annex 3 01
TRANSCRIPT
Measure 06
typ*:TM
length:5,4 km
average traffic volumepublic transport
on measure:30000 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volumepublic transport
on measure:38600 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volumepublic transport
on measure:15000 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram
roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
investment costs:
19,2 Mio. Person-km/year
347,2 Tsd. Person-h/year
-1926,1 t/year
57,8 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. 4
difference between realization case and norealization case
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
maintenance costs:
total costs:
Costs for additional needof tram waggons:
Tramway line 4
* Types:
Tramway track to Sykhiv from the existing end point stop vul. Mushaka vul. V. Stusa, Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny to Sykhiv
137,5 Mio. UAH
7 Mio. UAH
79,7 Mio. UAH
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 1/13
Measure 07
typ*:TM
length:3.2 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:15600 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:15600 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:15600 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
Tramway line 4
* Types:
Tramway track: Sykhiv, vul. Vernadskoho, Bus terminal vul. Stryyska
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
49.1 Mio. UAH
6
difference between realization case and norealization case
8.8 Mio. Person-km/year
73.8 Tsd. Person-h/year
-889.4 t/year
21.6 Mio. UAH
70.7 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need
of tram waggons: 3 Mio. UAH
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 2/13
Measure 08
typ*:TM
length:3.2 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:12700 persons per 24h
(Line 3)9800 persons per 24h
(Line 5)
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:12700 persons per 24h
(Line 3)9800 persons per 24h
(Line 5)
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:12700 persons per 24h
(Line 3)9800 persons per 24h
(Line 5)
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
3
difference between realization case and norealization case
589.8 Tsd. Person-h/year
-3342.9 t/year
33.3 Mio. Person-km/year
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
short description:
Trolleybus
Tramway line 3 and line 5
* Types:
Tramway track: Bus Terminal vul. Stryyska to vul. Knyahyny Olhy
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
40.8 Mio. UAH
18.4 Mio. UAH
roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need
of tram waggons:
59.2 Mio. UAH
6 Mio. UAH
investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 3/13
Measure 09
typ*:TM
length:6.9 km 6.3 km
(Line 2) (Line 6)
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:15900 persons per 24h
(Line 2)9200 persons per 24h
(Line 6)
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:27300 persons per 24h
(Line 2)9600 persons per 24h
(Line 6)
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:2900 persons per 24h
(Line 2)400 persons per 24h
(Line 6)
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
difference between realization case and norealization case
16.7 Mio. Person-km/year
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
Tramway line 2 and line 6
* Types:
Reconstruction of Tramway Line 2 and 6 (EBRD)
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
Trolleybus
12 Mio. UAH
120.0 Mio. UAH
251.2 Tsd. Person-h/year
-1675.2 t/year
141.3 Mio. UAH
261.3 Mio. UAH
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
11
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need
of tram waggons:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 4/13
Measure 10
typ*:TM
length:6.9 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:15900 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:27300 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:2900 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs:
3.5 Mio. UAH
Trolleybus line 12
* Types:
49.1 Mio. UAH
Extension Line 12: to vul. Shevchenka
105.7 Tsd. Person-h/year
-453.7 t/year
Costs for additionalneed of trolleybusses:
difference between realization case and norealization case
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus
investment costs include costs for construction of new road
4.5 Mio. Person-km/year
59.3 Mio. UAH
10
10.2 Mio. UAH
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 5/13
Measure 11
typ*:TM
length:3.4 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:5900 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:6900 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:5200 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs: 23.1 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
difference between realization case and norealization case
4.7 Mio. Person-km/year
99.4 Tsd. Person-h/year
-470.4 t/year
roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional
need of trolleybusses:
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
35.8 Mio. UAH
10.5 Mio. UAH
investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road
Trolleybus line 24
* Types:
12.7 Mio. UAH
Extension of Line 24: Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny, vul. Khutorivka to vul. Stryyska
The line 24 in the model goes alternately to vul. Stryyska (measure 11) and to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14). In case the measure 11 will not be realised it was assumed that all trips go to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14).
