animals and vegetables for minerals biogeochemical ... · animals and vegetables for minerals...
TRANSCRIPT
Animals and vegetables for minerals Biogeochemical exploration through sedimentary cover from tropical savannahs to arid shrublands of the Northern Territory
Steve Hill
AGES 2016, Alice Springs Animals and vegetables for minerals Biogeochemical exploration through sedimentary cover from tropical savannahs to arid shrublands of the Northern Territory Steve Hill Director
Geological Survey of South Australia www.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au
3 Department of State Development
3 main sections…
1.Biogeochemical exploration and the Context and Background to this presentation
2.Some results from and relating to major NT plant communities 3.Some themes and challenges for further investigation
Today’s presentation…
3
4 Department of State Development
Collaboration
Students • >500 undergraduates a year (of which 120 a year would collect and prepare a plant sample for analysis) • 48 Honours students since 1998 • 15 PhDs since 2003
Industry • >50 companies represented by industry collaborators
Researchers • Helen Waldron & Colin Dunn annual visits • Stephen Hore (Geological Survey of South Australia) • CRC LEME • Deep Exploration Technologies Cooperative Research Centre
Commercial Laboratory • ACME Laboratories, Vancouver (Bill Macfarlane) • Becquerel Laboratories (Dave Garnett & Helen Waldron) • Genalysis Laboratories (Helen Waldron)
4
Geoscience MoU between NT and SA…
6
1. Biogeochemical Exploration: Context and Background
Biogeochemistry: biota providing chemical expression of geochemistry • Plants; • Animals; • Micro-organisms….
Cost and Time efficient subsurface biogeochemical information (help prioritise drilling targets)
9 Department of State Development
Advantages of plant biogeochemical exploration
Provided sampling procedure is orientated and systematic:
• Time efficient • Minimal environmental impact • Minimal cultural impact • Flexible site access needs • Cost equivalent to soil geochemistry • Potential for depth penetration (via sinker roots) and amalgamation /
homogenisation (largely via lateral roots)
10 Department of State Development
• To provide an expression of buried substrates …. especially if mineralised.
• This best occurs where variables that influence the biogeochemical result, other than buried substrates, are well constrained
Main Objective of Biogeochemical Methods for Mineral Exploration
10
snappy gum
spinifex
soil / regolith / landform - carbonate -ferruginous materials -silicified materials
Dispersion -weathering - sedimentation - erosion - transport
termitaria
beefwood
Surface to subsurface interaction -chemical -physical
Time …. - rates & balance of process - evolution models
Map & characterise
12 Department of State Development
Consistency is the key!
• Sampling Procedures • Analytical Procedures • Sampling Site Selection Procedures and
Recognition
• The better constrained the variables other then buried substrate in sampling design - then the best chance of constraining buried substrate
• Methodologies widely published but also talk to people that have done it before
Main Objective of Biogeochemical Methods for Mineral Exploration
12 Colin Dunn under the shade of a coolabah tree, Strzelecki Track
Biogeochemical Case Studies
13
1 2
3 4 6 5
8
10
9
11
12
13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20
