annexure - i list of companies selected for the study

29
ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study Industry Sr. Code No Name of Company Industry Sector 1 ACC Ltd Cement 2 CEAT Ltd Auto Ancillary 3 Exide Industries Ltd Auto Ancillary 4 Bajaj Auto Ltd Automobile 5 M&M Automotive Ltd Automobile 6 Tata Chemicals Ltd Chemical 7 Greaves Cotton Ltd Engineering 8 L&T Construction Equip Ltd Engineering 9 Siemens Ltd Engineering 10 RPG Raychem Ltd Engineering 11 Engineers India Ltd EPC Engineering 12 KEC LTD EPC Engineering 13 M&M Farm DIV Farm 14 GSFC Ltd Fertilizers 15 RCF Ltd Fertilizers 16 HUL Ltd FMGC 17 ITC Ltd FMGC 18 TM International Logistics Ltd Logistics 19 Coal India Ltd Mining 20 BPCL Petroleum 21 HPCL Petroleum 22 Ajanta Pharma Ltd Pharma 23 Lupin Ltd Pharma 24 RPG Life Science Ltd Pharma 25 CESC Ltd Power 26 NTPC Ltd Power 27 Tata Power Co Ltd Power 28 Mahendra Steel Ltd Steel 29 Rastriya Ispat Nigam Steel 30 Tata Steel Steel ANNEXTURE-II 1 | Page

Upload: others

Post on 01-Oct-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE - I

List of Companies Selected for the Study

Industry Sr. Code No

Name of Company Industry Sector

1 ACC Ltd Cement 2 CEAT Ltd Auto Ancillary 3 Exide Industries Ltd Auto Ancillary 4 Bajaj Auto Ltd Automobile 5 M&M Automotive Ltd Automobile 6 Tata Chemicals Ltd Chemical 7 Greaves Cotton Ltd Engineering 8 L&T Construction Equip Ltd Engineering 9 Siemens Ltd Engineering 10 RPG Raychem Ltd Engineering 11 Engineers India Ltd EPC Engineering 12 KEC LTD EPC Engineering

13 M&M Farm DIV Farm 14 GSFC Ltd Fertilizers 15 RCF Ltd Fertilizers 16 HUL Ltd FMGC 17 ITC Ltd FMGC 18 TM International Logistics Ltd Logistics

19 Coal India Ltd Mining 20 BPCL Petroleum 21 HPCL Petroleum 22 Ajanta Pharma Ltd Pharma 23 Lupin Ltd Pharma 24 RPG Life Science Ltd Pharma 25 CESC Ltd Power 26 NTPC Ltd Power 27 Tata Power Co Ltd Power 28 Mahendra Steel Ltd Steel 29 Rastriya Ispat Nigam Steel 30 Tata Steel Steel

ANNEXTURE-II

1 | P a g e

Page 2: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

Specimen Sample of the Questionnaire QUESTIONNAIRE

STUDY OF ROLE OF HRM IN CSR PRACTICES IN INDIA

PROFILE INFORMATION

1 Name (not to be entered for maintaining confidentiality)

2 Category (W - Workmen, S - Staff, M - Middle level executives, H - HR employees

3 CSR implementing agency (D - Directly by Company, F - Foundation / Trust, N - NGO)

4 Sales Turnover for last FY (1 - < Rs.100 crores, 2, Rs.100 - Rs.1000 crores, 3 - > Rs.1000 crores)

5 Net Profit for last FY (1 - < Rs.100 crores, 2, Rs.100 - Rs.1000 crores, 3 - > Rs.1000 crores)

6 CSR Budget for last FY (1 - < Rs.10 crores, 2, Rs.10 - Rs.50 crores, 3 - Rs.50-Rs.100 crores, 4. > Rs.100 crores)

7 CSR Actual spend for last FY (1 - < Rs.10 crores, 2, Rs.10 - Rs.50 crores, 3 - Rs.50-Rs.100 crores, 4. > Rs.100 crores)

8 Employee satisfaction score / assessment (1 - Excellent, 2 - Very good, 3 - Good, 4 - Just satisfactory, 5 - Poor)

9 Number of MAJOR IR disputes in the last FY (1 - < 5, 2 - 5-10, 3 - 10 - 20, 4- > 20)

PART A - PURPOSE OF CSR Response Codes - 1 - Exact, 2 - Nearer, 3 - Somewhat nearer, 4 - Least nearer)

1 Ethical motivation of top management

2 To make a positive contribution to society and the environment

3 Statutory Compliance: CSR spent/ funds for financial exemption

2 | P a g e

Page 3: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

4 Promote corporate image /Brand building 5 Better access to financial institutes credit 6 Pressure from consumer association and media 7 Attracting investor/ Shareholder 8 Commercial advantage to acquire the global business market

9 For ethical reputation to enhance trust between Management & employees for higher employee’s engagement.

10 Improving relations with suppliers, institutions, donors, community

PART B - RATING OF ROLE OF HR IN CSR Response Codes - (1 - Excellent, 2 - Very good, 3 - Good, 4 - Just satisfactory,

5 - Poor)

1 Plays key role in designing CSR strategy aligned to Business strategy

2 Conducting Survey to identify organisation business need aligned to Social need for designing CSR strategy

3 Facilitation for co creation CSR strategy with all stakeholders. 4 Communication of CSR strategy to all stakeholders. 5 Device road map for implementation of CSR plan. 6 CSR Annual planning & Budgeting. 7 Implementation of CSR plan. 8 As internal consultants to Management for CSR.

