annexes - energy regulatory commission ar-d_annex 1.pdfmarilou c. garcia aida l. tecson ... eduardo...
TRANSCRIPT
77
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
Annexes
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
78
ANNEX “1”
2006-503 CC
2006-489 CC
2006-444 CC
2006-443 CC
2006-438 CC
2006-437 CC
2006-428 CC
2006-427 CC
2006-417 CC
2006-414 CC
Marwin D. Tesalona vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Blesida de la Cruz vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Gliceria Dorado vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Catalina Bartolome
Edgardo Tongohan vs. First LagunaElectric Corporation (FLECO)
Restituto G. Dalisay vs. First LagunaElectric Corporation (FLECO)
Marina D. Gillera vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Daria Himongala vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Susie Beltran vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Divina D. Yermo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Divina D. Yermo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Marwin D. Tesalona
Blesida de la Cruz
Gliceria Dorado
Catalina Bartolome
Edgardo Tongohan Vs.Fleco
Restituto G. Dalisay Vs.Fleco
Marina D. Gillera
Daria Himongala
Susie Beltran
Divina D. Yermo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
THE 193 CASES DECIDED IN THE YEAR 2006THE 193 CASES DECIDED IN THE YEAR 2006THE 193 CASES DECIDED IN THE YEAR 2006THE 193 CASES DECIDED IN THE YEAR 2006THE 193 CASES DECIDED IN THE YEAR 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated November30, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November29, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November29, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated December 5,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November29, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November29, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated September19, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated October 4,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated October 12,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November13, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
79
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Celso L. Integro
Carmelita L. Co
Marilou M. Tungol
Ma. Agnes Obanil
Almen E. Suarez
Narciso A. Luciano
Allan A. Gardon
Ernesto Macabunga
Michael M. Dagcuta
Corazon Mediran
Marilou Dy Azores
Celso L. Integro vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Carmelita L. Co vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Marilou M. Tungol vs. ManilaElectric Company (MERALCO)
Ma. Agnes Obanil vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Almen E. Suarez vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Narciso A. Luciano vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Allan A. Gardon vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Ernesto Macabunga vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Michael M. Dagcuta vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Corazon Mediran vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Marilou Dy Azores vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
2006-413 CC
2006-409 CC
2006-406 CC
2006-405 CC
2006-395 CC
2006-393 CC
2006-387 CC
2006-386 CC
2006-385 CC
2006-382 CC
2006-377 CC
Decision dated November23, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated September13, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated September27, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November30, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November30, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated June 26,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated September4, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 13,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 31,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated September13, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated August 24,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
80
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
2006-372 CC
2006-368 CC
2006-365 CC
2006-361 CC
2006-360 CC
2006-346 CC
2006-343 CC
2006-342 CC
2006-336 CC
2006-335 CC
2006-332 CC
Ma. Corazon Cruz
Domingo M. Peralla
Rosmindo Malpal
Rosalita V. Matudan
Arsenio B. Lim
Maribeth Maricaban
Fabtech Industrial Inc. /Jacqueline So
Nonato Magsino
Domingo M. Gumaro
Jesus P. Yabut
Philip F. Almero
Decision dated October 4,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated September27, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated October 4,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 6, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated August 25,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated August 31,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November20, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated June 30,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 10,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 21,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated August 10,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Ma. Corazon Cruz vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Domingo M. Peralla vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Rosmindo Malpal vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Rosalita V. Matudan vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Arsenio B. Lim vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)
Maribeth Maricaban vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Fabtech Industrial Inc. /Jacqueline So vs.Manila Electric Company (MERALCO)
Nonato Magsino vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Domingo M. Gumaro vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Jesus P. Yabut vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)
Philip F. Almero vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
81
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated June 21,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated May 30,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November27, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated October 9,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated August 15,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated December 4,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated August 7,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 20,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated May 24,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated May 30,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated May 29,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
2006-331 CC
2006-329 CC
2006-327 CC
2006-325 CC
2006-313 CC
2006-312 CC
2006-309 CC
2006-306 CC
2006-279 CC
2006-235 CC
2006-234CC
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Enrique Tan vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Rolando S. Cruz vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Benjie L. Duremdes vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Angelina N. Soriano vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Guadencio Pamaos vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Cecilia Montefalcon vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Wilfredo Fuentes vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Ericson Pimentel vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Arlyn Sarmiento vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Beverly O. Cometa vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Benjamin O. Osias vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Enrique Tan
Rolando S. Cruz
Benjie L. Duremdes
Angelina N. Soriano
Guadencio Pamaos
Cecilia Montefalcon
Wilfredo Fuentes
Ericson Pimentel
Arlyn Sarmiento
Beverly O. Cometa
Benjamin O. Osias
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
82
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated September13, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated September19, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated August 15,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated September25, 2006. MERALCO wasordered to process thecomplainant’s applicationsfor new service.
Decision dated June 6,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated May 2, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated June 7,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated June 21,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated December11, 2006. The proposedformat was approved.MERALCO is directed toadopt the same effective itsJanuary 2007 billing andpost the same in its website.
