL Rating:
No PTAL Present 8 days
This data displays the number of selected surveys with PTAL Ratings.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 3
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters
1 CH-03-A-09 TERRACED HOUSES CHESHIRE
GREYSTOKE ROAD
MACCLESFIELD
HURDSFIELD
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 2 4
Survey date: MONDAY 24/11/14 Survey Type: MANUAL
2 DH-03-A-03 SEMI-DETACHED & TERRACED DURHAM
PILGRIMS WAY
DURHAM
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 5 7
Survey date: FRIDAY 19/10/18 Survey Type: MANUAL
3 ES-03-A-03 MIXED HOUSES & FLATS EAST SUSSEX
SHEPHAM LANE
POLEGATE
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 2 1 2
Survey date: MONDAY 11/07/16 Survey Type: MANUAL
4 KC-03-A-07 MIXED HOUSES KENT
RECULVER ROAD
HERNE BAY
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 2 8 8
Survey date: WEDNESDAY 27/09/17 Survey Type: MANUAL
5 SC-03-A-04 DETACHED & TERRACED SURREY
HIGH ROAD
BYFLEET
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 7 1
Survey date: THURSDAY 23/01/14 Survey Type: MANUAL
6 SH-03-A-05 SEMI-DETACHED/TERRACED SHROPSHIRE
SANDCROFT
TELFORD
SUTTON HILL
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 5 4
Survey date: THURSDAY 24/10/13 Survey Type: MANUAL
7 SM-03-A-01 DETACHED & SEMI SOMERSET
WEMBDON ROAD
BRIDGWATER
NORTHFIELD
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 3 3
Survey date: THURSDAY 24/09/15 Survey Type: MANUAL
8 ST-03-A-07 DETACHED & SEMI-DETACHED STAFFORDSHIRE
BEACONSIDE
STAFFORD
MARSTON GATE
Edge of Town
Residential Zone
Total Number of dwellings: 2 4 8
Survey date: WEDNESDAY 22/11/17 Survey Type: MANUAL
This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a
unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the
week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count.
MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES
Site Ref Reason for Deselection
DC-03-A-08 Bungalows
ES-03-A-04 Distance from urban centre
GM-03-A-10 Proximity to frequent Public Transport
NY-03-A-11 Distance from Urban Centre
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 4
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES (Cont.)
Site Ref Reason for Deselection
SH-03-A-06 Bungalows
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 5
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL VEHICLES
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.119 8 123 0.292 8 123 0.41107:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.173 8 123 0.394 8 123 0.56708:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.143 8 123 0.176 8 123 0.31909:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.128 8 123 0.155 8 123 0.28310:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.152 8 123 0.180 8 123 0.33211:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.168 8 123 0.166 8 123 0.33412:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.173 8 123 0.162 8 123 0.33513:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.216 8 123 0.180 8 123 0.39614:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.284 8 123 0.179 8 123 0.46315:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.291 8 123 0.202 8 123 0.49316:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.377 8 123 0.159 8 123 0.53617:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.291 8 123 0.189 8 123 0.48018:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 2.515 2.434 4.949
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
The survey data, graphs and all associated supporting information, contained within the TRICS Database are published
by TRICS Consortium Limited ("the Company") and the Company claims copyright and database rights in this published
work. The Company authorises those who possess a current TRICS licence to access the TRICS Database and copy the
data contained within the TRICS Database for the licence holders' use only. Any resulting copy must retain all copyrights
and other proprietary notices, and any disclaimer contained thereon.
The Company accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from reliance on data contained in the TRICS Database.
[No warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the data contained in the TRICS Database.]
Parameter summary
Trip rate parameter range selected: 24 - 288 (units: )
Survey date date range: 01/01/11 - 08/07/19
Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 8
Number of Saturdays: 0
Number of Sundays: 0
Surveys automatically removed from selection: 0
Surveys manually removed from selection: 5
This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate
calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum
survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of
surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of
the standard filtering procedure are displayed.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 6
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL TAXIS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.005 8 123 0.005 8 123 0.01007:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.004 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.00708:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.00609:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.002 8 123 0.00510:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.00711:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00212:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00313:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.007 8 123 0.006 8 123 0.01314:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.00715:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.004 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.00816:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.002 8 123 0.00517:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.00518:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.040 0.038 0.078
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 7
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL OGVS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00107:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00108:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00309:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.004 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.00710:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00211:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.00712:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.004 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00513:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.00414:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.002 8 123 0.00415:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.00716:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00217:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00018:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.023 0.020 0.043
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 8
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL PSVS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00007:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00008:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00009:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00010:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.002 8 123 0.00411:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00012:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00013:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00014:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00015:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00016:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00017:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00018:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.002 0.002 0.004
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 9
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL CYCLISTS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.007 8 123 0.01007:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.008 8 123 0.00908:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.002 8 123 0.00309:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00110:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00311:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00212:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00413:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.002 8 123 0.00414:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00215:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.004 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00516:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.008 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.01117:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.007 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.01018:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.034 0.030 0.064
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 10
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL VEHICLE OCCUPANTS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.152 8 123 0.504 8 123 0.65607:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.251 8 123 0.780 8 123 1.03108:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.207 8 123 0.280 8 123 0.48709:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.182 8 123 0.245 8 123 0.42710:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.228 8 123 0.280 8 123 0.50811:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.255 8 123 0.246 8 123 0.50112:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.262 8 123 0.250 8 123 0.51213:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.331 8 123 0.259 8 123 0.59014:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.520 8 123 0.287 8 123 0.80715:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.536 8 123 0.328 8 123 0.86416:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.651 8 123 0.256 8 123 0.90717:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.494 8 123 0.338 8 123 0.83218:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 4.069 4.053 8.122
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 11
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL PEDESTRIANS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.010 8 123 0.016 8 123 0.02607:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.025 8 123 0.055 8 123 0.08008:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.022 8 123 0.018 8 123 0.04009:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.021 8 123 0.015 8 123 0.03610:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.016 8 123 0.020 8 123 0.03611:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.020 8 123 0.023 8 123 0.04312:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.028 8 123 0.018 8 123 0.04613:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.025 8 123 0.032 8 123 0.05714:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.063 8 123 0.049 8 123 0.11215:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.051 8 123 0.021 8 123 0.07216:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.043 8 123 0.023 8 123 0.06617:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.024 8 123 0.052 8 123 0.07618:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.348 0.342 0.690
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 12
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL BUS/TRAM PASSENGERS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.013 8 123 0.01307:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.024 8 123 0.02408:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.006 8 123 0.00909:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.007 8 123 0.005 8 123 0.01210:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.005 8 123 0.00711:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.00712:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.008 8 123 0.00913:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.004 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.00814:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.009 8 123 0.008 8 123 0.01715:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.020 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.02416:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.014 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.01817:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.031 8 123 0.012 8 123 0.04318:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.094 0.097 0.191
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 13
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL TOTAL RAIL PASSENGERS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.010 8 123 0.01007:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.014 8 123 0.01408:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.005 8 123 0.00509:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.007 8 123 0.00710:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.00411:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00112:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00313:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00314:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.012 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.01515:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.008 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00916:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.008 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00817:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.010 8 123 0.002 8 123 0.01218:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.045 0.046 0.091
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 14
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT USERS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.023 8 123 0.02307:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.039 8 123 0.03908:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.011 8 123 0.01409:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.007 8 123 0.012 8 123 0.01910:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.008 8 123 0.01111:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.005 8 123 0.00812:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.004 8 123 0.008 8 123 0.01213:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.007 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.01114:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.021 8 123 0.011 8 123 0.03215:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.028 8 123 0.005 8 123 0.03316:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.022 8 123 0.004 8 123 0.02617:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.042 8 123 0.014 8 123 0.05618:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.140 0.144 0.284
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 15
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL TOTAL PEOPLE
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.165 8 123 0.550 8 123 0.71507:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.278 8 123 0.881 8 123 1.15908:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.233 8 123 0.311 8 123 0.54409:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.211 8 123 0.274 8 123 0.48510:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.249 8 123 0.309 8 123 0.55811:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.280 8 123 0.276 8 123 0.55612:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.298 8 123 0.278 8 123 0.57613:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.366 8 123 0.298 8 123 0.66414:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.606 8 123 0.347 8 123 0.95315:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.619 8 123 0.356 8 123 0.97516:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.724 8 123 0.287 8 123 1.01117:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.567 8 123 0.407 8 123 0.97418:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 4.596 4.574 9.170
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 16
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL CARS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.080 8 123 0.248 8 123 0.32807:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.140 8 123 0.343 8 123 0.48308:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.105 8 123 0.140 8 123 0.24509:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.095 8 123 0.129 8 123 0.22410:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.117 8 123 0.135 8 123 0.25211:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.129 8 123 0.128 8 123 0.25712:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.134 8 123 0.127 8 123 0.26113:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.171 8 123 0.143 8 123 0.31414:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.250 8 123 0.137 8 123 0.38715:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.245 8 123 0.159 8 123 0.40416:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.325 8 123 0.137 8 123 0.46217:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.259 8 123 0.169 8 123 0.42818:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 2.050 1.995 4.045
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 17
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL LGVS
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.026 8 123 0.030 8 123 0.05607:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.024 8 123 0.026 8 123 0.05008:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.026 8 123 0.026 8 123 0.05209:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.019 8 123 0.017 8 123 0.03610:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.020 8 123 0.030 8 123 0.05011:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.027 8 123 0.025 8 123 0.05212:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.027 8 123 0.025 8 123 0.05213:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.028 8 123 0.024 8 123 0.05214:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.022 8 123 0.034 8 123 0.05615:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.020 8 123 0.026 8 123 0.04616:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.035 8 123 0.013 8 123 0.04817:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.016 8 123 0.012 8 123 0.02818:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.290 0.288 0.578
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
TRICS 7.6.3 131019 B19.24 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2019. All rights reserved Saturday 23/11/19
Page 18
MLM STREET NAME TOWN/CITY Licence No: 532501
TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED
MULTI-MODAL MOTOR CYCLES
Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS
BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period
ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS
No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip No. Ave. Trip
Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate Days DWELLS Rate
00:00 - 01:00
01:00 - 02:00
02:00 - 03:00
03:00 - 04:00
04:00 - 05:00
05:00 - 06:00
06:00 - 07:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00007:00 - 08:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.003 8 123 0.00308:00 - 09:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.002 8 123 0.00209:00 - 10:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00310:00 - 11:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00111:00 - 12:00
8 123 0.001 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00112:00 - 13:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00013:00 - 14:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00014:00 - 15:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00015:00 - 16:00
8 123 0.002 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00316:00 - 17:00
8 123 0.003 8 123 0.001 8 123 0.00417:00 - 18:00
8 123 0.000 8 123 0.000 8 123 0.00018:00 - 19:00
19:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 21:00
21:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 23:00
23:00 - 24:00
Total Rates: 0.009 0.008 0.017
This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just
above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals
plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days
where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per
time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the
foot of the table.
To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days
that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals
(whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated
time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated
calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip
rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.
Manor Park, Drayton Transport Assessment © MLM Consulting Engineers Limited
\\mlmips.com\work\Tier2MLM\6100000\6100905\MLM\REP\6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-RP-TP-0001-R04-TA-Manor Park_Drayton.docx
Appendix 10 - Traffic Distribution and Assignment
WU03EW - Location of usual residence and place of work by method of travel to work (MSOA level)ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 1 November 2019]
population All usual residents aged 16 and over in employment the week before the censusunits Personsdate 2011usual residence E02005526 : Broadland 007 (2011 super output area - middle layer)
Threshold
Area Type Place of Work
All categories: Method of travel to
work (2001 specification)
Driving a car or van
8 Proportion 1 2 3 4 5 6Region East 2,241 1,701 1701 100%
East Midlands 5 5 0 0%London 16 7 0 0%North East 1 0 0 0%North West 0 0 0 0%Northern Ireland 0 0 0 0%Scotland 3 1 0 0%South East 11 8 0 0%South West 3 1 0 0%Wales 0 0 0 0%West Midlands 7 7 0 0%Yorkshire and The Humber 8 8 0 0%
2,295 1,738 1701 100%
LPA Babergh 1 1 0 0%Basildon 0 0 0 0%Bedford 0 0 0 0%Braintree 0 0 0 0%Breckland 56 56 56 3% 25% 25% 50%Brentwood 1 1 0 0%Broadland 741 539 539 32%Broxbourne 1 1 0 0%Cambridge 4 2 0 0%Castle Point 0 0 0 0%Central Bedfordshire 0 0 0 0%Chelmsford 0 0 0 0%Colchester 1 0 0 0%Dacorum 0 0 0 0%East Cambridgeshire 0 0 0 0%East Hertfordshire 1 1 0 0%Epping Forest 0 0 0 0%Fenland 0 0 0 0%Forest Heath 3 3 0 0%Great Yarmouth 35 28 28 2% 50% 50%Harlow 1 1 0 0%Hertsmere 2 2 0 0%Huntingdonshire 0 0 0 0%Ipswich 4 3 0 0%King's Lynn and West Norfolk 33 30 30 2% 50% 50%Luton 0 0 0 0%Maldon 0 0 0 0%Mid Suffolk 5 5 0 0%North Hertfordshire 1 0 0 0%North Norfolk 74 59 59 4% 50% 50%Norwich 958 698 698 42% 50% 50%Peterborough 0 0 0 0%Rochford 0 0 0 0%South Cambridgeshire 2 2 0 0%South Norfolk 300 254 254 15% 100%Southend-on-Sea 1 1 0 0%St Albans 1 1 0 0%St Edmundsbury 2 2 0 0%Stevenage 0 0 0 0%Suffolk Coastal 0 0 0 0%Tendring 0 0 0 0%Three Rivers 0 0 0 0%Thurrock 0 0 0 0%Uttlesford 2 2 0 0%Watford 0 0 0 0%Waveney 10 8 0 0%Welwyn Hatfield 1 1 0 0%
2,241 1,701 1,664 100% 2% 21% 21% 3% 4% 17%
MSOA E02005520 : Broadland 001 24 22 22 1% 50% 50%E02005521 : Broadland 002 58 48 48 3% 50% 50%E02005522 : Broadland 003 14 11 11 1% 50% 50%E02005523 : Broadland 004 40 33 33 2% 50% 50%E02005524 : Broadland 005 12 10 10 1% 50% 50%E02005525 : Broadland 006 103 70 70 4% 100%E02005526 : Broadland 007 171 83 83 5% 100%E02005527 : Broadland 008 17 15 15 1% 50% 50%E02005528 : Broadland 009 9 7 0 0%E02005529 : Broadland 010 71 60 60 4% 100%E02005530 : Broadland 011 70 55 55 3% 100%E02005531 : Broadland 012 4 3 0 0%E02005532 : Broadland 013 45 36 36 2% 50% 50%E02005533 : Broadland 014 8 5 0 0%E02005534 : Broadland 015 7 6 0 0%E02005535 : Broadland 016 44 40 40 3% 50% 50%E02005536 : Broadland 017 31 25 25 2% 50% 50%E02005537 : Broadland 018 13 10 10 1% 50% 50%
741 539 518 32% 4% 12% 0% 8% 8% 0%
SUMMARY 1 2 3 4 5 6
6% 33% 21% 10% 12% 17%100% 100% 100% 100% 0% 100%
0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 0%
Route
Proportion of traffic on route using South AccessProportion of traffic on route using North Access
Proportion of Vehicle Trips
Route Assignment
12%
6%
17%33%
10%
21%
MANOR PARK, HALL LANE, DRAYTONTRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ROUTES AND DISTRIBUTION
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-DR-TP-1002-P02
Approximate Site Boundary
Route 1
Route 2
Route 3
Route 4
Route 5
Route 6
KEY
Manor Park, Drayton Transport Assessment © MLM Consulting Engineers Limited
\\mlmips.com\work\Tier2MLM\6100000\6100905\MLM\REP\6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-RP-TP-0001-R04-TA-Manor Park_Drayton.docx
Appendix 11 - Turning Movement Diagram
J1
J2J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane W J5 Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
OBSERVED 2019 ‐ AM PEAK (0800‐0900)
454 180 275 Two‐Way Flow
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
6100905‐MLM‐ZZ‐XX‐CA‐TP‐0002‐R01‐Turning Movement Diagrams
One Way Flow
3%
34 143 3
Costessey Lane
302 6%
6% 2% 0% 88 Turning Movement
HGV %%
561 506
116 2% 1404
1444
883 898
0% 1
3% 620 226 186 274
Scho
ol Road
2% 262 1% 7% 8%
521 686 1206
1109 389 720
Reep
ham Road S 12 0%959 476 483 0% 2% 50%
106 280 3
15
3 0%
Scho
ol Road S
420 2% Holly Lane 7
0 0%
76 0% 22
0%1% 2% 0% 0 0% 113
146 330 0 519 0% 1 0%
2531015 0 0% 1015 0 0%
Hall Lane E 114 106Hall Lane 496 496 Hall Lane E 496 520
568
519 519 519 436 139 141
140
1%
1015 2% 496 956 0% 0 247 2%
00 63 189 0% 0 0 0 0%
0%0% 0%
Scho
ol Road N
Site Access
0% 0% 0% 0%
0
Drayton Lane
0% 1% 299 0%
3
222 253 475 0 0
137 0 407 2 0% 1
Reep
ham Road N
0% 0 0%
300 409 709 283 571 854
475 222 253
0% 0%
222 0
Scho
ol Road S
0 0%
0 0% 0
Site Access 0
0
Scho
ol Road N
222 253 475
253 0
0% 0%
J1
J2J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane W J5 Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
181 310 Two‐Way Flow492
OBSERVED 2019 ‐ PM PEAK (1630‐1730)
6100905‐MLM‐ZZ‐XX‐CA‐TP‐0002‐R01‐Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
Turning Movement
One Way Flow
0% 0% 0% 92 0%
% HGV %
33.4 145 3
Costessey Lane
435 1%
802 683
156 1% 1201
1440
639 518
334 215 163
0% 3
0% 0% 1%
1% 353
Scho
ol Road
0% 283
585 712 1296
1085 718 367
0% 1% 0%
Reep
ham Road S 3 0%1026 455 571
515 1 0
8
7
4 0%
15
Scho
ol Road S
439 0% Holly Lane
0%202
204 0%
29 0%
1% 1% 0% 0 0%
339 0 362 0% 5 0%
0% 281
117
829 0 0% 829 0
Hall Lane E 468 533 Hall Lane E 209 203Hall Lane 468 468
362 362 362 387 72 62
0 265 0% 58829 1% 362 920 0%
306 50 329 6 0% 2 10% 0 0 0 0% 66
2% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 2 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Scho
ol Road N
Site Access
301 0 0 0
Drayton Lane
1% 321
0
326 335 661
Reep
ham Road N
132 23
146 155
521 312 833
301 146 155
0Scho
ol Road S
0 0%
1%
146
0%
0 0% 0
Site Access 0
0
Scho
ol Road N
146
0%
155 301
0%
155 0
Growth Factor
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
2025 BASELINE - AM PEAK (0800-0900)
517 204 313Two-Way Flow
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
One Way Flow
638 575
132 1596
38 162 3
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
343
100
Turning Movement
1642
1004 1021
1
705 256 211 312
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
298
592 779 1371
1261 443 819
1091 541 549
121 318 4
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
14
17
3
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
477Holly Lane
8
0
0 128
86 25
166 375 0 590 1
2871154 0 1154 0
Hall Lane E 129 121Hall Lane 564 590 Hall Lane E 590 591
590 564 564 496 158 160
1591154 564 1087 0 281
156 0 463 2 1
340
0 6460 72 215 0 0 0
253 287 540 0 0
0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
0
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
3
341 465 806 322 649 971
540 253 287
253 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0
0 0
Site Access 0
0
287 0
1.1371
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
253 287 540
Growth Factor
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
2025 BASELINE - PM PEAK (1630-1730)
561
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
Turning Movement
One Way Flow
105
207 354Two-Way Flow
915 780
179 1371
38 166 3
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
496
1645
729 592
381 246 186
3
402
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
323
667 813 1480
520 652
588 1 0
1238 820 419
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
31172
9
8
5
17
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
501Holly Lane
231
387 0 413
233
33
0
6
321
133
947 0 947 0
608 Hall Lane E 238 232Hall Lane 534 534
413 413 413
Hall Lane E 534
442 82 71
0 303 66947 413 1050
2
349 61
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
177
0 375 7 20 0 0 76151 26
166
372 382
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
344 0 0 0
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
366
0
754 595 356 950
332 166 166
0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0166
0 0
Site Access 0
0
166 0
166 332
1.1417
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
166
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
7% 7%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
7% 0
0
0%
Site Access 0%
7% 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0
7% 7%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
11% 11% 0% 0%
7% 7% 0%
11% 0%
0%
0% 7% 0% 0 0
11% 0%
0 5% 0%
16% 0%
0% 0% 0% 0%
5%
16% 16% 16% 16% 5% 5%
Hall Lane 16% 16% Hall Lane E 16% 16% Hall Lane E 5% 5%
7% 16% 0% 16% 0%
0 0%
0%
0% 5%
0%
0%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
16%Holly Lane
0%
0%
23% 23%
5% 0% 0%
5% 5%
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
0%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
0%
23% 23%
0%
60% 0% 0% 23%
60% 100%
23%
60% 100%
0% 0% 17%
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
60%
17%
One Way Flow
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
17% 17%Two-Way Flow
COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRIBUTION - AM PEAK (0800-0900)
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
6% 6%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
6% 0
0
0%
Site Access 0%
0S
ch
oo
l R
oa
d S
06%
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
6% 6%
14% 14% 0% 1%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
6% 6% 0%
0%14%
0%
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
0% 0% 0%3% 0% 14% 0%6% 0% 0 0 00%
0% 3%17%
0%
17% 3% 3%17% 17% 17%
Hall Lane E 17% 17% Hall Lane E 3% 3%Hall Lane 17% 17%
6%
0% 0%
3%
0%
0%
17% 0% 17% 0%
0%
0%
0%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
17%Holly Lane
3% 0% 0% 0%
3% 3%
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
0%23% 23%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
0%
23% 23%
0% 0% 23%
0%
64%
64% 100%
23%
64% 100%
0% 0% 13%
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
64%
13%
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
One Way Flow
COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT DISTRIBUTION - PM PEAK (1630-1730)
13% 13%Two-Way Flow
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
0 0 0
0
1
1
1
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
0 0
0 0
0 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0
0
Site Access 0
0 0
0 00 0 0 0
1 1 2 0 0 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
0 0 0 0 0
1 0
0 0
0 3 0
0 0 0 1 0
1 0
0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0
Hall Lane E 0 0Hall Lane 0 0 Hall Lane E 0 1
0 0 0 0 0
10 1 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
0
0
0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0Holly Lane
0
1 0 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
0
2 1 3
7
2 3
0
2 0 0 1
0 0
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
5
1
5 8
2 11
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
One Way Flow
1 0 1Two-Way Flow
COMMITED DEVELOPMENT FLOWS - AM PEAK (0800-0900)
0
DeparturesArrivals
3 8
Trips taken from Land off Drayton High Road Transport
Statement (20170212) and assigned using observed turning
proportions.
