annual health survey 2010-11 fact sheetcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/ahsbulletins/ahs...annual...

132
ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh Road, New Delhi-110 011 Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India Ministry of Home Affairs,

Upload: others

Post on 14-Apr-2020

9 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY2010-11

FACT SHEET

Uttarakhand

Government of India 2/A, Mansingh Road, New Delhi-110 011

Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, IndiaMinistry of Home Affairs,

Page 2: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh
Page 3: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand

ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY2010-11

FACT SHEET

Vital Statistics DivisionOffice of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India

New DelhiWebsite : www.censusindia.gov.in

Page 4: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh
Page 5: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

UttarakhandA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Index

Page No.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

29.

30.

31.

Introduction

Sample Particulars

Wealth Index

Household Characteristics

Sex Ratio

Effective Literacy Rate

Marriage

Schooling Status

Work Status

Disability

Injury

Acute Illness

Chronic Illness

Personal Habits

Fertility

Abortion

Family Planning Practices

Unmet Need for Family Planning

Ante Natal Care

Delivery Care

Post Natal Care

Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY)

Immunization, Vitamin A & Iron Supplement and Birth Weight

Childhood Diseases

Breastfeeding and Supplementation

Birth Registration

Awareness

Mortality

Confidence Interval (95%) for some important Indicators

Housing Characteristics

Annexure

i-xvii

1-4

5

6

7-8

9

10-11

12

13

14-15

16-18

19-23

24-34

35-37

38-43

44-45

46-48

49

50-53

54-56

57-58

59

60-63

64-65

66-69

70

71-72

73-79

80-81

82-85

86-106

Page 6: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh
Page 7: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

i

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Introduction

Genesis

Objective

Coverage

Decentralized district-based health planning is essential in India because of the

large inter-district variations. In the absence of vital data at the district level, the State

level estimates are being used for formulating district level plans as well as setting the

milestones thereof. In the process, the hotspots (districts requiring special attention)

very often get masked by the State average. This statistical fallacy compounds the

problems of the districts acutely, more so in the health sector. At present, none of the

Surveys provides estimates of core vital indicators on fertility and mortality at district

level. The District Level Household Survey conducted with periodicity of five years mainly

focuses on indicators pertaining to maternal health and child welfare programmes. There

has, therefore, been a surge in demand from various quarters, in recent years, to

generate timely and reliable statistics at the district level for informed decision making in

the health sector.

2. The Annual Health Survey (AHS) was conceived during a meeting of the National

Commission of Population held in 2005 under the Chairmanship of the Prime Minister

wherein it was decided that “there should be an Annual Health Survey of all districts

which could be published / monitored and compared against benchmarks”. The objective

was to monitor the performance and outcome of various health interventions of the

Government including those under National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) at closer

intervals through these benchmark indicators. The AHS has been made an integral part

of the NRHM, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare. The responsibility of the project has

been entrusted to the Office of the Registrar General, India on behalf of the Ministry of

Health & Family Welfare in view its expertise in handling the Sample Registration

System, one of the largest demographic surveys in the world.

3. Realizing the need for preparing a comprehensive district health profile on key

parameters based on a community set up, the AHS has been designed to yield

benchmarks of core vital and health indicators at the district level; prevalence of

disabilities, injuries, acute and chronic illness and access to health care for identified

morbidities; and access to maternal, child health and family planning services. By virtue

of being a panel survey, it has the unique ability to map the rate of change in these

indicators on a yearly basis. AHS would, thus, enable better capturing of the health

seeking behaviour of the public as compared to other periodic cross-sectional surveys,

and also help needed corrections in the strategies.

4. The sample size at the district level has been derived taking Infant Mortality Rate as

the decisive indicator and host of other practical issues related to execution of the

survey. Keeping in view the mammoth size of the sample, it was a conscious decision of

the Government to initially confine the survey to the 284 districts (as per 2001 Census)

of the 8 Empowered Action Group States (Bihar, Jharkhand, Uttar Pradesh,

Uttarakhand, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Odisha and Rajasthan) and Assam for a

three year period starting from 2010-11. These 9 high focus States with relatively high

fertility and mortality account for about 48 percent of the total population in the country.

A representative sample of 20,694 statistically selected Primary Sample Units (PSUs -

Census Enumeration Blocks in case of urban areas and villages or a segment thereof in

Page 8: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

ii

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

case of larger villages in rural areas) based on 2001 Census has been drawn from these

AHS States which would cover about 18 million population and 3.6 million households

each year. However, during the Base-line Survey, a total of 20.1 million population and

4.14 million households have actually been covered. Despite being restricted to 9 States,

the AHS is the largest demographic survey in the world and covers two and a half times

that of the Sample Registration System.

5. The project is being implemented as a hybrid model wherein the actual field work

has been outsourced to seven selected Survey Agencies on the pattern of National Family

Health Survey (NFHS) and District Level Household Survey (DLHS). The co-ordination,

supervision and monitoring of the fieldwork in the States are being carried out by

dedicated staff posted at various levels in the respective Directorate of Census

Operations (DCOs). The responsibility for overall co-ordination, supervision and

monitoring across the nine AHS States rests with the AHS Division of ORGI. For smooth

and effective execution of the survey, the AHS States have been divided into 18 mutually

exclusive and exhaustive zones, each having a group of contiguous districts with more or

less equal workload.

6. The outline of the survey such as approach, periodicity, coverage, sampling

strategy, sample size, permissible levels of relative standard errors, and levels of

aggregation, was finalized after a series of deliberations with the representatives from

Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), Central

Statistics Office (CSO), Ministry of Woman & Child Development, Indian Council of

Medical Research, Planning Commission, International Institute for Population Sciences

and other subject experts. Based on the recommendations, various technical details

including preparation of sample design, derivation of sample size etc. were worked out

and vetted by the Technical Advisory Group (TAG) constituted for the purpose.

7. The Sample design adopted for Annual Health Survey is a uni-stage stratified

simple random sample without replacement except in case of larger villages in rural

areas ( population more than or equal to 2000 as per 2001 Census), wherein a two

stage stratified sampling has been applied. The sample units are Census Enumeration

Blocks (CEBs) in urban areas and villages in rural areas. In rural areas, the villages

have been divided into two strata. Stratum I comprises villages with population less than

2000 and Stratum II contains villages with population 2000 or more. Smaller villages

with population less than 200 were excluded from the sampling frame in such a manner

that the total population of villages so excluded did not exceed 2 per cent of the total

population of the district. In case of Stratum I, the entire village is the sample unit. In

case of Stratum II, the village has been divided into mutually exclusive (non-overlapping)

and geographically contiguous units comprising group of EBs called segments of more or

less equal size and population not exceeding 2000 in any case. One segment from the

frame of segments thus prepared was selected in a random manner to represent the

selected village at the second stage of sampling.

8. The number of sample villages in each district was allocated between the two strata

proportionally to their size (population). The villages within each size stratum were

further ordered by the female literacy rate based on the Census 2001 data, and three

Fieldwork Strategy

Technical Consultation

Sample Design

Page 9: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

iii

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

disjoint and equal size substrata were established. The sample villages within each

substratum were selected by simple random sampling without replacement. Similarly, in

urban areas, the Census Enumeration Blocks within a district were ordered by the

female literacy rate based on the Census 2001 data, and three disjoint and equal size

substrata were established. The sample Census Enumeration Blocks within each

substratum were selected by simple random sampling without replacement. Thus, female

literacy which has a direct bearing on the fertility behaviour was used for implicit

stratification. Further, the process of selection ensured equal representation across

three sub-strata both in rural as well as in urban areas of a district besides rendering

the sample design as self-weighting.

9. Generating robust estimates of Infant Mortality Rate at the district level has become

an utmost necessity as reduction in Infant Mortality constitutes one of the key targets in

the Reproductive & Child Health Programme (RCH) under the umbrella of NRHM. This

would also facilitate effective tracking of the Millennium Development Goal 4 on Child

Mortality. The Infant Mortality Rate has therefore been taken as the decisive indicator for

estimation of sample size at the district level. The permissible level of error has been

taken as 10 percentage relative standard error (prse) at the district level. The sample size

so worked out would yield relatively better estimates of Crude Birth Rate / Crude Death

Rate and may also enable generation of rarer indicators like MMR (for a group of

districts) with good precision. In the absence of district level estimates from any other

reliable source, the district level derived estimates of IMR based on SRS pooled data have

been used for estimation of sample size for each district.

10. One of the essential prerequisites for the commencement of the survey was to

uniquely identify the sample units on ground. This was done in all the sample units

across the nine AHS States by the regular staff of ORGI. The work involved firming up of

the boundary of the selected villages / Enumeration Blocks; resorting to segmentation in

case of villages exceeding the population 2000, random selection of segment thereof and

drawing of appropriate notional maps of the sample units to serve as the base map for

the survey work.

11. The Baseline Survey in all the nine AHS States was carried out during July 2010 to

March 2011 and four Schedules, in all, were administered. These are: (i) House-listing

Schedule, (ii) Household Schedule, (iii) Woman Schedule and (iv) Mortality Schedule. In

the House-listing Schedule, besides the mapping and listing of all the houses and

households in a sample unit, some key particulars relating to the housing characteristics

(type and ownership), basic amenities available to the household and assets possessed

by them were collected. In the Household Schedule, all Usual Residents as on

01.01.2010 were listed and for each listed member, information on background

characteristics like Name, Sex, Relationship to Head, Date of Birth, Age, Religion, Social

Group, Marital Status, Date at first Marriage, Education and Occupation/Activity Status

was captured. Besides, information in respect of Disability, Morbidity (Injuries, Acute

Illness, and Chronic Illness) and Personal Habits (like Chewing, Smoking and

Consumption of Alcohol) was also collected wherever applicable. Woman Schedule

comprised two sections. Section-I was administered to all Ever Married Women (EMW)

aged 15-49 years and information relating to the outcome of pregnancy(s) (live birth/still

Sample Size

Sample Identification Work

Survey Tools

Page 10: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

iv

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

birth/abortion); birth history; type of medical attention at delivery; details of maternal

health care(ante-natal/natal/post-natal); immunization of children; breast feeding

practices including supplements; occurrence of child diseases (Pneumonia, Diarrhoea

and fever); registration of births, etc. taken place during the reference period i.e.

01.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 was collected. Section II focused on information on pregnancy;

use, sources and practices of family planning methods; details relating to future use of

contraceptives and unmet need; awareness about RTI/STI, HIV/AIDS, administration of

HAF/ORT/ORS during diarrhoea and danger signs of ARI/Pneumonia; and these details

were collected from all Currently Married Women aged 15-49 years.

12. Through the Mortality Schedule, details relating to death occurred to usual

residents of sample household during 01.01.2007 to 31.12.2009 were captured and it

included information on name & sex of deceased, date of death, age at death, registration

of death and source of medical attention received before death. For infant deaths, a

question on symptoms leading to death was also probed. In case of deaths associated

with pregnancy, information on a variety of questions on factors leading/contributing to

death, symptoms leading to death, time between onset of complications and death, etc.

was asked to yield data on various determinants of maternal mortality. These schedules

were finalized after a series of deliberations in the TAG and thereafter piloting in the field

situation. The fieldwork in sample units was carried out by teams of field enumerators

which had at least one female in each team. This was done to ensure that besides

canvassing of woman schedule, questions on morbidity for female members in household

schedule and questions relating to infant deaths as well as deaths associated with

pregnancy in the mortality schedule were also probed and recorded only by the female

enumerator.

13. Since information on morbidity, disability and few specific details in case of infant

and maternal deaths etc. were collected at the district level in such a large survey setup

for the first time, adequate emphasis was given to training. An exhaustive training

manual for the field staff was prepared with inputs from various stakeholders and

subject experts. A three day ‘Training of Trainers’ programme was organized at New Delhi

prior to commencement of State/Zone level training sessions wherein experts imparted

training on concepts, definitions and how best to collect data on different parameters. A

pool of medical doctors was arranged with the help of National Institute of Health &

Family Welfare (NIHFW) who imparted training to the field staff on disability and

morbidity during State/Zone level training programmes. A standardized Video Training

Module was specially developed for the purpose. Officers from ORGI and DCOs were

deputed to observe the training programmes conducted at State level by Survey Agencies.

14. In addition to the multilayer supervision mechanism adopted by the Survey

Agencies, regular inspections were carried out by the officers/officials of respective DCOs

and those from ORGI headquarters to ensure the data quality. The inspections were a

judicious mix of concurrent as well as post survey audit. Over and above, a component of

Third Party Audit was included to verify and authenticate the surveyed data through an

independent mechanism. The Third Party Audit work was carried out in 20 randomly

selected AHS units in each of the districts covering every fourth household thereof by

following a standard protocol prescribed by ORGI. Truncated versions of Household,

Women and Mortality Schedules were filled in afresh by the field staff of the Third Party

Training

Supervision and Third Party Audit

Page 11: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

v

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Audit Agencies. The findings in respect of key indicators were matched and re-survey

was undertaken by the Survey Agencies in units where the variation was outside the

permissible limit. The third party audit also helped in netting of missed vital events,

particularly rarer ones like infant and maternal deaths.

15. In view of the large volume of data collected under AHS and significant time

required for validation and processing, dissemination of AHS results is done in two

phases. The first set of data was released in August 2011 in the form of State-wise

bulletins, which contained the district level data on crude birth rate, crude death rate,

natural growth rate, infant mortality rate, neo-natal and post neo-natal mortality rates,

under 5 mortality rate, sex ratio at birth, sex ratio (0-4 years) and overall sex ratio. In

addition, the Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR), Maternal Mortality Rate and life time risk

were released for a group of districts. In order to facilitate direct intervention, the

maternal mortality indicators were combined and released for a group of districts on the

basis of existing administrative divisions in the respective AHS States.

16. Under the present phase of dissemination, data on host of other important

parameters covered in AHS under Household and Woman Schedules are being released

in the form of State and District Level Factsheets. Though the sample size has been

calculated for the district as a whole, the rural and urban estimates at the district level

have also been published as byproduct. Users are advised to keep the above fact into

consideration while using the rural / urban estimates of a district. In order to ward off

unusual sampling fluctuations, the urban estimates have not been published in respect

of some indicators for the districts where the number of urban sample units was less

than six. To begin with, number of PSUs, Households, Population, Ever Married Women,

Currently Married Women, Children aged 12-23 months (as on date of survey) covered in

the sample of each district and the State along with their rural-urban breakup have been

given to provide the users requisite insight on the metadata. The indicators contained in

the AHS Bulletin have also been reproduced in these Factsheets so that the users may

have access to complete set of indicators at one place. However, they may refer to the

AHS Bulletin for details on metadata.

17. A few relevant indicators based on House-listing Schedule, which would help in

assessing the economic profile of the households such as, structure of the house where

the household is residing, i.e. Pucca/Kachcha; Ownership status of the house, i.e.

Owned/Rented; Improved source of drinking water; Treatment of water by the

households to make it safer for drinking; Access to toilet facility; Access to electricity;

Main Source of lighting; Main source of fuel used for cooking; Availability of kitchen; and

Possession of Computer/Telephone/Mobile have also been tabulated. In the absence of

income and expenditure measures of economic status, household wealth Index has been

constructed at State level for each of the nine study States using the assets possessed

and the facilities availed by the households as mentioned above to determine a

household’s relative economic status and also to assess the differential impact with

respect to health outcomes or health service utilization thereof. The technique of

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) has been used to determine variable weightings.

Similar approach was also followed in NFHS and DLHS Household Wealth Index.

Dissemination of Results

Wealth Index

Page 12: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

vi

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

List of Variables selected for the development of HH Wealth Index

Assets Coded Categories

Type of Structure of the House Pucca House=1 Otherwise=0

Main Source of drinking water Piped water into dwelling/yard/plot, Public

tap/stand pipe, Hand pump, Tube well or bore

well , Protected dug well = 1 Otherwise=0

Type of Toilet Facility mainly Used Flush/Pour Flush Latrine – connected : to piped

sewer line /septic tank/ pit latrine/somewhere

else, Pit Latrine (Without flush/pour flush):

Ventilated improved pit, Pit latrine with slab = 1

Otherwise=0

Household having Electricity Yes=1, No= 0

Main Source of lighting Electricity, Solar=1, Otherwise=0

Main Source of Fuel used for Cooking LPG/PNG, Electricity, Biogas= 1, Otherwise=0

Household having no dwelling room exclusively in possession = 0, 1 dwelling room exclusively in possession = 1, 2 dwelling rooms exclusively inpossession = 2, 3 dwelling rooms exclusively in

Number of Dwelling rooms exclusively possession = 3, 4 dwelling rooms exclusively in in the possession of household possession = 4, 5 dwelling rooms exclusively in

possession = 5, 6 dwelling rooms exclusively in

possession = 6, 7 dwelling rooms exclusively in

possession = 7, 8 dwelling rooms exclusively in

possession = 8, 9 or more dwelling rooms

exclusively in possession=9

Availability of Kitchen Cooking inside or Outside House - Has Kitchen=1,

Otherwise=0

Possession of Radio/Transistor Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Television Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Computer/Laptop Computer/Laptop with or without internet

connection = 1, No =0

Possession of Telephone/Mobile Phone Telephone, Mobile Phone or both = 1, No=0

Possession of Washing Machine Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Refrigerator Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Sewing Machine Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Bicycle Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Two wheeler (Scooter/Motorcycle/Moped) Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Car/Jeep/Van Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Tractor Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Water Pump/Tube well Yes=1, No= 0

Possession of Cart (Driven by animal/ Cart-Driven by animal/machine/other=1, Doesn’tmachine/other) have =0

Land Possessed (in hectares) No land= 0, Less than 0.02 hectare = 1, 0.02 to

less than 1.00 hectare = 49, 1.00 to less than 4.00

hectares = 250, 4.00 to less than 10.00 hectares

=700, 10.00 hectares or more=1000

18. The list of variables used for the development of wealth index along with their

coding structure is given below:

Page 13: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

vii

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Considering these variables, principal component analysis technique was applied and

each of the above household assets/ facilities was assigned a weight or a factor loading.

The Asset Scores have then been computed for each single household by using the

following formula:

Subsequently, the Asset Scores of all the variables were added at the household level to

get the Total Asset Score for each of the households. Thereafter the households were

ranked according to their individual Household Asset Score (HHAS) and then divided into

five quintiles with the same number of households in each. This provided the cut off

points or the ranges for each quintile. The highest (20%) and the lowest (20%) quintiles

have been published for each of the districts in a State to highlight the extreme disparity

in the household’s relative economic well being. The value of the indicators

corresponding to these quintiles is outside the purview of this factsheet and would be

presented in State level reports.

19. The information on marital status as on 01.01.2010 was probed in respect of all

household members (Usual Residents) irrespective of their age. For those who were

married, the date of first marriage was recorded. Using this, age at first marriage, which

has a direct impact on child bearing as women marrying early have on an average a

longer period of exposure to pregnancy and a greater number of lifetime births, was

obtained. Using the age data, the mean age at marriage for males and females has been

worked out and included in the Factsheet. The mean age at marriage is based on the

marriages to the members of the household (Usual Residents as on 1.1.2010) taken place

during 2007-09. The proportion of marriages among males and females taking place

below the legal age, i.e., 21 and 18 years respectively, has also been tabulated. Such

proportions are also based on the marriages to the members of the household (Usual

Residents as on 1.1.2010) taken place during 2007-09. Besides, the percentage of

Currently Married Women aged 20-24 years marrying before legal age (18 years) and

percentage of Currently Married Men aged 25-29 years marrying before legal age (21

years) have been worked out and presented.

20. The data on any type of disability as on date of survey was collected in respect of all

the usual residents. The type of disability included `mental’, `visual’, `hearing’, `speech’,

`loco-motor’ and `multiple’. The prevalence of any type of disability per 1,00,000

population by gender and residence at the district and State levels has been presented in

the factsheet. Since it is difficult to capture the type of injury and its severity from lay

reporting, an attempt has been made to assess the severity of injury from the type and

duration of hospitalization required. This would also provide an assessment of the

workload on hospitals / doctors on account of injury. Accordingly, the type of treatment

meted to the injury during last one year of the date of survey has been collected. The

categories by type of treatment included `treated in intensive care unit for any time-1,

treated as in-patient with stay more than two weeks-2, treated as in-patient with stay

one to two weeks-3, treated as in-patient with stay less than one week-4, treated as out-

patient-5, treated by traditional healers-6, and treated at home-7’. Based on these

Marriage

Disability and Injury

[Value of Asset Variable - Mean of Asset Variable]

Standard Deviation of Asset VariableHH Asset Score (AS) = x Weight of component I

Page 14: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

viii

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

categories, the number of persons injured by type of treatment received per 1,00,000

population, have been categorized into severe(by including categories 1 & 2), major (by

including categories 3 & 4) and minor (by including categories 5 & 6) groups. Those

treated at home have been excluded from the above categorization and thus from the

analysis also.

21. On the morbidity front, if any member (usual resident) of the household suffered

from any ‘acute illness’ during last fifteen days prior to the date of survey, the type of

illness has been ascertained. Based on this data, persons suffering from acute illness per

1,00,000 population has been presented for a few select diseases like diarrhoea /

dysentery; acute respiratory infection & all types of fever and also for any type of acute

illness. Besides, the source from where the treatment for the acute illness was taken has

also been included. Accordingly, two important indicators, viz., percentage of persons

suffering from acute illness and taking treatment from any source and percentage of

persons suffering from acute illness and taking treatment from Government source have

been presented. The latter gives the share of Government source across all types of

sources availed for taking treatment. It may be noted that the entire fieldwork was

carried out over a period of six to seven months and in the process, districts were

covered at different points of time (i.e., months / seasons). The seasonality effect may be

taken note of while interpreting the results.

22. The data in respect of chronic illness has been collected based on the symptoms

pertaining to a particular illness persisting for more than one month and also in respect

of illnesses where it was diagnosed. For both the cases, the reference period was last one

year preceding the date of survey. For ascertaining information on symptoms, a list of

symptoms associated with various types of diseases was provided along with a separate

category for asymptomatic (i.e., having no symptoms). The asymptomatic included those

who were not suffering from any illness as well as those who were suffering but had no

symptoms. Using this data, percentage of persons having any kind of symptoms of

chronic illness along with their source of treatment has been presented. As regards

chronic illnesses diagnosed, this was included to measure the extent to which facilities

for diagnosis and treatment of some major chronic illnesses set up by centre/State/local

Government / private agencies have been utilized. A list of common chronic diseases and

those pertaining to major health intervention programmes was provided. Based on this

data, percentage of persons diagnosed for a few important diseases such as diabetes,

hypertension, tuberculosis, asthma / chronic respiratory disease and arthritis per

1,00,000 population has been presented besides those diagnosed for any type of chronic

illness. Using the data collected on source of diagnosis, status with regard to getting

regular treatment and source of treatment, percentage of persons having diagnosed for

any kind of chronic illness and getting regular treatment as well as those getting regular

treatment from Government source has been worked out and included in the Factsheet.

Since the data on morbidity has been elicited as reported by the respondents, it may

suffer on account of accuracy. Nevertheless, the availability of such a rich data set at the

district level would fill in the much awaited void and pave the way for evidence-based

health planning and appropriate interventions.