Decision dated May 31,2006. The Effective Ratethat shall be used as basisfor the computation of thepayment of the charges for
Teoderico Crelencia
Marilou C. Garcia
Aida L. Tecson
Teresita Canlas
Jel Jiongco
Luningning M. Marquez
Eduardo C. Mejia
Barnard Belleza
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC) and HydroElectric DevelopmentCorporation (HEDC)and
2006-233 CC
2006-232 CC
2006-231CC
2006-230 CC
2006-227 CC
2006-226 CC
2006-216 CC
2006-156 CC
2006-122 MC
2006-091 MC
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Teoderico Crelencia vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Marilou C. Garcia vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Aida L. Tecson vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)
Teresita Canlas versusManila ElectricCompany
Jel Jiongco vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Luningning M. Marquez vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Eduardo C. Mejia vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Barnard Belleza vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
In Re: Approval of the Proposed New BillFormat of Manila Electric Company
In the Matter of the Dispute Between HydroElectric Development Corporation (HEDC)and Northern Mini Hydro Corporation(NMHC) and National Power Corporation(NPC)
83
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
the electricity purchased bythe NPC from HEDC andNHMC shall be the prevail-ing unbundled ratesincluding all the componentsincluded in the pre-un-bundled rates (i.e. forex,power delivery charges,ancillary charges, etc.). TheNPC shall pay the differenceof the amount paid retroac-tive to October 2004 withoutprejudice to recovery fromthe GRAM. The parties weredirected to negotiate,execute a renegotiatedagreement, and submit thesame to ERC for approval.
Decision dated September21, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated April 11,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated May 31,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated October 6,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated November15, 2006. The applicationswere approved subject to thelimitation that any lossincurred by TRANSCO ingranting discounts must notbe recovered from othercustomers and not berecognized as under-recovery of its MaximumAllowable Revenue (MAR).
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Northern Mini HydroCorporation (NMHC)
Allan Poe J. Dela Paz
Editha Albano Chua
Geronima Lupanggo
Charlo Uriarte
Clark Electric Distribu-tion Corporation(CEDC) and NationalTransmission Corpora-tion (TRANSCO)
Felicidad Aguilar
Allan Poe J. Dela Paz vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Editha Albano Chua vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Geronima Lupanggo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Charlo Uriarte vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)
In the Matter of the Joint Application forApproval of the Memorandum ofAgreement (MOA) and TransmissionService Agreement (TSA) Between ClarkElectric Distribution Corporation (CEDC)and National Transmission Corporation
Felicidad Aguilar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
2006-074 CC
2006-072 CC
2006-068 CC
2006-056 CC
2006-051 RC
2006-047 CC
54
55
56
57
58
59
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
84
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
2006-046 RC
2006-047 CC
2006-046 CC
2006-045 CC
2006-044 CC
2006-043 CC
2006-042 CC
2006-041 CC
2006-040 RC
2006-040 CC
2006-038 CC
In the Matter of the Petition for theApproval/Review of the Supplement to thePower Purchase Agreement with CebuPrivate Power Corporation, with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
Felicidad Aguilar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Felicidad Aguilar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Felicidad Aguilar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Felicidad Aguilar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Felicidad Aguilar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Felicidad Aguilar vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Jeffrey Reyes vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Power Supply Agreementwith Sta. Clara International Corporation(SCIC)
Roberto Monteverde Represented byRomeo Sj Cabral vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Alicia A. Rosit vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Visayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Felicidad Aguilar
Felicidad Aguilar
Felicidad Aguilar
Felicidad Aguilar
Felicidad Aguilar
Felicidad Aguilar
Jeffrey Reyes
Bohol I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BOHECO I)
Roberto MonteverdeRepresented by RomeoSj Cabral
Alicia A. Rosit
Decision dated December28, 2006. The petition wasapproved subject to baserates on fixed and variablecapacity, energy, and othercharges.
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated November 3,2006. The application wasapproved as the agreedupon rate was 4% less thanthe prevailing basic chargesof NPC exclusive of NationalWealth and Franchise Tax.
Decision dated July 6, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated October 23,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
85
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated March 21,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 18,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated June 2,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated august 29,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated October 19,2006. The application wasapproved. The Net Con-tracted Capacity wasmodified from 1.8 MWbaseload to 65% of themaximum demand ofGUIMELCO from all sourcesof electricity.
Decision dated May 17,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated March 22,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated April 11,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 6, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
Decision dated April 25,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
2006-035 CC
2006-032 CC
2006-029 CC
2006-025 CC
2006-024 RC
2006-024 CC
2006-023 CC
2006-022 CC
2006-021 CC
2006-020 CC
Genet Cortez vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Christine Cosing vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Leticia V. Medina vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Jennifer L. Villanueva vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval/Review of the Amended Electricity SupplyAgreement (ESA) with Trans-Asia Oil andEnergy Development Corporation withPrayer for Provisional Authority
Ramon E. Viola vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Ma. Lourdes Paraiso vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Edna Gutierrez vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Efren Abantao vs. Manila Electric Com-pany (MERALCO)
Catalina Leones vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Genet Cortez
Christine Cosing
Leticia V. Medina
Jennifer L. Villanueva
Guimaras ElectricCooperative, Inc.(GUIMELCO) andTrans-Asia Oil EnergyDevelopment Corpora-tion (TA-Oil)
Ramon E. Viola
Ma. Lourdes Paraiso
Edna Gutierrez
Efren Abantao
Catalina Leones
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
86
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated October 19,2006. The 32 TSCs wereapproved.
Decision dated October 19,2006. The 31 TSCs wereapproved.
Decision dated March 1,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated June 29,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated December13, 2006. The OATS Rulesis approved with modification
Partial Decision dated July14, 2006. DAA charges inthe amount of PhP0.4170/kWh for Luzon andPhP0.5048/kWh forMindanao recoverable in 9and 16 months respectively,were approved.