investment costs:
5
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 6/13
Measure 12
typ*:TM
length:4.3 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:2700 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:5100 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:1000 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs:
17.5 Mio. UAH
Trolleybus line 24
* Types:
16.0 Mio. UAH
Extension Line 11/24: vul. Dzh. Vashyngtona, vul. Pasichna, Mayorivka, vul. Medovoy Pechery
The measure 12 was added to the model as independent sub-line of the trolleybus line 24 from vul. Zelena to the end ofvul. Medovoy Pechery
19.2 Tsd. Person-h/year
-105.4 t/year
Costs for additionalneed of trolleybusses:
difference between realization case and norealization case
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus
investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road
1.0 Mio. Person-km/year
45.3 Mio. UAH
13
29.2 Mio. UAH
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 7/13
Measure 13
typ*:TM
length:1.0 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:7200 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:8700 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:5400 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs: 8.2 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
difference between realization case and norealization case
1.2 Mio. Person-km/year
18.6 Tsd. Person-h/year
-120.2 t/year
investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road
estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional
need of trolleybusses:
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
12.6 Mio. UAH
8
3.5 Mio. UAH
Trolleybus line 24
* Types:
4.5 Mio. UAH
Extension of Trolley bus line 24 for 1 Kilometer from cinema in Zone „Santa Barbara“
The measure 13 was added to model as blind line within the trolleybus line.
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
total costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 8/13
Measure 14
typ*:TM
length:3.3 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:1400 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:2000 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:1000 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs: 22.4 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
difference between realization case and norealization case
3.2 Mio. Person-km/year
73.4 Tsd. Person-h/year
-320.5 t/year
investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road
estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional
need of trolleybusses:
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
34.7 Mio. UAH
9
10.5 Mio. UAH
Trolleybus line 24
* Types:
12.3 Mio. UAH
Construction of 2.5 km new Trolley bus line from cinema to the existing line on vul. Karbyshev over Sykhiv Bridge for passenger transport from Sykhiv - Novyy Lviv, connection of two highly passenger frequented parts of the city Sykhiv und Novyy Lviv and shortest Line from Sykhiv in the city centre (Pl. Petrushevycha) over vul. Stusa
The trolleybus line 1 is out of order because of the realised tram line 4. The line 24 in the model goes from the cinema alternately to vul. Stryyska (measure 11) and to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14).In case the measure 14 is not realised, it was assumed that all trips gotovul. Stryyska (measure 11).
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
total costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 9/13
Measure 16
typ*:TM
length:5.0 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:3100 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:7200 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:900 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs:
7.0 Mio. UAH
Trolleybus line 2
* Types:
14.9 Mio. UAH
Extension Line 2 to vul. Trolleybusna (circle line in 2 directions: Kulparkivska-Naukova-Trolleybusna, V.Velykoho) - chance to create new lines to connect Sykhiv)
101.6 Tsd. Person-h/year
-434.8 t/year
Costs for additionalneed of trolleybusses:
difference between realization case and norealization case
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road
total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus
4.3 Mio. Person-km/year
42.1 Mio. UAH
7
27.2 Mio. UAH
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 10/13
Measure 17
typ*:TM
length:1.2 km (8.2 km)shifting (whole line)
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:11000 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:18000 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:3100 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs: 8.2 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
difference between realization case and norealization case
7.2 Mio. Person-km/year
169.7 Tsd. Person-h/year
-725.5 t/year
investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road
estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional
need of trolleybusses:
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
12.6 Mio. UAH
1
14.0 Mio. UAH
Trolleybus line 3
* Types:
4.5 Mio. UAH
Shifting of one line (one direction) from vul. Stryyska to vul. Trolleybusna over vul. V. Velykoho - increase of traffic flows by the double line on vul. Rubachka
Measure 17 includes a doubling on the vul. Rubachka by doubling of the time table of the whole line. The benefits and costs were calculated together with measure 18.
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
total costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 11/13
Measure 18
typ*:TM
length:1.2 km (8.2 km)shifting (whole line)
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:11000 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:18000 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:3100 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs:
0.0 Mio. UAH
Trolleybus line 3
* Types:
4.5 Mio. UAH
Analogue (Measure 17) shifting of the Line in one direction from vul. Trolleybusna to vul. Stryyska over Naukova (right turn is no bar for the other traffic) Line can be an important Trolley bus connection to Bus Terminal and Stadion
Measure 18 includes a doubling on the vul. Rubachka by doubling of the time table of the whole line. The benefits and costs were calculated together with measure 17.
