Description of document: Annual Historical Review, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), FY 1986

Request date: 10-June-2008 Released date: 02-November-2015 Posted date: 23-November-2015 Source of document: Freedom Of Information Act Request

Commander, INSCOM ATTN: IAMG-C-FOI 4552 Pike Road Fort Meade, MD 20755-5995 Fax: (301) 677-2956

The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

~I UNITED STA TES ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION/PRIVACY OFFICE

Freedom of Information/ Privacy Office

FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-5995

0 2 NUV 2015

This is in further response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of June 10, 2008, for a copy of the INSCOM Annual History for FY1986 and supplements our letter of June 11, 2009.

Coordination has been completed with other elements of this command and other government agencies. The records have been returned to this office for our review and direct response to you.

We have completed a mandatory declassification review in accordance with Executive Order (EO) 13526. As a result of our review information has been sanitized and 44 pages are being withheld in their entirety as the information is currently and properly classified TOP SECRET, SECRET and CONFIDENTIAL according to Sections 1.2(a)(1 ), 1.2(a)(2), 1.2(a)(3) and 1.4(c) of EO 13526. This information is exempt from the public disclosure provisions of FOIA pursuant to Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(1 ). It is not possible to reasonably segregate meaningful portions of the withheld pages for release. A brief explanation of the applicable sections follows:

Section 1.2(a)(1) of EO 13526, provides that information shall be classified TOP SECRET if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.

Section 1.2(a)(2) of EO 13526, provides that information shall be classified SECRET if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause serious damage to the national security.

Section 1.2(a)(3) of EO 13526, provides that information shall be classified CONFIDENTIAL if its unauthorized disclosure reasonably could be expected to cause damage to the national security.

Section 1.4(c) of EO 13526, provides that information pertaining to intelligence activities, intelligence sources or methods, and cryptologic information shall be considered for classification protection.

Information has been withheld that would result in an unwarranted invasion of the privacy rights of the individuals concerned, this information is exempt from the public disclosure provisions of the FOIA per Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(6).

-2-

In addition, information has been sanitized from the records as the release of the information would reveal sensitive intelligence methods. This information is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(7)(E) of the FOIA. The significant and legitimate governmental purpose to be served by withholding is that a viable and effective intelligence investigative capability is dependent upon protection of sensitive investigative methodologies.

The withholding of the information described above is a partial denial of your request. This denial is made on behalf of Major General George J. Franz, Ill Commanding, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, who is the Initial Denial Authority for Army intelligence investigative and security records under the Freedom of Information Act and may be appealed to the Secretary of the Army. If you decide to appeal at this time, your appeal must be post marked no later than 60 calendar days from the date of our letter. After the 60-day period, the case may be considered closed; however, such closure does not preclude you from filing litigation in the courts. You should state the basis for your disagreement with the response and you should provide justification for reconsideration of the denial. An appeal may not serve as a request for additional or new information. An appeal may only address information denied in this response. Your appeal is to be made to this office to the below listed address for forwarding, as appropriate, to the Secretary of the Army, Office of the General Counsel.

Commander U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Freedom of Information/Privacy Office (APPEAL) 2600 Ernie Pyle Street, Room 3S02-B Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755-5910

We have been informed by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that their information is exempt from public disclosure pursuant to Title 5 U.S. Code 552 (b)(1) of the FOIA. The applicable Sections of the Executive Order are Sections 1.4(c) and 3.3 (b)(1 ). Additional information, while no longer meeting the requirements for declassification, must be withheld on the basis of Section 3.5(c).

The withholding of the information by the CIA constitutes a denial of your request and you have the right to appeal this decision to the Agency Release Panel within 45 days from the date of this letter. If you decide to file an appeal, it should be forwarded to this office and we will coordinate with the CIA on your behalf. Please cite CIA #EOM-2011-00283/Army #589F-08 assigned to your request so that it may be easily identified.

The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) has informed our office that they have no objection to the release of their information.

-3-

In addition, we have been informed by the National Security Agency (NSA) that portions of their information has been sanitized from the records pursuant to the exemptions listed below:

5 U.S. Code 552(b)(1) - The information is properly classified in accordance with the criteria for classification in Section 1.4(c) of Executive Order 13526.

5 U.S. Code 552(b)(3) - The specific statutes are listed below:

50 U.S. Code 3605 (Public Law 86-36 Section 6) 50 U.S. Code 3024(i) 18 U.S. Code 798

The initial denial authority for NSA information is the Director Associate Director for Policy and Records. Any person denied access to information may file an appeal to the NSA/CSS FOIA/PA Appeal Authority. The appeal must be postmarked no later than 60 calendar days of the date of the initial denial. The appeal shall be in writing to the NSA/CSS FOIA/PA Appeal Authority· (DJP4), National Security Agency, 9800 Savage Mill Road, STE 6248, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20755-6248. The appeal shall reference the initial denial of access and shall contain, in sufficient detail and particularity, the grounds upon which the requester believes release of the information is required. The NSA/CSS FOIA/PA Appeal Authority will endeavor to respond to the appeal within 20 working days after receipt, absent unusual circumstances.

We apologize for any inconvenience this delay may have caused you.

Copies of the records are enclosed for your use. You have received all available Army intelligence investigative records concerning this subject at this headquarters.

There are no assessable FOIA fees.

If you have any questions regarding this action, feel free to contact this office at 1-866-548-5651, or email the INSCOM FOIA office at: usarmy.meade.902-mi-grp-mbx.inscom-foia-service­center@mail.mil and refer to case #589F-08.

Enclosure

Joanne Benear Chief Freedom of Information/Privacy Office

~. ~

' t... .,)

'

~T

HQ INSCOM ARLINGTON HALL STATION

ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA

THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS SPECIAL INTELLIGENCE MATERIAL

CLASSIFIED BY MULTIPLE SOURCES REVIEW ON 30 SEPTEMBER 2017

LIMITED DISTRIBUTION ii' .

. NOT RELEJ\SJ\BLI!: TO

FOREISN NATIONM;S

I

CONFlDENTlAl.1

CONTENTS

Chapter Page

I. MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION Mission and Functions................................. 1 Transfer of the Army Biographic Repository............ 2 Location.............................................. 2

II. COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS Command and Staff Relationships....................... ~ INSCOM-TRADOC MOU..................................... 5 Staff Turnover •••.•••••••.•• ~......................... 5

III. ORGANIZATION INSCOM Organization................................... 8 Oversight Matters ••••••••••• ~......................... 15 MI Brigades. . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • 15 Korean Developments................................... 16 CENTAM................................................ 16 CONUS Initiatives..................................... 17 Headquarters Consolidation............................ 18

IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds.......... 20 Family Housing Units.................................. 25 INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance, FY 1986

(Authorized Strength)................................ 25 Civilian Strength by Program.......................... 26 Army Organizational Efficiency Review/Manpower Staffing Standards System (OER/HS-3)................. 26

Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement (MOU/HOA) Program. • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 27 ·

Personnel Security.................................... 27 Information Security.................................. 27 AUTOVON Funding cut •••••••••••••• ~.................... 28 HQ INSCOM STU-II Access............................... 28 USAISC-lNSCOM Operations and Maintenance, Army

(OMA) Funds. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 28 USAISC-INSCOM Other Procurement, Army (CPA)........... 28 Secure Voice.......................................... 28 Automation Budget..................................... 28 Arlington Hall Station Office Automation.............. 28 HQ Office Automation.................................. 29 Arlington Hall Station Intelligence Data Handling Systems Node......................................... 30

Commanders' Conference................................ 30

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ONj3o October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOi PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.lR

v

GONFIDENTIAl ..

I

CON17JDEN TIA.L

Chapter Page

IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT (Continued) IG Inspections.~...................................... 30 IGAR's ......•............•.•..•.................•..••• 30 IGAR Category......................................... 30 Congressional Inquiries............................... 30 IG Inquiries and Investigations....................... 30 Department of the Army Inspector General (DAIG) Special Inspections of Procurement................... 31

Army Award for Maintenance Excellence................. 31 RPMA Funding. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 31 CG's Plaque and the First Annual Chief of Staff, Army Supply Excellence Award......................... 3·1

Leased Vehicles....................................... 32 Special Mission Funds................................. 32 Phillip A. Connelly Award............................. 32 Command Personnel Situation........................... 32 Travis Trophy......................................... 32 Director's Trophy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . 33 Public Affairs Activities •••••• :.... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 33 INSCOM Today. • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 33 Transfer-In-Status Program............................ 34 Request for Service................................... 34 Communications Service for INSCOM's New Building at Fort Belvoir............................. 34

Army of Excellence (AOE) Reorganization............... 34 Mobile Tactical Communications Center (MTCC).......... 34 Introduction of the KL-43............................. 35 Combined Cryptologic Program.......................... 35 The Headquarters Information Center (HQIC)............ 35 INSCOM Journalist of the Year......................... 35 CIVPER Classification Surveys •••••••••••••••••• ~······ 35 New OPM Classifications............................... 36 Performance Appraisal Surveys......................... 36 DA Permanent Part-Time Employment Program............. 36 DA Intern Training.................................... 36 EO (Equal Opportunity) and EEO (Equal

Employment Opportunity) Complaints................... 37 Purple Heart Recepient................................ 37 Contract Support Activity............................. 37 Safety Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . • . 37 Alcohol and Drug Prevention Program~.................. 37 Implementation of the Enlisted Distribution Target Model (EDTM) and the Enlisted Distribution Plan (EDP).............................. 38

Enlisted Retirements..................................... 38

RE~ ADFD I !NCI ASSJBE? ON ~O October 2015 _

BY USAINSCOM FOHA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.IR

vii

CONFIDEN TJATJ

CON.FIDEN TIA.L

Chapter Pase

IV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT (Continued) Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture.................... 38 Retention Conference.................................. ~1 Retention NCO of the Year............................. ~1 HQDA Retention Award.................................. ~1. FY 1986 Retention Statistics •••••••••••• ~ ••••••••••••• · ~1 Retention Rates of CMF 98 and 33 (SIGINT) MOS for FY 1985.......................................... ~2

Ninth Annual USAINSCOM Organization Day •• ~............ 42 INSCOM Grade Rollback Program......................... 43 Management Employee Relations......................... 43 INsroM •verage Grade.................................. 44 New OPM Classification Guide for Managers and Superv1$ors Proposed ••••••...•••••.••.••.. ~~·········

Development of a SES Position ••••••••••••••••••••••••• AHS Task Force to Coordinate Relocation of INSCOM

to Fort Belvoir ••...•.....•..••.•.••..••••••••••••••• ISA/FGGM Realignment •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Upward Mobility Program ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Intern Equal Employment Opportunity Program •••••••••••••••••• Morale and Welfare ...••....•....••••..••.••••.•••.•••• Command Officer Personnel Strength •••••••••••••••••••• Badge System at 17~th MI Company •••••••••••••••••••••• New Attorney Advisor Position •••••••••••••••••••••••••

~4 ~4 44

·Military Justice ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

45 46 47 47 47 47 49 49 49 49 50 50

INSCOM Worldwide Training Conference •••••••••••••••••• Collection Management .•••••...••••••••••.•••...••••••• Automation •.....•...•.•.••.•..••.•••...•...••• ·-· •••.•• Collector of the Year Award ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• REDTRAIN Training Program .•••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Technical Intelligence •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Technical Languages Systems Incorporated (TLSI)

Proposal • ..........•.....••...•••...........••...•..• Army Biographic Repository ••••••••••••••••••••••••••. • • Military Construction Army (MCA) Program •••••••••••••• HQ INSCOM Facility at Fort Belvoir •••••••••••••••••••• Non Dissolution of INSCOMBA HQIC Newsletter ••.••.•••• · ............................. .

V. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES Multidiscipline

51 51 51 52

52a

MI Battalion (Low Intensity).......................... 56 500th MI Group Issues................................. 57

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED oNl30 October 2015 I

ix

BY USAINSCOM FOIPA Auth Para 4-102 OOD 5200.lR CONI~IDEN TIAL

Chapter Page

V. ·OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES (Continued) 513th MI Group OPLANS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• PRESENT ARMS 8 6 • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • Linguist Shortfalls ..•.••.•...•••..•.•.••••••••••••••• Tagalog Capabilities •••••.•..••••••.•••••..•.••••••••• Opposing Forces (OPFOR) •••••••••••••••.•.•••••••••••••

(b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L. 86-36

Blue Ribbon Panel .••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••

(b} (1) Per NSA,(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L. 86-36

Project TROJA ........................................ (b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3}:P.L. 86-36

IMINT/MASINT MASINT •.•••••. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LANK BENCH • ••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • LAND WATER • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• HOT WATER •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• GRAVEL WATER • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• TALON GRIP • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ! •• _ •••••

LIGHTNING BOLT • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• CLAY WATER ••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••• TORSO VEST • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• TO'WER WIND • •••••••••••••••••••• II ••••••••••••••••••••• T0"'8 DOOR • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • TONE CASE • ••••••••••••••••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • QRC • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •" •••••••• • •• • •

Army Space Program •.•••.•.••••••..••••••.••.••••••.••• !MINT Collection Management •••••••••••••••••••••••••••

xi

57 58 58 59 59

60 60 62 62 63 63 63 6lt 614 64 64 65 65 65 66 66 66

66 66

68 68 68 68 68 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 70 70 70

Chapter

V. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES (Continued) Digital Imagery Transmission System (DITS)............ 70 ~70th MI Group IMINT.................................. 71 GRAY WOLF • ••••••••••• " •.•••.••••••••••••••••••••••• -• • • 71 GRISLY HUNTER. • • • • . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • 71 Small Aerostat Surveillance System.................... 71 ROGUE PANTHER • ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• , • • • • 72

HUMINT/TAREX HQ Personnel Constraihts ••••••••••••••••• ~ •••••••••••• Case Officer Personnel •.•...•..•..••.••.••.•.••••••••• · Collection Operations Managements System (COMS) Refugee Debriefing ••.••••••.••••.••••••..•••..•••••••• Termination of Project 2024 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 513th MI Brigad·e Initiatives •••••••••••••••••••••••••• Operational Realignments ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

(Cb)(1)PerCIA ~-··••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Controlled Collection in USAREUR •••••••••••••••••••••• Support, Maintenance, and Settlement (SMS) •••••••••••• Forward Basing ...•....•.........••....•.......••.•..•• CANDY RABBIT • •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• • •• CANNABIS TRIP . ..•...•.•.•••..•••••.•....•.....•••..••• CANADA HILL • .... ··• ..•••••.•....•.••..........••••.•••• Italian Basing ••...•..••.•.......•••••..•••.•.•••••••• Portable Secure Voice (PSV) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Target Exploitation (TAREX) ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Chief, TMD Retirement ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Collection Management .•.••......••.•...•...•.••••••••• Personnel Initiatives ••••••...••...•••••.•••.•••.••••.

(b)(1 ),(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3) P.L 86-36

Counterintelligence/Operations Security Counterespionage . ..•....•....•........•••••••.••••..•• 766th MI Detachment Success ••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SAEDA Investigations ..•••.•..•••....•••..•.....••••••• INSCOM Polygraph Program •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Personnel Security Investigation (PSI) Support

in Europe . ..••••....•••..•..•.•..•••••..•••.••.•••••• Special Access Programs (SAP) ••••••••••••••••••••••••• Counter-SIGINT Concept •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• COMSEC Issues • •••....•..••.•..•...••••.••••..••..••..• COMSEC I nsecuri ti es • ................................... John Walker Damage Assessment •••••••••••••••••••••••••

xiii

-CON1i1DEN 'I,IAL -

73 7~

75 75 75 76 76 76 77 77 78 78 78 78 79 79 80 80 80 80 81 81

82 82 82 83

83 83 84 811 85 85

e

Chapter

V. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES (Continued) Mobile TEMPEST Test System (MTTS)..................... 66

l(b)(1) Pee CIA f • • • • • • • • • • • • 86

Appendix

A. B. c. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K.

USAINSCOM Organization Structure ••••••••••••••••••••••••.••• TOE Uni ts ...............•.........••.......•..•...•.•.••••. Changes in Status of TOE Units ••••.•••••••••••••••••••••••• TDA Uni ts ...•...............•...................•.•.•••.••• Changes in Status of TDA Units ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• USAINSCOM Personnel Strength by Unit ••••••••••••••••••••••• Provisional Units ...••••.•••.••....•••••.•••••...•••••••••• Changes in Status of Provisional Units •••.••••••••••••••••• USAINSCOM Key Personnel •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• Travis Trophy Winners .......................•...•...... •'• .• Director's Trophy Winners •••••• ~ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••

92 96 97 98

100 101 106 107 108 118 120

GLOSSARY. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • • • 121

INSCOM Staff Directory - November 1986

Tables No.

1. Direct Funding by Subprogram............................... 21 2. Direct Obligations for FY 1986 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 25 3. INSCOM Program and Budget Guidance, FY 1986................ 25 ~- Civilian Strength by Program............................... 26 5. Enlisted Personnel Posture for FY's 1985-1986 •••••• ~.~····· 38 6. Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture by Area and

Unit •••••.••.•••••••.•••••••.•••.••••.•••••.••••••••••••• • 39 7. COMSEC Insecurities ..•..•••.•••...•••••.••••••..•.•.•• ·-·.... 85

xv

CHAPTER I

MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION

(b)(1)

--QQ NJ?IDEN TJA.L

(b)(1)

Transfer of the Army Biographic Repository. (U) On 27 August 1985, the CG, I.NSCOM informed ACSI, DA that in FY 1986 INSCOM would discontinue functions involving maintenance of the Army Biographic Repository and that resources involved in that activity would be transferred to higher priority HUMINT tasks. On 27 September 1985, ACSI, DA concurred with the decision and directed that INSCOM coordinate with DIA on disposition of the Army biographic files and give ample notification to the analytical community of the repository's closure. Accordingly, INSCOM operation of the element terminated in 1st Quarter, FY 1986. The files were taken over by DIA.2 .

Location. (U) All elements of Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command are located at Arlington Hall Station, 4000 Arlington Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22212. Staff elements previously located at Fort George G. Meade were restationed at Arlington Hall during 2d Quarter, FY 1986.3

I

I

6FFlelAL USE BNLY

FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER I. MISSION, FUNCTIONS, AND LOCATION

1. DF, DCSRM, subj: AR 10-53, Organization and Functions, U.S. Army Intelligence and SEcurity Command (U) (Undtd) (C).

2. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), p. 6. 3. Ibid., pp. 1-2.