9 Streamline various management policies processes aligned to CSR practices/initiatives.

10 Identification of competencies, job description, recruitment,& evaluation, training & developing of CSR team.

11 Identification, Corroboration /building synergy with various CSR partners/NGOs.

12 Liaison & coordination with various CSR agencies including NGOs, corporate, Government & Semi Government etc.

13 Coordination & facilitation with Board of Directors, CSR Board of Trustees, review committees on CSR initiatives.

14 Ensuring various Statutory compliances on account of CSR.

15 Organise training sessions for stakeholders to promote CSR as core organisation value

16 Encourage &nomination of employees to participated in internal /external CSR training.

17 Human Resources initiative to a lead CSR for empowered and participative work environment

3 | P a g e

Page 4: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

18 Forecast future CSR need aligned to Business 19 Conduction /coordinating CSR audits

20 Review & implantation of action plan based on CSR audits /reviews

21 Publication of CSR Report Part C - IMPACT OF CSR IMPLEMENTATION

Response Codes - (1 - Excellent, 2 - Very good, 3 - Good, 4 - Just satisfactory, 5 - Poor)

1 Society in general 2 Maximising Shareholders value 3 The Economy 4 The global environment 5 Customer or client satisfaction 6 Employees welfare and wellbeing 7 Level of motivation of your employees. 8 Level of awareness of employees on Company’s CSR. 9 Level of participation of employees in CSR of organisation.

10 Level of influence of CSR on commitment of employees towards productivity.

11 Percentage of reduction in staff turnover

12 Reduced recruitment and training costs due to CSR community skill training.

13 With better Brand building attracted and retained talent especially amongst graduates.

14 Cost savings through improved employee engagement.

15 Different people initiative/ CSR activities created a network of committed, satisfied and motivated workforce.

16 Better employee friendly and conducive atmosphere.

17

Enhanced ethical reputation assisted to built trust between Management & employees resulted reduction in grievances & disputes.

18 Improving relations with suppliers, institutions, NGO s, & community.

19 Promoted CSR as a core organizational value for business sustainability.

20

Enhanced employees’ skills in receptive stakeholder engagement and communication for higher employee’s engagement.

4 | P a g e

Page 5: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

21 Infuse sense of willingness to sacrifice their self-interest for the benefit of team

22 Enhanced level of sharing between team members to increase overall efficiency.

23 Much better stakeholder inclusive culture leading to seamless organisation.

24 For competitive advantage by developing more sustainable business models

25

With better brand image, could gain more commercial benefit by placing a premium on products and services labelled as ethical.

Part –D –CSR Evaluations (Response Codes - Y - Yes, N - No)

1 Managerial assessment

2 Employee surveys

3 Stakeholder feedback/surveys

4 External assessment 5 Sustainability meetings

6 ROI calculations

7 We do not evaluate our HR & CR

PART E - HRM PRACTICES

Response Codes - 0 - No Option, 1 - Somewhat agree, 2 - Completely agree, 3 - Somewhat disagree, 4 - Completely disagree

1

My company provides CSR training to develop employees’ skills in receptive stakeholder engagement and communication

2 Our organization places the right person in the right job.

3 Selection of a candidate in our organization is strictly based on his/her merit.

4 We are being paid adequately for the work we do.

5 Pay increments offered by our organization are satisfactory.

6 Our organization makes all payments due to us in time.

5 | P a g e

Page 6: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

7

The pay & compensation received by our employees are competitive compared to that of employees doing similar work in other organizations.

8 Rewards and incentives are fairly distributed in our organization

9 We feel our performance appraisal has been fair and objective.

10 We do not work under the threat of losing our jobs.

11

Continuous efforts are made in our organization to create a sense of belonging among employees and feel like a member of the Corporate family.

12 Each employee is treated with genuine respect.

13

We believe that our management follows policies and practices that serve combined interests of employees and the organization including all stakeholders & Society at large.

14

All members of organisation whenever required go beyond their job description and work as seamless organisation.

PART F- PROBLEMS OF CSR

Response Codes - 0 - No Option, 1 - Somewhat agree, 2 - Completely agree, 3 - Somewhat disagree, 4 - Completely disagree

1 CSR strategy is not aligned with Business & vice versa

2 Non availability of competent trained CSR professionals

3 Shortage of competent NGOs

4 Statutory Compliances & Ambiguous CSR statutory provisions/ rules

5 CSR is implemented by independent Cell & not part of HR

6 | P a g e

Page 7: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE -III

ABSTRACT OF PRIMARY DATA

PART A - PURPOSE OF CSR

Criteria No

Response Codes - 1 - Exact, 2 - Nearer, 3 - Somewhat nearer, 4 - Least nearer) Exact Nearer

Somewhat nearer

Least nearer

1 Ethical motivation of top management 223 231 161 58

2 To make a positive contribution to society and the environment 248

240 125 60

3 Statutory Compliance: CSR spent/ funds for financial exemption 241

241 136 55

4 Promote corporate image /Brand building 225

233 148 67

5 Better access to financial institutes credit 230

228 148 67

6 Pressure from consumer association and media 233

230 142 68

7 Attracting investor/ Shareholder 219

227 160 67

8 Commercial advantage to acquire the global business market 219

239 151 64

7 | P a g e

Page 8: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

9

For ethical reputation to enhance trust between Management & employees for higher employee’s engagement.