Acute Illness

Chronic Illness

Page 15: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

ix

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Personal Habits

Fertility

23. During the base-line survey, information on personal habits such as chewing

practices, smoking and consumption of alcohol has been collected for all the usual

residents of age 15 years and above. Under chewing habits, the information has been

separately collected for chewing with and without tobacco. Based on the data, the

percentage of population by habit of chewing with and without tobacco, percentage of

population by habit of smoking and percentage of population by habit of drinking

alcohol, for the usual residents of age 15 years and above, have been presented. Both for

smoking and consuming alcohol, the proportion is based on usual as well as occasional

smokers / drinkers. The usual smoker is the one who smokes at least once every day

and the usual drinker, who drinks at least once every week. The data on disability,

morbidity as well as personal habits have been given by residence and sex to capture the

differentials. The enumerators were specifically instructed to collect information

pertaining to morbidity as well as personal habits from the concerned individuals in

privacy and with due sensitivity in order to elicit proper response to the extent possible.

24. The Total Fertility Rate (TFR), which is an age-period fertility rate for a synthetic

cohort of women, measures the average number of births a group of women would have

by the time they reach 50 years of age if they were to give birth at the current age-

specific fertility rates. The TFR is expressed as the average number of births per woman.

Under AHS, TFR has been calculated by dividing three years average of all births

reported during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09 by all the women in respective age

group. The seven five-yearly age-specific fertility rates for all women in the age groups

from 15-19 to 45-49 have been added and thereafter multiplied by 5 to yield the TFR.

Due to lack of adequate number of births, the TFR by residence could not be worked out

and hence is not being published.

25. The distribution of births by birth order is another way to understand the dynamics

on spacing of children and level of fertility. In this regard, two key indicators namely,

`percentage of women aged 20-24 reporting birth of order 2 & above’ and `percentage of

women reporting birth of order 3 & above’ based on last two live births taken place to

Ever Married Women aged 15-49 years during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09, have

been presented. ‘Percentage of Currently Married Women aged 15-49 years with two

living children wanting no more children’ is one of the most crucial indicators on desire

to limit child bearing. While deriving this indicator, sterilized women or their husbands

have not been taken into account whereas women who were currently pregnant have

been included.

26. Teen-age pregnancy and motherhood is an important subject in the settings where

the marriage of girls takes place at very young ages. This is not only important from the

fertility perspective but also its consequent implication on the health of the mother and

child. Accordingly, `percentage of women aged 15-19 who were already mothers or

pregnant at the time of survey’ has been tabulated and it depicts the percentage of

women who have begun child bearing among all ever married women aged 15-19 years.

The ever married sample denominator for the age group 15-19 years has not been

adjusted by the all women factors for the same age group. This factor should be taken

into consideration while interpreting the results.

Page 16: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

x

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Median age at first live birth

Birth interval

Mean number of children ever born and surviving

Abortion

27. Median age at first live birth of women aged 15-49 years has been presented to

reflect the age at which 50 percent of the women have given their first live birth. This

indicator covers women of all marital status and ever married sample denominator has

been adjusted by the all women factors in this age group. Ever Married Women not yet

having first live birth and Never Married Women have been included as a separate

category for computation. Median has been calculated from cumulated single year of age

percent distributions of age at first birth. Median is linearly interpolated by the age

values by which 50 percent or more of the women had a first birth. In order to gauge the

same for older women of the same cohort, median age at first live birth for women aged

25-49 years has also been calculated and presented. These two indicators in conjunction

would help in comparing the age with regard to entry into parenthood between the two

cohorts.

28. The information on birth interval, which is defined as the length of time between

two successive live births, has been collected in respect of last two live births which took

place during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09 for birth order 2 & above. Short birth

intervals are likely to have adverse bearing on the mother’s health as also on the chances

of survival of the neonates and infants. In the Indian context, the birth interval of 36

months may be taken as the bare minimum from the perspective of reducing neonatal

and infant mortality and also for achieving the requisite nutritional outcomes. The

information on percentage of live births taking place after an interval of 36 months has

been calculated and presented to provide insight into the pace of child bearing.

29. The number of children ever born and surviving has been collected for all Ever

Married Women aged 15-49 years. The survival status has been assessed as on 1.1.2010

(the reference point for the population). The number of children ever born to women

provides an estimate of cohort fertility against the period measures of fertility such as the

CBR and the TFR. In order to facilitate comparison of completed cohort fertility with the

current fertility, the mean number of ever born children to women aged 45-49 years has

been calculated and presented. The gap between the two would demonstrate the decline

in fertility levels in the recent past.

30. Abortion as an option was probed for all the pregnancies which resulted into any

kind of outcome i.e. live birth, still birth, spontaneous and induced abortion during the

reference period i.e. 2007-2009. This was followed by a series of questions such as when

the abortion had taken place (month & year), month of pregnancy when the abortion had

occurred, whether any ANC was received, whether ultrasound was performed before the

abortion, the place of abortion and who performed the abortion. Based on these data,

various indicators such as percentage of pregnancy(s) to women aged 15-49 years

resulting in abortion, percentage of women who received any ANC before abortion,

percentage of women who went for ultrasound before abortion, average month of

pregnancy at the time of abortion, percentage of abortions performed by skilled health

personnel (doctor / nurse / ANM / LHV / trained dai), and abortions which took place

in institutions have been tabulated and presented.

Page 17: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

xii

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Family Planning Practices

Current usage of Family Planning Methods

Unmet Need for Family Planning

31. The information on awareness as well as the usage in respect of Family Planning

Practices was probed from Currently Married Women aged 15-49 years. There were a few

women whose marital status as on 1.1.2010 (reference date) was Currently Married but

on date of survey, their marital status was widow / divorcee / separated. In such cases,

questions on only awareness were probed from them.

32. Currently Married Women aged 15-49 years, who were currently menstruating or

who were in lactating status or secondary amenorrhoea as on date of survey, were asked

whether they or their husbands are currently using any method(s) of family planning. In

other words, those CMW who were currently pregnant or in menopause status or who

have undergone hysterectomy or never menstruated were excluded from the sample. The

family planning methods included both modern as well as traditional methods. Modern

methods included Tubectomy, Vasectomy, Copper-T/IUD, Pills (Daily), Pills (Weekly),

Emergency Contraceptive Pill, Condom/Nirodh, etc., while the traditional ones were

Contraceptive Herbs, Rhythm/Periodic abstinence, Withdrawal, Lactational Amenorrhoea

Method, etc. Accordingly, percentage of CMW reporting use of various types of family

planning methods (most used method) has been tabulated. In addition, percentage of

CMW using any method (Contraceptive Prevalence Rate), any modern method and any

traditional method has also been tabulated. Levels of use of contraceptives provide the

most obvious and widely accepted criterion for assessing the success of FP programme.

33. The unmet need for Family Planning is a crucial indicator for assessing the future

demand for Family Planning services / supplies. Currently Married Women who are not

using any method of contraception but who do not want any more children are defined

as having an unmet need for limiting and those who are not using contraception but

want to wait for two years or more before having another child are defined as having an

unmet need for spacing. The sum total of unmet need for limiting and spacing is the

unmet need for Family Planning. In order to ensure comparability with DHS Estimates,

similar set of questions were probed from CMW aged 15-49 years under AHS also.

34. For working out the estimates on unmet need, the unmet need for spacing has been

calculated as the “proportion of pregnant CMW whose pregnancy was mistimed; CMW in

lactational amenorrhoea who are not using any family planning method and whose last

birth was mistimed, or whose last birth was unwanted but now they say they want more

children; fecund CMW who are neither currently pregnant nor in amenorrhoea, and who

are not using any family planning method and say that they want to wait for two or more

years for the next birth, including those who say that they are unsure whether they

want another child, or want another child but are unsure when to have the birth”.

35. The unmet need for limiting has been worked out as the “proportion of pregnant

CMW whose pregnancy was unwanted; CMW in lactational amenorrhoea who are not

using any family planning method, whose last child was unwanted and who do not want

any more children; and fecund CMW who are neither pregnant nor in amenorrhoea who

are not using any method of family planning and who want no more children”. Using the

met demand for contraception (current contraceptive users) and the unmet need for

contraception, the total demand for family planning as well as the percentage demand

Page 18: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

xii

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Ante-natal Care

36. Ante-natal care constitutes one of the key elements towards initiatives to promote

safe motherhood. A series of questions to capture various aspects of ante-natal care such

as, number of ante-natal check-ups received, months of pregnancy at the time of first

ANC, main source of ANC, type of tests performed during ANC, number of Tetanus

Toxoid (TT) injections received and number of days of consumption of Iron & Folic Acid

(IFA) tablets/syrup, were asked from the EMW aged 15-49 years in respect of their last

two outcomes of pregnancies which have resulted into live births / still births during the

reference period, i.e., 2007-09. However, appropriate indicators based on the above

aspects have been tabulated in respect of responses recorded for last live / still births.

37. The indicators included in the Factsheets are percentage of mothers who received

any ANC, percentage of mothers who had ANC in first trimester, percentage of mothers

who received 3 or more ANC, percentage of mothers who received at least one TT

injection, percentage of mothers who consumed IFA for 100 days or more and percentage

of mothers who had full ante-natal check-up. The full ante-natal check-up comprises at

least three visits for ANC, at least one TT injection received and IFA consumption for 100

days or more. In addition, percentage of mothers who received ANC from Government

source, percentage of mothers whose blood pressure & blood (for Hb) were taken and

percentage of mothers who underwent ultrasound have been calculated and presented.

Besides, percentage of Currently Married Pregnant Women aged 15-49 years registered

for ANC has also been presented.

satisfied can be assessed. The classification for the need for family planning is illustrated

as under:

Classification of the need for family planning

Total need for family planning

For limiting:Pregnant women whose pregnancy was unwanted, amenorrhoeic women whose last birth was unwanted, and women who are neither pregnant nor amenorrhoeic and who want no more children but are not using a family planning method

For spacing:Pregnant women whose pregnancy was mistimed, amenorrhoeic women whose last birth was mistimed, and women who are neither pregnant nor amenorrhoeic who say they want to wait two or more years for the next birth, are unsure whether they want another child, or want another child but are unsure when to have it and are not using a family planning method

For spacing:Women who want another child or are undecided and are us ing a f am i l y planning method

For limiting:Women who want no more children and are using a family planning method

Met need(current use)

Unmetneed

Page 19: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

xiii

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Delivery Care

Post-natal Care

Financial assistance under Janani Suraksha Yojana

38. Under Delivery Care, the details about place of delivery, source of transport

provided / availed for reaching the institution, length of stay in the institution after

delivery, type of delivery (normal / caesarean / assisted) and the personnel conducting

delivery in case of domiciliary births were inquired from the EMW aged 15-49 years for

their last two pregnancy outcomes resulting into live births/still births during the

reference period, i.e. 2007-09. As in the case of ante-natal care, indicators based on

these parameters have been tabulated in respect of responses for last live/still births.

Percentage of deliveries taken place in institutions and their distribution into

Government and Private institutions; percentage of deliveries taken place at home;

percentage of home deliveries conducted by skilled health personnel; and percentage of

Safe deliveries are the key indicators presented in the Factsheet. Safe delivery comprises

institutional deliveries and home deliveries conducted by doctor/ nurse / ANM / LHV

and it does not include those attended by trained dai. However, trained dai is included

under skilled health personnel. If the respondent has mentioned more than one person

attending delivery, only the most qualified person is taken into consideration.

39. As regards the extent of stay in institutions after delivery which is very crucial and

has a direct bearing on the new born care as also on the health of the mother, the

percentage of less than 24 hours stay in the institution after delivery has been worked

out and presented. Besides, percentage of Caesarean deliveries out of total deliveries

taken place in Government and Private Institutions respectively has also been presented.

40. Getting a Post partum / Post-natal check-up soon after the birth of baby or within

48 hours is crucial for the health of both the mother and the child. Accordingly, three

indicators, viz., percentage of mothers who received Post-natal check-up within 48 hours

of delivery, percentage of mothers who received Post-natal check-up within one week of

delivery and percentage of mothers who did not receive any Post-natal check-up have

been calculated and presented. In case of institutional delivery where the woman had

stayed there for at least 48 hours, it was presumed that the post-natal care was given

within 48 hours. These indicators are based on the last outcome of pregnancy which

resulted into live / still birth during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09.

41. Along with the first post-natal check-up of mother, check-up of the new borns is

essential. It was therefore probed from the mothers, whose last outcome of pregnancy

resulted into live birth during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09, when was the new born

checked up. Based on this, the percentage of new born who received check up within 24

hours of birth has been worked out and presented. In case of institutional delivery if the

baby remained there for at least 24 hours, it was presumed that the first check-up was

done within 24 hours.

42. The Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) is one of the most important programmes under

the overall umbrella of NRHM aimed at reducing Maternal Mortality Ratio and Neo-natal

Mortality Rate by promoting institutional deliveries. Under the Scheme, cash incentives

are provided to mothers and they are facilitated by Accredited Social Health Activists

(ASHAs) to deliver their babies in a health facility. There are also provisions for cost

reimbursement for transport and incentives to ASHAs for encouraging mothers to opt for

institutional delivery. The scheme is fully sponsored by the Central Government and is

Page 20: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

xiv

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

implemented in all States and Union Territories, with special focus on low-performing

States. There is also a provision for roping in the private sector by giving accreditation to

willing private hospitals/nursing homes for providing delivery services. The Scheme has

been implemented in all the 9 AHS States since 2005.

43. In order to gauge the spread and effectiveness of the JSY, Ever Married Women

aged 15-49 years were probed whether they had availed the maternity financial

assistance for safe motherhood under the scheme in respect of their last two outcomes of

delivery resulting in live / still births during the reference period, i.e., 2007-09. The

percentage of mothers who availed financial assistance for delivery, percentage of

mothers who availed financial assistance for institutional delivery and percentage of

mothers who availed financial assistance for Government institutional delivery under

JSY, all in respect of the last outcome of delivery resulting in live birth / still birth, have

been calculated and presented. Since the scope of JSY has been extended to domiciliary

births also, these three sets of indicators would present a holistic picture.

44. The information on childhood immunization, i.e., vaccination coverage, has been

collected for all living children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births

during reference period, i.e., 2007-09]. Information on six vaccine preventable diseases

namely, tuberculosis, diphtheria, whooping cough (Pertussis), tetanus, polio and

measles, has been collected with reference to the status as on date of survey. Universal

immunization of children against these six diseases is vital for reducing infant and child

mortality. Whenever the mother had the vaccination card (Immunization / MCH) and if

the card was available at the time of interview, the responses were recorded based on

entries in the card. Otherwise, the responses as reported by the mother were noted

down. For those living children who did not receive any vaccination, the main reason

thereof has also been noted.

45. In conformity with the International and Govt. of India guidelines which specify that

children should be fully vaccinated by the time they complete their first year of life, the

12-23 months age group has been chosen for analysis. The percentage of children having

Immunization Card, percentage of children aged 12-23 months who have received BCG,

percentage of children who have received 3 doses of polio vaccine, percentage of children

who have received polio dose at birth, percentage of children who have received three

doses of DPT vaccine and percentage of children who have received measles vaccine, all

for the age group 12-23 months, have been calculated and presented. Besides the

percentage of children aged 12-23 months who have been fully immunized, the

percentage of children aged 12-23 months who did not receive any vaccination have also

been tabulated in order to portray the complete picture of immunization. According to

the WHO guidelines, children are considered fully immunized when they have received

vaccination against tuberculosis, three doses of DPT, three doses of the poliomyelitis and

one dose of measles.

46. Proper and sufficient intake of Vitamin-A and Iron supplements is essential to

thwart childhood morbidity and mortality. Vitamin-A is an essential micro nutrient for

the immune system and plays an important role in maintaining the epithelial tissues in

the body. Severe Vitamin-A deficiency (VAD) can cause eye damage. VAD has also the

potential to increase the severity of measles and diarrhoeal diseases in children and slow

recovery from illness. Since the human liver can store an adequate amount of the

Immunization

Administration of Vitamin-A and Iron & Folic Acid supplements

Page 21: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

xv

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

vitamin for 4-6 months, Vitamin-A dosing every six months is one of the usual methods

for ensuring that children at risk are protected from developing VAD. The National

Programme on Prevention of Blindness mandates that children of age 9 months to 5

years should be administered oral doses of Vitamin-A every six months. In order to

assess the situation, information on children aged 6-35 months who have received at

least one dose of Vitamin-A during the last six months has been collected and presented.

47. Anaemia, which is characterised by a low level of haemoglobin in the blood, is a

great concern in young children because it can result in impaired cognitive performance,

behavioural and motor coordination, language development and scholastic achievement.

It also enhances the risk of morbidity from other infectious diseases. One of the most

vulnerable groups to anaemia is children aged 6-23 months. It was probed from the

mothers of all living children older than 6 months whether IFA tablet / syrup was

administered to the children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births

during reference period, i.e., 2007-09] in the last 3 months. IFA tablet/syrup as

supplements is given to child beyond six months to prevent anaemia. Based on this, the

percentage of children aged 6-35 months who have received IFA tablets / syrup during

last three months has been calculated and presented.

48. Birth weight is an important indicator to measure the vulnerability of a new born to

the risk of childhood illness and chances of survival. The information on birth weight

assists in monitoring programmes to reduce neo-natal and infant mortality through a

reduction in low birth weight infants. The information on birth weight has been collected

in respect of all living children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births

during reference period, i.e., 2007-09]. Based on this data, the percentage of children

whose birth weight was taken and percentage of children whose birth weight was less

than 2.5 Kg. have been worked out and presented.

49. Treatment practices and contact with health services among children with the 3

most important childhood illnesses namely, Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI), Fever and

Diarrhoea, help in the assessment of National Programmes aimed at reducing the

mortality impact of these illnesses. The information on children suffering from Acute

Respiratory Infection, Fever and Diarrhoea in respect of all the living children [last two

outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference period, i.e., 2007-09]

during fifteen days preceding the date of survey has been collected. This has been done

to minimise the recall lapse. Besides the prevalence, the information on treatment of ARI

with antibiotics, treatment of fever and the treatment of diarrhoea with Home Available

Fluids (HAF) / fluids prepared from ORS packet has been collected. The treatment of

diarrhoeal diseases with Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT) aids in the assessment of

programmes that recommends such treatment. Based on these data, the percentage of

children suffering from Diarrhoea and received HAF / ORS / ORT, percentage of children

suffering from ARI and sought treatment, and percentage of children suffering from fever

and sought treatment have been calculated and presented.

50. Early breastfeeding practices determine the successful establishment and duration

of breastfeeding. It is recommended that children be put to the breast immediately or

within one hour of birth. There is growing evidence of the benefits to mother and child of

Birth weight

Childhood diseases

Child feeding practices

Page 22: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

xvi

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

early initiation of breastfeeding preferably in the first hour of the birth. Early initiation of

breastfeeding contributes to reducing neo-natal mortality. It ensures early skin to skin

contact which is important in preventing hypothermia and establishing the bond

between the mother and her child. Early initiation of breastfeeding also reduces the

mother's risk of post partum haemorrhage, one of the leading causes of maternal

mortality. Although breastfeeding is nearly universal in India, very few children are put

to breastfeed immediately after birth. In order to have an assessment with regard to the

time of initiation of breastfeeding, the mothers of all living children [last two outcomes of

pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference period, i.e., 2007-09] were asked

when did they first breastfeed their baby. Based on this, the percentage of children

breastfed within one hour of birth has been calculated and presented.

51. Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of the child's life is an essential

component of the optimal infant and young child feeding practices. The Government of

India recommends that children should be exclusively breastfed for the first six months

of life (i.e., the child should be given only breast milk and nothing else, not even water).

In order to assess the situation on ground, the mothers of all living children [last two

outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference period, i.e., 2007-09]

were asked how many days/months did they exclusively breastfeed their baby. Based on

the responses, percentage of children aged 6-35 months exclusively breastfed for at least

six months has been worked out and presented.

52. The introduction of complementary feeding at six months of age, solid and semi-

solid food and the diverse food combinations fed to children also constitute part of the

optimal feeding practices. The purpose of complementary feeding is to complement the

breast milk and sustain the growth and development of the child. WHO recommends

introduction of solid or semi-solid foods to infants around the age of 6 months because

by that age, breast milk by itself is no longer sufficient to maintain the child's optimal

growth. Information on supplementation was obtained by asking mothers of all living

children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference

period, i.e., 2007-09] at what age did they start feeding the baby food other than breast

milk. The type of food included water, animal milk / formula milk, semi-solid mashed

food, solid (adult) food and vegetables/fruits. Based on these, the percentage of children

who received foods other than breast milk such as water, animal/formula milk, semi-

solid mashed food, solid (adult) food and vegetables/fruits during first six months has

been worked out and presented. Besides, the average month by which children received

these foods have also been worked out and presented.

53. India, being a signatory to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989

which recognizes birth registration as one of the first rights of child, is committed to

achieve universalization of birth registration. In India, registration of birth is compulsory

under the Registration of Births and Deaths (RBD) Act, 1969. The Act mandates that

every birth should be registered and a birth certificate provided free of charge to the

informant. Despite significant efforts to improve the Civil Registration System, especially

during the past decade, the overall level of registration of births still falls short by about

25 percent. The registration system in the country functions at different levels of

efficiency across States/UTs. In order to assess the functioning of the Civil Registration

System in the community, information on whether the birth of the baby was registered

Complementary feeding

Birth Registration

Page 23: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

xvii

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

with the civil authority and if so, the birth certificate was received or not in respect of all

living children [last two outcomes of pregnancy(s) resulting in live births during reference

period, i.e., 2007-09] has been collected. Based on this, the percentage of children whose

births were registered and the percentage of children whose births were registered & who

also received the Birth Certificates have been arrived at and presented.

54. Under the RBD Act, the institutions where birth takes place is to register the birth

and issue the birth certificate in case they have been declared as the registration units or

to report the event to the local Registrar of Births & Deaths. Of late, majority of the

Government institutions have been declared as registration units. Since a review of the

system across different States/UTs has revealed that due to lack of a proper and

complete reporting system, the institutional births which have already been registered

are not being reflected in the final figures compiled and therefore in order to net all such

cases, it was presumed that the birth would have been registered. However, even in these

cases it was probed whether the birth certificate has been received.

55. This Factsheet pertains to the State of Uttarakhand. The field work for the AHS has

been carried out by M/s. Academy of Management Studies, Lucknow and M/s. EPOS

Health (India) Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon in the allotted zones. The third party audit work in the

State has been done by M/s. TALEEM Research Foundation, Ahmedabad.