3

BFFICIAL If SE BHLY

/o

I

UNCLASSIFIED

CHAPTER II

COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS

Command and Staff Relationships. (U) The CG, INSCOM is under supervision of the Chief of Staff, United States Army. Directives; authorities; policy, planning, and programming guidance; approved programs; resource allocations; and other methods of command direction are issued to CG, INSCOM by the Chief of Staff, United States Army.

(U) The CG, INSCOM--

1. Commands all assigned units and activities.

2. ls subordinate to the Chief, Central Security Service (CHCSS) for the conduct of SIGINT operations.

3. Manages SIGINT resources to accomplish SIGINT operational tasks assigned by DIRNSA/CHCSS.

4. Provides specified military personnel and administrative, logistic, and operational support to the DIRNSA/CHCSS.

5. Deals directly with the Director, DIA for the coordination of HUMINT operational proposals.

(U) INSCOM and other major Army commands (MACOM's) are coordinate elements of DA. The CG, INSCOM is authorized to communicate directly with other major Army commanders or with heads of Army Staff agencies on matters of mutual interest.

(U) The CG, INSCOM will maintain liaison as necessary with other MACOM's, field operating agencies, other cryptologic and intelligence activities, and other foreign domestic governmental agencies to maintain an awareness of, to exchange information on, and to ensure coordination of matters of mutual concern.

(U) The CG, INSCOM acts as executive agent for logistic support, SIGINT technical support, and mission steerage for the DA TROJAN program, an effort to provide units in garrison with live signals for training (and possibly operational) purposes. In the area of S!GINT technical support/mission steerage, INSCOM has the responsibility to ensure adequate SIGINT technical support and mission steerage to TROJAN users. This responsibility is met by INSCOM's Army Technical Control and Analysis Element (ATCAE) and

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSlFlED

Primary Control and Analysis Centers (PCAC's). The 66th MI· Group, OPCON to USAREUR, operates the PCAC for USAREUR TROJAN's. CONUS MI Group operates a PCAC, OPCON to FORSCOM, for all CONUS based TROJAN's. The ATCAE provides support to the PCAC's and to TROJAN users not currently supported by a PCAC (such as SOUTHCOM, WESTCOM, and the 8th U.S. Army). Technical support and mission steerage provided by the ATCAE and the PCAC's consists primarily of target environment data base management and tipoffs to impending or occuring target activity.

(U) INSCOM does not have a responsibility in the areas of developing, fielding, and testing the TROJAN systems nor for any product improvement plans (PIP); these are the responsibilities of the Army Materiel Com.~and's (USA Electronics Research and Development Command) project manager, USA Signals Warfare Laboratories. USA Information Systems Command {USAISC) has full responsibility for communications support to include: cryptonet establishment, Defense Special Security Communications System (DSSCS) requirements, commercial communications contracts, and overall communications requirements monitoring. 1

INSCOM-TRADOC MOU. (U) On 13 May 1986 a revised Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between INSCOM and the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) was implemented. The MOU was designed to provide for the integration of certain INSCOM Intelligence and Electronic Warfare (IEW) Echelon Above Corps (EAC) Life Cycle System Management Model (LCSMM) activities into TRADOC; establish relationships and responsibilities between TRADOC and INSCOM for training and development IEW EAC activities; and promote complete expeditious coordination and processing of doctrinal IEW EAC activities between the two commands. It did not impact upon IEW activities exclusive tc INSCOM's fixed SIGINT stations and strategic agent or Offensive Counterintelligence (OFCO) activities. Implementation was to be carried out by a specific set of procedures jointly developed by the Chief of Staff, INSCOM and the Deputy Commander of the U.S. Army Intelligence Center and School (USAICS), the TRADOC proponent in the IEW field. 2

Staff Turnover. CU) One of the principal strengths of the command has been the reservoir of functional expertise embodied in its senior civilian management. Department of the Army civilians have provided the command and its predecessor organization with the continuity and experience needed for organizational effectiveness. During the course of FY 1986, this pool of talent suffered significant losses. On 22 December 1985, Mr. j(b)(S) !Deputy Chief of Staff for Systems, was forced to go on extended sick leave. Mr. l(b)(6) !Deputy Chief of Staff for Plans, Programs,

5

UNCLASSIFIED /2-

and Modernization, went to the Pentagon on 13 January 1986 to accept a post in the Senior Executive Service (SES) as special assistant to the Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (ACSI). Finally, Dr.jCb){6) jscientific and Cryptologic Advisor to the command since 1968, retired from Federal Service on 30 June 1986.3 .

High Technology/Low Intensity Conflict. (U) In a letter dated 6 August 1981', the Vice Chief of Staff Army assigned INSCOM the task of addressing the intelligence requirements of low intensity conflicts. Low intensity conflicts were defined as those military operations involving U.S. Forces in a support role to friendly and allied nations which are being militarily threatened or attached by internal and/or external military and/or para-military forces. Under these conditions, it was assumed that no major U.S. ground forces were employed in defense of the friendly and/or allied governments. Under such situations as this, the U.S. Army and other service and departmental intelligence resources would be brought to bear against the opposing military and/or para-military forces as a major means to execute U.S. policy in the affected region.

(b)(1)

6

-----·---···-----

BFFletAL HSE 6Hlu ·1

FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER 11. COMMAND AND STAFF RELATIONSHIPS

1. DF, DCSRM, subj: AR 10-53, Organization and Functions, U.S. Army lntelliEence irnd Security Command (Undtd) (C); Msg., CDR JNSCOM, ~ubj: lNSCOM as Executive Authority for TROJAN-Defined (271929Z Sep 85) (U).

2. DF, IAOPS-SA, subj: TRADOC-JNSCOM/MOU Echelon Above Corps Combat/Training Development Training and Doctrine Activities (Encl), dtd 20 Jun 86 (U).

3. Msg., JACS, subj: . HOUSAJNSCOM Prin.ary Staff Changes {272100Z Dec 85) (U); History Office, DCSOPS, Log: USASA Key Personnel i91l5 - Present.

4. Ltr., CDR INSCOM to VCSA, subj: Military Intelligence Battalion (Low Intensity) (U), dtd 28 Jan 86 (S).

7

er Fl61Al YSE BHL¥

UNCLASSIFIED

CHAPTER III

ORGANIZATION

INSCOM Organi~ation. (U) At the close of FY 1986, there was a total of 74 units (34 TOE and 40 TDA) within INSCOM. The TDA figure does not include Augmentation or Provisional units. All types of units are listed in appendix A. For individual lists of TOE, TDA, and Provisional units at the close of FY 198n, see appendices B, D, and G respectively. Changes in the status of TOE, TDA, and Provisional are listed in appendices C, E, and H.

(U) Throughout FY 1986, MG Harry E. Soyster served as Commander, INSCOM. BG Charles F. Scanlon served as Deputy Commanding General until 10 May 1986 when he was replaced by BG George J, Walker, the former Chief of Staff. In turn, BG Ira c. Owens replaced BG Walker as Chief of Staff. The position of INSCOM Command Sergeant Major continued to be occupied by CSM j<b)(6) I throughout the course of FY 1986.

(U) At the end of FY 1986, Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was organized to consist of a Command Group, Office of the Chief of Staff, Special Staff, Personal Staff, and Coordinating Staff as shown below:1

Command Group:

Commanding General (CG). (U) The CG, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command was responsible to the Chief of Staff, U.S. Army for accomplishment of the missions and functions prescribed by AR 10-53 and was concurrently responsible to the Chief, Central Security Service for all SlGINT activities for which the National Security Agency/Central Security Service (NSACSS) were responsible.

Deputy Commander (DCG). (U) The deputy commander assisted the commander in the management of all intelligence and support operations of INSCOM to include the review and execution of all tasked and delegated operations and the determination of future requirements.

Command Sergeant Major (CSM). (U) The Command Sergeant Major as the senior enlisted person in the command provided advice and assistance to the CG on all matters involving enlisted personnel.

8

U NCLASSlFIED rS

U NCLASSlFIED

Office of the Chief of Staff:

Chief of Staff (CofS). (U) The CofS acted as the principal coordinating agent of, and advisor tc, the CG and DCG on those matters pertaining to INSCOM; directed and coordinated the staff to achieve efficiency and unit of action; and assisted the CG and DCG in the supervision of the execution of orders. Directly subordinate to the CofS were the Liaison Officers, the Office of Public Affairs, Organizational Effectiveness Office, and Internal Review Office.

Command Group Executive Office. (U) The command group executive officer coordinated the activities and communications of the CG and DCG offices with the Chief of Staff. The position was discontinued 8 January 1986 when the incumbent was assigned to a special project.

Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS). (U) The DCS acted for the Chief of Staff during his absence and assisted to coordinate all actions of the HQ INSCOM staff, and supervised the activities of or provided support to the Command Chaplain, Organizational Effectiveness Office, Secretary of the General Staff, Staff Psychologist, Scientific Advisor, Public Affairs Office, and INSCOM Liaison Officers.

Secretary of the General Staff (SGS). (U) The SGS acted as executive officer for the CofS and as office manager for the offices of the CG, DCG's, and CofS.

Special Assistant to Chief of Staff. (U) The Special Assistant to Chief of Staff acted as special advisor and consultant to the commander, deputy commanders, and the Chief of Staff.

Protocol Office. (U) The Protocol Officer served to advise the command group on matters related to protocol.

Liaison Officers. (U) The liaison officers provided liaison representation to NSACSS, FORSCOM, TRADOC, USAREUR, and other commands as required. On 1 August 1986, the INSCOM liaison office at NSA was made an organic part of the CONUS MI Group and initially redesignated as the Office of the Senior INSCOM Representative to NSA (SIRO). This was later changed to INSCOM Representative (INSR) because the first acronymn was also used by another element of DOD.

9

UNCLASSIFIED J lfJ

UNCLASSIFIED

WARNING

THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AFFECTING THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE ESPIONAGE LAWS, U.S. CODE TITLE 18, SECTIONS 793, 7914, AND 798. THE LAW PROHIBITS ITS TRANSMISSION OR THE REVELATION OF ITS CONTENTS IN ANY MANNER PREJUDICIAL TO THE SAFETY OR INTEREST OF THE UNITED STATES OR FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANY FOREIGN GOVERNMENT TO THE DETRIMENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

THIS DOCUMENT MUST BE KEPT IN COMINT CHANNELS· AT ALL TIMES: IT IS TO BE SEEN ONLY BY U.S. PERSONNEL ESPECIALLY INDOCTRINATED AND AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE COMINT INFORMATION ON A STRICTLY NEED-TO-KNOW BASIS. REPRODUCTION AND/OR FURTHER DISSEMINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT OUTSIDE THE U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR HQ INSCOM APPROVAL.

iii

UNCLASSIFIED I 'l

ANNUAL HISTORICAL REVIEW

U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY COMMAND

FISCAL YEAR 1986

History Office Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations

Headquarters, U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Arlington Hall Station

Arlington, Virginia 22212-5000

1.2 i i1cc~icb: ti:il::t T8 F8REl8H­UMIQtl°I S .----·· -····

RE~RADED ! INCi ASSIFIJD ON 30 October 2015

BY USAINSCOM FOl'PA Auth Para 4-102 OOD 5200.IR

(RCS CSHIS-6(R3))

September 1987

IOP SECR£1

.AIA't 19~9 80€t:fMf:tff (Q.A2'1US SPEE11<L 114fELL16EUEE t<'h*cT&RIAL

I

UNCLASSIFIED

Special Staff:

Chief, Leadership Assistance Office. (U) The Leadership Assistance Office (formerly the Organizational Effectiveness Office) aided INSCOM's senior leaders in leading the human element of their organizations through complex organizational change• The office also provided assistance to INSCOM's leaders in management and leadership training programs. Finally, the office managed INSCOM's Organizational Effectiveness (OE) Program. Effective 22 September 1986, the Leadership Assistance Office was reassigned to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, Resource Management.

Chief, Internal Review (IR) Office. (U) Served as the principal advisor to the CDR, INSCOM on internal review matters. Conducted independent review and examination of command operations and internal controls to provide the commander with an objective evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency with which his financial and related functions were being performed.

Scientific and Cryptologic Affairs Advisor. (U) Served as the principal advisor to the CDR, INSCOM and his staff on scientific and cryptologic matters. The office became vacant on 30 May. 1986 when Dr. Edwin A. Speakman, the long-time incumbent, retired• In September 1986, the scientific and technical position was converted to Senior Executive Service (SES) status and retitled as Deputy Director for Policy and Development.

PubHc Affairs Officer (PAO). (U) Served as the Public Affairs Officer of INSCOM, advising the commander and staff on all public affairs matters.

Command Psychologist. (U) Served as the psychologist of INSCOM, advising the commander on matters pertaining to mental health and providing guidance on psychological factors pertaining to intelligence operations.

Command Chaplain. (U) Served as the chaplain of INSCOM, providing advice and assistance to the commander and his staff on religious, moral, moral leadership, and human self-development matters.

Personal Staff:

Inspector General (IG). (U) The IG, as member of the personal staff, inquired into and reported upon matters affecting the performance of mission and state of the economy, efficiency, discipline, and morale of every phase of activity which was within the sphere of responsibility of the commanding general and as

10

UNCLASSIFIED

t

I

I

UNCLASSiFIED.

prescribed by law. The IG Office consisted of the Plans and Analysis Division, the Inspections Division, and the AssistanGe -and Investigations Divison.

Staff Judge Advocate (SJA). (U) The SJA served as legal advisor to the CG, DCG, CofS, and all staff elements of HQ INSCOH and, as necessary, to subordinate elements of the command.

General Staff:

Deputy Chief of Staff, Force Integration (DCSFI). (U) The DCSFI was the newest member of the INSCOM general staff. The office was created in June 1986 as a result of the MERCURY GRAIL Study commissioned by the the Chief of Staff on 7 January 1986. Motiyation for the study came from the increasing unease felt by the command group and staff throughout 1985 that INSCOM was executing responsibilities in combat and materiel developments that. did not belong to the command and that, conversely, INSCOM efforts to acquire needed IEW materiel and systems were fragmented both in authority and process. The study found significant disconnects in INSCOM's processes for material acquisition. DCSFI was formed by merging elements of the former DCSSYS and DCSPPM to form a new staff element.

Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel (DCSPER). (U) The DCSPER served as the principal staff officer for the administration of military and civilian personnel. Acted for the CDR, INSCOM in the · direction, supervision, and coordination of plans, policies, and procedures for personnel administration, distribution, and management; maintenance of order and discipline; safety; welfare; morale; human affairs; and nonappropriated fund activities. Throughout FY 1986, DCSPER remained divided between the ADCSPER Military and the ADCSPER Civilian. The ADCSPER Military oversaw the Military Personnel Division and Plans and Proponency Division. The ADCSPER Civilian oversaw Human Resources Division, Equal Opportunity Program Division, and Civilian Personnel Division.

Deputy Chief of Staff, Operations (DCSOPS). (U) The DCSOPS was the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for current intelligence collection, production, electronic warfare, and counterintelligence, and security support operations. Provided operational policy guidance and direction, coordinated, and supervised current operations. Managed REDTRAIN direction; coordinated and supervised current operations. Managed REDTRAIN program as Army executive agent. Provided operationally oriented INSCOM interfaces between national, departmental, theater (echelon above corps), and tactical (echelon below corps); intelligence

11

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSiFIED

organizations. Served as the staff budget director (current and budget year) for allocation and employment of Program 2, 3, and 8 operational resources. Coordinated operational matters with Department of the Army, NSA/CSS, Department of Defense, DIA, CIA, FBI, joint/combined commands, other MACOM's, and other governmental agencies. Supervised command aviation activities. Prepared and coordinated command operational plans and managed command operational planning system; was command focal point for reserve affairs. Supervised command historical program. Exercised staff proponency over the Intelligence Exchange Support Center, the ROYAL CAPE SAP, and Administrative Survey Detachment. The office of the Intelligence Counterpart Fund (ICF) Management Officer remained within DCSOPS. The ICF Management Officer advised on all aspects of the control, administration, supervision, and utilization of !CF. The officer was accountable to and received technical financial guidance from the Special Finance and Accounting Officer.

(U) During FY 1986, a number of significant restructurings took place within DCSOPS. On 1 October 1985, the ADCSOPS-IS (Intelligence Support) was dissolved and a new office, ADCSOPS-OR, created. The new office consisted of a Current Operations Division (the old Intelligence Operations Center), a Geographic Division, and the Readiness Training (REDTRAIN) Division. The Geographic Division was designed to provide a focal po1nt for handling all multid1sc1pline intelligence operational matters involving INSCOM headquarters and field units. However, implementation of the concept was dependent upon a level of resourcing that never materialized. Accordingly, ADCSOPS-OR was disestablished on 12 May 1986 and a restructured ADCSOPS-IS established. Concurrently, REDTRAIN was resubordinated to ADCSOPS, Plans and Training (P&T).

(U) On 2 January 1986, ADCSOPS-SIGINT/EW assumed responsibility for operating the Special Projects Office (formerly CRAZYHORSE Project Office), previously assigned to DCSSYS. The office was integrated into the existing staff aviation office to form a Staff Aviation/Special Projects Division.

(U) In February 1986, the ADCSOPS-IMINT/E-0 was redesignated as ADCSOPS IMINT/MASINT as a result of a decision within the intelligence community to substitute the new term Measurement and Signature Intelligence (MASINT) for the old Electro-Optics designation. On 15 August 1986, the ADCSOP IMINT/MASINT Office was resubordinated to ADCSOPS-SIGINT-EW which became the ADCSOPS­Technical Operations (TO).

12

UNCLASSIFIED ~\

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) Finally, on 15 April 1986, an Office of the Special Assistant was created. The development was necessitated by the fact that the position of DDCSOPS had become militarized, forcing the creation of a new civilian position within DCSOPS to provide for the needed continuity of operations.

(U) At the close of FY 1986, DCSOPS consisted of the following major divisions: Office of the Special Assistant, Project Coordination Office, Administrative Office, History Office, Reserve Affairs Office, ADCSOPS Plans/Training, ADCSOPS Counterintelligence (CI), ADCSOPS HUMINT, ADCSOPS SIGINT/TO, and ADCSOPS Intelligence Support.

Deputy Chief of Staff, Logistics (DCSLOG). (U) DCSLOG was the principal coordinating staff officer for logistics, and was responsible for integrated logistics planning policy; procurement/contracts; budgeting; distribution, storage, and maintenance of electronic equipment systems (less telecommunications); engineering; construction; support services; transportation; logistics oversight/compliance; and supply and maintenance management. The DCSLOG also had staff supervision of the Materiel Support Activity at Vint Hill Farms Station and the Maintenance Assistance and Instruction Team Activity based at Arlington Hall Station.

