anhang a herleitung des multinomialen logit-modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · eigenschaften...

19
Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus der Gumbel-Verteilung Für die gelten folgende Eigenschaften l. Der Modus ist 17· 2. Der Mittelwert ist 17 + 1/ p, mit 1 als Euler'sche Konstante. 3. Die Varianz beträgt 1r 2 /6p, 2 4. Wenn c gumbelverteilt ist mit den Parametern (17, f.t), W und a > 0 seien Skalare, dann ist auch m + W gumbelverteilt mit den Parametern (a17 + W,f.t/a), d. h. die Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor- mationen. 5. Wenn c 1 und c 2 unabhängig gumbelverteilt sind mit den Parametern (17 1 ,f./,) bzw. (17 2 , f.t), dann ist c• = ( 1 - logistisch verteilt mit (A.l) 6. Wenn und ( 2 unabhängig gumbelverteilt sind mit den Parametern (171,1-") und (17 2 , f.t), dann ist max(t 1 , t 2 ) auch gumbelverteilt und zwar mit den Parametern (1/p,ln(exp(J.L17d + exp(f.t172)),Jt). 7. Aus der Eigenschaft 6 folgt, dass wenn t 1 , ... , t'J J unabhängige te Zufallsvariablen mit den Parametern (17 1 , f.t), (17 2 , f.t), ... , (17J. f.t) sind, dass auch max(t1, t2, ... , tJ) gurnbelverteilt ist mit den Parametern (1/ f.t, ln exp(f.t17i), f.t). Gleichung (4.3.8) kann aus den Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung wie folgt hergeleitet werden. Für c gumbelverteilt gilt F(() cxp(- cxp( -J.L(t -17))), f.t > 0 (A.2) und die Dichtefunktion f lautet (A.3)

Upload: truongdat

Post on 17-Aug-2019

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Anhang A

Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus der Gumbel-Verteilung

Für die Gumbel~~Verteilung gelten folgende Eigenschaften

l. Der Modus ist 17·

2. Der Mittelwert ist 17 + 1/ p, mit 1 als Euler'sche Konstante.

3. Die Varianz beträgt 1r2 /6p,2 •

4. Wenn c gumbelverteilt ist mit den Parametern (17, f.t), W und a > 0 seien Skalare, dann ist auch m + W gumbelverteilt mit den Parametern (a17 + W,f.t/a), d. h. die Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor­mationen.

5. Wenn c1 und c2 unabhängig gumbelverteilt sind mit den Parametern (171,f./,) bzw. (172 , f.t), dann ist c• = ( 1 - ~:2 logistisch verteilt mit

(A.l)

6. Wenn ~: 1 und (2 unabhängig gumbelverteilt sind mit den Parametern (171,1-") und (172, f.t), dann ist max(t1, t 2 ) auch gumbelverteilt und zwar mit den Parametern (1/p,ln(exp(J.L17d + exp(f.t172)),Jt).

7. Aus der Eigenschaft 6 folgt, dass wenn t1, ~: 2 , ... , t'J J unabhängige gumbelverteil~ te Zufallsvariablen mit den Parametern (171, f.t), (172 , f.t), ... , (17J. f.t) sind, dass auch max(t1, t2, ... , tJ) gurnbelverteilt ist mit den Parametern (1/ f.t, ln ~f=1 exp(f.t17i), f.t).

Gleichung (4.3.8) kann aus den Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung wie folgt hergeleitet werden. Für c gumbelverteilt gilt

F(() ~ cxp(- cxp( -J.L(t -17))), f.t > 0 (A.2)

und die Dichtefunktion f lautet

(A.3)

Page 2: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

186 Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells

mit 1) als Lokations-und 1~ als positivem Skalenparameter (Hen-Akiva & Lerman, 1985).

Aus den zuvor dargestellten Eigenschaften der Gumbcl-·Vert.eilung kann nun die Glei-chung (4.3.8) hergeleitet werden. Zur Vereinfachung gelte TJ 0. Außerdem werden o. B. d. A. die Alternativen so angeordnet., dass i - 1 gilt. Nun folgt

Prn(1) = Pr[V!n + f]n 2': . rpax (V;n I C1n)J. J c 2, ... ,./n

(A.1)

Es sei (A.5)

Da t 1n gumbelverteilt ist mit den Parametern (0, /.!), ist auch fjn + V;n gumbel­verteilt und zwar mit den Parametern (V,/.l) gemäß Eigenschaft 1. Aus der Eigen­schaft 7 der Gurnbel-Verteilung folgt, dass U~ gumbelverteilt ist mit den Parametern ((1/ /.l) ln I;j;"2 exp(/.l\l;n), 1-l)· Unter Verwendung der Eigenschaft 4 gilt für U~ ~·- v,: t t;,

(A.6)

und t~ ist gumbelverteilt mit den Parametern (0,/.l)· Nun kann aus Gleichung (A.4) ge­folgert werden

(A.7)

Sowohl t 1n als auch t~ sind gumbelverteilt mit den Parametern (0, /.l)· V,;' t c~ ist gurnbel­verteilt mit den Parametern (V,;',/~) und Vin + t 1n ist gnrnbelverteilt mit. (Vin,ft). Gemäß Eigenschaft 5 gilt nun für Gleichung (A. 7)

1 Pr n ( 1) ~· -1-~--e-xp-(:-/.l..,.-(v.-,;---~~,-ln-))

exp(/.lVIn) + exp(/.lV,7)

exp(f~ Vin)

exp(pYin) t exp(ln I;j" 2 exp(ft\l;n))

exp(f~Vln)

(A.S)

Damit ist die Gültigkeit der Gleichung (4.3.8) gezeigt. Für einen anderen Weg der Her­leitung siehe auch Cramer (1991).

Page 3: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Anhang B

Die Schätzung der Loyalitätsvariablen gemäß Fader et al. 1992

Die Methode von Fader et al. (1992) zur Schätzung des Loyalitätsparameters basiert auf einer Taylorreihenentwicklung. Die r--te erklärende Variable Xintn die nichtlinear abhängig ist von einem Parameter, hier .X, wird zur Vereinfachung x(t, .X) genannt. Für sie wird am Startpunkt .X0 eine Taylorreihe entwickelt mit

( .X) = ( .X ) 8x(t, .X) I (.X- .X ) ~ anx(t, .X) I (.X- .Xo)n X t, X t, 0 + ß,X 0 + ~ ß,Xn n!