Page 24: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 25: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

1

UttarakhandA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

SAMPLE PARTICULARS

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Sample Units Households Population

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Ever Married Women(aged 15-49 years)

Currently Married Women(aged 15-49 years)

Children 12-23 months

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 2501 1962 539 367183 292975 74208 1605561 1280191 325370

Almora 192 173 19 26704 24512 2192 115112 106586 8526

Bageshwar 162 156 6 26569 25707 862 110925 107436 3489

Chamoli 276 236 40 36404 30470 5934 152336 130390 21946

Champawat 42 34 8 5996 5078 918 27823 23475 4348

Dehradun 367 133 234 57093 26131 30962 269201 130475 138726

Haridwar 50 25 25 10163 6478 3685 56828 37547 19281

Nainital 110 59 51 20298 12640 7658 94635 59224 35411

Pauri Garhwal 386 337 49 46093 41377 4716 192088 171778 20310

Pithoragarh 161 136 25 24893 20115 4778 100986 82902 18084

Rudraprayag 225 222 3 32378 32218 160 134713 134068 645

Tehri Garhwal 351 317 34 46867 41791 5076 191953 170848 21105

Udham Singh Nagar 81 45 36 17151 11839 5312 86693 60948 25745

Uttarkashi 98 89 9 16574 14619 1955 72268 64514 7754

Uttarakhand 315432 252852 62580 298921 239397 59524 21971 17922 4049

Almora 22215 20547 1668 20867 19306 1561 1565 1485 80

Bageshwar 22131 21442 689 20930 20287 643 1237 1205 32

Chamoli 29726 25282 4444 28310 24119 4191 2308 2004 304

Champawat 5359 4547 812 5045 4278 767 416 361 55

Dehradun 50717 24287 26430 48486 23300 25186 3862 2111 1751

Haridwar 9826 6213 3613 9486 6018 3468 961 678 283

Nainital 17392 11027 6365 16475 10456 6019 1227 775 452

Pauri Garhwal 39587 35423 4164 37308 33361 3947 2288 2082 206

Pithoragarh 20906 17050 3856 19653 16006 3647 1274 1101 173

Rudraprayag 27569 27456 113 26072 25965 107 1826 1821 5

Tehri Garhwal 41284 36872 4412 38845 34594 4251 2795 2533 262

Udham Singh Nagar 14826 10304 4522 14177 9853 4324 1230 871 359

Uttarkashi 13894 12402 1492 13267 11854 1413 982 895 87

Page 26: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

2

UttarakhandA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Uttarakhand: Sample Units

Uttarakhand: District wise Sample Units

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Almora

Bage

shwar

Chamoli

Champa

wat

Dehradu

n

Haridwar

Nainital

Pauri G

arhw

al

Pithorag

arh

Rudrapray

ag

Tehri G

arhw

al

Udham

Singh

Nag

ar

Uttarkas

hi

Rural Urban

Rural

78%

Urban

22%

Page 27: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

3

UttarakhandA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Uttarakhand: Sample Households

Uttarakhand: District wise Sample Households

Rural

80%

Urban

20%

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

Almor

a

Bages

hwar

Chamoli

Champa

wat

Dehra

dun

Haridw

ar

Nainita

l

Pauri Gar

hwal

Pithor

agar

h

Rudra

pray

ag

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Uttarkas

hi

UrbanRural

Page 28: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

4

UttarakhandA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Uttarakhand: Sample Population

Uttarakhand: District wise Sample Population

Rural

80%

Urban

20%

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

180000

200000

Almor

a

Bages

hwar

Chamoli

Champa

wat

Dehra

dun

Haridw

ar

Nainita

l

Pauri Gar

hwal

Pithor

agar

h

Rudra

pray

ag

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Uttarkas

hi

UrbanRural

Page 29: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

5

UttarakhandA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

WEALTH INDEX

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Lowest (20%) Highest (20%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand 20.0 24.2 3.5 20.1 12.2 51.0

Almora 23.8 25.9 0.8 8.7 5.7 42.2

Bageshwar 28.9 29.8 3.4 7.2 6.3 35.4

Chamoli 19.0 22.1 3.2 7.8 4.1 27.2

Champawat 32.7 36.1 14.2 16.9 14.8 28.6

Dehradun 5.5 7.9 3.4 52.8 38.8 64.5

Haridwar 14.8 21.8 2.5 31.4 15.4 59.6

Nainital 10.4 14.0 4.4 40.8 35.8 49.1

Pauri Garhwal 22.3 24.6 1.5 18.7 15.5 47.2

Pithoragarh 30.5 37.3 2.0 10.3 5.1 32.1

Rudraprayag 20.7 20.8 0.6 5.1 5.0 28.8

Tehri Garhwal 25.6 28.3 3.2 10.3 6.3 43.2

Udham Singh Nagar 11.8 14.7 5.3 26.0 20.3 38.6

Uttarkashi 31.3 34.9 4.7 11.1 7.7 36.5

Page 30: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

SC ST ALL

Average Household Size

Uttarakhand 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.2 5.3 5.0 4.6 4.6 4.6

Almora 4.7 4.8 4.2 4.1 3.8 4.5 4.3 4.3 3.9

Bageshwar 4.5 4.5 4.4 3.7 3.8 3.0 4.2 4.2 4.0

Chamoli 4.4 4.5 4.1 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.3 3.7

Champawat 4.9 4.8 5.1 3.2 1.6 4.1 4.6 4.6 4.7

Dehradun 5.2 5.5 5.0 6.3 6.7 4.5 4.7 5.1 4.5

Haridwar 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.6 5.8 5.2

Nainital 4.9 5.0 4.6 5.4 4.8 5.6 4.7 4.8 4.6

Pauri Garhwal 4.7 4.7 4.9 4.5 4.6 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.3

Pithoragarh 4.6 4.6 4.3 3.6 3.5 3.7 4.1 4.1 3.8

Rudraprayag 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.3 4.3 0.0 4.2 4.2 4.0

Tehri Garhwal 4.6 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.3 4.6 4.1 4.1 4.2

Udham Singh Nagar 5.0 5.0 4.9 5.4 5.4 4.9 5.0 5.1 4.8

Uttarkashi 4.5 4.6 4.4 4.1 4.1 4.3 4.4 4.4 4.0

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Population below age 15 years (%)

Dependency RatioCurrently Married Illiterate

Women aged 15-49 years (%)

Uttarakhand 31.8 33.2 28.4 69.8 75.5 57.1 28.2 32.1 18.6

Almora 30.8 31.4 23.9 75.9 78.1 50.8 14.3 15.2 2.4

Bageshwar 31.5 31.7 28.3 75.5 76.6 55.7 17.9 18.7 3.0

Chamoli 32.1 32.4 30.9 70.7 73.2 59.4 16.5 18.9 5.4

Champawat 35.1 35.3 33.8 80.2 82.8 68.1 29.4 28.5 33.6

Dehradun 27.6 30.6 25.5 59.5 66.2 55.0 22.6 29.7 17.6

Haridwar 34.6 37.9 28.7 73.3 82.0 59.5 46.6 59.8 24.8

Nainital 29.4 29.7 29.0 60.1 62.9 56.2 14.3 15.6 12.4

Pauri Garhwal 31.1 31.6 28.7 74.9 78.4 57.1 21.3 22.4 15.0

Pithoragarh 31.7 31.4 33.0 73.6 75.6 65.1 16.7 19.4 5.1

Rudraprayag 33.0 33.0 30.5 78.7 79.0 54.7 19.2 19.2 18.0

Tehri Garhwal 35.1 35.8 30.8 83.8 88.5 58.6 41.1 45.2 15.9

Udham Singh Nagar 32.2 33.5 30.0 64.5 69.5 56.5 36.7 43.3 25.4

Uttarkashi 33.9 34.5 29.8 73.5 76.1 57.3 42.4 46.1 16.9

6

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 31: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand 866 877 833 877 888 846 992 1026 913

Almora 874 879 802 896 899 843 1131 1144 968

Bageshwar 823 831 667 880 885 776 1089 1099 925

Chamoli 857 856 864 879 900 781 1045 1077 903

Champawat 880 853 1017 888 877 943 1017 1045 891

Dehradun 836 876 800 865 880 852 944 953 937

Haridwar 870 870 868 847 842 862 881 868 904

Nainital 918 908 932 882 872 896 910 924 890

Pauri Garhwal 885 890 854 912 920 861 1134 1162 989

Pithoragarh 764 781 668 817 844 699 1067 1084 991

Rudraprayag 861 863 500 894 897 586 1194 1200 720

Tehri Garhwal 890 895 843 922 929 867 1220 1273 929

Udham Singh Nagar 867 914 787 877 912 817 904 918 880

Uttarkashi 868 882 741 921 933 818 996 1012 891

SEX RATIO

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Sex Ratio at Birth Sex Ratio (0-4 years) Sex Ratio (All ages)

7

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 32: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

1300

Haridw

ar

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Nainita

l

Dehra

dun

Uttara

khan

d

Uttarka

shi

Champa

wat

Chamoli

Pithor

agar

h

Bages

hwar

Almor

a

Pauri G

arhw

al

Rudra

pray

ag

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Sex Ratio at Birth Sex Ratio (0- 4 years) Sex Ratio (All ages)

Uttarakhand: Sex Ratio

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

Total Rural Urban

Sex Ratio at Birth Sex Ratio (0- 4 years) Sex Ratio (All ages)

Uttarakhand: Sex Ratio

8

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 33: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

EFFECTIVE LITERACY RATE

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Person Male Female

Uttarakhand 81.3 78.7 87.6 89.8 88.7 92.2 72.9 69.1 82.6

Almora 85.3 84.4 97.2 95.8 95.5 99.1 76.3 75.0 95.2

Bageshwar 84.1 83.5 95.2 94.8 94.6 98.2 74.6 73.8 92.0

Chamoli 87.0 85.3 94.8 96.6 96.1 98.7 78.0 75.6 90.4

Champawat 81.3 81.5 80.2 92.5 93.7 87.2 70.5 70.2 72.5

Dehradun 84.6 79.7 88.0 89.8 86.4 92.1 79.2 72.7 83.8

Haridwar 74.4 68.7 84.2 81.9 77.7 89.3 65.8 58.3 78.5

Nainital 89.7 88.6 91.2 94.9 95.3 94.3 84.0 81.3 87.8

Pauri Garhwal 81.3 80.1 88.5 91.6 91.3 93.5 72.6 70.8 83.6

Pithoragarh 85.4 83.4 94.5 95.4 94.8 98.2 76.3 73.2 91.0

Rudraprayag 83.7 83.6 90.6 96.2 96.2 95.8 73.6 73.6 83.3

Tehri Garhwal 73.2 70.6 89.0 87.8 86.3 95.0 62.0 59.1 82.6

Udham Singh Nagar 78.7 75.2 84.6 86.2 83.7 90.5 70.4 66.1 78.0

Uttarkashi 77.5 75.8 88.9 90.0 89.2 95.2 65.1 62.9 81.8

9

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 34: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

MARRIAGE

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Marriages among Females below legal age (18 years) (%) #

Marriages among Males below legal age (21 years) (%) #

Currently Married Women aged 20-24 years married before legal age (18 years) (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Mean age at Marriage#

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Currently Married Men aged 25-29 Yearsmarried before legal age ( 21 years) Male Female

Uttarakhand 3.0 3.7 1.3 5.4 6.7 3.1 25.2 26.6 20.1

Almora 2.0 2.2 0.0 2.9 3.3 0.0 19.0 19.1 17.7

Bageshwar 5.2 5.4 1.8 5.2 5.5 3.0 32.0 32.0 31.6

Chamoli 2.1 2.3 1.0 3.8 4.5 1.2 21.2 21.5 19.1

Champawat 8.1 7.6 10.5 5.0 3.1 11.9 37.2 35.5 47.6

Dehradun 1.1 1.8 0.6 2.9 3.8 2.3 16.8 18.6 14.9

Haridwar 2.4 3.5 1.0 8.0 10.8 4.1 24.1 27.5 14.6

Nainital 1.4 1.7 1.1 1.6 1.9 1.1 21.6 22.7 19.6

Pauri Garhwal 1.9 2.1 0.9 3.1 3.4 1.8 21.4 21.8 18.0

Pithoragarh 9.2 10.4 3.3 7.2 8.3 2.5 42.8 43.5 38.2

Rudraprayag 2.5 2.6 - 3.2 3.2 - 21.7 21.7 -

Tehri Garhwal 4.1 4.5 1.1 6.6 7.7 3.5 23.6 23.9 20.2

Udham Singh Nagar 3.1 3.8 2.0 7.8 10.0 4.6 28.7 31.1 23.9

Uttarkashi 6.0 6.3 3.3 10.4 11.0 5.1 29.9 29.8 31.6

Uttarakhand 22.6 25.5 15.7 25.8 25.3 26.8 22.0 21.4 23.2

Almora 16.2 16.9 7.7 26.8 26.4 29.6 21.7 21.4 24.6

Bageshwar 26.8 27.5 13.6 25.9 25.7 28.1 21.1 21.0 23.3

Chamoli 21.1 23.0 12.3 26.0 25.5 27.8 21.8 21.6 23.0

Champawat 24.8 24.2 28.6 25.6 25.6 25.4 20.5 20.4 21.1

Dehradun 15.8 17.4 14.5 26.8 26.2 27.3 23.3 22.7 23.7

Haridwar 27.7 33.0 16.1 24.8 23.7 26.5 22.2 21.1 23.7

Nainital 15.4 17.7 12.1 27.3 27.2 27.5 22.8 22.4 23.4

Pauri Garhwal 17.5 18.4 13.2 27.3 27.2 27.9 22.3 22.1 23.4

Pithoragarh 29.0 30.9 19.1 25.7 25.3 27.1 20.6 20.3 21.9

Rudraprayag 22.0 22.0 - 25.9 25.9 - 21.5 21.4 -

Tehri Garhwal 24.0 25.3 18.9 25.7 25.3 27.0 21.4 21.2 23.3

Udham Singh Nagar 23.3 26.4 17.8 24.9 24.3 25.7 21.5 21.1 22.0

Uttarkashi 32.5 33.7 17.5 24.5 24.2 26.9 21.3 21.1 23.3

# Based on marriages taken place during 2007-2009.

# Based on marriages taken place during 2007-2009.

10

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 35: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Utt

arak

han

d:

Mea

n a

ge

at M

arri

age

(bas

ed o

n m

arri

ages

tak

en p

lace

du

rin

g 2

007-

2009

)

051015202530 Champa

watPith

oraga

rh

Bages

hwar

Uttarka

shi Te

hri G

arhwal

Rudrap

rayag Udh

am S

ingh N

agar

Almora

Chamoli

Uttarak

hand

Haridw

arPau

ri Garh

wal

Nainita

l

Dehrad

un

Mal

eFe

mal

e

11

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 36: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

SCHOOLING STATUS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children currently attending school (Age 6-17 years) (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children attended before / Drop out (Age 6-17 years) (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 92.6 93.0 91.7 93.4 94.2 91.5 91.7 91.7 91.9

Almora 97.3 97.2 98.8 98.1 98.1 98.6 96.5 96.4 99.1

Bageshwar 97.3 97.3 97.4 98.5 98.5 96.8 96.1 96.0 98.1

Chamoli 98.1 97.9 99.0 98.7 98.6 99.2 97.4 97.1 98.9

Champawat 95.0 96.6 87.0 95.6 97.2 88.0 94.3 95.8 85.7

Dehradun 93.1 92.9 93.3 92.9 93.2 92.6 93.4 92.6 94.0

Haridwar 84.5 82.8 88.3 86.7 85.8 88.6 81.8 79.2 88.0

Nainital 93.5 95.5 90.5 93.6 96.7 89.3 93.3 94.2 91.8

Pauri Garhwal 96.1 96.4 94.2 96.8 97.3 93.8 95.4 95.5 94.7

Pithoragarh 97.2 96.7 99.2 98.0 97.6 99.2 96.3 95.7 99.2

Rudraprayag 98.0 98.1 - 98.7 98.7 - 97.3 97.3 -

Tehri Garhwal 96.6 96.4 98.0 97.8 97.8 97.6 95.3 94.9 98.5

Udham Singh Nagar 88.3 88.0 88.9 89.2 89.2 89.2 87.4 86.8 88.6

Uttarkashi 97.6 97.4 98.8 98.1 98.1 98.7 97.0 96.7 98.9

Uttarakhand 6.2 5.9 7.2 5.6 4.9 7.4 6.9 6.9 6.8

Almora 2.5 2.6 0.9 1.8 1.8 1.1 3.2 3.3 0.7

Bageshwar 2.5 2.5 2.5 1.4 1.4 3.0 3.7 3.8 1.9

Chamoli 1.8 2.0 0.9 1.2 1.2 0.7 2.5 2.7 1.1

Champawat 4.5 3.2 11.1 4.1 2.7 10.5 5.1 3.8 11.9

Dehradun 5.7 6.0 5.4 6.0 5.9 6.1 5.3 6.1 4.6

Haridwar 12.5 13.7 9.9 10.7 11.2 9.6 14.7 16.6 10.2

Nainital 6.0 3.9 9.0 5.9 2.9 10.2 6.1 5.1 7.6

Pauri Garhwal 3.5 3.2 5.5 2.9 2.4 6.0 4.2 4.1 5.0

Pithoragarh 2.7 3.1 0.8 1.9 2.2 0.8 3.5 4.1 0.7

Rudraprayag 1.9 1.8 - 1.2 1.2 - 2.6 2.6 -

Tehri Garhwal 3.1 3.3 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.3 4.2 4.6 1.3

Udham Singh Nagar 9.5 9.6 9.4 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.8 10.0 9.4

Uttarkashi 1.9 2.1 0.7 1.5 1.6 0.9 2.4 2.6 0.5

12

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 37: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

WORK STATUS

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children aged 5-14 years engaged in work (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Work Participation Rate (15 years and above)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 2.2 2.0 2.8 2.6 2.3 3.3 1.7 1.6 2.2

Almora 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5

Bageshwar 0.7 0.7 1.5 0.8 0.7 2.1 0.6 0.6 0.6

Chamoli 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 0.7

Champawat 0.4 0.1 1.8 0.6 0.1 2.6 0.1 0.0 0.7

Dehradun 2.9 2.8 2.9 3.4 3.3 3.6 2.2 2.2 2.2

Haridwar 5.5 5.1 6.2 6.0 5.6 6.8 4.9 4.6 5.5

Nainital 0.5 0.2 0.8 0.8 0.3 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2

Pauri Garhwal 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.1 1.9 2.8 1.8 1.8 1.5

Pithoragarh 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.8

Rudraprayag 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 - 0.6 0.6 -

Tehri Garhwal 2.0 2.1 1.5 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.9 2.0 1.1

Udham Singh Nagar 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.9 3.0 2.7 1.1 0.9 1.5

Uttarkashi 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.5 1.4 2.2 1.1 1.2 0.5

Uttarakhand 37.2 35.2 41.8 67.0 65.3 70.5 8.7 7.6 11.4

Almora 32.1 31.5 38.9 59.6 59.2 63.4 9.9 9.5 14.9

Bageshwar 30.0 29.3 42.2 59.1 58.5 69.4 5.3 4.9 14.7

Chamoli 31.7 30.0 39.8 61.9 60.3 68.8 4.8 4.0 9.4

Champawat 33.5 32.2 39.5 61.4 59.4 70.1 8.2 8.4 7.1

Dehradun 40.6 39.6 41.4 69.0 69.1 69.0 11.4 9.3 12.8

Haridwar 43.0 42.7 43.3 74.0 74.7 72.9 8.4 6.6 11.3

Nainital 39.5 37.7 42.2 68.3 66.1 71.3 8.5 7.4 10.0

Pauri Garhwal 30.2 28.8 38.5 57.8 56.1 66.4 8.3 7.7 12.2

Pithoragarh 31.3 31.1 32.5 60.6 61.1 58.7 6.4 5.7 9.9

Rudraprayag 26.6 26.4 - 57.5 57.2 - 3.9 3.9 -

Tehri Garhwal 29.3 27.5 39.5 60.3 58.5 68.2 7.6 7.3 10.3

Udham Singh Nagar 43.3 42.9 43.9 73.3 73.1 73.6 10.2 10.0 10.6

Uttarkashi 37.2 36.8 39.8 65.3 65.4 64.5 10.5 10.1 13.5

13

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 38: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

DISABILITY

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Prevalence of any type of Disability (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand: Prevalence of any type of Disability (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand 1331 1470 991 1554 1730 1147 1107 1217 820

Almora 1317 1342 997 1499 1554 832 1157 1156 1167

Bageshwar 1174 1172 1204 1376 1369 1489 989 993 895

Chamoli 1429 1498 1098 1552 1653 1110 1311 1354 1085

Champawat 1494 1559 1173 1774 1819 1566 1218 1309 732

Dehradun 949 1275 716 1153 1544 875 733 992 546

Haridwar 1549 1668 1333 1863 2000 1609 1192 1286 1027

Nainital 1221 1334 1059 1359 1481 1187 1070 1175 916

Pauri Garhwal 1141 1246 537 1437 1581 675 881 958 396

Pithoragarh 1227 1379 536 1323 1521 463 1138 1248 611

Rudraprayag 1495 1496 - 1684 1692 - 1337 1332 -

Tehri Garhwal 1218 1304 673 1489 1608 859 997 1068 472

Udham Singh Nagar 1567 1802 1161 1786 2095 1264 1324 1482 1045

Uttarkashi 1566 1673 812 1762 1889 925 1369 1459 686

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

14

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 39: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Utt

arak

han

d:

Pre

vale

nce

of

any

typ

e o

f D

isab

ility

(P

er 1

00,0

00 P

op

ula

tio

n)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

DehradunPauri G

arhwal

Bageshwar

Tehri G

arhwal

Nainital

Pithoragarh

Almora

Uttarakh

and

Chamoli

ChampawatRudrapraya

g

Haridwar

Uttarka

shi

Udham Singh Nagar

15

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 40: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

16

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Number of Injured Persons by type of Treatment received (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Major

INJURY

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Number of Injured Persons by type of Treatment received (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Severe

Uttarakhand 261 285 204 346 377 274 176 195 126

Almora 123 124 117 159 162 116 92 90 119

Bageshwar 119 112 258 134 123 331 106 103 179

Chamoli 343 315 478 396 355 572 293 278 375

Champawat 274 302 138 378 403 261 173 205 0

Dehradun 220 297 165 273 399 183 164 189 146

Haridwar 285 360 150 410 515 217 143 181 76

Nainital 236 225 251 312 294 337 153 151 156

Pauri Garhwal 222 229 182 271 282 215 179 184 149

Pithoragarh 263 288 149 345 387 165 186 198 133

Rudraprayag 378 381 - 438 440 - 329 331 -

Tehri Garhwal 315 328 232 390 407 302 254 267 157

Udham Singh Nagar 301 329 252 442 465 402 146 182 83

Uttarkashi 382 396 284 452 469 341 311 323 220

Uttarakhand 300 311 272 394 403 373 205 221 163

Almora 126 133 35 163 172 46 94 99 24

Bageshwar 108 107 115 134 132 165 84 85 60

Chamoli 295 281 365 352 333 433 241 232 288

Champawat 346 379 184 417 461 217 277 301 146

Dehradun 266 370 192 361 513 254 165 221 125

Haridwar 444 477 384 628 679 533 235 245 219

Nainital 227 212 249 295 265 337 152 154 150

Pauri Garhwal 205 215 153 224 227 206 189 204 99

Pithoragarh 225 247 122 302 331 176 152 170 67

Rudraprayag 333 337 - 379 384 - 296 298 -

Tehri Garhwal 416 407 474 494 471 612 354 358 325

Udham Singh Nagar 330 332 326 444 434 460 204 222 174

Uttarkashi 385 405 245 442 457 341 328 354 137

Page 41: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

INJURY

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Number of Injured Persons by type of Treatment received (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Minor

Uttarakhand: Number of Injured Persons (Per 100,000 Population)

by type of Treatment received

Uttarakhand 1234 1247 1202 1636 1649 1607 829 856 758

Almora 246 251 188 276 282 208 220 224 167

Bageshwar 350 367 29 369 386 55 333 349 0

Chamoli 817 576 1973 880 619 2029 756 536 1911

Champawat 1622 1680 1334 1783 1850 1479 1464 1519 1171

Dehradun 1514 1803 1307 2056 2483 1753 939 1089 830

Haridwar 2629 2897 2142 3698 4053 3041 1416 1567 1147

Nainital 494 432 582 593 547 658 385 309 497

Pauri Garhwal 1366 1429 1000 1598 1637 1390 1162 1252 604

Pithoragarh 672 715 476 762 800 595 588 636 355

Rudraprayag 708 715 - 797 807 - 633 638 -

Tehri Garhwal 1715 1821 1042 2095 2231 1371 1406 1503 689

Udham Singh Nagar 865 893 816 1197 1248 1110 497 506 481

Uttarkashi 859 902 555 1048 1111 633 669 696 467

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Severe Major Minor

Person

Male

Female

17

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 42: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Utt

arak

han

d:

Nu

mb

er o

f In

jure

d P

erso

ns

by

typ

e o

f Tr

eatm

ent

rece

ived

(P

er 1

00,0

00 P

op

ula

tio

n)

0

100

200

300

400

500 Bagesh

war

Almora

DehradunPauri G

arhwal

Nainital

Uttarakh

and

Pithoragarh

Champawat

Haridwar

Udham Singh NagarTe

hri Garhwal

ChamoliRudrapraya

g

Uttarka

shi

Se

vere

M

ajo

r

18

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 43: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

ACUTE ILLNESS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Diarrhoea/Dysentery

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI)

Uttarakhand 675 767 447 646 742 424 703 791 473

Almora 448 446 469 501 496 555 401 402 381

Bageshwar 385 401 86 367 382 110 402 418 60

Chamoli 1824 1569 3048 1708 1493 2653 1936 1640 3487

Champawat 1280 1390 736 1218 1342 652 1340 1436 830

Dehradun 351 401 314 338 388 303 364 415 327

Haridwar 535 687 259 530 678 257 541 698 262

Nainital 453 407 517 408 321 529 501 500 503

Pauri Garhwal 320 317 340 327 321 362 314 313 317

Pithoragarh 955 1055 498 914 1025 430 994 1084 566

Rudraprayag 1083 1091 - 1046 1057 - 1114 1120 -

Tehri Garhwal 367 356 431 364 355 411 369 357 453

Udham Singh Nagar 855 1141 361 809 1089 336 906 1198 390

Uttarkashi 1612 1681 1122 1430 1517 852 1795 1844 1427

Uttarakhand 1983 2004 1930 1861 1906 1759 2105 2100 2118

Almora 239 233 328 268 258 393 214 210 262

Bageshwar 250 257 115 196 201 110 300 309 119

Chamoli 2115 1195 6530 1487 773 4621 2717 1587 8645

Champawat 116 139 0 137 167 0 95 112 0

Dehradun 3004 2904 3075 2796 2719 2851 3224 3098 3314

Haridwar 4392 5741 1945 4209 5451 1915 4599 6074 1978

Nainital 728 243 1418 659 224 1267 803 264 1586

Pauri Garhwal 1745 1748 1728 1671 1688 1586 1809 1799 1873

Pithoragarh 73 77 55 67 75 33 78 79 78

Rudraprayag 2910 2940 - 2531 2565 - 3226 3252 -

Tehri Garhwal 5067 5093 4904 4933 4997 4597 5175 5167 5235

Udham Singh Nagar 419 431 396 395 412 365 445 452 431

Uttarkashi 919 911 980 846 867 706 993 954 1290

19

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 44: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

ACUTE ILLNESS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Fever (All Types)

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Any type of Acute Illness

Uttarakhand 5225 5366 4877 5004 5199 4552 5447 5529 5234

Almora 776 772 833 651 638 809 886 888 858

Bageshwar 1076 1113 373 865 901 221 1271 1305 537

Chamoli 2354 2318 2529 1770 1660 2254 2913 2928 2834

Champawat 2881 3191 1357 2439 2735 1087 3316 3626 1659

Dehradun 1990 3050 1229 1785 2727 1115 2206 3388 1351

Haridwar 18379 21041 13552 17985 20682 13002 18826 21453 14161

Nainital 2603 1561 4086 2296 1381 3576 2939 1755 4657

Pauri Garhwal 1641 1696 1329 1447 1480 1272 1812 1880 1387

Pithoragarh 2212 2265 1969 1861 1858 1872 2541 2641 2066

Rudraprayag 4338 4378 - 2743 2772 - 5673 5715 -

Tehri Garhwal 2769 2994 1355 2175 2377 1106 3252 3473 1624

Udham Singh Nagar 4603 4584 4638 4203 4213 4186 5046 4986 5151

Uttarkashi 3539 3549 3469 2490 2525 2263 4592 4561 4830

Uttarakhand 8448 8736 7742 8029 8403 7163 8870 9060 8375

Almora 1694 1680 1877 1636 1604 2033 1745 1747 1715

Bageshwar 1955 2024 631 1622 1685 496 2261 2332 776

Chamoli 7681 6471 13483 6066 5049 10533 9226 7791 16752

Champawat 4868 5351 2484 4321 4829 2001 5406 5851 3026

Dehradun 5758 6924 4921 5295 6358 4539 6249 7519 5330

Haridwar 24241 28424 16654 23666 27814 16004 24893 29127 17373

Nainital 3982 2384 6258 3586 2118 5640 4416 2671 6950

Pauri Garhwal 4154 4189 3949 3844 3864 3739 4425 4467 4161

Pithoragarh 3579 3708 2992 3096 3183 2720 4032 4193 3265

Rudraprayag 9505 9594 - 7224 7308 - 11413 11497 -

Tehri Garhwal 8493 8747 6899 7762 8035 6315 9088 9300 7527

Udham Singh Nagar 6343 6667 5784 5801 6177 5164 6942 7200 6487

Uttarkashi 7487 7566 6925 5999 6144 5036 8981 8971 905620

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 45: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI) (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand: (Per 100,000 Population)

Persons suffering from Fever (All Types)

Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from any type of Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from Diarrhoea/Dysentery (Per 100,000 Population)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

21

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 46: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand: Persons suffering from Acute Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

Diarrhoea/Dysentery Acute Respiratory Infection

(ARI)

Fever (All Types)

Total

Rural

Urban

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

Almor

a

Bages

hwar

Pauri Gar

hwal

Dehra

dun

Pithor

agar

h

Chamoli

Nainita

l

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Champa

wat

Uttarkas

hi

Rudra

pray

ag

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Uttara

khan

d

Haridw

ar

Fever (All Types)Acute Respiratory Infection (ARI)Diarrhoea/Dysentery

22

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 47: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

ACUTE ILLNESS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Persons suffering from Acute Illness and taking treatment from Any Source (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Persons suffering from Acute Illness and taking treatment from Government Source (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 96.4 96.1 97.5 96.7 96.3 97.6 96.3 95.8 97.4

Almora 73.6 73.2 79.4 69.6 69.0 75.0 77.0 76.4 84.7

Bageshwar 79.3 79.3 81.8 79.1 79.1 77.8 79.5 79.4 84.6

Chamoli 93.3 92.2 95.8 93.0 91.4 96.3 93.6 92.7 95.8

Champawat 90.1 89.4 97.2 91.3 90.7 97.8 89.5 88.7 96.8

Dehradun 96.5 96.3 96.6 96.1 96.0 96.2 96.8 96.6 97.0

Haridwar 98.6 98.6 98.7 98.6 98.5 98.8 98.6 98.6 98.6

Nainital 97.2 95.8 97.9 97.6 96.0 98.4 96.8 95.6 97.5

Pauri Garhwal 91.9 91.5 94.1 92.2 92.0 93.2 91.6 91.1 95.0

Pithoragarh 91.9 91.3 95.2 91.8 91.3 94.3 91.9 91.3 95.9

Rudraprayag 94.5 94.5 - 94.9 94.9 - 94.3 94.3 -

Tehri Garhwal 94.0 94.3 91.8 94.5 94.9 91.2 93.8 93.9 92.4

Udham Singh Nagar 98.2 98.4 97.9 98.6 98.4 98.9 98.0 98.5 97.2

Uttarkashi 95.3 95.2 96.3 94.7 94.7 94.7 95.7 95.5 97.3

Uttarakhand 12.7 13.7 10.3 11.7 12.3 10.1 13.7 14.9 10.4

Almora 47.7 47.9 44.9 46.5 46.7 45.5 48.5 48.8 44.3

Bageshwar 58.5 58.1 83.3 60.9 60.7 71.4 56.9 56.3 90.9

Chamoli 25.9 29.9 17.2 28.4 32.7 19.8 24.4 28.2 15.4

Champawat 28.3 29.6 15.2 28.5 29.3 20.0 28.1 29.9 11.7

Dehradun 9.2 10.6 7.7 8.9 10.4 7.5 9.4 10.9 8.0

Haridwar 4.2 4.8 2.4 4.3 4.9 2.3 4.2 4.7 2.5

Nainital 38.7 39.8 38.2 38.8 39.4 38.5 38.6 40.1 37.8

Pauri Garhwal 21.7 22.5 17.0 21.6 22.5 16.6 21.8 22.5 17.3

Pithoragarh 43.9 45.3 36.3 43.7 45.3 35.6 44.1 45.3 36.9

Rudraprayag 40.6 40.7 - 37.4 37.4 - 42.4 42.4 -

Tehri Garhwal 11.8 12.3 7.7 11.1 11.6 7.3 12.3 12.7 8.1

Udham Singh Nagar 7.7 7.6 8.0 7.5 7.0 8.6 7.9 8.2 7.5

Uttarkashi 29.0 30.3 19.0 29.6 30.9 18.4 28.6 29.9 19.3

23

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 48: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

CHRONIC ILLNESS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having any kind of Symptoms of Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having any kind of Symptoms of Chronic Illness and sought Medical Care (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 9656 9530 9967 7826 7604 8340 11499 11403 11749

Almora 6199 6082 7753 5090 5019 5961 7177 7009 9600

Bageshwar 10014 10142 7538 7222 7346 5019 12574 12684 10263

Chamoli 8932 8619 10435 5960 5987 5843 11776 11061 15522

Champawat 13526 14515 8648 10238 11128 6177 16758 17756 11420

Dehradun 11941 11125 12527 10254 9305 10929 13730 13035 14233

Haridwar 10967 11059 10798 9517 9645 9280 12612 12687 12478

Nainital 6537 5197 8447 5378 4224 6992 7808 6247 10075

Pauri Garhwal 10741 10797 10419 8828 8797 8995 12421 12511 11860

Pithoragarh 14191 14570 12464 10269 10649 8612 17868 18187 16348

Rudraprayag 8064 8132 - 5890 5949 - 9884 9950 -

Tehri Garhwal 14716 15195 11699 11819 12203 9779 17070 17519 13766

Udham Singh Nagar 6043 5823 6425 5179 4928 5603 6999 6796 7358

Uttarkashi 7560 7474 8164 5518 5506 5596 9609 9418 11059

Uttarakhand 88.4 86.2 93.5 90.4 88.2 94.9 87.0 84.9 92.3

Almora 83.2 82.9 87.0 86.8 86.4 90.7 81.0 80.7 84.6

Bageshwar 83.9 83.5 95.1 85.2 84.8 95.6 83.2 82.8 94.8

Chamoli 71.0 74.9 55.7 77.5 79.3 69.3 67.9 72.7 50.1

Champawat 83.9 83.5 87.0 85.4 85.1 87.3 83.0 82.6 86.8

Dehradun 94.3 89.4 97.5 95.0 90.3 97.9 93.8 88.8 97.1

Haridwar 90.8 90.3 91.8 91.4 91.2 91.8 90.3 89.5 91.9

Nainital 90.6 89.3 91.8 92.6 91.0 94.0 89.2 88.0 90.2

Pauri Garhwal 90.8 90.1 94.8 92.1 91.6 94.7 89.9 89.2 94.8

Pithoragarh 85.7 83.6 97.0 85.6 83.4 97.6 85.8 83.7 96.7

Rudraprayag 71.1 71.0 - 75.8 75.7 - 68.7 68.7 -

Tehri Garhwal 87.4 86.2 96.7 89.6 88.3 98.1 86.1 85.1 95.6

Udham Singh Nagar 93.9 91.7 97.2 94.1 91.9 97.4 93.6 91.5 97.1

Uttarkashi 79.0 81.0 66.7 85.1 85.5 82.6 75.5 78.3 57.6

24

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 49: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Hypertension

CHRONIC ILLNESS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Diabetes

Uttarakhand 669 356 1436 732 393 1517 606 321 1348

Almora 182 150 610 237 205 624 134 102 596

Bageshwar 157 139 516 188 171 496 129 109 537

Chamoli 268 126 952 313 156 1006 225 98 893

Champawat 415 364 667 495 460 652 337 272 683

Dehradun 1628 934 2125 1706 984 2219 1545 882 2025

Haridwar 532 127 1265 561 121 1372 499 134 1147

Nainital 937 544 1497 1016 589 1614 850 496 1365

Pauri Garhwal 792 705 1290 899 793 1458 697 630 1120

Pithoragarh 307 208 758 369 252 881 248 168 633

Rudraprayag 136 134 - 151 146 - 123 124 -

Tehri Garhwal 542 378 1568 695 492 1773 417 290 1348

Udham Singh Nagar 675 470 1029 673 466 1023 678 475 1037

Uttarkashi 206 121 812 223 109 973 190 132 631

Uttarakhand 1005 664 1843 798 520 1442 1214 804 2283

Almora 583 466 2135 558 456 1802 605 475 2477

Bageshwar 429 409 831 382 369 607 473 444 1074

Chamoli 528 368 1294 500 362 1110 554 374 1498

Champawat 917 902 989 786 796 739 1045 1003 1269

Dehradun 2228 1297 2897 1861 951 2508 2618 1659 3313

Haridwar 875 508 1540 535 269 1027 1261 784 2109

Nainital 1372 893 2053 996 703 1406 1783 1098 2778

Pauri Garhwal 1216 1110 1827 1011 932 1429 1396 1262 2229

Pithoragarh 1214 940 2466 1068 815 2170 1351 1054 2765

Rudraprayag 405 410 - 381 386 - 426 429 -

Tehri Garhwal 1060 833 2488 935 740 1974 1162 906 3040

Udham Singh Nagar 408 309 579 278 192 424 552 437 755

Uttarkashi 441 385 838 347 304 633 536 466 1070

25

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 50: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Diabetes (Per 100,000 Population)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

Rudrapray

ag

Bage

shwar

Almora

Uttarkas

hi

Chamoli

Pithorag

arh

Champa

wat

Haridw

ar

Tehri G

arhw

al

Uttarakh

and

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Pauri G

arhw

al

Nainita

l

Dehradu

n

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Diabetes (Per 100,000 Population)

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

26

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 51: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Hypertension (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Hypertension (Per 100,000 Population)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Rudrap

raya

g

Udha

m Singh

Nag

ar

Bage

shwa

r

Uttarkas

hi

Cham

oli

Almora

Harid

war

Cham

pawa

t

Uttarakh

and

Tehri G

arhw

al

Pithorag

arh

Pauri G

arhw

al

Nainita

l

Dehrad

un

27

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 52: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

28

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

CHRONIC ILLNESS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Tuberculosis (TB)

Uttarakhand 189 189 187 219 223 210 158 156 163

Almora 92 96 47 103 108 46 83 85 48

Bageshwar 86 86 86 103 100 165 71 74 0

Chamoli 68 71 55 81 86 61 55 56 48

Champawat 126 124 138 116 131 43 137 117 244

Dehradun 159 168 153 177 174 180 140 161 124

Haridwar 370 405 306 418 479 306 316 321 306

Nainital 124 89 172 141 81 225 105 98 114

Pauri Garhwal 117 120 98 157 163 127 82 84 69

Pithoragarh 121 132 72 132 145 77 112 121 67

Rudraprayag 78 79 - 81 82 - 75 75 -

Tehri Garhwal 174 182 123 210 222 146 145 151 98

Udham Singh Nagar 272 302 221 312 350 248 228 249 191

Uttarkashi 147 159 64 161 171 97 133 147 27

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Asthma / Chronic Respiratory Disease

Uttarakhand 550 614 393 631 730 404 469 502 382

Almora 492 510 258 613 642 254 386 395 262

Bageshwar 1144 1168 688 1354 1402 496 952 955 895

Chamoli 489 518 351 543 586 355 438 455 346

Champawat 1304 1466 506 1353 1545 478 1256 1390 537

Dehradun 470 476 466 507 511 504 432 439 426

Haridwar 346 385 275 437 530 267 243 219 284

Nainital 378 344 426 425 399 460 327 283 389

Pauri Garhwal 450 467 350 606 646 392 313 314 307

Pithoragarh 1526 1668 874 1595 1787 760 1461 1560 988

Rudraprayag 430 434 - 558 565 - 322 324 -

Tehri Garhwal 819 877 455 1183 1311 503 524 541 403

Udham Singh Nagar 385 419 326 386 425 321 383 412 332

Uttarkashi 374 401 181 483 515 268 264 288 82

Page 53: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Tuberculosis (TB) (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Tuberculosis (TB) (Per 100,000 Population)

0

50

100

150

200

250

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Chamoli

Rudrapray

ag

Bage

shwar

Almora

Pauri G

arhw

al

Pithorag

arh

Nainital

Champa

wat

Uttarkas

hi

Dehradu

n

Tehri G

arhw

al

Uttarakh

and

Udham

Singh

Nag

ar

Haridwar

29

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 54: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Asthma/Chronic Respiratory Disease (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Asthma/Chronic Respiratory Disease (Per 100,000 Population)

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

Haridw

ar

Uttark

ashi

Nainita

l

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Rudra

pray

ag

Pauri

Garhw

al

Dehra

dun

Cham

oli

Almor

a

Uttara

khan

d

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Bages

hwar

Cham

pawat

Pithor

agar

h

30

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 55: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

31

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

CHRONIC ILLNESS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Arthritis

Uttarakhand 1358 1509 988 731 834 493 1989 2165 1531

Almora 1512 1504 1619 809 803 878 2132 2114 2382

Bageshwar 3922 4001 2379 2184 2248 1048 5515 5596 3819

Chamoli 1737 1909 916 1016 1156 399 2427 2606 1489

Champawat 3464 3821 1702 2050 2337 739 4854 5242 2782

Dehradun 971 958 980 476 535 434 1496 1402 1564

Haridwar 648 625 690 487 521 425 832 746 983

Nainital 1041 1104 952 484 532 417 1652 1721 1550

Pauri Garhwal 952 993 719 478 517 274 1369 1401 1169

Pithoragarh 4878 5073 3987 2380 2507 1828 7219 7441 6164

Rudraprayag 2175 2191 - 1134 1145 - 3046 3062 -

Tehri Garhwal 997 1030 787 569 599 411 1344 1365 1191

Udham Singh Nagar 676 617 777 392 343 475 990 917 1120

Uttarkashi 769 772 748 483 486 462 1057 1055 1070

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having diagnosed for Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Any kind of Chronic Illness

Uttarakhand 8005 7579 9049 6752 6274 7861 9266 8850 10351

Almora 5497 5339 7589 4595 4484 5938 6293 6085 9290

Bageshwar 8601 8665 7366 6302 6380 4909 10709 10742 10024

Chamoli 5448 5281 6252 4230 4059 4985 6614 6415 7655

Champawat 11466 12238 7659 8808 9538 5481 14078 14822 10102

Dehradun 10371 9077 11301 9074 7695 10056 11747 10527 12631

Haridwar 9074 8806 9559 8183 7861 8777 10085 9895 10424

Nainital 6348 4779 8582 5295 3896 7254 7501 5733 10069

Pauri Garhwal 8289 8236 8597 7184 7102 7615 9259 9206 9591

Pithoragarh 12321 12354 12171 8870 8959 8480 15557 15486 15893

Rudraprayag 6314 6364 - 4854 4900 - 7536 7584 -

Tehri Garhwal 9394 9220 10486 8320 8174 9093 10266 10032 11985

Udham Singh Nagar 5734 5543 6063 4899 4673 5281 6658 6491 6951

Uttarkashi 6116 6134 5984 4955 4920 5182 7282 7334 6888

Page 56: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Arthritis (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for Arthritis (Per 100,000 Population)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

Har

idwar

Udh

am Singh

Nag

ar

Uttar

kash

i

Paur

i Gar

hwal

Deh

radu

n

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Nainital

Uttarak

hand

Almor

a

Cham

oli

Rudr

apraya

g

Cham

pawat

Bage

shwar

Pith

orag

arh

32

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 57: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for any kind of Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

Uttarakhand: Having diagnosed for any kind of Chronic Illness (Per 100,000 Population)

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

Chamoli

Almora

Udham

Singh

Nag

ar

Uttarkas

hi

Rudrapray

ag

Nainital

Uttarakh

and

Pauri G

arhw

al

Bage

shwar

Haridwar

Tehri G

arhw

al

Dehradu

n

Champa

wat

Pithorag

arh

33

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 58: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

CHRONIC ILLNESS

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having diagnosed for any kind of Chronic Illness and getting Regular Treatment (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Having diagnosed for any kind of Chronic Illness and getting Regular Treatment from Government Source (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 60.7 54.3 73.6 63.6 57.1 75.5 58.5 52.4 72.0

Almora 47.3 47.7 43.0 50.9 51.9 42.0 44.9 45.1 43.6

Bageshwar 42.5 41.9 56.0 44.8 44.3 56.2 41.2 40.5 56.0

Chamoli 47.3 41.4 70.9 52.1 45.7 74.8 44.3 38.9 68.1

Champawat 48.4 47.4 56.5 53.6 52.6 61.1 45.2 44.2 53.6

Dehradun 73.6 65.1 78.5 75.1 66.4 79.8 72.3 64.0 77.3

Haridwar 57.4 45.6 77.0 59.2 47.0 79.3 55.7 44.3 74.9

Nainital 67.2 67.1 67.4 68.1 68.4 67.9 66.6 66.1 66.9

Pauri Garhwal 67.2 65.8 74.7 70.1 68.7 77.0 65.1 63.8 72.8

Pithoragarh 46.2 45.4 49.7 50.1 49.1 54.3 44.1 43.4 47.2

Rudraprayag 44.4 44.4 - 48.2 48.2 - 42.3 42.3 -

Tehri Garhwal 65.0 62.6 77.9 69.1 67.0 79.3 62.2 59.9 76.8

Udham Singh Nagar 68.8 63.9 76.5 69.8 65.3 76.6 67.9 62.8 76.4

Uttarkashi 58.2 58.2 58.2 59.6 59.8 58.7 57.2 57.2 57.8

Uttarakhand 26.4 29.2 21.0 25.5 28.4 20.5 27.0 29.7 21.5

Almora 50.4 50.5 49.2 51.9 52.5 46.7 49.4 49.3 50.8

Bageshwar 56.3 55.4 78.3 55.9 54.9 79.3 56.5 55.6 77.8

Chamoli 56.1 59.1 44.9 56.5 60.8 41.8 55.9 58.0 47.2

Champawat 22.9 24.0 14.8 23.0 24.3 12.8 22.9 23.8 15.9

Dehradun 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 14.6 15.3 15.1 15.4 14.9

Haridwar 9.5 8.2 11.4 10.1 8.5 12.4 8.8 7.8 10.4

Nainital 48.5 52.2 45.6 47.5 52.1 44.2 49.3 52.4 46.8

Pauri Garhwal 21.8 21.4 24.0 22.9 22.5 24.6 21.0 20.6 23.4

Pithoragarh 41.5 43.6 32.5 43.5 45.6 34.0 40.5 42.5 31.6

Rudraprayag 52.4 52.4 - 54.6 54.7 - 51.2 51.2 -

Tehri Garhwal 15.1 15.4 13.6 14.8 14.9 14.5 15.4 15.8 13.0

Udham Singh Nagar 20.1 23.1 15.7 19.7 23.2 14.8 20.4 23.0 16.5

Uttarkashi 39.5 40.6 32.1 37.7 39.6 27.6 40.6 41.3 36.0

34

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 59: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

PERSONAL HABITS (15 YEARS AND ABOVE )

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Population by habit of Chewing with Tobacco (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Population by habit of Chewing without Tobacco (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 8.8 9.4 7.3 15.7 17.4 12.3 2.1 2.2 2.0

