annual report 2010 en july1 - hgpi · em, presenting health and healthcare policy options ealthy,...

Annual Report 2010

Health and Global Policy Institute

© Specified Non‐Profit Corporation, Health and Global Policy Institute

Our mission is to improve the civic mind and individhealthy community, by shaping ideas and values, reasociety for impact.

h b h l

Our Mission

We commit to activities that bring together relevantinnovative and practical solutions, and to help interebenefits from a broader global and long‐term perspe

Guiding Principles

CONNECT and FACILITATE We connect players and facilitate discussions.

INDEPENDENT and GLOBALWe represent an independent voice and nurture a g

FEASIBLE and RESPONSIBLE We provide feasible and responsible policy options.

RESEARCH and ANALYSIS We provide quality research and analysis.

OPEN and CREATIVE OPEN and CREATIVE We are open to new ideas and foster creative solut

uals’ well‐being, and to foster a sustainable aching out to global needs, and catalyzing

l d ff f ld dt players in different fields to provide ested citizens understand choices and ective.

global perspective.

.

ions.

Contents

1. Message from the Chairman

2. Our Activities in FY2010

(1) Health Policy

(2) Commission on Citizens and Health

(3) Global Health Center(3) Global Health Center

3. Our Plans for FY2011

4. Our Websites and Email Publications

5. Our History

6. Corporate Overview

7. Financial Results

5

6

9

1212

15

15

16

17

18

We aim to achieve a sustainable, he

FEASIBLE and RESPONSIBLE

INDEPENDENT and GLOBAL

OPEN and CREATIVE

ealthy, and more prosperous world.

CONNECT and FACILITATE

RESEARCH and ANALYSIS

1. Message from the Chairman

This year marks the seventhsince our establishment, there hcircumstances relating to healtpolicymaking process, deterioramong many other political upaging societies, rising rates of cworsening financial conditionsimplementing to create sustainimplementing to create sustainhealthier life. Moreover, in emelong‐term efforts to combat infagainst chronic disease. Thus, tborders, it has become more imdomestic and international stakto develop global activities dra

In consideration of this evol

Photo: Tetsuo SAKUMA

develops and expands from traon its efforts to date by developglobal society. Accordingly, aschanged from “Health Policy Iand we redefined our mission

To tackle the challenges in gresponsible decision‐making b

d i t ti l t k h ldand international stakeholderstogether and work alongside thand aiming at realization of a h

We ask for your continued uyour participation in the sympmonths and years ahead. Throbroad perspective fixed firmly achievable solutions for a healtachievable solutions for a healt

h anniversary of our Institute’s foundation. In the years has been a dramatic transformation in the h policy, with increasing public participation in the rating public finances, and a change of government pheavals. In advanced nations, against a background of chronic disease, widening social disparities, and s, new social frameworks need designing and nable societies in which each individual can live anable societies in which each individual can live a erging countries, disease structures are changing, and fectious disease must be expanded to include measures to resolve common problems now shared across mportant than ever to bring together a broad diversity of keholders to debate the issues and seek solutions, and awing on cross‐sector collaboration.lving health policy environment, and as healthcare g p y ,aditional frameworks, our Institute intends to expand ping activities with a greater potential for impact on of February 1, 2011, the Institute’s English name was Institute, Japan” to “Health and Global Policy Institute” and vision to better reflect this increased global focus.global health and healthcare, what is required is ased on open discussion among wide‐ranging domestic O i t ti t HGPI i t b i th ls. Our intention at HGPI is to bring these people

hem, presenting health and healthcare policy options healthy, prosperous, and sustainable society.understanding of our aims and activities, and welcome posiums, seminars, and other events we organize in the ugh deep discussion with all involved, and from a on a sustainable future, we want to offer practical, thy society.thy society.

Annual Report 2010 | 5

2. (1) Health Policy― Activities in FY20

■Summary■SummaryIn 2010, at the same time as making efforts to rebuild an

Health Policy Summit and Health Policy Forum, we endproposals by focusing on specific policy themes, includinmanagement”.At the 5th Health Policy Summit, there was fruitful disc

around a theme of “Building a New Community throughof “growth strategy” and “sustainable society”. The SumH lth P li P j t t b d t d ith U S li thHealth Policy Project, to be conducted with U.S. policy thStudies), which will research health policy issues commoBipartisan Congressional Briefing was held to promote dthe U.S. among experts from both countries and bipartismatters.Moreover, in response to the political situation, we end

specific issues and organizing Stroke Policy Forum 2011 trials.In this way, we have focused on seeing open discussion

in a practical policymaking process in the domain of dom

■Health Policy Summit 2011 (2011/02/26)At Health Policy Summit 2011 (Hotel New Otani Tokyo

through Health and Healthcare Policy”, 100 leading figurgovernment, business, media and others, gathered for a bhealthcare issues as local healthcare, the aging society, heaspeakers include: Mr. Mitsunori Okamoto (ParliamentaryRepresentative, Labour and Welfare, The Democratic PartTakeda Pharmaceutical) and Prof. Shinya Nakayama (DirInstitute for Integrated Cell‐Material Sciences; Professor, IThe intention is for the output of these discussions to be c