240

218 142 73

10 Improving relations with suppliers, institutions, donors, community 238

218 151 66

PART B - RATING OF ROLE OF HR IN CSR 1 2 3 4 5

Criteria No

Response Codes - (1 - Excellent, 2 - Very good, 3 - Good, 4 - Just satisfactory, 5 - Poor)

Excellent

Very Good

Good Just Satisfactory

Poor

1 Plays key role in designing CSR strategy aligned to Business strategy 212

223 141 49 48

2

Conducting Survey to identify organisation business need aligned to Social need for designing CSR strategy

224

226 120 46 57

3 Facilitation for co creation CSR strategy with all stakeholders. 213

223 129 47 61

4 Communication of CSR strategy to all stakeholders. 216

208 142 43 64

5 Device road map for implementation of CSR plan. 196

226 144 58 49 6 CSR Annual planning & Budgeting. 234 218 126 47 48 7 Implementation of CSR plan. 208 236 125 57 47

8 As internal consultants to Management for CSR. 196

226 144 58 49

9 Streamline various management policies processes aligned to CSR practices/initiatives.

221 219 130 54 49

10 Identification of competencies, job description, recruitment,& evaluation, training & developing of CSR team.

222 215 140 46 50

11 Identification, Corroboration /building synergy with various CSR partners/NGOs.

221 200 126 53 73

8 | P a g e

Page 9: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

12

Liaison & coordination with various CSR agencies including NGOs, corporate, Government & Semi Government etc.

235

208 132 48 50

13

Coordination & facilitation with Board of Directors, CSR Board of Trustees, review committees on CSR initiatives.

210

229 125 46 63 Criteria No

Description of Parameters Excellent

Very Good

Good Just Satisfactory

Poor

14 Ensuring various Statutory compliances on account of CSR. 205

216 137 58 57

15 Organise training sessions for stakeholders to promote CSR as core organisation value

224 212 127 52 58

16 Encourage &nomination of employees to participated in internal /external CSR training.

233 210 118 52 60

17 Human Resources initiative to a lead CSR for empowered and participative work environment

233 210 118 52 60

18 Forecast future CSR need aligned to Business 211

213 143 57

49

19 Conduction /coordinating CSR audits 227 223 132 46

45

20 Review & implantation of action plan based on CSR audits /reviews 218

220 132 51 52

21 Publication of CSR Report 220 218

138

46

51

Part C - IMPACT OF CSR IMPLEMENTATION 1 2 3 4 5

Criteria No

Response Codes - (1 - Excellent, 2 - Very good, 3 - Good, 4 - Just satisfactory, 5 - Poor)

Excellent

Very Good

Good Just Satisfactory

Poor

1 Society in general 222 221 129 43 58

9 | P a g e

Page 10: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

2 Maximising Shareholders value 226 206 136 47 58 3 The Economy 206 224 139 54 50 4 The global environment 219 206 136 54 58 5 Customer or client satisfaction 237 191 135 63 47 6 Employees welfare and wellbeing 221 212 135 54 51

7 Level of motivation of your employees. 190 220 150 56 57

8 Level of awareness of employees on Company’s CSR. 221 211 132 48 61

Criteria No

Response Codes - (1 - Excellent, 2 - Very good, 3 - Good, 4 - Just

satisfactory, 5 - Poor)

Excellent

Very Good

Good Just Satisfactory

Poor

9 Level of participation of employees in CSR of organisation. 196

226 144 58 49

10 Level of influence of CSR on commitment of employees towards productivity.

222 221 128 44 58

11 Percentage of reduction in staff turnover 226 216 126 54 51

12 Reduced recruitment and training costs due to CSR community skill training.

206 213 164 49 41

13 With better Brand building attracted and retained talent especially amongst graduates. 230 213 136 46 48

14 Cost savings through improved employee engagement. 221

224 118 58 52

15 Different people initiative/ CSR activities created a network of committed, satisfied and motivated workforce.

206 230

138

49

50

16 Better employee friendly and conducive atmosphere. 218

200 132 58 65

17

Enhanced ethical reputation assisted to built trust between Management & employees resulted reduction in grievances & disputes.

225

208 126 56 58

18 Improving relations with suppliers, institutions, NGO s, & community. 239

212 126 52 44

19 Promoted CSR as a core organizational value for business sustainability.

206 221 143 51 52

10 | P a g e

Page 11: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

20

Enhanced employees’ skills in receptive stakeholder engagement and communication for higher employee’s engagement.

226

206 136 47 58

21 Infuse sense of willingness to sacrifice their self-interest for the benefit of team

210 221 143 52 47

22 Enhanced level of sharing between team members to increase overall efficiency.

236 197 139 50 51

Criteria No

Response Codes - (1 - Excellent, 2 - Very good, 3 - Good, 4 - Just

satisfactory, 5 - Poor)

Excellent

Very Good

Good Just Satisfactory

Poor

23 Much better stakeholder inclusive culture leading to seamless organisation.

225 220 129 58 41

24 For competitive advantage by developing more sustainable business models

221 209 135 47 61

25

With better brand image, could gain more commercial benefit by placing a premium on products and services labelled as ethical.