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
0 0 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
0 0
0
0
0
0
Site Access 0
0S
ch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0
0 0 0
1 1 2
0 0 0
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
0 0 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
0 0 0
1
0
2 0 0 01 0
0 00 0
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
0
0 1 00 0 0 0 00
0 0 0
Hall Lane E 1
1 0 0
0 0Hall Lane 1 1
0
1 0
0
0
0 0 1
0
0
0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
1Holly Lane
0
2 0 1
0 0 0
0 0 0
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
0
1 2
9
5 8
0 0 2
0
5
3 5
1 14
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
One Way Flow
2
COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT FLOWS (1630-1730)
Two-Way Flow
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
3
1
Arrivals Departures
8 4
1 1
Trips taken from Land off Drayton High Road Transport
Statement (20170212) and assigned using observed turning
proportions.
0 0 1
3
0
0
0
01 0
1 Hall Lane E
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
287 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
253 287 540
0 0
0
Site Access 0
253 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0
253 287
0 0253 287 540 0
342 466 808 322 649 971
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
0 72 215 0 0
341 0
0 646
564 1089 0 282
1 30 156 0 464 2
591 591 591 497 159
1601181
161
Hall Lane 564 591 Hall Lane E 591 592 Hall Lane E 129 121
0 1181 0 288
166 375 0 591 1
1155
86 25
0 128
542 550
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
14
17
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
478Holly Lane
8
3
121 318 4 0
443 819
1
708 256 211 313
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
298
643 583
134 1607
1649
1006 1024
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
One Way Flow
518 204 314Two-Way Flow
BASELINE 2025 + COMMITED DEVELOPMENT - AM PEAK (0800-0900)
38 162 3
540
1091
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
348
102
594 781 1374
1262
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
166 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
166 166 333
0 0
0
Site Access 0
0S
ch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0166
333 166 166
373 383 756
0 0 0
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
595 356 950
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
166 177 344
2
2367
1 349 676 0 377 7151 26 0 0 00
0 303 66827 413 1052
71413 413 413 443 83
Hall Lane E 238 232
948
Hall Lane 535 414 Hall Lane E 414 609
0 827 0 321
33 17
0 233
6133 387 0 414
502Holly Lane
9
8
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
5
231 588 1
1238 820 419
1173 520 653
0
3
408
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
323
919 785
180 1385
1653
734 600
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
One Way Flow
563
BASELINE 2025 + COMMITTED DEVELOPMENT - PM PEAK (1630-1730)
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
500
106
208 355Two-Way Flow
38 166 5
381 246 188
669 815 1483
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
3
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
DEVELOPMENT DISTRIBUTION
21%21%
31%
31% 21%
Turning Movement
One Way Flow
0%31%
0% 21% 0% 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
56%
0%
0%
31%
31%
North Access South Access
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
6%
33%
21%
Distribution
Route 1
Route 2
Route 3
100%
0%
100%
0%
0% 21%
0%
0%
0%
10%
12%
17%
0%
100%
21%
Route 4
Route 5
Route 6
12%12%
12%
Site Access
0%
0%S
ch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0%
0%
12%
12%
0%
12%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
0%
33%
56%
17%
17% 0%
6%
0%
56%
0% 6%
0%
6%
6%
33%
33%
0%0%
0%0%
56%
56% 56%
0% 56%
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0% 0%
56%
33%
0%
17% 17%
0%
0%
31%
87% 87%
56%
0%
0%
56%
0%
31%
0%
0%31%
0%
0%
0%0% 31%0%
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
Hall Lane Hall Lane E Hall Lane E
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
Holly Lane
56%
31%56%
Sit
e A
cce
ss
0%
J1
J2
J4Hall Lane W Hall Lane W J5 Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
DEVELOPMENT FLOWS - AM PEAK
27 8 19Two-Way Flow
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
Turning Movement
0 8 0
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
0
0
7 16
One Way Flow
16 52
9
3 36
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
3
0
0 7 19 36
88 27 61
27 61 88
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
0
33 10 23
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
61Holly Lane
0
00 10 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 27 0 0 0
088 15 49 0
Hall Lane E 0 0Hall Lane 61 61 Hall Lane E 15 15
27 27 34 34 0 0
088 0 49 0 0
0 230 0 0 27 61 34
42 95
0
0 0 15 0 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
137
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
0
34
0 0 0
34 15 49 10 23 32.97
0 0 0
0 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
13 19
Site Access 13
13 6 19
Trip Generation
6
0 6
Arrivals Departures
48 109
J1
J2
J4Hall Lane W Hall Lane W J5 Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
Two-Way Flow
DEVELOPMENT FLOWS - PM PEAK
24
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
15 9
One Way Flow
0
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
00 15 0
3 29
29 47
9
5 18
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
5
3 9 18
0
0
0
80 49 30
49 30 80
30 18 11
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
0
0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
30Holly Lane
18 0 00
0
0
0
0 0
49 0 0 0
044 0
0
80 27
27 Hall Lane E 0 0Hall Lane 30 30
49 49 17
Hall Lane E 27
17 0 0
0 0 080 0 44
11 00 27 0 0 049 30 17 0
0
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
0 77 47 124
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
17
0 0 0
0 0
17 27 44 18 11 29.82
0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0
0 0 0
0
Site Access 6
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
6 17
6
11
Trip Generation
11 17
0 11
DeparturesArrival
5488
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
287 6
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
253 287 540
0 5.76
5.76
Site Access 0
253 0
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0
540 253 287
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
376 481 857 322 672 994
253 287 0 41.76
479 2
540 41.76
0 72 215 27 0
374 0
0 156 0
1243 564 1138 0
1 0 669 3
160
618 618 618 531 159 161
Hall Lane 625 625 Hall Lane E 625 607 Hall Lane E 129 121
166 402 0 591 1
2881243 15 1243 0
86 25
0 128
17
3
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
539Holly Lane
8
0
1179 569 611
121 318 4
1285 443 842
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
14
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
301
621 842 1462
1
708 263 230 349
649 599
149 1659
1659
1009 1060
38 171 3
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
348
102
One Way Flow
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
545 212 333Two-Way Flow
BASELINE 2025 + COMMITED DEVELOPMENT + DEVELOPMENT - AM PEAK (0800-0900)
J1
J2
J4
Hall Lane W Hall Lane WJ5
Hall Lane
J6
`
Fakenham Road J3 Drayton High Road
KEY:
Turning Movement
166 11
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
173 177 350
6 17
11
Site Access 6
0S
ch
oo
l R
oa
d S
0166
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d N
333 166 166
389 411 800 613 367
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d N
Sit
e A
cce
ss
166
980
177 344 77
2384
47 124
Dra
yto
n L
an
e
1 360 676 0 404 7151 26 49 30 170
1096 0 303 66907 413
2
459 83 71462 462 430
Hall Lane E 441 636 Hall Lane E 238 232Hall Lane 565 444
321
133
1028 27 871 0
233
33
0
436 0 414 6
9
8
5
17
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d S
532Holly Lane
231 606 1 0
1563
1268 838 430
Re
ep
ha
m R
oa
d S
31253 569 684
Sch
oo
l R
oa
d
328
718 845
384 255 205
3
408
922 814
209 1432
1662
739 618
38 181 5
Co
ste
sse
y L
an
e
500
106
6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-0002-R01-Turning Movement Diagrams
MANOR PARK, DRAYTON
One Way Flow
588
BASELINE 2025 + COMMITED DEVELOPMENT + DEVELOPMENT - PM PEAK (1630-1730)
223 364Two-Way Flow
Manor Park, Drayton Transport Assessment © MLM Consulting Engineers Limited
\\mlmips.com\work\Tier2MLM\6100000\6100905\MLM\REP\6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-RP-TP-0001-R04-TA-Manor Park_Drayton.docx
Appendix 12 - Junction Capacity Assessments
Filename: 6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-1003-R02-Junction 1 Site Access.j9 Path: \\MLMIPS.com\Work\MLM\6_\610_\61009_\6100905\CALC\Capacity Models Report generation date: 26/11/19 16:07:06
»2019, AM »2019, PM »2025 Baseline + Committed, AM »2025 Baseline + Committed, PM »2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, AM »2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, PM
Summary of junction performance
Junctions 9PICADY 9 - Priority Intersection Module
Version: 9.0.1.4646 []
© Copyright TRL Limited, 2019
For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL:
Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk
The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
AM PM
Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS
2019
Stream B-C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream B-A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream C-AB 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
2025 Baseline + Committed
Stream B-C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream B-A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream C-AB 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development
Stream B-C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream B-A 0.0 9.12 0.04 A 0.0 8.08 0.01 A
Stream C-AB 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
There are warnings associated with one or more model runs - see the 'Data Errors and Warnings' tables for each Analysis or Demand Set.
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
1
File summary
Units
Analysis Options
Demand Set Summary
Analysis Set Details
File Description
Title (untitled)
Location
Site number
Date 15/11/19
Version
Status (new file)
Identifier
Client
Jobnumber
Enumerator MLMIPS\jamie.ferguson
Description
Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units
m kph PCU PCU perHour s -Min perMin
Vehicle length (m)
Calculate Queue Percentiles
Calculate detailed queueing delay
Calculate residual capacity
RFC Threshold
Average Delay threshold (s)
Queue threshold (PCU)
5.75 0.85 36.00 20.00
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D1 2019 AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü
D2 2019 PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü
D3 Development Flows AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D4 Development Flows PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15
D5 2025 Baseline AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D1*1.1371
D6 2025 Baseline PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 Simple D2*1.1417
D7 2025 Baseline+Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D5+D3
D8 2025 Baseline+Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 Simple D4+D6
D9 Committed AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D10 Committed PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15
D11 2025 Baseline + Committed AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
D12 2025 Baseline + Committed PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D6+D10
D13 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
D14 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D8+D10
ID Include in report Network flow scaling factor (%) Network capacity scaling factor (%)
A1 ü 100.000 100.000
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2
2019, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Arms
Arms
Major Arm Geometry
Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.
Minor Arm Geometry
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts
The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments.
Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted.
Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Warning Vehicle Mix HV% is zero for all movements / time segments. Vehicle Mix matrix should be completed whether working in
PCUs or Vehs.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/School Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.00 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
Arm Name Description Arm type
A School Road N Major
B Site Access Minor
C School Road S Major
Arm Width of carriageway (m) Has kerbed central reserve Has right turn bay Visibility for right turn (m) Blocks? Blocking queue (PCU)
C 6.21 153.6 ü 1.00
ArmMinor arm
typeWidth at give-
way (m)Width at 5m (m)
Width at 10m (m)
Width at 15m (m)
Width at 20m (m)
Estimate flare length
Flare length (PCU)
Visibility to left (m)
Visibility to right (m)
BOne lane plus
flare10.00 4.54 3.00 3.00 3.00 ü 1.00 20 18
Junction StreamIntercept(PCU/hr)
Slopefor A-B
Slopefor A-C
Slopefor C-A
Slopefor C-B
1 B-A 524 0.095 0.239 0.150 0.342
1 B-C 676 0.103 0.259 - -
1 C-B 663 0.255 0.255 - -
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
3
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D1 2019 AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 253 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 0 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 222 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 253
B 0 0 0
C 222 0 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 0
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 204 306
A-B 0 0
A-C 232 348
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
4
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 626 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 454 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1229 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 167 42 167
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 190 48 190
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 617 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 440 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1210 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 200 50 200
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 227 57 227
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 603 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 421 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1184 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 244 61 244
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 279 70 279
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 603 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 421 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1184 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 244 61 244
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 279 70 279
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 617 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 440 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1210 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 200 50 200
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 227 57 227
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
5
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 626 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 454 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1229 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 167 42 167
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 190 48 190
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
6
2019, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/School Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.00 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D2 2019 PM ONE HOUR 16:45 18:15 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 155 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 0 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 146 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 155
B 0 0 0
C 146 0 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 0
B 0 0 0
C 1 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
7
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 134 201
A-B 0 0
A-C 142 213
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 645 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 480 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1273 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 110 27 110
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 117 29 117
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 639 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 471 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1261 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 131 33 131
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 139 35 139
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 631 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 459 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1245 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 161 40 161
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 171 43 171
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 631 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 459 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1245 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 161 40 161
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 171 43 171
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
8
17:45 - 18:00
18:00 - 18:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 639 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 471 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1261 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 131 33 131
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 139 35 139
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 645 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 480 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1273 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 110 27 110
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 117 29 117
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
9
2025 Baseline + Committed, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Warning Vehicle Mix HV% is zero for all movements / time segments. Vehicle Mix matrix should be completed whether working in
PCUs or Vehs.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/School Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.00 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D11 2025 Baseline + Committed AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 288 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 0 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 252 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 288
B 0 0 0
C 252 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
10
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 0
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 232 347
A-B 0 0
A-C 264 396
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 619 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 444 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1216 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 190 48 190
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 217 54 217
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 609 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 428 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1194 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 227 57 227
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 259 65 259
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 593 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 407 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1165 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 278 69 278
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 317 79 317
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
11
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 593 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 407 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1165 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 278 69 278
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 317 79 317
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 609 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 428 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1194 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 227 57 227
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 259 65 259
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 619 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 444 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1216 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 190 48 190
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 217 54 217
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
12
2025 Baseline + Committed, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/School Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.00 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D12 2025 Baseline + Committed PM ONE HOUR 16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D6+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 177 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 0 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 167 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 177
B 0 0 0
C 167 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
13
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 0
B 0 0 0
C 1 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 153 229
A-B 0 0
A-C 162 244
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 641 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 473 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1264 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 125 31 125
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 133 33 133
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 634 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 464 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1251 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 150 37 150
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 159 40 159
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 625 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 450 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1233 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 184 46 184
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 195 49 195
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
14
17:30 - 17:45
17:45 - 18:00
18:00 - 18:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 625 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 450 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1233 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 184 46 184
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 195 49 195
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 634 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 464 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1251 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 150 37 150
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 159 40 159
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 641 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 473 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1264 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 125 31 125
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 133 33 133
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
15
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Warning Vehicle Mix HV% is zero for all movements / time segments. Vehicle Mix matrix should be completed whether working in
PCUs or Vehs.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/School Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.21 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D13 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 294 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 13 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 252 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 6 288
B 13 0 0
C 252 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
16
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 0
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.04 9.12 0.0 A 12 18
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 232 347
A-B 6 8
A-C 264 396
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 550 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 10 2 446 0.022 10 0.0 0.0 8.240 A
C-AB 0 0 1213 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 190 48 190
A-B 5 1 5
A-C 217 54 217
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 539 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 12 3 431 0.027 12 0.0 0.0 8.592 A
C-AB 0 0 1191 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 227 57 227
A-B 5 1 5
A-C 259 65 259
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 525 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 14 4 409 0.035 14 0.0 0.0 9.125 A
C-AB 0 0 1161 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 278 69 278
A-B 7 2 7
A-C 317 79 317
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
17
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 525 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 14 4 409 0.035 14 0.0 0.0 9.125 A
C-AB 0 0 1161 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 278 69 278
A-B 7 2 7
A-C 317 79 317
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 539 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 12 3 431 0.027 12 0.0 0.0 8.593 A
C-AB 0 0 1191 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 227 57 227
A-B 5 1 5
A-C 259 65 259
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 550 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 10 2 446 0.022 10 0.0 0.0 8.244 A
C-AB 0 0 1213 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 190 48 190
A-B 5 1 5
A-C 217 54 217
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
18
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/School Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.13 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D14 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D8+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 188 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 6 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 167 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 11 177
B 6 0 0
C 167 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
19
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 0
B 0 0 0
C 1 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.01 8.08 0.0 A 6 8
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 153 229
A-B 10 15
A-C 162 244
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 570 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 5 1 476 0.009 4 0.0 0.0 7.635 A
C-AB 0 0 1260 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 125 31 125
A-B 8 2 8
A-C 133 33 133
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 564 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 5 1 466 0.012 5 0.0 0.0 7.817 A
C-AB 0 0 1246 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 150 37 150
A-B 10 2 10
A-C 159 40 159
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 555 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 7 2 452 0.015 7 0.0 0.0 8.083 A
C-AB 0 0 1227 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 184 46 184
A-B 12 3 12
A-C 195 49 195
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
20
17:30 - 17:45
17:45 - 18:00
18:00 - 18:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 555 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 7 2 452 0.015 7 0.0 0.0 8.083 A
C-AB 0 0 1227 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 184 46 184
A-B 12 3 12
A-C 195 49 195
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 564 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 5 1 466 0.012 5 0.0 0.0 7.819 A
C-AB 0 0 1246 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 150 37 150
A-B 10 2 10
A-C 159 40 159
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 570 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 5 1 476 0.009 5 0.0 0.0 7.638 A
C-AB 0 0 1260 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 125 31 125
A-B 8 2 8
A-C 133 33 133
Generated on 26/11/19 16:07:33 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
21
Filename: 6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-1001-R02-Junction 2 School Road.j9 Path: \\MLMIPS.com\Work\MLM\6_\610_\61009_\6100905\CALC\Capacity Models Report generation date: 26/11/19 15:40:01
»2019, AM »2019, PM »2025 Base + Committed, AM »2025 Base + Committed, PM »2025 Base + Committed + Development, AM »2025 Base + Committed + Development, PM
Summary of junction performance
Junctions 9ARCADY 9 - Roundabout Module
Version: 9.0.1.4646 []
© Copyright TRL Limited, 2019
For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL:
Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk
The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
AM PM
Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS
2019
Arm 1 1.3 8.61 0.56 A 1.2 8.64 0.55 A
Arm 2 1.0 6.73 0.49 A 0.8 6.08 0.46 A
Arm 3 0.4 5.86 0.31 A 0.2 5.03 0.19 A
2025 Base + Committed
Arm 1 1.8 10.59 0.64 B 1.7 10.79 0.64 B
Arm 2 1.3 7.87 0.56 A 1.1 6.93 0.52 A
Arm 3 0.6 6.54 0.36 A 0.3 5.42 0.23 A
2025 Base + Committed + Development
Arm 1 2.5 13.13 0.71 B 2.0 11.98 0.67 B
Arm 2 1.4 8.41 0.59 A 1.3 7.73 0.57 A
Arm 3 0.6 6.72 0.37 A 0.3 5.65 0.23 A
There are warnings associated with one or more model runs - see the 'Data Errors and Warnings' tables for each Analysis or Demand Set.
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
1
File summary
Units
Analysis Options
Demand Set Summary
Analysis Set Details
File Description
Title (untitled)
Location
Site number
Date 15/11/19
Version
Status (new file)
Identifier
Client
Jobnumber
Enumerator MLMIPS\jamie.ferguson
Description
Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units
m kph PCU PCU perHour s -Min perMin
Mini-roundabout model
Vehicle length (m)
Calculate Queue Percentiles
Calculate detailed queueing delay
Calculate residual capacity
RFC Threshold
Average Delay threshold (s)
Queue threshold (PCU)
JUNCTIONS 9 5.75 0.85 36.00 20.00
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D1 2019 AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü
D2 2019 PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü
D3 Development Flows AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D4 Development Flows PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15
D5 2025 Baseline AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D1*1.1371
D6 2025 Baseline PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 Simple D2*1.1417
D7 2025 Baseline + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D3+D5
D8 2025 Baseline + Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 Simple D4+D6
D9 Committed Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D10 Committed Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15
D11 2025 Base + Committed AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
D12 2025 Base + Committed PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D6+D10
D13 2025 Base + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
D14 2025 Base + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D8+D10
ID Include in report Network flow scaling factor (%) Network capacity scaling factor (%)
A1 ü 100.000 100.000
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2
2019, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Arms
Arms
Mini Roundabout Geometry
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model
The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/School Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 7.31 A
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
Arm Name Description
1 Hall Lane
2 School Road S
3 School Road N
ArmApproach road half-width (m)
Minimum approach road half-width (m)
Entry width (m)
Effective flare length (m)
Distance to next arm (m)
Entry corner kerb line distance (m)
Gradient over 50m (%)
Kerbed central island
1 3.61 3.61 4.24 2.0 9.75 7.67 0.0 ü
2 2.92 2.92 4.68 9.5 10.23 8.08 0.0
3 2.54 2.54 4.87 10.5 7.99 4.61 0.0 ü
Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)
1 0.515 1007
2 0.630 1121
3 0.513 1078
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D1 2019 AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
3
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 496 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 476 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 252 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 420 76
2 330 0 146
3 189 63 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 2 0
2 2 0 1
3 0 0 0
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.56 8.61 1.3 A 455 683
2 0.49 6.73 1.0 A 437 655
3 0.31 5.86 0.4 A 231 347
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 373 93 47 982 0.380 371 389 0.0 0.6 5.962 A
2 358 90 57 1085 0.330 356 361 0.0 0.5 5.013 A
3 190 47 247 951 0.199 189 166 0.0 0.2 4.715 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 446 111 57 978 0.456 445 466 0.6 0.8 6.861 A
2 428 107 68 1078 0.397 427 433 0.5 0.7 5.623 A
3 227 57 296 926 0.245 226 199 0.2 0.3 5.141 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
4
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 546 137 69 971 0.562 544 570 0.8 1.3 8.542 A
2 524 131 83 1068 0.491 523 530 0.7 1.0 6.700 A
3 277 69 362 892 0.311 277 244 0.3 0.4 5.847 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 546 137 69 971 0.562 546 571 1.3 1.3 8.610 A
2 524 131 84 1068 0.491 524 532 1.0 1.0 6.731 A
3 277 69 363 892 0.311 277 244 0.4 0.4 5.860 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 446 111 57 978 0.456 448 468 1.3 0.9 6.932 A
2 428 107 69 1077 0.397 429 436 1.0 0.7 5.657 A
3 227 57 297 925 0.245 227 200 0.4 0.3 5.159 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 373 93 48 982 0.380 374 391 0.9 0.6 6.030 A
2 358 90 57 1084 0.330 359 364 0.7 0.5 5.051 A
3 190 47 249 950 0.200 190 167 0.3 0.3 4.736 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
5
2019, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Mini-roundabout Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction; treat results with
caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 1 and 2 have 85% of the total flow for the roundabout for one or
more time segments]
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/School Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 7.04 A
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D2 2019 PM ONE HOUR 16:45 18:15 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 468 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 456 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 155 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 439 29
2 339 0 117
3 23 132 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 0 0
2 1 0 1
3 0 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
6
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
17:45 - 18:00
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.55 8.64 1.2 A 429 644
2 0.46 6.08 0.8 A 418 628
3 0.19 5.03 0.2 A 142 213
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 352 88 99 956 0.369 350 271 0.0 0.6 5.919 A
2 343 86 22 1107 0.310 341 427 0.0 0.5 4.740 A
3 117 29 254 948 0.123 116 109 0.0 0.1 4.325 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 421 105 119 946 0.445 420 325 0.6 0.8 6.834 A
2 410 102 26 1104 0.371 409 512 0.5 0.6 5.228 A
3 139 35 304 922 0.151 139 131 0.1 0.2 4.599 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 515 129 145 932 0.553 514 398 0.8 1.2 8.567 A
2 502 126 32 1101 0.456 501 627 0.6 0.8 6.056 A
3 171 43 373 887 0.192 170 160 0.2 0.2 5.023 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 515 129 145 932 0.553 515 399 1.2 1.2 8.635 A
2 502 126 32 1100 0.456 502 629 0.8 0.8 6.075 A
3 171 43 373 887 0.192 171 161 0.2 0.2 5.028 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 421 105 119 946 0.445 422 326 1.2 0.8 6.903 A
2 410 102 26 1104 0.371 411 515 0.8 0.6 5.254 A
3 139 35 305 921 0.151 140 132 0.2 0.2 4.607 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
7
18:00 - 18:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 352 88 100 956 0.369 353 273 0.8 0.6 5.985 A
2 343 86 22 1107 0.310 344 431 0.6 0.5 4.769 A
3 117 29 256 947 0.123 117 110 0.2 0.1 4.339 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
8
2025 Base + Committed, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/School Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 8.70 A
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D11 2025 Base + Committed AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 564 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 541 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 287 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 478 86
2 375 0 166
3 215 72 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 2 0
2 2 0 1
3 0 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
9
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.64 10.59 1.8 B 518 776
2 0.56 7.87 1.3 A 497 745
3 0.36 6.54 0.6 A 263 394
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 425 106 54 979 0.434 422 442 0.0 0.8 6.530 A
2 407 102 65 1080 0.377 405 411 0.0 0.6 5.405 A
3 216 54 281 934 0.231 215 189 0.0 0.3 4.995 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 507 127 64 974 0.521 506 530 0.8 1.1 7.801 A
2 487 122 77 1072 0.454 486 493 0.6 0.8 6.227 A
3 258 64 337 905 0.285 257 226 0.3 0.4 5.550 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 621 155 79 966 0.643 618 648 1.1 1.8 10.434 B
2 596 149 95 1061 0.562 594 602 0.8 1.3 7.813 A
3 315 79 412 867 0.364 315 277 0.4 0.6 6.514 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 621 155 79 966 0.643 621 650 1.8 1.8 10.592 B
2 596 149 95 1061 0.562 596 605 1.3 1.3 7.874 A
3 315 79 413 866 0.364 315 278 0.6 0.6 6.537 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 507 127 65 974 0.521 510 532 1.8 1.1 7.939 A
2 487 122 78 1071 0.454 488 496 1.3 0.9 6.296 A
3 258 64 339 904 0.285 258 228 0.6 0.4 5.579 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
10
09:00 - 09:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 425 106 54 979 0.434 426 445 1.1 0.8 6.637 A
2 407 102 65 1079 0.378 408 415 0.9 0.6 5.462 A
3 216 54 283 933 0.231 216 191 0.4 0.3 5.025 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
11
2025 Base + Committed, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Mini-roundabout Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction; treat results with
caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 1 and 2 have 85% of the total flow for the roundabout for one or
more time segments]
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/School Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 8.39 A
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D12 2025 Base + Committed PM ONE HOUR 16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D6+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 534 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 521 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 177 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 501 33
2 387 0 134
3 26 151 0
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
12
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 0 0
2 1 0 1
3 0 0 0
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.64 10.79 1.7 B 490 735
2 0.52 6.93 1.1 A 478 717
3 0.23 5.42 0.3 A 162 244
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 402 101 113 949 0.424 399 309 0.0 0.7 6.520 A
2 392 98 25 1105 0.355 390 487 0.0 0.6 5.069 A
3 133 33 290 929 0.143 133 125 0.0 0.2 4.513 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 480 120 135 937 0.513 479 371 0.7 1.0 7.839 A
2 468 117 30 1102 0.425 467 585 0.6 0.7 5.722 A
3 159 40 347 900 0.177 159 150 0.2 0.2 4.857 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 588 147 166 922 0.638 586 454 1.0 1.7 10.628 B
2 573 143 36 1098 0.522 572 715 0.7 1.1 6.896 A
3 195 49 425 860 0.227 195 183 0.2 0.3 5.407 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 588 147 166 921 0.638 588 455 1.7 1.7 10.794 B
2 573 143 36 1098 0.522 573 718 1.1 1.1 6.932 A
3 195 49 426 859 0.227 195 184 0.3 0.3 5.416 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
13
17:45 - 18:00
18:00 - 18:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 480 120 136 937 0.513 483 373 1.7 1.1 7.978 A
2 468 117 30 1102 0.425 469 589 1.1 0.8 5.762 A
3 159 40 349 899 0.177 159 150 0.3 0.2 4.870 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 402 101 114 948 0.424 404 312 1.1 0.7 6.623 A
2 392 98 25 1105 0.355 393 492 0.8 0.6 5.111 A
3 133 33 292 928 0.144 133 126 0.2 0.2 4.531 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
14
2025 Base + Committed + Development, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/School Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 10.08 B
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D13 2025 Base + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 625 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 568 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 287 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 539 86
2 402 0 166
3 215 72 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 2 0
2 2 0 1
3 0 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
15
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.71 13.13 2.5 B 574 860
2 0.59 8.41 1.4 A 521 782
3 0.37 6.72 0.6 A 263 394
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 471 118 54 979 0.481 467 462 0.0 0.9 7.097 A
2 428 107 65 1080 0.396 425 456 0.0 0.7 5.570 A
3 216 54 301 924 0.234 215 189 0.0 0.3 5.068 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 562 140 64 974 0.577 560 554 0.9 1.4 8.817 A
2 511 128 77 1072 0.477 510 547 0.7 0.9 6.503 A
3 258 64 361 893 0.289 257 226 0.3 0.4 5.659 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 688 172 79 966 0.712 684 677 1.4 2.4 12.779 B
2 626 156 95 1061 0.590 624 668 0.9 1.4 8.331 A
3 315 79 441 852 0.370 315 277 0.4 0.6 6.698 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 688 172 79 966 0.712 688 679 2.4 2.5 13.131 B
2 626 156 95 1061 0.590 626 672 1.4 1.4 8.413 A
3 315 79 443 851 0.371 315 278 0.6 0.6 6.723 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 562 140 65 974 0.577 566 557 2.5 1.4 9.074 A
2 511 128 78 1071 0.477 513 552 1.4 0.9 6.580 A
3 258 64 363 892 0.289 258 228 0.6 0.4 5.688 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
16
09:00 - 09:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 471 118 54 979 0.481 472 466 1.4 1.0 7.257 A
2 428 107 65 1079 0.396 429 461 0.9 0.7 5.636 A
3 216 54 304 922 0.234 216 191 0.4 0.3 5.100 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
17
2025 Base + Committed + Development, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Mini-roundabout Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction; treat results with
caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 1 and 2 have 86% of the total flow for the roundabout for one or
more time segments]
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/School Road Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 9.27 A
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D14 2025 Base + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D8+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 564 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 570 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 177 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 531 33
2 436 0 134
3 26 151 0
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
18
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 0 0
2 1 0 1
3 0 0 0
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.67 11.98 2.0 B 518 777
2 0.57 7.73 1.3 A 523 784
3 0.23 5.65 0.3 A 162 244
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 425 106 113 949 0.448 422 346 0.0 0.8 6.791 A
2 429 107 25 1105 0.388 426 510 0.0 0.6 5.339 A
3 133 33 326 911 0.146 133 125 0.0 0.2 4.623 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 507 127 135 937 0.541 506 415 0.8 1.2 8.319 A
2 512 128 30 1102 0.465 511 612 0.6 0.9 6.144 A
3 159 40 391 877 0.181 159 150 0.2 0.2 5.009 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 621 155 166 922 0.674 618 508 1.2 2.0 11.729 B
2 627 157 36 1098 0.571 625 747 0.9 1.3 7.667 A
3 195 49 479 832 0.234 195 183 0.2 0.3 5.641 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 621 155 166 921 0.674 621 509 2.0 2.0 11.976 B
2 627 157 36 1098 0.571 627 751 1.3 1.3 7.725 A
3 195 49 480 832 0.234 195 184 0.3 0.3 5.651 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
19
17:45 - 18:00
18:00 - 18:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 507 127 136 937 0.541 511 417 2.0 1.2 8.510 A
2 512 128 30 1102 0.465 514 616 1.3 0.9 6.205 A
3 159 40 393 876 0.182 159 150 0.3 0.2 5.025 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 425 106 114 948 0.448 426 349 1.2 0.8 6.919 A
2 429 107 25 1105 0.388 430 515 0.9 0.6 5.393 A
3 133 33 329 909 0.147 133 126 0.2 0.2 4.642 A
Generated on 26/11/19 15:41:02 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
20
Full Input Data And Results Full Input Data And Results User and Project Details Project:
Title:
Location:
Additional detail:
File name: 6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-1006-R02-Junction 3 School Road_Drayton High Road.lsg3x
Author:
Company:
Address: Network Layout Diagram
School Road/ Drayton High Road
Arm 1 - Drayton High Road
12
1/11/2
Arm 2 - Fakenham Road
12/1
Arm
3 -
Sch
ool R
oad
13/
1
Arm 4 - Drayton High Road Ex
14/1
Arm 5 - Fakenham Road Ex
1 5/1
Arm
6 - School R
oad Ex
16/1
P1
P2
AB
C
Full Input Data And Results Phase Diagram
A
B
C
D
E
Phase Input Data Phase Name Phase Type Assoc. Phase Street Min Cont Min
A Traffic 7 7
B Traffic 7 7
C Traffic 7 7
D Pedestrian 5 5
E Pedestrian 7 7
Phase Intergreens Matrix
Starting Phase
Terminating Phase
A B C D E
A - - 5 - 5
B - - 5 - 6
C 5 5 - 5 -
D - - 6 - -
E 12 12 - - -
Phases in Stage Stage No. Phases in Stage
1 A B D
2 C E
Full Input Data And Results Stage Diagram
A
B
C
D
E
1 Min >= 7
A
B
C
D
E
2 Min >= 7
Phase Delays Term. Stage Start Stage Phase Type Value Cont value
There are no Phase Delays defined
Prohibited Stage Change
To Stage
From Stage
1 2
1 6
2 12
Full Input Data And Results Give-Way Lane Input Data Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
There are no Opposed Lanes in this Junction
Full Input Data And Results Lane Input Data Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
Lane Lane Type Phases Start
Disp. End
Disp. Physical Length (PCU)
Sat Flow Type
Def User Saturation
Flow (PCU/Hr)
Lane Width
(m) Gradient Nearside
Lane Turns Turning Radius
(m)
1/1 (Drayton High
Road) U A 2 3 60.0 Geom - 3.06 0.00 Y Arm 5
Ahead Inf
1/2 (Drayton High
Road) U A 2 3 6.6 Geom - 3.06 0.00 N Arm 6
Right Inf
2/1 (Fakenham
Road) U B 2 3 60.0 Geom - 3.75 0.00 Y Arm 4
Ahead Inf
3/1 (School Road) U C 2 3 60.0 Geom - 4.95 0.00 Y Arm 5
Right 12.93
4/1 (Drayton High
Road Ex) U 2 3 60.0 Inf - - - - - -
5/1 (Fakenham Road Ex)
U 2 3 60.0 Inf - - - - - -
6/1 (School Road
Ex) U 2 3 60.0 Inf - - - - - -
Traffic Flow Groups
Flow Group Start Time End Time Duration Formula
1: 'Observed 2019 AM' 08:00 09:00 01:00
2: 'Observed 2019 PM' 16:30 17:30 01:00
9: 'Baseline 2025 +Committed AM' 08:00 09:00 01:00 F3+F5
10: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed PM' 16:30 17:30 01:00 F4+F6
11: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed + Development AM' 08:00 09:00 01:00 F3+F5+F7
12: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed + Development PM' 16:30 17:30 01:00 F4+F6+F8
Scenario 1: 'Scenario 1' (FG1: 'Observed 2019 AM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow :
Destination
Origin
A B C Tot.