010

nd enhance the Institute’s regular platforms such as the deavored to strengthen their capacity to shape policy ng “aging society”, “growth strategy”, and “disease

cussion of health and healthcare policy issues based h Health and Healthcare Policy” and the two key concepts mmit also saw the first announcement of the Japan‐U.S. hi k t k CSIS (C t f St t i d I t ti lhink tank CSIS (Center for Strategic and International on to both countries. The day before the Summit, a discussion of health policy issues affecting both Japan and san Diet members familiar with healthcare and welfare

deavored to offer a lead to policymakers by tackling and an international symposium on clinical research and

n among leaders drawn from diverse fields being reflected mestic health policy.

o), held on the theme of “Building a New Community es representing the healthcare field, patient groups, broad and wide‐ranging discussion of such health and althcare payment systems, and healthcare IT. The major y Secretary of Health, Member of the House of ty of Japan), Mr. Yasuchika Hasegawa (President & CEO, rector of the Center for iPS Cell Research and Application, Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University).compiled as a report and series of policy proposals.

■Japan‐U.S. Health Policy Project (2011/01～)In collaboration with U.S. policy think tank, the Center fo

Health Policy Project was established to survey, study, andaffecting both countries.The project was first announced at a special CSIS‐HGPI je p oje a i a ou e a a pe ia I I j

February 2011, with discussions on such themes as healthcpromote efficiency and improve quality. In Washington, Ddiscussion of the project’s joint Japan‐U.S. proposals with

■Bipartisan Congressional Briefing (2011/02/25To mark the 50th anniversary of the introduction of uni

sponsored a Bipartisan Congressional Briefing togetherStrategic International Studies (CSIS) HGPI organized thStrategic International Studies (CSIS). HGPI organized thhistory. With experts from Japan and the U.S. joining wiand welfare matters to discuss health policy issues affectinew initiative of HGPI. The major speakers include Mr. Hformer Minister of Health), Mr. Chikara Sakaguchi (Komand Mr. Kan Suzuki (DPJ, House of Councillors; SeniorTechnology).

[top from left] Hiroshige Seko (LDP, House of Councillors) ・ J. Stephen Morrison ((Vice President of the House of Councillors; former Minister of Health) ・ Kan SuzuScience and Technology) ・ Gerard F. Anderson (Johns Hopkins University) ・ ShinyIT Standards Committee in the Obama administration, Harvard Medical School)[bottom from left] David Bowen (Deputy Director for Global Health Policy and AdBrian Biles (George Washington University) ・ Chikara Sakaguchi (Komeito, House

■International Symposium ʺClinical Trials inCancer Clinical Trial System ‐ʺ (2010/05/25)

In cooperation with the British, American, and Koreasymposium at the British Embassy in Tokyo on the themEffective System for Cancer Clinical Trials.” Together withover 100 participants joined in active discussions on eaeffective systems for the cancer domain and developmenstandardization and improvement of clinical research a

立場や党派を超えて、国民にとって最も重要な論点を示す。

standardization and improvement of clinical research asolutions.

or Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), the Japan‐U.S. d put forward proposals on urgent healthcare issues

joint panel discussion at the Health Policy Summit in joi pa e i u io a e ea o i y u i icare payment systems and the use of healthcare IT to DC, in July 2011, there will be a final presentation and U.S. experts and policymakers.

5)versal health insurance coverage in Japan, the Institute co‐with leading Washington, DC, think tank, the Center forhe very first Bipartisan Congressional Briefing in Japanesehe very first Bipartisan Congressional Briefing in Japaneseith Diet members from all parties familiar with healthcareng both countries, the event represented an unprecedentedHidehisa Otsuji (Vice President of the House of Councillors;meito, House of Representatives; former Minister of Health)r Vice Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and

Senior Vice President, CSIS; Director, Global Health Policy Center) ・ Hidehisa Otsujiki (DPJ, House of Councillors. Senior Vice Minister of Education, Culture, Sports, ya Adachi (DPJ, House of Councillors) ・ John D. Halamka (Co‐chair of the Healthcare

dvocacy at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) ・ Naoki Ikegami (Keio University) ・of Representatives; former Minister of Health)

n a Globalized Society ‐ Building an Effective

an Embassies as co‐sponsors, the Institute organized ame of “Clinical Trials in a Globalized Society: Building anh the Ambassadors and visiting experts from each country,ach country’s clinical trial system, their efforts to creatent of new medicines in the midst of ongoing internationaland trial systems and likely future issues and potentialand trial systems, and likely future issues and potential


■Stroke Policy Forum 2011 (2011/01/26)Together with the Council to Promote Legislation on Stro

2011 as an emergency session coinciding with the Januarybuild momentum for enactment of a Basic Law on Stroke Diet Members, patient groups, medical experts, journalistsLeading figures in the field were invited from the U.K. anddeveloped comprehensive measures that have realized a s

■Dispatch of Medical Personnel to Earthquakp qIn response to the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake, the In

consultations to dispatch medical personnel to the strickenProject Hope, an international non‐profit medical relief prUSA. While cooperating with domestic stakeholders inclumobilize support, we are ascertaining both immediate on‐requirements.