Almora 9.4 9.7 5.5 19.2 20.1 10.6 1.5 1.5 0.5

Bageshwar 14.3 14.6 9.8 25.8 26.3 18.8 4.6 4.8 0.8

Chamoli 10.9 11.6 7.9 21.8 23.4 15.2 1.2 1.4 0.2

Champawat 11.3 11.7 9.3 22.4 23.9 15.7 1.2 1.0 2.5

Dehradun 7.8 9.2 6.9 13.5 16.0 11.9 1.9 2.3 1.6

Haridwar 6.8 7.5 5.8 9.6 10.2 8.8 3.7 4.5 2.6

Nainital 8.8 9.8 7.3 15.8 18.4 12.2 1.1 0.6 1.8

Pauri Garhwal 5.0 4.9 5.3 10.3 10.3 10.0 0.7 0.7 1.0

Pithoragarh 14.8 16.2 8.7 28.2 30.7 16.9 3.5 3.9 1.6

Rudraprayag 7.4 7.3 - 16.6 16.5 - 0.5 0.5 -

Tehri Garhwal 4.3 3.9 6.9 9.8 9.0 13.2 0.5 0.5 0.5

Udham Singh Nagar 10.9 11.8 9.5 17.8 19.4 15.1 3.4 3.4 3.3

Uttarkashi 8.4 8.6 7.2 16.2 16.6 13.8 1.0 1.1 0.2

Uttarakhand 0.9 1.0 0.9 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.7

Almora 1.1 1.0 2.2 2.1 2.0 3.5 0.3 0.2 0.9

Bageshwar 2.4 2.4 1.4 4.2 4.3 2.5 0.8 0.8 0.4

Chamoli 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.6 1.6 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.1

Champawat 1.1 1.2 0.6 1.7 2.0 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5

Dehradun 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4

Haridwar 1.0 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.3 0.9

Nainital 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.7 1.7 1.6 0.6 0.3 1.1

Pauri Garhwal 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2

Pithoragarh 1.3 1.4 1.1 2.4 2.4 2.1 0.5 0.5 0.3

Rudraprayag 0.8 0.8 - 1.5 1.5 - 0.2 0.2 -

Tehri Garhwal 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1

Udham Singh Nagar 1.0 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.0

Uttarkashi 1.1 1.2 0.3 2.0 2.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2

35

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 60: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

PERSONAL HABITS (15 YEARS AND ABOVE )

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Population by habit of Smoking (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Population by habit of Drinking Alcohol (%)

Person Male Female

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 13.8 16.0 8.7 24.8 28.9 16.1 3.2 4.1 1.0

Almora 14.7 15.3 7.5 29.3 30.7 14.7 3.0 3.1 0.5

Bageshwar 20.2 20.6 11.8 34.3 35.0 22.5 8.2 8.5 1.1

Chamoli 19.8 20.7 15.4 37.0 38.8 29.4 4.4 5.2 0.7

Champawat 13.1 14.2 7.7 24.2 26.5 14.1 3.1 3.5 1.0

Dehradun 10.2 13.2 8.3 17.8 21.7 15.2 2.4 4.5 1.1

Haridwar 15.6 19.6 9.2 25.4 30.9 16.4 4.7 6.8 1.5

Nainital 10.1 11.6 7.9 18.7 21.6 14.8 0.8 1.0 0.4

Pauri Garhwal 15.8 16.9 9.9 30.0 32.1 19.5 4.6 5.2 0.7

Pithoragarh 15.7 17.7 6.8 29.1 32.5 13.1 4.4 5.1 1.4

Rudraprayag 18.4 18.4 - 40.7 40.9 - 1.9 1.9 -

Tehri Garhwal 16.1 16.8 12.0 34.6 37.2 23.1 3.2 3.5 0.6

Udham Singh Nagar 9.6 10.8 7.8 17.1 18.9 14.1 1.5 1.9 0.8

Uttarkashi 17.8 18.5 12.9 32.3 33.5 24.4 4.0 4.5 0.7

Uttarakhand 11.6 12.9 8.5 23.0 26.2 16.2 0.7 0.8 0.4

Almora 11.9 12.1 9.3 25.8 26.5 18.4 0.7 0.7 0.4

Bageshwar 17.3 17.5 12.8 36.8 37.5 25.1 0.8 0.8 0.3

Chamoli 20.0 20.2 19.2 41.7 42.8 37.0 0.7 0.8 0.5

Champawat 14.2 15.2 9.2 29.3 32.0 17.5 0.6 0.6 0.4

Dehradun 11.3 12.2 10.7 21.3 22.7 20.4 1.0 1.5 0.7

Haridwar 6.8 7.5 5.7 12.4 13.5 10.6 0.5 0.6 0.4

Nainital 9.4 11.8 6.0 17.8 22.5 11.4 0.4 0.5 0.1

Pauri Garhwal 14.2 14.8 11.0 31.1 32.9 22.3 0.8 0.8 0.4

Pithoragarh 15.9 17.1 10.0 33.3 36.1 20.7 1.1 1.2 0.8

Rudraprayag 17.9 17.9 - 41.6 41.7 - 0.5 0.4 -

Tehri Garhwal 14.0 14.1 13.6 33.0 34.4 26.5 0.8 0.8 0.3

Udham Singh Nagar 7.9 9.1 5.8 14.7 17.1 10.9 0.3 0.4 0.2

Uttarkashi 16.1 15.8 18.1 31.9 31.5 34.7 1.0 1.0 0.4

36

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 61: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Chewing with Tobacco Chewing without Tobacco

Person FemaleMale

Uttarakhand: Population by habit of Chewing with/without Tobacco (%)

Uttarakhand: Population by habit of Smoking (%)

Uttarakhand: Population by habit of Drinking Alcohol (%)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Person Male Female

Total

Rural

Urban

37

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 62: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand 36.5 37.2 33.6 31.4 33.4 25.7

Almora 29.7 30.2 16.0 25.3 26.1 9.9

Bageshwar 36.3 36.2 38.2 26.0 26.5 13.8

Chamoli 38.2 38.2 38.2 26.4 27.7 19.6

Champawat 41.5 41.3 42.7 34.1 33.4 37.7

Dehradun 32.4 35.3 28.8 24.2 28.9 19.9

Haridwar 40.6 43.7 27.9 43.8 49.3 29.7

Nainital 37.3 36.9 37.9 29.2 28.8 29.7

Pauri Garhwal 28.0 28.0 28.5 29.7 30.3 25.5

Pithoragarh 40.4 39.9 44.4 21.3 22.2 16.1

Rudraprayag 37.7 37.3 - 26.2 26.2 -

Tehri Garhwal 34.5 34.3 36.9 32.5 33.3 25.6

Udham Singh Nagar 36.7 37.2 35.7 32.9 35.4 28.1

Uttarkashi 40.6 40.3 44.1 26.5 26.6 25.4

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Crude Birth Rate (CBR) Natural Growth Rate Total Fertility Rate

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

FERTILITY

Uttarakhand 18.6 19.3 16.7 12.0 12.4 11.0 2.3 2.4 2.0

Almora 16.3 16.7 12.1 10.3 10.4 7.8 2.0 - -

Bageshwar 14.7 14.7 13.0 7.4 7.5 6.0 1.8 - -

Chamoli 17.7 17.9 16.7 12.4 12.2 13.5 2.0 - -

Champawat 17.3 17.1 18.2 11.9 11.6 13.4 2.2 - -

Dehradun 17.9 20.7 15.9 11.0 13.3 9.3 2.2 - -

Haridwar 22.7 25.3 18.1 14.8 17.0 10.9 3.1 - -

Nainital 16.8 16.6 17.1 11.3 10.6 12.2 2.1 - -

Pauri Garhwal 19.9 20.5 16.4 11.5 11.7 10.5 2.4 - -

Pithoragarh 14.7 15.4 11.8 8.8 8.8 8.7 1.7 - -

Rudraprayag 16.4 16.5 - 10.4 10.5 - 1.8 - -

Tehri Garhwal 22.4 23.1 17.8 13.1 13.4 10.9 2.6 - -

Udham Singh Nagar 18.6 19.1 17.9 13.3 13.4 13.1 2.4 - -

Uttarkashi 16.1 16.6 12.5 11.5 11.8 8.7 1.9 - -

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Women aged 20-24 reporting birth of order 2 & above (%)

Women reporting birth of order 3 & above (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

38

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 63: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Crude Birth Rate and Natural Growth Rate

0

5

10

15

20

25

Total Rural Urban

Crude Birth Rate (CBR) Natural Growth Rate

Uttarakhand: Crude Birth Rate and Natural Growth Rate

0

5

10

15

20

25

Bages

hwar

Pithor

agar

h

Uttarka

shi

Almor

a

Rudra

pray

ag

Nainita

l

Champa

wat

Chamoli

Dehra

dun

Uttara

khan

d

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Pauri G

arhw

al

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Haridw

ar

Crude Birth Rate (CBR) Natural Growth Rate

39

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 64: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Total Fertility Rate

Uttarakhand: Total Fertility Rate

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Total Rural Urban

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

Pithorag

arh

Bage

shwar

Rudrapray

ag

Uttarkas

hi

Chamoli

Almora

Nainital

Champa

wat

Dehradu

n

Uttarakh

and

Udham

Singh

Nag

ar

Pauri G

arhw

al

Tehri G

arhw

al

Haridwar

40

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 65: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Women with two children wanting no more children (%)

Women aged 15-19 years who were already mothers or pregnant at the time of survey (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand 78.4 73.6 85.2 41.4 41.0 43.5

Almora 50.0 48.6 64.4 32.6 32.5 37.5

Bageshwar 51.6 51.1 59.8 38.8 38.7 50.0

Chamoli 38.9 33.7 57.2 44.8 42.7 60.5

Champawat 53.5 50.7 63.7 42.4 44.9 26.7

Dehradun 88.5 84.9 90.3 41.5 42.3 40.5

Haridwar 74.2 65.0 82.0 37.1 37.0 37.5

Nainital 65.9 64.8 67.1 46.0 49.0 37.1

Pauri Garhwal 85.4 84.5 88.8 37.2 36.1 52.2

Pithoragarh 53.9 50.1 66.5 48.3 47.8 53.6

Rudraprayag 47.5 47.1 - 35.1 35.1 -

Tehri Garhwal 73.6 68.3 89.8 33.7 33.3 43.5

Udham Singh Nagar 62.3 60.1 65.6 50.1 50.7 48.4

Uttarkashi 70.4 66.2 87.2 42.3 42.3 40.0

FERTILITY

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Median age at first live birth of Women aged 15-49 years

Median age at first live birth of Women aged 25-49 years

Live Births taking place after an interval of 36 months (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 22.2 21.8 23.3 21.7 21.2 22.8 37.9 36.2 42.8

Almora 22.0 21.9 24.1 21.4 21.3 23.6 44.4 43.9 56.5

Bageshwar 21.5 21.4 22.4 21.0 21.0 21.9 51.5 50.8 66.7

Chamoli 22.1 22.0 22.6 21.6 21.4 22.3 37.1 36.1 42.7

Champawat 20.8 20.7 21.4 20.4 20.2 21.1 44.3 46.5 34.5

Dehradun 23.6 22.9 24.1 23.1 22.4 23.6 39.8 33.4 46.4

Haridwar 21.9 21.2 23.2 21.3 20.7 22.6 32.2 28.6 43.1

Nainital 23.0 22.6 23.7 22.5 22.1 23.1 38.4 34.0 44.3

Pauri Garhwal 22.3 22.2 23.3 21.9 21.8 22.9 45.7 46.0 43.8

Pithoragarh 20.9 20.8 21.8 20.7 20.5 21.5 46.2 44.1 58.4

Rudraprayag 21.9 21.9 - 21.4 21.4 - 42.9 42.9 -

Tehri Garhwal 21.8 21.7 22.7 21.4 21.3 22.3 41.6 41.2 44.8

Udham Singh Nagar 22.1 21.8 22.7 21.4 21.1 22.0 31.2 29.7 34.2

Uttarkashi 21.8 21.6 23.1 21.3 21.1 22.6 35.2 33.5 49.7

41

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 66: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

42

UttarakhandA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Uttarakhand: Women aged 15-19 years who were already mothers or pregnant at the time of survey (%)

Uttarakhand: Median age of Women at first live birth

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Champa

wat

Pithor

agar

h

Bages

hwar

Uttarkas

hi

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Rudra

pray

ag

Haridw

ar

Almor

a

Chamoli

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Uttara

khan

d

Pauri Gar

hwal

Nainita

l

Dehra

dun

Age 15-49 years Age 25-49 years

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Almor

a

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Rudra

pray

ag

Haridw

ar

Pauri Gar

hwal

Bages

hwar

Uttara

khan

d

Dehra

dun

Uttarkas

hi

Champa

wat

Chamoli

Nainita

l

Pithor

agar

h

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Page 67: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

43

UttarakhandA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

FERTILITY

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Mean number of children ever born to Women aged 15-49 years

Mean number of children surviving to Women aged 15-49 years

Mean number of children ever born to Women aged 45-49 years

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.4 3.9 4.1 3.5

Almora 2.6 2.6 2.0 2.5 2.6 2.0 3.6 3.6 2.7

Bageshwar 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 3.4 3.4 2.8

Chamoli 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.3 3.6 3.6 3.3

Champawat 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.7 2.7 3.9 3.9 4.0

Dehradun 2.5 2.7 2.3 2.3 2.5 2.2 3.4 3.8 3.2

Haridwar 3.2 3.6 2.6 2.9 3.1 2.4 5.0 5.8 4.0

Nainital 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.7 3.6 3.7

Pauri Garhwal 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.5 2.4 3.9 4.0 3.5

Pithoragarh 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.4 2.4 2.2 3.3 3.3 2.9

Rudraprayag 2.5 2.5 - 2.5 2.5 - 3.6 3.6 -

Tehri Garhwal 2.9 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.4 4.4 4.5 3.5

Udham Singh Nagar 2.8 2.9 2.6 2.7 2.7 2.5 4.1 4.3 3.9

Uttarkashi 2.8 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.4 4.1 4.2 3.4

Page 68: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Pregnancy to Women aged 15-49 years resulting in abortion (%)

Women who received any ANC before abortion (%)

Women who went for Ultrasound before abortion (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

ABORTION

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Average Month of pregnancy at the time of abortion

Abortion performed by skilled health personnel (%)

Abortion taking place in Institution (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 4.5 3.9 6.2 52.4 43.1 68.7 31.6 23.7 45.3

Almora 1.0 1.0 0.3 40.8 39.8 100.0 23.6 22.3 100.0

Bageshwar 1.5 1.5 0.0 26.8 26.8 0.0 18.3 18.3 0.0

Chamoli 1.4 1.4 1.5 38.9 35.3 56.3 21.7 21.0 25.0

Champawat 1.4 1.3 1.8 59.7 55.5 75.0 34.1 29.7 50.0

Dehradun 7.9 7.0 8.7 58.7 48.5 66.1 37.2 31.1 41.6

Haridwar 8.7 8.3 9.5 51.2 41.8 72.2 29.2 20.6 48.5

Nainital 3.3 2.0 5.1 80.6 79.0 81.4 47.4 38.5 52.3

Pauri Garhwal 4.5 4.0 8.2 36.7 36.2 38.5 23.6 24.3 21.5

Pithoragarh 1.2 1.4 0.2 39.0 37.8 100.0 20.5 20.9 0.0

Rudraprayag 1.2 1.2 - 29.2 29.2 - 24.1 24.1 -

Tehri Garhwal 5.3 5.0 7.9 35.0 32.6 46.7 21.3 17.8 38.7

Udham Singh Nagar 1.6 1.3 2.2 63.9 54.0 75.0 47.1 38.2 57.1

Uttarkashi 2.9 2.9 2.8 45.1 46.0 37.5 18.8 18.0 25.0

Uttarakhand 2.8 2.9 2.5 57.4 53.1 64.8 54.3 50.1 61.7

Almora 3.7 3.7 3.0 31.3 30.0 100.0 27.5 26.2 100.0

Bageshwar 3.6 3.6 0.0 38.0 38.0 - 33.8 33.8 -

Chamoli 4.2 4.2 4.2 32.1 29.8 43.8 30.2 28.7 37.5

Champawat 4.7 4.6 5.3 56.9 51.9 75.0 51.1 44.5 75.0

Dehradun 2.5 2.6 2.5 63.0 60.8 64.7 61.3 59.8 62.3

Haridwar 2.5 2.6 2.3 60.5 56.7 69.1 58.2 53.8 68.0

Nainital 3.2 3.7 3.0 63.6 67.1 61.6 53.1 58.7 50.0

Pauri Garhwal 2.8 2.9 2.5 49.1 46.6 56.9 47.4 46.3 50.8

Pithoragarh 4.1 4.1 3.0 40.6 39.5 100.0 29.0 27.7 100.0

Rudraprayag 3.7 3.7 - 51.8 51.8 - 50.5 50.5 -

Tehri Garhwal 2.8 2.9 2.4 50.1 51.7 42.7 47.0 49.0 37.3

Udham Singh Nagar 3.3 3.4 3.0 52.1 38.2 67.9 47.5 32.6 64.3

Uttarkashi 3.4 3.5 2.4 40.0 37.4 62.5 37.0 34.1 62.5

44

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 69: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Pregnancy to Women aged 15-49 years resulting in abortion (%)

Uttarakhand: Abortion where ultrasound was performed/Abortion performed by skilled health personnel (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Almor

a

Chamoli

Bages

hwar

Uttarkas

hi

Pithor

agar

h

Pauri Gar

hwal

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Rudra

pray

ag

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Champa

wat

Uttara

khan

d

Haridw

ar

Dehra

dun

Nainita

l

Ultrasound before abortion Performed by skilled health personnel

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Almor

a

Rudra

pray

ag

Pithor

agar

h

Cham

pawat

Cham

oli

Bages

hwar

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Uttark

ashi

Nainita

l

Uttara

khan

d

Pauri

Garhw

al

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Dehra

dun

Haridw

ar

45

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 70: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

FAMILY PLANNING PRACTICES (CMW AGED 15-49 YEARS)

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Current Usage

Any Method (%) Any Modern Method (%) Female Sterilization (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Current Usage

Male Sterilization (%) Copper-T/IUD (%) Pills (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 62.7 61.4 66.0 55.4 55.5 55.0 32.5 37.3 20.6

Almora 59.7 59.8 59.2 58.7 58.8 57.3 45.0 45.7 35.5

Bageshwar 61.3 60.9 69.0 58.2 57.7 67.4 38.6 38.8 34.7

Chamoli 66.5 66.1 68.3 65.9 65.6 67.4 57.8 59.8 48.4

Champawat 65.5 65.1 67.6 61.3 61.3 61.4 43.5 46.8 26.7

Dehradun 67.1 66.4 67.6 53.7 54.7 53.0 22.5 27.9 18.7

Haridwar 53.7 48.3 62.7 41.9 36.6 50.8 12.9 13.7 11.7

Nainital 66.2 68.8 62.3 61.8 65.7 56.0 29.2 35.9 19.2

Pauri Garhwal 64.6 63.7 69.3 52.7 52.3 54.8 36.2 38.4 23.5

Pithoragarh 64.9 65.7 61.3 62.9 63.5 60.3 48.5 50.9 38.5

Rudraprayag 59.4 59.3 - 58.5 58.4 - 53.7 53.8 -

Tehri Garhwal 60.2 58.9 67.9 50.9 50.1 55.5 41.3 43.0 30.4

Udham Singh Nagar 66.4 64.3 70.1 58.2 58.9 57.1 24.5 27.7 19.0

Uttarkashi 62.6 62.3 64.3 58.7 58.7 58.4 45.1 46.4 35.6

Uttarakhand 1.5 1.8 0.8 1.0 0.7 1.6 4.1 3.8 4.9

Almora 3.5 3.6 2.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 2.4 2.3 4.6

Bageshwar 6.8 7.0 2.2 0.5 0.4 2.0 3.3 2.5 18.9

Chamoli 2.1 2.4 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.6 2.9

Champawat 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 1.1 4.6 3.9 7.9

Dehradun 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.9 1.5 2.2 4.8 5.5 4.3

Haridwar 0.3 0.1 0.5 1.1 1.0 1.3 5.5 5.9 4.8

Nainital 2.8 4.0 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.5 7.2 7.7 6.4

Pauri Garhwal 1.2 1.3 0.8 1.2 1.0 2.8 3.0 2.6 5.2

Pithoragarh 1.2 1.3 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.7 2.6 2.4 3.5

Rudraprayag 1.0 1.0 - 0.2 0.2 - 0.7 0.7 -

Tehri Garhwal 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.4 1.5 2.3 1.9 5.0

Udham Singh Nagar 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.1 0.8 1.5 5.2 5.5 4.9

Uttarkashi 3.7 3.9 2.4 0.7 0.6 1.4 3.2 3.1 3.8

46

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 71: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

FAMILY PLANNING PRACTICES (CMW AGED 15-49 YEARS)

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Current Usage

Condom/Nirodh (%) Emergency Contraceptive Pills (%) Any Traditional Method (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Current Usage

Periodic Abstinence (%) Withdrawal (%) LAM (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 15.9 11.5 26.7 0.2 0.2 0.2 7.4 5.9 11.0

Almora 7.2 6.7 14.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 1.1 1.0 1.9

Bageshwar 8.7 8.7 8.6 0.2 0.2 0.8 3.1 3.2 1.6

Chamoli 4.4 2.3 14.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.5 0.9

Champawat 12.5 9.9 25.5 0.1 0.1 0.0 4.1 3.7 6.2

Dehradun 22.9 18.1 26.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 13.4 11.7 14.5

Haridwar 21.5 15.2 31.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 11.8 11.7 12.0

Nainital 21.1 16.8 27.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 4.4 3.1 6.2

Pauri Garhwal 10.7 8.7 22.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 11.9 11.4 14.5

Pithoragarh 10.0 8.4 17.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 2.0 2.2 0.9

Rudraprayag 2.7 2.6 - 0.1 0.1 - 0.9 0.9 -

Tehri Garhwal 5.9 4.1 17.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 9.3 8.8 12.4

Udham Singh Nagar 27.0 24.5 31.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 8.2 5.4 13.0

Uttarkashi 5.6 4.3 14.8 0.3 0.3 0.4 3.9 3.6 5.9

Uttarakhand 4.3 3.4 6.7 1.7 1.3 2.7 1.2 1.1 1.3

Almora 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.7 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.0

Bageshwar 0.2 0.2 0.0 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 0.0

Chamoli 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3

Champawat 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.1 1.7 4.5 1.9 2.0 1.5

Dehradun 10.0 8.6 10.9 2.2 1.8 2.4 1.0 1.1 0.9

Haridwar 7.1 6.7 7.6 2.4 2.1 2.9 2.0 2.5 1.1

Nainital 0.4 0.2 0.6 2.9 2.3 3.9 0.9 0.6 1.4

Pauri Garhwal 9.0 8.8 10.5 1.5 1.4 2.0 1.2 1.1 1.5

Pithoragarh 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.4 1.4 1.6 0.3

Rudraprayag 0.1 0.1 - 0.4 0.4 - 0.4 0.4 -

Tehri Garhwal 6.8 6.4 9.3 1.0 0.8 2.0 1.4 1.5 0.9

Udham Singh Nagar 4.2 2.7 6.9 2.1 1.5 3.2 1.6 1.0 2.5

Uttarkashi 2.5 2.4 2.7 0.6 0.4 1.4 0.6 0.6 0.7

47

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 72: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

