annual salary and benefits report and …...report and recommendations, 2012 . faculty compensation...

ANNUAL SALARY AND BENEFITS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 2012

FACULTY COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF THE UNIVERSITY SENATE

MEMBERSHIP, 2011-2012:

Member College Source Term expires

Eugene W. Holland, Chair HUM/ASC Faculty Council 2012

Alicia Bertone VETMED Faculty Council 2014

Alan Beyerchen, Vice Chair HUM/ASC Faculty Council 2013

Greg Davis FAES Faculty Council 2013

Michael Firstenberg MED Faculty Council 2014

Masanori Hashimoto SBS/ASC Faculty Council 2012

Ulrich Heinz MAPS/ASC Faculty Council 2012

Robert Heneman BUS Faculty Council 2012

Mike Hogan FAES Faculty Council 2012

Richard Hill OPT Retiree designee 2011

Mari Noda HUM/ASC Faculty Council 2014

Jos Raadschelders JGSPA Faculty Council 2013

Mary Ellen Wewers COPH Faculty Council 2014

Kathleen McCutcheon OHR ex officio, Human Resources Susan Williams OAA ex officio, Academic Affairs

Tom Bond OHR Human Resources expert

Laura Gast OHR Human Resources expert

FCBC 2012 Annual Report

1

SUMMARY It remains the conviction of FCBC that an essential strategy for recruiting and retaining top-flight faculty in line with the University’s ambition to move from excellence to eminence is to offer salary and benefits packages that are competitive with those of the best universities in the land.

• OSU’s ranking among AAU institutions remains at 36th (down from 34th two years ago), no closer to the target position of 30th (the top half of the group). • OSU average salaries moved up one position to 5th in both the Benchmark and CIC comparison groups, by moving ahead of Penn State. • Dramatic changes in STRS benefits due to the recession are still pending; in addition to the implementation of short-term pricing adjustments, long-term remodeling of OSU health-plans is under consideration. • The committee recommends that OSU continue to aim higher in the AAU salary ranking, and that to accomplish this, some of the revenue generated by initiatives such as the leasing of university parking services be devoted to faculty compensation as well as to new hires.

BACKGROUND According to the University By-Laws (3335-5-4812), it is the responsibility of the Faculty Compensation and Benefits Committee (FCBC) to “study the adequacy and other attributes of the university’s policies and provisions for : (i) salaries, outside professional services and supplemental compensation; and (ii) retirement benefits, hospitalization, medical insurance, and other health benefits, life insurance, other insurance, travel reimbursement, educational benefits, recreational benefits, and other perquisites, benefits, and conditions of faculty employment.” Each year, the FCBC issues a Report to the university community at large, outlining the results of its on-going examination of salaries, benefits and other conditions of faculty employment at OSU. Like its predecessors, this year's Report will start by presenting the conclusions of this year's study of salaries and benefits. It will then outline on-going issues that may be taken up again by the Committee next year. It concludes by recommending steps the University should take to meet its goals for recruiting, rewarding, and retaining top-caliber faculty at an institution with aspirations to eminence. New this year was the election of a vice-chair: Alan Beyerchen. By identifying the next chair of the Committee in the middle of the outgoing chair’s last year, it is expected that a smoother transition and better leadership continuity will be achieved, as the vice-chair learns the ropes for a year before becoming chair. Ohio State continues to enjoy a stable fiscal position and significant support from the state legislature, while at the same time facing a steady long-term decline in State funding and a near-future comparatively abrupt decrease in federal funding. While the latter is difficult to predict and quantify (although it seems clear that the federal stimulus package due to expire in 2012 will not be renewed given the current political climate), the secular decline in the State's financial contribution to OSU's budget is clear:


2

Comparison of State Support* to Tuition** Income: Columbus Campus

State Support and Tuition Income themselves represent only two of several income sources for the University; other sources are not graphed here. Graph courtesy of the OSU Office of Business and Finance Partly in response to that combined challenge, the University embarked on a controversial plan to lease OSU assets, notably the parking operation, to acquire an infusion of capital to be invested in the endowment so as to generate a replacement revenue-stream. The Committee spent a considerable amount of time evaluating the proposed monetization of parking. Some time was also spent assessing the fairness of the University's plan to compensate 9-month faculty during the shift in the academic calendar (one month earlier) attendant on the conversion to semesters. STRS reform remained an important issue, but it appears likely that the legislature will finally vote on a reform package in the next few months (before the end of the calendar year). Lastly, short- and long-term changes to health plan benefits were considered. We start with the compensation data, before turning to the more complex set of issues concerning benefits and working conditions. COMPENSATION Ohio State measures the adequacy of its faculty salaries by three main criteria: (i) average salaries at OSU compared with those at a select group of Benchmark institutions; (ii) average salaries at OSU compared with those of other CIC (Committee on Institutional Cooperation) institutions; and (iii) average salaries at OSU compared to the level of compensation it would take to get the university to the 30th position (the mid-point) in the annual AAU (Association of American Universities) salary rankings. In addition to these main criteria, data on continuing faculty compensation at OSU is included, to isolate and foreground actual salary increases by eliminating from consideration the salaries of new hires and retirees; also included are salary comparisons adjusted for the cost of living in the various cities in which our peers are located.


3

New this year is the inclusion of U.S. News salary rankings. Also new this year is a discussion of OSU regional campus salaries compared with those at other Ohio regional campuses. As has been the case for the past 4 years or so, an important proviso must be kept in mind about the salary data presented here: what is reported is nominal base salaries, not the salaries actually paid out; it is not possible to take into account salary reductions due to furloughs and other cost-saving measures, even though we know that such measures have been taken at a significant number of peer institutions, and considerably reduced actual take-home pay. SALARIES: THE COMPARISONS Benchmark Institutions (See Appendix A) In many respects, the most appropriate salary comparison is to be made with our Benchmark institutions, since they were selected specifically because they are most like us: they are all large public research universities. Longitudinal comparisons with this group were compromised three years ago when the group itself was redefined: ever since (but unlike before, when compared to the original Benchmark institutions), OSU average salaries have been slightly (about 1%) above the Benchmark average [see bar-graph in Appendix A, p.20]. This year, in fact, the amount by which our average salary exceeds that of the Benchmark average increased slightly (from 0.9% to 1.1%). Moreover, our overall relative position with the group moved up one, from 6th to 5th (because Penn State slipped from 4th to 6th); while Assistant Professors remained in 5th position, Associate Professors moved from 5th to 4th, and Full Professors from 6th to 5th. (UCLA and Michigan average salaries continue to lead the Benchmark group, with UCLA overall salaries increasing by 5.7% last year alone!) CIC Institutions (See Appendix B) Our situation with respect to the Committee on Institutional Cooperation is practically identical. OSU’s overall average salary went up one position from 6th to 5th (again due to the decline of Penn State), with Assistant Professors remaining unchanged at 5th, Associate Professors moving up from 5th to 4th, and Full Professors moving up from 6th to 5th (see bar-graphs in Appendix B, p.23). Of the twelve CIC institutions, two (Chicago and Northwestern) are private universities, which makes this group slightly less reliable than the Benchmark Group as a standard of comparison for OSU salaries: Chicago and Northwestern regularly top the list of average salaries in the CIC, and this year is no exception; Michigan is always third. AAU Institutions (See Appendix C) The final main comparison group is the Association of American Universities (AAU), which describes itself as “an association of the 61 leading research universities in the United States.” This group provides the target ranking to which OSU aspires, rather than a select group of institutions with which direct salary comparisons can fruitfully be made. For some time now, Ohio State has been committed to the goal of reaching the salary rank of 30th among AAU institutions. As is the case for the CIC institutions, longitudinal data presenting an historical perspective on OSU’s performance relative to this goal are available [see bar-graphs in Appendix C, pp.10-12]. This year’s Report, like last year's, distinguishes between OSU's position relative


4

to the subset of public AAU universities and its position relative to the entire group (publics and privates combined); both comparisons are included in the Appendix [pp.7-9]. In relation to both groups, OSU's ranking remained the same as last year: 36th out of 61 in relation the entire group, and 15th out of 35 in relation to public research universities alone. And so we are still shy of the goal of 30th position, though no farther from it than we were last year, and are nowhere near the position that OSU achieved in the mid-1980s to early-1990s, when our rankings ranged from 28th (AY1991-92) to 14th (AY1983-84). To return to 34th position, the highest OSU has attained in the last 15 years, would require an overall average salary increase of roughly $1,080 (or 1%) more than whatever increases are received by our closest rivals (Illinois, SUNY-Buffalo, and UC-Irvine). Looking more closely at the data-set reveals that the Associate Professor rank remains a trouble-spot at OSU: despite a marginal gain relative to our Benchmarks and the CIC group, our AAU position at this rank dropped from 36th last year to 39th this year, whereas at the Professor and Assistant Professor ranks our AAU position improved slightly from 39th to 38th and 31st to 30th respectively. The fact that for the Assistant Professor rank alone, OSU salaries have broken into the top half of the group (30th position) argues for an aggressive “proactive retention” program of maintaining competitive salaries as these junior professors move up the ranks. Top 25 Public Institutions (See Appendix D) This data-set, new to the Report this year, compares OSU to what U.S. News & World Report considers the top public universities in the country, according to two criteria: reputation and average salary. Overall our position on average salary is slightly higher (at 14th) than our position on reputation (17th), but the disparity is greater at the Assistant Professor rank, where our salaries put it us in the 9th position among public universities. Having attracted talent with competitive salaries to begin with, we should keep these junior faculty at OSU through the kind of aggressive “proactive retention” program described above, so that our reputational ranking moves closer to our salary ranking in the U.S. News & World Report lists. Salary Adjustment for Cost-of-living (See Appendix E) Relying on base salaries alone smuggles into the comparisons the mistaken presumption that the purchasing power or real value of those salaries is the same regardless of the institutions' locations. A different perspective on salary differentials emerges when the relatively low cost of living in central Ohio is taken into account. The Runzheimer Report of Living Cost Standards now makes it possible to adjust the salaries paid at various institutions in light of the living costs of their respective locations. Although no longitudinal comparisons are yet possible, adjusting for cost-of-living can change OSU's ranking in relation to all three groups – but not always for the better (see Appendix E). In relation to our Benchmark institutions, OSU's living-cost-adjusted position improves considerably from 5th to 3rd (the same adjusted position as last year). (As an index of how dramatically living-cost adjustment can affect ranking, UCLA's position among the Benchmarks drops from first to last when living-costs are factored into the comparison.) In relation to the CIC, however, OSU's living-cost-adjusted position falls noticeably from 5th to 7th out of 12 (also the same adjusted position as last year). In relation to the whole AAU group, finally, OSU's living-cost-adjusted position rises from 36th to 25th (the