(U) During FY 1986, the organization of the DCSLOG consisted of the following: Supply and Services Division, Maintenance Division, Engineer and Housing Division, Fixed Station Engineering Division, Management and Plans Division, Contracts Support Office, and Administrative Office.

Deputy Chief of Staff, Systems (DCSSYS). (U) DCSSYS was the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for INSCOM materiel/systems development. DCSSYS represented INSCOM as the Army's materiel developer of fixed strategic signal intelligence systems and IHSCOM operated fixed automated systems. DCSSYS also represented INSCOM in the materiel development process for systems to be used by INSCOM. The DCSSYS was divided into the Requirement Validations Division, Systems Division, and Budgets and Contracts Office. The position was discontinued in June 1986, and elements formerly assigned were resubordinated to DCSFI. (See Deputy Chief of Staff, Force Integration.)

Deputy Chief of Staff, Resource Management (DCSRM). (U) The DCSRM was the principal staff officer in matters concerning management, financial management, and manpower management. The DCSRM established and maintained administrative control of appropriated

13

UNCLASSIFIED

U NCLASS1FJEU

funds, exercised responsibility for manpower ~anagement and The Army Authorization Document System (TAADS), developed and supervised the implementation of force requirements, administered the structure and strength program, exercised control over the manpower and equipment survey programs, and reviewed and prepared financial and/or manpower annexes for operational and force development plans. ln addition, the DCSRM exercised staff supervision over the.Finance and Accounting Activity. The Special Finance Accounting Officer was established within DCSRM on 1 October 198ij. The office provides disbursing services to activities utilizing Special Mission Funds (SMF) and Intelligence Contingency Funds (lCF). During FY 1986, DCSRM was composed of the following elements: Administrative Office, Budget Division, Finance and Accounting Division, Management and Analysis Division, and Manpower Division.

Deputy Chief of Staff, Plans, Programs, and Modernization (DCSPPM). (U) DCSPPM was the principal coordinating staff officer responsible for INSCOM long-range and mid-range planning; force design and operational concepts; and resource program development, submission, defense, and evaluation. DCSPPM represented INSCOH in the conceptual and doctrinal aspects of the combat development process. Served as staff point of contact with other Army/DOD activities for force planning, combat developments, TENCAP planning, program submission, and force integration. At the beginning of FY 1986, DCSPPM consisted of the.Concepts and Studies Division, Force Design and Integration Division, Programs Division, and Program Plans Division. In June 1986, DCSPPH was discontinued and its elements phased into DCSFI. (See Deputy Chief of Staff, Force Integration.)

Deputy Chief of Staff for Information Management (DCSIM). (U) The DCSIM was the principal staff assistant to the Commander, INSCOM for all matters pertaining to information management. The position was dual-hatted, since the DCSIM concurrently served as Director, U.S. Army Information Services Command, INSCOM (USAISC-INSCOM). DCSIM served as Program Area Director for command programs, budgets, and the Army Management System as it relates to telecommunications/automation. Discharged primary staff responsibilities for engineering, installation, and maintenance of INSCOM information systems. Exercised staff supervision over operation of the Defense Special Security Communication System (DSSCS), CRITICOMM, and other telecommunications activities of the command. Directed development of tactical information systems objectives concepts and requirements of the command. Directed development of tactical information systems objectives, concepts, and requirements within INSCOM areas of interest. Finally, the

UNCLASSIFIED

t

UNCLA.SSIFIED

DCSIM exercised operational control over the USAISC Communications Center supporting USAINSCOM, Arlington Hall Station. The staff element also exercised co~trol over the Automated Systems Activity and the Administrative/Visual Information Support Activity {A/VISA). A/VISA, formerly the Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity, was redesignated on 1 January 1986 in compliance with DOD's redefinition of the term "audiovisual."

Command Security Office (CSO). (U) The Chief, CSO formulated, implemented, and supervised policies and procedures for personnel, physical, automation, and information security and acted as command and headquarters security manager, internal OPSEC manager, TEMPEST Coordinating Officer {TCO), and chief law enforcement official for INSCOM. Due to consolidation of headquarters elements at Arlington Hall, the small satellite CSO formerly maintained at Fort George G. Meade, MD, was closed in January 1986.

Oversight Matters. {U) On 30 June 1986, INSCOH Regulation 15-5, USAINSCOH Intelligence Oversight Board, was published. The regulation established a new ·mechanism for providing oversight to three functional intelligence areas (intelligence activities, fiscal management, and acquisition contracting actions) from three different role perspectives (policy, advisory, and compliance). The oversight board established by the regulation to advise the Commanding General, INSCOM on these matters consisted of DCSOPS, DCSRM, DCSLOG, the Staff Judge Advocate, and the INSCOM Inspector General.2

MI Brigades. {U) During the course of FY 1986, planning continued to convert INSCOM's theater-level Ml groups into brigades. This was part of a move to standardize theater-level support units, provide for wartime fill by reserve-component {RC) elements, and give intelligence units designations more readily intelligible to the rest of the Army. The first INSCOM group to be so converted was the 501st MI Group, which became the 50lst MI Brigade (Provisional) on 15 April 1986. It was anticipated that the change would be formalized early in FY 1987. The 66th and 513th Ml Groups were also scheduled for conversion to brigade status during ls~ Quarter, FY 1987. INSCOH's two other theater support units, the 470th and 500th Ml Groups, would be upgraded the following year. In addition, plans were underway to relocate the 500th HI Group from Japan to Hawaii. To facilitate this transition, the INSCOM Theater Intelligence Center-Pacific CITIC-PAC) would be reassigned to the 500th MI Group as its Echelon Above Corps Intelligence Center (EACIC) on 1 October 1986.3

15

UNCLASSIFIED

Korean Developments. (U) Under the Army of Excellence (•nE) concept, Tables of Organization and Equipment (TOE's) of M­brigades in support of echelons above corps (EAC) are to be standardized. However, the 501st MI Brigade, when formally organized, would function in a unique env~ronment. No u~s~ Army corps-level intelligence assets were available in Korea, although intelligence support is available from other service elements and from Republic of Korea (ROK) sources. As a result, the 50lst MI Brigade was allowed to operate under a theater-specific Modification TOE (MTOE), even though, under Army reporting requirements, this might present an appearance of "instant unreadiness."

(U) As a step to flush-out the ultimate · rigade. the 532d MI Battalion (Provisional) was organized on 3 September 1986. The unit consisted of a Headquarters, Headquarters and Service Company and Company A, the operations company. Company A functioned as a scaled-down Echelon Above Corps Intelligence Center (EACIC), providing a 77-person intelligence center to the Eighth U.S. Army, an 18-person cell to the All Source lntelli,~nce Center, Combined Forces Army (ASIC-CFA), and manning for the _<~l< 1 l I

j<b)(1) I which serviced Tactical User Terminals (TUT 2. CFA, and the Third ROK Army (TROKA). The company was under th' operational control of Field Station Korea. Additionally, two other companies were attached to the provisional battalion: the Headquarters and Headquarters Company of the provisonal brigade,

2d MI Com an a tactical EW unit.~

16

(b)(1)

(U) The 513th Ml Group also underwent structural change. The Echelon Above Corps Aviation Intelligence Company (EACAIC) of the g~oup's 202d MI Battalion was redesignated as the MI Battalion (Low Intensity) (Provisional) on 2 April 1986 anQ concurrently resubordinated to group headquarters. (The unit had already been attached to the 470th MI Group and deployed to CENTAM.) In June 1986, as the result of an IPR, the 641st MI Company, the group's clandestine collection element, was resubordinated from the 202d MI Battalion to group headquarters. Subsequently, a Service Support Activity was created within the headquarters to manage both clandestine and overt collection operations. In another action, it was found that the 203d MI Battalion had not been resourced under Army of Excellence (AOE). Initial planning was that only the 11th MI Company (Technical Intelligence) and its augmentation would continue to be active. However, DA approved the concept for a Foreign Material Intelligence Group in April 1986 which would assign the Army's technical intelligence and Opposing Forces (OPFOR) mission to a TDA unit, eliminating the need for a technical intelligence battalion. It was decided to place the Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 203d MI Battalion, minimally filled and with a new counterintelligence mission, under the operational control of the Commander, 202d MI Battalion.

(U) INSCOM's CONUS-headquartered Special Security Group was reconfigured to meet changing Army requirements for access to Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI). During FY 1986, Special Security Detachments (SSD) previously assigned to Watertown, N.Y.; Fort Lee, Virginia; Fort Lewis, Washington; Yuma, Arizona; Automated Switching Centers Coltano and Hancock; and Okinawa were phased out. Functionally tailored detachments were opened in Los Angeles, California (for contractor Support), and at the following Combined Training Facilities (CTF): Fort Dix, New Jersey; CTF Hamilton, California; CTF Austin, Texas; and CTF St. Paul, Minnesota. In addition, Combat Support Coordination Teams (CSCT)

17

UNCLASSIFIED

One and Three wer.e fielded in Kores. Control over the CSCT' s had been a long-standing issue between Eight U.S. Army and !NSCOM. The matter was resolved to INSCOM's satisfaction; it was decided that although these units were performing a tactical function, they still operated at echelon above corps (EAC). One Special Security Command, USAREUH, was eliminated by consolidating SSG assets in Europe under an 0-6 at SSC EUCOM.

(U) Finally, INSCOM's 902d MI Group was drastically restructured. At the beginning of FY 1986, the group consisted of two geographic battalions (located respectively on the east and west coasts); one . functional battalion involved in technical support services and two independent detachments. These elements were realigned to form a counterintelligence/counterespionage battalion, with headquarters at the Presidio of San Francisco, California; a counterintelligence/security battalion at Fort Meade, Maryland, which operated in support of Army Special Access Programs (SAP); and a counterintelligence technical services support battalion, . also at Fort Meade. However, the new structure was found less than adequate to meet the Army's needs. Agents assigned to the SAP­oriented battalion found that their offices were involved in counterespionage cases and vice-versa. Moreover, approximately half of the personnel of the west coast-based counterespionage battalion were located on the east coast and no less than three quarters of them were east of San Antonio, Texas. The conclusion of DCSOPS was that "simply from the viewpoint of location, the CI Battalion is in the wrong place; there is no justification for it being in San Francisco •••• " By the end of FY 1986, a concept plan to combine the CI/CE Battalion and the CI SAP Battalion at a Fort Meade location was under study.6

Headquarters Consolidation. (U) Headquarters, INSCOM was successfully consolidated at Arlington Hall Station during 2d Quarter, FY 1986. The action' involved the movement of approximately 180 spaces formerly assigned to INSCOM headquarters and support elements at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. In actuality, however, faces did not automatically accompany the shifted spaces: clerical employees generally preferred to find new positions in the Fort Meade area, and a number of military personnel chose reassignment. As a result, the Counterintelligence and HUMINT sections of DCSOPS suffered a temporary loss of up to half of their authorized personnel strength when they made the transition from Fort Meade to Arlington Hall. The fact that Fort Meade elements moved into facilities in Building 1, forcing long­established offices to relocate into new offices in a refurbished Building "A", caused further disruptions. Turbulence caused by the reshuffling of people from building to building and the lack of available telephone lines did not stop unti.1 August 1986. 1

18

UNCLASSIFIED

I

-Bffl61A t ~Sf--BllLV-

FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER III. ORGANIZATION

1.

2. 3.

4.

5.

6.

1.

History Office, DCSOPS, Log: USASA Key Personnel, 19-5 _, Present; Ltr., lAOPS-SE-0, subj: New Office of the Senior INSCOM Representative to NSA/CSS (SIRO), dtd 16 Jul 86 (U); FY 1986, CONUS MI Group AHR, vol. I, pt. 3 (S), p. 5; DF, IARM-M, subj: Reassignment of the Leadership Assistance Office, dtd 23 Sep 86 (U); Paper,.subj: HQ INSCOM Force Integration Research Study: MERCURY GRAIL (MAJ /tbl(6l I (Undtd) (U); DF, lAFI,, subj: Establishment of DCSFI, dtd 9 Jun 86 (U); DF, lAFl, subj: Establishment of Interim Office Symbols, dtd 10 Jun 86 (U); FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN),, pp. --5; Msg., IAOPS-SE-AS, subj: Consoljdation of ADSCSOP SlGlNT/EW Staff Aviation Office (lAOPS-SE-A) and DCSSYS Special Projects Office (lASYS-CH/IASYS-SPO) (171200Z Jan 86) (U); FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), pp. 5-6; Msg., IASA-A, subj: Redesignation of Administrative/Audiovisual Support Activity (200600Z Dec 85) (U). USAINSCOM Regulation 15-5, dtd 30 June 1986 (U). 373 Card, 501st MI Brigade (Provisional); FY 1986, 501st MI Bde AHR (SCW/NOFORN), p. 3; Msg., IAOPS-PL, subj: ITIC-PAC Resubordination, Pacific Implementation (132020Z Jun 86) (U); Memo for Cmdr, INSCOM, lAOPS, subj: 500th MI Group and ITIC­PAC, Restationing Feasability Analysis and Resubordination, dtd 2 Sep 86 (S). FY 1986, 501st MI Bde AHR (SCW/NOFORN), p.4, section V, pp. 8~10; Msg., IAOPS, subj: Readiness Condition and Activation of 501st as a Brigade (092300Z Sep 86) (U). FY 1986, 470th MI Gp AHR (S/NOFORN), p. 5; DF, IAOPS-IS-GS, subj: 470th Ml GP IPR, After Action Report w/encl, dtd 26 Aug 86 (S). 373 Card, U.S. Army Field Support Center; FY 1986, AHR, CONUS MI Gp AHR (S), vol l, pt. 3, pp. 3-5; FY 1986, 513th HI Gp AHR (S/NOFORN), pp. 21-22; 373 Card, Echelon Above Corps Aviation Intelligence Company; Interview with Ms. Hull, DCSOPS, 18 Aug 87; FY 1986, SSG AHR (S), p. 5; Msg., IASSG-ZA, subj: Command and Control of Army SSO Assets (U) (5 Dec 85) (S); FY 1986, 902d MI Gp AHR (S/NOFORN/), p. 8; Memo for~~~ Cmd Gp, IAOPS, subj: Summary Trip Report - Colonel J<bl<5

> Ji-11 August 1986, dtd 8 Sep 86 (S); Ltr., IAOPS-Cl, subj: 902d MI Group Jiealignment--MI Bn (Cl) West Coast, dtd 22 Sep 86 (C). MFR, IALOG-MP, subj: Briefing on HQ lNSCOM Consolidation for Mrs.l(b)(6) I dtd 7 Jun 83 (U); FY 1986. DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/ NOFORN), pp. 2, 24; Interview with MSG _(b)(5) J DCSOPS, 19 Aug 87.

19 -BfFfGIAL llSE

BHt'I

UNCLASSIFIED

Chapter IV

RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT

Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds. (U) FY 1986 was an extraordinary year due tc the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings (G-R-H) legislation which resulted in a $9,892 million reducton to INSCOM's funding profile. Overall budget execution was much improved from FY 1985 with yearend turn-ins totaling $3.3 million of which $1.4 million was INSCOM funds. Recapped below are yearend returns to include G-R.;.H. 1

P2 l,534 ELT

162 Flying Hours 1,696 TOTAL

P31 65

8,8U 148

13 9,067

0

GDIP Turn-in G-R-H Reductions LANCE PERRY Flying Hours TOTAL

31 Second Destination Transportation Turn-in

P8T 24 Military Training Turn-in

15 ACES/EDG/Interns Turn-in

3 QRIP Turn-in

BA SEO PS 1,051 G-R-H Reductions 1,252 VHFS RPMA Turn-in 2,303 TOTAL

20

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command's OMA funding program at the close of FY 1986 consisted of $199,195,000 of Direct Funds and $35,000 of Funded Reimbursements for a total of $199,230,000. The table below shows a breakout of direct funding by subprogram at the close of FY 1986.2

Table 1. - Direct Funding by Subprogram. (As of 30 September 1986)

Subprogram FY 1986

P2 (General Purpose Forces) P3I (Intelligence Activities) P3C (Communications Security) P7 (Troop Issue) P80 (Education Services) PST (Training) P9 (Administration and Associated Activities) Base Operations (AHS & VHFS)

TOTAL

$ 39,518,000 135,389,000

3,011,000 91,000

1,482,000 l,Oi6,000

190,000 18,438,000

$199,195,000

(U) The following is an audit trail ($ in thousands) from DA dollar guidance use for preparation of the FY 1986 Command Operating Budget (COB) to final FY 1986 Annual Funding Program (AFP) :3

Pro5ram 2

Dollar Guidance - FY 1986 COE $ 40,694

Pay Restoral 85 CANOPY· WING 1,475 Foreign Currency Reval (91)

RG-8A 1,797 Congressional Adj (l ,067)

TROJAN 567

FY 1986 Initial AFP $ 43,460

TROJAN 1,600 Foreign Currency Reval (1)

JCS 20

Joint Tactical Fusion (365)

P2 Mission 100

Flying Hours (162)

GRAYWOLF (3,600)

ELT Oi5~4)

Final FY 1986 AFP i 292518 21

UNCLASSIFIED.

UNCLASSIFIED

I Program 3!

Dollar Guidance - FY 1986 COB $147,202

GD!P Adjustments (896) Pay Restoral 1,700 Expense Invest Criteria (155) FMA 32 Misc (32) LANCE PERRY Manpower 132 CRA 13,896

FY 1986 Initial AFP $1311,087 GDIP Adj 706 Foreign Currency (2,084) OP SEC (2,340) FMA 569 Space Transfer (g4) Misc 32 CANAL PILOT 835 CRA Restoral 13,896 G-R-H Reductions (8,841) ACSI Withdrawal (5,000) ACSI Restoral 2,000 Trans to Other MACOH's (902) FCI-MPDI Adj 71 TBHC 404 FS Berlin Design 75 Flying Hours (13) LANCE PERRY (148) CCP Initiatives 170 Sinop SAF 500 641st Operations 660 ACS! Adj 7 Transfer from Base Opns 175 Polygraph/TSCM 624

Final FY 1986 AFP $135,389

22

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Program 3C

Dollar Guidance - FY 1986 COE

Pay Restoral CRA Withhold

FY 1986 Initial AFP CHA Withhold Restored Foreign Currency Reval Transferred to BASEOPS

Final FY 1986 AFP

Program 7

Dollar Guidance - FY 1986 COB

Pay Restoral CRA Withhold

FY 1986 Initial AFP CHA Restoral DA Withdrawal

Final FY 1986 AFP

Program 8T

Dollar Guidance - FY 1986 COB

AIA Transfer Erroneous Issue

FY 1986 Initial AFP Erroneous Issue QM Nutrition Course Foreign Currency Reval Funds Returned

Final FY 1986 AFP

Program 80

Dollar Guidance - FY 1986 COB

Pay Restoral CTED

23

$

$

!

