antitrust policy and regulation chapter 18 mcgraw-hill/irwin copyright © 2009 by the mcgraw-hill...

12
Antitrust Policy and Regulation Chapter 18 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Upload: riley-streeter

Post on 14-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Antitrust Policy and Regulation

Chapter 18

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Chapter Objectives

• Antitrust laws in the United States

• Interpretation and application of antitrust laws

• Natural monopolies• Social regulation

18-2

Antitrust Laws

• The purpose:–Prevent monopoly

–Promote competition

–Achieve allocative efficiency

• Historical background–Regulatory agencies

–Antitrust laws

18-3

Antitrust Laws

• Sherman Act 1890• Clayton Act 1914

– Outlaw price discrimination– Prohibit tying contracts– No interlocking directorates

• Federal Trade Commission Act 1914• Wheeler-Lea Act 1938• Celler-Kefauver Act 1950

18-4

Antitrust Policy

• Issues of interpretation• Monopoly behavior or structure

–1920 U.S. Steel Case–1945 Alcoa Case

18-5

Effectiveness of Antitrust Laws

• Monopoly–Microsoft Case

• Mergers–Horizontal merger

–Vertical merger

–Conglomerate merger

18-6

Natural Monopoly

• Economies of scale• Public utilities

–Electricity, water, gas, phone• Solutions for better outcomes

–Public ownership–Public regulation–Public interest theory of regulation

18-7

Industrial Regulation

• Regulators establish rates to give natural monopoly “fair return”

• No incentive to reduce cost

• X-inefficiency

• Perpetuate monopoly–Conditions of natural monopoly can

end

18-8

Social Regulation

• Applies “across the board” to all industries

• Food and Drug Administration 1906• Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission 1964• Occupational Safety and Health

Administration 1971• Environmental Protection Agency 1972• Consumer Product Safety Commission

197218-9

Social Regulation

• Optimal level of social regulation• In support of social regulation• Criticisms of social regulation• Two reminders

–There is no free lunch–Less government is not always

better than more

18-10

United States vs. Microsoft

• Charged May 1998 under the Sherman Act

• Accused of having a “Windows” monopoly

• District court findings:– Used anticompetitive means

• District court remedy• Appeals court ruling• Final settlement

18-11

Key Terms• antitrust policy

• industrial regulation

• social regulation

• Sherman Act

• Clayton Act

• tying contracts

• interlocking directorates

• Federal Trade Commission Act

• cease-and-desist order

• Wheeler-Lea Act

• Celler-Kefauver Act

• Standard Oil case

• U.S. Steel case

• rule of reason

• Alcoa case

• DuPont cellophane case

• Microsoft case

• horizontal merger

• vertical merger

• conglomerate merger

• per se violations

• natural monopoly

• public interest theory of regulation

• legal cartel theory of regulation 18-12