5

same adjusted position we held last year). Within the Top 25 Public Institutions list, finally, the cost-of-living adjustment improves Ohio State’s salary ranking from 14th to 9th position. Salary Increments: Total Faculty vs. Continuing Faculty Increases (See Appendix F) The final analysis of OSU faculty compensation differentiates internally between the percentage salary increase of all faculty and the percentage increase of continuing faculty, i.e. only those faculty who were employed at OSU in both fall of 2010 and fall of 2011. This difference is significant because the latter figure excludes from the salary pool the salaries of both the faculty who left the university in 2011 – generally due to retirement, and at relatively high salaries – and those who joined the university in 2011 – generally at entry rank, and at relatively low salaries. Assuming that roughly the same number of faculty in any given year leave the University as join it, a comparison of the total salary pool in fall 2010 with the total salary pool in fall 2011 skews the rate of increase downward: in effect, the salaries of the highly-paid retirees of 2011 are replaced with those of the entry-level faculty of 2011, thereby reducing the average increase. Comparing continuing faculty alone thus provides a better indication of the actual rate of increase of salaries for the year: for AY2011-2012, while comparing all faculty salaries registers only a 2.1% gain, the average gain for continuing faculty at OSU was in fact 2.6%. Regional Campus Faculty Compensation Comparisons Although faculty salaries at the regional campuses are budgeted separately from those of the Columbus campus, regional campus faculty are nonetheless still OSU faculty, and belong to the same departments as Columbus campus faculty. Salary comparisons, however, are made not between the regional campuses and the Columbus campus (since workloads and expectations differ so greatly), but between OSU's regional campuses and the regional campuses of other University System of Ohio (USO) institutions. Inasmuch as OSU is the flagship university of the system, and our regional campuses are part of OSU, the salaries of regional campus faculty should reflect that status; but they don't. Although our regional campus salaries have improved relative to the 19 other Ohio regional campuses over the past 10-15 years, they do not top the list, as they arguably should. This is a matter that bears continuing attention. BENEFITS Benefits are far more difficult to compare quantitatively than salaries. Nevertheless, FCBC plays an important role in monitoring and sometimes advising on benefits issues. Most important among these, at the moment, is probably still the effect of the 2008 Recession on OSU pensions. The Committee also spent a great deal of time this year, however, on the issue of parking monetization. Health-plan reform is a perennial topic, and this year both minor short-term and comprehensive long-term changes were considered. The State Teachers Retirement System (STRS) Up through 2008, STRS - to which over 63% of OSU faculty belong - had sufficient assets to cover its pay-out obligations for roughly the next 40 years; State law requires that pension funds hold sufficient reserves to cover pay-outs 30 years into the future, so the System was in good


6

shape. Once the recession hit, however, STRS assets were no longer adequate to cover pay-outs for the stipulated 30 years, so pension system reform was called for. Ex officio FCBC member Kathleen McCutcheon, OSU's Vice-President for Human Resources, sits on the state-wide Healthcare Pension Advocates group (HPA), which works with STRS and the Ohio Retirement Study Council (ORSC), the legislative body that oversees all the State retirement systems and developed reforms to propose to the State legislature. Committee member Dick Hill of the OSU Retirees Association provided an invaluable retiree’s perspective. As of June 1, the Ohio Senate had passed the long-awaited pension reform bill (Sub. Senate Bill 342), which now awaits action by the House. It is not clear whether the House will take up this issue before the November elections or wait until afterward; it is also not clear whether the House will insist on changes to the Senate bill. Most observers agree that changes are unlikely, but that if they do occur, they will make the reform harsher. Major changes to STRS contained in the Senate bill include the following:

Starting on July 1, 2013, member contributions to STRS (as well as to the other pension plans) will increase by 1% per year until 2016, for a total increase of 4% - so that pensions contributions that are now 10% will eventually be 14%. Also starting July 1, 2013, there will be a one-year suspension of the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) for ALL retirees, followed by a reduction of the COLA from 3% to 2% for ALL retirees. For everyone retiring after July 1, 2013, there will be a 5-year hiatus before the 2% COLA kicks in - so that someone retiring in 2016, for example, will receive no COLA until 2022. Starting on August 1, 2015, the Final Average Salary (FAS) on which pension amounts are calculated will be based on the highest 5 years earnings (rather than the highest 3 years, as is the case now). Also starting on August 1, 2015, the age and years of service requirements increase in graduated steps over the next decade, and the 35-year enhanced benefit will be eliminated.

These and other proposed changes are complicated; more information is available at https://www.strsoh.org/pdfs/40-305.pdf Parking Monetization Because of all the controversy surrounding the proposed monetization of parking at OSU, the Committee spent a considerable amount of time examining the issue. We met early on with Geoff Chatas, Vice-President of Business and Finance, as well as on a separate occasion with University Treasurer Michael Papadakis (also from Business and Finance); we read Bruce Weide’s analysis; and some of us attended two presentations - by a faculty member from Penn State and two faculty members from Ohio State’s Fischer College of Business - about the legal and financial ramifications of monetization. Among the issues we considered were:


7

* whether parking fees were a legitimate source of funding for the core academic mission * what the possible impact of “privatizing” parking on the quality of service might be * whether the projected rate-increases were fair and historically justifiable * whether the decision-making process truly included faculty input * what the likelihood was of seeing a net gain in funding for OSU from monetization * how any such funds should be used

While no actions were called for from the Committee, we did reach three conclusions:

* that OSU would “possibly” or “likely” perceive a net gain from leasing its parking; there was disagreement on which characterization was more accurate; the preponderance of opinion favored “possibly,” and * that therefore more information (in the form of actual bids) would be required to reach a reasonable decision * that should OSU lease its parking operations as proposed, some portion of the proceeds be devoted to increasing compensation for faculty already at OSU, in addition to recruiting new faculty to OSU.

Health Plan Pricing Adjustments and Remodeling Consideration of the Health Plan fell into two categories. One was the usual marginal adjustment of charges (premiums, co-pays, deductibles, out-of-pocket maximums, etc.) that is required periodically (every two to three years) to keep up with the continually-increasing costs of medical care. The other was a far more ambitious and long-term project to completely re-model the health plan along the lines of the Your Plan For Health initiative. While YP4H is incentive-based - faculty get points and premium rebates for participating - the new health plan model foresees establishing two tracks, one for those who participate, and one for those who don't: the former would be cheaper and more comprehensive than the latter. Subsequent to our discussion of the remodeling plans, the Medical Center decided to put off implementation and lengthen the discussion and planning period. This is an issue FCBC will want to keep a close eye on. Already in the first round of discussions, the Committee noted an extreme imbalance in the proposed remodeling: all the attention was focused on individual patient/subscriber behaviors (such as undergoing annual biometric screenings), and no attention was focused on the other two necessary pillars of health-care reform: improvements in the delivery of care (supply-side efficiencies and savings), and changes in institutional policy to support better health (population-wide rather than individual behavior modification). In the second round of discussions, the Committee learned that the University does have plans to address these other two pillars; further consultation about all three aspects of health care remodeling will take place in the coming years as the University and the Medical Center design and implement sweeping changes.