A 0 390 116 506
B 620 0 0 620
C 0 412 0 412
Tot. 620 802 116 1538
Full Input Data And Results Traffic Lane Flows
Lane Scenario 1: Scenario 1
Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
1/1 (with short)
506(In) 390(Out)
1/2 (short) 116
2/1 620
3/1 412
4/1 620
5/1 802
6/1 116
Lane Saturation Flows Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
Lane Lane Width
(m) Gradient Nearside
Lane Allowed Turns
Turning Radius
(m) Turning
Prop. Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
Flared Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
1/1 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 Y Arm 5 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1921 1921
1/2 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 N Arm 6 Right Inf 100.0 % 2061 2061
2/1 (Fakenham Road) 3.75 0.00 Y Arm 4 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1990 1990
3/1 (School Road) 4.95 0.00 Y Arm 5 Right 12.93 100.0 % 1891 1891
4/1 (Drayton High Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
5/1 (Fakenham Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
6/1 (School Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
Scenario 2: 'Scenario 2' (FG2: 'Observed 2019 PM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow :
Destination
Origin
A B C Tot.
A 0 527 156 683
B 353 0 0 353
C 0 549 0 549
Tot. 353 1076 156 1585
Full Input Data And Results Traffic Lane Flows
Lane Scenario 2: Scenario 2
Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
1/1 (with short)
683(In) 527(Out)
1/2 (short) 156
2/1 353
3/1 549
4/1 353
5/1 1076
6/1 156
Lane Saturation Flows Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
Lane Lane Width
(m) Gradient Nearside
Lane Allowed Turns
Turning Radius
(m) Turning
Prop. Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
Flared Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
1/1 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 Y Arm 5 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1921 1921
1/2 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 N Arm 6 Right Inf 100.0 % 2061 2061
2/1 (Fakenham Road) 3.75 0.00 Y Arm 4 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1990 1990
3/1 (School Road) 4.95 0.00 Y Arm 5 Right 12.93 100.0 % 1891 1891
4/1 (Drayton High Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
5/1 (Fakenham Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
6/1 (School Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
Scenario 3: 'Scenario 3' (FG9: 'Baseline 2025 +Committed AM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow :
Destination
Origin
A B C Tot.
A 0 449 134 583
B 707 0 0 707
C 0 468 0 468
Tot. 707 917 134 1758
Full Input Data And Results Traffic Lane Flows
Lane Scenario 3: Scenario 3
Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
1/1 (with short)
583(In) 449(Out)
1/2 (short) 134
2/1 707
3/1 468
4/1 707
5/1 917
6/1 134
Lane Saturation Flows Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
Lane Lane Width
(m) Gradient Nearside
Lane Allowed Turns
Turning Radius
(m) Turning
Prop. Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
Flared Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
1/1 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 Y Arm 5 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1921 1921
1/2 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 N Arm 6 Right Inf 100.0 % 2061 2061
2/1 (Fakenham Road) 3.75 0.00 Y Arm 4 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1990 1990
3/1 (School Road) 4.95 0.00 Y Arm 5 Right 12.93 100.0 % 1891 1891
4/1 (Drayton High Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
5/1 (Fakenham Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
6/1 (School Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
Scenario 4: 'Scenario 4' (FG10: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed PM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow :
Destination
Origin
A B C Tot.
A 0 606 179 785
B 408 0 0 408
C 0 627 0 627
Tot. 408 1233 179 1820
Full Input Data And Results Traffic Lane Flows
Lane Scenario 4: Scenario 4
Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
1/1 (with short)
785(In) 606(Out)
1/2 (short) 179
2/1 408
3/1 627
4/1 408
5/1 1233
6/1 179
Lane Saturation Flows Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
Lane Lane Width
(m) Gradient Nearside
Lane Allowed Turns
Turning Radius
(m) Turning
Prop. Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
Flared Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
1/1 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 Y Arm 5 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1921 1921
1/2 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 N Arm 6 Right Inf 100.0 % 2061 2061
2/1 (Fakenham Road) 3.75 0.00 Y Arm 4 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1990 1990
3/1 (School Road) 4.95 0.00 Y Arm 5 Right 12.93 100.0 % 1891 1891
4/1 (Drayton High Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
5/1 (Fakenham Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
6/1 (School Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
Scenario 5: 'Scenario 5' (FG11: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed + Development AM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow :
Destination
Origin
A B C Tot.
A 0 449 150 599
B 707 0 0 707
C 0 494 0 494
Tot. 707 943 150 1800
Full Input Data And Results Traffic Lane Flows
Lane Scenario 5: Scenario 5
Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
1/1 (with short)
599(In) 449(Out)
1/2 (short) 150
2/1 707
3/1 494
4/1 707
5/1 943
6/1 150
Lane Saturation Flows Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
Lane Lane Width
(m) Gradient Nearside
Lane Allowed Turns
Turning Radius
(m) Turning
Prop. Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
Flared Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
1/1 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 Y Arm 5 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1921 1921
1/2 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 N Arm 6 Right Inf 100.0 % 2061 2061
2/1 (Fakenham Road) 3.75 0.00 Y Arm 4 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1990 1990
3/1 (School Road) 4.95 0.00 Y Arm 5 Right 12.93 100.0 % 1891 1891
4/1 (Drayton High Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
5/1 (Fakenham Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
6/1 (School Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
Scenario 6: 'Scenario 6' (FG12: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed + Development PM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Traffic Flows, Desired Desired Flow :
Destination
Origin
A B C Tot.
A 0 606 208 814
B 408 0 0 408
C 0 639 0 639
Tot. 408 1245 208 1861
Full Input Data And Results Traffic Lane Flows
Lane Scenario 6: Scenario 6
Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
1/1 (with short)
814(In) 606(Out)
1/2 (short) 208
2/1 408
3/1 639
4/1 408
5/1 1245
6/1 208
Lane Saturation Flows Junction: School Road/ Drayton High Road
Lane Lane Width
(m) Gradient Nearside
Lane Allowed Turns
Turning Radius
(m) Turning
Prop. Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
Flared Sat Flow (PCU/Hr)
1/1 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 Y Arm 5 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1921 1921
1/2 (Drayton High Road) 3.06 0.00 N Arm 6 Right Inf 100.0 % 2061 2061
2/1 (Fakenham Road) 3.75 0.00 Y Arm 4 Ahead Inf 100.0 % 1990 1990
3/1 (School Road) 4.95 0.00 Y Arm 5 Right 12.93 100.0 % 1891 1891
4/1 (Drayton High Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
5/1 (Fakenham Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
6/1 (School Road Ex Lane 1) Infinite Saturation Flow Inf Inf
Scenario 1: 'Scenario 1' (FG1: 'Observed 2019 AM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Stage Sequence Diagram
A
BD
1 Min: 7
12 60s
C
E
2 Min: 7
6 42s Stage Timings
Stage 1 2
Duration 60 42
Change Point 0 72
Full Input Data And Results Signal Timings Diagram
0
0
10
10
20
20
30
30
40
40
50
50
60
60
70
70
80
80
90
90
100
100
110
110
120
120
Time in cycle (sec)
Phas
es
1 12 : 600
2 6 : 4272
E ED DC CB BA A
Full Input Data And Results Network Layout Diagram
Full Input Data And Results
School Road/ Drayton High RoadPRC: 46.8 %Total Traffic Delay: 11.7 pcuHrAve. Route Delay Per Ped: 0.0 s/Ped
Arm 1 - Drayton High Road
12
AA
Arm 2 - Fakenham Road
1B
Arm
3 -
Sch
ool R
oad
1C
Arm 4 - Drayton High Road Ex
1
Arm 5 - Fakenham Road Ex
1
Arm
6 - School R
oad Ex
1
AB
C
Full Input Data And Results Network Results
Item Lane Description
Lane Type
Controller Stream
Position In Filtered Route Full Phase Arrow
Phase Num Greens
Total Green (s)
Arrow Green (s)
Demand Flow (pcu)
Sat Flow (pcu/Hr)
Capacity (pcu)
Deg Sat (%)
Network - - N/A - - - - - - - - 61.3%
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - N/A - - - - - - - - 61.3%
1/1+1/2 Drayton High Road Ahead
Right U N/A N/A A 1 60 - 506 1921:2061 818+243 47.7 :
47.7%
2/1 Fakenham Road Ahead U N/A N/A B 1 60 - 620 1990 1012 61.3%
3/1 School Road Right U N/A N/A C 1 42 - 412 1891 678 60.8%
4/1 Drayton High Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 620 Inf Inf 0.0%
5/1 Fakenham Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 802 Inf Inf 0.0%
6/1 School Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 116 Inf Inf 0.0%
Ped Link: P1 Drayton High Road - N/A - E 1 42 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Ped Link: P2 School Road - N/A - D 1 67 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Full Input Data And Results
Item Arriving (pcu) Leaving (pcu)
Turners In Gaps (pcu)
Turners When Unopposed (pcu)
Turners In Intergreen (pcu)
Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Rand + Oversat Delay (pcuHr)
Storage Area Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Total Delay (pcuHr)
Av. Delay Per PCU (s/pcu)
Max. Back of Uniform Queue (pcu)
Rand + Oversat Queue (pcu)
Mean Max Queue (pcu)
Network - - 0 0 0 9.7 2.0 0.0 11.7 - - - -
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - 0 0 0 9.7 2.0 0.0 11.7 - - - -
1/1+1/2 506 506 - - - 2.5 0.5 - 2.9 20.9 8.3 0.5 8.8
2/1 620 620 - - - 3.6 0.8 - 4.4 25.6 14.6 0.8 15.4
3/1 412 412 - - - 3.6 0.8 - 4.4 38.3 11.2 0.8 12.0
4/1 620 620 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5/1 802 802 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6/1 116 116 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped Link: P1 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
Ped Link: P2 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 46.8 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 11.74 Cycle Time (s): 120 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 46.8 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 11.74
Full Input Data And Results Scenario 2: 'Scenario 2' (FG2: 'Observed 2019 PM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Stage Sequence Diagram
A
BD
1 Min: 7
12 54s
C
E
2 Min: 7
6 48s Stage Timings
Stage 1 2
Duration 54 48
Change Point 0 66
Signal Timings Diagram
0
0
10
10
20
20
30
30
40
40
50
50
60
60
70
70
80
80
90
90
100
100
110
110
120
120
Time in cycle (sec)
Phas
es
1 12 : 540
2 6 : 4866
E ED DC CB BA A
Full Input Data And Results Network Layout Diagram
Full Input Data And Results
School Road/ Drayton High RoadPRC: 26.6 %Total Traffic Delay: 13.9 pcuHrAve. Route Delay Per Ped: 0.0 s/Ped
Arm 1 - Drayton High Road
12
AA
Arm 2 - Fakenham Road
1B
Arm
3 -
Sch
ool R
oad
1C
Arm 4 - Drayton High Road Ex
1
Arm 5 - Fakenham Road Ex
1
Arm
6 - School R
oad Ex
1
AB
C
Full Input Data And Results Network Results
Item Lane Description
Lane Type
Controller Stream
Position In Filtered Route Full Phase Arrow
Phase Num Greens
Total Green (s)
Arrow Green (s)
Demand Flow (pcu)
Sat Flow (pcu/Hr)
Capacity (pcu)
Deg Sat (%)
Network - - N/A - - - - - - - - 71.1%
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - N/A - - - - - - - - 71.1%
1/1+1/2 Drayton High Road Ahead
Right U N/A N/A A 1 54 - 683 1921:2061 743+220 70.9 :
70.9%
2/1 Fakenham Road Ahead U N/A N/A B 1 54 - 353 1990 912 38.7%
3/1 School Road Right U N/A N/A C 1 48 - 549 1891 772 71.1%
4/1 Drayton High Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 353 Inf Inf 0.0%
5/1 Fakenham Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 1076 Inf Inf 0.0%
6/1 School Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 156 Inf Inf 0.0%
Ped Link: P1 Drayton High Road - N/A - E 1 48 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Ped Link: P2 School Road - N/A - D 1 61 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Full Input Data And Results
Item Arriving (pcu) Leaving (pcu)
Turners In Gaps (pcu)
Turners When Unopposed (pcu)
Turners In Intergreen (pcu)
Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Rand + Oversat Delay (pcuHr)
Storage Area Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Total Delay (pcuHr)
Av. Delay Per PCU (s/pcu)
Max. Back of Uniform Queue (pcu)
Rand + Oversat Queue (pcu)
Mean Max Queue (pcu)
Network - - 0 0 0 11.2 2.7 0.0 13.9 - - - -
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - 0 0 0 11.2 2.7 0.0 13.9 - - - -
1/1+1/2 683 683 - - - 4.6 1.2 - 5.8 30.6 15.7 1.2 16.9
2/1 353 353 - - - 2.1 0.3 - 2.4 24.6 7.7 0.3 8.1
3/1 549 549 - - - 4.5 1.2 - 5.7 37.6 15.2 1.2 16.5
4/1 353 353 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5/1 1076 1076 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6/1 156 156 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped Link: P1 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
Ped Link: P2 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 26.6 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 13.95 Cycle Time (s): 120 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 26.6 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 13.95
Full Input Data And Results Scenario 3: 'Scenario 3' (FG9: 'Baseline 2025 +Committed AM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Stage Sequence Diagram
A
BD
1 Min: 7
12 60s
C
E
2 Min: 7
6 42s Stage Timings
Stage 1 2
Duration 60 42
Change Point 0 72
Signal Timings Diagram
0
0
10
10
20
20
30
30
40
40
50
50
60
60
70
70
80
80
90
90
100
100
110
110
120
120
Time in cycle (sec)
Phas
es
1 12 : 600
2 6 : 4272
E ED DC CB BA A
Full Input Data And Results Network Layout Diagram
Full Input Data And Results
School Road/ Drayton High RoadPRC: 28.8 %Total Traffic Delay: 14.5 pcuHrAve. Route Delay Per Ped: 0.0 s/Ped
Arm 1 - Drayton High Road
12
AA
Arm 2 - Fakenham Road
1B
Arm
3 -
Sch
ool R
oad
1C
Arm 4 - Drayton High Road Ex
1
Arm 5 - Fakenham Road Ex
1
Arm
6 - School R
oad Ex
1
AB
C
Full Input Data And Results Network Results
Item Lane Description
Lane Type
Controller Stream
Position In Filtered Route Full Phase Arrow
Phase Num Greens
Total Green (s)
Arrow Green (s)
Demand Flow (pcu)
Sat Flow (pcu/Hr)
Capacity (pcu)
Deg Sat (%)
Network - - N/A - - - - - - - - 69.9%
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - N/A - - - - - - - - 69.9%
1/1+1/2 Drayton High Road Ahead
Right U N/A N/A A 1 60 - 583 1921:2061 817+244 54.9 :
54.9%
2/1 Fakenham Road Ahead U N/A N/A B 1 60 - 707 1990 1012 69.9%
3/1 School Road Right U N/A N/A C 1 42 - 468 1891 678 69.1%
4/1 Drayton High Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 707 Inf Inf 0.0%
5/1 Fakenham Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 917 Inf Inf 0.0%
6/1 School Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 134 Inf Inf 0.0%
Ped Link: P1 Drayton High Road - N/A - E 1 42 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Ped Link: P2 School Road - N/A - D 1 67 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Full Input Data And Results
Item Arriving (pcu) Leaving (pcu)
Turners In Gaps (pcu)
Turners When Unopposed (pcu)
Turners In Intergreen (pcu)
Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Rand + Oversat Delay (pcuHr)
Storage Area Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Total Delay (pcuHr)
Av. Delay Per PCU (s/pcu)
Max. Back of Uniform Queue (pcu)
Rand + Oversat Queue (pcu)
Mean Max Queue (pcu)
Network - - 0 0 0 11.7 2.9 0.0 14.5 - - - -
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - 0 0 0 11.7 2.9 0.0 14.5 - - - -
1/1+1/2 583 583 - - - 3.0 0.6 - 3.6 22.2 10.7 0.6 11.3
2/1 707 707 - - - 4.4 1.2 - 5.6 28.4 17.9 1.2 19.0
3/1 468 468 - - - 4.3 1.1 - 5.4 41.3 13.3 1.1 14.4
4/1 707 707 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5/1 917 917 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6/1 134 134 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped Link: P1 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
Ped Link: P2 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 28.8 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 14.55 Cycle Time (s): 120 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 28.8 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 14.55
Full Input Data And Results Scenario 4: 'Scenario 4' (FG10: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed PM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Stage Sequence Diagram
A
BD
1 Min: 7
12 54s
C
E
2 Min: 7
6 48s Stage Timings
Stage 1 2
Duration 54 48
Change Point 0 66
Signal Timings Diagram
0
0
10
10
20
20
30
30
40
40
50
50
60
60
70
70
80
80
90
90
100
100
110
110
120
120
Time in cycle (sec)
Phas
es
1 12 : 540
2 6 : 4866
E ED DC CB BA A
Full Input Data And Results Network Layout Diagram
Full Input Data And Results
School Road/ Drayton High RoadPRC: 10.4 %Total Traffic Delay: 18.4 pcuHrAve. Route Delay Per Ped: 0.0 s/Ped
Arm 1 - Drayton High Road
12
AA
Arm 2 - Fakenham Road
1B
Arm
3 -
Sch
ool R
oad
1C
Arm 4 - Drayton High Road Ex
1
Arm 5 - Fakenham Road Ex
1
Arm
6 - School R
oad Ex
1
AB
C
Full Input Data And Results Network Results
Item Lane Description
Lane Type
Controller Stream
Position In Filtered Route Full Phase Arrow
Phase Num Greens
Total Green (s)
Arrow Green (s)
Demand Flow (pcu)
Sat Flow (pcu/Hr)
Capacity (pcu)
Deg Sat (%)
Network - - N/A - - - - - - - - 81.5%
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - N/A - - - - - - - - 81.5%
1/1+1/2 Drayton High Road Ahead
Right U N/A N/A A 1 54 - 785 1921:2061 744+220 81.5 :
81.5%
2/1 Fakenham Road Ahead U N/A N/A B 1 54 - 408 1990 912 44.7%
3/1 School Road Right U N/A N/A C 1 48 - 627 1891 772 81.2%
4/1 Drayton High Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 408 Inf Inf 0.0%
5/1 Fakenham Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 1233 Inf Inf 0.0%
6/1 School Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 179 Inf Inf 0.0%
Ped Link: P1 Drayton High Road - N/A - E 1 48 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Ped Link: P2 School Road - N/A - D 1 61 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Full Input Data And Results
Item Arriving (pcu) Leaving (pcu)
Turners In Gaps (pcu)
Turners When Unopposed (pcu)
Turners In Intergreen (pcu)
Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Rand + Oversat Delay (pcuHr)
Storage Area Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Total Delay (pcuHr)
Av. Delay Per PCU (s/pcu)
Max. Back of Uniform Queue (pcu)
Rand + Oversat Queue (pcu)
Mean Max Queue (pcu)
Network - - 0 0 0 13.7 4.7 0.0 18.4 - - - -
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - 0 0 0 13.7 4.7 0.0 18.4 - - - -
1/1+1/2 785 785 - - - 5.7 2.2 - 7.9 36.1 20.1 2.2 22.2
2/1 408 408 - - - 2.5 0.4 - 2.9 25.7 9.2 0.4 9.6
3/1 627 627 - - - 5.5 2.1 - 7.6 43.5 18.5 2.1 20.6
4/1 408 408 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5/1 1233 1233 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6/1 179 179 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped Link: P1 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
Ped Link: P2 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 10.4 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 18.35 Cycle Time (s): 120 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 10.4 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 18.35
Full Input Data And Results Scenario 5: 'Scenario 5' (FG11: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed + Development AM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Stage Sequence Diagram
A
BD
1 Min: 7
12 59s
C
E
2 Min: 7
6 43s Stage Timings
Stage 1 2
Duration 59 43
Change Point 0 71
Signal Timings Diagram
0
0
10
10
20
20
30
30
40
40
50
50
60
60
70
70
80
80
90
90
100
100
110
110
120
120
Time in cycle (sec)
Phas
es
1 12 : 590
2 6 : 4371
E ED DC CB BA A
Full Input Data And Results Network Layout Diagram
Full Input Data And Results
School Road/ Drayton High RoadPRC: 26.3 %Total Traffic Delay: 15.3 pcuHrAve. Route Delay Per Ped: 0.0 s/Ped
Arm 1 - Drayton High Road
12
AA
Arm 2 - Fakenham Road
1B
Arm
3 -
Sch
ool R
oad
1C
Arm 4 - Drayton High Road Ex
1
Arm 5 - Fakenham Road Ex
1
Arm
6 - School R
oad Ex
1
AB
C
Full Input Data And Results Network Results
Item Lane Description
Lane Type
Controller Stream
Position In Filtered Route Full Phase Arrow
Phase Num Greens
Total Green (s)
Arrow Green (s)
Demand Flow (pcu)
Sat Flow (pcu/Hr)
Capacity (pcu)
Deg Sat (%)
Network - - N/A - - - - - - - - 71.2%
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - N/A - - - - - - - - 71.2%
1/1+1/2 Drayton High Road Ahead
Right U N/A N/A A 1 59 - 599 1921:2061 790+264 56.9 :
56.9%
2/1 Fakenham Road Ahead U N/A N/A B 1 59 - 707 1990 995 71.1%
3/1 School Road Right U N/A N/A C 1 43 - 494 1891 693 71.2%
4/1 Drayton High Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 707 Inf Inf 0.0%
5/1 Fakenham Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 943 Inf Inf 0.0%
6/1 School Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 150 Inf Inf 0.0%
Ped Link: P1 Drayton High Road - N/A - E 1 43 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Ped Link: P2 School Road - N/A - D 1 66 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Full Input Data And Results