222

215 140 46 50

Criteria No

PART D - EVALUATION OF CSR

(Response Codes - Y - Yes, N - No) Yes No 1 Managerial assessment

136 537

2 Employee surveys

144 529 3 Stakeholder feedback/surveys

114 559

4 External assessment

135 538 5 Sustainability meetings

129 544

6 ROI calculations

126 547 7 We do not evaluate our HR & CR

125 548

Part E- HRM Practices

1 2 3 4 5

Criteria No

Response Codes - 0 - No Option, 1 - Somewhat agree, 2 - Completely agree, 3 - Somewhat disagree, 4 - Completely disagree

No Option

Somewhat agree

Completely agree

Somewhat disagree

Completely disagree

11 | P a g e

Page 12: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

1

My company provides CSR training to develop employees’ skills in receptive stakeholder engagement and communication 55 267 246 40 65

2 Our organization places the right person in the right job. 55 267 246 40 65

3

Selection of a candidate in our organization is strictly based on his/her merit. 51 262 265 51 44

Criteria No

Response Codes - 0 - No Option, 1 - Somewhat agree, 2 - Completely agree, 3 - Somewhat disagree, 4 - Completely disagree

No Optio

n Somew

hat agree

Completel

y agree

Somewhat

disagree

Completely

disagree

4 We are being paid adequately for the work we do. 46 255 253 67 52

5 Pay increments offered by our organization are satisfactory. 49 259 259 55 51

6 Our organization makes all payments due to us in time. 55 262 244 58 54

7

The pay & compensation received by our employees are competitive compared to that of employees doing similar work in other organizations. 57 267 259 49 41

8 Rewards and incentives are fairly distributed in our organization 58 260 245 61 49

9 We feel our performance appraisal has been fair and objective. 56 274 254 48 41

10 We do not work under the threat of losing our jobs. 55 243 270 54 51

11

Continuous efforts are made in our organization to create a sense of belonging among employees and feel like a member of the Corporate family. 52 268 248 55 50

12 Each employee is treated with genuine respect. 46 251 274 55 47

12 | P a g e

Page 13: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

13

We believe that our management follows policies and practices that serve combined interests of employees and the organization including all stakeholders & Society at large. 55 251 259 65 43

14

All members of organisation whenever required go beyond their job description and work as seamless organisation. 53 253 268 52 47

PART F - CSR PROBLEMS 1 2 3 4 5

Criteria No

Response Codes - 0 - No Option, 1 - Somewhat agree, 2 - Completely agree, 3 - Somewhat disagree, 4 - Completely disagree

No Option

Somewhat Agree

Completely agree

Somewhat disagree

Completely disagree

1 CSR strategy is not aligned with Business & vice versa 167 123 154 135 94

2 Non availability of competent trained CSR professionals 153 146 156 137 81

3 Shortage of competent NGOs 143 148 146 144 92

4 Statutory Compliances & Ambiguous CSR statutory provisions/ rules 150 135 154 152 82

5 CSR is implemented by independent Cell & not part of HR 147 135 162 146 83

13 | P a g e

Page 14: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE –IV Abstract of Financial Details of selected Company for the study -2017-18 Industry No

Industry Sector Turnover Net Profit CSR CSR %of

(Rs in Cr)

Spent PRISCRIBED

CSR spent

1 Cement 13431 915 120 18 656 2 Auto Ancillary 6376 363 10.11 10 100 3 Auto Ancillary 7628 694 13.23 16 82 4 Automobile 23019 3828 86.72 159 54 5 Automobile 24082 2176 46 44 58 6 Chemical 7218 283.5 15 14 108 7 Engineering 1300 110 0.1 2 6 8 Engineering 110011 6041 100.77 99 102 9 Engineering 11348 1133.6 23 23 101 10 Engineering 318 27 0.54 1 100 11 EPC Engineering 600 65 11 10 107 12 EPC Engineering 7603 423 8.55 8 101 13 Farm 10946 544 21 20 27 14 Fertilizers 5477 424.5 11 11 100 15 Fertilizers 7223 179.26 8.63 9 100 16 FMGC 34619 7347 103.88 102 102 17 FMGC 39255 10953 276 275 100 18 Logistics 2013 331 55.28 55 101 19 Mining 15211 14500 128.05 127 101 20 Petroleum 242047 8036 94.98 95 100 21 Petroleum 213803 6208 108.11 83 130 22 Pharma 2155 500 8.72 8 104 23 Pharma 12753 3141 19.68 63 31 24 Pharma 321 20.46 0.42 0 103 25 Power 7367 862 17.41 17 101

14 | P a g e

Page 15: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

26 Power 79274 9385 280 228 123 27 Power 8454 693 22.79 22 104 28 Steel 8757 109 17 16 21 29 Steel 16500 -264 9 0 0 30 Steel 52361 3444 22.79 22 104

ANNEXURE - V

Data on Geographical PAN India presence of the Selected Companies

Industry. Serial Nos

Industry Sector No of Locations/Operation

Units

No of States operated in India

1 Cement 17 11 2 Auto Ancillary 16 15 3 11 4 4 Automobile 4 2 5 56 15 6 Chemical 5 5 7 Engineering 15 2 8 2 2 9 14 8 10 3 2 11 EPC Engineering 5 5 12 8 6 13 Farm 26 10 14 Fertilizers 5 1 15 4 1 16 FMGC 51 17 17 61 20 18 Logistics 7 5 19 Mining 430 8 20 Petroleum 6 4 21 12 6 22 Pharma 7 3 23 12 8