1.King River (Cameco) 2.Pine Creek (Australasian Gold) 3.Coyote (CRC LEME - Tanami Gold) 4.Titania (CRC LEME - Newmont) 5.Indee (Range River) 6.Lander River (Tanami Gold) 7.Napperby (Toro) 8.Tibooburra – Milparinka (NSW GS) 9.Broken Hill (NSW GS) 10.Mt Caroline – Woodroofe (PepinNinni) 11.Alcurra (GSSA) 12.Mt Painter (GSSA – Heathgate Res) 13.Olary – White Dam (UoA) 14.Tunkillia – Tarcoola (Minotaur Expl) 15.Wudinna (Adelaide Resources) 16.Middleback Ra (Arrium) 17.Yorke Peninsula – Hillside (Rex Min) 18.Kangaroo Island (UoA) 19.Bookpornong (UoA) 20.Fowlers Gap (UoA) 21.Aileron (NuPower) 22.W.Gawler-Coompana (GSSA – Dunn & Waldron)
21
22 CSIRO / AMIRA
GSQ, JCU, MIM
14 Department of State Development
What has been sampled and analysed…? Eucalyptus Corymbia Acacia Triodia Heteropogon Maireana Atriplex Callitris Casuarina / Allocasuarina Eremophila Macropod scats Termitaria Meat Ants Meat Ant nests Terrestrial Gastropod shells
BIOTA TYPES
14
Media where n > 100
15 Department of State Development
2. Results from NT plant communities
1. Eucalyptus / Corymbia forest / woodlands 2. Acacia Woodlands 3. Hummock Grasslands 4. Chenopod Shrublands 5. Riparian Eucalypts
16 Department of State Development
2.1 Eucalyptus / Corymbia forest / woodlands
Distribution • Top-end
• Arnhem land • Pine Creek
Species sampled • Eucalyptus tetrodonta
(Darwin stringybark) • Eucalyptus miniata
(Darwin woollybutt) • Corymbia polycarpa
(long-fruited bloodwood)
Stringybark – Bloodwood woodland, King River region, NT
17 Department of State Development
2.1 Eucalyptus / Corymbia forest / woodlands
Beatrice U prospect • 3.37 ppm U in Corymbia
polycarpa leaves • Below detection U in sand
palm
Great Western Au prospect Ag (28 ppm) and Au (8.7 ppb) assays in Xanthostemon paradoxus and very high Zn contents (53.9-119.3 ppm)
18 Department of State Development
2.1 Eucalyptus / Corymbia forest / woodlands Species Availability along Toposequence
Eucalyptus miniata
Eucalyptus tetradonta
Corymbia polycarpa
Melaleuca viridiflora
19 Department of State Development
2.1 Eucalyptus / Corymbia forest / woodlands
Canopy Sampling
Extendable shears Anchored line (use a stick)
Tree selection important WARNING! Do not use heavily weighted line
20 Department of State Development
2.1 Eucalyptus / Corymbia forest / woodlands
Watch Out For Green Ants!
21 Department of State Development
2.1 Eucalyptus / Corymbia forest / woodlands
Green vs burnt leaves
Eucalyptus miniata tested near Pine Creek • Significant differences for La, Zn, Co, S • Not significant for As, Mo, Cu, Pb, Cr, Hg
22 Department of State Development
2.2 Acacia Woodlands
Distribution
Widespread across southern half of NT
Acacia aneura, Dunja Bore, NT
23 Department of State Development
2.2 Acacia Woodlands
Species Sampled
Acacia kempeana
Acacia aneura
Acacia bivenosa
24 Department of State Development
2.2 Acacia Woodlands
Examples
Tanami Gold Lander River Tenements • Sabre, Yataghan, Falchion…
Arafura Resources • Nolans Bore (also Eucalyptus / Corymbia
at site)
NuPower • Reynolds Range / Ti-tree Basin
Alcurra 1:100k sheet (SA) Sabre Prospect, Lander River, NT
25 Department of State Development
2.2 Acacia Woodlands
Alcurra 1:100k SA
~200 mulga sample points • Along roads / tracks
(but sampled > 20 m off tracks)
• ~2 km sample spacing • ~2.5 days sampling • Area has 80% regolith
cover
26 Department of State Development
2.2 Acacia Woodlands
Alcurra SA
• Not only detection of mafic dyke swarms
• Expressions of ‘geochemical fertility’!