Item Arriving (pcu) Leaving (pcu)
Turners In Gaps (pcu)
Turners When Unopposed (pcu)
Turners In Intergreen (pcu)
Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Rand + Oversat Delay (pcuHr)
Storage Area Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Total Delay (pcuHr)
Av. Delay Per PCU (s/pcu)
Max. Back of Uniform Queue (pcu)
Rand + Oversat Queue (pcu)
Mean Max Queue (pcu)
Network - - 0 0 0 12.2 3.1 0.0 15.3 - - - -
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - 0 0 0 12.2 3.1 0.0 15.3 - - - -
1/1+1/2 599 599 - - - 3.2 0.7 - 3.8 23.1 10.9 0.7 11.6
2/1 707 707 - - - 4.6 1.2 - 5.8 29.5 18.3 1.2 19.5
3/1 494 494 - - - 4.5 1.2 - 5.7 41.5 14.0 1.2 15.2
4/1 707 707 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5/1 943 943 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6/1 150 150 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped Link: P1 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
Ped Link: P2 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 26.3 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 15.32 Cycle Time (s): 120 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 26.3 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 15.32
Full Input Data And Results Scenario 6: 'Scenario 6' (FG12: 'Baseline 2025 + Committed + Development PM', Plan 1: 'Network Control Plan 1') Stage Sequence Diagram
A
BD
1 Min: 7
12 54s
C
E
2 Min: 7
6 48s Stage Timings
Stage 1 2
Duration 54 48
Change Point 0 66
Signal Timings Diagram
0
0
10
10
20
20
30
30
40
40
50
50
60
60
70
70
80
80
90
90
100
100
110
110
120
120
Time in cycle (sec)
Phas
es
1 12 : 540
2 6 : 4866
E ED DC CB BA A
Full Input Data And Results Network Layout Diagram
Full Input Data And Results
School Road/ Drayton High RoadPRC: 7.7 %Total Traffic Delay: 19.3 pcuHrAve. Route Delay Per Ped: 0.0 s/Ped
Arm 1 - Drayton High Road
12
AA
Arm 2 - Fakenham Road
1B
Arm
3 -
Sch
ool R
oad
1C
Arm 4 - Drayton High Road Ex
1
Arm 5 - Fakenham Road Ex
1
Arm
6 - School R
oad Ex
1
AB
C
Full Input Data And Results Network Results
Item Lane Description
Lane Type
Controller Stream
Position In Filtered Route Full Phase Arrow
Phase Num Greens
Total Green (s)
Arrow Green (s)
Demand Flow (pcu)
Sat Flow (pcu/Hr)
Capacity (pcu)
Deg Sat (%)
Network - - N/A - - - - - - - - 83.6%
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - N/A - - - - - - - - 83.6%
1/1+1/2 Drayton High Road Ahead
Right U N/A N/A A 1 54 - 814 1921:2061 725+249 83.6 :
83.6%
2/1 Fakenham Road Ahead U N/A N/A B 1 54 - 408 1990 912 44.7%
3/1 School Road Right U N/A N/A C 1 48 - 639 1891 772 82.8%
4/1 Drayton High Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 408 Inf Inf 0.0%
5/1 Fakenham Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 1245 Inf Inf 0.0%
6/1 School Road Ex U N/A N/A - - - - 208 Inf Inf 0.0%
Ped Link: P1 Drayton High Road - N/A - E 1 48 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Ped Link: P2 School Road - N/A - D 1 61 - 0 - 0 0.0%
Full Input Data And Results
Item Arriving (pcu) Leaving (pcu)
Turners In Gaps (pcu)
Turners When Unopposed (pcu)
Turners In Intergreen (pcu)
Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Rand + Oversat Delay (pcuHr)
Storage Area Uniform Delay (pcuHr)
Total Delay (pcuHr)
Av. Delay Per PCU (s/pcu)
Max. Back of Uniform Queue (pcu)
Rand + Oversat Queue (pcu)
Mean Max Queue (pcu)
Network - - 0 0 0 14.1 5.2 0.0 19.3 - - - -
School Road/ Drayton High Road
- - 0 0 0 14.1 5.2 0.0 19.3 - - - -
1/1+1/2 814 814 - - - 6.0 2.5 - 8.4 37.3 21.0 2.5 23.5
2/1 408 408 - - - 2.5 0.4 - 2.9 25.7 9.2 0.4 9.6
3/1 639 639 - - - 5.6 2.3 - 7.9 44.8 19.0 2.3 21.3
4/1 408 408 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
5/1 1245 1245 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
6/1 208 208 - - - 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ped Link: P1 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
Ped Link: P2 0 0 - - - - - - - - - - -
C1 PRC for Signalled Lanes (%): 7.7 Total Delay for Signalled Lanes (pcuHr): 19.30 Cycle Time (s): 120 PRC Over All Lanes (%): 7.7 Total Delay Over All Lanes(pcuHr): 19.30
Filename: 6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-1004-R02-Junction 4 Site Access.j9 Path: \\MLMIPS.com\Work\MLM\6_\610_\61009_\6100905\CALC\Capacity Models Report generation date: 26/11/19 16:19:30
»2019, AM »2019, PM »2025 Baseline + Committed, AM »2025 Baseline + Committed, PM »2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, AM »2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, PM
Summary of junction performance
Junctions 9PICADY 9 - Priority Intersection Module
Version: 9.0.1.4646 []
© Copyright TRL Limited, 2019
For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL:
Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk
The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
AM PM
Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS
2019
Stream B-C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream B-A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream C-AB 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
2025 Baseline + Committed
Stream B-C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream B-A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
Stream C-AB 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 0.00 A
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development
Stream B-C 0.1 8.54 0.08 A 0.0 7.15 0.04 A
Stream B-A 0.3 17.19 0.24 C 0.1 11.72 0.10 B
Stream C-AB 0.0 7.18 0.03 A 0.1 6.82 0.06 A
There are warnings associated with one or more model runs - see the 'Data Errors and Warnings' tables for each Analysis or Demand Set.
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
1
File summary
Units
Analysis Options
Demand Set Summary
Analysis Set Details
File Description
Title (untitled)
Location
Site number
Date 15/11/19
Version
Status (new file)
Identifier
Client
Jobnumber
Enumerator MLMIPS\jamie.ferguson
Description
Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units
m kph PCU PCU perHour s -Min perMin
Vehicle length (m)
Calculate Queue Percentiles
Calculate detailed queueing delay
Calculate residual capacity
RFC Threshold
Average Delay threshold (s)
Queue threshold (PCU)
5.75 0.85 36.00 20.00
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D1 2019 AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü
D2 2019 PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 ü
D3 Development Flows AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D4 Development Flows PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15
D5 2025 Baseline AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D1*1.1371
D6 2025 Baseline PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 Simple D2*1.1417
D7 2025 Baseline+Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D5+D3
D8 2025 Baseline+Development PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 Simple D4+D6
D9 Committed Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D10 Committed Development PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15
D11 2025 Baseline + Committed AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
D12 2025 Baseline + Committed PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 ü Simple D6+D10
D13 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
D14 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 ü Simple D8+D10
ID Include in report Network flow scaling factor (%) Network capacity scaling factor (%)
A1 ü 100.000 100.000
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2
2019, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Arms
Arms
Major Arm Geometry
Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.
Minor Arm Geometry
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts
The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments.
Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted.
Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/Hall Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.00 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
Arm Name Description Arm type
A Hall Lane W Major
B Site Access Minor
C Hall Lane E Major
Arm Width of carriageway (m) Has kerbed central reserve Has right turn bay Visibility for right turn (m) Blocks? Blocking queue (PCU)
C 6.21 153.6 ü 1.00
ArmMinor arm
typeWidth at give-
way (m)Width at 5m (m)
Width at 10m (m)
Width at 15m (m)
Width at 20m (m)
Estimate flare length
Flare length (PCU)
Visibility to left (m)
Visibility to right (m)
BOne lane plus
flare10.00 4.54 3.00 3.00 3.00 ü 1.00 16 18
Junction StreamIntercept(PCU/hr)
Slopefor A-B
Slopefor A-C
Slopefor C-A
Slopefor C-B
1 B-A 523 0.094 0.238 0.150 0.341
1 B-C 676 0.103 0.259 - -
1 C-B 663 0.255 0.255 - -
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
3
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D1 2019 AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 496 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 0 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 519 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 496
B 0 0 0
C 519 0 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 2
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 476 714
A-B 0 0
A-C 455 683
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
4
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 579 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 375 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1136 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 391 98 391
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 373 93 373
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 560 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 346 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1099 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 467 117 467
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 446 111 446
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 534 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 307 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1048 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 571 143 571
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 546 137 546
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 534 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 307 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1048 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 571 143 571
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 546 137 546
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 560 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 346 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1099 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 467 117 467
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 446 111 446
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
5
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 579 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 375 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1136 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 391 98 391
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 373 93 373
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
6
2019, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/Hall Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.00 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D2 2019 PM ONE HOUR 16:15 17:45 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 362 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 0 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 362 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 362
B 0 0 0
C 362 0 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 1 0
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
7
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:15 - 16:30
16:30 - 16:45
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 332 498
A-B 0 0
A-C 332 498
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 605 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 417 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1187 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 273 68 273
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 273 68 273
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 591 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 396 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1160 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 325 81 325
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 325 81 325
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 572 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 368 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1123 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 399 100 399
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 399 100 399
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 572 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 368 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1123 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 399 100 399
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 399 100 399
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
8
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 591 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 396 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1160 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 325 81 325
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 325 81 325
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 605 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 417 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1187 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 273 68 273
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 273 68 273
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
9
2025 Baseline + Committed, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/Hall Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.00 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D11 2025 Baseline + Committed AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 564 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 0 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 590 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 564
B 0 0 0
C 590 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
10
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 2
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 542 812
A-B 0 0
A-C 518 776
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 565 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 355 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1110 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 444 111 444
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 425 106 425
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 544 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 322 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1068 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 531 133 531
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 507 127 507
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 515 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 277 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1010 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 650 162 650
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 621 155 621
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
11
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 515 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 277 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1010 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 650 162 650
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 621 155 621
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 544 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 322 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1068 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 531 133 531
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 507 127 507
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 565 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 355 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1110 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 444 111 444
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 425 106 425
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
12
2025 Baseline + Committed, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Warning Vehicle Mix HV% is zero for all movements / time segments. Vehicle Mix matrix should be completed whether working in
PCUs or Vehs.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/Hall Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.00 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D12 2025 Baseline + Committed PM ONE HOUR 16:15 17:45 15 ü Simple D6+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 413 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 0 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 414 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 413
B 0 0 0
C 414 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
13
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:15 - 16:30
16:30 - 16:45
16:45 - 17:00
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 0
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-A 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-AB 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-A 380 570
A-B 0 0
A-C 379 569
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 595 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 402 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1167 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 312 78 312
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 311 78 311
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 579 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 378 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1137 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 372 93 372
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 372 93 372
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 558 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 346 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1094 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 456 114 456
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 455 114 455
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
14
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 558 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 346 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1094 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 456 114 456
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 455 114 455
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 579 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 378 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1137 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 372 93 372
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 372 93 372
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 595 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-A 0 0 402 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-AB 0 0 1167 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-A 312 78 312
A-B 0 0 0
A-C 311 78 311
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
15
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/Hall Lane T-Junction Two-way 1.12 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D13 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 591 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 95 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 605 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 27 564
B 61 0 34
C 590 15 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
16
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 0 2
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.08 8.54 0.1 A 31 47
B-A 0.24 17.19 0.3 C 56 84
C-AB 0.03 7.18 0.0 A 14 21
C-A 541 812
A-B 25 37
A-C 518 776
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 26 6 528 0.048 25 0.0 0.1 7.159 A
B-A 46 11 360 0.128 45 0.0 0.1 11.437 B
C-AB 11 3 559 0.021 11 0.0 0.0 6.576 A
C-A 444 111 444
A-B 20 5 20
A-C 425 106 425
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 31 8 500 0.061 31 0.1 0.1 7.659 A
B-A 55 14 325 0.169 55 0.1 0.2 13.314 B
C-AB 14 3 541 0.026 14 0.0 0.0 6.825 A
C-A 530 133 530
A-B 24 6 24
A-C 507 127 507
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 37 9 459 0.081 37 0.1 0.1 8.528 A
B-A 67 17 277 0.243 67 0.2 0.3 17.120 C
C-AB 17 4 519 0.033 17 0.0 0.0 7.175 A
C-A 649 162 649
A-B 30 7 30
A-C 621 155 621
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
17
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 37 9 459 0.082 37 0.1 0.1 8.540 A
B-A 67 17 277 0.243 67 0.3 0.3 17.187 C
C-AB 17 4 519 0.033 17 0.0 0.0 7.175 A
C-A 649 162 649
A-B 30 7 30
A-C 621 155 621
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 31 8 500 0.061 31 0.1 0.1 7.674 A
B-A 55 14 325 0.169 55 0.3 0.2 13.374 B
C-AB 14 3 541 0.026 14 0.0 0.0 6.826 A
C-A 530 133 530
A-B 24 6 24
A-C 507 127 507
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 26 6 527 0.049 26 0.1 0.1 7.176 A
B-A 46 11 360 0.128 46 0.2 0.1 11.491 B
C-AB 11 3 559 0.021 12 0.0 0.0 6.577 A
C-A 444 111 444
A-B 20 5 20
A-C 425 106 425
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
18
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Minor arm flareArm B - Minor arm
geometry
Is flare very short? Estimated flare length is zero but has been increased to 1 because a zero flare length is
not allowed.
