“using microclimate analysis to improve external ...uuid:1ce1e34e-2095-42… · case study –...
TRANSCRIPT
Buro
Happold
External Environments
Bernardo Vazquez, Associate
“Using Microclimate Analysis to improve external environments for Hospital Master planning”
5th European Hospital Engineering Conference , Bern Switzerland, 2013.
Buro
Happold
Presentation outline
� Human Comfort
� Case Studies
• Liverpool Arena
• Pinderfields Hospital, UK
� Closure
Buro
Happold
Analysis of Comfort Conditions (External conditions)
Buro
Happold
Analysis of Comfort Conditions - Transition strategy
Buro
Happold
Analysis of Comfort Conditions (External conditions)
Buro
Happold
Analysis of Comfort Conditions (External conditions)
Buro
Happold
Analysis of Comfort Conditions (External conditions)
Buro
Happold
Analysis of Comfort Conditions (External conditions)
Buro
Happold
Analysis of Comfort Conditions (External conditions)
Temperature & velocity
Temperature & Humidity
Wind velocity
Buro
Happold
Analysis of Comfort Conditions (External conditions)
Temperature
Radiation
Wind
Humidity
Clothing
Expectation
Acclimatisation
Activity
Exposure time
Hot Climates
Cooling breezes
Shelter from extreme winds
Cold climates
Protect from cold winds
Evergreen trees
Temperate climates
Balance cooling vs. shelter
Shelter from strong winds
Dependent on activity
Buro
Happold
Design Criteria
External activities on site are classified based on their sensitivity. Quantitative assessment
is required to determine the magnitude of the wind speeds and if areas are likely to be
suitable for selected activities.
Buro
Happold
1946 Beaufort Scale
1946 Beaufort Scale
0Calm Calm. Smoke rises vertically.
1Light air Wind motion visible in smoke.
2Light breeze
Wind felt on exposed skin.
Leaves rustle.
3 Gentle
breeze
Leaves and smaller twigs in
constant motion.
4 Moderate
breeze
Dust and loose paper raised.
Small branches begin to
move.
5Fresh breeze Smaller trees sway.
6 Strong
breeze
Large branches in motion.
Whistling heard in overhead
wires. Umbrella use becomes
difficult.
7
Whole trees in motion. Effort
needed to walk against the
wind.
Land conditionsBeaufort
numberDescription
Buro
Happold
Lawson Criteria– Comfortable conditions
Buro
Happold
Lawson Criteria – Tolerable conditions
Buro
Happold
Design Criteria
With ICT Methodology developed by TV Lawson from Bristol University
"The evaluation of the windiness of a building complex before construction,” TV
Lawson, London Docklands Development Corporation
• Developed from Beaufort Scale, extending applicability to
environments in and around buildings.
• Widely accepted for this type of study and comparable with
international guidance
Buro
Happold
Design Criteria
Comfort & Safety Criteria
CriteriaFrequency of Wind
Speed OccurrencesActivity
Comfort <5% All pedestrian activities
Safety <0.025% All pedestrian activities
The safety criteria correspond to a single occurrence
of about 2-3hours within a year of a value of the mean
hourly wind speed not exceeding 15m/s for the elderly
and 20m/s for the able bodied
Buro
Happold
Case Study – Liverpool Arena
Buro
Happold
Wind Engineering Process
Site climate Building Effects
Impacts Design
Wind Data
Buro
Happold
Site Proposal
Buro
Happold
Desktop – identification of possible mitigation measures
Permeable screens that are as tall as the underside of the tree
canopy provide a wind screen for pedestrians on sidewalk while
allowing views
Low level
sculptural screens
will help screen
high speed winds
from the south
Fin like screens will
shelter exits form West
winds blowing down
the street
Low level
shrubs will
increase the
surface
roughness
of the earth
mounds and
slow high
speed winds
Buro
Happold
CFD
With Mitigation
Without Mitigation
Buro
Happold
Wind tunnel
Buro
Happold
In use
Buro
Happold
External Microclimate AnalysisFast wind comfort analysis tool for EIA planning
• To provide both qualitative and quantitative expert advice to designers and planners of new
development to ensure comfort and safety of pedestrians as well as regulatory requirements for EIA’s.