..\o n=2 ..\o

(B.l)

Unter der Annahme, dass x(t, .X) glatt sei (ihre Ableitungen bzgl. .X seien beschränkt) in einem Intervall, dass sowohl .X0 als auch die Maximum-Likelihood-Schätzung von .X ent­halte, gehen die Terme zweiter und höherer Ordnung aus Gleichung (B.l) gegen Null, wenn .X0 gegen seine Maximum-Likelihood-Schätzung strebt. Damit lässt sich Gleichung (R.J) unter Verwendung von x'(t, .X)= 8x(t, .X)/8-X vereinfachen zu

x(t, .X) -::e x(t, .Xo) + x'(t, .Xo)(.X- .Xo). (B.2)

In Gleichung (B.2) gilt die Gleichheit bei der Konvergenz von .X0 zu .X. Unter Einbeziehung des Koeffizienten ß der erklärenden Variable x(t, .X) aus dem multinomialen Logit-Modell wird Gleichung (B.2) zu

ßx(t, .X) -::e ßx(t, .Xo) + ß(.X- .Xo)x'(t, .Xo). (B.3)

Aus Gleichung (B.3) wird ersichtlich, dass der Term ßx(t, .X) durch die Terme x'(t, .X0 )

und x(t, .X0 ) in der Nutzenfunktion des Logit-Modells repräsentiert werden kann. Die resultierenden Schätzungen können auch mit ß' bzw. ß bezeichnet werden. Damit wird Gleichung (B.3) zu

ßx(t, .X) -::e ßx(t, .Xo) + ß'x'(t, .Xo). (B.4)

Aus dem Vergleich von Gleichung (B.3) und Gleichung (B.4) folgt

ß' -::e ß(.X- .Xo) (B.5)

bzw. .X -::e .Xo + ß' / ß. (B.6)

Page 4: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

188 Die Schät;;;tmg der Loyalitätsvariablen

Zur Bestimmung der Gewiehtungsparameter .\aus der Gleichung ( 5.:l.l) wird zunächst die erste Ableitung D LOY benötigt. Die Gleichung ( 5.3.1) kann umgeschrieben werden zu

t~l

LOY.nt = (1 - .\) L A1 Yint~l~1· [.]

(H.7)

Die Ableitung der Gleichung (B. 7) nach .\ lautet

DLOY.nt = .\DLOlint~I I LOlint~I- Yint~l· (B.8)

Zur lnitialisierung wird LOY;n1 - l/ J gesetzt mit .J als Anzahl der Marken, und es gilt DLOY.n1 = 0.

Unter Verwendung der Taylorapproximat.ion für x(t, .\) gelt.en für den nichtlinearen Schätzlogarithmus die folgenden Schritte

l. Wähle Startwerte für .\ als .\0 .

2. Berechne x(t, .\0 ) und x'(t, .\0 ) am Punkt .\0 für alle Beobacht.ungcn zum Zeitpunkt t.

3. Beziehe x(t, .\0 ) und x'(t, .\0 ) mit allen anderen erklärenden Variablen in das Logit~ Modell mit ein und bestimme die Koeffizienten durch eine gewöhnliche Schätzung.

4. Aktualisiere .\0 gemäß Gleichung (1:3.5) mit .\0 <--- (.\0 + ß' /ß).

5. Gehe zurück zu Schritt 2 und führe die Iteration durch bis .\0 konvergiert bzw. der Koeffizient von x' nicht mehr unterscheidbar ist von Null.

Page 5: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Literatur

Abe, M. ( 1995 ). II. nonpararnetric density estirnation method for brand choice using scanner data. Marketing Science 14 (3), 300 325.

Abe, M. (1998). Measuring consurner, nonlinear brand choice response to price. Journal of Retailing 14 (4), 541-568.

Abramson, C., Andrews, R. L., and Cnrrim, I. S. (2000). Parameterbias from unobser­ved effects in the multinorniallogit model of consnrner choice. Journal of Marketing Research 31, 410 426.

Adam, D. (1970). Consnmer reaction to price. In B. Taylor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Stmtegy, London, pp. 88 7.5. Staples.

Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K., and Ncslin, S. A. (1999). Heterogencity and purchase event feedback in choice models: An empirical analysis with implications for model building. International Journal of Research in Marketing 16, 177-198.

Alford, H. L. and Engelland, ß. T. (2000). Advertised reference price effects on con­sumer price cstimates, valne perception, and search intention. Journal of Busines8 Research 48, 93-100.

Allais, P. M. (1953). Le comporternent de l'homme rationnel devant Je risqne: Critique des postnlates et axiomes de l'ecole Americaine. Econometrica 21 ( 4), 503-546.

Allenby, G. M. and Lenk, P . .J. (1994). Modeling hausehold pnrchase behavior with logistic regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89(428), 1218 1231.

Allenby, G. M. and Rossi, P. E. (1999). Marketingmodels of consnmer heterogencity. Journal of Econometrics 89, 57-78.

Appley, \1. II. (Ed.) (1971). Adaption Level Theory. New York: Academic Press.

Assun<;iio, J. L. and Meycr, R. ( 1993). The rational effect of price promotions on sales and consnmption. Management Science 39(5), 517-535.

Bartels, K., Boztug, Y., and Müller, M. (2000). Testing the multinomial logit model. In R. Dccker & W. Gaul (Eds.), Classijication and Information Processing at the Turn of the Millennium, Berlin, pp. 296-303. Springer.

ßatsell, R. R. and Lodish, L. M. (1981). A modeland measurement methodology for predicting individual consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 1-12.

Bearden, W. 0., Kaicker, A., Smith de Borrero, M., and Urbany, J. E. ( 1992). Exarni­ning alternative operational measures of internal reference prices. In J. F. Sherry, jr. & B. Sternthai (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 19, Provo: UT, pp. 629-635. Association for Consumer Research.