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025
Baseline+Development,
AM
Demand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Major road direction Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Site Access/Hall Lane T-Junction Two-way 0.70 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D14 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 ü Simple D8+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 462 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 47 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 441 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C
A 0 49 413
B 30 0 17
C 414 27 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
19
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:15 - 16:30
16:30 - 16:45
16:45 - 17:00
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C
A 0 1 0
B 0 0 0
C 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.04 7.15 0.0 A 16 23
B-A 0.10 11.72 0.1 B 28 41
C-AB 0.06 6.82 0.1 A 26 38
C-A 379 569
A-B 45 67
A-C 379 569
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 13 3 566 0.023 13 0.0 0.0 6.512 A
B-A 23 6 403 0.056 22 0.0 0.1 9.454 A
C-AB 21 5 585 0.035 21 0.0 0.0 6.372 A
C-A 312 78 312
A-B 37 9 37
A-C 311 78 311
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 15 4 547 0.028 15 0.0 0.0 6.764 A
B-A 27 7 377 0.072 27 0.1 0.1 10.290 B
C-AB 25 6 573 0.044 25 0.0 0.0 6.564 A
C-A 372 93 372
A-B 44 11 44
A-C 372 93 372
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 19 5 522 0.036 19 0.0 0.0 7.150 A
B-A 33 8 340 0.097 33 0.1 0.1 11.703 B
C-AB 31 8 559 0.056 31 0.0 0.1 6.822 A
C-A 455 114 455
A-B 54 13 54
A-C 455 114 455
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
20
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 19 5 522 0.036 19 0.0 0.0 7.152 A
B-A 33 8 340 0.097 33 0.1 0.1 11.715 B
C-AB 31 8 559 0.056 31 0.1 0.1 6.825 A
C-A 455 114 455
A-B 54 13 54
A-C 455 114 455
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 15 4 547 0.028 15 0.0 0.0 6.769 A
B-A 27 7 377 0.072 27 0.1 0.1 10.301 B
C-AB 25 6 573 0.044 25 0.1 0.0 6.568 A
C-A 372 93 372
A-B 44 11 44
A-C 372 93 372
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 13 3 565 0.023 13 0.0 0.0 6.518 A
B-A 23 6 403 0.056 23 0.1 0.1 9.470 A
C-AB 21 5 585 0.035 21 0.0 0.0 6.375 A
C-A 312 78 312
A-B 37 9 37
A-C 311 78 311
Generated on 26/11/19 16:19:54 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
21
Filename: 6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-1002-R02-Junction 5 Drayton Lane.j9 Path: \\MLMIPS.com\Work\MLM\6_\610_\61009_\6100905\CALC\Capacity Models Report generation date: 26/11/19 16:33:09
»2019, AM »2019, PM »2025 Baseline + Committed, AM »2025 Baseline + Committed, PM »2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, AM »2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, PM
Summary of junction performance
Junctions 9ARCADY 9 - Roundabout Module
Version: 9.0.1.4646 []
© Copyright TRL Limited, 2019
For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL:
Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk
The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
AM PM
Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS
2019
Arm 1 0.3 7.35 0.20 A 0.5 8.10 0.34 A
Arm 2 0.9 7.16 0.49 A 0.8 6.47 0.43 A
Arm 3 1.7 14.11 0.64 B 1.0 9.40 0.49 A
2025 Baseline + Committed
Arm 1 0.3 8.11 0.24 A 0.6 9.19 0.40 A
Arm 2 1.2 8.01 0.54 A 0.9 7.10 0.48 A
Arm 3 2.5 18.45 0.72 C 1.2 10.74 0.55 B
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development
Arm 1 0.4 8.46 0.26 A 0.7 9.85 0.43 A
Arm 2 1.4 8.72 0.58 A 1.0 7.36 0.50 A
Arm 3 2.9 21.37 0.75 C 1.3 11.32 0.57 B
There are warnings associated with one or more model runs - see the 'Data Errors and Warnings' tables for each Analysis or Demand Set.
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
1
File summary
Units
Analysis Options
Demand Set Summary
Analysis Set Details
File Description
Title (untitled)
Location
Site number
Date 15/11/19
Version
Status (new file)
Identifier
Client
Jobnumber
Enumerator MLMIPS\jamie.ferguson
Description
Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units
m kph PCU PCU perHour s -Min perMin
Mini-roundabout model
Vehicle length (m)
Calculate Queue Percentiles
Calculate detailed queueing delay
Calculate residual capacity
RFC Threshold
Average Delay threshold (s)
Queue threshold (PCU)
JUNCTIONS 9 5.75 0.85 36.00 20.00
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D1 2019 AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü
D2 2019 PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü
D3 Development Flows AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D4 Development Flows PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15
D5 2025 Baseline AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D1*1.1371
D6 2025 Baseline PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 Simple D2*1.1417
D7 2025 Baseline + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D3+D5
D8 2025 Baseline + Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 Simple D4+D6
D9 Committed Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D10 Committed Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15
D11 2025 Baseline + Committed AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
D12 2025 Baseline + Committed PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D6+D10
D13 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
D14 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D8+D10
ID Include in report Network flow scaling factor (%) Network capacity scaling factor (%)
A1 ü 100.000 100.000
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2
2019, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Arms
Arms
Mini Roundabout Geometry
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Roundabout Slope and Intercept used in model
The slope and intercept shown above include any corrections and adjustments.
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Mini-roundabout Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction; treat results with
caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 2 and 3 have 88% of the total flow for the roundabout for one or
more time segments]
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/Drayton Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 10.15 B
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
Arm Name Description
1 Hall Lane E
2 School Road W
3 Drayton Lane
ArmApproach road half-width (m)
Minimum approach road half-width (m)
Entry width (m)
Effective flare length (m)
Distance to next arm (m)
Entry corner kerb line distance (m)
Gradient over 50m (%)
Kerbed central island
1 2.59 2.59 3.00 20.7 16.43 16.43 0.0
2 2.54 2.54 5.09 3.4 13.17 11.49 0.0
3 2.58 2.58 7.20 2.4 8.77 5.09 0.0
Arm Final slope Final intercept (PCU/hr)
1 0.640 907
2 0.605 990
3 0.599 795
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D1 2019 AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
3
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 114 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 436 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 409 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 113 1
2 137 0 299
3 2 407 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 1 0
2 2 0 1
3 0 0 0
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.20 7.35 0.3 A 105 157
2 0.49 7.16 0.9 A 400 600
3 0.64 14.11 1.7 B 375 563
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 86 21 304 712 0.120 85 104 0.0 0.1 5.793 A
2 328 82 0.75 990 0.332 326 388 0.0 0.5 5.481 A
3 308 77 103 734 0.420 305 224 0.0 0.7 8.343 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 102 26 365 673 0.152 102 125 0.1 0.2 6.367 A
2 392 98 0.90 990 0.396 391 466 0.5 0.7 6.090 A
3 368 92 123 722 0.510 366 269 0.7 1.0 10.105 B
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
4
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 126 31 445 622 0.202 125 153 0.2 0.3 7.320 A
2 480 120 1 989 0.485 479 570 0.7 0.9 7.128 A
3 450 113 150 705 0.639 448 330 1.0 1.7 13.830 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 126 31 448 620 0.202 126 153 0.3 0.3 7.353 A
2 480 120 1 989 0.485 480 572 0.9 0.9 7.159 A
3 450 113 151 705 0.639 450 330 1.7 1.7 14.112 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 102 26 369 671 0.153 103 125 0.3 0.2 6.406 A
2 392 98 0.90 990 0.396 393 470 0.9 0.7 6.125 A
3 368 92 124 721 0.510 370 270 1.7 1.1 10.337 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 86 21 308 710 0.121 86 105 0.2 0.1 5.832 A
2 328 82 0.75 990 0.332 329 393 0.7 0.5 5.524 A
3 308 77 103 733 0.420 309 226 1.1 0.7 8.516 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
5
2019, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/Drayton Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 7.89 A
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D2 2019 PM ONE HOUR 16:45 18:15 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 209 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 387 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 335 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 204 5
2 66 0 321
3 6 329 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 1
3 0 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
6
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
17:45 - 18:00
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.34 8.10 0.5 A 192 288
2 0.43 6.47 0.8 A 355 533
3 0.49 9.40 1.0 A 307 461
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 157 39 246 749 0.210 156 54 0.0 0.3 6.059 A
2 291 73 4 988 0.295 290 398 0.0 0.4 5.186 A
3 252 63 49 766 0.329 250 244 0.0 0.5 6.958 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 188 47 295 718 0.262 188 65 0.3 0.4 6.785 A
2 348 87 4 987 0.352 347 478 0.4 0.5 5.666 A
3 301 75 59 760 0.396 301 293 0.5 0.6 7.828 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 230 58 361 676 0.341 229 79 0.4 0.5 8.060 A
2 426 107 5 987 0.432 425 585 0.5 0.8 6.455 A
3 369 92 73 752 0.491 368 358 0.6 0.9 9.341 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 230 58 362 675 0.341 230 79 0.5 0.5 8.095 A
2 426 107 6 987 0.432 426 587 0.8 0.8 6.473 A
3 369 92 73 752 0.491 369 359 0.9 1.0 9.400 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 188 47 297 717 0.262 189 65 0.5 0.4 6.824 A
2 348 87 5 987 0.352 349 481 0.8 0.6 5.692 A
3 301 75 59 760 0.396 302 294 1.0 0.7 7.892 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
7
18:00 - 18:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 157 39 248 748 0.210 158 54 0.4 0.3 6.105 A
2 291 73 4 988 0.295 292 402 0.6 0.4 5.219 A
3 252 63 50 765 0.330 253 246 0.7 0.5 7.035 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
8
2025 Baseline + Committed, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Mini-roundabout Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction; treat results with
caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 2 and 3 have 88% of the total flow for the roundabout for one or
more time segments]
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/Drayton Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 12.47 B
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D11 2025 Baseline + Committed AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 130 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 497 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 466 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 128 1
2 156 0 341
3 2 464 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
9
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 1 0
2 2 0 1
3 0 0 0
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.24 8.11 0.3 A 116 174
2 0.54 8.01 1.2 A 445 668
3 0.72 18.45 2.5 C 418 626
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 95 24 337 691 0.138 95 115 0.0 0.2 6.093 A
2 365 91 0.83 990 0.369 363 431 0.0 0.6 5.798 A
3 343 86 114 727 0.471 339 250 0.0 0.9 9.198 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 114 28 405 647 0.176 114 138 0.2 0.2 6.809 A
2 436 109 1.00 990 0.441 435 518 0.6 0.8 6.570 A
3 409 102 136 714 0.573 407 300 0.9 1.3 11.688 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 139 35 494 590 0.236 139 169 0.2 0.3 8.047 A
2 534 133 1 989 0.540 532 632 0.8 1.2 7.955 A
3 501 125 167 695 0.721 497 367 1.3 2.4 17.716 C
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 139 35 498 588 0.237 139 170 0.3 0.3 8.107 A
2 534 133 1 989 0.540 534 636 1.2 1.2 8.006 A
3 501 125 167 695 0.721 501 368 2.4 2.5 18.446 C
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
10
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 114 28 411 643 0.177 114 139 0.3 0.2 6.877 A
2 436 109 1 990 0.441 437 525 1.2 0.8 6.626 A
3 409 102 137 713 0.574 413 301 2.5 1.4 12.188 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 95 24 343 687 0.139 95 116 0.2 0.2 6.145 A
2 365 91 0.84 990 0.369 366 437 0.8 0.6 5.857 A
3 343 86 115 727 0.471 344 252 1.4 0.9 9.468 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
11
2025 Baseline + Committed, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/Drayton Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 8.88 A
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D12 2025 Baseline + Committed PM ONE HOUR 16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D6+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 239 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 443 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 383 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 233 6
2 75 0 367
3 7 377 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 1
3 0 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
12
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
17:45 - 18:00
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.40 9.19 0.6 A 214 320
2 0.48 7.10 0.9 A 396 595
3 0.55 10.74 1.2 B 343 515
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 175 44 274 731 0.240 174 60 0.0 0.3 6.448 A
2 325 81 4 988 0.329 323 444 0.0 0.5 5.449 A
3 282 70 55 762 0.369 279 272 0.0 0.6 7.418 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 209 52 329 696 0.301 209 72 0.3 0.4 7.387 A
2 388 97 5 987 0.393 388 533 0.5 0.6 6.049 A
3 336 84 66 756 0.445 335 327 0.6 0.8 8.547 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 256 64 403 649 0.395 255 88 0.4 0.6 9.132 A
2 476 119 6 986 0.482 474 652 0.6 0.9 7.074 A
3 412 103 81 747 0.551 410 400 0.8 1.2 10.639 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 256 64 404 648 0.396 256 88 0.6 0.6 9.193 A
2 476 119 6 986 0.482 476 655 0.9 0.9 7.105 A
3 412 103 81 747 0.552 412 401 1.2 1.2 10.741 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 209 52 332 694 0.301 210 72 0.6 0.4 7.450 A
2 388 97 5 987 0.393 389 537 0.9 0.7 6.083 A
3 336 84 66 756 0.445 338 328 1.2 0.8 8.651 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
13
18:00 - 18:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 175 44 277 729 0.240 176 60 0.4 0.3 6.510 A
2 325 81 4 988 0.329 326 449 0.7 0.5 5.490 A
3 282 70 55 762 0.370 282 275 0.8 0.6 7.523 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
14
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
Warning Mini-roundabout Mini-roundabout appears to have unbalanced flows and may behave like a priority junction; treat results with
caution. See User Guide for details.[Arms 2 and 3 have 87% of the total flow for the roundabout for one or
more time segments]
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/Drayton Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 13.95 B
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D13 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 140 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 531 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 477 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 138 1
2 179 0 352
3 2 475 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
15
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 1 0
2 2 0 1
3 0 0 0
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.26 8.46 0.4 A 125 188
2 0.58 8.72 1.4 A 476 714
3 0.75 21.37 2.9 C 428 641
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 103 26 345 686 0.150 102 133 0.0 0.2 6.223 A
2 391 98 0.83 990 0.395 388 447 0.0 0.7 6.040 A
3 351 88 131 717 0.489 347 258 0.0 0.9 9.643 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 123 31 415 641 0.191 123 159 0.2 0.2 7.008 A
2 467 117 1.00 990 0.471 466 536 0.7 0.9 6.950 A
3 419 105 157 701 0.597 417 310 0.9 1.4 12.574 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 150 38 505 583 0.258 150 195 0.2 0.3 8.380 A
2 571 143 1 989 0.578 570 654 0.9 1.4 8.650 A
3 513 128 192 680 0.754 508 379 1.4 2.8 20.207 C
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 150 38 510 580 0.259 150 195 0.3 0.4 8.459 A
2 571 143 1 989 0.578 571 659 1.4 1.4 8.724 A
3 513 128 193 680 0.755 513 380 2.8 2.9 21.375 C
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
16
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 123 31 423 636 0.193 123 160 0.4 0.2 7.094 A
2 467 117 1 990 0.471 468 545 1.4 0.9 7.026 A
3 419 105 158 701 0.598 425 311 2.9 1.5 13.290 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 103 26 351 682 0.151 103 134 0.2 0.2 6.287 A
2 391 98 0.84 990 0.395 392 454 0.9 0.7 6.111 A
3 351 88 132 716 0.490 353 260 1.5 1.0 9.975 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
17
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction Name Junction Type Arm order Junction Delay (s) Junction LOS
1 Hall Lane/Drayton Mini-roundabout 1,2,3 9.34 A
Driving side Lighting Road surface In London
Left Normal/unknown Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D14 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:45 18:15 15 ü Simple D8+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
1 ONE HOUR ü 257 100.000
2 ONE HOUR ü 459 100.000
3 ONE HOUR ü 392 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 251 6
2 86 0 372
3 7 386 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
1 2 3
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 1
3 0 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
18
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
17:45 - 18:00
Arm Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
1 0.43 9.85 0.7 A 230 345
2 0.50 7.36 1.0 A 411 617
3 0.57 11.32 1.3 B 351 527
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 189 47 281 727 0.260 187 68 0.0 0.3 6.656 A
2 337 84 4 988 0.341 335 464 0.0 0.5 5.544 A
3 288 72 63 757 0.381 286 276 0.0 0.6 7.600 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 225 56 337 691 0.326 225 82 0.3 0.5 7.721 A
2 403 101 5 987 0.408 402 557 0.5 0.7 6.195 A
3 344 86 76 750 0.459 343 331 0.6 0.8 8.838 A
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 276 69 413 643 0.430 275 100 0.5 0.7 9.768 A
2 493 123 6 986 0.500 492 682 0.7 1.0 7.323 A
3 422 105 93 740 0.570 420 405 0.8 1.3 11.193 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 276 69 414 641 0.430 276 100 0.7 0.7 9.851 A
2 493 123 6 986 0.500 493 684 1.0 1.0 7.357 A
3 422 105 93 740 0.570 422 406 1.3 1.3 11.319 B
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 225 56 340 689 0.327 226 82 0.7 0.5 7.802 A
2 403 101 5 987 0.408 404 562 1.0 0.7 6.237 A
3 344 86 76 750 0.459 346 333 1.3 0.9 8.961 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
19
18:00 - 18:15
ArmTotal
Demand (PCU/hr)
Junction Arrivals (PCU)
Circulating flow (PCU/hr)
Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)
Throughput (exit side) (PCU/hr)
Start queue (PCU)
End queue (PCU)
Delay (s) LOS
1 189 47 284 725 0.261 189 69 0.5 0.4 6.733 A
2 337 84 4 988 0.342 338 469 0.7 0.5 5.594 A
3 288 72 64 757 0.381 289 278 0.9 0.6 7.714 A
Generated on 26/11/19 16:33:32 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
20
Filename: 6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-CA-TP-1005-R02-Junction 6 Reepaham Road.j9 Path: \\MLMIPS.com\Work\MLM\6_\610_\61009_\6100905\CALC\Capacity Models Report generation date: 26/11/19 16:30:30
»2019, AM »2019, PM »2025 Baseline + Committed, AM »2025 Baseline + Committed, PM »2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, AM »2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, PM
Summary of junction performance
Junctions 9PICADY 9 - Priority Intersection Module
Version: 9.0.1.4646 []
© Copyright TRL Limited, 2019
For sales and distribution information, program advice and maintenance, contact TRL:
Tel: +44 (0)1344 770758 email: [email protected] Web: http://www.trlsoftware.co.uk
The users of this computer program for the solution of an engineering problem are in no way relieved of their responsibility for the correctness of the solution
AM PM
Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS Queue (PCU) Delay (s) RFC LOS
2019
Stream B-C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 8.32 0.01 A
Stream B-AD 0.8 17.86 0.43 C 0.2 13.66 0.20 B
Stream A-BCD 0.0 10.42 0.01 B 0.0 5.95 0.00 A
Stream D-A 0.0 7.78 0.03 A 0.0 6.27 0.01 A
Stream D-BC 0.0 14.00 0.01 B 0.0 11.92 0.01 B
Stream C-ABD 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 7.22 0.00 A
2025 Baseline + Committed
Stream B-C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 8.95 0.01 A
Stream B-AD 1.1 23.17 0.53 C 0.3 16.14 0.25 C
Stream A-BCD 0.0 10.93 0.01 B 0.0 6.11 0.00 A
Stream D-A 0.0 8.33 0.03 A 0.0 6.45 0.01 A
Stream D-BC 0.0 16.17 0.02 C 0.0 13.31 0.02 B
Stream C-ABD 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 7.69 0.00 A
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development
Stream B-C 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 9.19 0.01 A
Stream B-AD 1.5 27.73 0.61 D 0.4 17.23 0.30 C
Stream A-BCD 0.0 11.08 0.01 B 0.0 6.14 0.00 A
Stream D-A 0.0 8.47 0.03 A 0.0 6.49 0.01 A
Stream D-BC 0.0 16.76 0.02 C 0.0 13.62 0.02 B
Stream C-ABD 0.0 0.00 0.00 A 0.0 7.79 0.00 A
There are warnings associated with one or more model runs - see the 'Data Errors and Warnings' tables for each Analysis or Demand Set.
