annexure 1 guideline framework for the compilation … · guideline framework for the compilation...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
DRAFT
GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION
OF SURVEY REPORTS
TECHNICAL SURVEY REPORT 1. SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER 3. SURVEYED BY (Name of organisation that performed the survey) 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
4.1 Locality of the survey area 4.2 Terrain type description 4.3 Size of the survey 4.4 Date and duration of the survey 4.5 Surveyors involved (Names, qualifications and registration numbers).
5. EXECUTION OF THE SURVEY PROJECT
5.1 Instrumentation and equipment used 5.2 Special aids 5.3 Application of special techniques 5.4 Detail description of methodology applied
5.4.1 Horizontal fixing 5.4.2 Vertical fixing
5.4.3 DTM observations
5.4.4 Structural surveys
5.4.5 Add to this list any other surveys undertaken on the project
ANNEXURE 1
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 2: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
DRAFT
5.5 Problem situations and solving of problems 5.6 Delays due to unforeseen circumstances 5.7 Survey projection system and height datums
6. QUALITY CONTROL
6.1 Detail description of quality control methodology 6.2 Accuracies (Provide a summary of accuracies obtained)
6.2.1 Horizontal control accuracies
6.2.2 Vertical control accuracies
6.2.3 DTM accuracies
6.2. 4 Structural accuracies
6.2.5 Out of specification tolerances accepted
ANNEXURE 1
(CONTINUED)
7. RECORDS
(Records submitted to the client and the format of digital data supplied.)
8. RECOMMENDATIONS (Results from the survey to be kept in mind for future surveys in the same
area.) 9. GENERAL INFORMATION (Information that the surveyor wants to bring to the attention of the client,
and not mentioned elsewhere in the report.)
SIGNATURE
Printed Name
Designation
Plato Registration Number
Date
NOTE: This report can be supplemented with photographs and bound into the hard copy job file.
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 3: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
DRAFT}(300m Survey Area
Buffer Zone)
Instrument on Survey Station B
Survey Station A
Survey Station C
AD
VA
NC
E W
AR
NIN
G A
REA
1
AD
VA
NC
E W
AR
NIN
G A
REA
2
KM 0.60
KM 0.30
KM 0
Survey assistant
TIN11.3
TIN11.3
TW336 &
TW336 &
300
M
300
M
Flagman no. 2 , 50m behind flagman no. 1
Flagman no. 1 , 20m behind survey assistant
Flagman no. 4 , 50m in front of flagman no. 3
Flagman no. 3 , 20m in front of survey assistant
ANNEXURE 2
TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR WORKING
ON THE ROAD PRISM AND UP TO 5M
FROM THE ROAD PRISM
LOW VOLUME TRAFFIC ROADSFOR
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 4: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
DRAFTWorking area
Traffic Cones
}
75 M
}30 M
}
20 M
}30 M
Flagman 3 , 75m behind flagman no. 2
Flagman no. 4
Flagman no. 1 , 20m behind working area
Flagman no. 2 , 30m behind Flagman no. 1
ANNEXURE 3
TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR STATIC
WORK ON THE ROAD PRISM AND WITHIN 5M
OF THE ROAD PRISM FOR SHORT PERIODS
LOW VOLUME TRAFFIC ROADSFOR
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 5: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
DRAFT}30 M
}
20 M
50 M
}
Survey Instrument
Staff Carrier
Staff Carrier
Flagman no. 3
Flagman no. 1 , 20m behind Staff Carrier
Flagman no. 2 , 50m behind Flagman no. 1
ANNEXURE 4
TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR SURVEYORS
MOVING ONLY ON THE SHOULDER OF THE ROAD
OR WITHIN 5M OUTSIDE THE ROAD PRISM.
LOW VOLUME TRAFFIC ROADSFOR
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 6: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
DRAFT
1000m
}(300m Survey Area Buffer Zone)
Instrument on Survey Station B
1000m
Survey Station A
}
50 M
Survey Station C
AD
VA
NC
E W
AR
NIN
G A
REA
1
AD
VA
NC
E W
AR
NIN
G A
REA
2
KM 0.60
KM 0.30
KM 0
Survey assistant
TIN11.3
TIN11.2
TIN11.3
TW336 &
TW336 &
TW336 &
TW336 &
TIN11.2
High Visibility Vehicle
500
M
500
M
Amber Flashing Lights
Black on YellowClass & Retroreflective Panels
TW336
ANNEXURE 5
TR103/TR104 Sign (To be
Rotated to Indicate the Safe Passing Side).
Flagman no. 5 , 30m in front of flagman no. 4
Flagman no. 4 , 20m in front of Surveyor
Flagman no. 3 , 20m behind surveyor
Flagman no. 2 , 30m behind flagman no. 3
Flagman no. 1
TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR WORKING
ON THE ROAD PRISM AND UP TO 5M
HIGH FROM THE ROAD PRISM FOR
VOLUME SINGLE CARRIAGE WAY ROADS
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 7: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
DRAFTHigh Visibility Vehicle is 20m behind working area
Working areaTraffic Cones
Flagman 3
High Visibility Vehicle
}
75 M
}30 M
}
20 M
}30 M}300 M
TW336
Class & Retroreflective PanelsBlack on Yellow
To Indicate the Safe Passing Side).TR103/TR104 Sign (To be Rotated
Amber Flashing Lights
ANNEXURE 6
Flagman no. 2 , 75m behind flagman no. 1
Flagman no. 1 , 30m behind High Visibility Vehicle
WORK ON THE ROAD PRISM AND WITHIN 5M
OF THE ROAD PRISM FOR SHORT PERIODS
TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR STATIC
FOR HIGH VOLUME SINGLE CARRIAGE WAY ROADS
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 8: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
DRAFT}30 M
}
20 M
High Visibility Vehicle
30 M
}}
75 M
Survey Instrument
High Visibility Vehicle
TW336
Class & Retroreflective PanelsBlack on Yellow
To Indicate the Safe Passing Side).TR103/TR104 Sign (To be Rotated
Amber Flashing Lights
Staff Carrier
Staff Carrier
ANNEXURE 7
Flagman no. 3
Flagman no. 1 , 30m behind High Visibility Vehicle
Flagman no. 2 , 75m behind flagman no. 1
TRAFFIC ACCOMMODATION FOR SURVEYORS
MOVING ONLY ON THE SHOULDER OF THE ROAD
OR WITHIN 5M OUTSIDE THE ROAD PRISM.
HIGH VOLUME SINGLE CARRIAGE WAY ROADSFOR
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 9: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 8
FILM INDEX
JOB DESCRIPTION:
SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER: FLIGHT PLAN NUMBER:
LOCALITY:
CONTACT SCALE: PHOTOGRAPHY DONE BY:
FLIGHT PLAN SCALE:
FILM NUMBER: DATE:
STRIP NUMBER PHOTO NUMBER REMARKS
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 10: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 9
PREMARKS
ANNEXURE 9.1 Premark for photogrammetric aerial surveys
ANNEXURE 9.2 Premark for lidar surveys
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 11: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
DRAFTA
1000
B= A/2
2 2
C
B
PREMARK FOR AERIAL SURVEY
PREMARK FOR PHOTOGRAPHY (ALL SCALES)
ANNEXURE 9.1
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 12: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 9.2
600 m
m
PREMARK FOR LIDAR SURVEY FOR POSITION AND HEIGHT
Survey peg
NOTE:
The permanent survey control can be premarked in terms of Annexure 9.1 as if for
100% flat surface painted white.
Use a concrete slab or any
other durable surface such as
Concrete thickness minimum 5cm
1:6000 scale aerial photography
road paving etc.
Existing permanent survey control points have to be used as photo ground control points for all lidar and photogrammetric surveys
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 13: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
DRAFT16mm O STEEL ROD
OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED
50mm FINISHINGLAYER
GROUND LEVEL 255
CONICAL CONCRETE BEACON
N2/25NRB 76/10
ANNEXURE 10
250 m
m
300 m
m275m
m
450m
m
145m
m
16mm
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 14: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
DRAFT
1. DRIVE IRON STANDARD INTO GROUND
TO ENSURE STABILITY IN SOFT MATERIAL
250 mm BEACON COLUMN WITH
PVC OR PITCH FIBER
CASING PAINTED WHITE
200mm LONG
SLEEVE FOR TARGET
SCREED TOP TO
SMOOTH SURFACE
REMOVABLE TARGET 20mm
GALVANISED PIPE PAINTED
RED, WHITE AND BLACK
PILLAR BEACON
WHITE
RED
BLACK
PVC OR PITCH FIBRE CASING
FILL WITH 4:3:1 CONCRETE
2. CONCRETE MIX TO BE 4:3:1 (STONE, SAND ,CEMENT)
NOTES:
SECTION A-A
A A
ANNEXURE 11
150 mm
200mm
END OF PVC/PITCH FIBRE CASTING, 150MM INTO THE CONCRETE BASE
THE REINFORCED STEEL SHALL BE CASTED 450MM
INTO THE BASE AND WILL PROTRUDE 1250MM
ABOVE THE BASE
150 mm
150 mm
1300mm
500mm
500mm 500mm
GROUND LEVEL
8mm reinforced steel bars,1600mm in length ,
with wire binders every 200mm
8mm REINFORCED BARS WITHWIRE BINDERS
BRASS/STAINLESS STEEL STUDIN BASE
CONCRETE BASE
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 15: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 12
CO-ORDINATE LIST
SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
SURVEYED BY:
SYSTEM: WG Lo …..… °
NAME & HEIGHT OF DATUM LEVEL POINT
HEIGHT DATUM:
DATE SURVEYED:
SURVEY STATION METRES
Y± METRES
X+
HEIGHT ABOVE M.S.L.
BEACON DESCRIPTION
SURVEYED BY: Name _________________________
CHECKED AND CERTIFIED BY: Name _________________________
SIGNATURE: ______________________________
DATE: ______________________________
PLATO Reg. No.: ______________________________
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 16: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
DRAFT
8.6Km
NRB107/10 NRB107/10 686.887 686.887NRB107/10 NRB01/11 4.660 -4.661 -0.001 4 4.660 NRB01/11 691.547NRB01/11 NRB02/11 1.810 -1.810 0.000 5 1.810 NRB02/11 693.358NRB02/11 NRB03/11 5.156 -5.155 0.001 6 5.156 NRB03/11 698.514NRB03/11 NRB04/11 -0.892 0.890 -0.002 7 -0.891 NRB04/11 697.622NRB04/11 NRB05/11 0.830 -0.828 0.002 8 0.829 NRB05/11 698.451NRB05/11 NRB06/11 -3.350 3.349 -0.001 4 -3.350 NRB06/11 695.101NRB06/11 NRB07/11 5.140 -5.142 -0.002 5 5.141 NRB07/11 700.242NRB07/11 NRB08/11 3.016 -3.016 0.000 6 3.016 NRB08/11 703.258NRB08/11 NRB09/11 0.841 -0.842 -0.001 7 0.842 NRB09/11 704.100NRB09/11 NRB10/11 -0.595 0.603 0.008 * 8 -0.599 NRB10/11 703.501NRB10/11 NRB11/11 -1.235 1.238 0.002 4 -1.236 NRB11/11 702.264NRB11/11 NRB12/11 -0.432 0.435 0.003 5 -0.434 NRB12/11 701.830NRB12/11 NRB13/11 -9.880 9.884 0.003 6 -9.882 NRB13/11 691.949NRB13/11 NRB14/11 1.494 -1.491 0.003 7 1.493 NRB14/11 693.441NRB14/11 NRB15/11 -9.495 9.492 -0.002 8 -9.493 NRB15/11 683.948NRB15/11 NRB16/11 -7.599 7.598 -0.002 4 -7.599 NRB16/11 676.349NRB16/11 NRB17/11 -0.895 0.899 0.004 5 -0.897 NRB17/11 675.452NRB17/11 NRB18/11 11.189 -11.191 -0.002 6 11.190 NRB18/11 686.642NRB18/11 NRB19/11 -5.196 5.202 0.006 * 7 -5.199 NRB19/11 681.443NRB19/11 NRB20/11 -5.672 5.674 0.002 8 -5.673 NRB20/11 675.770NRB20/11 NRB21/11 -3.516 3.522 0.006 * 4 -3.519 NRB21/11 672.251NRB21/11 NRB22/11 13.042 -13.045 -0.003 5 13.043 NRB22/11 685.295NRB22/11 NRB23/11 0.509 -0.510 -0.001 6 0.509 NRB23/11 685.804NRB23/11 NRB24/11 -8.158 8.163 0.005 7 -8.160 NRB24/11 677.644NRB24/11 NRB25/11 7.063 -7.069 -0.006 * 8 7.066 NRB25/11 684.710NRB25/11 NRB26/11 -5.549 5.550 0.001 4 -5.550 NRB26/11 679.160NRB26/11 NRB27/11 2.172 -2.171 0.001 5 2.172 NRB27/11 681.332NRB27/11 NRB28/11 4.508 -4.509 -0.001 6 4.509 NRB28/11 685.840NRB28/11 TSOBM 6 0.891 -0.891 0.000 7 0.891 TSOBM 6 686.731 -0.035 686.696
CHECKS TOTAL -0.143 0.169 0.026 172 -0.156 CHECK -0.156
Allowable error between forward and reverse levelling: 0.003 X √ no of setups
Allowable Closure 0.039Actual Closure 0.026 Pass
Allowable error between Terminal points: 0.013 X √ Total distance in Km between terminal points
Allowable Closure 0.038Actual Closure -0.035 Pass
Out of tolerance closures. Maximum closure between points 300m apart is.005m
Checked by:
Signature Name Plato No
ANNEXURE 13
Beacon Number
Provisional Heights
LEVELS BASED ON NRB107 = 686.887m A.M.S.L. and TSOBM 6 = 686.696m A.M.S.L.
LEVELLING RESULTS
Final Heights
Job Description
Levelling circuit from to
From To Level Forward
Level Reverse Difference No of
Setups Corrections
Total distance
Mean height difference
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 17: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 14
REPORT FOR THE VERIFICATION OF EXISTING PERMANENT
SURVEY CONTROL
ANNEXURE 14.1 Beacon construction verification status report
ANNEXURE 14.2 Co-ordinate and height verification survey results
ANNEXURE 14.3 Framework for the compilation of survey reports for verification of survey control
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 18: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
DRAFT
BEACON CONSTRUCTION VERIFICATION STATUS REPORT
SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER: ........................................................................... SURVEYED BY:......................................................
SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ........................................................................... DATE OF SURVEY: .....................................................