$

$

$

$

!

3,281

48 (161)

3,168 161

(6) (252)

32071

. 155

2 (27)

130 27

(66)

91

1,550

( 39) 934

2,445 (934)

2 (7)

(24)

1 2482

$ ·533

3 550

UNCI-ASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

FY 1986 Initial AFP Pay Reduction Program Reduction ACES Program Increase Funds Returned

Final FY 1986 AFP

Program 9

Dollar Guidance - FY 1986 COE

OMA/OPA Transfer

FY 1986 Initial AFP QRIP/PECIP OMA Funds Funds Returned

Final FY 1986 AFP

BASEOPS

Dollar Guidance - FY 1986 COE

Pay Restoral CRA Withhold Congressional Adj

FY 1986 Initial AFP CRA Release DA Adj Audit Reports Force Protection DA Withdraw Family Action Plan Congressional Cut Civilian Workyears Reduction G-R-H Reduction Pay Restoral RPMA Withhold Services Program Returned Decrease to P3I from P3C

Final FY 1986 AFP

$ 1,086 (3)

(69) 17

(15)

! 1,016

$ 1,856

(l,856)

0 193

(3)

$ 190.

$19,301

20 (3,135)

327

$16,513 3,135

10 6

!116 (11) (20) (19) (50)

(1,051) 8

621 Family 100 VHFS RPMA

(1,252) DA (.45) Transfer

(175) Transfer 252

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) The following table reflects direct obligations by elements of expense for FY 1986 ($ in thousands): Obligations of $199,068,000 and an Annual Funding Program of $199,195,000 resulted in rate of 99.9 percent.4

an obligation

Table 2. - Direct Obligations for FY 1986.

Element of ExEense P2 P31 P31 P7 P8T P80 pg BO Total Civ Pay 1,773 45,8ll3 1,486 44 611 5,313 55,070 Travel 4,626 8,78S 529 39 1,145 67 19 81 15,294 TIT 564 1,051 35 1 . 2 119 1,772 Hnt/Comm/Ut 1,035 4,691 50 294 6,070 Cont Svcs 24,726 51,117 8811 (: 328 333 89 11,844 89,327 Sup/Equip 6,495 20,2811 80 2 81 744 27' 716 FNIH 2111 3,578 - 3,819 -

TOTAL 39,1160 135,352 3,06!! 90 1,1173 1,015 189 18,!!25 199,068

Family Housing Units. (U) The U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command operated and maintained family housing units at Arlington Hall Station and Vint Hill Farms Station. Funds received from Department of the Army for these units for FY 1986 were $1,440 of which $1,1140 was obligated (99.8 percent).5

(b)(1)

25

Percent 28

8 l 3

45 13

2

100

(b)(1)

Army Organizational Efficjency Review/Manpower Staffing Standards System (OER/MS-3). (U) The separate programs at the DA level have been combined at INSCOM into one program. The purpose of OER/M.S-3 is to conduct functional organizational efficiency reviews for the purpose of determining appropriate organizational structure, staffing, and operating procedures.8

26

UNCLASSIFIED

Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement (MOU/MOA) Program. (U) FY 1986, all MOU/MOA's maintained in the repository were reviewed, and DCSRM personnel were able to eliminate 39 documents and determine the status of the remaining documents. At the end of the fiscal year, the repository contained 120 MOU/MOA's of which 110 were current and 10 were awaiting final signatures of the parties involved. During the reporting period, 18 new or revised MOU/MOA's were processed.9

Personnel Security. (U) INSCOM achieved 100 percent execution of Non-Disclosure Agreements (SF189) by July 1986. This satisfied the OACSI DA requirement of July 1985 that all Army personnel (military and civilian) who have acc€ss to classified information will complete the form. 10

Information Security. (U) In November 1985, a report was published which had a profound impact on the information security program within Department of Defense. The report was entitled, "Keeping the Nation's Secrets: A Report to the Secretary of Defense by the Commission to neview DOD Security Policies and Practices." Out of 63 recom.'llendations by the "Stilwell Commission" to improve the information security program, two had been implemented by CSO by the end of FY 1986. The first was to implement a one-time top-to­bottom security inspection of all activities that handled or stored classified information; the second was to implement a "two person" rule in all areas where TOP SECRET and Special Access Program materials are processed or -stored.

(U) In January 1986, the one-time top-to-bottom security inspection was conducted and the results were reported by 1 October 1986. Inspections of all elements directly subordinate to HQ INSCOM were conducted and formal reports were consolidated and forwarded to OACSI DA, noting that most security programs were operating within acceptable boundaries. Problems were highlighted in automation security, and it was noted that the INSCOM Operations Security Program and the INSCOM Terrorism Counteraction Program were being administered inconsistently in the field. The need for additional security resources and the need to perpetuate the security.inspection process were also mentioned.

(U) The "two person" rule was established between INSCOM Special Security Detachment and Arlington Hall Station Garrison to require non-duty hour sign-in and sign-out of all personnel. MP's were then to conduct random patrols and to thereby serve as the second person in areas where people may be working alone. 11

27

UNCLASSIFIED

I

I

UNCLASSIFIED

AUTOVON Funding Cut. (U) The Gramm-Rudman-Hollings fair share budget cut for INSCOM was $29,590 from AUTOVON service. This was met by eliminating circuit UUBBKK24 from INSCOM AUTOVON service. This netted a savings of $50,076, a $20,486 savings over the amount requested by U.S. Army Commercial Communications Office (USARCCO.) 12

HQ INSCOM STU-II Access. (U) The telephone access for AHS STU-II terminals was expanded to include AUTOVON. The incoming AUTOVON prefix 222 services the CG, CofS, DCSOPS, and DCSIM terminals while AUTOVON 286 accesses DCSSYS, DCSLOG, and Cdr, USASSG. 13

USAISC-INSCOM Operations and Maintenance, Army (OMA) Funds. (U) a. PE 381055: FY 1986 funds in the amount of $1,631K were allocated for supplies, TDY, and various support services. A further $717K was provided in the program element for civilian compensation.14

b. PE 393111: Civilian compensation was $126K and an additional $9.5K·was provided for TDY.

c. PE 814771: $5K was allocated for military TDY for training.

USAISC-INSCOM Other Procurement, Army (OPA). (U) During FY 1986 all PE 381055 OPA funds were apportioned to NSA for budgetary management. Expenditure of primary interest to DCSIM was the communications equipment (ST2D-PC) for $225K. 15

Secure Voice. (U) INSCOM participation in DOD/DA STU-II and STU­III program is expected to provide the command with ·extensive secure voice capability to meet command requirements into the next decade. A total of 38 STU-II terminals have been installed command-wide, with another 45 scheduled for installation prior to the conclusion of the program. During FY 1986, the command identified secure voice requirements for 4966 STU-III terminals, the projected DOD-standard secure voice systems. 16

Automation Budget. (U) The automation budget was cut $548K in FY 1986 due to Gramm-Rudman-Hollings. The obligation rate for FY 1986 ADPE funds was 99.98 percent. 17

Arlington Hall Station Office Automation. (U) During FY 1986, Life Cycle Management Division (LCMD) acquired responsibility for contractual support and inventory of office automation associated with Arlington Hall Station (AHS). All TELEX (Lexitron) equipment became government owned on 30 September 1986. This was due to the completion of the original Lease to Ownership Plan (LTOP) contract. All leased word processing equipment at AHS was brought out or

28

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASS1F1ED

scheduled for return to vendor. Peripherals for the four WANG alliance systems were purchased and will be used with the new VS65 systems due to arrive 1st Quarter, FY 1987. 18

HQ Office Automation. (U) The Headquarters Office Automation (OA) Plan was approved by CofS INSCOM on 7 August 1986. The implementation of the HQ OA plan marks the beginning of HQ wi.de compatibility in data exchange through the eventual phase-out and conversion from diverse word processing systems. Additionally, HQ will have data exchange compatibility with the field, through acquisition of WANG OA equipment. As writ ten, the plan initially implements the Intelligence Support, Information System (ISIS) architecture as provided in the ISIS Functional Description, a deliverable provided through GSA contract by the American Management Systems (AMS) Incorporated. Implementation at AHS will entail the acquisition of approximately 1"60 WANG PC's, 7 WANG VS mini computers, and associated printers and communications hardware and software. The new 160 workstations supplement the 50 already onsite connected to present WANG alliance systems. The WANG alliance central processing units currently in use will be replaced with VS minicomputers.

(U) A concurrent action with the acquisition of new WANG office automation equipment is the planned buyout of on-site leased WANG alliance peripheral devices. Since the architecture of the alliance does not readily fit the needs of INSCOM when compared to the cost per connection and power of the Vital Storage - Central Processing Unit (VS CPU), the leased alliances CPU's will not be retained. The associated peripherals, however, as serial devices can be readily used with the more powerful CPU. A further benefit of shifting from alliance to VS technology is the favorable effect of the hardware on the environment. Actual requirement for electricity will decrease since the new modular mass storage units associated with the VS require 9nly 25 percent of the power needed for previous generation disk drive assemblies.

(U) Initial implementation of the system with phased training and conversion from the diverse word processors is delayed due to the inability of WANG to supply letter quality printers. Projected delivery date for the printers is 2d Quarter, FY 1987.

(U) Office automation took a big leap forward in FY 1986. Sixty­nine systems consisting of 447 workstations were approved for INSCOM units worldwide. Total cost of systems approved was $4,227,048 with a 5-year cost savings estimated to be $9,245,912. Productivity Enhancing Capital Investment Program/Quick Return On Investment Program (PECIP/QRIP) and Productivity Improvement Funds (PIF) funding programs have proven an effective means of obtaining unprogrammed funds for OA during FY 1986.19

29

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Arlington Hall Station Intelligence Data Handling Systems (IDHS) Node. (U) Because of the loss of the Army Threat Intelligence Production System's (ATIP) computer and no other requirements for IDHS computer support within the HQ INSCOM staff, the AHS IDHS Node was disconnected and declared excess. The AHS IDHS Node had consisted of a FDP/11/1115 Mini-Computer System. With its demise, the components of the AHS IDHS Node were transferred to the Pentagon branch and the Fort Bragg branch.20

Commanders' Conference. (U) The 1985 INSCOM Commanders' Conference was held at Fort Monroe, VA, during 29 October-2 November 1985. Billeting was at the Chamberlin Hotel. The theme of the conference was "leadership.n21

IG Inspections. (U) Eleven major units encompassing 118 different subordinate elements at 77 differen~ locations were inspected by the lG Office during FY 1986. Fifteen inspection reports were published, totaling 77 findings, 17 comrnendables, and 59 minor irregularities and deficiencies for internal correction.22

JGAR's. (U) There was a slight increase in IGAR's processed by HQ INSCOM detailed IG's during FY 1986, to include those evolving from complaint periods conducted as an integral part of inspections. N~nety-one such IGAR's were completed in FY 1986 compared to 8~ in FY 1985. Acting inspectors general at major subordinate units processed 65 additional IGAR's, representing 3~ percent of the total IGAR cases as compared to 57 percent in FY 1985. Of the total 156 lGAR's processed by INSCOM IG/AIG's in FY 1986, 19 percent were substantiated, ~l percent were nonsubstantiated, and 40 percent were assistance cases.23

lGAR Category. (U) The IGAR category ''Conditions in Unit" was the leading INSCOM category with 22 cases (11 percent of the total). This also is the leading category in the Army as a whole. The next most common categories in FY 1986 were: "Assignment/Reassignment" (19 cases/9 percent); "Civilian Personnel Program" (l~ cases/7 percent); "Travel and Transportation" (14 cases/7 percent); and "Pay and Allowances" (13 cases/6 percent) .24

Congressional Inquiries. (U) During FY 1986, 36 Congressional Inquiries were. responded to, an increase of two over FY 1985. Of the 36 total inquiries, 11 were defined as assistance cases, 18 as nonsubstantiated, and 7 were substantiated.25

IG Inquiries and Investigations. (U) There were seven inquiries and zero investigations completed during FY 1986. There was one inquiry at the close of the period.26

30

UNCLASSIFIED

I

I

UNCLASSIFIED

Department of the Army Inspector General <DAJG) Special Inspection of Procurement. (U) On 11 April 1986, INSCOM's special inspection of procurement was completed and resolved all but one finding. However, the DAJG-JO inspected selected INSCOM units during the period April-June 1986 and developed 14 findings. General officer bi-monthly DAJG Fix-It-Task Force meetings, chaired by the Vice Chief of Staff, were held to monitor the resolution of findings developed by DAIG-IO as a result of their inspection.27 .

Army Award for Maintenance Excellence. (U) Two INSCOM units were recognized in the FY 1985 Chief of Staff, Army award for Maintenance Excellence Award Competition. Field Station Augsburg received the first place award in the heavy TDA unit category and Detachment Wobeck was the runner up in the light TDA unit category, The nominees for the next FY 1986 awards are: HHC 513th MI Brigade, light TOE unit; HHC 3d MI Battalion, medium TOE units; Detachment Wobeck, light TDA unit; and Field Station Berlin, heavy TDA unit.28

RPMA Funding. (U) The FY 1986 RPMA programs for AHS and VHFS were funded as follows: AHS - $5,229,751 and VHFS - $7,236,000 •. Expenditures to reduce the backlog of maintenance and repair (BMAR) workload, all at VHFS, amounted to $204,000. The proposed RPMA for FY 1987 will be as follows: AHS - $6,177,000 and VHFS -$7,236,ooo.29

CG's Plague and the First Annual Chief of Staff, Army Supply Excellence Award. (U) The Command Supply Inspections (CSI) team is responsible for the administrative requirements for preparation of the Annual Chief of Staff Army Supply Excellence Award and the Commanding General's Plaque for Supply Excellence. The CG's Plaque is presented to INSCOM units that score 98 percent or higher on their inspection. The 902d MI Group is the only unit that received the CG's Plaque during FY 1986.

{U) The purpose of the Annual Chief of Staff Army Supply Excellence Award is to provide an incentive at the organizational level to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of supply operations within the total Army force structure, while providing a management tool to ensure standardization of supply support functions and procedures. The program is designed to improve operations within the supply arena and the ability to support and sustain our forces while providing a means for recognizing exceptional performance and standards. INSCOM's Field Station Korea, which is part of the 50lst MI Brigade, Seoul, Korea, achieved the runner-up position in the active TDA company category. The Joint Security Area Command Security Force, Korea, took first place.30

31

UNCLASSIFIED

LEased Vehicles. (U) Effective l October 1986, with transition to begin l January 1987, HQDA approved convErsion of all CONUS, to include Hawaii and Puerto Hice, non-tactical vehicles over to GSA leased vehicles.31

Special Mission Funds. (U) INSCOM processed and coordinated 19 operational projects dealing with issues concerning accountability for property and services purchased with Special Mission Funds. Eighteen operational projects were finalized which established property accountability for approximately $2,2811,000 for equipment procured with Special Mission Funds.32

Phillip A. Connelly Award. (U) The dining facility at Field Station Berlin, Andrews Barracks, was nominated to represent INSCOM in the small category of the Phillip A. Connelly Awards Program for Excellence in Army Food Service. This category applles to dining facilities serving 200 persons or less per meal. The dining facility at Field Station Augsburg, Gablingen Kaserne, was nominated to represent the command in the large category, serving more than 200 persons per mea1.33

(b)(1)

(U) FY 1986 command personnel strength by unit, see appendix F.

Travis Trophy. (U) The Travis Trophy recognizes the most significant contribution in the field of operations, management, and administration by fixed field stations. NSACSS presented the 1985 award to the U.S. Army Field Station Berlin. See appendix J for a complete list of previous winners.35

32

UNCLASSIFIED Director's Trophy. (U) During FY 1980, Vice Admiral B.R. Inman, DIRNSA, established a new award which would recognize the mobile SIGINT element making the most signficant contribution to the cryptologic community durig the calendar year. For 1985, DIRNSA chose the Army's 525th Military Intelligence Brigade, as the winner of the Director's Trophy. See appendix K for a complete list of the year's winner.36

Public Affairs Activities. (U) The office of Public Affairs began a periodic critique of all JNSCOM subordinate unit newspapers as part of a detailed review of unit Command Information during FY 1986. However, due to the departure of the Public Affairs Specialist who held the responsibility for the action, the review process was discontinued with the understanding that it would resume with the arrival of a new Public Affairs Specialist in FY 1987. The following is a' list of !NSCOM publications as of 30 September 1986.37

Publication

Alamo Wrangle Augsburg Profile Red Dragon The Dagger T orii Typhoon Vanguard Write On Kunia Underground News Caribbean Sentinel Voice 'i5i0genese Review

Unit Publisher

USAFS San Antonio* USAFS Augsburg 50lst MI Group 66th MI Group USAFS Okinawa** Vint Hill Farms Station CONUS Ml.Group*** USAFS Kunia USAFS Key West USAFS Berlin**** USAFS Sinop

*The USAFS San Antonio newspaper which was a monthly publication in FY 1985 went to semiannual and then to quarterly publication.

**Discontinued when USAFS Okinawa closed. ***Name changed in mid-year to Tiger Tales. ••••Discontinued early in year when editor of USAFS Berlin

departed.

