ant254 ppt origins of language ppt origins...1 origins of language ant254, language and culture...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Origins of Language
ANT254, Language and CultureNorth Carolina State University
The central ideas of evolution are that life has a history-changed over time -and that different species share
common ancestors. Does it work for language?
Key Question:
Where did language come from?Sudden development?Gradual development?Evolved?Other?
Noam Chomsky: Does it Matter?
Language comes into existence suddenly as a mutation so it is not very important to talk aboutCan’t really be knownSyntactic structure is key
2
Does Chomsky’s opinion matter?
Is it scientifically based?Why is his refusal to be interested largely accepted?
Steve Pinker & Paul Bloom say language is connected to evolution, but so what? Prove it.
Their paper (1999) challenged Chomsky.
What do the evolutionary biologists say?
Jay Stephen GouldIt doesn’t matter.
Phil LiebermanIt matters a lot.
Spandrels!?!Jay Stephen Gould Said that language
is probably a “spandrel”Accidental by-products of other evolutionary changesMental skills evolved by not useful until brain was ready.
3
Non-Human Primate and Human Language: How close?
According to Christine Kenneally, The First Word, 2007, animals have the capability for flexible and creative thinkingNot limited to a bag of a few tricksOther primates lack the vocal apparatus for speech, but seem to have at least child-level cognitive abilities.
Phil Lieberman: Who dat!Chomsky student who breaks ranksInterested in biophysics of languageStudies language evolutionStudy of Neandertalspeech capability
Basal ganglia? What dat?A part of speech?
What does Mt. Everest have to do with them?How can they be part of speech?Functions:
Control Cognition Movement Coordination Voluntary Movement
Lieberman…Lieberman studied patients with Parkinsonsand who had speech impairmentsOnly syntax tripped them upMt. Everest study showed basal ganglia affects speech and cognition at high altitudeThus motor control and speech are connectedBasal ganglia are found in other animal speciesSuggests non-humans share genetic traits eventually related to speech.
4
Human Paleontology and Population Genetics: Which one is more important
What does paleontology have to do with understanding the origins of speech?What does DNA analysis have to do with it?
What does this map tell you?
Two broad Categories of Primates
HominoidsNon-Human higher primates
Hominids/homininsHuman ancestorsModern humans
5
The evolution tree says…Monkeys split into two geographic groups.Humans split off after other primates, not before. Humans are more distantly related to Gorillas than ChimpsChimps are closer genetically to humans than to gorillas.Interesting fact: Apparently, Orang Utans are more “clever” or thoughtful than chimps, at least according to zookeeper tales.
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid)
DNA is the double-stranded molecule that contains the genetic code. DNA is a main component of chromosomes.Why is proximity to primates a consideration for us regarding speech?
Humans and Primates: Who’s on first?
Jared Diamond (The Third Chimpanzee) suggests that the amount of DNA similarity is a key indicator of the closeness to other primates, esp., the Bonobos.Common and pygmy chimps differ in 0.7% DNA.Gorillas differ in 2.3%.Gorillas separated from chimps before humans did.
DNA: One of the ways we determine closeness with other primates
Closest primates are:
Bonobo (pygmy) 98.6% Common chimp 98.4%Gorilla 97.7%Orang Utan 96.4%Gibbon 95.2%
6
Humans differ genetically from closest relatives by only 1.2%
Many gestures in Chimps
Are the same in humansUniversal human gestures are recognized by chimps.