Beacon Number
Beacon Appearance Beacon Tag Beacon
Stability Vegetation
Cleaned Fence post painted at
beacon Arrow on Tar
Beacon Distance from
Fence COMMENTS
. G = Good OR B = Bad Y = Yes OR N = No Meter NRB1/11 B G B Y N Y 1.2 (Example)
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
4.1
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 19: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
DRAFT
CO-ORDINATE AND HEIGHT VERIFICATION SURVEY RESULTS
SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER: ......................................................................................... SURVEYED BY: ............................................................................
SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ......................................................................................... DATE SURVEYED: ............................................................................
Beacon No REF Y X Z Y X Z DY DX DZ
1 NRB13/12 REF -97974.92 2759809.57 865.508 20.817 865.508 0.000
2 NRB11/12 -97408.53 2761386.99 869.357 -97408.565 2761386.975 869.494 0.035 0.015 -0.137 890.311 -20.940 869.371 -0.014 869.351 0.006
3 NRB12/12 -97473.55 2761321.10 868.628 -97473.585 2761321.056 868.755 0.035 0.044 -0.127 889.572 -20.934 868.638 -0.010 868.624 0.004
4 NRB14/12 -97935.27 2759737.04 863.112 -97935.273 2759737.015 863.108 0.003 0.025 0.004 883.925 -20.813 863.112 0.000 863.109 0.002
5 NRB15/12 DESTROYED
6 NRB16/12 -98349.21 2758042.76 846.255 -98349.209 2758042.741 846.105 -0.001 0.019 0.150 866.922 -20.678 846.244 0.011 846.260 -0.005
7 NRB17/12 -99851.54 2757055.62 856.217 -99851.559 2757055.634 855.930 0.019 -0.014 0.287 876.747 -20.531 856.216 0.001 856.218 -0.001
8 NRB18/12 -99966.91 2756981.93 854.513 -99966.917 2756981.943 854.209 0.007 -0.013 0.304 875.026 -20.520 854.506 0.007 854.520 -0.007
9 NRB19/12 -101380.99 2756022.20 859.710 -101381.023 2756022.177 859.251 0.033 0.023 0.459 880.068 -20.387 859.681 0.029 859.712 -0.002
10 NRB20/12 -101477.61 2755959.02 860.484 -101477.658 2755958.985 860.024 0.048 0.035 0.460 880.841 -20.378 860.463 0.021 860.481 0.003
11 NRB26/12 REF -105853.24 2751868.68 822.025 19.880 822.020 0.005
NRB20/12 -101477.61 2755959.02 860.484 -101477.619 2755958.992 861.019 0.009 0.028 -0.535 880.899 -20.378 860.521 -0.037 860.479 0.005
12 NRB21/12 -102822.86 2754837.19 822.386 -102822.874 2754837.195 822.740 0.014 -0.005 -0.354 842.620 -20.231 822.389 -0.003 822.384 0.002
13 NRB22/12 -102910.35 2754748.76 823.096 -102910.347 2754748.754 823.447 -0.003 0.006 -0.351 843.327 -20.220 823.107 -0.011 823.100 -0.004
14 NRB23/12 -104374.54 2753232.73 820.103 -104374.553 2753232.741 820.274 0.013 -0.011 -0.171 840.154 -20.034 820.120 -0.017 820.108 -0.005
15 NRB24/12 -104443.44 2753161.29 821.354 -104443.439 2753161.298 821.499 -0.001 -0.008 -0.145 841.379 -20.025 821.354 -0.017 821.365 -0.011
16 NRB25/12 -105793.73 2751949.47 821.072 -105793.741 2751949.461 821.074 0.011 0.009 -0.002 840.954 -19.886 821.068 0.004 821.079 -0.007
17 NRB27/12 -107353.06 2750953.38 830.620 -107353.069 2750953.384 830.473 0.009 -0.004 0.147 850.353 -19.749 830.604 0.016 830.626 -0.006
18 NRB28/12 -107446.71 2750900.02 828.479 -107446.709 2750900.055 828.305 -0.001 -0.035 0.174 848.185 -19.740 828.445 0.034 828.488 -0.009
19 NRB29/12 -108950.28 2749926.04 832.215 -108950.278 2749926.052 831.894 -0.002 -0.012 0.321 851.774 -19.578 832.196 0.019 832.226 -0.011
20 NRB30/12 -109014.97 2749847.77 829.294 -109014.970 2749847.767 828.975 0.000 0.003 0.319 848.855 -19.569 829.286 0.008 829.298 -0.004
21 NRB31/12 -110246.18 2748732.36 822.584 -110246.154 2748732.339 822.118 -0.026 0.021 0.466 841.998 -19.408 822.590 -0.006 822.589 -0.005
22 NRB32/12 -110315.78 2748636.99 826.037 -110315.748 2748636.928 825.543 -0.032 0.062 0.494 845.423 -19.397 826.026 0.011 826.036 0.001
23 NRB33/12 -111498.17 2747340.61 832.477 -111498.120 2747340.594 831.842 -0.050 0.016 0.635 851.722 -19.249 832.473 0.004 832.480 -0.003
24 NRB34/12 -111530.51 2747256.54 834.946 -111530.486 2747256.529 834.300 -0.024 0.011 0.646 854.180 -19.243 834.937 0.009 834.945 0.001
GPS CHECK SURVEY
GPS BASE STATION FOR CHECK SURVEY
EXISTING MINUS CHECK VALUESA
NN
EX
UR
E 1
4.2
Difference
existing Z
MINUS ortho
corrected GPS
levels
Ortho
corrected GPS
levels
No of
beacons
verified
Diff existing Z
MINUS check
survey spirit
levelled heights
Check survey
spirit levelled
heights
Add REFERENCE
BEACON geoid
separation to
GPS heights
Geoid
separation at
individual
Beacons
GPS BASE STATION FOR CHECK SURVEY
CO-ORDINATES TO BE CHECKED (Existing)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 20: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 14.3
FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION OF SURVEY REPORT FOR VERIFICATION OF SURVEY CONTROL
1. SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER 3. SURVEYED BY (Name of organisation that performed the survey)
4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
4.1 Locality of the survey area
4.2 Terrain type description
4.3 Date and duration of the survey
4.4 Surveyors involved (Names, qualifications and registration numbers).
5. EXECUTION OF THE SURVEY PROJECT
5.1 Instrumentation and equipment used
5.2 Detail description of methodology applied
5.2.1 Horizontal verification including orientation and calibration results as well as beacons used to
do the calibration
5.2.2 Vertical verification including levelling results as per Annexure 13
5.3 Problem situations and solving of problems
5.4 Survey projection system and height datums used to verify the existing survey
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 21: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
DRAFT
6. VERIFICATION RESULTS
6.1 Accuracies (General discussion on the accuracies found through the verification survey)
6.1.1 Horizontal accuracies: Comments on beacon verification survey results and supply a list of
the out of tolerance beacons showing the beacon numbers, dy and dx errors. (Also attach a
spread sheet as per Annexure 14.2 to this report).
6.1.2 Vertical accuracies: Comments on beacon verification results and supply a list of the out of
tolerance beacons showing the dz errors. (Also attach a spread sheet as per Annexure 14.2
to this report).
6.1.3 Beacon construction status: Supply a list of beacon numbers not conforming to the
requirements. General comments on beacons quality and appearance. (Also attach spread
sheet as per Annexure 14.1 and provide photos to prove the non-compliance of the
beacons.
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
(The Surveyor must make a recommendation indicating whether these beacons and their
values are acceptable for future use. If no such recommendation can be made, the
Surveyor has to advise the Client on actions to be taken in order to rectify the quality and/or
accuracy of the control).
8. RECORDS
(List all records submitted to the Client and indicate the format of digital data supplied. All
new survey data and reductions shall be supplied.)
9. GENERAL INFORMATION
(Supply any other information that the surveyor wants to bring to the attention of the Client,
which is not mentioned elsewhere in this report.)
SIGNATURE .............................................................
Printed Name .............................................................
Designation .............................................................
Plato Registration Number ..............................................................
Date .............................................................
NOTE: This report can be supplemented with photographs and binded into the hard copy
job file.
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 22: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
DRAFT
SURVEY FEATURE CODES
Common abbreviations to be used with the codes below
ABBREVIATION DESCRIPTION
B- Bottom of ………..... Use the relevant abbreviation below C- Centre of ………...... Use the relevant abbreviation below CONC- Concrete ……….…. Use the relevant abbreviation below CR- Corner of ……..…… Use the relevant abbreviation below E- End of ………..……. Use the relevant abbreviation below ED- Edge of ……………. Use the relevant abbreviation below L- Left of …………..…. Use the relevant abbreviation below MID- Middle of ………….. Use the relevant abbreviation below R- Right of ………...…. Use the relevant abbreviation below T- Top of ……………… Use the relevant abbreviation below
X-
If measurements are not to be included in DTM Use the relevant abbreviation below
DESCRIPTION CODE
Abutment AB Arrow AW Bank (natural features, river, donga, etc.…) B Beginning of curve BCURVE Beginning of transition curve BTC Bench mark BM Boom Security BOOM Borehole BH Box culvert BC Break-point BP Bridge BRG Bridge deck BD Bridge Pier PIER Building BLD Cable duct CD Cable marker CM Catch pit CP Centre line CL Centreline road - broken and solid lines CLBS Centreline Road - broken lines CLB Centreline road - solid lines CLS Change of slope CS Channel CH Concrete CONC Concrete / cement CC Concrete palisade wall PAL Corner Building 1, 2 etc. (All common building points with same number) CB1 Crossing power line XPL Crossing telephone line XTL Crown Line – if not the same as CL CROWN Culvert CULV Curb C Curve CURVE Dam DAM
ANNEXURE 15
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 23: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
DRAFT
Dashed white line DWL Drain D Drive way DW Drop inlet DI Duct DUCT End curve ECURVE Fence (Wire fence) F Fence electric FE Fence post FP Fence Security FS Fence stock proof FSP Field Inlet (Storm water) FI Fill of existing road FILL Fire Hydrant FH Floor Level FL Foot bank (natural features, river, donga, etc.) FB Furrow FUR Gate GT Gate post GP Geotechnical bore hole GBH Geotechnical test pit GTPT Grave yard GY Gravel road GRD Gravel shoulder of existing road GS Ground G Guardrail GR Gutter GU Headwall HW House HS Invert level IL Invert level with pipe size IL100 Kerb K Kerb inlet KI Kilometre marker old KM 23 KMO23 Kilometre marker (32.2N – add number) KM (32.2N) Lamp post (Light pole) LP Land L Left hand side LHS Manhole MH Median M Neotel manhole NEOMH Overhang of building OH Paving PV Pillar PILL Pipe P Pipe culvert PC Pipe line Marker PLM Post office manhole POM Power box PB Power line PL Power pole PP Pre cast wall PREW Pylon PYLN Railway line RL Red line RL Reservoir RES Right hand side RHS River RIV Road R Rock RCK Rocky area RCKA Rondaval (Survey 3 Shots) ROND Security fence SF
ANNEXURE 15
(CONTINUED)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 24: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
DRAFT
Septic tank ST Sewer manhole SEWMH Shoulder SH Side drain SDR Side walk SWLK Sign board (number of poles for board) SB(1) Sign gantry SG Sign post SP Slope (spot shot between BP and TOE) SLP Soffit level SL Soil S Solid white line SWL Spot shot SS Stake value SV Stay pole STYP Stay wire STYW Steel palisade wall SPAL Stone pitched STP Stop street road marking STOP Storm water manhole SWMH Stream STR Tap Water TAP Tar T Telephone booth TPB Telephone line TL Telephone pole TP Telkom cable marker TCM Telkom manhole TELMH Toe of embankment/cut/fill TOE Toilet TOI Track TR Traffic sign TS Transformer TF Transition curve TC Tree TRE Underground pipe line UPL Wall (Brick) W Water WA Water course WC Water pipe WP Water pipe and size WP150 Water valve WV Wing wall WW 'Y' standard YSD Yellow line YL
Note: If no specific code is provided in this list then new codes may be created taking into
account the principles used for the creation of the codes in the list of survey feature codes.
The Surveyor shall also supply a list of the newly created feature codes to the Client
on submission of the survey.
ANNEXURE 15
(CONTINUED)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 25: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 16
TYPICAL POSITIONS TO BE SURVEYED ON A ROAD,
STREET AND RAIL PRISMS
ANNEXURE 16.1 Typical positions for single carriageway survey points
ANNEXURE 16.2 Typical positions for dual carriageway and city street survey points
ANNEXURE 16.3 Typical positions for rail prism and track survey points
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 26: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
DRAFT
ROAD MARKINGS ROAD MARKINGS
ROAD MARKINGS ROAD MARKINGS
TYPICAL POSITIONS TO BE SURVEYED ON A ROAD PRISM
AN
NE
XU
RE
16
.1
TYPICAL POSITIONS FOR SINGLE CARRIAGEWAY SURVEY POINTS
(ROAD IN CROSS-FALL & RAMPS)
TYPICAL POSITIONS FOR SINGLE CARRIAGEWAY SURVEY POINTS
(ROAD IN CAMBER)
NATURAL GROUND
NATURAL GROUND
NATURAL GROUND
NATURAL GROUND
TOESHBP
CR
TD
SHBPBD
TB
TOESHBP
TBBD
TD
SHBP
BEDT
TEDT(100MM FROM ACTUAL EDGE)
BEDT
TEDT(100MM FROM ACTUAL EDGE)
BEDT
TEDT(100MM FROM ACTUAL EDGE)
BEDT
TEDT(100MM FROM ACTUAL EDGE)C.L
C.L
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 27: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
DRAFTTYPICAL POSITIONS FOR DUAL CARRIAGEWAY SURVEY POINTS
TYPICAL POSITIONS TO BE SURVEYED ON A ROAD PRISM
AN
NE
XU
RE
16
.2
NATURAL GROUND
NATURAL GROUND
NATURAL GROUND NATURAL GROUND
TOESHBP
SHBP
TD
BDTBTEDT
TEDT
TEDTTEDT
BEDT
BEDTBEDT
BEDT
CM
C.L
C.L
C.L
EC
BCHBCH
EC
ED TAR ED TAR
PAVING
ED PAVING ED PAVING
PAVING
TYPICAL POSITIONS FOR CITY STREETS SURVEY POINTS
NOTE: TEDT IS 100mm FROM THE ACTUAL EDGE
NOTE: TEDT IS 100mm FROM THE ACTUAL EDGE
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 28: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
DRAFTTYPICAL POSITIONS TO BE SURVEYED ON A RAIL PRISM
AN
NE
XU
RE
16
.3
NATURAL GROUND
NATURAL
GROUND
TB
TD
BD
SHBP
CRLCRL
SHBP
ED-SLEEPER
ED-SLEEPER
TOE
TB
TOE
TBTOE
TYPICAL POSITIONS FOR RAIL PRISM AND TRACK SURVEY POINTS
NOTE 1: HEIGHTS TAKEN ON TOP OF THE RAIL NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DTM
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 29: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
DRAFTROADS
AN
NE
XU
RE
17
BC
IL
BC
BWW
BWW
TWW
TWW
THW
THW
EDHW( ON GROUND )
BWW BC BC BWWIL
TWW TWWTHW THW
90
A
A
B
H
ELEVATION A - A
CULVERT & STRUCTURES
Extent of concrete slab
Extent of concrete slab
PLAN VIEW
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 30: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 18
TYPICAL SURVEY POINTS ON BRIDGES
ANNEXURE 18.1 Position of cross-section for top and bottom deck survey points (Bridge Deck)
ANNEXURE 18.2 Positions and dimensions of survey positions on Bridge Piers
ANNEXURE 18.3 Positions of survey points on Soffit Edges and Abutments
ANNEXURE 18.4 Dimensions to be surveyed and shown on the final drawings for gantries (Sectional view) ANNEXURE 18.5 Dimensions to be surveyed and shown on the final drawings for gantries (Top view)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 31: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
DRAFT
AN
NE
XU
RE
18
.1
STRUCTURAL SURVEY
BRIDGE DECK
A B C D E F G H
K L M NA
O P
T1 T2 T3
B1 B2
B3 B4
B5 B6
SIDE VIEWNOTE:
SECTION A - A POSITIONS ON THE BOTTOM AND
TOP CROSS - SECTIONS TO BE SURVEYED
-It is the intention that the dimensions of all structural elementsneed to be surveyed
-Side walks on the bridgeshall also be included
in the top cross- section
A
-All positions shall be surveyed in y , x and z
POSITION OF CROSS-SECTION FOR TOP DECK SURVEY POINTS (A TO H)POSITION OF CROSS-SECTION FOR BOTTOM DECK SURVEY POINTS (K TO P)
Position of actual shapeand balustrade
Position of actual shapeand balustrade
-The numbering coventionfor spot shots shall be
as followscross- section at position A (TOP)
AT1,AT2,AT3cross- section at position N (BOTTOM)
NB1,NB2,NB3
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 32: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
DRAFT
AN
NE
XU
RE
18
.2
BRIDGE PIER
STRUCTURAL SURVEY
LEGEND
Y X Z CO - ORDINATES
MEASURED DISTANCES
.