Partial Decision dated July17, 2006. DAA charges inthe amount of PhP0.3203/kWh for Visayas recoverablein 5 months was approved.
Decision dated July 12,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated July 6, 2006.The case was declaredclosed and terminated.
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
Fe R. Mangilit
Rogelio O. Arago
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
Leonila NatividadRepresented byArsenio Cajurao
Nestor P. Ifurung
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Transition SupplyContracts (TSC) Entered into withDistribution Utilities Located in MindanaoAreas.
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Transition SupplyContracts (TSC) Entered into withDistribution Utilities Located in VisayasAreas.
Fe R. Mangilit vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Rogelio O. Arago vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Amendments/Revisionson the Rules, Terms and Conditions forOpen Access Transmission Service(OATS Rule)
In the Matter of the Adoption of theGeneration Rate Adjustment Mechanism(6th GRAM)
Leonila Natividad Represented by ArsenioCajurao vs. Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Nestor P. Ifurung vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
2006-018 RC
2006-017 RC
2006-017 CC
2006-016 CC
2006-015 RC
2006-013 RC
2006-009 CC
2006-008 CC
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
87
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated June 20,2006. The Price Determina-tion Methodology wasapproved subject to, amongothers, the redistribution ofnet settlement surplus tomarket participants,submission of the MarketNetwork Model and semi-annual impact study, and thedevelopment of policies andprocedures for monitoringthe market.
Decision dated October 23,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated February 8,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated August 10,2006. The petition wasapproved subject to therecovery of the differencebetween the Cash Costs andthe amount already collectedfrom the consumers peggedat PhP15 Million or theactual Operation & Mainte-nance expenses, whicheveris lower. VECO and CPPCwere directed to arrive at apermanent agreement toresolve the impasse in thenegotiations for the upwardadjustment of electricityprice before the expiration ofthe extension of the CashCost arrangement.
Decision dated September20, 2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Decision dated March 20,2006. The case wasdeclared closed andterminated.
Department of Energy(DOE) through thePhilippine ElectricityMarket Corporation(PEMC)
Manuel S. Cosca
Lilian J. Estanislao
Visayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Bernadette Orbigo
Lazaro Punongbayan
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Price DeterminationMethodology for the Philippine WholesaleElectricity Spot Market
Manuel S. Cosca vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Lilian J. Estanislao vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
In the Matter of the Petition for theRecovery of Additional Cost IncurredPursuant to the Emergency MeasuresUndertaken to Avoid Shut Down ofOperations with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
Bernadette Orbigo vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
Lazaro Punongbayan vs. Manila ElectricCompany (MERALCO)
2006-007 RC
2006-005 CC
2006-004 CC
2006-003 RC
2006-003 CC
2006-002 CC
89
90
91
92
93
94
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
88
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated March 8,2006. The application wasapproved.
Decision dated April 26,2006. The application for therehabilitation andreconductoring of andinstallation of a secondcircuit on the Petersville-TransCo Mexico 69 kV Sub-transmission line project wasapproved. A permit fee in theamount of PhP676,789.79was imposed.
Decision dated August 16,2006. The application wasapproved. A permit fee in theamount of PhP2,020,270.21was imposed.
Decision dated March 15,2006. The application toobtain loan in order toexpand, upgrade, andenhance CEPALCO’selectric system and facilitiesfor the period 2005 to 2009was approved.
Decision dated May 10,2006. The application wasapproved. A permit fee in theamount of PhP418,034 wasimposed.
Decision dated June 1,2006. Capital projects for theyears 2001 to 2005 wereapproved. A permit fee in theamount of PhP576,235.76was ordered paid.
Cagayan Electric Lightand Power Company,Inc. (CEPALCO)
Angeles ElectricCorporation (AEC)
Cagayan Electric Powerand Light Company,Inc. (CEPALCO)
Cagayan Electric Power& Light Company, Inc.(CEPALCO)
Qurino Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (QUIRELCO)
Bohol Light Company,Inc. (BOHECO)
In the Matter of the Application for theConversion of Dollar Loan to Peso Loan(US$4,472,222.20)
In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Implement Major Capital Projects forYear 2006, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application for MajorCapital Projects for 2000 - 2005 , Namely:1) Natumulan - Pueblo De Oro 69 KV line,2) TRANSCO Aplaya - PKI 138 KV Line,3) Pueblo De Oro Substation, 4)Macasandig Substation, 5) SCADAProject, 6) Reconductoring of 69KV Linefrom Cugman to Camaman-an, 7) 3-Phase Upgrading of Puerto-Alae Line,and 8) 138 KV Line for ECAC in thePHIVIDEC Area
In the Matter of the Application to Obtainan Eight Hundred Twelve Million EightHundred Five Thousand Peso (PhP812,805,000.00) Loan and to Enter into aMortgage Agreement to Secure the Loan
In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto (a) Acquire, Install, Construct andMaintain One (1) 10MVA Substation (b)Construct and Maintain an 18-KM Subtransmission Line and (c) Relocate One(1) 5MVA Substation and Substation SiteDevelopment, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof Electric Capital Projects within theFranchise Area with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
2005-296 MC
2005-280 MC
2005-270 MC
2005 – 239 MC
2005 – 231 MC
2005-213 MC
95
96
97
98
99
100
89
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Philippine ElectricityMarket Corporation(PEMC)
Philippine ElectricityMarket Corporation(PEMC)
Panay Electric Com-pany, Inc. (PECO)
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO) and PowerSector Assets andLiabilities ManagementCorporation (PSALM)
Decision dated June 22,2006. The proposedAdministered Price Determi-nation Methodology wasdisapproved. PEMC wasauthorized to impose anadministered price based onthe load weighted averageex-post energy price duringmarket suspension andintervention.