INSCOM Today. (U) The command overview briefing underwent its most major revision in more thaf 10 years during FY 1986. Under the guidance of the DCSOPS, COL (bJ(S) l the INSCOM Today Briefings were rewrote to effect more than 75 percent of the text and half of the visual aids. In the process of making the improvements, the briefing was reduced from 55 minutes to 25 minutes, without loss of meaningful content or understanding.38

33

UNCLASSIFIED

I

UNCLASSIFIED

Transfer-In-Status Program. (U) This program, implemented and tested in FY 1986, allows the in~status transfer of all SCI-cleared soldiers, regardless of rank, from one assignment/billet to another assignment/billet without having to wait for the clearance once the soldier is at his new assignment. A local security indoctrination is built-in: paperwork is reduced, and soldiers can work their SCI-related jobs upon arrival. This program directly impacts on improved support to INSCOM field stations, communication centers, and high-level staff assignments. There are some bugs to be worked out--changes of assignments enroute; lack of pinpoint assignments; total coordination within SSG--but the program is off to an excellent start. In billet management, there was a 6 percent. increase (48,000 to 51,000 after annual reviews) of SCI bill.eta in FY 1986 and the automation of the area is about one-quarter complete.39

Reouest for Service (RFS). (U) The DCSIM prepared and processed 102 RFS actions during FY 1986. RFS actions are used to request circuit start up, circuit cancellation, and circuit changes • .110

Communications Service for INSCOM's New Building at Fort Belvoir. (U) IAW DOD Directive 4640.7 and DOD Instruction 5335.1, administrative telephone service for INSCOM at Fort Belvoir will be provided by Defense Telecom.munications Service-Washington (DTS-W). All communications services provided will comply with DIAM PAAM 5-3 requirements.41 ·

Army of Excellence (AOE) Reorganization. (U) This Army-wide action was accomplished to standardize unit organization within the Army. AOE changed Mi groups to brigades within INSCOM. DCSIH provided.tactical communications assistance during the formation of the MI battalion (imagery interpretation), which will be assigned to each theater Ml brigade. The conversion of· MI groups to brigades also involved the introduction of force modernization packages to improve the communication capability for the brigades. This action was initiated in 1984, and essentially replaced outdated equipment with new equipment.42

Mobile Tactical Communications Center (MTCC). (U) The U.S. Army Signal Center announced significant changes to the fielding of the MTCC in 1980-90. Previously, INSCOM was to receive six units, each going to the groups/brigades. This policy was changed; all MTCC's would now be issued only to signal units. INSCOH will not own or operate the MTCC, a move that reflects the U.S. Army Signal Center's desire to keep the communication mission within signal uni ts. 43

34

UNCLASSIFIED

'

I

UNCLASSIFIED Introduction of the KL-43. (U) DCSIM received the first MACOM level issue of the KL~43, an off-line crypto device used on dial-up telephones. The KL-43's were used during Exercise PRESENT ARMS 86 by exercise participants. DCSIM also conducted training sessions in the DCSOPS exercise cell, and to the U.S. Army Field Station Kunia operations section. The KL-43 will be issued to all MACOM's for off-line secure telephone use.44

Combined Cryptologic Program. (U) Congressional cuts and budget constraints imposed in an effort to balance the budget have begun to affect INSCOM's programmed growth for the outyears. No new initiatives were added to the FY 1988 program within DU41B.

(U) Despite imposed constraints, INSCOM was able to get a new requirement into the program by consolidating a new INSCOM initiative for Agency Standard Hosts {ASH) with an ongoing NSA initiative for ASH's.

(U) Directly related to congressional cuts was the loss of funds for the HQ office automation project. All that remains of a 5-year programmed effort are the funds for FY 1988.45

The Headauarters Information Center {HQIC). (U) The HQIC formally ·opened its door on 24 February 1986, at a ceremony presided over by MG Harry E. Soyster, Commanding General, USAINSCOM. A contract with American Management Systems (AMS) to operate the HQIC began in March 1986, at which time the HQIC became fully operational, . providing technical support, consultations, educational assistance, and advice on personal computer software products, standards, and acquisition. The HQIC assists approximately 20 individuals per week. It is also involved in assisting specific HQ INSCOM staff elements which have complex, one-time requirements for either technical assistance or consultation. The HQIC's major undertaking is the in-house training of the HQ INSCOM staff in the use of the standard office automation equipment--WANG. A training plan was developed for the use of the OA equipment and training began on 30 August 1986.46

INSCOM Journalist of the Year. (U) U.S. Army Field Station San Antonio was named "INSCOM Journalist of the Year" in October 1985.47

ClVPER Classification Surveys. (U) The following position management and classification surveys were completed in FY 1986: ASA, Detachment O, DCSPPM/SAA, Officers' Club and NCO Club, DCSRM, DCSLOG, USAISC-AHS, and major portions of DCSOPS, AVISA, and ITAC. Four hundred and eighty-six positions were reviewed during the conduct of these 10 surveys. The FY 1987 survey schedule has been published and distributed to all activities.48

35

UNCLASSIFIED

t

UNCLASSIFIED New OPM Ciassifications. (U) Several new OPM classification standards were received during FY 1986. Those few that were applicable to the HS serviced population included the Pe.rsonnel Clerical and Assistance Series (GS-203) and Paralegal Speciali~t Series (GS-950). Both standards were implemented well within the prescribed time frame of 180 days for application. A test application of the draft EMSGEG (Executive, Managerial, and Supervisory Grade Evaluation Guide) was· conducted in July. This standard has not yet been published in final form by OPM.49

Performance Appraisal System. (U) The Department of t.he Army revised the performance appraisal system and on 23 May issued the Performance Management System to all MACOM's. This system Sf:lt forth several major changes including employee coverage, rating forms, and summary rating levels. Training on the new system was provided by the Management and Employee Relations (MER) Branch to approximately 140 supervisors.

(U) There was a noted improvement in the timeliness and quality of performance appraisal: 65 percent of the Performance Management Recognition System (PMRS) ratings and 70 percent of the GS ratings were received within 60 days of the end of the rating period. The rate of delinquent appraisals decreased from 14 percent to 7 percent.50

DA Permanent Fart-Time Employment Program. (U) The DA goals for the Permanent Fart-Time Employment Program (one position for every 80 permanent positions) were not met during FY 1986. However, at the time of submission of this report, the DCSRM, had agreed to allocate two permanent part-time positions to the AHS Garrison. With the allocation and subsequent fill of these positions in FY 1987, some progress is expected next year.51

DA Intern Training. (U) Ten DA interns graduated from the Intern Training Program during the fiscal year. Graduation from the program is based upon satisfactory completion of on-the-job training and formal training courses as outlined in their respective training program plans. The intern graduates were placed into permanent positions within the command.

(U) Nine DA interns were employed during the year to participate in a 2-year training program. The entry grade was GS-05 with promotion potential to GS-09 with the exception of two civilian personnel administrative interns. The total interns on board at the end of the fiscal year equals 18.52

36

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

EO. (Equal Opportunity) and EEO (Equal Employment Opportunity) Complaints. (U) In FY 1986, two EO complaints and twelve EEO complaints and inquiries were processed. Of these, one EO complaint was resolved through the chain of command and two EEO complaints became formal and were sustained. One EEO complaint was resolved at the command level. The other was resolved after a U.S. Army Ci vi.lian Appellate Review Agency fact finding conference on 11 August 1986, was pending resolution at the end of the fiscal year. At the end of FY 1986, there were two active formal complaints of discrimination within the command.53

l(b)(6) I Purple Heart Recepient. (U) SGT _of the 766th MI Detachment was awarded the Purple Heart Medal in a ceremony held on 23 July 1986 for wound received during a terrorist attack on the La Belle Discotheque in Eerlin-Steglitz during the early morning hours of 5 April 1986.5~

Contract Support Activity. (U) The activity came into existence on 21 May 1985 to perform a new mission acquired by HQ INSCOM, supporting the DCSLOG. The activity provides the required supervisory, technical review, staff guidance, and contract oversight necessary to act as Head, Contract Activity (HCA) for procuring supplies and services in support of classified intelligence operations; establishes and operates an activity to support CONUS requirements for secure intelligence procurement in accordance with appropriate guidelines stated in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Defense and Army FAR supplements; establishes and operates sufficient activities to support INSCOM worldwide (OCONUS) requirements for secure intelligence procurements in accordance with appropriate guidelines stated in the Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense and Army FAR supplements. 55

Safety Program. CU) The command goal in FY 1986 was to reduce accidents in all categories at least 10 percent over the FY 1985 rate. The emphasis on safety at all echelons of command resulted in reaching the overall 10 percent reduction despite a increase in Army military vehicle accidents. The command remained under the Armywide rate in all categories of accidents by a considerable margin.56

Alcohol and Drug Prevention Program. (U) The Alcohol and Drug Counselling Officer (ADCO) position which had been vacant since April 1985 was filled in April 1986. During FY 1986, the Army instituted the Tobacco Cessation Program of which a major part was an antismoking campaign starting in July 1986. Smoking became prohibited in Army-controlled buildings, except where specifically authorized. Also in FY 1986, the Army and INSCOM started 100 percent testing for the virus that causes AIDS. Testing was almost complete by the end of the fiscal year.57

37

UNCLASSIFIED

I

UNCLASSIFIED Implementation of the Enlisted Distribution Target Model (EDTM) and the Enlisted Distribution Plan (EDP). (U) The ODCSPER EDTM and EDP were enacted during the 1st Qtr of FY 1986 as a method of distributing the available force to the various MACOM's.

(U) MOS and grade imbalances, averages, and shortages will be distributed among the various. MACOM's on a "fair share" basis. Each command's "fair share" will be determined based on DAMPL priorities, missions, and other factors. Assets will be distributed based on projected authorizations contained in the Personnel Management Authorization Document (PMAD), and should achieve a Minimum Acceptable Level of Fill (MALOF) at least to the MACOM level. Provisions have been made to selectively manage certain MOS's as required.58

Enlisted Retirements. (U) Thirty-two requests for voluntary retirement were approved by this headquarters in FY 1986. This figure does not encompass all enlisted retirements within INSCOH in that an unknown number were approved by other approving authorities as authorized by paragraph 12-2, AR 635-200. Other cases were processed by this headquarters, and approved by HQDA.59

Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture. (U) Enlisted personnel . posture by MOS (EW/Crypto and HUMINT MOS 1 s) is shown in the table below.60

Table 5. - Enlisted Personnel Posture for FY's 1985-1986.

11th Qtr Percent 11th Qtr INS COM DA FY 1985 Of FY 1986 Percent Percent

MOS Auth/Asf Fill Auth/Ass Of Fill Of Fill

05D 224/278 1211 237/287 121 1110 05H 88811,250 1111 986/1,155 117 120 05K 630/8119 135 793/770 97 106 33M 971101 101! 111/103 93 80 33P 171/165 97 157/150 96 103 33Q 1631170 1011 160/168 105 102 33R 23/27 117 27/18 67 53 33T 9!1/78 80 70/70 100 87 96B 289/2119 86 253/278 110 96 96D 290/196 68 232/211 91 89 97B 608/!f 8!1 80 561/558 99 97 97C 911/37 39 61/29 !J8 100 97G 185/158 85 202/21!1 106 127 97E 20!1/183 90 186/201 108 114 98C 1,111/1,llllJ 130 l,05!1/l,022 97 94

38

UNCLASSIFIED Lf 1

t

UNCLASSIFIED

11th Qtr Percent 4th Qtr INS COM DA FY 1985 Of FY 1986 Percent Percent

MOS Auth/Asg Fill Auth/Ass Of Fill or Fill

98G 9011/891 99 1,015/905 89 81 98J 2121331 1211 312/318 102 97 98Z 130/124 95 132/124 911 81

Notes: 1. MOS 05G converted to MOS 97G. 2. MOS 33S converted to MOS 33M, 33P, 330, 33R, 33T 3. MOS 96C converted to MOS 97E.

Table 6. - Enlisted Personnel Strength Posture by Area and Unit. (As of 30 September 1986)

Unit

European Area Field Station Augsburg Field Station Berlin Field Station Sinop USA Cryptologic Support Group 66th MI Group USA Russian Institute USA Foreign Lang Trng Ctr Europe

TOTAL

Panama Area 1170th MI Group MI Battalion (LI) Field Station Panama

TOTAL

MAIT Team USA MAIT Team USA Mission Support Activity

TOTAL

Pacific Area Field Station Kunia !TIC-PAC 500th MI Group 50lst MI Group

TOTAL

39

Authorizations

l,567 718 258 11

1,313 5 8

3,880

123 16.I! ill 400

13 60 73

l ,0.1!5 38

219 1,118 2,1120

UNCLASSIFIED

Assigned

1,1182 699 239 12

1,218 5

10 3,665

118 126 117 361

ll.! 59 73

1,0115 .1!8

229 h.ill 2,656

UNCLASSIFIED

Unit Authorizations Assigned

CON US Area Admin/AV Support Activity 17 19 Automated Survey Det 106 111 Admin Survey Det 58 68 Central Security Facility 9 9 CONUS MI Group 968 1,127 Finance Accounting Activity 13 11 513th MI Group 1,042 1,224 Foreign Material Intelligence Group 189 185 USA Garrison, AHS ll.13 166 HQ INSCOM 98 85 HQ Support Activity 16 22 Intel Exchange and Support Ctr 6 4 Field Station Key West 60 41 902d MI Group 229 357 Operational Group 38 44 Field Station San Antonio 262 286 Foreign CI Activity 22 30 Special Security .Group 282 261 USA Garrison, VHFS 116 144

TOTAL 3,674 4,194

INSCOM Consolidated European Area 3,880 3,665 Panama Area 400 361 HAIT Team 73 73 Pacific Area 2,420 2,626 CONUS Area 3,665 hl-22

TOTAL 10,1138 9,924

40

UNCLASSIFIED

t

UNCLASSIFIED

Retention Conference. (U) INSCOM Retention Office hosted the FY 1987 HODA CONUS Retention Conference at San Antonio, Texas, during the period 6 October through 10 October 1986. It was the largest such conference ever held, with over 260 attendees. The conference included speakers from the Soldier Support Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, and briefings by members of the Department of the Army Staff and U.S. Army Military Personnel Center in addition to items of specific interest.. Attendees included all senior retention NCO's and principal reenlistment NCO's from INSCOH as well as representatives from FORSCOM, TRADOC, USAREUR, Health Services Command (HSC), and Information Systems Command (ISC) commands.61

Retention NCO of the Year. (U) SFC James Taylor, U.S. Army Field Station Kunia, Wahiawa, Hawaii, was selected as the INSCOH Retention NCO of the Year for FY 1985. SFC Taylor appeared before the HODA Retention NCO Of the Year Board in January ~985, but was not selected as the HODA Retention NCO Of the Year.62

HODA Retention Award. (U) USAINSCOM was presented the HQDA · Reenlistment Award for FY 1985 at the meeting of the DA Reenlistment Steering Group in February 1986.63

FY 1986 Retention Statistics. (U) a. The retention goals established by HODA for FY 1986 were ij26 Initial Term, 254 Mid Career, and 2ij4 Career. Minimum acceptable achievement is 100 percent in each reenlistment category.

b. Actual INS90M achievements:

Initial Term Total FY 1986 per DCSPER 398 537

Percent achieved 126%

Mid Term 3611

143i

Career 290

119%

c. For FY 1986, INSCOM has an initial term quality point average of 79.6 compared to the Army goal of 66, and the Army-wide average of 69.9. lNSCOM is the leading MACOM in.retaining quality initial term soldiers.611

41

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Retention Rates of CMF 98 and 33 (SJGINT) MOS for FY 1985. (U) In CMF 33 and 98, the Total Army retention rates for FY 1986 were down significantly from FY 1985. A breakdown is shown in the following table.65

USA I NS COM Army Minus INS COM

Total Army

USAINSCOM Army Minus INS COM

Total Army

USAINSCOM Army Minus INS COM

Total Army

INITIAL TERM

EliSible Jieenlisted 699 301 951 284

1550 585

MID TERM

222 152 337 217 559 369

CAREER

86 74 151 123 237 197

Percentage 43 ~ 38

86 81 83

Ninth Annual USAINSCOM Organization Day. (U) On 26 September 1986, Major General Harry E. Soyster, INSCOM Commander, officially recognized recipients chosen for their outstanding performance and meritorious service during FY 1986. Eight awards were presented, to include a new addition--the Commander's Plaque for Operational Achievement. Three of the eight awards went to OCONUS command, U.S. Army Field Station Kunia.

(U) The presentation included awarding Russell J. Heinen, Chief of Internal Review in the Office qf the Chief of Staff, with the Albert w. Small Award; Captain [(b)(S) I Field Station Kunia, with the Colonel Richard F. Judge Military/Civilian Team Improvement Award for military recipient and Mr. l(b)(S) I (b)(6) INSCOM Liaison Detchment NSA, as the civilian recipient; (b)(SJ U.S. Arm Field Station Kunia, was presented the Jackie Keith Award· Ms. (b)(6) DCSLOG, with the Virginia McDill Award; (b)(SJ DCSLOG, with the Equal Employment Opportunity Award; Mr. j(b)(6) jU.S. r,;A~r;,,m;...y---~ Fi~ld Station Kunia, with the Annual Wage Grade Award; Ms. Ll(b_l(_6~) ___ .....J

j(b)(s[ I DPCA, USAG VHFS, the nonappropriated Fund Employee of the Year Award; and Staff Sergeant l(bJ(6) I U.S. Army Field Station Kunia, with the new Commander's Plaque for Operational Achievement.

42

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

(U) The DCSOPS History Office, Public Affairs Office, and the Audiovisual Information Services Activity contributed significantly to the ceremony with an excellent IO-minute slide/audio presentation on Army Intelli~ence history and INSCOM.66

lNSCOM Grade Rollback Program. (U) During FY 1986, INSCOM continued its policy of directing that all nonsupervisory GS-11 and GS-12 positions be filled at the GS-09 level or lower in an effort to comply with the OMB/OPM directed 1.5 percent reduction in GS/GM 11-15 strength program. During FY 1986, lNSCOM increased its GS/GM 11-15 population by just 5 positions, an increase of 0.63 percent. This slight growth occurred in spite of many new civilian authorizations, to include military to civilian conversions. INSCOM's GS-01 through GS-10 population increased by nine positions (a 1.10 percent increase). This balanced growth was due mainly to this innovative Position Management Program.67

Management Employee Relations. (U) An average number of grievances, appeals, and lG complaints were processed in DCSPER during the year as follows:

(U)

~ - PMRS rating grievances l - PMRS informal rating grievance l - Management reclama on PMRS rating 1 - Congressional complaint 3 - IG complaints 1 - MSPB appeal ~ - Grievances 1 - Legal suit

A somewhat larger than average number of awards were processed.