ds
A B C D
A
AB
UT
ME
NT
AB
UT
ME
NT
SOFFIT EDGESOFFIT EDGE
ds ds ds ds
S S S
DIMENSIONS AND SHAPEOF COLUMN
INCREASING CHAINAGE
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
A
observationpoints
to determinethe shape
of thepiers
SECTION A - A
NOTE: Sufficient shots shall be taken to
determine the shape of the piers
PLAN
Top foundation
Top pier
Bottom pier on foundation
.
. . . .
...
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 33: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
DRAFT
AN
NE
XU
RE
18
.3
SOFFIT EDGE & ABUTMENTS
STRUCTURAL SURVEY
LEGEND
.
F= FOUNDATION
S=MEASURED DISTANCE
=Y X Z CO - ORDINATES
G=GROUND
S=SOFFIT
R=RIGHT
A=ABUTMENT
L=LEFT
SECTION ALONG SOFFIT EDGE
SECTION ALONG SOFFIT EDGE
SOFFIT EDGE SOFFIT EDGE
POSITIONS DIRECTLY BELOWSOFFIT EDGE
LEFT POSITIONS RIGHT POSITIONS
10M
10M
10M
10M
10M RA14
RA1
RA2RA3
RA4RA5
RA6
RA7RA8
RA9
RA10
RA11
RA12
RAB
10M
RF1RF7
RG1 RG2RF3
RF4 RF5
RF6
RG3RG4 RG8
RF7
SURVEY POSITIONS ALONG THE RIGHT HAND SOFFIT EDGE
NOTE:
SECTION A - A
A
A
Position descriptions along the left hand side shall start with L
Position of actual shapeand balustrade
Position of actual shapeand balustrade
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 34: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
DRAFT154 DURBAN
Higginson H’way
ChatsworthPort Shepstone
CE
NT
RE
LIN
E
CE
NT
RE
LIN
E
TOP OF PLATE = 78162mm
SCALE 1:50
SECTIONAL VIEW
360mm
620mm
790mm
7130mm
5370mm180mm
1240mm
270mm
3040mm
250mm
36mm
3400mm
1290mm
200mm
5610mm2380mm
450mm
5610mm
24590mm
200mm
676mm
1760mm
5460mm
180mm
7220mm
300mm
7190mm
TOP OF PLATE = 77767.00mm
TOP OF CONCRETE = 77468.00mm
ELEVATION=86238mm
ELEVATION=87413mm ELEVATION=86657mm
6370mm
ELEVATION=86202mm
TOP OF CONCRETE = 77870mm
AN
NE
XU
RE
18
.4
GANTRIES - SECTIONAL VIEW
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 35: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
DRAFT 77.412BC
78.159BC
77.757BC 77.762BC
77.761BC
79.105BC
84.199BG
84.242BG 84.201BG
86.238BG
77.466BOLT 77.468BOLT
77.465BOLT
77.464BOLT
77.463BOLT
77.458BOLT 77.462BOLT
77.457BOLT
77.460BOLT
77.337BOLT
77.864BOLT 77.857BOLT 77.870BOLT
77.868BOLT 77.873BOLT
77.861BOLT
77.858BOLT
77.820BOLT
84.465BP
84.501BP
84.746BP
84.757
BP 84.505
BP 86.013BP
79.105P
78.984P 78.981P
77.354PL
77.358PL
77.351PL
77.412PL
77.820PL
77.822PL
77.764PL
77.760TC
77.756TC
77.761TC
77.468TC
78.162TC
78.162TC
77.870TC
86.118TG 86.133TG 85.362TG
85.309TG 86.604TG
86.657TG 87.424TG 87.413TG
84.167TG
86.236TP 86.007TP
86.008TP
86.202TP 85.976TP
84.705TP
86.257TP
77.767TP
SIGNBOARD SIGNBOARD
CE
NT
RE
LIN
E
CE
NT
RE
LIN
E
SCALE 1:50
TOP VIEW
24590mm
120mm
90mm
120mm
100mm
880mm
430mm
180mm
TOP OF BOLT=77462.00mm
430mm
880mm
120mm
90mm120mm
100mm
SOP 1 - Y= 4980.3125 X= 3312003.3925
TOP OF BOLT=77462.00mm
SCALE 1:5
see inset 1
INSET 1 INSET 2
SCALE 1:5
TOP OF BOLT=77858mm
TOP OF BOLT=77858mm
SOP 2 - Y= 5004.8025 X = 3312001.1995
SEE INSET 2
880m
m
100mm 120mm 90mm 120mm
45.00mm
75.00mm 75.00mm
45.00mm
120mm90mm120mm100mm
430mm430mm
880m
m
AN
NE
XU
RE
18
.5
GANTRIES - TOP VIEW
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 36: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 19
CAD CONFIGURATION AND CONVERSION TABLES
BETWEEN PEN SIZES AND LINE WEIGHTS
ANNEXURE 19.1 CAD configuration pages Pages 1 to 10
ANNEXURE 19.2 Conversion table between Pen sizes and Line weights as per CAD configuration requirements
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 37: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 1 of 10
CAD CONFIGURATION
SIZES SPECIFIED ARE FOR 1:1000 DRAWINGS: TO BE CHANGED FOR OTHER SCALES
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
1
Title, Border, etc. Title, Border: Proclamation sketches Strip No. of Proclamation sketches To the Client’s requirements
0 0 Blue (33)
Sheet: A0PSP Sheet: A4CAD
Place Cell / Block
1:1000 Ø = 6mm Text = 25mm height
(1:10 000)
2 Cadastral Boundaries Farm boundary Erven/Portion/Sub-division boundary International Boundary Provincial Boundary District and Municipal Boundary Centre line (River) and Farm Boundary
2 1 2 2 2 2
0 0 0 0 0 0
Red (51) White (0) Red (51) Red (51) Red (51) Red (51)
Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear
3
Servitudes Lines
1
3
White (0)
Linear
4
Cut and Fill Top Bottom Hatching
1 0 0
0 2 0
Brown (22) Brown (6) Brown (6)
Bank Bank Bank
5
Contours Major Minor Major Labels Minor Labels
1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
Brown (86) Brown (6)
Brown (86) Brown (6)
Contour Contour Contour Contour
Place Place
Label: TH = 2.0mm TW = 2.0mm Label: TH = 2.0mm TW = 2.0mm
6
Water Features Edge River Flow arrows for rivers & canals (centre river) Chute Canaling Water Edge Canal
1 1 0 1
0 0 0 0
Blue (15) Blue (15) Blue (1) Blue (1)
Linear Linear Linear Linear
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 38: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 2 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
Streams/Ditches: Perennial River Seasonal River Concrete Furrow Drainage Furrow
0 0 1 0
0 0 0 0
Blue (1) Blue (1)
Blue (17) Blue (17)
Linear Linear Linear Linear
7 Roads Major Tar Minor Gravel, Gravel Road Gravel Shoulder Remains Road Minor Tar Bridge Culvert Guard Rail Kerb Sign Board (All Road Signs) Overhead Road Signs Route Marker/Km Stone Route Marker/Km Stone Text
1 1 0 0 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0
0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Red (35) Red (19) Red (19) Red (3)
Red (19) Red (35) Red (19) Grey (80)
Green (130) Purple (21) Purple (21) Green (2) Green (2)
Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear
Structure Linear Symbol Linear Symbol Linear Symbol
Text
Miscellaneous, Sign Board SB 1, SB 2
Miscellaneous, Km/RM TH = 2.0mm TW = 2.0mm
8
Railways Single Track Electrified Track Signal
1 1 0
0 0 0
Red (3) Red (3) Red (3)
Linear Linear Symbol
9
Dams + Lakes Lakes/Pans/Dams (Outline) Dam Symbol (Water Symbol)
1 0
0 0
Blue (17) Blue (7)
Linear Symbol
Geological
10 Constructed Development Permanent Building Temporary Building Hatching Buildings Outline Buildings Ruins Water Tank Sport Fields/Courts Catch Pit Fire Hydrant Flag Pole
2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 0 0
Red (19) Red (19) Red (3)
Red (19) Red (19) Blue (17)
Green (18) Red (19) Blue (23) White (0)
Structure Structure 45° Angle Structure Structure Structure
Structure Symbol Symbol
Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 39: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 3 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
Graves Manhole Monument Tap/Breather Dip Trough Silo Kraal Inspection Hole Radio Mast Rondavel/Hut Carport Foundation Stoep Ramp Shack Reservoir Fuel Tank Septic Tank Windmill Well Fountain Graveyard Outline Concrete Wall Dry Stone Wall Borehole Building under Construction Ruins Walls
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Purple (29) Blue (17)
Purple (29) Blue (23) Blue (17) Blue (17) Red (19) Red (19) Red (19) Red (19) Red (19) Red (19)
Green (130) Green (130) Green (130)
Grey (8) Red (35) Blue (71) Blue (71) Blue (71)
Grey (120) Blue (17)
Purple (29) Red (19)
Brown (190) Blue (23) Red (3) Red (3)
Red (19)
Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol
Structure Structure Symbol Linear Symbol
Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Structure Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Linear Linear Linear Linear Symbol Symbol Linear
Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells
11
Fences Standard Boundary (cadastral) Security Gate Cattle Grid
0 2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Blue (1) White (0) Blue (1) Blue (1)
Grey (120)
Linear Linear Linear Symbol Symbol
Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells Place cells
12
Vegetation Outline Symbol Golf Course Outline
0 0 0
1 0 1
Green (2) Green (2) Green (2)
Linear Symbol Linear
Cultivation, land
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 40: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 4 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
Land/Cultivation Bush Trees Reeds Hedge Irrigated Land Irrigated Vineyard Orchard/Vineyard Plantation Forrest Reeds/Marsh
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
Green (2) Green (2) Green (2)
Green (90) Green (98) Green (2)
Green (2) Blue (71)
Green (2) Green(2) Green (2) Green (2)
Green (90) Blue (71)
Symbol Symbol Symbol Symbol Linear Symbol Symbol
Symbol
Symbol
Symbol
Bush Trees Reeds Linear
Cultivation, hatch area Cultivation, hatch area Cultivation, hatch area
Trees, hatch area
Reeds, hatch area
13
Electric Power Powerline U/G Cables
0 0
0 2
Red (3) Red (3)
Pole Linear
14
Telephone + Telec + Radio Poles (telephone, electric) Outer circle Inner circle Light Pole Outer circle Inner circle Line Underground Line Poles Telephone pole without position
0 2
0 2
0 0 0 1
0 0
0 0
0 2 0 1
White(0) Red (3)
White (0) Red (3)
Green (2) Green (2) Green (2) Green (2)
Pole Pole
Pole Pole
Linear Pole Pole Pole
15
Pipelines Underground gas pipeline Optic fibre cables Surface Pipe Underground Pipe
1 1
1 1
3 3
0 3
Green (18) Green (18)
Blue (17) Blue (17)
Linear Linear
Linear Linear
16
Shafts Shafts
0
0
Red (3)
Shaft
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 41: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 5 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
17
Paths Footpath Track
0 0
2 3
Brown (22) Brown (6)
Linear Linear
18
DTM Mark (Observations) DTM Mark (Observations)
0
0
White (0)
Cell
19
Mining Lease Mining Lease Boundary Beacon
2 0
0 0
Green (18) Green (18)
20
Grid + Values Grid + Values
1
0
White (0)
21
Sand + Rock Sand Symbol Outline Rock Symbol Outline Solid Rock/Scattered Rock
0 0
0 0 0
0 5
0 5 0
Brown (22) Brown (22)
Brown (6) Brown (22) Brown (6)
Symbol Linear
Symbol Linear Symbol
Geological Geological
Geological Geological Geological
22
Fire Break Fire Break Soil Erosion/Eroded Area
0 0
2 2
Brown (6) Brown (22)
Linear Linear
23
Servitude Diagram Text Servitude Diagram Text
0
0
White (0)
Text
TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
24 Control All text 2.5mm height NRB Symbol NRB Height NRB Number Photo control (X, Y, Z)
1 1 1 1
0
0 0 0 0
0
White (0) White (0) White (0)
Red (35)
SPoint, NRB SPoint, DES
Structure
Symbol
3mm and 1.5mm Ø 25mm Ø TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
θ 3mm Ø TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 42: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 6 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
Trig Bench Mark Trig Survey Beacon Temporary Survey Station Photo ground control (X, Y) HP Horizontal Photo ground control (Z) LPC Vertical PGC (photogram) CP/PC Traverse Arrow
1 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
White (0) Red (35)
Purple (21) Red (35) Red (35) Red (35) White (0)
Circle & Text Spoint, PGC
SPoint TSBM
SPoint, TBN SPoint, TEMP
SPoint, HP SPoint, LPC SPoint, CP
Symbol
TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
θ 3mm Ø TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm θ 3mmØ TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm θ 3mmØ TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm θ 3mmØ TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
25
Spot height mark Spot height mark
0
0
White (0)
SPoint, Spot
26
Township street + gravel roads Township Streets Gravel Road
1 1
0 3
White (0) White (0)
27
DTM Height (Observation) DTM Height
0
0
White (0)
TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
28
Default 2
29
Township Dimensions Township Dimensions
0
0
Red (19)
TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
30 Co-ordinate List Co-ordinate List
0
0
White (0)
TH = 2.0mm TW = 2.0mm
31 North Arrow + Sheet Layout North Arrow Project Number Sheet Layout
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Red (19) White (0) White (0) White (0)
Symbol
North Arrow TH = 2mm TW = 2mm Place Block, 45 x 30
TH = 3mm TW = 3mm
32 Text For Cadastral Farm Name
1
0
Red (51)
TH = 7mm TW = 7mm
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 43: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 7 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
Subdivision Name Name on Boundary Street Name International Boundary Provincial Boundary District/Municipal Boundary Centre Line River and Farm Boundary Erven/Agricultural Holdings Town or Farm Boundary
1 0 2 2 1 1 1 0
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
White (0) White (0) White (0) White (0) White (0) White (0) Red (35) White (0)
White (0)
TH = 4.5mm TW = 4.5mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm
TH = 4.5mm TW = 4.5mm Or TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
TH = 4mm TW = 4mm
33 Text for Servitudes Text for Servitudes
0
0
White (0)
TH = 4.5mm TW = 4.5mm
34 Text for cut and fill Text for cut and fill
0
0
White (0)
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
35 Text for spot height Text for spot height
0
0
White (0)
TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
36 Text for Water Features Text for Water Features
1
0
Blue (15)
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
37 Text for Roads Text for Roads Text for Clearance Heights Text for Overhead Sign Board/Gantries Destination Description Route Description Bridge Annotation Culvert Description Culvert Arrow Km Stone Description Route Mark Description Sign Board Ellipse Text Sign Board Text
0 0 0 0 0 0 1
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
Red (3) White (0) White (0) Red (35) Red (19) Red (35) White (0)
Red (19)
Geen(2)
Red (19)
Purple (21)
Purple (21)
Text Text Text Text
Structure Needle
Structure
Structure
Symbol
Symbol
Symbol
Text
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm TH = 4mm TW = 4mm
Misc Des, Block & TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
Symbol: Indicator
Misc Des, Circle & TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
Misc Des, Block & TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
SB Ellipse & TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 44: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 8 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
Destination Arrow Road Markings: Solid White (0) Solid Yellow Centre Line etc. Dashed White Line Two Solid and one Dashed White Line One Solid and one Dashed White Line
0
0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0 0 0 2
0&2&0 0&2
Red (35)
White (0) Yellow (4) White (0) White (0) White (0) White (0)
Symbol
Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear Linear
Destination Arrow
38
Text for Railways Text for Railways Station Name
0 0
0 0
White (0) White (0)
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 5mm TW = 5mm
39
Text for Dams + Lakes Text for Dams + Lakes
0
0
Blue (17)
TH = 2mm TW = 2mm
40 Text for Constructed Development Text for Constructed Development
1
0
Colour should match the colour of the
symbol eg. (17), (18) etc.