48

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Utt

arak

han

d:

Cu

rren

t U

sag

e o

f F

amily

Pla

nn

ing

Pra

ctic

es (

CM

W a

ged

15-

49 y

ears

) (%

)

Udham Singh N

agar

0102030405060708090100

Haridwar

Rudraprayag

Almora

Tehri G

arhwal

Bageshwar

Uttarka

shi

Uttarakh

andPauri G

arhwal

Pithoragarh

Champawat

Nainital

Chamoli

Dehradun

Any

Met

hod

Any

Mod

ern

Met

hod

Any

Trad

ition

al M

etho

d Fe

mal

e St

eriliz

atio

n

Page 73: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

UNMET NEED FOR FAMILY PLANNING

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Unmet need for Spacing (%)

Unmet need for Limiting (%)

Total Unmet need (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 12.0 13.1 9.4 11.2 11.6 10.1 23.2 24.7 19.5

Almora 12.2 12.4 9.5 13.5 12.9 20.3 25.7 25.4 29.8

Bageshwar 13.2 13.4 9.7 14.4 14.7 9.9 27.7 28.1 19.6

Chamoli 12.9 13.6 9.8 7.9 7.3 10.4 20.7 20.9 20.2

Champawat 13.1 13.8 9.2 10.3 10.4 9.6 23.3 24.2 18.9

Dehradun 7.9 9.0 7.1 8.9 9.4 8.6 16.8 18.4 15.7

Haridwar 14.7 17.6 9.9 14.5 16.8 10.6 29.2 34.4 20.5

Nainital 12.1 12.9 10.9 10.5 8.9 12.8 22.5 21.8 23.7

Pauri Garhwal 8.6 8.8 7.2 11.0 11.6 7.6 19.6 20.4 14.9

Pithoragarh 12.8 13.5 9.8 12.2 10.6 19.3 25.1 24.1 29.1

Rudraprayag 13.3 13.3 - 13.4 13.3 - 26.6 26.6 -

Tehri Garhwal 10.5 11.2 6.1 10.9 11.0 10.1 21.4 22.2 16.2

Udham Singh Nagar 13.9 14.9 12.1 9.1 10.3 7.0 23.0 25.2 19.1

Uttarkashi 12.1 12.6 8.1 10.3 9.9 13.1 22.3 22.5 21.2

49

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 74: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

ANTE NATAL CARE

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Currently Married Pregnant Women aged 15-49 years registered for ANC (%)

Mothers who received any Antenatal Check-up (%)

Mothers who had Antenatal Check-up in First Trimester (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 68.5 65.2 79.2 84.4 81.2 93.3 59.5 53.5 76.2

Almora 66.7 65.9 80.4 85.8 85.1 97.0 42.0 40.3 71.6

Bageshwar 62.1 61.4 79.2 81.9 81.2 98.4 51.6 50.6 73.6

Chamoli 70.0 67.0 86.5 80.2 77.1 96.0 45.5 41.1 67.9

Champawat 59.6 61.0 52.4 86.3 85.4 90.6 56.4 53.6 70.7

Dehradun 81.7 77.6 85.7 94.2 92.6 95.7 77.3 72.7 81.5

Haridwar 69.5 65.8 80.9 85.1 82.1 92.2 64.6 60.0 75.9

Nainital 73.2 65.9 84.6 88.6 84.8 93.9 67.7 61.7 76.2

Pauri Garhwal 75.8 75.3 79.4 88.1 86.8 96.6 58.4 55.7 76.6

Pithoragarh 63.2 60.4 84.5 82.6 79.9 98.6 49.7 45.6 74.1

Rudraprayag 54.8 54.5 - 66.4 66.2 - 41.9 41.6 -

Tehri Garhwal 64.9 63.0 86.7 72.6 69.7 96.1 48.2 44.7 76.1

Udham Singh Nagar 64.4 62.0 69.5 82.6 79.2 88.9 62.5 57.2 72.5

Uttarkashi 67.4 66.5 77.8 80.1 78.3 94.2 48.9 46.2 70.3

Uttarakhand: Antenatal Care (%)

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Rudrap

raya

g

Tehri G

arhw

al

Uttarkas

hi

Cham

oli

Bage

shwa

r

Udha

m Singh

Nag

ar

Pithorag

arh

Uttarakh

and

Harid

war

Almora

Cham

pawa

t

Pauri G

arhw

al

Nainita

l

Dehrad

un

Currently Married Pregnant Women aged 15-49 years registered for ANC Mothers who received any Antenatal Check-up Mothers who had Antenatal Check-up in First Trimester

50

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 75: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Mothers who had Full Antenatal Check-up (%)

Mothers who received ANC from Govt. Source (%)

Mothers whose Blood Pressure (BP) taken (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

ANTE NATAL CARE

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Mothers who received 3 or more Antenatal Care (%)

Mothers who received at least one Tetanus Toxoid (TT) injection (%)

Mothers who consumed IFA for 100 days or more (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 52.3 44.2 74.8 83.6 80.4 92.5 14.9 12.6 21.4

Almora 40.2 37.8 84.1 85.6 85.0 97.0 23.2 22.1 42.4

Bageshwar 47.2 45.2 92.0 81.6 80.9 98.4 17.4 17.1 23.2

Chamoli 44.3 39.3 69.9 79.9 76.8 95.6 7.0 5.5 14.6

Champawat 50.3 46.5 69.6 86.3 85.4 90.6 14.1 15.0 9.9

Dehradun 74.8 68.2 80.6 93.1 91.3 94.8 24.5 20.9 27.7

Haridwar 54.7 46.2 75.4 83.2 80.2 90.4 8.2 4.6 16.7

Nainital 61.7 52.7 74.4 88.3 84.6 93.5 21.1 20.5 22.0

Pauri Garhwal 47.4 43.8 71.4 87.3 86.0 95.7 13.4 13.0 15.8

Pithoragarh 50.7 45.6 81.2 82.4 79.7 98.3 16.6 15.8 20.8

Rudraprayag 39.9 39.6 - 66.4 66.2 - 5.4 5.4 -

Tehri Garhwal 34.0 29.2 72.1 71.3 68.4 95.0 10.1 10.2 9.5

Udham Singh Nagar 51.4 42.6 67.8 82.3 78.8 88.8 15.0 11.6 21.3

Uttarkashi 37.2 33.2 68.7 78.7 76.9 93.4 9.1 7.7 19.7

Uttarakhand 11.1 8.3 19.0 69.7 75.1 56.6 55.7 48.2 76.5

Almora 13.7 12.3 39.1 81.2 80.9 86.3 61.8 60.3 89.7

Bageshwar 8.2 7.6 22.4 81.3 80.5 95.9 53.2 51.4 92.0

Chamoli 4.8 3.4 11.8 81.6 79.4 90.1 45.4 40.3 70.8

Champawat 8.3 8.5 7.3 82.6 82.4 83.8 57.5 56.9 60.7

Dehradun 22.7 18.6 26.5 58.8 67.5 51.4 77.2 68.0 85.3

Haridwar 7.0 3.5 15.4 40.3 45.7 28.8 41.9 31.8 66.2

Nainital 17.0 15.9 18.6 75.5 74.6 76.7 74.6 68.7 82.8

Pauri Garhwal 9.6 8.8 14.4 80.7 81.5 75.6 51.7 48.5 73.1

Pithoragarh 12.1 11.2 17.1 86.0 84.2 94.7 47.6 41.7 82.9

Rudraprayag 3.7 3.8 - 76.8 76.6 - 34.3 34.1 -

Tehri Garhwal 5.8 5.5 7.8 74.2 76.2 62.5 36.8 31.4 79.5

Udham Singh Nagar 9.9 6.1 16.8 52.4 53.8 50.0 62.4 57.4 71.6

Uttarkashi 6.4 5.0 18.1 89.6 90.7 82.4 47.2 43.6 76.4

51

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 76: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

ANTE NATAL CARE

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Mothers whose Blood taken for Hb (%)

Mothers who underwent Ultrasound (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand 47.0 38.9 69.4 43.9 35.3 68.0

Almora 46.8 44.8 81.9 43.4 41.0 84.9

Bageshwar 38.8 37.0 79.2 31.4 29.5 73.6

Chamoli 30.4 24.7 59.0 21.9 16.9 47.1

Champawat 33.0 30.8 44.0 26.9 25.5 34.0

Dehradun 71.1 62.2 79.0 70.0 61.6 77.4

Haridwar 34.1 23.9 58.7 40.6 29.8 66.7

Nainital 72.8 65.8 82.7 67.9 59.9 79.2

Pauri Garhwal 46.3 43.8 63.5 38.7 35.8 58.3

Pithoragarh 37.3 31.5 71.7 34.4 28.8 67.8

Rudraprayag 25.0 24.8 - 22.9 22.7 -

Tehri Garhwal 32.0 26.9 73.0 28.1 22.7 71.5

Udham Singh Nagar 52.6 47.9 61.2 44.8 38.6 56.3

Uttarkashi 38.8 34.2 75.7 25.3 21.7 53.7

Uttarakhand: Mothers who received Full Antenatal Check-up (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Rudra

pray

ag

Cham

oli

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Uttark

ashi

Haridw

ar

Bages

hwar

Cham

pawat

Pauri

Garhw

al

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Uttara

khan

d

Pithor

agar

h

Almor

a

Nainita

l

Dehra

dun

3 or more Antenatal care At least one Tetanus Toxoid (TT) injecction IFA for 100 days or more Full Antenatal Check-up

52

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 77: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Utt

arak

han

d:

Mo

ther

s w

ho

rec

eive

d t

ests

du

rin

g A

nte

Nat

al C

hec

k-u

p (

%)

0102030405060708090

Chamoli

Rudra

pray

ag

Uttarka

shi

Champa

watTe

hri G

arhw

al

Bages

hwar

Pithor

agar

hPau

ri Gar

hwal

Haridw

ar

Almor

a

Uttara

khan

dUdh

am S

ingh N

agar

Nainita

l

Dehra

dun

Blo

od T

est f

or H

bU

ltras

ound

Blo

od P

ress

ure

(BP

)

53

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 78: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

DELIVERY CARE

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Institutional Delivery (%)Delivery at

Government Institution (%)Delivery at

Private Institution (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand: Institutional Delivery (%)

Uttarakhand 50.5 43.2 71.1 29.9 28.7 33.1 20.3 14.3 37.1

Almora 39.8 37.5 80.8 35.3 33.5 67.9 4.4 4.0 12.5

Bageshwar 33.9 32.4 68.0 30.5 29.2 60.0 3.4 3.2 8.0

Chamoli 34.7 29.0 63.8 32.2 27.5 55.6 2.5 1.4 8.1

Champawat 59.7 58.8 64.4 51.5 52.4 47.1 8.2 6.4 17.3

Dehradun 70.2 61.1 78.4 35.0 35.1 34.9 34.1 25.6 41.7

Haridwar 48.7 38.8 72.4 13.1 12.4 14.6 35.3 26.3 56.8

Nainital 57.7 51.1 66.9 40.0 36.8 44.5 17.6 14.2 22.4

Pauri Garhwal 52.8 49.6 74.9 38.5 36.6 51.3 13.8 12.5 23.1

Pithoragarh 49.4 43.7 83.2 46.8 41.4 79.0 2.5 2.2 4.2

Rudraprayag 35.3 35.0 - 31.7 31.5 - 3.5 3.5 -

Tehri Garhwal 38.7 33.5 80.0 26.1 23.9 44.1 11.9 9.3 33.0

Udham Singh Nagar 51.5 46.5 60.8 23.0 22.9 23.1 28.5 23.5 37.7

Uttarkashi 50.5 47.3 75.7 43.2 42.1 51.7 6.6 4.8 20.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Harid

war

Udha

m Singh

Nag

ar

Tehri G

arhw

al

Uttarakh

and

Bage

shwa

r

Rudrap

raya

g

Cham

oli

Dehrad

un

Almora

Pauri G

arhw

al

Nainita

l

Uttarkas

hi

Pithorag

arh

Cham

pawa

t

Government Private

54

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 79: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

DELIVERY CARE

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Delivery at Home (%)Delivery at home conducted by

skilled health personnel (%)Safe Delivery (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand: Safe Delivery (%)

Uttarakhand 49.0 56.4 28.4 32.0 28.4 52.1 56.9 49.4 77.6

Almora 60.0 62.3 19.2 35.0 34.4 67.3 60.8 58.9 93.7

Bageshwar 65.8 67.4 32.0 16.9 15.9 62.5 45.0 43.1 88.0

Chamoli 65.2 70.9 36.2 34.9 34.0 43.1 57.4 53.1 79.4

Champawat 39.9 40.8 35.6 20.0 16.9 38.2 67.7 65.6 78.0

Dehradun 29.4 38.3 21.4 39.7 35.9 45.7 75.8 67.8 82.8

Haridwar 50.4 60.5 26.1 32.0 29.8 43.9 52.8 42.9 76.6

Nainital 42.0 48.5 32.8 51.9 43.0 70.5 79.5 72.0 90.0

Pauri Garhwal 46.6 49.8 24.3 18.3 16.7 39.6 58.2 54.9 80.6

Pithoragarh 50.4 56.1 16.4 23.1 22.4 38.1 61.0 56.2 89.5

Rudraprayag 64.6 64.8 - 16.2 16.2 - 45.7 45.5 -

Tehri Garhwal 60.7 65.9 19.6 13.3 12.2 42.7 43.1 37.7 85.9

Udham Singh Nagar 48.4 53.4 39.0 44.7 40.3 55.9 73.1 68.0 82.6

Uttarkashi 48.9 52.1 23.9 28.0 27.2 40.3 52.9 49.5 79.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

Tehri G

arhw

al

Bage

shwar

Rudrapray

ag

Haridwar

Uttarkas

hi

Uttarakh

and

Chamoli

Pauri G

arhw

al

Almora

Pithorag

arh

Champa

wat

Udham

Singh

Nag

ar

Dehradu

n

Nainital

55

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 80: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

DELIVERY CARE

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Caesarean out of total delivery taken place in Government Institutions (%)

Caesarean out of total delivery taken place in Private Institutions (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand: Caesarean out of total delivery taken place in Government/Private Institutions (%)

Uttarakhand 10.1 8.1 15.1 30.4 28.4 32.5

Almora 8.8 7.1 23.9 38.7 34.6 61.8

Bageshwar 5.7 5.3 9.3 36.5 34.9 50.0

Chamoli 7.0 6.4 8.4 29.3 34.4 25.0

Champawat 3.6 3.5 4.4 37.5 39.7 33.3

Dehradun 19.1 16.1 21.7 31.3 30.5 31.8

Haridwar 8.8 5.8 15.0 27.8 26.0 29.8

Nainital 13.4 10.5 16.7 47.2 43.8 50.3

Pauri Garhwal 9.5 8.5 14.3 28.7 26.6 36.6

Pithoragarh 6.5 5.7 9.2 33.1 30.9 40.0

Rudraprayag 10.4 10.3 - 25.4 25.4 -

Tehri Garhwal 8.9 7.9 13.4 21.2 21.0 21.6

Udham Singh Nagar 7.7 7.9 7.5 28.2 26.6 30.1

Uttarkashi 5.9 5.4 9.0 34.6 28.1 46.3

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Tehri G

arhw

al

Rudrapray

ag

Haridwar

Udham

Singh

Nag

ar

Pauri G

arhw

al

Chamoli

Uttarakh

and

Dehradu

n

Pithorag

arh

Uttarkas

hi

Bage

shwar

Champa

wat

Almora

Nainital

Government Private

56

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 81: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

POST NATAL CARE

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Less than 24 hrs. stay in institution after delivery (%)

Mothers who received Post-natal Check-up within 48 hrs. of delivery (%)

Mothers who received Post-natal Check-up within 1 week of delivery (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Mothers who did not receive any Post-natal check-up (%)

New borns who were checked up within 24 hrs. of birth (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand 40.5 41.7 38.5 59.1 51.0 81.5 61.4 53.7 83.0

Almora 36.3 34.8 48.4 50.2 48.3 84.9 54.3 52.4 87.5

Bageshwar 40.0 38.3 57.1 39.0 37.5 72.8 41.3 39.8 75.2

Chamoli 43.7 44.3 42.5 35.5 29.1 68.0 38.5 32.1 70.9

Champawat 79.8 81.1 73.8 60.1 58.1 70.2 63.5 61.6 73.3

Dehradun 48.3 50.0 47.1 79.3 70.9 86.7 81.0 73.7 87.5

Haridwar 34.7 35.2 34.0 61.8 53.7 81.3 63.0 55.4 81.3

Nainital 30.0 28.5 31.7 64.3 59.1 71.7 67.0 62.1 74.0

Pauri Garhwal 45.3 47.1 36.9 59.6 55.2 89.8 61.7 57.3 91.7

Pithoragarh 42.9 44.1 39.1 54.1 48.7 86.3 55.7 50.2 88.3

Rudraprayag 36.5 36.5 - 34.1 33.8 - 37.7 37.4 -

Tehri Garhwal 48.2 48.6 46.6 42.5 36.6 89.7 45.2 39.5 90.7

Udham Singh Nagar 32.6 36.0 27.7 65.7 56.9 82.0 69.2 60.8 84.6

Uttarkashi 45.8 44.8 50.5 52.9 49.8 77.2 52.9 49.8 77.2

Uttarakhand 35.8 42.9 16.1 59.3 51.4 81.3

Almora 42.4 44.2 10.3 50.1 48.3 83.7

Bageshwar 53.7 55.1 24.0 39.2 37.6 72.8

Chamoli 47.1 52.2 21.4 35.0 28.8 66.5

Champawat 32.8 34.3 25.1 63.8 62.1 72.8

Dehradun 18.2 25.3 12.0 79.5 71.4 86.8

Haridwar 36.5 44.1 18.3 61.3 53.2 80.4

Nainital 29.9 34.2 23.7 63.0 57.1 71.5

Pauri Garhwal 33.0 36.6 8.0 59.4 55.1 88.5

Pithoragarh 39.3 44.4 9.5 53.6 48.0 86.6

Rudraprayag 53.4 53.6 - 36.1 35.8 -

Tehri Garhwal 51.2 56.8 7.1 43.0 37.2 89.9

Udham Singh Nagar 30.5 38.8 15.2 67.8 60.1 82.1

Uttarkashi 47.1 50.2 22.8 52.1 49.0 77.0

57

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 82: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Utt

arak

han

d:

Mo

ther

s b

y st

atu

s o

f re

ceip

t o

f P

ost

-nat

al C

hec

k-u

p (

%)

0102030405060708090100 Rudrapraya

g

Chamoli

Bageshwar

Tehri G

arhwal

Almora

Uttarka

shi

Pithoragarh

Uttarakh

andPauri G

arhwal

Champawat

Haridwar

Nainital

Udham Singh Nagar

Dehradun

Did

not r

eceiv

eCh

eck-

up w

ithin

48 h

rs.

58

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 83: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

JANANI SURAKSHA YOJANA (JSY)

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Mothers who availed financial assistance for delivery under JSY (%)

Mothers who availed financial assistance for institutional delivery under JSY (%)

Mothers who availed financial assistance for Government Institutional delivery under JSY (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 26.9 26.7 27.3 51.4 61.5 36.4 81.1 83.3 76.0

Almora 29.9 29.0 45.4 72.8 74.8 56.4 81.1 82.7 66.8

Bageshwar 26.5 25.7 44.8 75.6 76.5 65.9 83.2 84.0 74.7

Chamoli 27.3 24.3 42.4 78.0 83.1 66.3 83.4 86.7 75.3

Champawat 50.0 51.6 41.9 80.4 83.9 64.2 93.2 94.1 87.8

Dehradun 28.6 30.7 26.7 40.0 47.8 34.4 76.6 79.4 74.1

Haridwar 10.9 10.8 11.0 21.7 26.6 15.4 78.2 79.8 75.0

Nainital 29.6 29.5 29.6 51.0 57.3 44.2 73.0 79.0 66.0

Pauri Garhwal 32.5 30.9 44.0 61.1 61.6 58.7 82.3 81.8 84.9

Pithoragarh 39.6 36.8 56.1 79.4 83.3 67.4 83.1 87.0 70.8

Rudraprayag 27.4 27.1 - 76.8 76.4 - 84.5 84.3 -

Tehri Garhwal 21.3 19.4 36.4 54.3 56.3 47.2 78.0 77.1 81.8

Udham Singh Nagar 20.1 19.5 21.1 38.5 41.4 34.4 84.7 82.6 88.6

Uttarkashi 41.5 40.7 47.9 80.5 83.5 64.9 92.1 92.4 90.3

Uttarakhand: Mothers who availed financial assistance for delivery under JSY (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Haridwar

Udham

Singh

Nag

ar

Tehri G

arhw

al

Bage

shwar

Uttarakh

and

Chamoli

Rudrapray

ag

Dehradu

n

Nainital

Almora

Pauri G

arhw

al

Pithorag

arh

Uttarkas

hi

Champa

wat

Any delivery Institutional delivery Government Institutional delivery

59

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 84: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

IMMUNIZATION, VITAMIN A & IRON SUPPLEMENT AND BIRTH WEIGHT

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children aged 12-23 months having Immunization Card (%)

Children aged 12-23 months who have received BCG (%)

Children aged 12-23 months who havereceived 3 doses of Polio vaccine (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children aged 12-23 months who have received 3 doses of DPT vaccine (%)

Children aged 12-23 months who have received Measles vaccine (%)

Children aged 12-23 months Fully Immunized (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 87.2 85.8 91.2 91.9 91.1 94.1 83.2 81.9 86.9

Almora 96.2 96.1 98.8 95.8 95.7 97.5 90.0 89.8 93.8

Bageshwar 87.2 86.6 100.0 93.2 93.0 96.9 90.0 89.6 100.0

Chamoli 93.7 93.7 93.8 95.5 95.3 97.0 87.7 87.2 90.1

Champawat 92.8 93.1 90.9 94.4 94.1 96.4 92.9 93.5 89.1

Dehradun 91.8 89.8 93.7 95.2 93.8 96.4 89.1 86.0 92.1

Haridwar 68.8 62.0 83.7 81.5 78.8 87.6 64.4 59.0 76.3

Nainital 94.6 96.0 92.7 95.6 96.3 94.7 90.5 92.0 88.3

Pauri Garhwal 89.9 91.0 82.5 94.6 95.0 92.2 83.2 83.7 79.6

Pithoragarh 92.8 91.9 98.3 97.0 96.5 100.0 92.7 92.0 97.1

Rudraprayag 92.8 92.7 - 95.6 95.5 - 80.6 80.5 -

Tehri Garhwal 85.2 83.9 95.0 88.5 87.2 98.1 81.2 79.9 91.2

Udham Singh Nagar 92.9 92.6 93.3 95.2 95.0 95.5 90.1 90.1 90.0

Uttarkashi 83.2 81.8 95.4 89.3 88.6 95.4 75.9 76.8 67.8

Uttarakhand 83.0 81.6 86.7 82.6 81.7 85.0 75.4 73.8 79.9

Almora 89.4 89.4 88.8 90.6 90.3 97.5 77.6 77.3 83.8

Bageshwar 89.8 89.4 100.0 87.2 86.9 93.8 78.8 78.3 90.6

Chamoli 86.8 86.4 89.1 88.5 88.1 90.5 80.9 80.1 84.9

Champawat 92.9 93.5 89.1 88.2 89.6 80.0 86.4 87.8 78.2

Dehradun 87.7 84.7 90.5 89.0 85.8 91.9 83.7 79.3 87.7

Haridwar 65.4 59.5 78.4 65.0 59.6 77.0 55.3 49.3 68.6

Nainital 90.5 92.0 88.3 89.1 90.0 87.8 85.5 86.5 84.1

Pauri Garhwal 82.1 82.7 78.6 87.6 87.5 88.8 76.9 76.9 76.7

Pithoragarh 92.7 92.0 97.1 91.4 90.4 97.7 87.5 86.2 96.0

Rudraprayag 80.6 80.5 - 86.6 86.6 - 73.5 73.4 -

Tehri Garhwal 79.8 78.5 89.7 82.0 80.7 91.2 75.6 74.1 86.6

Udham Singh Nagar 90.1 90.1 90.0 82.9 85.3 78.6 80.2 81.6 77.7

Uttarkashi 75.9 77.2 64.4 81.9 81.4 86.2 67.7 68.6 59.8

60

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 85: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