■ Special Breakfast Meetings■ Special Breakfast MeetingsOpinion leaders in health policy are invited to address thsupporters and board of advisors.• 6th Special Breakfast Meeting (2010/05/10)“Life Innovation Policy for Japan’s Growth”Koichi Kawabuchi, Professor, Tokyo Medical and DenAtsushi Sunami, Professor, National Graduate InstitutRyosuke Tsuchiya, Scientific Advisor, Japanese Found

• 7th Special Breakfast Meeting (2010/09/03)• 7th Special Breakfast Meeting (2010/09/03)“Current Measures Against HIV/AIDS & The Role JapaMichel Sidibé, Executive Director of UNAIDS (Joint UN

• 8th Special Breakfast Meeting (2011/01/27)“A Basic Plan for Stroke Control”Damian Jenkinson, National Clinical Lead, NHS StrokeChris OʹCallaghan, Executive Director, Ontario Stroke

■ B eakfa t Meeti Se ie■ Breakfast Meeting SeriesOpinion leaders are invited to join informal discussions• 26thBreakfast Meeting (2010/01/07)“Toward Realizing Citizen‐Centered Health Policy ~ GNew Government”Kiyoshi Kurokawa, HGPI Chairman

• 27th Breakfast Meeting (2010/03/17)“The Health Policy of the New Administration”Satoshi Umemura, House of Councillors

• 28th Breakfast Meeting (2010/05/27)“Japan’s Needed Contribution in Resolving Global HeaKeizo Takemi, Senior Fellow & Chair of Global HealthProgram, Japan Center for International Exchange

• 29th Breakfast Meeting (2010/07/28)“Community & Japan’s Society of the Future ~ Cities・SYoshinori Hiroi, Professor, Chiba University / HGPI D


, , y /• 30th Breakfast Meeting (2010/10/29)“Disparities & Health ~ The Reality of Social Determinafor the Future”Hideki Hashimoto, Professor, Department of Health EcEpidemiology Research, The University of Tokyo

oke Control, the Institute co‐sponsored Stroke Policy Forum y 2011 opening of the ordinary session of the Diet in order to Prevention and Control. With the participation of bipartisan p p ps, and others, a very active and positive discussion took place. d Canada to share their insights into how their countries have significant impact on stroke prevention and control.

[from left] Damian Jenkinson(National Clinical Lead, National Health Service (NHS) Stroke Improvement Programme), Chris OʹCallaghan (Executive Director,

ke Stricken Areas (2011/03~)

g (Ontario Stroke Network), KeishuTanaka (DPJ, House of Representatives), Shozaburo Jimi (Minister of State for Financial Services, Minister for Postal Reform), Takao Watanabe (Komeito, House of Councillors)

nstitute commenced n area in collaboration with rovider headquartered in theuding the government to ‐site needs and long‐term

he Institute’s corporate

ntal Universityte for Policy Studiesdation for Cancer Research

an Can Play”N Programme on HIV/AIDS)

e Improvement Programme (U.K.) Network (Canada)

on a bimonthly basis.

Greeting the New Year and

alth & Healthcare Issuesʺand Human Security

Social Security・Science”irector

ants of Health and Ideas

conomics and

■Summary

2. (2) Commission on Citizens and H

■SummaryTo further promote patient participation in the health pol

Health (CCH) continues to provide the skills and knowledrecommendation. In 2010, the CCH strengthened its effort cardiovascular disease, by introducing comprehensive croscontinue to involve advocacy stakeholders from the legislaand industry, to create a favorable environment for the act

C P l I f C ll blCancer Policy Information Center project, initially establischeduled. The project aims to support 1) the participationgood policies and regulations; and 2) patient advocates in iother measures at both a national and prefectural level. In numerous new cancer control‐related measures were deveapproaches of (1) expanding patient advocate human netwlearning from best practices, we will continue to diligently2011, the final year of the project’s initial phase.

◇Major principal activities and outcomes of FY2010（1）Supporting patient advocate skill acquisition: Eighty‐ei（2）Supporting policy proposal activities of patient advocaparticipation of 87 patient advocates & representatives.（3）Supporting policymaking activities of patient advocate〔2009 survey has been reported on media 77 times. 2010 S

（4）Supporting and gathering information on regional best（）Suppo i g a ga e i g i o a io o egio a e〔over 2 years, we have collaborated with 16 projects; ove

（5）Information Sharing Operate the “Cancer Policy Inform“Disparities Data” 〔approx. 1,500 items published〕/ Collec

■ “Advocacy Training Book”We published “Advocacy Training Book” that introduce

close observation of the activities of patient advocates, inclpto impact health policy and the essential knowledge that aThe Training book will continue to be revised and improvfrom patient advocates and other stakeholders.