169.7 Tsd. Person-h/year
-725.5 t/year
Costs for additionalneed of trolleybusses:
difference between realization case and norealization case
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road
total costs:estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus
7.2 Mio. Person-km/year
12.6 Mio. UAH
2
8.2 Mio. UAH
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 12/13
Measure 19
typ*:TM
length:2.0 km
average traffic volume public transport
on measure:1900 persons per 24h
maximum traffic volume public transport
on measure:1900 persons per 24h
minimum traffic volume public transport
on measure:1900 persons per 24h
TM - TramwayTB -
comment:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
maintenance costs: 13.6 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
difference between realization case and norealization case
2.8 Mio. Person-km/year
59.9 Tsd. Person-h/year
-279.5 t/year
investment costs include costs for construction of new road
estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional
need of trolleybusses:
short description:
Trolleybus
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport.
73.1 Mio. UAH
12
3.5 Mio. UAH
Trolleybus line 5
* Types:
59.5 Mio. UAH
Future close connection of the Bus terminal to the Stadion by trolley bus
investment costs:roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
total costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 13/13
Measure 01
typ*:A
lanes:
length:
tunnel/bridges:
average traffic volume on measure:
maximum traffic volume on measure:
minimum traffic volume on measure:
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
investment costs:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
total costs:
difference between realization case and no realization case
costs:
Completion of the road circle
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
traffic performance:
short description:
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
time in traffic:
Completion of the road circle
national measure not included in urban budget
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 1/26
Measure 02
typ*:A
lanes:
length:
tunnel/bridges:
average traffic volume on measure:
maximum traffic volume on measure:
minimum traffic volume on measure:
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
Extension of the entire road circle to four lanes
* Types:
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
Extension of the entire road circle to four lanes
national measure not included in urban budget
time in traffic:
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
Motorway/ highway
traffic performance:
difference between realization case and no realization case
roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
total costs:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 2/26
Measure 03
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:10 km
tunnel/bridges:yes / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
42300 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
58500 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
32300 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
Construction of a main road near city centre, which will carry all traffic flows through the city centre in north-south direction (cp. current master plan)Course: from exit to Kiev, vul. Khmelnytskoho, over railway line Lviv-Krasne, over High Castle, with tunneled sections, new section alongside Shevchenkivskyy Gay, crossing vul. Lychakivska, Zelena, Stusa, along vul. Ivana Franka and vul. Stryyska to the exit to Stryy
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
difference between realization case and no realization case
-21 Mio. Veh-km/year
-2038 Tsd. Veh-h/year
234.8 Mio. UAH
6
- 5871 t/year
1399 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
total costs:
investment costs:
Chorda - Axis
1633.8 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 3/26
Measure 04
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:20 km
tunnel/bridges:no / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
36600 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
58300 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
16700 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Small inner circle
- 8221 t/year
1167.5 Mio. UAH
* Types:
4
difference between realization case and no realization case
total costs: 1395.7 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
-27 Mio. Veh-km/year
-4828 Tsd. Veh-h/year
228.2 Mio. UAH
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
Motorway/ highway
The inner circle is planned to proceed from the industrial centre Sykhiv, alongside the railway line Lviv-Khodoriv at vul. Luhanska, crossing the railway line Lviv-Mostyska-frontier, vul. Syayvo, Levandivska, Yeroshenka, Lypynskoho, through the northern industrial zone, crossing the railway line Lviv-Krasne, vul. Bogdanivska (planned) through the south-eastern industrial zone, vul. Pasychna, to the industrial centre Sykhiv
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 4/26
Measure 05
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:27 km
tunnel/bridges:no / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
33100 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
46500 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
18400 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 1631.7 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
-6985 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Route: from Sykhiv industrial zone, vul Khutorivka, Naukova, Ryashivska, crossing of vul. Horodotska and railway lines Lviv-Stryy and Lviv-Mostyska-frontier, new main road Roksolyani (planned), near residential area Ryasne, through forest park zone, to the northern residential area Zboyska and to the exit towards Kiev
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
259.2 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Peripheral semi-circle
- 20553 t/year
1372.5 Mio. UAH
3
difference between realization case and no realization case
-79 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 5/26
Measure 06
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:8.5 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
24500 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
32800 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
11100 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
67 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Exit Ternopil
- 666 t/year
335 Mio. UAH
9
difference between realization case and no realization case
-3 Mio. Veh-km/year
-425 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Exit Ternopil - from band main road alongside Glynyanskyy Trakt to the circle bypass