8

Supplemental Retirement Accounts It has become clear that the comprehensive web-based chart comparing supplemental retirement account (SRA) plans and fees which the University had tried to implement will never see the light of day. Although the University succeeded in insisting that SRA vendors provide complete and accurate information regarding their plan details and fee-structures (and dropped those vendors that refused to comply), an effective web-based comparison chart proved impossible to design, due to the hundreds--if not thousands--of variations in selections used by different vendors to tailor plans to individual faculty, and it would have been impractical to keep up to date. The OSU Retirees Association has however established a very informative web portal devoted to SRAs [specifically 403(b) and 457 (b)]; it is available at http://hr.osu.edu/osura/rr_403b457b.aspx. The Committee also examined and approved of the University's plans to provide overlapping pay for faculty on 9-month appointments, who will in effect work an extra month this year because of the transition to the semester calendar. We also heard from Associate Vice President Leslie Flesch from Business and Finance about the possibility of moving all University employees onto the bi-weekly pay schedule, which offers efficiencies (over the current system whereby some employees are paid bi-weekly while others, notably faculty, are paid monthly) and doesn't appear to severely inconvenience anyone. This issue may return to FCBC next year, if the University decides to pursue the possibility further. ISSUES OF ON-GOING CONCERN FOR NEXT YEAR The main issues probably confronting the Committee next year include

* the final formulation of, vote on, and implementation of STRS reform * the transfer of parking operations to an outside agent * the projected remodeling of OSU health-plans * regional campus faculty compensation * possible move to a bi-weekly pay schedule

RECOMMENDATIONS It has been customary at the end of recent FCBC reports to iterate or reiterate recommended compensation goals for the University. The goals have consistently taken two forms:

1) that the average overall faculty salary at OSU at least meet, and preferably exceed, the average overall faculty salary of our Benchmark institutions, and that reasonable efforts be made to ensure that the average OSU faculty salary at each rank also meets or exceeds the corresponding Benchmark average

2) that the ranking of OSU faculty salaries reach or exceed the 30th position among AAU institutions (i.e., the midpoint of the group of 61)


9

The main recommendation of the first of these goals has again been met in AY2011-2012; there was in fact an incremental advance in the amount by which we exceed the average (from 0.9% last year to 1.1% this year). It must be kept in mind, however, that this success has only been achieved by the re-selection several years ago (in FY 2010) of a new set of Benchmark institutions with whose faculty salaries our own compare favorably. The more important and reliable measure remains the AAU salary rankings, and as for the second compensation goal of reaching the midpoint of those rankings, we are still short of the target; the only positive thing that can be said is that at least we are no farther from the target than we were last year. It has been estimated that even just to return to the 34th position (the highest attained by OSU within the last 15 years) would require an average salary increase of $1,000 more than our closest peer institutions. Compounding the problem of OSU’s failure to close in on the AAU mid-point is the fact that while our Professor and Assistant Professor average salary rankings rose by one position each, our Associate Professor average salary fell three positions (from 36th to 39th). This reflects the severity of “salary compression” at OSU, which is an important contributor to morale problems at that rank. At the Assistant Professor rank, meanwhile, the University is often unable to keep the talent that was attracted by competitive salaries in the first place – making a policy of “proactive retention” essential for the intellectual strength of the institution. The Committee’s final recommendations are therefore that the University

* maintain or improve its position with Benchmark and CIC comparison groups * continue to aim for the 30th position in the AAU comparison group * and most importantly, devote a portion of any proceeds from monetization programs to continuing faculty compensation as well as new hires.

Respectfully yours, Eugene W. Holland

Dr. Eugene W. Holland Chair of the Faculty Compensation and Benefits Committee 451 Hagerty Hall, 1775 College Road The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210 614-292-2559

APPENDIX A

The Ohio State University 2011‐12 Faculty Salary Comparisons

Benchmark Institutions

2011-12 Benchmark Comparison Ten Year Faculty Salary History

PROFESSOR

11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk

UCLA 162.59 153.65 148.02 144.50 141.97 133.21 128.37 123.33 122.40 117.90 115.70 5.82 1 4.07 1 3.46 2MICHIGAN 148.78 146.93 143.97 142.09 137.03 130.44 125.62 120.17 117.80 114.80 108.90 1.26 8 2.67 3 3.17 5ILLINOIS 137.20 133.51 130.02 129.58 125.68 120.93 116.62 111.82 107.00 101.40 100.90 2.76 3 2.56 4 3.12 7MARYLAND 136.32 134.36 134.73 133.42 127.50 121.11 115.69 111.04 107.00 106.50 105.60 1.46 7 2.40 7 2.59 9OHIO STATE 134.23 131.55 129.48 126.45 121.50 117.17 112.65 108.42 103.53 98.18 93.75 2.04 5 2.75 2 3.65 1PENN STATE 132.06 133.49 130.41 131.08 125.40 120.21 116.51 112.58 108.00 102.70 98.10 -1.07 11 1.90 10 3.02 8MINNESOTA 125.71 123.22 124.82 127.44 121.27 116.60 110.31 105.36 102.00 101.30 97.60 2.02 6 1.52 11 2.56 10WASHINGTON 122.69 118.29 121.93 121.65 116.38 108.92 102.15 98.10 93.20 91.20 90.10 3.72 2 2.41 6 3.14 6FLORIDA 121.75 122.08 117.05 115.19 109.30 107.67 101.42 95.95 93.50 89.30 86.90 -0.27 10 2.49 5 3.43 3ARIZONA 119.89 117.49 117.26 114.48 113.11 107.13 102.27 95.88 92.50 90.60 87.70 2.05 4 2.28 8 3.18 4WISCONSIN 114.69 113.78 111.13 109.51 106.98 103.54 100.53 97.82 96.20 96.40 92.90 0.80 9 2.07 9 2.13 11

Average excl OSU 132.17 129.68 127.93 126.89 122.46 116.98 111.95 107.21 103.96 101.21 98.44 1.92 2.47 2.99

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk

UCLA 107.36 100.61 95.21 92.10 90.74 84.22 81.97 78.06 77.00 74.60 73.20 6.70 1 4.97 1 3.90 1MICHIGAN 98.21 96.11 94.34 93.09 89.06 86.55 83.73 81.57 80.90 78.90 76.30 2.18 2 2.56 5 2.56 6MARYLAND 95.72 94.55 94.41 94.88 89.50 84.23 80.29 76.30 74.90 74.50 74.40 1.24 7 2.59 4 2.55 7OHIO STATE 89.28 87.67 85.76 84.22 80.28 76.94 74.19 72.13 69.08 66.27 63.53 1.83 4 3.02 2 3.46 2PENN STATE 89.16 89.03 86.72 87.68 84.99 81.35 77.75 75.42 72.40 70.30 66.50 0.15 9 1.85 7 2.98 4WASHINGTON 88.29 86.81 88.12 87.13 83.44 77.15 72.91 70.21 66.70 65.80 65.50 1.70 5 2.73 3 3.03 3WISCONSIN 87.37 87.28 85.80 84.47 82.48 78.11 76.52 73.44 73.30 73.70 70.20 0.11 11 2.27 6 2.21 9ILLINOIS 86.55 84.82 83.24 83.51 82.24 79.55 77.57 75.06 72.00 69.40 69.90 2.03 3 1.70 10 2.16 11MINNESOTA 86.01 85.06 85.43 86.22 84.34 80.56 75.63 70.68 69.90 70.90 69.20 1.11 8 1.32 11 2.20 10ARIZONA 81.85 80.57 79.65 79.51 79.02 74.91 71.44 67.23 64.90 64.20 61.80 1.58 6 1.79 8 2.85 5FLORIDA 80.10 79.99 75.55 75.41 73.00 73.32 71.71 69.09 65.70 63.70 62.40 0.13 10 1.78 9 2.53 8

Average excl OSU 90.06 88.48 86.85 86.40 83.88 80.00 76.95 73.70 71.77 70.60 68.94 1.78 2.40 2.71

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk

UCLA 87.43 84.03 81.73 79.61 76.77 72.06 67.02 65.48 63.70 63.80 63.50 4.05 2 3.94 1 3.25 4MICHIGAN 85.80 84.45 83.07 81.61 79.30 74.95 72.78 67.06 66.70 65.30 61.70 1.60 7 2.74 5 3.35 2MARYLAND 83.88 82.45 82.58 83.43 78.80 77.39 75.86 75.19 70.00 69.20 69.20 1.73 6 1.62 10 1.94 11ILLINOIS 83.61 80.32 76.75 76.27 73.69 71.69 69.63 68.18 64.50 61.00 60.40 4.10 1 3.12 3 3.30 3OHIO STATE 81.46 79.44 77.99 74.99 71.68 69.38 65.78 64.77 62.25 59.08 55.20 2.54 4 3.26 2 3.97 1WASHINGTON 79.34 77.41 77.25 78.04 73.90 70.90 67.22 64.67 63.20 60.20 58.30 2.49 5 2.27 7 3.13 5MINNESOTA 79.15 78.53 76.46 74.96 72.33 69.43 65.39 62.53 60.60 61.90 58.20 0.78 10 2.65 6 3.12 6PENN STATE 76.11 75.90 72.03 72.40 69.53 68.16 66.28 64.04 62.50 59.50 56.00 0.29 11 2.23 8 3.12 7WISCONSIN 75.86 74.93 73.62 73.05 70.39 66.01 64.30 63.57 63.60 62.00 59.80 1.24 8 2.82 4 2.41 10ARIZONA 70.77 68.38 67.95 66.64 69.68 66.87 63.54 59.75 57.60 56.30 54.20 3.50 3 1.14 11 2.70 8FLORIDA 68.94 68.39 63.91 63.62 62.50 61.94 61.56 59.48 56.60 55.30 53.70 0.81 9 2.17 9 2.53 9

Average excl OSU 79.09 77.48 75.54 74.96 72.69 69.94 67.36 64.99 62.90 61.45 59.50 2.08 2.49 2.89