7
Koko’s gestures are similarRemember the story of “Kong”
Research station in Indonesia
Now, let’s look at
Skeletal anatomy Human paleontology
8
Ancient hominids include:
Australopithecines(3-5 MYA) Tanzania
Australopithecus anamensisAustralopithecus africanusAustralopithecus boiseiAustralopithecus afarensisAustralopithecus robustus
Genus Homo 2.5-1.8 MYAHomo erectus (1-2MYA)used fireBig game huntingLeft Africa earlier than later hominids that become H. sapiensCould have mated with later H. habilisBrian size of gorillas, 1/3 smaller than H. sapiensDid not have human speech as we know it
Closer relatives
Homo habilus (Aunt or Uncle closeness)Homo rudolfensisParanthropus boiseiHomo ergaster (Grandfather-mother?)Tool use is associated with all members of this family, though only H. ergaster is on the direct line to humans
9
Homo ergasterFirst to have a basically human body form Direct hominid line of ancestry to H. sapiens“Turkana Boy” is from 1.6 MYA2x brain size of chimpanzees, though smaller than oursHand axe invented after 1.5 MYA - major change in tool kit – dominant tool for 1 M years
Homo heidelbergensis
Follows H. ergasterDeveloped prepared-core tool (a stone is shaped and then struck once to produce finished tool)Ancestor of both H. neanderthalensisand H. sapiens.
Homo neanderthalensis
Left Africa much earlier than H. sapiensLived in Europe and W. Asia for 200,000 YDied out 28,000 YACo-existed at same time as H. sapiensH. sapiens migrated from Africa about 60,000 YA, according to MtDNA
Homo sapiens
200,000YA – presentEmerged as a small group in AfricaStable for 100-000 years80,000 – 60,000 YA big changes
Expansion of numbers
10
One group left for Europe and Middle East
100,000YAColonies of these H. sapiens died out, no modern traces of their genome presentOur direct fathers and mothers left via N. Africa and then split: to Europe & Asia
Expansion and symbol development
Big changes in technology and cultureGreater usage of unambiguous symbolsNew forms of tools (stone and bone) appearTraces of art, decorations, tradeAdapt to varied hot and cold climatesBy 40,000 YA humans were using speech
Symbol use
Probably starts around 2 MYA when ancestors became bipedalH. neanderthalensis must have had some symbolic ability and probably even borrowed from humans. May have been able to speak somewhat.FOXP2 gene develops quickly in last 200,000 Y and is advantageous to humans
40,000 YA H. sapiens
Was sculpting in stonePainting in cavesCreating a variety of musical instruments and jewelryRitually burying their deadIt took 30,000 years to invent agriculture (though was there a need?)
11
Were there other human species?
H. floresiensis “Hobbit” species found on Flores Island, IndonesiaThe new data on the Hobbit reveal little similarity to microcephalics and pygmies and support the theory that the fossil is a member of a unique ancestral species roughly similar in tool use to H. ergaster of 800,000 YABut she stood only about 3 feet tall and had a brain approximately one-third the size of modern adult humans. Evidence suggests she may have lived as recently as 13,000 years ago.
Origins of language?
Monogenesis? A single location from which all humans emergedPolygenesis? More than one location, but similar development in each site, or very early single location of a pre-H. sapiens human, then multiple locationsThus was there a polygenetic or monogenetic linguistic origin?
FOXP2 Gene
Located on chromosome 72 copies of C7 and FOXP2With only 1 working copy – a series of difficulties with language and speechAppear related to brain regions involving motor control1st example of a single gene affecting language ability and speech articulation
12
So, to conclude, do you know…
When hominids began to speak?Which hominids had speech approximating that of H. sapiens?By when H. sapiens had modern speech?Which of our ancestors are on our direct line?
Mitochondrial DNAmtDNA is typically passed on only from the mother during sexual reproduction meaning that the mitochondria are clones. This means that there is little change in the mtDNA from generation to generation, unlike nuclear DNA which changes by 50% each generation. Since the mutation rate is easily measured, mtDNA is a powerful tool for tracking matrilineage for example, and has been used in this role for tracking many species back thousands of generations.
Speech begins… When?
By at least 40-30,000 years ago human speech was fully modern.Begins between Australopithecines and Homo Homo habilus (between 4M B.P. and 700,000B.P.)Gestures origins?http://humanorigins.si.eduhttp://www.bradshawfoundation.com/journey
13
The Human Brain Ape (Gorilla and Chimp) brainsAre asymmetrical like those of humansLarge, left-hemisphere dominant brains evident in apes at least 5 million years agoHumans and primates share “mirror neurons”which form basis for gestures and imitation.But human brains develop for a longer period than ape brains.Human brains are bigger than ape brains when considering body mass.