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 422 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 6/26
Measure 07
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:6.5 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
25500 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
49100 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
20400 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 354.1 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
-203 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Exit Ivano-Frankivsk - from the circle connection and peripheral semi-circle to Sykhiv alongside vul. Zelena to the circle bypass
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
59.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Exit Ivano-Frankivsk
-112 t/year
295 Mio. UAH
14
difference between realization case and no realization case
-0.8 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 7/26
Measure 08
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:6.8 km
tunnel/bridges:no / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
15800 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
18900 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
6800 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
54.9 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Exit Zhovkva
27 t/year
289 Mio. UAH
22
difference between realization case and no realization case
0.3 Mio. Veh-km/year
-274 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Exit Zhovkva - from band main road to the northern bypass motorway
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 343.9 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 8/26
Measure 09
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:6.2 km
tunnel/bridges:no / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
28700 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
57600 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
5200 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 340.1 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
-203 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Exit Horodok - from inner circle at vul. Horodotska to Konopnyca
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
58.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Exit Horodok
-376 t/year
282 Mio. UAH
11
difference between realization case and no realization case
-1 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 9/26
Measure 10
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:8.8 km
tunnel/bridges:no / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
20400 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
34300 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
12300 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
86.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Exit Yavoriv
-235 t/year
408 Mio. UAH
13
difference between realization case and no realization case
-1 Mio. Veh-km/year
-231 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Exit Yavoriv - from inner circle at vul. Shevchenka through Ryasne industrial zone to the peripheral circle
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 494.1 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 10/26
Measure 11
typ*:B
lanes:4
length:4 km
tunnel/bridges:no / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
12300 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
14700 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
6500 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 249.4 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
-204 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Road construction Vernadskyy Prospekt, 3.2 km length
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
39.9 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Road construction Vernadskyy prospekt
-45 t/year
209.5 Mio. UAH
15
difference between realization case and no realization case
-0.4 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 11/26
Measure 12
typ*:B
lanes:
length:
tunnel/bridges:no / no
total traffic volumeheading to the node:
84500 Veh/24h
cross sectionwith highest trafficvolume at the node
45200 Veh/24h
cross sectionwith least traffic
volume at the node39000 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
3.6 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
15 Mio. UAH
17
short description:
total costs: 18.6 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
Crossing vul. Stryyska - vul. Khutorivska, Naukova
* Types:
65 t/year
difference between realization case and no realization case
0.1 Mio. Veh-km/year
-124 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Complete extension of crossing vul. Stryyska - vul. Khutorivska, Naukova (multilevel solution)
Motorway/ highway
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 12/26
Measure 16
typ*:C
lanes:4
length:4.5 km
tunnel/bridges:no / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
9200 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
9700 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
8400 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
40.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
New main roads in western residential/ industrial areas
-964 t/year
199.5 Mio. UAH
5
difference between realization case and no realization case
-4 Mio. Veh-km/year
-394 Tsd. Veh-h/year
New main roads in the western residential and industrial areas with connection to the motorway Lviv-Mostyska-frontier
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 239.6Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 13/26
Measure 17
typ*:C
lanes:4
length:2.8 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
16500 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
18900 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
15700 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 142.9Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
-260 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Vul. Kulparkivska and Knyahyni Olhy - connection of central urban districts with southern residential areas and Sokilnyky
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
23.4 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Connection of city with southern districts
-178 t/year
119.5 Mio. UAH
10
difference between realization case and no realization case
-0.6 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 14/26
Measure 18
typ*:D
lanes:2
length:3.8 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
11000 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