Page 6: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

190 Literatur

Bell, D. R. and Bucklin, R. E. ( 1999). The role of internal reference points in thc category purchase decision. Journal of Consumer Research 26(2), 128 143.

Bell, D. R. and Lattin, J. M. (2000). Looking for loss aversion in scanner pancl data: The confounding effect of price rcsponse hcterogencity. Marketing Science 1.9(2), 185-200.

Ben-Akiva, M. and Boccara, B. ( 1995). Discrete choice models with latent choice sets. International Journal of Research in Marketing 12, 9 24.

Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete Choice Analysis. Carnbridge, Mas­sachusetts: The MIT Press.

Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Abe, M., Böckenholt, U., Bolduc, D., Gopinath, D., Mo­rikawa, T., Ramawamy, V., Rao, V., Revelt, D., and Steinberg, D. (1997). Modeling methods for discrete choice analysis. Marketing Letters 8(3), 273-286.

Berkowitz, E. N. and Walton, J. R. (1980). Contextual influences on consumcr price responses: An experimental analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 17, 349-358.

Biswas, A. (1992). The moderating role of brand familiarity in reference price percep­tions. Journal of Business Research 25, 251-262.

Biswas, A. and Blair, E. A. (1991). Contextual effects of rcference price in retail adver­tisements. Journal of Marketing 55(3), 1-12.

Biswas, A., Pullig, C., Krishnan, B. C., and Burton, S. (1999). Consurner evaluation of reference price advertisements: Effects of other brands' prices and sernantic cues. Journal of Public Policy f3 Marketing 18(1), 52-65.

Biswas, A., Wilson, E. J., and Licata, J. W. (1993). Reference pricing studies in mar­keting: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Business Research 27, 239-256.

Blair, E. A. and Landon, E. L. (1981). The effects of rcference prices in retail adverti­sements. Journal of Marketing 45, 61-69.

Bleicker, U. (1983). Produktbeurteilung der Konsumenten, Volume 5 of Konsum und Verhalten. Würzburg: Physica.

Bonnen, M., Delecroix, M., and Malin, E. (1993). Semiparametric versus nonparametric estimation in single index regression model: A computational approach. Computa­tional Statistics 8, 207-222.

Bowman, A. W. (1984). An alternative method of cross validation for the smoothing of density estimates. Biometrika 71, 313-327.

Box, G. E. P. and Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time Series Analysis: PaTecasting and Contra/ (Revised ed.). San Francisco: Holden Day.

Boztug, Y. and IIildebrandt, L. (2001a). Die Schätzung von Responsefunktionen mit pa­rametrischen und nichtparametrischen Verfahren über Scannerdaten. In H. Hippner, U. Küsters, M. Meyer, & K. Wilde (Eds.), Handbuch Data Mining im Marketmg, pp. 227-239. Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

Boztug, Y. and Hildebrandt, L. (2001b ). Nichtparametrische Methoden zur Schätzung von Responsefunktionen. In II. Hippner, U. Küsters, M. Mcycr, & K. Wilde (Eds.), Handbuch Data Mining im Marketing, pp. 121-1:!4. Wiesbaden: Vieweg.

Page 7: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Literatur 191

Boztug, Y. and Hildebrandt, L. (2001c). Nonparametrie modeling of buying behavior in fast moving consumer goods markets. In G. Papastefanou, P. Schmidt, A. Börsch­Supan, H. Lüdtke, & U. Oltersdorf (Eds.), Social and Economic Research with Con­sumer Panel Data, pp. 189-205. Mannheim: ZUMA.

Briesch, R. A., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., and Raj, S. P. (1997). A comparative analysis of reference price models. Journal of Consumer Research 24, 202-214.

Ruja, A., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R. (1989). Linear smoothers and additive models (with discussion). The Annals of Statistics 17(2), 453-555.

Bunch, D. S. and Batsell, R. R. (1989). A monte carlo comparison of estimators for the multinomial logit model. Journal of Marketing Research 26, 56-68.

Cagan, P. (1956). The monetary dynamics of hyperinflations. In M. Friedman (Ed.), Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, pp. 25-117. Chicago: University of Chi­cago Press.

Chandrashekaran, R. (2001 ). The implications of individual differences in reference price utilization for designing effective price communications. Journal of Business Research 53, 85-91.

Chandrashekaran, R. and Jagpal, H. (1995). Is there a well-defined internal reference price? In F. R. Kardes & M. Sujan (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Volu­me 22, Provo: UT, pp. 230-235. Association for Consumer Research.

Chang, K., Siddarth, S., and Weinberg, C. B. (1999). The impact of heterogeneity in purchase timing and price responsiveness on estimating of sticker shock effects. Marketing Science 18(2), 178-192.

Chen, R., Härdle, W., Linton, 0. B., and Severance-Lossin, E. (1996). Nonparametrie estimation of additive separable regression models. In W. Härdle & M. G. Schimek (Eds.), Statistical Theory and Computational Aspects of Smoothing, pp. 247-254. Physica-Verlag.

Chiang, J. (1991). A simultaneous approach to the whether, what and how much to buy. Marketing Science 10(4), 297··315.

Chintagunta, P. K. (1992a). Estimating a multinomial probit rnodel of brand choice using the rnethod of simulated mornents. Marketing Science 3(4), 386-407.

Chintagunta, P. K. (1992b). Heterogencity in nested logit rnodels: An estirnation ap­proach and empirical results. International Journal of Research in Marketing 9, 161-175.

Chintagunta, P. K. (1993). Investigating purchase incidence, brand choice and purchase quantity decisions of households. Marketing Science 12(2), 184-208.

Chintagunta, P. K. and Honore, 8. E. (1996). Investigating the effects of rnarketing variables and unobserved heterogeneity in a rnultinornial probit model. International Journal of Research in Marketing 13, 1-15.

Chintagunta, P. K., Jain, D. C., and Vilcassirn, N. J. (1991). Investigating heteroge­neity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. Journal of Marketing Research 28, 417-428.

Page 8: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

192 Literatur

Christensen, R. (1987). Plane Answers to Camplex Questions. New York: Springer~ Verlag.