1 - National Intelligence Medal of Achievement (Central Intelligence Agency) ·

3 - Decorations for Exceptional Civilian Service 12 - Meritorious Civilian Service Awards

7 - Commander's Awards for Civilian Service ~ - Large monetary awards to include a Suggestion Award

(U) Several command letters were also published--one on "Delegation of Authority to Exigencies of the Service" and one on "Disciplinary Action for Civilians Following Violation of Administrative Security Regulations or Procedures.". In addition to these letters, seven newsletters for supervisors were published on a variety of civilian personnel management topics to include a summary of the new Federal Employee Retirement System.68

43

UNCLASSIFIED

I

UNCLASSlFIED

INSCOM Average Grede. (U) The DA average grade ceiling assigned to INSCOM is 9.17. The FY 1985 average grade was 9.11. During FY 1986, the average grade increased 9.12.69

New OPM Classification Guide for Managers and Supervisors Proposed. (U) OPM proposed a tentative new classification standard by which supervisors and managers will be graded. INSCOM test applied the new standards to 20 positions. The results were as follows: 12 positions (60 percent) maintained their current grade; 6 positions (30 percent) were downgraded; and 2 positions (10 percent) were upgraded. It remains to be seen if this standard will ever be adopted federal-wide.70

Development of a SES Position. (U) The only scientific and technical position at INSCOM was converted to the first SES position in September 1986. It is titled: Deputy for Policy and Development, ES-301. The position will report directly to the CG, INSCOM.71

AHS Task Force to Coordinate Relocation of INSCOM to Fort Belvoir. (U) In June 1986, Arlington Hall Station established a task force to oversee the details from physical relocation to personnel relocation to Fort Belvoir in May, 1988. Civilian Personnel Training Division (CPTD) is the DCSPER representative on the task force. Civilian Fersonnel Division (CPD) responsibilities include informing employees of their rights regarding the move and attempting to resolve potential problems before the move actually occurs.72

ISA/FGGM Realignment. (U) ln July 1986 the decision was made to close the INSCOM Support Activity at FGGM. DCSPER was an administrative liaision for the activities at Fort George G. Meade. This action was accomplished in order to consolidate resources. Seven positions were abolished but all employees were placed in other positions with no loss of personne1.73

Upward Mobility Program. (U) The Upward Mobility Program (UMP) has been a reporting item for the INSCOM Review and Analysis Program (lRAP) for the past 2 years. The FY 1985 represented a growth year in which the number of participants increased 100 percent (6 positions to 12 positions). Command emphasis continued to promote a significant increase in INSCOM participation in the UMP. During FY 86, the INSCOM goal of 13 positions filled was achieved for the first time. The goal subsequently was exceeded by two positions as a result of 4th Quarter, FY 1986 accomplishments. The program is an important element of the INSCOM affirmative action effort. The number of UMP participants has increased by 250 percent in the past two fiscal years.74

44

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Intern Program. (U) The FY 1986 average quarterly fill rate for interns was 98-plus percent. This was the result of prior planning accomplished within each training activity and advance recruitment. A perfect record (100 percent) for the placement of intern graduates into permanent spaces was again achieved in FY.1986. For the sixth consecutive year, it was not necessary to request HQDA assistance to place any command intern graduates. Twelve interns graduated from the program during FY 1986. A major and continuing program initiative is the shifting of intern spaces from the command headquarters to field tr·aining sites. The reason for this initiative is that technical skills are best developed in the field rather than in MACOM headquarters staff activities. The headquarters to field ratio of spaces in June 1985 was 13:12 or 52 percent to 48 percent whereas in June 1986 the headquarters to field ratio was 10:16 or 38 percent to 62 percent.75

Equal Employment Opportunity Program. (U) The following is a brief command overview of USAINSCOM's efforts in eliminating underrepresentation of women and minorities in mid and senior level positions in the workforce:76

As of 30 SeEtember 1285

GS-9 GS.;.10 GS-11 GS-12 GS-13 GS-14 GS-15

White Female 43 2 54 46 8 1 0

Black Male 4 2 4 14 4 l 0 Black Female 6 0 9 8 1 0 0

Hispanics Male 3 0 0 6 3 0 1 Hispanics Female 1 0 1 2 0 0 0

AA/Pl Male 3 1 9 27 8 l 1 AA/Pl Female 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

AI/AN Male 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 AI/AN Female 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

45

UNCLASSIFIED

Total

154

29 211

12 4

50 2

2 0

UNCLASSIFIED

As of 1 October 1986

GS-9 GS-10 GS-11 GS-12 GS-13 GS-1~ GS-15

White Female 39 2 56 55 5 0 0

Black Male 5 1 10 17 , 1 0 .J.

Black Female 12 0 10 7 0 0 0

Hispanics Male 2 0 3 3 2 0 0 Hispanics Female 1 0 1 2 0 0 0

AA/PI Male 4 I 8 25 8 0 0 AA/PI Female 1 0 l 2 0 0 0

AI/AN Male 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 AI/AN Female 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morale and Welfare. (U) The lnstallation Morale, Welfare, and Recreation Fund (IMWRF) concept was approved in FY 1986 for implementation in FY 1987. The IMWRF consolidates all nonappropriated funds (NAF) and business operations on an installation incorporated into a single fiscal entity. This restructuring of both the financial and business principals allows the installation commander to apply all available NAF resources to Morale, Welfare, and Recreation (MWR) programs and facility requirements. It also provides the means to ensure the efficient use of resources in support of MWR Programs and to maximize the amount of NAF available for Capital Purchases/Minor Construction (CPMC) and NAF major construction. Each installation is required to submit a plan through channels to OSD for approval. The IMWRF is scheduled for implementation at AHS and VHFS on 1 October 1986.

(U) HQDA was successful in obtaining funds to support many of family programs. Vint Hill Farms Station and Arlington Hall Station received support through Programs Development Increment Package (PDIP). These funds supported many areas within Army Community Services (CS) and Child Development Services. (CDS). Funds which were passed to the DPCA at VHFS were executed in an outstanding manner. Funds allocated to AHS were diverted to other requirements since they do not provide family support services. These funds will be diverted to VHFS in future years. Although $122K was allocated to VHFS, only $72K was actually obligated for the intended purpose. The installation used $50K of these funds to help offset Gramm-Rudman-Hollings cuts in BASEOPS.. Distribution of funds allocated by HQDA is as indicated.

46

UNCLASSIFIED

Total

157

35 29

10 lj

ll6 lj

.lj

0

UNCLASSlFIED

PDIP Number Purpose VHFS AHS 1S6H Army Family Child Care $ 60K 1S6K Financial Planning $ 17K $ 7K 1S6G Army Family Services $ ll5K $15K

Family Advocacy $ lOK

TOTAL $132K $22K

(U) Construction on the community center at VHFS proceeded at a less than desirable pace. Although originally scheduled for completion in April 1986, the finishing touches were still being applied at years end. Occupancy is now planned for November 1986. A part-day preschool, which will ultimately be housed in this new facility, will open the 1986-87 term in the post chapel. Vint Hill Farms is a proactive installation and has implemented many new programs within the family support arena.77

Command Officer Personnel Strength. (U) The command strength as of 30 September 1985 was 1,253 officers and 516 warrant officers. This was an increase of 18 officers and 50 warrant officers compared to the end of FY 198ll strength. As of 30 September 1986, the strength had increased to l,3ol! officers and 552 warrant officers.78

Badge System at 17llth MI Company. (U) The 17llth MI Company implemented a badge system in April 1986 to enhance security.79

New Attorney Advisor Position. (U} During FY 1985, the CG USAINSCOM was designated a Head of Contracting Activity {HCA) by HQDA. This designation was in response to a need to form a dedicated element within the Army for secure environment contracting. The formation of this element was completed in FY 1986. The office of the SJA played a major role in its successful operation. The TDA for this HCA contains a space for a GM-13 attorney-advisor, the incumbent of which is under the technical supervison of the SJA. As of the close of FY 1986, the position was filled by Mr. Robert M. Echols.BO

Military Justice. (U) By General Order No. 6, signed by John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, dated 1 May 1985, the CG USAINSCOM was designated, pursuant to Uniform Code of Military Justice Article 22(a)(6), to convene general courts-martial. A breakdown of the military justice reports revealed the following statistics.81

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

' ARTICLE 15's

FY 1985: 605 FY 1986: 127 Summarized

l.176 Formal 603 TOTAL

COURTS-MARTIAL

FY 1985 FY 1986 Summary 9 Summary 2 Special 7 Special 6 General 5 General 13

TOTAL 2l! TOTAL 21

DRUG OFFENSES

FY 1985: 109 FY 1986: 105

I FY 1985 ADMINISTRATIVE ELIMINATIONS

(AR 635-200) Chapter 5 (Sep for Convenience of Govt) 17 Chapter 9 (Alcohol or Drug Abuse) LI Chapter 10 (Discharged for Good of Service) 6 Chapter 13 (Separated for Unsuitability) 21 Chapter 14 (Separated for Misconduct) 27 Chapter 15 (Separated for Homosexuality) 2 All others: 30

FY 1986 ADMINISTRATIVE ELIMINATIONS

Chapter 5 (Sep for Convenience of Govt) 32 Chapter 9 (Alcohol or Drug Abuse) 9 Chapter 10 (Discharged for Good of Service) 7 Chapter 13 (Separated for Unsuitability) 2 Chapter 14 (Separated for Misconduct) 3l.I Chapter 15 (Separated for Homosexuality) 2 All others: 58

48

UNCLASSIFIED

JNSCOM Worldwide Training Conference. (U) The annual INSCOM Worldwide Training Conference took place the week of 3 September 1986 at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, Crystal City, Virginia. The conference was designed around the theme "Values in Training." During the course of the conference, BG Walker expressed concern over the high turnover of trainers in INSCOM units. He noted that of the 3~ personnel from INSCOM units in attendance, only six had been present at the previous conference. He was further disappointed that only one unit had elected to send its S-3. BG Walker messaged INSCOM units that nr believe we are putting good people in our training jobs. We just are not keeping them there long enough •. Training is one of our highest priorities in INSCOM; we can't do our job without excellent training. We cannot fill these vital positions with someone who will only be in that job a short time while awaiting another job, or who is there for an orientation or OJT program." The general suggested that trainers be kept in their jobs for at least 18 months, or for the entire tour of dutv in a short tour area.82 (b)(1)

(b)(1)

(b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(1),(b)(1) Per CIA,(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L. 86-36

49 . c;g N9{ RELEASABLE 18 f8REI~ "JliTl8Pt'1"2'- •

UNCLASSIFIED

REDTRAIN Training Program. (U) Although REDTRAIN has proved to be one of the most valuable training programs available to the unit commanders, both the Active Component (AC) and Reserve Component (RC) report problems in purchasing off-the-shelf equipment using REDTRAIN funds. This report is based on approximately 90 percent of the AC second half semi-annual REDTRAIN reports and 60 percent of RC second half reports. Several procurement officers indicate although AR 350-3 authorizes such purchases, it is not a recognized authority. Suggestions have been made to update AR 350~3 and logistics regulations to reflect correct procedures and references for procurement of off-the-shelf items using REDTRAIN funds.

(U) RC organizations continue to reflect major problems in the identification and tracking of REDTRAIN funds. AC units express a concern that REDTRAIN funds will decrease as TROJAN facilities come on line, pointing to the fact that most TROJAN facilities will have only four positions and will be available on a limited basis. AC units also expressed the concern that some organizations and personnel tend to forget that TROJAN is a COMINT facility and provides rio training for either CMF 96 or non-intelligence personnel working in intelligence positions.

(U) At the same time, the RC reports indicate that Combined Training Facilities (CTF) continues to be both a blessing and a curse. Commanders acknowledge that the CF program offers invaluable skill refresher training for their personnel, but they are concerned that 12 days dedicated to CTF activities out of the available 39 training days seriously hampers their ability to conduct integrated unit and team training and poses potential major disruption as units start transitioning from current to RC CEWI structures.86 .

Technical Intelligence. (U) In December 1985, the results of an ODCSPPM staff study was briefed to a headquarters Executive Committee (EXCOM) regarding a 513th MI Group proposal to modify the Tactical Technical Intelligence (TAC TECHINT) structure developed under AOE and the present TDA organization that supports the Army's worldwide Opposing Forces (OPFOR) Foreign Materiel for Training (FMT) Program. The EXCOM approved forwarding to HQDA a proposed structure that has a Foreign Materiel Intelligence Group (FMIG) directly subordinate to HQ INSCOM with the mission to provide centralized management and support for Army TAC TECHINT training, ensure operationai readiness of active and reserve TAC TECHINT training, and manage the Army's OPFOR FMT Program. A concept plan requesting permission to reorganize will be submitted in January 1986 to HQDA IAW AR 310-49. The proposed activation date for the new structure is 4th Quarter, FY 1986.87

50

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

Technical Lanfuages Systems Incorporated (TLSI) Proposal. (U) !NSCOM launched a MACOM-wide Command Language Program (CLP) effective l October 1985. In accordance with Regulation 350-3 (chapter 1, p~ra l-7d) responsibilities of subordinate commanders are formally established. Commanders have been tasked with language enhancement without additional technical or manpower resources. INSCOM headquarters has always regarded diagnostic testiqg as a key factor in units CLP methodology. INSCOM is considering a language training proposal to contract TLSI to provide diagnostic testing and remedial training to a controlled group of Russian linguists so that INSCOM can evaluate the potential of such a contracted program for command-wide applicability.88

Army Biographic Repository. (U) On 27 September 1985 ACSI, DA approved a decision of CG, INSCOM to discontinue maintenance of the Army Biographic Repository at Fort Meade in FY 1986. On 29 October 1985, ADCSOPS-HUMINT forwarded a letter to DIA alerting them to this decision and seeking DIA comments/recommendations on ultimate disposition fo the biographic files. On 10 December 1985, DIA/Directorate of Research (DR) notified INSCOM that they were interested in taking all the files. DIA is presently negotiating to reorient several Reserve programs to utilize the manpower · necessary to integrate/utilize the material now in the Army biographic files. DIA biographic analysts will work closely with the reservists to ensure proper integration of the material. ADCSOPS-HUMINT anticipates transfer of the files to DIA to be completed by 31 March 1986. As soon as details and dates are worked out with DIA, all units that provide information to or use the biographic repository will be advised of new procedures to follow.B9

Military Construction Army (MCA) Program. (U) The Authorization Bill for FY 1986 MCA projects was signed into law on 3 December 1985 and the Appropriation Bill on 10 December 19.85. Budget outs will have a big impact on the INSCOM FY 1987 MCA Program, and as in FY 1986, we won't have FY 1987 MCA projects until Congress approves and appropriates the projects~ The FY 1987 MCA Program is not final at DA yet, but it is anticipated that five INSCOM funded projects will be in the program totaling $20,000,010. The MCA construction lists forwarded with the FY 1988-92 PARR submission will follow programming guidance from DA, limiting the INSCOM · program as follows:

51

UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

FY 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992

GUIDANCE ($000) $13,809 $10,504 $13,936 $34,098 $34,098

(U) The trend is toward increased fiscal restraint through the programming years. Greater emphasis on describing, validating, documenting, and justifying requirements will ensure INSCOM retains its share of construction funds to support the mission.90

HQ INSCOM Facility at Fort Belvoir. (U) Congress has approved and funded the project, and design of the FY 1986 MCA proj~ct for a new headquarters at Fort Belvoir is nearly complete. The design firm has provided the Baltimore Division, Corps of Engineers, a final design package, and once review comments are incorporated, the design effort will be complete. Construction of the new facility should be complete in the Spring of 1988, with occupancy of the new facility anticipated in the Summer of 1988. The specific time schedule may change, but ont fact remains--INSCOM HQ will move to Fort Belvoir.91

Non-Tactical Vehicles (NTV) Update. (U) HQ USAINSCOM received an initial allocation of 289 vehicles for procurement from FY 1986 funds based on a projected requirement of 446 vehicles. In order to obtain other critically needed vehicles not allocated to the command (i.e., fire trucks and ambulances), it was necessary to trade off 39 sedans and l bus to stay within the budgetary constraints imposed by Congress. This action reduced the HQ FY 1986 vehicle allocation from 289 vehicles to 244. Subsequent to the passing of the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings legislation requiring a balanced budget by 1991, the command received an additional reduction of 33 sedans and 3 buses from the FY 1986 allocation. This action reduced the command's FY 1986 vehicle allocation to a total of 208 vehicles for distribution command-wide. While this additional reduction may not have a severe impact on vehicle assets throughout the command, it will require an additional expenditure of funds to maintain selected overage/overmileage vehicles beyond their normal life expectancy. Consequently, the latest reduction will alter the initial planned distribution of vehicles to subordinate units and require organizations to become more dependent on leased vehicles.92

52

UNCLASSIFIED

t

UNCLASSIFIED

Dissolution of INSCOMBA. (U) The Board of Governors voted to dissolve INSCOMBA effective 1 September 1986. The association discontinued the paying of Death Grants and registering dependents for tuition assistance unless the member was eligible for the benefits on or before 31 August 1986. A trust was established to satisfy all tuition assistance requests from those dependents who were or became eligible on or before 31 August 1986. All INSCOMBA funds raised were discontinued imrnediately.93

I

HQIC Newsletter. (U) The HQIC opened its door on February 21, 1986, at a ceremony presided over by MG Harry E. Soyster, Commander, INSCOM. Since the opening, HQIC personnel have produced a monthly newsletter that covers areas of interest to end-users and ADP personnel at HQ JNSCOM, the field stations, and MI groups. Pertinent areas considered in the newsletter are mainframe software, personal computer software, hardware, educational advice, special articles, and security issues.9~

52a

UNCLASSIFIED

-6f FICIAL HSE . .QNL'r

FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER lV. RESOURCES AND MANAGEMENT

1. FY 1986, DCSRM AHR CC), pp. 6-7. 2. Ibid., pp. 7-8. 3. Ibid., pp. 8-13. !!. Ibid., p. 13. 5. Ibid., p. l!i. 6. Ibid., p. 22. 7. Ibid., pp. 22-23. 8 • Ibid • , p • 27 • 9. 'i'bI'd.' p. 30. 10. ----PY-1986, CSO AHR (U), p.ll. 11. Ibid., pp. 11-6. · 12. FY 1986, DCSIM AHR (C), p. 11. 13 • I bi d • , p • 12 • l!i. Ibid., p. 16. 15. Ibid., p. 16. 16. Ibid., p. 20. 17. Ibid., p. 27. 18. Ibid., pp. 27-28. 19. Ibid., pp. 29 & 32. 20. FY 1986, ASA AHR (U), p. 26. · 21. FY 1986, IG AHR (U), p. 13; Ltr, lAOPS-PL, subj: HQ.USAINSCOM

Letter of Instructions (LOI) for 1985 INSCOM Comanders' Conference, dtd 7 Oct 85 (U).