20800 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
2000 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
33.5 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Traffic improvement between vul. Zelena/ vul. Sakharova
622 t/year
131.3 Mio. UAH
16
difference between realization case and no realization case
2 Mio. Veh-km/year
28 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Traffic improvement on the section between vul. Zelena and vul. Sakharova (vul. Franko, Rustaveli, Voloska, Sarytskykh, Vitovskoho, Kopernyka). Planning of one-way-streets at vul. Franko, Rustaveli, Voloska, Zarytskykh, SaksahanskohoPlanning of reconstruction of vul. Voloska - road extension near Stryyskyy-market to 3 lanes with organisation of one-way-streets and extension of vul. Rustaveli near vul. ArchypenkaReorganisation of bus- and electric public transport
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 164.8 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 15/26
Measure 19
typ*:D
lanes:2
length:1.1 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
6000 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
15200 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
1500 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 56.1 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
-19 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Improvement of the traffic scheme at Pl. Petrushevycha, at vul. Saksahanskoho and Zelena incl. establishment of one-way-streets and access from vul. Saksahanskoho to Pl. Petrushevycha via vul. Kostomarova (extended by partial demolition of buildings) and traffic light controlled crossings - relief of crossing vul. Zelena – vul. FrankaThe basic traffic scheme provides the establishment of a one-way-street and the effective utilisation of vul. Sarytskykh: Planning of an access to this street from vul. Vitovskoho (left corner of the park, in front of park entrance). inspection of th variant of continuation of vul. Sarytskykh towards vul. Bohuna (perspective 2012-2015).
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
12.5 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Improvement of the traffic scheme at Pl. Petrushevycha
97 t/year
43.6 Mio. UAH
20
difference between realization case and no realization case
0.3 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 16/26
Measure 20
typ*:D
lanes:2
length:2 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
8000 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
12200 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
3100 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
19.1 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Reconstruktion of sections in north-eastern city centre
74 t/year
72 Mio. UAH
21
difference between realization case and no realization case
0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year
27 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Reconstruction of several sections to improve traffic flows in the north-eastern city centre: alongside Lychakivska, Halytskyy place, Prospekt Svoboda and vul. Pidvalna by planned intensified utilisation of the streets Sankovetska, Lysenka, Vynnychenkarequired reconstruction of parts of vul. Lysenka (executed), opening of a small part of vul. Vynnychenka (approx. 70 m), to secure the left-hand exit to vul. Kryvonosa and the ascension to vul. Honta by circumnavigatingperspectively: partial reconstruction of Vynnychenka, to redirect traffic flows from vul. Franka to Honta through Vynnychenka which will relieve Pidvalna. demolition of a salient quoin at vul. Honta to increase the passage capacity
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 91.1 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 17/26
Measure 21
typ*:D
lanes:3
length:1.4 km
tunnel/bridges:no / yes
average traffic volume on measure:
13300 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
16000 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
10900 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 74.9 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
22 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Radical relief of the city centre from transit traffic on Lychakivska, Mayorivka, Zelena by construction of a 3-lane road as a connection of Kharkivska with Musorskoho near Znesinnya park - redirection of traffic flows on vul. Korduba and tunnel entrance to Promyslova and Khmelnytskoho, through Saklynskykh to Kovelska and Polova to the northern district of the city
The 3-laned road construction measure goes via Chorda - Axis (measure 3), for measure 21 only the drives to the Chorda - Axis were modelled as measure.
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
14.2 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
3-lane road connection of Kharkivska with Musorskoho
154 t/year
60.7 Mio. UAH
19
difference between realization case and no realization case
0.8 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 18/26
Measure 22
typ*:D
lanes:2
length:1.2 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
8100 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
10500 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
6200 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
13.0 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Abscission of the corner on crossing Pstrak/ Kleparivska
-53 t/year
46.2 Mio. UAH
12
difference between realization case and no realization case
-0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year
3 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Abscission of the sharp corner at the green area on the street crossing Pstrak and Kleparivska, to allow for an active traffic flow from Horodocka via J.Mudroho to Kleparivska and onto north, radical reconstruction of vul. Y Mudroho (currently under construction)
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 59.2 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 19/26
Measure 23
typ*:D
lanes:2
length:0.5 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
7500 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
11000 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
4900 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 34.0 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
-133 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Reconstruction vul. Chuprynky (partly executed) and Melnyka to intensify traffic flows from Horbachevskoho to Antonovycha for relief of vul. Sakharova and Kopernyka as well as the city centreTraffic from Antonovycha via vul. Bandery, Nevskoho and Ozarkevycha will be directed via Horodotska and Y.Mudroho-Pstraka-Kleparivska to the north of the city.