Values shown are the highest values encountered over all time segments. Delay is the maximum value of average delay per arriving vehicle.
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
1
File summary
Units
Analysis Options
Demand Set Summary
Analysis Set Details
File Description
Title (untitled)
Location
Site number
Date 15/11/19
Version
Status (new file)
Identifier
Client
Jobnumber
Enumerator MLMIPS\jamie.ferguson
Description
Distance units Speed units Traffic units input Traffic units results Flow units Average delay units Total delay units Rate of delay units
m kph PCU PCU perHour s -Min perMin
Vehicle length (m)
Calculate Queue Percentiles
Calculate detailed queueing delay
Calculate residual capacity
RFC Threshold
Average Delay threshold (s)
Queue threshold (PCU)
5.75 0.85 36.00 20.00
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D1 2019 AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü
D2 2019 PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 ü
D3 Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D4 Development PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15
D5 2025 Baseline AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D1*1.1371
D6 2025 Baseline PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 Simple D2*1.1417
D7 2025 Baseline + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 Simple D3+D5
D8 2025 Baseline + Development PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 Simple D4+D6
D9 Committed AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15
D10 Committed PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15
D11 2025 Baseline + Committed AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
D12 2025 Baseline + Committed PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 ü Simple D6+D10
D13 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
D14 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 ü Simple D10+D8
ID Include in report Network flow scaling factor (%) Network capacity scaling factor (%)
A1 ü 100.000 100.000
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
2
2019, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Arms
Arms
Major Arm Geometry
Geometries for Arm C are measured opposite Arm B. Geometries for Arm A (if relevant) are measured opposite Arm D.
Minor Arm Geometry
Slope / Intercept / Capacity
Priority Intersection Slopes and Intercepts
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction NameJunction
TypeMajor road direction
Junction Delay (s)
Junction LOS
1
Reepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Reepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly Lane
Right-Left
StaggerTwo-way 2.41 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
Arm Name Description Arm type
A Reepaham Road S Major
B Hall Lane Minor
C Reepaham Road N Major
D Holly Lane Minor
Arm Width of carriageway (m) Has kerbed central reserve Has right turn bay Visibility for right turn (m) Blocks? Blocking queue (PCU)
A 6.00 250.0 ü 1.00
C 6.16 250.0 ü 1.00
ArmMinor arm
typeWidth at give-
way (m)Width at 5m (m)
Width at 10m (m)
Width at 15m (m)
Width at 20m (m)
Estimate flare length
Flare length (PCU)
Visibility to left (m)
Visibility to right (m)
BOne lane plus
flare10.00 5.44 3.56 3.45 3.29 ü 1.00 29 21
DOne lane plus
flare10.00 5.35 3.00 2.91 2.91 ü 1.00 32 35
Junction StreamIntercept(PCU/hr)
Slopefor A-B
Slopefor A-C
Slopefor A-D
Slopefor B-A
Slopefor B-D
Slopefor C-A
Slopefor C-B
Slopefor C-D
Slopefor D-B
Slopefor D-C
1 A-D 719 - - - 0.278 0.278 0.278 - 0.278 - -
1 B-AD 550 0.100 0.252 - - - 0.158 0.359 0.158 0.100 0.252
1 B-C 619 0.094 0.238 - - - - - - 0.094 0.238
1 C-B 719 0.277 0.277 - - - - - - 0.277 0.277
1 D-A 686 - - - 0.266 0.105 0.266 - 0.105 - -
1 D-BC 507 0.147 0.147 0.333 0.233 0.092 0.233 - 0.092 - -
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
3
The slopes and intercepts shown above do NOT include any corrections or adjustments.
Streams may be combined, in which case capacity will be adjusted.
Values are shown for the first time segment only; they may differ for subsequent time segments.
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D1 2019 AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 389 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 141 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 571 100.000
D ONE HOUR ü 15 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C D
A 0 106 280 3
B 140 0 0 1
C 568 0 0 3
D 12 0 3 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C D
A 0 0 2 50
B 2 0 0 0
C 1 0 0 0
D 0 0 0 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
4
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-AD 0.43 17.86 0.8 C 129 194
A-BCD 0.01 10.42 0.0 B 3 4
A-B 97 146
A-C 257 385
D-A 0.03 7.78 0.0 A 11 17
D-BC 0.01 14.00 0.0 B 3 4
C-ABD 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-D 3 4
C-A 521 782
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 526 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 106 27 421 0.252 105 0.0 0.3 11.579 B
A-BCD 2 0.57 577 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 9.343 A
A-B 80 20 80
A-C 211 53 211
D-A 9 2 543 0.017 9 0.0 0.0 6.737 A
D-BC 2 0.56 339 0.007 2 0.0 0.0 10.695 B
C-ABD 0 0 1279 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 2 0.56 2
C-A 428 107 428
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 505 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 127 32 395 0.321 126 0.3 0.5 13.613 B
A-BCD 3 0.69 551 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 9.776 A
A-B 95 24 95
A-C 252 63 252
D-A 11 3 515 0.021 11 0.0 0.0 7.137 A
D-BC 3 0.67 306 0.009 3 0.0 0.0 11.871 B
C-ABD 0 0 1247 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.67 3
C-A 511 128 511
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
5
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 476 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 155 39 361 0.431 154 0.5 0.7 17.685 C
A-BCD 3 0.85 516 0.007 3 0.0 0.0 10.412 B
A-B 117 29 117
A-C 308 77 308
D-A 13 3 476 0.028 13 0.0 0.0 7.770 A
D-BC 3 0.83 261 0.013 3 0.0 0.0 13.985 B
C-ABD 0 0 1204 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.83 3
C-A 625 156 625
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 475 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 155 39 361 0.431 155 0.7 0.8 17.862 C
A-BCD 3 0.85 515 0.007 3 0.0 0.0 10.418 B
A-B 117 29 117
A-C 308 77 308
D-A 13 3 476 0.028 13 0.0 0.0 7.775 A
D-BC 3 0.83 260 0.013 3 0.0 0.0 13.998 B
C-ABD 0 0 1204 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.83 3
C-A 625 156 625
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 505 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 127 32 395 0.321 128 0.8 0.5 13.778 B
A-BCD 3 0.69 548 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 9.786 A
A-B 95 24 95
A-C 252 63 252
D-A 11 3 515 0.021 11 0.0 0.0 7.144 A
D-BC 3 0.67 306 0.009 3 0.0 0.0 11.887 B
C-ABD 0 0 1247 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.67 3
C-A 511 128 511
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 525 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 106 27 421 0.252 107 0.5 0.4 11.722 B
A-BCD 2 0.57 575 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 9.354 A
A-B 80 20 80
A-C 211 53 211
D-A 9 2 543 0.017 9 0.0 0.0 6.747 A
D-BC 2 0.56 338 0.007 2 0.0 0.0 10.707 B
C-ABD 0 0 1279 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 2 0.56 2
C-A 428 107 428
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
6
2019, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction NameJunction
TypeMajor road direction
Junction Delay (s)
Junction LOS
1
Reepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Reepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly Lane
Right-Left
StaggerTwo-way 0.83 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario name Time Period name Traffic profile type Start time (HH:mm) Finish time (HH:mm) Time segment length (min) Run automatically
D2 2019 PM ONE HOUR 16:15 17:45 15 ü
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 718 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 62 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 312 100.000
D ONE HOUR ü 7 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C D
A 0 202 515 1
B 58 0 2 2
C 306 1 0 5
D 3 0 4 0
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
7
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:15 - 16:30
16:30 - 16:45
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C D
A 0 0 1 0
B 0 0 0 0
C 2 0 0 0
D 0 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.01 8.32 0.0 A 2 3
B-AD 0.20 13.66 0.2 B 55 83
A-BCD 0.00 5.95 0.0 A 0.92 1
A-B 185 278
A-C 473 709
D-A 0.01 6.27 0.0 A 3 4
D-BC 0.01 11.92 0.0 B 4 6
C-ABD 0.00 7.22 0.0 A 0.92 1
C-D 5 7
C-A 281 421
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.38 497 0.003 1 0.0 0.0 7.269 A
B-AD 45 11 399 0.113 45 0.0 0.1 10.135 B
A-BCD 0.75 0.19 642 0.001 0.75 0.0 0.0 5.617 A
A-B 152 38 152
A-C 388 97 388
D-A 2 0.56 613 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 5.892 A
D-BC 3 0.75 375 0.008 3 0.0 0.0 9.668 A
C-ABD 0.75 0.19 569 0.001 0.75 0.0 0.0 6.335 A
C-D 4 0.94 4
C-A 230 58 230
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.45 471 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 7.664 A
B-AD 54 13 370 0.146 54 0.1 0.2 11.375 B
A-BCD 0.90 0.23 627 0.001 0.90 0.0 0.0 5.752 A
A-B 182 45 182
A-C 463 116 463
D-A 3 0.67 598 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 6.044 A
D-BC 4 0.90 346 0.010 4 0.0 0.0 10.502 B
C-ABD 0.90 0.22 540 0.002 0.90 0.0 0.0 6.678 A
C-D 4 1 4
C-A 275 69 275
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
8
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.55 435 0.005 2 0.0 0.0 8.314 A
B-AD 66 17 330 0.200 66 0.2 0.2 13.625 B
A-BCD 1 0.28 606 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 5.948 A
A-B 222 56 222
A-C 567 142 567
D-A 3 0.83 578 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 6.264 A
D-BC 4 1 306 0.014 4 0.0 0.0 11.921 B
C-ABD 1 0.28 500 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 7.216 A
C-D 6 1 6
C-A 337 84 337
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.55 435 0.005 2 0.0 0.0 8.317 A
B-AD 66 17 330 0.200 66 0.2 0.2 13.658 B
A-BCD 1 0.28 606 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 5.949 A
A-B 222 56 222
A-C 567 142 567
D-A 3 0.83 578 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 6.266 A
D-BC 4 1 306 0.014 4 0.0 0.0 11.923 B
C-ABD 1 0.28 500 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 7.216 A
C-D 6 1 6
C-A 337 84 337
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.45 471 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 7.671 A
B-AD 54 13 370 0.146 54 0.2 0.2 11.408 B
A-BCD 0.90 0.23 627 0.001 0.90 0.0 0.0 5.756 A
A-B 182 45 182
A-C 463 116 463
D-A 3 0.67 598 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 6.047 A
D-BC 4 0.90 346 0.010 4 0.0 0.0 10.505 B
C-ABD 0.90 0.22 540 0.002 0.90 0.0 0.0 6.680 A
C-D 4 1 4
C-A 275 69 275
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.38 496 0.003 2 0.0 0.0 7.276 A
B-AD 45 11 399 0.113 45 0.2 0.1 10.174 B
A-BCD 0.75 0.19 641 0.001 0.75 0.0 0.0 5.620 A
A-B 152 38 152
A-C 388 97 388
D-A 2 0.56 613 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 5.899 A
D-BC 3 0.75 375 0.008 3 0.0 0.0 9.671 A
C-ABD 0.75 0.19 569 0.001 0.75 0.0 0.0 6.338 A
C-D 4 0.94 4
C-A 230 58 230
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
9
2025 Baseline + Committed, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction NameJunction
TypeMajor road direction
Junction Delay (s)
Junction LOS
1
Reepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Reepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly Lane
Right-Left
StaggerTwo-way 3.09 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D11 2025 Baseline + Committed AM ONE HOUR 07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D5+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 442 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 160 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 649 100.000
D ONE HOUR ü 17 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C D
A 0 121 318 3
B 159 0 0 1
C 646 0 0 3
D 14 0 3 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
10
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C D
A 0 0 2 50
B 2 0 0 0
C 1 0 0 0
D 0 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-AD 0.53 23.17 1.1 C 147 221
A-BCD 0.01 10.93 0.0 B 3 5
A-B 111 166
A-C 292 438
D-A 0.03 8.33 0.0 A 13 19
D-BC 0.02 16.17 0.0 C 3 5
C-ABD 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-D 3 5
C-A 593 889
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 512 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 121 30 403 0.300 119 0.0 0.4 12.863 B
A-BCD 3 0.65 558 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 9.641 A
A-B 91 23 91
A-C 240 60 240
D-A 10 3 524 0.020 10 0.0 0.0 7.010 A
D-BC 3 0.64 316 0.008 3 0.0 0.0 11.490 B
C-ABD 0 0 1256 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.64 3
C-A 486 122 486
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 487 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 144 36 374 0.385 143 0.4 0.6 15.851 C
A-BCD 3 0.79 529 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 10.158 B
A-B 108 27 108
A-C 286 72 286
D-A 12 3 492 0.025 12 0.0 0.0 7.510 A
D-BC 3 0.77 278 0.011 3 0.0 0.0 13.077 B
C-ABD 0 0 1221 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.77 3
C-A 581 145 581
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
11
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 452 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 177 44 335 0.528 175 0.6 1.1 22.686 C
A-BCD 4 0.98 491 0.008 4 0.0 0.0 10.921 B
A-B 133 33 133
A-C 350 88 350
D-A 15 4 447 0.034 15 0.0 0.0 8.324 A
D-BC 4 0.94 227 0.017 4 0.0 0.0 16.132 C
C-ABD 0 0 1171 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 4 0.94 4
C-A 711 178 711
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 452 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 177 44 335 0.528 176 1.1 1.1 23.165 C
A-BCD 4 0.98 489 0.008 4 0.0 0.0 10.932 B
A-B 133 33 133
A-C 350 88 350
D-A 15 4 447 0.034 15 0.0 0.0 8.334 A
D-BC 4 0.94 226 0.017 4 0.0 0.0 16.165 C
C-ABD 0 0 1171 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 4 0.94 4
C-A 711 178 711
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 486 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 144 36 374 0.385 146 1.1 0.7 16.213 C
A-BCD 3 0.79 526 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 10.175 B
A-B 108 27 108
A-C 286 72 286
D-A 12 3 491 0.025 12 0.0 0.0 7.523 A
D-BC 3 0.77 278 0.011 3 0.0 0.0 13.109 B
C-ABD 0 0 1221 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.77 3
C-A 581 145 581
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 511 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 121 30 403 0.300 122 0.7 0.4 13.097 B