OVERALL -- ALL RANKS COMBINED

11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk

UCLA 127.76 120.79 115.68 112.27 109.85 102.65 98.98 95.22 94.15 91.44 89.56 5.77 1 4.47 1 3.62 2MICHIGAN 118.13 116.35 113.90 111.99 107.70 102.90 99.64 95.40 94.12 91.89 87.25 1.53 6 2.80 3 3.08 5MARYLAND 111.31 109.77 109.69 109.19 103.60 98.64 94.80 91.27 87.98 87.50 86.84 1.41 8 2.45 6 2.51 10ILLINOIS 108.52 105.64 102.62 102.09 99.19 95.67 92.90 89.70 85.80 81.76 81.29 2.73 3 2.55 5 2.93 8OHIO STATE 107.67 105.54 103.48 100.66 96.25 92.64 89.16 86.46 82.78 78.84 74.84 2.02 5 3.05 2 3.70 1PENN STATE 105.52 106.10 102.86 103.26 99.05 95.15 92.18 89.28 85.96 82.33 77.93 -0.55 11 2.09 9 3.08 4MINNESOTA 102.26 100.74 100.95 101.76 97.68 93.61 88.55 84.14 82.05 82.43 79.12 1.51 7 1.78 11 2.60 9WASHINGTON 101.73 98.88 100.72 100.22 95.60 89.48 84.45 81.25 77.61 75.83 74.61 2.89 2 2.60 4 3.15 3WISCONSIN 97.11 96.49 94.32 92.86 90.39 86.33 84.33 82.03 81.32 81.27 77.77 0.65 9 2.38 8 2.25 11ARIZONA 96.46 94.47 93.75 91.94 91.72 87.02 83.19 78.19 75.49 74.19 71.39 2.11 4 2.08 10 3.06 7FLORIDA 96.31 96.33 91.40 90.19 86.40 85.58 82.47 78.82 76.00 73.24 71.13 -0.03 10 2.39 7 3.08 6

Average excl OSU 106.51 104.56 102.59 101.58 98.12 93.70 90.15 86.53 84.05 82.19 79.69 1.87 2.60 2.94

1 YEAR 5 YEAR 10 YEAR




Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12Note: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution for the appropriate year as weights.

All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis.

Office of Human ResourcesHR Analytics

4/25/2012BENCHMARK_10YR.xlsx

14

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands)Ohio State Benchmark Institutions

OVERALL PROFESSORASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

2010-11 OVERALL RANKING

1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 UCLA2 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 2 MICHIGAN3 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 3 MARYLAND4 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 4 PENN STATE5 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 5 ILLINOIS6 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 6 OHIO STATE7 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 7 MINNESOTA8 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 8 WASHINGTON9 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 9 WISCONSIN

10 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 10 FLORIDA11 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 11 ARIZONA

Average Excluding OSU: 106.51 132.17 90.06 79.09

Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. CIC institutions are in bold type.

INSTITUTION



15



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

2010-11 PROFESSOR RANKING

1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 UCLA2 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 2 MICHIGAN3 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 3 MARYLAND4 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 4 ILLINOIS5 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 5 PENN STATE6 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 6 OHIO STATE7 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 7 MINNESOTA8 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 8 FLORIDA9 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 9 WASHINGTON

10 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 10 ARIZONA11 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 11 WISCONSIN



INSTITUTION



16



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

2010-11 ASSOCIATEPROFESSOR RANKING

1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 UCLA2 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 2 MICHIGAN3 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 3 MARYLAND4 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 4 PENN STATE5 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 5 OHIO STATE6 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 6 WISCONSIN7 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 7 WASHINGTON8 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 8 MINNESOTA9 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 9 ILLINOIS

10 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 10 ARIZONA11 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 11 FLORIDA



INSTITUTION



17



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

2010-11 ASSISTANTPROFESSOR RANKING

1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 MICHIGAN2 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 2 UCLA3 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 3 MARYLAND4 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 4 ILLINOIS5 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 5 OHIO STATE6 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 6 MINNESOTA7 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 7 WASHINGTON8 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 8 PENN STATE9 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 9 WISCONSIN

10 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 10 FLORIDA11 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 11 ARIZONA



INSTITUTION



18

The Ohio State University History of Ranking in Benchmark Institutions: 2001-02 to 2011-12

7th 7th6th 6th 6th 6th 6th

7th6th 6th

5th

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Professor

9th8th 8th

7th8th

9th 9th8th

7th

5th4th

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Associate Professor

9th 9th8th

5th

7th 7th 7th6th

4th5th 5th

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Assistant Professor

8th 8th

6th 6th 6th7th 7th 7th

4th

6th5th

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Overall -- All Ranks Combined



19

-3.0%

-6.1%

-4.1%

-1.5%

-0.1%

-1.1% -1.1%

-1.9%

-0.9%

0.9% 0.9% 1.1%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012

Per

cen

t D

iffe

ren

ce f

rom

Ben

chm

ark

Ave

rag

e

OSU Faculty SalariesPercent Difference from Benchmark Average

Regular Faculty SalariesFY 2001 through FY 2012

Benchmark Average Excluding OSU

Note: Percentage > 0 indicates average salary above benchmark average.

Office of Human Resources 4/25/2012

HR Analytics

20

Appendix B


CIC Institutions

2011-12 CIC Ten Year Faculty Salary History

PROFESSOR

11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk

U OF CHICAGO 197.79 190.43 184.07 179.52 170.81 162.52 155.08 148.43 141.30 134.70 129.20 3.87 2 4.01 1 4.35 1NORTHWESTERN 172.11 169.47 166.31 161.76 153.62 147.22 140.80 136.33 131.90 127.70 122.30 1.56 10 3.17 4 3.48 4MICHIGAN 148.78 146.93 143.97 142.09 137.03 130.44 125.62 120.17 117.80 114.80 108.90 1.26 11 2.67 8 3.17 6ILLINOIS 137.20 133.51 130.02 129.58 125.68 120.93 116.62 111.82 107.00 101.40 100.90 2.76 4 2.56 10 3.12 8OHIO STATE 134.23 131.55 129.48 126.45 121.50 117.17 112.65 108.42 103.53 98.18 93.75 2.04 8 2.75 7 3.65 3PENN STATE 132.06 133.49 130.41 131.08 125.40 120.21 116.51 112.58 108.00 102.70 98.10 -1.07 13 1.90 12 3.02 9IOWA 130.02 126.25 124.08 124.58 118.08 109.84 105.34 102.81 100.80 99.40 97.10 2.99 3 3.43 2 2.96 10MICHIGAN STATE 128.56 125.22 125.03 121.89 116.02 110.23 105.89 101.85 98.30 95.00 89.70 2.67 5 3.12 5 3.66 2INDIANA 128.39 120.90 120.66 118.41 114.01 109.05 104.92 101.77 99.10 96.80 94.20 6.19 1 3.32 3 3.14 7MINNESOTA 125.71 123.22 124.82 127.44 121.27 116.60 110.31 105.36 102.00 101.30 97.60 2.02 9 1.52 13 2.56 12PURDUE 125.09 122.08 115.81 114.97 111.30 107.56 104.32 100.66 97.20 93.10 90.50 2.47 6 3.07 6 3.29 5NEBRASKA 114.79 112.33 112.03 110.12 105.20 101.12 97.50 93.93 90.90 90.70 86.60 2.19 7 2.57 9 2.86 11WISCONSIN 114.69 113.78 111.13 109.51 106.98 103.54 100.53 97.82 96.20 96.40 92.90 0.80 12 2.07 11 2.13 13

Average excl OSU 137.93 134.80 132.36 130.91 125.45 119.94 115.29 111.13 107.54 104.50 100.67 2.32 2.84 3.20

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR

11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk

U OF CHICAGO 114.12 108.93 106.56 106.80 103.34 97.80 93.61 92.29 89.30 88.10 81.70 4.77 2 3.14 1 3.40 2NORTHWESTERN 110.22 108.34 106.94 105.32 100.54 97.48 93.73 90.67 86.90 83.90 80.30 1.73 9 2.49 7 3.22 4MICHIGAN 98.21 96.11 94.34 93.09 89.06 86.55 83.73 81.57 80.90 78.90 76.30 2.18 6 2.56 6 2.56 9OHIO STATE 89.28 87.67 85.76 84.22 80.28 76.94 74.19 72.13 69.08 66.27 63.53 1.83 8 3.02 3 3.46 1MICHIGAN STATE 89.24 87.01 87.30 85.90 82.78 79.16 76.45 73.72 72.40 69.90 67.60 2.57 5 2.43 8 2.82 8PENN STATE 89.16 89.03 86.72 87.68 84.99 81.35 77.75 75.42 72.40 70.30 66.50 0.15 12 1.85 10 2.98 7WISCONSIN 87.37 87.28 85.80 84.47 82.48 78.11 76.52 73.44 73.30 73.70 70.20 0.11 13 2.27 9 2.21 10PURDUE 87.11 84.83 80.23 80.19 77.19 74.82 72.92 70.58 68.80 64.50 62.70 2.69 4 3.09 2 3.34 3INDIANA 87.05 82.24 82.04 81.65 77.76 75.06 72.85 70.69 68.50 66.20 64.00 5.84 1 3.01 4 3.12 5ILLINOIS 86.55 84.82 83.24 83.51 82.24 79.55 77.57 75.06 72.00 69.40 69.90 2.03 7 1.70 11 2.16 12IOWA 86.37 84.10 82.54 83.09 81.01 75.35 70.88 69.07 67.50 65.80 63.70 2.70 3 2.77 5 3.09 6MINNESOTA 86.01 85.06 85.43 86.22 84.34 80.56 75.63 70.68 69.90 70.90 69.20 1.11 11 1.32 13 2.20 11NEBRASKA 77.64 76.73 77.24 76.70 74.40 71.66 69.85 68.12 65.40 65.10 62.80 1.18 10 1.62 12 2.14 13

Average excl OSU 91.59 89.54 88.20 87.88 85.01 81.45 78.46 75.94 73.94 72.23 69.58 2.29 2.37 2.79

ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk

U OF CHICAGO 102.57 100.55 100.07 97.70 90.68 85.34 77.75 73.43 72.30 70.30 69.60 2.01 8 3.74 1 3.95 2NORTHWESTERN 98.93 96.84 95.31 93.48 87.88 83.50 81.21 79.26 76.80 73.40 69.10 2.16 7 3.45 2 3.65 3MICHIGAN 85.80 84.45 83.07 81.61 79.30 74.95 72.78 67.06 66.70 65.30 61.70 1.60 9 2.74 8 3.35 6ILLINOIS 83.61 80.32 76.75 76.27 73.69 71.69 69.63 68.18 64.50 61.00 60.40 4.10 2 3.12 6 3.30 7OHIO STATE 81.46 79.44 77.99 74.99 71.68 69.38 65.78 64.77 62.25 59.08 55.20 2.54 4 3.26 4 3.97 1MINNESOTA 79.15 78.53 76.46 74.96 72.33 69.43 65.39 62.53 60.60 61.90 58.20 0.78 11 2.65 9 3.12 8PURDUE 79.07 77.39 72.65 72.30 69.23 66.80 65.26 62.95 60.50 57.10 55.70 2.17 6 3.43 3 3.57 4INDIANA 77.38 72.82 72.38 71.07 68.37 66.01 62.63 61.27 59.60 58.80 55.30 6.26 1 3.23 5 3.42 5PENN STATE 76.11 75.90 72.03 72.40 69.53 68.16 66.28 64.04 62.50 59.50 56.00 0.29 13 2.23 13 3.12 9WISCONSIN 75.86 74.93 73.62 73.05 70.39 66.01 64.30 63.57 63.60 62.00 59.80 1.24 10 2.82 7 2.41 13IOWA 74.08 72.49 71.42 72.59 69.58 65.80 63.93 61.66 59.80 59.30 56.10 2.19 5 2.40 11 2.82 11NEBRASKA 71.62 68.89 68.88 66.32 65.10 62.88 59.98 57.57 56.20 56.30 54.20 3.95 3 2.64 10 2.83 10MICHIGAN STATE 69.49 69.10 68.60 66.87 64.15 61.83 60.21 59.70 58.90 57.00 53.90 0.57 12 2.36 12 2.57 12

Average excl OSU 81.14 79.35 77.60 76.55 73.35 70.20 67.44 65.10 63.50 61.83 59.17 2.25 2.94 3.21

OVERALL -- ALL RANKS COMBINED

11-12 10-11 09-10 08-09 07-08 06-07 05-06 04-05 03-04 02-03 01-02 % Rnk % Rnk % Rnk

U OF CHICAGO 148.99 143.60 139.63 136.66 129.80 122.98 117.01 112.87 108.57 104.94 99.70 3.76 2 3.91 1 4.10 1NORTHWESTERN 135.43 133.22 130.76 127.41 120.75 115.81 111.56 108.24 104.55 101.02 96.10 1.66 9 3.18 5 3.49 3MICHIGAN 118.13 116.35 113.90 111.99 107.70 102.90 99.64 95.40 94.12 91.89 87.25 1.53 10 2.80 8 3.08 8ILLINOIS 108.52 105.64 102.62 102.09 99.19 95.67 92.90 89.70 85.80 81.76 81.29 2.73 4 2.55 9 2.93 10OHIO STATE 107.67 105.54 103.48 100.66 96.25 92.64 89.16 86.46 82.78 78.84 74.84 2.02 8 3.05 6 3.70 2PENN STATE 105.52 106.10 102.86 103.26 99.05 95.15 92.18 89.28 85.96 82.33 77.93 -0.55 13 2.09 12 3.08 7INDIANA 103.43 97.52 97.06 95.38 91.39 87.70 84.63 82.30 80.07 78.15 75.22 6.07 1 3.36 2 3.24 6IOWA 103.23 100.47 98.53 98.92 94.54 88.09 84.42 82.27 80.51 79.26 76.56 2.75 3 3.22 4 3.03 9MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 100.26 99.86 97.37 93.01 88.62 85.76 83.06 80.94 78.28 74.17 2.31 6 2.97 7 3.30 5PURDUE 102.35 99.90 94.36 93.66 90.22 87.16 84.97 82.13 79.53 75.57 73.25 2.45 5 3.26 3 3.40 4MINNESOTA 102.26 100.74 100.95 101.76 97.68 93.61 88.55 84.14 82.05 82.43 79.12 1.51 11 1.78 13 2.60 12WISCONSIN 97.11 96.49 94.32 92.86 90.39 86.33 84.33 82.03 81.32 81.27 77.77 0.65 12 2.38 11 2.25 13NEBRASKA 92.93 90.98 90.85 89.01 85.68 82.40 79.77 77.19 74.67 74.55 71.25 2.15 7 2.43 10 2.69 11

Average excl OSU 110.04 107.61 105.48 104.20 99.95 95.53 92.14 89.05 86.51 84.29 80.80 2.26 2.87 3.14





Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12Note: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution for the appropriate year as weights.

All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis.University of Nebraska - Lincoln entered the CIC in 2011, but a complete 10-year history of salary data has been included .


4/25/2012CIC_10YR.xlsx

22

The Ohio State UniversityHistory of Ranking in CIC: 2001-02 to 2011-12

Note: The number of CIC institutions increased to 13 in 2011 (addition of Nebraska)

9th8th

6th 6th 6th 6th 6th7th

6th 6th5th

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Professor

11th

9th 9th8th

9th 9th10th

8th7th

5th4th

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Associate Professor

11th

9th

7th

5th6th 6th 6th

5th4th

5th 5th

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Assistant Professor

10th9th


4th

6th5th

01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR



4/25/2012CIC_10YR.xlsx23

The Ohio State UniversityHistory of Ranking in CIC: 1983-84 to 2011-12

Note: The number of CIC institutions increased to 13 in 2011 (addition of Nebraska)

2nd3rd

4th

6th7th

8th

6th

4th

7th 7th

9th 9th10th

9th


4th

6th5th

83-84

84-85

85-92

92-93

93-94

94-95

95-96

96-97

97-98

98-99

99-00

00-01

01-02

02-03

03-04

04-05

05-06

06-07

07-08

08-09

09-10

10-11

11-12

FISCAL YEAR



4/25/2012CIC_10YR.xlsx

24

Appendix C


AAU Institutions

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands)AAU Institutions


ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

1 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 1 HARVARD2 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 2 STANFORD3 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 3 COLUMBIA4 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 4 U OF CHICAGO5 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 5 PRINCETON6 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 6 PENNSYLVANIA7 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 7 CAL TECH8 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 8 MIT9 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 9 NEW YORK

10 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 10 NORTHWESTERN11 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 11 YALE12 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 12 CORNELL-ENDOWED13 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 13 DUKE14 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 14 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY15 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 15 RICE16 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA17 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 17 EMORY18 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 18 UCLA19 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 19 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY20 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 20 BROWN21 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 21 MICHIGAN22 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 22 VANDERBILT23 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 23 CARNEGIE-MELLON24 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 24 RUTGERS25 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 25 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL26 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 26 GEORGIA TECH27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK28 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 28 MARYLAND29 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 29 TEXAS30 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 30 VIRGINIA31 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 31 SUNY-BUFFALO32 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 32 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO33 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 33 ROCHESTER34 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 34 PENN STATE35 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 35 ILLINOIS36 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 36 OHIO STATE37 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 37 PITTSBURGH38 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 38 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE39 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 39 TULANE40 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 40 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA41 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 41 CASE WESTERN RESERVE42 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 42 BRANDEIS43 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 43 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS44 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 44 MINNESOTA45 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 45 IOWA46 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 46 MICHIGAN STATE47 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 47 PURDUE48 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 48 WASHINGTON49 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 49 COLORADO50 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 50 INDIANA51 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 51 TEXAS A&M52 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 52 WISCONSIN53 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 53 FLORIDA54 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 54 SYRACUSE55 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 55 IOWA STATE56 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 56 ARIZONA57 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 57 KANSAS58 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 58 NEBRASKA59 JOHNS HOPKINS 59 OREGON

60 MISSOURI61 JOHNS HOPKINS

2010-11 OVERALL RANKINGINSTITUTION

NO DATA REPORTED SINCE 2007-08

Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institutions McGill and University of Toronto are excluded.

Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights.All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis.Number of U.S. AAU Institutions changed from 61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse)


4/25/2012AAURANKS.xlsx

4



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

1 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 1 HARVARD2 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 2 COLUMBIA3 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 3 U OF CHICAGO4 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 4 STANFORD5 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 5 PRINCETON6 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 6 YALE7 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 7 NEW YORK8 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 8 PENNSYLVANIA9 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 9 CAL TECH

10 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 10 NORTHWESTERN11 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 11 MIT12 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 12 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY13 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 13 DUKE14 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 14 CORNELL-ENDOWED15 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 15 RICE16 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 16 EMORY17 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 17 UCLA18 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 18 VANDERBILT19 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 19 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA20 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 20 BROWN21 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 21 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY22 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 22 MICHIGAN23 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 23 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL24 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 24 RUTGERS25 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 25 GEORGIA TECH26 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 26 CARNEGIE-MELLON27 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK28 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 28 VIRGINIA29 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 29 TEXAS30 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 30 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO31 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 31 SUNY-BUFFALO32 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 32 MARYLAND33 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 33 TULANE34 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 34 ILLINOIS35 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 35 PENN STATE36 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 36 PITTSBURGH37 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 37 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA38 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 38 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE39 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 39 OHIO STATE40 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 40 ROCHESTER41 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 41 CASE WESTERN RESERVE42 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 42 IOWA43 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 43 MICHIGAN STATE44 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 44 BRANDEIS45 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 45 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS46 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 46 MINNESOTA47 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 47 FLORIDA48 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 48 PURDUE49 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 49 INDIANA50 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 50 TEXAS A&M51 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 51 COLORADO52 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 52 WASHINGTON53 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 53 KANSAS54 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 54 ARIZONA55 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 55 SYRACUSE56 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 56 IOWA STATE57 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 57 WISCONSIN58 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 58 NEBRASKA59 JOHNS HOPKINS 59 MISSOURI

60 OREGON61 JOHNS HOPKINS

2010-11 PROFESSOR RANKINGINSTITUTION


Source: American Association University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institutions McGill and University of Toronto are excluded.