Collett, D. (1991). Modelling Binary Data. London: Chapman & Hall.

Conover, J. N. (1986). The accuracy ofprice knowledge: Issues in research methodology. In R. J. Lutz (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, Valurne 1:l, Provo: UT, pp. 589-593. Association for Consurner Research.

Cooper, P. (1970a). The begrudging index and the subjective value of rnoney. In !3. Tay­lor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Stmtegy, London, pp. 122-131. Staples.

Cooper, P. (1970b). Subjective econornics: Factars in a psychology of spending. In B. Taylor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Stmtegy, London, pp. 112-121. Staples.

Corstjens, M. L. and Gautschi, D. A. (1983). l<orrnal choice rnodels in rnarketing. Mar-keting Science 2(1), 19-56.

Crarner, J. S. (1991). The Logit Model. London: Edward Arnold.

Daganzo, C. (1979). Multinomial Probit. New York: Acadernic Press.

Dalal, S. R. and Klein, R. W. (1988). A flexible class of discrete choice rnodels. Marke-ting Science 7(3), 232-251.

de Boor, C. (1978). A Pmctical Guide to Splines. Basel: Springer-Verlag.

de Boor, C. (1990). Splinefunktionen. New York: Birkhäuser Verlag.

Della Bitta, A. J. and Monroe, K. B. (1973). The influence of adaption Ievels on snb­jective price perceptions. In S. Ward & P. Wright (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 1, Urbana: IL, pp. 359~369. Association for Consurner Research.

Della Bitta, A. J. and Monroe, K. B. (1980). A rnultivariate analysis of the perccpti­on of value frorn retail price advertisernents. In K. B. Monroe (Ed. ), Advances in Consumer Research, Valurne 8, Ann Arbor, pp. 161-165. Association for Consurner Research.

Della Bitta, A. J., Monroe, K. B., and McGrinnis, J. M. (1981). Consurner perceptions of cornparative price advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research 18, 416-427.

DeSarbo, W. S., Ansari, A., Chintagunta, P., Ilirnmelberg, C., Jedidi, K., .Johnson, R., Kamakura, W., Lenk, P., Srinivasan, K., and Wedel, M. (1997). Representing heterogeneity in consurner response rnodels. Marketing Letters 8(3), 335-348.

Dickson, P. R. and Sawyer, A. G. (1990). The price knowledge and search of superrnar­ket shoppers. Journal of Marketing 54, 42-53.

Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D. ( 1991). Effects of pricc, brand, and store inforrnation on bnyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research 28, 307~ 319.

Edwards, K. D. (1996). Prospect theory: A Iiterature review. International Review of Financial Analysis 5(1), 19~38.

Emery, F. (1970). Sorne psychological aspects of price. In B. Taylor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Strategy, London, pp. 98-111. Staples.

Erdern, T. (1996). A dynarnic analysis of market structure based on panel data. Mar­keting Science 15 ( 4), 359-378.

Page 9: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Literatur 193

Erdem, T. and Keane, M. P. (1996). Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods market. Marketing Science 15(1), 1-20.

Estelami, H., Lehmann, D. R., and Holden, A. C. (2001). Macr<M!conomic determi­nants of consumer price knowledge: A meta-analysis of four decades of research. International Journal of Research in Marketing 18, 341-355.

Eubank, R. L. (1988). Spline Smoothing and Nonparametrie Regression. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Fader, P. S. (1993). Integrating the Dirichlet-multinornial and multinomiallogit models of brand choice. Marketing Letters 4 (2), 99-112.

Fader, P. S. and Lattin, J. M. (1993). Accounting for heterogeneity and nonstationarity in a cross-sectional model of consumer purchase behavior. Marketing Science 12(3), 304-317.

Fader, P. S., Lattin, J. M., and Little, J. D. C. (1992). Estimating nonlinear parameters in the multinomiallogit model. Marketing Science 11(4), 372-385.

Fan, J. and Marron, J. S. (1992). Best possible constant for bandwidth selection. The Annals of Statistics 29(4), 2057-2070.

Fechner, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf und Harte!.

Fischer, G. W. and Nagin, D. (1981). R.andom versus fixed coeffi.cient quantal choice models. In C. F. Manski & D. McFadden (Eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, pp. 273-304. The MIT Press.

Fouilhe, P. (1970). The subjective evaluation of price: Methodological aspects. In B. Taylor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Stmtegy, London, pp. 89-97. Staples.

Friedman, J. H. and Stuetzle, W. (1981). Projection pursuit regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76(376), 817-823.

Gabor, A. (1977). Pricing: Principles and Practices. London: Heinemann Educational Books.

Gabor, A. and Granger, C. (1965). The pricing of new products. Scientific Business 3, 141-150.

Gabor, A. and Granger, C. (1966). Price as an indicator of quality: R.eport on an equiry. Economica 46, 43-70.

Gabor, A. and Granger, C. (1970). Price consciousness of consumers. In B. Taylor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Stmtegy, London, pp. 5-25. Staples.

Gaudry, M. J. I. and Dagenais, M. G. (1979). The dogit model. Transportalion Research, Series B 13B, 105-111.

Gier!, H., Helm, R., and Stumpp, S. (2001). Wertfunktion der Propect Theorie, Pro­duktpräferenzeil und Folgerungen für das Marketing. Zeitschrift für betriebswirt­schaftliche Forschung 53, 559-588.

Gier!, H. and Stumpp, S. (2000). Erklärung und Beeinflussung von R.eferenzniveaus. Marketing ZFP (4), 273-295.

Page 10: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

194 Literatur

Gijsbrechts, E. (1993). Prices and pricing research in consumer marketing: Some recent developments. International Journal of Research in Marketing 10, 115-151.

Gönül, F. and Srinivasan, K. (1993a). Consumer purchase behavior in a frequently bought product category: Estimation issues and managerial insights from a Hazard function model with heterogeneity. Journal of the American Statistical Associati­on 88(424), 1219-1227.

Gönül, F. and Srinivasan, K. (1993b). Modeling multiple sources of heterogenei­ty in multinomial logit models: Methodological and managerial issues. Marketing Science 12, 213-229.