22. Ibid., p. lll. 23. Ibid., p. l!i. 211. Ibid., pp.111-15. 25. Ibid., p. 15. 26. Ibid., p. 15. 27. Ibid., p. 17. 28. FY 1986, DCSLOG AHR (C), p. 26. 29. Ibid., pp. 32-33, 30. Ibid., pp. 16-17. 31. Ibid., p. 18. 32 • I bi d • , p • 19 • 33, Ibid., p. 12. 3!1. lNSCOM Command Strength Report from DCSPER, as of 30 September

1986, published 17 October 1986 (C). 35. FY 1986, USAFS Berlin AHR (TS), Overview. 36. Travis Trophy and Director's Trophy Awards Brochure, dtd 7 May 1986 (U). 37. FY 1986, PAO AHR (U), p. 7. 38. Ibid., p. 8. 39. FY 1986, SSG AHR (S), p. 18. 110. FY 1986, DCSIM AHR (C), p. 11. lll. Ibid., p. 19. ll2. Ibid., p. 19.

53

Bf FlelAL USE QNLY

I

43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 5!!. 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 62. 63. 6!!. 65. 66.

67. 68. 69. 70. 71. 72. 73. 111. 75. 76. 77. 78.

79. 80. 81. 82.

l bi d • ' p • 19 • "Ibid. ' p. 20. lbfd. , p. 34 • I'b'id., p. 36. Ff"1986, USAFS San Antonio AHR (U), p. 10. FY 1986, USAG AHS AHR (U), p. 26. l bid. ' p • 27 • Ibi'd., P• 28. l bid. ' p. 32. Ibi'd., P• 33. Ibid., p. 71; FY 1986 DCSPER AHR (U), P. 46. FY 1986, 766th MI Det AHR (S}, p. 25. FY 1986, DCSLOG AHR (U), p. 40. FY 1986, DCSPER AHR (U), p. 6. Ibid., p. 6. Ibid., pp. 15-16. Ibid., p. 19. Ibid., pp. 12-15. Ybfd.' p. 20. Ibid., p. 20. Ibid., p. 20. .!.lli·, p. 20. 1li!..5!•J pp. 21-22.

BFFJCIAL USE 61f LY

Ibid., P• 21. ~NSCOM Journal, December 1986 Issue, pp. 12-17; FY 1986 DCSPER AHR (U), PP• 26-27. FY 1986, DCSPER AHR (U), p. 33. Ibid., PP• 31-32. Ibid.' p. 34. Ibid.," PP• 3!!-35. Ibid., P• 35. Ibid., P• 36. lbid.' p. 36. Ibid., p. llO. Ibid., p. 40. "fbid., p. !17. "fbid., pp. 7-8. '!NSCoH Command Strength Report from DCSPER, as of 30 September 1986, published 17 October 1986. FY 1986, 174th HI Company AHR (SNF), p. III-5. FY 1986, SJA AHR (U), p. 6. !did., pp. 7-8 • . Msg., IADCG, subj: The Importance of Personal Continuity in Unit Training Sections (241ll20Z Sep 86) (U); Msg., IAOPS-TNG, subj: 1986 INSCOM Worldwide Training Conference (2301300Z Aug 86) (U) •

83. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), p. 54.

54 8FFICIAL USE 9NLY

CFflelAL HSE -9HL¥

FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), p. 63. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), p. 55. Ltr, lAlESC-T, ~ubj: Interim Second Half Fiscal Year (FY) 85 Semi-Annual REDTRAJN Tteport, dtd 13 Dec 85 (U). Ltr., lAOPS-OR-GE, subj: Quarterly Activities Report (U), dtd 3 Feb 86 (S), p. 1. Ibid., p • .Ii. Ibid., P• .Ii. Ibid.' p. 9, 'ibid., pp. 9-10. Ibid., p. 10. ~from lNSCOMBA, dtd 16 May 86, to all commanders and staff heads. HQlC Newsletter, Vol. 1, No. 1, dtd May 1986, p.1.

55

41Ff1GIAl YS~ -6NLY-

I

!t

I I

I

Multidiscioline (b)(1)

(b)(1)

Chapter V

OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES

56

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page(s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93

Page(s) 67-68

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

[8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

[8J Other: (b )(1) (b )(3) Per NSA

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93

Page( s) 69-77

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

[8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

Other:

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 78-82

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

HUMINT/TAREX

HQ Personnel Constraints. (U) Management of the HUMINT discipline within INSCOM was adversely affected during FY 1986 by the consolidation of all elements at DCSOPS at Arlington Hall Station. Although the move greatly aided the functioning of DCSOPS as.a whole, the impact on the elements previously stationed at Fort Meade was severe. Over 50 percent of the HUMINT staff declined to make the move. All clerical personnel resigned and opted to seek other employment at Fort Meade, and only 7 of the 22 military personnel assigned to ADCSOPS-HUMINT at the beginning of 1986 were still with the HUMINT staff when it became operational at Arlington Hall on 18 February. The situation was further aggravated by a lack of telephone lines in the new office spaces; a number of offices were without working telephones. This situation had been largely rectified by August. By the end of FY 1986, the HUMINT staff had edged back to a 75 percent fill rate of authorized stro<>nath. (b)(1)

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

~ Other: (b )(1) Per CIA

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93

Page( s) 84-86

DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page(s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s ):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93

Page(s) 87

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption( s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

~ Other: (b )(1) Per CIA

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 88

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

IZ! Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93

Page(s) 89

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

C8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

C8J Other: (b)(l) (b)(3) Per NSA

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93

Page( s) 90-91

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Counterintelli~ence/OnP-rations Securitv (b)(1)

(b)(1)

(b)(1)

82

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 93

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

(b)(1)

Counter-SIGINT Concept. (U) In 1985, the counter-SIGINT concept became the basis for INSCOM security support in the collllllunications­electronics arena. The approach emphasized analysis of the potential SIGINT threat, assessment of existing vulnerabilities, creation of countermeasures, and evaluation of the success of the countermeasures. It deemphasized traditional COM.SEC monitoring. However, this approach was not fully comprehended by other Army elements which INSCOM was tasked with supporting. The situation was exacerbated by the fact that under the Army of Excellence (AOE) concept, Army COMSEC personnel were reduced by 48 percent. Echelons-below-corps were essentially stripped of organic COMSEC monitoring capabilities: all COMSEC assessment people were removed from the division, and only a two-man team left at corps. As a result, INSCOM was deluged with requests for COM.SEC monitoring that could not be supported. Nonetheless, the comm.and group was convinced that the counter-SIGINT concept was the only viable way t~ approach the problem of securing Army communications. Efforts by subordinate elements in the field to develop or acquire new COM.SEC monitoring equipment were disapproved as not being cost­effecti ve. It was felt that the fact that all Army communications would be secured within a 5-to7-year period would create a situation in which the need for COMSEC monitoring would no longer exist.7

COMSBC Issues. (U) AR 380-40, Policy for Safeguarding and Controlling COMSEC Information, is the Army Regulation which provides physical security standards for the use, storage, transfer, ·transport, and destruction of COMSEC material. ACSI, DA is the proponent for the AR, but INSCOM and its predecessor have written and revised the document for over 25 years. Since 1982, when the regulation was last revised, COMSEC developments and national policy changes such as electronic keying, over-the-air rekeying (OTAR), the appearance of unclassified equipment designated as Controlled Cryptographic Items (CCI), and the COMSEC Endorsement Program made revision of AR 380-40 imperative. Action to update the document was initiated in April 1984. By the end of FY 1986, a coordinating draft of the revised AR had been distributed to HQDA, Army MACOM's, and INSCOM units and staff elements.a

84

COMSEC Insecurities. (U) The INSCOM COMSEC Insecurity Program for the purpose of monitoring, reviewing, and when required, evaluating COMSEC insecurity reports initiated within DA was implemented in February 1981. The program serves primarily to ensure that all detected insecurities to COMSEC material are reported promptly to the officials responsible for evaluating the incidents and initiating action to minimize their security impact. These reports also help in identifying trends in insecurity occurrences, and in developing measures to prevent recurrences. Evaluations of insecurities are rendered by the cryptonet controlling authority (CONAUTH) in the case of key at the user level; by INSCOH, when the key is in distribution channels, when multiple Army CONAUTH's are involved, or when there is a personnel insecurity; by DIRNSA, for cryptographic insecurities, physical insecurities (COMSEC equipment and documents); and cases involving CONAUTH's from more than one service. Insecurities which involve a mix of NATO and U.S. short titles will be evaluated by the Security and Evaluation Committee of Allied Nations (SECAN). .

(U) Total reported COMSEC insecurities, by MACOH, for CY 1984 and 1985 are as follows:

Table 7. - COMSEC Insecurities.

Command CY 1985 CY 1986 USAISC 99 '47 AMC 7 5 USAREUR 317 264 FORS COM 122 109 HQDA 1 3 INS COM 11 10 Joint 5 2 EU SAK 15 10 NGB 27 20 TRADOC 1 2 WEST COM 9 6 SOUTH COM 0 3 Other _Jl -11

Total 627 '498

(U) As of 1 October 1985, 10 cases were yet to be opened, bringing the total CY 1986 cases to 508.9

I'"''' 85

fl8T RElEVi!tABlE T8 f 6.ltEUtrt -MM18H~LS

(b){1)

(b)(1)

Mobile TEMPEST Test System (MTTS). (U) This project, an initiative to upgrade nine FETTS-160 TEMPEST systems and to fabricate a tenth system for deployment to the field, was first undertaken in 1979. Since that time, the scope of the project was expanded to include replacing all 10 overloaded vehicles mounting the system as well as upgrading mission equipment. Uowever, this project has had a troubled history, and neither a vehicle nor a satisfactorily working system had been delivered to the command by t-ha end of FY 1Q86. 11

(b)(1),(b)(1) Per CIA

86

NOT ft!tfR!ABl! "' f8.ltEl8N HM'l8NAl:9

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

~ Other: (b )( 1) Per CIA

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 97

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

FOOTNOTES: CHAPTER V. OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES

Mul tidiscioline (b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(1),(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L. 86-36

(b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(1),(b)(3):50 USC 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L. 86-36

88 qi UAtl9lw' >416 C0 •fll'H

'' "'tu an:& ettl:¥.

(b) (1) Per NSA,(b)(3):50 use 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L. 86-36

15. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), pp. 66-7. 1~- Ibid •• D. 66. (b) (1) Per NSA.(b)(3):50 use 3024(i),(b)(3):P.L 66-36

IMINT/MASINT 1. Input from MrJbl(Sl IDCSOPS, 5 Aug 87. 2. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR t'S-CCO/NOFORN), p. 77. 3. FY 1985, DCSOPS AHR (~, p. 26. 4. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (fr-CCO/NOFORN), pp. 78-9.

BF F I e I At . If SE . BNLY

5. Ibid., pp. 75-6 6. "Ibid., ~· 74; Narrative SUI!ltllary, PROJECT GRAY WOLF, MAJ

itbl(S) ]DCSOPS, dtd 18 Jul 85; Msg., DCSOPS, subj: Project Gray Wolf Phase III IPR After Action Report (200930Z Dec 85) (S); Msg., IAOPS-SE-ASP, subj: Gray Wolf Operations (U) (091730Z Apr 86) (S); FY 1986, MI Bn (LI) AHR (S), ohs. I, V,

7. Msg., IAOPS-SE-AVN, subji Grisly Hunter (U) (241700Z "ar 86) (S); Msg., IA OPS-SE-ASP, subj: Request for Grisly Hunter Operational Shakedown Support (U) (031705 Apr 86) (S/NOFORN); FY 1986, MI Bn (LI) AHR (S), ch. I.

50lst MI Gp AHR Annex A

86-2 (0)

8. FY 1986, MI Bn (LI) AHR (S), ch. I; FY 1986, (S/NOFORN), p. 25; M~g., IAOPS-SE-ASP, subj: (Operations Security) to Operation Order No. (022100Z May 86) (S).

9. FY 1986, 513th MI Bde AHR (S), p. 30; FY 1986, MI Bn (LI) AHR (S), ch. I.

l(b)(1) I

....__ ----=----=---::-o-=--_,,___J~/NOFORN), p. 24; Memo for Command Group, IAOPS, subj: Resources Versus Priority Tasks in ADCSOPS-HUMINT, dtd 4 Sep 86 (U).

2. Ltr., IACG, subj: Additional HUMINT Training (U), dtd 3 Feb 86 ~NOFORN); Msg., IAOPS-H-P, subj: · Status of MOS .97C ( 231430Z Sep 86) '81'NOFORN) • .

3. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR few.CCO/NOFORN), pp. 49-50; Msg., IAOPS-H-P, subj: COMS Implementation (241300Z Dec 85) .(S/NOFORN); Interview with Mr .l<b)(6) I DCSOPS, 17 Jul 86.

4. FY 1986, Ops Gp AHR fS1NOFORN),Tab C, pp. 6,9. 5, ~' Ops. Div. Historical Report (S).

89 9FFl61AL USE

8NLY

'", .uhH, i:JSE QNLY

6. FY 1986, 513th MI Brigade AHR (S/NOFORN), pp. 26-7; DF, IAOPS, subj: 513th MIGP's 4102 Mission (U), dtd 23 Sep 86 (S).

7. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), pp. 44-5. 8. Fact Sheet IAOPS-H subj: l(b)(1) Per CIA

(b )( 1) Per CIA Fact S::-:h:-e-e-:t-,-=1A:-:o=P:-:S:-_::H:---F=-, -s-u--:b-:j:--:--;::::(b=::;l(;:;;1 )=::P;=er=;C;;;!Ad__,

Ltr •• IAOPS-OR-GC, sub : 'Ii>ml:hlln-n;;;=-rr;=......--~~,.,,......-.....,,...J(U), dtd 8 Jan 86 (S/NOFORN).

9. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-H-F, subj: Redirection of 430th HI Battalion, 66th MI Group (U), dtd 31 Jul 86 (S/NOFORN); Ltr., IAOPS-H-F, subj: Restructuring of Controlled Collection in USAREUR (U), dtd 13 Nov 85 ( S/NOFORN) •

10. Interview with cPTl(b)(S) I DCSOPS, 17 Jul 86. 11. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), pp. 32-33. 12. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-H-F, subj: CANDY RABBIT II (U), dtd 3 Jan 86

(SiNOFORN); Fact Sheet, IAOPS-H-F, subj: Philippines Collection Working Group Meeting (U), dtd 3 Jan 86 (S/NOFORN); Interview with Mr. j(b)(6) IDCSOPS, 17 Jul 86. · ·

13. Info Paper, IAOPS-H-F, subj: Status of CANNABIS TRIP Concept (U), dtd 16 May 86 (S/NOFORN).

1 li. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-H, subj: CANADA HILL-Vienna Insert (U), dtd 1 Nov 85) (S/NOFORN); Interview with Mr. j(b)(6) I DCSOPS, 17 Jul 86.

15. FY 1986, Ops Gp AHR (S/NOFORN), Operations Division Historical Report. 16. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), pp. li6-li9. . . 17. FY 1985, INSCOM AHR, p. 19. 18. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), p. 58. 19. Ibid., p. 64; Info Memo, TMD, subj: TAREX Personnel

Situation, dtd 21 Mar 86 (C/NOFORN); Ltr., IAOPS-H, subj: Incorporation of TAREX Personnel into GREAT SKILLS Program (C/NOFORN),dtd 25 Jun 86 (C/NOFORN).

20. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR (S-CCO/NOFORN), p. 53. 21. Ibid., p. 57. 22. Ibid., p. 61.

Counterintelligence/Operations Security 1. DF, IAOPS-CI-RAP, subj: Aggressive Counterespionage

Initiatives, dtd 29 Oct 85 (S); Ltr., IAOPS-CI, subj: Letter of Instruction, Headquarters U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command Defensive Source Program (U) (Undtd) (S); . Ltr., IAOPS-CI-RAP, subj: 902d MI Group CISOC (U), dtd 5 Sep 86 (S).

2. Ltr., IAGPE-I, subj: Army Superior Unit Award Recommendation (U), dtd 31 Dec 85 (S); Msg., subj: Defensive Counterespionage (301345Z Oct 85) (S/EYES ONLY).

3. 1st End, IAOPS-CI-RAP, subj: Army Counterintelligence Activities (U), dtd 2 May 86 (S); Ltr., IAOPS-CI-RAP, subj: Annual SAEDA Statistics Report-FY 1986, dtd 17 Dec 86 (C). ·

90 9FFlelAL USE

9HLY

. QFflGIAL HSE

9HL¥

4. Ltr., IAOPS-CI-PG, subj: Polygraph Expansion, dtd 26 Jun 86 (~); DF, IAOPS-CI, subj: Expanded Polygraph Security Screening Program, dtd 8 Aug 86 (U); FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR -CS::CCO/NOFORN), pp. 190-1911.

5. Fact Sheet, IAOPS-CI-OC, subj: INSCOM Support Of Army Personnel Security Investigation (PSI) Program, dtd 24 Jan 86 (U); Info Paper, ADCSOPS-CI-OP, subj: "Catch 'Em in CONUS Program and Its Impact on PSI/PR Mission OCONUS, dtd 29 Apr 86 (U).

6. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR .fS=.CCO/NOFORN), pp. 195-196. 7. Msg., subj: SIGSEC Support for EAC (1140820Z Apr 86)

(U); Ltr., IAOPS-CI-OS, .subj: Counter-SIGINT Support Under AOE, dtd 27 Mar 86 (U); Action DF, IAOPS-CI-P, subj: INSCOM SIGSEC Monitoring Capability, dtd 18 Mar 86 (U}; Ltr., IAOPS­CI-OS, subj: COMSEC Monitoring Support to FORSCOM, dtd 28 Jan 86 (U).

8. FY 1986, DCSOPS AHR ~CCO/NOFORN), pp. 101-102. 9. Ibid., pp. 167-169.

10. Ibid., pp. 158-159. 11. Ibid., pp. 128-133. 12.. Ibid.' pp. 184-187.

91

Qf FIGIAL USE _g u L'f=

-to!