■ Patient Advocate Mailing ListIn order to facilitate frequent, year‐round exchange of in

operate a mailing list for Cancer Policy Summit participancommittee members patient groups and other stakeholdecommittee members, patient groups and other stakeholde

■International Information SharingWe have had overseas opportunities to share informatio

and the participation of Japanese patient advocates in the ◇ Presentations・ American Cancer Society, Advocacy Training in Asia, 20・ Global Health Partnership: Partner’s Meeting, 2010/8/16‐◇ Poster display◇ Poster display・The International Union Against Cancer (UICC), 2010/8/2

Health― Activities in FY2010

licymaking process, the Commission on Citizens and dge necessary for patient advocate‐led policy in the area of cancer, cerebral stroke, diabetes, and ss‐disease training programs for patient advocates, and ature, administrator, healthcare providers, media, academia tivities of patient advocates.

h d f ll d l d d f ll lished in 2009, were fully developed and fully operational as n and influence of patient advocates in the formulation of influencing the positive development of cancer budgets and particular in FY2010, seven ordinances were enacted, and eloped in many regions. By emphasizing the complementary works, (2) collecting and publishing disparities data, and (3) y develop the Cancer Policy Information Center through

ight participated in patient advocate training program.tes: Hosted the Cancer Policy Summit twice, with the

s: Conducted the “Cancer Patient Awareness Survey”.Survey results currently being compiled〕t practices: Conducted the Regional Intervention Program p a i e Co u e e egio a I e e io og ar 60 inquiries from other regions〕mation Center” website has 200,000 page views annually. ct and share “Best Practice Cases”

s key points learned fromluding the leadership neededg padvocates must be aware of. ved based on feedback received

nformation and opinions, we nts, prefectural cancer control ersers.

n about the Cancer Policy Information Center project policy making process.

010/8/16‐18, Hong Kong‐18, Hong Kong

20‐23, Shenzhen


■ Cancer Policy SummitWe held two national meetings where patient leaders ac

Prefectural Cancer Control Promotion Committees from aand Prefectural Assembly members and prefectural offici

d t di d tiunderstanding and cooperation.

■“Cancer Policy Summit Spring 2010 ~ A Manifesto Made by Patients and Diet memb

【Theme】 Cancer Control Proposals for the Patients (for Councillors election)【Participants】 48 patient representatives from 31 prefectu4 prefectural cancer control officials from 4 prefectures, m【O 】 b d d d【Output】 Patients, Diet members, and administrators disthe national cancer plan and formulated “A Patient‐PropThis was submitted to lawmakers in the Diet Study Grouwith a request to realize “the cancer control that patients

■“Cancer Policy Summit Autumn 2010 ~ Influencing Local Regulations & Budgets ~” (

【Theme】 Pushing for Enactment of Prefectural OrdinancgControl【Participants】 39 patient representatives from 29 prefectuAssembly members from 20 prefectures, 17 prefectural cfrom 11 prefectures, media etc.【Output】 Participants made “My Manifesto” detailing thregulations and budget acquisition for their own prefectuopportunity to consider the focus of their future activity.provided opportunities to learn about “Ordinances for thp ovided oppo tu ities to ea about O di a ces o tSmoking” and to deepen awareness of tobacco control ascontrol.

■Overseas TrainingBy providing opportunities for patient advocates to part

study from the latest international cases, we support the d

• The International Union Against Cancer (UICC), Augus• European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Octobe


ctive in cancer control and patient‐related members of across the country gathered together and were joined by Diet als to learn from each other about cancer control and deepen

bers ~” (2010/04/10‐12)the House of

ures, 19 Diet members,media etc.

d h l fscussed each element ofposed Draft Manifesto”. up on Cancer Control s want”.

2010/11/6‐8)ces to Promote Cancer

ures, 32 Prefecturalancer control officials

he establishment ofure, providing an . A session on tobaccohe Prevention of Passivee eve tio o assives a key element in cancer

ticipate in international conferences and workshops and development of advocacy activity in Japan.

t 18‐21, Shenzhener 8‐12, Milan

■From Local to National: Regional IntervenUnder the slogan of ʺsaving 30,000 lives in 3 yearsʺ, w

people. The best ideas and examples resulting from theeffort to disseminate best practices and positively influep p y・In 2009, we supported 3 main projects and 9 develop・In 2010, we supported 6 main projects and 2 develop・Regional Intervention Programs emulated in other r・Inquiries about Regional Intervention Programs from

■Cancer Patient Awareness Survey 2010Continuing on from 2009, and with the kind cooperat

we again conducted a survey of cancer patients, survivwe again conducted a survey of cancer patients, survivof cancer care policy, with the results summarized in a

The following points were highlighted by the survey:① 40% would have liked to receive palliative care but d② 60% felt both physical and emotional pain from canc③ 70% feel the financial burden of cancer treatment is g④ Among those “dissatisfied” with cancer treatment, “⑤ 8.4% have experienced the feeling of being a “cancer

■Processing & Publishing Disparities DataBy processing disparities data, organizing them along

p g g⑥ The main reason given for not being screened for can⑦ Awareness of tobacco control is high among cancer p⑧ 63.7% feel policy does not reflect the voices of cancerResults of the survey were announced in May 2011. (“Csearch sites)

y p g p , g g gwebsite, regional disparities in cancer care become more1,147 items published by the end of 2010.