Gotlieb, J. B. and Dubinsky, A. J. (1991). Influence of price on aspects of consumers' cognitive process. Journal of Applied Psychology 76(4), 541-549.

Greene, W. H. (1993). Econometric Analysis. New York: Macmillian Publishing Com­pany.

Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., and Borin, N. (1998a). The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers' evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing 74 (3), 331-352.

Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., and Krishnan, R. (1998b). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers' perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and be­havioral intentions. Journal of Marketing 62, 46-59.

Guadagni, P. M. and Little, J. D. C. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing Science 2(3), 203-238.

Günther, M., Vossbein, U., and Wildner, R. (1998). Marktforschung mit Panels. Gabler.

Gupta, S. (1988). Impact of sales promotions on when, what, and how much to buy. Journal of Marketing Research 25, 342-355.

Gupta, S. and Chintagunta, P. K. (1994). On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models. Journal of Marketing Research 31, 128-136.

Gupta, S., Chintagunta, P. K., and Wittink, D. R. (1997). Hausehold heterogeneity and state dependence in a model of purchase strings: Empirical results and managerial implications. International Journal of Research in Marketing 14, 341-357.

Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press.

Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., and Fader, P. S. (1993). Modeling loss aversion and reference dependence effects on brand choice. Marketing Science 12(4), 378-394.

Härdle, W. (1990). Applied Nonpammetric Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer­sity Press.

Härdle, W. (1991). Smoothing Techniques with Implementation in S. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Härdle, W., Klinke, S., and Müller, M. (2000). XploRe Leaming Guide. Berlin: Springer­Verlag.

Härdle, W., Spokoiny, V., and Sperlich, S. (1997). Semiparametric single index versus fixed link function modelling. The Annals of Statistics 25(1), 212-243.

Page 11: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Literatur 195

Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. {1986). Generalized additive models. Statistical Science 1 (3), 297-318.

Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. {1987). Generalized additive models: Some applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82(398), 371-386.

Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. J. {1990). Generalized Additive Models. London: Chap­man & Hall.

Hausman, J. and McFadden, D. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomiallogit models. Econometrica 52(5), 1219-1240.

Hausman, J. A. and Wise, D. A. {1978). A conditional probit model for qualitative choi­ce: Discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneaus preferences. Econometrica 46(2), 403-426.

Heath, T. B., Chatterjee, S., and Russo France, K. (1995). Mental accounting and chan­ges in price: The frame dependence of reference dependence. Journal of Consumer Research 22, 90-97.

Heckman, J. and Singer, B. (1984). A method for minimizing the impact of distribu­tional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52(2), 271-320.

Heckman, J. J. {1981). Statistical models for discrete data. In C. F. Manski & D. McFad­den (Eds.), Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, pp. 114-178. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

Heilman, C. M., Bowman, D., and Wright, G. P. {2000). The evolution of brand pre­ferences and choice behaviors of consumers new to a market. Journal of Marketing Research 37, 139-155.

Helson, H. (1964). Adaption-Level Theory. New York: Harper & Row.

Horowitz, J. L. (1993). Semiparametric estimation of a work-trip mode choice model. Journal of Econometrics 58, 49-70.

Horowitz, J. 1., Bolduc, D., Divakar, S., Geweke, J., Gönül, F., Hajivassiliou, V., Kop­pelman, F. S., Keane, M., Matzkin, R., Rossi, P., and Ruud, P. (1994). Advances in random utility models. Marketing Letters 5, 311-322.

Horowitz, J. L. and Härdle, W. {1996). Direct semiparametric estimation of single­index models with discrete covariates. Journal of the American Statistical Associa­tion 91(436), 1632-1640.

Hruschka, H. {1996). Marketing-Entscheidungen. München: Verlag Vahlen.

Ichimura, H. {1993). Semiparametric least squares (SLS) and weighted SLS estimation of single-index models. Journal of Econometrics 58, 71-120.

Inmam, J. J., McAlister, L., and Hoyer, W. D. (1990). Promotion signal: Proxy for a price cut? Journal of Consumer Research 17, 74-81.

Jacobson, R. and Obermiller, C. (1990). The formation of expected future price: A reference price for forward-looking consumers. Journal of Consumer Research 16, 420-432.

Page 12: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

196 Literatur

Jacoby, J. and Olson, J. C. (1977). Consumer response to price: An attitudinal, informa­tion processing perspective. In Y. Wind & M. G. Greenberg (Eds.), Moving a Head with Attitude Research, Chicago: IL, pp. 73-86. American Marketing Association.

Jain, D. C. and Vilcassim, N. J. (1991). lnvestigating hausehold purchase timing deci­sions: A conditional Hazard function approach. Marketing Science 10(1), 1-23.

Jain, D. C., Vilcassim, N. J., and Chintagunta, P. K. (1994). A random-coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 12(3), 317-328.

Janiszewski, C. and Lichtenstein, D. R. (1999). A range theory account of price per­ception. Journal of Consumer Research 25, 353-368.

Jones, J. M. and Landwehr, J. T. (1988). Removing heterogeneity bias from logit model estimation. Marketing Science 7(1), 41-59.

Kahneman, D. (1992). Reference points, anchors, norms, and mixed feelings. Organi­zational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51 (2), 296-312.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1986). Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business 59(4), 8285-8300.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., and Thaler, R. H. (1991). The endowment effect, lass aversion, and status qua bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(1), 193-206.

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263-291.

Kalwani, M. U. and Yim, C. K. (1992). Consumer price and promotion expectations: An experimental study. Journal of Marketing Research 29, 90-100.

Kalwani, M. U., Yim, C. K., Rinne, H. J., and 8ugita, Y. (1990). A price expectations model of customer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research 17, 251-262.

Kalyanam, K. and 8hively, T. 8. (1998). Estimating irregular pricing effects: A stocha­stic spline regression approach. Journal of Marketing Research 35, 16-29.

Kalyanaram, G. and Little, J. D. C. (1994). An empirical analysis of latitude of price acceptance in consumer package goods. Journal of Consumer Research 21, 408-418.