All text on this level: TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
41
Text for Fences Text for Fences
1
0
Blue (17)
All text on this level:
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
42 Text for Vegetation Text for Vegetation
1
0
Green (18)
All text on this level:
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
43 Text for Electric Power Text for Electric Power
1
0
Red (19)
All text on this level:
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
44 Text for Telephone + Telec + Radio Text for Telephone + Telec + Radio
1
0
Green (18)
All text on this level:
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
45 Text for Pipelines Text for Pipelines Text for Gas Pipelines Text for Optic Fibre Pipelines
1 1 1
0 0 0
Blue (17) Green (18) Green (18)
All text on this level:
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 45: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 9 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
46
Text for Shafts Text for Shafts
1
0
Green (18)
All text on this level:
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
47 Text for Paths Text for Paths
1
0
Red (19)
All text on this level:
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
48 Text for DTM Codes Text for DTM Codes
0
0
White (0)
All text on this level:
TH = 1.8mm TW = 1.8mm
49 Text for Mining Lease Text for Mining Lease
0
0
Green (18)
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
50 Photo Centres Symbol Text
1 0
0 0
Green (18) Green (18)
Symbol Symbol
Photo Centre TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
51
Text for Sand + Rock Text for Sand + Rock
0
0
White (0)
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
52
Text for Fire Break Text for Fire Break
0
0
Brown (22)
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm
53 National Road Reserve Line National Road Reserve Line
0
3 or 0
Red (51)
Import Sline, Adjust Configure Change style to (0) when NRR falls
on cadastral
54 National Road Reserve Beacon National Road Reserve Beacon
0
0
White (0)
Create Cell under SPoint
θ 3mmØ
55
Hatching of National Road Reserve Area Hatching of National Road Reserve Area
0
0
Green
Create Cell under Sign
Hatch Pattern Area 1:10 000 r = 1mm
56
National Road Reserve Beacon Number National Road Reserve Beacon Number
0
0
White (0)
SPoint (name)
TH = 2.5mm TW = 2.5mm TH = 15mm TW = 15mm (1:10 000)
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 46: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 10 of 10
LEVEL / LAYER
DESCRIPTION LINE WEIGHT
LINE STYLE
COLOUR AND CODE
CELLS REMARKS
57 Keyplan Number Text Keyplan Number Text
1
0
White (0)
58 Keyplan Sheet Number Text Keyplan Sheet Number Text
1
0
White (0)
59 Triangles Triangles
0
0
Green (50)
60 Cadastral Parcel Cut Lines Cadastral Parcel Cut Lines
0
0
Green (2)
61 Property Identifier Text Property Identifier Text
0
0
White (0)
62 Key Plan Extent Boundary Lines Key Plan Extent Boundary Lines
0
1
White (0)
63 Internal Sheet Extent Lines Internal Sheet Extent Lines
0
1
White (0)
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 47: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
DRAFTCONVERSION TABLE BETWEEN PEN SIZE
AND LINE WEIGHTS AS PER SPECIFICATION
PEN1
PEN WEIGHT
PEN2
PEN3
PEN4
PEN5
PEN6
PEN7
PEN8
PEN9
SIZESIZE WEIGHT PEN
PEN10
PEN11
PEN12
PEN13
PEN14
PEN15
PEN16
PEN17
PEN18
PEN19
PEN20
PEN21
PEN22
PEN23
PEN24
PEN25
PEN26
PEN27
PEN28
PEN29
PEN30
WEIGHT 0
WEIGHT 1
WEIGHT 2
WEIGHT 3
WEIGHT 4
WEIGHT 5
WEIGHT 6
WEIGHT 7
WEIGHT 8
WEIGHT 9
WEIGHT 10
WEIGHT 11
WEIGHT 12
WEIGHT 13
WEIGHT 14
WEIGHT 15
WEIGHT 16
WEIGHT 17
WEIGHT 18
WEIGHT 19
WEIGHT 20
WEIGHT 21
WEIGHT 22
WEIGHT 23
WEIGHT 24
WEIGHT 25
WEIGHT 26
WEIGHT 27
WEIGHT 28
WEIGHT 29
0.25
0.5
0.75
1.25
1.5
1.75
0.375
0.625
0.875
1
1.125
1.375
1.625
1.875
2
2.125
2.25
2.375
2.5
2.625
2.75
2.875
3
3.125
3.25
3.375
3.5
3.625
3.75
3.875
SIZE WEIGHT PEN
PEN30 WEIGHT 304
4.125PEN 31 WEIGHT 31
LINE STYLE
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
AN
NE
XU
RE
19
.2
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 48: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 20
LEVEL STRUCTURE FOR CAD WORK "Note: No level numbers shall be used, only level descriptions as indicated" Number Name to be used in the CAD layer structure 0 Default 1 Title + Border etc. 2 Cadastral Boundaries 3 Servitudes 4 Cut and Fill 5 Contours 6 Water Features 7 Roads 8 Railways 9 Dams + Lakes 10 Constructed Development 11 Fences 12 Vegetation 13 Electric power 14 Telephone + Telec + Radio 15 Pipelines 16 Shafts 17 Paths 18 DTM Marks (Observations) 19 Mining Lease 20 Grid + Values 21 Sand + Rock 22 Fire Break 23 Servitude Diagram Text 24 Survey Control 25 Spot height mark 26 Township streets + gravel roads 27 DTM Height (Observation) 28 Default 2 29 Township Dimensions 30 Coordinate-List 31 North Arrow + Sheet Layout 32 Text for Cadastral 33 Text for Servitudes 34 Text for cut + fill 35 Text for Spot height 36 Text for Water Features 37 Text for Roads 38 Text for Railways 39 Text for Dams + Lakes 40 Text for Constructed Development 41 Text for Fences 42 Text for Vegetation 43 Text for Electric power 44 Text for Telephone + Telec + Radio 45 Text for Pipelines 46 Text for Shafts 47 Text for Paths 48 DTM Codes 49 Text for Mining Lease 50 Photo Centres 51 Text for Sand + Rock 52 Text for Fire Break 53 National Road Reserve Line 54 National Road Reserve Beacon 55 Hatching of National Road Reserve Area 56 National Road Reserve Beacon Number 57 Key Plan Number Text 58 Key Plan Sheet Number Text 59 Triangles 60 Cadastral Parcel Cut Lines 61 Property Identifier Text 62 Key Plan Extent Boundary Lines 63 Internal Sheet Extent Lines
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 49: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 21
CAD SYMBOL SIZES AND WEIGHTS
ANNEXURE 21.1 TO 21.27 CAD symbol sizes and weights
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 50: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
DRAFT204
1416,8
205
416 834
TITLE DESCRIPTION
TRIG SURVEY BEACON
TRIG SURVEY BENCH MARK
PERMANENT SURVEY STATION FIXED BY TRAVESING
STATE ELEVATION AND NUMBER
SURVEY DATA
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.1
LINE: WEIGHT 1
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
NRB 200
1520.000
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
= 25M
= 1.5M & 3.0M
O
O
BELOW THE SYMBOL
AT GROUND LEVEL
NUMBER ABOVE AND ELEVATION
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 51: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
DRAFT1120
AUX NR 6
83
PC 207
2416 83
4441
416 8SPOT HEIGHT
AERIAL PHOTO PRINCIPAL POINT
PHOTO GROUND CONTROL POINT
TEMPORARY SURVEY STATION
TITLE DESCRIPTION
TACHE SURVEYS
AND VERTICALLY
FIXED HORIZONTALLY
AND PHOTO NUMBER
STATE FLIGHTSTRIP
DOT INDICATES THE POSITION
SURVEY DATA
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
CIRCLE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.2
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
= 3.0M
= 3.0M
EDR
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
O
O
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 52: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
DRAFTTITLE
STREET NAMES
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY
PROVINCIAL BOUNDARY
DISTRICT OR MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY
TOWN OR FARM BOUNDARY
TEXT: WEIGHT 2 & TH=4 TW=4
TEXT: WEIGHT 2 & TH=4 TW=4
LINE: WEIGHT 2
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=4 TW=4
LINE: WEIGHT 2
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=4 TW=4
LINE: WEIGHT 2
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=4 TW=4
LINE: WEIGHT 2
BOUNDARIES
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.3
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
JONES STREET
(AVENUE,GROVE,SINGLE)OR SMALLER
SOUTH AFRICA
ZIMBABWE
GAUTENG
MPUMALANGA
PRETORIA
JOHANNESBURG
LOOF 391 - JR
VAALKOP 267 - JR
= 3.5M & 2.5MO
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 53: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
DRAFTCENTRE LINE
NOT REGISTERD SUBDIVISION
SERVITUDE OR APPROVED BUT
SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY
ERVEN OR FARM
TITLE
BOUNDARIES & CADASTRAL DATA
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 2
LINE: WEIGHT 1
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.4
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
LINE STYLE 3
LINE STYLE 4
LINE STYLE 0
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
FENCE ON CADASTRAL BOUNDARY
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 54: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
DRAFTSOLID LINE
DASHED LINE
2 SOLIDS AND A DASHED LINE
SOLID AND DASHED LINE
YELLOW LINE
TITLE
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.5
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 2
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 2
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 2
LINE STYLE 0
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
ROAD CENTER AND YELLOW LINE
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 55: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
DRAFTTITLE
NATIONAL ROAD RESERVE
BOUNDARY
NATIONAL ROAD RESERVE
BOUNDARY
FARM OR TOWNSHIP NAMES
SUBDIVISION NUMBERS
ERF OR AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS
NUMBERS OR SERVITUDES TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=4.5 TW=4.5
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=4.5 TW=4.5
= 3M
LINE: WEIGHT 0
= 3M
LINE: WEIGHT 0
BOUNDARIES & CADASTRAL DATA
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.6
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
REGISTERS ON AN EXISTING CADASTRAL BOUNDARY
DOES NOT REGISTER ON AN EXISTING CADASTRAL BOUNDARY
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=7 TW=7
PTN 8
679/SERV ROW
KLOOF 391-JR
O
O
L1 L2
R4 R5
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
OR SMALLER TO FIT AVAILABLE SPACE
OR SMALLER TO FIT AVAILABLE SPACE
OR SMALLER TO FIT AVAILABLE SPACE
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 56: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
DRAFT = 3M & 0.9M
CIRCLE: WEIGHT 2 & WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
= 3M & 0.9M
CIRCLE: WEIGHT 2 & WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
= 3M & 0.9M
CIRCLE: WEIGHT 2 & WEIGHT 0
CIRCLE: WEIGHT 2 & WEIGHT 0
= 3M & 0.9MSOLITARY
INDIVIDUAL POLE POSITIONS
FIXED BY SURVEY
INDIVIDUAL POLE POSITIONS
FIXED BY SURVEY
LAMP POST
PYLONS
POWER LINES
TELEPHONE LINE
TITLE DESCRIPTION
MISCELLANEOUS
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.7
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE STYLE 2
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
UNDER GROUND POWER CABLES MH MH
O
O
O
O
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 57: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
DRAFT
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 2
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 1
MISCELLANEOUS
DESCRIPTION
ABOVE GROUND: WATER
AIR, SEWER ETC.