15 | P a g e

Page 16: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

24 3 3 25 Power 11 1 26 46 22 27 44 14 28 Steel 20 6 29 20 6 30 23 8

Average 31 7

16 | P a g e

Page 17: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

Ho1 – There is no significant relationship between the HRM role with effectiveness of CSR of the Company

H11 – There is significant relationship between the HRM roles with effectiveness of CSR of the Company

Correlations

Correlations

R_1 R_2 R_3 R_4 R_5 R_6 R_7 R_8 R_9 R_10 R_11 R_12 R_13 R_14 R_15 R_16 R_17 R_18 R_19 R_20 R_21 C_1

R_1

Pearson Correlation

1 .894** .830** .863*

* .850** .851** .818** .854*

* .869** .807** .719** .810** .870*

* .862*

* .819*

* .857*

* .881*

* .889** .790** .826*

* .843** .647**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_2

Pearson Correlation

.894*

* 1 .923** .938*

* .935** .938** .924** .924*

* .939** .928** .869** .933** .946*

* .935*

* .933*

* .954*

* .970*

* .977** .916** .941*

* .931** .793**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_3

Pearson Correlation

.830*

* .923** 1 .970*

* .950** .961** .952** .975*

* .978** .961** .944** .959** .963*

* .953*

* .959*

* .953*

* .922*

* .938** .960** .928*

* .985** .868**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_4

Pearson Correlation

.863*

* .938** .970** 1 .955** .960** .937** .977*

* .979** .952** .915** .947** .981*

* .962*

* .947*

* .970*

* .933*

* .957** .941** .919*

* .963** .856**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_5

Pearson Correlation

.850*

* .935** .950** .955*

* 1 .975** .951** .969*

* .964** .976** .916** .967** .954*

* .985*

* .981*

* .945*

* .944*

* .940** .953** .911*

* .960** .872**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_6

Pearson Correlation

.851*

* .938** .961** .960*

* .975** 1 .943** .954*

* .969** .964** .924** .954** .951*

* .962*

* .967*

* .951*

* .946*

* .945** .954** .919*

* .972** .875**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_7

Pearson Correlation

.818*

* .924** .952** .937*

* .951** .943** 1 .948*

* .948** .951** .949** .976** .935*

* .958*

* .968*

* .930*

* .928*

* .929** .964** .940*

* .960** .885**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_8 Pearson Correlation

.854*

* .924** .975** .977*

* .969** .954** .948** 1 .979** .965** .926** .957** .967*

* .974*

* .957*

* .954*

* .920*

* .942** .954** .915*

* .967** .865**

403 | P a g e

Page 18: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_9

Pearson Correlation

.869*

* .939** .978** .979*

* .964** .969** .948** .979*

* 1 .961** .922** .953** .968*

* .969*

* .953*

* .962*

* .931*

* .954** .949** .926*

* .981** .857**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_10

Pearson Correlation

.807*

* .928** .961** .952*

* .976** .964** .951** .965*

* .961** 1 .926** .972** .943*

* .972*

* .976*

* .950*

* .924*

* .940** .953** .927*

* .966** .868**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_11

Pearson Correlation

.719*

* .869** .944** .915*

* .916** .924** .949** .926*

* .922** .926** 1 .946** .900*

* .910*

* .946*

* .903*

* .879*

* .892** .948** .890*

* .934** .940**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_12

Pearson Correlation

.810*

* .933** .959** .947*

* .967** .954** .976** .957*

* .953** .972** .946** 1 .946*

* .971*

* .987*

* .938*

* .933*

* .935** .968** .935*

* .964** .878**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_13

Pearson Correlation

.870*

* .946** .963** .981*

* .954** .951** .935** .967*

* .968** .943** .900** .946** 1 .959*

* .946*

* .963*

* .934*

* .955** .939** .906*

* .960** .850**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_14

Pearson Correlation

.862*

* .935** .953** .962*

* .985** .962** .958** .974*

* .969** .972** .910** .971** .959*

* 1 .971*

* .949*

* .939*

* .944** .948** .922*

* .966** .856**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_15

Pearson Correlation

.819*

* .933** .959** .947*

* .981** .967** .968** .957*

* .953** .976** .946** .987** .946*

* .971*

* 1 .939*

* .942*

* .935** .969** .924*

* .964** .885**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_16

Pearson Correlation

.857*

* .954** .953** .970*

* .945** .951** .930** .954*

* .962** .950** .903** .938** .963*

* .949*

* .939*

* 1 .951*

* .976** .932** .938*

* .950** .852**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_17

Pearson Correlation

.881*

* .970** .922** .933*

* .944** .946** .928** .920*

* .931** .924** .879** .933** .934*

* .939*

* .942*

* .951*

* 1 .966** .924** .944*

* .928** .815**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

404 | P a g e

Page 19: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

R_18

Pearson Correlation

.889*

* .977** .938** .957*

* .940** .945** .929** .942*

* .954** .940** .892** .935** .955*

* .944*

* .935*

* .976*

* .966*

* 1 .922** .940*

* .942** .829**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_19

Pearson Correlation

.790*

* .916** .960** .941*

* .953** .954** .964** .954*

* .949** .953** .948** .968** .939*

* .948*

* .969*

* .932*

* .924*

* .922** 1 .934*

* .963** .900**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_20

Pearson Correlation

.826*

* .941** .928** .919*

* .911** .919** .940** .915*

* .926** .927** .890** .935** .906*

* .922*

* .924*

* .938*

* .944*

* .940** .934** 1 .940** .808**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_21