Decision dated June 22,2006. Market RegistrationFees at a fixed rate ofPhP50,000 plus registrationexpenses and MarketTransaction Fees in the totalamount of PhP433,624,276to cover PEMC’s budgetaryrequirements for CY 2006were approved.
Decision dated March 10,2006. The amendment wasapproved subject to certainconditions.
Decision dated June 13,2006. The ERC resolved,among others, to apply thisdecision to the single entitythat provides RegulatedTransmission Services underthe TWRG irrespective ofthe Concession Agreementeventually agreed upon, todivide the reasonable costsTRANSCO is allowed torecover into three (3)components, to orderTRANSCO to treat theTransmission ConnectionService and the ResidualSubtransmission Service asExcluded Services, to adoptthe values stated in thedecision on Annual RevenueRequirement and SmoothedMaximum Annual Revenue.
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Administered PriceDetermination Methodology for thePhilippine Wholesale Electricity SpotMarket (WESM)
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Structure and Level ofMarket Fees for the Philippine WholesaleElectricity Spot Market (WESM)
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Amendment Agreement ofthe Power Purchase Agreement BetweenPanay Electric Company, Inc. and PanayPower Corporation, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of Undertaking a RevenueReset for the National TransmissionCorporation (TRANSCO) and Any FutureConcessionaire Thereof for the Period of2006 to 2010 In Accordance with theAlternative Form of Rates SettingMethodology Under the TransmissionWheeling Rates Guidelines (TWRG)
2005-056 RC
2005-048 RC
2005-043RC
2005-041 RC
101
102
103
104
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
90
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated February 10,2006. Deferred AccountingAdjustments (DAAs) ofPhP660.2 Million for Luzon,PhP85.2 Million for Visayas,and PhP118.0 Million forMindanao recoverable inthree (3) years wereapproved.
Decision dated February 15,2006. The application wasapproved subject to themodification that the CPI ofCebu should be usedinstead of the foreignexchange index and theretail price index for theNational Capital Regionsince the project is pesodenominated and the powerplants are in Cebu and thatthe fuel rate of PhP0.26li/kWh is allowed instead ofPhP0.28li/kWh.
Decision dated July 26,2006. PELCO I was finedPhP212,700 for notimplementing the revisedunbundled rates effective thebilling month of April 2003.
Decision dated April 19,2006. An Overall AverageTariff Adjustment (OATA) ofPhP0.2019/kWh wasapproved.
Decision dated July 18,2006. Double-charging byNMT/NEECO III of custom-ers for the billing periodSeptember 10, 2004 toOctober 10, 2004 wasconfirmed. NMT/ NEECO IIIwas directed to strictlyimplement the ERC’sdirective relative to itsconfirmation of its PPAcharges.
National Power Corpora-tion – Small PowerUtilities Group (NPC-SPUG)
Bantayan Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BANELCO) andBantayan Island PowerCorporation (BIPCOR)
Pampanga I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(PELCO I)
Dagupan ElectricCorporation (DECORP)
Antonio Atendido Tan
In the Matter of the Adoption of theGeneration Rate Adjustment Mechanism(2nd GRAM)
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval/Review of the Power Supply Agreement(PSA) with Bantayan Island PowerCorporation (BIPCOR) and Approval ofComposite Rates with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Violation of ERCOrders, Rules and Regulations
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof Revised Rate Schedule in Compliancewith the Distribution Wheeling RatesGuidelines, and for Approval of Appraisalof Properties
Antonio Atendido Tan versus Ramon deVera, Jose Cabanilla, Ester M. Santos, allEmployees of NEA Management Team(NMT) of Nueva Ecija III Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (NEECO III) and Edita S. Bueno,Leila Bonifacio, Mila Quinahon, allEmployees of National ElectrificationAdministration (NEA)
2005-038 RC
2005-036 RC
2005-031 MC
2005-029 RC
2005-022 CC
105
106
107
108
109
91
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Electric Sales Agreement(ESA) as Amended by the Memorandumof Clarification on the Renewable EnergySales Agreement Between Ilocos NorteElectric Cooperative, Inc. (INEC) andNorthwind Power Development Corpora-tion, with Prayer for the Issuance ofProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Petition for theAvailment of the Environmental Charge/Share from the Universal Charge for theRehabilitation and Management ofWatershed Areas with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Petition for theAvailment of the Environmental Charge/Share from the Universal Charge for theRehabilitation and Management ofWatershed Areas with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Petition for theAvailment of the Environmental Charge/Share from the Universal Charge for theRehabilitation and Management ofWatershed Areas
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Renewal of the ElectricPower Supply Agreement (EPSA)Entered into by and Between HydroElectric Development Corporation andSan Fernando Electric Light and PowerCompany, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval ofthe Inclusion to AKELCO’s Retail Rate ofCost from the 5MW and 12.5MW ElectricPower Purchase Agreements (EPPA) asAmended, with Mirant Global Corporation(MIRANT)
In the Matter of the Application forAuthority to Implement/Charge the LocalFranchise Tax Rate in the Cities ofParañaque, Malolos, and Trece Martires,
2005-019 RC
2005 – 017 RC
2004 – 78
2003 – 186
2005-016 RC
2005-013 RC
2005-014 RC
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
Ilocos Norte ElectricCooperative, Inc.(INEC)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
San Fernando ElectricLight and PowerCompany, Inc.(SFELAPCO)
Aklan Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (AKELCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Decision dated February 22,2006. The application wasapproved. In case the NPCrate is no longer applicable,they may renegotiate,subject to ERC approval, thepricing scheme to reflect thetrue cost of generation.