Improvements in Cancer Mortality Rates (ma-2009Akita PrefectureStandardized Mortality Ratio: Colorectal cancer (male)" 2003-2007

■Others◇In 2009, we served as secretariat for the “Proposal Gaand Welfare’s Committee for Promotion of Cancer ConProposals ~ Measures Made By All ~”.◇In 2010, we were commissioned by the Ministry of Hanalysis of cancer control measures. We conducted a suasking them to share their experiences and opinions ofasking them to share their experiences and opinions of 2,273 patients had responded.For this work and the evaluation of policy, the survey

an external evaluation committee consisting of legal sp

tion Programs for Cancer Controlwe support local cancer control projects initiated by local ese projects are then shared nationwide as model cases in an ence other regions.gpmental projectspmental projectsegions: 4 in the past year (according to our own research)m other regions: 60 in the past year (our own research)

tion of cancer‐related patient groups,vors, and relatives to gauge awarenessvors, and relatives to gauge awareness report. (Survey: Nov.~Dec. 2010; 1,446 valid responses)

didn’t feel they couldcer diagnosis and treatmentgreat“lack of emotional support” was cited by 1 in 5.r refugee”

relevant themes, and making them available on our

gncer was “ didn’t feel it was necessary”patients and their relativesr patientsCancer Patient Awareness Survey 2010” can be found on

, ge easily and widely understood.

Improvements in Cancer Mortality Rates (male+female) 2006-2009

athering Working Group” for the Ministry of Health, Labourntrol, providing clerical services for “2011 Cancer Control

Health, Labour and Welfare to conduct evaluation and urvey on cancer control among patients and their relatives cancer diagnosis and treatment as outpatients or in hospitalcancer diagnosis and treatment as outpatients or in hospital.

y was designed and analysis conducted under guidance from pecialists, healthcare providers, media experts, and patients.


2. (3) Global Health Center― Activitie

■SummaryJust four years remain to the 2015 deadline for achieving

framework aimed at eradicating both extreme poverty anadoption of the United Nations Millennium Declaration. Acontinued effort in the global health arena is essential to aAt Health and Global Policy Institute, we have organize

with think tanks in G8 Summit countries each year since 2G20 Summit in Korea in November, we held both an interInvesting in health and development,” on the theme of G8g p ,Health Forum, focusing on innovative financing mechanihuman resource development.As a proposed research activity, through conducting a h

the University of Tokyo, we have undertaken practical stuglobal health field.

■International Symposium: “What is Next for(2010/06/30)Centering on the “G8 Plus Global Health Think Tank Co

the U.K.’s Royal Institute of International Affairs (ChathamStudies (CSIS) from the U.S., “What is Next for the G20? IHouse, London.Convened shortly after the close of the Muskoka G8 Sum

international conference to discuss how global health chalframework including newly emerging nations With arouframework including newly emerging nations. With aroudomains, including the governments of G8/G20 nations, inwas vigorous discussion of critical matters such as the rolevolving system of global governance, and the priority issframework. The output of the conference was shared withJapan, Professor Shigeru Omi of Jichi Medical University the conference was introduced on NHK World’s “Asian V

×


es in FY2010

g the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), the global d its adverse effects which emerged from the 2000 As 3 of the 8 MDGs are specific global health issues, achieve the MDGs by 2015.d international conferences on global health in cooperation 2008. With the G8 Summit in Canada in June 2010, and the rnational symposium, “What is Next for the G20? 8/G20 cooperation, and an international conference, Global / p , ,sms and strengthening public‐private partnerships in

human resource development program co‐sponsored with udy of how capable personnel can be developed for the

r the G20? Investing in health and development”

oalition”, organized by the Institute in 2009 together with m House) and the Center for Strategic and International nvesting in health and development” was held at Chatham

mmit in Canada, this was the first private sector‐initiated llenges can be addressed through the new G8/G20 und 200 global health experts gathered from variousund 200 global health experts gathered from various nternational organizations, foundations, and NGOs, there les of developed and newly emerging nations in the sues to be resolved through the G8/G20 international h the Korean government as chair of the G20 in 2010. From participated as a Ministry of Foreign Affairs observer, and Voices”.

×

■Global Health Forum 2011 (2011/02/25)With the aim of strengthening public and private efforts

Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by the target yealie beyond the MDGs the Institute organi ed Global Heallie beyond the MDGs, the Institute organized Global HealThe University of Tokyo’s Global Health Leadership ProgIn the presence of keynote speaker, President of UNITA

Innovative Finance for Development, and former French Mpanelists representing diverse fields including Mr. J. StepHealth Policy Center), Mr. Masato Mugitani (Assistant MTisdall (Senior Manager, Donor Relations, Programme FuYonekura (Chairman, Sumitomo Chemical K.K.; Chairma

d f ʹ ff h f ld f l b lvigorous discussion of Japanʹs efforts in the field of globalto support continuous funding, and the actions needed tosummary of the discussions will be published.

■Research & Study Activity

あ[top from left] Philippe Douste‐Blazy (Chair , Board of UNITAID / UN Special AdAiko Doden (Senior Commentator, NHK) ・ Kenji Shibuya (Professor, Departmentof Tokyo) ・ J. Stephen Morrison (Senior Vice President and Director, Global Healthand Welfare) ・ Brian Tisdall (Senior Manager, Donor Relations, Programme FundiChemical K.K.; Chairman, Keidanren (Japan Business Federation))

y y

◇ “Research into the Development of Human Reso(Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare’s Sciences ReseaGlobal Health Policy Summer Program ～ Talk