Pearson Correlation

.843*

* .931** .985** .963*

* .960** .972** .960** .967*

* .981** .966** .934** .964** .960*

* .966*

* .964*

* .950*

* .928*

* .942** .963** .940*

* 1 .869**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

C_1

Pearson Correlation

.647*

* .793** .868** .856*

* .872** .875** .885** .865*

* .857** .868** .940** .878** .850*

* .856*

* .885*

* .852*

* .815*

* .829** .900** .808*

* .869** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Ho2 - There is no significant relationship between the effectiveness of HRM in implementation of CSR with employee’s engagement score.

H12 – There is significant relationship between the effectiveness of HRM in implementation of CSR with employee’s engagement score

Correlations

R_1 R_2 R_3 R_4 R_5 R_6 R_7 R_8 R_9 R_10 R_11 R_12 R_13 R_14 R_15 R_16 R_17 R_18 R_19 R_20 R0_21 E_10

R_1

Pearson Correlation 1 .894** .830** .863** .850** .851** .818** .854** .869** .807** .719** .810** .870** .862** .819** .857** .881** .889** .790** .826** .843** .939**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_2 Pearson Correlation .894** 1 .923** .938** .935** .938** .924** .924** .939** .928** .869** .933** .946** .935** .933** .954** .970** .977** .916** .941** .931** .910**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

405 | P a g e

Page 20: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_3

Pearson Correlation .830** .923** 1 .970** .950** .961** .952** .975** .978** .961** .944** .959** .963** .953** .959** .953** .922** .938** .960** .928** .985** .809**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_4

Pearson Correlation .863** .938** .970** 1 .955** .960** .937** .977** .979** .952** .915** .947** .981** .962** .947** .970** .933** .957** .941** .919** .963** .856**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_5

Pearson Correlation .850** .935** .950** .955** 1 .975** .951** .969** .964** .976** .916** .967** .954** .985** .981** .945** .944** .940** .953** .911** .960** .842**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_6

Pearson Correlation .851** .938** .961** .960** .975** 1 .943** .954** .969** .964** .924** .954** .951** .962** .967** .951** .946** .945** .954** .919** .972** .831**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_7

Pearson Correlation .818** .924** .952** .937** .951** .943** 1 .948** .948** .951** .949** .976** .935** .958** .968** .930** .928** .929** .964** .940** .960** .809**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_8

Pearson Correlation .854** .924** .975** .977** .969** .954** .948** 1 .979** .965** .926** .957** .967** .974** .957** .954** .920** .942** .954** .915** .967** .833**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_9

Pearson Correlation .869** .939** .978** .979** .964** .969** .948** .979** 1 .961** .922** .953** .968** .969** .953** .962** .931** .954** .949** .926** .981** .842**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_10 Pearson Correlation .807** .928** .961** .952** .976** .964** .951** .965** .961** 1 .926** .972** .943** .972** .976** .950** .924** .940** .953** .927** .966** .812**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

406 | P a g e

Page 21: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_11

Pearson Correlation .719** .869** .944** .915** .916** .924** .949** .926** .922** .926** 1 .946** .900** .910** .946** .903** .879** .892** .948** .890** .934** .694**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_12

Pearson Correlation .810** .933** .959** .947** .967** .954** .976** .957** .953** .972** .946** 1 .946** .971** .987** .938** .933** .935** .968** .935** .964** .819**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_13

Pearson Correlation .870** .946** .963** .981** .954** .951** .935** .967** .968** .943** .900** .946** 1 .959** .946** .963** .934** .955** .939** .906** .960** .880**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_14

Pearson Correlation .862** .935** .953** .962** .985** .962** .958** .974** .969** .972** .910** .971** .959** 1 .971** .949** .939** .944** .948** .922** .966** .856**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_15

Pearson Correlation .819** .933** .959** .947** .981** .967** .968** .957** .953** .976** .946** .987** .946** .971** 1 .939** .942** .935** .969** .924** .964** .818**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_16

Pearson Correlation .857** .954** .953** .970** .945** .951** .930** .954** .962** .950** .903** .938** .963** .949** .939** 1 .951** .976** .932** .938** .950** .874**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_17

Pearson Correlation .881** .970** .922** .933** .944** .946** .928** .920** .931** .924** .879** .933** .934** .939** .942** .951** 1 .966** .924** .944** .928** .896**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_18 Pearson Correlation .889** .977** .938** .957** .940** .945** .929** .942** .954** .940** .892** .935** .955** .944** .935** .976** .966** 1 .922** .940** .942** .900**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

407 | P a g e

Page 22: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_19

Pearson Correlation .790** .916** .960** .941** .953** .954** .964** .954** .949** .953** .948** .968** .939** .948** .969** .932** .924** .922** 1 .934** .963** .768**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_20

Pearson Correlation .826** .941** .928** .919** .911** .919** .940** .915** .926** .927** .890** .935** .906** .922** .924** .938** .944** .940** .934** 1 .940** .830**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_21

Pearson Correlation .843** .931** .985** .963** .960** .972** .960** .967** .981** .966** .934** .964** .960** .966** .964** .950** .928** .942** .963** .940** 1 .816**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

C_11

Pearson Correlation .939** .910** .809** .856** .842** .831** .809** .833** .842** .812** .694** .819** .880** .856** .818** .874** .896** .900** .768** .830** .816** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

H03 - There is no significant relationship between the effectiveness of HRM in implementation of CSR with employee’s retention.