TEMPORARY BUILDINGS
PERMANENT BUILDINGS
PIPE LINES
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.8
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
UNDER GROUND PIPE LINES
BELOW GROUND
(DESCRIBE APPROPRIATELY)
UNDER GROUND GAS PIPE LINES TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
LINE: WEIGHT 1
= 6.0M
= 6.0M
LINE STYLE 3
LINE STYLE 0
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTHTITLE
LINE STYLE 3
LINE STYLE 3
Eg.300MM WATER MAIN
Eg.100MM U/G SEWER
UNDER GROUND OPTIC FIBER CABLES
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 1
ABOVE GROUND
(DESCRIBE APPROPRIATELY)
LINE STYLE 0
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICELINE STYLE 3
ALL UNDER GROUND SERVICES
ALL ABOVE GROUND SERVICES
UNDER GROUND
(DESCRIBE APPROPRIATELY)
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE
OFC
G
O
O
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 58: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
DRAFT
BOX CULVERTS22 INDICATES THE NUMBER
ON THE SCHEDULE
21 INDICATES THE NUMBER
ON THE SCHEDULEPIPE CULVERTS
SILO
TROUGH
DIP
TITLE DESCRIPTION
MISCELLANEOUS
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5 AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.9
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZESYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
LINE: WEIGHT 2 (WING WALLS)
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 2 (WING WALLS)
LINE: WEIGHT 1 (DASH LINE)
TROUGH
SILO
1 X 60 O PC
IL=1234.67
2.0 X 3.0 BC
IL=1234.67
21
22
LINE: WEIGHT 1 (DASH LINE)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 59: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
DRAFTTITLE
SINGLE TRACK
SIGNALS
GATELINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=5 TW=5
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=5 TW=5
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 1
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.10
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
FENCING:
ANNOTATE TYPE OF FENCE
STANDARD FENCE
SECURITY FENCE
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
TO
TO TO
TO
LEFT RAIL
RIGHT RAIL
SIGNAL
ANNOTATE TYPE OF FENCE
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
RAILWAYS, ETC
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 60: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
DRAFTTO TON1/21
TO TON1/21
AND CONCRETE FURROW
GUARDRAIL,CURBING
GRAVEL SHOULDERS
TARRED ROAD:
FREEWAY WITH PAVED SHOULDERS
TARRED ROAD:
TITLE
ROADS
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=4 TW=4
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=4 TW=4
LINE: WEIGHT 2
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.9
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.1
1
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
GUARDRAIL
CURBING
CONCRETE FURROW
LINE: WEIGHT 2
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 3
LINE STYLE 0
SIDE DRAIN
CURB
GUARD RAIL
GUARD RAILCURB
SIDE DRAIN
EDGE OF TAR
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
SHOW DIRECTION OF FLOW
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 61: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
DRAFTFOOTPATH
GRAVEL ROAD
TITLE
ROADS
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.1
2
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
GRAVEL SHOULDER
REMAINS OF ROAD
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE STYLE 3
LINE STYLE 2
LINE STYLE 3
LINE STYLE 3
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTHSCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 62: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
DRAFTTITLE
ROADS
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.13
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
600
0P
IP
E
PIPE750 0
OV
ER
HE
AD
S
IGN
BO
AR
D
SIG
NB
OA
RD
OV
ER
HE
AD
OV
ER
HE
AD
SIG
NB
OA
RD
MANHOLE, CATCHPIT AND PIPELINE
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE STYLE:2
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE STYLE:2
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=1.8 TW=1.8
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5CLEARANCE HEIGHT : 8.4m
CLEARANCE HEIGHT : 8.4m
SERVICE: SW AS28
INVERT LEV: 337.071
COVER LEV: 339.131
CHAMBER:890X900
HEIGHT:2.060
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
OVERHEAD SIGNBOARDS/GANTRIES
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 63: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
DRAFTU/C R
CP
MH
WINDMILL
MONUMENT (DESCRIBE)
MANHOLE
OR RUIN
BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION
TITLE
MISELLANEOUS
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.1
4
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
CATCH PIT
DESCRIPTION TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 64: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
DRAFTBH
WT
FUEL TANK
WATER TANK
WELL
BOREHOLE
FOUNTAIN
TITLE
TOPOGRAPHY
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.1
5
FN
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
FT
W
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 65: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
DRAFTBOTRIVER
HKFL
CANAL
RESRES RES
TITLE
RIVER BANKS
RIVERS AND STREAMS
WATER COURSES
HIGHEST KNOWN
FLOOD LEVEL
RESERVOIRSSHOW ACTUAL SHAPE
AND DESCRIBE
STATE DATE OF FLOOD AND
SOURCE OF INFORMATION
PERENNIAL / SEASONAL
TOPOGRAPHY
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.16
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 0
INDICATE DIRECTION
OF FLOW AND DESCRIBE
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5CANALS
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 66: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
DRAFTTITLE
DAMS
LAKES
PANS
CLIFF
DONGA WITH ROCK CHECKS
TOPOGRAPHY
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.1
7
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 2
LINE STYLE 2
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 3
LINE STYLE 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 3
LINE STYLE 2
PERMANENT DRY
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
LINE: WEIGHT 0
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 67: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
DRAFT1105
1100
01020304
510
500
02
04
06
08
1525
1500
05
10
15
20
TITLE
WALLS
(DRY STONE)
TOPOGRAPHY
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2 TW=2
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2 TW=2
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.18
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
WALLS
(BRICK,CONCRETE,MASONRY)LINE: WEIGHT 1
RETAINING WALLS
(BRICK,CONCRETE,MASONRY,STONE)
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2 TW=2
LINE STYLE 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE STYLE 0
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2 TW=2
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2 TW=2
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2 TW=2
CONTOURS (1M INTERVALS)
CONTOURS (2M INTERVALS)
CONTOURS (5M INTERVALS)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 68: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
DRAFT600
02
SAND/PROSPECTING PIT
SURFACE EROSION
CONTOURS IN A DEPRESSION
TITLE
TOPOGRAPHY
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2 TW=2
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.1
9
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
EROSION
PROSPECTING PIT
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2 TW=2
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 69: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
DRAFTTITLE
CUTTING
EMBANKMENT
QUARRY OR DUMPLINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TOPOGRAPHY
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.2
0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 2
LINE STYLE 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 2
LINE STYLE 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE STYLE 0
LINE STYLE 2
SINKHOLE
NATURAL EMBANKMENT
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE STYLE 0
LINE: WEIGHT 1
LINE STYLE 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE STYLE 2
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5APPROPRIATELY
DESCRIBE
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 70: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
DRAFTTITLE
ROCK OUTCROP
SCATTERED ROCK
SOLID ROCK
GRAVE YARD
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TOPOGRAPHY
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.2
1
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
CENTRE OF THE GRAVE
INDICATES POSITION OF THE
INTERSECTION OF CROSS
GRAVE:
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 71: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
DRAFTVEGETATION
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
DENSE BUSH
MEDIUM DENSE BUSH
TITLE
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.22
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
TH =TEXT HEIGHT HT TW = TEXT WIDTH
SCATTERED BUSH
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 72: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
DRAFT
PLANTATION
(STATE TYPE OF TREE)
IRRIGATED CULTIVATION
TITLE
VEGETATION
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.23
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
TH =TEXT HEIGHT HT TW = TEXT WIDTH
LINE STYLE 1
LINE STYLE 1
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS
TEXT: WEIGHT 1 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 73: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
DRAFTCULTIVATION
ORCHARD OR VINEYARD
OR VINEYARD
IRRIGATED ORCHARD
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TITLE
VEGETATION
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.2
4
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
LINE STYLE 1
LINE STYLE 1
LINE STYLE 1
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 74: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
DRAFT
FOREST
SINGLE ROW OF TREES
AVENUE
HEDGE
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TITLE
VEGETATION
AN
NE
XU
RE
21
.25
LINE STYLE 1
LINE STYLE 0
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZESYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
SINGLE TREE
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 75: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
DRAFTVEGETATION
TITLE
MARSHLINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
AN
NE
XU
RE 2
1.2
6
LINE STYLE 1
LINE STYLE 1
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
SCREEN COLOURS1:1000
SYMBOL
TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
REEDS
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 76: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
DRAFTS
TAP
V
FH
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2.5 TW=2.5
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2 TW=2
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
LINE: WEIGHT 0
DESCRIPTION
ROADS
TITLE
KM DISTANCE MARKERS
GENERAL SIGN POST
TAP
VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
RADIO MAST
AN
NE
XU
RE
21.2
7
WEIGHT & LETTER SIZE
SIGN POST
SINGLE
SB
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2 TW=2
TEXT: WEIGHT 0 & TH=2 TW=2
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
SYMBOL1:1000
SCREEN COLOURS TH =TEXT HEIGHT TW = TEXT WIDTH
(( ))
DOT AT BOTTOM OF SIGN
INDICATES THE SURVEYED POSITION
DOT AT BOTTOM OF SIGN
INDICATES THE SURVEYED POSITION
DOT AT BOTTOM OF SIGN
INDICATES THE SURVEYED POSITION
DOT AT BOTTOM OF SIGN
INDICATES THE SURVEYED POSITION
CIRCLE REPRESENTS SURVEYED
POSITIONS OF SIGN POST POLE
DOUBLE POST
20.29
km
SP
CIRCLE REPRESENTS SURVEYED
POSITIONS OF SIGN BOARD POLES
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 77: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 22
CULVERT SCHEDULE
Survey Project: ................................................................... Project Description: .................................................................. Surveyed by: .................................................................. Date surveyed: ..................................................................
CULVERT NO. CO-ORDINATES CULVERT SIZE
& TYPE PHOTO
NUMBER REMARKS Y X INVERT LEVEL
1L 65248.95 2896044.76 1642.323 1500 X 1200 BC
1R 65244.81 2896052.76 1642.362
2L 65289.75 2895973.93 1644.558 900mm PC
2R 65288.59 2895973.44 1644.573
3L 65293.78 2895972.72 1644.389 450mm PC
3R 65071.32 2895863.32 1642.396
4L 63387.99 2895083.74 1601.332 750mm PC
4R 62993.53 2895217.33 1594.777
ANNEXURE 22
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 78: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 23
COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE
SURVEY PROJECT NUMBER: ……………………….…………………….…….......
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ……………………………………………………………………
I, the undersigned, being the duly authorized representative of the appointed survey company
on the above project, hereby warrant that:
1. All information as required by the project specifications have been supplied in full.
2. All field and office checks have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements
and specifications and the relevant quality control check list(s) have been supplied in full.
3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this
project.
Signed at ……………………….. this ……………. day of ……………………………………
___________________________ _________________________
Signed Name
PLATO Registration Number: ………………………………...……………..
For and on behalf of: (Survey Company) ……………………………………..
Note: The compliance certificate has to be submitted with the submission of the survey data and shall be bound in the job file.
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 79: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 24
QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST
ANNEXURE 24.1 Topographical ground surveys
ANNEXURE 24.2 Topographical photogrammetric surveys
ANNEXURE 24.3 Laser scanning (mobile)
ANNEXURE 24.4 Laser scanning (stationary)
ANNEXURE 24.5 Bridge structural surveys
ANNEXURE 24.6 Culvert structural surveys
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 80: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 1 of 8
QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR TOPOGRAPHICAL GROUND SURVEYS
SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: ……………………………………………………….. DATE: …………...……….
SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ………………………………………………………. REPORT NO: ……...…………….
JOB NUMBER: ……………………………………………………….
I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against and complies with the project specifications and TMH11 survey
requirements as stated in the survey instruction/contract documents.
The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction are marked as N/A.
SOME OF THE MOST IMPORANT REQUIREMENTS
Note: Not all requirements have been listed
Confirmation by a
registered Surveyor
1. PERMANENT SURVEY CONTROL
1.1 Were the permanent survey control observations and coordinates submitted to the Client for approval prior
to acceptance?
1.2 Was a final coordinate list supplied in Excel and hard copy formats for approval?
1.3 Did the final coordinate list conform to the requirements?
1.4 Were the beacons numbered correctly?
1.5 Was the final coordinate list signed by a registered Surveyor?
1.6 Did the positions (locations) of the permanent control meet the requirements?
1.7 Was the spacing of the control beacons correct in terms of the requirements?
(normally 300m for Road surveys – see specifications for bridge site surveys)
1.8 Did the fixing of the permanent beacons (horizontal and vertical) adhere to normal survey practice and
standards?
AN
NE
XU
RE
1
9
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.1
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 81: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 2 of 8
1.9 Did the accuracy meet the requirements?
1.10 Were the heights based on correct datum and was the datum height determined correctly?
1.11 Was the height datum point number and height shown on the coordinate list?
1.12 Were the calibration results between beacons for horizontal fixing submitted?
1.13 Can the calibration results be accepted?
1.14 Were the level comparisons between levels and check levels as well as the actual and allowable closing
errors supplied?
1.15 Were the independent height checks by GPS observation supplied?
Did the independent GPS height checks conform to the requirements?
1.16 Did the level accuracies between level and check levels adhere to TMH11 requirements?
1.17 Did the level closure between terminal points adhere to TMH11 requirements?
1.18 What percentage of height differences between level and check exceeds
5mm?
Note: Acceptable if not more than 5% exceeds 5mm and 0% exceeds
10mm
0 – 5mm
%
% > 10mm
1.19 Were the raw survey data supplied for fixing PRMs?
1.20 Was the process of fixing control in position and elevation fully discussed in the survey report?
1.21 General Comments on the Fixing of Permanent Survey Control:
2. VERIFICATION OF PERMENT SURVEY CONTROL
2.1 Were the verification report, results and the recommendations by the Surveyor submitted to the Client prior
to acceptance of the values?
2.2 Was a permanent beacon condition report submitted prior to final acceptance?
2.3 Did both reports form part of the final submission to the Client on completion?
2.4 Was the raw survey data supplied for the verification survey?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 82: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 3 of 8
2.5 Was the verification of permanent survey control in accordance with TMH11 and the project
specifications?
2.6 General comments on the Verification of Permanent Survey Control:
3. DTM SURVEY
3.1 Was the road prism (toe line to toe line) surveyed using a Total Station?
3.2 Was the road surface surveyed using laser scanners?
3.3 Was the rest of the survey area surveyed using GPS?
3.4 Were maximum 10m spot shot intervals surveyed on the road prism?
3.5 Were the spot shots off the road prisms surveyed to a maximum of 20m intervals?
3.6 Were break lines correctly utilized?
3.7 Were cut and fills used as break lines?
3.8 Were the triangles in the culvert and bridges cleaned to give a realistic representation of the culvert?
3.9 Were the spot shot position, codes and heights shown in the 3D continuous model?
3.10 Was the decimal point of the spot shot also the position where the spotshot was taken?
3.11 Were the spotshot positions, codes and heights shown on three different layers in the CAD data?
3.12 Was the DTM supplied in:
DWG format as per specification (No 3D faces)?
DGN-TIN format as per specification (No 3D faces)?
Model Maker format as per specification?
Civil Designer format as per specification?