Basic biological aspects of human language: Brain
Cerebral lateralization Left hemisphereCorpus callosumNeo-Cortex
Broca’s AreaWernicke’s AreaNeurons communicate across the brainFOXP2 gene (2@ on chromosome 7)
14
Speech areas
Basic biological aspects of human language: Voice Box
Hyoid BoneLayrnxTracheaTongue Oral/Nasal Cavity
Hyoid bone
16
And Putting it all together…
Brain and voice box apparatus work together without any thought by us about how it works… at least until it doesn’t.
Where was the first Language?
What does comparative linguistics tell us?What does an analysis of human mitochondrial DNA tell us?Using both measures would we come up with the same answers?
Proto-World Language
The term Proto-World language refers to the hypothetical latest common ancestor of all the world's languages, an ancient language from which all modern languages and language families – and usually including all known dead languages – derive. would have been spoken roughly 200,000 years ago Very controversial
17
Glottochronology
Estimating age of language using Basic word list from suspected related languages with emphasis on cognates
Cognates are words from two or more languages with common origins
Lexico-Statistics (Morris Swadesh)Words change at a constant rateE.g., 80% cognates, <500 years
1. I2. you (singular)
7. this11. who12. what22. one23. two45. fish47. dog
48. louse64. blood65. bone67. egg68. horn69. tail73. ear74. eye75. nose
Morris Swadesh listof 207 basic words, a sample
77. tooth78. tongue83. hand103. know109. die128. give147. sun148. moon150. water155. salt156. stone163. wind167. fire179. year182. full183. new207. name
Reconstruction
Comparing related languages using their cognates to posit original phonemes, morphemes and syntax in common ancestor language
Language families
Genetically related languages (having a common origin)Deceased languages can be reconstructed Linguistic reconstruction produces a proto-language, e.g., Proto-Indo-European
18
Nostratic Language?
Merritt Ruhlen, The Origin of Languagesuggests that if you go systematically back and compare cognates you can eventually find a common relationship among all languages.Says that mitochondrial DNA analysis suggests that it is trueCritics suggest that it is too easy to mistake words that are not cognatic as cognates.
Is it correct to assume monogenesis? Or polygenesis?
What reasons might suggest polygenesis?Can we ever know for sure?Are mtDNA studies reliableNote that the Nostratic theory of linguistic origin (one Proto-world language) is akin to the Babel theory of linguistic dispersal and differentiation
Bilingualism and the Brain
How do we acquire two languages?
Acquisition theories for bilinguals: Two hypotheses
Unitary systemSeparate system
19
Unitary system
Simultaneous bilinguals begin by constructing one lexicon and one set of semantic rulesLater use two lexicons, but one set of semantic rulesAround 3 yrs, two separate sets of semantic rules
Separate systemInfants differentiate two languages from the beginningConstructing different
Phonemic rulesLexiconsSemantic systems
They practice code-switching (shifting between two languages depending on context and actors) – diff. from code-shifting which is switching from diff. modes of same language)
Bilinguals
Go through same grammar learning stages as monolingualsMistakes in each, separate language correspond to same mistakes that are common to monolinguals children in each language
Second language learning after puberty
Somewhat different process than learning native languageMore of an intellectual processLexical and grammatical knowledge of the new language is stored in a different part of the brain than the first language.
20
Success of bilinguals in society
Simultaneous, native bilinguals learn at a slightly slower pace than monolinguals due to extra brain processing required to learn two languages at the same time.
All things being equal, bilinguals have a richer, larger resource base and a more complex understanding of the world than monolinguals and generally do better in school, if one of the languages is not stigmatized.
The status (higher, lower or equal to) ofthe 1st language in the broader society of the 2nd language helps to determine likely success of the bilingual in society.E.g., French in Quebec as compared to Spanish in Texas or Kurdish in Turkey