• (b)(1)

< >< H Q z r:.1 0.. 0.. <

/02-

(\J

°'

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s ):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGP A-CSF Form 6-R I Sep 93

Page(s) 103-105

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

APPENDIX B (b)(1)

96

/Olf

APPENDIX C (b)(1)

97

{Dl

APPENDIX D (b)(1)

98

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/ or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 109

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

APPENDIX E (b)(1)

i9

100

)/0

0 CJ

r:r.. >< ..... ~ z r:i:l fl.. fl.. <

.. tll!f ~ r-

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

161 Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 112-115

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

APPENDIX G

(b)(1)

106

J J{p

APPENDIX H (b)(1)

107

fl1

8~NFIDENTIAL

APPENDIX I

USAINSCOM KEY PERSONNEL

Position/Name

COMMANDING GENERAL HG Harry E. Soyster

DEPUTY COMMANDING GENERAL BG George J. Walker BG Charles F. Scanlon

EXECUTIVE OFFICER MAJ l(b)(6)

STAFF ADVISOR FOR SCIENTIFIC AND CRYPTO AFFAIRS Mr.=1(b~)(=6)~~~~~~~-

COMMA¥iD SERGEANT MAJOR CSH[b)(6) I

CHIEF OF STAFF BG Ira C. Owens BG George J. Walker

DEPUT1 CHIEF Qi;: STAFF COL (b)(S)

COL LTC

INTER~L REVIEW OFFICE Mr. :(S)

SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL STAFF MAJ l(b)(6) I

SPECitL ASSISTANT TO CHIEF OF STAFF Mr. _<b)(S) I

USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, FORSCOM LTC l(b)(6) I

RErADFD !INC! ASSIFIED ON 30 October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOIPA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.IR

108

Dates Served

29 Jun 84 - Present

10 May 86 - Present 19 Feb 85 - 10 Hay 86

16 Sep 85 - 08 Jan 86

12 Aug 68 - 30 May 66

30 Dec 84 - Present

10 May 86 - Present 19 Feb 85 - 10 May 86

05 Aug 86 - Present 05 Nov 85 - 05 Aug 86

Jul 84 - 05 Nov 85

01 Apr 84 - Present

05 Jun 84 - Present

07 Mar 83 - Present

28 Mar 84 - Present

CONFIDENTIAL

- --·--------

CONFIDENTIAL

Position/Name

USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, TRADOC LTC l(b)(6) I

USAINUCOM LIAISON OFFICE, USAREUR LTC[b)(6) I

USAINSCOM LIAISON OFFICE, NSA COL l(b)(6) I

INSPEC(TOR :ENERAL COL [(b)(6) -

STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE COL l(b)(6J

CHIEF, OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS LTC l(b)(6) I

COMMA1D CHAPLAI.N COL (b)(SJ

COL '---~--------l

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF,

~~1~·" COL

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION

COL l(b)(6)

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF COL (b)(S)

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, AND MODERNIZATION

LTCrl(6) Mr.

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, COL i<b)(SJ

FORCE INTEGRATION

PLANS, PROGRAMS,

OPERATIONS I

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, LOGISTICS COL l(b)(6) I

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ONl30 October 2015 j

109

Dates Served

30 Sep 83 - 30 Sep 86

05 Oct 83 - 01 Aug 86

06 Jul 84 - 01 Aug 86

06 Aug 84 - Present

01 Jul 85 - Present

01 Jul 85 - Present

05 Jul 86 - Present 06 Jul 83 - 05 Jul 86

24 Aug 86 - Present 18 Jul 86 - 24 Aug 86 31 Mar 8~ - 18 Jul 86

01 May 85 - Present

09 Jun 86 ..: Present

12 Jan 86 - 09 Jun 86 01 Oct 83 - 12 Jan 86

08 Jul 85 - Present

Aug 85 - Present

BY USAlNSCOM FOl1PA Auth Para4-l02 DOD 5200.IR €0NFIDEN TIAt \\~

-GONFIDEN TIAt

Position/Name

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

COL l(b)(6)

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF, SYSTEMS ~;: l(b)(6) I

DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF TELECOMMUNICATION~ COL (b)(S)

Unit/Commander

66th i'ILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL (b)(6) I COL

'--~~~~~~~__.J

470th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP COL l(b)(6) I

500th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP ~~tl(b)(S) I

HBC, 501st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP

~g~ l(b)(6) I 513th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP

g~~(b)(6) I

902d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP g~~ l(b)(6) I

USAINSCOM CONUS MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP SIGINT/EW)

COL (b)(S)

COL

110

Dates Served

20 Oct 84 - Present

22 Dec 85 - 09 Jun 86 03 Jan 78 - 22 Dec 85

27 •uR 84 - 01 May 85

31 Aug 81 - Present

06 Aug 86 - Present 27 Jul 84 - 06 Aug 86

10 Jul 85 - Present

11 Jul 86 - Present 12 Jul 84 - 11 Jul 86

Jul 86 - Present 15 Jun 84 - Jul 86

27 Aug 86 - Present 13 Aug 84 - 27 Aug 86

17 Jan 86 - Present 10 Jul 84 - 17 Jan 86

14 Feb 86 - Present 04 Nov 83 - 14 Feb 86

CONFIDENTIAIJ J 20

CONFIDENTIAL

Unit/Commander

U.S. 1RMY OPEBATTONAI. GROf IP COL (bJ(6l

'--~~~~~~--I

U.S. 1RMY SPECIAL SECURITY GROUP COL lb)(6} - I

·U.S. ARMY CRYFTOLOGIC SUPPORT GROUP . LTC l{b}(6) I

U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION AUGSBURG COL l(b)(6) I

U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION BERLIN g~t rb)(G) I

U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION KEY WEST CPT l(b)(6) I

U.S. ~RMY FIELD STATION KUNii COL l(b)(SJ -

U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION KOREA LTC LTC

U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION MISAWA LTC l(b}(6) I

U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION OKINAWA LTC l(b)(SJ

COL '--~~~~~~~~~---'

U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION PANAMA

:~ rb)(6) I U.S. 1RHY FIELD STATION SAN ANTONIO

LTC (b)(6) I.

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED oNl 30 October 2015 I 111

Dates Served

29 Jun 8~ - Present

Dec 8~ - Present

17 Jun 83 - Present

16 Aug 85 - Present

01 Aug 86 - Present 01 Aug 84 - 7 Aug 86

25 Jun 84 - Present

14 Jun 85 - Present

24 Jul 86 - Present 15 Jun 84 - 24 Jul 86

Nov 8~ - Present

Oct 85 - 31 Dec 85 Jul 84 - Oct 85

03 Jul 86 - Present Sep 84 - 03 Jul 86

26 Jul 85 - Present

BY USAINSCOM FOL PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.IR CONFIDENTIAL

•

.CONFIDENTIAL

Unit/Commander

U.S. ARMY FIELD STATION SINOP ~t l(b)(S) I

3d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (AERIAL EXPLOITATION) LTC'~Cb_><6_l~~~~~~~~

HHC, 18th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION t~~ rb)(S} I

Dates Served ·

13 Aug 86 - Present 13 Aug 85 - 13 Aug 86

31 Jul 85 - Present

18 Jul 86 - Present 02 Jul 84 - 18 Jul 86

HHC, 201st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC l(b)(S) I 21 Feb 86 - Present LTC 14 Jun 84 - 21 Feb 86

HHC, 202d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION ~~~ l(b)(6) I

HHC, 203d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (TEC,NTCAJ. INTEl.I.TGENCE) LTC M<5l , .

430th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (PROVISIONAL) LTC'~(b-)(S-l~~~~~~----l

502d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC l(b)(6) I

524th ITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION LTC LTC

527th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION ti~ l(b}(S) I

USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (COUNTERINTELLIGENCE) EAST COAST LTC l(b)(6) I

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ONl30 October 2015 I

112

14 Mar 86 - Present 03 Jun 85 - 14 Mar 86

07 Jun 85 - Present

14 Jun 85 - Present

24 Jul 85 - Present

11 Jun 86 - Present Jun 84 - 11 Jun 86

09 Jul 86 - Present 09 Jul 84 - 09 Jul 86

25 Mar 85 - Present

BY USAINSCOM FOJiPA Auth Para4-102 DOD 5200.IR CONFIDENTIAb

CONFIDENTIAL

Unit/Commander

USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE (COU,TERINTELLIGENCE) WEST COAST LTC (b)(6) I

USAINSCOM MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (SECURITY) LTC. (b)(6)

LTC

U.S. ARMY MILITARY INTELLIGENCE BATTALION (LOW ENSITY PROVISIONAL LTC (b)(S)

5th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY ~;i rb)(6) I .

11th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (TE~NICAL INTELLIGENCE) CPT [b)(6) I

17th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY MAJ l{b)(6) I

164th ~LITARY INTELLIGENCE COHPAHY CPT ~}(S) I

166th LITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT

174th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT j(b)(S) I CPT(P) l(b)(6) I

209th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY CPT l(b)(6) I

219th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY MAJ (b)(6)

MAJ

332d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (ELE IC WARFARE) CPT

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ONl30 October 2015

113

Dates Served

06 Aug 85 - Pres~nt

23 Jul 86 - Present 11 Sep 84 - 23 Jul 86

02 Apr 86 - Present

26 Sep 86 - Present 25 Jul 85 - 26 Sep 86

20 Sep 85 - Present

31 Jul 84 - Present

17 Jun 85 - Present

31 Jul 84 - Present

15 Aug 86 - Present 20 May 85 - 15 Aug 86

16 Jun 85 - Present

10 Mar 86 - Present 14 Dec 84 - 10 Mar 86

16 Aug 85 - Present

BY USAINSCOM F<)l:PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.lR CONFIDENTIAL

-£0NFIDENTIA:b

Unit/Commander

INSCO~ EAC AVIATION INTjLLIGENCE COMPANY MAJ (b){6l

328th ARMY SECURITY AGENCY COMPANY ~:i l(b)(S) I

409th ARMY SECURITY AGENCY COMPANY ~:i rb)(S) I . ·

641st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE COMPANY (COLLECTION) MAJ l(b}(6)

'---~~~~~~~~.--!

149th ~LitARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT LTC L(6) I

181st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT =~rb)(6) t

430th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT LTC l(b)(6) I '

581st MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT (IMAGERY INTERPRETATION) CPT l(bJ(6) CPT

'--~~~~~~~---'

582d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT (IMAGERY INTERPRETATION) ~:i l'b)(6) I

583d MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT (IMAGERY INTERPRETATION) MAJ l(b)(6) CPT MAJ

584th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE DETAC~NT LTCl(b)(6) I '

REGJW)ED l!NCLASSIFIED oNl30 October 2015 I

114

Dates Served

30 Sep 85 - Present

09 Jan 86 - Present 10 Aug 84 - 09 Jan 86

21 Aug 86 - Present 03 May 85 - 21 Aug 86

10 Jul 85 - Present

Jan 85 - Present

01 Jun 86 - Present 17 Dec 84 - 01 Jun 86

14 Jun 85 - Present

01 Nov 85 - Present 04 May 84 - 01 Nov 85

11 Jun 86 - Present 19 Nov 84 - 11 Jun 86

01 Aug 86 - Present 31 May 86 - 07 Aug 86 03 Jan 84 - 31 May 86

09 Jan 84 - Present

BY USAINSCOM FOL'PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.lR CONFlDENTlAb 1vf

" CONFIDENTIAL

Unit/Commander

766th LTC LTC

TARY INTELLIGENCE DETACHMENT

U.S. ARMY ASIAN STUDIES DETACHMENT Mr· l(b)(6) I

USAINSCOM CI DETACHMENT, DEFENSE NUCLEAR AGENCrf.'Y~------__,

LTC l(b)(6)

66th MILITARY INTELLIGENCE GROUP, DETACHMENT HAHN LTCl~<b_l<S_J _____ __,

SPECIAL SECURITY DETACHMENT, INSCOM MAJ l(b){6) I

U.S. ARMY FIELD SUPPORT CENTER

~g~ rb)(6) I

USAINSCOM THEATER INTELLIGENCE CENTER -PACIF.,r;l:-H~--------,

LTC

U.S. ARMY INTELLIGENCE EXCHANGE AND SUPPORT CENTER

COL J._<b_l<S_> ________ _,

USAINSCOM FOREIGN LANGUAGE TRAINING CENTE: EUROPE

LTC e(S)

USAINSCOM PENTAGON COUNTERINTELLIGENCE FORCEj-;;:-;-;,~------------.

~~ l._'b-)(6_) _________ ___J

USAINSCOM AUTOMATED SYSTEMS ACTIVITY LTC(P) l<bJ(6) 1 ·

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ON 30 October 2015 j 115

BY USAINSCOM FOVPA

Dates Served

27 May 86 - Present 15 Jul 83 - 27 May 86

01 Oct 80 - Present

15 Apr 83 - Present

07 Aug 85 - Present

21 Apr 86 - Present

04 Sep 86 - Present 20 Jul 84 - 04 Sep 86

15 Jun 84 - Present

1 Aug 85 - Present

03 Jun 85 - Present

25 Sep 86 - Present 10 Jul 85 - 21 Aug 86

01 Jun 85 ~ Present

Auth Para4-l02 DOD 5200.lR -tJO N FIDEN TI1\:L

CONFIDENTIAL

Unit/Commander

USAINSCOM ADMINISTRATIVE/AUDIOVISUAL SUPP9BT ACTIVITY Mr. j(bJ(6l

USAINSCOM FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING ACTIY.,r:!-I~TY~----~ ~~ rb){S) !Acting)

USAISi AB!.IllJlION HALL STATION CPT -(b)(6) I

USAINSCOM SUPPORT ACTIVITY, FORT MEADE CPT l(b)(6) I -

USAINSCOM MAINTENANCE ASSISTANCE AND INST,tlCTION TEAM ACTIVITY

CPT _Cb)(6) I USAINSCOM MISSION SUPPORT ACTIVITY

Mr· l(b)(6) I U.S. ARMY FOREIGN COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ACTI~ITY

COL f<b)(S)

U.S. lRMY CENTRAL SECURITY FACILITY COL (b)(6) I COL _

U.S. ARMY RUSSIAN INSTITUTE COL l(b)(6) I

U.S. ARMY GARRISON, ARLINGTON HALL STATI~O~N:,.,.-------~

LTCl(bl(6) LTC_

U.S. ARMY GARRISON, VINT HILL FARMS STATfiON

COL t(bJ(6)

116

Dates Served

30-Nov 78 - Present

13 Jul 86 - Present 14 May 84 - 13 Jul 86

Aug 85 - Present

15 Aug 84 - Present

01 Oct 82 - Present

21 Sep 84 - Present

03 Jun 86 - Present 21 Mar 83 - 03 Jun 86

11 Aug 83 - Present

20 Jun 86 - Present 20 Jul 84 - 20 Jun 86

14 Jun 83 - Present

CONFIDENTIA.b

CONFIDENTIAL

APPENDIX J

TRAVIS TROPHY WINNERS

Calendar Year Winner

1964 6988 U.S. Air Force Security Squadron (USASA NOMINEE: 53d USASA Special Operations Command)

1965 313th ASA Battalion (Corps)

1966 1st Radio Company Fleet Marine Force (USASA NOMINEE: USASA Training Center and School)

1967 509th USASA Group

1968 6990th U.S. Air Force Security Squadron (USASA NOMINEE: USASA, Europe)

1969 6994th U.S. Air Force Security Squadron (USASA NOMINEE: 330th ASA Company)

1970 USASA Field Station, Udorn

1971 U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Bremerhaven, Germany (USASA NOMINEE: USASA Field .station, Vint Hill Farms)

1972 6916th U.S. Air Force Security Squadron (USASA NOMINEE: USASA Field Station, Udorn)

1973 USASA Field Station, Berlin

1974 U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Hisawa, Japan (USASA NOMINEE: USASA Field Station, Augsburg)

1975 Consolidated Security Operations Center, San Antonio (USASA Field Station, San Antonio/6993d U.S. Air Force Security Squadron)

1976 USASA Field Station, Sobe

1977 470th Military Intelligence Group

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED ONl30 October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOL'PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200.lR

117

CONFIDEN TI lr~ l J

.. CONFIDENTIAL

Calendar Year Winner

1978 6903 U.S. Air Force Security Squadron, Osan Air Base, Korea (USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Augsburg)

1979 U.S. Naval Security Group Activity, Misawa, Japan (USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Sobe)

1980 U.S. Army Field Station Misawa

1981 U.S. Army Field Station Berlin

1982 6912 Air Force Electronic Security Group, Berlin (USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Berlin)

1983 6920 Air Force Electronic Security Group, Misawa AB, Japan (USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Augsburg)

1984 Naval Security Group Activity, Edzell, Scotland (USAINSCOM NOMINEE: U.S. Army Field Station Augsburg)

1985 U.S. Army Field Station Berlin

REGRADED UNCLASSIFIED oNl30 October 2015 I BY USAINSCOM FOI:PA Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200. lR 118

GONFlDEN TIAl,,

I

CONFIDENTIAt

APPENDIX K

DIRECTOR'S TROPHY WINNERS

Calendar Year Winners

1979 Staff Commander Middle East Force, Jufair, Bahrain (ARMY NOMINEE: 193d Brigade Support Company, Fort Amador, Panama)

1980 6916 Electronic Security Squadron, Hillenikon Air Base, Greece (ARMY NOMINEE: 372d ASA Co, 25th Inf Div, Oahu, Hawaii)

1981 Navy Security Group Activity, Athens, Greece (ARMY NOMINEE: 372d ASA Co, 25th Inf Div, Oahu, Hawaii)

1982 Task Force 138, U.S. Southern Command

1983 2d Radio Battalion Fleet Marine Force, Atlantic, Camp Lejuene, North Carolina (ARMY NOMINEE: 193d Military Intelligence Company (CEWI), Panama)

1984 224th Military Intelligence Battalion (Aerial Exploitation)

1985 525th Military Intelligence Brigade

Auth Para 4-102 DOD 5200. l R

119

GONFIDENTI.A l~

I ' •

GLOSSARY

(b)(1 ),(b)(7)(E)

121

/?JO

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b )(1) (b )(7)( e)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

~ Other: (b )( 1) Per CIA

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 131

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b )( 1) (b )(7)( e)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

~ Other: (b )( 1 )(b )(3) Per NSA

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1 Sep 93

Page(s) 132

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page( s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

rgj Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l) (b)(7)(e)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGP A-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 133-134

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page(s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

~ Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b )(1) (b )(7)( e)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

D Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

~ Other: (b )( 1) Per CIA

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 135-136

DELETED P AGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.

Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act Deleted Page(s) Information Sheet

Indicated below are one or more statements which provide a brief rationale for the deletion of this page.

C8J Information has been withheld in its entirety in accordance with the following exemption(s):

(b)(l) (b)(7)(e)

It is not reasonable to segregate meaningful portions of the record for release.

D Information pertains solely to another individual with no reference to you and/or the subject of your request.

Information originated with another government agency. It has been referred to them for review and direct response to you.

D Information originated with one or more government agencies. We are coordinating to determine the releasability of the information under their purview. Upon completion of our coordination, we will advise you of their decision.

D Other:

IAGPA-CSF Form 6-R 1Sep93

Page(s) 137-140

DELETED PAGE(S) NO DUPLICATION FEE FOR THIS PAGE.