3.13 Could all the above files be opened from the source that was submitted?
3.14 Was the raw survey data supplied for the DTM survey?
3.15 Was the DTM survey in accordance with TMH11 and the project specifications?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 83: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 4 of 8
3.16 General comments on DTM Survey:
4. CAD WORK
4.1 Were the following supplied:
4.1.1 Continuous 2D drawing
Continuous 2D CAD drawing in DGN format (MicroStation)?
Continuous 2D CAD drawing in DWG format (AutoCAD)?
4.1.2 A0 Drawings
A0 drawing in DGN format?
A0 drawing in DWG format?
A0 layout key plan indicating all cadastral, permanent survey control positions and numbers, road
alignment and sheet layouts (The first sheet of the A0 range)?
4.1.3 Continuous 3D drawing
Was a continuous 3D drawing in DGN format (MicroStation) supplied?
Was a continuous 3D drawing in DWG format (AutoCAD) supplied?
Was the DTM-TIN (triangles) supplied as a separate layer on the 3D continuous CAD drawings?
4.1.4 Survey codes
Was a list of survey codes and descriptions supplied?
Did the survey codes conform to the requirements in TMH11?
Was the survey undertaken using the supplied codes?
4.1.5 General CAD work
Has the extent been covered by the survey as specified?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 84: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 5 of 8
Was the culvert detail submitted in terms of the specifications?
Were clearance heights for all overhead services shown on the drawing?
Were clearance heights for all overpass bridges shown on the drawings?
Were the positions of bridge columns/pillars shown on the drawing?
Were Invert levels, ground levels and grid levels for manholes supplied?
Were photos of all road signs in hard copy and digital format supplied?
Were the road sign positions numbered on the drawings and on the photos?
Were major access roads and streets surveyed to the specified length?
Were access road destinations and street names shown on the drawings?
Were the positions and numbers of the permanent survey control shown on the drawing as a separate
layer?
Was the cadastral data submitted on the final drawings?
Does the presentation of the cadastral data on the drawings conform to the requirements?
Were all features on different layers as specified?
Were the layers named correctly?
Did the layers conform to the requirements?
Did the lettering conform to the requirements (size and thickness)?
Were the triangles and detail of cross-roads on a separate layer or drawing?
Were the correct symbols used in accordance with TMH11?
Were the lane markings correctly represented (Broken, solid, broken & solid lines)?
4.1.6 Project File – Were the following supplied:
Survey report hard copy?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 85: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 6 of 8
Survey report digital?
Final coordinate list hard copy?
Final coordinate list Excel?
Level comparison hard copy?
Level comparison Excel?
Test results Excel?
Verification report and results?
Laser scanning reports as specified?
All other deliverables as specified in the specifications?
4.1.7 Is the CAD work in accordance with TMH11 and the project specifications?
4.1.8 General comments on CAD Work:
5. QUALITY CONTROL BY THE SURVEYOR
5.1 Were the field and office checked A0 plans submitted on completion?
5.2 Were the corrections to the field and office checked plans transferred to all the final CAD drawings?
5.3 Were test cross-sections every 300m surveyed independently from the actual setup from where the survey
was done?
5.4 Were the 30m check points data and results submitted for laser scanning projects in addition to the 300m
cross-sections?
5.5 Did the surveyed check points represent the profile of the road?
5.6 Do the check results conform to the accuracy standards?
0 - 30mm (85%) on the black top?
0 – 150mm (85%) off the black top?
5.7 Was the quality control by the Surveyor undertaken in accordance with TMH11 and the project
specifications?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 86: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 7 of 8
5.8 Was the quality control check list as per Annexure 24.1 submitted and signed by a registered Surveyor?
(Only for use by the Client)
5.9 General comments on Quality Control by the Surveyor:
6. GENERAL COMMENTS
6.1 Was the project delivered on time?
6.2 Does the labeling of CDs conform to the requirements?
6.3 Does the naming of files and folders conform to the requirements?
6.4 Was a delivery note, showing all data submitted, supplied on completion and any other subsequent
submissions?
6.5 Was the version number of the data shown on the CDs submitted?
6.6 Was all the data re-submitted with the re-submission, after corrections or extension surveys have been
done, in order to facilitate deletion of the previous version?
Any other general comments not stated before:
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 87: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 8 of 8
I, the undersigned, being the representative of the appointed survey company on the above project, hereby certify that:
1. All information required in the project specifications is hereby supplied.
2. All field and office checks have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements and specifications.
3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project.
4. All corrections as instructed in the previous report have been corrected and the entire survey project is re-submitted.
Signed at…………………………………..this…………………………………day of …………………………………………..
Signature: …………………………………………………
Plato Registration Number: ……………………………..
Name: ………………………………………..
For and on behalf of (Survey Company): ……………………………………………………………..
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.1
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 88: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 1 of 8
QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR TOPOGRAHICAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC/LIDAR SURVEYS
SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: ……………………………………………………….. DATE: ………………….
SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ………………………………………………………. REPORT NO: ………………….
JOB NUMBER: ……………………………………………………….
I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against the project specifications and TMH11 survey requirements as stated in the
survey instruction/contract documents.
The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction are marked as N/A
SOME OF THE MOST IMPORANT REQUIREMENTS
Note: Not all requirements have been listed
Confirmation by a
registered
Surveyor
1. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
1.1 Was the aerial photography undertaken at the specified scale or GSD?
1.2 Did the photography effectively cover the area in terms of the specifications?
1.3 Did the forward overlaps and side laps conform to the requirements?
(Max 30% side lap and 60% forward lap)
1.4 Were the photographs cloudless?
1.5 Did the photo contact prints conform to the requirements (Not applicable to lidar surveys)?
1.6 Was the specified information recorded on the photo frame (Not applicable to lidar surveys)?
1.7 Was a flight plan submitted in terms of the specifications?
1.8 Was the film correctly indexed and submitted? (Not applicable to digital aerial photography surveys –
Annotation for lidar surveys shall be done on orthophoto prints)
1.9 Were two sets of contact prints submitted? (one clean set and one annoted set) (Not applicable to lidar surveys
- Annotation for lidar surveys shall be done on orthophoto prints)
1.10 Was a camera calibration certificate supplied?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 89: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 2 of 8
1.11 Was the analogue photo scanning done at 21 microns?
1.12 Were the scanned images supplied in TIFF/JPEG format and indexed correctly?
1.13 Was the scanned output for digital aerial photography supplied as 8-bit for black & white and 24-bit for colour
photography?
1.14 Were the sample images at the start, centre and at the end of the project supplied?
(Only for digital and lidar photography)
1.15 General comments on the aerial photography
2. PHOTO GROUND CONTROL
(If the establishment and/or verification of permanent survey control formed part of the photogrammetric survey
requirements then the check list for establishment and verification of permanent survey control in Annexure 24.1,
Items 1 and 2, must be added to this list)
2.1 Was aerial triangulation employed Yes/No?
2.2 Does the following aerial triangulation block adjustment residuals conform to the requirements?
(Not applicable to lidar and “push-broom” surveys)
Between Models On the Ground Control 2.3 Were all the permanent survey control points used as photo ground control to reference the photogrammetric
model?
2.4 Was the permanent survey control leveled heights used to model the geoid (applicable to lidar and “push-
broom” surveys)?
2.5 Does the photo ground control configuration conform to the requirements for:
Lidar surveys?
Push Broom technology?
Conventional photogrammetry:
2 Model bases apart for a single strip?
4 Points in the corner of each model for full control?
3 Model bases apart in a block?
2.6 Were the field annotated aerial photographs/prints of orthophotos supplied on completion?
2.7 Were the annotations transferred to the CAD drawings?
2.8 General comments on photo ground control
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 90: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 3 of 8
3. DTM SURVEY – PHOTOGRAMMETRIC
(All types of survey methods except when otherwise indicated)
3.1 Was the maximum 20m spotshot interval observed?
(Applicable to conventional photogrammetric mapping)
3.2 Were break lines correctly utilized?
3.3 Were cut and fills used as break lines?
3.4 Were the triangles in the culvert and bridges cleaned to give a realistic representation of the culvert?
3.5 Were the spotshot positions and heights shown on the 3D continuous model?
(Not applicable to lidar surveys)
3.6 Were the decimal points of the spotshots also the positions where the spotshots were taken?
3.7 Were the spotshot positions and heights shown on two different layers?
(Not applicable to lidar surveys)
3.8 Was the DTM supplied in:
DWG-TIN format as per specification (No 3D faces) (Separate CAD file)?
DGN-TIN format as per specification (No 3D faces) (Separate CAD file)?
Model Maker format as per specification?
Civil Designer format as per specification?
3.9 Could all the above files be opened on the CD, DVD or hard drive that was submitted?
3.10 Is the DTM survey in accordance with TMH11 and the contract specifications?
3.11 Was the DTM data set broken up into different workable size files?
3.12 Did the triangles in the broken up files match with the adjacent triangles when the files were attached?
3.13 General comments on DTM survey – photogrammetric
4. SPLICING OF GROUND SURVEY INTO THE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEY
4.1 Were the TIN and detail spliced into the photogrammetric model as requested?
4.2 Were under and over passes spliced with the emphasis on different levels?
4.3 Were the final contours generated after splicing?
4.4 Was all ground survey detail spliced into the photogrammetric mapping?
4.5 Were the spliced triangles shown in a different color to the photogrammetric triangles?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 91: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 4 of 8
4.6 General comments on splicing of ground survey
5. CAD WORK
5.1 Were the following supplied:
5.1.1 Continuous 2D drawing
Continuous 2D CAD drawing in DGN format (MicroStation)?
Continuous 2D CAD drawing in DWG format (AutoCAD)?
5.1.2 A0 Drawings
A0 drawing in DGN format?
A0 drawing in DWG format?
A0 layout key plan (first sheet of the A0 range of sheets) indicating all cadastral, permanent survey control
positions and numbers, road alignment and sheet layouts?
5.1.3 Continuous 3D drawing
Continuous 3D drawing in DGN format (MicroStation)?
Continuous 3D drawing in DWG format (AutoCAD)?
Were the DTM-TIN (triangles) supplied as a separate layer on the 3D continuous CAD drawings?
Was the continuous model broken up into realistic usable sizes to be used in an average computer?
Did the matching between the broken up models form a complete continuous model when attached?
Were the photos of all road signs supplied in hard copy and digital format?
Were the photo positions of the road signs numbered on the plans and on the photos?
5.1.4 Survey codes (Applicable to field survey work to support the photogrammetric work)
Was a list of survey codes and descriptions supplied?
Did the survey codes conform to the requirements?
Was the survey undertaken using the supplied codes?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 92: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 5 of 8
5.1.5 General CAD work
Has photo annotation been done?
Has the extent been covered by the survey as specified?
Was the culvert detail submitted in terms of the specifications?
Were clearance heights for all overhead services shown on the drawing?
(Surveyed by ground method)
Were clearance heights for all overpass bridges shown on the drawings?
(Surveyed by ground method)
Were the positions of bridge columns/pillars shown on the drawing?
(Surveyed by ground method)
Were Invert levels, ground levels and grid levels for manholes supplied and shown on the drawing (Invert
levels surveyed by ground method)?
Were major access roads and streets surveyed to the required length as specified?
Were access road destinations and street names shown on all the drawings?
Were the positions and numbers of the permanent survey control shown on the drawing as a separate layer?
Was the cadastral data submitted on the final drawings?
Were all features placed on different layers as specified?
Were the layers named correctly?
Did the layers conform to the requirements as specified?
Did the lettering conform to the requirements (size and thickness)?
Were the triangles and detail of cross-roads on a separate layer or drawing?
Were the correct symbols used in accordance to TMH11?
Were the lane markings correctly represented (Broken, solid, broken & solid lines)?
Was the CAD work in accordance with TMH11 and the project specifications?
5.1.6 Project File – have the following been included:
Survey report hard copy?
Survey report digital?
Final coordinate list for permanent control in hard copy format?
Final coordinate list signed by a registered surveyor?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 93: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 6 of 8
Final coordinate list Excel?
Level comparison hard copy?
Level comparison Excel?
Test results Excel?
Verification report on permanent survey control and results?
All other deliverables as specified in the specifications?
5.1.7 General comments on CAD Work
6. ORTHOPHOTO PRODUCTION
Note: All relevant deliverables applicable to the orthophoto production shall be evaluated under that specific
section in this check list
6.1 Was the following information shown in CAD format to be superimposed on the rectified image:
6.1.1 Title block as specified?
6.1.2 Grid lines as specified?
6.1.3 Cadastral information as specified?
6.1.4 Contours, contour values and spotshots as specified?
6.1.5 Permanent survey control points as specified?
6.1.6 Culvert information (size and inverts surveyed by ground methods) as specified?
6.1.7 Manhole and drain data as surveyed in the field as specified?
6.1.8 Destinations of roads shown on the drawing?
6.1.9 Clearance height of structures and overhead services?
6.1.10 All annotated features not clearly visible on the photos?
6.1.11 Underground services?
6.1.12 Fences where not clearly visible on the photos?
6.1.13 Kilometer Markers?
6.1.14 River and stream names?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 94: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 7 of 8
6.1.15 Canals and boreholes?
6.1.16 Type of crops?
6.1.17 Description of buildings other than residential buildings?
6.1.18 Cemeteries?
6.2 Were the rectified images referenced and cut in sheets to the same layout as for the CAD A0 drawings?
6.3 Were features that are not clearly visible/identifiable on the images annotated on the orthophoto?
6.4 General comments on orthophoto production control
7. QUALITY CONTROL BY THE CONTRACTOR
7.1 Were the field and office checked A0 plans/orthophotos submitted with the final data?
7.2 Were the corrections on the field and office checked plans transferred to all the final CAD
drawings/orthophotos?
7.3 Were test cross-sections data supplied and surveyed independently at 300m intervals?
7.4 Did the surveyed check points represent the profile of the road?
7.5
Did the check results conform to the accuracy standards?
0 - 200mm (85%)?
7.6 Was the quality control by the Surveyor in accordance with TMH11 and the project specifications?
7.7 Was the quality control check list as per Annexure 24.2 submitted and signed by a registered Surveyor?
(Only for use by the Client)
7.8 General comments on Quality Control
8. GENERAL COMMENTS
8.1 Was the project delivered on time?
8.2 Does the labeling of CD, DVD or hard drive conform to the requirements?
8.3 Does the naming of files and folders conform to the requirements?
8.4 Was a delivery note showing all data submitted?
8.5 Was the version number of CD, DVD or hard drive supplied?
8.6 Was all the data submitted with the re-submission in order to facilitate deletion of the previous version?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 95: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 8 of 8
I, the undersigned, being the representative of the appointed survey company on the above project, hereby certify that:
1. All information required in the project specifications is hereby supplied.
2. All field and office checks have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements and specifications.
3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project.