27 Department of State Development
2.2 Acacia Woodlands
Challenges
• Dust • Phyllode separation
from twigs • Sub-species • Mosaic distribution
Xmas-tree form (Alcurra SA)
Standard form (Alcurra SA)
28 Department of State Development
2.3 Hummock Grasslands
Distribution
Much of southern 2 thirds of NT
29 Department of State Development
2.3 Hummock Grasslands
Species Sampled (Nathan Reid’s PhD thesis and papers has best collection of these results)
• Porcupine grass / spinifex (Triodia pungens, T. irritans) Also trees / shrubs from hummock grasslands: • Snappy gum (Eucalyptus brevifolia) • Corkwood (Hakea lorea) • Beefwood (Grevillea striata) • Bloodwood (Corymbia opaca) • Smooth barked coolibah (Eucalyptus victrix) • Inland tea-tree (Melaleuca glomerata) • Acacias (e.g. A bivenosa, A. aneura, A. victoriae) • Mallee eucalypts (e.g. blue mallee – Eucalyptus gamophylla)
30 Department of State Development
2.3 Hummock Grasslands
Examples • Tanami (Titania and Coyote)
Coyote Gold Mine, WA Tanami Spinifex detected a buried gold deposit (within white curve line) much better
than other surficial techniques
Arsenic Gold
(Reid et al., 2008)
Arsenic
Gold Titania Gold Prospect NT, Tanami (Reid et al,2009)
<0.2 0.2-0.3 0.3-0.5 0.5-0.7 0.7-2.9
Au (ppb)
0.1-0.3 0.3-0.4 0.4-0.6 0.6-1.1 1.1-1.9
As (ppm)
TANAMI AU MINERALISATION Conceptual multi-element dispersion and footprint
S
Zn As Au
spinifex
34 Department of State Development
2.3 Hummock Grasslands
Challenges / Advantages
• Who would have known that they are prickly? • Species and availability mosaic • Resinous (detritus sticking and can be difficult to mill)
35 Department of State Development
2.4 Chenopod Shrublands
Distribution
In NT, locally abundant but not extensive (e.g. calcareous bedrock, calcretes, hydrocarbon seeps, saline flats…) Not as exstensive as in SA, NSW, WA
Bluebush (Maireana sedifolia) plains, Hiltaba Station, SA
Western Gawler / Eucla Basin Geochemistry / Biogeochemistry
~450 plant samples ~170 sample sites
Colin Dunn & Helen Waldron)
Western Gawler / Eucla Basin Geochemistry / Biogeochemistry
Trans Australia Railway
MESA Journal v75, p.32-44 (2014) GSSA Report Book 2014/00025
38 Department of State Development
2.5 Riparian Eucalypts
Distribution
Ephemeral stream channels and floodplains, particularly in semi-arid areas. Coolibah becomes more dominant in lower catchments areas
Riparian river red gum woodland, Gidjya Bore, NT
39 Department of State Development
2.5 Riparian Eucalypts
Species sampled
• River red gum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) • Coolibah (Eucalyptus coolabah)
Coolibah, Lake Eyre Basin
40 Department of State Development
2.5 Riparian Eucalypts
Examples
• Ephemeral catchment sampling • Barrier Ranges NSW • Flinders Ranges SA • Murray Basin SA
• Isolated NT samples, but potential for
catchment study • Reynolds Range • Lander River
Pine Creek, NSW… (~10 km west of Broken Hill)
Sample spacing – every collectable RRG
• 215 River Red gums sampled – Media
• Leaves • Chest height • Sample size~300g
Middle Pinnacle
Pinnacles Mine
Lead…
•Pb up to 205 times background levels
•Geochemical footprint ~ 2.5 km
0 – 36 ppm 37 – 99 ppm 100 – 190 ppm 191 – 411 ppm
Hyperspectral Image, courtesy NSW DPI N
2 km
Silver…
• Ag up to 136 times background value
• Geochemical
footprint 2.2 km
0.005 – 0.100 ppm 0.101 – 0.340 ppm 0.341 – 0.710 ppm 0.711 – 1.360 ppm Hyperspectral Image, courtesy NSW DPI
N 2 km
Zinc…
• Zn up to 7 times background values
• Erratic pattern (repeated) – mobility – peaks related to floodouts
17 - 47 ppm 48 - 80 ppm 81 - 141 ppm 141 – 338 ppm Hyperspectral Image, courtesy NSW DPI
N 2 km
It was time to dig… Sarah ‘Gibbo’ Gibbons (earnest, hard-working CRC LEME Honours student)
Photos: Karen Hulme
Pinnacles - lodes extensions
Photographs: Steve Hill Mineralisation continues near surface but below main road!