Kalyanaram, G. and Wirrer, R. 8. (1995). Empirical generalization from reference price research. Marketing Science 14(3), G161-G169.

Kamakura, W. A., Kim, B.-D., and Lee, J. (1996). Modeling preference and structural heterogeneity in consumer choice. Marketing Science 15 (2), 152-172.

Kamakura, W. A. and Russell, G. J. (1989). A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research 26, 379-390.

Kamen, J. M. and Toman, R. J. (1970). Psychophysics of prices. Journal of Marketing Research 7, 27-35.

Kannan, P. K. and Wright, G. P. (1991). Modeling and testing structured markets: A nested logit approach. Marketing Science 10(1), 58-82.

Keane, M. P. (1997). Modeling heterogeneity and state dependence in consumer choice behavior. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 15(3), 310-327.

Page 13: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Literatur 197

Klein, N. M. and Oglethorpe, J. E. (1987). Cognitive reference points in consumer decision making. In M. Wallendorf & P. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 14, Provo: UT, pp. 183-187. Association for Consumer Research.

Korostelev, A. and Müller, M. (1994). Single index models with mixed discrete­continuous explanatory variables. Discussion paper, SFB 373.

Krishna, A. (1994). The effect of deal knowledge on consumer purchase behavior. Jour­nal of Marketing Research 31, 76-91.

Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., and Raj, S. P. (1992). Asymmetrieresponse to price in consumer brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. Journal of Consumer Research 19, 387-400.

Krishnamurthi, L. and Raj, S. P. (1988). A model ofbrand choice and purchase quantity price sensitivities. Marketing Science 7(1), 1-20.

Krishnamurthi, L. and Raj, S. P. (1991). An empirical analysis of the relationship between brand loyalty and consumer price elasticity. Marketing Science 10 (2), 172-183.

Kumar, V., Karande, K., and Reinartz, W. J. (1998). The impact of internaland exter­nal reference prices on brand choice: The moderating role of contextual variables. Journal of Retailing 74 (3), 401-426.

Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Eco­nomy 74, 132-157.

Lattin, J. M. and Bucklin, R. E. (1989). Reference effects of price and promotion on brand choice behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 26, 299-310.

Le Boutillier, J., Shore Le Boutillier, S., and Neslin, S. A. (1994). A replication and extension of the Dickson and Sawyer price-awareness study. Marketing Letters 5 (1), 31-42.

Leeflang, P. S. H. and Wittink, D. R. (2000). Building models for marketing decisions: Past, present and future. International Journal of Research in Marketing 17(2-3), 105-126.

Lichtenstein, D. R. and Bearden, W. 0. (1988). An investigation of consumer evalua­tions of reference price discount claims. Journal of Business Research 17, 189-200.

Lichtenstein, D. R. and Bearden, W. 0. (1989). Contextual influences on perceptions of merchant-supplied reference prices. Journal of Consumer Research 16, 55--66.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Bloch, P. H., and Black, W. C. (1988). Correlates of price accep­tability. Journal of Consumer Research 15, 243-252.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Burton, S., and Karson, E. J. (1991). The effect of semantic cues on consumer perceptions of reference price ads. Journal of Consumer Research 18, 380-391.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Burton, S., and O'Hara, B. S. (1989). Marketplace attributions and consumer evaluations of discount claims. Psychology & Marketing 6(3), 163-180.

Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., and Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: A field study. Journal of Consumer Research 30, 234-245.

Page 14: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

198 Literatur

Lilien, G. L., Kotler, P., and Moorthy, K. S. (1992). Marketing Models. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Linton, 0. and Nielsen, J. P. (1995). A kernel method of estimating structured nonpa­rametric regression based on marginal integration. Biometrika 82 ( 1), 93-100.

Linton, 0. B. (1997). Efficient estimation of additive nonparametric regression models. Biometrika 84 (2), 469-473.

Linton, 0. B. and Härdle, W. (1996). Estimation of additive regression models with known links. Biometrika 83(3), 529-540.

Loudon, D. L. and Della Bitta, A. J. (1993). Consumer Behavior (Fourth ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual Choice Behavior. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Mammen, E., Linton, 0., and Nielsen, J. (1999). The existence and asymptotic pro­perties of a backfitting projection algorithm under weak conditions. The Annals of Statistics 27(5), 1443-1490.

Matzkin, R. L. (1991). A nonparametric maximumrank correlation estimator. In W. A. Barnett, J. Powell, & G. Tauchen (Eds.), Nonpammetric and Semipammetric Me­thods in Econometrics and Statistics. Cambridge University Press.

Matzkin, R. L. (1992). Nonparametrie and distribution-free estimation of the binary threshold crossing and the binary choice models. Econometrica 60(2), 239-270.

Matzkin, R. L. (1993). Nonparametrie identification and estimation of polychotomous choice models. Journal of Econometrics 58, 137-168.

Mayhew, G. E. and Winer, R. S. (1992). An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research 19, 62-70.

Mazumdar, T. and Jun, S. Y. (1993). Consumer evaluations of multiple versus single price change. Journal of Consumer Research 20, 441-450.

Mazumdar, T. and Monroe, K. B. (1990). The effects of buyers' intentions to learn price information on price encoding. Journal of Retailing 66(1), 15-32.

Mazumdar, T. and Monroe, K. B. (1992). Effects of inter-store and in-store price comparisons on price recall accuracy and confidence. Journal of Retailing 68, 66-89.

Mazumdar, T. and Papatla, P. (1995). Loyalty differences in the use of internal and external reference prices. Marketing Letters 6(2), 111-122.

Mazumdar, T. and Papatla, P. (2000). An investigation of reference price segments. Journal of Marketing Research 17, 246-258.

McAlister, L., Horowitz, J., Jones, M., Kamakura, W., Kulchitsky, J., Ratchford, B., Russel, G., Sultan, F., Yai, T., Weiss, D., and Winter, R. (1991). Incorporating choice dynamics in models of consumer behavior. Marketing Letters 2(3), 241-252.

McCullagh, P. and Neider, J. A. (1989). Genemlized Linear Models (Second ed.). Lon­don: Chapman and Hall.