As one aspect of the Institute’s “Research into the dchallenges”, the Global Health Policy Summer Program wPolicy at the University of Tokyo) with the aim of nurturgraduate students capable of becoming the next generatiograduate students capable of becoming the next generatiodiverse disciplines with a keen interest in global healthleaders in various fields at the forefront of global healtcreate effective policy ideas, and announced their policy pWith lectures given by speakers active in government, i

and elsewhere, participants were able to grasp key aspectpresented its own policy proposals for the programʹs twoglobal health policy through advocacy activityʺ and ʺActif l i i i i l l i h l b l h l hof playing an active international role in the global healthThe Institute will submit a report on its “Research into t

challenges” to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

s in the global health field to accomplish the United Nations ar of 2015, and also begin preparing for the challenges that lth Forum 2011 together with co sponsors UNITAID andlth Forum 2011 together with co‐sponsors UNITAID and gram.AID, Special Advisor to the UN Secretary General on Minister of Foreign Affairs, Philippe Douste‐Blazy, and phen Morrison (Senior Vice President and Director, Global inister, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare), Mr. Brian unding Team, GAVI Alliance Secretariat) and Mr. Hiromasaan of Keidanren (Japan Business Federation)), there was l h l h h l f f hl health, the potential of innovative financing mechanisms o tackle both the MDGs and post‐MDG world. A full

visor on Innovative Financing for Development, Former French Foreign Minister) ・t of International Health Policy and Planning, Graduate School of Medicine, University h Policy Center) ・Masato Mugitani (Assistant Minister, Ministry of Health, Labouring Team, GAVI Alliance Secretariat) ・ Hiromasa Yonekura (Chairman, Sumitomo

ources to Meet Global Health Challenges”rch Grant to Promote Research on Global Health Issues)king for the World this Summer ～ (07/25~08/01)development of human resources to meet global healthwas organized (Co‐sponsor: Department of Global Healthring human resources among current undergraduates andon of leaders in the global health policy field Students fromon of leaders in the global health policy field. Students fromh gathered from across the country, attended lectures byth activity, worked through intense group discussions toproposals on the final day.international organizations, business, media, NGOs/NPOsts relating to global health before each group drew up ando themes of ʺHow to promote broader public awareness ofons needed for Japan to produce human resources capable

li fi ldʺpolicy fieldʺ.the development of human resources to meet global healthe, and research is scheduled to continue through this year.


■Other Events

◇Special Breakfast Meeting with Michel SidibéUNAIDS / UN Under‐Secretary‐General (2010/09A Special Breakfast Meeting was held with guest Mich

Secretary‐General and Executive Director of the Joint UHIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) The meeting saw a lively exchanHIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). The meeting saw a lively exchanranging from Japan’s expected future contributions in tcooperation between international organizations and thlooks forward to continuing and strengthening its close

◇CSIS P l Di i P ti i ti “Gl b l H◇CSIS Panel Discussion Participation: “Global HJapan, and Norway” (2010/10/22)HGPI director Hiromi Murakami spoke about Japan’

panelist on the discussion “Global Health Diplomacy inorganized by leading think tank Center for Strategic & home base of Washington, DC. Alongside the two otheLavison from France, former President of the EuropeanAssociation (EDMA), and Tore Godal, Special Advisor ( ) pmeeting offered a precious opportunity for exchange ofparticipants and CSIS researchers, and confirmed the vtackle international issues such as global health known

◇I t i ith M t Ch Di t G◇Interview with Margaret Chan, Director‐GenerHGPI Chairman Kiyoshi Kurokawa spoke with Marg

World Health Organization, on her visit to Japan.In addition to existing global health issues such as m

infectious disease, urgent measures are needed to addrin chronic diseases such as cancer and stroke in emergithe midst of changing social circumstances caused by suncertainty and aging populations, it is increasingly imy g g p p g ystakeholder efforts to achieve solutions to global healthvalue of HGPI’s activities in bringing together the expestakeholders from government, industry and academiamake an ongoing contribution to resolving issues in glo


, Executive Director of 9/03)hel Sidibé, United Nations Under‐United Nations Programme on nge of views on diverse themesnge of views on diverse themes, the field to the need for he private sector. The Institute e cooperation with UNAIDS.

H lth Di l i FHealth Diplomacy in France,

’s global health diplomacy as a n France, Japan, and Norway” International Studies (CSIS) in its er panelists (Jean‐Francois de n Diagnostic Manufacturers to Norway’s Prime Minister), the y )f ideas and opinions between value of making Japan’s efforts to n to a wider global audience.

l f WHO (2010/11/19)ral of WHO (2010/11/19)garet Chan, Director‐General of the

maternal & child health and ress a rapid and dramatic increase ing nations in the near future. In such factors as economic mportant for there to be multi‐ph issues, and this reaffirms the erience and expertise of numerous a to the media and civil society, to obal health and healthcare.