61

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Utt

arak

han

d:

Ch

ildre

n a

ged

12-

23 m

on

ths

hav

ing

Imm

un

izat

ion

Car

d v

s. F

ully

Imm

un

ized

(%

)

0102030405060708090100

Haridw

ar

Uttarka

shi

Rudra

pray

ag

Uttara

khan

dTe

hri G

arhw

alPau

ri Gar

hwal

Almor

a

Bages

hwar Udh

am S

ingh N

agar

Chamoli

Dehra

dun

Nainita

l

Champa

wat

Pithor

agar

h

Hav

ing

Imm

uniz

atio

n C

ard

Chi

ldre

n F

ully

Imm

uniz

ed

Page 86: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

IMMUNIZATION, VITAMIN A & IRON SUPPLEMENT AND BIRTH WEIGHT

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children who have received Polio dose at birth (%)

Children who did not receive any vaccination (%)

Children (aged 6-35 months) who received at least one Vitamin A dose during last six months (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children (aged 6-35 months) who received IFA tablets/syrup during last 3 months (%)

Children whose birth weight was taken (%)

Children with birth weight less than 2.5 Kg. (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 75.8 72.7 84.2 5.8 6.1 5.0 55.0 54.1 57.2

Almora 72.0 70.8 95.0 1.4 1.4 1.3 51.2 51.0 55.7

Bageshwar 51.9 50.2 93.8 2.5 2.6 0.0 37.2 36.8 45.4

Chamoli 50.6 46.8 70.4 2.6 2.6 2.3 50.5 48.3 62.5

Champawat 49.8 51.1 41.8 2.8 2.6 3.6 29.3 30.4 24.2

Dehradun 88.2 85.5 90.6 4.0 4.7 3.3 62.1 61.0 63.1

Haridwar 75.8 72.1 84.1 14.2 15.8 10.6 48.0 46.1 52.4

Nainital 83.3 82.8 84.1 2.4 1.6 3.8 65.3 66.4 63.7

Pauri Garhwal 91.6 92.1 88.3 3.8 3.8 3.9 69.9 71.8 57.7

Pithoragarh 68.0 64.6 89.6 1.6 1.9 0.0 43.0 41.8 50.4

Rudraprayag 62.6 62.5 - 2.8 2.8 - 61.8 61.6 -

Tehri Garhwal 76.1 73.4 96.2 8.0 8.8 1.9 65.0 63.7 74.9

Udham Singh Nagar 74.6 73.5 76.6 4.2 4.2 4.2 53.8 54.6 52.2

Uttarkashi 86.3 85.2 96.6 8.0 8.6 3.4 63.7 65.2 51.5

Uttarakhand 14.3 14.7 13.4 41.0 33.8 61.2 24.1 25.5 21.8

Almora 28.7 27.8 46.1 33.5 31.1 77.0 26.8 27.9 18.9

Bageshwar 8.2 7.6 19.6 27.1 25.6 60.8 31.4 32.0 26.6

Chamoli 26.1 27.9 16.3 26.8 22.1 50.4 17.1 17.1 16.9

Champawat 9.3 10.1 5.5 29.9 30.1 29.0 35.4 32.9 47.7

Dehradun 10.0 11.0 9.1 59.2 49.9 67.7 23.7 25.0 22.9

Haridwar 8.6 7.9 10.3 31.9 21.8 57.1 31.6 39.2 25.1

Nainital 20.9 20.9 20.8 56.6 52.0 63.1 24.3 24.0 24.6

Pauri Garhwal 7.4 7.8 5.1 44.7 42.1 62.6 20.7 20.0 24.0

Pithoragarh 9.2 10.1 4.0 43.9 38.5 76.1 26.8 27.6 24.5

Rudraprayag 23.3 23.1 - 26.8 26.5 - 14.1 14.3 -

Tehri Garhwal 6.9 6.6 9.0 29.6 24.4 70.4 24.1 25.5 20.2

Udham Singh Nagar 16.6 16.8 16.0 46.1 40.9 55.7 17.7 20.0 14.7

Uttarkashi 16.5 16.1 20.1 37.9 35.1 61.2 29.5 29.6 29.3

62

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 87: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Children with birth weight less than 2.5 Kg. (%)

Uttarakhand: Children with birth weight less than 2.5 Kg. (%)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

Rudra

pray

ag

Chamoli

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Pauri Gar

hwal

Dehra

dun

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Uttara

khan

d

Nainita

l

Almor

a

Pithor

agar

h

Uttarkas

hi

Bages

hwar

Haridw

ar

Champa

wat

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Total Rural Urban

63

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 88: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

CHILDHOOD DISEASES

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children suffering from Diarrhoea (%)

Children suffering from Diarrhoea who received HAF/ORS/ORT (%)

Children suffering from Acute Respiratory Infection (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children suffering from Acute Respiratory Infection who sought treatment (%)

Children suffering from Fever (%)

Children suffering from Fever who sought treatment (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 9.6 10.6 6.8 83.3 83.1 84.1 7.3 7.3 7.5

Almora 5.3 5.2 5.9 87.1 86.3 100.0 3.1 3.0 4.5

Bageshwar 1.9 2.0 0.8 83.7 85.2 0.0 1.2 1.2 0.8

Chamoli 9.6 9.7 9.3 84.4 82.2 95.8 6.7 4.9 16.2

Champawat 8.3 8.6 6.8 83.4 83.0 85.7 1.6 1.5 2.4

Dehradun 7.1 8.5 5.9 79.3 73.2 87.3 8.3 9.3 7.5

Haridwar 13.0 15.4 7.3 79.2 78.8 81.0 12.4 13.1 10.6

Nainital 8.4 9.6 6.7 92.3 92.3 92.3 5.8 5.1 6.8

Pauri Garhwal 6.8 6.7 7.1 79.5 78.2 88.0 5.7 5.5 7.1

Pithoragarh 4.8 5.3 2.1 91.7 92.2 84.6 1.0 1.1 0.5

Rudraprayag 8.3 8.3 - 85.5 85.5 - 6.1 6.1 -

Tehri Garhwal 5.3 5.5 3.6 79.7 78.9 90.0 6.2 6.1 6.9

Udham Singh Nagar 13.5 16.5 7.9 85.2 87.6 76.0 8.8 10.6 5.5

Uttarkashi 21.7 22.6 13.9 84.8 84.9 84.2 7.5 7.7 5.9

Uttarakhand 95.1 94.3 97.2 20.2 20.4 19.7 91.5 90.9 93.5

Almora 84.5 83.3 100.0 6.1 5.9 10.1 82.2 81.9 86.2

Bageshwar 87.2 86.8 100.0 3.1 3.1 3.1 79.0 78.0 100.0

Chamoli 91.1 88.0 95.8 11.9 11.0 16.6 87.5 87.6 87.1

Champawat 89.2 85.6 100.0 10.5 11.1 7.7 81.6 82.6 75.0

Dehradun 96.9 96.2 97.6 15.7 18.9 12.7 89.5 90.4 88.4

Haridwar 99.0 98.7 100.0 41.9 43.6 37.6 93.8 93.0 96.0

Nainital 92.5 93.5 91.4 14.3 14.5 14.1 92.4 93.1 91.3

Pauri Garhwal 91.5 91.0 94.0 12.7 12.4 14.8 87.0 86.1 92.3

Pithoragarh 88.1 87.3 100.0 6.1 6.3 5.2 87.9 87.5 90.6

Rudraprayag 95.4 95.4 - 10.9 10.9 - 87.9 87.8 -

Tehri Garhwal 87.6 87.6 87.7 14.2 14.1 15.3 82.3 80.6 94.5

Udham Singh Nagar 94.8 93.7 98.5 23.8 26.1 19.6 95.3 95.3 95.4

Uttarkashi 93.4 93.3 93.8 31.2 32.2 23.1 87.4 87.0 92.1

64

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 89: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Utt

arak

han

d:

Ch

ildh

oo

d D

isea

ses

(%)

0510152025303540

Bages

hwar

Almora

Pithora

garh

Champa

watRud

rapray

ag

Chamoli

Pauri G

arhwal

Tehri

Garh

wal

Nainita

l

Dehrad

un

Uttarak

hand Udh

am S

ingh N

agar

Uttarka

shi

Haridw

ar

Dia

rrhoe

aAc

ute

Res

pira

tory

Infe

ctio

nFe

ver

65

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 90: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

BREASTFEEDING AND SUPPLEMENTATION

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Children breastfed within one hour of birth (%)

Children aged 6-35 months exclusively breastfed for at least six months (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand: Children breastfed within one hour of birth (%)

Uttarakhand 63.2 66.0 55.2 38.2 39.2 35.0

Almora 79.2 79.7 70.0 37.7 37.5 41.6

Bageshwar 62.6 62.8 59.8 26.8 27.3 15.8

Chamoli 82.9 83.3 80.8 55.4 55.2 56.6

Champawat 61.4 58.8 74.9 52.6 51.1 61.1

Dehradun 51.9 54.8 49.3 46.2 47.3 45.1

Haridwar 39.6 38.8 41.4 33.5 35.8 27.8

Nainital 68.9 76.3 58.1 33.4 35.8 29.5

Pauri Garhwal 77.4 79.2 65.8 30.3 31.2 24.0

Pithoragarh 76.9 79.3 62.1 44.9 45.1 43.1

Rudraprayag 89.9 89.9 - 44.5 44.5 -

Tehri Garhwal 74.5 76.8 56.1 33.3 32.9 36.4

Udham Singh Nagar 58.9 56.9 62.8 34.5 39.0 26.3

Uttarkashi 80.7 81.8 71.6 38.1 35.9 56.8

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Haridw

ar

Dehra

dun

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Champa

wat

Bages

hwar

Uttara

khan

d

Nainita

l

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Pithor

agar

h

Pauri G

arhw

al

Almor

a

Uttarka

shi

Chamoli

Rudra

pray

ag

66

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 91: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Utt

arak

han

d:

Ch

ildre

n (

aged

6-3

5 m

on

ths)

exc

lusi

vely

bre

astf

ed f

or

at le

ast

six

mo

nth

s (%

)

0102030405060

Bages

hwar

Pauri G

arhwal

Tehri

Garh

wal

Nainita

l

Haridw

ar Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Almora

Uttarka

shi

Uttarak

hand

Rudrap

rayag

Pithora

garh

Dehrad

un

Champa

wat

Chamoli

67

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 92: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

CHILDREN WHO RECEIVED FOODS OTHER THAN BREAST MILK DURING FIRST 6 MONTHS

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Water (%) Animal/Formula Milk (%) Semi-Solid mashed food (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Solid (Adult) Food (%) Vegetables/Fruits (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand 53.6 52.1 58.0 59.2 56.7 65.9 13.5 13.0 14.8

Almora 60.2 60.4 57.0 50.0 50.2 46.2 13.1 13.3 9.9

Bageshwar 71.0 71.2 64.9 68.6 67.8 83.5 10.4 10.1 16.5

Chamoli 43.9 44.2 42.3 46.4 47.0 43.3 21.3 22.1 17.1

Champawat 47.5 49.4 37.7 50.7 51.7 45.5 7.5 7.9 5.4

Dehradun 44.4 41.9 46.7 65.2 60.0 70.0 20.3 18.9 21.6

Haridwar 39.0 32.8 53.2 57.6 54.8 64.1 9.3 7.9 12.4

Nainital 59.5 58.2 61.3 52.6 50.0 56.3 16.6 18.8 13.3

Pauri Garhwal 58.4 57.4 64.8 68.1 66.8 76.7 26.6 26.1 29.6

Pithoragarh 54.5 54.0 57.7 52.2 51.6 56.0 2.8 2.8 2.5

Rudraprayag 55.7 55.7 - 54.9 55.0 - 7.1 7.2 -

Tehri Garhwal 51.1 50.7 53.8 61.4 60.5 68.9 18.1 17.5 22.7

Udham Singh Nagar 71.3 68.3 77.1 68.0 63.9 75.8 10.1 9.6 11.1

Uttarkashi 41.7 42.4 35.8 54.5 55.6 45.9 10.7 11.3 6.6

Uttarakhand 8.0 7.9 8.4 9.0 8.8 9.6

Almora 6.3 6.4 4.9 6.8 6.8 5.8

Bageshwar 3.0 2.9 5.2 7.4 7.3 9.3

Chamoli 13.8 14.4 11.0 14.6 15.3 10.7

Champawat 1.0 0.8 1.8 6.1 6.9 1.8

Dehradun 14.3 13.8 14.7 16.8 15.0 18.3

Haridwar 5.6 5.4 5.9 5.9 5.4 7.0

Nainital 9.5 11.4 6.6 9.8 12.3 6.1

Pauri Garhwal 20.5 20.9 17.8 23.2 23.0 24.3

Pithoragarh 0.6 0.6 0.6 2.4 2.1 4.2

Rudraprayag 3.1 3.1 - 2.9 2.9 -

Tehri Garhwal 11.7 11.6 12.1 13.2 12.4 18.8

Udham Singh Nagar 4.8 4.4 5.4 4.1 4.0 4.1

Uttarkashi 7.7 8.4 2.2 7.8 8.5 2.6

68

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 93: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Water Animal/Formula Milk Semi-Solid mashed food

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

AVERAGE MONTH BY WHICH CHILDREN RECEIVED FOODS OTHER THAN BREAST MILK

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Solid (Adult) Food Vegetables/Fruits

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand 3.6 3.8 3.1 3.9 4.1 3.4 6.3 6.4 6.1

Almora 4.4 4.4 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.3 6.3 6.3 6.2

Bageshwar 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.1 4.2 2.9 6.3 6.3 6.0

Chamoli 5.2 5.3 4.9 5.2 5.3 4.8 6.1 6.1 6.0

Champawat 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.2 6.5 6.5 6.7

Dehradun 3.3 3.6 3.1 3.5 3.9 3.1 5.5 5.7 5.3

Haridwar 3.1 3.3 2.8 3.3 3.4 3.3 7.0 7.3 6.5

Nainital 4.2 4.4 3.8 5.0 5.3 4.5 6.1 6.0 6.3

Pauri Garhwal 2.8 2.9 2.3 3.4 3.5 2.8 5.1 5.1 4.9

Pithoragarh 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.6 4.6 4.8 6.8 6.8 7.0

Rudraprayag 4.2 4.2 - 4.6 4.6 - 6.5 6.5 -

Tehri Garhwal 3.5 3.5 3.1 3.7 3.7 3.4 5.9 5.9 5.4

Udham Singh Nagar 2.6 2.8 2.3 3.1 3.4 2.6 6.6 6.6 6.5

Uttarkashi 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.3 4.3 4.6 6.7 6.7 6.8

Uttarakhand 8.1 8.1 8.1 7.4 7.4 7.5

Almora 6.9 6.9 6.6 7.0 7.0 6.6

Bageshwar 8.5 8.5 7.0 6.8 6.8 6.4

Chamoli 7.1 7.1 6.9 6.7 6.7 6.4

Champawat 9.2 9.2 9.3 6.8 6.7 7.6

Dehradun 8.0 8.4 7.8 7.1 7.5 6.8

Haridwar 9.1 9.1 8.9 8.6 8.7 8.4

Nainital 6.7 6.6 6.8 6.7 6.5 6.9

Pauri Garhwal 7.8 7.6 8.6 6.1 6.2 5.8

Pithoragarh 9.2 9.1 9.6 6.8 6.9 6.4

Rudraprayag 7.6 7.6 - 7.5 7.5 -

Tehri Garhwal 9.0 9.1 7.8 7.8 7.9 6.8

Udham Singh Nagar 8.2 8.0 8.4 8.1 7.9 8.4

Uttarkashi 7.8 7.7 8.5 7.8 7.7 8.1

69

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 94: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

BIRTH REGISTRATION

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Birth Registered (%) Children whose birth was registered and received Birth Certificate (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Uttarakhand 66.7 63.8 74.7 37.7 31.0 56.7

Almora 66.0 64.8 88.5 46.8 44.9 82.6

Bageshwar 66.8 65.7 90.0 35.1 33.1 76.9

Chamoli 84.2 84.0 85.0 59.5 59.0 62.0

Champawat 53.2 55.4 42.0 27.1 28.3 21.3

Dehradun 82.8 77.9 87.4 54.5 41.0 66.8

Haridwar 73.1 67.9 85.8 27.2 14.5 58.5

Nainital 58.1 57.9 58.4 42.3 35.8 51.7

Pauri Garhwal 78.7 76.9 90.8 36.5 33.5 56.7

Pithoragarh 77.6 75.3 91.6 46.8 42.9 70.1

Rudraprayag 72.9 72.8 - 35.2 34.8 -

Tehri Garhwal 62.6 59.3 88.5 20.4 16.7 49.9

Udham Singh Nagar 40.9 34.5 52.8 34.2 27.8 46.0

Uttarkashi 71.3 69.5 86.1 26.3 24.3 43.6

Uttarakhand: Birth Registration (%)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Cham

pawat

Nainita

l

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Almor

a

Uttara

khan

d

Bages

hwar

Uttark

ashi

Rudra

pray

ag

Haridw

ar

Pithor

agar

h

Pauri

Garhw

al

Dehra

dun

Cham

oli

Received Birth CertificateBirth Registered

70

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 95: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

AWARENESS ON RTI/STI, HAF/ORS/ORT AND ARI/PNEUMONIAHIV/AIDS,

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Women who are aware of HIV/AIDS (%)

Women who are aware of RTI/STI (%)

Women who are aware of HAF/ORS/ORT (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

State / District

Total Rural Urban

Women who are aware of danger signs of ARI/Pneumonia (%)

1 2 3 4

Uttarakhand 94.8 94.0 96.8

Almora 89.8 89.3 96.7

Bageshwar 93.4 93.1 98.9

Chamoli 93.2 93.3 92.7

Champawat 97.4 97.1 98.9

Dehradun 96.6 95.0 97.8

Haridwar 96.9 96.5 97.6

Nainital 91.6 91.7 91.3

Pauri Garhwal 95.8 95.4 97.8

Pithoragarh 97.1 96.9 98.2

Rudraprayag 88.6 88.6 -

Tehri Garhwal 94.8 94.2 98.4

Udham Singh Nagar 98.3 98.4 98.2

Uttarkashi 86.8 85.8 93.6

Uttarakhand 87.2 84.3 94.3 74.1 72.4 78.2 97.5 96.9 98.9

Almora 85.8 84.9 96.8 55.2 53.6 76.5 97.0 96.9 98.5

Bageshwar 84.4 83.8 97.0 60.1 58.6 87.9 98.2 98.1 99.4

Chamoli 87.7 86.4 93.7 66.1 63.9 76.5 97.0 96.7 98.4

Champawat 92.3 91.1 98.5 93.8 96.2 81.8 98.7 98.5 99.6

Dehradun 93.5 89.5 96.3 91.1 88.7 92.7 98.4 97.6 99.0

Haridwar 80.0 75.1 88.0 91.5 90.9 92.4 96.8 95.8 98.4

Nainital 89.9 85.5 96.4 65.1 63.2 67.9 97.7 97.2 98.5

Pauri Garhwal 90.5 89.3 97.0 92.6 91.8 97.5 97.7 97.4 99.8

Pithoragarh 91.4 89.6 99.0 93.6 92.5 98.4 99.5 99.4 99.8

Rudraprayag 82.6 82.4 - 49.2 48.9 - 95.7 95.7 -

Tehri Garhwal 84.5 82.4 98.1 87.6 86.3 95.5 96.7 96.2 99.6

Udham Singh Nagar 88.9 86.0 93.8 40.4 43.0 35.9 99.0 99.0 99.1

Uttarkashi 78.5 76.2 94.9 72.6 69.9 91.6 91.1 90.2 97.2

71

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 96: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Women who are aware of HIV/AIDS (%)

Uttarakhand: Women who are aware of RTI/STI (%)

Uttarakhand: Women who are aware of HAF/ORS/ORT (%)

0

20

40

60

80

100

Total Rural Urban

0

20

40

60

80

100

Total Rural Urban

0

20

40

60

80

100

Total Rural Urban

72

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 97: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

MORTALITY

State / DistrictPerson Male Female Person Male Female

Crude Death Rate (CDR)

Total Rural Urban

Person Male Female

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 6.6 7.9 5.4 7.0 8.5 5.5 5.7 6.5 4.9

State / DistrictPerson Male Female Person Male Female

Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)

Total Rural Urban

Person Male Female

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 6.6 7.9 5.4 7.0 8.5 5.5 5.7 6.5 4.9

Almora 6.1 8.1 4.3 6.2 8.3 4.3 4.3 5.2 3.3

Bageshwar 7.2 9.3 5.3 7.3 9.3 5.4 7.0 9.1 4.8

Chamoli 5.3 6.6 4.0 5.7 7.2 4.3 3.2 4.0 2.3

Champawat 5.4 7.1 3.7 5.5 7.4 3.6 4.8 5.5 4.0

Dehradun 6.9 7.8 5.9 7.4 8.7 6.1 6.5 7.2 5.8

Haridwar 7.9 8.6 7.1 8.3 8.9 7.7 7.1 8.0 6.1

Nainital 5.5 6.4 4.6 6.0 7.0 4.9 4.9 5.5 4.2

Pauri Garhwal 8.4 10.4 6.6 8.8 11.0 6.9 6.0 7.0 4.9

Pithoragarh 6.0 7.7 4.4 6.6 8.5 4.9 3.1 4.1 2.0

Rudraprayag 6.0 8.2 4.1 6.0 8.2 4.2 - - -

Tehri Garhwal 9.3 11.9 7.2 9.7 12.7 7.3 6.9 7.4 6.3

Udham Singh Nagar 5.4 6.2 4.4 5.7 6.6 4.6 4.8 5.5 4.0

Uttarkashi 4.6 5.5 3.7 4.7 5.7 3.8 3.8 4.7 2.8

Uttarakhand 43 42 44 46 46 47 33 32 33

Almora 20 20 20 20 19 21 - - -

Bageshwar 31 31 31 32 33 32 - - -

Chamoli 27 27 26 30 31 29 - - -

Champawat 37 39 34 31 35 26 - - -

Dehradun 37 36 37 45 46 44 29 28 30

Haridwar 72 68 75 81 75 89 47 52 41

Nainital 31 33 29 27 30 23 37 37 36

Pauri Garhwal 43 42 43 44 44 45 32 32 32

Pithoragarh 20 18 24 23 21 27 - - -

Rudraprayag 19 19 19 19 20 19 - - -

Tehri Garhwal 61 61 61 64 65 62 40 29 53

Udham Singh Nagar 37 37 37 44 47 41 25 20 31

Uttarkashi 38 38 38 41 41 40 - - -

73

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 98: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Crude Death Rate (CDR)