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
8.5 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Reconstruction Chuprynky and Melnyka
75 t/year
25.5 Mio. UAH
18
difference between realization case and no realization case
0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 20/26
Measure 24
typ*:D
lanes:3
length:1 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
14200 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
15700 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
8700 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
12.0 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Enlarging of sections of vul. Kopernyka
-117 t/year
45.5 Mio. UAH
8
difference between realization case and no realization case
-0.5 Mio. Veh-km/year
-46 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Enlarging of sections of vul. Kopernyka (Kopernyka-Verbytskoho, Kopernyka-Bandery, Kopernyka-Stefanyka) to improve the situation on vul. Sakharova and Vitovskoho towards city centre at the expense of the pavement
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 57.5 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 21/26
Measure 25
typ*:D
lanes:3
length:0.4 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
13600 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
14100 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
13200 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs: 23.0 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
-59 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Start of the construction of a 3-lane-road between vul. Slovatskoho and Lepkoho through the green area in front of Franko memorial (relocation of the stopping points at university to secure the construction of the south-western circle aroung the city centre and the relief of vul. Sichovykh Striltsiv.
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
4.8 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
3-lane-road between vul. Slovatskoho and Lepkoho
0.2 t/year
18.2 Mio. UAH
23
difference between realization case and no realization case
-0.1 Mio. Veh-km/year
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 22/26
Measure 26
typ*:D
lanes:2
length:0.3 km
tunnel/bridges:no / no
average traffic volume on measure:
15100 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
16600 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
10800 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
1.4 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Finalisation 1st phase connection Zaliznychna/ Lutskoho
-222 t/year
7,8 Mio. UAH
1
difference between realization case and no realization case
-1 Mio. Veh-km/year
-155 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Finalisation of 1st phase workings for the connection of Zaliznychna and Lutskoho for traffic flows from district Pryvokzalnyy to vul.Shevchenka and relief of Horodotska
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 9.2 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 23/26
Measure 27
typ*:D
lanes:
length:
tunnel/bridges:no / no
total traffic volumeheading to the node:
42300 Veh/24h
cross sectionwith highest trafficvolume at the node
31000 Veh/24h
cross sectionwith least traffic
volume at the node8100 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
Roundabout at crossing prospekt Chornovola, Pid Dubom
* Types:
-244 t/year
difference between realization case and no realization case
-1 Mio. Veh-km/year
-81 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Construction of a roundabout instead of crossing Prospekt Chornovola, Pid Dubom and Kulisha
Motorway/ highway
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
1.7 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
9.9 Mio. UAH
2
short description:
total costs: 11.6 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 24/26
Measure 28
typ*:D
lanes:
length:
tunnel/bridges:
average traffic volume on measure:
12700 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
16000 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
10200 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
total costs:
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
Organisational measures for the redirection of traffic flows and to activate car and bus traffic through vul. Dzherelna to relieve vul. Kulisha and Chornovola
traffic organisation only
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
Measures for redirection traffic vul. Kulisha/ Chornovola
difference between realization case and no realization case
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 25/26
Measure 29
typ*:D
lanes:4
length:0.2 km
tunnel/bridges:yes / no
average traffic volume on measure:
15000 Veh/24h
maximum traffic volume on measure:
18000 Veh/24h
minimum traffic volume on measure:
12700 Veh/24h
A - B - Main road network with
moving traffic C - Road network of general
relevance with regulatedtraffic
D - Road and traffic organisation
comment:
tunnel construction under the tramway line
17.9 Mio. UAHroughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years
maintenance costs:
-402 t/year
113 Mio. UAH
7
difference between realization case and no realization case
-2 Mio. Veh-km/year
-150 Tsd. Veh-h/year
Inspection of possibilities for tunnel construction under the tramway line on vul. Khmelnytskoho for activation of the street parallel to vul. Zamarstyniyska
The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change
short description:
* Types:Motorway/ highway
total costs: 130.9 Mio. UAH
The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions.
benefit:
traffic performance:
time in traffic:
CO2 - emission:
ranking:
costs: investment costs:
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 26/26