4. All corrections as instructed in the previous report have been corrected and the entire survey project is re-submitted.
Signed at…………………………………..this…………………………………day of …………………………………………..
Signature: …………………………………………………
Plato Registration Number: …………………………………………………
Name: …………………………………………………
For and on behalf of (Survey Company): …………………………………………………………………………………………... AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.2
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 96: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 1 of 5
QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR TERRESTRIAL MOBILE LASER SCANNING
SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: …………………………………………. DATE: ..........................................
SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ………………………………............... REPORT NO: ..........................................
JOB NUMBER: ………………………………………….
Note: i) The surveyed deliverables for a survey undertaken by laser scanning shall be checked using the relevant
quality control check list for that specific survey
ii) This check list shall be used to check and verify that the laser survey procedures and requirements as stipulated in
TMH11 Chapter 14 have been followed
I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against and complies with the project specifications and TMH11 survey
requirements as stated in the survey instruction/contract documents.
The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction are marked as N/A.
REQUIREMENTS Confirmation by a
registered Surveyor
1. SUPERVISION
1.1 Has the name of supervisory Surveyor been supplied?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.3
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 97: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 2 of 5
1.2 Has the PLATO registration number of supervisory Surveyor been supplied?
1.3 General comments on Supervision
2. EYE SAFETY
2.1 Was written approval from the Department of Health, in accordance with their Radiation Control Program,
submitted?
2.2 General comments on Eye Safety
3. SURVEY CONTROL POINTS FOR LASER SCANNING
3.1 Is the laser scanner equipped with a compensator?
3.2 Was Point Cloud to Point Cloud registration employed?
3.3 Was the laser scanning control established at maximum 300m intervals?
3.4 For road surveys, were the control points for a dual carriageway established at both sides of the dual
carriageway?
3.5 For non-road surveys, was the control established in a 300m square grid covering the entire survey area?
3.6 Did any extrapolation take place during the scanning process (scanning outside the control configuration)?
3.7 General comments on Survey control Points
4. QUALITY ASSESSMENT PLAN
4.1 Was a quality assessment plan submitted to the Client prior to the scanning exercise?
5. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT ON COMPLETION
(This quality control is required over and above the quality control requirements stipulated in the various
chapters of TMH11)
5.1 Was the following information supplied:
Statistical systems report?
PDOP values during survey?
Comparison of elevation data from different runs/overlaps?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.3
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 98: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 3 of 5
Comparison of elevation data from overlapping (side laps) runs?
Comparison of points at the area of overlaps (end lap) where more than one base was used?
Statistical comparison of Point Cloud data and the 300mm check cross sections?
Statistical comparison of the final DTM and the 300m check cross sections?
Statistical comparison of adjusted Point Cloud data and redundant check points?
GNS accuracy report as per TMH11 Chapter 14?
IMU accuracy report as per TMH11 Chapter 14?
Control report to TMH11 requirements?
Statistical comparison of the final Point Cloud data and control points?
5.2 Was the Point Cloud filtered to one layer of points which represents the mean value of the scans?
5.3 Was the noise removed from the Point Cloud data?
5.4 General comments on Quality Control Report
6. GNS CONTROL STATIONS
6.1 Were the control stations spaced at a maximum of 15km apart?
6.2 Do any base lines exceed 7.5km in length?
6.3 Were control stations established at the start and end of the project?
6.4 Do the accuracies of the control stations adhere to the accuracy requirements as for permanent survey
control points?
6.5 General comments on GNS Control Stations
7. CALIBRATION OF THE EQUIPMENT
7.1 Were before and after data collection calibration results submitted?
7.2 General comments on Calibration of Equipment
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.3
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 99: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 4 of 5
8. TEST RUN
8.1 Was the test run data submitted?
8.2 General comments on Test Run
9. REDUNDANCY
9.1 How was the redundancy checked:
Two or more passes in the same direction?
Overlapping passes in opposite directions?
A combination of the above?
9.2 Was the side lap redundancy determined by a minimum of 20% of the pass width?
9.3 Was the time period between passes more than 1 hour?
9.4 General comments on Redundancy
10. SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTATION
10.1 Was all the documentation submitted on completion as per the document check list in paragraph 14.3.7 of
TMH11?
11. GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE MOBILE SCANNING EXERCISE
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.3
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 100: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 5 of 5
I, the undersigned, being the representative of the appointed survey company on the above project, hereby certify that:
1. All information required in the project specifications is hereby supplied.
2. All field and office procedures have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements and specifications.
3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project
Signed at…………………………………..this…………………………………day of …………………………………………..
Signature:…………………………………………………
Plato Registration Number:……………………………..
Name of Surveyor:………………………………………..
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.3
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 101: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 1 of 4
QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR TERRESTRIAL STATIONARY LASER SCANNING
SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: …………………………………………........... DATE: .........................................
SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: …………………………….............................. REPORT NO: .........................................
JOB NUMBER: ………………………………………..........….
Note: i) The surveyed deliverables for a survey undertaken by laser scanning shall be checked using the relevant
quality control check list for that specific survey
ii) This check list shall be used to check and verify the laser survey procedures and requirements as stipulated in
TMH11 chapter 14
PROJECT: …………………………………………...................................................................................................................
I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against the project specifications and TMH11 survey requirements as stated in the
survey instruction/contract documents.
The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction were marked as N/A.
REQUIREMENTS Confirmation by a
registered Surveyor
1. SUPERVISION
1.1 Name of supervisory Surveyor
1.2 PLATO registration number of supervisory Surveyor
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.4
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 102: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 2 of 4
1.3 General comments on supervision
2. EYE SAFETY
2.1 Was written approval from the Department of Health, in accordance with their Radiation Control Program,
submitted?
2.2 General comments on eye safety
3. SURVEY CONTROL POINTS FOR LASER SCANNING
3.1 Is the laser scanner equipped with a compensator?
3.2 Was Point Cloud to Point Cloud registration employed?
3.3 Was the laser scanning control established at maximum 120m intervals?
3.4 For road surveys, were the control points for a dual carriageway established at both sides of the dual
carriageway?
3.5 For non-road surveys, was the control established in a 120m square grid covering the entire survey area?
3.6 Did any extrapolation take place during the scanning process (scanning outside the control configuration)?
3.7 General comments on survey control
4. QUALITY ASSESSMENT PLAN
4.1 Was a quality assessment plan submitted to the Client prior to the scanning exercise?
4.2 General comments on quality assessment
5. QUALITY CONTROL REPORT ON COMPLETION
(This quality control is required over and above the quality control requirements stipulated in the various
chapters of TMH11)
5.1 Was the following information supplied:
Statistical systems report?
Statistical comparison of Point Cloud data and the 300 meter check cross sections for other surveys
than structures?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.4
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 103: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 3 of 4
Statistical comparison of the final DTM and the 300 meter check cross sections for non-structural
surveys?
Statistical comparison of adjusted Point Cloud data and redundant check points (30m check points)?
Statistical comparison of final DTM data and redundant check points (30m check points)?
Scan seam comparison of elevation data from overlapping scans?
Statistical comparison of the final Point Cloud data and control points?
5.2 Was the Point Cloud filtered to one layer of points which represents the mean value of the scans?
5.3 Was the noise removed from the Point Cloud data?
6. FIELD PROCEDURES FOR ROAD SURVEYS
6.1 Does any scanning setup exceed 120 meter from the previous setup?
6.2 Does any scanning distance exceed 70 meter?
6.3 Is the minimum overlap in scans 5%?
6.4 Are there any shadow areas that are not scanned?
6.5 Were a minimum of four (4) control points observed per setup when a scanner without a compensator was
used?
6.6 Was a report submitted on the referencing of the different scans?
6.7 Was a 2m x 2m grid DTM supplied?
6.8 Were breaklines utilized in the DTM?
6.9 Was the quality control report submitted as per TMH11?
7. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR STRUCTURAL SURVEYS
Note: The structural survey data shall be evaluated in terms of the structural survey check list Annexure 24.5
7.1 Were the scanned models geo-referenced to the permanent bridge control points?
7.2 Were the scanning observation distances limited to a maximum 70 meter?
7.3 Was a minimum 30% overlap achieved between adjacent scans?
7.4 Was a scan density of 5mm achieved at the bridge abutments, top of bridge piers and the bearings?
7.5 Was the remainder of the bridge structure scanned at a maximum interval of 10mm?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.4
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 104: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 4 of 4
I, the undersigned, being the representative of the appointed survey company on the above project, hereby certify that:
1. All information required in the project specifications is hereby supplied.
2. All field and office checks have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements and specifications.
3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project
Signed at…………………………………..this…………………………………day of …………………………………………..
Signature:…………………………………………………
Plato Registration Number:……………………………..
Name of Surveyor:………………………………………..
7.6 Is the scanner equipped with a compensator?
7.6.1 If yes, were a minimum of two control points and at least one redundancy point observed per setup?
If no, were a minimum of four control points observed per setup?
7.7 Was the final Point Cloud filtered down to a single layer of points which represent the mean value of all the
scans?
7.8 Was the noise removed from the Point Cloud?
7.9 Was the Point Cloud data base submitted in ASCII format?
8. GENERAL COMMENTS
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.4
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 105: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 1 of 6
QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR BRIDGE STRUCTURE SURVEYS
SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: …………………………………………. DATE: .................................
SURVEY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: ……………….......………………….... REPORT NO.: .................................
JOB NUMBER: ………………………………………….
BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER: ………………………………………….
Note: The completed check list must be submitted by the Surveyor with his final submission
I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against and complies with the project specifications and TMH11 survey
requirements as stated in the survey instruction/contract documents.
The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction are marked as N/A.
REQUIREMENTS Confirmation By The
Contractor
1. PERMANENT SURVEY CONTROL FOR STRUCTURAL SURVEYS
1.1 Were the permanent survey control observations and coordinates submitted for approval to the Client prior to
acceptance?
1.2 Were the beacons numbered correctly?
1.3 Do the positions (locations) of the permanent control adhere to the requirements?
1.4 Were the heights based on correct datum and was the datum height determined correctly?
(Survey control points for road structures are normally based on the control established along the road)
1.5 Were the calibration results between beacons for horizontal fixing submitted?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.5
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 106: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 2 of 6
1.6 Can the calibration results be accepted?
1.7 Do the independent GPS height checks conform to the requirements?
1.8 Do the level accuracies between level and check levels adhere to TMH11 requirements?
1.9 Does the level closure between terminal points adhere to TMH11 requirements?
1.10 What percentage of height differences between level and check exceeds 5mm?
Note: Acceptable if not more than 5% exceeds 5mm and 0% exceeds 10mm 0 – 5mm
> 10mm
%
%
1.11 Does the accuracy adhere to the requirements?
1.12 Were the level comparisons between levels and check levels as well as the actual and allowable closing
errors supplied?
1.13 Does the final coordinate list conform to the requirements of TMH11?
1.14 Was a final coordinate list supplied in Excel and hard copy formats?
1.15 Is the height datum point number and height shown on the coordinate list?
1.16 Were the raw survey data supplied for fixing the PRMs?
1.17 Is the process of fixing control in position and elevation fully discussed in the survey report?
1.18 Is the permanent survey control in accordance with TMH11 and the contract specifications?
1.19 Was the final coordinate list signed by a registered Surveyor?
1.21
General Comments on the Fixing of Permanent Survey Control:
2. VERIFICATION OF PERMENT SURVEY CONTROL (IF REQUIRED)
2.1 Were the verification report, results and recommendations by the Surveyor submitted to the Client prior to
acceptance of the values?
2.2 Was a permanent beacon condition report submitted prior to final acceptance?
2.3 Do both reports form part of the final submission to the Client?
2.4 Were the raw survey data supplied for the verification survey?
2.5 Is the verification of permanent survey control in accordance with TMH11 and the contract specifications?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.5
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 107: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 3 of 6
2.6 General comments on the Verification of Permanent Survey Control:
3. 2D PRESENTATION AND SURVEYED DIMENSIONS
3.1 Were the following features surveyed and the levels, dimensions and other specified information submitted
and shown on the different 2D view drawing:
The total length of each span of each deck?
The clear span of each span of each deck?
The width and length of each support at top and bottom?
The depth of the deck?
The level on top of the footings (foundation)?
The position of the New Jersey barriers or any other balustrades or handles?
Levels on the abutment and piers?
Existing ducts and visible services through the deck?
The minimum vertical clearance and all levels and positions on the soffit profile?
The level and position at the start and end of each span of each deck?
The deck level at regular intervals (not exceeding 5m)?
The deck levels at each end of each span along all edges and centre lines of the decks?
The kerb levels at the supports?
The asphalt thickness at the kerb at the end of the spans on each edge of each deck?
The intersection angle or angle of skew relative to the river/road/railway line?
3.2 Were the co-ordinates and heights of all observed surveyed positions added to the 2D drawings?
3.3 Was a co-ordinate list of all the strategic points surveyed as well as the measured dimensions and invert levels
supplied in Excel format?
3.4 Were photos of the different views of the structure supplied in:
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.5
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 108: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 4 of 6
Hard copy format?
Digital format?
3.5 Were the photos annotated?
3.6 Were the results of the test survey submitted?
3.7 Are the results within the specified tolerance?
3.8 Was a survey report submitted?
3.9 Were the 2D view drawings submitted in AutoCAD format?
3.10 Were the 2D view drawings submitted in MicroStation format?
3.11 For conventional surveyed structures,
Was a list of survey codes and descriptions submitted?
Do the survey codes conform to the requirements?
Were the submitted survey codes used in the survey?
3.12 General Comments on 2D Presentation
4. 3D PRESENTATION
4.1 Was a 3D drawing supplied in AutoCAD format?
4.2 Was a 3D drawing supplied in MicroStation format?
4.3 Does the 3D drawing represent a combination of all the 2D views, giving an accurate representation of the
structure?
4.4 General Comments on 3D Presentation
5. GENERAL
5.1 Was the hard copy of data supplied as specified?
5.2 Was the survey undertaken by laser scanning?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.5
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 109: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 5 of 6
5.3 Was the quality control report for laser scanning submitted as per Annexure 2.4.4?
5.4 Was the point cloud of the laser scanning submitted in LAS format?
5.5 Was the survey report submitted in:
Hard copy format?
Digital format?
5.6 Was the compliance certificate submitted and signed by a registered Surveyor?
(Only for use by the Client)
5.7 Was the quality control check list as per Annexure 24.5 supplied and signed by a registered Surveyor?
(For use by the Client only)
5.8 Were the office and field checked plans submitted?
5. Comments
6.
GENERAL COMMENTS
6.1 Was the project delivered on time?
6.2 Does the labeling of CD, DVD or hard drive conform to the requirements?
6.3 Does the naming of files and folders conform to the requirements?
6.4 Was a delivery note, showing all data submitted, supplied?
6.5 Was the version number of the data on the CD, DVD or hard drive shown?
6.6 Was all the data re-submitted after corrections or extensions were done in order to facilitate deletion of the
previous version?