Decision dated April 11,2006. The ConsolidatedWatershed ManagementProgram for Availment ofEnvironmental Charge underRepublic Act No. 9136 (CY2003-2005) was approved.NPC was allowed to availPhP182 Million and givenflexibility to use funds forunforeseen but necessaryprojects in the course of itswatershed managementoperations.
Decision dated July 4, 2006.The application wasapproved subject to thelimitation that the penalty forlate payment of power billsand other costs due tooperational inefficienciesshall not be passed on toconsumers.
Decision dated August 2,2006. The EPPAs wereapproved subject to the baserate of PhP2.4375/kWh, theOperation and Maintenancecomponent of which shall beadjusted based on theConsumer Price Index (CPI).
Decision dated February 1,2006. The application wasapproved subject to theconditions that the Distribu
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
92
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
and in the Province of Cavite, with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the (a) Renewal of Electricity PurchaseAgreement and (b) Extended ElectricityPurchase Agreement (EPA) Entered intoby and Between Angeles ElectricCorporation and Angeles Power Inc., withPrayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Electric Power Supply AgreementBetween Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (DLPC) and Hydro ElectricDevelopment Corporation, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Renewal of the Electric PowerSupply Agreement Between Davao Lightand Power Company, Inc. (DLPC) andHydro Electric Development Corporation,with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Construct and Maintain a 34KM. 69 KVLine from San Francisco to Talacogon,Agusan del Sur with Prayer for Provi-sional Authority
tion Charge should be thebasis of computing the LocalFranchise Tax (LFT), that inthe meantime, the TaxRecovery Adjustment Cost(TRAC) formula shall beused, and that MERALCOshall submit a proposedrecovery period for the LFTarrearages.
Decision dated February 22,2006. The application wasapproved with modificationto the effect that the CeilingRates provision of bothcontracts be limited to theTime-of-Use rates imposedby the NPC and theTRANSCO wheeling rates.In case the NPC rate is nolonger applicable, they mayrenegotiate, subject to ERCapproval, the pricing schemeto reflect the true cost ofgeneration.
Decision dated February 13,2006. The application wasapproved. In case the NPCrate is no longer applicable,they may renegotiate,subject to ERC approval, thepricing scheme to reflect thetrue cost of generation.
Decision dated February 13,2006. The application wasapproved. In case the NPCrate is no longer applicable,they may renegotiate,subject to ERC approval, thepricing scheme to reflect thetrue cost of generation.
Decision dated May 18,2006. The application wasapproved. A temporarypermit fee in the amount ofPhP434,929.50 wasimposed.
Angeles ElectricCorporation (AEC)
Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (DLPC)
Davao Light and PowerCompany, Inc. (DLPC)
Agusan del Sur ElectricCooperative, Inc.(AGELCO)
117
118
119
120
2005-010 RC
2005-002 RC
2005-001 RC
2004 – 475
93
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated December16, 2005. For the Luzonisland groups included in the14 First Wave NPC-SPUGareas, a uniform increase inthe SAGR of PhP1.934/kWhwere approved except inMasbate wherein onlyPhP1.4103/kWh increase inSAGR was approved. Noincrease was approved forthe Visayas and Mindanaoareas.
Decision dated February 20,2006. The application forthe installation, construction,and maintenance of 69kVtransmission lines, primarylines (13.8 kV) and second-ary lines (220 kV), and theexpansion of the Calibusubstation was approved. Apermit fee of PhP637,258.30was imposed.
Decision dated February 20,2006. The applications wereapproved. The ProvisionalAuthority previously issuedwas made permanent.
Decision dated March 23,2006. The CPCNs appliedfor were issued. Theprovisional authority grantedon December 6, 2004 wasmade permanent and madeeffective until June 28, 2028as provided in MERALCO’sapproved franchise.
121
122
123
124
125
126
2004-449
2004-436
2004-427
2004-01
2004 – 396
2004 – 395
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of a Subsidized/Approved[Formerly Termed “Socially-Acceptable”]Generation Rate (SAGR) and Corre-sponding Universal Charge MissionaryElectrification Subsidy (UC-ME Subsidy)for Fourteen (14) First Wave NPC-SPUGAreas
In the Matter of the Application forAuthority to Install, Construct andMaintain Proposed Major Projects forYear 2004, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval ofthe Supplemental Agreement BetweenVECO and Toledo Power Corporationwith Prayer for Issuance of ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Petition for Approval/Review of the Amended and RestatedElectric Power Purchase Agreement withToledo Power Company with Prayer forIssuance of Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for theIssuance of Certificate of Public Conve-nience an Necessity for the Operation ofElectric Service in San Pablo City,Province of Laguna, with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for theIssuance of Certificate of Public Conve-nience and Necessity for the Operation ofElectric Service in the Municipality ofTiaong, Province of Quezon, with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
National Power Corpora-tion-Small PowerUtilities Group (NPC-SPUG)
Angeles ElectricCorporation (AEC)
Visayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
94
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated March1,2006. Six (6) of the 37projects were excluded asthese were executed byIPPs. TRANSCO was finedPhP 9.44 M.
Decision dated August 24,2006. The application wasapproved subject to thelimitation that the subject lotshould not be included aspart of the rate base as itwas acquired throughdonation.