A-BCD 3 0.65 556 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 9.656 A
A-B 91 23 91
A-C 240 60 240
D-A 10 3 523 0.020 10 0.0 0.0 7.024 A
D-BC 3 0.64 315 0.008 3 0.0 0.0 11.515 B
C-ABD 0 0 1256 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.64 3
C-A 486 122 486
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
12
2025 Baseline + Committed, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction NameJunction
TypeMajor road direction
Junction Delay (s)
Junction LOS
1
Reepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Reepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly Lane
Right-Left
StaggerTwo-way 0.98 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime Period
nameTraffic
profile typeStart time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D12 2025 Baseline + Committed PM ONE HOUR 16:15 17:45 15 ü Simple D6+D10
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 820 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 71 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 356 100.000
D ONE HOUR ü 8 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C D
A 0 231 588 1
B 66 0 2 2
C 349 1 0 6
D 3 0 5 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
13
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:15 - 16:30
16:30 - 16:45
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C D
A 0 0 1 0
B 0 0 0 0
C 2 0 0 0
D 0 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.01 8.95 0.0 A 2 3
B-AD 0.25 16.14 0.3 C 63 94
A-BCD 0.00 6.11 0.0 A 1 2
A-B 212 317
A-C 540 809
D-A 0.01 6.45 0.0 A 3 5
D-BC 0.02 13.31 0.0 B 4 6
C-ABD 0.00 7.69 0.0 A 1 2
C-D 5 8
C-A 321 481
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.43 478 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 7.550 A
B-AD 52 13 378 0.136 51 0.0 0.2 10.987 B
A-BCD 0.86 0.22 631 0.001 0.86 0.0 0.0 5.714 A
A-B 174 43 174
A-C 443 111 443
D-A 3 0.64 602 0.004 3 0.0 0.0 6.000 A
D-BC 3 0.86 354 0.010 3 0.0 0.0 10.259 B
C-ABD 0.86 0.22 548 0.002 0.85 0.0 0.0 6.582 A
C-D 4 1 4
C-A 263 66 263
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.51 449 0.005 2 0.0 0.0 8.057 A
B-AD 62 15 345 0.179 61 0.2 0.2 12.700 B
A-BCD 1 0.26 614 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 5.874 A
A-B 207 52 207
A-C 529 132 529
D-A 3 0.77 585 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 6.181 A
D-BC 4 1 321 0.013 4 0.0 0.0 11.354 B
C-ABD 1 0.26 515 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 7.007 A
C-D 5 1 5
C-A 314 79 314
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
14
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 3 0.63 405 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 8.943 A
B-AD 75 19 298 0.253 75 0.2 0.3 16.077 C
A-BCD 1 0.32 591 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 6.108 A
A-B 254 63 254
A-C 647 162 647
D-A 4 0.94 562 0.007 4 0.0 0.0 6.447 A
D-BC 5 1 275 0.018 5 0.0 0.0 13.309 B
C-ABD 1 0.31 469 0.003 1 0.0 0.0 7.695 A
C-D 6 2 6
C-A 385 96 385
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 3 0.63 405 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 8.950 A
B-AD 75 19 298 0.253 75 0.3 0.3 16.143 C
A-BCD 1 0.32 590 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 6.109 A
A-B 254 63 254
A-C 647 162 647
D-A 4 0.94 562 0.007 4 0.0 0.0 6.450 A
D-BC 5 1 275 0.018 5 0.0 0.0 13.314 B
C-ABD 1 0.31 469 0.003 1 0.0 0.0 7.695 A
C-D 6 2 6
C-A 385 96 385
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.51 449 0.005 2 0.0 0.0 8.065 A
B-AD 62 15 345 0.179 62 0.3 0.2 12.763 B
A-BCD 1 0.26 614 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 5.876 A
A-B 207 52 207
A-C 529 132 529
D-A 3 0.77 585 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 6.187 A
D-BC 4 1 321 0.013 4 0.0 0.0 11.362 B
C-ABD 1 0.26 515 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 7.008 A
C-D 5 1 5
C-A 314 79 314
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.43 478 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 7.558 A
B-AD 52 13 378 0.136 52 0.2 0.2 11.045 B
A-BCD 0.86 0.22 631 0.001 0.86 0.0 0.0 5.718 A
A-B 174 43 174
A-C 443 111 443
D-A 3 0.64 602 0.004 3 0.0 0.0 6.005 A
D-BC 3 0.86 354 0.010 3 0.0 0.0 10.268 B
C-ABD 0.86 0.22 548 0.002 0.86 0.0 0.0 6.584 A
C-D 4 1 4
C-A 263 66 263
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
15
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, AM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction NameJunction
TypeMajor road direction
Junction Delay (s)
Junction LOS
1
Reepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Reepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly Lane
Right-Left
StaggerTwo-way 4.07 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D13 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development AMONE
HOUR07:45 09:15 15 ü Simple D7+D9
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 452 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 183 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 649 100.000
D ONE HOUR ü 17 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C D
A 0 131 318 3
B 182 0 0 1
C 646 0 0 3
D 14 0 3 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
16
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
07:45 - 08:00
08:00 - 08:15
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C D
A 0 0 2 50
B 2 0 0 0
C 1 0 0 0
D 0 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
B-AD 0.61 27.73 1.5 D 168 252
A-BCD 0.01 11.08 0.0 B 3 5
A-B 120 180
A-C 292 438
D-A 0.03 8.47 0.0 A 13 19
D-BC 0.02 16.76 0.0 C 3 5
C-ABD 0.00 0.00 0.0 A 0 0
C-D 3 5
C-A 593 889
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 505 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 138 35 402 0.343 136 0.0 0.5 13.697 B
A-BCD 3 0.65 554 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 9.718 A
A-B 98 25 98
A-C 240 60 240
D-A 10 3 519 0.020 10 0.0 0.0 7.074 A
D-BC 3 0.64 311 0.008 3 0.0 0.0 11.682 B
C-ABD 0 0 1252 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.64 3
C-A 486 122 486
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 479 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 165 41 373 0.442 164 0.5 0.8 17.434 C
A-BCD 3 0.79 524 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 10.260 B
A-B 117 29 117
A-C 286 72 286
D-A 12 3 486 0.025 12 0.0 0.0 7.599 A
D-BC 3 0.77 272 0.011 3 0.0 0.0 13.380 B
C-ABD 0 0 1216 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.77 3
C-A 581 145 581
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
17
08:15 - 08:30
08:30 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:00
09:00 - 09:15
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 441 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 202 50 334 0.605 199 0.8 1.5 26.775 D
A-BCD 4 0.98 484 0.008 4 0.0 0.0 11.062 B
A-B 144 36 144
A-C 350 88 350
D-A 15 4 441 0.034 15 0.0 0.0 8.459 A
D-BC 4 0.94 219 0.017 4 0.0 0.0 16.708 C
C-ABD 0 0 1165 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 4 0.94 4
C-A 711 178 711
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 440 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 202 50 334 0.605 202 1.5 1.5 27.732 D
A-BCD 4 0.98 482 0.008 4 0.0 0.0 11.080 B
A-B 144 36 144
A-C 350 88 350
D-A 15 4 440 0.034 15 0.0 0.0 8.475 A
D-BC 4 0.94 219 0.017 4 0.0 0.0 16.758 C
C-ABD 0 0 1165 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 4 0.94 4
C-A 711 178 711
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 478 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 165 41 373 0.442 168 1.5 0.8 18.066 C
A-BCD 3 0.79 520 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 10.281 B
A-B 117 29 117
A-C 286 72 286
D-A 12 3 485 0.025 12 0.0 0.0 7.618 A
D-BC 3 0.77 271 0.011 3 0.0 0.0 13.427 B
C-ABD 0 0 1216 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.77 3
C-A 581 145 581
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 0 0 504 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
B-AD 138 35 402 0.343 139 0.8 0.5 14.031 B
A-BCD 3 0.65 552 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 9.734 A
A-B 98 25 98
A-C 240 60 240
D-A 10 3 518 0.020 10 0.0 0.0 7.091 A
D-BC 3 0.64 310 0.008 3 0.0 0.0 11.711 B
C-ABD 0 0 1252 0.000 0 0.0 0.0 0.000 A
C-D 3 0.64 3
C-A 486 122 486
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
18
2025 Baseline + Committed + Development, PM
Data Errors and Warnings
Junction Network
Junctions
Junction Network Options
Traffic Demand
Demand Set Details
Demand overview (Traffic)
Origin-Destination Data
Vehicle Mix
Severity Area Item Description
WarningDemand Set
Relationship
D7 - 2025 Baseline +
Development, AMDemand Set relationships are chained. This may slow down the file.
Junction NameJunction
TypeMajor road direction
Junction Delay (s)
Junction LOS
1
Reepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Road/Hall Lane/Holly LaneReepaham Reepaham Road/Hall
Lane/Holly Lane
Right-Left
StaggerTwo-way 1.16 A
Driving side Lighting
Left Normal/unknown
ID Scenario nameTime
Period name
Traffic profile type
Start time (HH:mm)
Finish time (HH:mm)
Time segment
length (min)
Run automatically
Relationship type
Relationship
D14 2025 Baseline + Committed + Development PMONE
HOUR16:15 17:45 15 ü Simple D10+D8
Vehicle mix varies over turn Vehicle mix varies over entry Vehicle mix source PCU Factor for a HV (PCU)
ü ü HV Percentages 2.00
Arm Linked arm Profile type Use O-D data Average Demand (PCU/hr) Scaling Factor (%)
A ONE HOUR ü 838 100.000
B ONE HOUR ü 82 100.000
C ONE HOUR ü 356 100.000
D ONE HOUR ü 8 100.000
Demand (PCU/hr)
To
From
A B C D
A 0 249 588 1
B 77 0 2 2
C 349 1 0 6
D 3 0 5 0
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
19
Results
Results Summary for whole modelled period
Main Results for each time segment
16:15 - 16:30
16:30 - 16:45
Heavy Vehicle Percentages
To
From
A B C D
A 0 0 1 0
B 0 0 0 0
C 2 0 0 0
D 0 0 0 0
Stream Max RFC Max delay (s) Max Queue (PCU) Max LOSAverage Demand
(PCU/hr)Total Junction Arrivals (PCU)
B-C 0.01 9.19 0.0 A 2 3
B-AD 0.30 17.23 0.4 C 73 109
A-BCD 0.00 6.14 0.0 A 1 2
A-B 228 342
A-C 540 809
D-A 0.01 6.49 0.0 A 3 5
D-BC 0.02 13.62 0.0 B 4 6
C-ABD 0.00 7.79 0.0 A 1 2
C-D 5 8
C-A 321 481
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.43 474 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 7.625 A
B-AD 60 15 377 0.159 59 0.0 0.2 11.312 B
A-BCD 0.86 0.22 628 0.001 0.86 0.0 0.0 5.735 A
A-B 187 47 187
A-C 443 111 443
D-A 3 0.64 600 0.004 3 0.0 0.0 6.022 A
D-BC 3 0.86 350 0.010 3 0.0 0.0 10.379 B
C-ABD 0.86 0.22 544 0.002 0.85 0.0 0.0 6.627 A
C-D 4 1 4
C-A 263 66 263
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.51 442 0.005 2 0.0 0.0 8.175 A
B-AD 71 18 343 0.208 71 0.2 0.3 13.230 B
A-BCD 1 0.26 611 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 5.901 A
A-B 224 56 224
A-C 529 132 529
D-A 3 0.77 583 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 6.210 A
D-BC 4 1 316 0.013 4 0.0 0.0 11.531 B
C-ABD 1 0.26 510 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 7.069 A
C-D 5 1 5
C-A 314 79 314
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
20
16:45 - 17:00
17:00 - 17:15
17:15 - 17:30
17:30 - 17:45
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 3 0.63 395 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 9.179 A
B-AD 88 22 296 0.295 87 0.3 0.4 17.134 C
A-BCD 1 0.32 587 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 6.143 A
A-B 274 68 274
A-C 647 162 647
D-A 4 0.94 559 0.007 4 0.0 0.0 6.485 A
D-BC 5 1 270 0.019 5 0.0 0.0 13.610 B
C-ABD 1 0.31 464 0.003 1 0.0 0.0 7.786 A
C-D 6 2 6
C-A 385 96 385
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 3 0.63 394 0.006 3 0.0 0.0 9.190 A
B-AD 88 22 296 0.295 88 0.4 0.4 17.232 C
A-BCD 1 0.32 587 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 6.145 A
A-B 274 68 274
A-C 647 162 647
D-A 4 0.94 558 0.007 4 0.0 0.0 6.489 A
D-BC 5 1 269 0.019 5 0.0 0.0 13.616 B
C-ABD 1 0.31 464 0.003 1 0.0 0.0 7.786 A
C-D 6 2 6
C-A 385 96 385
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.51 442 0.005 2 0.0 0.0 8.186 A
B-AD 71 18 343 0.208 72 0.4 0.3 13.316 B
A-BCD 1 0.26 611 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 5.906 A
A-B 224 56 224
A-C 529 132 529
D-A 3 0.77 582 0.005 3 0.0 0.0 6.214 A
D-BC 4 1 316 0.013 4 0.0 0.0 11.541 B
C-ABD 1 0.26 510 0.002 1 0.0 0.0 7.072 A
C-D 5 1 5
C-A 314 79 314
StreamTotal Demand
(PCU/hr)Junction
Arrivals (PCU)Capacity (PCU/hr)
RFCThroughput
(PCU/hr)Start queue
(PCU)End queue
(PCU)Delay (s) LOS
B-C 2 0.43 473 0.004 2 0.0 0.0 7.635 A
B-AD 60 15 377 0.159 60 0.3 0.2 11.388 B
A-BCD 0.86 0.22 628 0.001 0.86 0.0 0.0 5.738 A
A-B 187 47 187
A-C 443 111 443
D-A 3 0.64 600 0.004 3 0.0 0.0 6.030 A
D-BC 3 0.86 350 0.010 3 0.0 0.0 10.390 B
C-ABD 0.86 0.22 544 0.002 0.86 0.0 0.0 6.630 A
C-D 4 1 4
C-A 263 66 263
Generated on 26/11/19 16:30:57 using Junctions 9 (9.0.1.4646)
21
Manor Park, Drayton Transport Assessment © MLM Consulting Engineers Limited
\\mlmips.com\work\Tier2MLM\6100000\6100905\MLM\REP\6100905-MLM-ZZ-XX-RP-TP-0001-R04-TA-Manor Park_Drayton.docx
Appendix 13 - Carter Road Traffic Calming Scheme
33
6
33a
61
63
37
1
CA
RT
ER
RO
AD
32
18.9m
51
7
39
13
40
9
CARTER ROAD
63
8
59
12
CAR
TE
RR
OA
D
15
2
30
10
34
36
38
61
59
57
55
53
32
34
36
59
57
51 3
0
53
9
12
10
6
CA
RTE
RR
OA
D
619
4
De s criptionRe v Ch k dDw n Date
K i n g d o m T P
Saffron House Lopham Road, East Harling, Norfolk NR16 2PX
01603 325 587
Drayton Farms Ltd
Manor Park, Hall Lane Drayton
Carter Road Traffic Calming Scheme - Proposed
TD JW 19/04/16
B10062/16/001See inset
Carter Road's existing "No Motor Vehicles Except For
Access" traffic regulation order to be maintained. 20mph
homezone scheme to be promoted on Carter Road. Signage
to be agreed at detailed design stage.
As part of NDR mitigation George Drive / Hall Lane junction
to be closed.
Based on Ordnance Survey mapping (OS licence number
WL1005153) and onsite observations. Subject to detailed
design.
A
Drivewayaccess points
Pedestrian crossingpoint - tactile paving.
Not to scale
1:500 1:5001:500
1:500
1:250
Viewport 1 Viewport 2
Viewport 3 Viewport 4 Viewport 5
Viewport 6 Viewport 7
1:250
Hall Lane
See Viewport 7for more details.
See Viewport 1for more details.
See Viewport 2for more details.
See Viewport 3for more details.
See Viewport 4for more details.
See Viewport 5for more details.
See Viewport 6for more details.
4.8m wide raised platformentrance with 6m junction radii,i.e. reduced from 10m.
Proposed kerb line totie into existing.
Proposed kerb line totie into existing.
Existing driveway accesspoint to be accomodatedwithin raised platform design.
4.8m wide raisedplatform entrance
with 6m junction radii,i.e. reduced from 10m
Speed cushion
Carter Road
Drayton HighRoad - A1067
1:500
0m
55m / 55m
100m / 45m
180m / 80m
250m / 70m
310m / 60m
365m / 55m
390m / 25m
distance betweentraffic calming features
A Homezone added and relocation of speed cushions TD 27/4/16 xx
www.mlmgroup.com
T +44 1233 610530
A Connect 38 1 Dover Place Ashford, TN23 1FB