Health Policy

3. Our Plans for FY2011

Commission onHea o icy Hea

In the area of domestic health policy,b a s ed on th e r e su l t s o f ou rcooperation with global think tanksand key opinion leaders at home andabroad in 2010, we will focus in 2011on specific policy issues, proposing

2011 is the finalphase of the CancerCenter project, andactivities to achiimmediate goals, wbus ine s s mode lp p y p p g

and shaping policy and promotinga n d f a c i l i t a t i n g p o l i c yimplementation. In particular, we willfocus on measures to control chronicdisease including stroke and diabetesin Japan’s aging society, which is ahealth policy issue without precedent,and develop domestic initiatives on

continuation of thfunction and tranphase.Learning from our

we recognize thcontribution to canfacilitator and provpatient‐centered mand develop domestic initiatives on

non‐communicable diseases (NCD).Moreover, with development of a

new plan for local healthcareimminent, we will gather proposalsfrom non‐partisan multi‐stakeholdersand present a vision of how aneffective system can be realizedthrough health and healthcare policy

patient centered mdiscussion. We intour process designvoices of patients anpolicy proposals apeople dealing withthe prefectural andholding the Cancer Pthe participation ofthrough health and healthcare policy.

In addition, in response to the GreatEastern Japan Earthquake, we wereimmediately involved in conductingmedical support activities in thestricken areas, and now, rather thansimply rebuilding what was lost, wewill offer proposals for effective

d it li ti b d

the participation of(patients, lawmakehealthcare providindustry), revisinTraining Book, a“White Paper on Cpromote patienti n t e nd t o make

t ib ti t th f

4. Our Websites and Email Publications

recovery and revitalization based on anew vision for healthcare.

contribution to the f

Event information research and resources are publishedEvent information, research, and resources are publishedwebsites.

■ Main Website www.hgpi.org

■ Program‐Specific Websites• Commission on Citizens and Health www.shimin‐iryo• Cancer Policy Information Center www.ganseisaku.Cancer Policy Information Center www.ganseisaku.• Stroke Policy Information Center www.nouseisaku.• Diabetes Policy Information Center www.tounyouseis• Cardiac Disease Information Center www.shinzousesi• Global Health Center www.global‐healt

■ Email Publications• Health and Global Policy Institute Email MagazineD li d b HGPI ( i di l)Delivered by HGPI (non‐periodical)

• Cancer Policy LetterDelivered by the Cancer Policy Information Center every

n Citizens and lth Global Health Centeralth Global Health Center

Although Japanese public opinionsupports development assistance in thehealth and healthcare field, the actualpercentage of ODA channeled to thisarea is presently very low. Therefore,this year we will examine Japan’s

year of the initialr Policy Informationd in parallel witheve the project’swe will establish al t o enab l e the y p

global health policymaking process,and work to raise domestic awarenessof global health issues. Moreover, onthe theme of ʺpolio eradicationʺ, one ofthe key issues in global health, we willdevelop public‐private participationadvocacy activities and build a globalnetwork through them.

he project’s socialsition to the next

r experience to date,at our principalncer control is as avider of forums formulti‐stakeholder network through them.

In addition, as co‐sponsors with theUniversity of Tokyo, we will continueto conduct research into thedevelopment of human resources forthe global health field through thetraining and education ofundergraduate and graduate students.Furthermore we will cooperate in the

multi stakeholdertend to strengthento better reflect thend their relatives inand support thoseh cancer control atd national level. ByPolicy Summit withf the 6 key players Furthermore, we will cooperate in the

health agenda of the CSIS initiated“Task Force on U.S.‐Japan Cooperationafter the March 11 Earthquake”,offering proposals for efficientrecovery and revitalization in the wakeof the earthquake, and construction ofeffective and sustainable new systems.

f the 6 key playersers, administrators,ders, media andng the Advocacyand publishing aCancer Control” toperspectives, wee a s i gn i f i c a n tfi ht i t

s

fight against cancer.

d on our variousd on our various

.org.net.net.netsaku.netisaku.netth‐summit.org/


other Tuesday

2004・Apr Establishment of Specified Non‐Profit O

5. Our History

Apr. Establishment of Specified Non‐Profit OLaunch of ʺHealth Policy Clerkshipʺ, sin

2005・Mar. Symposium: ʺLow Birthrate and Wome

and Social Policy Leadership Program)Change of name to: Specified Non‐Profi

・July Symposium: ʺThe Cancer Policy SoughtO i f h d i N hOpening of headquarters in Nagatacho

・Aug. Symposium: ʺRegenerative Medicine: ThUniversity)

・Oct. First Breakfast Meeting, since hosted bim・Dec. Symposium: ʺHow to Redesign Japanʹs

2006・Feb. Symposium: ʺ1st Health Policy Summity p y

“Public Survey on Healthcare in Japan”・Mar. Second National Convention of Cancer ・Dec. Symposium: ʺLegislation for Regenerati

2007・Apr. ʺInternational Patient Organization Sym

Policyʺ (Co‐sponsor: Fujitsu Research InJuly Ope i g of Co issio o Citi e s a・July Opening of Commission on Citizens an

・Nov. Symposium: ʺWellness and Innovation Tsukuba)

・Dec. Prefectural Cancer Policy Workshop (C2008

・Feb. ʺ1st Global Health Summitʺ (Co‐sponsoEstablishment of Global Health Unit

・Mar. ʺ2008 International Cardiovascular Dise・June First Breakfast Discussion, since held on

First Media Workshop, since hosted on ・Sep. ʺCancer Patient Advocate Seminarʺ・Dec. ʺPatient Universityʺ