H13 – There is significant relationship between the effectiveness of HRM in implementation of CSR with employee’s retention.

Correlations

R_1 R_2 R_3 R_4 R_5 R_6 R_7 R_8 R_9 R_10 R_11 R_12 R_13 R_14 R_15 R_16 R_17 R_18 R_19 R_20 R_21 ER

R_1

Pearson Correlation 1 .894** .830** .863** .850** .851** .818** .854** .869** .807** .719** .810** .870** .862** .819** .857** .881** .889** .790** .826** .843** .902**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_2 Pearson Correlation .894** 1 .923** .938** .935** .938** .924** .924** .939** .928** .869** .933** .946** .935** .933** .954** .970** .977** .916** .941** .931** .919**

408 | P a g e

Page 23: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_3

Pearson Correlation .830** .923** 1 .970** .950** .961** .952** .975** .978** .961** .944** .959** .963** .953** .959** .953** .922** .938** .960** .928** .985** .811**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_4

Pearson Correlation .863** .938** .970** 1 .955** .960** .937** .977** .979** .952** .915** .947** .981** .962** .947** .970** .933** .957** .941** .919** .963** .856**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_5

Pearson Correlation .850** .935** .950** .955** 1 .975** .951** .969** .964** .976** .916** .967** .954** .985** .981** .945** .944** .940** .953** .911** .960** .834**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_6

Pearson Correlation .851** .938** .961** .960** .975** 1 .943** .954** .969** .964** .924** .954** .951** .962** .967** .951** .946** .945** .954** .919** .972** .819**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_7

Pearson Correlation .818** .924** .952** .937** .951** .943** 1 .948** .948** .951** .949** .976** .935** .958** .968** .930** .928** .929** .964** .940** .960** .795**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_8

Pearson Correlation .854** .924** .975** .977** .969** .954** .948** 1 .979** .965** .926** .957** .967** .974** .957** .954** .920** .942** .954** .915** .967** .834**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_9

Pearson Correlation .869** .939** .978** .979** .964** .969** .948** .979** 1 .961** .922** .953** .968** .969** .953** .962** .931** .954** .949** .926** .981** .835**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_10 Pearson Correlation .807** .928** .961** .952** .976** .964** .951** .965** .961** 1 .926** .972** .943** .972** .976** .950** .924** .940** .953** .927** .966** .820**

409 | P a g e

Page 24: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_11

Pearson Correlation .719** .869** .944** .915** .916** .924** .949** .926** .922** .926** 1 .946** .900** .910** .946** .903** .879** .892** .948** .890** .934** .686**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_12

Pearson Correlation .810** .933** .959** .947** .967** .954** .976** .957** .953** .972** .946** 1 .946** .971** .987** .938** .933** .935** .968** .935** .964** .811**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_13

Pearson Correlation .870** .946** .963** .981** .954** .951** .935** .967** .968** .943** .900** .946** 1 .959** .946** .963** .934** .955** .939** .906** .960** .876**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_14

Pearson Correlation .862** .935** .953** .962** .985** .962** .958** .974** .969** .972** .910** .971** .959** 1 .971** .949** .939** .944** .948** .922** .966** .843**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_15

Pearson Correlation .819** .933** .959** .947** .981** .967** .968** .957** .953** .976** .946** .987** .946** .971** 1 .939** .942** .935** .969** .924** .964** .811**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_16

Pearson Correlation .857** .954** .953** .970** .945** .951** .930** .954** .962** .950** .903** .938** .963** .949** .939** 1 .951** .976** .932** .938** .950** .874**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_17

Pearson Correlation .881** .970** .922** .933** .944** .946** .928** .920** .931** .924** .879** .933** .934** .939** .942** .951** 1 .966** .924** .944** .928** .893**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_18 Pearson Correlation .889** .977** .938** .957** .940** .945** .929** .942** .954** .940** .892** .935** .955** .944** .935** .976** .966** 1 .922** .940** .942** .887**

410 | P a g e

Page 25: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_19

Pearson Correlation .790** .916** .960** .941** .953** .954** .964** .954** .949** .953** .948** .968** .939** .948** .969** .932** .924** .922** 1 .934** .963** .774**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_20

Pearson Correlation .826** .941** .928** .919** .911** .919** .940** .915** .926** .927** .890** .935** .906** .922** .924** .938** .944** .940** .934** 1 .940** .836**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_21

Pearson Correlation .843** .931** .985** .963** .960** .972** .960** .967** .981** .966** .934** .964** .960** .966** .964** .950** .928** .942** .963** .940** 1 .812**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