• Ability to communicate highly technical solutions and their cost vs. benefits to non-technical
audiences. This helps our clients make desirable spaces with a high retail potential, to generate
revenue.
Annual comfort map
Buro
Happold
External Microclimate AnalysisUniversal Thermal Climate Index
• Index used to quantify comfort annually and for specific detailed snapshot
•Maximise value of external spaces for revenue generation such as good retail facilities
•De-risks design to ensure comfortable external spaces, allowing early Master planning
opportunities
Buro
Happold
External Microclimate AnalysisExternal Comfort – Cont.
•BH assess the comfort levels against the usage or retail value of external areas for different
seasons and times of the day.
•Starting at early design stages, we look at different Masterplanning options (different building layouts
vs wind, shading, orientation, etc), progressing through detailed design of shelter schemes and
landscaping
Buro
Happold
Mean Scenarios
Scenario 2: Canopy Solar Performance
Scenario 3: Permeability/Openness
Scenario 6: Water FeaturesScenario 5: Black Sky Cooling Scenario 7: Planting
Mean Measures
Scenario 4: Increased Thermal Mass
• Six ‘MEAN’ Scenarios explored
• Scenarios 2 to 4 looked at in sequence and the cumulative effects analysed
• Scenarios 5 to 7 are looked at in turn and the potential benefits addressed with reference to the results of scenario 4
Buro
Happold
Base Scenario
� The Base Case Scenario assumes that there is
no canopy
Buro
Happold
Environmental conditions – Equivalent Temperature via (UTCI)
Buro
Happold
Heat exchanges
Q ground
Q Walls
Buro
Happold
Heat exchanges
Q ground
Q Walls
Buro
Happold
Heat exchanges
Q ground
Q Walls
Buro
Happold
Heat exchanges
Q ground
Q Walls
Buro
Happold
Canopy performance
� ETFE Canopy added above
the street
� The solar performance of the
canopy improved by reducing
the solar transmittance (g-
value) of the construction
No Canopy Canopy
Transmitted
Reflected
Buro
Happold
Canopy Solar Performance – environmental conditions
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
Galleria with no canopy roof
Roof material g=0.5
Roof material g=0.4
Roof material g=0.3
Roof material g=0.2
Roof material g=0.1
Slightly cold stress No thermal stress Moderate heat stress Hot heat stress Very hot heat stress Extreme heat stress
59%
59%
58%
58%
58%
54%
g = 0.1
g = 0.2
g = 0.3
g = 0.4
g = 0.5
Base Case
Buro
Happold
Canopy Solar Performance – environmental conditions 2
• Improving the g-value reduces the percentage of temperatures within the ‘very hot heat stress’ band. No
significant change to the percentage of hours in the green band
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%
Galleria with no canopy roof
Roof material g=0.5
Roof material g=0.4
Roof material g=0.3
Roof material g=0.2
Roof material g=0.1
Slightly cold stress No thermal stress Moderate heat stress Hot heat stress Very hot heat stress Extreme heat stress
59%
59%
58%
58%
58%
54%
g = 0.1
g = 0.2
g = 0.3
g = 0.4
g = 0.5
Base Case
Buro
Happold
Case Study – Pinderfield Hospital
Buro
Happold
Solar - shadow cast
� To Be Updated at Conference
Buro
Happold
CFD - UTCI
� To Be Updated at Conference
Buro
Happold
Urban Heat Island - 1
� To Be Updated at Conference
Buro
Happold
Urban Heat Island - 2
� To Be Updated at Conference
Buro
Happold
External Microclimate AnalysisUniversal Thermal Climate Index
•Measurement of annual and detailed snapshot that quantifies comfort
•Maximise value of external spaces for revenue generation
Area 1: 50% shadedArea 1
extreme heat stressmoderate heat stressno thermal stressstrong cold stress moderate cold stress
Buro
Happold
Effect of Landscape
Buro
Happold
Boston
New York
Chicago
Los Angeles
San Francisco
Belfast
Bath
Birmingham
London
Glasgow
Edinburgh
Manchester
Leeds
Berlin
Copenhagen
Milan
Moscow
Munich
Warsaw
Cairo
Jeddah
Riyadh
Kuwait
Abu Dhabi
Dubai
Beijing
Hong Kong
Mumbai
Global Offices
Buro
Happold
www.burohappold.com