Person

Male

Female

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Total Rural Urban

Uttarakhand: Crude Death Rate (CDR)

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

Uttarkas

hi

Chamoli

Champa

wat

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Nainita

l

Pithorag

arh

Rudrapray

ag

Almora

Uttarakh

and

Dehradu

n

Bage

shwar

Haridw

ar

Pauri G

arhw

al

Tehri G

arhw

al

Male Female

74

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 99: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Total Rural Urban

Person

Male

Female

Uttarakhand: Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Rudra

pray

ag

Almor

a

Pithor

agar

h

Chamoli

Bages

hwar

Nainita

l

Champa

wat

Dehra

dun

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Uttarka

shi

Uttara

khan

d

Pauri G

arhw

al

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Haridw

ar

Male Female

75

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 100: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

76

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Uttarakhand 30 32 23 13 14 10

Almora 13 14 - 6 6 -

Bageshwar 19 20 - 12 12 -

Chamoli 18 20 - 9 10 -

Champawat 25 23 - 11 7 -

Dehradun 25 32 19 11 13 10

Haridwar 50 57 32 22 24 15

Nainital 21 18 25 10 9 12

Pauri Garhwal 29 30 23 13 14 9

Pithoragarh 12 14 - 8 9 -

Rudraprayag 11 11 - 9 9 -

Tehri Garhwal 43 45 29 18 19 11

Udham Singh Nagar 28 32 20 9 12 5

Uttarkashi 23 25 - 15 16 -

MORTALITY

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Neo-natal Mortality Rate Post Neo-natal Mortality Rate

2 3 4 5 6 71

State / DistrictPerson Male Female Person Male Female

Under Five Mortality Rate (U5MR)

Total Rural Urban

Person Male Female

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Uttarakhand 53 53 54 58 58 59 39 39 40

Almora 25 26 25 26 25 26 - - -

Bageshwar 39 39 38 40 41 39 - - -

Chamoli 30 31 30 34 35 33 - - -

Champawat 44 44 43 34 37 31 - - -

Dehradun 45 45 45 57 58 56 35 34 36

Haridwar 94 89 99 111 103 121 54 58 49

Nainital 38 40 36 36 39 33 41 41 40

Pauri Garhwal 51 50 52 53 52 54 36 34 39

Pithoragarh 24 22 26 27 25 29 - - -

Rudraprayag 26 28 25 26 28 25 - - -

Tehri Garhwal 76 76 76 79 81 78 48 39 59

Udham Singh Nagar 44 45 43 49 51 47 35 34 36

Uttarkashi 47 45 48 50 49 51 - - -

Page 101: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Utt

arak

han

d:

Infa

nt

Mo

rtal

ity

Rat

e (I

MR

) w

ith

it's

co

mp

on

ent

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Rudra

pray

ag

Almor

a Pithor

agar

hCha

moli

Bages

hwar

Nainita

l Dehra

dun Cha

mpa

wat

Udham

Sing

h Nag

arUtta

rkas

hi Pauri

Garhw

al Uttara

khan

d Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Haridw

ar

Neo

-nat

al M

orta

lity

Rat

eP

ost N

eo-n

atal

Mor

talit

y R

ate

77

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 102: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Under five Mortality Rate (U5MR)

Person

Male

Female

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Total Rural Urban

Uttarakhand: Under five Mortality Rate (U5MR)

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Pithor

agar

h

Almor

a

Rudra

pray

ag

Chamoli

Nainita

l

Bages

hwar

Champa

wat

Udham

Sing

h Nag

ar

Dehra

dun

Uttarka

shi

Pauri G

arhw

al

Uttara

khan

d

Tehr

i Gar

hwal

Haridw

ar

Male Female

78

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 103: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / Commissionrait

SampleFemale

Population

21

MORTALITYMaternal Mortality Ratio (MMR), Maternal Mortality Rate and Life Time Risk

SampleLive

Births

MaternalDeaths MMR

95% Confidence Interval MaternalMortality

Rate

Life TimeRisk

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

Uttarakhand 435843 86881 163 188 159 216 12 0.44%

GARHWAL HQ 294328 61177 116 190 155 224 13 0.46%(Uttarkashi, Chamoli,Rudraprayag, TehriGarhwal, Dehradun,Pauri Garhwal,Haridwar)

KUMAON HQ 141515 25704 47 183 131 235 11 0.39%(Pithoragarh,Bageshwar, Almora,Champawat, Nainital,Udham Singh Nagar)

DISTRIBUTION OF MATERNAL AND NON-MATERNAL DEATHS BY BROAD AGE GROUP

Age Group LowerLimit

NonMaternalDeaths

SampleFemaleDeaths

95% Confidence Interval

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

MaternalDeaths

ProportionUpperLimit

95% Confidence Interval

LowerLimit

UpperLimitProportion

15-19 240 2 1 0 3 238 12 10 13

20-24 332 56 34 27 42 276 13 12 15

25-29 310 55 34 26 41 255 12 11 14

30-34 266 21 13 8 18 245 12 10 13

35-39 319 16 10 5 14 303 15 13 16

40-44 323 11 7 3 11 312 15 14 17

45-49 438 2 1 0 3 436 21 19 23

Total 2228 163 100 2065 100

Uttarakhand: Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) at Commissionrait level

176

178

180

182

184

186

188

190

192

194

196

Kumaon HQ Uttarakhand Garhwal HQ

79

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 104: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand 18.2 19.0 18.8 19.9 16.1 17.3 6.5 6.8 6.8 7.2 5.5 6.0

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL (95%) FOR SOME IMPORTANT INDICATORS

State / DistrictLowerLimit

Crude Birth Rate

Total

21

Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Crude Death Rate

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Almora 15.5 17.1 15.8 17.5 9.4 14.8 5.7 6.4 5.8 6.6 3.6 5.0

Bageshwar 14.1 15.2 14.1 15.3 10.6 15.4 6.8 7.6 6.9 7.6 4.0 10.0

Chamoli 17.3 18.5 15.4 18.1 17.2 18.2 5.4 6.0 2.6 3.8 5.0 5.6

Champawat 15.6 19.0 15.8 18.4 11.0 25.3 4.6 6.1 4.7 6.3 2.8 6.8

Dehradun 17.4 18.4 19.9 21.6 15.1 16.6 6.7 7.1 7.1 7.8 6.2 6.8

Haridwar 20.7 24.7 22.4 28.2 16.5 19.6 7.2 8.6 7.3 9.3 6.3 8.0

Nainital 16.0 17.7 15.5 17.8 15.8 18.4 5.1 6.0 5.4 6.6 4.2 5.5

Pauri Garhwal 19.4 20.4 19.9 21.1 15.0 17.9 8.1 8.7 8.4 9.2 5.4 6.5

Pithoragarh 14.2 15.3 14.8 16.0 10.8 12.7 5.6 6.3 6.2 7.0 2.5 3.7

Rudraprayag 16.0 16.9 16.0 16.9 - - 5.7 6.2 5.7 6.3 - -

Tehri Garhwal 21.8 23.0 22.5 23.8 16.4 19.1 9.0 9.6 9.3 10.0 5.8 7.9

Udham Singh Nagar 17.6 19.6 17.8 20.3 16.1 19.6 5.0 5.8 5.2 6.2 4.2 5.5

Uttarkashi 15.1 17.0 15.6 17.6 11.3 13.8 4.2 5.0 4.3 5.2 2.7 4.9

State / DistrictLowerLimit

Total

21

Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

LowerLimit

UpperLimit

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Infant Mortality Rate U5MR

Uttarakhand 40 46 43 50 27 38 52 55 57 60 36 42

Almora 15 24 15 25 - - 21 29 21 30 - -

Bageshwar 25 37 26 38 - - 33 44 34 46 - -

Chamoli 26 34 5 19 - - 27 34 30 38 - -

Champawat 22 51 18 43 - - 33 54 24 45 - -

Dehradun 33 40 40 50 24 33 42 48 52 62 30 39

Haridwar 61 82 68 95 29 64 84 103 100 123 40 68

Nainital 23 39 17 37 24 49 32 44 29 43 31 50

Pauri Garhwal 39 47 40 49 24 40 47 55 49 57 25 48

Pithoragarh 16 25 18 29 - - 19 28 22 32 - -

Rudraprayag 16 22 17 22 - - 22 30 23 30 - -

Tehri Garhwal 56 66 58 69 29 52 71 80 74 84 36 60

Udham Singh Nagar 30 44 35 54 15 35 38 50 42 57 25 44

Uttarkashi 29 47 31 50 - - 40 54 42 58 - -

80

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 105: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / District Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 71

LowerLimit

LowerLimit

LowerLimit

Sex Ratio at Birth

CONFIDENCE INTERVAL (95%) FOR SOME IMPORTANT INDICATORS

UpperLimit

UpperLimit

UpperLimit

Uttarakhand 854 877 864 890 807 860

Almora 830 921 833 927 639 1002

Bageshwar 778 871 785 880 465 933

Chamoli 820 895 816 897 767 972

Champawat 792 977 760 956 786 1318

Dehradun 809 864 838 916 762 841

Haridwar 815 927 807 938 766 982

Nainital 867 973 843 977 849 1023

Pauri Garhwal 854 918 857 924 755 965

Pithoragarh 719 810 732 832 569 782

Rudraprayag 820 903 822 906 - -

Tehri Garhwal 860 920 864 928 750 947

Udham Singh Nagar 819 918 854 977 705 876

Uttarkashi 811 928 822 946 584 933

81

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 106: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Households living in a Pucca House (%) Households living in a Kachcha House (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

Structure of House

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Households living in Owned House (%) Households living in Rented House (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

Ownership of House

Uttarakhand 80.3 76.0 90.8 7.8 9.4 4.0

Almora 84.6 84.1 90.3 0.3 0.3 0.3

Bageshwar 56.5 54.6 92.3 13.9 14.6 1.2

Chamoli 88.5 87.3 93.6 4.5 5.4 0.8

Champawat 59.3 59.8 57.2 28.5 26.2 40.1

Dehradun 90.9 85.1 94.5 6.0 9.4 3.8

Haridwar 90.5 86.6 96.9 6.3 9.1 1.7

Nainital 86.2 84.1 89.1 4.3 5.9 2.2

Pauri Garhwal 80.4 77.7 96.3 3.0 3.3 1.5

Pithoragarh 58.5 51.6 87.2 20.3 23.0 9.1

Rudraprayag 82.7 82.5 100.0 3.4 3.4 0.0

Tehri Garhwal 76.6 73.5 96.3 4.5 5.1 0.9

Udham Singh Nagar 76.6 73.8 81.2 10.7 13.4 6.2

Uttarkashi 68.1 63.8 95.0 16.8 19.0 3.1

Uttarakhand 84.8 90.8 70.4 12.3 6.7 26.0

Almora 87.9 91.0 50.7 10.5 7.7 43.2

Bageshwar 88.9 90.8 53.5 10.6 8.7 46.3

Chamoli 83.5 91.9 48.8 15.2 7.5 47.1

Champawat 89.6 95.3 60.5 6.4 2.8 24.6

Dehradun 80.0 89.5 73.9 17.4 8.2 23.3

Haridwar 88.3 91.5 83.2 6.9 2.3 14.4

Nainital 77.9 85.7 67.2 17.5 9.6 28.4

Pauri Garhwal 86.2 90.2 62.4 12.0 8.1 35.1

Pithoragarh 82.6 91.2 47.0 15.8 7.2 51.6

Rudraprayag 92.4 93.1 26.9 6.7 6.0 70.0

Tehri Garhwal 87.9 92.9 56.2 10.5 5.7 41.5

Udham Singh Nagar 84.8 91.2 74.6 11.2 5.4 20.5

Uttarkashi 83.4 87.9 54.9 14.4 10.2 41.3

82

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 107: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Households having Improved Source of Drinking Water (%) Households treating water to make it Safer for Drinking (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

Source of Drinking Water

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Households having Access to Toilet Facility (%) Households Sharing Toilet Facility (%) Households having Access to Electricity (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Access to Toilet Facility Availability of Electricity

Uttarakhand 89.6 85.8 98.6 15.7 9.1 31.6

Almora 74.7 73.0 94.7 18.0 14.0 66.7

Bageshwar 81.3 80.5 97.7 10.5 8.4 50.3

Chamoli 90.9 89.5 96.8 15.1 9.0 40.1

Champawat 82.1 80.4 90.6 4.7 3.3 11.8

Dehradun 99.2 98.0 99.9 29.8 17.2 37.8

Haridwar 99.7 99.7 99.8 7.2 0.5 18.1

Nainital 87.4 80.7 96.6 31.5 20.7 46.4

Pauri Garhwal 85.0 82.9 97.6 13.6 8.3 45.2

Pithoragarh 77.5 74.1 91.5 26.4 17.9 62.0

Rudraprayag 85.5 85.4 95.0 9.6 9.5 25.0

Tehri Garhwal 79.7 76.5 99.8 9.6 5.8 33.6

Udham Singh Nagar 99.9 99.9 99.9 4.5 2.2 8.1

Uttarkashi 84.0 81.6 99.3 11.8 6.3 46.6

Uttarakhand 67.7 56.4 95.4 14.2 11.0 21.9 92.5 90.2 98.2

Almora 61.1 57.9 98.9 9.2 8.6 16.8 84.4 83.1 99.2

Bageshwar 62.4 60.6 95.9 9.0 8.4 20.6 87.5 86.9 99.0

Chamoli 59.5 52.0 90.4 7.9 6.3 14.3 87.7 84.9 99.1

Champawat 46.3 43.0 63.3 8.6 9.0 6.3 80.7 78.1 94.3

Dehradun 89.8 79.8 96.2 20.7 15.9 23.8 97.5 98.2 97.0

Haridwar 65.4 46.2 96.8 18.1 13.1 26.3 96.6 94.9 99.2

Nainital 84.2 74.6 97.3 15.9 12.9 20.2 94.6 91.9 98.3

Pauri Garhwal 60.0 53.6 98.1 10.4 8.6 21.3 91.7 90.6 98.4

Pithoragarh 60.0 51.2 96.8 8.9 8.1 12.4 86.5 83.5 99.3

Rudraprayag 55.0 54.5 98.8 8.0 7.9 16.9 95.2 95.1 99.4

Tehri Garhwal 60.3 54.7 95.9 15.7 13.7 28.9 93.0 92.4 96.5

Udham Singh Nagar 70.9 57.0 93.4 16.3 13.4 21.0 96.3 94.6 99.1

Uttarkashi 48.0 40.3 96.4 11.6 11.0 15.4 87.6 86.1 97.2

83

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 108: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Households using Electricity (%) Households using Kerosene (%) Households having Separate Kitchen (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

Main Source of Lighting Availability of Kitchen

State / DistrictTotal Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Households using Firewood/Crop residues/Cow Dung Cake (%) Households using Kerosene (%) Households using LPG/PNG (%)

Total Rural Urban

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101

Main Source of Fuel Used for Cooking

Uttarakhand 89.1 85.9 97.0 8.9 11.7 2.1 71.6 67.9 80.6

Almora 83.4 82.1 98.7 15.5 16.7 0.8 75.6 74.5 88.2

Bageshwar 87.1 86.5 98.7 11.1 11.7 1.0 73.5 72.5 92.5

Chamoli 87.2 84.5 98.2 7.0 8.5 1.0 79.6 79.2 81.4

Champawat 80.5 77.9 93.8 18.1 20.5 5.9 88.2 85.9 99.7

Dehradun 96.0 96.3 95.8 3.0 2.8 3.1 81.4 79.7 82.4

Haridwar 88.4 83.0 97.4 10.9 16.2 2.1 55.0 41.6 77.0

Nainital 94.3 91.6 98.0 4.9 7.2 1.7 77.5 76.9 78.3

Pauri Garhwal 87.8 86.3 96.6 9.8 11.2 1.7 70.5 68.1 85.2

Pithoragarh 85.7 82.5 98.9 9.3 11.4 0.7 65.5 60.6 86.4

Rudraprayag 89.0 88.9 99.4 10.2 10.3 0.6 90.2 90.3 81.9

Tehri Garhwal 84.7 83.3 94.2 11.4 12.6 3.6 65.1 61.9 85.4

Udham Singh Nagar 95.4 93.7 98.0 4.1 6.0 1.1 65.6 59.5 75.5

Uttarkashi 74.6 71.5 94.2 20.0 22.8 2.9 80.1 78.1 92.9

Uttarakhand 57.0 73.3 17.3 1.4 0.7 3.0 40.8 25.0 79.0

Almora 73.6 79.7 2.0 1.1 1.0 2.3 24.9 19.0 95.3

Bageshwar 74.6 78.0 10.3 1.2 1.1 4.5 23.9 20.6 85.0

Chamoli 69.8 82.3 17.8 1.1 0.8 2.4 28.7 16.5 79.4

Champawat 69.0 73.6 46.2 0.3 0.C3 0.1 30.1 25.4 53.7

Dehradun 24.7 45.6 11.4 2.9 1.7 3.6 71.8 51.8 84.4

Haridwar 63.4 90.1 19.7 0.8 0.2 1.9 35.3 9.3 78.0

Nainital 42.1 60.8 16.4 2.4 0.8 4.6 53.6 35.7 78.3

Pauri Garhwal 56.4 63.6 13.4 0.8 0.6 2.0 41.6 34.4 84.2

Pithoragarh 60.3 74.0 3.3 1.1 0.8 2.5 38.3 25.0 94.0

Rudraprayag 81.2 82.0 1.9 0.4 0.4 8.8 18.2 17.5 85.6

Tehri Garhwal 61.0 68.9 10.3 1.3 0.4 7.2 36.4 29.2 81.8

Udham Singh Nagar 59.4 77.3 30.3 0.8 0.3 1.8 38.4 20.7 67.1

Uttarkashi 63.4 71.8 10.2 2.0 1.6 4.1 33.7 25.9 82.5

84

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 109: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

State / District

Total Rural Urban Total Rural Urban

Households having Computer/laptop with or without Internet Connectivity (%) Households having Telephone/Mobile (%)

2 3 4 5 6 71

HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS

Possession of Computer/Telephone/Mobile

Uttarakhand 9.4 5.5 19.1 81.2 76.1 93.5

Almora 5.1 3.7 22.3 80.9 79.6 96.9

Bageshwar 4.3 3.9 11.1 74.0 73.1 91.0

Chamoli 6.0 3.4 16.9 81.4 78.0 95.8

Champawat 3.1 2.4 6.6 65.7 63.3 78.1

Dehradun 20.6 11.5 26.4 92.2 86.8 95.5

Haridwar 10.3 5.0 19.1 83.9 76.6 95.8

Nainital 13.5 11.2 16.5 85.0 80.9 90.7

Pauri Garhwal 7.7 5.8 19.0 76.1 72.5 97.7

Pithoragarh 6.8 2.7 24.0 67.8 61.8 92.9

Rudraprayag 3.9 3.8 13.8 81.5 81.3 99.4

Tehri Garhwal 6.3 4.3 18.6 80.1 77.4 97.1

Udham Singh Nagar 7.4 5.4 10.5 83.2 79.5 89.2

Uttarkashi 6.8 5.2 17.3 69.6 65.8 94.1

85

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 110: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

86

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

ANNEXURE

Page 111: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

87

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 112: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

88

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 113: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

89

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 114: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

90

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 115: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

91

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 116: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

92

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 117: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

93

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 118: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

94

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 119: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

95

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 120: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

96

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 121: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

97

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 122: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

98

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 123: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

99

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 124: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

100

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 125: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

101

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 126: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

102

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 127: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

103

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 128: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

104

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 129: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

105

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual H

ealth

Survey 2

01

0-1

1

Page 130: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

106

UTTARAKHANDA

nn

ual

He

alth

Su

rvey

20

10

-11

Page 131: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

Uttarakhand: Coverage along the continuum of care

91.5

83.3

95.1

75.4

55.0

82.6

83.0

59.2

38.2

63.2

59.1

56.9

43.9

11.1

59.5

84.4

62.7

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Care sought for Fever

Care sought for Diarrhoea

Care sought for ARI

Fully Immunized

Received at least one Vitamin A dose

Received Measles vaccine

Received 3 doses of DPT vaccine

Animal/Formula Milk

Exclusively breastfed for at least six months

Children breastfed within one hour of birth

Check-up within 48 hrs.

Safe Delivery

Ultrasound

Full Antenatal Check-up

Antenatal Check-up in First Trimester

Received any Antenatal Check-up

Family Planning (Any Method)

Pregnancy

Birth

Infancy

Childhood

Pre pregnancy

Page 132: ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEETcensusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/AHSBulletins/AHS...ANNUAL HEALTH SURVEY 2010-11 FACT SHEET Uttarakhand Government of India 2/A, Mansingh

P

A

K

IS

TA

N

BHUTAN

BANGLADESH

ARABIAN SEA

N

E

PA

L

BAY OF

BENGAL

AN

DA

MA

NA

ND

NI

CO

BA

RI

SL

AN

DS

ANDAMAN SEA

(I

ND

IA

)

LA

KS

HA

DW

EE

P

(I

ND

IA

)

MYANMAR

BOUNDARY, INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY, STATE/U.T.

New More I.(INDIA)

P - PUDUCHERRY

AFGHANISTAN! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

JHARKHAND

Coco Is.(MYANMAR)

Narcondam I.(INDIA)

Barren I.(INDIA)

INDIRA POINT

SRILANKA

P

P

PThe administrative headquarters of Chandigarh,Haryana and Punjab are at Chandigarh.

80

120

16

20

24

0

28

0

320

360

0

0

720 76 0

800

840

880

920

East of Greenwich

36

0

32

0

28

0

24

0

20

0

16

0

12

0

8

0

800

840

880

920

960

680

720

760

LA

KS

HA

DW

EE

PS

EA

INDIAN OCEAN

KILOMETRES

100 0 100 200 300 400

UTTARAKHAND

C

H

IN

AT

IB

E T

RAJASTHAN

ODISHA

MAHARASHTRA

MADHYA PRADESH

KARNATAKA

GUJARAT

BIHAR

ANDHRA PRADESH

UTTAR PRADESH

ASSAM

TAMIL NADU

CHHATTISGARH

JAMMU AND KASHMIR

PUNJAB

WESTBENGAL

KERALA

HARYANA

ARUNACHAL PRADESH

HIMACHALPRADESH

MANIPUR

MIZORAM

MEGHALAYA

NAGALAND

TRIPURA

SIKKIM

GOA

NCT OF DELHI

DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI

DAMAN & DIU

PUDUCHERRY

CHANDIGARH

C Government of India Copyright, 2011The responsibility for the correctness of internal details rests with the publisher.

The territorial waters of India extend into the sea to a distance of twelve nautical miles measured from the appropriate base line.

The external boundaries and coastlines of India agree with the Record/MasterCopy certified by Survey of India.

The state boundaries between Uttarakhand & Uttar Pradesh, Bihar & Jharkhand and Chattisgarh & Madhya Pradesh have not been verified by the Governments concerned.

The administrative headquarters of Chandigarh, Haryana and Punjab are at Chandigarh.

The interstate boundaries amongst Arunachal Pradesh, Assam and Meghalaya shown on the map are as interpreted from the North-Eastern Areas (Reorganisation) Act. 1971," but have yet to be verified.

AHS STATES IN INDIA

POSITION OF UTTARAKHAND

Pri

nte

d b

y :

Sara

sw

ati

Off

set

Pri

nte

rs P

vt.

Ltd

., N

ew

Delh

i

Email : [email protected]: www.censusindia.gov.in

Enquiries should be directed to:Vital Statistics DivisionOffice of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, IndiaMinistry of Home AffairsGovernment of India