ER

Pearson Correlation .902** .919** .811** .856** .834** .819** .795** .834** .835** .820** .686** .811** .876** .843** .811** .874** .893** .887** .774** .836** .812** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

H04 - There is no significant relationship between the effectiveness of HRM in implementation of CSR with brand image of the Company

H14 – There is significant relationship between the effectiveness of HRM in implementation of CSR with brand image of the Company

Correlations

R_1 R_2 R_3 R_4 R_5 R_6 R_7 R_8 R_9 R_10 R_11 R_12 R_13 R_14 R_15 R_16 R_17 R_18 R_19 R_20 R_21 BI

R_1

Pearson Correlation 1 .894** .830** .863** .850** .851** .818** .854** .869** .807** .719** .810** .870** .862** .819** .857** .881** .889** .790** .826** .843** .900**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

411 | P a g e

Page 26: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

R_2

Pearson Correlation .894*

* 1 .923** .938** .935** .938** .924** .924** .939** .928** .869** .933** .946** .935** .933** .954** .970** .977** .916** .941** .931** .932**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_3

Pearson Correlation .830*

* .923** 1 .970** .950** .961** .952** .975** .978** .961** .944** .959** .963** .953** .959** .953** .922** .938** .960** .928** .985** .870**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_4

Pearson Correlation .863*

* .938** .970** 1 .955** .960** .937** .977** .979** .952** .915** .947** .981** .962** .947** .970** .933** .957** .941** .919** .963** .914**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_5

Pearson Correlation .850*

* .935** .950** .955** 1 .975** .951** .969** .964** .976** .916** .967** .954** .985** .981** .945** .944** .940** .953** .911** .960** .885**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_6

Pearson Correlation .851*

* .938** .961** .960** .975** 1 .943** .954** .969** .964** .924** .954** .951** .962** .967** .951** .946** .945** .954** .919** .972** .868**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_7

Pearson Correlation .818*

* .924** .952** .937** .951** .943** 1 .948** .948** .951** .949** .976** .935** .958** .968** .930** .928** .929** .964** .940** .960** .857**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_8 Pearson Correlation

.854*

* .924** .975** .977** .969** .954** .948** 1 .979** .965** .926** .957** .967** .974** .957** .954** .920** .942** .954** .915** .967** .894**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

412 | P a g e

Page 27: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_9

Pearson Correlation .869*

* .939** .978** .979** .964** .969** .948** .979** 1 .961** .922** .953** .968** .969** .953** .962** .931** .954** .949** .926** .981** .904**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_10

Pearson Correlation .807*

* .928** .961** .952** .976** .964** .951** .965** .961** 1 .926** .972** .943** .972** .976** .950** .924** .940** .953** .927** .966** .896**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_11

Pearson Correlation .719*

* .869** .944** .915** .916** .924** .949** .926** .922** .926** 1 .946** .900** .910** .946** .903** .879** .892** .948** .890** .934** .765**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_12

Pearson Correlation .810*

* .933** .959** .947** .967** .954** .976** .957** .953** .972** .946** 1 .946** .971** .987** .938** .933** .935** .968** .935** .964** .868**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_13

Pearson Correlation .870*

* .946** .963** .981** .954** .951** .935** .967** .968** .943** .900** .946** 1 .959** .946** .963** .934** .955** .939** .906** .960** .907**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_14

Pearson Correlation .862*

* .935** .953** .962** .985** .962** .958** .974** .969** .972** .910** .971** .959** 1 .971** .949** .939** .944** .948** .922** .966** .908**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_15 Pearson Correlation .819*

* .933** .959** .947** .981** .967** .968** .957** .953** .976** .946** .987** .946** .971** 1 .939** .942** .935** .969** .924** .964** .860**

413 | P a g e

Page 28: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_16

Pearson Correlation .857*

* .954** .953** .970** .945** .951** .930** .954** .962** .950** .903** .938** .963** .949** .939** 1 .951** .976** .932** .938** .950** .921**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_17

Pearson Correlation .881*

* .970** .922** .933** .944** .946** .928** .920** .931** .924** .879** .933** .934** .939** .942** .951** 1 .966** .924** .944** .928** .899**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_18

Pearson Correlation .889*

* .977** .938** .957** .940** .945** .929** .942** .954** .940** .892** .935** .955** .944** .935** .976** .966** 1 .922** .940** .942** .935**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_19

Pearson Correlation .790*

* .916** .960** .941** .953** .954** .964** .954** .949** .953** .948** .968** .939** .948** .969** .932** .924** .922** 1 .934** .963** .823**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_20

Pearson Correlation .826*

* .941** .928** .919** .911** .919** .940** .915** .926** .927** .890** .935** .906** .922** .924** .938** .944** .940** .934** 1 .940** .894**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

R_21

Pearson Correlation .843*

* .931** .985** .963** .960** .972** .960** .967** .981** .966** .934** .964** .960** .966** .964** .950** .928** .942** .963** .940** 1 .881**

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

414 | P a g e

Page 29: ANNEXURE - I List of Companies Selected for the Study

ANNEXURE VI--SPSS Correlation Hypothesis Test Reports

BI

Pearson Correlation .900*

* .932** .870** .914** .885** .868** .857** .894** .904** .896** .765** .868** .907** .908** .860** .921** .899** .935** .823** .894** .881** 1

Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000

N 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673 673

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

415 | P a g e