Decision dated March 1,2006. The Agreement for theSale of Electricity Energybetween MERALCO andSUNPOWER, the ElectricPower Purchase Agreementbetween MERALCO andMIRANT, the Amendment/Supplement to NPCMERALCO Contract forSupply of Electricity, theTransmission ServiceAgreement betweenMERALCO and TRANSCO,and the Protocol on NPCand MIRANT GenerationDispatch for the ElectricityRequirements ofSUNPOWER were ap-proved. SUNPOWER, on theother hand, was notexempted from the Inter-Class and Lifeline Ratesubsidies, nor was it allowedto fix the Universal Charge.MERALCO was enjoined topass on to customers asystem loss in excess of1.5% resulting from the saidcontract.
Decision dated July 26,2006. The application wasdismissed for lack ofjurisdiction since an
In the Matter of Violation of ERC Orders,Rules and Regulations (Construction of37 projects without ERC approval inviolation of Sec. 9(d) of R.A. No. 9136)
In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Convey Property by Exchange for theEstablishment of Substation in CarmelrayIndustrial Park, Canlubang, Calamba City,Laguna with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application for Authorityto Convey Property by Exchange for theEstablishment of Substations
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Memorandum of Understanding(MOU) Between and Among ManilaElectric Company (MERALCO),Sunpower Philippines Mfg. Ltd.(SUNPOWER), National TransmissionCorporation (TRANSCO), National PowerCorporation (NPC) and Mirant EnergyCorporation (MIRANT); The Agreementfor the Sale of Electric Energy BetweenMERALCO and SUNPOWER (ASEE);The Electric Power Purchase AgreementBetween MERALCO and MIRANT (PPA);Amendment/Supplement to NPC -MERALCO Contract for Supply ofElectricity; Transmission Service Agree-ment Between MERALCO and TRANSCO(TSA); and the Protocol on NPC andMirant Generation Dispatch for theElectricity Requirement of Sunpower(PROTOCOL) with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application to ChargeRoyalty Fee to Directly-ConnectedCustomers of the National PowerCorporation
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Albay Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (ALECO)
2004-3832004-252
2004-376
2001-622
2004-295
2004-180
127128
129
130
131
132
95
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
unauthorized person filedthe same.
Decision dated March 8,2006. The application wasapproved. A CPCN is issuedeffective September 3, 2003to September 2, 2028.
Decision dated May 24,2006. The sale of theCabanatuan-CELCOR 69kVsub-transmission line for anet price ofPhP11,161,446.44 wasapproved.
Decision dated March 15,2006. The sale of theMexico-SFELAPCO(Magdalena and SMC) andMexico-Elegant lines toSFELAPCO at a net price ofPhP12,632,438.42 wasapproved.
Decision dated May 31,2006. The application wasapproved. MERALCO isdirected to pass on to itscustomers whateverdiscounts it may derive fromthe effects of this approval.
Decision dated July 26,2006. The retirement of theequipment and machineriesat the Lucban Substationwas approved since theTayabas Substation canadequately service the areaeven in the absence of theLucban Substation.
Decision dated September14, 2006. The loan, intendedfor the capital and otherpertinent expendituresneeded for the moderniza-tion and rehabilitation ofCLPC’s distribution system,was approved.
In the Matter of the Application for theIssuance of Certificate of Public Conve-nience and Necessity for the Operation ofElectric Service in the Municipality ofMaripipi with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Sale of VariousSubtransmission Assets within theFranchise Area of Cabanatuan ElectricCorporation (CELCOR)
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Sale of VariousSubtransmision Lines/Assets within theFranchise Area of San Fernando ElectricLight and Power Company, Inc.(SFELAPCO)
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of the Amendments to thePower Purchase Agreements Between(a) First Gas Power Corporation (STA.RITA) and Manila Electric Company, and(b) FGP Corporation (San Lorenzo) andManila Electric Company with Prayer forProvisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application forAuthority to Withdraw from the Servicethe Equipment and/or MachineriesInstalled at Lucban Substation Located inLucban, Province of Quezon with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application forAuthority to Secure a Thirty Million FiveHundred Thousand (PhP 30,500,000.00)Peso Loan with the Union Bank of thePhilippines, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
133
134
135
136
137
138
2004 – 162
2004-145
2004 – 102
2004 – 74
2004-10
2003-557
Maripipi Multi-PurposeCooperative, Inc.(MMPC)
National TransmissionCorporation(TRANSCO)
San Fernando ElectricLight and PowerCompany, Inc.(SFELAPCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Cotabato Light andPower Company, Inc.(CLPC)
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
96
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated April 26,2006. The classification ofthe 3.4 km-138kV lines fromthe Isabel Substation to thePASAR Substation as sub-transmission assets wereretained while that of the 35km – 138kV lines fromTongonan to Isabel Substa-tion, including theSwitchyard in Mahayag,Isabel, Leyte were classifiedas transmission assets.
Decision dated February 28,2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. An annualrelease of PhP1.34 B fromthe UC-ME was authorizedfor the missionary electrifica-tion program for the years2005-2008.
Decision dated March 1,2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP5.3 M.
Decision dated January 3,2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP298.9 M.
Decision dated July 26,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP16,370,000 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated June 1,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP6,520,916 are likewiseapproved.