5



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

1 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 1 STANFORD2 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 2 COLUMBIA3 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 3 PRINCETON4 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 4 HARVARD5 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 5 MIT6 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 6 PENNSYLVANIA7 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 7 CAL TECH8 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 8 CORNELL-ENDOWED9 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 9 U OF CHICAGO

10 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 10 RICE11 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 11 NORTHWESTERN12 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 12 DUKE13 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 13 NEW YORK14 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 14 YALE15 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 16 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY17 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 17 UCLA18 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 18 EMORY19 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 19 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY20 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 20 SUNY-STONY BROOK21 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 21 CARNEGIE-MELLON22 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 22 BROWN23 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 23 RUTGERS24 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 24 VANDERBILT25 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 25 MICHIGAN26 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 26 MARYLAND27 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 27 GEORGIA TECH28 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 28 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL29 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 29 SUNY-BUFFALO30 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 30 VIRGINIA31 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 31 ROCHESTER32 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 32 PENN STATE33 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 33 TEXAS34 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 34 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO35 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 35 PITTSBURGH36 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 36 OHIO STATE37 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 37 WISCONSIN38 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 38 MICHIGAN STATE39 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 39 WASHINGTON40 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 40 BRANDEIS41 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 41 COLORADO42 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 42 TULANE43 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 43 MINNESOTA44 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 44 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE45 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 45 PURDUE46 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 46 ILLINOIS47 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 47 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS48 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 48 CASE WESTERN RESERVE49 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 49 IOWA50 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 50 SYRACUSE51 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 51 IOWA STATE52 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 52 INDIANA53 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 53 TEXAS A&M54 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 54 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA55 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 55 ARIZONA56 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 56 FLORIDA57 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 57 KANSAS58 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 58 NEBRASKA59 JOHNS HOPKINS 59 OREGON


2010-11 ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR RANKING

INSTITUTION






6



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

1 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 1 CAL TECH2 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 2 PENNSYLVANIA3 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 3 HARVARD4 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 4 STANFORD5 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 5 U OF CHICAGO6 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 6 MIT7 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 7 COLUMBIA8 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 8 NORTHWESTERN9 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 9 CORNELL-ENDOWED

10 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 10 CARNEGIE-MELLON11 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 11 NEW YORK12 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 12 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA13 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 13 PRINCETON14 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 14 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY15 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 15 ROCHESTER16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 16 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY17 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 17 YALE18 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 18 DUKE19 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 19 RICE20 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 20 GEORGIA TECH21 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 21 EMORY22 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 22 MICHIGAN23 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 23 UCLA24 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 24 MARYLAND25 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 25 TEXAS26 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 26 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL27 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 27 BROWN28 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 28 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO29 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 29 ILLINOIS30 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 30 BRANDEIS31 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 31 OHIO STATE32 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 32 RUTGERS33 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 33 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS34 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 34 SUNY-STONY BROOK35 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 35 MINNESOTA36 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 36 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE37 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 37 WASHINGTON38 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 38 PURDUE39 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 39 SUNY-BUFFALO40 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 40 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA41 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 41 VIRGINIA42 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 42 PENN STATE43 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 43 WISCONSIN44 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 44 VANDERBILT45 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 45 COLORADO46 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 46 CASE WESTERN RESERVE47 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 47 TEXAS A&M48 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 48 IOWA STATE49 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 49 INDIANA50 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 50 IOWA51 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 51 PITTSBURGH52 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 52 OREGON53 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 53 SYRACUSE54 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 54 TULANE55 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 55 MICHIGAN STATE56 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 56 NEBRASKA57 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 57 FLORIDA58 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 58 ARIZONA59 JOHNS HOPKINS 59 KANSAS


2010-11 ASSISTANT PROFESSOR RANKING

INSTITUTION






7

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands)

Public AAU Institutions


ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 UCLA2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY3 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 3 MICHIGAN4 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 4 RUTGERS5 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL6 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 6 GEORGIA TECH7 SUNY-STONY BROOK 113.23 140.48 99.51 78.09 7 SUNY-STONY BROOK8 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 8 MARYLAND9 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 9 TEXAS

10 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 10 VIRGINIA11 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 11 SUNY-BUFFALO12 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 12 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO13 SUNY-BUFFALO 108.64 135.40 93.12 77.39 13 PENN STATE14 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 14 ILLINOIS15 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 15 OHIO STATE16 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 16 PITTSBURGH17 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 17 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE18 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 18 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA19 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 19 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS20 INDIANA 103.43 128.39 87.05 77.38 20 MINNESOTA21 COLORADO 103.27 125.51 90.26 77.49 21 IOWA22 IOWA 103.23 130.02 86.37 74.08 22 MICHIGAN STATE23 MICHIGAN STATE 102.58 128.56 89.24 69.49 23 PURDUE24 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 24 WASHINGTON25 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 25 COLORADO26 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 26 INDIANA27 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 27 TEXAS A&M28 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 28 WISCONSIN29 ARIZONA 96.46 119.89 81.85 70.77 29 FLORIDA30 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 30 IOWA STATE31 IOWA STATE 96.17 115.93 83.46 75.12 31 ARIZONA32 KANSAS 93.41 116.14 78.75 69.25 32 KANSAS33 OREGON 92.99 112.25 79.62 74.03 33 NEBRASKA34 MISSOURI 89.85 113.89 75.94 61.74 34 OREGON

35 MISSOURI

INSTITUTION 2010-11 RANKING

Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institution University of Toronto is excluded.

Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio States rank distribution as weights.All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis.Number of U.S. Public AAU Institutions changed from 35 to 34 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska)



8

2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands)

Ohio State and Private AAU Institutions


ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

1 STANFORD 155.31 195.44 131.21 109.80 1 HARVARD2 HARVARD 153.09 198.37 120.91 109.76 2 STANFORD3 COLUMBIA 151.96 197.80 125.05 98.96 3 COLUMBIA4 U OF CHICAGO 148.99 197.79 114.12 102.57 4 U OF CHICAGO5 PRINCETON 148.67 193.76 123.70 94.15 5 PRINCETON6 PENNSYLVANIA 145.09 181.60 117.78 112.32 6 PENNSYLVANIA7 CAL TECH 143.12 174.99 121.30 111.31 7 CAL TECH8 MIT 139.57 171.85 120.29 102.78 8 MIT9 NEW YORK 138.76 182.37 106.07 99.71 9 NEW YORK

10 DUKE 137.69 175.31 114.47 96.03 10 NORTHWESTERN11 YALE 136.60 180.43 108.55 89.68 11 YALE12 NORTHWESTERN 135.43 172.11 110.22 98.93 12 CORNELL-ENDOWED13 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 131.65 172.36 100.16 96.79 13 DUKE14 CORNELL-ENDOWED 131.37 161.80 113.02 96.96 14 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY15 RICE 125.74 159.55 105.96 86.59 15 RICE16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 125.33 155.92 105.30 93.32 16 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA17 EMORY 123.55 157.97 101.63 86.53 17 EMORY18 BROWN 121.31 156.74 99.26 82.35 18 BROWN19 VANDERBILT 120.57 158.34 98.65 76.51 19 VANDERBILT20 CARNEGIE-MELLON 118.59 141.98 98.88 101.13 20 CARNEGIE-MELLON21 ROCHESTER 112.74 133.81 97.20 93.46 21 ROCHESTER22 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 22 OHIO STATE23 TULANE 107.30 140.22 86.56 71.53 23 TULANE24 BRANDEIS 106.84 130.05 90.51 84.36 24 CASE WESTERN RESERVE25 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 104.62 131.16 85.76 79.18 25 BRANDEIS27 JOHNS HOPKINS 26 SYRACUSE

27 JOHNS HOPKINS

INSTITUTION


2010-11 RANKING

Source: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12Notes: Canadian institution McGill is excluded.

Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights.All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis.Number of U.S. Private AAU institutions changed from 27 to 26 in 2011-12 (removal of Syracuse)



9

History of Ranking in AAU: 1997-98 to 2011-12

37th 38th 40th 41st44th 44th

39th 37th 36th 36th 36th 38th35th

39th 38th

97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Professor

40th 42nd39th 40th

51st48st 47th

41st 43rd46th 48th

43rd37th 36th

39th

97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Associate Professor

42nd 42nd 42nd 41st

51st

44th

34th 32nd35th 34th

38th35th

28th31st 30th

97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR

Assistant Professor

40th 39th 40th 42nd46th 46th

40th 38th 38th 39th 38th 37th34th 36th 36th

97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR


Note: Number of U.S. AAU institutions changed in the following years: 56 to 60 in 1996-97 (addition of Cal-Davis,Cal-Irvine, Cal-Santa Barbara, Emory); 60 to 61 in 2001-02 (addition of Texas A&M, SUNY-Stony Brook;removal of Clark); 61 to 60 in 2002-03 (removal of Catholic University); 60 to 61 in 2010-11 (addition of GeorgiaTech); 61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse)



10

History of Ranking in AAU: 1983-84 to 2011-12

Note: Number of U.S. AAU institutions changed in the following years:56 to 60 in 1996-97 (addition of Cal-Davis, Cal-Irvine, Cal-Santa Barbara, Emory)60 to 61 in 2001-02 (addition of Texas A&M, SUNY-Stony Brook; removal of Clark)61 to 60 in 2002-03 (removal of Catholic University)60 to 61 in 2010-11 (addition of Georgia Tech)61 to 59 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska, Syracuse)

14th17th

21st27th26th28th

32th37th38th

35th32nd

40th39th40th42nd46th46th

40th38th38th39th38th37th34th36th36th

FISCAL YEAR




11

History of Ranking in Public AAU Institutions1996-97 to 2010-11

Note: Number of U.S. Public AAU institutions changed in the following years:32 to 34 in 2001-02 (addition of Texas A&M, SUNY-Stony Brook)34 to 35 in 2010-11 (addition of Georgia Tech)35 to 34 in 2011-12 (removal of Nebraska)

16th 16th18th 19th

23rd 22nd

17th15th 15th

17th 16th 16th13th

15th 15th

97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

FISCAL YEAR




12

Appendix D


Top 25 Public Institutions

2011-12 Faculty Salaries (In Thousands)U.S. News Top 25 Public Institutions


ASSISTANT PROFESSOR

2012 REPUTATIONAL RANKING

1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 2 UCLA3 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 VIRGINIA4 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 4 MICHIGAN5 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL6 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 6 WILLIAM & MARY7 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO9 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS

10 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA11 CONNECTICUT 109.22 139.09 92.30 73.70 WASHINGTON12 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 WISCONSIN13 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 13 PENN STATE14 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE15 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 ILLINOIS16 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 TEXAS17 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 17 OHIO STATE18 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 MARYLAND19 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 19 TEXAS A&M20 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 CONNECTICUT21 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 FLORIDA22 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 PITTSBURGH23 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 23 PURDUE24 WILLIAM & MARY 96.72 117.60 87.03 68.48 GEORGIA25 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 25 CLEMSON26 GEORGIA 91.12 107.81 79.15 75.33 RUTGERS27 CLEMSON 90.08 107.98 79.04 70.25 MINNESOTA


Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12 U.S. News 2012 Best Colleges rankings, Top Public Schools, National Universities Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis. Benchmark institutions are in bold type.

INSTITUTION


4/25/2012TOP25PUBLIC.xlsx

26



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR


1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 2 UCLA3 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 VIRGINIA4 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 4 MICHIGAN5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL6 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 6 WILLIAM & MARY7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO9 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS

10 CONNECTICUT 109.22 139.09 92.30 73.70 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA11 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 WASHINGTON12 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 WISCONSIN13 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 13 PENN STATE14 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE15 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 ILLINOIS16 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 TEXAS17 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 17 OHIO STATE18 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 MARYLAND19 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 19 TEXAS A&M20 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 CONNECTICUT21 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 FLORIDA22 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 PITTSBURGH23 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 23 PURDUE24 WILLIAM & MARY 96.72 117.60 87.03 68.48 GEORGIA25 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 25 CLEMSON26 CLEMSON 90.08 107.98 79.04 70.25 RUTGERS27 GEORGIA 91.12 107.81 79.15 75.33 MINNESOTA



INSTITUTION



27



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR


1 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY2 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 2 UCLA3 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 VIRGINIA4 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 4 MICHIGAN5 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL6 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 6 WILLIAM & MARY7 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH8 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO9 CONNECTICUT 109.22 139.09 92.30 73.70 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS

10 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA11 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 WASHINGTON12 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 WISCONSIN13 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 13 PENN STATE14 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE15 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 ILLINOIS16 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 TEXAS17 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 17 OHIO STATE18 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 MARYLAND19 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 19 TEXAS A&M20 WILLIAM & MARY 96.72 117.60 87.03 68.48 CONNECTICUT21 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 FLORIDA22 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 PITTSBURGH23 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 23 PURDUE24 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 GEORGIA25 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 25 CLEMSON26 GEORGIA 91.12 107.81 79.15 75.33 RUTGERS27 CLEMSON 90.08 107.98 79.04 70.25 MINNESOTA



INSTITUTION



28



ASSISTANT PROFESSOR


1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 124.01 154.04 104.55 92.25 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY2 UCLA 127.76 162.59 107.36 87.43 2 UCLA3 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 112.31 140.74 90.91 87.01 VIRGINIA4 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 113.78 141.34 94.56 86.81 4 MICHIGAN5 MICHIGAN 118.13 148.78 98.21 85.80 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL6 TEXAS 111.30 140.73 89.90 83.90 6 WILLIAM & MARY7 MARYLAND 111.31 136.32 95.72 83.88 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH8 ILLINOIS 108.52 137.20 86.55 83.61 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO9 OHIO STATE 107.67 134.23 89.28 81.46 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS

10 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 105.94 129.37 90.63 81.35 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA11 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 108.94 137.03 89.83 80.68 WASHINGTON12 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 113.63 143.98 94.61 80.47 WISCONSIN13 VIRGINIA 112.66 141.63 94.99 80.27 13 PENN STATE14 WASHINGTON 101.73 122.69 88.29 79.34 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE15 MINNESOTA 102.26 125.71 86.01 79.15 ILLINOIS16 PURDUE 102.35 125.09 87.11 79.07 TEXAS17 RUTGERS 114.97 144.98 98.40 78.64 17 OHIO STATE18 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 107.65 138.61 85.36 78.45 MARYLAND19 PENN STATE 105.52 132.06 89.16 76.11 19 TEXAS A&M20 WISCONSIN 97.11 114.69 87.37 75.86 CONNECTICUT21 GEORGIA 91.12 107.81 79.15 75.33 FLORIDA22 PITTSBURGH 106.78 134.81 89.96 74.96 PITTSBURGH23 CONNECTICUT 109.22 139.09 92.30 73.70 23 PURDUE24 TEXAS A&M 97.37 120.01 83.08 72.79 GEORGIA25 CLEMSON 90.08 107.98 79.04 70.25 25 CLEMSON26 FLORIDA 96.31 121.75 80.10 68.94 RUTGERS27 WILLIAM & MARY 96.72 117.60 87.03 68.48 MINNESOTA



INSTITUTION



29

APPENDIX E


Living Cost Adjustments

The Ohio State University2011-12 Average Faculty Salaries (In Thousands)