McFadden, D. (1974). Conditionallogit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Za­rembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105-142. New York: Academic Press.

Page 15: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Literatur 199

McFadden, D. (1980). Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. Journal of Business 53(3), 3~29.

McFadden, D. (1991). Advances in computation, statistical methods, and testing of discrete choice models. Marketing Letters 2(3), 215~229.

McFadden, D., Train, K., and Tye, W. (1977). An application of diagnostic tests for the independence from irrelevant alternatives property of the multinomial logit model. Transportation Research Record 637, 39~46.

Mela, C. F., Gupta, S., and Lehmann, D. R. (1997). The long~term impact ofpromotion and advertising on consumer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research 34, 248~ 261.

Mellens, M., Dekimpe, M. G., and Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1996). A review of brand~ loyalty measures in marketing. Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management 41 (4), 507~5.33.

Meyer, R. and Johnson, E. J. (1995). Empirical generalizations in the modeling of consumer choice. Marketing Science 14 (3), G 180~G 189.

Monger, J. E. and Feinberg, R. A. ( 1997). Mode of payment and formation of reference prices. Pricing Strategy fj Practice 5(4), 142~147.

Monroe, K. B. (1971a). Mcasuring price thresholds by psychophysics and latitudes of acceptance. Journal of Marketing Research 8, 460~464.

Monroe, K. B. (197lb). 'Psychophysics of price': A reappraisal. Journal of Marketing Research 8, 248~251.

Monroc, K. B. (1973). Buyers' subjective pcrceptions of price. Journal of Marketing Research 10, 70~80.

Monroe, K. B. (1977). Objective and subjective contextual infiuences on price per­ception. In A. G. Woodside, J. N. Sheth, & P. D. Bennett (Eds.), Consumer and lndustrial Buying Behavior, pp. 287-296. New York: ~orth~Holland.

Monroe, K. B. (1990). Pricing (Second ed.). New York: McGraw~Hill.

Monroe, K. B. and Chapman, J. D. (1987). Framing effects on buyers' subjective pro­duct evaluations. ln M. Wallendorf & P. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Valurne 14, Provo: UT, pp. 193~ 197. Association for Consumer Research.

Monroe, K. ß., Powell, C. P., and Choudhury, P. K. (1986). Recall versus recognition as a measure of price awareness. In R. J. Lutz (Ed. ), Advances in Consumer Research, Valurne 13, Provo: UT, pp. 594~599. Association for Consumer Research.

Nadaraya, E. A. (1964). On estimating regression. Theory of Probability and its Appli­cation 9, 141 ~ 142.

Neider, J. A. and Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972). Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 135(3), 370~384.

Nerlove, M. (1958). Adaptive expectations and Cobweb phenomena. Quarterly Journal of Economics 72, 227~240.

Newey, W. K. (1994). Kerne! estimation of partial means and a general variance esti­mator. Econometric Theory 10, 233~253.

Page 16: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

200 Literatur

Nielsen, J. P. and Linton, 0. 8. (1998). An optimization interpretation of integrati­on and back-fitting estimators for separable nonparametric models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 60(1), 217-222.

Ölander, F. (1970). The infiuence of price on the consumer's evaluation of products and purchases. In 8. Taylor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Stmtegy, London, pp. 50-69. Staples.

Opsomer, J. D. (2000). Asymptotic properties of backfitting estimators. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 73, 166-179.

Opsomer, J. D. and Ruppert, D. (1997). Fitting a bivariate additive model by local polynomial regression. The Annals of Statistics 25(1), 186-211.

Papatla, P. (1996). A multiplicative fixed-effects model of consumer choice. Marketing Science 15(3), 243-261.

Park, 8. U. and Marron, J. S. (1990). Comparison of data-driven bandwidth selectors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85, 66-72.

Putter, D. S. (1992). Incorporating reference price effects into a theory of consumer choice. Marketing Science 11 (3), 287-309.

Rajendran, K. N. and Tellis, G. J. (1994). Contextual and temporal components of reference price. Journal of Marketing 58, 22-34.

Raman, K. and Bass, F. M. (1988). A generat test of reference price theory in the presence of threshold effects. Discussion paper, Department of Marketing, U niversity of Texas at Dallas.

Rao, A. R. and Sieben, W. A. (1992). The effect of prior knowledge on price accep­tability and the type of information examined. Journal of Consumer Research 19, 256-270.

Rao, V. R. (1984). Pricing research in marketing: The state of the art. Journal of Business 57(1), 839-860.

Ricardo, D. (1871). On the principles of political economy and taxation. Berlin: Akade­mie Verlag.

Rossi, P. E. and Allenby, G. M. (1993). A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters. Journal of Marketing Research 30, 171-182.

Rowe, D. and Puto, C. P. (1987). Do consumers' reference points affect their buying decision? In M. Wallendorf & P. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Volume 14, Provo: UT, pp. 188-192. Association for Consumer Research.

Rudemo, M. (1982). Empirical choice of histograms and kerne! density estimators. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 9, 65-78.

Sabavala, D. J. and Morrison, D. G. (1981). A nonstationary model of binary choice applied to media exposure. Management Science 27(6), 637-657.

Sawyer, A. G. and Dickson, P. R. (1984). Psychological perspectives on consumer re­sponse to sales promotion. In K. E. Jocz (Ed. ), Research on Sales Promotion: Goilee­ted Papers, Number 84-104, pp. 1-21. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Marketing Science Institute.

Page 17: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Literatur 201

Schimek, M. G. and Thrlach, 8. A. (2000). Additive and generalized additive models. In M. G. Schimek (Ed.), Smoothing and Regression Approaches, Computation and Application, pp. 277-327. New York: Wiley & Sons.

Scott, D. W. and Terrell, G. R. (1987). 8iased and unbiased cross-validation in density estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association (82), 1131-1146.

Seather, S. J. (1992). The performance of six popular bandwidth selection methods on some real data sets. Computational Statistics 7, 225-250.

Sheather, S. J. and Jones, M. C. (1991). A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for kerne! density. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 53(3), 683-690.