In the Matter of the Reclassification ofTongonan-PASAR Transmission Linesfrom Sub-transmission to TransmissionAsset
In the Matter of the Petition for theAvailments from Universal Charge theShare for Missionary Electrification
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136and Executive Order No. 119 with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136and Executive Order No. 119 with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
Philippine AssociatedSmelting and RefiningCorporation (PASAR)
National Power Corpora-tion-Small PowerUtilities Group (NPC-SPUG)
Siasi Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (SIASELCO)
Albay Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (ALECO)
Lanao del Norte ElectricCooperative, Inc.(LANECO)
First Bukidnon ElectricCooperative, Inc.(FIBECO)
2003-524
2003-424
2003-400
2003-305
2003-282
2003-276
139
140
141
142
143
144
97
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated May 31,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP11,003,000 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated August 16,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP14,908,250 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated June 1,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP2,053,500 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated June 14,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP9,882,000 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated June 1,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP16,298,400 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated August 14,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP27,973,126.30 arelikewise approved.
Decision dated August 24,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP10,065,000 are likewise
Camarines Sur II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CASURECO II)
Camarines Sur I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CASURECO I)
Marinduque ElectricCooperative, Inc.(MARELCO)
Aurora Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (AURELCO)
Don Orestes Romualdezor Leyte I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(DORELCO/LEYECO I)
South Cotabato IIElectric Cooperative,Inc. (SOCOTECO II)
Bohol II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(BOHECO II)
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provisions of R.A.9136
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136
2003-266
2003-265
2003-257
2003-253
2003-250
2003-246
2003-244
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
98
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
approved.
Decision dated August 14,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP5,092,900 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated June 14,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP2,221,335.20 arelikewise approved.
Decision dated August 16,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP26,726,000 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated August 14,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP8,899,530.25 arelikewise approved.
Decision dated June 1,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP5,939,866 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated June 14,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP818,500 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated August 16,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans with
Bohol I Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (BOHECO I)
Quirino Electric Coop-erative, Inc.(QUIRELCO)
Negros OccidentalElectric Cooperative,Inc. (NOCECO)
Iloilo I Electric Coopera-tive, Inc. (ILECO I)
Guimaras ElectricCooperative, Inc.(GUIMELCO)
Panay Electric Com-pany, Inc. (PENELCO)
Agusan del Sur ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ASELCO)
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provisions of R.A. 9136
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution Code
2003-243
2003-237
2003-221
2003—217
2003-216
2003-191
2003-162
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
99
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
a total estimated cost ofPhP2,772,545 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated February 13,2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP102.82 M.
Decision dated September4, 2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP8.79 Million.
Decision dated March 23,2006. The provisionalauthority granted toMERALCO on March 24,2003 was made permanenteffective from June 28, 2003to June 27, 2028 asprovided in its approvedfranchise.
Decision dated February 13,2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP105.5 M.
Decision dated March 1,2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP278.5 M.
Decision dated May 31,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP4,166,880 are likewiseapproved.
Pursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of a Reduction of Rates inCompliance with Section 60 of RepublicAct No. 9136 and Executive Order No.119 with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of a Reduction of Rates inCompliance with Section 60 of RepublicAct No. 9136 and Executive Order No.119 with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for theIssuance of Certificate of Public Conve-nience and Necessity for the Operation ofElectric Service in the following Cities andMunicipalities: Malabon, Manila, Pasay,Mandaluyong, Quezon, Caloocan,Makati, Parañaque, Las Piñas, Navotasand San Juan, with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of a Reduction of Rates inCompliance with Section 60 of RepublicAct No. 9136 and Executive Order No.119 with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of a Reduction of Rates inCompliance with Section 60 of RepublicAct No. 9136 and Executive Order No.119 with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136
159
160
161162163164165166167168169170171
172
173
174
2003-159
2003-145
2003 – 1392003 – 1382003 – 1372003 – 1362003 – 1352003 – 1342003 – 1332003 – 1322003 – 1312003 – 1302003 – 129
2003-94
2003-82
2003-81
Guimaras ElectricCooperative, Inc.(GUIMELCO)
Dinagat Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.(DIELCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Negros Oriental IIElectric Cooperative,Inc. (NORECO II)
Camarines Sur II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(CASURECO II)
Davao Oriental ElectricCooperative, Inc.(DORECO)
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
100
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
2003-65
2003-37
2003-33
2003-17
2003-10
2002-342
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136and Executive Order No. 119 with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provisions of R.A. 9136
In the Matter of the Omnibus Applicationfor Approval of a Reduction of Rates inCompliance with Section 60 of RepublicAct No. 9136 and Executive Order No.119 with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136and Executive Order No. 119 with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof the Statement of Compliance andCompliance Plan to the Philippine GridCode and the Philippine Distribution CodePursuant to the Provision of Republic ActNo. 9136
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof a Reduction of Rates in Compliancewith Section 60 of Republic Act No. 9136
Panay I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(PANELCO I)
Davao del Norte ElectricCooperative, Inc.(DANECO)
Nueva Ecija I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(NEECO I)/ NuevaEcija II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(NEECO II)/ PeninsulaElectric Cooperative,Inc. (PENELCO)/ TarlacI Electric Cooperative,Inc. (TARELCO I)/Tarlac II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(TARELCO II)/Zambales I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ZAMECO I)/Zambales II ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ZAMECO II)
Negros OccidentalElectric Cooperative,Inc. (NOCECO)
Davao del Sur ElectricCooperative, Inc.(DASURECO)
Pampanga I ElectricCooperative, Inc.(PELCO I)/ Pampanga
Decision dated April 19,2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP215.2 M.
Decision dated June 14,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP44,168,600 are likewiseapproved.