Any other general comments not stated before:
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.5
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 110: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 6 of 6
I, the undersigned, being the representative of the appointed survey company on the above project, hereby certify that:
1. All information required in the project specifications is hereby supplied.
2. All field and office checks have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements and specifications.
3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project
Signed at…………………………………..this…………………………………day of …………………………………………..
Signature:…………………………………………………
Plato Registration Number:……………………………..
Name of Surveyor:………………………………………..
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.5
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 111: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 1 of 4
QUALITY CONTROL CHECK LIST FOR CULVERT STRUCTURE SURVEYS
SURVEY UNDERTAKEN BY: …………………………………………. DATE: ...............................
SURVEY PROJECT: DESCRIPTION ……………………………................... REPORT NO.: ...............................
JOB NUMBER: ………………………………………….
CULVERT STRUCTURE NUMBER / DESCRIPTION: ……………………………………......................................................................….
I hereby confirm that this survey was checked against and complies with the project specifications and TMH11 survey
requirements as stated in the survey instruction/contract documents.
The Items that do not form part of the survey instruction are marked as N/A.
REQUIREMENTS Confirmation by a
registered Surveyor
1. DRAWINGS
1.1 Were 2D drawings of both the front views of the culvert submitted in AutoCAD format?
1.2 Were 2D drawings of both the front views of the culvert submitted in MicroStation format?
1.3 Was a 2D plan view drawing of the entire structure submitted in AutoCAD format?
1.4 Was a 2D plan view drawing of the entire structure submitted in Micro Station format?
1.5 Were all dimensions as per Annexure 17 shown on the drawings?
1.6 Were levels surveyed on the top of both the head wall and shown on the drawings?
1.7 Were levels surveyed at the soffit below both the head walls and shown on the drawings?
1.8 Were levels surveyed on top of the deck directly behind both the head walls, at the inlet and outlet position
and shown on the drawings?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.6
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 112: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 2 of 4
1.9 Were the invert levels of all openings at the inlet and outlet surveyed and shown on the drawings?
1.10 Were the dimensions and relative positions of the wing walls surveyed and shown on the drawings?
1.11 Was the perpendicular width of each ”opening” and each support at the inlet and outlet measured at the
top and at the bottom of the opening and shown on the drawings?
1.12 Were the positions of head walls relative to the centre line or staked line of the road surveyed and shown on
the drawings?
1.13 Was the angle of skew as per Annexure 27 shown on the drawings?
1.14 Was the extent of the concrete slab at the inlet and outlet surveyed and shown on the drawings?
1.15 Was a table of co-ordinates and heights of all observed surveyed points added to the drawings?
1.16 Was a co-ordinate list of all strategic points surveyed submitted in Excel format, together with the measured
dimensions?
1.17 Were photos of the different views of the culvert taken and submitted in:
Hard copy format?
Digital format?
1.18 Were the results of the check survey submitted?
Do the results conform to the requirements?
1.19 Was a list of survey codes and descriptions submitted?
Do the survey codes conform to the requirements?
Were the submitted survey codes used in the survey?
1.20 General Comments
2. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Was the hard copy data supplied as specified?
2.2 Was the survey undertaken by laser scanning?
2.3 Was the Point Cloud of the laser scanning submitted in LAS format?
2.4 Was the survey report submitted in:
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.6
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 113: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 3 of 4
Hard copy format?
Digital format?
2.5 Was the compliance certificate submitted and signed by a registered Surveyor?
2.6 Was the quality control check list as per Annexure 24.6 supplied and signed by a registered Surveyor?
(Only for use by the Client)
2.7 Were the office and field checked plans submitted?
2.8 General comments on Drawings
3. GENERAL COMMENTS
3.1 Was the project delivered on time?
3.2 Does the labeling of the CD/DVD’s or hard drive conform to the requirements?
3.3 Does the naming of files and folders conform to the requirements?
3.4 Was a delivery note, showing all the submitted data, supplied?
3.5 Was the version number of the data on the CD/DVD’s or hard drive submitted?
3.6 Was all the data submitted with the re-submission in order to facilitate deletion of the previous version?
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.6
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 114: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
DRAFT
Page 4 of 4
I, the undersigned, being the representative of the appointed survey company on the above project, hereby certify that:
1. All information required in the project specifications is hereby supplied.
2. All field and office checks have been carried out in terms of the relevant requirements and specifications.
3. All data supplied conforms to the relevant requirements and specifications for this project
Signed at…………………………………..this…………………………………day of …………………………………………..
Signature:…………………………………………………
Plato Registration Number:……………………………..
Name of Surveyor:………………………………………..
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
4.6
(C
ON
TIN
UE
D)
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 115: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 25
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORTS
ANNEXURE 25.1 Topographical ground surveys
ANNEXURE 25.2 Topographical photogrammetric surveys
ANNEXURE 25.3 Lidar surveys
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 116: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
DRAFTWEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT
(EXAMPLE FOR GROUND TOPOGRAHICAL SURVEYS)
Survey company: ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Project description: ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Survey Project number: .........................................
Reporting date: .........................................
Note: The survey phases shall be changed to suit the different survey instructions that were specified. This is an example for a seven week project:
SURVEY PHASE % COMPLETE WEEK 1
% COMPLETE WEEK 2
% COMPLETE WEEK 3
% COMPLETE WEEK 4
% COMPLETE WEEK 5
% COMPLETE WEEK 6
% COMPLETE WEEK 7
Establishment on site
Verification survey
Submission of the verification survey and report to the survey project manager
Fixing of permanent survey control: Horizontal Vertical
Submission of permanent control to survey project manager for approval
Detail contour survey
CAD work on detail contour survey
Office check on CAD work
Structural surveys
CAD work on structural surveys
Office check on structural survey
Field check cross-sections
Field check on final survey data
Final submission
Corrections completed
Project finalized
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
5.1
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 117: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
DRAFT
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT
(EXAMPLE FOR PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SURVEYS)
Survey company: ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Project description: ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Survey Project number: .........................................
Reporting date: .........................................
Note: The survey phases shall be changed to suit the different survey instructions that were specified. This is an example for a seven week project:
SURVEY PHASE % COMPLETE WEEK 1
% COMPLETE WEEK 2
% COMPLETE WEEK 3
% COMPLETE WEEK 4
% COMPLETE WEEK 5
% COMPLETE WEEK 6
% COMPLETE WEEK 7
Establishment on site
Verification survey
Submission of the verification survey and report to the survey project manager
Fixing of permanent survey control: Horizontal Vertical
Submission of permanent control data to survey project manager for approval
Establishment of photo ground control points
Aerial photography
Photo annotation
Field survey work as invert levels, clearance heights, etc.
Aerial triangulation
Mapping
Production of orthophotos
Splicing
Office checks
Field checks
Final submission
Corrections completed
Project finalised
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
5.2
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 118: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
DRAFT
WEEKLY PROGRESS REPORT
(EXAMPLE FOR LIDAR SURVEYS)
Survey company: ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Project description: ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Survey Project number: .........................................
Reporting date: .........................................
Note: The survey phases shall be changed to suit the different survey instructions that were specified. This is an example for a seven week project:
SURVEY PHASE % COMPLETE WEEK 1
% COMPLETE WEEK 2
% COMPLETE WEEK 3
% COMPLETE WEEK 4
% COMPLETE WEEK 5
% COMPLETE WEEK 6
% COMPLETE WEEK 7
Establishment on site
Verification survey
Submission of the verification survey and report to the survey project manager
Fixing of permanent survey control: Horizontal Vertical
Submission of permanent control data to survey project manager for approval
Establishment of photo ground control points
Aerial photography and lidar survey
Photo annotation
Field survey work as invert levels, clearance heights, etc.
Line mapping if applicable
Compilations and office work
Compilation of orthophotos
Office checks
Field checks
Final submission
Corrections completed
Project finalised
AN
NE
XU
RE
2
5.3
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 119: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
DRAFT
Sample form: Agreement between client and contractor
The sample agreement attached is generic and should be adapted to be site-specific.
REGULATION AND CONTROL OF CONTRACTORS
IN REGARD TO CONSTRUCTION WORK
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH & SAFETY REQUIREMENTS
AGREEMENT FRAMED IN TERMS OF SECTION 37(2) OF THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT
(issued to Principal Contractors and where applicable, Contractors)
This document is to be issued in triplicate to all Contractors. The Contractors and witnesses are to sign two copies, initial each page and return these copies to the Company.
I, the undersigned, in my capacity as the authorised office of, and as such representing the undermentioned contracting firm, hereby acknowledge that I have read the attached Regulations for Principal Contractors and Contractors, the contents of which I fully understand and I hereby agree to abide by these regulations in all respects. I acknowledge that I am a mandatory in terms of the Occupational Health and Safety act and agree to comply with the Act and Safety Regulations. To this end, I will comply in full with the Occupational Health and Safety Act and in particular with the Construction Regulations GN R1010 of 18 July 2003.
__________________________ __________________________ SIGNATURE NAME IN BLOCK LETTERS
__________________________ __________________________ WITNESS NAME IN BLOCK LETTERS _______________________________________________ NAME OF PRINCIPAL/AGENT __________________________ DATE Certified that ____________________________________ has produced to me proof of registration in terms of Section 80 of the Occupational injuries and Diseases Act or registration with a registered compensation Insurer. Registration/Certificate Number _____________________ Signed _________________________________________ Date ___________________________ PREAMBLE (Note that where the term Contractor is used in this document this shall also be taken to mean Principal Contractor where applicable.) These regulations have been compiled by ____________________________________________(hereinafter referred to as the Company) to ensure that all construction work carried out for or on behalf of the Company is performed in a safe and healthy manner and that the Occupational Health and Safety Act and Regulations, particularly the Construction Regulations, are complied with as far as is reasonably practicable. This agreement is drawn up as provided for in Section 37(2) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act and in signing these Regulations the contractor not only specifies adherence to the legal requirements, but also undertakes to comply with the same. *** Where Principal Contractors and Contractors require assistance in preparing this document, add the following paragraph***
ANNEXURE 26
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 120: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
DRAFT
It is essential that all Contractors are aware that they are bound by the provisions of the legislation and to assist you the following documents are attached. They set out basic requirements.
A matrix indicating duties and responsibilities of owner/employer/agents, contractors and their contractors, commonly referred to as sub-contractors;
An inspection checklist for use by owner/employer/agents, contractors and their contractors;
An abridged version of the Occupational Health and Safety Act; and
The required Health and Safety System that must be fully documented. Important: Where, in any documentation relating to this contract, reference is made to the Act, this shall mean the Occupational health and Safety Act of 1993, which includes all Regulations thereto, any Regulations made under the Machinery and Occupational Safety Act of 1983, which may still be enforced at the time of implementation of this contract, and all relevant safety standards as outlined in Section 44 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act. The Contractor hereby indemnifies the Company against any liability, loss, claim or proceedings whatsoever, whether arising in Common Law or by Statute; consequent personal injuries or the death of any person whomsoever (including claims by employees of the Contractor and their dependents); or consequent loss of or damage to any moveable or immoveable property arising out of or caused by or in connection with the execution of the Contractor’s contract with the Company. The contractor agrees:
To ensure all employees receive the necessary training before commencing work and carry such proof of training with them.
To ensure provision of welfare facilities as per Construction Regulation 28.
To provide the client with a fully documented Safety, Health and Environmental (SHE) plan and specifications.
To provide risk assessments, safe work procedures and method statements.
To provide first aid facilities and first aiders as per General Safety Regulations.
To comply with the hazardous chemical substance regulations and where applicable lead and asbestos regulations.
To comply with environmental requirements as per the environmental impact study and the environmental regulation for workplaces.
To keep on site the written appointment for supervision of construction work.
To provide written designation of health and safety representatives and minutes of all meetings, whether site or separate, regarding occupational health and safety.
To provide all legal safety and health documents and registers as required by the Act and Regulations, including a copy of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
To comply with Construction Regulation 22, Electrical Machinery Regulations, and Electrical Installation Regulations regarding temporary electrical installations on site.
To comply with Construction Regulations relating to construction vehicles.
To prepare a fully documented fall protection plan.
To comply with General Safety Regulation 2 regarding protective clothing and equipment.
To report all incidents and accidents and occupational diseases as per Section 24 of the OHS Act and Regulation 6 of the General Administrative Regulations.
To comply with the General Safety Regulations – Sections 5 and 9 – concerning confined spaces and welding, flame cutting and/or soldering.
This should be read in conjunction with Construction Regulation 27 regarding the appropriate measures to be taken to avoid the risk of fire and explosion (see Construction Regulation 27).
To ensure that when using or erecting support or form work, scaffolding and ladders, he complies with Construction Regulation 10 and others.
That good housekeeping be done, including monitoring of stacking and storage and temporary storage of flammable materials as per Construction Regulations 25 and 26.
That where explosive power tools are used, correct training is given, registers kept and precautions exercised.
That excavation work is done in accordance with Construction Regulation 11.
That blasting is done in accordance with the explosive regulations.
That demolition work is done in accordance with Construction Regulation 12.
That hoists, suspended platforms and boatswain’s chairs comply with the Construction Regulation requirements.
That when erecting or using scaffolding, in addition to the Construction Regulation requirements, SANS code 85 is complied with.
The Contractor undertakes to carry out his obligations as required by law for the construction work to be carried out. These regulations shall not be deemed to relieve Contractors of any other civil, legal or statutory liability or obligation, or to waive or modify such other liability or obligation. Signed at ________________________________________ on _______________________________. Client’s agent _____________________________________ Principal Contractor/Contractor
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013
![Page 121: ANNEXURE 1 GUIDELINE FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPILATION … · guideline framework for the compilation of survey reports technical survey report 1. ... quality control](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062600/5accf2d87f8b9aad468d4cd7/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
DRAFT
ANNEXURE 27
EXAMPLE OF ANGLE OF SKEW
CASE 1
TWO STRAIGHTS
CASE 2
CASE 3
CASE 4
A CURVE AND A STRAIGHT
TWO CURVES
RIVER CROSSINGS
ONE CL
CL
OT
HER
S
KE
W
AN
GL
E
OF
ONE CL
OTHER S
KE
W
AN
GL
E
OF
S
KE
W
AN
GL
E
OF
CL
TA
NGE
NT
CL
S
KE
W
AN
GL
E
OF
CL
TA
NGE
NT
TANGENT
ONE
OT
HER
FL
OW
DIRECTI
ON
OF
CHAINAGE INCREASE
DIRECTI
ON
OF FL
OW
SKEW
ANGLE OF
Standard Survey Methods TMH11 Draft Version 2.0 February 2013