Sherif, C. W. (1963). Social categorization as a function of latitude of acceptance and series range. Journal of Abnormaland Social Psychology 67(2), 148-156.

Sherif, M. and Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social Judgment. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Sherif, M. and Taub, D. (1958). Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55(2), 150-155.

Silverman, 8. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman & Hall.

Slovic, P., Fischhoff, 8., and Lichtenstein, S. (1977). 8ehavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology 28, 1-39.

Sperlich, S. (1998). Additive Modelling and Testing Model Specification. Shaker Verlag.

Sperlich, S., Linton, 0. 8., and Härdle, W. (1999). Integration and backfitting methods in additive models-finite sample properties and comparison. Sociedad de Estadistica e lnvestigacion Opemtiva Test 8(2), 419-458.

Sperlich, S., 'l'j0stheim, D., and Yang, L. (2002). Nonparametrie estimation and testing of interaction in additive models. Econometric Theory 18, 197-251.

Stoetzel, J. (1970). Psychological/ sociological aspects of price. In 8. Taylor & G. Wills (Eds.), Pricing Stmtegy, London, pp. 70-74. Staples.

Stone, C. J. (1985). Additiveregression and other nonparametric models. The Annals of Statistics 13(2), 689-705.

Svenson, 0. (1979). Process descriptions of decision making. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance 23, 86-112.

Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, 39-60.

Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science 4 (3), 199-214.

Thießen, F. (1993). Das Paradoxon von Maurice Allais. Zeigt es die Notwendigkeit einer zu erneuernden Verhaltenstheorie? Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche For­schung 45, 157-174.

Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgement. Psychological Review 34, 273-286.

Page 18: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

202 Literatur

Tj!Zistheim, D. and Auestad, 8. (1994). Nonparametrie identification of nonlinear time series: Projections. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89(428), 1398-1409.

Tversky, A. (1972a). Choice by elimination. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 9, 341-367.

Tversky, A. (1972b). Elimination by aspect: A theory of choice. Psychological Re­view 79(4), 281-299.

Tversky, A. (1979). Preference trees. Psychological Review 86(6), 542-573.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453-458.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing decisions. Journal of Business 59(4), 8251-8278.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference­dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 6, 1039-1061.

Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative re­presentation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297-323.

Tversky, A. and Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science 39(10), 1179-1189.

Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. 0., and Weilbaker, D. C. (1988). The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price research. Journal of Consumer Research 15, 95-110.

Urbany, J. E. and Dickson, P. R. (1990). Prospect theory and pricing decision. Journal of Behavioml Economics 19(1), 69-81.

Urbany, J. E. and Dickson, P. R. (1991). Consumer normal price estimation: Market versus personal standards. Journal of Consumer Research 18, 45-51.

van Heerde, H. J., Leeflang, P. S. H., and Wittink, D. R. (2001). Semiparametric analysis to estimate the deal effect curve. Journal of Marketing Research 38, 197-215.

von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, 0. (1953). Theory of Gamesand Economic Behavior (Third ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

von Nitzsch, R. (1998). Prospect Theory und Käuferverhalten. Die Betriebswirt­schaft 58(5), 622-634.

Wahba, G. (1990). Spline Models for Observational Data. SIAM.

Watson, G. S. (1964). Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya, The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A 26, 359-372.

Weber, E. H. (1834). Annotationes anatomicae et physiologicae; progmmmata collecta, Heft 1. Leipzig.

Wedel, M. and Kamakura, W. (2000). Market Segmentation. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Page 19: Anhang A Herleitung des multinomialen Logit-Modells aus ...978-3-663-08372-6/1.pdf · Eigenschaften der Gumbel-Verteilung sind invariant gegenüber linearen Transfor ... Die Methode

Literatur 203

Wedel, M., Kamakura, W., Arora, N., ßemmaor, A., Chiang, J., Elrod, T., Johnson, R., Lenk, P., Neslin, S., and Poulsen, C. S. (1999). Discrete and continuous repre­sentation of unobservcd heterogeneity in choice modeling. Marketing Letters 10(3), 219 232.

Wegrnan, E. J. and Wright, I. W. (1983). Splines in statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78(382), 3.51-365.

Wild, C. J. and Yee, T. W. (1996). Additive extcnsions to generalized estimation equa­tion rnethods. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58(4), 711-725.

Winer, R. S. (1985). A price vector rnodel of dernand for consurner durables: Prelirninary developrnents. Marketing Science 4(1), 74-90.

Winer, R. S. (1986). A reference pricc rnodel of brand choice for frequently purchased products. Journal of Consumer Research 13, 250-256.

Winer, R. S. (1988). ßehavioral perspcctive on pricing: Buyers' subjective perceptions of price revisited. In T. M. Devinney (Ed.), lssues in Pricing, pp. 35-57. Lexington, Massachusctts: Lexington Books.

Winer, R. S. (1989). A rnulti-stage model of choice incorporating reference prices. Marketing Letters 1 ( 1), 27 36.

Wricke, M., Ilerrmann, A., and Huber, F. (2000). Behavioral Pricing. WiSt 12, 692·-697.

Yang, S. and Allenby, G. M. (2001). A rnodel for observation, structural, and hausehold heterogeneity in panel data. Marketing Letters 11 (2), 137-149.

Yee, T. W. and Wild, C .. J. (1996). Vector generalized additive models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 58(3), 481-493.

Zeithaml, V. A. ( 1982). Consurner response to in-store price inforrnation environments. Journal of Consumer Research 8, :357-369.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1984). Issucs in conceptualizing and mcasuring consumer response to price. In T. Kinnear (Ed. ), Advances in Consumer Research, Valurne 11, Ann Arbor: MI, pp. 612-616. Association for Consurner Research.

Zcithaml, V. 11.. (1988). Consumer perceptions ofprice, quality, and value: A rneans-end model and synthesis of cvidence. Journal of Marketing 52, 2-22.

Zeithaml, V. 11.. and Graham, K. L. (1983). The accuracy of reported reference pri­ccs for professional services. In R. P. Bagozzi & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Volmne 10, Ann Arbor: MI, pp. 607-611. Association for Consumer Research.