Partial Decision dated May29, 2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP235 Million for NEECO I.(The application of otherECs were approved in aDecision dated June 14,2005).
Decision dated February 27,2006. The provisionalauthority was madepermanent. The outstandingloan condoned totaledPhP181.05 M.
Decision dated June 1,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP16,970,000 are likewiseapproved.
Partial Decision datedJanuary 3, 2006. Except forthe application of PELCO I,
175
176
177
178
179
180
101
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
which has yet to be decided,the provisional authoritiesissued to the applicantswere made permanent. Theoutstanding loan condonedtotaled PhP365.4 Million forPELCO II, PhP183.9 Millionfor PELCO III, and PhP37.2Million for PRESCO.
Decision dated August 15,2006. The Statement ofCompliance was approved.The Compliance Plans witha total estimated cost ofPhP10,367,000 are likewiseapproved.
Decision dated March 8,2006. The application wasapproved with a Cost ofReproduction New ofPhP4.54 Billion and SoundValue of P2.45 Billion as ofAugust 9, 2001.
Decision dated February 15,2006. An Overall AverageTariff Adjustment (OATA) ofPhP0.1853/kWh wasapproved.
Decision dated June 28,2006. The PPA wasapproved subject to therecoverable base energy ofPhP2.50 plus fuel costadjustment.
Decision dated February 24,2006. The petition wasapproved but the rate ispegged at the effective rateof the Luzon Grid or thepurchased power cost underthe Agreement, whichever islower. Any amount in excessof the PhP3.8299/kWh(capacity fee for the SanRoque plant) shall be part ofthe energy charge allowableunder the GRAM.
II Electric Cooperative,Inc. (PELCO II)/Pampanga III ElectricCooperative, Inc.(PELCO III)/ PampangaRural Electric ServiceCooperative, Inc.(PRESCO)
Antique ElectricCooperative, Inc.(ANTECO)
Visayan ElectricCompany, Inc. (VECO)
Dinagat Island ElectricCooperative, Inc.(DIELCO)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
and Executive Order No. 119 with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Statement of Complianceand Compliance Plan to the PhilippineGrid Code and the Philippine DistributionCode Pursuant to the Provision ofRepublic Act No. 9136
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Sound Value Appraisal ofApplicant’s Properties
In the Matter of the Application forApproval of the Unbundled RatesPursuant to the Provisions of RepublicAct No. 9136
In the Matter of the Petition for Authorityfor the Inclusion of the Power PurchaseAgreement with Island Power Corporation(IPC) in the Fuel and Purchased PowerClause Adjustment (FPCA) with Prayerfor Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Petition for Authorityfor the Inclusion of the Power Purchase/Energy Conversion Agreement of the SanRoque Multipurpose Project in the Fueland Purchase Power Adjustment (FPCA)with Prayer for Provisional Authority
2002-341
2002-28
2001 – 928
2001-8422001-58
2001 – 816
181
182
183
184185
186
Energy Regulatory Commission/Annual Report 2006
102
CASENUMBER
CASE TITLEAPPLICANT/
COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT
DECISION
Decision dated May 24,2006. The petition wasapproved. The provisionalauthority granted onSeptember 13, 2004 wasmade permanent.
Decision dated August 24,2006. The petition wasapproved. Any amount inexcess of PhP3.8299/kWh(capacity fee for the SanRoque plant) shall be part ofthe energy charge allowableunder the GRAM.
Decision dated May 15,2006. The application wasapproved. A temporarypermit fee in the amount ofPhP19,189,846.37 wasimposed.
Decision dated May 15,2006. The application wasapproved. A permit fee in theamount ofPhP57,234,895.07 wasimposed.
Decision dated March 22,2006. The application wasapproved subject to thelimitation that the recover-able rate amounts toPhP1.2008/kWh plus theescalation factor provided inthe contract.
Decision dated March 1,2006. The application wasapproved at a rate equal toUS$0.0734/kWh. Any under-recovery between theprovisionally approved rateof PhP3.8299/kWh and thefinal approved rate shall berecovered through theGRAM.
In the Matter of the Petition for Authority forthe Inclusion of the Power Purchase/Energy Conversion Agreement of theNatural Gas Combined Cycle Power PlantProject (NATGAS) in the Fuel andPurchase Power Adjustment (FPCA) withPrayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Petition of Authority forthe Inclusion of the Power Purchase/Energy Conversion Agreement of theBakun Hydro Electric Power Plant Project(BAKUN) in the Fuel and PurchasedPower Clause Adjustment (FPCA) withprayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Application for theApproval of Electric Capital Projectswithin the Franchise Area for the CalendarYear 2001 with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application for Approvalof Electric Capital Projects within theFranchise Area for the Calendar Years1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 and2000 with Prayer for Provisional Authority
In the Matter of the Petition for Authority forthe Inclusion of the power Purchase /Energy Conversion Agreement of theMindanao II Geothermal Power PlantProject (Mt. Apo II) in the Fuel andPurchase Power Adjustment Clause(FPCA) with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
In the Matter of the Application for Authorityfor the Inclusion of the Power Purchase/Energy Conversion Agreement of theCasecnan Multi-Purpose Project in theFuel and Purchased Power AdjustmentClause (FPCA) with Prayer for ProvisionalAuthority
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
Manila Electric Company(MERALCO)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
National Power Corpora-tion (NPC)
2001 – 814
2001-813
2001-7972001-13
2001 – 756(2000-167)
2001 – 714
2001-457(98-50)
187
188
189190
191
192
193