AAU InstitutionsLiving Cost Adjusted

Living CostAAU Institution Index Overall Rank Overall Rank AAU Institution RankDUKE 98.5 $139.78 1 $137.69 10 DUKE 1 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 101.4 $129.83 2 $131.65 13 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY 2 VANDERBILT 93.4 $129.09 3 $120.57 21 RICE 3 U OF CHICAGO 115.7 $128.77 4 $148.99 4 VANDERBILT 4 CORNELL-ENDOWED 103.7 $126.68 5 $131.37 14 U OF CHICAGO 5 PENNSYLVANIA 115.1 $126.06 6 $145.09 6 CORNELL-ENDOWED 6 RICE 100.2 $125.49 7 $125.74 16 PENNSYLVANIA 7 EMORY 100.0 $123.55 8 $123.55 19 EMORY 8 PRINCETON 120.7 $123.17 9 $148.67 5 PRINCETON 9 YALE 114.3 $119.51 10 $136.60 11 YALE 10 MICHIGAN 101.1 $116.84 11 $118.13 23 MICHIGAN 11 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 98.5 $115.36 12 $113.63 26 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 12 COLUMBIA 131.9 $115.20 13 $151.96 3 GEORGIA TECH 13 HARVARD 133.5 $114.68 14 $153.09 2 HARVARD 14 PURDUE 89.9 $113.84 15 $102.35 48 COLUMBIA 15 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 100.0 $113.78 16 $113.78 25 PURDUE 16 BROWN 107.1 $113.27 17 $121.31 20 BROWN 17 INDIANA 92.2 $112.18 18 $103.43 44 TEXAS A&M 18 CARNEGIE-MELLON 107.4 $110.42 19 $118.59 22 CARNEGIE-MELLON 19 ILLINOIS 98.3 $110.40 20 $108.52 35 ILLINOIS 20 ROCHESTER 102.5 $109.99 21 $112.74 28 SUNY-BUFFALO 21 TEXAS A&M 89.3 $109.03 22 $97.37 51 INDIANA 22 VIRGINIA 103.5 $108.85 23 $112.66 29 MICHIGAN STATE 23 MICHIGAN STATE 94.9 $108.09 24 $102.58 47 ROCHESTER 24 OHIO STATE 100.0 $107.67 25 $107.67 36 OHIO STATE 25 SUNY-BUFFALO 101.8 $106.71 26 $108.64 34 PENN STATE 26 TEXAS 104.8 $106.20 27 $111.30 32 VIRGINIA 27 NORTHWESTERN 128.3 $105.56 28 $135.43 12 NORTHWESTERN 28 IOWA 97.8 $105.55 29 $103.23 46 TEXAS 29 CAL TECH 135.6 $105.55 30 $143.12 7 IOWA 30 TULANE 101.8 $105.40 31 $107.30 38 TULANE 31 MIT 133.5 $104.55 32 $139.57 8 CAL TECH 32 PENN STATE 101.0 $104.48 33 $105.52 42 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 33 CASE WESTERN RESERVE 100.7 $103.89 34 $104.62 43 MIT 34 MINNESOTA 101.3 $100.95 35 $102.26 49 MINNESOTA 35 PITTSBURGH 107.4 $99.42 36 $106.78 40 FLORIDA 36 FLORIDA 97.2 $99.08 37 $96.31 54 WISCONSIN 37 STANFORD 156.9 $98.99 38 $155.31 1 PITTSBURGH 38 MISSOURI 90.9 $98.84 39 $89.85 58 KANSAS 39 WISCONSIN 98.6 $98.49 40 $97.11 52 MISSOURI 40 IOWA STATE 98.7 $97.44 41 $96.17 55 IOWA STATE 41 COLORADO 107.1 $96.42 42 $103.27 45 STANFORD 42 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 116.6 $96.32 43 $112.31 30 NEBRASKA 43 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 110.2 $96.13 44 $105.94 41 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 44 KANSAS 97.2 $96.10 45 $93.41 56 MARYLAND 45 MARYLAND 118.5 $93.94 46 $111.31 31 SYRACUSE 46 ARIZONA 103.4 $93.29 47 $96.46 53 COLORADO 47 OREGON 101.8 $91.34 48 $92.99 57 CALIFORNIA-DAVIS 48 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 137.3 $91.28 49 $125.33 17 ARIZONA 49 WASHINGTON 113.2 $89.87 50 $101.73 50 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 50 UCLA 142.9 $89.41 51 $127.76 15 WASHINGTON 51 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 140.3 $88.39 52 $124.01 18 OREGON 52 RUTGERS 132.9 $86.51 53 $114.97 24 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 53 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 133.5 $81.60 54 $108.94 33 RUTGERS 54 BRANDEIS 133.5 $80.03 55 $106.84 39 UCLA 55 SUNY-STONY BROOK 143.2 $79.07 56 $113.23 27 SUNY-STONY BROOK 56 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 164.0 $65.64 57 $107.65 37 CALIFORNIA-IRVINE 57 NEW YORK 223.5 $62.08 58 $138.76 9 BRANDEIS 58 JOHNS HOPKINS* 102.5 N/A N/A CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 59

NEW YORK 60 JOHNS HOPKINS* N/A

Adjusted by Index Unadjusted 2010-11 Adjusted

Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-122010 Runzheimer Report of Living Cost Standards

Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type. Canadian institutions McGill and University of Toronto are excluded.Number of U.S. AAU Institutions changed from 61 to 60 in 2011-12 (removals of Nebraska, Syracuse)Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis.Living cost can vary from community to community within a large metropolitan area. When information was available

regarding the specific location of a campus, that index was used. When information regarding the particular location was unavailable or ambiguous, the cost-of-living for the metropolitan area as a whole was used.

* Data for Johns Hopkins unavailable.


Living Cost Comparisons.xlsx4/25/2012

31


Benchmark and CIC InstitutionsLiving Cost Adjusted

Benchmark Institutions

Living CostInstitution Index Overall Rank Overall RankMICHIGAN 101.1 $116.84 1 $118.13 2 ILLINOIS 98.3 $110.40 2 $108.52 4 OHIO STATE 100.0 $107.67 3 $107.67 5 PENN STATE 101.0 $104.48 4 $105.52 6 MINNESOTA 101.3 $100.95 5 $102.26 7 FLORIDA 97.2 $99.08 6 $96.31 11 WISCONSIN 98.6 $98.49 7 $97.11 9 MARYLAND 118.5 $93.94 8 $111.31 3 ARIZONA 103.4 $93.29 9 $96.46 10 WASHINGTON 113.2 $89.87 10 $101.73 8 UCLA 142.9 $89.41 11 $127.76 1

$105.54 3 $105.54 6

CIC Institutions

Living CostInstitution Index Overall Rank Overall RankU OF CHICAGO 115.7 $128.77 1 $148.99 1 MICHIGAN 101.1 $116.84 2 $118.13 3 PURDUE 89.9 $113.84 3 $102.35 10 INDIANA 92.2 $112.18 4 $103.43 7 ILLINOIS 98.3 $110.40 5 $108.52 4 MICHIGAN STATE 94.9 $108.09 6 $102.58 9 OHIO STATE 100.0 $107.67 7 $107.67 5 NORTHWESTERN 128.3 $105.56 8 $135.43 2 IOWA 97.8 $105.55 9 $103.23 8 PENN STATE 101.0 $104.48 10 $105.52 6 MINNESOTA 101.3 $100.95 11 $102.26 11 WISCONSIN 98.6 $98.49 12 $97.11 12 NEBRASKA 97.6 $95.22 13 $92.93 13

$105.54 7 $105.54 6 Previous OHIO STATE Ranking (2010-11)

Adjusted by Index Unadjusted

Adjusted by Index Unadjusted

Previous OHIO STATE Ranking (2010-11)

Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-122010 Runzheimer Report of Living Cost Standards

Notes: Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights.All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis.Number of CIC institutions increased to 13 in 2011-12 (addition of Nebraska)Living cost can vary from community to community within a large metropolitan area. When information was available




32


Top 25 Public InstitutionsLiving Cost Adjusted

Living CostInstitution Index Overall Rank Overall RankMICHIGAN 101.1 $116.84 1 $118.13 3 1 CALIFORNIA-BERKELEYNORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILL 98.5 $115.36 2 $113.63 6 2 UCLAPURDUE 89.9 $113.84 3 $102.35 19 VIRGINIAGEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECH 100.0 $113.78 4 $113.78 5 4 MICHIGANILLINOIS 98.3 $110.40 5 $108.52 13 5 NORTH CAROLINA-CHAPEL HILLCONNECTICUT* 100.0 $109.22 6 $109.22 11 6 WILLIAM & MARYTEXAS A&M 89.3 $109.03 7 $97.37 22 7 GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHVIRGINIA 103.5 $108.85 8 $112.66 7 8 CALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGOOHIO STATE 100.0 $107.67 9 $107.67 14 9 CALIFORNIA-DAVISTEXAS 104.8 $106.20 10 $111.30 10 10 CALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARAPENN STATE 101.0 $104.48 11 $105.52 18 WASHINGTONMINNESOTA 101.3 $100.95 12 $102.26 20 WISCONSINPITTSBURGH 107.4 $99.42 13 $106.78 16 13 PENN STATEFLORIDA 97.2 $99.08 14 $96.31 25 CALIFORNIA-IRVINEWISCONSIN 98.6 $98.49 15 $97.11 23 ILLINOISWILLIAM & MARY* 100.0 $96.72 16 $96.72 24 TEXASCALIFORNIA-SAN DIEGO 116.6 $96.32 17 $112.31 8 17 OHIO STATECALIFORNIA-DAVIS 110.2 $96.13 18 $105.94 17 MARYLANDMARYLAND 118.5 $93.94 19 $111.31 9 19 TEXAS A&MGEORGIA* 100.0 $91.12 20 $91.12 26 CONNECTICUTCLEMSON* 100.0 $90.08 21 $90.08 27 FLORIDAWASHINGTON 113.2 $89.87 22 $101.73 21 PITTSBURGHUCLA 142.9 $89.41 23 $127.76 1 23 PURDUECALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 140.3 $88.39 24 $124.01 2 GEORGIARUTGERS 132.9 $86.51 25 $114.97 4 25 CLEMSONCALIFORNIA-IRVINE 133.5 $81.60 26 $108.94 12 RUTGERSCALIFORNIA-SANTA BARBARA 164.0 $65.64 27 $107.65 15 MINNESOTA

Adjusted by Index Unadjusted2011-12 Reputiational Rankings

Sources: American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Faculty Compensation Survey 2011-12U.S. News 2012 Best Colleges rankings, Top Public Schools, National Universities2010 Runzheimer Report of Living Cost Standards

Notes: Benchmark institutions are in bold type.Overall salaries are a weighted average of rank salaries using Ohio State's rank distribution as weights. All 12-month salaries have been converted to a 9-month basis.Living cost can vary from community to community within a large metropolitan area. When information was available


* Living Cost adjustment factor unavailable, factor of 100 used.



33

Autumn 2011Faculty Compensation Metrics – by Columbus Campus.pptx


Average of faculty

population for 2010 National Survey as of10/31/2010

Resignations / retirements

New Hires

Overall Change: 2.1%

Professor: 2.0%Associate Professor: 1.8%Assistant Professor: 2.5%

National Survey Methodology

Average of faculty

population for 2011 National Survey as of10/31/2011

Comparison of total OSU Faculty Population *

All faculty continuously here from 10/31/2010 through 10/31/2011 (includes all increases)

Continuing Faculty *

Faculty Compensation MetricsTotal University - Columbus Campus

Step One: Measure Internally

Step Two: Compare with Benchmarks and AAU (March 2012)

* National survey population excludes Library faculty, COM clinical science faculty, and Research faculty.

Overall Change: 2.6%

Professor: 2.3%Associate Professor: 2.8%Assistant Professor: 3.3%

annual salary and benefits report and …...report and recommendations, 2012 . faculty compensation...

Documents