47 Department of State Development
3. Some themes and challenges
For further investigation: Scale
• Key criteria for exploration “search space” volume reduction • Ideal sample spacing • Viability of samples at regional or local scale? • E.g. River red gums regionally used to regional detect buried U
mineralization flanking Flinders Ranges and Ag-Pb-Zn in Barrier Ranges. • Sampling at 200 - 250 m spacing • Could drive vehicle along lower reaches of creek and walked
headwater sections
48 Department of State Development
3. Some themes and challenges
For further investigation: Seasonality
Availability of plant organs • E.g. flowers, fruit, new leaves etc
Biogeochemical characteristics • E.g. Cruikshank & Pyke (1986) from Ranger U mine area. Better U
background to anomaly contrast in E. miniata prior to ‘wet season’ • Seasonal groundwater hydrogeochemistry changes are critical if plants
are tapping into these aquifers
49 Department of State Development
3. Some themes and challenges
For further investigation: Climatic patterns
El Niño and La Nina, where buried mineralisation may still be expressed but with significant variations in trace element concentrations (eg Mitchell et al 2015)
Modified from Climate Data Online, Bureau of Meteorology, 2013.
50 Department of State Development
3. Some themes and challenges
Pb concentrations vary enormously within climate cycle:
• Higher in dry year • (2005) • Lower in wet year
(2012) Mg concentrations stay much the same
From: Mitchell et al., 2015
51 Department of State Development
3. Some themes and challenges
For further investigation: Compatibility and Levelling
• Essential for developing useful regional data sets • Normalisation? • Potential exists for use of different element ratios and factors rather
than single elemental concentrations • U2/Th • Pb:Zn • Zn / In • Zr, Al, Fe associated elements and detritus
52 Department of State Development
3. Some themes and challenges
For further investigation: Sampling Confidence
• When is enough sample, enough? • Different for different elements, organs, species….. • Repeatability • “fit for purpose”
• Influence of fire?
• Other parts of the system? • Ground litter • Plant water • Gases / evapo-transpiration atmosphere
53 Department of State Development
3. Some themes and challenges
For further investigation: Other controls on biogeochemical results • Depth of cover • Target mineralogy • Hydrogeology • Hydrogeochemistry
(e.g. salinity elevating Mo results)
• Landscape setting (e.g. black soil plains?)
Napperby Prospect, NT Acacia bivenosa roots in carnotite but phyllodes only 0.11 ppm U (carnotite has low U bio-availability)
e.g. Arnhem land Eucalyptus / Corymbia Below detection Th (limits use of U2/Th) due to Th held in Fe-oxides
54 Department of State Development
Australian Biogeochemical Ambition
Integrated into workflows for exploration undercover Not used in isolation
At regional scale (Geological surveys):
• Introduces ‘chemical fertility’ to geophysical systems • Provides ‘geochemical’ baseline information • Provides biogeochemical baseline results for detailed industry surveys
• Minimum number of species sampled for regional coverage? • SA currently biogeochemistry mapping: Mt Painter, Yorke Peninsula, NE Eyre Peninsula,
Kangaroo Island, Alcurra At tenement to camp scale (Industry):
• add depth to soil and stream sediment surveys; • add chemical fertility to geophysics; and, • refine drilling targets
Disclaimer The information contained in this presentation has been compiled by the Department of State Development and originates from a variety of sources. Although all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation and compilation of the information, it has been provided in good faith for general information only and does not purport to be professional advice. No warranty, express or implied, is given as to the completeness, correctness, accuracy, reliability or currency of the materials. The Department of State Development and the Crown in the right of the State of South Australia does not accept responsibility for and will not be held liable to any recipient of the information for any loss or damage however caused (including negligence) which may be directly or indirectly suffered as a consequence of use of these materials. The Department of State Development reserves the right to update, amend or supplement the information from time to time at its discretion.
www.statedevelopment.sa.gov.au