2009・Jan Launch of ʺCancer Policy Information C・Jan. Launch of Cancer Policy Information C・Feb. Symposium: ʺGlobal Health Forumʺ (C・May “Cancer Policy Summit”, since hosted a・June Launch of “Health Policy Forum”・Oct. “Stroke Policy Summit“・Nov. “Survey on the Attitudes of Cancer Pati・Dec. Urgent Session: ʺCritical Issues in Tobac

2010・May International symposium “Clinical Tri

Clinical Trial System ‐”・June Conference in the U.K. “What is Next

(Co‐sponsors: CSIS and Chatham House・July “Global Health Policy Summer Program

The School of International Health/Glob・Dec. “Advocacy Workbook ～A guide to Pol

2011・Jan. Authorized as a “Certified NPO Organ


Organization Tokyo Advanced Healthcare Policy CenterOrganization, Tokyo Advanced Healthcare Policy Centernce hosted every year

n’s Healthʺ (Co‐sponsor: University of Tokyo Healthcare

it Organization, Health Policy Institute, Japant by Patientsʺ

he Road to Clinical Applicationʺ (Co‐sponsor: Tokai

monthlyHealthcare Systemʺ (Co‐sponsor: Genron NPO)

ʺ, since hosted annuallyy, conducted annually until 2010Patientsive Medicineʺ

mposium: Patient Participation in Cardiovascular Health nstitute)d Health i Suite gud Health in Suitenguin the 21st Centuryʺ (Co‐sponsor: University of

Co‐sponsor: American Cancer Society)

or: World Bank)

ease Patient Organization Symposium“n irregular basisirregular basis

Centerʺ projectCenter projectCo‐sponsor: Aspen Institute Italia)annually

ients“, since conducted annuallycco Policy – Promotion of Health and Price Policy”

als in a Globalized Society ‐ Building an Effective Cancer

for the G20? Investing in Health and Development” e)m ～Talking for the World this Summer～” (Co‐sponsor: bal Health Sciences at the University of Tokyo)licy Proposal Activity Made by Patients～” published

nization” by the National Tax Agency

Name Health and Global Policy Institute

6. Corporate Overview

Name Health and Global Policy Institute(Authorized as a “Certified NPO Organization

Address (HQ)7F 1‐11‐28, Nagatacho, Chiyoda‐ku, TTel. 03‐5511‐8521 Fax 03‐5511‐8523(C i i Citi d H lth)(Commission on Citizens and Health)4F 2‐5‐3, Kakigaracho, Nihonbashi, CTel. 03‐5614‐7796 Fax 03‐5614‐7795

Board Chairman Kiyoshi KurokawaDirector Hiroyuki William SaitoDi K ShibDirector Ken ShibusawaDirector Takashi TakenoshitaDirector Kenichi HaniokaDirector Yoshinori HiroiDirector Hiroaki YoshidaAuditor Tsuyoshi Dai

(As of 2011/04/01)

Annual Revenue

(¥1,000)

238,208245,376

128,578

169,152

48,98361,447

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 20102005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

n” by the National Tax Agency in January 2011)

Tokyo, 100‐0014, Japan

))Chuo‐ku, Tokyo, 103‐0014

o

Individual Memberships

62,146

3,316

3,9224,120

382815

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


7. Financial Results

I. Assets1. Current Assets2. Fixed Assets

List of Assets(As of 2011/03/31)

Total Assets

II. Liabilities1. Current Liabilities2. Fixed Liabilities

Total Liabilities

Net Assets

Statement of Revenues and Expenses(April 1, 2010 – March 31, 2011)

I. Current Revenues1. Membership Fees2. Contributions and Grants3. Other Revenues

Total Current Revenue

II. Current Expenditures1. Operating Expenses

Health Policy Research and Study ProHealth Policy Proposal ProjectsHuman Resource Development ProjeHealth Policy Information ExchangeCommissioned Healthcare Research &Commissioned Healthcare Research &

Total Operating Expenses2. Administrative Expenses

Total Current Expenditure

Current Revenue Expenditure Balance*( *Including Grant Funding Applicable to Next Period)


(Units: Yen)

155,148,006 9,502,906 , ,

164,650,912

11,964,619 0

11,964,619

152,686,293

(Units: Yen)

7,520,000221,228,73216,627,709 245,376,441

ojects

ects

& Study

1,967,28596,032,8896,023,01638,761,21216 243 083& Study 16,243,083159,027,48525,723,485184,750,970

60,625,471

■He7F 1‐1TEL 0URL:

Heal

© Specified Non‐Profit Corporation, Health and Global Policy Institute

URL:■Com4F 2‐5TEL: URL: E‐ma

eadquarters (Health Policy / Global Health)11‐28, Nagatacho, Chiyoda‐ku, Tokyo 100‐001403‐5511‐8521 FAX 03‐5511‐8523

www.hgpi.org E‐mail: [email protected]

lth and Global Policy Institute

www.hgpi.org E mail: [email protected] on Citizens and Health5‐3, Kakigaracho, Nihonbashi, Chuo‐ku, Tokyo, 103‐0014 03‐5614‐7796 FAX: 03‐5614‐7795 http://ganseisaku.net/ http://shimin‐iryou.org/il: info‐[email protected]

annual report 2010 en july1 - hgpi · em, presenting health and healthcare policy options ealthy,...

Documents